Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Calling in the Cold: Pervasive Acoustic Presence of Humpback Whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in Antarctic Coastal Waters

Calling in the Cold: Pervasive Acoustic Presence of Humpback Whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in Antarctic Coastal Waters

  • Ilse Van Opzeeland, 
  • Sofie Van Parijs, 
  • Lars Kindermann, 
  • Elke Burkhardt, 
  • Olaf Boebel
PLOS
x
  • Published: September 6, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073007

Abstract

Humpback whales migrate between relatively unproductive tropical or temperate breeding grounds and productive high latitude feeding areas. However, not all individuals of a population undertake the annual migration to the breeding grounds; instead some are thought to remain on the feeding grounds year-round, presumably to avoid the energetic demands of migration. In the Southern Hemisphere, ice and inclement weather conditions restrict investigations of humpback whale presence on feeding grounds as well as the extent of their southern range. Two years of near-continuous recordings from the PerenniAL Acoustic Observatory in the Antarctic Ocean (PALAOA, Ekström Iceshelf, 70°31’S, 8°13’W) are used to explore the acoustic presence of humpback whales in an Antarctic coastal area. Humpback whale calls were present during nine and eleven months of 2008 and 2009, respectively. In 2008, calls were present in January through April, June through August, November and December, whereas in 2009, calls were present throughout the year, except in September. Calls occurred in un-patterned sequences, representing non-song sound production. Typically, calls occurred in bouts, ranging from 2 to 42 consecutive days with February, March and April having the highest daily occurrence of calls in 2008. In 2009, February, March, April and May had the highest daily occurrence of calls. Whales were estimated to be within a 100 km radius off PALAOA. Calls were also present during austral winter when ice cover within this radius was >90%. These results demonstrate that coastal areas near the Antarctic continent are likely of greater importance to humpback whales than previously assumed, presumably providing food resources year-round and open water in winter where animals can breathe.

Introduction

Baleen whales undertake annual migrations between tropical or temperate wintering areas where breeding takes place, and high latitude feeding grounds in summer [1]. In contrast to migrations undertaken by terrestrial species, which are primarily driven by nutritional resources at both locations [2], [3], baleen whales migrate between relatively unproductive breeding grounds and productive feeding areas. Corkeron and Conner [4] revisited several hypotheses as to why baleen whales undertake these long-distance migrations and concluded that the most likely hypotheses driving baleen whale migration are those related to calf growth and survival, i.e., the benefits of calm water and absence of major predators such as killer whales in the wintering areas. However, there is increasing evidence for baleen whale species, such as blue (Balaenoptera musculus), fin (B. physalus) and minke whales (B. acutorostrata), that not all individuals of a population undertake the annual migration and that part of the population is present on the feeding grounds during the winter [5], [6], [7], [8]. Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) have been shown to be present on the feeding grounds off the Alaskan coast year-round [9]. Brown et al., [10] found that the sex-ratio of humpback whales migrating from the feeding grounds in the Antarctic to the breeding areas near the east-Australian coast was highly skewed towards males, demonstrating that some females remain in the feeding area year-round. This study provides clear evidence to support that humpback whales are present on the feeding grounds in winter.

Based on mark-recapture and historic catch data, most humpback whale feeding grounds in the Southern Hemisphere are believed to be located around 60°S [11], [12]. However, this knowledge is primarily based on data collected off-shore during the austral summer and is limited in scope because of heavy ice conditions close to the continent as well as limited daylight and extensive ice cover in austral winter. Consequently, the extent of the southern range of humpback whale feeding areas is unknown. In the Northern Hemisphere, humpback whales show a strong affinity for coastal waters [13], which during the summer is thought to reflect the distribution of prey species [14]. Similarly, off the western Antarctic Peninsula, resource sites for humpback whales are mainly located in near-coastal areas [15], [16], raising the question as to whether humpback whales off the Antarctic mainland might feed close to the ice-shelf edge. During Antarctic winter, vast areas of the Southern Ocean are ice covered while coastal polynyas within the ice-shelf edge region provide small areas of open water where minke whales and beaked whales have been observed [6]. Humpback whales are thought to avoid entering ice-covered areas [16], leaving the question as to whether humpback whales remain on the Antarctic feeding grounds during winter unresolved.

Humpback whales are highly vocal and are known to produce sound on the breeding and feeding grounds as well as during migration [17], [18], [19]. Passive acoustic recording techniques therefore offer a suitable tool for monitoring humpback whale presence year-round in – from the human perspective – remote areas such as the Antarctic. In this study we investigate the year-round acoustic presence of humpback whales close to the ice-shelf edge using two years of continuous passive acoustic recordings obtained by the autonomous PerenniAL Acoustic Observatory in the Antarctic Ocean (PALAOA).

Methods

Acoustic Recordings

The PerenniAL Acoustic Observatory in the Antarctic Ocean (PALAOA) is located at 70°31′S, 8°13′W on the Eckström Iceshelf, eastern Weddell Sea coast, Antarctica (Fig. 1). For this study we used recordings from 2008 [20] and 2009 [21] made with a RESON TC4032 hydrophone deployed at 170 m depth underneath the 100 m thick floating Antarctic ice shelf through a bore-hole. Distance to the ice shelf edge is ~1 km and water depth around 250 m [22]. Signals were digitized at 48 kHz/16 bit, encoded to a 192 kBit MP3 stream and stored as a sequence of time-stamped files. The effective bandwidth of the PALAOA recordings is 10 Hz to 15 kHz, the dynamic range ~90 dB, with full scale set manually to values between 138 and 150 dBFS re 1 µPa to avoid clipping in case of loud conditions. Full scale settings were logged for each file and accounted for in all calculations of sound pressure levels referred to hereinafter. PALAOA records continuously year-round, however occasional gaps occur due to power outages. For 2008 and 2009, recordings covered 72% and 91% of the year, respectively.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Bathymetry map [53] showing the location of PALAOA (white star).

The location of the German Neumayer Station II is indicated by the black star. The white triangle indicates the location of a RAFOS sound source. Inset image: map of Antarctica showing the location of Neumayer Station (black star).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073007.g001

Automated Call Detection

Previous analyses showed that two predominant humpback whale vocalization types were present in the PALAOA recordings: moans and high calls [23]. Both vocalization types were positively assigned to humpback whales based on previous evidence [18], [19], [24]. Both moans and high calls were produced in un-patterned sequences, representing non-song sound production. High calls (Fig. 2, [23]) were too variable to be useful for our automated detection method and were not included in the analysis in this study. Moans are low frequency (fundamental frequency ~100 Hz, [24]) arch-shaped calls that are sufficiently stereotyped to allow for automated detection (Fig. 3a & b). Moans were automatically detected using the ‘data template detector’ in XBAT (Bioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, www.xbat.org, [25]). Detections are based on acoustic similarity between a specified template and the acoustic events in the recording, quantified through spectrogram cross-correlation. Detections were run with one template of the moan (duration 1.1 s, bandwidth 240 Hz, detection correlation threshold 0.42, spectrogram parameters used for template development: FFT size 4048 points, data window overlap 25%, window length = 1 (i.e., equal to the FFT size), window function = Hanning). All automated detections were visually and aurally reviewed and classified as false or true. Only verified detections were used to explore seasonal acoustic presence of humpback whales.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Spectrograms of two humpback whale high calls recorded by PALAOA.

Spectrogram a) shows a typical double call consisting of two roughly identical elements, whereas b) represents a high call type consisting of one single call element.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073007.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Spectrograms of humpback whale moans recorded by PALAOA.

Moans recorded: a) on 1 April 2008 representing a moan from austral fall, and b) on 6 July 2008, representing a moan from austral winter.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073007.g003

Ice Cover and Acoustic Ranging

To compare humpback whale acoustic presence to local ice cover, percentage open water was calculated using ENVISAT ice cover data with a 6.25×6.25 km resolution [26]. The radius of the area off PALAOA for which percentage open water was calculated was based on estimations of the approximate distance of calling humpback whales recorded by PALAOA. This distance was estimated by comparing the received levels at PALAOA of humpback whale moans with signals of an oceanographic RAFOS sound source with comparable acoustic propagation characteristics as humpback whale moans. The RAFOS sound source was located 177 km north of PALAOA (Fig. 1). From March 2008 to December 2010, the oceanographic sound source produced a 80 s frequency modulated sweep between 259 and 261 Hz at 180 dBrms re 1 µPa @ 1 m, comparable to the frequencies of humpback whale moans. RAFOS signals (N = 939) were received at levels of 70±7 dBrms re 1 µPa rms, resulting in direct empirical evidence of an almost spherical transmission loss law with TL = 20.9±1.3·log10(r). In further calculation, the ±7 dBrms standard deviation of received RAFOS levels was taken into account as the ±1.3 uncertainty in the transmission loss law. This relation was used to estimate the distances of moaning humpback whales (RL = 86±7 dBrms re 1 µPa rms; N = 9), assuming moan source levels SL = 175 dB0-p re 1 µPa @ 1 m [24]. Resulting distance estimates ranged between 2 and 78 km, including any variations resulting from the uncertainty in the transmission loss law.

Results

Seasonal Presence

For September 2008 and June 2009 acoustic data were collected on only 8 and 1 days, respectively, as PALAOA was offline due to energy shortage during that time. For 16 months recording coverage was >80%, for the remaining 6 months recordings covered ≥50%.

Humpback whale moans were present during 9 months of the year in 2008: January through April, June through August and November and December and 11 months in 2009 (no moans were detected in September; Fig. 4). Typically, moans occurred in bouts, ranging from 2 to 42 consecutive days. For both years, February, March and April had the highest daily occurrence of humpback moans. In May 2009, the daily occurrence of humpback whale moans reached a maximum, whereas in 2008 no calls were present in this month.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Monthly number of automatically detected and manually verified humpback whale moans for 2008 and 2009.

Note that the number of detections is shown on a log scale on the y-axis.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073007.g004

Ice Cover

Moans were estimated to be produced by humpback whales at a distance between 2 and 79 km from the observatory. Figure 5 shows the percentage ice cover for the area within a 100 km radius off PALAOA along with the days on which moans were detected (black triangles) and PALAOA recording status (black bar indicates the observatory was recording).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Presence of humpback whale moans in relation to percentage ice coverage off PALAOA.

The area graph shows the percentage of ice cover within a 100 km range off PALAOA. Red triangles indicate acoustic presence of humpback whales. Recording status of PALAOA is indicated by the black bar below the acoustic presence indicators (PALAOA is recording = black bar present).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073007.g005

Moans were present in both years from February when open water dominated the area around PALAOA (less than 10% ice cover) to the end of April when percentage of ice cover increased to more than 70%. Calls were furthermore detected in austral winter when percentage of ice cover on some days exceeded 90%. In 2008, calls were absent in September and October and detected again on 27 November, whereas in 2009, calls were absent throughout September until 22 October.

Discussion

Humpback Whale Feeding Grounds Near the Ice-shelf Edge

The presence of humpback whale vocalizations in the PALAOA recordings from austral summer suggests that humpback whale feeding grounds in IWC areas II and III extend further south than previously assumed [12,27, Fig. 6]. Tynan [28] proposed that humpback whale southbound migration and location of primary feeding areas is linked to the occurrence of predictably productive areas at the southern boundary of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. With the receding pack-ice in austral summer, whales migrate south of the southern boundary, following the productive marginal ice-edge zone, approaching the continent by February–March [28]. In contrast to more or less confined locations of humpback whale feeding areas as proposed by the IWC [12], Tynan’s [28] and our study suggest that feeding grounds in the Southern Hemisphere are more likely longitudinal regions through which the animals range in a southbound direction while foraging. Humpback whales are known to travel extensive distances on the feeding grounds as part of their foraging strategy [16]. The location of primary feeding areas might therefore not be static, but determined by the interplay of seasonal sea-ice retreat, primary productivity and krill (Euphausia superba) abundance. Preliminary analyses of PALAOA data from other years show similar patterns in the presence of humpback whale calls, suggesting that whales return to this area annually.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Seasonal humpback whale distribution between 20°W and 80°E.

Grey areas indicate regions where summer concentrations are thought to occur for the humpback whale breeding stocks within the Southeast Atlantic and Southwest Indian Oceans [12], [48]. White areas with black dots indicate the winter concentrations. The white star indicates the location of PALAOA. The light grey and the diagonally striped areas represent the larger summer and winter ranges, respectively, as suggested in this study. Figure adapted from P. Best [27]. Reprinted and adapted by permission of the publisher.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073007.g006

These observations emphasize the important niche that passive acoustic techniques fill as a method to year round collect data on marine mammal occurrence and behavior in areas such as many parts of the Southern Ocean where access by human observers is (seasonally) restricted.

Winter Presence

The results of our study show that Southern Hemisphere humpback whales are also present near the ice-shelf edge in the austral winter (Fig. 5). Brown et al., [10] suggested that females might avoid undertaking or completing the long-distance migration each year. Size rather than age is thought to be an important factor determining sexual maturity in humpback whale females [29] and it might therefore primarily be sexually or physically immature females that remain on the feeding grounds all year to maximize growth. These observations along with the relatively large number of Northern Hemisphere humpback whale populations in which individuals have been observed on the feeding grounds in winter [9], [30], [31], [32], [33], suggests that winter presence on the feeding grounds might be common to humpback whale populations in general, and possibly even a general characteristic of baleen whale migratory behavior [34].

The acoustic presence of humpback whales in the region off PALAOA in austral winter (June – August) implies that these whales overwinter in this area. Straley [9] found humpback whales present on Northern Hemisphere feeding grounds throughout winter, although no individual whales overwintered in the feeding area and whales were more likely to be irregular migrants departing late or arriving early on the feeding grounds. In our study, the extent of the Antarctic ice sheet in the mid-winter period with open water mainly occurring in coastal polynyas, is likely to periodically exclude large scale north- or southbound migration of whales. This suggests that whales present on the feeding grounds in winter are more or less confined to these areas until the sea-ice recedes in austral spring.

Presence in Ice-covered Areas

The acoustic presence of humpback whales in April and in austral winter when sea ice cover in the area around PALAOA is pervasive, contradicts previous suggestions that humpback whales avoid entering ice-covered areas [16], [35], [36]. Little is known about the presence of baleen whales in ice-covered areas, mainly because of the logistic difficulties of accessing these regions, particularly in the Antarctic. Nevertheless, observations of several studies suggest that the availability of polynyas, or areas with open water that reliably occur, rather than the ice itself restricts cetacean distribution [6], [37]. Sirovic et al., [34] used passive acoustic techniques and found blue whale calls present in spring when sea ice cover was still substantial. Minke whales are known to associate with pack ice in winter and autumn [6] and have been observed creating breathing holes in ice [38]. Large groups of various cetacean species were observed being ‘entrapped’ in pools surrounded by vast ice-covered areas in winter [39], [40], [41]. In the Antarctic, the presence of open water and the formation of polynyas are variable and depend on catabatic and westerly winds transporting ice in northern directions [42], whereas easterly winds parallel to the coast transport ice towards the Antarctic continent. Furthermore, the presence of icebergs can affect the formation and size of polynyas which often tend to form on the lee side of (stranded) icebergs or glacier tongues [43]. Variability in the presence and size of areas with open water resulting from ice movements might temporarily limit access to certain areas, possibly explaining the temporal patchiness in the occurrence of humpback whale moans within and between months. In addition, humpback whale movements are likely also affected by krill distribution. In winter, krill is known to prefer under-ice habitat to open water, concentrating near specific sea-ice features such as ridges and polynya borders for feeding and shelter [44]. Although we do not know if humpback whales forage in the area off PALAOA, the coastal polynya likely offers plentiful food supply to humpback whales in winter.

Conclusions

Our results show that humpback whales may be much more plastic in their migratory behavior than previously assumed, and that many aspects of their migration are still poorly understood [see also 45]. Acoustic recording techniques provide the possibility of monitoring acoustic presence year round and in areas that are (seasonally) difficult to access, but can also be used to gain insights to which breeding stock calling individuals belong [46], [47]. Sounds recorded by PALAOA are likely produced by animals from breeding stock B, off the west-coast of South-Africa, which are thought to migrate to feeding areas between 20°W and 20°E [48]. Several studies have recorded partial and full humpback whale song on feeding grounds [49], [50], [51], which - when compared to recordings from suspected breeding grounds - can provide evidence for stock-specific linkages between areas used for feeding and breeding. Although PALAOA did not record song, humpback whale social vocalizations are often used as units of seasonal song structures [19]. The moans recorded by PALAOA likely lack the required ‘acoustic specificity’, as calls similar to the moan have been recorded in many other areas as well [18], [19], [24]. The humpback whale high call repertoire in the PALAOA recordings, on the other hand, consists of several complexer call types [23] and appears to differ in composition between years (Van Opzeeland, unpublished data). Comparing these high calls to recordings from the various breeding grounds – if available on the appropriate temporal scales - might provide cues to identify to which stock the humpback whales that feed in the waters off PALAOA belong.

Improving the current knowledge on humpback whale migratory behavior is important given that incorrect assumptions on migratory behavior can significantly affect outcomes of population models and management decisions. This is of particular relevance for large baleen species such as humpback whales, which populations were so drastically reduced during the commercial whaling era.

Acknowledgments

We thank Rosa Wilm, Svenja Zakrzewski and Taryn Overton for assistance with acoustic analyses and Stephan Frickenhaus for statistical advice. The logistics department of the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, Reederei F. Laeisz GmbH, Rostock, Germany and FIELAX Services for Marine Science and Technology GmbH, Bremerhaven, Germany all played a crucial role in setting up and/or maintaining PALAOA. Special thanks to the 2008 and 2009 overwintering teams at Neumayer Station who helped maintain PALAOA.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: IVO SVP OB. Performed the experiments: IVO OB. Analyzed the data: IVO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EB LK. Wrote the paper: IVO SVP OB.

References

  1. 1. Kellogg R (1929) What is known of the migrations of some of the whalebone whales. Smithsonian Report 1928: 467–494.
  2. 2. Baker RR (1978) The evolutionary ecology of animal migration. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers Inc, 1024p.
  3. 3. Newton I (2008) The migration ecology of birds. London: Academic Press, 984p.
  4. 4. Corkeron PJ, Conner RC (1999) Why do baleen whales migrate? Marine Mammal Science 15: 1228–1245. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1999.tb00887.x
  5. 5. Mackintosh NA, Brown SG (1956) Preliminary estimates of the southern populations of the larger baleen whales. The Norwegian Whaling Gazette 9: 469–480.
  6. 6. Ribic CA, Ainley DG, Fraser WR (1991) Habitat selection by marine mammals in the marginal ice zone. Antarctic Science 3: 181–186. doi: 10.1017/s0954102091000214
  7. 7. Stafford KM, Mellinger DK, Moore SE, Fox CG (2007) Seasonal variability and detection range modeling of baleen whale calls in the Gulf of Alaska, 1999–2002. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122: 3378–3390. doi: 10.1121/1.2799905
  8. 8. Širovic A, Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM, Thiele D (2009) Blue and fin whale acoustic presence around Antartica during 2003 and 2004. Marine Mammal Science 25: 125–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00239.x
  9. 9. Straley JM (1990) Fall and winter occurrence of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in Southeastern Alaska. Report of the International Whaling Commission (special issue) 12: 319–323.
  10. 10. Brown MR, Corkeron PJ, Thale PT, Schultz KW, Bryden MM (1995) Evidence for a sex-segregated migration in the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 259: 229–234. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0034
  11. 11. Rayner GW (1940) Whale marking: progress and results to December 1939. Discovery Reports 19: 245–284.
  12. 12. International Whaling Commission (1998) Annex G - Report of the Sub-Committee on comprehensive assessment of southern Hemisphere humpback whales. Report of the International Whaling Commission 48: 170–182.
  13. 13. Stevick PT, Allen J, Bérubé M, Clapham PJ, Katona SK, et al. (2003) Segregation of migration by feeding ground origin in North Atlantic humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Journal of Zoology London 259: 231–237. doi: 10.1017/s0952836902003151
  14. 14. Piatt JF, Methven DA, Burger AE (1989) Baleen whales and their prey in a coastal environment. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 1523–1530. doi: 10.1139/z89-217
  15. 15. Nowacek DP, Friedlaender AS, Halpin PN, Hazen EL, Johnston DW, et al. (2011) Super-aggregations of krill and humpback whales in Wilhelmina Bay, Antarctic Peninsula. PLoS One 6: 1–5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019173
  16. 16. Dalla-Rosa L, Secchi ER, Maia YG, Zerbini AN, Heide-Jørgensen MP (2008) Movements of satellite-monitored humpback whales on their feeding ground along the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biology 31: 771–781. doi: 10.1007/s00300-008-0415-2
  17. 17. Payne R, McVay S (1971) Songs of humpback whales. Science 173: 585–597. doi: 10.1126/science.173.3997.585
  18. 18. D’Vincent CG, Nilson RM, Hanna RE (1985) Vocalization and coordinated feeding behavior of the humpback whale in Southeastern Alaska. Scientific Reports of the Whales Research Institute, Tokyo 36: 41–47.
  19. 19. Dunlop RA, Noad MJ (2007) The social vocalization repertoire of east Australian migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122: 2893–2905. doi: 10.1121/1.2783115
  20. 20. Kindermann L (2012) Acoustic records of the underwater soundscape at PALAOA in 2008 with links to audio stream files. Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.774290.
  21. 21. Kindermann L (2012) Acoustic records of the underwater soundscape at PALAOA in 2009 with links to audio stream files. Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.774878.
  22. 22. Boebel O, Kindermann L, Klinck H, Bornemann H, Plötz J, et al. (2006) Real-time underwater sounds from the Southern Ocean. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Union 87: 361–362. doi: 10.1029/2006eo360002
  23. 23. Van Opzeeland IC (2010) Acoustic ecology of marine mammals in polar oceans. PhD dissertation, University of Bremen, Germany. Reports on Polar and Marine Research 619: 332p.
  24. 24. Thompson PO, Cummings WC, Ha SJ (1986) Sounds, source levels, and associated behavior of humpback whales, Southeast Alaska. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80: 735–740. doi: 10.1121/1.393947
  25. 25. Figueroa H (2012) XBAT: eXtensible Bioacoustics Tool. Available from http://www.xbat.org.
  26. 26. Spreen G, Kaleschke L, Heygster G (2008) Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89 GHz channels. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: C02S03. doi: 10.1029/2005jc003384
  27. 27. Best PB (2007) Whales and dolphins of the Southern African Subregion. Cape Town: Cambridge University Press, 352p.
  28. 28. Tynan CT (1998) Ecological importance of the Southern Boundary of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Nature 392: 708–710.
  29. 29. Lockyer C (1984) Review of baleen whale reproduction and implications for management. Report of the International Whaling Commission (special issue) 6: 27–50.
  30. 30. Ingebrigtsen A (1929) Whales caught in the North Atlantic and other seas. Report of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea 56: 3–26.
  31. 31. Williamson GR (1961) Winter sighting of a humpback suckling its calf on the Grand Bank of Newfoundland. Norwegian Whaling Gazette 8: 335–341.
  32. 32. Clapham PJ, Baraff LS, Carlson CA, Christian MA, Mattila DK, et al. (1993) Seasonal occurrence and annual return of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, in the southern Gulf of Maine. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 440–443. doi: 10.1139/z93-063
  33. 33. Swingle WM, Barco SG, Pitchford TD, McLellan WA, Pabst DA (1993) Appearance of juvenile humpback whales feeding in the nearshore waters of Virginia. Marine Mammal Science 9: 309–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1993.tb00458.x
  34. 34. Širovic A, Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM, McDonald MA, Moore SE, et al. (2004) Seasonality of blue and fin whale calls and the influence of sea ice in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep-Sea Research II 51: 2327–2344. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.08.005
  35. 35. Thiele D, Chester ET, Moore SE, Širovic A, Hildebrand JA, et al. (2004) Seasonal variability in whale encounters in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep-Sea Research II 51: 2311–2325. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.07.007
  36. 36. Dawbin WH (1997) Temporal segregation of humpback whales during migration in Southern Hemisphere waters. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 42: 105–138.
  37. 37. Gill PC, Thiele D (1997) A winter sighting of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Antarctic sea-ice. Polar Biology 17: 401–404. doi: 10.1007/s003000050134
  38. 38. Scheidat M, Bornemann H, Burkhardt E, Flores H, Friedlaender A, et al.. (2008) Antarctic sea ice habitat and minke whales. Annual Science Conference in Halifax, Canada, 22–26 September 2008.
  39. 39. Porsild MP (1918) ‘Savsatts’, a crowding of Arctic animals at holes in the sea-ice. Geographical Reviews 6: 215. doi: 10.2307/207815
  40. 40. Taylor RJF (1957) An unusual record of three species of whale being restricted to pools in the Antarctic sea ice. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 129: 325–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1957.tb00297.x
  41. 41. Freeman MMR (1968) Winter observations on beluga (Delphinaterus leucas) in Jones Sound NWT. Canadian Field Naturalist 82: 276–286.
  42. 42. Wendler G, Gilmore D, Curtis J (1997) On the formation of coastal polynyas in the area of Commonwealth Bay, East Antarctica. Atmospheric Research 45: 55–75. doi: 10.1016/s0169-8095(97)00024-0
  43. 43. Massom RA, Hill KL, Lytle VI, Worby AP, Paget MJ, et al. (2001) Effects of regional fast-ice and icerberg distributions on the behaviour of the Mertz Glacier polynya, East Antarctica. Annals of Glaciology 33: 391–398. doi: 10.3189/172756401781818518
  44. 44. Marschall HP (1988) The overwintering strategy of Antarctic krill under the pack-ice of the Weddell Sea. Polar Biology 9: 129–135. doi: 10.1007/bf00442041
  45. 45. Valsecchi E, Corkeron PJ, Galli P, Sherwin W, Bertorelle G (2010) Genetic evidence for sex-specific migratory behaviour in western South Pacific humpback whales. Marine Ecology Progress Series 398: 275–286. doi: 10.3354/meps08280
  46. 46. Darling JD, Sousa-Lima RS (2005) Songs indicate interaction between humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations in the western and the eastern South Atlantic Ocean. Marine Mammal Science 21: 557–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2005.tb01249.x
  47. 47. Dunlop RA, Cato DH, Noad MJ (2008) Non-song acoustic communication in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). Marine Mammal Science 24: 613–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2008.00208.x
  48. 48. Rosenbaum HC, Pomilla C, Mendez M, Leslie MS, Best PB, et al. (2009) Population structure of humpback whales from their breeding grounds in the South Atlantic and Indian Oceans. Public Library of Science 4: 1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007318
  49. 49. Vu ET, Risch D, Clark CW, Gaylord S, Hatch LT, et al. (2012) Humpback whale song occurs extensively on feeding grounds in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Aquatic Biology 14: 175–183. doi: 10.3354/ab00390
  50. 50. Stimpert AK, Peavey LE, Friedlaender AS, Nowacek DP (2012) Humpback whale song and foraging behavior on an Antarctic feeding ground. PLoS One 7: 1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051214
  51. 51. Clark CW, Clapham PJ (2004) Acoustic monitoring on a humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) feeding ground shows continual singing into late spring. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 1051–1057. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2699
  52. 52. Clapham PJ, Young SB, Brownell RL Jr (2002) Baleen whales: conservation issues and the status of the most endangered populations. Mammal Review 29: 37–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.1999.00035.x
  53. 53. GEBCO (2003) The GEBCO Digital Atlas published by the British Oceanographic Data Centre on behalf of IOC and IHO.