Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Effect of Alcohols on Red Blood Cell Mechanical Properties and Membrane Fluidity Depends on Their Molecular Size

The Effect of Alcohols on Red Blood Cell Mechanical Properties and Membrane Fluidity Depends on Their Molecular Size

  • Melda Sonmez, 
  • Huseyin Yavuz Ince, 
  • Ozlem Yalcin, 
  • Vladimir Ajdžanović, 
  • Ivan Spasojević, 
  • Herbert J. Meiselman, 
  • Oguz K. Baskurt
PLOS
x

Abstract

The role of membrane fluidity in determining red blood cell (RBC) deformability has been suggested by a number of studies. The present investigation evaluated alterations of RBC membrane fluidity, deformability and stability in the presence of four linear alcohols (methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol) using ektacytometry and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. All alcohols had a biphasic effect on deformability such that it increased then decreased with increasing concentration; the critical concentration for reversal was an inverse function of molecular size. EPR results showed biphasic changes of near-surface fluidity (i.e., increase then decrease) and a decreased fluidity of the lipid core; rank order of effectiveness was butanol > propanol > ethanol > methanol, with a significant correlation between near-surface fluidity and deformability (r = 0.697; p<0.01). The presence of alcohol enhanced the impairment of RBC deformability caused by subjecting cells to 100 Pa shear stress for 300 s, with significant differences from control being observed at higher concentrations of all four alcohols. The level of hemolysis was dependent on molecular size and concentration, whereas echinocytic shape transformation (i.e., biconcave disc to crenated morphology) was observed only for ethanol and propanol. These results are in accordance with available data obtained on model membranes. They document the presence of mechanical links between RBC deformability and near-surface membrane fluidity, chain length-dependence of the ability of alcohols to alter RBC mechanical behavior, and the biphasic response of RBC deformability and near-surface membrane fluidity to increasing alcohol concentrations.

Introduction

The physicochemical properties of membranes are of critical importance for many fundamental functions of cells, with the specific effects of these properties determined by complex cellular mechanisms [1]. Mammalian red blood cells (RBC) have a relatively simple structure (i.e., membrane surrounding a hemoglobin solution with no internal structures), and thus the properties and functions of the cell membrane are of primary importance. RBC have unique mechanical properties, which are crucial for the maintenance of in vivo blood flow [2]: when exposed to physiological levels of shear stress (SS), RBC are able to deform and change their shape. This ability to respond to SS, known as cellular deformability, enables these ~8 micron-diameter cells to pass through vessels with diameter as small as 3 microns, thereby significantly contributing to normal blood flow resistance at the microcirculatory level [3]. Further, the high deformability of RBC provides them with mechanical stability, tending to protect them from fragmentation and hemolysis under hemodynamic shear forces [4]. Decreased deformability and decreased stability of RBC might result in: (i) impaired blood flow, which may lead to ischemia and hypertension; (ii) endothelial dysfunction; (iii) chronic hypercoagulable state, which may lead to thromboembolic events [57].

It is well known that RBC deformability and stability, which represent parameters having direct in vivo implications, are determined by the mechanical and structural characteristics of the cytoskeleton and lipid bilayer [3,8,9]. A positive correlation between RBC deformability and membrane fluidity has been previously suggested, but to date this concept has not been examined in a coherent and detailed manner [1013]. In addition, the relation between deformability and the fluidity at different membrane depths (e.g. surface, hydrophobic core) has never been studied.

Alcohols interact with lipid bilayers, with the -OH group positioned in the bilayer interfacial region and with the hydrocarbon chains facing the hydrophobic core of the bilayer. The relevant characteristics of alcohols include: (i) A simple structure with hydrophilic and lipophilic moieties; (ii) The size of their lipophilic moiety and their partition coefficient into the bilayer gradually increase with increasing chain length; (iii) They insert deeper into membrane layers with increasing concentration and can penetrate into the hydrophobic core [14,15]; (iv) Their penetration into the lipid bilayer increases with the length of the alcohol’s hydrophobic chain [16]; (v) They appear to modify both the deformability and fluidity of RBC.

The aims of the present study were (i) to examine the effects of small alcohols on RBC mechanics and membrane stability; (ii) to acquire new information regarding the interactions of small alcohols with cellular membranes using RBC as a model; (iii) to determine the potential relationship between RBC deformability and membrane fluidity using laser diffraction ektacytometery and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) with two spin-labels -5-DS and 16-DS that provide fluidity information of the near-surface membrane layer [17,18] and the deeper membrane layer [19]. Four members of a homologous series of primary alcohols (i.e., methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 1-butanol) were selected for study in order to explore the effects of hydrophobic chain length; alcohol concentrations were ≥ 0.5% and thus above physiological levels.

Materials and Methods

Blood samples

Venous blood samples were obtained from healthy volunteers, aged between 19 to 57 years, using vacuum tubes with ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 1.8 mg/mL). A tourniquet was applied to the upper arm during sampling from antecubital vein and sampling was completed within 90 s following the tourniquet application [20]. All procedures related to the use of human blood in this study are in conformity with the recommendation provided in The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans. The protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey and Ethics Committee of Institute for Biological Research "Siniša Stanković", Belgrade, Serbia. The subjects provided verbal consent, following the explanation of the blood sampling procedure and the protocols briefly; a written consent was not seen necessary by the IRB and Ethics Committee as the procedure was accepted not to involve more than minimal risk. The information related to the volunteers are kept in a separate data file, which is not directly linked to the experimental data files. Experiments were completed within 4 hours following blood sampling.

Preparation of RBC suspensions containing alcohols

Whole blood was diluted 1:200 in a viscous medium containing alcohol at various concentrations for ektacytometry. Methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol were added to a 6% solution of high-molecular weight polyvinylpyralidone (PVP, 360 kDa) prepared in isotonic-phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) at concentrations presented in Table 1; these concentrations were selected based on preliminary studies. The viscosities of the PVP solutions were measured at 37°C following the addition of alcohols using a Wells-Brookfield cone-plate rotational viscometer. The viscosity of the PVP solution was 23.0 mPa·s without added alcohol but was slightly increased by the addition of ethanol, propanol and butanol, with the increase being a function of both alcohol molecular size and concentration; no change of viscosity was observed with methanol at any concentration (Table 1). Measured viscosity values were used to calculate the rotational speed (i.e., shear rate) of the ektacytometer that are needed to achieve a given SS.

MethanolEthanolPropanolButanol
Concent.Visc.Concent.Visc.Concent.Visc.Concent.Visc.
(%)(M)(mPa·s)(%)(M)(mPa·s)(%)(M)(mPa·s)(%)(M)(mPa·s)
0023.00023.00023.00023.0
0.50.12323.00.50.08623.20.50.06723.20.50.05523.5
10.24723.010.17123.410.13323.510.10923.8
20.49423.020.34323.820.26623.820.21924.2
40.98823.040.68724.740.53225.1---
51.23423.050.85925.150.66526.4---
---71.20225.570.93227.2---

Table 1. Concentrations of methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol used and the viscosity of PVP solutions containing these alcohols (measured at 37°C).

CSV
Download CSV

Assessment of RBC deformability

RBC elongation indexes (EI) were determined as a function of applied SS using a laser diffraction ektacytometer (LORCA MaxSis, Mechatronics, Hoorn, The Netherlands). The system uses a co-axial cylindrical shearing system; both the inner and outer cylinders are made of transparent material with a gap of ~350 µm between them. The outer cylinder rotates at a calculated rotational speed to generate the desired SS in the sample introduced into the gap. The suspending medium viscosity is also a determinant of SS and hence the viscosity values shown in Table 1 were utilized. A laser beam (670 nm wavelength) is projected perpendicular to the rotation axis and the diffraction pattern generated by RBC in the gap on the opposite side is captured by a CCD camera and analyzed by microcomputer that also controls the rotation of the outer cylinder. EI were calculated during the application of 10 steps of SS, in the range of 0.3 to 50 Pa, by using the long and short axes of the elliptical diffraction patterns (a and b, respectively) as EI= (a-b)/(a+b); the data are expressed as EI-SS curves. Additionally, the maximum EI (EImax) and the shear stress required to cause one-half of this maximum (SS1/2) were determined using the Lineweaver-Burk approach and non-linear curve fitting [21]. The SS1/2/EImax ratio was calculated as a normalized measure of SS1/2 [22]; SS1/2/EImax is inversely related to RBC deformability such that a lower value indicates better deformability.

Assessment of RBC mechanical stability

RBC, suspended in the viscous PVP solution, were subjected to constant 100 Pa SS using the ektacytometer. EI was continuously monitored for 300 s at this SS, and exhibited a characteristic time course. This EI-time course provides information about RBC fragmentation and related changes in deformability, thereby reflecting the influence of alcohols on membrane stability. The stability test was performed in the presence of methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol in the suspending medium of RBC at concentrations listed in Table 1. Additionally, SS-EI curves were obtained after the application of 100 Pa SS for 300 s, and normalized SS1/2 values (SS1/2/EImax) were compared with those measured before the application of 100 Pa SS.

EPR measurements of RBC membrane fluidity

RBC were spin-labeled as described previously [17,18]. In brief, RBC were isolated from fresh blood and washed three times with PBS by centrifugation at 3500g/10 min/4°C; the hematocrit of all samples was adjusted to ~40%. Ethanol solutions of spin-labels 5-DS and 16-DS (5- and 16-doxyl stearate, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were applied onto the walls of microtubes, with the amount of DS calculated to obtain an optimal spin label to membrane lipid ratio of approximately 1:100. After the ethanol had evaporated, RBC were added and gently mixed, and then methanol, ethanol, propanol or butanol were added to the RBC in the microtubes to achieve final molar concentrations shown in Table 1. RBC samples were placed in Teflon tubes with a wall thickness of 0.025 mm and an internal diameter of 0.6 mm (Zeus Industries, Raritan, NJ, USA) and inserted into quartz capillaries. EPR spectra were recorded at 20°C, 2 min after the addition of alcohols, using a Varian E104-A EPR spectrometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA) operating at X-band (9.1 GHz) with the following settings: modulation amplitude, 2 G; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; microwave power, 20 mW; scan range, 100 G; scan time, 4 min; time constant, 0.25 s. Spectra were recorded and analyzed using EW software (Scientific Software Inc., Bloomington, IL, USA), and the order parameter (S) of 5-DS-labeled RBC, which is reciprocally proportional to fluidity, was calculated as described previously [17,18]. 5-DS has a paramagnetic group at C5 in the fatty acid chain which enables the evaluation of fluidity of the layer near the membrane surface, while 16-DS has a paramagnetic group much deeper in the membrane, at C16 of the fatty acid chain, which therefore enables evaluation of membrane fluidity in the membrane’s hydrophobic core [23]. For 16-DS, it is more appropriate to calculate rotational correlation times (τ) rather than the order parameter (S), where τ is also reciprocally proportional to fluidity. Rotational correlation times were calculated as described previously [19,24]. All experiments were performed at least in quadruplicate.

Assessment of hemolysis

Blood was diluted 1:200 in PBS containing methanol, ethanol, propanol or butanol at concentrations listed in Table 1; 1: 200 dilution samples without alcohol were used as a control and for the determination of total hemoglobin. These dilute RBC suspensions were incubated at room temperature for 30 min then, with the exception of the total hemoglobin sample, centrifuged at 400g/5 min/25°C. An aliquot of supernatant from each centrifuged sample and the same volume of the total hemoglobin sample were mixed with 10-fold concentrated Drabkin’s reagent containing 5% Triton X-100. The absorbance (Abs) was read at 540 nm. Hemolysis percentages for each alcohol and each concentration were calculated as follows: Hemolysis (%) = (Abssample-Abscontrol) / (Abstotal hemoglobin) x 100.

Assessment of RBC morphology

RBC morphology was assessed in freshly prepared, wet-mount preparations. Briefly, dilute RBC (1:200 dilution of blood) in PBS containing various alcohols at the concentrations used in the experiments were transferred onto glass microscope slides having a silicone grease well of ~1 mm depth, and covered with a coverslip. RBC were observed approximately mid-way between the slide and coverslip. This method allows observation of RBC in the suspension away from glass surfaces, therefore minimizing the crenation artifact caused by surface effects. The RBC were not stained. Micrographs were obtained using a light microscope (Zeiss Axio Scope A1 with Axiocam Icc3, Carl Zeiss MicroImaging GmbH, Göttingen, Germany).

Data presentation and statistics

Data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE), except for S and τ which are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two-way ANOVA followed by "Bonferroni post test" were used for comparison of EI-SS curves obtained in the presence of various alcohols. RBC deformability parameters SS1/2, EImax and the SS1/2/EImax ratio, S and τ, as well as percent hemolysis were compared with one-way ANOVA. Non-linear curve fitting using a Lineweaver-Burk approach was performed using Graphpad 4.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Effect of alcohols on RBC deformability

Figure 1 presents EI-SS curves for RBC suspensions containing methanol, ethanol, propanol or butanol at various concentrations. For all four alcohols, EI measured at SS in the low to mid-range (i.e., 0.3–9 Pa) increased with alcohol concentration, reaching a maximum at a specific concentration that depended on the molecular size of the alcohol. The increase of EI above control was statistically significant (P<0.05) for 0.494 M methanol in the SS range of 0.3 to 5.15 Pa (Figure 1A). Significant increase was observed in the same SS range with ethanol at 0.343 M and 0.687 M (P<0.001; Figure 1B), and for propanol at 0.266 M (P<0.001; Figure 1C). The only significant improvement in EI with butanol was detected at 0.109 M with 0.94 Pa SS (P<0.05; Figure 1D). Further increases of alcohol concentration above a critical level specific for each alcohol resulted in significantly reduced EI, especially at higher SS (i.e., 9–50 Pa); the critical concentrations at which EI started to decrease were 0.219 M for butanol, 0.665 for propanol, 1.202 M for ethanol, and 1.234 M for methanol.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Elongation index (EI)-shear stress (SS) curves for RBC in suspending medium containing the four alcohols at different concentrations.

(A) Methanol. (B) Ethanol. (C) Propanol. (D) Butanol. The data are means ± SE from 10 experiments on blood samples from different donors. Note that error bars often lie within the symbols and therefore are not visible. The curves representing the EI-SS relations for RBC suspensions containing different concentrations of alcohols were significantly different from each other for all for alcohols as determined by two-way ANOVA (P<0.001).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g001

This pattern can also be clearly recognized for the SS1/2 parameter obtained from EI-SS curves (see Figure 2 for ethanol and propanol). SS1/2 values decreased significantly at 0.343 and 0.687 M of ethanol (P<0.01), but approached control values at higher concentrations (Figure 2A); a similar pattern was found for other alcohols. For example, the exposure of RBC to propanol resulted in a biphasic alteration of SS1/2; a decrease of SS1/2 was significant between 0.133 and 0.532 M (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively), while the SS1/2 for RBC suspensions at 0.932 M of propanol were significantly increased compared to control, thus indicating an impairment of deformability at this highest propanol concentration (Figure 2C). Figure 2B and 2D demonstrate that EImax values are also altered significantly by alcohols. Given that both SS1/2 and EImax are affected, SS1/2/EImax ratios were calculated in order to allow comparisons of the effects of the four alcohols at various concentrations [22]. The concentration-dependent influence of alcohols with different molecular weights is presented in Figure 3: the SS1/2/EImax ratio reaches a minimum (i.e., the maximum of deformability) at a concentration specific to each alcohol, with reversal of the effects with further increase of concentration. It is important to note that butanol could only be tested at concentrations of up to 0.219 M, since higher concentrations caused significant hemolysis that precluded deformability measurements. However, the biphasic effect of butanol on deformability was clearly observed in the accessible concentration range (Figure 3). Note also that the concentration at which SS1/2/EImax reaches a minimum is a linear inverse function of the molecular size of the alcohol (Figure 4).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Half-maximal shear stress (SS1/2) and maximum elongation index (EImax) calculated by Lineweaver-Burk approach.

The curves presented in Figure 1 were used in calculus. (A) SS1/2 for RBC exposed to ethanol; (B) EImax for RBC exposed to ethanol; (C) SS1/2 for RBC exposed to propanol; (D) EImax for RBC exposed to propanol. The data are means ± SE from 10 experiments on blood samples from different donors. Difference from control without alcohol were tested by one-way ANOVA: * P<0.05; ** P<0.01.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Effect of alcohol concentration on SS1/2/EImax parameters.

The effects were determined using the EI-SS curves presented in Figure 1. SS1/2/EImax is inversely proportional to RBC deformability. The data are means ± SE from 10 experiments on blood samples from different donors. Statistical significance of the differences in comparison to control (no alcohol) are: * P<0.05 and ** P<0.01, as tested by one-way ANOVA.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Alcohol concentrations at which the SS1/2/EImax parameter reached a minimum (i.e., maximal RBC deformability).

The minimal concentrations were determined using the fitted curves presented in Figure 3.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g004

Effect of alcohols on RBC mechanical stability

Exposure of RBC suspensions to 100 Pa SS in the shearing system of the ektacytometer resulted in altered EI, which exhibited temporal changes (Figure 5). In general, for alcohol-free RBC suspensions, EI increased initially, reaching a maximum in the first 50 s, then approached a minimum between 50–100 s, followed by a small increase and a further decrease of EI, reaching a slightly lower EI at the end of 300 s of shearing. Inclusion of smaller alcohols (methanol and ethanol) at lower concentrations had no significant effects on the early parts of this time course, but affected the later parts of the EI-time curves. EI values measured at the end of the 300 s of exposure to 100 Pa were significantly lower in the presence of methanol at 0.247 M and ethanol at 0.687 M compared to control (Figure 5A and 5B). Propanol and butanol at comparable concentrations exhibited a different pattern (Figure 5C and 5D): (i) For propanol, EI increased initially, reaching a maximum within the first 60 s and then decreased, becoming significantly lower than control at 132 and 183 s for 0.266 and 0.665 M; (ii) For butanol, EI became significantly lower than initial control at 138 s for 0.219 M. A similar pattern (i.e., a progressive decrease of EI after the initial peak) was observed for methanol and ethanol only at extremely high concentrations (> 1.20 M); there was no significant decrease at ~300 s.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Effect of alcohol concentration on elongation indexes (EI) at 100 Pa SS during a 300 s period of shearing.

(A) Methanol. (B) Ethanol. (C) Propanol. (D) Butanol. EI values are presented as % of the initial value. Each curve represents the mean from 10 experiments. Standard Error (SE) varied between 0.05 and 2.12, and showed increase with the duration of SS (error bars not shown for clarity). The curves were compared to control using two-way ANOVA, with significant differences (P<0.0001) observed for all four concentrations of methanol, ethanol at 0.687 and 1.202 M, both concentrations of propanol, and the single concentration of butanol.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g005

SS1/2/EImax values, that were determined prior to and following shearing, indicated alterations of RBC mechanical stability that were modulated by the presence of alcohol (Figure 6). Following shearing at 100 Pa for 300 s, SS1/2/EImax increased indicating an impairment of RBC deformability. Average differences of SS1/2/EImax measured before and after the application of 100 Pa for 300 s are presented in Table 2; the alteration of SS1/2/EImax increased with alcohol concentration. The effects on SS1/2/EImax were especially evident at the higher concentrations of alcohol (at 1.234 M for methanol, ≥ 0.859 M for ethanol, 0.665 M for propanol, and 0.219 M for butanol), where the differences were significantly more pronounced than for control (Table 2). Higher concentrations of butanol resulted in significant hemolysis, and therefore were not employed in these experiments.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Changes of SS1/2/EImax following the application of 100 Pa SS for 300 s.

(A) Methanol. (B) Ethanol. (C) Propanol. (D) Butanol. Data are means + SE from 10 experiments on blood samples from different donors. Differences between values that were obtained before (white bars) and after (black bars) the exposure to 100 Pa SS, as determined by the means of two-way ANOVA: * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g006

MethanolEthanolPropanolButanol
MDifferenceMDifferenceMDifferenceMDifference
00.92 ± 0.4500.92 ± 0.4500.48 ± 0.7700.48 ± 0.77
0.1231.12 ± 0.340.1711.76 ± 0.340.1331.17 ± 0.120.0550.83 ± 0.17
0.2471.27 ± 0.390.3432.01 ± 0.330.2662.14 ± 0.140.1091.02 ± 0.25
0.4941.20 ± 0.300.6871.57 ± 0.520.5322.62 ± 0.260.2192.18 ± 0.82*
0.9881.67 ± 0.500.8592.22 ± 0.34*0.6652.83 ± 0.53*--
1.2342.81 ± 0.26**1.2022.69 ± 0.26**0.932-2.53 ± 2.46--

Table 2. Difference of SS1/2/EImax parameters measured before and after the application of 100 Pa SS for 300 s.

M – molar concentration of each alcohol present during the test. Data are presented as mean + SE. Differences for each alcohol and concentration are compared to the difference observed in control suspensions not containing alcohol: *P<0.05; **P<0.01.
CSV
Download CSV

Membrane fluidity alterations by alcohols

EPR spectra of spin-labels 5-DS and 16-DS provide information about the fluidity of the near-surface membrane layer [17,18] and the deeper membrane layer [19], respectively. Both calculated parameters, S for 5-DS and τ for 16-DS, are inversely proportional to the fluidity of the specific membrane layer. Figure 7A shows dose-dependent changes of S in response to alcohols with different molecular weights. Note that at lower alcohol concentrations, fluidity gradually increases (i.e., S decreases), and that the downward slope and the concentrations at which the minimal S values occurred appear inversely related to the alcohol’s molecular weight. In other words, the rank order of the impact on membrane fluidity is butanol > propanol > ethanol > methanol. However, the minimal S value for propanol was only slightly and non-significantly different than ethanol. It should be noted that the S value does not appear to have reached a minimum for suspensions containing methanol in the range of concentrations shown in Figure 7A.

thumbnail
Figure 7. The effects of alcohols on RBC membrane fluidity at various concentrations as determined by EPR spectroscopy.

(A) The order parameter (S) of 5-DS-labeled RBC. S for 2 M methanol was 0.729 ± 0.007 (not shown). (B) Rotational correlation time (τ) of 16-DS-labeled RBC. τ for 2 M methanol was 18.20 ± 0.88** (10-10 s) (not shown). Data are mean ± SD from 4 experiments on blood samples from different donors. Statistically significant differences compared to control (no alcohol) using one-way ANOVA: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g007

However, in additional experiments, the S parameter increased at higher concentrations of methanol (i.e., 2 M), clearly indicating a minimum at around 1 M. Therefore, similarly to other alcohols, the pattern of alterations of S for methanol mimics the biphasic pattern for SS1/2/EImax (Figure 3).

The biphasic effects on membrane fluidity are clearly evident at higher alcohol concentrations. Interestingly, a comparison of concentration-dependent changes of deformability (Figure 3) and near-surface fluidity (Figure 7A) indicates very similar trends and the correlation between deformability and S was significant (Pearson r = 0.697; P<0.01). Additionally, the maximal RBC deformability (i.e., minimum SS1/2/EImax) and the highest membrane fluidity (i.e., minimum S parameter) were observed at similar concentrations, suggesting an association between these two cellular properties. Figure 7B presents the rotational correlation times. Inspection of these EPR data indicates that: (i) that methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol all decrease the fluidity of the membrane hydrophobic core (i.e., increase τ); (ii) the concentrations at which the effects first become noticeable are inversely related to the alcohol’s molecular weight; (iii) at the highest concentration used, τ for butanol returned to control values.

Hemolysis level

The level of hemolysis, which is provoked by the alcohols, depended on their molecular weight and concentration. While no hemolysis was observed for RBC exposed to methanol over the concentration range used in this study, hemolysis was observed with increasing concentrations of ethanol, propanol and butanol (Figure 8). Statistically significant increases were found for ethanol and propanol; hemolysis levels were 10.1±7.42% for ethanol at 1.202 M (P<0.05), 25.8±17.4% for propanol at 0.932 M (P<0.05), and 94.9±5.3% for butanol at 0.760 M (P<0.01).

thumbnail
Figure 8. Hemolysis (%) plotted against alcohol concentration for four alcohols with different molecular sizes.

Data are mean ± SE from 7 experiments on blood samples from different donors. Statistical significance from control (no alcohol) tested by one-way ANOVA: * P<0.05; ** P<0.01.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g008

RBC morphology under the influence of alcohols

Figure 9 presents the changes in RBC morphology that are provoked by alcohols. Echinocytosis was observed in the presence of ethanol at 0.859 M, with >80% of RBC being type II-III echinocytes [25], but was negligible in the suspensions with lower concentrations of ethanol. Morphological alteration of RBC started at lower concentrations for propanol, with ~40% of RBC being type I-III echinocytes at 0.133 M propanol and increased to >80% in suspensions containing 0.665 M propanol. Shape alterations were not observed in suspensions containing methanol and butanol in the range of concentrations used in this study.

thumbnail
Figure 9. Light microscopy images of RBC in the presence of alcohols.

The cells were observed in dilute (1:200), fresh, wet-mount, unstained preparations in which cell shape was unaffected by the "glass slide" effect (i.e., crenation due to alkaline conditions at glass surface).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076579.g009

Discussion

The data obtained in the current study have shown three important aspects of the influence of alcohols with various molecular sizes on RBC mechanical properties: 1) Alcohols have biphasic effects on RBC deformability, wherein the deformability was increased at lower concentrations but the effects were diminished or even reversed at higher concentrations; 2) Alcohols at higher concentrations (i.e., 1.23 M for methanol, ≥ 0.86 M for ethanol, 0.67 M for propanol, and 0.22 M for butanol) reduced RBC mechanical stability as indicated by reduced deformability following the application of a non-physiological shear stress of 100 Pa; 3) Near-surface membrane fluidity showed a biphasic response to increasing concentrations of alcohols, with significant increase in fluidity in the lower concentration range, whereas alcohols caused a decrease of fluidity of the hydrophobic core. A positive correlation between RBC deformability and near-surface membrane fluidity was observed. The effects of alcohol on RBC deformability and membrane fluidity were positively associated with molecular weight.

Ethanol is the most widely investigated alcohol and its effects on RBC membrane and mechanical properties have been evaluated previously [15,26,27]; while corresponding data on the effects of other alcohols are missing in the literature. Various groups have previously reported improvement of RBC deformability by ethanol. Rabai and co-workers studied the effects of ethanol in a concentration range similar to the one applied here [28], and reported a progressive improvement of RBC deformability (i.e., decreased SS1/2 and SS1/2/EImax) in the presence of ethanol at concentrations between 0.5 to 5% (0.08 to 0.8 M), with a slight reversal of these parameters at 6% (~1 M). Ethanol has also been the subject of several clinically-oriented studies in which RBC mechanical properties were investigated [2932]. The concentrations used in these clinical studies were 10–100 mM (i.e., 0.06-0.6%) and thus the results are not comparable with the data of Rabai [28] and the present study. However, improvement of RBC deformability has been reported even at these relatively low ethanol concentrations [29].

The influence of alcohols with molecular weights ranging between 32 to 74 Da on RBC deformability exhibited an interesting dose dependence, with an intermediate concentration having the maximum effect. This critical concentration (i.e., concentration for minimal SS1/2/EImax) for each alcohol was inversely proportional to its molecular weight: methanol 0.905 M; ethanol: 0.515 M; propanol: 0.334 M; butanol: 0.088 M. The pattern of effect on membrane fluidity S near the hydrophilic surface was very similar to that on deformability, leading to the significant correlation coefficient observed between deformability and fluidity parameters. Ingolfsson and Anderson, in a study examining various membrane lipid bilayer alterations, found the dependence of the effective concentrations on chain length for a wide range of alcohols [33]. Molecular size- and dose-dependent effects of alcohols on RBC mechanical properties appear to reflect their interactions with lipid bilayer properties, the most notable property being membrane fluidity [34].

The concentration- and chain length-dependent increase of membrane fluidity of the surface layer observed here is in accordance with previous studies on biological membranes [35,36], and with data obtained on simpler model membranes [14,15,33,37]. The impact of alcohols on membrane fluidity might be attributed to the alterations of the free-energy gradient in the lipid bilayer [36]. The insertion of small, mobile amphiphilic molecules into the membrane surface layer affects its compactness by increasing the mobility of lipids and by decreasing their interactions [15]. Pertinent to this, Patra and co-workers have documented that the order parameter of a lipid molecule which is bound to at least one ethanol molecule is lower compared to non-bound lipid [37]. Further, it has been shown that ethanol decreases lipid density in the near-surface layer, but provokes density increase in the middle of the membrane [14,15].

Previous studies on model membranes have shown that at lower concentrations, alcohol molecules are predominantly located in the surface layer of the membrane. However, as alcohol concentration increases, alcohol is pushed towards the deeper membrane layers and inserts into the hydrophobic core [14,15]. The longer the alcohol’s hydrophobic chain the easier it enters the interior of the lipid bilayer [16]. The insertion of alcohol into the middle of the membrane results in augmented interdigitation of lipid chains and increased lipid density [14,15], as shown here by the decreased fluidity of deeper membrane layers. For example, methanol is inserted into the central core region only at high concentrations [37], which is consistent with its weak effects on the fluidity of the core. The potency of short chain alcohols to modify membrane fluidity scales with their bilayer partitioning, which increases with the addition of each methyl group [38,39]. Since the fluidities of the two layers are inter-dependent, the observed gradual decrease of fluidity of deeper membrane layers with increasing concentrations of alcohols might reflect both the decrease of near-surface membrane fluidity as well as the decrease of RBC deformability at higher concentrations. Interestingly, as observed herein, the hemolytic potential of alcohols increases with chain length and partition coefficient [40], thus indicating a link between decreased fluidity of membrane’s core and the initiation of hemolysis [41].

Bilayer fluidity is a key determinant of the function of protein elements within the cell membrane, including ion pump activities, receptor signaling and enzymatic functions [42]. However, data on the correlation of fluidity alterations and functional changes (e.g., the activity of ion pumps) as influenced by alcohols have not always been consistent [35]. It has been suggested that alcohols may affect lipid-protein interactions differently depending on the chain size, or may directly interfere with the protein elements [35]. The association between membrane fluidity and RBC rheological properties has been proposed in relation to specific pathophysiologies such as hypertension [11,13,43], yet fluidity alterations have not always been concordant with RBC deformability data [10,12,44]. The contribution of the membrane skeleton, mainly composed of a spectrin network, as a determinate of rheological behavior is well known [8]. Therefore, the correlated effects of the same alcohols over a similar concentration range on membrane fluidity and RBC deformability may reflect simultaneous changes of both lipid and protein structures. Alcohols may also have more specific effects on protein-protein interactions, via alterations of signaling mechanisms and/or phosphorylation cascades [45], which regulate the associations of the spectrin network with membrane integral proteins [42]. Such alterations have been demonstrated to modulate membrane mechanical properties and RBC deformability [9,46].

It should be noted that alcohols induce morphological alterations, with the degree of echinocytosis increasing with the concentration of ethanol and propanol. A possible cause of echinocytosis could be altered suspending medium osmolality [25], since the presence of alcohol molecules at relatively high concentrations may significantly alter the osmotic properties of the suspending medium. However, RBC membrane permeability (Pd) for the alcohols utilized in this study (Pdmeth 3.7 x 10-3, Pdeth 2.1 x 10-3, Pdprop 6.5 x 10-3, Pdbut ≤ 61 x 10-3 cm s-1, all at 25°C [47]) are comparable to or even higher than Pd for water (5 x 10-3 cm.s-1, at 25°C [48]). Thus, even in the presence of these alcohols, the extracellular and the intracellular osmolarity are swiftly balanced and there is no net transfer of water across the RBC membrane. Even alcohols with Pd slightly lower than Pdwater (e.g., methanol and ethanol), have been shown to cause no net water movement across the RBC membrane [49]. Recently, it has been shown that methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol may even suppress water diffusion across RBC membrane [50]. The phenomenon was not related to osmolarity changes, but to the dual effects of alcohols on RBC membrane components: water channels have decreased permeability and the lipid bilayer has an increased permeability for water, with the later being related to increased membrane fluidity [51]. The unaltered RBC morphology in methanol and lower concentrations of ethanol also indicates that osmotic gradient were absent.

Echinocytosis may also be the result of preferential incorporation of alcohols into the outer leaflet of the membrane lipid bilayer [25], with the level of influence determined by the molecular size of the alcohol. It should be noted that the alcohols show substantial partition coefficients that increase with molecular size [39]. Using RBC ghosts, Vertessy and Steck have shown that ethanol at concentrations higher than 2% causes cytoskeleton expansion [52], which leads to echinocytosis. Note that the mechanical behavior of RBC is affected by shape transformations [25]. Therefore, deformability data for alcohols that affect RBC morphology should be interpreted with caution, since shape transformation at relatively higher concentrations of each alcohol may also contribute to the biphasic modification of RBC mechanical behavior.

The data presented in this study also imply that membrane/cellular alterations by alcohols did not improve cellular stability as would be expected from observations of improved deformability [53]. It has thus been argued that deformability and stability are two characteristics of RBC membranes, which are determined by different protein-protein interactions [54], thereby providing a possible explanation for the discrepancy between our data on deformability and stability. On the other hand, model membrane studies show that the alcohols used herein cause gradual membrane expansion and decreased thickness with increasing concentrations, and that the effects correlate with the chain length [16], as evidenced by the increased density of the membrane’s core and augmented interdigitation of lipid chains [14,15]. Decreased membrane thickness and tight packing of fatty acid chains could represent another factor involved in alcohol-caused decrease of RBC stability.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: OKB VA IS HJM. Performed the experiments: MS HYI OY VA IS. Analyzed the data: OKB HJM. Wrote the manuscript: OKB HJM VA IS.

References

  1. 1. Subczynski WK, Wisniewska A (2000) Physical properties of lipid bilayer membranes: relevance to membrane biological functions. Acta Biochim Pol 47: 613–625. PubMed: 11310964.
  2. 2. Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ (2003) Blood rheology and hemodynamics. Semin Thromb Hemost 29: 435–450. doi:10.1055/s-2003-44551. PubMed: 14631543.
  3. 3. Chien S (1987) Red cell deformability and its relevance to blood flow. Annu Rev Physiol 49: 177–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.49.030187.001141. PubMed: 3551796.
  4. 4. Mohandas N, Clark MR, Health BP, Rossi M, Wolfe LC et al. (1982) A technique to detect reduced mechanical stability of red cell membranes: relevance to elliptocytic disorders. Blood 59: 768–774. PubMed: 7059678. PubMed: 7059678.
  5. 5. Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ (2012) Iatrogenic hyperviscosity and thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost 38: 854–864. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1325616. PubMed: 22915493.
  6. 6. Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ (2013) Vascular fluid mechanics in the regulation of endothelial function. In: AB EnginA. Engin. Endothelium: Molecular aspects of metabolic disorders. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 72–100.
  7. 7. Cicco G, Pirrelli A (1999) Red blood cell (RBC) deformability, RBC aggregability and tissue oxygenation in hypertension. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 21: 169–177. PubMed: 10711739.
  8. 8. Mohandas N, Chasis JA (1993) Red blood cell deformability, membrane material properties and shape: regulation by transmembrane, skeletal and cytosolic proteins and lipids. Semin Hematol 30: 171–192. PubMed: 8211222.
  9. 9. Mohandas N, Gallagher PG (2008) Red cell membrane: past, present, and future. Blood 112: 3939–3948. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-161166. PubMed: 18988878.
  10. 10. Chabanel A, Abbott RE, Chien S, Schachter D (1985) Effects of benzyl alcohol on erythrocyte shape, membrane hemileaflet fluidity and membrane viscoelasticity. Biochim Biophys Acta 816: 142–152. doi:10.1016/0005-2736(85)90402-X. PubMed: 4005233.
  11. 11. Orlov SN, Gulak PV, Litvinov IS, Postnov YuV (1982) Evidence of altered structure of the erythrocyte membrane in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Sci (Lond) 63: 43–45. PubMed: 7083763.
  12. 12. Uyuklu M, Meiselman HJ, Baskurt OK (2007) Effect of decreased plasma cholesterol by atorvastation treatment on erythrocyte mechanical properties. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 36: 25–33. PubMed: 17211059.
  13. 13. Zicha J, Kunes J, Devynck MA (1999) Abnormalities of membrane function and lipid metabolism in hypertension. Am J Hypertens 12: 315–331. doi:10.1016/S0895-7061(98)00178-2. PubMed: 10192236.
  14. 14. Dickey AN, Faller R (2007) How alcohol chain-length and concentration modulate hydrogen bond formation in a lipid bilayer. Biophys J 92: 2366–2376. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.097022. PubMed: 17218462.
  15. 15. Gurtovenko AA, Anwar J (2009) Interaction of ethanol with biological membranes: The formation of non-bilayer structures within the membrane interior and their significance. J Phys Chem B 113: 1983–1992. doi:10.1021/jp808041z. PubMed: 19199697.
  16. 16. Ly HV, Longo ML (2004) The influence of short-chain alcohols on interfacial tension, mechanical properties, area/molecule and permeability of flied lipid bilayers. Biophys J 87: 1013–1033. doi:10.1529/biophysj.103.034280. PubMed: 15298907.
  17. 17. Ajdzanović V, Spasojević I, Filipović B, Šošić-Jurjević B, Sekulić M et al. (2010) Effects of genistein and daidzein on erythrocyte membrane fluidity: an electron paramagnetic resonance study. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 88: 497–500. doi:10.1139/Y10-020. PubMed: 20555419.
  18. 18. Ajdžanović V, Spasojević I, Šošić-Jurjević B, Filipović B, Trifunović S et al. (2011) The negative effect of soy extract on erythrocyte membrane fluidity: an electron paramagnetic study. J Membr Biol 239: 131–135. doi:10.1007/s00232-010-9332-8. PubMed: 21132426.
  19. 19. Koter M, Franiak I, Strychalska K, Broncel M, Chojnowska-Jezierska J (2004) Damage to the structure of erythrocyte plasma membranes in patients with type-2 hypercholesterolemia. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36: 205–215. doi:10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00195-X. PubMed: 14643886.
  20. 20. Baskurt OK, Boynard M, Cokelet GC, Connes P, Cooke BM et al. (2009) New guidelines for hemorheological laboratory techniques. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 42: 75–97. PubMed: 19433882.
  21. 21. Baskurt OK, Hardeman MR, Uyuklu M, Ulker P, Cengiz M et al. (2009) Parametrization of red blood cell elongation index-shar stress curves obtained by ektacytometry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 69: 777–788. doi:10.3109/00365510903266069. PubMed: 19929721.
  22. 22. Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ (2013) Data reduction methods for ektacytometry in clinical hemorheology. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 54: 99–107. PubMed: 23109549.
  23. 23. Spasojević I (2011) Free radicals and antioxidants at a glance using EPR spectroscopy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 48: 114–142. doi:10.3109/10408363.2011.591772. PubMed: 21875311.
  24. 24. Schreier S, Polnaszek CF, Smith IC (1978) Spin labels in membranes. Problems in practice. Biochim Biophys Acta 515: 395–436. doi:10.1016/0304-4157(78)90011-4. PubMed: 215206.
  25. 25. Reinhart WH (2011) Peculiar red cell shapes: Fåhraeus Lecture 2011. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 49: 11–27.
  26. 26. Kaye MD, Schmalzl K, Nibali VC, Tarek M, Rheinstädter MC (2011) Ethanol enhances collective dynamics of lipid membranes. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 83: 050907. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.83.050907. PubMed: 21728483.
  27. 27. Mesquita R, Gonçalves MI, Dias S, Sargento L, Saldanha C et al. (1999) Ethanol and erythrocyte membrane interaction: a hemorheologic perspective. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 21: 95–98. PubMed: 10599592.
  28. 28. Rabai M, Detterich JA, Wenby RB, Toth K, Meiselman HJ (2013) Effects of ethanol on red blood cell rheological behavior. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc: ([MedlinePgn:]) doi:10.3233/CH-2012-1632. PubMed: 23089886.
  29. 29. Chmiel BA, Olszowy ZB, Turczynski BB, Kusmierski SA (1999) Effect of controlled ethanol intake on arterial blood pressure, heart rate and red blood cells deformability. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 21: 325–328. PubMed: 10711764.
  30. 30. Fehr M, Galliard-Grigioni KS, Reinhart WH (2008) Influence of acute alcohol exposure on hemorheological parameters and platelet function in vivo and in vitro. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 39: 351–358. PubMed: 18503145.
  31. 31. Nagai Y, Ishida K, Hirooka M, Nishimaru K (2001) Effect of ethanol on hemorheology in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease with ischemic cerebrovascular disease and elderly healthy men. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 25: 135–144. PubMed: 11847416.
  32. 32. Rabai M, Toth A, Kenyeres P, Mark L, Marton Z et al. (2010) In vitro hemorheological effects of red wine and alcohol-free red wine extract. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 44: 227–236. PubMed: 20364068.
  33. 33. Ingólfsson HI, Andersen OS (2011) Alcohol’s effects on lipid bilayer properties. Biophys J 101: 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.013. PubMed: 21843475.
  34. 34. Widmer J, Raffin Y, Gaillard JM, Tissot T (1987) In vitro effects of short-chain aliphatic alcohols, benzyl alcohol and chlorpromazine on the transport of precursors of monoamines across the human erythrocyte membrane. Neuropsychobiology 18: 60–67. doi:10.1159/000118394. PubMed: 3451078.
  35. 35. Almeida LM, Vaz WLC, Stümpel J, Madeira VMC (1986) Effect of short-chain primary alcohols on fluidity and activity of sarcoplasmic-reticulum membranes. Biochemistry 25: 4832–4839. doi:10.1021/bi00365a017. PubMed: 2945592.
  36. 36. Boigegrain RA, Fernandez Y, Massol M, Mitjavila S (1984) Thermodynamic interpretation of effects of alcohols on membrane lipid fluidity. Chem Phys Lipids 35: 321–330. doi:10.1016/0009-3084(84)90075-6. PubMed: 6094034.
  37. 37. Patra M, Salonen E, Terama E, Vattulainen I, Faller R et al. (2005) Under the influence of alcohol: the effect of ethanol and methanol on lipid bilayers. Biophys J 90: 1121–1135. PubMed: 16326895.
  38. 38. Barry JA, Gawrisch K (1994) Direct NMR evidence for ethanol binding to the lipid-water interface of phospholipid bilayers. Biochemistry 33: 8082–8088. doi:10.1021/bi00192a013. PubMed: 8025114.
  39. 39. Collander R (1954) The permeability of Nitella cells to non-electrolytes. Physiol Plant 7: 420–445. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1954.tb07589.x.
  40. 40. Reed KW, Yalkowsky SH (1987) Lysis of human red blood cells in the presence of various cosolvents III. The relationship between hemolytic potential and structure. J Parenter Sci Technol 41: 37–39. PubMed: 3559834.
  41. 41. Kleszczyńska H, Bonarska D, Luczyński J, Witek S, Sarapuk J (2005) Hemolysis of erythrocytes and erythrocyte membrane fluidity changes by new lysosomotropic compounds. J Fluoresc 15: 137–141. doi:10.1007/s10895-005-2521-7. PubMed: 15883768.
  42. 42. Marguet D, Lenne PF, Rigneault H, He HT (2006) Dynamics in the plasma membrane: how to combine fluidity and order. EMBO J 25: 3446–3457. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601204. PubMed: 16900097.
  43. 43. Tsuda K, Iwahashi H, Minatogawa Y, Nishio I, Kido R et al. (1987) Electron spin resonance studies of erythrocytes from spontaneously hypertensive rats and humans with essential hypertension. Hypertension 9: III19–III24. PubMed: 3036703.
  44. 44. Beaugé F, Niel E, Hispard E, Perrotin R, Thepot V et al. (1994) Red blood cell deformability and alcohol dependence in humans. Alcohol Alcohol 29: 59–63. PubMed: 8003118.
  45. 45. Oonishi T, Sakashita K (2000) Ethanol improves decreased filterability of human red blood cells through modulation of intracellular signaling pathways. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24: 352–356. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb04621.x. PubMed: 10776675.
  46. 46. Blanc L, Salomao M, Guo XH, An XL, Gratzer W et al. (2010) Control of erythrocyte membrane-skeletal cohesion by the spectrin-membrane linkage. Biochemistry 49: 4516–4523. doi:10.1021/bi1003684. PubMed: 20433199.
  47. 47. Brahm J (1983) Permeability of human red cells to a homologous series of aliphatic alcohols. Limitations of the continuous flow-tube method. J Gen Physiol 81: 283–304. doi:10.1085/jgp.81.2.283. PubMed: 6842175.
  48. 48. Benga G, Borza T (1995) Diffusional water permeability of mammalian red blood cells. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 112: 653–659. doi:10.1016/0305-0491(95)00116-6. PubMed: 8590380.
  49. 49. Chien DY, Macey RI (1977) Diffusional water permeability of red cells. Independence on osmolality. Biochim Biophys Acta 464: 45–52. doi:10.1016/0005-2736(77)90369-8. PubMed: 831792.
  50. 50. Lahajnar G, Macek P, Zupancic I (2000) Suppression of red cell diffusional water permeability by lipophilic solutes. Bioelectrochemistry 52: 179–185. doi:10.1016/S0302-4598(00)00100-8. PubMed: 11129241.
  51. 51. Lande MB, Donovan JM, Zeidel ML (1995) The relationship between membrane fluidity and permeabilities to water, solutes, ammonia and protons. J Gen Physiol 106: 67–84. doi:10.1085/jgp.106.1.67. PubMed: 7494139.
  52. 52. Vertessy BG, Steck TL (1989) Elasticity of the human red cell membrane skeleton. Effects of temperature and denaturants. Biophys J 55: 255–262. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82800-0. PubMed: 2713438.
  53. 53. Johnson RM (1989) Ektacytometry of red blood cells. Methods Enzymol 173: 35–54. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(89)73004-4. PubMed: 2779431.
  54. 54. Chasis JA, Mohandas N (1986) Erythrocyte membrane deformability and stability: two distinct membrane properties that are independently regulated by skeletal protein associations. J Cell Biol 103: 343–350. doi:10.1083/jcb.103.2.343. PubMed: 3733870.