Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Crosstalk of Responsive Genes to Multiple Abiotic Stresses in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

  • Ya-Na Zhu,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Dong-Qiao Shi ,

    wcyang@genetics.ac.cn (WCY); dqshi@genetics.ac.cn (DQS)

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Meng-Bin Ruan,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Li-Li Zhang,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Zhao-Hong Meng,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Jie Liu,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

  • Wei-Cai Yang

    wcyang@genetics.ac.cn (WCY); dqshi@genetics.ac.cn (DQS)

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Crosstalk of Responsive Genes to Multiple Abiotic Stresses in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

  • Ya-Na Zhu, 
  • Dong-Qiao Shi, 
  • Meng-Bin Ruan, 
  • Li-Li Zhang, 
  • Zhao-Hong Meng, 
  • Jie Liu, 
  • Wei-Cai Yang
PLOS
x

Abstract

Abiotic stress is a major environmental factor that limits cotton growth and yield, moreover, this problem has become more and more serious recently, as multiple stresses often occur simultaneously due to the global climate change and environmental pollution. In this study, we sought to identify genes involved in diverse stresses including abscisic acid (ABA), cold, drought, salinity and alkalinity by comparative microarray analysis. Our result showed that 5790, 3067, 5608, 778 and 6148 transcripts, were differentially expressed in cotton seedlings under treatment of ABA (1μM ABA), cold (4°C), drought (200mM mannitol), salinity (200mM NaCl) and alkalinity (pH=11) respectively. Among the induced or suppressed genes, 126 transcripts were shared by all of the five kinds of abiotic stresses, with 64 up-regulated and 62 down-regulated. These common members are grouped as stress signal transduction, transcription factors (TFs), stress response/defense proteins, metabolism, transport facilitation, as well as cell wall/structure, according to the function annotation. We also noticed that large proportion of significant differentially expressed genes specifically regulated in response to different stress. Nine of the common transcripts of multiple stresses were selected for further validation with quantitative real time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, several well characterized TF families, for example, WRKY, MYB, NAC, AP2/ERF and zinc finger were shown to be involved in different stresses. As an original report using comparative microarray to analyze transcriptome of cotton under five abiotic stresses, valuable information about functional genes and related pathways of anti-stress, and/or stress tolerance in cotton seedlings was unveiled in our result. Besides this, some important common factors were focused for detailed identification and characterization. According to our analysis, it suggested that there was crosstalk of responsive genes or pathways to multiple abiotic or even biotic stresses, in cotton. These candidate genes will be worthy of functional study under diverse stresses.

Introduction

Abiotic stresses such as drought, cold and high salinity are environmental limiting factors for crop growth and yield. Plants have evolved various biochemical and physiological mechanisms to achieve tolerance and adaption to stresses [1]. Lately, significant progress has been made in identification of stress-inducible genes and components of signaling pathways involved in a variety of abiotic stresses. Many stress-related transcripts and proteins acting in pathways and signaling cascades have been identified, such as the salt-overly-sensitive (SOS) pathway that activated by Ca2+ spike from cytoplasm and overcoming the salt damage by maintaining cellular ion homeostasis[2,3], the ICE-CBF /DREB1 pathway critical for the regulation of the cold-responsive transcriptome [4,5], the calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) pathway that taking an important role in hyperosmotic stress response [6], and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway essential to both abiotic and biotic stresses [7,8].

Various abiotic stresses result in both general and specific effect on plant growth and development [9]. There are multiple pathways involved in stress perception and signaling, some of them are cross-talked at various points [10]. ABA is a major intracellular messenger in the regulation of plant's water status, it is a stress phytohormone that proved to be a player of critical function in signaling network of various stresses, such as drought, cold and salinity [11-13]. Analysis of stress-inducible genes has revealed the existence of ABA-dependent and independent signaling pathways [2,14,15]. In nature, plants often face to several abiotic stresses, rather than a particular one at the same time [10], furthermore, global climatic trends may accentuate this problem [16-18]. Subject to the complex regulatory networks and the crosstalk of various stresses, manipulation of key sensor genes involved in signal transduction or TFs that regulating downstream genes of various pathways, will be an effective way to improve the plant adaption or tolerance to multiple stress conditions [19].

Cotton is one of the most economically important crops worldwide, it is necessary to improve stress tolerance of cotton to increase its yield even under unfriendly environmental conditions. Recently, draft cotton genome sequence was acquired and published, as will benefit gene functional research in cotton [20]. However, in last decade, cotton research is mainly focused on fiber development [21-24], the studies on stress response physiology, identification of novel genes, the function of genes, and stress tolerance improvement with gene engineering have only been attempted more recently, compared with the model plants such as Arabidopsis, rice and tobacco [12,25-27], furthermore, most of the studies are engaged in one kind of stress, little is known about the crosstalk of multiple stresses [28-33]. In this paper, we tried to dissect pathways under multiple stresses in cotton with profiling data of global transcription.

So far, transcriptome profiling is an effective and widely used tool to investigate the gene expression dynamics in response to a spectrum of abiotic stresses at the global level in many species [34-36], however, more study on significant crop plants such as cotton is badly needed. In this report, we tend to profile the transcriptome of cotton seedlings stressed with ABA, cold, drought, salinity and alkalinity (pH=11, hereinafter referred to pH in this paper). Differentially expressed genes and related crosstalk network for stress perception, signal transduction and tolerance of cotton were explored using comparative microarray analysis.

Results and Discussion

Identification of differentially expressed genes under ABA, cold, drought, salinity or pH stresses

Expression profiling of cotton in response to the abiotic stresses like drought, cold and salinity has been reported recently [29-33], however, most of the studies only focus on one type of stress. In this study, we aimed to identify components of the regulatory network of multiple abiotic stresses. The stress treatments were performed separately on seedlings 4-day after germination (DAG), and RNA was isolated from specimens of 10-day treatment before a 24K Affymetrix cotton genome array [31,37] was conducted to compare the transcription profiles of the plant's response to ABA, cold, drought, salinity and alkalinity (pH=11, hereinafter referred to pH in this paper). The expression level of transcripts was compared, so that genes with more than two-fold change and a p-value of ≤ 0.05 were defined as those with significant different expression. The stress-induced or -repressed genes were identified.

As shown in Figure 1, microarray analysis revealed striking difference in gene expression level under ABA (1μM ABA), cold (4°C), drought (200mM mannitol), salinity (200mM NaCl) and pH (pH=11) treatments, which caused 5790, 3067, 5608, 778 and 6148 changed transcripts, respectively. Among these expression changed transcripts, 3242, 1231, 3179, 480 and 3378 genes were identified as stress-induced ones accordingly. There were more induced genes than the repressed in most of the cases except cold treatment (Figure 1-A, B). Most of the significant differentially expressed genes exhibited a 2-3 fold change, and some even showed more than 10-fold change of expression level (Figure 1). We also noticed that there were more than three thousand genes induced by each of ABA, drought and pH stress, while cold and salinity caused expression change of much fewer genes, especially salinity stress, suggesting that there were more genes involved in ABA, drought and pH stress, compared with cold and salinity in cotton seedlings, on the other hand, it is likely because that cotton is a kind of species which is more adaptable to salinity and cold stress compared to other species as Arabidopsis [34].

thumbnail
Figure 1. Number and the level of transcripts identified as differentially expressed in cotton seedlings under abiotic stress conditions.

The y-axis indicates the treatment of different stress. pH, pH=11; ABA, 1μM ABA; Man, 200mM mannitol; Cold, 4°C; NaCl, 200mM NaCl. The x-axis indicates the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), the columns with different color show the fold change of corresponding DEGs. A. up-regulated; B. down-regulated.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.g001

In our study, genes with altered expression spanned a wide variety of regulatory and metabolic processes as signal transduction components, TFs, hormone related genes, antioxidants, detoxification enzymes, and biological metabolic processes, a significant number of which were covered in the previous reports of Arabidopsis. Several classes of protein kinase and phosphatase involved in abiotic stress signal transduction were up-regulated. It is well-known that MAPK (Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase) pathways are universal transducers and activated by diverse abiotic stresses, such as cold, salt, heat, drought, wounding, UV irradiation, osmotic shock, ozone or heavy metal intoxication in plants [38]. In our data of microarray, MAPK components are also active under the treatments, a gene encoding MAPK 3 was induced by ABA, cold, drought and pH treatments (Table S1), and it suggested that MAPK signaling pathway was a common way in response of cotton seedlings to multiple abiotic stresses. Previous studies have shown that calcium plays a role as a second messenger during abiotic or biotic stress, when cells are stimulated with external conditions, the concentration of cytosolic free calcium (Ca2+) will change accordingly, and calcium-sensing proteins like CDPKs (Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase), are able to integrate the transient change of Ca2+ concentration into a phosphorylation signal [39]. In our results, CPK28, a CDPK member was up-regulated by mannitol and pH treatment but down-regulated by ABA, cold and NaCl. TFs such as DRE (Dehydration-Responsive Element)-binding factor 2 and MYB family members were up-regulated in response to ABA. DRE-binding proteins (DREBs) bind to DRE/C-repeat (DRE/CRT) cis-acting element in the promoter region of abiotic stress-responsive genes and activate these genes. Consistently, GhDREB1A gene was found induced by cold treatment. A glycolate oxidase (glcD) oxidoreductase gene was activated by NaCl treatment and a G. hirsutum Gibberellin 20-oxidase 1 (GA20ox1) was up-regulated by pH treatment. Interestingly, a gene encoding thiazole biosynthetic enzyme (GeneBank ID: CO076413) was up-regulated over 18 times by all of the five stress conditions, similar result was also reported in other species such as yeast and sunflower [40,41]. Function of more than 40-50% of the identified stress-responsive genes remained unknown. The detail information of above stress-induced and -repressed genes is presented in Table S1.

Functional classification of the transcripts differentially expressed under various abiotic stresses

To determine whether the accumulated transcripts were functionally involved in the processes of stress response/defense, we classified the differentially expressed genes according to their putative GO annotation. Since the genes from the 24K Affymetrix cotton genome array were classified into different GO categories, we grouped them into 18 classes according to their percentage of biological process (Figure 2). These categories contained carbohydrate metabolism, stress/defense response, nucleic acid metabolism, amino acid and protein metabolism, nitrogen compound metabolism, transcription, transcriptional regulation, transport facilitation, photosynthesis, thiamin metabolism, lipid metabolism, leaf and root development, reproductive and embryo development, cell growth, hormone, signal transduction, electron transport, and unclassified.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Functional classification of transcripts in cotton seedlings under different abiotic stress conditions.

Functional classification of the transcripts was performed using the biological process category of GO Analysis Toolkit and Database for Agricultural Community (http://bioinfo.cau.edu.cn/agriGO/). The x-axis indicates the proportion of the genes expressed in each GO. pH, pH=11; ABA, 1μM ABA; Man, 200mM mannitol; Cold, 4°C; NaCl, 200mM NaCl. The transcripts with fold change greater than 2 or less than 0.5 (only GO term IDs with P ≤ 0.05) were listed. A. up-regulated; B. down-regulated.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.g002

Surprisingly, most of the up- and/or down-regulated transcripts (30-60% of the total) were those involved in the carbohydrate metabolism. Furthermore, many of the up-regulated transcripts were those genes for stress/defense response (10-40%), nucleic acid metabolism (10-20%), or transcriptional regulation (≥10%). Most of the down-regulated transcripts were categorized into amino acid and protein metabolism (10-30%), and stress/defense responses (10-40%). It is worth mentioning that quite a number of transcripts involved in thiamin metabolism were up-regulated while none of these genes was down-regulated. Whereas only down regulation but not up regulation of some photosynthesis genes was found in our data. It suggests that all the abiotic stresses applied in this study can lead to the sudden drop of photosynthesis, and the obvious increase of thiamin as a detoxification factor, as maybe a common mechanism underlying abiotic stress defense of cotton. The detail information of the GO function category of ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH stress-inducible genes are available in Table S2.

Crosstalk among the stresses

In order to identify some common members shared by ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH, we profiled the transcriptome of cotton seedlings under these conditions. Venn diagrams were constructed and the common differentially expressed genes were identified in all of the five abiotic treatments (Figure 3). Analysis of the overlapping section of the Venn diagram showed that among the up-regulated genes, 1893 were shared in ABA, pH and mannitol treatments, while there were only 83 common up-regulated genes for ABA, cold and NaCl treatments (Figure 3-A). As shown in Figure 3-B, a similar situation occurs in the down-regulated genes, 1356 genes were identified as commonly responsible to ABA, pH and mannitol treatments, however, only 70 common genes showed suppression under ABA, cold and NaCl stresses. The difference between the common members activated or inhibited in above stresses suggested the greater cross-talk among ABA, pH and mannitol than ABA, cold and NaCl. We further classified these common members (Table S3) and the results showed that ABA, mannitol and pH stress shared many components in signaling transduction like MPK3, NADK1 (NAD+ kinase 1) as well as GPA1 (G Protein Alpha Subunit 1), furthermore, many transcription factors were also commonly up-regulated such as AP2, MYB, zinc finger and WRKY TF family, while ABA, cold and NaCl did not show any significant common signaling pathway. These results indicated that there was a closer relationship between the drought, alkalinity stress and ABA signal transduction pathways in cotton, while cold and NaCl stress might less efficient in the activation of ABA pathways. Similar results were also reported in previous study on Arabidopsis [34]. This was possibly due to the different response to cold, salt and the other stresses in cotton. We also noticed that large proportion of significant differentially expressed genes were specifically regulated under different stresses, this indicated that some special signaling pathways were correspond to certain stress, although the others were cross-talked in many stresses. We identified some molecular components (Figure 3 and Table S3), only a few of these genes had been characterized in cotton or showed homologous in other species like Arabidopsis or rice, their function remained largely unknown, so we could not find any pathway or pattern of these genes, it was expected that the function or characterization of these components would be dissected in details with mutants. Among the stresses applied, the most number of genes up- or down-regulated specifically to a stress was 965 or 1114, corresponding to ABA or cold respectively. Sixty-four genes were induced while 62 genes were repressed under all five stresses, and the percentage of these members is low, as 1.97% in ABA, 2.01% in mannitol, 1.89% in pH, 5.2% in cold and 13.3% in NaCl, the detailed information is available as Table S3.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Venn diagram of transcripts identified as up (A) and down (B) regulated in cotton seedings under different abiotic stress conditions.

pH, pH=11; ABA, 1μM ABA; Man, 200mM mannitol; Cold, 4°C; NaCl, 200mM NaCl.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.g003

Characterization of common differentially expressed genes

The common 64 induced and 62 repressed genes were identified and listed (Figure 3, Table S4). In these common genes, 29 induced and 30 repressed genes had been characterized in cotton or showed homologous in other species, like Arabidopsis or rice. The differentially expressed transcripts in response to ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH stress were predicted to encode various functional and regulatory proteins involved in signal transduction, transcription regulation, stress defense/response, secondary metabolism and transport facilitation (Table 1, Table S4).

Putative FunctionNo.   Description
Up-regulated transcripts
Rector-like protein kinase2alpha-glucan water dikinase 1, alpha-glucan water dikinase 1
Protein phosphatase2Protein phosphatase 2C 77, protein phosphatase 2C 12
Phosphorylase3ATPHS2, α-glucan phosphorylase isozyme H, starch phosphorylase
Chaperone protein2Chaperone DnaJ-domain containing protein, Tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein
Ubiquitin-fold modifier1Ubiquitin-fold modifier 1
Lignin biosynthesis protein1Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase like protein
Transcription factor2NAC domain containing protein 47, SCPL20
Stress/defense response4Bifunctional Nucleases in basal defense response 1, Bifunctional Nucleases in basal defense response 1, SAP domain-containing protein, putative PAP_fibrillin
Detoxification5Putative thiamine biosynthesis protein, putative thiamine biosynthesis protein, putative thiamine biosynthesis protein, thiazole biosynthetic enzyme, Gossypium hirsutum alcohol dehydrogenase 1
Photosynthesis1Chlororespiratory reduction 3
Metabolism3Protein like SEX4 1, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase 1, MAR-binding filament-like protein 1
Electron transport system1NDH-dependent cyclic electron flow 1
Transporter2Copper transporter 1, nitrate transporter 1.5
Unknown protein35Unknown protein
Down-regulated transcripts
Rector-like protein kinase1Protein kinase family protein
Protein phosphatase1Serine theronine protein phosphatase PP1
F-box protein2EID1-like F-box protein 2, EIN3-binding F-box protein 1
Chaperone protein1TCP-1/cpn60 chaperonin family protein
Phosphorylase1C2 calcium/lipid-binding and phosphoribosyltransferase C-terminal domain-containing protein
Ribosomal protein160S ribosomal protein L4-1
Post-translational modification1Carboxypeptidase
Transcription factor1Scarecrow transcription factor
Heat shock protein2Heat shock protein cognate 70, HSP20 family protein
Hormone3DELLA protein RGA, putative 12-oxophytodienoate reductase, 4-coumarate--CoA ligase-like 7
Stress/defense response1Immediate-early salicylate-induced glucosyltransferase
Phototropic response1Root phototropism protein 2
Sulfotransferase1Flavonol sulfotransferase-like protein
Cell wall biosunthesis2Cellulose synthase, pectinesterase 3
Metabolism6HXXXD-type acyl-transferase-like protein, putative 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit, beta-xylosidase 1, glucan endo-1,3-beta-D-glucosidase, OSJNBa0088H09.3, Nitrate reductase (NADH)
Transporter2Nitrate transporter 1.4, nitrate transporter 1.4
Other3Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein, putative elongation factor 2, putative elongation factor 2
Unknown protein32Unknown protein

Table 1. No. of transcripts involved in different functional groups commonly changed under ABA, cold, drought, high-salinity and pH stress.

CSV
Download CSV

Signal transduction

As expected, the genes functional in signal transduction were the most since different abiotic stress share overlapping signal transduction pathways in many steps. Thirteen of 29 commonly induced and 11 from the 30 commonly repressed transcripts took roles in signal transduction and regulation of gene expression under abiotic stress. The first group of genes included kinases, phosphatases, calcium-binding proteins and proteases which were previously shown involved in stress signal transduction. An alpha-glucan phosporylase isozyme H [42] was up-regulated over 20 times by ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH. We also characterized two alpha-glucan water dikinase 1 [43], and AtPHS2 (alpha-glucan phosporylase), a phosphorylase transferase, all of them were up-regulated over 5 times by these five stress conditions, especially over 10 times by ABA, they were all starch-related and involved in the signal transduction of abiotic stress in Arabidopsis. A Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR-like protein) was found activated in all of the five stress conditions. It was reported that, OsCCR1 is a key enzyme in lignin biosynthesis, and functions as an effector of the small GTPase Rac in defense response in rice [44]. Protein phosphatase (PP) is a type of phosphoprotein cascade, with the function to inactivate the phosphoprotein. There are four subunits in PP, and each one has different interaction partners, while PP2B and PP2C are Ca2+-dependent. In our results, we found two well-known ABA signal transduction components, PP2C 77 and PP2C 12, were commonly up-regulated [45,46]. EID1 (Empfindlicher im Dunkelroten Licht 1) is an F-box protein that functions as a negative regulator in phytochrome A (phyA)-specific light signaling [47,48]. Ethylene insensitive 3 (EIN3) is a key transcription regulator mediating ethylene signaling [49,50], EBF1 (EIN3-binding F-box protein 1) and EBF2 interact with EIN3 directly for the ubiquitination and proteolysis of EIN3 [51]. These genes are ubiquitin-protein related but play an important role in the signal transduction of cotton abiotic stress [33]. Serine threonine protein phosphatase PP1 is a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases required in cell growth and signaling [52,53]. The immediate-early salicylate-induced glucosyl transferase was important not only in biotrophic stress but also for wounding stress [54]. Down-regulation of these genes suggested the crosstalk of stress response in above pathways.

In addition to the stress signal transduction cascades, the second group featured as genes functioning as cofactors. A Chaperone DnaJ-domain containing protein (Genebank ID: AI727487) [55], a Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) protein [56,57] and a ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 (Ufm1) [58] were also identified as commonly up-regulated members, these proteins do not transduce signals directly but work as cofactors in stress tolerance, developmental process, or ER stress. A heat shock protein cognate 70 (Hsp70) [59], a member of small heat shock protein or HSP20 family [60] and a TCP-1 (T-complex protein 1) /cpn60 chaperone family protein [61] were repressed by all five stresses, it means that these proteins were likely involved in stress response, besides their roles in immune sensing, hypersensitive response or protein folding. The 60S ribosomal protein L4A can be directly regulated by auxin and the exogenous application of auxin results in vacuolar trafficking defects of plants [62,63]. The carboxypeptidase is functional in post-translational modification [64,65] and the leucine-rich repeat-containing protein are involved in the formation of protein-protein interaction and signaling [66].

Stress response of plant is often mediated by phytohormones such as ABA, ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and gibberellin (GA), it is believed that there is crosstalk between stress adaption/response and hormone regulation pathways, although the hormones may participate in stress reaction independently, synergistically or antagonistically [67]. Consistently, we found that many genes involved in the metabolism of GA and JA were repressed by all five stress conditions. These genes were DELLA protein RGA, 4-coumarate--CoA ligase-like 7 and putative 12-oxophytodienoate reductase [68-70].

Transcription factor

TFs function as key modular players in stress perception. In our results, two TFs were identified as commonly up-regulated, they were NAC domain containing protein 47 [71], and SCPL 20, a serine carboxypeptidase with a NAC domain that active in the regulation of wood formation in poplar and defense responses against biotic and oxidative stress in rice [72]. A scarecrow (SCR) TF (Protein ID: NP_190990.1) was found commonly repressed [73], it suggested that NAC TF family maybe a kind of common factor that regulated the downstream genes to improve the adaption to various abiotic stresses.

Stress response/defense

The third portion covered the functional proteins that might take roles in stress tolerance. Bifunctional Nucleases (BFNs) have both RNase and DNase activities. Two BFNs in basal defense response 1 (BBD1) from Oryza minuta and Arabidopsis, OmBBD1 and AtBBD1 respectively, were investigated recently, and it was reported that these two proteins took regulatory roles in ABA-mediated callose deposition to set up an initial defense barrier against pathogenesis [74]. Interestingly, we found 2 BBD1 proteins from our microarray data, it suggests the existence of shared defensing pathways and transduction signals to abiotic and biotic stresses in plant. There were three putative thiamine biosynthesis proteins induced by the above stresses (Table 1), vitamin B1 (thiamine) is a player during plant adaptation to stresses, mainly oxidative stress [75,76]. Our results also showed that chlororespiratory reduction 3 (CRR3) [77], thiazole biosynthetic enzyme, the precursor of vitamin B1[78], G. hirsutum alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (ADH1) [79], PAP (Plastid-lipid associated protein) fibrillin, MAR-binding filament-like protein 1 (MFP1) [80], NDH-dependent cyclic electron flow 1, protein like Starch Excess 4 (SEX4) 1 [81], SAP domain-containing protein, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase 1 (PAL1) were commonly up-regulated.

Metabolism

Many genes involved in cell wall metabolism were repressed by all five stress conditions, such as beta-xylosidase 1 (BXL1) [82], cellulose synthase, pectinesterase 3 (PME3) [83], HXXXD-type acyl-transferase-like protein [84] and putative glucan endo-1 and 3-beta-D-glucosidase[85], they were involved in cell wall modification, cell division or growth .

Transporter facilitation

There were several genes encoding transporters, such as a copper transporter 1 (COPT1) [86] and a nitrate transporter (NRT) 1.5 [87], were commonly up-regulated, while two NRT 1.4 were commonly down-regulated. Transporters play an important role in ion homeostasis and detoxification of toxic metal ions, no report about their roles in stress response/defense has been found previously, so it is worthy of further investigation.

Quantitative real-time PCR validation

In order to validate differentially expressed genes identified from microarray analysis, we repeated the stress treatments and isolated RNA from samples. Nine interesting genes that were commonly regulated under all of the five stresses were selected for validation with qRT-PCR. Four commonly induced transcripts for CRR3 (Ghi.1545.1.S1_at), GhADH1 (Ghi.8046.1.S1_at), putative thiamine biosynthesis protein (Ghi.10424.1.S1_s_at), NAC domain containing protein (Ghi.6538.1.S1_at) and five commonly repressed transcripts encoding NRT1.4 (Gra.2247.1.S1_at), SCR TF (Protein ID: NP_190990.1) (Gra.1312.2.S1_s_at), a HSP20 family protein (Ghi.9308.1.S1_at), immediate-early salicylate-induced glucosyltransferase (Ghi.9820.2.S1_s_at), pectinesterase 3 (Gra.1483.2.S1_at) were verified with qRT-PCR (Figure 4, Table S5). Comparison of the results from qRT-PCR analysis revealed the consistent expression pattern with our microarray data, and the Person’s correlation coefficient between the two sets of data was between 0.4 and 0.9 (Figure 4, Table S5).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Quantitative real-time PCR validation for selected transcripts.

The columns indicate the qRT-PCR values of CK (white bar), ABA (red bar), Cold (light blue bar), Man (dark blue bar), NaCl (purple bar) and pH (yellow bar), respectively. The columns (grey bar) indicate the relative microarray expression value of crossponding stress treatment. CK, control plants; pH, pH=11; ABA, 1μM ABA; Man, 200mM mannitol; Cold, 4°C; NaCl, 200mM NaCl.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.g004

TFs responsible to ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH stress

There are a large number of TFs encoded by plant genome to perceive and mediate response to environmental changes. These TFs act as the earliest and vital players during stresses [88]. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis revealed that a number of TFs were induced or repressed in response to diverse abiotic stresses. Among the genes induced by ABA, cold, drought, salinity or pH, we found several TF families, suggesting that various transcriptional regulatory mechanisms were active in stress signal transduction pathways (Table 2, Table S6). Stress-activated or repressed TF genes were identified from 10 different families including WRKY, NAC, MYB, AP2-ethylene (AP2/ERF), and C2H2 like zinc finger, auxin response factor (ARF), G-box, bHLH, bZIP, and TCP. In ABA stress network, 15 WRKY genes were induced, 6 ethylene genes were repressed, corresponding to 19% and 21.4% of all ABA-induced and repressed TFs respectively. For cold stress response, 14 AP2-ethylene and 13 C2H2 like zinc finger genes were induced, 4 MYB genes and 3 bZIP genes were repressed, taking 50% and 24.1% of all cold-induced and repressed TFs. There are 18 AP2-ethylene genes, 17 WRKY genes and 11 NAC genes were induced by drought, corresponding to 47.4% of all drought-induced TFs. Three ERF genes, 3 C2H2 like zinc finger genes and 3 bZIP genes were repressed by salinity treatment, covering 90% of all salinity-repressed TFs, whereas under pH stress treatment, 19 WRKY genes, 16 AP2-ethylene genes and 10 C2H2 like zinc finger genes were induced, 4 C2H2 like zinc finger genes and 3 ERF genes were repressed, proportioning 36.1% and 30.4% of all pH-induced and repressed TFs respectively. TFs are important regulators primarily involved in the initiation stage of RNA transcription. Recently, several reports have shown up-regulation of these TF families in response to biotic stresses in cotton, and DREB-binding TF gene and ERF TF gene were isolated and identified [31,33,89-91]. According to our results, WRKY family was the most highly expressed TF , while ERF was the most important repressed TF that mediating transcription of stress-responsible genes under various abiotic stress conditions, and this was consistent with the repressed genes EID1 and EIN3 observed in the commonly inhibited genes, they are the important components of ethylene signaling pathway of stress response [32].These results also suggested that both ABA-dependent and -independent pathways were induced under various stress. However, we only identified 2 transcription factors that were common to all of the 5 kinds of abiotic stress, while more than 30 transcription factors were common to ABA, drought, cold and alkalinity stress (Table S6), this suggested that there was possibly a TF network to regulate various stresses including drought, cold and alkalinity, and pathways for different stresses shared cross-talk at many steps. We did not find much TFs to salinity stress, this was likely due to cotton was more adaptable to salinity than other plants, so that the anti-salinity genes were always on in cotton and not so many TFs were necessary for salinity tolerance or adaption.

TF familyUp-Regulated Transcripts
ABA%Cold%Mannitol%NaCl%pH%
WRKY1519.01018.51717.5001919.6
NAC11.3001111.3112.522.1
MYB67.6611.188.2112.588.2
AP2-ERF67.61425.91818.6001616.5
C2H2 like Zinc finger56.31324.100112.51010.3
Auxin response factor 56.30033.1112.522.1
G-box33.823.722.1112.533.1
bHLH45.111.933.1225.033.1
bZIP56.30066.20044.1
TCP22.500000000
Other2734.2814.82929.9112.53030.9
Total791005410097100810097100
TF familyDown-Regulated Transcripts
ABA%Cold%Mannitol%NaCl%pH%
WRKY13.60016.250000
NAC27.113.4000014.3
MYB27.1413.816.250028.7
ERF621.40016.25330.0313.0
C2H2 like Zinc finger310.713.416.25330.0417.4
Auxin response factor 0000000014.3
G-box13.600000000
bZIP13.6310.316.25330.028.7
bHLH0026.9000000
TCP13.613.416.250000
Other1139.31758.61062.5110.01043.5
Total2810029100161001010023100

Table 2. Summary of differentially expressed transcription factors (TFs) under ABA, cold, drought, high-salinity and pH stress conditions.

Percentage refers to the ratio of transcripts of each TF family relative to total up-regulated or down-regulated TFs identified in the microarray data.
CSV
Download CSV

Conclusion

In this study, we identified 3242, 1231, 3179, 480, and 3378 genes induced by ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH stress, respectively. We further found out 64 or 62 common genes were induced or repressed by these five kinds of stresses simultaneously. Our results indicated that, comparative microarray analysis was a powerful tool for the identification of multiple stress-inducible genes. These results highlighted the existence of crosstalk among ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH stresses on plants. Most of the commonly changed genes were involved in signal transduction, stress response/defense and metabolism. WRKY family was implicated as a major type of TF involved in the response to ABA, cold, drought, salinity and pH stress of cotton. However, we noticed that the function of a number of these genes still remained unknown. The functional study on stress involved genes is demanded badly, not only for further understanding of the mechanisms underlying stress response and tolerance of plants, but also improving the stress adaption of crops such as cotton by genetic manipulation.

Based on our microarray results, we will further investigate the function of key genes involved in plant-stress interaction possibly by reverse genetic method. It is no doubt that the transciptome profiling should benefit the isolation of candidate genes, functional analysis, promoter sequences identification, molecular breeding and genetic manipulation of crops.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and stress treatments

An Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), C312 (Coker 312) was used in this study at Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IGDB, CAS). Healthy seeds of cotton were surfacely sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 minute, and soaked in 10% H2O2 for 2 hours, followed by washing thoroughly with sterile water, then kept in double distilled water overnight.

The sterilized seeds were germinated and grown on half strength MS solid medium (Murashige and Skoog medium) [92] for 4 days in a growth chamber of 25°C, 12h photoperiod (white fluorescent light at 500–600 μm m-2s-1). For abiotic stress treatment, the seeds were raised on the corresponding medium: for ABA treatment, seeds were kept in 1/2 MS+1μM ABA, pH 5.8 for ten days; for cold treatment, seeds were first kept on 1/2 MS, pH 5.8, and 25°C for 8 days, then exposed to 4°C for 2 days; for drought stress, seeds were treated with 200mM mannitol, pH 5.8, and 25°C for 10 days; for salinity stress, seeds were treated with 200mM NaCl, pH 5.8, and 25°C for 10 days; for alkalinity stress (high pH, hereinafter referred to “pH stress”), seeds were kept in 1/2 MS, pH 11, and 25°C for 10 days. The control and stressed plants were used for RNA extraction and the subsequent microarray experiment.

RNA isolation

The seedlings of 14-day after germination were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. A modified LiCl method [93] was used for RNA isolation. The total RNA was checked with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer followed by gel electrophoresis, while the intactness of RNA was verified by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer.

Microarray hybridization and data analysis

For the microarray experiment, RNA was pooled from the three biological replicates based on each abiotic treatment. Cleaned total RNAs from each of the six samples, including control, ABA, cold, Mannitol, NaCl as well as pH stress were sent to CapitalBio Corporation in Beijing for microarray hybridization and preliminary data analysis. Affymetrix GeneChip® Cotton Genome Array with 23, 977 probes on the chip were used for hybridization. The arrays of specimens were hybridized with Cy3 and Cy5 labeled probe pairs of ABA treated plants plus control, cold-treated plants plus control, mannitol-treated plants plus control, NaCl-treated plants plus control, and pH-treated plants plus control. To assess the reproducibility of the microarray analysis, we repeated the same experiment three times. Data analysis was performed using SAM&R software. Genes with Fold Change ≥ 2 and FDR (False Discovery Rate) (%) ≤ 5 were identified as differentially expressed genes [94,95]. The analysis of the quality and the reproducibility among the experiments were performed according to the Affymetrix Statistical Algorithms Description Document (2002) by Affymetrix. The microarray data were deposited at GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ with the accession number GSE50770.

qRT-PCR

Nine common differentially expressed genes were selected for real-time quantitative RT-PCR based on the microarray results. A cotton Actin 7 (GenBank ID: DQ402078.1) gene was used as a standard control in the qRT-PCR reactions. The specificity of all primers was checked via BLASTN searches (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). A two-step RT-PCR procedure was performed in all experiments. The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized in a 20 µL reaction solution containing 2μg total RNA samples of control plants, as well as abiotic stressed plants using PrimeScript® RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) Kit (TaKaRa, Japan, Catalog No. DRR047A). The real-time amplification reactions were performed using the iCycler iQ thermocycler (Bio-Rad) and the SuperReal PreMix (SYBR Green) Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, Catalog No. FP204) followed the manuals from the manufacturers. The relative value for expression level of each gene was calculated by the equation Y=2ΔCt (ΔCt is the differences of Ct between the control GhActin 7 products and the target gene products).

Accession

The microarray data of this report were deposited at GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ with the accession number GSE50770.

Supporting Information

Tables S1.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.s001

Cotton microarray annotation data. (XLSX)

Tables S2.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.s002

Cotton microarray GO analysis. (XLSX)

Tables S3.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.s003

Cotton microarray Venn diagram data. (XLSX)

Tables S4.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.s004

Commonly changed transcripts under different treatment. (XLSX)

Tables S5.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.s005

QRT-PCR primer information. (XLSX)

Tables S6.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080218.s006

Transcription factors under different treatment. (XLSX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WCY DQS YNZ. Performed the experiments: YNZ DQS MBR LLZ ZHM. Analyzed the data: YNZ DQS MBR LLZ WCY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZHM JL. Wrote the manuscript: YNZ DQS WCY.

References

  1. 1. Seki M, Kamei A, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (2003) Molecular responses to drought, salinity and frost: common and different paths for plant protection. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14: 194-199. doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00030-2. PubMed: 12732320.
  2. 2. Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53: 247-273. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329. PubMed: 12221975.
  3. 3. Ji H, Pardo JM, Batelli G, Van Oosten MJ, Bressan RA et al. (2013) The Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) pathway: established and emerging roles. Mol Plants 6: 275-286. doi:10.1093/mp/sst017. PubMed: 23355543.
  4. 4. Chinnusamy V, Ohta M, Kanrar S, Lee BH, Hong X et al. (2003) ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 17: 1043-1054. doi:10.1101/gad.1077503. PubMed: 12672693.
  5. 5. Miura K, Furumoto T (2013) Cold signaling and cold response in plants. Int J Mol Sci 14: 5312-5337. doi:10.3390/ijms14035312. PubMed: 23466881.
  6. 6. Patharkar OR, Cushman JC (2000) A stress-induced calcium-dependent protein kinase from Mesembryanthemum crystallinum phosphorylates a two-component pseudo-response regulator. Plant J 24: 679-691. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00912.x. PubMed: 11123806.
  7. 7. Nakagami H, Pitzschke A, Hirt H (2005) Emerging MAP kinase pathways in plant stress signalling. Trends Plant Sci 10: 339-346. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.05.009. PubMed: 15953753.
  8. 8. Munnik T, Meijer HJ (2001) Osmotic stress activates distinct lipid and MAPK signalling pathways in plants. FEBS Lett 498: 172-178. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02492-9. PubMed: 11412851.
  9. 9. Chinnusamy V, Schumaker K, Zhu JK (2004) Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. J Exp Bot 55: 225-236. PubMed: 14673035.
  10. 10. Huang GT, Ma SL, Bai LP, Zhang L, Ma H et al. (2012) Signal transduction during cold, salt, and drought stresses in plants. Mol Biol Rep 39: 969-987. doi:10.1007/s11033-011-0823-1. PubMed: 21573796.
  11. 11. Christmann A, Moes D, Himmelbach A, Yang Y, Tang Y et al. (2006) Integration of abscisic acid signalling into plant responses. Plant Biol Stuttg 8: 314-325. doi:10.1055/s-2006-924120. PubMed: 16807823.
  12. 12. Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H, Khan MA, Katsura K et al. (2003) Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol 133: 1755-1767. doi:10.1104/pp.103.025742. PubMed: 14645724.
  13. 13. Zhang Y, Yang C, Li Y, Zheng N, Chen H et al. (2007) SDIR1 is a RING finger E3 ligase that positively regulates stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 1912-1929. doi:10.1105/tpc.106.048488. PubMed: 17573536.
  14. 14. Xiong L, Schumaker KS, Zhu JK (2002) Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell 14 Suppl: S165-S183. doi:10.1105/tpc.010278. PubMed: 12045276.
  15. 15. Valliyodan B, Nguyen HT (2006) Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9: 189-195. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.019. PubMed: 16483835.
  16. 16. Harish SR, Murugan K (2011) Oxidative stress indices in natural populations of Avicennia alba Blume. as biomarker of environmental pollution. Environ Res 111: 1070-1073. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2011.07.002. PubMed: 21803350.
  17. 17. Romieu I, Castro-Giner F, Kunzli N, Sunyer J (2008) Air pollution, oxidative stress and dietary supplementation: a review. Eur Respir J 31: 179-197. doi:10.1183/09031936.00128106. PubMed: 18166596.
  18. 18. Ahuja I, de Vos RC, Bones AM, Hall RD (2010) Plant molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends Plant Sci 15: 664-674. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.002. PubMed: 20846898.
  19. 19. Kanneganti V, Gupta AK (2008) Overexpression of OsiSAP8, a member of stress associated protein (SAP) gene family of rice confers tolerance to salt, drought and cold stress in transgenic tobacco and rice. Plant Mol Biol 66: 445-462. doi:10.1007/s11103-007-9284-2. PubMed: 18205020.
  20. 20. Wang K, Wang Z, Li F, Ye W, Wang J et al. (2012) The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii. Nat Genet 44: 1098-1103. doi:10.1038/ng.2371. PubMed: 22922876.
  21. 21. Li DD, Ruan XM, Zhang J, Wu YJ, Wang XL et al. (2013) Cotton plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2s (PIP2s) selectively interact to regulate their water channel activities and are required for fibre development. New Phytol 199: 695-707. doi:10.1111/nph.12309. PubMed: 23656428.
  22. 22. Pang Y, Wang H, Song WQ, Zhu YX (2010) The cotton ATP synthase delta1 subunit is required to maintain a higher ATP/ADP ratio that facilitates rapid fibre cell elongation. Plant Biol Stuttg 12: 903-909. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00313.x. PubMed: 21040305.
  23. 23. Tan JF, Tu LL, Deng FL, Hu HY, Nie YC et al. (2013) A Genetic and Metabolic Analysis Revealed that Cotton Fiber Cell Development Was Retarded by Flavonoid Naringenin. Plant Physiol 162: 86-95. doi:10.1104/pp.112.212142. PubMed: 23535943.
  24. 24. Ruan YL (2013) Boosting Seed Development as a New Strategy to Increase Cotton Fiber Yield and Quality. J Integr Plant Biol, 55: 572–5. PubMed: 23718313.
  25. 25. Guo Y, Xiong L, Song CP, Gong D, Halfter U et al. (2002) A calcium sensor and its interacting protein kinase are global regulators of abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 3: 233-244. doi:10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00229-0. PubMed: 12194854.
  26. 26. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot 58: 221-227. PubMed: 17075077.
  27. 27. Mitchell C, Joyce AR, Piper JT, McKallip RJ, Fariss MW (2010) Role of oxidative stress and MAPK signaling in reference moist smokeless tobacco-induced HOK-16B cell death. Toxicol Lett 195: 23-30. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.02.020. PubMed: 20206247.
  28. 28. Chaudhary B, Hovav R, Flagel L, Mittler R, Wendel JF (2009) Parallel expression evolution of oxidative stress-related genes in fiber from wild and domesticated diploid and polyploid cotton (Gossypium). BMC Genomics 10: 378. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-378. PubMed: 19686594.
  29. 29. Christianson JA, Llewellyn DJ, Dennis ES, Wilson IW (2010) Global gene expression responses to waterlogging in roots and leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. p. L. ). Plant Cell Physiol 51: 21-37.
  30. 30. Rodriguez-Uribe L, Higbie SM, Stewart JM, Wilkins T, Lindemann W et al. (2011) Identification of salt responsive genes using comparative microarray analysis in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. p. L. ). Plant Sci 180: 461-469.
  31. 31. Yao D, Zhang X, Zhao X, Liu C, Wang C et al. (2011) Transcriptome analysis reveals salt-stress-regulated biological processes and key pathways in roots of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. p. L. ). Genomics 98: 47-55.
  32. 32. Park W, Scheffler BE, Bauer PJ, Campbell BT (2012) Genome-wide identification of differentially expressed genes under water deficit stress in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. p. L. ). BMC Plant Biol 12: 90.
  33. 33. Padmalatha KV, Dhandapani G, Kanakachari M, Kumar S, Dass A et al. (2012) Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of cotton under drought stress reveal significant down-regulation of genes and pathways involved in fibre elongation and up-regulation of defense responsive genes. Plant Mol Biol 78: 223-246. doi:10.1007/s11103-011-9857-y. PubMed: 22143977.
  34. 34. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, Nanjo T, Fujita M et al. (2002) Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 31: 279-292. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01359.x. PubMed: 12164808.
  35. 35. Jia J, Fu J, Zheng J, Zhou X, Huai J et al. (2006) Annotation and expression profile analysis of 2073 full-length cDNAs from stress-induced maize (Zea mays. p. L. ) seedlings. Plant J 48: 710-727.
  36. 36. Xin MM, Wang Y, Yao YY, Song N, Hu ZR et al. (2011) Identification and characterization of wheat long non-protein coding RNAs responsive to powdery mildew infection and heat stress by using microarray analysis and SBS sequencing. BMC Plant Biol 11: 61-. PubMed: 21473757.
  37. 37. Curtiss J, Rodriguez-Uribe L, Stewart JM, Zhang J (2011) Identification of differentially expressed genes associated with semigamy in Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) through comparative microarray analysis. BMC Plant Biol 11: 49. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-11-49. PubMed: 21410961.
  38. 38. Šamajová O, Plíhal O, Al-Yousif M, Hirt H, Samaj J (2013) Improvement of stress tolerance in plants by genetic manipulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Biotechnol Adv 31: 118-128. doi:10.1038/nbt.2513. PubMed: 22198202.
  39. 39. Franz S, Ehlert B, Liese A, Kurth J, Cazalé AC et al. (2011) Calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK21 functions in abiotic stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plants 4: 83-96. doi:10.1093/mp/ssq064. PubMed: 20978086.
  40. 40. Medina-Silva R, Barros MP, Galhardo RS, Netto LES, Colepicolo P et al. (2006) Heat stress promotes mitochondrial instability and oxidative responses in yeast deficient in thiazole biosynthesis. Res Microbiol 157: 275-281. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2005.07.004. PubMed: 16171982.
  41. 41. Kode A, Rajagopalan R, Penumathsa SV, Menon VP (2004) Influence of a thiazole derivative on ethanol and thermally oxidized sunflower oil-induced oxidative stress. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 18: 565-571. doi:10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00274.x. PubMed: 15482378.
  42. 42. Zeeman SC, Thorneycroft D, Schupp N, Chapple A, Weck M et al. (2004) Plastidial alpha-glucan phosphorylase is not required for starch degradation in Arabidopsis leaves but has a role in the tolerance of abiotic stress. Plant Physiol 135: 849-858. doi:10.1104/pp.103.032631. PubMed: 15173560.
  43. 43. Yano R, Nakamura M, Yoneyama T, Nishida I (2005) Starch-related alpha-glucan/water dikinase is involved in the cold-induced development of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138: 837-846. doi:10.1104/pp.104.056374. PubMed: 15894744.
  44. 44. Kawasaki T, Koita H, Nakatsubo T, Hasegawa K, Wakabayashi K et al. (2006) Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase, a key enzyme in lignin biosynthesis, is an effector of small GTPase Rac in defense signaling in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 230-235. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509875103. PubMed: 16380417.
  45. 45. Leung J, Merlot S, Giraudat J (1997) The Arabidopsis ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE2 (ABI2) and ABI1 genes encode homologous protein phosphatases 2C involved in abscisic acid signal transduction. Plant Cell 9: 759-771. doi:10.1105/tpc.9.5.759. PubMed: 9165752.
  46. 46. Sun HL, Wang XJ, Ding WH, Zhu SY, Zhao R et al. (2011) Identification of an important site for function of the type 2C protein phosphatase ABI2 in abscisic acid signalling in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 62: 5713-5725. doi:10.1093/jxb/err274. PubMed: 21885535.
  47. 47. Marrocco K, Zhou Y, Bury E, Dieterle M, Funk M et al. (2006) Functional analysis of EID1, an F-box protein involved in phytochrome A-dependent light signal transduction. Plant J 45: 423-438. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02635.x. PubMed: 16412087.
  48. 48. Dieterle M, Zhou YC, Schäfer E, Funk M, Kretsch T (2001) EID1, an F-box protein involved in phytochrome A-specific light signaling. Genes Dev 15: 939-944. doi:10.1101/gad.197201. PubMed: 11316788.
  49. 49. Guo H, Ecker JR (2003) Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCF(EBF1/EBF2)-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 115: 667-677. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00969-3. PubMed: 14675532.
  50. 50. Chao Q, Rothenberg M, Solano R, Roman G, Terzaghi W et al. (1997) Activation of the ethylene gas response pathway in Arabidopsis by the nuclear protein ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 and related proteins. Cell 89: 1133-1144. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80300-1. PubMed: 9215635.
  51. 51. Gagne JM, Smalle J, Gingerich DJ, Walker JM, Yoo SD et al. (2004) Arabidopsis EIN3-binding F-box 1 and 2 form ubiquitin-protein ligases that repress ethylene action and promote growth by directing EIN3 degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6803-6808. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401698101. PubMed: 15090654.
  52. 52. Antolín-Llovera M, Leivar P, Arró M, Ferrer A, Boronat A et al. (2011) Modulation of plant HMG-CoA reductase by protein phosphatase 2A: positive and negative control at a key node of metabolism. Plant Signal Behav 6: 1127-1131. doi:10.4161/psb.6.8.16363. PubMed: 21701259.
  53. 53. País SM, Téllez-Iñón MT, Capiati DA (2009) Serine/threonine protein phosphatases type 2A and their roles in stress signaling. Plant Signal Behav 4: 1013-1015. doi:10.4161/psb.4.11.9783. PubMed: 20009558.
  54. 54. Seto Y, Hamada S, Ito H, Masuta C, Matsui H et al. (2011) Tobacco salicylic acid glucosyltransferase is active toward tuberonic acid (12-hydroxyjasmonic acid) and is induced by mechanical wounding stress. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 75: 2316-2320. doi:10.1271/bbb.110454. PubMed: 22146717.
  55. 55. Liu JZ, Whitham SA (2013) Overexpression of a soybean nuclear localized type-III DnaJ domain-containing HSP40 reveals its roles in cell death and disease resistance. Plant J 74: 110-121. doi:10.1111/tpj.12108. PubMed: 23289813.
  56. 56. Lakhssassi N, Doblas VG, Rosado A, del Valle AE, Posé D et al. (2012) The Arabidopsis tetratricopeptide thioredoxin-like gene family is required for osmotic stress tolerance and male sporogenesis. Plant Physiol 158: 1252-1266. doi:10.1104/pp.111.188920. PubMed: 22232384.
  57. 57. Rosado A, Schapire AL, Bressan RA, Harfouche AL, Hasegawa PM et al. (2006) The Arabidopsis tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein TTL1 is required for osmotic stress responses and abscisic acid sensitivity. Plant Physiol 142: 1113-1126. doi:10.1104/pp.106.085191. PubMed: 16998088.
  58. 58. Lemaire K, Moura RF, Granvik M, Igoillo-Esteve M, Hohmeier HE et al. (2011) Ubiquitin fold modifier 1 (UFM1) and its target UFBP1 protect pancreatic beta cells from ER stress-induced apoptosis. PLOS ONE 6: e18517. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018517. PubMed: 21494687.
  59. 59. Mathioudakis MM, Veiga R, Ghita M, Tsikou D, Medina V et al. (2012) Pepino mosaic virus capsid protein interacts with a tomato heat shock protein cognate 70. Virus Res 163: 28-39. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2011.08.007. PubMed: 21884738.
  60. 60. Van Ooijen G, Lukasik E, Van Den Burg HA, Vossen JH, Cornelissen BJ et al. (2010) The small heat shock protein 20 RSI2 interacts with and is required for stability and function of tomato resistance protein I-2. Plant J 63: 563-572. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04260.x. PubMed: 20497382.
  61. 61. Suzuki K, Nakanishi H, Bower J, Yoder DW, Osteryoung KW et al. (2009) Plastid chaperonin proteins Cpn60 alpha and Cpn60 beta are required for plastid division in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 9: 38. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-9-38. PubMed: 19344532.
  62. 62. Rosado A, Raikhel NV (2010) Application of the gene dosage balance hypothesis to auxin-related ribosomal mutants in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav 5: 450-452. doi:10.4161/psb.5.4.11341. PubMed: 20383066.
  63. 63. Rosado A, Sohn EJ, Drakakaki G, Pan S, Swidergal A et al. (2010) Auxin-mediated ribosomal biogenesis regulates vacuolar trafficking in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22: 143-158. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.068320. PubMed: 20061553.
  64. 64. Shi Y, Wang Z, Meng P, Tian S, Zhang X et al. (2013) The glutamate carboxypeptidase AMP1 mediates abscisic acid and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 199: 135-150. doi:10.1111/nph.12275. PubMed: 23621575.
  65. 65. Shi H, Ye T, Wang Y, Chan Z (2013) Arabidopsis ALTERED MERISTEM PROGRAM 1 negatively modulates plant responses to abscisic acid and dehydration stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 67C: 209-216. PubMed: 23603279.
  66. 66. Sondheimer N, Fang JK, Polyak E, Falk MJ, Avadhani NG (2010) Leucine-rich pentatricopeptide-repeat containing protein regulates mitochondrial transcription. Biochemistry 49: 7467-7473. doi:10.1021/bi1008479. PubMed: 20677761.
  67. 67. Bari R, Jones JD (2009) Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol 69: 473-488. doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0. PubMed: 19083153.
  68. 68. Dill A, Jung HS, Sun TP (2001) The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 14162-14167. doi:10.1073/pnas.251534098. PubMed: 11717468.
  69. 69. Schneider K, Kienow L, Schmelzer E, Colby T, Bartsch M et al. (2005) A new type of peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A synthetase from Arabidopsis thaliana has the catalytic capacity to activate biosynthetic precursors of jasmonic acid. J Biol Chem 280: 13962-13972. doi:10.1074/jbc.M413578200. PubMed: 15677481.
  70. 70. Tani T, Sobajima H, Okada K, Chujo T, Arimura S et al. (2008) Identification of the OsOPR7 gene encoding 12-oxophytodienoate reductase involved in the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid in rice. Planta 227: 517-526. doi:10.1007/s00425-007-0635-7. PubMed: 17938955.
  71. 71. Jensen MK, Kjaersgaard T, Nielsen MM, Galberg P, Petersen K et al. (2010) The Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factor family: structure-function relationships and determinants of ANAC019 stress signalling. Biochem J 426: 183-196. doi:10.1042/BJ20091234. PubMed: 19995345.
  72. 72. Liu H, Wang X, Zhang H, Yang Y, Ge X et al. (2008) A rice serine carboxypeptidase-like gene OsBISCPL1 is involved in regulation of defense responses against biotic and oxidative stress. Gene 420: 57-65. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2008.05.006. PubMed: 18571878.
  73. 73. Sabatini S, Heidstra R, Wildwater M, Scheres B (2003) SCARECROW is involved in positioning the stem cell niche in the Arabidopsis root meristem. Genes Dev 17: 354-358. doi:10.1101/gad.252503. PubMed: 12569126.
  74. 74. You MK, Shin HY, Kim YJ, Ok SH, Cho SK et al. (2010) Novel bifunctional nucleases, OmBBD and AtBBD1, are involved in abscisic acid-mediated callose deposition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 152: 1015-1029. doi:10.1104/pp.109.147645. PubMed: 20018603.
  75. 75. Tunc-Ozdemir M, Miller G, Song L, Kim J, Sodek A et al. (2009) Thiamin confers enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 151: 421-432. doi:10.1104/pp.109.140046. PubMed: 19641031.
  76. 76. Rapala-Kozik M, Wolak N, Kujda M, Banas AK (2012) The upregulation of thiamine (vitamin B1) biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings under salt and osmotic stress conditions is mediated by abscisic acid at the early stages of this stress response. BMC Plant Biol 12: 2. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-2. PubMed: 22214485.
  77. 77. Munshi MK, Kobayashi Y, Shikanai T (2006) Chlororespiratory reduction 6 is a novel factor required for accumulation of the chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase complex in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 141: 737-744. doi:10.1104/pp.106.080267. PubMed: 16648216.
  78. 78. Tonelli F, Alossaimi M, Williamson L, Tate RJ, Watson DG et al. (2013) The sphingosine kinase inhibitor 2-(p-hyroxyanilino)-4-(p-chlorophenyl)thiazole reduces androgen receptor expression via an oxidative stress-dependent mechanism. Br J Pharmacol 168: 1497-1505. doi:10.1111/bph.12035. PubMed: 23113536.
  79. 79. Cheng H, Li L, Xu F, Cheng S, Cao F et al. (2013) Expression patterns of a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase gene involved in lignin biosynthesis and environmental stress in Ginkgo biloba. Mol Biol Rep 40: 707-721. doi:10.1007/s11033-012-2111-0. PubMed: 23143181.
  80. 80. Samaniego R, Jeong SY, Meier I, de la Espina SM (2006) Dual location of MAR-binding, filament-like protein 1 in Arabidopsis, tobacco, and tomato. Planta 223: 1201-1206. doi:10.1007/s00425-005-0168-x. PubMed: 16331467.
  81. 81. Kötting O, Santelia D, Edner C, Eicke S, Marthaler T et al. (2009) STARCH-EXCESS4 is a laforin-like Phosphoglucan phosphatase required for starch degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21: 334-346. doi:10.1105/tpc.108.064360. PubMed: 19141707.
  82. 82. Goujon T, Minic Z, El Amrani A, Lerouxel O, Aletti E et al. (2003) AtBXL1, a novel higher plant (Arabidopsis thaliana) putative beta-xylosidase gene, is involved in secondary cell wall metabolism and plant development. Plant J 33: 677-690. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01654.x. PubMed: 12609041.
  83. 83. Ozler A, Karakus E, Pekyardimci S (2008) Purification and biochemical characteristics of pectinesterase from Malatya apricot (Prunus armeniaca. p. L. ). Prep Biochem Biotechnol 38: 358-375.
  84. 84. Costaglioli P, Joubès J, Garcia C, Stef M, Arveiler B et al. (2005) Profiling candidate genes involved in wax biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana by microarray analysis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1734: 247-258. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2005.04.002. PubMed: 15914083.
  85. 85. Kotaka A, Bando H, Kaya M, Kato-Murai M, Kuroda K et al. (2008) Direct ethanol production from barley beta-glucan by sake yeast displaying Aspergillus oryzae beta-glucosidase and endoglucanase. J Biosci Bioeng 105: 622-627. doi:10.1263/jbb.105.622. PubMed: 18640601.
  86. 86. Sancenón V, Puig S, Mira H, Thiele DJ, Peñarrubia L (2003) Identification of a copper transporter family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 51: 577-587. doi:10.1023/A:1022345507112. PubMed: 12650623.
  87. 87. Wang YY, Hsu PK, Tsay YF (2012) Uptake, allocation and signaling of nitrate. Trends Plant Sci 17: 458-467. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.006. PubMed: 22658680.
  88. 88. Sreenivasulu N, Sopory SK, Kavi Kishor PB (2007) Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by genomic approaches. Gene 388: 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.10.009. PubMed: 17134853.
  89. 89. Gao SQ, Chen M, Xia LQ, Xiu HJ, Xu ZS et al. (2009) A cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) DRE-binding transcription factor gene, GhDREB, confers enhanced tolerance to drought, high salt, and freezing stresses in transgenic wheat. Plant Cell Rep 28: 301-311. doi:10.1007/s00299-008-0623-9. PubMed: 19005655.
  90. 90. Jin LG, Li H, Liu JY (2010) Molecular Characterization of Three Ethylene Responsive Element Binding Factor Genes from Cotton. J Integr Plant Biol 52: 485-495. PubMed: 20537044.
  91. 91. Meng XP, Li FG, Liu CL, Zhang CJ, Wu ZX et al. (2010) Isolation and Characterization of an ERF Transcription Factor Gene from Cotton (Gossypium barbadense. p. L. ). Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 28: 176-183.
  92. 92. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473-497. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.
  93. 93. Wan CY, Wilkins TA (1994) A modified hot borate method significantly enhances the yield of high-quality RNA from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum. p. L. ). Anal Biochem 223: 7-12.
  94. 94. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 5116-5121. doi:10.1073/pnas.091062498. PubMed: 11309499.
  95. 95. Shi YH, Zhu SW, Mao XZ, Feng JX, Qin YM et al. (2006) Transcriptome profiling, molecular biological, and physiological studies reveal a major role for ethylene in cotton fiber cell elongation. Plant Cell 18: 651-664. doi:10.1105/tpc.105.040303. PubMed: 16461577.