Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Removal of Vanadium(III) and Molybdenum(V) from Wastewater Using Posidonia oceanica (Tracheophyta) Biomass

Removal of Vanadium(III) and Molybdenum(V) from Wastewater Using Posidonia oceanica (Tracheophyta) Biomass

  • Chiara Pennesi, 
  • Cecilia Totti, 
  • Francesca Beolchini


The use of dried and re-hydrated biomass of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica was investigated as an alternative and –low-cost biomaterial for removal of vanadium(III) and molybdenum(V) from wastewaters. Initial characterisation of this biomaterial identified carboxylic groups on the cuticle as potentially responsible for cation sorption, and confirmed the toxic-metal bioaccumulation. The combined effects on biosorption performance of equilibrium pH and metal concentrations were investigated in an ideal single-metal system and in more real-life multicomponent systems. There were either with one metal (vanadium or molybdenum) and sodium nitrate, as representative of high ionic strength systems, or with the two metals (vanadium and molybdenum). For the single-metal solutions, the optimum was at pH 3, where a significant proportion of vanadium was removed (ca. 70%) while there was ca. 40% adsorption of molybdenum. The data obtained from the more real-life multicomponent systems showed that biosorption of one metal was improved both by the presence of the other metal and by high ionic strength, suggesting a synergistic effect on biosorption rather than competition. There data ware used for the development of a simple multi-metal equilibrium model based on the non-competitive Langmuir approach, which was successfully fitted to experimental data and represents a useful support tool for the prediction of biosorption performance in such real-life systems. Overall, the results suggest that biomass of P. oceanica can be used as an efficient biosorbent for removal of vanadium(III) and molybdenum(V) from aqueous solutions. This process thus offers an eco-compatible solution for the reuse of the waste material of leaves that accumulate on the beach due to both human activities and to storms at sea.


Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile, is the most important and abundant seagrass and it is endemic to the Mediterranean Sea. It forms large underwater meadows from the surface to depths of 40 m, which are an important part of the ecosystem [1], [2] P. oceanica has a significant ecological role, as it can form structures known as ‘matte’, which are monumental constructions that result from the horizontal and vertical growth of the rhizomes with their entangled roots and the entrapped sediment [3][5]. This seagrass is very sensitive to human disturbance, such as coastal development, pollution, trawling and high water turbidity [3][5]. Indeed, in the year 2000, P. oceanica was selected as a Biological Quality Element [6] under the Water Framework Directive [7], as a representative of the aquatic Mediterranean angiosperms for use in the monitoring of the ecological status of coastal waters. P. oceanica in Italy is mostly present along the Tyrrhenian and Ionian coasts, where it is destroyed mainly by trawling and by high water turbidity [8]. Human activities and sea storms result in the accumulation of the leaves of this plant on beaches; and their disposal represents a significant environmental problem [9]. This can, however, be avoided if this waste material can be transformed into a resource.

The physicochemical process known as ‘biosorption’ indicates the removal of heavy metals from an aqueous solution by passive binding to non-living biomass [10][12]. Marine biomass represents an important resource for biosorption processing of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Indeed, non-living seaweed and seagrass can be used as low-cost sorbents as an alternative to more costly synthetic resins [10][16].

The high metal-binding capacity of seaweeds is due to the structure of their cell wall, with various functional groups involved. These include: (1) alginic acid, with carboxyl groups and sulfated polysaccharides, such as fucoidan, and with sulfonic acid, in brown algae matrix (Phylum Ochrophyta) [10], [11], [17]; (2) sulfated galactans such as agar, carregeenan, porphyran, and furcelleran in red algae (Phylum Rhodophyta) [10], [12], [18]; (3) an external capsule that is composed of proteins and/or polysaccharides in green algae (Phylum Chlorophyta) [19]. While algal materials have been broadly investigated for metal biosorption (Table 1), the potential of marine plants has been notably understudied. However, recent studies in the literature have stated that the ability of seagrasses to adsorb heavy metals also depends on the chemical structure of the plant tissues [11], [12], [20], [21]. In particular, Pennesi at al. [11], [12] studied for the first time the biosorption performance of Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson and Zostera marina Linnaeus, for the removal of lead and arsenic from aqueous solution. They showed that the optimal biosorption of heavy metal occurs because of the chemical composition of the thin cuticle which is the external layer that covers the leaves. Cutin is a waxy polymer that is the main component of the plant cuticle, and it consists of omega hydroxy acids and their derivatives, which are interlinked via ester bonds, to form a polyester polymer of indeterminate size [22]. This substance is probably responsible for the chemical and physical bond with heavy metals, through the carboxylic groups.

Table 1. Sorption performance by marine macrophytes according to the literature.

P. oceanica not only contains cutin, but it is also a highly fibrous material that is made of cellulose and hemicellulose (ca. 60%–75%) and lignin (ca. 25%–30%), plus a relevant percentage of ash that contains essentially silica and traces of some heavy metals [23]. Moreover, P. oceanica contains two type of metallothioneins (MTs) which are a group of cysteine-rich proteins. These proteins have the capacity to bind heavy metals through the thiol groups, which are also known as sulfhydryl groups (R-SH), and amino groups (R-NH2) of its cysteine residues [24], [25]. Other studies have investigated the biosorption of heavy metals such as copper, lead, and chromium, and the removal of dyes from textile waters using P. oceanica biomass [21], [26][30].

Vanadium and molybdenum are discharged into the environment from various industries that work on alloy steels [31], [32], and these are considered to be persistent environmental contaminants [33], [34]. Due to their toxicity and their accumulation throughout the food chain, they represent a significant problem with ecological and human-health effects. Thus, it is appropriate to eliminate these heavy metals from industrial wastewaters using cheap material such as marine macrophytes [10][12], [18], [19], [35].

In the present study, the P. oceanica biomass, consisted of dried leaves (material from a beach) that was used for the first time as a low-cost biosorbent for the removal of vanadium(III) and molybdenum(V) from aqueous solution. The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate the performance of P. oceanica non-living biomass in ideal single-metal systems (with either vanadium or molybdenum) under different pH conditions (to determine the optimum operating conditions); (2) to determine any competition phenomena in more real-life systems that were characterized by either high ionic strength or the presence of both vanadium and molybdenum; and (3) to define an equilibrium model to predict the biosorption performance under these more real-life conditions.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and preparation

The biosorbent materials was obtained from dead leaves of P. oceanica (Phylum: Tracheophyta). The samples were collected from Italian beaches of the Ionian Sea: Marina di Leporano, Taranto (Puglia Region; 40°21′43.60″N, 17°20'00.05″E). Specific permission was not required for this geographical location because it is not part of the Marine Protected Area. Furthermore, the material used was destined for waste disposal. After collection, the samples were washed in deionized water (10% w/v, aquaMAXTM, Basic 360 Series) to remove the remaining salt and impurities. Subsequently, the biomass was washed in acid solution (HCl 0.1 N, pH 2; Carlo Erba Reagents) for 4 h under vigorous stirring at room temperature (ratio solid/washing solution 1/10) to remove any traces of metals from the binding sites of the seagrass. Then the leaves were dried (Dry Systems Labconco, Kansas City, MO) at room temperature for 4–5 days to 5 days (to a stable weight) and kept in bottles (Kartell) until use. Before the biosorption tests, each dried biomass sample was reduced into small fragments (of about 0.5 cm, Porcelain Mortar & Pestle Carlo Erba, model 55/8) and re-hydrated before use to increase the percentage removal. This field study did not involve any endangered or protected species.


Stock solutions of molybdenum(V) chloride (MoCl5, Sigma-Aldrich®) and vanadium(III) chloride (VCl3, Sigma-Aldrich®) at, 1 g/L were prepared in distilled water (Sigma-Aldrich®). All of the working solutions at the various concentrations were obtained by successive dilution, according the experimental design (see section 2.5).

Characterization of functional groups: titration test

The characterization of the functional groups on P. oceanica that are involved in binding the metals was carried out by acid-base titration test and analyzed according to the Gran Method [36], [37]. Biosorbent materials (i.e, 5 g leaves of P. oceanica in 100 mL deionised water) were titrated using standard solutions of NaOH 1 N (basic branch, Sigma-Aldrich®) and H2SO4 0.1 N (acid branch, Sigma-Aldrich®). The pH of the suspension was measured after each addition of titrant (0.05 mL, Eppendorf Research® plus) when stability had been obtained, using a pH-meter (ISteK pH 730p).

Adsorption tests

Before each test, 5 g dried P. oceanica biomass was put into 100 mL distilled water for 30 min to rehydrate the sample, with stirring using a magnetic stirrer (MICROSTIRRER-VELP Scientific). The concentrated metal stock solutions (1 g/L molybdenum; 1 g/L vanadium) were added according to the experimental conditions. The suspension pH was adjusted with HCl (0.1 M) and NaOH (0.1 M) and monitored during the whole biosorption test. Aliquot amounts of the solution (1 mL) were periodically sampled to determination the metal concentration(s). The samples were centrifuged (3000 rpm for 5 min.; ALC centrifuge PK 120), to eliminate any suspended matter before the analytical determination, and they were subsequently diluted with acidified water at pH 2 to stabilize the metal(s) before the analytical determinations. Control tests were performed without biomass and showed constant metal concentrations in the solutions over time. This confirmed that precipitation did not take place and that no metal was released by the testing equipment. Metal uptake, q (mg g−1), was calculated as the difference in the metal concentration(s) in the aqueous phase before and after sorption, according to Eq. A:(A)where, V is the volume of the solution (L), Ci and C are the initial and equilibrium concentration of metal (molybdenum or vanadium) in solution (mg L−1), respectively, and W is the mass of the dry leaves (g). Through regression analysis, the Langmuir adsorption isotherm [38] given in Eq. (B) was adapted to the experimental data:(B)where qmax is the maximum adsorption (mg/g) and Ks is the equilibrium constant of the sorption reaction (mg/L).

Experimental design

Table 2 shows the factors and levels investigated for the biosorption of these leaves of P. oceanica. All of the experiments were carried out at a constant room temperature. For the ideal systems and the real-life systems with high ionic strength, the equilibrium pH was the only factor considered in the experimental plan. In particular, for the ideal single metal systems, sorption isotherms were evaluated at pH 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 10 and 12 for vanadium, and at pH 1–3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 12 for molybdenum. For high ionic strength systems, 20 mg/L NaNO3 was added at the beginning of each experiment, and the sorption isotherms were evaluated at pH 3, 6 and 9 for vanadium, and at pH 6, 9 and 12 for molybdenum,. In the case of the more real-life multi-metal systems, the sorption isotherms were determined at pH 3, and the only factor considered in the experimental plan was the presence of the other metal (0,20 and 40 mg/L vanadium/molybdenum for the molybdenum/vanadium sorption, respectively).

Table 2. Factors and levels investigated in the study of molybdenum(V) and vanadium(III) biosorption by biomass of Posidonia oceanica.

Analytical determinations

The pH measurements were made using a pH meter (ISteK 730p). All of the samples were diluted with HNO3 at pH 2 and stored at 4°C before analysis. The metals concentrations in the liquid phase were determined by ICP-AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry) (Jobin Yvon JY 24, method EPA200.7.2001).

Results and Discussion

Biomass characterization

Posidonia oceanica characterisation: acid-base titration.

The number and type of functional groups involved in the binding of the metals onto the P. oceanica samples were analyzed using acid-base titration [36], [37], [39]. This analysis is based on a neutralization reaction, in order to determine an unknown concentration of functional groups that have an acid behaviour in aqueous solution. The P. oceanica titration curve in Figure 1 shows the pH profile as a function of the added meq NaOH: (1) this curve is typical of weak polyprotic acids, which have more than one proton that can be removed by reaction with a base; (2) the equivalence point (i.e., where all of the protons are neutralized by the added hydroxylic groups) is not easily identifiable. The Gran method was used to linearise the titration curve before and after the equivalence point (Fig. S1). The volume necessary to reach the equivalence point was estimated as in the range of 3500–5000 µL (Fig. S1), which when considering the biomass of P. oceanica in solution (i.e., 10 g/L), corresponds to a concentration of functional groups with an acid behavior of 3.5–5 meq/g biomass. It can be seen that this titration procedure allowed the estimation of a range for the volume of equivalence, rather than a single value, as in the case of titration of pure acid solutions. This can be explained by considering the heterogeneity of the solid matrix subjected to titration, in terms of these dead leaves of P. oceanica. Furthermore, the titration curve in Figure 1 allows an estimation of the acid dissociation constant (Ka) of these functional groups that behave as weak acids. Indeed, the pKa (i.e., the pH corresponding to half the equivalence point) [40], is in the range of 3 to 4, which is typical of the R–COO− carboxyl groups of the P. oceanica cuticle [17]. Similar results were also obtained for the carboxyl groups in the biomass of the algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa H. Chick, Cyanidium caldarium (Tilden) Geitler [41] and Sargassum fluitans (Børgesen) Børgesen [42]. Moreover, previous studies have used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis (FTIR) to demonstrate that the functional groups of P. oceanica that might have a role in the adsorption process are carboxyl (COOH) and carbonyl stretching (C = O) groups in particular [28], [29].

Figure 1. P. oceanica titration curve (biosorbent 10 g/L; room temperature).

Heavy metal concentration in Posidonia oceanica leaves.

The leaves of P. oceanica show significant concentrations of As, Hg, Mo, Pb and V in their tissues (Table 3). Before metals determination, a part of the stock was first washed in acid at pH 2 to remove metals eventually bound at the surface level, while another sample was analyzed under natural conditions. It can be seen that there were no significant differences between the metal concentrations in the two samples (Table 3). This suggests that the P. oceanica tissue contains traces of metals, which will be connected to the phenomenon of bioaccumulation, of which there are many studies in the literature [43][47]. This result might be related to the presence of industrial sites (e.g., refinery, metallurgical plant and commercial port) located near the collection site (about 30 km away). Indeed, P. oceanica is increasingly used as an indicator of chemical contaminations for coastal regions of the Mediterranean Sea, and it is often considered a useful metal bio-indicator [44], [45], [48]. In particular, P. oceanica has been investigated as a bio-indicator for mercury, which was also found in samples used for this study (Table 3), and some studies have suggested that several trace metals can be memorized through analysis of its below-ground tissues [44], [49], [50].

Table 3. Heavy metal concentrations in the samples of Posidonia oceanica leaves.

Vanadium and molybdenum speciation

In this section, vanadium(III) and molybdenum(V) speciation as a function of pH is discussed, in terms of the predictions of the MEDUSA software [51]. The chemistry of vanadium and molybdenum is complex; indeed, such metals can be present in solution in both anionic and cationic forms. For this reason, theoretical predictions can help both in the choice of experimental conditions to be investigated and in the discussion of the results obtained. Figures 2 and 3 show the predictions for vanadium(III) and molybdenum(V) speciation as a function of pH as given by the MEDUSA software, where the x-axis indicates the pH while the y-axis shows the logarithm of the metal concentration. It can be seen that anionic forms, cationic forms and insoluble species can be present under different pH conditions (Figs 2, 3). The pH range where vanadium appears to be stable in its ionic form in solution is wide (Fig. 2); indeed, vanadium speciation includes both cationic forms (for pH 2–6) and anionic forms (from pH 5 onwards). Consequently, both negatively (e.g., carboxylic groups) and positively (e.g., aminic groups) charged sites of P. oceanica biomass are considered to be involved in vanadium biosorption. For molybdenum, Figure 3 shows that it is mainly stable in solution in an anionic form for pH>3; this suggests that positively charged binding sites on the P. oceanica are responsible for molybdenum biosorption.

Figure 2. Prediction of vanadium(III) speciation as a function of pH where y-axis shows the logarithm of the metal concentration (MEDUSA software) [51].

Figure 3. Prediction of molybdenum(V) speciation as a function of pH where y-axis shows the logarithm of the metal concentration (MEDUSA software) [51].

Biosorption: the ideal single metal system

This part of the study was aimed at an evaluation of the influence of pH on vanadium and molybdenum biosorption by P. oceanica in the single metal systems (Table 2; two levels investigated). Figure 4 shows the sorption isotherms for vanadium that were determined for the different equilibrium pHs (pH 1–3, Fig. 4a; pH 3–12, Fig. 4b). It can be seen that the optimal pH for vanadium biosorption by P. oceanica is pH 3, with maximum adsorption of about 7 mg/g with an equilibrium concentration of vanadium in solution of 10 mg/L (Fig. 4a). The profiles in Figure 5 also show that the adsorption capacity decreases at both pH<3(Fig. 4a) and >3 (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, control experiments with no biomass excluded any significant precipitation phenomena. For molybdenum biosorption in the single metal ideal systems (Fig. 5), the best adsorption performance was at pH 3 with maximum adsorption around 4 mg/g with the molybdenum equilibrium concentration of 10 mg/L (Fig. 5). Significant precipitation occurred at pH 1 and 2, as also predicted theoretically by the MEDUSA software [51] (Fig. 3). For the pH range from pH 5 to 12, the highest observed values for the specific uptake (q) were around 2 mg/g.

Figure 4. Sorption isotherms for vanadium in the single metal system, for the range of pH–3 (a) and 3–12 (b) (biosorbent 10 g/L; room temperature).

Figure 5. . Sorption isotherms for molybdenum in the single metal system, for the range of pH 3–12 (biosorbent 10 g/L; room temperature).

Biosorption: real life multicomponent systems

High ionic strength systems.

This part of the study was dedicated to the estimation of the influence of pH on vanadium and molybdenum biosorption by P. oceanica in the presence of NaNO3 (20 mg/L). Sodium nitrate was added (Table 2) to simulate real-life systems, by providing potential antagonist ions that can compete with the metals for the active sites involved in biosorption on the cuticle of Posidonia oceanica. The solution was diluted according to the experimental design (see section 2.5; Table 2; two levels investigated). Figure 6 shows the effects of pH on the sorption isotherms for vanadium and molybdenum, respectively, in the presence of the antagonist ions (NaNO3). A comparison with the data observed in the single metal systems (Fig. 4), confirms that pH 3 was optimal for the adsorption of vanadium (Fig. 6a) and that no competition appears to have taken place. The data in Figure 6b suggest that the adsorption capacity for molybdenum was optimal at pH 12, while in the single metal system, no significant adsorption was observed at this pH (Fig. 5). The oxidative action of NaNO3 might have modified the speciation of molybdenum (Fig. 3), and then modified the performances at pH 3. These data show that there are linear correlations between the metal concentrations on the solid and in the liquid in equilibrium, except for the adsorption of vanadium at pH 3, which appears to follow a Langmuir trend.

Figure 6. Sorption isotherms in real life high ionic strength systems: pH effect for vanadium (a) and molybdenum (b) in the presence of NaNO3 20 mg/L (biosorbent 10 g/L; room temperature).

Multi-metal systems.

Potential competition between vanadium and molybdenum might affect the biosorption performances when these metals are present simultaneously. The sorption isotherms were determined at pH 3 considering that this pH was the optimum for the biosorption performances of both of these metals, in the ideal single metal systems. Figure 7 shows the sorption isotherms of each metal in the presence of increasing concentration of the other metal in solutions diluted according to the experimental design (see section 2.5; Table 2; two levels investigated). It can be seen that no competition appeared to take place, and that conversely, the presence of one of the metals appears to favor the adsorption of the other metal. The absence of competition can be explained with reference to theoretical predictions previously reported (see section 3.2): at ca. pH 3, molybdenum is mainly stable as an anion, while vanadium is a cation. Consequently, this indicates that bothof these ions can be adsorbed simultaneously; as they have opposite charges, the two metals interact with different binding sites on the P. oceanica cuticle. The Langmuir equation of Eq. (B) was fitted to the experimental data, and Table 4 gives the estimated values for the parameters qmax and Ks. Here, it can be seen that parameter qmax is estimated at 16 mg/g and 18 mg/g for vanadium and molybdenum, respectively, without any significant effects of the other metal; on the other hand, parameter Ks significantly decreased as the concentration of the other metal increased. This trend confirmed the absence of competition between these two metals, and suggested that the identification of a mathematical model suitable for predicting real multi-metal systems should take into account the variability of the sorption equilibrium constant, Ks, depending on the concentration of the other metal. This approach is described in the following section.

Figure 7. Sorption isotherms in the two metal system for vanadium (a) and molybdenum (b) in the presence of the other metal respectively (pH 3; biosorbent 10 g/L; room temperature).

Table 4. Langmuir model parameters in the multi-metals systems (vanadium and molybdenum).

Mathematical modeling of multi-metal equilibrium.

As reported above, the theoretical prediction of vanadium speciation (Fig. 2) suggests that under conditions of pH 3, vanadium is substantially present as the VO2+ cation. Consequently the biosorbent functional groups involved in vanadium sorption are considered to be carboxylic groups (as documented in the literature [28] and shown by the acid-base titration), according to the following simplified sorption/ion-exchange mechanism:(C.1)where the carboxylic groups are dissociated in the water solution according to the following acid dissociation equilibrium:(C.2)with a pKA in the range of 3 to 4 as previously reported.

For molybdenum, the theoretical prediction of its speciation (Fig. 3) indicates that at pH 3 it is mainly present as the negatively charged species: H3Mo7O243− and MoO42−, where this latter becomes the ion dominant species as the pH increases. Contrary to what happens for vanadium, in this case, the biosorbent functional groups involved in molybdenum sorption are considered to be positively charged groups, as mainly aminic groups, which are well known as being present on the seagrass cuticle [22], according to the following mechanism:(C.3)

Where, the aminic groups are dissociated in water solution according to the following acid dissociation equilibrium:(C.4)with a pKA in the range 9–10 [52].

In summary, the vanadium and molybdenum sorption process is relatively complex, with many factors involved, such as the metal speciation in solution and the dissociation equilibria of the main functional groups in the biosorbent material. Considering the pKa values reported above, it is expected that under pH 3, at least half of the carboxylic functional groups are available for vanadium biosorption, while all of the aminic groups are positively charged and ready to bind molybdenum complexes. To define a simple mathematical model that can be used to predict the sorption of one metal in the presence of the other, was taken into account that the two metals do not compete for the same sites, due to the opposite charges of the species involved. Consequently, in this case a non-competitive Langmuir equilibrium model can be considered as the simplest one to be tested for data fitting, as follows:(C.5)(C.6)where CV and CMo represent the equilibrium concentrations in solution, qV and qMo are the metal specific uptakes, qV,max and qMo,max are the maximum metal-specific uptakes and KV and KMo are the equilibrium constant of sorption in Eqs. (C.1) and (C.3), respectively.

The experimental data reported in Figure 7 shows that for both of these metals, the presence of the other metal favors the biosorption: e.g., vanadium sorption in the presence of molybdenum is higher than in the single metal system. This can be explained by a partial neutralization of charged sites that might have a repulsing action; consequently, in the presence of molybdenum, the positively charged aminic groups are neutralized, and their repulsion towards the positively charged vanadium ions is removed. For molybdenum biosorption an analogous consideration can be performed, as the opposite effect. To take these phenomena into account in the sorption model, the presence of one metal increases the equilibrium constant of the other metal sorption according to the following empirical rules:(C.7)(C.8)

Equations (C.5) and (C.6), with the equilibrium constants given by equations (C.7) and (C.8), were fitted to the experimental data by non linear regression analysis for parameter estimation, through the least-squares method. Table 5 shows the estimated values for the parameters and the performance of the data fitting, which can be considered satisfactory considering that the multiple regression coefficient R2 is near 0.90. Figure 8 shows the equilibrium specific uptake of vanadium (Fig. 8a) and molybdenum (Fig. 8b) as functions of the two metal concentrations, as predicted by equations (C.5) and (C.6), where the synergic effects of the two metals on the biosorption performance can be seen.

Figure 8. Sorption isotherms of vanadium (a) and molybdenum (b) as a function of the two metal concentrations, as predicted by equations (C.5) and (C.6) (pH 3, parameters as in Table 5).

Table 5. Estimated parameters for the synergistic equilibrium sorption isotherms from Eqs. (C.5) and (C.6).


The disposal of biomass of Posidonia oceanica accumulated on the beaches represents a significant environmental problem [9], that could be avoided if such waste material is transformed as a resource. Some few examples are available in the literature where its potential use as metal biosorbent is assessed: indeed, it has already been demonstrated that Posidonia oceanica could adsorb uranium (VI) [53], chromium (VI) [54], lead (II) [28] with the highest sorption capacities of 5.67, 14.48 and 140 mg/g, respectively. Furthermore this biomass has also been reported to effectively adsorb anionic species, such as ortophosphate ions, with sorption capacity of 7.45 mg/g [55]. This work demonstrates the suitability of such biomass also as vanadium and molybdenum sorbent, with a maximum sorption ability estimated at 16 and 18 mg/g, respectively. Sorption of vanadium and molybdenum was explained by chemico-physical interaction (mainly based on ion exchange) with carboxilic and amminic groups that are present in many macromolecules on the cuticle of the plant (e.g. cutin, metallothionein [22], [24], [25]). The real system simulation allowed to exclude any competition phenomena of nitrate ions and of one metal with the other, due to a different speciation of vanadium and molybdenum in aqueous solution (cation vs. anion). This evidence has allowed to develop a new simple multi-metal sorption equilibrium model that is able to take into account the synergic effect on the biosorption performance, that was evident when both metals were present. The availability of a mathematical tool that can predict the performance of biosorption in such multi-metal systems is considered very important [56], [57] and there is a real need that new scientific literature goes beyond the very well-known Langmuir/Freundlich sorption models, representative of ideal single metal systems. Future work will be addressed on one hand at real systems coming from refinery catalysts recycling process [58], [59], on the other hand at the upscale of the biosorption process, in order to find a suitable process configuration for the application of Posidonia oceanica biomass at industrial scale.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Gran elaboration of P. oceanica titration curve (biosorbent 10 g/L; room temperature).


Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CP CT FB. Performed the experiments: CP CT FB. Analyzed the data: CP CT FB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CP CT FB. Wrote the paper: CP CT FB.


  1. 1. Boudouresque CF, Meinesz A (1982) Découverte de l'herbier de Posidonie. Cah Parc nation Port-Cros 4: 1–79.
  2. 2. Boudouresque CF, Bernard G, Bonhomme P, Charbonnel E, Diviacco G, et al.. (2006) Préservation et conservation des herbiers a' Posidonia oceanica. Monaco: Ramoge Publication.
  3. 3. Piazzi L, Acunto S, Cinelli F (1999) In situ survival and development of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile seedlings. Aquatic Botany 63: 103–112.
  4. 4. Francour P, Magréau JF, Mannoni PA, Cottalorda JM, Gratiot J (2006) Management guide for Marine Protected Areas of the Mediterranean sea, Permanent Ecological Moorings. Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis & Parc National de Port-Cros, Nice.
  5. 5. Gacia E, Invers O, Manzanera M, Ballesteros E, Romero J (2007) Impact of the brine from a desalination plant on a shallow seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadow. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72: 579–590.
  6. 6. Med-GIG (2007) WFD Intercalibration technical report for coastal and transitional waters in the Mediterranean ecoregion. WFD Intercalibration Technical Report Part 3: Coastal and Transitional Waters.
  7. 7. EC (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Community OJ L 327: 1–73.
  8. 8. González-Correa JM, Bayle JT, Sánchez-Lizaso JL, Valle C, Sánchez-Jerez P, et al. (2005) Recovery of deep Posidonia oceanica meadows degraded by trawling. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 320: 65–76.
  9. 9. WWF. (2012) Dossier coste “profilo” fragile. Benedetto G, Maceron C, editors.
  10. 10. Davis TA, Volesky B, Mucci A (2003) A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae. Water Research 37: 4311–4330.
  11. 11. Pennesi C, Totti C, Romagnoli T, Bianco B, De Michelis I, et al. (2012) Marine Macrophytes as Effective Lead Biosorbents. Water Environment Research 84: 1–8.
  12. 12. Pennesi C, Vegliò F, Totti C, Romagnoli T, Beolchini F (2012) Nonliving biomass of marine macrophytes as arsenic(V) biosorbents. Journal of Applied Phycology 24: 1495–1502.
  13. 13. Veglio' F, Beolchini F (1997) Removal of metals by biosorption: a review. Hydrometallurgy 44: 301–316.
  14. 14. Volesky B (1990) Removal and Recovery of Heavy Metals by Biosorption. In: Volesky B, editor. Biosorption of Heavy Metals. Florida: CRC Press, Boca Raton. pp.7–43.
  15. 15. Davis T, Volesky B, Vieira RHS (2000) Sargassum seaweed as biosorbent for heavy metals. Water Research 34: 4270–4278.
  16. 16. Murphy V, Hughes H, McLoughlin P (2008) Comparative study of chromium biosorption by red, green and brown seaweed biomass. Chemosphere 70: 1128–1134.
  17. 17. Sheng PX, Ting Y-P, Chen JP, Hong L (2004) Sorption of lead, copper, cadmium, zinc, and nickel by marine algal biomass: characterization of biosorptive capacity and investigation of mechanisms. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 275: 131–141.
  18. 18. Sari A, Tuzen M (2008) Biosorption of total chromium from aqueous solution by red algae (Ceramium virgatum): equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Journal of hazardous materials 160: 349–355.
  19. 19. Bulgariu D, Bulgariu L (2012) Equilibrium and kinetics studies of heavy metal ions biosorption on green algae waste biomass. Bioresource technology 103: 489–493.
  20. 20. Demirak A, Dalman Ö, Tilkan E, Yıldız D, Yavuz E, et al. (2011) Biosorption of 2,4 dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) onto Posidonia oceanica (L.) seagrass in a batch system: Equilibrium and kinetic modeling. Microchemical Journal 99: 97–102.
  21. 21. Ncibi MC, Mahjoub B, Hamissa AM Ben, Mansour R Ben, Seffen M (2009) Biosorption of textile metal-complexed dye from aqueous medium using Posidonia oceanica (L.) leaf sheaths: Mathematical modelling. Desalination 109–121.
  22. 22. Benavente J, Ramos-Barrado J, Heredia A (1998) A study of the electrical behaviour of isolated tomato cuticular membranes and cutin by impedance spectroscopy measurements. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 140: 333–338.
  23. 23. Khiari R, Khiari R, Mhenni M, Belgacem M, Mauret E (2010) Chemical composition and pulping of date palm rachis and Posidonia oceanica – A comparison with other wood and non-wood fibre sources. Bioresource Technology 101: 775–780.
  24. 24. Giordani T, Natali L, Maserti BE, Taddei S, Cavallini A (2000) Characterization and Expression of DNA Sequences Encoding Putative Type-II Metallothioneins in the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Plant Physiology 123: 1571–1582.
  25. 25. Cozza R, Pangaro T, Maestrini P, Giordani T, Natali L, et al. (2006) Isolation of putative type 2 metallothionein encoding sequences and spatial expression pattern in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Aquatic Botany 85: 317–323.
  26. 26. Ncibi MC, Mahjoub B, Seffen M (2007) Kinetic and equilibrium studies of methylene blue biosorption by Posidonia oceanica (L.) fibres. Journal of Hazardous Materials 139: 280–285.
  27. 27. Izquierdo M, Gabaldón C, Marzal P, Álvarez-Hornos FJ (2010) Modeling of copper fixed-bed biosorption from wastewater by Posidonia oceanica. Bioresource Technology 101: 510–517.
  28. 28. Allouche FN, Mameri N, Guibal E (2011) Pb(II) biosorption on Posidonia oceanica biomass. Chemical Engineering Journal 168: 1174–1184.
  29. 29. Cengiz S, Tanrikulu F, Aksu S (2012) An alternative source of adsorbent for the removal of dyes from textile waters: Posidonia oceanica (L.). Chemical Engineering Journal 32–40.
  30. 30. Izquierdo M, Marzal P, Gabald&oacute, n C, Silvetti M, et al. (2012) Study of the Interaction Mechanism in the Biosorption of Copper(II) Ions onto Posidonia oceanica and Peat. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water 40: 428–437.
  31. 31. Staśko R, Adrian H, Adrian A (2006) Effect of nitrogen and vanadium on austenite grain growth kinetics of a low alloy steel. Materials Characterization 340–347.
  32. 32. Tang Z, Stumpf W (2008) The role of molybdenum additions and prior deformation on acicular ferrite formation in microalloyed Nb–Ti low-carbon line-pipe steels. Materials Characterization 59: 717–728.
  33. 33. Gerke TL, Scheckel KG, Maynard JB (2010) Speciation and distribution of vanadium in drinking water iron pipe corrosion by-products. The Science of the total environment 408: 5845–5853.
  34. 34. Liber K, Doig LE, White-Sobey SL (2011) Toxicity of uranium, molybdenum, nickel, and arsenic to Hyalella azteca and Chironomus dilutus in water-only and spiked-sediment toxicity tests. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 74: 1171–1179.
  35. 35. Montazer-Rahmati MM, Rabbani P, Abdolali A, Keshtkar AR (2011) Kinetics and equilibrium studies on biosorption of cadmium, lead, and nickel ions from aqueous solutions by intact and chemically modified brown algae. Journal of hazardous materials 185: 401–407.
  36. 36. Michałowski T, Toporek M, Rymanowski M (2005) Overview on the Gran and other linearisation methods applied in titrimetric analyses. Talanta 65: 1241–1253.
  37. 37. Michałowski T, Kupiec K, Rymanowski M (2008) Numerical analysis of the Gran methods. A comparative study. Analytica chimica acta 606: 172–183.
  38. 38. Langmuir I (1918) The Adsorption of Gases on Plane Surfaces of Glass, Mica and Platinum. Journal Of The American Chemical Society 40: 1361–1402.
  39. 39. Whittaker G, Mount A, Heal M (2000) BIOS Instant Notes in Physical Chemistry. Taylor, Francis, editors.
  40. 40. Shriver D., Atkins PW (1999) Inorganic Chemistry British: Oxford University Press.
  41. 41. Gardea-Torresdey JL, Becker-Hapak MK, Hosea JM, Darnall DW (1990) Effect of chemical modification of algal carboxyl groups on metal ion binding. Environmental Science & Technology 24: 1372–1378.
  42. 42. Fourest E, Serre A, Roux J (1996) Contribution of carboxyl groups to heavy metal binding sites in fungal wall. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry 54: 1–10.
  43. 43. Fourqurean JW, Marbà N, Duarte CM, Diaz-Almela E, Ruiz-Halpern S (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in the elemental and stable isotopic content of the seagrasses Posidonia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa from the Illes Balears, Spain. Marine Biology 151: 219–232.
  44. 44. Lafabrie C, Pergent G, Pergent-Martini C, Capiomont A (2007) Posidonia oceanica: a tracer of past mercury contamination. Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987) 148: 688–692.
  45. 45. Lafabrie C, Pergent G, Kantin R, Pergent-Martini C, Gonzalez J-L (2007) Trace metals assessment in water, sediment, mussel and seagrass species–validation of the use of Posidonia oceanica as a metal biomonitor. Chemosphere 68: 2033–2039.
  46. 46. Lafabrie C, Pergent-Martini C, Pergent G (2008) First results on the study of metal contamination along the Corsican coastline using Posidonia oceanica. Marine pollution bulletin 57: 155–159.
  47. 47. Lafabrie C, Pergent-Martini C, Pergent G (2008) Metal contamination of Posidonia oceanica meadows along the Corsican coastline (Mediterranean). Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987) 151: 262–268.
  48. 48. Ferrat L, Pergent-Martini C, Roméo M (2003) Assessment of the use of biomarkers in aquatic plants for the evaluation of environmental quality: application to seagrasses. Aquatic Toxicology 65: 187–204.
  49. 49. Ferrat L, Gnassia-Barelli M, Pergent-Martini C, Roméo M (2003) Mercury and non-protein thiol compounds in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Comparative biochemistry and physiology Toxicology & pharmacology: CBP 134: 147–155.
  50. 50. Maserti BE, Ferrillo V, Avdis O, Nesti U, Garbo A Di, et al. (2005) Relationship of non-protein thiol pools and accumulated Cd or Hg in the marine macrophyte Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Aquatic Toxicology 75: 288–292.
  51. 51. Puigdomenech I (2009) Program MEDUSA (Make Equilibrium Diagrams Using Sophisticated Algorithms), Department of Inorganic Chemistry.
  52. 52. Hoffman RV (2004) Organic chemistry: an intermediate text. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Hoboken, Wiley-Interscience.
  53. 53. Aydin M, Cavas L, Merdivan M (2012) An alternative evaluation method for accumulated dead leaves of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile on the beaches: removal of uranium from aqueous solutions. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 293, 2: 489–496.
  54. 54. Krika F, Azzouz N, Ncibi MC (2012) Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous media using Mediterranean Posidonia oceanica biomass: adsorption studies and salt competition investigation. International Journal of Environmental Research 6, 3: 719–732.
  55. 55. Wahab MA, Hassine RB, Jellali S (2011) Posidonia oceanica (L.) fibers as a potential low-cost adsorbent for the removal and recovery of orthophosphate. Journal of Hazardous Materials 191, 1–3: 333–341.
  56. 56. Beolchini F, Pagnanelli F, Toro L, Vegliò F (2005) Continuous biosorption of copper and lead in single and binary systems using Sphaerotilus natans cells confined by a membrane: experimental validation of dynamic models. Hydrometallurgy 73–85.
  57. 57. Beolchini F, Pagnanelli F, De Michelis I, Vegliò F (2006) Micellar Enhanced Ultrafiltration for Arsenic(V) Removal: Effect of Main Operating Conditions and Dynamic Modelling. Environmental Science & Technology 40: 2746–2752.
  58. 58. Beolchini F, Fonti V, Ferella F, Vegliò F (2010) Metal recovery from spent refinery catalysts by means of biotechnological strategies. Journal of Hazardous Materials 178: 529–534.
  59. 59. Rocchetti L, Fonti V, Vegliò F, Beolchini F (2013) An environmentally friendly process for the recovery of valuable metals form spent refinery catalysts. Waste Management & Research 31, 6: 568–576.