It is becoming increasingly evident that genetic variants contribute to the development of opioid addiction. An elucidation of these genetic factors is crucial for a better understanding of this chronic disease and may help to develop novel therapeutic strategies. In recent years, several candidate genes were implicated in opioid dependence. However, most study findings have not been replicated and additional studies are required before reported associations can be considered robust. Thus, the major objective of this study was to replicate earlier findings and to identify new genetic polymorphisms contributing to the individual susceptibility to opioid addiction, respectively. Therefore, a candidate gene association study was conducted including 142 well-phenotyped long-term opioid addicts undergoing opioid maintenance therapy and 142 well-matched healthy controls. In both study groups, 24 single nucleotide polymorphisms predominantly located in pharmacogenetic candidate genes have been genotyped using an accurate mass spectrometry based method. The most significant associations with opioid addiction (remaining significant after adjustment for multiple testing) were observed for the rs948854 SNP in the galanin gene (GAL, p = 0.001) and the rs2236861 SNP in the delta opioid receptor gene (OPRD1, p = 0.001). Moreover, an association of the ATP binding cassette transporter 1 (ABCB1) variant rs1045642 and the Mu Opioid receptor (OPRM1) variant rs9479757 with opioid addiction was observed. The present study provides further support for a contribution of GAL and OPRD1 variants to the development of opioid addiction. Furthermore, our results indicate a potential contribution of OPRM1 and ABCB1 SNPs to the development of this chronic relapsing disease. Therefore it seems important that these genes are addressed in further addiction related studies.
Citation: Beer B, Erb R, Pavlic M, Ulmer H, Giacomuzzi S, Riemer Y, et al. (2013) Association of Polymorphisms in Pharmacogenetic Candidate Genes (OPRD1, GAL, ABCB1, OPRM1) with Opioid Dependence in European Population: A Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE 8(9): e75359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075359
Editor: Lin Lu, Peking University, China
Received: May 29, 2013; Accepted: August 13, 2013; Published: September 25, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Beer et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was funded by the Anniversary Fund of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank (http://www.oenb.at/de/ueber_die_oenb/foerderung/jubilaeumsfonds/jubilaeumsfonds.jsp; grant number: 13253). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The etiology of opioid addiction is complex and involves environmental, psychological as well as drug induced factors [1,2]. Moreover, genetic factors play an essential role in the pathogenesis of opioid addiction - estimates of the heritability of opioid abuse and/or addiction range from 43 to 60% [3,4]. Several candidate genes have been implicated in opioid dependence. One of the most extensively studied candidates is the mu opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) and its functional single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1799971 (A118G), which has been reported to affect the individual vulnerability to opioid dependence, although not in all studies . Furthermore, also other genes of the opioid system or genes involved in serotoninergic, dopaminergic or noradrenergic pathways have been linked with this chronic relapsing disease [1,2,5-8]. However, study findings have often not been replicated or are inconsistent between studies and the overall knowledge on genetic factors influencing the development of opioid addiction is still limited [3,5,6]. Moreover, many study results are based on the analysis of populations with mixed ancestries and/or poorly phenotyped cohorts [6,7]. Thus, further research is required to identify genetic variants contributing to the development of opioid addiction, to confirm tentative genetic associations and to improve the neurobiological understanding of opioid dependence [1,6].
The major aim of the present study was to identify genetic polymorphisms contributing to the individual susceptibility to opioid addiction and to replicate earlier findings in this regard, respectively. Therefore, a candidate gene case-control association study including 14 different genes and 24 SNPs was performed. A particular focus was put on pharmacogenetic candidate genes, which may contribute to inter-individual variations in opioid effects and opioid-induced behaviours (i.e. genes encoding proteins directly involved in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic action of commonly abused opioids) [1,6,9]. A well-phenotyped sample of long-term addicts undergoing opioid maintenance treatment (OMT) and a well-matched sample of healthy controls, both recruited according to stringent exclusion criteria, were investigated. Genotyping was performed using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay combined with ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ICEMS). Thereby, significant associations of pharmacogenetic variants with opioid addiction were identified and preliminary, yet unconfirmed genetic associations were replicated.
Patients and Methods
The present study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Innsbruck Medical University and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki as adopted and promulgated by the National Institutes of Health and the European Union. All participants signed an informed consent after receiving a complete description of the study and been given the chance to discuss any questions or issues.
Study design and study subjects
The presented study is a prospective observational cohort study that was originally intended to be a sub-study of a clinical trial. The clinical trial, EudraCT registration number 2008-002714-22, did not proceed. Participants described here did not take part in a clinical trial, and were recruited based on the inclusion criteria of substudy 1 of our study protocol (Protocol S1). For the presented candidate gene association study, a total of 148 unrelated opioid dependent individuals undergoing opioid maintenance treatment were recruited at the drug addiction outpatient clinic of the Innsbruck Medical University. Following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) written informed consent; (2) opioid dependence according to the DSM-IV criteria; (3) opioid maintenance therapy with either methadone or buprenorphine; (4) history of at least 2 years of daily heroin (and/or morphine) use. Patients were not included if they met one of the following exclusion criteria: (1) alcohol dependence; (2) regular co-use of cocaine; (3) age < 18 and > 50 years; (4) opioid dependence < 2 years. Ascertainment was made by a structured personal interview, using a self-designed questionnaire for data collection. All interviews were conducted by the same physician. The 142 healthy control subjects were included after personal interview and according to following exclusion criteria: (1) age < 18 and > 50 years; (2) history of alcohol dependence (3) history of regular illicit drug use. The controls were matched for ethnicity, sex and age to the patient sample.
DNA sample collection and DNA extraction.
DNA samples of all participants (all of Western European descent, 96% Austrian) were obtained via buccal swabs. DNA was extracted using a standard Chelex extraction protocol . The DNA content of the samples was determined by spectrophotometry (ND-1000, Nano-Drop, Wilmington, USA) and values between 15-121 ng/µl were determined.
Selection of polymorphic loci.
The present study involved a candidate gene approach. The selection of the genes and polymorphic loci was performed after an extensive literature study and was primarily based on the knowledge of metabolic pathways, transporters or targets of opioids. The main criterion for the inclusion of a genetic variant was the availability of data suggesting or confirming a functional relevance. In total, 24 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in 14 different genes were selected (Table 1). Four of the 14 investigated genes are postulated to be involved in opioid pharmacokinetics (ABCB1, SLCO1B1, SLCO1A2, UGT2B7) [11,12], eight genes are postulated to be directly or indirectly involved in the pharmacodynamic opioid response (OPRM1, OPRD1, OPRK1, GAL, STAT6, ADRBK2, COMT, MC1R) [7,8,12-14] and two genes were reported to be associated with opioid addiction or opioid treatment outcome in previous studies (DRD2, HTR1A), although not directly involved in opioid pharmacodynamics and kinetics [15,16].
|OPRM1||Opioid receptor, mu 1||rs1799971||A/G||0.14|
|OPRD1||Opioid receptor, delta 1||rs2236861||C/T||0.29|
|OPRK1||Opioid receptor, kappa 1||rs1051660||G/T||0.08|
|ADRBK2||Beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 2||rs5761122||G/A||0.29|
|STAT6||Signal transducer and activator of transcription 6||rs841718||T/C||0.47|
|MC1R||Melanocortin 1 receptor||rs1805007||C/T||0.05|
|UGT2B7||Uridine diphosphate glycosyltransferase 2B7||rs7439366||T/C||0.43|
|ABCB1||ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 1||rs2032588||C/T||0.07|
|SLCO1B1||Solute carrier organic anion transporter family, 1B1||rs4149056||T/C||0.15|
|SCLO1A2||Solute carrier organic anion transporter family, 1A2||rs11568563||A/C||0.07|
|HTR1A||5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor 1A||rs6295||C/G||0.49|
|DRD2||Dopamine receptor D2||rs6275||C/T||0.32|
Genotyping of the 24 polymorphic loci was performed using a multiplex PCR assay combined with ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ICEMS) [17,18]. Details of the genotyping assay are described elsewhere (Supporting Information S1) . In brief, a 2-step PCR approach covering 23 polymorphic sites was developed using hybrid primers consisting of a target-specific and a non-specific universal sequence. The thereby generated PCR products were directly analyzed by ICEMS. One SNP (DRD2 rs6277) was analyzed in singleplex reactions, since its close genomic vicinity to the DRD2 rs6275 SNP did not allow for a successful integration into the multiplex assay. A total of 399 SNPs were retyped by Sanger sequencing and a concordance rate of 99.8% was assessed.
The sample size of the study was calculated aiming to detect odds ratios of approximately 2 and higher with 80% statistical power and a significance level of p < 0.05. Because of varying prevalences of the genotypes/alleles a definite single sample size estimation was not possible. An odds ratio of 2 means for instance that the control proportion is 0.52 and the case proportion is 0.69 or that the control proportion is 0.25 and the case proportion is 0.4. All statistical analyses were performed with the PASW Statistics 18 software package. Differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics between the groups were assessed by the Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Furthermore, Chi-square and Fisher’s exact testing were applied to assess deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, to compare allele and genotype frequencies between cases and controls and to estimate odds ratios with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. For certain statistical purposes, the ABCB1 SNPs rs2032582 and rs1045642 were tabulated as 2-locus genotype  and those genotype patterns with a low frequency (< 0.05) were pooled into a single class called “others”. Beside overall p-values (df = 2), point-wise p-values (df = 1) were calculated by comparing the genotype frequency of each genotype subgroup to the pooled genotype frequency of the remaining subgroups. Finally, the results were adjusted for multiple testing by using the conservative Bonferroni correction (p-value/ number of tested SNPs, significance level p < 0.002).
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study subjects
In total, 142 of the 148 recruited patients and all 142 healthy control subjects were included in the study. One patient was excluded due to regular co-use of cocaine. Five patients were excluded due to other reasons (discontinuation of treatment, no saliva swab provided, lack of phenotypic data). All study participants were of Western European descent and 96% were Austrian. There were no significant differences between patients and controls in terms of age, sex or ethnicity. The patient group consisted of 80 individuals undergoing methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and 62 individuals undergoing buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT). The mean duration of opioid dependence was 11 years (long-term addicts). Complete sociodemographic and clinical data were recorded for 89% of all patients. For the remaining patients the major part of the data was available. The key sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 2. The daily maintenance doses of methadone ranged between 10 mg and 150 mg, the daily maintenance doses of buprenorphine ranged between 0.4 mg and 32 mg. In the MMT group significantly more non-abstinent patients with regard to illicit opioid use were identified than in the BMT group (p = 0.017, χ2 = 5.75, df = 1). The observed prevalence of urines positive for illicit opioids was comparable to the data reported in other studies .
|Patients MMT||Patients BMT||Patients total||Controls|
|Age in years, mean (SD±)||33 (8)||29 (8)||31 (8)||29 (6)|
|Western European descent %||100||100||100||100|
|Body mass index, mean (SD±)||23.5 (4)||22.1 (4)||22.9 (4)|
|Mean dose, M or B in mg (SD±)||77 (39)||14 (9)|
|Opioid abuse in years, mean (SD±)||13 (8)||8 (6)||11 (8)|
|Duration of OMT in month, mean (SD±)||85 (70)||54 (48)||72 (64)|
|Illicit opioid use|
|Abstinence1 (%)||28 (35)||32 (52)||60 (42)|
|Non-abstinence2 (%)||51 (64)||25 (40)||76 (54)|
|No data available (%)||1 (1)||5 (8)||6 (4)|
In the present study, 6816 SNPs (24 SNPs in 14 candidate genes, 284 individuals) were genotyped using PCR-ICEMS. For all study subjects, complete and high quality genotype data were acquired. Confirmative sequencing experiments revealed that the applied genotyping approach is accurate. The assessed genotype and allele frequencies (Table 1) correlated well with published frequencies for other European populations (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/). In the control group, the genotype distribution of one polymorphism (ADRBK2 rs5761122) showed a statistically significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p = 0.001, χ2 = 10.88). In the patient group, chi-square testing revealed a statistically significant deviation of the genotype distribution of two polymorphisms: GAL rs948854 (p = 0.0002, χ2 = 14.34) and ABCB1 rs1045642 (p = 0.002, χ2 = 9.35). One investigated SNP (SCLO1A2, rs45502302) turned out to be not polymorphic in our samples and was therefore excluded from the statistical analysis.
When the genotype and allele frequencies of the patient group were compared to those of the control group, significant differences could be observed for SNPs in the genes OPRD1, GAL, ABCB1 and OPRM1. The observed (overall and point-wise) p-values, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. No significant sex-specific differences were found.
|Genotypes/Alleles||Patients, n (frequency)||Controls, n (frequency)||OR (95% CI)||Point-wise p1||Overall p2|
|CC||97 (0.68)||74 (0.52)||1.98 (1.19-3.31)||0.005||0.004|
|CT||42 (0.30)||55 (0.39)||0.66 (0.39-1.12)||0.104|
|TT||3 (0.02)||13 (0.09)||0.21 (0.05-0.83)||0.018|
|C||236 (0.83)||203 (0.72)||0.001|
|T||48 (0.17)||81 (0.29)|
|AA||87 (0.61)||81 (0.57)||1.19 (0.72-1.97)||0.469||0.001|
|AG||37 (0.26)||57 (0.40)||0.53 (0.31-0.90)||0.012|
|GG||18 (0.13)||4 (0.03)||5.01 (1.54-18.00)||0.002|
|A||211 (0.74)||219 (0.77)||0.434|
|G||73 (0.26)||65 (0.23)|
|CC||23 (0.16)||40 (0.28)||0.49 (0.27-0.91)||0.015||0.026|
|CT||89 (0.63)||69 (0.49)||1.78 (1.08-2.93)||0.017|
|TT||30 (0.21)||33 (0.23)||0.89 (0.49-1.61)||0.668|
|C||135 (0.48)||149 (0.53)||0.240|
|T||149 (0.53)||135 (0.48)|
|GG||130 (0.92)||119 (0.84)||2.09 (0.95-4.69)||0.047||0.036|
|GA||11 (0.8)||23 (0.16)||0.43 (0.19-0.98)||0.028|
|AA||1 (0.01)||0 (0)||1.000|
|G||171 (0.95)||261 (0.92)||0.085|
|A||13 (0.05)||23 (0.08)|
|2-Locus Genotype||Patients, n (frequency)||Controls, n (frequency)||OR (95% CI)||Point-wise p1||Overall p2|
|GG-CC||18 (0.13)||33 (0.23)||0.48 (0.24-0.94)||0.020|
|GG-CT||24 (0.17)||15 (0.11)||1.72 (0.82-3.64)||0.121|
|GT-CT||62 (0.44)||47 (0.33)||1.57 (0.94-2.61)||0.067|
|TT-TT||18 (0.13)||19 (0.13)||0.94 (0.45-1.98)||0.860|
|Others||20 (0.14)||28 (0.20)||0.67 (0.34-1.31)||0.205||0.042|
We observed significantly more homozygous carriers of the OPRD1 rs2236861 major allele (CC genotype) in the patient group and more homozygous carriers of the minor allele (TT genotypes) in the control group (p = 0.004, χ2 = 11.09, df = 2). Correspondingly, we found a significantly higher T allele frequency in the controls (p = 0.001, χ2 = 10.92, df = 1). The latter finding withstood the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
For this GAL SNP significant genotype frequency differences where observed, which also remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing (p = 0.001, χ2 = 13.38, df = 2). Homozygous carriers of the minor allele (GG genotype) were significantly more prevalent in the patient group (p = 0.002, χ2 = 9.657, df = 1). At the same time, less AG carriers where detected in the patient group. The overall allele frequencies showed no significant differences between the two groups.
ABCB1, rs1045642, rs2032582.
We found a higher prevalence of CT genotypes and less CC carriers of the ABCB1 rs1045642 variant in the patient group (p = 0.026, χ2 = 7.26, df = 2). Two SNPs in the ABCB1 (rs2032582 and rs1045642) were additionally evaluated as 2-locus genotype pattern (Table 4), since they have been found to be in strong linkage disequilibrium . Among the opioid dependent study participants, a significantly lower frequency of GG-CC genotype patterns was observed (p = 0.020, χ2 = 5.377, df = 1).
In the present study, a well-phenotyped sample of long-term opioid addicts and a sample of well-matched controls (all of Western European descent) were investigated. By using a candidate gene approach, significant associations of pharmacogenetic variants with opioid addiction were identified and preliminary, yet unconfirmed genetic associations were replicated.
When comparing genotype and allele frequencies of the patient group with those of the control group the lowest overall p-values (remaining significant after Bonferroni correction) were observed for SNPs located in the OPRD1 (rs2236861) and GAL (rs948854). Significant frequency differences were also observed for an ABCB1 SNP (rs1045642), a ABCB1 2-locus genotype pattern (rs2032582 - rs1045642), and a SNP located in the OPRM1 gene (rs9479757).
Delta opioid receptor (OPRD1, chromosome 1)
Opioid receptors can be subdivided into mu-, kappa- and delta opioid receptors. The mu opioid receptor is the primary target of commonly abused opioids and has attracted major attention in addiction related studies [5,6]. However, also the delta opioid receptor is a plausible candidate for case-control studies, since it has been shown to be involved in rewarding and analgesic effects of opioids and the development of opioid tolerance [22,23]. Indeed, we observed a significant association of the intronic OPRD1 SNP rs2236861 with opioid dependence in our European study population. This finding supports the results of a candidate gene association study that also found the rs2236861 SNP to be positively associated with opioid addiction in European Americans . Also a very recent large case-control study found a positive association of this SNP with heroin dependence in an Australian study population (primarily of European ancestry) . These facts strongly indicate an important role of this SNP in addiction susceptibility. However, the functional consequence of this SNP still remains to be elucidated. The non-synonymous OPRD1 SNP rs1042114, which was associated with opioid dependence risk in an European American study population , was not found to be positively associated with opioid dependence in our study (nor in the study of Nelson and co-workers ).
Galanin (GAL, chromosome 11).
Galanin is a 30-amino acid neuropeptide which is widely distributed in the central as well as peripheral nervous system. It has been indicated to be involved in diverse behavioural functions and stress response. Furthermore, GAL has been linked with neurochemical and behavioural effects of opiates and opioid withdrawal [25,26]. However, its role as susceptibility factor in opioid addiction has hardly been studied . The SNP (rs948854) we investigated in our approach is located in the GAL promoter region and has been repeatedly linked with symptom severity and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis activity in female patients suffering from panic and other anxiety disorders [27,28]. More precisely, the minor allele (G) was associated with more severe anxiety pathology and a higher activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis, thereby supporting a functional role of this SNP in the pathophysiology of psychiatric phenotypes. By investigating this SNP in context with opioid addiction, we found significantly more homozygous carriers of the minor allele (G) among the patients. This association remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing. To our knowledge, a genetic association of this promoter SNP with opioid addiction has not been described so far. The presented result may significantly contribute to current knowledge of the role of GAL in opioid addiction susceptibility, which so far was mainly based on one study that found a GAL variant located in intron 2 (rs694066) to be associated with heroin addiction .
P-glycoprotein (ABCB1, chromosome 7)
The p-glycoprotein belongs to the ATP binding cassette transporter family and acts as a multispecific efflux pump transporting various endogenous compounds as well as drugs from the intracellular to the extracellular domain . P-glycoprotein is expressed in intestinal, kidney or hepatic cells as well as endothelial cells of brain capillaries (blood brain barrier) and is suggested to play a critical role in the distribution of drugs including certain opioids [12,30]. A functional impairment of the p-glycoprotein mediated drug transport is expected to result in an increased oral bioavailability, reduced renal clearance and increased brain concentrations of its substrates . Different SNPs as well as haplo- and genotype patterns of the ABCB1 have been linked with the level of expression and/or function of the p-glycoprotein [31,32]. Many studies focused on the SNP rs1045642 (exon 26), which is a common variant in the coding region of the ABCB1 gene. The T variant of this SNP has been associated with impaired function and/or expression of the p-glycoprotein in vitro and in vivo . In a recent study investigating 98 methadone maintained patients, an ABCB1 multilocus genotype pattern including this SNP (rs1045642- rs2032582-rs1128503 TT-TT-TT, and by trend also TT-GT-CT) was linked to the requirements of “higher” methadone doses (> 150 mg/day) for treatment stabilization . Two further studies point to a significant role of these ABCB1 SNPs for opioid dosage requirements [15,35] while other studies did not find any relationship [36,37]. We found in our study a significantly higher frequency of the rs1045642 CT genotype and a lower frequency of CC genotypes in the patient group compared to the controls. Moreover, a trend towards a higher frequency of the 2-locus genotype pattern (rs2032582 - rs1045642) GT-CT and significantly less GG-CC genotypes (linked to a “normal” p-glycoprotein activity) were observed among the addicts. The role of the p-glycoprotein as susceptibility factor has already been discussed in context with other psychiatric disorders and it has been hypothesized, that an impaired functionality of the p-glycoprotein may lead to an increased accumulation of particular endogenous compounds (e.g. cortisol) in the brain, which are related to psychiatric disorders such as depression [38,39]. Principally, a similar mechanism could also underlie opioid addiction susceptibility.
Mu opioid receptor (OPRM1, chromosome 6)
Many endogenous and exogenous and opioids exert their primary effects at the mu opioid receptor. Correspondingly, numerous studies focussed on the association of OPRM1 polymorphisms with opioid addiction [2,7]. The most extensively studied OPRM1 variant in this context is the non-synonymous and functional SNP rs1799971 (A118G). However, the studies on this variant brought controversial results [6,7,40,41]. In our European study population, no significant association of this SNP with opioid addiction was found (p = 0.27). However, we found significant frequency differences of the OPRM1 rs9479757 (IVS2 + 31G/A, intron 2) genotypes between cases and controls - the GG genotype was more prevalent among the cases. This SNP is a rarely investigated variant and data on its functional consequence are practically lacking . There is one study that found an overrepresentation of the G variant (as part of a haplotype) in regular smokers compared to non-smokers , which also points to a potential contribution of this SNP to addictive behaviour. However, further research is required to verify the role of this SNP in addiction susceptibility.
A limitation of the present study is the relatively small sample size. However, the most significant genetic associations we observed (OPRD1, GAL) were in accordance with previous reports based on larger sample sizes [7,23]. A major strength of this study is that only well-characterized individuals, who were prospectively recruited according to stringent exclusion criteria, were included. A total of 96% of all individuals were of Austrian ancestry and patients and controls were well-matched in terms of age, sex and ancestry. Moreover, an accurate genotyping method has been applied in the present study and all investigated alleles had a prevalence of at least 4% (except rs45502302). Accordingly, frequent statistical problems of association studies, such as population stratification or genotyping error , are not relevant in our study.
Taken together, our findings confirm a significant contribution of pharmacogenetic polymorphisms to the individual susceptibility of opioid addiction. In particular, we provide further support for a significant role of GAL and OPRD1 in opioid dependency. In addition, our results indicate a potential contribution of OPRM1 and ABCB1 SNPs to the development of opioid addiction in the European population. The identified genetic susceptibility markers may contribute to the neurobiological understanding of addictive behaviour may help to develop novel therapeutic options. Thus, these variants should be addressed in further studies.
The authors would like to acknowledge the cooperative help of the staff of the Drug addiction outpatient clinic of the Innsbruck Medical University.
Conceived and designed the experiments: BB HO YR SG MP. Performed the experiments: BB RE. Analyzed the data: HU BB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BB HO. Wrote the manuscript: BB.
- 1. Ho MK, Goldman D, Heinz A, Kaprio J, Kreek MJ et al. (2011) Breaking barriers in the genomics and pharmacogenetics of drug addiction. Clin Pharmacol Ther 88: 779-791. PubMed: 20981002.
- 2. Yuferov V, Levran O, Proudnikov D, Nielsen DA, Kreek MJ (2010) Search for genetic markers and functional variants involved in the development of opiate and cocaine addiction and treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1187: 184-207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05275.x. PubMed: 20201854.
- 3. Goldman D, Oroszi G, Ducci F (2005) The genetics of addictions: uncovering the genes. Nat Rev Genet 6: 521-532. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1700. PubMed: 15995696.
- 4. Li MD, Burmeister M (2009) New insights into the genetics of addiction. Nat Rev Genet 10: 225-231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ni0309-225. PubMed: 19238175.
- 5. Kreek MJ, Bart G, Lilly C, LaForge KS, Nielsen DA (2005) Pharmacogenetics and human molecular genetics of opiate and cocaine addictions and their treatments. Pharmacol Rev 57: 1-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.57.1.1. PubMed: 15734726.
- 6. Kreek MJ, Nielsen DA, Butelman ER, LaForge KS (2005) Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nat Neurosci 8: 1450-1457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1583. PubMed: 16251987.
- 7. Levran O, Londono D, O’Hara K, Nielsen DA, Peles E et al. (2008) Genetic susceptibility to heroin addiction: a candidate gene association study. Genes Brain Behav 7: 720-729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00410.x. PubMed: 18518925.
- 8. Levran O, Yuferov V, Kreek MJ (2013) The genetics of the opioid system and specific drug addictions. Hum Genet 131: 823-842. PubMed: 22547174.
- 9. Mroziewicz M, Tyndale RF (2010) Pharmacogenetics: a tool for identifying genetic factors in drug dependence and response to treatment. Addict Sci Clin Pract 5: 17-29. PubMed: 22002450.
- 10. Brandstätter A, Niederstätter H, Pavlic M, Grubwieser P, Parson W (2007) Generating population data for the EMPOP database - an overview of the mtDNA sequencing and data evaluation processes considering 273 Austrian control region sequences as example. Forensic Sci Int 166: 164-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.006. PubMed: 16829006.
- 11. Kadiev E, Patel V, Rad P, Thankachan L, Tram A et al. (2008) Role of pharmacogenetics in variable response to drugs: focus on opioids. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 4: 77-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.4.1.77. PubMed: 18370860.
- 12. Lötsch J, Geisslinger G, Tegeder I (2009) Genetic modulation of the pharmacological treatment of pain. Pharmacol Ther 124: 168-184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.06.010. PubMed: 19615406.
- 13. Terman GW, Jin W, Cheong YP, Lowe J, Caron MG (2004) G-protein receptor kinase 3 (GRK3) influences opioid analgesic tolerance but not opioid withdrawal. Br J Pharmacol 141: 55-64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705595. PubMed: 14662727.
- 14. Vandenbergh DJ, Rodriguez LA, Miller IT, Uhl GR, Lachman HM (1997) High-activity catechol-O-methyltransferase allele is more prevalent in polysubstance abusers. Am J Med Genet 74: 439-442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970725)74:4. PubMed: 9259381.
- 15. Hung CC, Chiou MH, Huang BH, Hsieh YW, Hsieh TJ et al. (2011) Impact of genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1, CYP2B6, OPRM1, ANKK1 and DRD2 genes on methadone therapy in Han Chinese patients. Pharmacogenomics 12: 1525-1533. doi:https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.11.96. PubMed: 21902500.
- 16. Li T, Liu X, Zhao J, Hu X, Ball DM et al. (2002) Allelic association analysis of the dopamine D2, D3, 5-HT2A, and GABA(A)gamma2 receptors and serotonin transporter genes with heroin abuse in Chinese subjects. Am J Med Genet 114: 329-335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.10200. PubMed: 11920858.
- 17. Beer B, Erb R, Pitterl F, Niederstätter H, Maroñas O et al. (2011) CYP2D6 genotyping by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 400: 2361-2370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4597-4. PubMed: 21225252.
- 18. Oberacher H, Niederstätter H, Casetta B, Parson W (2005) Detection of DNA sequence variations in homo- and heterozygous samples via molecular mass measurements by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 77: 4999-5008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050399f. PubMed: 16053315.
- 19. Beer B, Krjutškov K, Erb R, Viltrop T, Oberacher H (2012) A novel amplification strategy for genotyping with liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Analyst 137: 5325-5333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/c2an35440c. PubMed: 23034565.
- 20. Kim RB, Leake BF, Choo EF, Dresser GK, Kubba SV et al. (2001) Identification of functionally variant MDR1 alleles among European Americans and African Americans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 70: 189-199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1067/mcp.2001.117412. PubMed: 11503014.
- 21. Farré M, Mas A, Torrens M, Moreno V, Camí J (2002) Retention rate and illicit opioid use during methadone maintenance interventions: a meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 65: 283-290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(01)00171-5. PubMed: 11841899.
- 22. Le Merrer J, Becker JA, Befort K, Kieffer BL (2009) Reward processing by the opioid system in the brain. Physiol Rev 89: 1379-1412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00005.2009. PubMed: 19789384.
- 23. Nelson EC, Lynskey MT, Heath AC, Wray N, Agrawal A et al. (2012) Association of OPRD1 polymorphisms with heroin dependence in a large case-control series. Addict Biol. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00445.x.
- 24. Zhang H, Kranzler HR, Yang BZ, Luo X, Gelernter J (2008) The OPRD1 and OPRK1 loci in alcohol or drug dependence: OPRD1 variation modulates substance dependence risk. Mol Psychiatry 13: 531-543. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4002035. PubMed: 17622222.
- 25. Picciotto MR (2010) Galanin and addiction. EXS 102: 195-208. PubMed: 21299070.
- 26. Arias-Carrión O, Salama M (2012) Reward-seeking behavior and addiction: cause or cog? Curr Drugs Abuse Rev 5: 178-189. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473711205030178.
- 27. Unschuld PG, Ising M, Erhardt A, Lucae S, Kohli M et al. (2008) Polymorphisms in the galanin gene are associated with symptom-severity in female patients suffering from panic disorder. J Affect Disord 105: 177-184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.006. PubMed: 17573119.
- 28. Unschuld PG, Ising M, Roeske D, Erhardt A, Specht M et al. (2010) Gender-specific association of galanin polymorphisms with HPA-axis dysregulation, symptom severity, and antidepressant treatment response. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 1583-1592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.30. PubMed: 20237460.
- 29. Cascorbi I (2011) P-glycoprotein: tissue distribution, substrates, and functional consequences of genetic variations. Handb Exp Pharmacol 201: 261-283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14541-4_6. PubMed: 21103972.
- 30. Thiebaut F, Tsuruo T, Hamada H, Gottesman MM, Pastan I et al. (1987) Cellular localization of the multidrug-resistance gene product P-glycoprotein in normal human tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84: 7735-7738. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.21.7735. PubMed: 2444983.
- 31. Zheng H, Webber S, Zeevi A, Schuetz E, Zhang J et al. (2002) The MDR1 polymorphisms at exons 21 and 26 predict steroid weaning in pediatric heart transplant patients. Hum Immunol 63: 765-770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-8859(02)00426-3. PubMed: 12175731.
- 32. Zhou SF (2008) Structure, function and regulation of P-glycoprotein and its clinical relevance in drug disposition. Xenobiotica 38: 802-832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00498250701867889. PubMed: 18668431.
- 33. Hoffmeyer S, Burk O, von Richter O, Arnold HP, Brockmöller J et al. (2000) Functional polymorphisms of the human multidrug-resistance gene: multiple sequence variations and correlation of one allele with P-glycoprotein expression and activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 3473-3478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.7.3473. PubMed: 10716719.
- 34. Levran O, O’Hara K, Peles E, Li D, Barral S et al. (2008) ABCB1 (MDR1) genetic variants are associated with methadone doses required for effective treatment of heroin dependence. Hum Mol Genet 17: 2219-2227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddn122. PubMed: 18424454.
- 35. Coller JK, Barratt DT, Dahlen K, Loennechen MH, Somogyi AA (2006) ABCB1 genetic variability and methadone dosage requirements in opioid-dependent individuals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 80: 682-690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpt.2006.09.011. PubMed: 17178268.
- 36. Fonseca F, de la Torre R, Díaz L, Pastor A, Cuyàs E et al. (2011) Contribution of cytochrome P450 and ABCB1 genetic variability on methadone pharmacokinetics, dose requirements, and response. PLOS ONE 6: e19527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019527. PubMed: 21589866.
- 37. Crettol S, Déglon JJ, Besson J, Croquette-Krokar M, Hämmig R et al. (2006) ABCB1 and cytochrome P450 genotypes and phenotypes: influence on methadone plasma levels and response to treatment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 80: 668-681. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpt.2006.09.012. PubMed: 17178267.
- 38. De Klerk OL, Bosker FJ, Luurtsema G, Nolte IM, Dierckx R et al. (2011) The role of p-glycoprotein in psychiatric disorders: a reliable guard of the brain? 11 Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. pp. 197-209.
- 39. Fujii T, Ota M, Hori H, Sasayama D, Hattori K et al. (2012) Association between the functional polymorphism (C3435T) of the gene encoding P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and major depressive disorder in the Japanese population. J Psychiatr Res 46: 555-559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.01.012. PubMed: 22306099.
- 40. Gelernter J, Kranzler HR (2010) Genetics of drug dependence. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 12: 77-84. PubMed: 20373669.
- 41. Bart G, Heilig M, LaForge KS, Pollak L, Leal SM et al. (2004) Substantial attributable risk related to functional µ-opioid receptor gene polymorphism in association with heroin addiction in central Sweden. Mol Psychiatry 9: 547-549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001504. PubMed: 15037869.
- 42. Huang CJ, Liu HF, Su NY, Hsu YW, Yang CH et al. (2008) Association between human opioid receptor genes polymorphisms and pressure pain sensitivity in females. Anaesthesia 63: 1288-1295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05760.x. PubMed: 19032295.
- 43. Zhang L, Kendler KS, Chen X (2008) The mu-opioid receptor gene and smoking initiation and nicotine dependence. Behav Brain Funct 2: 28. PubMed: 16887046.
- 44. Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI (2005) What makes a good genetic association study? Lancet 366: 1315-1323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67531-9. PubMed: 16214603.