Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Meta Analysis and Hierarchical Classification of HU-Based Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization Criteria

  • Wisnumurti Kristanto,

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, Center for Medical Imaging – North East, Netherlands, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

  • Peter M. A. van Ooijen ,

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, Center for Medical Imaging – North East, Netherlands, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

  • Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide,

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, Center for Medical Imaging – North East, Netherlands, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

  • Rozemarijn Vliegenthart,

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, Center for Medical Imaging – North East, Netherlands, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

  • Matthijs Oudkerk

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, Center for Medical Imaging – North East, Netherlands, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

A Meta Analysis and Hierarchical Classification of HU-Based Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization Criteria

  • Wisnumurti Kristanto, 
  • Peter M. A. van Ooijen, 
  • Marijke C. Jansen-van der Weide, 
  • Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, 
  • Matthijs Oudkerk



Many computed tomography (CT) studies have reported that lipid-rich, presumably rupture-prone atherosclerotic plaques can be characterized according to their Hounsfield Unit (HU) value. However, the published HU-based characterization criteria vary considerably. The present study aims to systematically analyze these values and empirically derive a hierarchical classification of the HU-based criteria which can be referred in clinical situation.

Material and Methods

A systematic search in PubMed and Embase for publications with HU-criteria to characterize lipid-rich and fibrous atherosclerotic plaques resulted in 36 publications, published between 1998 and 2011. The HU-criteria were systematically analyzed based on the characteristics of the reporting study. Significant differences between HU-criteria were checked using Student’s t-test. Subsequently, a hierarchical classification of HU-criteria was developed based on the respective study characteristics.


No correlation was found between HU-criteria and the reported lumen contrast-enhancement. Significant differences were found for HU-criteria when pooled according to the respective study characteristics: examination type, vessel type, CT-vendor, detector-rows, voltage-setting, and collimation-width. The hierarchical classification resulted in 21 and 22 CT attenuation value categories, for lipid-rich and fibrous plaque, respectively. More than 50% of the hierarchically classified HU-criteria were significantly different.


In conclusion, variations in the reported CT attenuation values for lipid-rich and fibrous plaque are so large that generalized values are unreliable for clinical use. The proposed hierarchical classification can be used to determine reference CT attenuation values of lipid-rich and fibrous plaques for the local setting.


Multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) is currently the preferred non-invasive modality to assess the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) [1], MDCT can reliably exclude the presence of obstructive CAD [2]. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced MDCT shows potential for differentiating types of atherosclerotic plaques, including calcified and non-calcified plaques [3]. MDCT can accurately quantify calcified plaque burden [46] and potentially non-calcified plaque volume [3]. However, quantitatively characterizing non-calcified plaque components has been found more challenging [7].

Characterizing the lipid-rich component of non-calcified plaques has become of increasing interest as lipid-rich, thin-capped plaques are considered to have an increased risk of rupture, with the potential sequel of an acute cardiovascular event [8,9]. Early CT studies reported that non-calcified plaque components can be characterized based on their CT attenuation values, expressed in Hounsfield Unit (HU) [10,11]. Since then, a number of studies on this topic has emerged, using new generations of the rapidly evolving MDCT technology [12,13]. However, a reliable and consistent non-calcified plaque characterization based on its HU values is yet to be achieved. The reported plaque-specific HU values vary considerably. Several factors influencing non-calcified plaque HU values have been identified, among others lumen contrast-enhancement and reconstruction kernel [14,15]. However, the fact that each study investigating HU-based non-calcified plaque characterization has different characteristics may also contribute to the considerable variation. Examples of those characteristics are examination type, vessels of interest, and CT-system. The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the published HU-based criteria to characterize non-calcified plaques, and empirically derive a hierarchical classification of the HU-based criteria, in order to assist CT determination of non-calcified components in atherosclerotic plaques in a clinical setting.

Material and Methods

In this study, we systematically searched and collected publications which reported HU-criteria to characterize lipid-rich and fibrous plaques. Subsequently, the HU-criteria were systematically analyzed based on the specific characteristics of each study.

Literature Study

With the guidance of a librarian and using denominator terms for several relevant publications obtained beforehand, a computerized search was performed per April 22nd, 2011 to identify relevant publications in Pubmed, using MeSH terms and free text keywords: ("Ultrasonography, Interventional"[Mesh] OR "Coronary Artery Disease"[Mesh] OR "Carotid Artery Diseases"[Mesh]) AND plaque* AND "Tomography, X-Ray Computed"[Mesh] NOT "Review"[Publication Type]; and in Embase, using the keywords: ('endoscopic echography'/exp OR 'coronary artery disease'/exp OR 'carotid artery disease'/exp) AND 'plaque' AND 'computer assisted tomography'/exp NOT 'review'/exp/. Inclusion criteria for publication selection were: 1) original publication; 2) characterization of non-calcified plaques into lipid-rich and fibrous plaques, and report of their specific HU values; 3) using human derived materials; and 4) using other an imaging modality as plaque composition reference. Publications meeting one or more of the defined exclusion criteria were excluded (Figure 1).

The search yielded 2062 publications. After removing 576 duplicates (either overlaps between Pubmed and Embase results or repetitions in each database results), 1486 individual publications were screened by one reviewer (WK) based initially on the title and abstract, and when inclusion was still unclear, on the full-text of the article. In case of doubt about inclusion of a publication, arbitration was performed in a consensus meeting with a second reviewer (PvO). Finally, 1450 out of the remaining 1486 publications were excluded based on the exclusion criteria. No language or publication date related exclusions were made. In total, 36 publications were included in this study [7,1013,1646] (Figure 1, Table 1). A preliminary check was performed to evaluate whether one study which used two different CT modalities could be regarded as two separate studies [46] and whether another study which used four different kV settings could be regarded as four separate studies [44]. The preliminary check involved pooling all HU-criteria and pooling all HU-criteria minus one of the aforementioned studies, repeated for all six studies in question. As no significant difference in outcome was found when splitting up these studies, the two studies were treated as six studies resulting in total 40 studies for our systematical analysis obtained from the 36 publications.

NoPublicationModalityScan SettingsLumen contrast (HU)SubjectReference ModalityPlaqueRef#
First AuthorYearBrandDetector rowsVoltage (kV)Collim. - width (mm)PopulationStudy DesignVessel TypeLipid-richFibrous
NMale (%)AgeNValueNValue
1Becker2003Siemens41200.52501145(34-87)Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology1547 + 916104 ± 28 [16]
2Brodoefel2008Siemens641200.6NA139265+7In-vivoCoronaryIVUSNA(-10-66)NA(67-153) [17]
3Carrascosa2003Philips41201NA30NANAIn-vivoCoronaryIVUS10575.73 + 44.314148.61 + 36.54 [18]
4Carrascosa2006Philips41201NA408052 (33-86)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS18871.5 + 32.145116.3 + 35.7 [19]
5Caussin2004Siemens16NANANA215258+13 (39-77)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS1212 + 38*463.8 + 18.9* [20]
6Chopard2010Philips641200.625NA21NANAEx-vivoCoronaryPathology2070 + 414283 + 35 [21]
7de Weert2005Siemens161400.750218164.7 (41-81)Ex-vivoCarotidPathology3545 + 212879 + 20 [22]
8de Weert2006Siemens161200.75~400154070.3 (62-84)In-vivoCarotidPathology3125 + 195388 + 18 [23]
9Estes1998Siemens1NA3150-300208074 (57-85)In-vivoCarotidPathologyNA39 + 12NA90 + 24 [10]
10Ferencik2006Siemens161200.7525066777+1Ex-vivoCoronaryOCT4129 + 4340101 + 21 [24]
11Galonska2008GE161200.625308306761.5+13.4Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology33(26-67) median: 4421(37-124) median: 67 [25]
12Hur2009Siemens641200.6NA397259 (45-74)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS1054 + 131182 + 17 [26]
13Iriart2007Siemens161200.75NA208553+12 (38-83)In-vivoCoronaryIVUSNA38 + 33NA94 + 44 [27]
14Jin2006Siemens16120NANA4955NAIn-vivoCarotidDUSNA6 + 28NA51 + 19 [28]
15Kim2009GE641200.625NA424866+9In-vivoCoronaryIVUS2852.9 + 24.64398.6 + 34.9 [29]
16Kitagawa2007GE641200.625~350217666+9In-vivoCoronaryIVUS2518 + 171367 + 21 [30]
17Kopp2001Siemens41201NA66760+8In-vivoCoronaryIVUS20.5 + 7.8*267 + 22.6* [11]
18Leber2004Siemens161200.75NA37NANAIn-vivoCoronaryIVUS6249 + 228791 + 22 [31]
19Leschka2010Siemens641200.6300257272+13 (38-85)Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology9140 + 17*4391 + 16 [32]
20Marwan2011Siemens641200.6NA407559+10 (52-85)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS1567 + 314096 + 40 [33]
21Motoyama2007Toshiba161350.5258+43 (174-384)378466+12In-vivoCoronaryIVUS1810.6 + 11.64078.1 + 20.8 [34]
22Nikolaou2004Siemens41200.52501765(38-86)Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology1645 + 162197 + 31 [36]
23Nikolaou2004Siemens41200.5242+281362(34-87)Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology1047 + 131187 + 29 [35]
24Pohle2007Siemens161200.75NA327259+8In-vivoCoronaryIVUS8458 + 4342121 + 34 [12]
25Qiu2006Philips64120-1400.625NA66777.5+9.3In-vivoCoronaryIVUS2-21.5 + 36.6485.3 + 14.3 [37]
26Sakakura2006Toshiba161350.5NA166963+12 (42-80)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS650.6 + 14.811131 + 21 [38]
27Schroeder2001Siemens41401NA158758+10 (44-71)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS1214 + 26591 + 21 [39]
28Schroeder2004Siemens41401182+3412NA63+17Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology642 + 22670 + 21 [41]
29Schroeder2004Siemens161200.75237+179NANAEx-vivoPoplitealPathology1351 + 20*18126 + 99 [40]
30Shen2010GE641200.6NA9158.264.78+9.19 (38-79)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS652.52 + 15.7136108.32 + 43.44 [42]
31Soeda2011Siemens641200.6NA1782.463.5+8.4In-vivoCoronaryOCT7828.9 + 30.64277.5 + 25.7 [43]
32Sun2008Toshiba64120-1350.5398+74266556In-vivoCoronaryIVUSNA79 + 34NA90 + 27 [13]
33Tanami2010GE32800.62501573.372+9Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology3920.5 + 6.53028.1 + 4.3 [44]
10021.8 + 7.327.8 + 4.7
12023.1 + 7.227.1 + 5
14023.9 + 7.227.3 + 5.1
34Wintermark2008GE161200.625NA810061 (55-69)In-vivoCarotidPathologyNA32.6 + 20NA46.4 + 19.9 [7]
35Wu2007GE161201.25NA307358 (43-75)In-vivoCoronaryIVUS1623 + 181969 + 21 [45]
36Xiao2007GE161200.625NA25NA(50-72)Ex-vivoCoronaryPathology1353 + 1210106 + 17 [46]
Toshiba641200.551 + 13110 + 19

Table 1. Characteristics of the included publications.

Notes:1. Values in the columns Lumen Contrast, Age, and Plaque Values are in means, with the range in brackets.
2. *: Values were self-calculated
3. NA: data were not available
Download CSV

HU-criteria were collected for lipid-rich plaques (synonyms used: soft, hypoechoic, lipid, lipid-rich, hypodense, or lipid-rich necrotic core) and for fibrous plaques (synonyms used: intermediate, hyperechoic, fibrous, fibrous-rich, or connective tissue), as has been characterized by each study based on each chosen reference modality. When only the raw or partial data were presented in the publications, the plaque value (mean + standard deviation [SD]) was calculated [11,20,32,40].

Systematic Analysis of Published HU-criteria

First, all published HU-criteria were pooled. Next, the correlation between published HU-criteria and the reported lumen contrast-enhancement was investigated. Finally, the published HU-criteria were pooled based on similarity of the studies concerning: 1) examination type (in-vivo or ex-vivo), 2) vessel type (coronary or other arteries), 3) CT-system brand, 4) detector-rows, 5) voltage-setting, and 6) collimation-width. Studies using a dual-source CT (DSCT) [26,32,33,43] were grouped with 64-row MDCT studies because of the similarity in number of detector-rows. For the remainder of this article, DSCT was regarded as equal to 64-row MDCT. Pooling was performed by the pooled statistics, using the following formulas:



  1. N. amount of plaques region of interests (ROIs), segments, or squares used to make the mean + SD
  2. k. number of studies included

Not all information to compute the pooled statistics was available in 8 studies. Contact information of corresponding authors was used to contact them in 7 of these studies. Of these, one author replied but was not able to provide the requested missing information. Only those studies providing all the necessary information for pooling (table 1) were included in each pooling calculation.

Hierarchical Classification

The analysis was extended by systematically classifying the HU-criteria by the following hierarchy: examination type, vessel type, CT-system brand, detector-rows, voltage-setting, and collimation width. Comparisons were made between criteria at the lowest tree branches. HU-criteria which were not significantly different were pooled.

Statistical Analysis

The correlation between the published HU-criteria and the reported lumen contrast-enhancement was analyzed using linear regression analysis and was expressed as the coefficient of determination (r2), ranging from 0 to 1 with r2 = 1 indicating perfect correlation. Significant differences between the pooled HU-criteria were determined using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test when more than 2 groups are compared or unpaired student’s t-test with unequal variances assumed when 2 groups are compared in Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., USA) at p value < 0.05.


Preliminary analysis on the 40 analyzed studies showed that:

  1. Sixteen were ex-vivo studies and 24 in-vivo studies;
  2. In 34 coronary arteries were studied and in 6 other arteries (i.e. carotid and popliteal arteries);
  3. Eleven studies were performed on General Electric (GE) CT-systems, 4 on Philips systems, 21 on Siemens systems, and 4 on Toshiba systems;
  4. One study was performed on a 1 detector-row CT-system, 8 on 4-row MDCT, 15 on a 16-row MDCT, 4 on a 32-row MDCT, and 12 on a 64-row MDCT;
  5. Two used the voltage setting <120 kV, 28 studies used 120kV, 6 studies used >120kV, and 2 studies used variable kV settings. In 2 studies, the kV setting was not reported;
  6. The collimation width applied in the CT-system in 7 studies was <0.6 mm, 17 studies applied 0.6-0.7 mm, 7 studies applied 0.7-0.8 mm, and 7 studies applied >0.8 mm collimation width In 2 studies, the collimation width was not reported.
  7. Thirty eight studies reported the plaque HU values in mean + SD format, 1 study reported plaque median HU value and the range, and 1 study only HU value range.
  8. Out of 20 in-vivo studies that examined the coronaries, 19 studies used intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS) and 1 study used optical coherence tomography (OCT) as plaque composition reference. Out of 4 in-vivo study that examined the carotid arteries, 3 used histopathology and 1 used Doppler ultrasound (DUS) as plaque composition reference.
  9. Out of 14 ex-vivo studies that examined coronaries, 13 studies used histopathology and 1 study used OCT as plaque composition reference. One ex-vivo study that examined carotid arteries and another that examined popliteal arteries used histopathology as plaque composition reference.

Systematic Analysis of Published HU-criteria

Pooling all published HU-criteria, the values for lipid-rich and fibrous plaques were: 47 + 29 HU and 86 + 29 HU, respectively. The published mean HU-criteria showed a low correlation with lumen contrast-enhancement, for lipid-rich (r2 = 0.0054 ; p > 0.05) and fibrous plaques (r2 = 0.0304; p < 0.05) (Figure 2).

Figure 2. HU criteria for lipid-rich and fibrous plaques versus the reported lumen contrast-enhancement.

Results of the pooled HU-criteria based on similar study characteristics are shown in Table 2. The HU-criteria in all study characteristic groups were significantly different, except the HU-criteria for fibrous plaque between coronary and other arteries. Comparison between HU-criteria within one group of study characteristics shows all were significantly different except 12 pair of HU-criteria (see table 2).

NpMean + st devSig. Diff.NpMean + st devSig. Diff.
TypeOther Arteries37938+209992+45

Table 2. Pooled HU-criteria.

Note:1. Ns: total amount of studies included in the pooling calculation. There were studies excluded because of incomplete data needed for pooling calculation or unclear characteristics needed for classification.
2. Np : total amount of plaques ROIs, segments, or squares of the studies of similar characteristic used to make the mean+st dev
3. All comparisons between groups’ HU-criteria within one type of characteristics were significantly different (p≤0.05) except the 12 pairs marked with the same symbols (*, †, ‡, §, ||, #, **, † †, ‡ ‡, § §, ||||, and # #).
Download CSV

Hierarchical classification of the published HU-criteria

Extending the analysis, a hierarchical classification of the published HU-criteria was performed, resulting in 27 distinct HU-criteria groupings (Figures 3 and 4). No further classification based on collimation-width was performed because the studies included in each of these 27 groups had the same collimation-width or did not provide the collimation-width information. The criteria at the lowest tree branches, which were not significantly different, were pooled (boxed groups in Figures 3 and 4), resulting in 21 and 22 distinct HU-criteria groupings for lipid-rich and fibrous plaques, respectively. Comparing the HU-criteria for lipid-rich plaque of each group to each other, 34% (52 out of 153 comparisons) were significantly different, of which 51.9% (27 out of 52 comparisons) were significantly different at p < 0.001 (Table 3). For fibrous plaque, 22.2% (38 out of 171 comparisons) of the HU-criteria were significantly different, of which 57.9% (22 out of 38 comparisons) were significantly different at p < 0.001 (Table 4). A visual representation of the hierarchically grouped HU-criteria along with their range (+/- 1 standard deviation) is given in Figure 5.

Figure 3. Hierarchical classification of HU-criteria for lipid-rich plaques.

Figure 4. Hierarchical classification of HU-criteria for fibrous plaques.


Table 3. Comparison of HU-criteria for lipid-rich plaque between hierarchical-classified groups.

Note:1. Significantly different at p < 0.001
2. Significantly Different at p <= 0.05
* Not significantly different
NA Comparison cannot be made due to lack of data, i.e. amount of plaque
Download CSV

Table 4. Comparison of HU-criteria for fibrous plaque between hierarchical-classified groups.

Note:1. Significantly different at p < 0.001
2. Significantly different at p <= 0.05
* Not significantly different
NA Comparison cannot be made due to lack of data, i.e. amount of plaque
Download CSV
Figure 5. The hierarchically grouped HU-criteria for lipid-rich and fibrous plaques along with their +/-1 standard deviation.

The blue and purple rounded-boxes bound the groups that give non-significant different HU-criteria and therefore pooled, for lipid-rich and fibrous plaque, respectively.


Plaque rupture has been identified as the most prevalent feature at sudden coronary death cases [9]. A thin fibrous cap (<65µm) and a relatively large lipid-rich content are associated to plaque’s vulnerability to rupture [47]. Also, plaques showing positive remodeling are reported to contain more lipid-rich components [48,49]. It has been suggested that MDCT should be able to measure plaque volume [50], to detect and measure positive remodeling [51] and to even follow the change of plaque characteristics after lipid-lowering therapy [52,53], using a simple HU-based approach. Patients having low attenuation value coronary plaques as detected by MDCT were shown to be at higher risk of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [54].

Direct use of HU-criteria to quantify lipid-rich plaque is not trivial as considerable variability exists in the reported HU values of lipid plaque. Over the years, CT technology has advanced rapidly from producing a thick slab image during a rather long scan time to producing submillimeter thin images in subsecond scan time, allowing for accurate coronary imaging. Due to its calibration, HU value of a material or a tissue should be equal irrespective of how or with which CT system it was acquired. However, it is advised to be extra cautious in applying absolute HU-criteria when characterizing plaques as CT attenuation values were found to differ in case of different reconstruction settings [14,55]. The present study identified 36 publications, published between 1998 and 2011, each giving HU-criteria for lipid-rich and fibrous plaque. Specific patterns were found when the HU-criteria were pooled according to the reporting studies’ characteristics. Both HU-criteria for lipid-rich and fibrous plaques were significantly lower for ex-vivo studies compared to in-vivo studies, presumably due to lack of movement during scanning. HU-criteria of coronary lipid-rich plaques were significantly higher than those of other arteries (carotid and popliteal arteries). This may be caused by more partial volume effect from the surrounding fibrous tissue and lumen contrast-enhancement due to smaller plaque size and more movement during scanning. The specific way in which each CT-vendor processes scan data may cause the significant differences in HU-criteria for different CT-systems. HU-criteria for lipid-rich plaques decreased as the number of detector-rows increased (except for low HU-value of the 32-detector rows group, which is explainable because the studies did not use contrast material in the experiment) and the lipid-rich HU-criteria from the largest collimation-widths are significantly higher than the rest. This might be explained by the fact that improvements in scanner technology with higher spatial resolution result in less partial volume effect, especially from the lumen contrast-enhancement. Materials’ x-ray attenuation values depend on the x-ray photon energy, a principle behind the material decomposition with dual energy CT [56]. Our results concurred with this fact by showing that the HU-criteria for both lipid-rich and fibrous plaques were significantly higher for studies using 120 kV voltage settings than those using higher voltage settings. The significantly lower HU-criteria for studies using lower than 120 kV voltage settings is caused by the fact that the scan was performed without lumen contrast-enhancement. Lumen contrast-enhancement is one of the most frequently identified influencing sources to the non-calcified plaques’ HU value [15,5760]. However, no direct correlation between the reported lumen contrast-enhancements and plaque HU-criteria were found in this study result. Besides by the different characteristics of the reporting studies, this lack of association may also be explained by one aspect of the measurement, i.e. the distance of the measurement ROI from the lumen border, which has been reported to affect plaque HU values [15]. Unfortunately, none of the analyzed publications reported this particular information on ROI placement which prohibits further analysis. Potential differences in patient characteristics or in tube current were not analyzed. Patient characteristics may influence the composition of plaque [47,61]. However, it should not have affected the HU value of the plaque as such. The tube current will mainly affect image quality and not the HU value of the plaque.

The investigated HU-criteria in this study were of the lipid-rich and fibrous plaque. However, more complex division of tissues is attributed to non-calcified plaque. The American Heart Association (AHA) has classified the atherosclerotic plaque into 6 types according to its composition, progression, and complexity [62,63]. In several of the included CT studies, non-calcified plaque has been characterized according to the AHA classification [32,35,36,40]. One study managed to characterize one other type of tissue, i.e. hemorrhage, on carotid atherosclerotic plaques [7]. However, due to the limitation of CT in spatial resolution to characterize each individual plaque component, most of the studies characterize non-calcified plaque into two categories only: low and high attenuation value, of which the previous attributed to lipid-rich plaque and the latter to fibrous plaque. Even then, the HU-criteria of lipid-rich and fibrous plaque still overlap largely. Some of the included studies proposed a HU-threshold or -range to characterize different plaque components [7,17,19,22,23,25,29,30,34,39,42]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine some threshold, showing promising accuracies (sensitivity ranged from 82% to 92%) [19,25,29,30,42].

An HU-based plaque characterization approach was used to quantify non-calcified plaques in patients in a number of studies. Some studies applied the HU-criteria published by their own group and thus with exact study characteristics match [54,64,65]; while another group applying HU-criteria of group other than theirs but with matching study characteristics [66]. However, sometimes, HU-criteria coming from studies with different characteristics than their own were applied, ranging from small differences, e.g. the generation of the CT-system used [67], to larger differences, e.g. the brand and detector-rows [53,68]; the brand and vessel type [69]. The original studies that published the HU-criteria and test them have shown promising accuracies. This is presumably caused by the fact that the used HU-criteria match the study characteristics exactly. As has been shown in the present study, HU-criteria for non-calcified plaque derived from studies with different study characteristics may be significantly different. This could result in considerably different measurements of non-calcified plaque components. Since obtaining the correct amount of lipid-rich plaques is of importance in determining the extent of vulnerable plaque [9], it is theoretically preferable to characterize plaques using criteria which match one’s specific study characteristics.

Some reviews exist on non-calcified plaque characterization by CT [70,71]. We managed to extend the discussion by systematically investigating the published HU-criteria based on specific characteristics of each study. By hierarchically grouping the HU-criteria based on the study characteristics, the effect of each characteristic was separately analyzed. As a result, 21 and 22 distinct HU-criteria were obtained from lipid-rich and fibrous plaque, respectively. Two post-mortem studies with histopathological correlation and an in-vitro validation study without reference standard reported non-significant differences in HU-criteria when using different CT-system brands [46] and voltage-settings [44,46,72]. In our study, some of the pooled and grouped HU-criteria comparisons were also not significantly different, but a significant portion of the comparisons were, indicating that specific HU-criteria correspond to specific characteristics of each study. This warrants a careful selection of the HU-criteria, should non-calcified plaque characterization be desired. Therefore, the proposed hierarchical diagram may be consulted for using the HU-criteria in clinical practice (Figures 3 and 4). The most suitable HU-criteria for lipid and fibrous plaque for a specific clinical situation can be traced, e.g. when an in-vivo examination of coronary plaque should be done on a Siemens 64-row MDCT at 120 kV, the HU-criteria of group 9 in the diagram should be used.

A limitation of our study is that the provided HU-criteria hierarchical diagram is not 100% complete as not every combination of characteristics is currently available in literature. Moreover, with the advent of more advanced CT-systems, such as the 320-MDCT and 0.23 mm spatial resolution, new HU-criteria can emerge. Not every HU-criterion presented in the diagram has the same accuracy due to unequal number of supporting studies or samples and therefore, clinical application still leaves room for improvements. Several limitations can be traced into possible biases in the included study. First, since all the included studies are published, publication bias cannot be ruled out. Most of the included studies are on English, but no language preference is set for the selection criteria. The number of data in each included studies varies considerably. In fact, several studies have a very small number of data that we can suspect also the possibility of small sample bias. However, for the sake of completeness of the diagram, the results from those small sample studies are included in the diagram. The hierarchical diagram is aimed to provide a guidance to seek the most suitable HU-criteria for the local settings. The number of the studies and their analyzed samples are reported also in the diagram. This information should warn the user of the diagram on the potential bias it contains. Further research should provide more input for the proposed diagrams involving phantoms or arterial specimens with known plaque compositions scanned using multiple CT-systems at different settings and a clinical validation to establish a clinically useful guide with which HU-criteria can be applied per study set-up.


Criteria to characterize non-calcified plaques based on CT attenuation value are non-uniform, due to differences in examination type, vessels of interest, and CT scanning. Therefore, generalized values are unreliable for clinical use. The proposed hierarchical classification can be used to determine reference CT attenuation value values of lipid-rich and fibrous plaques for the local setting.

Supporting Information


The authors acknowledge the contribution of Xie Xueqian and Zhao Yingru in translating publications from Chinese; and Estelle Noach for providing extensive remarks on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WK PvO MJ. Performed the experiments: WK. Analyzed the data: WK PvO MJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WK MJ. Wrote the manuscript: WK PvO MJ RV MO.


  1. 1. Taylor A, Cerqueira M, Hodgson J, Mark D, Min J et al. (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4:407: e1-e33.
  2. 2. Korosoglou G, Mueller D, Lehrke S, Steen H, Hosch W et al. (2010) Quantitative assessment of stenosis severity and atherosclerotic plaque composition using 256-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 20: 1841-1850. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1753-3. PubMed: 20306078.
  3. 3. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Sirol M et al. (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 672-677. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.058. PubMed: 16458154.
  4. 4. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J et al. (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 28: 2354-2360. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm294. PubMed: 17644815.
  5. 5. Miralles M, Merino J, Busto M, Perich X, Barranco C et al. (2006) Quantification and characterization of carotid calcium with multi-detector CT-angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32: 561-567. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.02.019. PubMed: 16979917.
  6. 6. Oudkerk M, Stillman AE, Halliburton SS, Kalender WA, Möhlenkamp S et al. (2008) Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24: 645-671. doi:10.1007/s10554-008-9319-z. PubMed: 18504647.
  7. 7. Wintermark M, Jawadi SS, Rapp JH, Tihan T, Tong E et al. (2008) High-resolution CT imaging of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 875-882. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0950. PubMed: 18272562.
  8. 8. Gao T, Zhang Z, Yu W, Zhang Z, Wang Y (2009) Atherosclerotic carotid vulnerable plaque and subsequent stroke: a high-resolution MRI study. Cerebrovasc Dis 27: 345-352. doi:10.1159/000202011. PubMed: 19218800.
  9. 9. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD (2006) Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 13-18. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.065.
  10. 10. Estes JM, Quist WC, Lo GFW, Costello P (1998) Noninvasive characterization of plaque morphology using helical computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Surg 39: 527-534. PubMed: 9833706.
  11. 11. Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Baumbach A, Kuettner A, Georg C et al. (2001) Non-invasive characterisation of coronary lesion morphology and composition by multislice CT: first results in comparison with intracoronary ultrasound. Eur Radiol 11: 1607-1611. doi:10.1007/s003300100850. PubMed: 11511879.
  12. 12. Pohle K, Achenbach S, MacNeill B, Ropers D, Ferencik M et al. (2007) Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: Comparison to IVUS. Atherosclerosis 190: 174-180. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.01.013. PubMed: 16494883.
  13. 13. Sun J, Zhang Z, Lu B, Yu W, Yang Y et al. (2008) Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190: 748-754. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2763. PubMed: 18287448.
  14. 14. Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Runza G, Palumbo A, Maffei E et al. (2007) Influence of convolution filtering on coronary plaque attenuation values: observations in an ex vivo model of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 17: 1842-1849. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0548-z. PubMed: 17245583.
  15. 15. Suzuki S, Furui S, Kuwahara S, Kaminaga T, Yamauchi T et al. (2006) Accuracy of attenuation measurement of vascular wall in vitro on computed tomography angiography: Effect of wall thickness, density of contrast medium, and measurement point. Invest Radiol 41: 510-515. doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000209662.24569.c7. PubMed: 16763469.
  16. 16. Becker CR, Nikolaou K, Muders M, Babaryka G, Crispin A et al. (2003) Ex vivo coronary atherosclerotic plaque characterization with multi-detector-row CT. Eur Radiol 13: 2094-2098. doi:10.1007/s00330-003-1889-5. PubMed: 12692681.
  17. 17. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Heuschmid M, Tsiflikas I, Kopp AF et al. (2008) Characterization of coronary atherosclerosis by dual-source computed tomography and HU-based color mapping: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 18: 2466-2474. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1019-5. PubMed: 18491107.
  18. 18. Carrascosa PM, Capuñay CM, Parodi JC, Padilla LT, Johnson P et al. (2003) General utilities of multislice tomography in the cardiac field. Herz 28: 44-51. doi:10.1007/s00059-003-2443-6. PubMed: 12616320.
  19. 19. Carrascosa PM, Capuñay CM, Garcia-Merletti P, Carrascosa J, Garcia MJ (2006) Characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques by multidetector computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 97: 598-602. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.096. PubMed: 16490420.
  20. 20. Caussin C, Ohanessian A, Ghostine S, Jacq L, Lancelin B et al. (2004) Characterization of vulnerable nonstenotic plaque with 16-slice computed tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 94: 99-104. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.03.036. PubMed: 15219516.
  21. 21. Chopard R, Boussel L, Motreff P, Rioufol G, Tabib A et al. (2010) How reliable are 40 MHz IVUS and 64-slice MDCT in characterizing coronary plaque composition? An ex vivo study with histopathological comparison. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26: 373-383. doi:10.1007/s10554-009-9562-y. PubMed: 20052618.
  22. 22. de Weert TT, Ouhlous M, Zondervan PE, Hendriks JM, Dippel DWJ et al. (2005) In vitro characterization of atherosclerotic carotid plaque with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 15: 1906-1914. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2712-2. PubMed: 15806368.
  23. 23. de Weert TT, Ouhlous M, Meijering E, Zondervan PE, Hendriks JM et al. (2006) In vivo characterization and quantification of atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26: 2366-2372. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000240518.90124.57. PubMed: 16902158.
  24. 24. Ferencik M, Chan RC, Achenbach S, Lisauskas JB, Houser SL et al. (2006) Arterial wall imaging: evaluation with 16-section multidetector CT in blood vessel phantoms and ex vivo coronary arteries. Radiology 240: 708-716. doi:10.1148/radiol.2403051204. PubMed: 16857982.
  25. 25. Galonska M, Ducke F, Kertesz-Zborilova T, Meyer R, Guski H et al. (2008) Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques in human coronary arteries with 16-slice multidetector row computed tomography by analysis of attenuation profiles. Acad Radiol 15: 222-230. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.09.007. PubMed: 18206621.
  26. 26. Hur J, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Nam JE, Choe KO et al. (2009) Quantification and Characterization of Obstructive Coronary Plaques Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33: 186–192. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31817c420f. PubMed: 19346843.
  27. 27. Iriart X, Brunot S, Coste P, Montaudon M, Dos-Santos P et al. (2007) Early characterization of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multidetector computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Radiol 17: 2581-2588. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0665-3. PubMed: 17549491.
  28. 28. Jin S, Cui SM, Tian C, Yan SX, Gao M et al. (2006) Study on 16-section spiral CT angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis and comparison with imaging diagnosis. Chin J ContemP Neurol Neurosurg 6: 398-403.
  29. 29. Kim SY, Kim KS, Lee YS, Lee JB, Ryu JK et al. (2009) Assessment of Non-Calcified Coronary Plaques Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound. Korean Circ J 39: 95-99. doi:10.4070/kcj.2009.39.3.95. PubMed: 19949594.
  30. 30. Kitagawa T, Yamamoto H, Ohhashi N, Okimoto T, Horiguchi J et al. (2007) Comprehensive evaluation of noncalcified coronary plaque characteristics detected using 64-slice computed tomography in patients with proven or suspected coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 154: 1191-1198. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.020. PubMed: 18035094.
  31. 31. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, Becker C, von Ziegler F et al. (2004) Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques A comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1241-1247. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.059. PubMed: 15063437.
  32. 32. Leschka S, Seitun S, Dettmer M, Baumüller S, Stolzmann P et al. (2010) Ex vivo evaluation of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: characterization with dual-source CT in comparison with histopathology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4: 301-308. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.05.016. PubMed: 20947041.
  33. 33. Marwan M, Taher MA, El Meniawy K, Awadallah H, Pflederer T et al. (2011) In vivo CT detection of lipid-rich coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques using quantitative histogram analysis: A head to head comparison with IVUS. Atherosclerosis 215: 110-115. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.12.006. PubMed: 21227419.
  34. 34. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Anno H, Sugiura A, Ito Y et al. (2007) Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization by 0.5-mm-Slice Multislice Computed Tomographic Imaging: Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound. Circ J 71: 363-366. doi:10.1253/circj.71.363. PubMed: 17322636.
  35. 35. Nikolaou K, Becker CR, Muders M, Babaryka G, Scheidler J et al. (2004) Multidetector-row computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic lesions in human ex vivo coronary arteries. Atherosclerosis 174: 243-252. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.01.041. PubMed: 15136054.
  36. 36. Nikolaou K, Becker CR, Wintersperger BJ, Rist C, Trumm C et al. (2004) Evaluierung der Mehrzeilendetektorcomputertomographie zur Darstellung der koronaren Atherosklerose. Radiologe 44: 130-139. doi:10.1007/s00117-003-1004-6. PubMed: 14991131.
  37. 37. Qiu JX, Wang JC, Sun XW, Gao L, Qin NS et al. (2006) Detection of coronary atherosclerosis by 64-slice spiral CT: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 22: 1456-1459.
  38. 38. Sakakura K, Yasu T, Kobayashi Y, Katayama T, Sugawara Y et al. (2006) Noninvasive tissue characterization of coronary arterial plaque by 16-slice computed tomography in acute coronary syndrome. Angiology 57: 155-160. doi:10.1177/000331970605700204. PubMed: 16518522.
  39. 39. Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A, Meisner C, Kuettner A et al. (2001) Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 1430-1435. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01115-9. PubMed: 11300457.
  40. 40. Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Wojak T, Janzen J, Heuschmid M et al. (2004) Non-invasive evaluation of atherosclerosis with contrast enhanced 16 slice spiral computed tomography: results of ex vivo investigations. Heart 90: 1471-1475. doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.037861. PubMed: 15547032.
  41. 41. Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Leitritz M, Janzen J, Kopp AF et al. (2004) Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: a comparison with histology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28: 449-454. doi:10.1097/00004728-200407000-00003. PubMed: 15232374.
  42. 42. Shen Y, Qian JY, Wang MH, Liu Y, Liu XB et al. (2010) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of non-obstructive left main coronary artery plaques using 64-multislice computed tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound. Chin Med J (Engl) 123: 827-833. PubMed: 20497672.
  43. 43. Soeda T, Uemura S, Morikawa Y, Ishigami K, Okayama S et al. (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: Comparison with intravascular optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiol 148:313-318.
  44. 44. Tanami Y, Ikeda E, Jinzaki M, Satoh K, Nishiwaki Y et al. (2010) Computed tomographic attenuation value of coronary atherosclerotic plaques with different tube voltage: an ex vivo study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34: 58-63. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181b66c41. PubMed: 20118723.
  45. 45. Wu WH, Lu B, Jiang SL, Lu JG, Qiao SB et al. (2007) Noninvasive detection and evaluation of coronary atheroselerotic plaques with multi-slice spiral CT: A comparative study with intravascular ultrasonograhy. Chin J Radiol 41: 1027-1031.
  46. 46. Xiao XG, Xie DX, Shen BZ, Han X, Li AY et al. (2007) Value of multi-slice computed tomography in diagnosis of coronary plaque characterization. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 87: 3247-3250. PubMed: 18396617.
  47. 47. Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom GT, Liang YH, Smialek J et al. (1997) Coronary risk factors and plaque morphology in men with coronary disease who died suddenly. N Engl J Med 336: 1276-1282. doi:10.1056/NEJM199705013361802. PubMed: 9113930.
  48. 48. Schmid M, Pflederer T, Jang IK, Ropers D, Sei K et al. (2008) Relationship between degree of remodeling and CT attenuation of plaque in coronary atherosclerotic lesions: An in-vivo analysis by multi-detector computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 197: 457-464. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.07.003. PubMed: 17727859.
  49. 49. Varnava AM, Mills PG, Davies MJ (2002) Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 105: 939-943. doi:10.1161/hc0802.104327. PubMed: 11864922.
  50. 50. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Heuschmid M, Reimann A, Khosa F et al. (2009) Accuracy of dual-source CT in the characterization of non-calcified plaque: use of a colour-coded analysis compared with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Br J Radiol.
  51. 51. Schoenhagen P, Murat Tuzcu E, Stillman AE, Moliterno DJ, Halliburton SS et al. (2003) Non-invasive assessment of plaque morphology and remodeling in mildly stenotic coronary segments: comparison of 16-slice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound. Coron Artery Dis 14: 459-462. doi:10.1097/00019501-200309000-00007. PubMed: 12966267.
  52. 52. Sato Y, Inoue F, Yoshimura A, Fukui T, Imazeki T et al. (2003) Regression of an atherosclerotic coronary artery plaque demonstrated by multislice spiral computed tomography in a patient with stable angina pectoris. Heart Vessels 18: 224-226. doi:10.1007/s00380-003-0712-1. PubMed: 14520493.
  53. 53. Kunita E, Fujii T, Urabe Y, Tsujiyama S, Maeda K et al. (2009) Coronary plaque stabilization followed by Color Code Plaque analysis with 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography. Circ J 73: 772-775. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0333. PubMed: 19075520.
  54. 54. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K et al. (2009) Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 49-57. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068. PubMed: 19555840.
  55. 55. Achenbach S, Boehmer K, Pflederer T, Ropers D, Seltmann M et al. (2010) Influence of Slice Thickness and Reconstruction Kernel on the CT Attenuation of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 4: 110-115. doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.01.013. PubMed: 20430341.
  56. 56. Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H et al. (2007) Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 17: 1510-1517. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0517-6. PubMed: 17151859.
  57. 57. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, Bruining N, Hamers R et al. (2005) Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol 15: 1426-1431. doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2697-x. PubMed: 15750815.
  58. 58. Fei X, Du X, Yang Q, Shen Y, Li P et al. (2008) 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography: Phantom Study of Effects of Vascular Attenuation on Detection of Coronary Stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191: 43-49. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2653. PubMed: 18562723.
  59. 59. Halliburton SS, Schoenhagen P, Nair A, Stillman A, Lieber M et al. (2006) Contrast enhancement of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: a high-resolution, multidetector-row computed tomography study of pressure-perfused, human ex-vivo coronary arteries. Coron Artery Dis 17: 553-560. doi:10.1097/00019501-200609000-00009. PubMed: 16905968.
  60. 60. Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Shen Y, Althoff CE et al. (2007) Soft and intermediate plaques in coronary arteries: how accurately can we measure CT attenuation using 64-MDCT? AJR Am J Roentgenol 189: 981-988. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2296. PubMed: 17885074.
  61. 61. Kitagawa T, Yamamoto H, Horiguchi J, Ohhashi N, Tadehara F et al. (2009) Characterization of noncalcified coronary plaques and identification of culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome by 64-slices computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2: 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.09.015.
  62. 62. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W Jr. et al. (1994) A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 89: 2462-2478. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.89.5.2462. PubMed: 8181179.
  63. 63. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S et al. (1995) A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation 92: 1355-1374. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.92.5.1355. PubMed: 7648691.
  64. 64. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, Sugiura A, Harigaya H et al. (2007) Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 319-326. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.044. PubMed: 17659199.
  65. 65. Rozie S, de Weert TT, De Monyé C, Homburg PJ, Tanghe HLJ et al. (2009) Atherosclerotic plaque volume and composition in symptomatic carotid arteries assessed with multidetector CT angiography; relationship with severity of stenosis and cardiovascular risk factors. Eur Radiol 19: 2294-2301. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1394-6. PubMed: 19384548.
  66. 66. Kinohira Y, Akutsu Y, Li HL, Hamazaki Y, Sakurai M et al. (2007) Coronary Arterial Plaque Characterized by Multislice Computed Tomography Predicts Complications Following Coronary Intervention. Int Heart J 48: 25-33. doi:10.1536/ihj.48.25. PubMed: 17379976.
  67. 67. Gaudio C, Mirabelli F, Pelliccia F, Francone M, Tanzilli G et al. (2009) Early detection of coronary artery disease by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in asymptomatic hypertensive high-risk patients. Int J Cardiol 135: 280-286. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.091. PubMed: 18614251.
  68. 68. Hammer-Hansen S, Kofoed KF, Kelbæk H, Kristensen T, Kühl JT et al. (2009) Volumetric evaluation of coronary plaque in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction or stable angina pectoris--a multislice computerized tomography study. Am Heart J 157: 481-487. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.10.011. PubMed: 19249418.
  69. 69. Saba L, Montisci R, Sanfilippo R, Mallarini G (2009) Multidetector row CT of the brain and carotid artery: a correlative analysis. Clin Radiol 64: 767-778. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.03.009. PubMed: 19589415.
  70. 70. Foster G, Shah H, Sarraf G, Ahmadi N, Budoff M (2009) Detection of noncalcified and mixed plaque by multirow detector computed tomography. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 7: 57-64. doi:10.1586/14779072.7.1.57. PubMed: 19105767.
  71. 71. Springer I, Dewey M (2009) Comparison of multislice computed tomography with intravascular ultrasound for detection and characterization of coronary artery plaques: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol 71: 275-282. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.04.035. PubMed: 18586427.
  72. 72. Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Yamamoto H, Shen Y et al. (2011) In vitro measurement of CT density and estimation of stenosis related to coronary soft plaque at 100kV and 120kV on ECG-triggered scan. Eur J Radiol 77: 294-298. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.002. PubMed: 19716249.