Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Phytophthora Have Distinct Endogenous Small RNA Populations That Include Short Interfering and microRNAs

  • Noah Fahlgren,

    Affiliations Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America, Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • Stephanie R. Bollmann,

    Affiliation Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • Kristin D. Kasschau,

    Affiliation Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • Josh T. Cuperus,

    Current address: Department of Genome Sciences and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

    Affiliation Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • Caroline M. Press,

    Affiliation Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • Christopher M. Sullivan,

    Affiliation Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • Elisabeth J. Chapman,

    Current address: Forage Genetics, International, West Salem, Wisconsin, United States of America

    Affiliation Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • J. Steen Hoyer,

    Affiliation Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America

  • Kerrigan B. Gilbert,

    Affiliation Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America

  • Niklaus J. Grünwald ,

    nik.grunwald@ars.usda.gov (NJG); JCarrington@danforthcenter.org (JCC)

    Affiliation Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • James C. Carrington

    nik.grunwald@ars.usda.gov (NJG); JCarrington@danforthcenter.org (JCC)

    Affiliations Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America, Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

Phytophthora Have Distinct Endogenous Small RNA Populations That Include Short Interfering and microRNAs

  • Noah Fahlgren, 
  • Stephanie R. Bollmann, 
  • Kristin D. Kasschau, 
  • Josh T. Cuperus, 
  • Caroline M. Press, 
  • Christopher M. Sullivan, 
  • Elisabeth J. Chapman, 
  • J. Steen Hoyer, 
  • Kerrigan B. Gilbert, 
  • Niklaus J. Grünwald
PLOS
x

Abstract

In eukaryotes, RNA silencing pathways utilize 20-30-nucleotide small RNAs to regulate gene expression, specify and maintain chromatin structure, and repress viruses and mobile genetic elements. RNA silencing was likely present in the common ancestor of modern eukaryotes, but most research has focused on plant and animal RNA silencing systems. Phytophthora species belong to a phylogenetically distinct group of economically important plant pathogens that cause billions of dollars in yield losses annually as well as ecologically devastating outbreaks. We analyzed the small RNA-generating components of the genomes of P. infestans, P. sojae and P. ramorum using bioinformatics, genetic, phylogenetic and high-throughput sequencing-based methods. Each species produces two distinct populations of small RNAs that are predominantly 21- or 25-nucleotides long. The 25-nucleotide small RNAs were primarily derived from loci encoding transposable elements and we propose that these small RNAs define a pathway of short-interfering RNAs that silence repetitive genetic elements. The 21-nucleotide small RNAs were primarily derived from inverted repeats, including a novel microRNA family that is conserved among the three species, and several gene families, including Crinkler effectors and type III fibronectins. The Phytophthora microRNA is predicted to target a family of amino acid/auxin permeases, and we propose that 21-nucleotide small RNAs function at the post-transcriptional level. The functional significance of microRNA-guided regulation of amino acid/auxin permeases and the association of 21-nucleotide small RNAs with Crinkler effectors remains unclear, but this work provides a framework for testing the role of small RNAs in Phytophthora biology and pathogenesis in future work.

Introduction

Phytophthora species are a diverse group of filamentous, eukaryotic plant pathogens that are related to other stramenopile (heterokont) eukaryotes within the chromalveolate super-group [1], [2]. The stramenopile group includes golden-brown algae, diatoms, brown algae, and oomycetes. These diverse organisms, ranging from autotrophic algae to pathogenic, fungus-like oomycetes, were only recently grouped together based on phylogenetic analysis [1]. The oomycete lineage (non-photosynthetic stramenopiles, including the genus Phytophthora) was shown to be evolutionarily ancient. The oomycota lineage is estimated to have split from the photosynthetic stramenopiles in the ochrophyta lineage near the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic boundary ca. 570 million years ago [2]. The genus Phytophthora contains some of the most devastating plant pathogens and contains upwards of 100 formally described species [3]. Phytophthora species are capable of infecting nearly all eudicot plants and several monocot species, causing multibillion-dollar damage to crops, ornamental plants, and natural environments. P. infestans infection of potatoes and tomatoes causes late blight disease and is best known as the cause of the Irish potato famine [4], [5]. P. sojae is an economically important pathogen of soybeans resulting in estimated losses of $1–2 billion annually worldwide [6]. P. ramorum causes sudden oak death and infects a large variety of ornamental nursery crops [7]. P. ramorum infections have afflicted trees in the western United States since the mid-1990s and more recently gained notoriety for causing massive landscape-scale dieback in plantations of Japanese larch in the United Kingdom [8]. The genomes of these three Phytophthora species have been sequenced [9], [10], thus enabling discovery of the silencing machinery employed and the resulting small RNA expression patterns observed in this group. The fact that the oomycete lineage is ancient and basal to the stramenopile group provides an opportunity to elucidate the evolutionary history of the silencing machinery in the stramenopiles.

Eukaryotes use RNA-based pathways to regulate gene expression at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. RNA silencing pathways utilize small RNAs (∼20–30 nucleotides) to program effector protein complexes to recognize specific target nucleic acids in a sequence-dependent manner [11]. Target recognition by small RNA-effector complexes generally results in the suppression of activity of the target, either through degradation or recruitment of additional silencing factors. Generally, small RNAs are generated from double-stranded RNA through the activity of one or more Ribonuclease III (RNaseIII)-like enzymes [12]. Therefore, the conversion of single-stranded RNA into double-stranded RNA is a key step in RNA silencing pathways and occurs by intramolecular hybridization of self-complementary RNA to form a stem-loop (or hairpin) RNA, or by conversion of RNA into double-stranded RNA through the action of an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDR). Several classes of small RNA are distinguished and include most notably the short-interfering RNAs (siRNA) and microRNAs (miRNA).

In plants and animals, and several other eukaryotic lineages, microRNAs are ∼20-24-nucleotide RNAs that mediate silencing of target transcripts post-transcriptionally. Primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNA) are generally transcribed by RNA polymerase II and contain self-complementary regions that fold to form imperfect double-stranded stem-loop structures. In animals, pri-miRNAs are initially processed by the RNaseIII protein DROSHA, or by the spliceosome in the case of mirtrons, to form precursor-miRNA (pre-miRNA). The miRNA and duplex strand (miRNA*) are released from the stem-loop RNA by the RNaseIII protein DICER (DCR) [13]. Plants lack a DROSHA homolog and instead DICER-LIKE1 (DCL1), a homolog of DCR, catalyzes both miRNA-processing steps [14]. The resulting miRNA/miRNA* duplex has 5′ monophosphates and 2-nucleotide, 3′ overhangs [15]. The final maturation step requires proper selection of the miRNA (guide strand) from the miRNA/miRNA* duplex by a member of the ARGONAUTE (AGO) protein family. AGOs select guide strands by one or more criteria including the miRNA 5′ end thermodynamic stability, 5′ nucleotide identity, miRNA/miRNA* duplex structure and in some cases other sequence-specific interactions [16]. AGO proteins loaded with miRNA are programmed to recognize and repress specific cellular target RNAs through AGO-mediated cleavage or translational repression [11]. MiRNA-guided target repression is an important regulator of developmental timing and patterning and response to biotic and abiotic signals [15], [17].

Another diverse class of small RNAs, referred to broadly as siRNA, are common to animals, plants, and fungi [18], [19]. Unlike miRNAs, siRNAs are generally produced from fully complementary RNA, generated through the activity of an RDR, or in some cases long, hairpin RNAs with nearly full complementarity. Biogenesis and function of siRNAs are diverse and include adaptive defense against viruses, maintenance of genome stability and chromatin structure, identification and suppression or elimination of transposable elements and duplicated DNA, and transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of gene expression [20], [21], [22], [23]. In many lineages, the diversification of small RNA pathways has been accompanied by duplication and diversification of small RNA biogenesis factors (DCR/DCL and RDR) and effectors (AGO) [24].

Small RNAs have been studied in several pathosystems [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], but their role in regulating pathogen biology and host-pathogen interactions is poorly understood. Endogenous silencing pathways and differential expression of different classes of small RNAs during host-pathogen interaction remain to be characterized for most pathogens, including Phytophthora species. Dcl, Rdr and Ago genes were described in P. infestans [30], and several small RNA size classes between 21- and 32-nucleotides in length were described by deep sequencing in P. infestans [28], but further work is needed to characterize and assess the conservation of RNA silencing pathways in the Phytophthora genus. We used deep sequencing and comparative genomic approaches to analyze the endogenous small RNA populations of P. infestans, P. ramorum and P. sojae. A bimodal distribution of small RNA sizes was observed across all three species with peaks centered on 21- and 25-nucleotide long small RNAs. A bimodal distribution is suggestive of separate processing by the two DCL homologs in each species. The larger small RNA size class is predominantly associated with loci encoding transposable elements or other repetitive DNA while the shorter class was associated with several gene families, including Crinkler effectors and type III fibronectins, inverted repeats and a novel, conserved miRNA family. This work is a crucial step in elucidating the endogenous RNA silencing pathways in these important plant pathogens and provides novel insights into the silencing machinery in the stramenopiles.

Results/Discussion

RNA Silencing Machinery in Phytophthora Species

RNA interference (RNAi) is an established tool for studying gene function in Phytophthora species [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], which indicates that small RNA-based pathways exist in Phytophthora. In agreement with the observed activity of RNAi, homologs of the core eukaryotic RNA silencing machinery were identified in P. infestans, including one Dcl, one Rdr, and five Ago genes [30]. To determine if this complement of core silencing machinery is common among Phytophthora species, we used the genomic resources available for P. infestans, P. sojae, and P. ramorum to identify homologs in the three phylogenetically diverse species (see methods) [3], [9], [10]. Each Phytophthora genome encodes a single Rdr protein (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis of the signature RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase (RdRP) domain suggests that the common ancestor of oomycetes (and possibly chromalveolates) had a single Rdr gene (Figure 1A). Two Dcl genes were found in P. sojae and P. ramorum, but P. infestans was previously reported to have a single Dcl gene [30], PiDcl1, that is orthologous to PsDcl1 and PrDcl1 (Table 1). We hypothesized that PiDcl2 was either lost or was mistakenly excluded from the P. infestans genome assembly. To address the latter possibility, we searched for evidence of PiDcl2 in the whole-genome shotgun reads from P. infestans at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Trace Archive. We were able to assemble a 3962-nucleotide contig that contained a Dcl gene that was distinct from PiDcl1 and shared significant amino acid similarity to PsDcl2 and PrDcl2, confirming that P. infestans has two Dcl genes (Figure 1B, Table 1). Dcl1 and Dcl2 from Phytophthora species and the alveolates Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia are phylogenetically distinct, suggesting an ancient divergence (Figure 1B).

thumbnail
Figure 1. RNA silencing machinery in Phytophthora.

(A–C) Phylogenetic analysis of Rdr, Dcl and Ago proteins, respectively. Protein domains used for analysis were the Rdr RdRP domain, the Dcl RNaseIII A and B domains and the Ago DUF1785-PAZ-PIWI region. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap support values are shown. In (A) and (B), taxonomic groups are color-coded: viridiplantae (green), alveolates (blue) and oomycetes (orange). (D) Synteny maps of regions containing Ago3–5 (top) and Ago1/2 (bottom) in P. ramorum (Pr), P. sojae (Ps), and P. infestans (Pi). Regions are labeled with scaffold numbers, alignment orientation (+/−) and coordinate ranges. Genes (dark arrows), Ago genes (orange arrows), and transposable elements (green arrows) are depicted. Conserved intervals are connected by gray (direct) or blue (inverse) boxes (E) MAFFT alignment with ClustalX coloring of amino acid residues from the Ago MID (5′ phosphate binding) and PIWI (catalytic) domains. Positions shown to interact with the guide-strand 5′ monophosphate (MID), and the Mg2+-coordinating catalytic residues (PIWI) are marked with an asterisk [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.g001

Five Ago homologs and six probable Ago pseudogenes were identified from all three Phytophthora species (Table 1, Table 2). In a phylogenetic analysis of the DUF1785, PAZ and RNaseH-like PIWI domain, Phytophthora Ago proteins formed two deeply branching clades (Figure 1C). One clade contained proteins encoded by the orthologous Ago1 genes and PiAgo2, an Ago1 paralog (Figure 1C and D). The second clade contained four closely related groups of Ago proteins (Figure 1C). The Ago3, Ago4 and Ago5 groups are encoded by syntenic orthologs that are colocalized to the same approximately 100–200 kilobase pair (Kbp) region in each species (Figure 1D). PsAgo6 and two PsAgo6 pseudogenes are also located in the Ago3, Ago4 and Ago5 region of P. sojae (Figure 1D, Table 2). The Ago1-5 proteins contain the conserved MID domain amino acids known to interact with small RNA guide strand 5′ phosphates [40], [41], and contain the conserved PIWI domain metal-ion-coordinating residues (aspartic acid, aspartic acid, histidine) that are required for endonucleolytic cleavage activity (slicing) [42], [43], [44], [45], [46] (Figure 1E). In contrast, PsAgo6 and PrAgo7 encode proteins that lack one or more conserved catalytic residues in the PIWI domain (Figure 1E), and could represent a class that functions through a mechanism other than slicing. Alternatively, PsAgo6 and PrAgo7 may be pseudogenes given that they have substitution per site rates that are higher than Ago proteins encoded by syntenic orthologs (Ago1-5) and similar to the putative product of the PsAgo5_ps pseudogene (Figure 1C). We conclude that the genomes of P. infestans, P. sojae and P. ramorum encode a highly conserved set of core RNA silencing components with two anciently diverged clades of Dcl and Ago genes.

Phytophthora have Distinct Small RNA Populations

The P. infestans, P. sojae and P. ramorum genomes provide a platform to study small RNA biogenesis and function in Phytophthora as they span the genus [3], [9], [10]. In plants, animals, fungi and other eukaryotes, high-throughput sequencing of small RNA is a valuable experimental tool for understanding small RNA biology [47]. In particular, analysis of small RNA length, distribution across the genome and co-occurrence with annotated genomic features is useful for classifying small RNA into distinct pathways (for example, see [27], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55]). To assess the small RNA landscape of P. infestans, P. sojae and P. ramorum, we prepared small RNA libraries for sequencing from mycelium tissue. Individually prepared small RNA libraries from P. sojae and P. ramorum mycelia were sequenced on the 454 pyrosequencing platform [56] and yielded 34,784 and 59,314 reads, respectively. Two biological replicate samples prepared from P. infestans mycelium were sequenced on the Illumina 1G sequencing platform [57] and yielded a total of 9,932,843 reads. Small RNA sequences were parsed from adaptors and reads from each library that aligned without mismatches to its respective genome were kept for further analysis. P. sojae had 22,226 aligned reads (16,609 unique sequences) with 140,022 genomic matches, P. ramorum had 31,821 aligned reads (25,304 unique sequences) with 160,953 genomic matches and P. infestans had 5,594,216 aligned reads (1,893,617 unique sequences) with 54,692,467 genomic matches. The differences in genomic matches per unique sequence between species are probably caused by differences in genome size [9], [10].

The genome-wide small RNA size profile for each of the three species was bimodal with peaks centered on 21- and 25-nucleotide RNAs (Figure 2). The most abundant small RNAs were 25 nucleotides long, but 26-nucleotide small RNAs were nearly as prevalent (Figure 2A). In total, 18-23-nucleotide and 24-30-nucleotide small RNA were 30–44% and 56–70% of the total aligned reads in each species, respectively. In P. infestans, the majority (84%) of small RNA genome alignments (loci) that could be assigned to an annotated feature category overlapped retrotransposons (Figure 2B). Small RNA read abundance was more distributed amongst P. infestans features, relative to small RNA loci, with 16–33% of reads overlapping transposons, tandem repeats, protein-coding genes and retrotransposons (16%, 19%, 22%, and 33%, respectively), and less than 10% overlapping inverted repeats, helitron transposons and satellite repeats (7%, 3% and <1%, respectively) (Figure 2C). The proportion of small RNA loci and reads that overlapped each P. infestans feature category was approximately proportional to the total genome space occupied by each feature type. Therefore, to better understand the relative small RNA-generating activity of each type of feature, we normalized the feature small RNA size profiles to account for total feature length. P. infestans inverted and tandem repeats had the highest small RNA-generating activity per megabase pair (Mbp) (Figure 2D). In contrast, P. infestans transposable elements and protein-coding genes had 4.6–11.4 times fewer reads per Mbp than inverted repeats (Figure 2D). Therefore, while transposable element and protein-coding gene loci are the most widespread sources of small RNA, inverted and tandem repeat loci may be the most potent triggers of small RNA biogenesis.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Classification of small RNA populations in three Phytophthora species.

(A) Distribution of small RNA reads by size in P. infestans, P. sojae and P. ramorum. (B–D) Distribution of small RNA in P. infestans at retrotransposon, transposon, helitron transposon, inverted repeat, tandem repeat, satellite repeat and gene loci. Graphs are color-coded by small RNA size based on the legend in (A). (E) Biplot of principal components 1 and 2 from the PCA of P. infestans small RNA-generating segments. Small RNA-generating segments are color-coded based on overlapping features. Segments included in Cluster 1 or Cluster 2 from DBSCAN clustering of segments based on rotated small RNA size profile data are outlined. (F) Proportion of small RNA reads corresponding to 20-27-nucleotide small RNA for each small RNA-generating segment in DBSCAN Cluster 1 (upper) or Cluster 2 (lower). Gray lines are small RNA size profiles for individual segments and black lines are the cluster average profiles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.g002

P. infestans feature-specific small RNA size profiles were similar to the genome-wide profile: bimodal with peaks at 21- and 25-nucleotide RNAs (Figure 2A–D). Retrotransposons, transposons, helitrons and satellite repeats had similar size profiles where 24-30-nucleotide small RNAs were 3.5–5.7 times more abundant than 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs. For tandem repeats, 24-30-nucleotide small RNAs were only 1.1 times more abundant than 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs. In contrast, P. infestans inverted repeats and protein-coding genes were the only feature types for which 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs were more abundant than 24-30-nucleotide small RNAs. Based on the whole-genome and feature-specific small RNA size profiles, we hypothesized that Phytophthora species produce two small RNA size classes. To explore this possibility, we analyzed the size distributions of small RNA-generating loci using principal component analysis (PCA). Small RNA generating-loci were defined as segments of the P. infestans genome that contained mapped reads with up to 50 nucleotides of space between consecutive small RNAs. Segments were kept for further analysis if they contained at least one distinct pair of small RNAs that overlapped on opposite strands with 2-nucleotide 3′ overhangs, as expected for Dicer products [11]. We reasoned that segments that contained putative Dicer-duplexes were more likely to be bona fide small RNA-generating loci. For each of the 2,328 P. infestans segments that contained a Dicer-duplex pair (2,812,472 total reads), a proportional small RNA size profile was constructed, to remove abundance differences between segments, by calculating the proportion of small RNA reads for each size (20–27 nucleotides) relative to the total segment reads (Table A in File S1). PCA was done on the segments using a model that treated the proportion for each small RNA size (20–27 nucleotides) as an independent variable. The first principal component explained 30% of the variance and differentiated segments into two groups based on predominant small RNA sizes: 20-23-nucleotides versus 24-27-nucleotides (Figure 2E). The second principal component explained 15% of the variance and primarily differentiated segments based on the proportion of 25- and 26-nucleotide small RNA (Figure 2E). To further validate the size class differentiation, segments were clustered on the rotated data from the first and second principal components using the DBSCAN (density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise) algorithm [58]. DBSCAN clustering produced two clusters (Figure 2E, Cluster 1 and Cluster 2). Cluster 1 contained 52 segments that produced primarily 21-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 2F). Cluster 2 contained 2,141 segments that produced primarily 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 2F). Clustering did not result in a noticeable differentiation between segments with different proportions of 25- and 26-nucleotide small RNA (Figure 2E). The PCA and clustering results are consistent with our hypothesis that Phytophthora species produce two primary small RNA sizes centered around 21- and 25-nucleotides.

Taken together, the size distributions, PCA and clustering analyses are all consistent with the presence of two size classes of Phytophthora small RNA. The presence of two small RNA size classes and two Dcl orthologs in each species raises the possibility that each Dcl produces RNAs of one of the two size groups, similar to the way that plants partition small RNA pathways with specialized DCL proteins [59]. Consistent with this model, RNAi knockdown of PiDcl1 was recently shown to disrupt accumulation of 21-, but not 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs [28]. Additionally, Phytophthora Ago proteins may be partitioned into two or more functional groups that might stabilize 21- or 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs. Further analysis of RNA silencing-deficient lines will be required to confirm this hypothesis and identify any functional differences between the two small RNA size classes.

Genome-wide Distribution of Small RNA-generating Loci

The feature types in Figure 2, other than inverted repeats, were associated with abundant 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs, relative to 21-nucleotide small RNAs. Furthermore, the relative proportion of feature types in Cluster 1 and 2 (21- versus 25/26-nucleotide small RNA-generating segments, Figure 2E) were significantly different (p<0.001, Fisher’s exact test). Protein-coding gene and simple repeat segments were 7.0 (95% confidence interval: 3.5–13.4) and 36.5 (95% confidence interval: 11.0–116.1) times more likely to generate predominantly 21-nucleotide small RNAs, respectively (p<0.001, Fisher’s exact test). In contrast, transposable element segments were 3.2 (95% confidence interval: 1.8–6.0) times more likely to generate predominantly 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs (p<0.001, Fisher’s exact test). The P. infestans genome (240 Mbp) is more than twice as large as the P. sojae and P. ramorum genomes (95 and 65 Mbp, respectively) due to recent proliferation of transposable elements [9], [10]. Expansion of the P. infestans genome was not uniform and resulted in a distinct genome architecture that consists of blocks of gene-dense and gene-sparse regions [9]. Genome-wide differences in gene density can be visualized by binning genes into a two-dimensional matrix based on the length of 5′ and 3′ intergenic border regions [9]. As shown previously [9], most genes in P. infestans are flanked by intergenic regions between 20 bp and 3 Kbp long (gene-dense regions, GDRs), while another set are flanked by at least one intergenic region that is 5 Kbp or larger (gene-sparse regions, GSRs and border regions, BRs) (Figure 3A, left panel). GDRs and GSRs are markedly different; genes that lack transposable elements in their flanking intergenic regions are primarily in GDRs (Figure 3A, right panel). Similarly, the proportion of intergenic space occupied by transposable elements was lowest in GDRs (median = 0%) and highest in GSRs and BRs (median = 22%) (Figure 3B). A similar pattern was observed for intergenic small RNAs. Intergenic segments from gene-sparse, transposon-rich regions had the highest density (reads per bp) of all small RNAs, and in particular, 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 3C). In contrast, intergenic segments generally had low 21-nucleotide small RNA density and were distributed between both GDRs and GSRs (Figure 3C). Small RNA density within genes was more variable, but was generally highest for 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 3D). Unlike intergenic small RNAs, intragenic 25/26-nucleotide small RNA density was more pronounced in genes from GSRs than BRs (Figure 3D). Genes generally had low 21-nucleotide small RNA density (Figure 3D), with the exception of a few gene families discussed below.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Distribution of small RNA in the P. infestans genome.

(A–D) Two-dimensional binning of P. infestans genes based on the length of 5′ and 3′ flanking intergenic regions. Plots are divided into quadrants with dashed lines: gene-dense regions (GDRs), gene-sparse regions (GSRs), and border regions (BRs). (A) Heatmap color scale represents the number of genes per bin for all genes (left) and genes without transposable elements in flanking intergenic regions (Data from [9]). (B) Genes were binned as in (A), but the heatmap color scale represents the percentage of base pairs in both the 5′ and 3′ flanking intergenic regions that were occupied by transposable elements. (C and D) Genes were binned as in (A), but the heatmap color scale represents the repeat-normalized small RNA reads per base pair in either both the 5′ and 3′ flanking intergenic regions (C) or the gene body (D).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.g003

The distribution of 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs across the P. infestans genome coincides with the location of transposable elements and low gene density. Additionally, we observed enrichment of transposable element loci at 25/26-nucleotide-generating segments of the P. infestans genome. Therefore, we hypothesize that 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs function to repress transposable elements in Phytophthora species. In agreement with our observations, P. sojae strains that contain naturally silenced alleles of the avirulence gene Avr3a were shown to have abundant 24-26-nucleotide small RNAs at the Avr3a locus [60]. Furthermore, heritable transgenerational silencing of Avr3a was demonstrated in crosses between silenced and non-silenced strains, suggesting an epigenetic mode of inheritance [60]. In other RNA silencing systems, transposable elements and other repetitive DNA are silenced through heterochromatin modifications [61]. In plants, 24-nucleotide small RNAs guide AGO proteins to target loci, resulting in DNA methylation and ultimately repressive chromatin modifications [22]. The mechanism by which 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs might silence targets is unknown, but previous work suggests that transcriptional silencing in Phytophthora is mediated through chromatin modifications and not DNA methylation [62], [63].

Distinct Small RNA Populations from Protein-coding Gene and Pseudogene Loci

As described above, the majority of small RNAs in P. infestans are derived from transposable elements, repeats and other intergenic regions, but some genes were identified at small RNA-generating loci (Figure 2, Figure 3). To examine small RNA-generating genic loci in more detail, we identified 1,166 P. infestans genes and pseudogenes that overlapped at least 100 total small RNA reads. Gene annotations were updated using BLAST2GO [64], and genes were grouped by annotation and small RNA size profile (Figure 4A, Table B in File S1). Of the 1,166 genes, 875 genes (including 17 pseudogenes) overlapped predominantly 24-30-nucleotide small RNAs and 291 genes (including 54 pseudogenes) overlapped predominantly 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 4A, Table B in File S1). The majority (55.8%) of the small RNA-generating genes were of unknown type (hypothetical and conserved hypothetical), and 90% of the genes in these categories were associated primarily with 24-30-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 4A, Table B in File S1). Annotated families with four or more members in the small RNA-generating set included genes encoding 4 annexins (ANX), 9 aspartyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS), 12 ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, 163 crinkler effectors (CRN) (including 68 pseudogenes), 17 C48 family cysteine proteases (C48), 6 elicitins (ELI) (including 2 pseudogenes), 16 type III fibronectins (FN3), 4 M96 mating-specific proteins (M96) (including 1 pseudogene), 6 major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporters, 23 methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenases (MTHFD), 11 P-type ATPases (P-ATPase), 10 polysaccharide lyases (PL), 11 RXLR (Arg-X-Leu-Arg, where X is any amino acid) effectors, 6 SET domain-containing proteins and 11 SpoU rRNA methyltransferases (Figure 4A, Table B in File S1). The small RNAs from AARS, C48, M96, MTHFD, PL, RXLR, SET and SpoU genes were predominantly 24-30-nucleotides long (60–85% of the total reads on average per family). Interestingly, five of the eight families (C48, PL, RXLR, SET and SpoU) are enriched in gene-sparse regions [65]. Given that 24-30-nucleotide small RNAs were enriched at transposable element loci, or in gene-sparse, transposable element-rich regions (Figure 2, Figure 3), genes that overlap 24-30-nucleotide small RNA-generating regions may represent loci that were captured by transposable element silencing machinery either in cis or in trans. The distribution of small RNAs within, upstream, and downstream of genes that overlapped predominantly 24-30-nucleotide small RNAs was similar to transposons and LTR retrotransposons where 25/26-nucletide small RNA abundance was greatest within genes or transposable elements and continued, at a lower level, into the 500 bp upstream and downstream regions (Figure 4B). The higher 25/26-nucleotide small RNA abundance within genes and transposable elements, relative to flanking regions suggests that silencing is generally feature-specific. The appreciable 25/26-nucleotide small RNA density in the upstream and downstream flanking regions may arise from local spreading of silencing.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Small RNA from protein-coding gene and pseudogene loci in P. infestans.

(A) Heatmap-based size profile of 18-30-nucleotide small RNA reads mapping to 1,166 P. infestans genes that overlapped at least 100 total small RNA reads. Gene annotation groups with at least four genes are labeled with alternating black and gray boxes. (B and C) Regional metaplots with average 18-27-nucleotide small RNA reads per position. X-axis positions are relative scale (0–100%) for each region. Genes from (A) with more 24-30- than 18-23-nucleotide small RNA reads, LTR retrotransposons and transposons are shown (B). Genes from (A) with more 18-23- than 24-30-nucleotide small RNA reads, crinklers and type III fibronectins are shown (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.g004

Unlike most other features in the P. infestans genome, some genes encoding ANX, CRN, FN3 and P-ATPases overlapped small RNAs that were primarily 18-23-nucleotides long (64–95% of the total reads on average per family). In contrast to genes associated with 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs, 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs, and in particular 21-nucleotide small RNAs, at ANX, CRN, FN3 and P-ATPase loci were more abundant on average and were almost exclusively located in the gene body (Figure 4B and C). In particular, CRN and FN3 genes produced large clusters of abundant 21-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 4A, C). In the P. infestans genome, CRN genes and pseudogenes are found in several large gene clusters and are often grouped with CRN genes with the same domain architecture [9]. Of the 163 CRN genes and pseudogenes, 135 genes were associated with predominantly 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs, and 123 of these CRN genes were from or were found clustered with CRN with one of four domain architectures (Figure 5A). CRN groups that generate 21-nucleotide small RNAs were the DN5-type that were found primarily (14 of 17) on Supercontig 16 and 63, the DC-type that were found primarily (28 of 34) on Supercontig 6, and the D2 and DXZ types that were found together primarily (63 of 73) on Supercontig 31, 48, 82, 85, 69, 104 and 143 (Figure 5A). Interestingly, FN3 genes that produced 21-nucleotide small RNAs were also found in dense gene clusters (Figure 5B). It is unclear what mechanism generates 21- rather than 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs from ANX, CRN, FN3 and P-ATPase genes. Because inverted repeats (Figure 2) and miRNA (see below) are associated with 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs, one possibility is that 21-nucleotide small RNAs from ANX, CRN, FN3 and P-ATPase are generated through an Rdr-independent mechanism that involves intramolecular double-stranded RNA formation. Small RNAs produced from a folded single-stranded RNA precursor are expected to match only the transcribed precursor strand, but 95% of genes that were associated with predominantly 18-23-nucleotide small RNAs had at least one antisense read, suggesting that these precursors are converted to double-stranded RNA through Rdr activity.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Regions of P. infestans containing clusters of CRN and FN3 genes and pseudogenes.

(A and B) Genomic regions containing CRN and FN3 genes. The position of genes, transposable elements, CRN genes (A) and FN3 genes (B) are shown. 18-23- and 24-30-nucleotide small RNA read density heatmaps are shown (see legend at the bottom of B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.g005

A Conserved MIRNA Family in Phytophthora

To address the question of whether oomycetes have precisely-processed miRNAs similar to those in other eukaryotes, we designed a pipeline to identify candidate MIRNA genes using high-throughput small RNA sequencing data from P. infestans, P. sojae and P. ramorum. First, small RNA that mapped to transposable element or structural RNA loci were removed from further analysis. Second, 20-22-nucleotide small RNA sequences were filtered to limit further analysis to sequences with two or more reads and ten or fewer matches to the genome. The remaining sequences and surrounding genomic regions were extracted and RNA structural analysis was done to identify foldback structures with MIRNA-like characteristics. Overlapping loci were consolidated and filtered for strand bias (at least 95% of the small RNA reads were required to originate from one strand) to eliminate Rdr-dependent small RNA-generating regions. Finally, for each remaining foldback, the most abundant sequence was considered the mature miRNA and was required to have a complementary sequence with two-nucleotide 3′ overhangs (miRNA*) from the opposite arm of the foldback. Two loci each from P. infestans, P. sojae and P. ramorum matched our criteria (Figure 6A). One locus from P. infestans was a 714-nucleotide inverted repeat (pin-IR2758) that produced heterogeneous 21-nucleotide siRNA and was therefore not considered a MIRNA (Figure 6A). The two putative MIRNA loci in P. ramorum and P. sojae were from the same family (MIR8788) and were related to one of the loci from P. infestans. The foldback structures of all MIR8788 homologs were strikingly similar, and multiple sequence alignment of the primary foldback sequences also showed that the foldbacks were highly conserved (Figure 6B and C). MIR8788 foldback arms were particularly conserved, relative to loop sequences, possibly due to functional sequences present in the foldback stem (Figure 6C). Additionally, the first 15 nucleotides of the miRNA guide strand, which corresponds to the putative miRNA-target RNA seed-pairing region, were preserved in all MIR8788 foldbacks (Figure 6C). The miRNA and miRNA* 5′ end processing positions within the MIR8788 foldbacks (deduced from the sequenced small RNAs) were consistent while the 3′ ends were variable (Figure S1). Positioning of the miRNA and miRNA* 5′ ends suggests that Dcl processing of MIR8788 in P. infestans and P. ramorum results in a 21-nucleotide guide strand, but results in a 22-nucleotide guide in P. sojae (Figure S1). We confirmed the presence and size of pin-miR8788 by northern blot assay (Figure 6D). In plants, miRNA are protected from 3′–>5′ degradation by 2′-O-methyl modification of the 3′ terminal nucleotide by the methyltransferase HUA ENHANCER1 (HEN1) [66]. The 3′ end heterogeneity we observed might result from trimming of the small RNAs after Dcl processing because P. infestans small RNAs were found to have unmodified 3′ terminal nucleotides, and P. infestans lacks a clear HEN1 homolog [28].

thumbnail
Figure 6. Computational and molecular characterization of Phytophthora MIRNA genes.

(A) Single-nucleotide resolution small RNA read density in regions containing pin-MIR8788, pra-MIR8788a, psj-MIR8788a and pin-IR2758. (B) MIR8788 foldback structures predicted with RNAfold [90]. Ribonucleotides are colored by base-pairing entropy. (C) T-coffee alignment of DNA sequences corresponding to the MIR8788 foldbacks. Alignment quality is shown as a heatmap. (D) Northern blot detection of the pin-miR8788 guide RNA and pin-IR2758- and Pi-helitron-derived small RNA in P. infestans mycelia tissue. Northern blot detection of serine-tRNA was included as a loading standard. (E) Summary of TargetFinder results for predicted target transcripts of miR8788. (F) RLM-5′RACE validation of psj-miR8788-guided cleavage of AAAP transcripts. Arrows indicate the detected cleavage position with the number of clones supporting cleavage out of the total tested. The representative structure of AAAP transcripts is shown with the AAAP domain and miRNA target site highlighted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.g006

We used TargetFinder [67] to computationally predict target transcripts for miR8788 in P. sojae, P. ramorum and P. infestans. The best-scoring target RNAs for all three species were from the amino acid/auxin permease family (AAAP) (Figure 6E). In addition, pin-miR8788, psj-miR8788 and pra-miR8788 were predicted to target 5, 11 and 11 AAAP transcripts, respectively, while predicted targeting of single genes from other families was limited to specific species (Figure 6E). We used RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of 5′ complementary DNA ends (RLM-5′RACE) to assess two AAAP transcripts for miR8788-guided cleavage in P. sojae. Physo2.s_450095 cleavage products with cleavage between the canonical positions 10 and 11 relative to the 5′ end of psj-miR8788 were detected (Figure 6F). Gm1.7889_g cleavage products were also detected within the psj-miR8788 target site, but cleavage was detected between positions 9 and 10 (Figure 6F). Further work would be required to assign biological significance to regulation of AAAP transcripts by MIR8788.

Evidence that MIR8788 is a bona fide miRNA-generating locus is strong, but it is perhaps surprising that only one MIRNA family was found in our analysis. To assess possible biases in our computational pipeline, we independently analyzed the P. infestans small RNA libraries using the ShortStack pipeline [68]. Results from ShortStack matched those from our pipeline in predicting only a single MIRNA locus, MIR8788. These analyses may have missed miRNAs that were not represented in our libraries because of specific spatiotemporal or environmental-dependent patterns. Furthermore, our analysis relied on libraries from mycelium grown in broth and it is possible that additional MIRNA loci specific to certain life-stages, particularly during host-pathogen interaction, remain to be discovered. Alternatively, the concept of a distinct miRNA biogenesis pathway may not be relevant to Phytophthora species if their small RNA pathways produce ∼21-nucleotide miRNA-like sequences from hairpin RNAs with differing precision and processing efficiencies, producing sets of small RNAs that range from heterogeneous (pin-IR2758) to precise (MIR8788) (Figure 6A). Indeed, the P. infestans, P. ramorum and P. sojae genomes all contained inverted repeats predicted to produce hairpin RNAs that are processed into ∼21-nucleotide small RNAs (Figure 2B–D, Table C in File S1). It may be that these MIRNA-like inverted repeats have functions similar to plant and animal MIRNA genes. If this is the case, computational prediction of these loci and their targets will need to be refined, particularly because of their relatively imprecise processing by Dcls.

Conclusions

In plants, animals and fungi, duplication and diversification of genes that encode DCR/DCL, RDR, AGO and other accessory proteins has resulted in the evolution of distinct RNA silencing pathways [24]. We find that Phytophthora species have a conserved set of core RNA silencing machinery, including one Rdr, two Dcl and four Ago proteins, with some species-specific duplicates. Our detailed analysis of small RNA sizes and distribution across the P. infestans genome, as well as small RNA sizes from P. sojae and P. ramorum, supports the presence of two primary, distinct small RNA size classes: 21- and 25/26-nucleotides. The 21- and 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs are not just distinct in size but are also generated from distinct features, with 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs predominantly associated with transposable elements and 21-nucleotide small RNAs associated with inverted repeats and several gene families. These results are largely in agreement with Vetukuri et al. [28] except that we do not provide evidence for or against a 32-nucleotide size class, as these RNAs were not present in our data sets. Taken together, we propose that Phytophthora have at least two distinct small RNA pathways that may be partitioned by Rdr, Dcl and Ago diversification as well as small RNA size. In this model, we propose that 25/26-nucleotide small RNAs define a siRNA pathway that targets transposable elements and other repetitive features and silences target loci through an epigenetic mechanism. Besides a role for genome defense and evolution of genome structure, epigenetic regulation of pathogenicity factors has important implications for the evolution of isolates and host range [60].

Additionally, we propose that 21-nucleotide small RNAs define at least a second pathway that regulates targets by post-transcriptional control. The presence of a second pathway for small RNA biogenesis is further supported by the observed ancient divergence of Dcl1 and Dcl2, and the deep split in the Ago tree separating Ago1/2 from the other Agos, reflecting independent evolution. Some 21-nucleotide-generating loci, such as CRN and FN3, appear to be siRNA and likely are dependent on Rdr activity. In contrast, other 21-nucleotide small RNAs may be generated from hairpin RNA (e.g. MIR8788) without the need for Rdr activity. It is unclear what the function of 21-nucleotide small RNAs is, but given the large number of P. infestans CRN genes associated with 21-nucleotide small RNAs they may be important components of pathogenicity, host range or variability of effector repertoire between isolates.

Materials and Methods

Phytophthora Strains and Growth Conditions

Mycelium was grown from the sequenced strains of three Phytophthora species; Phytophthora ramorum Pr-102, Phytophthora sojae P6497 and Phytophthora infestans T30-4 [9], [10]. Phytophthora isolates were maintained on cleared 10% V8 agar medium (100 mL V8 juice; 1 g CaCO3; 30 mg/L β-sitosterol (EMD Chemicals, Incorporated); 15 g agar; 900 mL deionized water) in a 20°C incubator in the dark [69]. Mycelia were grown in V8 broth (V8 agar medium without agar) on a rotating shaker in flasks and collected after 7 days for P. sojae and P. ramorum and after 4 days for P. infestans.

Total RNA Preparation

Total RNA was isolated as described previously [49]. Briefly, mycelium samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground into a fine powder and homogenized in Trizol (1 g∶10 mL, Life Technologies). After adding 2 mL chloroform per 10 mL Trizol, samples were mixed, incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 8400×g for 10 minutes. Two additional chloroform extractions were done before RNA was precipitated in 0.7 volumes isopropanol for 20 minutes at room temperature and spun for 30 minutes at 8400×g. Minimally dried pellets were resuspended in 200 µL 0.1X TE, extracted 2 times with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (50∶49∶1), and once with chloroform. Total RNA was precipitated with 5 M ammonium acetate and ethanol at −80°C overnight, spun at 12000×g for 30 minutes at 4°C, resuspended in 100 microliters 0.1X TE and quantitated by Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific).

Small RNA Library Construction and Sequencing

Small RNA libraries for P. ramorum and P. sojae were prepared for sequencing on the 454 platform using 5′ adaptors 5′-ATCGTAGGCUGCUGAUA-3′ and 5′-ATCGTAGGCCACUGAUA-3′ for P. sojae and P. ramorum, respectively, with strain-specific bases bolded, as described previously [49]. P. infestans libraries were prepared for sequencing on the Illumina 1 G platform as described previously [70] except that no RNA spike-in standards were added and no barcoded adaptors were used.

Small RNA Data Processing

Sequencing reads were parsed to remove adaptors and collapsed to a unique set with read counts. Parsed sequences from each species were aligned to their respective genome using BOWTIE v0.12.8 [71] with settings that limit the results to perfect matches only (–f –v 0–a –S). Aligned small RNAs were stored in Sequence Alignment/Map (SAM) format and were accessed using SAMTOOLS [72]. The annotated genomes for P. sojae (v3.0) and P. ramorum (v1.1) were obtained from the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) [6]. The annotated genome for P. infestans was provided by the Broad Institute [9]. Where noted, reads were repeat-normalized by dividing the read counts by the total number of locations in the genome the small RNA mapped to.

Identification of Rdr, Dcl and Ago Homologs

Putative homologs of the small RNA biogenesis and effector genes Rdr, Dcl, and Ago were located using tBLASTn [73]. Plant and animal homolog protein sequences were used as the query against both transcript and genome databases from P. sojae, P. ramorum, and P. infestans [9], [10]. For PiDcl2, MEGABLAST [73] was used to align PsDcl2 to the P. infestans whole-genome shotgun reads at the NCBI Trace Archive (File S2). CAP3 [74] was used to assembly the whole-genome shotgun reads into a 3962 bp contig (File S2). In cases where BLAST results from transcript and genome databases overlapped at the same locus, the annotated gene model was used and is reported in Table 1. PiDcl2 and genomic BLAST results for PrRdr1, PrAgo3 and PrAgo7 did not have corresponding gene models so GENSCAN [75] and FGENESH [76] were used to predict gene structures (File S2). Conserved domains were annotated using the PFAM database [77] for the complete set of proteins identified. Proteins were filtered based on the presence of conserved domain architecture specific to the gene families: Rdr proteins were required to contain an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase domain [78], Ago proteins were required to contain a DUF1785, PAZ and PIWI domain [79], and Dcl proteins were required to contain two RNaseIII domains [80]. Six Ago genes had one or more missing or truncated domain and were considered pseudogenes (Table 2). Gene names were assigned to orthologs and paralogs based on phylogenetic and syntenic analysis (see below) and to preserve previously published nomenclature [28], [30] (Table 1).

Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was done using the amino acid sequences of the RdRP domain, RNaseIII-RNaseIII domains region and DUF1785-PAZ-PIWI domains region. PsAgo6_ps1, PsAgo6_ps2, PrAgo1_ps1, PrAgo1_ps2 and PrAgo3_ps were not included in the Ago phylogenetic analysis because each had missing or truncated DUF1785, PAZ or PIWI domains. For each family, protein multiple sequence alignments were built with MAFFT [81]. The aligned sequences were imported into Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA v5.05) [82] and trimmed to exclude positions that contained a gap in any sequence. Maximum Likelihood inference with RAxML v7.3.0 [83] was used with a GAMMA model of rate heterogeneity and the LG substitution matrix to build phylogenetic trees using the majority-rule consensus criterion. Support for clades was obtained using 1,000 bootstraps. Arabidopsis thaliana RDR and DCL proteins were included as outgroups for the Rdr and Dcl analyses, respectively, and T. gondii Ago1 was included as the outgroup for the Ago analysis. Consensus trees were drawn with DENDROSCOPE 3.2.4 [84]. Synteny analysis of Ago1-5 genes was done using the JGI Genome Portal and VISTA Point browser [85], [86].

Statistical Analyses

All statistical tests were done using R v2.15 [87]. Principal component analysis was done by the scalar value decomposition method on centered and scaled data with the prcomp function (stats package). For PCA, the size profiles for P. infestans small RNA-generating segments were normalized to remove abundance differences between segments but maintain the relative contribution of each size class to the overall segment profile. For each segment, the relative contribution of each small RNA size class between 20- and 27-nucleotides was calculated by dividing the total size class reads by the total reads for the segment. DBSCAN clustering [58] was done with the dbscan function (fpc package [88]) using a minimum cluster size of 30 and a maximum distance (eps) of 0.8. Fisher’s exact test was done with the fisher.test function (stats package).

Identification and Analysis of MIRNA Genes

A computational pipeline was used to identify putative miRNA from among the Phytophthora small RNA datasets. First, small RNA arising from transposable elements and structural RNA loci were removed. Second, only 20-22-nucleotide small RNAs with two or more reads and ten or fewer matches to the genome were considered. Third, an initial foldback assessment was done with small RNA-flanking sequence (1 Kbp) using EINVERTED (-gap 12 -threshold 10 -match 3 -mismatch -4) [89]. Small RNAs located within EINVERTED alignment results were analyzed further, and overlapping loci were consolidated. Fourth, secondary structure analysis was done using RNAfold [90] on consolidated loci where at least 95% of the small RNA reads were from one strand. The most abundant small RNA from each locus had to be located in a stem region and was considered a miRNA if a small RNA matching the predicted miRNA* was sequenced in our datasets.

To assess possible biases in our computational pipeline, we independently analyzed the P. infestans small RNA libraries using the ShortStack pipeline v0.4 [68]. Aligned small RNA reads in SAM format were compressed, sorted and indexed in BAM format using SAMTOOLS. Prep_bam.pl v0.1.1 from ShortStack was used to prepare the BAM file for the ShortStack pipeline. ShortStack was run with default settings except that the small RNA size range was set to 18–26 nucleotides (–dicermin 18–dicermax 26).

miRNA Target Prediction

Targets for miR8788 were predicted for P. sojae, P. ramorum and P. infestans transcripts using TargetFinder v1.6 (http://carringtonlab.org/resources/targetfinder) [67] with a score cutoff of 5 (-c 5).

Northern Blot Analysis

Total RNA (10 µg) from P. infestans mycelium tissue was resolved by denaturing 17% polyacrylamide-urea gel electrophoresis. For size standards, 21- and 24-nucleotide synthetic RNA markers (5′-pUGUGGCCGAGGAUGUUUCCGU-3′ and 5′-pUUGUGGCCGAGGAUGUUUCCGUCC-3′, respectively) were also resolved. RNA was transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (Nytran SuPerCharge, Whatman) by semi-dry electrotransfer. RNA was UV-crosslinked to the membrane twice at 1200 Joules. DNA probes for pin-miR8788 (5′-GCGGCGCTGGTACGCTTGGTAG-3′) and serine-tRNA (5′-CTGTGAGATTCGAACTCACGC-3′) were end-labeled by phosphorylation with γ32P-ATP and Optikinase (Amersham). Membranes were incubated with hybridization solution (PerfectHyb Plus, Sigma) at 38°C for 1 hour and then incubated with probes at 38°C overnight.

RLM-5′RACE

The P. sojae candidate psj-miR8788 target transcripts Physo2.s_450095 and gm1.7889_g were analyzed for miRNA-guided cleavage by modified RLM-5′RACE using the GeneRacer kit (Life Technologies) as described [91]. RT-PCR was done using nested 5′ linker primers and gene-specific primers located downstream of the predicted psj-miR8788 binding site. Gene-specific primers were 5′-AGCAGCGAGCCGCCCAGCACGAGGAA-3′ and 5′-TGGGCACCAGGCACACGGGCAGCAC-3′ for Physo2.s_450095 and 5′-AGCGTGGGAATGAGGCACACCGGCA-3′ and 5′-AGGTCGGGGAACGGCACACTCGGGT-3′ for gm1.7889_g. PCR products were cloned and sequenced to detect RNA fragment 5′ ends.

Accessions

P. tetraurelia sequences were extracted from ParameciumDB [92], [93]: Rdr1 [GSPATP00024768001]; Rdr2 [GSPATP00036857001]; Dcl1 [GSPATP00021751001]; Dcl2a [GSPATP00027456001]; Dcl2b [GSPATP00032258001]. T. thermophilia sequences were extracted from the Tetrahymena Genome Database [94]: Rdr1 [TTHERM_00853150]; Dcl1 [TTHERM_00284230]; Dcl2 [TTHERM_00316190]. T. gondii sequences were extracted from the NCBI protein database: Rdr1 [XP_002371017]; Ago1 [XP_002364262]. A. thaliana sequences were extracted from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR v10) [95]: RDR1 [AT1G14790]; RDR2 [AT4G11130]; RDR6 [AT3G49500]; DCL1 [AT1G01040]: DCL2 [AT3G03300]; DCL3 [AT3G43920]; DCL4 [AT5G20320]; AGO1 [AT1G48410]. Homo sapiens AGO2 [Q9UKV8] and Drosophila melanogaster AGO1 [Q27IR0] were extracted from UniProtKB [96]. Small RNA datasets were uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database under the series accession GSE50033. MIR8788 was submitted to miRBase (http://www.mirbase.org/).

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

MIR8788 processing in P. infestans, P. ramorum and P. sojae. MIR8788 foldback diagrams for P. infestans (A), P. ramorum (B) and P. sojae (C). miR8788 guide strands and miR8788* strands are highlighted in each foldback. Proportion of small RNA reads for the entire foldback are plotted as stacked bar graphs. Small RNAs are color coded by size.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.s001

(EPS)

File S1.

Supplemental tables for small RNA-generating segments, genes and inverted repeats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.s002

(XLSX)

File S2.

Manually annotated gene sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077181.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Karan Fairchild and Kim Henslee for excellent technical support, and the Oregon State University Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing for use of the bioinformatics computer cluster. The P. sojae v3.0 sequence data were produced by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute http://www.jgi.doe.gov/in collaboration with the user community. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this manuscript are solely for the purpose of providing specific information and do not imply recommendation or endorsement.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JCC NJG NF KDK SRB. Performed the experiments: KDK NF SRB CMP EJC. Analyzed the data: NF CMS KDK JTC SRB KBG JSH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NJG JCC CMP. Wrote the paper: NF JTC KDK SRB JSH NJG JCC.

References

  1. 1. Baldauf SL (2003) The deep roots of eukaryotes. Science 300: 1703–1706
  2. 2. Brown JW, Sorhannus U (2010) A molecular genetic timescale for the diversification of autotrophic stramenopiles (Ochrophyta): substantive underestimation of putative fossil ages. PLoS ONE 5: e12759
  3. 3. Blair JE, Coffey MD, Park S-Y, Geiser DM, Kang S (2008) A multi-locus phylogeny for Phytophthora utilizing markers derived from complete genome sequences. Fungal Genet Biol 45: 266–277
  4. 4. Fry WE (2008) Phytophthora infestans: the plant (and R gene) destroyer. Mol Plant Pathol 9: 385–402
  5. 5. Yoshida K, Schuenemann VJ, Cano LM, Pais M, Mishra B, et al. (2013) The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. eLife 2: e00731
  6. 6. Tyler BM (2007) Phytophthora sojae: root rot pathogen of soybean and model oomycete. Mol Plant Pathol 8: 1–8
  7. 7. Grünwald NJ, Goss EM, Press CM (2008) Phytophthora ramorum: a pathogen with a remarkably wide host-range causing sudden oak death on oaks and ramorum blight on woody ornamentals. Mol Plant Pathol 9: 729–740
  8. 8. Brasier C, Webber J (2010) Plant pathology: Sudden larch death. Nature 466: 824–825
  9. 9. Haas BJ, Kamoun S, Zody MC, Jiang RHY, Handsaker RE, et al. (2009) Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature 461: 393–398
  10. 10. Tyler BM, Tripathy S, Zhang X, Dehal P, Jiang RHY, et al. (2006) Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science 313: 1261–1266
  11. 11. Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ (2009) Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell 136: 642–655
  12. 12. Kim VN, Han J, Siomi MC (2009) Biogenesis of small RNAs in animals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 126–139
  13. 13. Winter J, Jung S, Keller S, Gregory RI, Diederichs S (2009) Many roads to maturity: microRNA biogenesis pathways and their regulation. Nat Cell Biol 11: 228–234
  14. 14. Axtell MJ, Westholm JO, Lai EC (2011) Vive la différence: biogenesis and evolution of microRNAs in plants and animals. Genome Biol 12: 221
  15. 15. Voinnet O (2009) Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell 136: 669–687
  16. 16. Czech B, Hannon GJ (2011) Small RNA sorting: matchmaking for Argonautes. Nat Rev Genet 12: 19–31
  17. 17. Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281–297
  18. 18. Axtell MJ, Bowman JL (2008) Evolution of plant microRNAs and their targets. Trends Plant Sci 13: 343–349
  19. 19. Shabalina SA, Koonin EV (2008) Origins and evolution of eukaryotic RNA interference. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 578–587
  20. 20. Bourc’his D, Voinnet O (2010) A small-RNA perspective on gametogenesis, fertilization, and early zygotic development. Science 330: 617–622
  21. 21. Ghildiyal M, Zamore PD (2009) Small silencing RNAs: an expanding universe. Nat Rev Genet 10: 94–108
  22. 22. Law JA, Jacobsen SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet 11: 204–220
  23. 23. Chang SS, Zhang Z, Liu Y (2012) RNA interference pathways in fungi: mechanisms and functions. Annu Rev Microbiol 66: 305–323
  24. 24. Chapman EJ, Carrington JC (2007) Specialization and evolution of endogenous small RNA pathways. Nat Rev Genet 8: 884–896
  25. 25. Cai P, Hou N, Piao X, Liu S, Liu H, et al. (2011) Profiles of small non-coding RNAs in Schistosoma japonicum during development. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1256
  26. 26. Nunes CC, Gowda M, Sailsbery J, Xue M, Chen F, et al. (2011) Diverse and tissue-enriched small RNAs in the plant pathogenic fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Genomics 12: 288
  27. 27. Braun L, Cannella D, Ortet P, Barakat M, Sautel CF, et al. (2010) A complex small RNA repertoire is generated by a plant/fungal-like machinery and effected by a metazoan-like Argonaute in the single-cell human parasite Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000920
  28. 28. Vetukuri RR, Asman AK, Tellgren-Roth C, Jahan SN, Reimegard J, et al. (2012) Evidence for small RNAs homologous to effector-encoding genes and transposable elements in the oomycete Phytophthora infestans. PLoS ONE 7: e51399
  29. 29. Raman V, Simon SA, Romag A, Demirci F, Mathioni SM, et al. (2013) Physiological stressors and invasive plant infections alter the small RNA transcriptome of the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Genomics 14: 326
  30. 30. Vetukuri RR, Avrova AO, Grenville-Briggs LJ, Van West P, Soderbom F, et al. (2011) Evidence for involvement of Dicer-like, Argonaute and histone deacetylase proteins in gene silencing in Phytophthora infestans. Mol Plant Pathol 12: 772–785
  31. 31. Ah Fong AM, Judelson HS (2003) Cell cycle regulator Cdc14 is expressed during sporulation but not hyphal growth in the fungus-like oomycete Phytophthora infestans. Mol Microbiol 50: 487–494
  32. 32. Avrova AO, Boevink PC, Young V, Grenville-Briggs LJ, van West P, et al. (2008) A novel Phytophthora infestans haustorium-specific membrane protein is required for infection of potato. Cell Microbiol 10: 2271–2284
  33. 33. van West P, Kamoun S, van ‘t Klooster JW, Govers F (1999) Internuclear gene silencing in Phytophthora infestans. Mol Cell 3: 339–348
  34. 34. Whisson SC, Avrova AO, P VANW, Jones JT (2005) A method for double-stranded RNA-mediated transient gene silencing in Phytophthora infestans. Mol Plant Pathol 6: 153–163
  35. 35. Walker CA, Koppe M, Grenville-Briggs LJ, Avrova AO, Horner NR, et al. (2008) A putative DEAD-box RNA-helicase is required for normal zoospore development in the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Genet Biol 45: 954–962
  36. 36. Grenville-Briggs LJ, Anderson VL, Fugelstad J, Avrova AO, Bouzenzana J, et al. (2008) Cellulose synthesis in Phytophthora infestans is required for normal appressorium formation and successful infection of potato. Plant Cell 20: 720–738
  37. 37. Dou D, Kale SD, Liu T, Tang Q, Wang X, et al. (2010) Different domains of Phytophthora sojae effector Avr4/6 are recognized by soybean resistance genes Rps4 and Rps6. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23: 425–435
  38. 38. Zhao W, Dong S, Ye W, Hua C, Meijer HJ, et al. (2011) Genome-wide identification of Phytophthora sojae SNARE genes and functional characterization of the conserved SNARE PsYKT6. Fungal Genet Biol 48: 241–251
  39. 39. Dong S, Yu D, Cui L, Qutob D, Tedman-Jones J, et al. (2011) Sequence variants of the Phytophthora sojae RXLR effector Avr3a/5 are differentially recognized by Rps3a and Rps5 in soybean. PLoS ONE 6: e20172
  40. 40. Elkayam E, Kuhn CD, Tocilj A, Haase AD, Greene EM, et al. (2012) The structure of human argonaute-2 in complex with miR-20a. Cell 150: 100–110
  41. 41. Schirle NT, MacRae IJ (2012) The crystal structure of human Argonaute2. Science 336: 1037–1040
  42. 42. Ma JB, Yuan YR, Meister G, Pei Y, Tuschl T, et al. (2005) Structural basis for 5′-end-specific recognition of guide RNA by the A. fulgidus Piwi protein. Nature 434: 666–670
  43. 43. Parker JS, Roe SM, Barford D (2004) Crystal structure of a PIWI protein suggests mechanisms for siRNA recognition and slicer activity. EMBO J 23: 4727–4737
  44. 44. Parker JS, Roe SM, Barford D (2005) Structural insights into mRNA recognition from a PIWI domain-siRNA guide complex. Nature 434: 663–666
  45. 45. Wang Y, Sheng G, Juranek S, Tuschl T, Patel DJ (2008) Structure of the guide-strand-containing argonaute silencing complex. Nature 456: 209–213
  46. 46. Jinek M, Doudna JA (2009) A three-dimensional view of the molecular machinery of RNA interference. Nature 457: 405–412
  47. 47. McCormick KP, Willmann MR, Meyers BC (2011) Experimental design, preprocessing, normalization and differential expression analysis of small RNA sequencing experiments. Silence 2: 2
  48. 48. Lu C, Kulkarni K, Souret FF, MuthuValliappan R, Tej SS, et al. (2006) MicroRNAs and other small RNAs enriched in the Arabidopsis RNA-dependent RNA polymerase-2 mutant. Genome Res 16: 1276–1288
  49. 49. Kasschau KD, Fahlgren N, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, Cumbie JS, et al. (2007) Genome-wide profiling and analysis of Arabidopsis siRNAs. PLoS Biol 5: e57
  50. 50. Czech B, Malone CD, Zhou R, Stark A, Schlingeheyde C, et al. (2008) An endogenous small interfering RNA pathway in Drosophila. Nature 453: 798–802
  51. 51. Ghildiyal M, Seitz H, Horwich MD, Li C, Du T, et al. (2008) Endogenous siRNAs derived from transposons and mRNAs in Drosophila somatic cells. Science 320: 1077–1081
  52. 52. Okamura K, Chung WJ, Ruby JG, Guo H, Bartel DP, et al. (2008) The Drosophila hairpin RNA pathway generates endogenous short interfering RNAs. Nature 453: 803–806
  53. 53. Tam OH, Aravin AA, Stein P, Girard A, Murchison EP, et al. (2008) Pseudogene-derived small interfering RNAs regulate gene expression in mouse oocytes. Nature 453: 534–538
  54. 54. Watanabe T, Totoki Y, Toyoda A, Kaneda M, Kuramochi-Miyagawa S, et al. (2008) Endogenous siRNAs from naturally formed dsRNAs regulate transcripts in mouse oocytes. Nature 453: 539–543
  55. 55. Ruby JG, Jan C, Player C, Axtell MJ, Lee W, et al. (2006) Large-scale sequencing reveals 21U-RNAs and additional microRNAs and endogenous siRNAs in C. elegans. Cell 127: 1193–1207
  56. 56. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376–380
  57. 57. Bentley DR (2006) Whole-genome re-sequencing. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16: 545–552
  58. 58. Ester M, Kriegel H-p, S Jr, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: AAAI Press. 226–231.
  59. 59. Axtell MJ (2013) Classification and comparison of small RNAs from plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 137–159
  60. 60. Qutob D, Chapman BP, Gijzen M (2013) Transgenerational gene silencing causes gain of virulence in a plant pathogen. Nat Commun 4: 1349
  61. 61. Castel SE, Martienssen RA (2013) RNA interference in the nucleus: roles for small RNAs in transcription, epigenetics and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 14: 100–112
  62. 62. Judelson HS, Tani S (2007) Transgene-induced silencing of the zoosporogenesis-specific NIFC gene cluster of Phytophthora infestans involves chromatin alterations. Eukaryot Cell 6: 1200–1209
  63. 63. van West P, Shepherd SJ, Walker CA, Li S, Appiah AA, et al. (2008) Internuclear gene silencing in Phytophthora infestans is established through chromatin remodelling. Microbiology 154: 1482–1490
  64. 64. Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, et al. (2008) High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 3420–3435
  65. 65. Raffaele S, Farrer RA, Cano LM, Studholme DJ, MacLean D, et al. (2010) Genome evolution following host jumps in the Irish potato famine pathogen lineage. Science 330: 1540–1543
  66. 66. Ji L, Chen X (2012) Regulation of small RNA stability: methylation and beyond. Cell Res 22: 624–636
  67. 67. Fahlgren N, Carrington JC (2010) miRNA target prediction in plants. Methods Mol Biol 592: 51–57
  68. 68. Axtell MJ (2013) ShortStack: Comprehensive annotation and quantification of small RNA genes. RNA. doi: 10.1261/rna.035279.112.
  69. 69. Goss EM, Larsen M, Chastagner GA, Givens DR, Grunwald NJ (2009) Population genetic analysis infers migration pathways of Phytophthora ramorum in US nurseries. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000583
  70. 70. Fahlgren N, Sullivan CM, Kasschau KD, Chapman EJ, Cumbie JS, et al. (2009) Computational and analytical framework for small RNA profiling by high-throughput sequencing. RNA 15: 992–1002
  71. 71. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL (2009) Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10: R25
  72. 72. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079
  73. 73. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, et al. (2009) BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 421
  74. 74. Huang X, Madan A (1999) CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 9: 868–877
  75. 75. Burge C, Karlin S (1997) Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol 268: 78–94
  76. 76. Salamov AA, Solovyev VV (2000) Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res 10: 516–522
  77. 77. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D290–301
  78. 78. Iyer LM, Koonin EV, Aravind L (2003) Evolutionary connection between the catalytic subunits of DNA-dependent RNA polymerases and eukaryotic RNA-dependent RNA polymerases and the origin of RNA polymerases. BMC Struct Biol 3: 1
  79. 79. Poulsen C, Vaucheret H, Brodersen P (2013) Lessons on RNA silencing mechanisms in plants from eukaryotic argonaute structures. Plant Cell 25: 22–37
  80. 80. Macrae IJ, Zhou K, Li F, Repic A, Brooks AN, et al. (2006) Structural basis for double-stranded RNA processing by Dicer. Science 311: 195–198
  81. 81. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30: 772–780
  82. 82. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739
  83. 83. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690
  84. 84. Huson DH, Scornavacca C (2012) Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol 61: 1061–1067
  85. 85. Grigoriev IV, Nordberg H, Shabalov I, Aerts A, Cantor M, et al. (2012) The genome portal of the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D26–32
  86. 86. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I (2004) VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W273–279
  87. 87. R Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  88. 88. Hennig C (2013) fpc: Flexible procedures for clustering. 2.1–5 ed.
  89. 89. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16: 276–277
  90. 90. Hofacker IL (2003) Vienna RNA secondary structure server. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3429–3431
  91. 91. Llave C, Xie Z, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC (2002) Cleavage of Scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science 297: 2053–2056
  92. 92. Arnaiz O, Cain S, Cohen J, Sperling L (2007) ParameciumDB: a community resource that integrates the Paramecium tetraurelia genome sequence with genetic data. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D439–444
  93. 93. Arnaiz O, Sperling L (2011) ParameciumDB in 2011: new tools and new data for functional and comparative genomics of the model ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D632–636
  94. 94. Stover NA, Krieger CJ, Binkley G, Dong Q, Fisk DG, et al. (2006) Tetrahymena Genome Database (TGD): a new genomic resource for Tetrahymena thermophila research. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D500–503
  95. 95. Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Garcia-Hernandez M, et al. (2008) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D1009–1014
  96. 96. Magrane M, Consortium U (2011) UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database (Oxford) 2011: bar009