Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genetic and Cytological Analysis of a Novel Type of Low Temperature-Dependent Intrasubspecific Hybrid Weakness in Rice

  • Chong-Yun Fu,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Feng Wang ,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Bing-Rui Sun,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Wu-Ge Liu,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Jin-Hua Li,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Ru-Fang Deng,

    Affiliation Public Laboratory, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Di-Lin Liu,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Zhen-Rong Liu,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Man-Shan Zhu,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Yi-Long Liao,

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

  • Jian-Wei Chen

    Affiliations Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding, Guangzhou, P.R. China

Genetic and Cytological Analysis of a Novel Type of Low Temperature-Dependent Intrasubspecific Hybrid Weakness in Rice

  • Chong-Yun Fu, 
  • Feng Wang, 
  • Bing-Rui Sun, 
  • Wu-Ge Liu, 
  • Jin-Hua Li, 
  • Ru-Fang Deng, 
  • Di-Lin Liu, 
  • Zhen-Rong Liu, 
  • Man-Shan Zhu, 
  • Yi-Long Liao


Hybrid weakness (HW) is an important postzygotic isolation which occurs in both intra- and inter-specific crosses. In this study, we described a novel low temperature-dependent intrasubspecific hybrid weakness in the F1 plants derived from the cross between two indica rice varieties Taifeng A and V1134. HW plants showed growth retardation, reduced panicle number and pale green leaves with chlorotic spots. Cytological assay showed that there were reduced cell numbers, larger intercellular spaces, thicker cell walls, and abnormal development of chloroplast and mitochondria in the mature leaves from HW F1 plants in comparison with that from both of the parental lines. Genetic analysis revealed that HW was controlled by two complementary dominant genes Hw3 from V1134 and Hw4 from Taifeng A. Hw3 was mapped in a 136 kb interval between the markers Indel1118 and Indel1117 on chromosome 11, and Hw4 was mapped in the region of about 15 cM between RM182 and RM505 on chromosome 7, respectively. RT-PCR analysis revealed that only LOC_Os11g44310, encoding a putative calmodulin-binding protein (OsCaMBP), differentially expressed among Taifeng A, V1134 and their HW F1. No recombinant was detected using the markers designed based on the sequence of LOC_Os11g44310 in the BC1F2 (Taifeng A//Taifeng A/V1134) population. Hence, LOC_Os11g44310 was probably the candidate gene of Hw3. Gene amplification suggested that LOC_Os11g44310 was present in V1134 and absent in Taifeng A. BLAST search revealed that LOC_Os11g44310 had one copy in the japonica genomic sequence of Nipponbare, and no homologous sequence in the indica reference sequence of 9311. Our results indicate that Hw3 is a novel gene for inducing hybrid weakness in rice.


During evolution, ancestral species may diverge into several species that become genetically isolated from one another and develop a reduced capacity for hybridization due to pre- and postzygotic isolation [1], [2]. Prezygotic isolation inhibits the formation of zygotes, whereas postzygotic isolation occurs after the zygotes have formed. Postzygotic reproductive isolation is often expressed as embryonic lethality, seed inviability, weakness or sterility. The Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller (BDM) model offers a theoretical explanation for postzygotic isolation [3], [4], [5]. This model presumes that hybrid incompatibility is caused by negative interactions between 2 or more unlinked genes of the nuclear genome or between nuclear and organellar genomes [6]. As one type of postzygotic barrier, hybrid weakness (HW) is defined as weak growth occurring in F1 hybrids derived from crosses between two normal parents and can be potentially explained by the BDM model.

HW has been found in a number of plant species, including Oryza sativa [7], Arabidopsis thaliana [8], and Phaseolus vulgaris [9], as well as in inter-specific crosses among Nicotiana species [10]. Some causal genes have recently been isolated and most cases of hybrid weakness or necrosis had a physiological response similar to pathogen attack, which suggested that the plant immune system could contribute to hybrid weakness or necrosis [11], [12]. For instance, the introgression of a resistance gene Cf-2 from a wild relative into a domestic tomato led to hybrid necrosis [13]. In Arabidopsis, an allele of an NB-LRR disease resistance gene is both necessary and sufficient for the induction of hybrid necrosis by interaction with another unknown gene from the other parent [12]. In addition, Alcázar et al [14] found that an interacting QTL lying in a cluster of RPP1-like TIR-NB-LRR genes was associated with hybrid weakness and it requires the salicylic acid (SA) pathway activation induced by low temperature. These studies appeared to indicate that resistance genes might be linked with hybrid necrosis. Though transposons or retrotransposons might also be involved in hybrid incompatibility in Arabidopsis and Drosophila, HW in plants mainly resulted from negative consequences of immune system diversification and epistatic interactions among divergent immune components [12], [15], [16], which indicates the close relationship between hybrid incompatibility and evolution of plant immune system.

In China, hybrid rice is estimated to be planted on more than 50% of rice-growing land and it is credited with helping the country increase its rice yields. Hybrid weakness induced by low temperature will affect the application of heterosis in hybrid rice, to some extent, especially in the double-cropping rice areas of South China, although the frequency of hybrid weakness in rice is apparently much lower than that of intraspecific crosses in Arabidopsis [8]. Hybrid weakness in rice was reported more than four decades ago and its occurrence was sometimes conditioned by low temperature [17]. These hybrid weakness cases showed similar symptoms, including stunted growth, fewer tillers and abnormal root development. However, no gene for hybrid weakness has been cloned, and only several causal genes have been fine mapped to a relatively small genomic interval [18][21], especially the histological analysis on hybrid weakness was rarely involved in the previous studies, and the molecular mechanisms underlying hybrid weakness remain to be elucidated.

In this study, a novel intrasubspecific hybrid weakness was discovered in the F1 plants derived from the crosses between the indica varieties Taifeng A and some indica lines carrying blast resistance gene Pi1. We observed that these F1 plants showed the phenotype of hybrid weakness only in the early-cropping seasons with relatively low temperature at seedling stage, in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, South China. Temperature is known to influence disease resistance to pathogens. A high temperature very often inhibits disease resistance [22], which suggests low temperature should enhance disease resistance. Reduced growth of the plant is thought to be due to the high metabolic cost of maintaining activated resistance pathways [23]. Was the newly discovered hybrid weakness caused by enhanced resistance of Pi1 gene at low temperatures? Here, we characterized the phenotype and analyzed the histological structures of the HW F1 plants derived from the cross between Taifeng A and V1134, conducted the genetic analysis and mapped the underlying genes.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

In the improvement of disease resistance for hybrid rice using MAS, all the F1 plants derived from the crosses between the elite indica line Taifeng A and the indica lines containing blast resistance gene Pi1 displayed HW when they were grown in the early-cropping season with relatively low temperature (average daily temperature of 19.87°C from March to April based on thirty-three years’ historical data in Guangzhou, Guangzhou Province, South China). The F1 population of Taifeng A/V1134 showed hybrid weakness in the early growing season of 2009, and the F2 population were used to genetic analysis for the trait of hybrid weakness in the early-cropping season of 2010. One BC1F2 (Taifeng A/Taifeng A/V1134) populations including 952 individual plants was utilized for fine mapping the Hw3 gene. Among of them, the line V1134 was derived from the cross between the elite line SH527 and the line GD7S/BL122 with blast resistance genes Pi1 and Pi2. SH527 and GD7S are two indica varieties used widely in rice production in China. BL122 was bred by introgression of Pi1 gene from the japonica cultivar LAC23 in West Africa and Pi2 gene from Columbia variety 5173, into the indica variety Co39.

In the early-cropping season of 2010, Taifeng A and V1134 and their HW F1 progeny grown in the natural field conditions again was used to observe the cytological structure of the leaves and to screen for the candidate gene by RT-PCR.

Phenotypic Characterization and Cytological Analysis

In order to characterize the phenotype of hybrid weakness, Taifeng A, V1134, and their HW F1 plants were grown in paddy field in the early-cropping season, 2011. Quantitative analysis of the agronomic traits including culm length, panicle length (PN), panicle number, and spikelet number per plant was conducted using 10 mature plants of Taifeng A, V1134, and their HW F1 line, respectively, grown in a paddy field.

Tissues from the same part of mature leaves were harvested from both parental lines and the HW F1 lines planted in the early-cropping season, 2011. The tissues were cut into approximately 1-mm2 pieces and fixed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 2% glutaraldehyde. After 3 times wash with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, the leaf samples were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. Next, the fixed leaf samples were dehydrated and embedded in flat molds using fresh resin. Semi-thin sections (1 µm) and ultra-thin sections (80 nm) were cut using a Leica-Ultracut S ultramicrotome and stained with toluidine blue and uranyl acetate, respectively. Five ultra-thin sections per sample were randomly selected to observe the cellular anatomy and chloroplast and mitochondrial structure using a transmission electron microscope (model JEM-1010; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 100 KV. Five semi-thin sections per sample were used to observe the cell structure under a fluorescence microscope (AxioScope A1; ZEISS, German).

According to Van Wees’s protocol [24], the chlorotic leaves from the HW F1 and their parents were stained with 2.5 mg ml−1 trypan blue in a boiling water bath for 2 min, and cooled at room temperature for 1–24 h. The stained leaves were then destained in chloral hydrate solution at room temperature for 2–6 h. Finally, the samples were mounted in 70% glycerol.

Measurement of Chlorophyll Contents (SPAD) and Photosynthesis

The five plants of the two parents Taifeng A and V1134 and HW F1 lines were randomly selected to measure the chlorophyll contents (SPAD value) using a SPAD-502 (Konica-Minolta, Osaka, Japan) and the photosynthetic rate using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR 6400, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) at maximum tillering stage. The top three leaves from the main stems of every plant were used to survey the chlorophyll content, and the top, middle and base parts of each leaf were measured, respectively. The photosynthetic rate was measured at 10∶00–12∶00 am on a sunny day under the condition of CO2 concentration of 400 µmol mol–1and 800 Lux light intensity with the LI-COR LED (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) irradiation source. The five top second leaves of the lines were measured.

Temperature Sensitivity Tests

To analyze the sensitivity of the weakness phenotype to low temperatures, Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1 line were sown in experimental field in August (the late-cropping season with average daily temperature of 28.22°C), 2011. After 3 weeks, 40 plants from the F1 and their parents were randomly transplanted at 21°C and 32°C for 10 days in identical climate chambers (Sanyo, MLR-351H), respectively. Plants were observed every day for any aberrant phenotypes.

Extraction of Genomic DNA

DNA was prepared using the modified hexadecyltrimethylammonium (CTAB) method. Fresh leaf material weighing ∼200 mg per sample was harvested from fully expanded leaves and placed in 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes. The samples were then frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to fine powder. The ground samples were suspended in 750 µl of warm (65°C) CTAB buffer (2% [w/v] CTAB, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0]) and incubated at 65°C for 30 min. Next, 300 µl of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24∶1) was added to the mixture, and the microcentrifuge tubes were gently centrifuged for 5 min. The supernatants were transferred into fresh microcentrifuge tubes, and 800 µl of cold 95% ethanol were added to each tube. The samples were again centrifuged for 5 min, and the pellet obtained were washed twice with 70% ethanol and subsequently air-dried. The air-dried DNA were then dissolved in 500 µl of ddH2O and stored at –20°C prior to use.

Mapping of Causal Gene for the HW

Ten normal plants and 10 HW plants from the BC1F2 populations derived from Taifeng A//Taifeng A/V1134 were used to create the recessive and dominant DNA pools, respectively, and DNA was extracted from the individual plants to perform bulked segregant analysis (BSA). Fine mapping of the HW genes was conducted with SSR, STS, and Indel markers. The primers for the STS and Indel markers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 based on differences in the DNA sequences between indica and japonica rice, which are available at (for indica 93-11) and japonica Nipponbare). The primer sequences and the amplified length of the developed DNA markers used in this study are listed in Table 2. PCR was performed in a reaction volume of 20 µl containing 10 ng of template DNA, 0.2 µM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Amplification was carried out in a S1000 Thermocycler (Bio-Rad, USA) using the following conditions: 5 min at 94°C; followed by 35 cycles of 0.5 min at 94°C, 0.5 min at 55°C, and 0.5 min at 72°C; and a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated in 3.0% agarose gels and stained with Gold View (Applygen Technologies Inc).

Table 2. The SPAD values and the photosynthetic rates for Taifeng A, V1134 and the HW F1.

RT-PCR Analysis

To confirm the candidate gene and examine its expression pattern, RT-PCR analysis was performed on the samples from the parental lines and F1 plants. The leaves were harvested from plants growing in the growth chamber (showing HW phenotype) and the paddy field. Total RNA was extracted from the leaves using SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of DNase I-treated RNA samples in a 20-µl reaction solution with random primers, using a ReverTra Ace-a-kit (TOYOBO). The PCR-amplified products were separated by electrophoresis through a 2% agarose gel and stained with Gold View. The OsActin1 gene was used as the internal control for equal loading of cDNA template.

Sequencing of the Candidate Gene

The full-length genomic DNA sequence of the candidate gene was divided into 7 segments to develop specific PCR primers. These primers were used to amplify genomic DNA from the two parental lines Taifeng A and V1134. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis,extracted and purified using a 3S Spin Agarose Gel DNA Purification Kit (Shanghai Biocolor Bioscience and Technology Company, China) for sequencing using specific primers with an ABI Prism 3730 XL DNA Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems, USA). Sequence alignment was conducted with the BLAST network services (National Center for Biotechnology Information, NCBI and Beijing Genomics Institute, BGI).


Characterization of the HW Phenotype

In this study, the F1 population derived from the cross between two indica lines Taifeng A and V1134 showed a typical hybrid weakness phenotype. When grown at low temperature or in the early cropping season in South China, the F1 plants could be easily distinguished from both parental lines (Figure 1). The HW F1 plants showed short culms, fewer panicles, pale green leaves, and chlorotic spots in the mature leaves compared with their parents. We characterized the phenotypic traits of HW by measuring different agronomic traits including culm length (CL), panicle length (PL), panicle number (PN) and spikelet number (SN). As shown in Table 1, the panicle number, culm length, panicle length and spikelet numbers in F1 plants were 6.6, 61.2 cm, 21.2 cm and 142.4, respectively. They were significantly lower (p<0.05) than those of both parental lines, which were 7.8–7.9, 76.8–85.2 cm, 21.2–28.4 cm and 175.2–211 cm, respectively.

Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of hybrid weakness in rice plants.

(a) The morphology of the 40-day seedlings of Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1. (b) The leaf phenotypes of HW F1 and both parents’ 40-day seedlings. (c) The morphology of the HW F1 and their parents at mature stage.

HW is Induced by Low Temperature

In early-cropping seasons (with relatively low temperatures at seedling stage, sown at the early of March) of four consecutive years (2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012), HW phenotype was observed in all F1 plants derived from the cross between Taifeng A and V1134. However, no HW phenotype was observed in late-growing seasons (with relatively high temperatures at seedling stage, sown at the end of July). We assumed that the occurrence of HW might be conditioned by temperatures. To test this hypothesis, the parental lines Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1 seeds were sown under natural field condition in July, 2011. After three weeks, 40 seedlings of the F1 and their parents were then transferred to versatile environmental test chambers (Sanyo, MLR-351H). Twenty of these plants were grown at 21°C, and the other 20 plants were grown at 32°C as control. After ten days’ treatment, the F1 seedlings growing at 21°C began to show symptoms of HW, including a pale green pigmentation in the primary leaves and growth retardation compared with their parents. But chlorotic spots in the primary leaves were not observed in the controlled growth condition (Figure 2). In contrast, the F1 seedlings growing at 32°C showed no HW phenotype at all, even with heterosis to some extent. These results corroborated our assumption that the observed HW was associated with low temperatures.

Figure 2. Phenotypic characterizations of the seedlings of Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1 grown under 21°C and 32°C.

These 3-week-old seedlings grown in August, 2011 were treated under the conditions of 21°C and 32°C for ten days, respectively. (a) under 21°C. (b) under 32°C.

Cytological Observation of the HW F1 Plants

Previous studies have demonstrated that leaf discoloration mutants are related to chloroplast biogenesis [25]. To determine whether the pale green phenotype of the HW F1 plants was caused by a defect in chloroplast biogenesis, the chloroplast ultrastructure of leaves from HW F1 and their parents was analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). As shown in Figure 3a and b, abundant stroma and stacked grana thylakoids were observed in the chloroplasts of primary leaves from both parents. In contrast, no grana thylakoid was detected in the chloroplasts of the HW F1 plants. Only some lamellar structures were observed in these aberrant chloroplasts (Figure 3c). These results also further indicated that the grana formation in the leaves of HW plants was defective under low temperatures.

Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) observations of organelle structure of leaves and root tips in Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1 plants.

The F1 and its parents were planted in the early-growing season with relative low temperatures for 5 weeks. (a and b) Chloroplast structures of the parents. (c) Chloroplast structure of the HW F1 plants. (d and e) Mitochondria structure of the leaves from the parent plants. (f) Mitochondria structure of leaves in the HW F1 plants. (g) and (h) Mitochondria structure of root tips from the parents. (i) Mitochondria structure of root tips from the HW F1 plants. Bars indicate 100 nm (a–f), 50 nm (g–i).

Growth retardation of HW plants under low temperatures could be associated with the aberrant metabolism of energy, which indicated that the defection of mitochondrial biogenesis was involved. We also compared the mitochondrial ultrastructure in the mesophyll cells by TEM. As a result, typical crista structure formed by the folding of the inner membrane of a mitochondrion was observed in the mitochondria of leaves from the parental lines (Figure 3d and e). In HW F1 leaves, however, the typical mitochondrial structure was not found. There were only mitochondrial precursor-like structures in mesophyll cells around the vascular bundles and they were quite obscure (Figure 3f).

To further verify the abnormal mitochondrial biogenesis in the other tissues of HW F1 plants, the mitochondrial structure from root tips cells was investigated by TEM. The mitochondrial volume in the cells of root tips from HW F1 plants was apparently smaller than those of their parents, and the folding of the inner membrane in these mitochondrial structures was mostly defective in the HW F1 plants (Figure 3g, h and i). These results indicated that mitochondrial biogenesis was affected in HW F1 plants.

The final size of a plant organ depends on both the number and size of its cells [26]. To investigate the cellular basis of the HW F1 plants, mesophyll cells were examined in the primary leaves from HW F1 plants and the parental lines using semi-thin plastic embedded sections. Compared to the parental lines, the size of mesophyll cell in HW F1 leaves did not significantly different. However, the number of mesophyll cells from HW F1 leaves was much lower and they were distantly distributed and loosely arranged with large intercellular spaces (Figure 4a, b and c), indicating that cell division was attenuated in the HW F1 plants. Interestingly, the cell walls of the HW F1 plants were remarkably thickened compared with those of their parents (Figure 4d, e and f).

Figure 4. Cell characteristics of the leaves in Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1 plants.

(a–c) Light microscopic observations of mesophyll cell structure of the HW F1 and their parents in transverse section. (a and b) Mesophyll cells of the parents (c) Mesophyll cells of the HW F1 plants. (d–f) Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) observations of cell wall structure of the HW F1 and their parents. (d and e) Cell wall of the parents. (f) Cell wall of the HW F1 plants. Bars indicate 20 µm (a, b and c), 5 µm (d and e), 2 µm (f).

To further analyze the reasons for chlorotic spots occurring in the mature leaves of HW F1 plants, the leaves from both parents and their HW F1 were stained with trypan blue. Small and scattered blue spots were observed in the leaves of HW F1, but not occurred in the leaves of the parents (Figure 5), which suggested that the chlorotic spots in the leaves of HW F1 should be caused by cell death.

Figure 5. Cellular responses of the leaves from Taifeng A, V1134 and their HW F1 stained with trypan blue.

Analysis of Chlorophyll Contents and Photosynthesis

Because the HW F1 plants showed pale green leaves and chlorotic spots in the leaves, and the chloroplast development was abnormal, the chlorophyll contents (SPAD values) and photosynthetic rate of the HW F1 was evaluated. The SPAD values and photosynthetic rate were listed in Table 2. The results showed that the SPAD values from the top first leaves to the top third leaves were gradually increased in all of the parental lines V1134, Taifeng A and their HW F1. In contrast, it was dramatically reduced in all the top three leaves of HW F1 compared to both the parents V1134 and Taifeng A. The photosynthetic rate of the HW F1 was 13.87 µmol CO2 m−2s−1, significantly lower than those (22.41 and 20.18 µmol CO2 m−2s−1) of the parents. The results suggested that the reduction of the chlorophyll content of the HW F1 plant began with the primary leaves, and its chloroplast development and chlorophyll biosynthesis were accordingly influenced.

Genetic Segregation of HW Phenotype

To determine the inheritance pattern of the observed HW, 264 F2 plants derived from the cross between Taifeng A and V1134 (SH527//GD7S/BL122) were grown in the early cropping season with relatively low temperature. By defining the individuals with pale green leaves and chlorotic spots as weak plants, we investigated the number of individuals showing weak and normal growth in the F2 population. The segregation of the weak (HW) to normal (N) plants was 162 to 102, which fits the expected ratio of 9∶7 (X2 = 2.805<3.841). The results suggested that two complementary dominant genes, here designated as Hw3 and Hw4, respectively, genetically controlled the low temperature-conditioned HW. Some more severe weakness plants were observed in the F2 or BC1F2 (Taifeng A//Taifeng A/V1134) population (Figure S1), which further proved the two dominant gene model. Each parental line contributed one of the two dominant genes, namely, Hw3 from V1134 and Hw4 from Taifeng A, to the F1 progeny. In addition, we also observed that hybrid weakness occurred in the F1 plants derived from Taifeng A and BL122 in the early-cropping seasons (Figure S2), which suggests that Hw3 gene should originate from BL122, the donor of Pi1 gene.

Mapping of the HW Genes Hw3 and Hw4

Genetic analysis suggested that the HW was governed by two complementary dominant genes contributed by each parental line. To map the Hw3 and Hw4 genes from V1134 and Taifeng A, 360 SSR markers from the International Rice Genome Sequencing Project evenly distributed over the 12 chromosomes were screened for polymorphisms between Taifeng A and V1134 [27]. As a result, 29 SSR markers showed genetic polymorphism between the two parents.

Linkage analysis of Hw3 with the two polymorphic markers in the 292 BC1F2 (Taifeng A//Taifeng A/V1134)plants showed that the Hw3 was located in between the markers RM27000 and RM224 on chromosome 11 with a distance of 2.4 and 0.6 cM, respectively. Because both genes Hw3 and Pi1 originated from BL122 and were linked to RM224.and Pi1 consists of Pi-5C and Pi-6C [28], and two candidate resistance gene markers CRG11-5 of Pi-5C and CRG11-6 of Pi-6C could be anchored on Chr.11and located at the right side of RM224 based on the Nipponbare genomic sequence (, the position of Hw3 and Pi1 could be clearly determined (Figure 6a).

Figure 6. Linkage map of the Hw3 gene and cosegregation analysis.

(a) Linkage map of the Hw3 gene. (b) Cosegregation analysis in the BC1F2 population of Taifeng A//Taifeng A/V1134 using the specific marker CBP2 (F: 5′ AGCATCTGGAAGCGGTTTTG 3′, R: 5′ CCATCTGCCTGTCACTATCATT 3′, the predicted size: 948 bp). P1: V1134. P2: Taifeng A. NR: the number of recombinants.

To fine map Hw3 gene, a population of 952 BC1F2 plants was used. Sixty SSR markers selected between RM27000 and RM224 did not display any polymorphisms between the two DNA pools. Hence, the DNA sequence of the region between RM27000 and RM224 was aligned at based on the 93-11(indica) and Nipponbare (japonica) genomic databases, and 31 novel DNA markers (8 STS markers and 23 Indel markers) were developed in this region. Twelve markers showing polymorphisms between two DNA pools were used to genotype the 952 BC1F2 plants (Table S1, Figure 6). Eventually, the Hw3 gene was delimited by the two flanking markers Indel1117 and Indel1118. Two and three recombinants were detected in the BC1 F2 population for Indel1117 and Indel1118, respectively. The physical distance between Indel1117 and Indel1118 was 136 kb using the Nipponbare (O. sativa ssp. japonica) genomic sequence as a reference (

On the other hand, Hw4 from Taifeng A was mapped in the about 15 cM interval between SSR markers RM182 and RM505 on the long arm of chromosome 7 with the 190-plant BC1F2 (Taifeng A/V1134//V1134).

Prediction of the Candidate Gene for Hw3 and Sequence Analysis

Because our mapping population was generated from a breeding program, the genetic differences between the two parental lines were small. It was very difficult to develop new polymorphic markers in the limited region where the target gene harbored. In order to predict the candidate genes for Hw3, we deployed a strategy of expression analysis using RT-PCR. To this end, the genes in the region were predicted according to the annotation databases ( The region contains 18 annotated genes: 2 calmodulin-binding proteins, 1 protein kinase, 6 small expressed proteins, 3 hypothetical proteins, and 6 transposons or retrotransposons. The expressed hypothetical proteins in this region were relatively short, and the transposons or retrotransposons did not show transcriptional activation in general [15]. Thus, these short sequences and the transposable elements were excluded through the expression analysis. The cDNA primers for the remaining three predicted genes were designed with Primer Premier 5 based on the putative cDNA sequence of these genes in (Table S2). The transcript level of these genes was examined by RT-PCR using OsActin1 as the internal control. The results indicated that only LOC_Os11g44310, which encoded a putative calmodulin-binding protein (CaMBP), displayed different expression among Taifeng A, V1134 and HW F1 (Figure 7a). It was expressed in V1134 and F1 plants at very similar level and was almost not detectable in Taifeng A. In addition, we compared the expression of LOC_Os11g44310 in seedlings grown at 21°C and 32°C, respectively. The results showed that LOC_Os11g44310 was expressed in V1134 and the F1 plants except Taifeng A in both treatments of 21°C and 32°C. Interestingly, it displayed much higher expression at 21°C than that at 32°C for both V1134 and F1 plants (Figure 7b).

Figure 7. RT-PCR assays to screen the candidate gene causal to hybrid weakness in the candidate region and detect sensitivity to low temperatures in Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1 plants, and OsActin1 gene used as the internal control.

(a) Expression analysis of the annotated genes in the candidate region in Taifeng A, V1134 and their HW F1 plants. (b) Expression analysis of the candidate gene LOC_Os11g44310 in Taifeng A, V1134 and their F1 plants after 10-day treatments of 21°C and 32°C temperature, respectively.

Due to no detection of transcript in Taifeng A, it was necessary to further verify whether LOC_Os11g44310 was really lost in it, the complete genomic sequence of the candidate gene LOC_Os11g44310 was amplified using 7 PCR reactions, which produced 7 over-lapping segments spanning the full-length genomic region. All the primers (CBP1∼CBP7) (Table S3) were designed based on the Nipponbare (japonica) reference sequence. All 7 segments were successfully amplified in the parental line V1134. However, only 2 (CBP3 and CBP4) of 7 primers could amplify the specific products showing different sizes between V1134 and Taifeng A (Figure 8a). The amplified products from Taifeng A were isolated and sequenced. BLAST analysis found that the sequence of the CBP3-amplified product from Taifeng A did not match the Nipponbare sequence, while the CBP4-amplified product from Taifeng A was aligned on chromosome 8. Therefore it could be concluded that the allele of LOC_Os11g44310 was absent in Taifeng A. Hence, we speculated that LOC_Os11g44310 could be the candidate gene for Hw3.

Figure 8. Amplification of the candidate gene between Taifeng A and V1134.

(a) With the seven markers (CBP1-CBP7) specific to the seven divided segments of the candidate gene. I–VII: The markers of CBP1, CBP2……CBP7, respectively.

The specific marker CBP2 was used in cosegregation analysis to further determine the candidate gene for Hw3. Due to the absence of LOC_Os11g44310 in Taifeng A, the specific marker is a dominant marker. The single-exchange recombinant plants can’t be distinguished from the no recombinant plant and the double-exchange recombinant plants can be discriminated from no recombinant plants when the dominant marker is used in cosegregation analysis. The new marker was used in PCR analysis for 716 weak individuals (dominant population) of the 952 BC1F2 population and no double-exchanged recombinant plant was detected (Figure 6). There was no recombinant plant observed using the new marker when 236 normal plants (recessive population) were deployed for cosegregation analysis. Since these normal plants showed the same bands to Taifeng A and LOC_Os11g44310 was absent in Taifeng A, the related figure of electrophoresis was not shown here. Hence, the predicted gene OsCaMBP (LOC_Os11g44310) was considered as the candidate gene for Hw3.

In Nipponbare, the candidate gene LOC_Os11g44310 consists of 8 exons and is predicted to encode a 542-amino acid protein based on the annotation databases ( To analyze the structural characteristic of the candidate gene in V1134, these specific amplified products from the paternal line V1134 were cloned and sequenced. BLAST analysis indicated there was large sequence differentiation between V1134 and Nipponbare. For instance, the identities of sequences between the amplified products in the paternal line V1134 using the CBP3 and CBP4 primer pairs and the reference sequence of Nipponbare were only 89% and 84%, respectively. Further, BLAST analysis indicated that these large divergent sequences were at the intron-exon junctions (Figure 9), suggesting large differences could be found in the amino acid sequence encoded by the candidate gene and the putative amino acid sequence based on the reference Nipponbare sequence. BLAST analysis was performed on NCBI to investigate the copy number of the candidate gene LOC_Os11g44310 in two rice subspecies (indica and japonica) ( Only one copy of the candidate gene was found in the database of reference genome of japonica cultivars, and no homologous sequence of the candidate gene was found in the database of reference genome of indica cultivar.

Figure 9. DNA sequence alignment between the amplified sequence in Taifeng A using the primers CBP3 and CBP4 and the reference sequence of Nipponbare.

(A) Using the primer CBP3. (B) Using the primer CBP4. Bold: Location of selected alignment. Highlighted Gray: Location of the Exons.


Linkage Drag and Hybrid Weakness

We found the hybrid weakness occurred in the F1 progenies derived from the crosses between Taifeng A and some improved rice lines carrying Pi1 gene in the early-cropping seasons. Linkage analysis indicated that the SSR marker RM224 used to screen Pi1 gene was linked to hybrid weakness. Is Pi1 gene indeed the underlying gene of Hw3? Further linkage analysis and isolation of Pi1 gene [28] found that Hw3 and Pi1 are linked to each other but not just the same gene. It is possible that Hw3 from the donor BL122 was transferred along with Pi1 into the recurrent parent. Although added backcrosses and large population could overcome the linkage drag, the linkage between Hw3 and Pi1 loci might be concealed when two complementary genes regulating the low temperature-dependent hybrid weakness did not occur in the same genome, or the breeding materials were grown in the high-temperature conditions of the late-cropping seasons. Several similar hybrid weakness or lethality cases were reported. The hybrid necrosis gene Ne2 was found to tightly link to a leaf rust resistance gene Lr13 in wheat [29]. The hybrid weakness gene HWC2 in rice was closely linked to Xa1 [19]. And several other resistance genes such as Pikahei-1(t) [30], Pi39(t) [31], Xa2 [32] and Gm7 [33] were also linked with the hybrid weakness gene HWC2. The wild flower Mimulus guttatus growing under copper tolerance condition displayed hybrid lethality which was induced by low temperature, and the genetic analysis showed that the hybrid lethality gene Nec1 was closely linked to the copper tolerance gene Tol1 [34].

In addition, Hw3 existed in V1134, missed in Taifeng A and its candidate gene LOC_Os11g44310 had large sequence variation in V1134 compared with the reference sequence of Nipponbare. Haplotype analysis of HWC2 gene illustrated that its allele hwc2-2 and Xa1 originated from indica or tropical japonica and Hwc2-1 gene diffused in temperate japonica [19]. Ne2 locus has been differentiated into five alleles (Ne2w, Ne2mw, Ne2m, Ne2ms, and Ne2s) in wheat [35]. Tight linkage between hybrid ncompatibility and resistance loci in several independent cases seems to indicate that the coexistence between them could be a by-product of adaptive evolution.

Low Temperature and Hybrid Weakness

Previous studies indicated that defense-related genes were up-regulated and photosynthesis-associated genes were down-regulated in hybrid weakness plants [36].In this study, the hybrid weakness was induced by low temperatures, and cytological observation indicated that there was large intercellular space, thickening of cell wall, chloroplast without grana thylakoids and mitochondrial without typical crista structure in HW F1 plants. The SPAD values of HW F1 plants gradually increased from the top first leaves to the top third leaves, but it was significantly less than both the parents, which indicated that chlorophyll biosynthesis was reduced in the HW F1 plants. And the photosynthetic rate of the HW F1 was significantly lower than those of the parents. Currently, several hybrid weakness or necrosis cases in some plants were previously reported to be temperature sensitive [8] and high temperature could rescue hybrid weakness [17]. Autoactivation of immune responses associated with Arabidopsis hybrid breakdown at low temperature has been described [8]. A number of CaM-binding proteins that are pathogen-inducible have been identified, suggesting that they may participate in the defense response [37], [38]. Cell death has a central role in innate immune responses in both plants and animals. The results of Trypan blue staining indicated that cell death existed in the leaves of the HW F1. LOC_Os11g44310 was found to be remarkably up-regulated in Nipponbare upon the inoculation with M. grisea isolate FR13 ( [39]. These above results suggests LOC_Os11g44310 and the hybrid weakness should be associated with defense response.We also found that the expression of the candidate gene LOC_Os11g44310 was up-regulated at low temperature (21°C).

Low temperature significantly influences chloroplast development and chlorophyll biosynthesis [40], and the granal thylakoids were usually affected more than the intergranal ones under chilling temperature [41]. On the other hand, the mitochondria in the soybean axes were slightly diminished, and lacked internal structure at low temperatures [42]. Loss of grana thylakoids carrying many proteins in chloroplast and cristae in mitochondria might result in hybrid weakness by influencing photophosphorylation, and oxidative phosphorylation and reducing the generation of ATP. Although temperature was considered to affect the degree of hybrid necrosis by alerting thresholds for defense and cell death pathway triggering [43] and LOC_Os11g44310 was involved in defense response. It is currently unknown how low temperature affects the chlorophyll synthesis, chloroplast development and the interaction between Hw3 and Hw4 to cause hybrid weakness.

The Candidate Gene of Hw3 Encodes a Putative Calmodulin-binding Protein

Hw3, one of the two complementary dominant genes controlling the hybrid weakness was fine mapped and the candidate gene was found to encode a putative calmodulin-binding protein. Calcium ions play an important role as a second messenger in eukaryotic cells. Calmodulin, a ubiquitous calcium-binding protein, regulates many diverse cellular functions by interacting with a wide range of calmodulin-binding proteins. The diverse CaMBPs in plants harbor various motifs and display functional diversity [44], [45], [46]. Several studies reported the involvement of CaMBP in cell division [47], [48], plant defense responses [37], [38] and organelle development [49], [50], [51], [52].

We found that cell division, cell wall and the development of chloroplasts and mitochondria was influenced under low temperatures in the HW F1 plants. These results indicated that the alteration of cell structure could be associated with the up-regulated expression of OsCaMBP. In addition, we did not find any typical stacked grana thylakoids in the chloroplasts of the HW F1 leaves. Grana thylakoids act as the main vector of pigments in plants, and the defection of grana thylakoids caused the reduction of pigment accumulation resulting in the occurrence of the pale leaves and lower chlorophyll contents (SPAD values). And only some mitochondrial precursor-like structures were observed around the vascular bundles. This indicated that the development of mitochondria was affected more substantially than that of chloroplasts in HW F1 plants, although we don’t know currently how it affects the development of chloroplast and mitochondria in the HW F1 plants. Bussemer et al [52] reported that AFG1L1, a calmodulin-binding AAA+-ATPase, was localized in both mitochondria and chloroplasts, and was potentially localized on the inner membrane on the side towards the mitochondrial matrix rather than on the chloroplast using the prediction software of NPS@ (PBIL, Lyon, France). And AFG1L1 was considered to be originally a mitochondrial protein and that the dual localization of AFG1L1 in chloroplasts and mitochondria is a newly acquired secondary trait, suggesting that this type of calmodulin-binding protein could have a greater influence on the biogenesis of mitochondria than on that of the chloroplasts.

Origin of the Candidate Gene of Hw3

The results showed that the candidate gene of Hw3 was present in V1134, but absent in indica cultivar Taifeng A. Further BLAST search indicates that it has only one copy in the reference sequence of japonica group and no homologous sequence of it in the reference sequence of indica group based on, which suggests that the candidate gene should originate directly from BL122, the donor of the resistance genes Pi1 and Pi2 to blast and indirectly from the Libya japonica variety LAC23 with Pi1. In previous studies, all the HW cases appear in the interspecific rice hybrids. The action of certain genes with a foreign genetic background could be enhanced by other genes in a specific background [52]. The introgression of the foreign gene might break up the original coadapted genes, and the epistatic interactions between these genes that are harmless in their native genetic background could be enhanced under the specific conditions, which have highly deleterious consequences (the occurrence of hybrid weakness) for F1 hybrid progeny [8].

Overall, the molecular, cytological, physical and functional analysis of Hw3 and the cloning of another complementary gene Hw4 will further enhance the understanding of the mechanism underlying hybrid weakness and provide an opportunity to compare the similarities and differences in the regulation of the hybrid weakness phenomena for different species.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

The more severe weakness plants in the BC1F2 population of Taifeng A//Taifeng A/V1134.


Figure S2.

The weakness phenotype of the F1 plants derived from the cross between Taifeng A and BL122.


Table S1.

The 12 newly developed polymorphic molecular markers in the interval between RM27000 and RM224 on Chromosome 11 for fine mapping of Hw3.


Table S2.

The markers used in the RT-PCR analysis of three predicted genes in the candidate region.


Table S3.

The 7 markers (CBP1-CBP7) designed based on the reference sequence of Nipponbare used to amplify the candidate gene LOC_Os11g44310.


Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CYF FW. Performed the experiments: CYF BRS WGL JHL RFD. Analyzed the data: ZRL MSZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YLL JWC. Wrote the paper: CYF FW DLL.


  1. 1. Mallet J (2006) What does Drosophila genetics tell us about speciation? Trends Ecol Evo 21: 386–393.
  2. 2. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH (2007) Plant speciation. Science 317: 910–914.
  3. 3. Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.161p.
  4. 4. Muller HJ (1942) Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol Symp 6: 71–124.
  5. 5. Coyne JA, Orr HA. (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. 545p.
  6. 6. Burke J, Arnold ML (2001) Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annu Rev Genet 35: 31–52.
  7. 7. Oka HI (1957) Phylogenetic differentiation of cultivated rice. XV Complementary lethal genes in rice. Jpn J Genet 32: 83–87.
  8. 8. Bomblies K, Lempe J, Epple P, Warthmann N, Lanz C, et al. (2007) Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-Type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLOS Biology 5(9): 1962–1972.
  9. 9. Shii CT, Mok MC, Temple SR, Mok DWS (1980) Expression of developmental abnormalities of Phaseolus vulgaris L. interaction between temperature and allelic dosage. J Hered 71: 219–22.
  10. 10. Tezuka T, Kuboyama T, Matsuda T, Marubashi W (2007) Possible involvement of genes on the Q chromosome of Nicotiana tabacum in expression of hybrid lethality and programmed cell death during interspecific hybridization to Nicotiana debneyi. Planta 226: 753–64.
  11. 11. Wulff BBH, Kruijt M, Collins PL, Thomas CM, Ludwig AA, et al. (2004) Gene shuffling-generated and natural variants of the tomato resistance gene Cf-9 exhibit different auto-necrosis-inducing activities in Nicotiana species. Plant J 40: 942–956.
  12. 12. Bomblies K, Weigel D (2007) Hybrid necrosis: Autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nat Rev Genet 8: 382–393.
  13. 13. Krüger J, Thomas CM, Golstein C, Dixon MS, Smoker M, et al. (2002) A tomato cysteine protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance and suppression of autonecrosis. Science. 296: 744–747.
  14. 14. Alcázar R, García AV, Parker JE, Reymond M (2009) Incremental steps toward incompatibility revealed by Arabidopsis epistatic interactions modulating salicylic acid pathway activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(1): 334–339.
  15. 15. Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Comai1 L (2006) Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecies hybridization. Curr Biol 16: 1322–1328.
  16. 16. Blumenstiel JP, Hartl DL (2005) Evidence for maternally transmitted small interfering RNA in the repression of transposition in Drosophila virilis.. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 15965–15970.
  17. 17. Saito T, Ichitani K, Suzeki T, Marubashi W, Kuboyama T (2007) Developmantal observation and high temperature rescue from hybrid weakness in a cross between Japanese rice cultivar and Peruvian rice cultivar ‘Jamaica’. Breed Sci 57: 281–288.
  18. 18. Ichitani K, Namigoshi K, Sato M, Taura S, Aoki M, et al. (2007) Fine mapping and allelic dosage effect of Hwc1, a complementary hybrid weakness gene in rice. Theor Appl Genet 114: 1407–1415.
  19. 19. Kuboyama T, Matsumoto T, Wu JZ, Kanamori H, Taura S, et al. (2009) Fine mapping of HWC2, a complementary hybrid weakness gene, and haplotype analysis around the locus in rice. Rice 2: 93–103.
  20. 20. Ichitani K. Taura S, Tezuka T, Okiyama Y, Kuboyama T (2011) Chromosomal location of HWA1 and HWA2, complementary hybrid weakness genes in rice. Rice 4(2): 29–38.
  21. 21. Chen C, Chen H, Shan JX, Zhu MZ, Shi M, et al. (2013) Genetic and physiological analysis of a novel type of interspecific hybrid weakness in rice. Mol Plant 6: 716–728.
  22. 22. Dropkin VH. 1969. The necrotic reaction of tomato and other hosts resistant to Meloidogyne: Reversal by temperature. Phytopathology 59: 1632–1637.
  23. 23. Mirouze M, Sels J, Richard O, Czernic P, Loubet S, et al. (2006) A putative novel role for plant defensins: a defensin from the zinc hyper-accumulating plant, Arabidopsis halleri, confers zinc tolerance. The Plant Jour 47: 329–342.
  24. 24. Van Wees SC. (2008) Phenotypic Analysis of Arabidopsis Mutants: Trypan Blue Stain for fungi, oomycetes, and dead Plant Cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 3(8) doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4982.
  25. 25. Cui YL, Jia QS, Yin QQ, Lin GN, Kong MM, et al. (2011) The GDC1 Gene Encodes a Novel Ankyrin Domain-Containing Protein That Is Essential for Grana Formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 155: 130–141.
  26. 26. Breuer C, Stacey NJ, West CE, Zhao Y, Chory J, et al. (2007) BIN4, a novel component of the plant DNA topoisomerase VI complex, is required for endoreduplication in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19: 3655–3668.
  27. 27. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (IRGSP) (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436: 793–800.
  28. 28. Hua LX, Wu JZ, Chen CX, Wu WH, He XY, et al. (2012) The isolation of Pi1, an allele at the Pik locus which confers broad spectrum resistance to rice blast. Theor Appl Genet 125: 1047–1055.
  29. 29. Singh RP (1993) Resistance to leaf rust in 26 Mexican wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 33: 633–637.
  30. 30. Xu X, Chen H, Fujimura T, Kawasaki S (2008) Fine mapping of a strong QTL of field resistance against rice blast, Pikahei-1(t), from upland rice Kahei, utilizing a novel resistance evaluation system in the greenhouse. Theor Appl Genet. 117: 997–1008.
  31. 31. Terashima T, Fukuoka S, Saka N, Kudo S (2008) Mapping of a blast field resistance gene Pi39(t) of elite rice strain Chubu 111. Plant Breed127: 485–489.
  32. 32. He Q, Li D, Zhu Y, Tan M, Zhang D, et al. (2006) Fine mapping of Xa2, a bacterial blight resistance gene in rice. Mol Breed 17: 1–6.
  33. 33. Sardesai N, Kumar A, Rajyashri KR, Nair S, Mohan M (2002) Identification and mapping of an AFLP marker linked to Gm7, a gall midge resistance gene and its conversion to a SCAR marker for its utility in marker aided selection in rice. Theor Appl Genet 105: 691–8.
  34. 34. Wright KM, Lloyd D, Lowry DB, Macnair MR, Willis JH (2013) Indirect evolution of hybrid lethality due to linkage with selected locus in Mimulus guttatus. PLOS Biology 11(2): e1001497.
  35. 35. Hermsen JGTh (1963b) Sources and distribution of the complementary genes for hybrid necrosis in wheat. Euphytica 12: 147–160.
  36. 36. Hatano H, Mizuno N, Matsuda R, Shitsukawa N, Park P, et al. (2012) Dysfunction of mitotic cell division at shoot apices triggered severe growth abortion in interspecific hybrids between tetraploid wheat and Aegilops tauschii. New Phytol. 194: 1143–1154.
  37. 37. Reddy VS, Ali GS, Reddy AS (2003) Characterization of a pathogen-induced calmodulin-binding protein: mapping of four Ca2+-dependent calmodulin binding domains. Plant Mol Biol 52: 143–159.
  38. 38. Ali GS, Reddy VS, Lindgren PB, Jakobek JL, Reddy ASN (2003) Differential expression of genes encoding calmodulin-binding proteins in response to bacterial pathogens and inducers of defense responses. Plant Mol Biol 51: 803–815.
  39. 39. Ribot C, Hirsch J, Balzergue S, Tharreau D, Nottéghem JL, et al. (2008) Susceptibility of rice to the blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. J. Plant Physiol. 165: 114–124.
  40. 40. Li Y, Sun Z, Xu X, Jin M, Liu Y, et al. (2010) Influence of low temperatures on photosystem II photochemistry and expression of the NADPH: protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase in the alpine, subnival perennial, Chorispora bungeana. Photosynthetica 48(3): 457–468.
  41. 41. Holá D, Kutík J, Kočová M, Rothová O (2008) Low-temperature induced changes in the ultrastructure of maize mesophyll chloroplasts strongly depend on the chilling pattern/intensity and considerably differ among inbred and hybrid genotypes. Photosynthetica 46 (3): 329–338.
  42. 42. Yin GK, Sun HM, Xin X, Qin GZ, Liang Z, et al. (2009) Mitochondrial damage in the soybean seed axis during imbibition at chilling temperatures. Plant Cell Physiol. 50(7): 1305–1318.
  43. 43. Alcá zara R, Garcíab AV, Parkerb J E, Reymonda M (2009) Incremental steps toward incompatibility revealed by Arabidopsis epistatic interactions modulating salicylic acid pathway activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(1): 334–339.
  44. 44. Sundberg E, Slagter JG, Fridborg I, Cleary SP, Robinson C, et al. (1997) ALBINO3, an Arabidopsis nuclear gene essential for chloroplast differentiation, encodes a chloroplast protein that shows homology to proteins present in bacterial membranes and yeast mitochondria. Plant Cell 9: 717–730.
  45. 45. Rhoads AR, Friedberg F (1997) Sequence motifs for calmodulin recognition. The FASEB J 11(5): 331–340.
  46. 46. Reddy VS, Ali GS, Reddy ASN (2002) Genes encoding calmodulin-binding proteins in the Arabidopsis genome. J Biol Chem 277(2): 9840–9852.
  47. 47. Dymek EE, Goduti D, Kramer T, Smith EF. (2006) A kinesin-like calmodulin-binding protein in Chlamydomonas: evidence for a role in cell division and flagellar functions. J Cell Sci 119, 3107–3116.
  48. 48. Preuss ML, Delmer DP, Liu B (2003) The cotton kinesin-like calmodulin-binding protein associates with cortical microtubules in cotton fibers. Plant Physiol 132: 154–160.
  49. 49. Wang L, Tsuda K, Sato M, Cohen JD, Katagiri F, et al. (2009) Arabidopsis CaM binding protein CBP60g contributes to MAMP-induced SA accumulation and is involved in disease resistance against Pseudomonas syringae. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000301
  50. 50. Yang TB, Poovaiah BW (2000) Arabidopsis chloroplast chaperonin 10 is a calmodulin-binding protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 275: 601–607.
  51. 51. Bussemer J, Chigri F, Vothknecht UC (2009) Arabidopsis ATPase family gene 1-like protein 1 is a calmodulin-binding AAA+-ATPase with a dual localization in chloroplasts and mitochondria. FEBS J 276: 3870–3880.
  52. 52. Smith L M, Bomblies K, Weigel D (2011) Complex evolutionary events at a tandem cluster of Arabidopsis thaliana genes resulting in a single-locus genetic incompatibility. PLOS Genetics 7: e1002164.