Bee propolis is a mixture of plant resins and bee secretions. While bioactivity of honeybee propolis has been reported previously, information is limited on propolis from Australian stingless bees (Tetragonula carbonaria). The aim of this study was to investigate possible vasomodulatory effects of propolis in KCl-precontracted porcine coronary arteries using an ex vivo tissue bath assay. Polar extracts of propolis produced a dose-dependent relaxant response (EC50=44.7±7.0 μg/ml), which was unaffected by endothelial denudation, suggesting a direct effect on smooth muscle. Propolis markedly attenuated a contractile response to Ca2+ in vessels that were depolarised with 60 mM KCl, in Ca2+-free Krebs solution. Propolis (160 µg/ml) reduced vascular tone in KCl pre-contracted vessels to near-baseline levels over 90 min, and this effect was partially reversible with 6h washout. Some loss in membrane integrity, but no loss in mitochondrial function was detected after 90 min exposure of human cultured umbilical vein endothelial cells to 160 µg/ml propolis. We conclude that Australian stingless bee (T. carbonaria) propolis relaxes porcine coronary artery in an endothelial-independent manner that involves inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. This effect is partially and slowly reversible upon washout. Further studies are required to determine the therapeutic potential of Australian stingless bee propolis for conditions in which vascular supply is compromised.
Citation: Massaro FC, Brooks PR, Wallace HM, Nsengiyumva V, Narokai L, Russell FD (2013) Effect of Australian Propolis from Stingless Bees (Tetragonula carbonaria) on Pre-Contracted Human and Porcine Isolated Arteries. PLoS ONE 8(11): e81297. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081297
Editor: Chiara Bolego, University of Padua, Italy
Received: July 5, 2012; Accepted: October 22, 2013; Published: November 15, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Massaro et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors are grateful to the industry partner, Comvita New Zealand, for funding this project through the FRST bursary (New Zealand), and for providing the New Zealand propolis. This study also received financial support from the University of the Sunshine Coast. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: This study received financial support from Comvita New Zealand and the University of the Sunshine Coast. Comvita New Zealand provided the New Zealand propolis. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Bee propolis is a resinous material that bees produce from plant resins and their body secretions . The chemical composition of propolis reflects the botanical sources from which the bees forage . Honeybee (Apis mellifera) propolis has been more extensively studied than its stingless bee (tribe Meliponini) counterpart . In a recent study investigating the chemical composition of New Zealand honeybee and Australian stingless bee propolis, we identified compounds that were only present in honeybee propolis (eg. pinocembrin and galangin), or only present in stingless bee propolis (eg. gallic acid and pimaric acid) . Various bioactivities have been ascribed to some of the 300+ compounds present in honeybee propolis, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiinflammatory and antitumour effects [4-6]. For example, pretreatment of Raw 264.7 cells with an ethanolic extract of propolis inhibited lipopolysaccharide-stimulated pro-inflammatory signalling pathways including the phosphorylation of inhibitory protein κB, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 1/2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase . Synergistic activity by compounds within propolis is likely [8,9]. For example, antitumour effects were significantly greater for the water-soluble derivatives than for the combined effect of the individual polyphenolic compounds present within ethanolic extracts of Croatian and Brazilian honeybee propolis .
Over the past 5 years, much interest has focussed on the potential use of propolis for the treatment of injury and disease, and this has been investigated mainly using animal models or cell lines. For example propolis and its constituents have been reported to produce benefits in models of hypertension , wounds [11,12], burns , cancer  and septic arthritis . The antihypertensive effects of propolis were investigated in spontaneously hypertensive rat , and nitric oxide synthase-inhibited rat models of hypertension . Fractions of an ethanolic extract of propolis from Minas Gerai state in Brazil reduced blood pressure in the spontaneously hypertensive rats, with activity ascribed to the flavonoids dihydrokaempferide, isosakuranetin and betuletol . Propolis was found to cause vasorelaxation [10,17], and inhibit activity of the catecholamine-producing enzyme, tyrosine hydroxylase , suggesting possible mechanisms for its blood pressure lowering effects. The effect of propolis in human hypertension is not yet known. In the vasculature, honeybee propolis modulates blood vessel function by stimulating vasorelaxation [10,17], inhibiting angiogenesis [18,19], and protecting against atherosclerotic lesion formation , raising hopes for the development of new therapeutics in the treatment of hypertension, cancer and ischaemic heart disease. These studies have all used honeybee propolis in their investigations. We have previously reported on the chemical composition of propolis from one species of Australian stingless bee (Tetragonula carbonaria) . We showed in that study that propolis had antioxidant activity and inhibited 5-lipoxygenase in cell-free assays. Our study identified the presence of pimaric acid in propolis , whilst another study examining bioactivity of extracts from roots of Viguiera arenaria found that pimaric acid relaxes rat thoracic aorta . The bioactivity of Australian stingless bee propolis in cardiovascular preparations is presently unknown, and so the aim of this study was to investigate its potential to modulate vascular tone.
Materials and Methods
A bulk sample of stingless bee propolis was obtained from 40 hives from within suburban areas of South East Queensland. T. carbonaria is known to extensively forage on eucalypt resins, in particular C. torelliana and this species shapes their chemical ecology [22,23]. After removal of debris and honey using water, the propolis was unified into a single homogeneous sample. New Zealand honeybee (A. mellifera) propolis was obtained from ethanolic tinctures, provided by Comvita New Zealand. Samples were stored in sealed plastic containers at 4°C until use.
Gallic acid, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), indomethacin, DMSO, ethyl acetate (EtOAc), diethyl ether (Et2O), rat tail collagen type I, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)-based in vitro toxicology assay kit, and lactate dehydrogenase-based toxicology assay kit were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Castle Hill, NSW, Australia). Pimaric acid reference compound was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA. Medium 199, Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), fetal calf serum, collagenase Type II, heparin 1A, fungizone antimycotic liquid, Glutamax-I supplement, and penicillin-streptomycin were purchased from Invitrogen Australia (Rowville, VIC, Australia). All other reagents were of analytical grade.
Preparation of propolis
Five extracts of stingless bee propolis were prepared. Propolis (5% w/v) was extracted by maceration in hexane:methanol (1:1) for 24h, then paper filtered by gravity. A portion of the methanol extract was dissolved in diethyl ether:sodium carbonate (2% saturated) and partitioned into an ether extract and an aqueous extract. The aqueous extract was acidified by 0.1 M hydrochloric acid then extracted using ethyl acetate. The ethanolic extract of stingless bee propolis was obtained by maceration of raw material in 95% ethanol (5% w/v) and the solution was paper-filtered by gravity. Commercial batches of honeybee propolis contained 172 mg/mL of extracts in 62% ethanol. The five liquid extracts were dried using a rotary evaporator at 40°C and the dry polar residues were weighed and reconstituted to 61 mg/mL using 99% DMSO. These stock solutions were used at the final concentrations indicated for the bioassays. All samples of propolis used in this study were chromatographed prior to the bioassays to confirm their chemical composition. Chemical composition was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS), as previously described .
Tissue bath experiments using porcine isolated coronary artery and human isolated umbilical artery
Pig hearts were collected from a local abattoir and placed immediately in Krebs’ Henseleit buffer (125 mM Na+, 5 mM K+, 2.25 mM Ca2+, 0.5 mM Mg2+, 98.5 mM Cl-, 0.5 mM SO42-, 32 mM HCO3-, 1 mM HPO42-, 0.04 mM EDTA, 11.7 mM glucose; pH 7.4), pre-bubbled with 5% CO2 in oxygen, and transported to the University laboratory on ice. The circumflex coronary artery was dissected free from the heart and cut into ~1.5 cm segments using scissors. Vessels were set up in jacketed tissue baths (37°C) containing 25 ml Krebs’ Henseleit buffer that was bubbled with 5% CO2 in oxygen. Vessels were allowed to equilibrate in the baths for 1 h under 40-50 mN resting tension. During the equilibration period, vessels were contracted twice with 60 mM KCl followed each time by a washout with Krebs’ Henseleit solution. Vessels were pre-contracted with 60 mM KCl and then exposed to a single concentration of propolis (160 µg/ml), to increasing concentrations of propolis (0.8-160 µg/ml), or to isovolumetric solvent (DMSO; ≤0.26% v/v). Following washout, vessels were contracted with 60 mM KCl, either as a single administration or as repeat administrations with half-hourly washouts over 6 h. Some vessels were pre-contracted with 2 mM histamine.
The effect of propolis was also investigated on human umbilical arteries. Human umbilical cords were obtained from patients undergoing childbirth via Caesarean section at Nambour General Hospital with approval from the Human Research Ethics Committees of the University of the Sunshine Coast (S/09/221) and Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (HREC/09/QRBW/184), and Site Specific Assessment approval from Nambour General Hospital (SSA/09/QNB/22). Arteries were dissected free at the juncture of the umbilical cord with the placenta. These vessels were pre-contracted with 60 mM KCl and then exposed to 160 µg/ml propolis or isovolumetric DMSO. Developed tension in the blood vessels was recorded using Powerlab 26T with Chart 5 software (AD Instruments Pty Ltd, NSW, Australia) and expressed as a percentage of the initial response to 60 mM KCl.
The role of the endothelium in mediating the relaxant response to propolis, some vessels were denuded of endothelial cells by rubbing the lumen with a roughened metallic probe. Successful endothelial denudation was determined by visual inspection of 20 µm transverse sections of vessel cut using a cryostat (Reichert Jung, model 1800) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (data not shown). Endothelial-intact, and endothelial-denuded vessels were contracted with 60 mM KCl, and then exposed to 40 and 160 μg/ml propolis.
To examine the role of voltage-gated calcium channels in the relaxant response to propolis, coronary arteries were equilibrated in Krebs solution for 2h, exposing the tissues to 60 mM KCl to ensure tissue viability. Tissues were then equilibrated in Ca2+-free Krebs solution containing 0.06 mM EDTA for 2h, with six replicate sequences involving washout followed by addition of 60 mM KCl. The final exposure of tissue to KCl produced a negligible contractile response. Tissues were then treated with either 160 μg/ml propolis or DMSO (0.26%) for 30 min in the presence of 60 mM KCl. Without washout, a concentration-effect curve was constructed to Ca2+ (32 μM-10 mM), before adding the Ca2+ channel inhibitor, nifedipine (10 μM) to the bath.
Cell viability assays using human cultured umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)
Umbilical cords were collected as described above. The umbilical vein was flushed with Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline to remove blood, and then administered with 1 mg/mL collagenase type II solution (15-20 min, 22°C). The collagenase solution was recovered, spun (400xg, 5 min, 22°C), and the pellet was resuspended in M199 media containing 20% fetal calf serum, 50 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2.5 μg/mL fungizone and 2 mM Glutamax-I (20% media). Cells were seeded onto 12-well collagen-coated plates or collagen-coated 13 mm coverslips and grown to confluence in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 20-160 µg/ml propolis, or to isovolumetric solvent (0.26% DMSO) for 90 min at 37°C. Wells were rinsed with HBSS and then exposed to HBSS containing 10% thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide for 2h at 37°C. Developed formazan crystals in the 12-well plates were solubilised using MTT Solubilising Solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and absorbance was measured using a spectrophotometer (Versa Max, Associates of Cape Cod Int. Inc., Liverpool, UK) at 570 nm. Background readings measured at 690 nm were subtracted from all values, and cell viability was reported as a percentage of the media control. Coverslips were mounted onto glass microscope slides and formazan crystals in cells were photographed using a brightfield microscope (Olympus CX31) with camera attachment (Olympus Altra 20 Soft Imaging System).
Cytosolic and total lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity was measured in the supernatant collected from intact and solubilised cultured HUVECs using an in vitro LDH activity assay kit. Briefly, cells were grown to confluence in 12 well culture plates using 20% M199 media. Media was replaced with Dulbecco’s phosphate buffer solution and cells were incubated with propolis (30-160 µg/ml), or isovolumetric solvents (DMSO or water) for the 160 µg/ml sample of propolis, for 90 min at 37°C. Some wells were treated with lysis buffer (1:10 v/v) for 45 min at 37°C to solubilise membranes and allow determination of total LDH activity. Supernatants were collected from the wells, and spun at 250xg for 4 min to remove cellular debris. Samples were incubated with substrate in an amount equal to twice the volume of medium, for 20 min at 22°C in the dark. Absorbance was read at 490 nm, with subtraction of non-specific absorbance measured at 690 nm. LDH leakage was reported as LDH activity in the supernatant, expressed as a percentage of total cellular LDH activity.
Propolis constituents were quantitated using the Internal Standard method, as previously described . Concentration-effect curves were plotted using the Levenberg-Marquardt fitting routine based on reduction of chi-square (Microcal Origin Professional V7.5 SR6) and Equation 1.
Vasodilation (%) =[100 - ((Ytest/YKCl)x100)]%
where Ytest is the response to the sample and YKCl is the maximal response to 60 mM KCl.
Cell viability for cultured HUVECs was calculated using Equation 2.
Viability (%) = ((Atrig/ADMSO)x100)%
where Atrig is the absorbance of cell lysate from cells treated with T. carbonaria propolis and ADMSO is the absorbance of cell lysate from cells treated with DMSO.
All values shown in the text and figures are mean±SEM. Data was compared using Students t- test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test using Windows Prism v. 5.02 and Microsoft Excel 2000 v. 9.0.2812.
Chemical composition of bee propolis preparations
The chemical composition of propolis samples was examined using GC-MS analysis. T. carbonaria propolis contained several isomers of pimaric acid in both extracts and all subfractions (Table 1). Gallic acid was present in the methanol and ethanol extracts, and only in the ethyl acetate fraction (data not shown). Reference compounds of gallic and pimaric acid conclusively identified these molecules as constitutents of T. carbonaria propolis. The main constituents of honeybee propolis from New Zealand tinctures were caffeic acid derivatives and flavonoids (22.3% w/w), while pimaric and gallic acids were not detected.
|Pimaric acid isomer (#18)||0.5±0.0 %||0.3±0.1 %||0.2±0.0 %||0.9±0.1 %|
|Pimaric acid isomer (#19)||0.3±0.0 %||0.2±0.1 %||0.1±0.1 %||0.9±0.4 %|
|Pimaric acid (#20)||5.2±0.7 %||3.8±1.4 %||2.0±0.3 %||9.9±0.3 %|
|Pimaric acid isomer (#29)||8.4±0.6 %||4.5±0.7 %||8.1±5.0 %||1.8±0.2 %|
|Total pimaranes||14.4±1.2 %||8.8±2.0 %||10.3±5.2 %||13.4±1.0 %|
Effects of bee propolis on vascular tone
Baseline vascular tone, and developed tone in vessels pre-contracted with 60 mM KCl were 46±2 mN (n=6) and 298±47 mN (n=6), respectively. Addition of a single, high concentration of T. carbonaria propolis (160 µg/ml, 90min) to pre-contracted vessels reduced tone to near-baseline values (80±12 mN; n=6; Figure 1A). Propolis (160 µg/ml) also caused a reduction in tone in porcine coronary arteries that were pre-contracted with 2 mM histamine (Figure 1B), and in human umbilical arteries that were pre-contracted with 60 mM KCl (Figures 1C, 1E). Isovolumetric DMSO (0.26%) was without effect (Figures 1D, 1E). The rate of relaxation in pig coronary and human umbilical arteries following exposure of tissues to propolis was slow (~90 min to reach full relaxation).
Propolis relaxed porcine coronary arteries that were pre-contracted with 60 mM KCl (A), or 2 mM histamine (B). Propolis relaxed human umbilical arteries that were pre-contracted with 60 mM KCl (C, E; open bar), while the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was without effect (D, E; closed bar, n=3, * P<0.05).
The methanolic extract of T. carbonaria propolis (0.8-160 μg/ml) caused concentration-dependent relaxation of 60 mM KCl-contracted porcine coronary arteries, while isovolumetric solvent (DMSO, 0.001-0.26%) was without effect (Figure 2A, B). The potency of the methanolic extract of T. carbonaria propolis (IC50, 44.7±7.0 µg/ml; n=5) was similar to that of the ethanolic (IC50, 59.8±19.3 μg/ml; n=3), ethyl acetate (IC50, 34.6±2.7 μg/ml; n=3), and diethyl ether (IC50, 60.9±14.9 μg/ml; n=3) sub-fractions (Figure 2C, D). The potency of T. carbonaria propolis preparations was similar to that of the ethanolic tincture of New Zealand honeybee propolis (71.9±17.1 μg/ml; n=3) (Figure 2E). Pimaric acid (1-200 µM) and gallic acid (1-200 µM) reference compounds did not cause a vasorelaxant response (92.7±6.8% and 95.5±4.0% of KCl, respectively), with vascular tone similar to that observed for DMSO (95.9±3.6%; n=3). The addition of 160 µg/ml propolis to the tissue bath did not alter the pH of the Krebs Henseleit solution (pH before and after addition of propolis was 7.6).
A methanolic extract of propolis (0.8-160 µg/ml) produced a dose-dependent relaxant response in porcine coronary artery rings (A), while solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) was without effect (B). Concentration effect curves for methanolic (MeOH) and ethanolic (EtOH) extracts of stingless bee propolis (C). Concentration effect curves for ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and diethyl ether (Et2O) sub-fractions of the methanolic extract of stingless bee T. carbonaria propolis (D). Concentration effect curves for an ethanolic extract of New Zealand honeybee propolis, and DMSO (E).
After washout of propolis, the response to KCl (developed tension, 35±12 mN; n=6) was significantly less than the response to KCl before the addition of propolis (298±47 mN; n=6; P<0.05). The reversibility of relaxant response to 160 µg/ml propolis was therefore examined over a 6h period in which tissues were washed and exposed to 60 mM KCl at half-hourly intervals. The relaxant response was only partially reversible after 6h washout, with maximal response to KCl in propolis-treated tissues (56.02±4.13% of pre-treatment KCl response; n=6) being less than the response to KCl in DMSO-treated, time-control tissues (84.64±2.83% of pre-treatment KCl response; n=3; P<0.05) (Figure 3).
Propolis (160 µg/ml) caused a near-maximal reduction in coronary artery tone within 90 min of incubation. The contractile response to KCl immediately after washout was markedly lower than the KCl response obtained prior to addition of propolis (A). The KCl response was not blunted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated tissues (B). The relaxant response to propolis was partially reversed during half-hourly wash-KCl cycles over a 6 hour period (open bars, DMSO-treated tissues; closed bars, propolis-treated tissues (C). W, washout.
Effects of bee propolis on cell morphology and viability of HUVECs
We examined the possibility that exposure of cells to T. carbonaria propolis might have caused cytotoxicity leading to loss of cell viability. Using cultured HUVECs in an MTT cell toxicity assay, no loss in cell viability was detected when cells were exposed to T. carbonaria propolis (Figure 4A). Importantly, similar conditions employed in the tissue bath experiments were used in the cell viability assay (160 µg/ml propolis for 90 min at 37°C). Formazan crystals were visualised in the cytoplasm of the HUVECs using brightfield microscopy (Figure 4B). Using a toxicity assay that was based on lactate dehydrogenase activity, some lactate dehydrogenase activity was detected in the incubation medium (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffer solution) following exposure of cells to 80 and 160 µg/ml propolis (Figure 4C). Lower concentrations (20 and 40 µg/ml) of propolis were without effect. The findings indicate that whilst mitochondrial function appeared to be preserved in cells that were exposed to amounts of propolis up to 160 µg/ml propolis, there was some loss in membrane integrity when propolis was used at ≥80 µg/ml.
MTT assay showing cell viability for human cultured umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) exposed to stingless bee T. carbonaria propolis or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 90 min at 37°C (A). Propolis (20-160 µg/ml) and isovolumetric DMSO (0.26%) had no effect on cell viability. A punctuate pattern of formazan crystal staining was evident in the cytoplasm of HUVECs treated with 160 µg/ml propolis for 90 min at 37°C, confirming retention of mitochondrial enzyme activity (B). Propolis (80 and 160 µg/ml) caused some leakage of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the culture medium (C). Water, DMSO (0.26%) and propolis (20 and 40 µg/ml) had no effect on LDH leakage.
A possible endothelium-dependent mechanism for the vasorelaxant response to T. carbonaria propolis (40 and 160 µg/ml) was investigated (Figure 5). The relaxant response to propolis was not attenuated by endothelial cell denudation, suggesting a direct effect of propolis on the underlying smooth muscle cells. Successful removal of the endothelial layer was verified by histological staining of tissue sections taken from the vessels (data not shown).
Propolis (40 and 160 μg/ml) relaxed endothelial-intact (A) and endothelial-denuded coronary arteries (B). No relaxation was observed in endothelial-intact, time-control tissues treated with DMSO (C). There was no difference in relaxant response to propolis in endothelial-intact and endothelial-denuded arteries (D), indicating an endothelial-independent mechanism.
To examine the role of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in the relaxant response to propolis, vessels were incubated in Ca2+-free Krebs solution whilst cells were depolarised with 60 mM KCl to open the voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. In control tissues incubated with DMSO, Ca2+ caused a maximal response that was 109.8±14.0% of the response to KCl (EC50 of 0.81±0.19 mM; n=4; Figure 6A-C). The response to Ca2+ in the presence of propolis was markedly attenuated (20.4±7.4% of the response to KCl; P<0.05, n=5), with a non-significant trend for a rightward shift in the response curve (EC50, 2.3±0.69 mM, n=5). Responses to Ca2+ were inhibited by 10 μM nifedipine. Propolis was ineffective in relaxing endothelium-denuded coronary arteries that were pre-contracted with 100 nM calyculin A (Figure 6D).
Arteries were incubated with 60 mM KCl in calcium-free Krebs solution to depolarise the cells (A-C), or with 100 nM calyculin A in Krebs solution (D). In the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), arteries produced a concentration-dependent contractile response to Ca2+ (32 μM-10 mM; A, C). The relaxant response was markedly attenuated in the presence of 160 μg/ml propolis (B, C), and responses were blocked by the calcium channel inhibitor, nifedipine (Nif., 10 μM; A-C). Propolis was ineffective in relaxing endothelium-denuded coronary arteries that were pre-contracted with calyculin A (D).
In this study we investigated the possible modulation of vascular tone by Australian stingless bee (T. carbonaria) propolis. We found that propolis caused a vasorelaxant response in vessels that were pre-contracted in a receptor-dependent (histamine) and receptor-independent manner (KCl), and in vessels sourced from different species (human and pig). In porcine coronary arteries, the potency of stingless bee propolis extracts and fractions were similar and in the range, IC50, 33-63.7 µg/ml. Chemical analysis revealed several isomeric forms of pimaric acid (Table 1) . We hypothesised that pimaric acid may elicit a vasorelaxant response in porcine coronary artery, similar to that reported previously in rat aorta . However, a reference compound that was identical to Compound #20 had no effect in our blood vessel preparation. Whilst this isomer was not responsible for the vasorelaxant response in the porcine coronary arteries, it comprised only 5.2±0.7% (w/w) of all constituents identified in the methanolic extract, and we therefore do not exclude the possibility that one of the other pimaric acid isomers was active.
The potency of stingless bee propolis preparations was not significantly different to that determined for an ethanolic tincture of New Zealand honeybee propolis in porcine coronary artery (IC50, 87.3 µg/ml; this study). Interestingly, the potency of New Zealand propolis determined in our study was lower than that determined for an ethanolic extract of Brazilian green propolis (IC50,15.0 µg/ml) and a flavonoid-rich sub-fraction of that ethanolic extract (IC50, 4.4 µg/ml) in spontaneously hypertensive rat aorta . Differences may be related to the chemical composition of each sample of propolis (botanical origin), species of animal (pig, rat) and/or tissue type (coronary artery, aorta).
In this study, the relaxant response to stingless bee propolis was slow to develop, with maximal effect occurring within 90 min. To our knowledge, no other study has examined the kinetics for reversibility of the vasorelaxant response to any type of propolis following washout. After exposure of the coronary artery to stingless bee propolis for 90 min, vascular tone was reduced to near-baseline values. Following initial washout of propolis from the bath, addition of 60 mM KCl produced a contractile effect that was markedly lower than for KCl when applied prior to the addition of propolis. The findings suggest that propolis was either toxic to the tissue, or that the effect of propolis was slowly reversible. Both hypotheses were examined in this study.
Cell viability in the presence of stingless bee propolis was examined using an MTT-based in vitro toxicology assay, and a lactate dehydrogenase activity assay, with conditions that approximated those used in the tissue bath experiment (exposure of cells to 160 µg/ml propolis for 90 min at 37°C). Whilst no loss in cell viability was detected using the MTT assay using these conditions, some leakage of lactate dehydrogenase was detected at 80 and 160 µg/ml propolis, suggesting preserved mitochondrial function but some deterioration in membrane integrity. Formazan crystals were visualised in the cytoplasm of the HUVECs, confirming specificity of the MTT assay. The findings with the MTT assay are in contrast to previous reports that showed angiogenesis suppression and chromatic condensation, and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential in HUVECs by honeybee propolis extracts at <50 μg/ml [24-26]. Differences in chemical composition might contribute to the disparate results. It is noteworthy, however, that experimental conditions were also different: 90 min incubation using fed cells in our study compared to 6-48 h incubation using starved cells in the other studies. Serum starvation is an established stimulus of apoptosis [27,28] and autophagy , and it is possible that either of these conditions could have rendered cells more susceptible to the effects of propolis. This hypothesis is supported by a study using pancreatic INS-1(β) cells, which found that fatty acids were not cytotoxic to serum-fed cells, and only induced apoptosis when cells were ‘fragilized’ by serum starvation prior to fatty acid exposure . Importantly in our study, conditions were selected to mimic those used in the tissue bath experiment.
The possibility that the effects of stingless bee propolis were slow to reverse was examined by instigating half-hourly wash – KCl cycles over 6h following attainment of the maximal relaxant response to propolis. The findings confirmed that the effect of propolis was slow to reverse. The response to KCl in propolis-treated tissues increased steadily over the 6h, but remained lower than the response to KCl in DMSO-treated tissues. The findings suggest that a longer washout phase would be required to fully reverse the effects of propolis. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that this propolis chemotype contains a compound (or compounds) that partially and irreversibly relaxes vascular smooth muscle.
We investigated whether an endothelium dependent mechanism might be important in our observed vasodilator response. A previous study showed a nitric oxide-dependent vasorelaxant response to caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) , a constituent previously identified in honeybee propolis. However, in our study, CAPE was not detected in stingless bee propolis. Furthermore, the vasorelaxant response to stingless bee propolis was unaffected by endothelial denudation. Since nitric oxide synthase is expressed in endothelial cells and produces nitric oxide, the findings suggest that stingless bee propolis might mediate its effects by direct interaction with the vascular smooth muscle cells. As the response was observed in vessels that were pre-contracted with a high concentration of KCl (60 mM), mechanisms involving potassium efflux are unlikely . A possible mechanism involves inhibition of voltage-gated calcium channels in the smooth muscle by propolis, similar to that previously reported for NaHS in mouse aorta . To test this hypothesis, we constructed concentration-effect curves to Ca2+, in the presence or absence of propolis, in Ca2+-free Krebs solution. The findings showed marked attenuation in the contractile response to Ca2+ by propolis when cells were depolarized with potassium.
The role of myosin light chain phosphatase in the dephosphorylation of myosin light chain, leading to vascular relaxation is well established . We speculated that if propolis was mediating its vasorelaxant effect through stimulation of myosin light chain phosphatase, it would not be able to reverse a contractile response to a myosin light chain phosphatase inhibitor. We found that propolis was able to relax vessels pre-constricted with histamine and KCl, but was ineffective against calyculin A. Further studies are required to examine this possible mechanism in further detail, including effects on RhoA-dependent signalling pathways.
In conclusion, this study has identified a marked vasorelaxant response to Australian stingless bee T. carbonaria propolis in KCl- and histamine-precontracted porcine isolated coronary arteries. The response was endothelium-independent. We showed that a contractile response to Ca2+ in potassium depolarised vessels incubated in Ca2+-free Krebs solution was markedly attenuated by propolis. The findings suggest a mechanism involving inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Under the experimental conditions used in this study, high concentrations (80 and 160 µg/ml) propolis caused some loss in membrane integrity, but no apparent loss in mitochondrial function. The relaxant response was slowly and partially reversible upon washout. We suggest that Australian stingless bee propolis may have therapeutic potential for management of cardiovascular disorders involving compromised vascular supply, although safety testing is warranted.
The authors thank the staff and patients at Nambour General Hospital for assisting us with the collection of umbilical cords. We also thank Dr. Tim Heard for providing the sample of Australian stingless bee propolis, and Dr. Aaron Wiegand for his assistance with mathematical modelling of the concentration-effect curves. We are grateful to Dr. Tim Murphy and Dr. Shaun Sandow, University of New South Wales, for discussions regarding the mechanism of action of Australian stingless bee propolis.
Conceived and designed the experiments: FM PB HW VN LN FR. Performed the experiments: FM PB VN LN FR. Analyzed the data: FM PB HW VN LN FR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PB FR. Wrote the manuscript: FM PB HW FR.
- 1. Simone-Finstrom M, Spivak M (2010) Propolis and bee health: the natural history and significance of resin use by honey bees. Apidologie 41: 295-311. doi:10.1051/apido/2010016.
- 2. Bankova VS, Popova M (2007) Propolis of Stingless Bees: a Promising Source of Biologically Active Compounds. Pharmacog Rev 1: 88-92.
- 3. Massaro FC, Brooks PR, Wallace HM, Russell FD (2011) Cerumen of Australian stingless bees (Tetragonula carbonaria): gas chromatography-mass spectrometry fingerprints and potential anti-inflammatory properties. Naturwissenschaften 98: 329-337. doi:10.1007/s00114-011-0770-7. PubMed: 21347735.
- 4. Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Kadota S (2001) Recent progress in pharmacological research of propolis. Phytother Res 15: 561-571. doi:10.1002/ptr.1029. PubMed: 11746834.
- 5. Lotfy M (2006) Biological activity of bee propolis in health and disease. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 7: 22-31. PubMed: 16629510.
- 6. Seo KW, Park M, Song YJ, Kim SJ, Yoon KR (2003) The protective effects of Propolis on hepatic injury and its mechanism. Phytother Res 17: 250-253. doi:10.1002/ptr.1120. PubMed: 12672155.
- 7. Búfalo MC, Ferreira I, Costa G, Francisco V, Liberal J et al. (2013) Propolis and its constituent caffeic acid suppress LPS-stimulated pro-inflammatory response by blocking NF-κB and MAPK activation in macrophages. J Ethnopharmacol 149: 84-92. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2013.06.004. PubMed: 23770030.
- 8. Orsolić N, Kosalec I, Basić I (2005) Synergistic antitumor effect of polyphenolic components of water soluble derivative of propolis against Ehrlich ascites tumour. Biol Pharm Bull 28: 694-700. doi:10.1248/bpb.28.694. PubMed: 15802812.
- 9. Santos FA, Bastos EM, Uzeda M, Carvalho MA, Farias LM et al. (2002) Antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis and fractions against oral anaerobic bacteria. J Ethnopharmacol 80: 1-7. doi:10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00003-X. PubMed: 11891080.
- 10. Maruyama H, Sumitou Y, Sakamoto T, Araki Y, Hara H (2009) Antihypertensive effects of flavonoids isolated from brazilian green propolis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biol Pharm Bull 32: 1244-1250. doi:10.1248/bpb.32.1244. PubMed: 19571393.
- 11. Barroso PR, Lopes-Rocha R, Pereira EM, Marinho SA, de Miranda JL et al. (2012) Effect of propolis on mast cells in wound healing. Inflammopharmacol 20: 289-294. PubMed: 22179947.
- 12. McLennan SV, Bonner J, Milne S, Lo L, Charlton A et al. (2008) The anti-inflammatory agent Propolis improves wound healing in a rodent model of experimental diabetes. Wound Repair Regen 16: 706-713. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00421.x. PubMed: 19128266.
- 13. Pessolato AG, Martins DdosS, Ambrósio CE, Mançanares CA, de Carvalho AF (2011) Propolis and amnion reepithelialise second-degree burns in rats. Burns 37: 1192-1201. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2011.05.016. PubMed: 21741176.
- 14. Wu J, Omene C, Karkoszka J, Bosland M, Eckard J et al. (2011) Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer. Cancer Lett 308: 43-53. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2011.04.012. PubMed: 21570765.
- 15. Oner M, Kafadar I, Guney A, Halici M, Deniz K et al. (2011) Effect of intraarticular propolis in an experimental septic arthritis model. J Pediatr Orthop B 20: 8-13. doi:10.1097/BPB.0b013e32833faca8. PubMed: 20861751.
- 16. Gogebakan A, Talas ZS, Ozdemir I, Sahna E (2012) Role of propolis on tyrosine hydroxylase activity and blood pressure in nitric oxide synthase-inhibited hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Hyperten 34: 424-428. doi:10.3109/10641963.2012.665542. PubMed: 22471835.
- 17. Long Y, Han M, Chen J, Tian XZ, Chen Q et al. (2009) The vasorelaxant effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on porcine coronary artery ring segments. Vasc Pharmacol 51: 78-83. doi:10.1016/j.vph.2009.03.002. PubMed: 19345746.
- 18. Izuta H, Shimazawa M, Tsuruma K, Araki Y, Mishima S et al. (2009) Bee products prevent VEGF-induced angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. BMC Complement Altern Med 9: 45. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-9-45. PubMed: 19917137.
- 19. de Moura SA, Ferreira MA, Andrade SP, Reis ML, Noviello ML et al. (2011) Brazilian green propolis inhibits inflammatory angiogenesis in a murine sponge model. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011: 182703. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep197
- 20. Nader MA, el-Agamy DS, Suddek GM (2010) Protective effects of propolis and thymoquinone on development of atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Arch Pharm Res 33: 637-643. doi:10.1007/s12272-010-0420-1. PubMed: 20422375.
- 21. Tirapelli CR, Ambrosio SR, da Costa FB, de Oliveira AM (2004) Evidence for the mechanisms underlying the effects of pimaradienoic acid isolated from the roots of Viguiera arenaria on rat aorta. Pharmacol 70: 31-38. PubMed: 14646354.
- 22. Wallace HM, Howell MG, Lee DJ (2008) Standard yet unusual mechanisms of long distance dispersal: seed dispersal of Corymbia torelliana by bees. Diversity Distribut 14: 87-89. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00427.x.
- 23. Leonhardt S, Wallace HM, Schmitt T (2011) The cuticular profiles of Australian stingless bees mirror the unusual resin of their resin source (Corymbia torelliana). Austral Ecol 36: 537-543. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02184.x.
- 24. Ohta T, Kunimasa K, Kobayashi T, Sakamoto M, Kaji K (2008) Propolis suppresses tumor angiogenesis by inducing apoptosis in tube-forming endothelial cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72: 2436-2440. doi:10.1271/bbb.80169. PubMed: 18776674.
- 25. Xuan H, Zhao J, Miao J, Li Y, Chu Y et al. (2011) Effect of Brazilian propolis on human umbilical vein endothelial cell apoptosis. Food Chem Toxicol 49: 78-85. PubMed: 20933568.
- 26. Xuan H, Zhu R, Li Y, Hu F (2011) Inhibitory effect of chinese propolis on phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C activity in vascular endothelial cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011: 985278. PubMed: 20981295.
- 27. King AR, Francis SE, Bridgeman CJ, Bird H, Whyte MK et al. (2003) A role for caspase-1 in serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis of endothelial cells. Lab Invest 83: 1497-1508. doi:10.1097/01.LAB.0000093096.62765.85. PubMed: 14563951.
- 28. Lee SB, Kim JJ, Kim TW, Kim BS, Lee MS et al. (2010) Serum deprivation-induced reactive oxygen species production is mediated by Romo1. Apoptosis 15: 204-218. doi:10.1007/s10495-009-0411-1. PubMed: 19904609.
- 29. Chen Y, Azad MB, Gibson SB (2009) Superoxide is the major reactive oxygen species regulating autophagy. Cell Death Differ 16: 1040-1052. doi:10.1038/cdd.2009.49. PubMed: 19407826.
- 30. Maestre I, Jordán J, Calvo S, Reig JA, Ceña V et al. (2003) Mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal and fatty acids in the beta-cell line INS-1. Endocrinol 144: 335-345. doi:10.1210/en.2001-211282. PubMed: 12488362.
- 31. Deenadayalu VP, White RE, Stallone JN, Gao X, Garcia AJ (2001) Testosterone relaxes coronary arteries by opening the large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channel. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H1720-H1727. PubMed: 11557563.
- 32. Al-Magableh MR, Hart JL (2011) Mechanism of vasorelaxation and role of endogenous hydrogen sulfide production in mouse aorta. Naunyn-Schmied Arch. Pharmacol 383: 403-413. doi: 10.1007/s00210-011-0608-z
- 33. Webb RC (2003) Smooth muscle contraction and relaxation. Advan Physiol Educat 27: 201-206.