Advertisement

Dynamics of Regulatory Networks in Gastrin-Treated Adenocarcinoma Cells

Dynamics of Regulatory Networks in Gastrin-Treated Adenocarcinoma Cells

  • Naresh Doni Jayavelu, 
  • Nadav Bar
PLOS
x
  • Published: January 8, 2014
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078349

Abstract

Understanding gene transcription regulatory networks is critical to deciphering the molecular mechanisms of different cellular states. Most studies focus on static transcriptional networks. In the current study, we used the gastrin-regulated system as a model to understand the dynamics of transcriptional networks composed of transcription factors (TFs) and target genes (TGs). The hormone gastrin activates and stimulates signaling pathways leading to various cellular states through transcriptional programs. Dysregulation of gastrin can result in cancerous tumors, for example. However, the regulatory networks involving gastrin are highly complex, and the roles of most of the components of these networks are unknown. We used time series microarray data of AR42J adenocarcinoma cells treated with gastrin combined with static TF-TG relationships integrated from different sources, and we reconstructed the dynamic activities of TFs using network component analysis (NCA). Based on the peak expression of TGs and activity of TFs, we created active sub-networks at four time ranges after gastrin treatment, namely immediate-early (IE), mid-early (ME), mid-late (ML) and very late (VL). Network analysis revealed that the active sub-networks were topologically different at the early and late time ranges. Gene ontology analysis unveiled that each active sub-network was highly enriched in a particular biological process. Interestingly, network motif patterns were also distinct between the sub-networks. This analysis can be applied to other time series microarray datasets, focusing on smaller sub-networks that are activated in a cascade, allowing better overview of the mechanisms involved at each time range.

Introduction

Understanding gene transcription regulatory networks is critical to deciphering the molecular mechanisms resulting in different cellular states in response to growth factors [1], [2]. Gastrin is a peptide hormone that is mainly produced by G-cells in the stomach in response to a meal. It plays a key role in the physiological regulation of gastric acid secretion [3]. Gastrin binds to the cholecystokinin receptor-2 (CCKR-2), forming an active complex that initiates a signaling cascade [4]. The transduced signal results in different cellular processes such as growth, differentiation, proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and apoptosis [5][7]. Recent studies have revealed that gastrin can act as a co-risk factor for gastric carcinogenesis and atrophy in Helicobacter pylori infection [8], [9]. Dysregulation of gastrin can result in cancerous tumors, for example [10]. These cellular states are achieved through complex gene transcription regulation programs.

Gene regulatory networks are highly complex and dynamic, especially the coordinated regulation between transcription factors (TFs) and their target genes (TGs) [11][13]. At present, reconstructing these dynamic networks is a challenging task because only static TF-TG interaction data are available. In the gene regulation process, an active TF binds to the promoter region of a TG and initiates the process of transcription. The majority of transcription factors are not inherently active but become activated through complex mechanisms such as forming homo- or heterodimers, interacting with other signaling proteins and co-factors or binding to a specific microRNAs. The activity of a TF is dependent on the specific environment, cell type, and system dynamics. Thus, only specific TFs are active and regulate a set of TGs in a specific condition, resulting in a specific biological outcome in response to external stimuli. The group of active TFs and their regulated TGs are called active sub-networks or regulatory modules. For example, a regulatory module consisting of the TFs EGR4, FRA-1, FHL2 and DIPA promotes proliferation in breast cancer cells in response to epidermal growth factor (EGF) [2].

Understanding cellular functionality by studying its key components, interactions and network topological measures is a common approach in systems biology [14][17]. However, most of these studies are confined to static networks. Adding dynamic features to these studies may lead to new insights. Different active sub-networks have varying topological measures that characterize their biological functions. Thus, studying the active sub-networks in regulatory networks that respond to external signals may help to determine the cell fate.

It is well known that transcription networks often contain a small set of recurring regulatory patterns called network motifs. These small networks are frequently found in quantities that are significantly larger than would be expected for random networks [18]. These are the basic building blocks of any gene regulatory network and are found in the transcriptional networks of diverse organisms [19]. In the regulatory networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli, a 3-node motif called a feed forward-loop and a four-node motif called a bi-fan are the most common [18]. These network motifs are unique for each active sub-network. Finding these motifs in active sub-networks can enhance our understanding of the design principles of complex regulatory networks.

In the current study, we combined time series gene expression data and static TF-TG interaction data to study the dynamic features of gastrin-regulated transcriptional networks. We reconstructed the dynamic activities of key TFs using network component analysis (NCA) [20], [21]. Our study identified four active sub-networks at four time ranges, namely immediate-early (IE), mid-early (ME), mid-late (ML) and very late (VL). These sub-networks showed variations in their network topological measures and network motif usage. In addition, gene ontology analysis of the TGs in each active sub-network demonstrated that each network is highly enriched with specific biological processes. Overall, our study provides a framework for studying dynamic transcription networks and obtaining new biological insights on the manner networks at specific time ranges as a response to external stimuli.

Materials and Methods

Data preprocessing

The gene expression data used in this study were obtained by measuring the response of AR42J adenocarcinoma cells treated with gastrin hormone at 11 time points over a period of 14 hours. We downloaded the data from GEO database (Array Express accession number: GSE32869) [22]. We applied loess normalization within time points and quantile normalization across time points [23]. The expression values were averaged over two replicate measurements. We conducted t-tests to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The DEGs with p-value<0.05 at more than two time points were selected for further analysis [23]. This analysis resulted in 4105 DEGs. To reduce the noise and to smooth the data, we used Fourier transform functions to fit the time-series data. All the computations were performed using bioinformatics toolbox in MATLAB.

Static regulatory network construction

We collected the experimentally verified TF-TG regulations from TFacts [24], a database containing experimentally validated regulations between 2720 TGs and 330 TFs. This database includes information integrated from different resources as TRED, TRDD, PAZAR NFIregulomeDB and their own experimental predictions. In addition we retrieved TF-TG interactions based on Chip-X experiments from Transcriptome Browser [25]. This list includes interactions between 312 TFs and 13133 TGs. Furthermore, we collected protein-protein interactions between TFs from BIOGRID [26] and HPRD [27] data bases. We integrated all the data to construct a static regulatory network of 449 TFs, 13398 TGs and 164077 unique interactions among them.

Active sub-networks for four time ranges were excerpted from static network by incorporating gene expression data and predicted TF activities from NCA. For each time range, active TFs and TGs (which displays higher expression/activity than a threshold) were identified and combined it with static network to define an active sub-network.

Network component analysis (NCA)

Network component analysis (NCA) is a computational method for reconstructing hidden regulatory signals (TFs activity) from gene expression data with known connectivity information in terms of matrix decomposition [20], [28]. The NCA method can be represented in matrix form as follows:(1)where the matrix [E] represents the expression values of genes at various time points, the matrix [C] is the control strength of each TF on a target gene (TG), and the matrix [T] represents the activities of all of the TFs. The dimensions of [E], [C] and [T] are N X M (N is the number of targets, and M is the number of time points or measurement conditions), N X L (L is the number of TFs) and L X M, respectively.

Based on above formulation, the decomposition of [E] into [C] and [T] can be achieved by minimizing the following objective function:(2)where Z0 is the initial connectivity pattern. [C] and [T] are estimated using a two-step least-squares algorithm and are normalized through a nonsingular matrix [S] according to(3)

To guarantee the uniqueness of the solution for equation (3) up to a scaling factor, certain criteria, termed NCA criteria, must be satisfied:

  • The connectivity matrix [C] must have full-column rank
  • When a node in the regulatory layer is removed along with all of the output nodes connected to it, the resulting network must be characterized by a connectivity matrix that still has full-column rank
  • The [T] matrix must have full row rank

Using NCA as the reconstruction method, we predicted significant TFs and their temporal activity profiles.

Network topological metrics

The degree of a node n, k(n), is the number of edges connected to it. The in-degree and out-degree of a node n is the number of edges with n as their terminal and initial nodes, respectively. The clustering coefficient, Cn of a node n with k neighbors is the ratio of the actual number of edges En between the neighbors to all the possible edges.(4)

In the case of directed networks,(5)

The betweenness centrality Cb(n) of a node n is defined as follows.

In the case of directed networks,(6)where s and t are nodes in a network different from n, σst denotes the number of shortest paths from s to t, and σst(n) is the number of shortest paths from s to t that n presents in between. The closeness centrality Cc(n) of a node n is defined as the reciprocal of the average shortest path length.(7)where L(n,m) is the length of the shortest path between two nodes n and m. The mean values of all the topological metrics of all nodes in a network was computed to create a global view of the network. All computations are performed using the Cytoscape software tool [29].

Network motif detection

Network motifs are small networks that are present in large complex networks at higher frequencies than in random networks. To understand the regulation patterns, we used the FANMOD tool [30], [31] to find 3- and 4-node sized network motifs. Significant motifs were identified based on a statistical measure, the Z-score. The Z-score of a network motif is defined as the difference between the frequencies in the original and random networks divided by the standard deviation.

Gene ontology analysis

Gene ontology (GO) analysis aims to capture increasing knowledge of gene functions in a collective manner. We used the ClueGO tool [32] to find the highly enriched biological processes in active sub-networks. To calculate the enrichment values, we used a two-sided (enrichment/depletion) hypergeometric test, and p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method. ClueGO employs a new kappa static measure (ranging from 0 to 1) to link the terms or groups in the network. We chose a kappa score of 0.3. The size of the node in the network reflects the enrichment of the terms.

Results and Discussion

The workflow of our data pre-processing and subsequent analysis is presented in Figure 1. For this study, we used gene expression time series data of AR42J adenocarcinoma cells in response to gastrin measured at 11 time points over a period of 14 hours. The expression data provides the basis for our analysis of transcriptional regulatory network dynamics.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Schematic of the approach.

The schematic of our approach for constructing the active sub-networks at different time ranges from gene expression data.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.g001

Dynamics of gene expression and transcription factor activity

The changes in the expression of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) over the 14-hour period after gastrin stimulation are shown in Figure 2A. The gene expression data are clustered in a way such that we can observe both sequential and combinatorial regulation patterns. This expression pattern clearly displayed early-, mid-, and late-phase responses to gastrin stimulation. In addition, this expression pattern characterizes a typical stimuli response. The majority of the genes showed impulse response (exhibiting peak expression only at one time point), one of the typical response patterns in time series data [33].

thumbnail
Figure 2. Dynamics of transcriptional regulation.

(A) TG expression profiles. (B) Reconstructed TF activity profiles. Clustering was performed in such a way that both sequential and co-regulation was observed. Here, each row represents either a TG or TF, and each column represents a progression in time (in hours). Activations and repressions are represented by red and blue colors, respectively.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.g002

We used network component analysis (NCA) [20] to reconstruct the dynamic activities of TFs from gene expression data and a known TF-TG topology (see Methods section). The computed TF activities were also clustered in a pattern similar to that of the gene expression shown in Figure 2B. This model included a number of TFs, such as ATF2, CREB1, ELK1, EGR1, FOXO1, and SP1, which are known to be regulated by the gastrin-cholecystokinin receptor-2 (CCKR-2) signaling pathway [34][39].

To understand gastrin regulation in adenocarcinoma cells in terms of quantitative measurements, we computed the number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and TFs (computed from NCA) activated at each time point (Figure 3). It appears that during the initial time points, TGs expressions were activated by gastrin intracellular signaling which in turn activated a large number of TFs at later time points (1.5 hours after gastrin stimulation). The largest effects of gastrin on the transcriptome were found at 1 and 2 hours for TGs and 1.5 and 6 hours for TFs. At 2 hours, ~13% of TGs were differentially expressed and, interestingly, ~12.5% of TFs were active at the same time. Surprisingly, none of the TFs were showed peak activity at 12 hours, and only TGs were also only 1% showed peak expression.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Differential regulation.

The number of active TGs and TFs at each time point is presented. Active TGs and TFs were defined at each time point based on peak expression or activity at that time point.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.g003

Active sub-networks

To study the dynamic features of regulatory networks, a static integrated regulatory network was constructed by combining various data resources including Chip-X studies, experiments and predicted data bases. The regulatory TF-TG relationships were extracted from the Transcriptome Browser [25] and TFacts [24]. The interactions between TFs were retrieved from the BIOGRID and HPRD databases [26], [27]. The combined integrated network contained 449 TFs, 13398 TGs and 164077 unique interactions among them (see File S1).

The active sub-networks were built based on differential expression of TGs and peak TF activity during a specific time range. We defined four active sub-networks, namely immediate-early (IE), mid-early (ML), mid-late (ML) and very late (VL), as shown in Figure 1. First, we identified active TGs and TFs (showing expression or activity higher than a specified threshold) at each time point. We retrieved interactions between active TGs and TFs from a static regulatory network (see File S2).

We then examined the structural and modular architecture of the four constructed active sub-networks. This analysis clearly distinguished each active sub-network from the others. The size and topological metrics of the static regulatory network and the four active sub-networks are presented in Table 1. The size of the VL active sub-network was significantly smaller than the others. The clustering coefficient (CC), which defines the interconnectivity of nodes in the network, was higher in the ML and VL sub-networks. This indicates that the ML and VL active sub-networks were less organized in terms of modular structures than the IE and ME networks. The values for the average path length (APL) and betweenness centrality (BC) were greater in the ME and VL active sub-networks respectively than compared to the other sub-networks. The higher BC in the VL network and APL in the ME sub-networks suggests that they are controlled by a number of central nodes. Closeness centrality was higher in the ME and VL networks than IE and ML sub-networks. This suggests that ME and VL networks have more nodes with shortest paths to other nodes.

thumbnail
Table 1. Topological properties of networks.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.t001

To corroborate the significance of these topological divergences, we performed the same computations on a set of random networks created from a static network with the same number of nodes as the actual active sub-networks. We generated 100 random networks, and the structural properties were averaged over these 100 networks. The mean and standard deviations are provided in the last row of Table 1. All the structural properties of actual sub-networks were significantly different from those of random networks except for network diameter, indicating that the computed network properties are indeed biologically significant. We performed all these computations using the Cytoscape software tool [29].

Network motifs

Transcriptional regulatory networks are made up of small recurring patterns called network motifs. To understand the dynamic functional characteristics of the gastrin network, we performed a network motif analysis for each active sub-network. We identified network motifs with 3-, 4- and 5-nodes in four active sub-networks using the FANMOD tool [30], [31]. The statistical significance of a network motif is computed by comparing occurrences of the motif in an active sub-network and in random networks. The Z-score of a motif is determined as the difference between its occurrence in an active sub-network and in hundreds of random networks with a normalized standard deviation.

The significantly enriched network motifs and their Z-scores in the four active sub-networks are presented in Figures 4 and 5, respectively (see Files S3 to S10 for complete results). We found four variants of 3-node motifs that were overrepresented in the four active sub-networks. Cliques (three TFs regulating each other, type ‘a’), cross-regulating TFs co-targeting a TG (type ‘b’), SIMs (single input motifs, type ‘c’), and FFLs (feed forward loops, type ‘d’) are the various types of significantly enriched 3-node motifs. Cliques were most frequently used motif pattern in all active sub-networks, suggesting that formations of three interacting TFs regulatory complexes are involved during the whole response. Network motif types ‘b’ and ‘c’ were significantly missing in the IE network, suggesting that they are not main cause for the early activation of large number of TGs. Cliques and cross-regulating TFs co-targeting a TG (type ‘b’) were previously found in the integrated regulatory networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [40]. FFLs are well-known regulatory patterns in transcriptional networks [14], [15], [19], [41]. Six variants of 4-node motifs appeared more frequently than others. Interestingly, cliques of four TFs were not found in the VL active sub-network. Two variants of bi-fan motifs (types ‘c’ and ‘d’) were found. Bi-fan motifs type ‘c’ and ‘d’ were enriched in the VL network and ME sub-networks, respectively. Bi-fan motifs are well-known regulation patterns in gene regulatory networks [18], [40], [42]. Another commonly identified network motif was SIM (single input motif, type ‘e’), which was detected more prominently in all the sub-networks except in the IE sub-network. SIMs play a key role in large-scale gene activation [15], [19], [43].

thumbnail
Figure 4. Network motifs.

The key network motifs of 3-, 4-, and 5-component nodes detected in four active sub-networks are presented. Red nodes represent TGs and green nodes represent TFs. The network motif search was performed using the FANMOD tool. The motifs with p-value<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.g004

thumbnail
Figure 5. Differential usage of motifs.

The computed Z-scores for selected network motifs across the four active sub-networks were shown. Each active sub-network is enriched in specific network motifs. The labels ‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’, ‘d’, and ‘e’ represent the respective network motifs in Figure 4. The network motif search was performed using the FANMOD tool. The motifs with p-value<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.g005

Five types of 5-node motifs were enriched in the constructed networks. MIMs (multi input motifs, types ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘c’) were the most common regulatory pattern among 5-node motifs. Of these, type ‘b’ was significantly enriched in the VL sub-network and type ‘c’ in the ML network. MIMs are also known to regulate large-scale gene activation [15], [43]. It is possible that these motifs are also responsible to turn off expression of large number of genes, since here they mostly appear at late time ranges. Additionally, the IE and ME active sub-networks were uniquely enriched with types ‘e’ and ‘d’, respectively, and these network motifs were not found in other sub-networks. This may suggest that large TF regulatory complexes are responsible for large scale gene expression and as an immediate response to stimuli. The current literature on 5-node motifs is very limited [44]. Thus, network motif analysis disclosed basic regulatory patterns in the four active sub-networks, and each sub-network was enriched with different network motifs. Although the findings show differential usage of motifs by each active sub-network, these results should be confirmed experimentally.

Functional annotation of differentially expressed genes

To identify which and how various biological processes are affected by differentially expressed TGs in each active sub-network, we conducted functional annotations in ClueGO tool in Cytoscape [32]. All statistically significant functional terms in the interacting network for the four active sub-networks are presented in Figures 6 and 7. Interestingly, several unique terms for each active sub-network and few common terms among all sub-networks were found.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Functional enrichment analysis.

Network representations of enriched terms among active genes in the respective sub-networks. Enriched terms are represented as nodes based on their kappa score (≥0.3). The node size indicates the significance of the enrichment. (A) IE active sub-network. (B) ME active sub-network.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.g006

thumbnail
Figure 7. Functional enrichment analysis.

Network representations of enriched terms among active genes in the respective sub-networks. Enriched terms are represented as nodes based on their kappa score (≥0.3). The node size indicates the significance of the terms enrichment. (A) ML active sub-network. (B) VL active sub-network.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.g007

The IE active sub-network is highly enriched in functions involved in cellular differentiation. Many previous studies have confirmed the role of gastrin in differentiation processes [45][47]. Koh et al. demonstrated that gastrin deficiency in mouse models altered the differentiation of gastric mucosa [46]. Additionally, Wang et al. showed gastrin-induced differentiation of rat intestinal epithelial cells in correlation to the up regulation of villin expression [47]. The other significant categories are regulation of several signal transduction pathways as ErbB signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, Ras protein signal transduction and cell fate determination, cell fate commitment. Several studies have shown that stimulation of gastrin-CCK2R resulted in the activation of various signal transduction pathways including MAP kinases [48][52]. Gastrin induced the proliferation of AR42J cells by activating MAPKs and the c-fos gene [53].

The ME active sub-network is enriched in a large number of significant categories involving several metabolic and several types of cancer associated pathways. This sub-network is enriched in energy-related metabolic processes such as carbohydrate, polysaccharide, lipid, organic acid, cellular aromatic compound metabolic processes and generation precursor metabolites and energy processes. This network is overrepresented by cancer pathways such as small cell lung cancer, thyroid cancer, prostate cancer, endometrial cancer and chronic myeloid leukemia. In addition, this network is enriched with response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, cellular response to stimulus, B cell activation and hemostasis. One of the recent studies confirms the involvement of gastrin in regulating the genes resulting in ER stress [54].

The ML network is highly enriched in biological processes related to morphogenesis such as the cell morphogenesis, morphogenesis of an epithelium, embryonic epithelial tube formation, heart morphogenesis. In addition, this network is enriched with regulation of cell migration and cell growth, angiogenesis and activation of Wnt and calcium signaling pathways. Previous studies of gastrin-CCK2R (cholecystokinin-2 receptor) signaling have confirmed some of the processes predicted in this study. Gastrin-CCK2R involvement in the morphogenesis of epithelium cells was found in previous studies. Pagliocca et al. found that stimulation with gastrin promotes branching morphogenesis (process of tubule formation) in gastric AGS cells through the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) [55]. Previous studies have shown the involvement of gastrin in angiogenesis of various types of cells [56], [57]. Lefranc et al. investigated the role of gastrin on angiogenesis in gliomas both in vitro and in vivo. This study concluded that gastrin has marked proangiogenic effects in human glioblastomas and endothelial cells [56].

The VL sub-network is mainly involved in metabolic processes such as DNA metabolic process, phosphorous metabolic process, cell communication, apoptosis and tube morphogenesis. Gastrin has induced apoptosis in many cells in previous studies [52], [58]. Muerkoster et al. performed an in vivo study to determine the role of gastrin in colon carcinogenesis and found that gastrin was able to induce apoptosis in human colon cancer cells through the wild-type CCK2 receptor, thereby suppressing the growth of colon cells [58].

Thus, our functional annotation of genes in four active sub-networks revealed several known and new functions of gastrin. In addition, this analysis contributed to identifying the gastrin response from a dynamic perspective.

Conclusion

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the time series gene expression data generated by external stimuli to understand the transcriptional regulatory network from a dynamic perspective. To achieve this goal, we integrated information from a static TF-TG network with gene expression data to identify key TFs temporal dynamics. The gene expression and TF activities showed early-, mid-, and late-phase action in response to gastrin. This indicates that gastrin regulates genes over a period of 14 hours, although the majority of the genes were active at 1 and 2 hours and TFs were active 1.5 and 6 hours after gastrin treatment.

To more comprehensively understand the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation, we built four active sub-networks at four different time ranges. The active sub-networks defined in this study showed structural differences in their network organization. The ME and VL sub-networks were more strongly interconnected than the others. In addition, we identified key regulatory patterns, called network motifs, in all sub-networks. This analysis showed that distinct network motifs were significantly enriched in each active sub-network. The GO ontology and pathway analysis of active TGs and TFs in each active sub-network revealed interesting facts. Each active sub-network was enriched in unique GO terms/pathways. This shows that gastrin triggers different cellular states through diverse and complex transcription regulation patterns depending on the time of activation. We demonstrated that analyzing time series microarray data through partitioning to smaller temporal sub-networks reveals network properties that are unique for each time range, yet may otherwise be hidden when the whole time range is combined.

The development of high-throughput technologies such as microarrays results in large amounts of biological data and demands the rapid development of computational methods and strategies to analyze the data and thus extract biological knowledge. Our current study provides one such strategy for using these data and integrating known biological information to decipher the mechanisms of signaling and transcriptional programs of the biological system.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Integrated static network. The integrated static network from different sources used in the analysis of this study is provided as a Cytoscape network file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s001

(ZIP)

File S2.

Active sub-networks. The four active sub-networks extracted at different time ranges in gastrin signaling are provided as a Cytoscape network file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s002

(ZIP)

File S3.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 3-node network motif analysis for the IE active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s003

(OUT)

File S4.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 3-node network motif analysis for the ME active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s004

(OUT)

File S5.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 3-node network motif analysis for the ML active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s005

(OUT)

File S6.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 3-node network motif analysis for the VL active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s006

(OUT)

File S7.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 4-node network motif analysis for the IE active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s007

(OUT)

File S8.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 4-node network motif analysis for the ME active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s008

(OUT)

File S9.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 4-node network motif analysis for the ML active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s009

(OUT)

File S10.

Network motif analysis. The complete results of the 4-node network motif analysis for the VL active sub-network are provided as text file.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078349.s010

(OUT)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NDJ. Performed the experiments: NDJ. Analyzed the data: NDJ NB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NDJ NB. Wrote the paper: NDJ NB.

References

  1. 1. Nagashima T, Shimodaira H, Ide K, Nakakuki T, Tani Y, et al. (2007) Quantitative transcriptional control of ErbB receptor signaling undergoes graded to biphasic response for cell differentiation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282: 4045–4056. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m608653200
  2. 2. Saeki Y, Endo T, Ide K, Nagashima T, Yumoto N, et al. (2009) Ligand-specific sequential regulation of transcription factors for differentiation of MCF-7 cells. BMC Genomics 10: 1–16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-545
  3. 3. Rehfeld JF (1998) The New Biology of Gastrointestinal Hormones. Physiological Reviews 78: 1087–1108.
  4. 4. Noble F, Wank SA, Crawley JN, Bradwejn J, Seroogy KB, et al. (1999) International Union of Pharmacology. XXI. Structure, Distribution, and Functions of Cholecystokinin Receptors. Pharmacological Reviews 51: 745–781.
  5. 5. Jain RN, Brunkan CS, Chew CS, Samuelson LC (2006) Gene expression profiling of gastrin target genes in parietal cells. Physiol Genomics 24: 124–132. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00133.2005
  6. 6. Dufresne M, Seva C, Fourmy D (2006) Cholecystokinin and Gastrin Receptors. Physiological Reviews 86: 805–847. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2005
  7. 7. Jain RN, Samuelson LC (2007) Transcriptional profiling of gastrin-regulated genes in mouse stomach. Physiol Genomics 29: 1–12. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00176.2006
  8. 8. Konturek PC, Konturek SJ, Brzozowski T (2009) Helicobacter pylori infection in gastric cancerogenesis. J Physiol Pharmacol 60: 3–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00476.x
  9. 9. Matysiak-Budnik T, Megraud F (2006) Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer. European journal of cancer 42: 708–716. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.020
  10. 10. Goetze JP, Eiland S, Svendsen LB, Vainer B, Hannibal J, et al. (2013) Characterization of gastrins and their receptor in solid human gastric adenocarcinomas. Scand J Gastroenterol 48: 688–695. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.783101
  11. 11. Seok J, Xiao W, Moldawer LL, Davis RW, Covert MW (2009) A dynamic network of transcription in LPS-treated human subjects. BMC Systems Biology 3: 1–14. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-78
  12. 12. Wang J, Qiu X, Li Y, Deng Y, Shi T (2011) A transcriptional dynamic network during Arabidopsis thaliana pollen development. BMC Systems Biology 5: S8. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-s3-s8
  13. 13. Shao L, Wang L, Wei Z, Xiong Y, Wang Y, et al. (2012) Dynamic Network of Transcription and Pathway Crosstalk to Reveal Molecular Mechanism of MGd-Treated Human Lung Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE 7: e31984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031984
  14. 14. Luscombe NM, Madan Babu M, Yu H, Snyder M, Teichmann SA, et al. (2004) Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 431: 308–312. doi: 10.1038/nature02782
  15. 15. Yu H, Luscombe NM, Qian J, Gerstein M (2003) Genomic analysis of gene expression relationships in transcriptional regulatory networks. Trends in Genetics 19: 422–427. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(03)00175-6
  16. 16. Hwang W, Hackler J, Laszlo, Wu G, Ji H, et al. (2012) Dynamics of Regulatory Networks in the Developing Mouse Retina. PLoS ONE 7: e46521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046521
  17. 17. Barabasi A-L, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5: 101–113. doi: 10.1038/nrg1272
  18. 18. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, et al. (2002) Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex Networks. Science 298: 824–827. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5594.824
  19. 19. Alon U (2007) Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 8: 450–461. doi: 10.1038/nrg2102
  20. 20. Liao JC, Boscolo R, Yang YL, Tran LM, Sabatti C, et al. (2003) Network component analysis: reconstruction of regulatory signals in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15522–15527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2136632100
  21. 21. Tran LM, Brynildsen MP, Kao KC, Suen JK, Liao JC (2005) gNCA: a framework for determining transcription factor activity based on transcriptome: identifiability and numerical implementation. Metab Eng 7: 128–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2004.12.001
  22. 22. Fjeldbo CS, Bakke I, Erlandsen SE, Holmseth J, Lægreid A, et al. (2012) Gastrin upregulates the prosurvival factor secretory clusterin in adenocarcinoma cells and in oxyntic mucosa of hypergastrinemic rats. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 302: G21–G33. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00197.2011
  23. 23. Zvelebil M, Baum JO (2008) Understanding Bioinformatics. 772 p.
  24. 24. Essaghir A, Toffalini F, Knoops L, Kallin A, Helden J, et al. (2010) Transcription factor regulation can be accurately predicted from the presence of target gene signatures in micro array gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Research 38: e120. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq149
  25. 25. Lepoivre C, Bergon A, Lopez F, Perumal N, Nguyen C, et al. (2012) TranscriptomeBrowser 3.0: introducing a new compendium of molecular interactions and a new visualization tool for the study of gene regulatory networks. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-19
  26. 26. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Chatr-Aryamontri A, Boucher L, Oughtred R, et al. (2011) The BioGRID interaction database:2011 update. Nucleic Acids Research 39: D698–D704. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1116
  27. 27. Prasad Keshava, T S, Goel R, Kandasamy K, Keerthikumar S, Kumar S, et al. (2009) Human Protein Reference Database 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Research 37: D767–D772. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn892
  28. 28. Boscolo R, Sabatti C, Liao JC, Roychowdhury VP (2005) A generalized framework for network component analysis. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2: 289–301. doi: 10.1109/tcbb.2005.47
  29. 29. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, et al. (2003) Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Research 13: 2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303
  30. 30. Wernicke S, Rasche F (2006) FANMOD: a tool for fast network motif detection. Bioinformatics 22: 1152–1153. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl038
  31. 31. Wernicke S (2006) Efficient Detection of Network Motifs. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics 3: 347–359. doi: 10.1109/tcbb.2006.51
  32. 32. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, et al. (2009) ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 25: 1091–1093. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101
  33. 33. Bar-Joseph Z, Gitter A, Simon I (2012) Studying and modelling dynamic biological processes using time-series gene expression data. Nat Rev Genet 13: 552–564. doi: 10.1038/nrg3244
  34. 34. Leung-Theung-Long S, Roulet E, Clerc P, Escrieut C, Marchal-Victorion S, et al. (2005) Essential Interaction of Egr-1 at an Islet-specific Response Element for Basal and Gastrin-dependent Glucagon Gene Transactivation in Pancreatic Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 7976–7984. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m407485200
  35. 35. Cao J, Yu J-P, Liu C-H, Zhou L, Yu H-G (2006) Effects of gastrin 17 on beta-catenin/Tcf-4 pathway in Colo320WT colon cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol 12: 7482–7487.
  36. 36. Guo Y-S, Cheng J-Z, Jin G-F, Gutkind JS, Hellmich MR, et al. (2002) Gastrin Stimulates Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Intestinal Epithelial Cells through Multiple Signaling Pathways:Evidence for involvement of ERK5 kinase transactivation of the epidermal growth factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 48755–48763. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m209016200
  37. 37. Raychowdhury R, Schafer G, Fleming J, Rosewicz S, Wiedenmann B, et al. (2002) Interaction of Early Growth Response Protein 1 (Egr-1), Specificity Protein 1 (Sp1), and Cyclic Adenosine 3–5 Monophosphate Response Element Binding Protein (CREB) at a Proximal Response Element Is Critical for Gastrin-Dependent Activation of the Chromogranin A Promoter. Molecular Endocrinology 16: 2802–2818. doi: 10.1210/me.2001-0292
  38. 38. Subramaniam D, Ramalingam S, May R, Dieckgraefe BK, Berg DE, et al. (2008) Gastrin-Mediated Interleukin-8 and Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Expression: Differential Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Mechanisms. Gastroenterology 134: 1070–1082. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.040
  39. 39. Ferrand A, Kowalski-Chauvel A, Bertrand C, Escrieut C, Mathieu A, et al. (2005) A Novel Mechanism for JAK2 Activation by a G Protein-coupled Receptor, the CCK2R: Implication of this signaling pathway in pancreatic tumor models. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 10710–10715. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m413309200
  40. 40. Yeger-Lotem E, Sattath S, Kashtan N, Itzkovitz S, Milo R, et al. (2004) Network motifs in integrated cellular networks of transcription-regulation and protein-protein interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 5934–5939. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306752101
  41. 41. Neph S, Stergachis AB, Reynolds A, Sandstrom R, Borenstein E, et al. (2012) Circuitry and Dynamics of Human Transcription Factor Regulatory Networks. Cell 150: 1274–1286. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.040
  42. 42. Ingram P, Stumpf M, Stark J (2006) Network motifs: structure does not determine function. BMC Genomics 7: 108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-108
  43. 43. Shen-Orr SS, Milo R, Mangan S, Alon U (2002) Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 31: 64–68. doi: 10.1038/ng881
  44. 44. Prill RJ, Iglesias PA, Levchenko A (2005) Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network Organization. PLoS Biol 3: e343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030343
  45. 45. Gonzalez LM, Williamson I, Piedrahita JA, Blikslager AT, Magness ST (2013) Cell Lineage Identification and Stem Cell Culture in a Porcine Model for the Study of Intestinal Epithelial Regeneration. PLoS ONE 8: e66465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066465
  46. 46. Koh T, Goldenring J, Ito S, Mashimo H, Kopin A, et al. (1997) Gastrin deficiency results in altered gastric differentiation and decreased colonic proliferation in mice. Gastroenterology 113: 1015–1025. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70199-9
  47. 47. Wang Z, Chen W-W, Li R-L, Wen B, Sun J-B (2003) Effect of gastrin on differentiation of rat intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. World J Gastroenterol 9: 1786–1790.
  48. 48. Dabrowski A, Detjen KM, Logsdon CD, Williams JA (1997) Stimulation of both CCK-A and CCK-B Receptors Activates MAP Kinases in AR42J and Receptor-Transfected CHO Cells. pp. 361–367.
  49. 49. Tateishi K, Funakoshi A, Misumi Y, Matsuoka Y (1998) Jun and MAP Kinases Are Activated by Cholecystokinin in the Pancreatic Carcinoma Cell Line KP- 1N. Pancreas 16: 499–504. doi: 10.1097/00006676-199805000-00007
  50. 50. Stepan VM, Dickinson CJ, del Valle J, Matsushima M, Todisco A (1999) Cell type-specific requirement of the MAPK pathway for the growth factor action of gastrin. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 276: G1363–G1372. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)84808-7
  51. 51. Ming M, Zhou Y, Song W, Yu H, Luo H (2007) The role of p38 MAPK in gastrin-induced u-PA expression in human colon cancer cells. Chinese journal of oncology 29: 4–8.
  52. 52. Yu H-G, Schäfer H, Mergler S, Müerköster S, Cramer T, et al. (2005) Valine-286 residue in the third intracellular loop of the cholecystokinin 2 receptor exerts a pivotal role in cholecystokinin 2 receptor mediated intracellular signal transduction in human colon cancer cells. Cellular Signalling 17: 1505–1515. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.03.009
  53. 53. Stepan V, Ramamoorthy S, Pausawasdi N, Logsdon CD, Askari FK, et al. (2004) Role of small GTP binding proteins in the growth-promoting and antiapoptotic actions of gastrin. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 287: G715–G725. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00169.2003
  54. 54. Selvik L-K, Fjeldbo C, Flatberg A, Steigedal T, Misund K, et al. (2013) The duration of gastrin treatment affects global gene expression and molecular responses involved in ER stress and anti-apoptosis. BMC Genomics 14: 429. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-429
  55. 55. Pagliocca A, Wroblewski LE, Ashcroft FJ, Noble PJ, Dockray GJ, et al. (2002) Stimulation of the gastrin-cholecystokininBreceptor promotes branching morphogenesis in gastric AGS cells. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 283: G292–G299.
  56. 56. Lefranc F, Mijatovic T, Mathieu V, Rorive S, Decaestecker C, et al. (2004) Characterization of Gastrin-Induced Proangiogenic Effects In vivo in Orthotopic U373 Experimental Human Glioblastomas and In vitro in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. Clinical Cancer Research 10: 8250–8265. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0343
  57. 57. Clarke PA, Dickson JH, Harris JC, Grabowska A, Watson SA (2006) Gastrin Enhances the Angiogenic Potential of Endothelial Cells via Modulation of Heparin-Binding Epidermal-Like Growth Factor. Cancer Research 66: 3504–3512. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0280
  58. 58. Muerkosterr S, Isberner A, Arlt A, Witt M, Reimann B, et al. (2005) Gastrin Suppresses Growth of CCK2 Receptor Expressing Colon Cancer Cells by Inducing Apoptosis In Vitro and In Vivo. Gastroenterology 129: 952–968. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.06.059