Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Sex-Specific Effects of NLRP6/AVR and ADM Loci on Susceptibility to Essential Hypertension in a Sardinian Population

  • Nicola Glorioso,

    Affiliation Hypertension and Related Diseases Center, AUO-Universita’ di Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy

  • Victoria L. Herrera,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Tamara Didishvili,

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Maria F. Ortu,

    Affiliation Hypertension and Related Diseases Center, AUO-Universita’ di Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy

  • Roberta Zaninello,

    Affiliation Hypertension and Related Diseases Center, AUO-Universita’ di Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy

  • Giovanni Fresu,

    Affiliation Hypertension and Related Diseases Center, AUO-Universita’ di Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy

  • Guiseppe Argiolas,

    Affiliation Hypertension and Related Diseases Center, AUO-Universita’ di Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy

  • Chiara Troffa,

    Affiliation Hypertension and Related Diseases Center, AUO-Universita’ di Sassari, Sassari, Sardinia, Italy

  • Nelson Ruiz-Opazo

    nruizo@bu.edu

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

Sex-Specific Effects of NLRP6/AVR and ADM Loci on Susceptibility to Essential Hypertension in a Sardinian Population

  • Nicola Glorioso, 
  • Victoria L. Herrera, 
  • Tamara Didishvili, 
  • Maria F. Ortu, 
  • Roberta Zaninello, 
  • Giovanni Fresu, 
  • Guiseppe Argiolas, 
  • Chiara Troffa, 
  • Nelson Ruiz-Opazo
PLOS
x

Abstract

Coronary artery disease, heart failure, fatal arrhythmias, stroke, and renal disease are the most common causes of mortality for humans, and essential hypertension remains a major risk factor. Elucidation of susceptibility loci for essential hypertension has been difficult because of its complex, multifactorial nature involving genetic, environmental, and sex- and age-dependent nature. We investigated whether the 11p15.5 region syntenic to rat chromosome 1 region containing multiple blood pressure quantitative trait loci (QTL) detected in Dahl rat intercrosses harbors polymorphisms that contribute to susceptibility/resistance to essential hypertension in a Sardinian population. Initial testing performed using microsatellite markers spanning 18 Mb of 11p15.5 detected a strong association between D11S1318 (at 2.1 Mb, P = 0.004) and D11S1346 (at 10.6 Mb, P = 0.00000004), suggesting that loci in close proximity to these markers may contribute to susceptibility in our Sardinian cohort. NLR family, pyrin domain containing 6/angiotensin-vasopressin receptor (NLRP6/AVR), and adrenomedullin (ADM) are in close proximity to D11S1318 and D11S1346, respectively; thus we tested single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within NLRP6/AVR and ADM for their association with hypertension in our Sardinian cohort. Upon sex stratification, we detected one NLRP6/AVR SNP associated with decreased susceptibility to hypertension in males (rs7948797G, P = 0.029; OR = 0.73 [0.57–0.94]). For ADM, sex-specific analysis showed a significant association between rs4444073C, with increased susceptibility to essential hypertension only in the male population (P = 0.006; OR = 1.44 [1.13–1.84]). Our results revealed an association between NLRP6/AVR and ADM loci with male essential hypertension, suggesting the existence of sex-specific NLRP6/AVR and ADM variants affecting male susceptibility to essential hypertension.

Introduction

Essential hypertension is a highly prevalent disorder and remains a major risk factor for the most common causes of mortality, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, fatal arrhythmias, stroke, and renal disease [1,2]. As a complex, multifactorial disorder, elucidation of susceptibility loci remains difficult. Previous studies have emphasized the challenges of genetically analyzing essential hypertension [3-5]. Genome-wide association studies have failed to detect major hypertension susceptibility genes that may contribute greater than 5 mmHg to the blood pressure (BP) effect [6-9]. These studies reported that several loci were significantly associated with increased BP by analyzing tens of thousands of patients in a multi-center, meta-analysis paradigm with BP effects ranging from 0.5–1 mmHg [6-9]. This implies that either hundreds of hypertension susceptibility genes exist that account for essential hypertension in humans, with each locus contributing a small fraction of the increase in BP (0.5–1 mmHg effect), or the studies have failed to detect major hypertension susceptibility loci due to major confounders, such as inherent genetic heterogeneity of human populations, great variability in trait measurements, the existence of several factors that are not accounted for, and factors in the analytical paradigm (e.g., sex-specific effects, gestational risk factors, and presence of hypertension subtypes with unique pathogenetic mechanisms).

For complex multifactorial diseases with clinical heterogeneity such as hypertension, genetic studies of inbred rat models of polygenic (essential) hypertension are instrumental for identifying BP-quantitative trait loci (QTL) and candidate susceptibility genes for subsequent testing in human essential hypertension. We have successfully employed this approach to identify ATP1A1 (α1 Na,K-ATPase) [10,11] and DEspR (dual endothelin1/vascular endothelial growth factor signal peptide receptor) [12,13] as candidate hypertension genes in a Dahl salt-sensitive rat model of polygenic hypertension. Subsequent studies detected an association of ATP1A1 [14,15] and DEspR [15] with essential hypertension in humans and revealed a functionally significant DEspR T/CATAAAA-box promoter variant associated with 7.7 mmHg in increased systolic BP in a male Sardinian population [16]. We recently reported two closely-linked BP QTLs on chromosome-1 (chr1) (BP-m1 at 144.3 Mb and BP-m2 at 208.8 Mb) affecting salt-sensitive hypertension in Dahl rats [12]. These two chr1-BP QTLs contain some candidate genes, which has been supported by experimental evidence. Briefly, molecular genetic evidence demonstrates that a functionally significant N119S/C163R variant of the angiotensin-vasopressin receptor (NLRP6/AVR at 201.08 Mb), which exhibits sodium-induced dysfunction [17], may underlie chr1 BP-m1 QTL of salt-sensitive hypertension in F2 (Dahl S x Dahl R]-intercross male rats [12]. Another candidate gene in this chr1-BP QTL region includes adrenomedullin (ADM; at 168.38 Mb), which has been implicated in hypertension pathogenesis [18,19] and may underlie BP-m2 QTL [12].

Analyses of BP-m1 and BP-m2 corresponding syntenic regions in humans localized this chromosomal segment to the 11p15.5 region. We therefore investigated whether this 11p15.5 region harbors polymorphisms contributing to susceptibility/resistance to essential hypertension in our Sardinian population.

Results

Association between 11p15.1-11p15.5 region and essential hypertension

To enhance robustness of the population under study, we ascertained first a limited genetic diversity by restricting the cohort under analysis to a relatively isolated genetic population of northern Sardinia [20,21] and second , we minimized subtype heterogeneity by focusing on the extreme of the population to distinguish hypertensive patients and normotensive controls. Thus, we compared ascertained hypertensive patients (n = 433) with group means for systolic BP (SBP) of 174.4 ± 14.7 mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) of 110.5 ± 9.9 mmHg against control normotensives (n = 279) with group means for SBP of 127.6 ± 11.3 mmHg and DBP of 77.6 ± 7.2 mmHg (Table 1). Both groups contained equivalent representation of both sexes (Table 1).

VariableNTa (total)HTb (total)Male NTFemale NTMale HTFemale HT
n279433131148237196
Age, yc65.4 ± 10.651.0 ± 10.266.1 ± 8.964.8 ± 11.951.8 ± 10.650.0 ± 9.6
BMId, Kge/m226.2 ± 3.927.7 ± 4.026.3 ± 3.026.2 ± 4.628.0 ± 3.827.4 ± 4.3
SBPf, mmHgg127.6 ± 11.3174.4 ± 14.7127.9 ± 10.7127.4 ± 11.9173.2 ± 14.6175.9 ± 14.8
DBPh, mmHg77.6 ± 7.2110.5 ± 9.977.2 ± 6.878.0 ± 7.4111.9 ± 10.4108.8 ± 9.0

Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.

a Normotensives; b hypertensives; total, male + female subjects; c years; d body mass index; e kilogram per meter squared; f systolic blood pressure; g millimeters mercury; h diastolic blood pressure.
CSV
Download CSV

Initial testing of possible loci associated with essential hypertension within the 11p15.1–11p15.5 region was performed with microsatellite markers spanning 18 Mb of this chromosome 11 region. Since microsatellite markers are highly variable, they typically reveal a significant amount of information; therefore, they may be useful for examining large genomic segments in linkage and/or association studies [22,23]. As shown in Table 2, the D11S1318 and D11S1346 microsatellite markers showed a strong association with hypertension susceptibility after adjusting for multiple testing (D11S1318, P = 0.004; D11S1346, P = 0.00000004). This suggests that loci in closed proximity to D11S1318 and D11S1346 contribute to hypertension susceptibility in our Sardinian cohort.

MarkerPositionχ2dfPPbCandidate (bp)
D11S1318232722327.1780.000660.0040NLRP6/AVR (278570)
D11S133859879764.02520.13370.8022
D11S132362767142.91430.40501.0000
D11S13461095937443.7440.0000000070.00000004ADM (10327248)
D11S1315128045761.50840.82531.0000
D11S1310176228651.75520.41581.0000

Table 2. Association analysis of 11p15.1-11p15.5 region with hypertension susceptibility.

NLRP6,NLR family, pyrin domain containing 6; AVR, angiotensin-vasopressin receptor; ADM, adrenomedullin. df, degrees of freedom; P, nominal P values; Pb, P values with the Bonferroni adjustment. Significant results after bonferroni adjustment (P < 0.05) are shown in boldface type. Marker positions on chromosome 11p15.1-11p15.5 region as per NCBI Human Annotation Release 104, GRCh37.p10-Primary Assembly.
CSV
Download CSV

Single-point association analysis of NLRP6/AVR and ADM loci

Closed examination of genes in the vicinity of D11S1318 and D11S1346 identify NLRP6/AVR (at 278570) and ADM (at 10327248) as candidates for the corresponding associated regions marked by D11S1318 and D11S1346, respectively (Table 2). To assess the possible association of NLRP6/AVR and ADM with essential hypertension in our Sardinian cohort, we examined single-point associations between NLRP6/AVR and ADM SNPs (Figure 1, Table 3) with hypertension susceptibility. We used 4 tagged SNPs for the NLRP6/AVR locus and 2 tagged SNPs for the ADM locus (see Materials and Methods section). Genomic location, allele frequency, and Hardy-Weinberg test results for the 6 tagged SNPs are presented in Table 3. None of the tagged SNPs deviated significantly from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both hypertensive and normotensive cohorts (Table 3). One of the NLRP6/AVR SNPs, rs7937440, demonstrated a significant association with hypertension in the total cohort after adjustment for multiple testing (P = 0.032, Table 4). Upon sex stratification, one NLRP6/AVR SNP (minor allele rs7948797G, Table 4) was associated with decreased susceptibility to hypertension only in the male population (P = 0.029; OR = 0.63 [0.45–0.88], Table 4). For ADM, sex-specific analysis detected a significant association between rs4444073C minor allele and increased susceptibility to hypertension exclusively in the male cohort as well (P = 0.013; OR = 1.62 [1.14–2.29], Table 4).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Structure of NLRP6/AVR and ADM genes and location of the SNPs analyzed.

Exons (shown as boxes) 1–8 for NLRP6/AVR and exons 1–4 for ADM are shown. Gene untranslated (5′-untranslated and 3′-untranslated) regions are unfilled. Corresponding nucleotide positions for the NLRP6/AVR and ADM loci on chromosome 11 are indicated in bp. Locations of the SNPs genotyped are shown by vertical lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077562.g001

Gene (chr), SNPA/RPositionMAFP (NT)P (HT)
NLRP6/AVR (11)
rs7948797A/G2698560.2950.6030.528
rs7937440A/G2721990.4170.6010.636
rs11246048T/C2780390.3650.5330.238
rs4758635G/T2839280.4700.4380.956
ADM (11)
rs4399321A/G103234780.2800.2390.148
rs4444073A/C103316640.3440.9880.572

Table 3. Description of the tagged SNPs genotyped.

NLRP6, NLR family, pyrin domain containing 6; AVR, angiotensin-vasopressin receptor; ADM, adrenomedullin; A/R, ancestral allele/rare allele; MAF, minor allele frequency; P (NT), Hardy-Weinberg P value in normotensives; P (HT), Hardy-Weinberg P value in hypertensives. SNP locations as per NCBI Human Annotation Release 104, GRCh37.p10-Primary Assembly.
CSV
Download CSV
Gene (chr)SNPPositionPaOR (95% c.i.)PbOR (95% c.i.)PcOR (95% c.i.)
NLRP6/AVR (11)rs7948797269,8560.0560.73 (0.57-0.94)0.0290.63 (0.45-0.88)0.8450.86 (0.60-1.24)
rs7937440272,2740.0320.76 (0.60-0.95)0.1000.73 (0.53-1.00)0.5850.79 (0.57-1.09)
rs11246048278,0390.2541.17 (0.92-1.48)0.1801.29 (0.92-1.81)0.6941.07 (0.77-1.49)
rs4758635283,9280.1910.86 (0.68-1.08)0.1500.79 (0.57-1.09)0.8380.92 (0.67-1.28)
ADM (11)rs439932110,323,4780.1041.23 (0.96-1.58)0.1421.31 (0.91-1.87)0.4101.16 (0.81-1.66)
rs444407310,331,6640.0061.44 (1.13-1.84)0.0131.62 (1.14-2.29)0.2861.29 (0.92-1.81)

Table 4. Single-point association analysis of SNPs in NLRP6/AVR and ADM with hypertension.

NLRP6, NLR family, pyrin domain containing 6; AVR, angiotensin-vasopressin receptor; ADM, adrenomedullin; Pa, P in males + females; Pb, P in males; Pc, P in females. OR, odds ratio; c.i., confidence interval. Association analysis was performed with the HelixTree Genetic Analysis Software using Basic Allelic Tests: D vs d as genetic model. P, Chi-Squared FDR (Chi-squared P adjusted for multiple comparisons with False Discovery Rate procedure). Significant results (P < 0.05) are shown in boldface type.
CSV
Download CSV

Discussion

Identifying genes underlying susceptibility to essential hypertension has been difficult. Genome-wide association studies have failed to detect significant associations contributing greater than 5 mmHg in blood pressure despite the large number of subjects examined in different studied cohorts [6-9]. A number of reasons may account for these negative findings, including intrinsic genetic heterogeneity of human populations, differential accuracy and/or modality in trait measurements (blood pressure), exclusion of putative sex-specific effects on the phenotype in the analytical paradigm, and gestational risk factors.

Here, we present evidence suggesting that the NLRP6/AVR and ADM loci contribute to hypertension susceptibility in a Sardinian population. We first detected strong association of the 11p15.1–11p15.5 region with hypertension showing two distinct peaks marked by D11S1318 and D11S1346 SSLP markers. Their chromosomal location indicated NLRP6/AVR and ADM as putative loci underlying the observed associations. Subsequent analysis using SNPs spanning both the NLRP6/AVR and ADM transcription units confirmed their associations with essential hypertension in our Sardinian cohort. Both loci demonstrated sex-specific effects on hypertension susceptibility and were primarily associated with male essential hypertension.

ADM is a potent vasodilatory peptide important for blood pressure homeostasis, as well as cardiovascular and renal function [18,24,25]. Its role in blood pressure regulation has been substantiated by showing that heterozygous ADM+/- knockout male mice exhibited elevated blood pressure when compared with wild-type littermates [26]. The ADM locus has been detected as a genome-wide significant finding in a recently reported study involving a large population [8]. In addition, the ADM SNP rs4399321 utilized in our study has been reported to be associated with proteinuria in subjects with essential hypertension [27] and with BP levels in normotensive subjects in a Chinese population [28] supporting a regulatory role for ADM in blood pressure homeostasis in humans. Moreover, recent studies have implicated ADM in hypertension pathogenesis in humans. A dose-response relationship between ADM and BP status was observed among age- and sex-matched normotensive, pre-hypertensive, and hypertensive subjects, detecting lower ADM levels in the hypertensive group than in the pre-hypertensive and normotensive groups [19]. Moreover, ADM levels were found to be associated with mean arterial pressure in men but not in women in the Framingham cohort, thus indicating sex-specificity [29]. This observation is consistent with our results showing that ADM is associated with hypertension susceptibility only in the male Sardinian population.

NLRP6/AVR has been linked to salt-sensitive hypertension in Dhal rats. Genetic analysis in an F2 (Dahl S × Dahl R)-intercross rat population delineated NLRP6/AVR as a candidate gene underlying a chromosome 1 BP-m2 QTL [12]. BP-m2 has shown sex-specificity since it has been detected only in the F2 male population and not in females [12]. Additionally, functional androgen and estrogen response elements have been delineated within the NLRP6/AVR 5′-regulatory region that may contribute to the sex-specific effects of NLRP6/AVR [30]. Moreover, an NLRP6/AVR structural variant has been identified in Dahl S rats exhibiting sodium-induced dysfunction affecting ligand binding and hormone-dependent signal transduction [17]. This supports a pathogenetic role of NLRP6/AVR in salt-sensitive hypertension in Dhal rats. The role of NLRP6/AVR in blood pressure regulation is further supported by the recent findings showing that NLRP6/AVR deficiency affects urinary concentrating ability and lowers blood pressure in mice [31]. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that NLRP6/AVR contributes to hypertension susceptibility in humans.

In conclusion, our results revealed an association between NLRP6/AVR and ADM loci and hypertension susceptibility in a northern Sardinian population, primarily affecting male essential hypertension. Specific ADM and NLRP6/AVR variants affecting susceptibility to high blood pressure require further investigation.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was performed in strict accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of Local Health Unit-University of Sassari Medical School. Written informed consent was obtained and all clinical investigation was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study population

The study cohort comprised 712 subjects, with 433 patients with essential hypertension and 279 normotensive controls enrolled at the Hypertension Center of the University of Sassari Medical School. All subjects were white, unrelated, born in different domains of North Sardinia previously ascertained to have a high degree of genetic homogeneity [20,21], ascertained to be Sardinian for at least 6 generations, and resided in Sardinia. Hypertensive patients with BP > 160/95 mmHg (n = 433), no secondary hypertension etiology and absence of major comorbid conditions were considered in the study. Older patients were included only if they were diagnosed as hypertensive well before 55 years of age. BP measurements were obtained with patients not taking any medications. Family history of hypertension was investigated, and a complete pedigree was defined. To exclude erroneous control subjects with late-onset hypertension, normotensive controls (n = 279) were limited to those older than 60 years of age who had not been previously diagnosed or treated as hypertensive, had no family history of hypertension and cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, and had BP values < 135/85 on at least 4 occasions.

Identification of tag SNPs in NLRP6/AVR and ADM transcription units

To identify tag SNPs within the NLRP6/AVR and ADM transcription units we genotyped 300 random samples from our Sardinian sample with 13 NLRP6/AVR (rs7113424, rs10902117, rs17655663, rs7948797, rs7396066, rs7937440, rs7102570, rs10794306, rs11246048, rs4758627, rs4758635, rs3817637, rs741737) and 8 ADM (rs73420933, rs4641466, rs4399321, rs3814700, rs5002, rs4698, rs4444073, rs7944706) SNPs and tagged them by using the Carlson Method which is based on the R2 LD statistic as implemented by HelixTree Genetic Analysis software. We used the following parameters for tagging markers: 1) Minor Allele Frequency Threshold = 0.1. 2) Linkage Disequilibrium (R2) Threshold = 0.8. After Carlson SNP-tagging analysis we selected the following SNPs for association analysis (shown in Table 2): rs7948797, rs7937440, rs11246048, rs4758635 for NLRP6/AVR and rs4399321, rs4444073 for ADM.

Genotyping

Genotyping of microsatellite markers was performed as described previously using 20 ng of DNA [11,14]. Alleles were identified using 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (1/2× Tris-Borate-EDTA, 750 V for 14 h). Gels were exposed to autoradiograms for genotype readings. SNP genotyping was carried out by the Molecular Genetics Core Facility at the Boston University School of Medicine on a Life Technologies 7900 Real-Time PCR System (Foster City, CA, USA). Chromosomal position of microsatellite markers and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were based on the “NCBI build 37.1-Map”. SNP assays (TaqMan assays) were procured from Life Technologies. The genotyping completeness rate was 87%.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of microsatellite allele frequencies between cases and controls was performed using χ2 analysis (Sigma Plot 11.0) for D11S1318 2x9 χ2 analysis (9 alleles), D11S1338 2×3 χ2 analysis (3 alleles), D11S1323 2×4 χ2 analysis (4 alleles), D11S1346 2×5 χ2 analysis (5 alleles), D11S1315 2×5 χ2 analysis (5 alleles), and D11S1310 2×3 χ2 analysis (3 alleles). Bonferroni adjustment was applied to nominal P values for multiple testing corrections. For SNPs, single point association analysis comparing cases and control subjects was conducted using the HelixTreeTM SNP & Variation Suite genetic analysis software (version 6.4.3, Golden Helix Inc., Bozeman, MT, USA). A basic allelic test (D vs d) was implemented using a Chi-squared test as statistical method, obtaining as well odds ratios with corresponding confidence limits. Missing genotypes were not included (imputed) in the association analysis. The false discovery rate was utilized for multiple testing corrections. A chi-squared test using our cohort with α = 0.005 predicts statistically significant detection of at least 0.1 in allele frequency differences between groups of 433 hypertensives and 279 normotensive subjects with a Power > 0.8.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NG NR-O. Performed the experiments: VLH TD MFO RZ GF GA CT. Analyzed the data: NG NR-O. Wrote the manuscript: N-RO NG VLH.

References

  1. 1. Messerli FH, Williams B, Ritz E (2007) Essential hypertension. Lancet 370: 591-603. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61299-9. PubMed: 17707755.
  2. 2. Pedelty L, Gorelick PB (2008) Management of hypertension and cerebrovascular disease in the elderly. Am J Med 121: S23-S31. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.03.036. PubMed: 18638616.
  3. 3. Charchar F, Zimmerli L, Tomaszewski M (2008) The pressure of finding human hypertension genes: new tools, old dilemmas. J Hum Hypertens 22: 821-828. doi:10.1038/jhh.2008.67. PubMed: 18633428.
  4. 4. Ehret GB, Morrison AC, O’Connor AA, Grove ML, Baird L et al. (2008) Replication of the Wellcome Trust genome-wide association study of essential hypertension: the Family Blood Pressure Program. Eur J Hum Genet 16: 1507-1511. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.102. PubMed: 18523456.
  5. 5. Gong M, Hubner N (2006) Molecular genetics of human hypertension. Clin Sci 110: 315-326. doi:10.1042/CS20050208. PubMed: 16464173.
  6. 6. Levy D, Ehret GB, Rice K, Verwoert GC, Launer LJ et al. (2009) Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Genet 41: 677-687. doi:10.1038/ng.384. PubMed: 19430479.
  7. 7. Newton-Cheh C, Johnson T, Gateva V, Tobin MD, Bochud M et al. (2009) Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet 41: 666-676. doi:10.1038/ng.361. PubMed: 19430483.
  8. 8. The International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies (2011) Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature 478: 103-109.
  9. 9. the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007) Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447: 661-678. doi:10.1038/nature05911. PubMed: 17554300.
  10. 10. Herrera VL, Ruiz-Opazo N (1990) Alteration of alpha 1 Na+,K(+)-ATPase 86Rb+ influx by a single amino acid substitution. Science 249: 1023-1026. doi:10.1126/science.1975705. PubMed: 1975705.
  11. 11. Herrera VL, Xie HX, Lopez LV, Schork NJ, Ruiz-Opazo N (1998) The α1 Na,K-ATPase gene is a susceptibility hypertension gene in the Dahl salt-sensitiveHSD rat. J Clin Invest 102: 1102-1111. doi:10.1172/JCI3868. PubMed: 9739044.
  12. 12. Herrera VL, Tsikoudakis A, Ponce LR, Matsubara Y, Ruiz-Opazo N (2006) Sex-specific QTLs and interacting loci underlie salt-sensitive hypertension and target organ complications in Dahl S/jrHS hypertensive rats. Physiol Genomics 26: 172-179. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00285.2005. PubMed: 16720678.
  13. 13. Kaneko Y, Herrera VL, Didishvili T, Ruiz-Opazo N (2005) Sex-specific effects of dual ET-1/ANG II receptor (Dear) variants in Dahl salt-sensitive/resistant hypertension rat model. Physiol Genomics 20: 157-164. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00108.2004. PubMed: 15561758.
  14. 14. Glorioso N, Filigheddu F, Troffa C, Dettori F, Soro A et al. (2001) Interaction of α1Na,K-ATPase and Na.K: 2Cl-cotransporter genes in human essential hypertension. Hypertension 38: 204-209.
  15. 15. Glorioso N, Herrera VL, Bagamasbad P, Filigheddu F, Troffa C et al. (2007) Association of ATP1A1 and dear single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes with essential hypertension: sex-specific and haplotype-specific effects. Circ Res 100: 1522-1529. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000267716.96196.60. PubMed: 17446437.
  16. 16. Glorioso N, Herrera VL, Didishvili T, Argiolas G, Troffa C et al. (2011) DEspR T/CATAAAA-box promoter variant decreases DEspR transcription and is associated with increased BP in Sardinian males. Physiol Genomics 43: 1219-1225. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00012.2011. PubMed: 21862670.
  17. 17. Ruiz-Opazo N, Lopez LV, Herrera VL (2002) The dual AngII/AVP receptor gene N119S/C163R variant exhibits sodium-induced dysfunction and cosegregates with salt-sensitive hypertension in the Dahl Salt sensitive hypertensive rat model. Mol Medicine 8: 24-32.
  18. 18. Nishikimi T (2007) Adrenomedullin in the kidney-renal physiological and pathophysiological roles. Curr Med Chem 14: 1689-1699. doi:10.2174/092986707780830943. PubMed: 17584073.
  19. 19. Wang Z, Liu Y, Liu J, Wen J, Wen S et al. (2008) A pilot study on level of blood vasoactive factors in prehypertensive and hypertensive patients. Clin Exp Hypertens 30: 598-605. doi:10.1080/10641960802443068. PubMed: 18855263.
  20. 20. Piazza A (1993) Who are the Europeans? Science 260: 9-11. doi:10.1126/science.260.5104.9. PubMed: 17793514.
  21. 21. Cappello N, Rendine S, Griffo R, Mameli GE, Succa V et al. (1996) Genetic analysis of Sardinia: I. data on 12 polymorphisms in 21 linguistic domains. Ann Hum Genet 60: 125-141. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1996.tb01183.x. PubMed: 8839127.
  22. 22. Chen G, Adeyemo A, Zhou J, Yuan A, Chen Y et al. (2005) Genome scan linkage analysis comparing microsatellites and single-nucleotide polymorphisms markers for two measures of alcoholism in chromosomes 1, 4, and 7. BMC Genetics 6: S4.
  23. 23. Kauwe JS, Bertelsen S, Bierut LJ, Dunn G, Hinrichs AL et al. (2005) The efficacy of short tandem repeat polymorphisms versus single-nucleotide polymorphisms for resolving population structure. BMC Genet 6 Suppl 1: S84. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S84. PubMed: 16451699.
  24. 24. Cao YN, Kitamura K, Kato J, Kuwasako K, Ito K et al. (2003) Chronic salt loading upregulates expression of adrenomedullin and its receptors in adrenal glands and kidneys of the rat. Hypertension 42: 369-372. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000088560.10830.37. PubMed: 12913064.
  25. 25. Chao J, Chao L (2002) The role of adrenomedullin in cardiovascular and renal function. Drug News Perspect 15: 511-518. doi:10.1358/dnp.2002.15.8.840072. PubMed: 12677190.
  26. 26. Shindo T, Kurihara Y, Nishimatsu H, Moriyama N, Kakoki M et al. (2001) Vascular abnormalities and elevated blood pressure in mice lacking adrenomedullin gene. Circulation 104: 1964-1971. doi:10.1161/hc4101.097111. PubMed: 11602502.
  27. 27. Kobayashi Y, Nakayama T, Sato N, Izumi Y, Kokubun S et al. (2005) Haplotype-based case-control study revealing an association between the adrenomedullin gene and proteinuria in subjects with essential hypertension. Hypertens Res 28: 229-236. doi:10.1291/hypres.28.229. PubMed: 16097366.
  28. 28. Chen S, Lu X, Zhao Q, Wang L, Li H et al. (2013) Association of adrenomedullin gene polymorphisms and blood pressure in a Chinese population. Hypertens Res 36: 74-78. doi:10.1038/hr.2012.132. PubMed: 22932875.
  29. 29. Levy D, Hwang SJ, Kayalar A, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS et al. (2007) Associations of plasma natriuretic peptide, adrenomedullin, and homocysteine levels with alterations in arterial stiffness: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 115: 3079-3085. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652842. PubMed: 17533184.
  30. 30. Herrera VL, Bagamasbad P, Didishvili T, Decano JL, Ruiz-Opazo N (2008) Overlapping genes in Nalp6/PYPAF5 locus encode two V2-type vasopressin isoreceptors: angiotensin-vasopressin receptor (AVR) and non-AVR. Physiol Genomics 34: 65-77. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00199.2007. PubMed: 18413781.
  31. 31. Herrera VL, Bagamasbad P, Decano JL, Ruiz-Opazo N (2011) AVR/NAVR deficiency lowers blood pressure and differentially affects urinary concentrating ability, cognition, and anxiety-like behavior in male and female mice. Physiol Genomics 43: 32-42. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00154.2010. PubMed: 20923861.