Functional Reconstitution of Staphylococcus aureus Truncated AgrC Histidine Kinase in a Model Membrane System

  • Lina Wang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lina Wang, Chunshan Quan

    Affiliation: Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China

  • Chunshan Quan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lina Wang, Chunshan Quan

    Affiliations: Department of Life Science, Dalian Nationalities University, Dalian, China, The State Ethnic Affairs Commission-Ministry of Education, Dalian, China

  • Baoquan Liu,

    Affiliations: Department of Life Science, Dalian Nationalities University, Dalian, China, The State Ethnic Affairs Commission-Ministry of Education, Dalian, China

  • Jianfeng Wang,

    Affiliations: Department of Life Science, Dalian Nationalities University, Dalian, China, The State Ethnic Affairs Commission-Ministry of Education, Dalian, China

  • Wen Xiong,

    Affiliations: Department of Life Science, Dalian Nationalities University, Dalian, China, The State Ethnic Affairs Commission-Ministry of Education, Dalian, China

  • Pengchao Zhao,

    Affiliation: Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China

  • Shengdi Fan

    Affiliations: Department of Life Science, Dalian Nationalities University, Dalian, China, The State Ethnic Affairs Commission-Ministry of Education, Dalian, China

Functional Reconstitution of Staphylococcus aureus Truncated AgrC Histidine Kinase in a Model Membrane System

  • Lina Wang, 
  • Chunshan Quan, 
  • Baoquan Liu, 
  • Jianfeng Wang, 
  • Wen Xiong, 
  • Pengchao Zhao, 
  • Shengdi Fan
  • Published: November 26, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080400


The integral membrane protein AgrC is a histidine kinase whose sensor domains interact with an autoinducing peptide, resulting in a series of downstream responses. In this study, truncated AgrCTM5-6C and AgrCTM5-6C-GFP with GFP as a reporter gene were produced using a bacterial system. Purified AgrCTM5-6C and AgrCTM5-6C-GFP were reconstituted into liposomes by a detergent-mediated method. To achieve high-yield protein incorporation, we investigated the effect of different detergents on protein reconstitution efficiency. The highest incorporation was found with N,N-dimethyldode-cylamine N-oxide during complete liposome solubilization, which resulted in a yield of 85±5%. The COOH-terminus of the protein AgrCTM5-6C was almost exclusively oriented towards the inside of the vesicles. AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes exhibited approximately a 6-fold increase in constitutive activity compared with AgrCTM5-6C in detergent micelles. The reconstitution of AgrCTM5-6C or AgrCTM5-6C-GFP was characterized using dynamic light scattering, fluorescence microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Based on the results, the optimal conditions for protein incorporation were defined. These findings contribute to the study of membrane protein structure and function in vitro using a reconstitution system.


Two-component signal transduction (TCST) is a universal and important microbial modality for sensing and responding to diverse environmental changes. Although TCST systems are also found in plants, fungi, and other protists, they are absent in animals. Therefore, these systems are potential targets for the development of novel antibiotics [1], [2]. The classical TCST system consists of a transmembrane histidine protein kinase (HPK) receptor and a cytoplasmic response regulator (RR). Extracellular domain of the HPK senses an external signal and transmits it to the RR by conserved phosphotransfer events, resulting in an intracellular response [3], [4]. HPK receptors are reported to function as dimers [5], [6], however, the molecular mechanism for signal transduction across cell membranes remains unknown.

Staphylococcus aureus, a human pathogen, is a major problem of hospitals and a cause of infections in otherwise healthy individuals [7], [8]. The spectrum of diseases caused by S. aureus ranges from superficial skin infections to life-threatening disease [9]. Even with antibiotics, the morbidity and mortality associated with staphylococcal infections is high. Some strains are resistant to methicillin and oxacillin and the species in general has high virulence and transmissibility [10]. Consequently, novel antibacterial targets and new agents that attenuate virulence and disrupt the capacity of pathogenic bacteria to cause infection are urgently needed [11]. Virulence in S. aureus is largely regulated by the accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum-sensing system. Thus, agr is a focus as a new antibiotic target. Gordon et al. described new antibacterial targets and agents directed towards the (1) agr quorum-sensing system, (2) the transcriptional activator AgrA−DNA, (3) RNAIII, and (4) the SarA family of transcriptional regulators [12].

The agr locus of S. aureus is composed of two divergent transcription units named RNAII and RNAIII, controlled by the respective promoters P2 and P3 [13]. The P2 operon consists of four genes, agrBDCA, which are required for activation of transcription from P2 and P3 promoters. The P3 transcript, RNAIII, has 517 nucleotides and is the intracellular effector of the agr response [14], [15]. AgrA and AgrC constitute a two-component system with AgrC as the sensor histidine kinase and AgrA as the response regulator. AgrC, a 45 kDa integral membrane protein, is a member of the class 10 HPK family [16]. AgrA is the only member of the LytTR class of response regulator for which a structure has been determined [17]. Although many studies have illuminated ligand specificity determinants in AgrC [18][20], questions remain unresolved about how signal molecules affect AgrC kinase activity and how conformation associated with the regulation of AgrC kinase activity changes after autophosphorylation. In particular, little is known about the specific regions of AgrC that form dimers or oligomers during signal transmission. Similar to AgrC, many two-component sensor kinases have multiple membrane-spanning domains and are located in complex biological membranes, making study of their in situ structure and function difficult. Incorporation of membrane proteins purified from the native cell membranes into an artificial lipid bilayer is an excellent in vitro tool for elucidating of membrane protein structure and function. An artificial membrane system was recently used to analyze the activity of all membrane sensor kinases from Entercoccus faecalis [21] and to functionally reconstitute the thermosensor DesK of Bacillus subtilis [22], PhoQ of Salmonella typhimurium [23], and KdpD, EnvZ and DcuS of E. coli [24][26]. Reconstitution technology has the advantages of simplifying the complexity of biological systems and allowing control of in vitro system conditions and components, which potentially permits the precise study of receptor oligomerization and molecular mechanisms of ligand-receptor interactions.

To date, membrane proteins have been inserted into liposomes using strategies that involve mechanical means, freeze-thawing, organic solvents, or detergents. Successful incorporation of proteins into liposomes has largely used detergent-mediated methods [27], [28]. Previous studies have not found a single detergent that works equally well to reconstitute all membrane proteins [29][31]. Therefore, screening a suitable detergent is essential for a successful reconstitution strategy.

The goal of this work was to develop an effective method for constructing proteoliposomes. Our methodological approach could be useful for functional studies of membrane proteins in model systems. Truncated AgrC (residues 134–430), which has two transmembrane domains, an extracellular loop, and a cytoplasm domain, was used as a model protein because the truncated AgrC retains the constitutive kinase functions. The initial establishment of our reconstitution methods required a large amount of membrane protein and yields of expressed truncated AgrC (AgrCTM5-6C) are higher than yields of full-length AgrC. Incorporation of the recombinant AgrCTM5-6C-GFP into lipid membranes was used to evaluate protein reconstitution efficiency by centrifugation followed by fluorescence intensity measurement. Transitional changes induced by the interaction of detergents with phospholipids were studied by means of light-scattering and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Turbidity data was used to define the steps of the solubilization process. Structures of proteoliposomes were directly visualized using fluorescence microscopy (FM) and TEM. In addition, we characterized the kinase activities of the purified protein reconstituted into phospholipids. These results provided direct evidence that AgrCTM5-6C was reconstituted into model membranes. The construction of an artificial signal transduction model might help further our understanding of signal transmission mechanisms of receptor proteins and be useful for screening signal transfer inhibitors. Thus, the model described here could be important for both determining the role of AgrCTM5-6C plays in signaling and for developing novel antibacterial targets and agents.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents

Reagents n-dodecylmaltoside (DDM), N,N-dimethyldode-cylamine N-oxide (LDAO) 3-[(3-cholamidopro-pyl)-dimethylammonio]​-propanesulfonate(CHAPS), sodium cholate (SC), and n-dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) were from Sigma. Dioleoyl-phosphatidyl-choline (DOPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphochol​ine(DPPC), L-α-phosphatidic acid (egg PA), and cholesterol were from Avanti Polar Lipids. Bio-beads SM2 (Bio-Rad) were washed in methanol and rinsed with double-distilled water before use. Fluorescent reagents 4-acetamido-4’-maleidylstibene-2,2’-disu​lphonicacid (AmdiS), N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), and 5-iodoacetamidefluorescein (5-IAF) were from Invitrogen. Kinase-Glo Luminescent Kinase Assay Kit was from Promega. Double-distilled water was autoclaved before use. All other chemicals were of the highest purity.

Membrane protein overexpression and purification

Escherichia coli C43 (DE3) cells harboring the indicated pET-28a-AgrCTM5-6C or pET-28-AgrCTM5-6C-GFP vector (Fig. 1A) were routinely grown at 37°C. At optical density 600 nm (OD600) 0.25–0.35, isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added at a final concentration of 0.1 mM to induce protein production from the plasmids. Following 24 h at 20°C, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4 °C. Cells were washed three times and resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of target protein overexpression and purification.

(A) Untagged AgrCTM5-6C and fluorescence-tagged AgrCTM5-6C. Genes for GFP were introduced into AgrCTM5-6C constructs, to yield AgrCTM5-6C-GFP. (B) Membrane topology model of AgrCTM5-6C. (C) SDS-PAGE of AgrCTM5-6C and AgrCTM5-6C-GFP purification by size exclusion chromatography. 1, AgrCTM5-6C-GFP; 2, AgrCTM5-6C; M, size marker. (D) Western blotting analysis of AgrCTM5-6C and AgrCTM5-6C-GFP purification.


After cell disruption, the membranes were pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 300,000 ×g for 1 h. Membranes were solubilized by agitation in PBS buffer with 1% (w/v) DPC and 10 mM imidazole for 1 h. Insoluble material was removed by ultracentrifugation at 200,000 ×g for 1 h, and the resulting supernatants were loaded onto Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen). The protein-bound resin was washed 2–3 times using PBS buffer with 30 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol (v/v), and 0.1% LDAO, and eluted with the same detergent buffer with 300 mM imidazole. Purified samples were subjected to size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare) to purify and assess the homogeneity and stability in 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol (v/v), 0.1% LDAO (5×CMC), 10 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-N’-propane-sulfonic acid (HEPES), pH 7.4.

Preparation of lipid vesicles

Unilamellar vesicles were prepared by sonicating as described previously [32], [33]. All experiments was used DOPC: DPPC: egg PA: cholesterol at molar ratios of 4:4:1:1. For preparation of thin lipid films, dry lipid mixtures were dissolved in chloroform and phospholipid/chloroform mixtures were dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen. Dried lipid films were placed under high vacuum for 5 h, resuspended in 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), vortexed vigorously, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature to completely resuspend. The suspension was sonicated with a non-probe sonicator for 15 min at 300 watt, on 1s and off 0.5 s, in a room temperature water bath.

Solubilization of preformed liposomes

Liposomes prepared by sonicating were distributed into 1 ml aliquots and solubilized by adding detergent. Solubilization process of liposome is represented by a three-stage model previously described for all types of detergents [30]. DDM, SC, CHAPS and LDAO were tested at various concentrations for their suitability for liposome solubilization. The degree of liposome vesicles dissolution was determined by measuring turbidity with a Ultrospec4300 Pro ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometer (GE, USA) at 400 nm.

Proteoliposome preparation based on detergent-mediated reconstitution

With increasing detergent, liposome vesicles transitioned from saturation to micelle conditions. After reaching a stable turbidity, monodisperse detergent-protein solutions were added at lipid: protein mass ratio of 20:1 to saturated, partly dissolved, or completely solubilized liposome-detergent solutions in a total volume of 1 ml. Protein-lipid-detergent mixtures were incubated for 50 min at room temperature. Detergent was removed by adsorption on preconditioned Bio-Beads SM-2 [30]. After the removal of Bio-Beads SM-2, proteoliposome solutions were centrifuged at 300,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C and pellets resuspended in 10 mM HEPES buffer. Phospholipid vesicle recovery was performed by phosphorus analysis of the harvested liposomes as described by Bartlett and Bottcher et al [34], [35]. Protein recovery was determined using a standard curve of GFP fluorescence versus the protein concentration and Micro BCA protein assays of the reconstituted protein.

Determination of the morphology and size of liposome

The average particle size of liposomes and proteoliposomes was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS, SZ-100, Horiba, Japan). All the lipid solutions were centrifuged at 5000 ×g for 10 min before DLS experiments to remove debris. Liposome and proteoliposome morphology was determined by TEM and FM.

For TEM, liposome vesicles were stained in 2% sodium phosphotungstate. Equal quantities of sample and stain (10 µl) were mixed, and a drop of the mixture was placed onto a formvar grid held by tweezers. After 20 s, solution was removed with filter paper and the grid was air-dried. Liposome vesicles were observed under a JEM-2100 TEM (JEOL, Japan) at 100 kV with direct magnification of 40,000×.

For FM, a drop of proteoliposomes was put on a glass slide, covered with a coverslip, and immediately imaged with a fluorescent microscope (Olympus B×51, Japan). Images were processed with DPcontroller ver. software.

Orientation of AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes

Protein transmembrane topology in proteoliposomes was determined using membrane-impermeable and membrane-permeable thiol-reactive reagents as previously described [23], [36]. After incubation with thiol-reactive reagents, proteoliposomes were washed with 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 200,000×g for 1 h at 4 °C. All reactions were stopped by addition of 5×Laemmli loading buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Fluorescence of proteins labelled with 5-IAF was visualized with the UVP GelDoc-It Imaging System (Gene, UK) using excitation wavelength of 490 nm and emission wavelength of 510 nm. After fluorescence detection, the same gel was stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

Proteoliposome stability

Vesicle stability was assessed by determining the particle size of proteoliposomes using DLS and observing the structure of proteoliposomes using FM at indicated intervals. The DLS method was sensitive to vesicle rupture, fusion or aggregation, indicated by vesicle diameter and particle dispersion index (PDI) changes. Extensive vesicle fusion caused an increase in the size distribution and PDI value of the resulting polydisperse vesicle mixture. DLS provided qualitative information about particle size and extent of vesicle fusion. For imaging, AgrCTM5-6C-GFP inserted into liposomes was used for fluorescence imaging.

In vitro autophosphorylation assays

Kinase activity of AgrCTM5-6C in LDAO micelles or proteoliposomes was measured using Kinase-Glo Luminescent Kinase Assay Kit. Assay were performed in 96-well white plates in 50 µL kinase reaction volumes containing 20 µg (0.5 pmol) AgrCTM5-6C and 2 µM ATP in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1% BSA, 0.1% LDAO, 1 mM DTT. Kinase reactions were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. For AgrCTM5-6C in LDAO micelles and in proteoliposomes, effects of different concentrations of the signal molecule autoinducing peptide (AIP) were tested with 0.5 pmol protein per 50 µL reaction mixture. AIP and AgrCTM5-6C were incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Negative controls (blanks) contained no kinase. Following incubation, 50 µL of ATP detection reagent was added to the assay plates, which were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Relative light unit (RLU) signal was measured using the Synergy2 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek, USA). To quantitatively determine the fraction of functional activity protein, a standard curve of luminescence signal versus ATP concentration was prepared.


Protein expression and purification

S. aureus truncated AgrCTM5-6C, a hydrophobic polypeptide of 297 amino acids, has two transmembrane helices connected by a small polar loop that is exposed to the periplasm (Fig. 1B). The AgrCTM5-6C and AgrCTM5-6C-GFP extracted from the membrane pellets with 1% (w/v) DPC was purified by Ni-NTA agarose column chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography. Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1 C) and western blotting (Fig. 1 D). Fig. 1 C showed that protein purity was at least 95%. AgrCTM5-6C-GFP showed an aberrant running behavior on SDS-PAGE and western blotting typically observed for GFP structure preservation (Fig. 1 C, Lane 1; Fig. 1 D, Lane 1) [37]. The predicted molecular mass of AgrCTM5-6C was 35.5 kDa (Fig. 1 C, Lane 2; Fig. 1 D, Lane 2).

Comparison of detergents for liposome solubilization and protein reconstitution

Several commonly available detergents: SC, DDM, CHAPS, and LDAO, were compared for liposome solubilization and protein reconstitution. Incorporation of detergents into bilayers induced turbidity changes (Fig. 2A), depending upon the detergent. In stage I, detergent monomers were incorporated into phospholipid bilayers, saturating the liposomes and resulting in increased turbidity of detergent-liposome mixtures (purple arrows in Fig. 2A). During stage II, structural transitions from detergent-saturated liposomes to small lipid-detergent micelles, resulted in turbidity reduction (black arrows in Fig. 2A). In stage III, all liposomes were completely solubilized and solutions became optically transparent (blue arrows in Fig. 2A). Figure. 2A showed the ability of four detergents to solubilize liposomes. To gain insights into the liposome solubilization process, particle size and morphology of liposomes with detergent LDAO at each stage were measured as a function of the detergent concentration with DLS and TEM (Fig. S1).

Figure 2. Influence of different detergents on AgrCTM5-6C reconstitution in proteoliposomes.

(A) Turbidity of liposome suspensions upon detergent addition. Liposomes prepared by sonicating were resuspended at a final concentration of 2.5 mM in a spectrophotometer cell. Detergents from concentrated stock solutions were added stepwise to liposome suspension under constant stirring at room temperature. Turbidity was measured at 400 nm after equilibration. Detergent threshold concentrations indicated by purple arrows for saturated, black for partially solubilized and blue for completely solubilized liposomes. Results are mean ±S.D. from experiments conducted in triplicate. Effect of detergents on the recovery of lipids and incorporated AgrCTM5-6C at Rsat (B), at Rhalf-sol (C), and at Rhalf-sol (D). Size distribution and OD400 of AgrCTM5-6C proteoliposomes at Rsat, Rhalf-sol, and at Rhalf-sol (E). Rsat, detergent-to-lipid ratio in detergent-saturated liposomes; Rhalf-sol, detergent-to-lipid ratio in detergent-saturated liposomes and lipid-detergent micelles mixtures; Rtotal-sol, detergent-to-lipid ratio in mixed micelles at total solubilization. Data are means of three independent experiments; error bars are SD, P<0.05.


To determine the most suitable detergent for AgrCTM5-6C reconstitution, AgrCTM5-6C-GFP was added at each step of the liposome solubilization process. Proteoliposomes were reconstituted by removal of detergent from lipid-protein-detergent mixtures. Total phospholipid was determined by phosphorus analysis and the integration of AgrCTM5-6C-GFP into the liposomes was measured by GFP standard curve (Fig. S2). Figures. 2B, 2C, and 2D indicate that all detergents tested were capable of reconstituting a certain amount of membrane protein. Following centrifugation, LDAO, CHAPS, and DDM had high efficiency for formation of proteoliposomes in stage III (Fig. 2D). However, recovery of reconstituted protein in proteoliposomes following adsorption of SC was found to be the most effective in stage I, resulting in 48±3% protein recovery and 56±3% liposome recovery (Fig. 2B). Compared with other three detergents, SC gave poor protein reconstruction, possibly because of its ionic nature. Based on reconstitution after complete solubilization, LDAO resulted in 85±5% protein incorporation and 92±4% lipid recovery while stage II yielded about 72±4% protein recovery and 78±4% lipid recovery (Fig. 2C), with stage I leading to recovery of 65±3% protein and 69±4% lipid (Fig. 2B). The turbidity of each proteoliposome stage was recorded as optical density at 400 nm and size distributions of the proteoliposomes were measured by DLS. Figure. 2E shows that larger proteoliposomes particle sizes gave higher OD400 values. Turbidity of proteoliposomes was 0.521±0.011 to 0.905±0.015 while the OD400 of empty vesicles was 0.506±0.012. The corresponding particle size range of proteoliposomes was from 159±5 nm to 310±5 nm while empty liposomes were about 140±4 nm. Turbidity value might reflect vesicle size. Based on the above analysis, LDAO was used for subsequent experiments.

Proteoliposome characterization

To determine if protein was incorporated into the liposome vesicles, we used DLS, which showed proteoliposomes with an average diameter of 315 nm (Fig. 3A), compared to 140 nm for the mean diameter of the empty liposome vesicles was. This result suggested protein reconstitution into a lipid bilayer, which increased vesicle volume and proteoliposome particle diameter. The turbidity of liposome and proteoliposome samples prepared by a detergent-mediated method was recorded between 400 and 700 nm (Fig. 3B). As shown in Figure. 3B, characteristic absorption of proteins in liposomes was 280 nm. This also suggested reconstitution of protein into liposomes. TEM of negatively stained proteoliposomes confirmed structure and morphology. Figure 3C shows the proteoliposome morphology was vesicle of uniform size. Vesicle size measured by TEM was consistent with DLS. To validate TEM observations, we incorporated AgrCTM5-6C-GFP into liposomes for observation by fluorescence microscopy. Figure 3D shows proteins in proteoliposome, consistent with the TEM results.

Figure 3. Determination of reconstituted proteoliposomes.

(A) Size distribution histogram of reconstituted proteoliposomes. (B) Optical densities of liposomes and proteoliposomes. (C) Electron micrograph of proteoliposomes (D) Fluorescence microscopy dark-field image of proteoliposomes. Fluorescence image of membrane proteins incorporated into liposomes.


Proteoliposome stability is associated with storage lifespan. To assess stability, the size distribution and PDI of proteoliposomes was measured on alternate days. Liposomes were stable for at least 14 days (Fig. 4) with no changes in stability after proteoliposome preparation.

Figure 4. Time course of AgrCTM5-6C-GFP proteoliposome stability based on size distribution and PI.

Size distribution and PI of proteoliposomes without changes at 14 days after preparation. Inset, fluorescence image with no fusion in samples up to two weeks after preparation. Values represent the mean ± SD of three replicates of three independent experiments.


Transmembrane topology of AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes

Next, we determined whether AgrCTM5-6C is inserted into proteoliposomes with a unidirectional transmembrane topology. AgrCTM5-6C has both the NH2- and the COOH-terminus in the cytoplasm and a small loop connecting the two hydrophobic helices in the periplasm (Fig. 1B). AgrCTM5-6C contains a unique cysteine at position 337 in its cytoplasmic domain. Total labeling was achieved by solubilizing proteoliposomes with LDAO and labeling the cysteine residue with the membrane-impermeable fluorescent reagent 5-IAF (Fig. 5A, lane 1). Internally oriented protein labeling was determined by blocking the externally oriented AgrCTM5-6C with the membrane-impermeable non-fluorescent reagent AmdiS, solubilizing proteoliposomes with LDAO, and incubating with 5-IAF to label exposed cysteine residues of residual internally oriented AgrCTM5-6C (Fig. 5A, lane 2). The results indicated that more than 95±2% of protein reconstituted into liposomes was internally oriented. To confirm this result, the externally oriented protein labeling was achieved by directly incubating proteoliposomes with the impermeable probe 5-IAF (Fig. 5A, lane 3). Little fluorescence was detected, suggesting that little AgrCTM5-6C was externally oriented in proteoliposomes. In a control reaction for non-specific labeling, proteoliposomes were incubated with the membrane-permeable non-fluorescent thiol-reaction probe NEM followed by 5-IAF (Fig. 5A, lane 4). Little non-specific fluorescence attributable to 5-IAF was found, suggesting specific labeling of the thiol group. Another control reaction was performed by incubating solubilized AgrCTM5-6C with the membrane-impermeable non-fluorescent reagent AmdiS and labelling the cysteine residue with 5-IAF (Fig. 5A, lane 5). No fluorescence was seen, indicating that AmdiS blocked the Cys residues. These results indicated that periplasmic loop of AgrCTM5-6C was localized on the outside of vesicles, while the COOH-terminus was located in the lumen of proteoliposomes. These data showed that AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposome had acquired a unidirectional membrane topology. Following the fluorescence experiments, SDS-PAGE gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue to ensure that similar amounts of protein were used in all experiments (Fig. 5B). Together, these results provided evidence that AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes might be able to sense the extraluminal environment through the sensory domain and signal to the intraluminal histidine kinase domain (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5. Orientation of AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes.

(A) Fluorescence of 5-IAF-labelled AgrCTM5-6C. Lane 1, total protein labelling: solubilization of proteoliposomes with LDAO and incubation with 0.33 mM 5-IAF. Lane 2, Internally oriented protein labelling: externally oriented AgrCTM5-6C blocked with 0.33 mM AmdiS followed by solubilization with LDAO and incubation with 5-IAF. Lane 3, Externally oriented protein labelling: proteoliposomes were incubated with 0.33 mM 5-IAF. Lane 4, Nonspecific labelling: proteoliposomes were incubated with 15 mM NEM, then 5-IAF. Lane 5, Solubilized proteins were incubated with 0.33 mM AmdiS, then 5-IAF. All reactions were stopped with 5 × Laemmli loading buffer. (B) SDS/PAGE of total (Coomassie-stained) AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes. (C) Schematic representation of AgrCTM5-6C orientation in proteoliposomes. Experiments were repeated at least10 times under the same conditions.


In vitro autokinase activity of AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposome

To assess the autokinase activity of reconstituted AgrCTM5-6C, the amount of ATP remaining in solution after kinase reactions was quantified. Kinase reactions were carried out for 20 min, followed by addition of an equal volume of Kinase-Glo kit reagent and luminescence measurement (Fig. 6A). AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes and in detergent micelles retained constitutive autophosphorylation activity in the absence of signal molecules. AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes incubated for 20 min showed a 30-fold luminescence reduction compared to samples without kinase (P<0.001), while a 60% reduction was detected for AgrCTM5-6C in LDAO micelles when compared to samples without kinase (P<0.001). A five- to six-fold reduction in luminescence was detected for AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes compared to AgrCTM5-6C in LDAO micelles (P<0.001). These results demonstrated that reconstituted AgrCTM5-6C had autokinase activity.

Figure 6. Luminescent kinase assay.

AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes and LDAO micelles were resuspended in 50 µl kinase buffer with 2 µM ATP. Reactions with 20 ng (0.5 pmol) AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes and in LDAO micelles were performed with or without 1 pmol AIP. Control, reaction without AgrCTM5-6C. Values are mean ± SD of three replicates of three independent experiment. RLU = relative light units; P<0.001.


To determined if the signal molecule AIP induced activation through direct interaction with the AgrCTM5-6C, purified AgrCTM5-6C and AgrCTM5-6C proteoliposomes were incubated with different concentrations of AIP for 20 min. Compared with samples without signal molecule, AIP stimulated AgrCTM5-6C autophosphorylation by approximately 2-fold in response to a 2-fold molar excess of AIP over AgrCTM5-6C (Fig. 6A). Higher or lower AIP concentrations elicited no increase in phosphorylated AgrCTM5-6C (data not shown). To determine whether AIP was specific for the AgrCTM5-6C or if it stimulated the activity of other kinase, the effects of AIP on S. aureus KdpD kinase were tested. Using different concentrations of AIP did not change activity of KdpD kinase (data not shown), indicating that AIP exerted a specific effect on AgrCTM5-6C. These results suggested direct and specific interactions between AIP and AgrCTM5-6C. Based on a standard curve of luminescence signal versus ATP concentration (Fig. 6B), the fraction of constitutive, functional, active AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes was estimated to be as high as 85% and 65% in detergent micelles in the absence of AIP.


AgrC, a member of the HPK10 family, is a membrane protein that is important in signal transduction. Although AgrC has been extensively studied [6], [17][21], [38][41], biochemical and biophysical studies of AgrC in vitro are challenging because of its amphipathic nature and the difficulty of expressing native protein in large amounts. Therefore, in this present study, a truncated AgrCTM5-6C containing the last two transmembrane segments and cytoplasmic domain was constructed and overproduced and purified from an E. coli system (Fig.1). AgrCTM5-6C-GFP was used for screening detergents to facilitate detection of protein reconstruction efficiency. Although the GFP fusion proteins have been used to monitor bacterial membrane protein expression, screen detergents used for solubilization, and analyze the topological structure of transmembrane protein [42][45], it is the first report to test the effects of different detergents on the protein reconstruction efficiency using a GFP fusion protein, which allowed convenient and fast measurements by fluorescence intensity before and after protein incorporation.

AgrCTM5-6C in proteoliposomes showed a constitutive kinase activity (Fig.6A), while AgrCTM5-6C in the presence of detergent revealed relatively low activity. One likely reason for this result is that AgrCTM5-6C in detergent micelles lost their dimeric structure, which is important for autophosphorylation between two AgrC monomers [6]. Another possible reason for this result was that the liposome component was indispensable for kinase activity. Compared with detergent micelles, liposomes might mimic a more natural membrane environment, allowing appropriate conformational changes or structural arrangements for AgrC kinase activity. We demonstrated that autophosphorylation increased upon addition of AIP into activity assays (Fig. 6). This result indicated that the sites for AIP interaction with AgrC were not only in the first two extracellular loops.

Reconstitution of membrane proteins into liposomes provides a model membrane system, which could be important for detailed structure and function studies on membrane proteins. The most successful and frequently used methods for proteoliposome preparation use detergents [28], [30], [31], because most membrane proteins are not soluble in aqueous solution. Detergents are needed to disrupt the structure of native membranes in the initial solubilization step and as a means of sheltering the hydrophobic part of the membrane protein from a water-based environment during further purification. The optimal conditions for AgrCTM5-6C incorporation into liposomes were assessed using a detergent-mediated method [46], [47]. After analyzing the effect of different detergents, LDAO was chosen for AgrCTM5-6C and AgrCTM5-6C-GFP reconstitution. Detergent screening is a crucial step in protein reconstitution [48][50]. Our results (Fig. 2D) indicated that when the LDAO concentration reached complete solubilization (stage III), recovery of protein and liposomes was the highest. For optimal incorporation, especially for newly studied membrane proteins, we suggest reconstitution considers using different types of detergents over the entire solubilization process: detergent-saturated liposomes, half solubilization of liposomes, and complete solubilization of liposomes. This allows rapid screening of the best detergent for incorporation of the membrane protein, because the efficiency of the final proteoliposomes by a detergent-mediated pathway mainly depends on the detergent used.

A variety of methods developed for liposomes are appropriate for determining average size and the size distribution of reconstituted proteoliposomes. DLS is popular for obtaining information about the size and polydispersity of a reconstituted proteoliposomes. Although measuring the size distribution of reconstituted proteoliposomes by DLS is somewhat non-specific, DLS in combination with TEM, gives valuable information on vesicle size over a range of sizes. The insertion of fluorescently tagged proteins allows recognition by FM, which is practical and straightforward for confirming membrane protein reconstitution.

This study used the phospholipid DPPC because of their low cost compared with other phospholipids. DOPC was used because its gel-to-fluid phase transition of -20 °C was below the room temperature. To provide greater stability, cholesterol was also incorporated into phospholipid mixtures. Charged egg PA or egg phosphatidylglycerol is often also added [30] because these negatively charged lipids prevent liposome fusion or aggregation. In addition, the activity of many membrane proteins depends on negatively charged lipids. In this study, proteoliposomes remained stable for at least two weeks (Fig. 4).

The orientation of the incorporated protein was determined with membrane-permeable and membrane-impermeable thiol-reagents. Figure 5 shows that AgrCTM5-6C was unidirectionally oriented with the COOH-terminus oriented towards the inside of the liposome vesicles. The orientation of incorporated proteins might have been influenced by the detergent removal with Bio-beads SM2 because the rate of detergent removal can be crucial for protein orientation. When detergent is removed quickly, the protein incorporation occurs during formation of the vesicle favoring more symmetry in orientation [51]. Slow removal of detergent leads to preferential formation of liposomes and subsequent protein incorporation, which can favor protein asymmetry in orientation [52]. The membrane composition and protein incorporation stages (stage I, II, III) can also cause protein topology bias [53], [30].

In summary, we prepared proteoliposomes that might be helpful for studying the structure and function of AgrCTM5-6C as well as for illustrating signal transduction mechanisms at the molecular level. Many membrane proteins, such as AgrC, are fully active only when correctly oriented and inserted in a lipid bilayer. Therefore, reconstituting membrane proteins into phospholipid vesicles is useful for structural and functional study [54][57]. The results in this paper showed that careful choice of detergent, phospholipid mixture, and the stage at which proteins are added into liposomes to prepare proteoliposomes were essential to optimize protein incorporation. This type of analysis could prove instrumental for studies of structure-function relationships of the pharmacologically important protein AgrC and could also be applicable for other integral membrane proteins. Intensive study of reconstituted proteoliposomes could provide insights for discovering new drug targets and therapeutic agents for treatment of disorders that involve AgrC protein.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Size distribution histograms of liposomes treated by LDAO with electron microscopy images. (A) Liposome vesicles prepared by sonication had a mean diameters of 140 nm; (B) Saturated-liposomes prepared by LDAO had a mean diameters of 340 nm; (C) partially solubilized-liposomes prepared by LDAO had a mean diameters of 270 nm; (D) completely solubilized-liposomes prepared by LDAO had a mean diameters of 80 nm. Liposomes and detergent-liposome mixtures were examined by TEM after negative staining with 2% sodium phosphotungstate. Inset in S1A, liposomes prepared by sonication that were unilamellar vesicles. Inset in S1B, after detergent addition, suspensions of the large unilamellar vesicles rapidly reached saturation equilibrium, increasing turbidity and particle size. Inset in S1C, revealed system of detergent-saturated vesicles and lipid-detergent mixed micelles caused by detergent partitioning into vesicles, diminishing turbidity and particle size slightly. Inset in S1D, liposome vesicles transformed into mixed micelles with size distribution of 80 nm. Scale bars, 200 nm (A) or 0.5 µm (B, C, and D).



Figure S2.

Fluorescence intensities plotted against GFP-6His. GFP-6His was overexpressed and purified as described in Methods. GFP concentration was determined by BCA assay and GFP fluorescence was measured with a fluorescence spectrophotometer. Standard curve of GFP fluorescence versus protein concentration was used to estimate overexpressed or incorporated membrane protein.




We are indebted to Dr. Wang of National Laboratory of Macromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences with Escherichia coli C43 (DE3) host strains.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LW CQ SF. Performed the experiments: LW BL JW WX. Analyzed the data: LW CQ WX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LW PZ WX. Wrote the paper: LW CQ SF.


  1. 1. Buelow DR, Raivio TL (2010) Three (and more) component regulatory systems-auxiliary regulators of bacterial histidine kinase. Mol Microbiol 75: 547–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06982.x
  2. 2. Gotoh Y, Eguchi Y, Watanabe T, Okamoto S, Doi A, et al. (2010) Two-component signal transduction as potential drug targets in pathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.008
  3. 3. Casino P, Rubio V, Marina A (2010) The mechanism of signal transduction by two-component systems. Curr Opin Struct Biol 20: 763–771. doi: 10.1016/
  4. 4. Parkinson JS, Kofoid EC (1992) Communication modules in bacterial signaling proteins. Annu Rev Genet 26: 71–112. doi: 10.1146/
  5. 5. Khorchid A, Ikura M (2006) Bacterial histidine kinase as signal sensor and transducer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 38: 307–312. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.08.018
  6. 6. George Cisar EA, Geisinger E, Muir TW, Novick RP (2009) Symmetric signalling within asymmetric dimers of the Staphylococcus aureus receptor histidine kinase AgrC. Mol Microbiol 74: 44–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06849.x
  7. 7. Chambers HF, DeLeo FR (2009) Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 629–641. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2200
  8. 8. Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, et al. (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298: 1763–1771. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.15.1763
  9. 9. De Lencastre H, Oliveira D, Tomasz A (2007) Antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a paradigm of adaptive power. Curr Opin Microbiol 10: 428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.08.003
  10. 10. Novick RP, Christie GE, Penadés JR (2010) The phage-related chromosomal islands of Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 8: 541–551. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2393
  11. 11. Williams P (2002) Quorum sensing: an emerging target for antibacterial chemotherapy? Expert Opin Ther Targets 6: 257–274. doi: 10.1517/14728222.6.3.257
  12. 12. Gordon CP, Williams P, Chan WC (2013) Attenuating Staphylococcus aureus Virulence Gene Regulation: A Medicinal Chemistry Perspective. J Med Chem 56: 1389–1404. doi: 10.1021/jm3014635
  13. 13. Novick RP (2003) Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol Microbiol 48: 1429–1449. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03792.x
  14. 14. Janzon L, Arvidson S (1990) The role of the deltalysin gene (hld) in the regulation of virulence genes by the accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. EMBO J 9: 1391–1399. doi: 10.1007/bf00259623
  15. 15. Novick RP, Projan S, Kornblum J, Ross H, Kreiswirth B, et al. (1993) Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J 12: 3967–3975.
  16. 16. Thorsten W, Grebe B, Jeffry B (1999) The Histidine Protein Kinase Superfamily. Advances in Microbial Physiology 41: 139–227. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60167-8
  17. 17. Thoendel M, Kavanaugh JS, Flack CE, Horswill AR (2011) Peptide Signaling in the Staphylococci. Chem Rev 111: 117–151. doi: 10.1021/cr100370n
  18. 18. Geisinger E, George EA, Muir TW, Novick RP (2008) Identification of ligand specificity determinants in AgrC, the Staphylococcus aureus quorum-sensing receptor. J Biol Chem 283: 8930–8938. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m710227200
  19. 19. Geisinger E, Muir TW, Novick RP (2009) agr receptor mutants reveal distinct modes of inhibition by staphylococcal autoinducing peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 1216–1221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807760106
  20. 20. Lina G, Jarraud S, Ji G, Greenland T, Pedraza A, et al. (1998) Transmembrane topology and histidine protein kinase activity of AgrC, the agr signal receptor in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 28: 655–662. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00830.x
  21. 21. Ma P, Yuille HM, Blessie V, Gohring N, Igloi Z, et al. (2008) Expression, purification and activities of the entire family of intact membrane sensor kinases from Enterococcus faecalis. Mol Membr Biol 25: 449–473. doi: 10.1080/09687680802359885
  22. 22. Martin M, Albanesi D, Alzari PM, de Mendoza D (2009) Functional in vitro assembly of the integral membrane bacterial thermosensor DesK. Protein Expr Purif 66: 39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2009.02.006
  23. 23. Sanowar S, LeMoual H (2005) Functional reconstitution of the Salmonella typhimurium PhoQ histidine kinase sensor in proteoliposomes. Biochem J 390: 769–776. doi: 10.1042/bj20050060
  24. 24. Rigaud JL (2002) Membrane proteins: functional and structural studies using reconstituted proteoliposomes and 2-D crystals. Braz J Med Biol Res 35: 753–766. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2002000700001
  25. 25. Jung K, Hamann K, Revermann A (2001) K+ stimulates specifically the autokinase activity of purified and reconstituted EnvZ of Escherichia coli.. J Biol Chem 276: 40896–40902. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m107871200
  26. 26. Janausch IG, Garcia-Moreno I, Unden G (2002) Function of DcuS from Escherichia coli as a fumarate-stimulated histidine protein kinase in vitro. J Biol Chem 277: 39809–39814. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m204482200
  27. 27. Daghastanli KR, Ferreira RB, Thedei G, Maggio B, Ciancaglini P (2004) Lipid composition-dependent incorporation of multiple membrane proteins into liposomes. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 36: 127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.03.015
  28. 28. Seddon AM, Curnow P, Booth PJ (2004) Membrane proteins, lipids and detergents: not just a soap opera. Biochim Biophysica Acta 1666: 105–117. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.04.011
  29. 29. Rigaud JL, Mosser G, Lacapere JJ, Levy D, Olofsson A (1997) Bio-Beads: an efficient strategy for 2D crystallization of membrane proteins. J Struct Biol 118: 226–235. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3848
  30. 30. Rigaud JL, Lévy D (2003) Reconstitution of Membrane Proteins into Liposomes. Methods in Enzymology 372: 65–86. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(03)72004-7
  31. 31. Rigaud JL, Pitard B, Lévy D (1995) Reconstitution of membrane proteins into liposomes: application to energy-transducing membrane proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1231: 223–246. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(95)00091-v
  32. 32. Lee KE, Kim HM, Lee JO, Jeon H, Han SS (2008) Regulation of CD40 reconstitution into a liposome using different ratios of solubilized LDAO to lipids. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 62: 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.09.021
  33. 33. Heerklotz H, Tsamaloukas AD, Keller S (2009) Monitoring detergent-mediated solubilization and reconstitution of lipid membranes by isothermal titration calorimetry. Nat Protoc 4: 686–697. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.35
  34. 34. Bartlett GR (1959) Phosphorus assay in column chromatography. J Biol Chem 234: 466–468.
  35. 35. Böttcher CSF, Van Gent CM, Fries C (1961) A rapid and sensitive submicro phosphorus determination. Anal Chim Acta 24: 203–204. doi: 10.1016/0003-2670(61)80041-x
  36. 36. Vecino AJ, Segura RL, Ugarte-Uribe B, Aguila S, Hormaeche I, et al. (2010) Reconstitution in liposome bilayers enhances nucleotide binding affinity and ATP-specificity of TrwB conjugative coupling protein. Biochim Biophys Acta 1798: 2160–2169. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.07.005
  37. 37. Geertsma ER, Groeneveld M, Slotboom DJ (2008) Quality control of overexpressed membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 5722–5727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802190105
  38. 38. Lyon GJ, Wright JS, Muir TW, Novick RP (2002) Key determinants of receptor activation in the agr autoinducing peptides of Staphylococcus aureus.. Biochemistry 41: 10095–10104. doi: 10.1021/bi026049u
  39. 39. Novick RP, Geisinger E (2008) Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu Rev Genet 42: 541–564. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091640
  40. 40. Chen LC, Tsou LT, Chen FJ (2009) Ligand-receptor recognition for activation of quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus. J Microbiol 47: 572–581. doi: 10.1007/s12275-009-0004-2
  41. 41. Jensen RO, Winzer K, Clarke SR (2008) Differential recognition of Staphylococcus aureus quorum-sensing signals depends on both extracellular loops 1 and 2 of the transmembrane sensor AgrC. J Mol Biol 381: 300–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.018
  42. 42. Drew D, Slotboom DJ, Friso G, Reda T, Genevaux P, et al. (2005) A scalable, GFP-based pipeline for membrane protein overexpression screening and purification. Protein Sci 14: 2011–2017. doi: 10.1110/ps.051466205
  43. 43. Kawate T, Gouaux E (2006) Fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography for precrystallization screening of integral membrane proteins. Structure 14: 673–681. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2006.01.013
  44. 44. Hattori M, Hibbs RE, Gouaux E (2012) A fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography-based thermostability assay for membrane protein precrystallization screening. Structure 20: 1293–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.06.009
  45. 45. Daley DO, Rapp M, Granseth E, Melén K, Drew D, von Heijne G (2005) Global topology analysis of the Escherichia coli inner membrane proteome. Science 308: 1321–1323. doi: 10.1126/science.1109730
  46. 46. Jung K, Tjaden B, Altendorf K (1997) Purification, reconstitution, and characterization of KdpD, the turgor sensor of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 272: 10847–10852. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.16.10847
  47. 47. Groth G, Walker E (1996) ATP synthase from bovine heartmitochondria: reconstitution into unilamellar phospholipid vesicles of the pure enzyme in a functional state. Biochem J 318: 351–357.
  48. 48. Cladera J, Rigaud JL, Villaverde J, Duñach M (1997) Liposome solubilization and membrane protein reconstitution using Chaps and Chapso. Eur. Biochem 243: 798–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00798.x
  49. 49. Velamakanni S, Yao Y, Gutmann DA, van Veen HW (2008) Multidrug transport by the ABC transporter Sav1866 from Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry 47: 9300–9308. doi: 10.1021/bi8006737
  50. 50. Zehnpfennig B, Urbatsch IL, Galla HJ (2009) Functional reconstitution of human ABCC3 into proteoliposomes reveals a transport mechanism with positive cooperativity. Biochemistry 48: 4423–4430. doi: 10.1021/bi9001908
  51. 51. Rigaud JL, Levy D, Mosser G, Lambert O (1998) Detergent removal by non-polar polystyrene beads-applications to membrane. Protein reconstitution and two-dimensional crystallization. Eur Biophys J 27: 304–319. doi: 10.1007/s002490050138
  52. 52. Ueno M, Tanford C, Reynolds JA (1984) Phospholipid vesicle formation using nonionic detergents with low monomer solubility. Kinetic factors determine vesicle size and permeability. Biochemistry 23: 3070–3076. doi: 10.1021/bi00308a034
  53. 53. Bay DC, Turner RJ (2013) Membrane composition influences the topology bias of bacterial integral membrane proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1828: 260–270. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.09.003
  54. 54. Rigaud JL, Lévy D, Mosser G, Lambert O (1998) Detergent removal by non-polar polystyrene beads. Eur Biophys J 27: 305–319. doi: 10.1007/s002490050138
  55. 55. Lévy D, Gulik A, Seigneuret M, Rigaud JL (1990) Phospholipid vesicle solubilization and reconstitution by detergents. Symmetrical analysis of the two processes using octaethylene glycol mono-n-dodecyl ether. Biochemistry 29: 9480–94888. doi: 10.1021/bi00492a022
  56. 56. Wang L, Sigworth FJ (2009) Structure of the BK potassium channel in a lipid membrane from electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 461: 292–295. doi: 10.1038/nature08291
  57. 57. Lévy D, Gulik A, Bluzat A, Rigaud JL (1992) Reconstitution of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase: mechanisms of membrane protein insertion into liposomes during reconstitution procedures involving the use of detergents. Biochim Biophys Acta 1107: 283–298. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(92)90415-i