Phlebotomines are invertebrate hosts of Leishmania genus species which are etiological agents of leishmaniases in humans and other mammals. Sandflies are often collected in entomological studies of caves both in the inner area and the adjacent environments. Caves are ecotypes clearly different from the external environment. Several caves have been opened to public visitation before any studies were performed and the places do not have scientific monitoring of the fauna, flora, geological and geographical characteristics. These events can lead to the loss of geological and biological information. Considering these aspects, this study aimed to describe the sand fly fauna, including the ecological features, in a limestone cave at the Speleological Province of Bambuí (Minas Gerais State, Brazil). A total of 8,354 specimens of sandflies belonging to 29 species were analyzed: Lutzomyia cavernicola (20%), Nyssomyia intermedia (15%), Martinsmyia oliveirai (13%), Evandromyia spelunca (12%), Evandromyia sallesi (11%), Migonemyia migonei (9%), Nyssomyia whitmani (9%), Sciopemyia sordellii (4%) and Lutzomyia longipalpis (2%). The others species represent 5% of the total. This manuscript presents data found on richness, diversity, evenness and seasonality, comparing the sand fly fauna trapped in the cave and its surroundings.
Citation: Carvalho GMdL, Brazil RP, Ramos MCdNF, Serra e Meira PCL, Zenóbio APLdA, Botelho HA, et al. (2013) Ecological Aspects of Phlebotomine Sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from a Cave of the Speleological Province of Bambuí, Brazil. PLoS ONE 8(10): e77158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077158
Editor: Luzia Helena Carvalho, Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz-Minas), Brazil
Received: April 3, 2013; Accepted: August 30, 2013; Published: October 9, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Carvalho et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (Process: APQ-0235709); Programa Pesquisador Mineiro (FAPEMIG)- 00130-12; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera, Psychodidae) are considered the only natural vectors of Leishmania (Kinetoplastida, Trypanosomatidae) genus. These protozoans are the etiological agents of the leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease [1,2]. The transmission of the Leishmania parasite species to the vertebrate host occurs during the bite of infected female sandflies . The geographical distribution of leishmaniasis has undoubtedly expanded and is now being reported in areas that were previously non-endemic .
The resting places of the adult sandflies vary according to the species and to the environmental conditions, such as forest floor, small shrubs and plants, mammal nests and burrows, and rock crevices and caves . In general, the sandflies activity period ranges from dusk to dawn and these insects remain most of the day at rest in natural shelters.
Caves are considered stable environments in comparison with epigean habitats and are also characterized by a permanent lack of light far from entrances [6,7]. Fauna adapted to these conditions can be classified according to their level of adaptation: troglobites (animals that present unique modifications to cave environments), troglophiles (adapted animals, but devoid of modifications that can also develop in the external environment) and trogloxenes (animals that use caves for shelter or refuge) .
The caves, probably, can be considered as important geographical barriers, becoming evocative ecotypes for finding new genus and species of sandflies [9-15] and also seems to favor the occurrence of morphological anomalies in these insects , becoming important to study the sand fly fauna in this ecotype.
Caves are important for the ecosystem balance in their areas of occurrence. The interferences in the physical environment caused by human actions or natural phenomena are directly reflected in caves located in areas in which these impacts can occur. The alteration of the original structure of a cave system caused by different impacts can disturb the external system, stressing the state of unbalance of a given ecosystem [17-19].
Thus, considering that the sandflies are found in the cave environment and that this environment can sometimes offer attractive tourist and economic for the man, the chances of transmission of leishmaniasis may increase, considering not only possible changes, but the mere chance of contact of these insects with the people that visit this environment, which is still little studied. Recently was demonstrated that the environmental changes can cause the expansion of leishmaniases through closer contact between man and the vector of this disease .
There are few studies on the phlebotomine fauna in caves in Brazil. The recent expansion of ecotourism and the lack of management programs to access these environments may lead to the loss of valuable geological, paleontological or biological information due to predatory human exploitation of caves.
Some studies pointed out that insect diversity and density of sandflies in caves can be equal to or greater than those found in the forest [21,22]. Based on this context, and on the medical importance of phlebotomines sandflies, this work aimed to study the sandflies fauna in a cave and its surroundings area, considering the ecological aspects of these insects and comparing the fauna of both ecotypes. The cave belongs to the Speleological Province of Bambuí and is situated in the municipality of Lassance (Minas Gerais State, Brazil).
Material and Methods
Collections were made in a cave situated on a private farm. A term of consent was established to run the captures in this cave.
This study was conducted in the municipality of Lassance, northern of Minas Gerais State, in the microregion of Pirapora. The municipality covers an area of approximated 3,200 km2 and has an estimated population of 6,484 inhabitants . The region has 10 caves registered in the National Register of Caves of Brazil (CNC) . The Speleological Province of Bambuí is partly situated in the southeastern region of Tocantins, central east and southeast of Goiás, central west and north west of Minas Gerais and west of Bahia States. This speleological province is considered the largest in the country, with an extension of 105,200 km2 . The cave chosen for this study (coordinates 17°59'40.01"S, -44°39'3.23"W) has not been registered and it is situated in a private farm about 20 km from the center of Lassance municipality. It is a limestone cave with a horizontal extension of approximately 100 meters; the altitude is approximately 700 meters above sea level.
Sampling of sandflies
Sampling was performed monthly from June 2008 to May 2010, using automatic light traps, model HP . The collection points were patterned with five traps being used inside the cave and five traps in the area around, as it is described below.
The collection points inside the cave were situated within 10 meters of each other, with the first point located 10 meters from the cave entrance (Table 1). The collection points in the cave vicinity were arranged sparsely without a fixed distance among them. This distribution was done considering the environmental variation present in the surrounding area (Table 1). The traps were exposed during two consecutive days, continuously, with a total sampling effort of approximately 40 hours/trap per collection, for instance, a sampling effort of 200 hours inside and outside the cave per month. The temperature and relative humidity were measured using a digital thermo-hygrometer, inside and outside the cave. The averages of the climatic variables were used to correlate with the monthly densities of sandflies.
|Locations/Traps||Characterization of points|
|Cave 01||Trap located 10 meters from the cave entrance. Presence of light during the day period.|
|Cave 02||Trap located 20 meters from the cave entrance. Low penetration of light during the day period.|
|Cave 03||Trap located 10 meters from the cave 02 point. Total absence of light.|
|Cave 04||Trap located 10 meters from the cave 03 point. Total absence of light.|
|Cave 05||Trap located 10 meters from the cave 04 point. Total absence of light.|
|Locations/Traps||Characterization of points|
|Peridomicile||Hen house of a peridomicile. House 400 meters from the cave.|
|Pasture||Pastureland of cattle, underbrush area. Trap 200 meters from the cave.|
|Wooded area||Area of sparse vegetation, remnant of deforested area. Trap 100 meters of the cave.|
|10 meters out of entrance||Area near to the rock formation. Trap 10 meters from the cave entrance.|
|Cave entrance||Trap located at the entrance of the cave, but outside of it.|
Sandflies male were prepared and mounted on slides for identification. The females were dissected and identified based on the spermathecae characteristics. The specimens were identified according to the classification proposed by Galati  and the abbreviation of generic names was performed according to Marcondes . The voucher specimens were deposited in the phlebotomine sandfly collection of the Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou/Fiocruz.
Data were organized through Excell 97/2003, which was also used in the descriptive statistics. Graph Pad Instat software was used for statistical analyses. Chi-square test was used to compare the species distribution in the environments (surrounding area and cave) in the overall analysis. The calculations of Shannon and Simpson Diversity indexes, Richness and Equitability J were performed using the program DIVES v 2.0 .
A total of 8,354 specimens were collected, belonging to 10 genera and 29 species. Taking into account the environments separately, 5,255 (63%) sandflies were collected inside the cave and 3,099 (37%) in the adjacencies of the cave (Table 2). Considering the sex ratio, 4,564 (55%) of the specimens were females and 3,790 (45%) males.
|Species||Locations of Cave Area||Locations of Surrounding Area|
|Cave 01||Cave 02||Cave 03||Cave 04||Cave 05||Total (%)||Hen House||Pasture||Wooded area||10 meters out||Cave entrance||Total|
|Br. avellari||3||3||-||1||3||10 (0.19)||2||-||-||1||-||3 (0.10)|
|Br. pintoi||-||-||-||-||-||-||14||-||2||1||-||17 (0.55)|
|Ev. bacula||-||-||-||-||-||-||-||1||-||-||-||1 (0.03)|
|Ev. bourrouli||-||-||-||-||-||-||1||-||-||-||-||1 (0.03)|
|Ev. evandroi||-||-||-||-||1||1 (0.02)||19||11||6||11||1||48 (1.55)|
|Ev. lenti||-||-||-||-||-||-||-||-||1||1||-||2 (0.06)|
|Ev. sallesi||287||161||98||54||115||715 (13.61)||17||7||59||18||66||167 (5.39)|
|Ev. spelunca||416||242||153||78||73||962 (18.31)||2||-||38||2||22||64 (2.07)|
|Ev. teratodes||-||1||-||-||-||1 (0.02)||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Ev. termitophila||10||-||5||1||1||17 (0.32)||11||9||6||5||6||37 (1.19)|
|Lu. cavernicola||672||370||264||120||125||1551 (29.51)||-||1||31||9||57||98 (3.16)|
|Lu. longipalpis||28||-||1||-||-||29 (0.55)||16||63||9||6||10||104 (3.36)|
|Lu. renei||2||4||1||1||-||8 (0.15)||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Mt. oliveirai||701||141||37||23||11||913 (17.37)||27||13||53||6||92||191 (6.16)|
|Mg. migonei||390||59||35||20||18||522 (9.93)||28||19||37||20||140||244 (7.87)|
|Mi. echinatopharynx||2||-||1||-||-||3 (0.06)||6||1||-||1||1||9 (0.29)|
|Mi. quinquefer||12||-||-||-||-||12 (0.23)||3||-||23||2||29||57 (1.84)|
|Mi. rorotaensis||-||-||-||-||-||-||-||1||-||-||-||1 (0.03)|
|Ny. intermedia||25||5||4||25||2||61 (1.16)||244||84||351||208||288||1175 (37.92)|
|Ny. neivai||1||-||-||-||-||1 (0.02)||2||-||-||9||5||16 (0.52)|
|Ny. whitmani||51||3||15||16||-||85 (1.62)||145||105||196||93||136||675 (21.78)|
|Pa. aragaoi||-||-||-||-||-||-||-||-||1||-||-||1 (0.03)|
|Pa. lutziana||2||1||-||1||3||7 (0.13)||3||1||1||3||-||8 (0.26)|
|Pi. christenseni||1||-||-||-||-||1 (0.02)||3||3||4||2||1||13 (0.42)|
|Pi. misionensis||-||-||-||-||-||0||-||1||2||-||-||3 (0.10)|
|Pi. Monticola||1||-||1||-||-||2 (0.04)||-||-||11||1||6||18 (0.58)|
|Pi. pessoai||-||-||-||-||-||-||36||12||32||20||24||124 (4.00)|
|Sc. microps||1||-||-||1||2||4 (0.08)||-||-||-||-||-||-|
|Sc. sordellii||197||49||21||44||39||350 (6.66)||2||3||9||2||6||22 (0.71)|
|Total||2802 (53.32)||1039 (19.77)||636 (12.10)||385 (7.33)||393 (7.48)||5255 (100.00)||581 (18.75)||335 (10.81)||872 (28.14)||421 (13.59)||890 (28.72)||3099 (100.00)|
Considering both environments, Evandromyia Mangabeira, 1941 was the genus with the highest number of species captured, with eight species. However, the species with the highest numbers of specimens captured were respectively: Lutzomyia cavernicola (Costa Lima, 1932) (20%), Nyssomyia intermedia (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) (15%), Martinsmyia oliveirai (Martins, Silva & Falcão, 1970) (13%), Evandromyia spelunca Carvalho, Sanguinette, Brazil & Andrade Filho, 2011 (12%), Evandromyia sallesi (Galvão & Coutinho, 1939) (11%). The other species amounted to less than 10% of the total. The analyses of abundance considering each environment separately showed different results. The surrounding area presented two abundant species: Ny. intermedia (38%) and Nyssomyia whitmani (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) (22%). The cave presented five species which were abundant: Lu. cavernicola (29%), Ev. spelunca (18%), Ma. oliveirai (17%), Ev. sallesi (14%), Migonemyia migonei (França, 1920) (10%) (Table 2).
The comparison of the number of species collected in each environment revealed that from the total of 29 species, 18 were common to both environments, 26 were recorded in the surrounding area and 21 inside the cave. Only three species were found exclusively in the cave, whereas eight species were collected only in the surrounding area (Figure 1).
A significant number of sandflies were captured around the cave entrance, compared with the other points of collect. The trap “Cave 01” captured 53% of the total of sandflies collected inside the cave and the “cave entrance” trap, 29% of the total sandflies collected outside the cave (Table 2). The sum of the totals collected by these two traps represents 44% of total sandflies captured in both environments.
The analyses of the richness index, Simpson’s diversity, Shannon’s diversity and Jaccard’s evenness are summarized in Table 3. The comparison of the indexes demonstrates that the cave and the surrounding area showed a very similar profile. Considering the Simpson’s index, the cave area (0.9869) revealed greater diversity than the surrounding area (0.9676), whereas the Shannon’s index demonstrated that the surrounding area showed greater diversity (0.893) than the cave area (0.8190). Both areas had similar richness and evenness index (Table 3).
|Locations||Simpson’s Diversity||Shannon’s Diversity||J Evenness||Richness|
|Cave 1||0.9515||0.8275||0.6471||Smax: 37.2 - S2: 1.9|
|Cave 2||0.9820||0.7245||0.6713||Smax: 9.8 - S2: 1.9|
|Cave 3||0.9809||0.7090||0.6365||Smax: 7.8 - S2: 1.9|
|Cave 4||0.9763||0.8335||0.7483||Smax: 5.9 - S2: 1.9|
|Cave 5||0.9714||0.7234||0.6704||Smax: 9.8 - S2: 1.9|
|Cave area||0.9869||0.8190||0.6194||Smax: 15.7 - S2: 1.9|
|Locations||Simpson’s Diversity||Shannon’s Diversity||J Evenness||Richnees|
|Chicken’s house||0.9153||0.8116||0.6347||Smax: 7.8 - S2: 1.9|
|Wooded area||0.9441||0.8489||0.6525||Smax: 11.8 - S2: 1.9|
|Cave entrance||0.9707||0.8906||0.7238||Smax: 7.8 - S2: 1.9|
|10 meters out of entrance||0.9678||0.7593||0.5742||Smax: 5.9 - S2: 1.9|
|Pasture area||0.9469||0.8302||0.6747||Smax: 2.0 - S2: 1.9|
|Surrouding area||0.9676||0.8931||0.6312||Smax: 15.7 - S2: 1.9|
Despite the similarities of the cave and surrounding areas, considering the diversity, evenness and richness indexes, the analysis of the faunistic composition considering the abundance of specimens per species demonstrated a statistically significant difference between these areas (Chi-square test, p-value < 0.0001) (Figure 2). It is noteworthy that this comparison also favors the common and abundant species.
Lassance municipality, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
The species collected in low numbers, less than or equal to 0.02% of the total collected (Brumptomyia avellari (Costa Lima, 1932), Brumptomyia pintoi (Costa Lima, 1932), Evandromyia bacula (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1965), Evandromyia bourrouli (Barreto & Coutinho, 1941), Evandromyia lenti (Mangabeira, 1938), Evandromyia teratodes (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1964), Lutzomyia renei (Martins, Falcão & Silva, 1957), Micropygomyia echinatopharynx Andrade Filho, Galati, Andrade & Falcão, 2004, Micropygomyia rorotaensis (Floch & Abonnenc, 1944), Nyssomyia neivai (Pinto 1926), Pintomyia christenseni (Young & Duncan, 1994), Pintomyia misionensis (Castro, 1959), Pintomyia monticola (Costa Lima, 1932), Psathyromyia aragaoi (Costa Lima, 1932), Psathyromyia lutziana (Costa Lima, 1932), Siopemyia microps (Mangabeira, 1942)] were considered together during the analysis.
The points representing the seasonal variation of sandflies collected in both studied areas, and the climatic variables were represented in Figure 3. This analysis concerns the monthly averages of the climate variables recorded, and the monthly total of sandflies collected.
Lassance municipality, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
Regarding the climatic variables registered inside the cave and in the surrounding area, it can be noticed clearly that there were virtually no variation within the cave. These data indicate that the environment inside the cave tends to be stable during all seasons, with a maximum variation of 2°C in temperature along the year and the relative humidity around 99%. The temperature registered in the surrounding area varied up to 8°C throughout the year. The relative humidity varied from 55% in drier periods to 93%, in rainy periods. Even though the temperature and relative humidity presented large daily amplitudes in the surrounding environment, it was not observed in the cave environment data.
Comparing both environments, a higher density of sandflies was observed in the cave than in the surrounding area, all the months of the study, except August and November (Figure 3).
Chagas Disease was discovered in the municipality of Lassance . Due to this fact, several collections of insects were done at this location from 1920 to 1935. Some species of sandflies from this region were described, including Psathyromyia aragaoi (Costa Lima 1932) and Brumptomyia pintoi (Costa Lima 1932), which are present in our samples.
The present work recorded 29 species belonging to 10 genera. Comparing the species captured in previous studies, four species registered by Saraiva et al.  were not registered in our study. Until now, 35 species of sandflies were registered in the municipality of Lassance. This number is fairly representative, regarding the fauna of Minas Gerais state, which comprises 93 species, belonging to 16 genera .
Lutzomyiina was the predominant subtribe, and the genus that had the largest number of collected specimens was Evandromyia. This fact was also recorded in the States of Tocantins and Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil [33,34]. This group is quite common in the Brazilian savannah (cerrado), including the Lassance region . Andrade & Dantas-Torres  pointed this genus as the most representative of the Minas Gerais state, accounting 16 species. In our study, this genus was represented by eight species.
Some sandflies are often associated with forest environments. They are also found in areas without continuous vegetation cover, including urban areas and caves . Approximately 260 sand fly species are recorded in Brazil, and 84 of these  have already been registered from caves [10,11,13,21,22,37-42]. It is important to report that at least 15 species has its type locality from caves, including species classified as troglobites , with adaptations that allow them to live exclusively in this ecotype.
Considering the percentage and the number of species collected in the surrounding area and in the cave, 63% of sandflies were trapped in the cave, and 37% were captured in the surrounding. A total of 21 species have been reported inside the cave, and 26 species have been found in the surrounding area. These data reveal that the cave environment may prove as an important refuge for sandflies. The majority of the species collected are classified as troglophiles. However, the presence of trogloxens species was recorded. For example Lu. cavernicola, Ev. spelunca and Sc. sordellii have a significant number of specimens captured, and more than 90% of the specimens of these species were registered in the cave. Thus, these species may be adapted to live in this environment, but they also depend, in part, on the energy source from the external environment.
Evandromyia spelunca is a recently described phlebotomine species of the cortelezzii complex described from this cave . This species shows evidence of adaptation to the cave environment since it was captured in this study, in all months and was the second most abundant species in the cave.
A relevant data found in this study refers to the number of specimens collected in the first trap (Cave 01) inside the cave, and the trap of the cave entrance, representing 44% of the total sandflies collected in the study. These results corroborate those of Poulson & White  who describe that the twilight zone (cave area nearest the entrance) has the largest and most diverse fauna. In the case of sandflies, this higher density found near the cave entrance may be related to the increased supply of food (vertebrate hosts and vegetation) associated with the possibility of refuge in this environment.
The comparison of the ecological indexes demonstrates that the cave area and the surrounding area had a very similar profile (Table 3). The data of the ecological index in the environments studied demonstrate that each index should be analyzed according to the characteristics considered to generate them as different indexes cover different aspects of the species composition in an area. The Shannon’s index assigns greater value to rare species and Simpson’s index, little value. These characteristics of the indexes could explain the findings of our work. This data is corroborated by other researchers in ecology of insects that argue about the necessity of using different parameters/indexes for studying the structure of insect communities in different areas .
The results presented demonstrated a similar diversity and density of sandflies in the two environments. This data corroborate other studies which showed that the insect diversity and density of sandflies in caves can be equal to or greater than those found in the forest [21,22,41].
The human-induced environmental changes can affect the structure of insects communities, considering that cave areas and its surroundings require that two aspects are approached: entomological fauna and surveillance. Few studies have examined the ecological features of the sand fly populations in Brazil, especially studies that consider the ecological indexes and the faunistic composition [41,44,45] The ecological indexes analyzed with the faunal composition allow for more reliable analyses from different environments, since it considers both the present species and its frequency in the surveys as well as the abundance of specimens per species .
This point is exemplified in the present study, because, despite the similarities of the cave and surrounding areas considering the diversity, evenness and richness indexes, the analysis of the faunistic composition considering the abundance of specimens per species has demonstrated a statistically significant difference between these two areas (Figure 2). The result of this analysis could be explained by behavioral differences between the most abundant species of the two environments. The adaptation to the cave environment may be related to specializations developed by these insects, as it has been observed for other animals adapted to the cave environment.
Other recent published study describes the hourly activity of sandflies captured over 24-hours in the same cave . With this data, it became clear that some species presented differences in the circadian cycle and, consequently, a different period of activity compared with sandflies trapped in the external environment. An example, Lu. cavernicola, demonstrated that, in fact, these adaptations may lead to different behavior and, consequently, to a faunal composition, distinct in the two environments, with some species more adapted to the aphotic zone.
In a similar study conducted in Serra da Bodoquena, in forest and caves areas, it was observed that the abundances of the species in the forest also differed from those found in the caves of the region .
Our data suggest that while the diversity of the two environments are similar, most species are classified as troglophiles and, possibly, use the cave during the lifecycle.
The study of seasonality of sandflies correlated with climatic variables (relative humidity and temperature) showed interesting results. When we analyzed the density of sandflies captured over 24 months in both environments, with the exception of the months of August and November, a larger number of sandflies was captured inside the cave. The correlation of climatic variables with sandflies densities in each month revealed that in these two months, the relative humidity reached peaks and the values recorded were similar to the cave humidity values. These peaks of humidity found in these two months in the surrounding area (outside cave) were correlated with the occurrence of rainfall days before of the catch. However, this was only an observation since it was not possible to collect precipitation data for subsequent inclusion in this study. As well, other data such as wind speed, which can influence the density, richness and even the successful in the collections.
This analysis suggests that the relative humidity may influence the density of captured sandflies in the surrounding environment studied. The largest number of collected sandflies within the cave can be due to the slight variation of climate variables in this environment. For example, the air humidity presents low amplitude and high percentage in all seasons of the year. This argument is reinforced when considering that the northern region of Minas Gerais has dry and warm climate most of the year. Deane and Deane  investigated seasonal influences on Lu. longipalpis and found that the increased humidity during the rainy season can directly promote the proliferation and survival of this sand fly species. Other studies, carried out in similar environments to our surroundings, demonstrated that sandflies are usually found in greater numbers during warm and humid months [31,34,48,49].
However, it is necessary to consider another fact when analyzing the relation between relative humidity and density of collected sandflies in both environments. High humidity was also recorded in September and, especially, in October. However it was not observed as well as in the months of August and November, the highest densities of sandflies in the external environment. This result can be explained because of the larger exposure to the weatherproof of traps in the surrounding environment, which makes the collection success it is not equal to the cave collection success on rainy days. As previously mentioned, the precipitation data were not collected, but in both months, September and October occurred rains in at least one of the days of exposure (observation data), which may explains these results.
Regarding these data on cave, it can be considered an auspicious environment to sandflies, for instance, for sandflies feeding, since the insects can find vertebrate species which serve as food source both at day time and the twilight. This environment can be sandflies shelter or refuge in view of the stability of climate variables.
The presence of Leishmania vector species, such as: Lu. longipalpis, Ny. intermedia, Ny. neivai, Ny. whitmani, Mg. migonei, deserves to be highlighted.
Lutzomyia longipalpis, the main vector of Leishmania infantum in America represented 2% of the total sandflies captured. This species was more frequent in the surrounding area. It was also registered in the cave environment accounting for 20% of Lu. longipalpis captured specimens. Ny. intermedia was the second more abundant species, considering the whole number of collected specimens and the more abundant species in the surrounding environment. Ny. whitmani was the second more abundant species in the surrounding. Ny. intermedia and Ny. whitmani were found in the cave, and are the main species involved in the transmission cycle of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in Brazil . Ny. neivai was captured in smaller numbers, but it is important to point out that this species is also part of the transmission of Le. braziliensis in several regions of Brazil .
Mg. migonei accounted for 70% of total sand fly specimens caught in the cave and for 30% in the surroundings. The role of this sand fly in the transmission of Le. braziliensis was initially associated with foci of the disease in the Southeastern Region of Brazil. Currently, the presence of this species as a vector seems to have extended to the Northeastern Region. However, Mg. migonei is considered a secondary vector . Some studies have reported the natural infection of this species by Leishmania parasites [52-54].
Regarding to our data, it becomes extremely important to monitor cave areas due to its ecological significance, including karsts areas. Lassance is one of the six cities that comprise Serra do Cabral. Serra do Cabral is an isolated mountainous complex, in the center-north of the state of Minas Gerais. State Park of Serra do Cabral was recently created for Environmental Protection Area Serra do Cabral and with it, the environmental exploitation of the region has been significant.
Other studies, in several Brazilian karsts areas, that aim at better understanding the cave environment fauna are essential to prevent the biological losses and to monitor areas that may present risks to visitors. The studies of sandflies in this environment are of great importance in view of its role in the transmission cycle of leishmaniases and its constant presence in caves.
Conceived and designed the experiments: GMLC RPB JDAF. Performed the experiments: GMLC RPB MCNFR PCLSM APLAZ HAB CCS LS JDAF. Analyzed the data: GMLC RPB LS JDAF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GMLC RPB MCNFR PCLSM APLAZ HAB CCS LS JDAF. Wrote the manuscript: GMLC RPB LS JDAF.
- 1. Killick-Kendrick R (1990) Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Med Vet Entomol 4: 1–24. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00255.x. PubMed: 2132963.
- 2. WHO Expert Committee (2010) Control of the leishmaniasis: report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases, Geneva, 22–26 March 2010. WHO Tech Rep Ser 949: 1–186.
- 3. Sherlock IA (2003) Importância Médico Veterinária. In: EF. Rangel, R Lainson R (eds), Flebotomíneos do Brasil, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, p. 15-22.
- 4. McCarthy CB, Santini MS, Pimenta PFP, Diambra LA (2013) First Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Wild Adult Male and Female Lutzomyia longipalpis, Vector of Visceral Leishmaniasis. PLOS ONE 8: e58645. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058645. PubMed: 23554910.
- 5. Young DG, Duncan MA (1994) Guide to the Identification and Geographic Distribution of Lutzomyia Sand Flies in Mexico, the West Indies, Central and South America (Diptera: Psychodidae). Mem Am Entomol Inst 54: 1-881.
- 6. Poulson TL, White WB (1969) The cave environment. Limestone caves provide unique natural laboratories for studying biological and geological processes. Science 165, n. 3897: 971-981. doi:10.1126/science.165.3897.971. PubMed: 17791021.
- 7. Culver DC (1982) Cave Life. Evolution and Ecology. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. 189pp.
- 8. Holsinger JR, Culver DC (1988) The invertebrate cave fauna of Virginia, USA and a part of eastern Tennessee zoogeography and ecology. Brimleyana 14: 1-162.
- 9. Galati EAB, Filho Andrade, Silva ACL, Falcão AL (2003a) Description of a new genus and new species of New World Phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae). Rev Bras Entomol 47: 63-70.
- 10. Galati EAB, Marassá AM, Andrade RMG (2003b) Micropygomyia (Sauromyia) petari, a new species of Phlebotominae (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Vale do Ribeira, São Paulo state, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 47: 455-459. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262003000300016.
- 11. Alves VR, Freitas RA, Barrett TV (2008) Lutzomyia maruaga (Diptera: Psychodidae), a new bat-cave sand fly from Amazonas, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 103: 251-253. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762008005000012. PubMed: 18545859.
- 12. Carvalho GML, Brazil RP, Sanguinette CC, Andrade Filho JD (2010) Description of a new phlebotomine species, Martinsmyia reginae sp. nov. (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) from a cave in the state of Tocantins Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 105: 336-340. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762010000300017. PubMed: 20512251.
- 13. Carvalho GML, Brazil RP, Sanguinette CC, Andrade-Filho JD (2011) Description of Evandromyia spelunca, a new phlebotomine species of the cortelezzii complex, from a cave in Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae). Parasit Vectors 4: 158. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-4-158. PubMed: 21827682.
- 14. Barata RA, Serra e Meira PCL, Carvalho GML (2012) Lutzomyia diamantinensis sp. nov., a new phlebotomine species (Diptera, Psychodidae) from a quartzite cave in Diamantina, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 107: 1006-1010. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762012000800007. PubMed: 23295750.
- 15. Leng YJ (1987) A preliminary survey of phlebotomine sandflies in limestone caves of Sichuan and Guizhou Provinces, southwest China, and description and discussion of a primitive new genus Chinius. Annals Trop Med Hygiene 81: 311-317.
- 16. Andrade-Filho JD, Carvalho GML, Saraiva L (2004) Bilateral anomaly in the style of Micropygomyia schreiberi (Martins, Falcão & Silva) (Diptera, Psychodidae). Rev Bras Entomol 48: 583-585. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262004000400024.
- 17. Lisowski EA, Poulson TL (1981) Impacts of lockand Dam Six on baselevel ecosystem in Mammoth Cave. In: TL Poulson. Cave Research Foudation 1979 Annual Report. Albuquerque: Adobe Press. pp. 48-54.
- 18. Lewis JJ (1982) Aquatic ecosystems and management problems in the Mammoth cave area. In: RC WilsonJJ Lewis. National Cave Management Symposia Proceedings; .Carlsbad, New Mexico. 1978 and Mammoth Cave. Kentucky: Pygmy Dwarf Press, Oregon City, Oregon, pp. 73-76.
- 19. Elliot WR (1981) Damming up the caves. Caving International 10: 38-41.
- 20. Vilela ML, Azevedo CG, Carvalho BM, Rangel EF (2011) Phlebotomine Fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) and Putative Vectors of Leishmaniases in Impacted Area by Hydroelectric Plant, State of Tocantins, Brazil. PLOS ONE 6(12): e27721. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027721. PubMed: 22163271.
- 21. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Boggiani PC, Dorval MEC, Cristaldo G et al. (2003c) Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) in caves of the Serra da Bodoquena, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 47: 283-296. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262003000200017.
- 22. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Boggiani PC, Dorval MEC, Cristaldo G et al. (2006) Phlebotomines (Diptera: Psychodidae) in forested areas of the Serra da Bodoquena, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 101: 175-193. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762006000200010. PubMed: 16830711.
- 23. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) Censos Demográficos, Brasil. Available: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/default.php. Accessed 4 February 2010.
- 24. SBE (2013) (Sociedade Brasileira de Espeleologia). Available: http://www.sbe.com.br/. Accessed 5 February 2013.
- 25. Auler AS (2002) Karst areas in Brazil and the potential for major caves - an overview. Bol Soc Venezolana Espel 36: 29-35.
- 26. Pugedo H, Barata RA, França-Silva JC, Silva JC, Dias ES (2005) HP: um modelo aprimorado de armadilha luminosa de sucção para a captura de pequenos insetos. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38: 70-72.
- 27. Galati EAB (2003) Morfologia e taxonomia. Classificação de Phlebotominae. In: EF Rangel, R Lainson (org.), 1st ed., Flebotomíneos do; Brasil, Fiocruz Rio de Janeiro, p. 23-51.
- 28. Marcondes CB (2007) A proposal of generic and subgeneric abbreviations for phlebotomine sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) of the world. Entomol News 118: 351-356. doi:10.3157/0013-872X(2007)118[351:APOGAS]2.0.CO;2.
- 29. Rodrigues WC (2005) DivEs - Diversidade de espécies. Versão 2: 0. Software e Guia do Usuário. Available: . http://www.ebras.bio.br. Accessed 22 April 2009.
- 30. Chagas C (1909) Nova tripanozomiase humana: estudos sobre a morfolojia e o ciclo evolutivo do Schizotrypanum cruzi n. gen., n. sp., ajente etiolojico de nova entidade mórbida do homem. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1: 159-218. doi:10.1590/S0074-02761909000200008.
- 31. Saraiva L, Carvalho GML, Sanguinette CC, Carvalho DAA, Falcão AL (2008) et l. Sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) collected on the banks of the Velhas River in the state of . Minas Gerais, Brazil: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 103: 843-846.
- 32. Andrade AJ, Dantas-Torres F (2010) Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 39: 115-123. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2010000100016. PubMed: 20305907.
- 33. Almeida PS, Nascimento JC, Ferreira AD, Minzão LD, Portes F et al. (2010) Espécies de flebotomíneos (Diptera, Psychodidae) coletadas em ambiente urbano em municípios com transmissão de leishmaniose visceral do estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Bras Entomol 54: 304-310. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262010000200014.
- 34. Machado TO, Bragança MAL, Carvalho ML, Filho Andrade (2012) Species diversity of sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) during different seasons and in different environments in the district of Taquaruçú, state of Tocantins, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 107: 955-959. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762012000700021. PubMed: 23147157.
- 35. Forattini OP (1973) Entomologia Médica. Phlebotominae. Leishmanioses Bartonelose. São Paulo, editor. . Edgard Blücher Ltda. p. 658.
- 36. Serra e Meira PCL (2013) Estudos taxonômicos e ecológicos de flebotomíneos (Diptera: Psychodidae) coletados em cavernas ferruginosas do Parque Municipal das Mangabeiras e Parque Paredão Serra do Curral, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil (Dissertação). Belo Horizonte: Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. 165pp.
- 37. Galati EAB, Nunes VLB, Rego FA Jr, Oshiro ET, Chang MR (1997) Estudo de ﬂebotomíneos (Diptera: Psychodidae) em foco de leishmaniose visceral no estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Rev Saúde Pública 31: 378-390. PubMed: 9595767.
- 38. Filho Andrade, Silva ACL, Falcão AL (2001) Phlebotomine Sand Flies in the State of Piauí, Brazil (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 96: 1085-1087. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762001000800010. PubMed: 11784927.
- 39. Aguiar GM, Medeiros VM (2003) Distribuição regional e habitats das espécies de flebotomíneos do Brasil. In: Rangel EF, Lainson R editors Flebotomíneos do Brasil. pp. 207-255; Fiocruz de Rio Janeiro, 367p.
- 40. Barata RA, Antonini Y, Macedo CG, Costa DC, Dias ES (2008) Flebotomíneos do Parque Nacional Cavernas do Peruaçu, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Neotrop Entomol 37: 226-228. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2008000200018. PubMed: 18506304.
- 41. Alves VR, Freitas RA, Santos FL, Barrett TV (2011) Diversity of sandflies (Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) captured in sandstone caves from Central Amazonia, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 106: 353-359. PubMed: 21655825.
- 42. Barata RA, Apolinário EC (2012) Sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from caves of the quartzite Espinhaço Range, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 107: 1016-1020. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762012000800009. PubMed: 23295752.
- 43. Callisto M, Barbosa F, Moreno P (2000) Macrobenthic diversity on different habitats in an altitudinal lake surrounded by Eucalyptus plantations and secondary Atlantic Forest (southeast Brazil). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 12: 55-61.
- 44. Kamdem C, Fossog BT, Simard F, Etouna J, Ndo C et al. (2012) Anthropogenic Habitat Disturbance and Ecological Divergence between Incipient Species of the Malaria Mosquito Anophles gambie. PLOS ONE, 7: e39453. PubMed: 22745756.
- 45. Pinto IS, Ferreira AL, Valim V, Carvalho FS, Silva GM et al. (2012) Sand fly vectors (Diptera, Psychodidae) of America visceral leishmaniasis areas in the Atlantic Forest, State of Espiríto Santo, southeastern Brazil. J Vector Ecol 37: 90-94. doi:10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00204.x. PubMed: 22548541.
- 46. Carvalho GML, Brazil RP, Saraiva L, Quaresma PF, Botelho HA et al. (2012) Hourly Activity and Natural Infection of Sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae) Captured from the Aphotic Zone of a Cave, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. PLOS ONE 7: e52254. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052254. PubMed: 23284957.
- 47. Deane LM, Deane MP (1965) Sobre a biologia do Phlebotomus longipalpis, transmissor da leishmaniose visceral, em uma zona endêmica do Estado do Ceará. I. Distribuição, predominância e variação estacional. Rev Bras Biol 15: 83-95.
- 48. Aguiar GM, Soucasaux T (1984) Aspectos da ecologia dos flebótomos do Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, Estado do Rio de Janeiro. I. Freqüência mensal em isca humana (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 79: 179-209.
- 49. Gomes AC, Galati EAB (1987) Aspectos ecológicos da leishmaniose tegumentar americana. 5. Estratificação da atividade espacial e estacional de phlebotominae (Diptera, Psychodidae) em áreas de cultura agrícola da região de Vale Ribeira, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Inst Med Trop S Paulo 82: 467-473.
- 50. Rangel EF, Lainson R (2009) Proven and putative vectors of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil: aspects of their biology and vectorial competence. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 104: 937-954. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762009000700001. PubMed: 20027458.
- 51. Filho Andrade, Galati EAB, Falcão AL (2007) Nyssomyia intermedia (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) and Nyssomyia neivai (Pinto, 1936) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) geographical distribution and epidemiological importance. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 102: 481-487. doi:10.1590/S0074-02762007005000035. PubMed: 17612769.
- 52. Azevedo ACR, Rangel EF (1991) A study of sand fly species (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in a focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the municipality of Baturité, Ceará, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 86: 405-410. doi:10.1590/S0074-02761991000400005. PubMed: 1842431.
- 53. Queiroz RG, Vasconcelos IA, Vasconcelos AW, Pessoa FA, Souza RN et al. (1994) Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Ceará state in Northeastern Brazil: incrimination of Lutzomyia whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae) as a vector of Leishmania braziliensis in Baturité municipality. Ann J Trop Med Hyg 50: 693-698.
- 54. Pita-Pereira D, Alves CR, Souza MB, Brazil RP, Bertho AL et al. (2005) Identification of naturally infected Lutzomyia intermedia and Lutzomyia migonei with Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) revealed by a PCR multiplex non-isotopic hybridisation assay. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 99: 905-913. doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.06.019. PubMed: 16143358.