Figures
Abstract
Objective
Many studies have shown that magnetic fields (MF) inhibit tumor growth and influence the function of immune system. However, the effect of MF on mechanism of immunological function in tumor-bearing mice is still unclear.
Methods
In this study, tumor-bearing mice were prepared by subcutaneously inoculating Balb/c mice with hepatocarcinoma cell line H22. The mice were then exposed to a low frequency MF (0.4 T, 7.5 Hz) for 30 days. Survival rate, tumor growth and the innate and adaptive immune parameters were measured.
Results
MF treatment could prolong survival time (n = 28, p<0.05) and inhibit tumor growth (n = 9, p<0.01) in tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, this MF suppressed tumor-induced production of cytokines including interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) and keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) (n = 9–10, p<0.05 or 0.01). Furthermore, MF exposure was associated with activation of macrophages and dendritic cells, enhanced profiles of CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes, the balance of Th17/Treg and reduced inhibitory function of Treg cells (n = 9–10, p<0.05 or 0.01) in the mice model.
Citation: Nie Y, Chen Y, Mou Y, Weng L, Xu Z, Du Y, et al. (2013) Low Frequency Magnetic Fields Enhance Antitumor Immune Response against Mouse H22 Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 8(11): e72411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072411
Editor: Fabrizio Mattei, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italy
Received: December 3, 2012; Accepted: July 16, 2013; Published: November 20, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Nie et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101552/81070839), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2011571& BK2012744), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20100091120002), the Ministry of Science and Technology “Twelfth Five-Year” national scientific and technological support for major projects (2012BA/15B03), Key Project supported by Medical Science and Technology Development Foundation, Nanjing Department of Health (ZKX10030), and Jiangsu Province’s Outstanding Medical Academic Leader Program (No.LJ201110). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Biological effect of magnetic fields (MF) has been widely investigated. Epidemiological studies suggested that extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) may induce the risks of diseases, such as childhood cancer, Alzheimer’s disease and breast cancer [1], [2], [3]. However, some experimental studies indicated that there is no relationship between extremely low-frequency magnetic field (ELF-MF) and the risks of diseases in mice model [4], [5], [6]. Interestingly, substantial evidences have shown that ELF-MF possess significant antitumor activities in vitro and in vivo. Sixty Hz sinusoidal MF significantly inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells by cleaving caspase-3 and accumulating reactive oxygen species [7]. Oxygen radicals could be accumulated in K562 cells under exposure to 50 Hz ELF-MF (0.025 mT to 0.1 mT) [8]. ELF-MF (0.5–16.5 Hz) combined with a static MF markedly suppressed tumor growth in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma model mice [9]. Our previous study also demonstrated that a 0.4 T, 7.5 Hz MF inhibited tumor cell growth by distributing the cell cycle [10]. To date, several hypotheses were advanced to explain the antitumor mechanism of MF, including accumulated reactive oxygen species (ROS) [11], modified cell membrane [12] and increased calcium signaling [13]. However, these hypotheses on the antitumor activity of MF mainly based on the experimental results from cell lines in vitro without regard to immune system of organism.
As is well known, immune surveillance of immune system in organism plays essential roles in the prevention of tumors, i.e., protecting the host from virus-induced tumors, preventing the establishment of an inflammatory environment conducive to tumorigenesis and eliminating tumor cells [14]. Of note, immune surveillance is not always successful, tumors can escape immune surveillance and ‘edit’ immune system to hamper antitumor adaptive and innate immune responses and even promote tumor progression [15], [16]. Thus it is necessary to understand whether MF changes the immunologic surveillance in tumor-bearing mice. Fortunately, some roles of MF on immune system had been reported [17], [18]. Phagocyte activity, ROS release and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) production of mouse macrophages were significantly promoted after continuous exposure to 50 Hz ELF-MF (1mT) [19]. ELF-MF (0.97 mT, 50 Hz) could alter hematologic variations, eosinophil, hemoglobin and mean platelet volume (MPV) in rats [20]. Nature Killer cell (NK) activity in workers negatively correlated with exposure to different levels of ELF-MF (Time-Weighted Average (TWA) ≤0.2 µT and TWA >0.2 µT) [21]. It is thus evident that MF may modify the immune surveillance of immune system. However, it is still need to clarify the detailed effect of MF on subpopulation of lymphocytes and their secreted cytokine levels in immune system of tumor-bearing mice.
Therefore, in our present study, we explored the correlation between tumor development and immunity in tumor-bearing mice after exposure to the effective MF (0.4 T, 7.5 Hz), which has been shown to inhibit the growth of cancer cells in vitro [10]. The effects of MF on innate and adaptive immune parameters, including macrophage, dendritic cell, CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes in tumor-bearing mice were analyzed. Furthermore, in order to investigate the effects of MF on subpopulation of T lymphocytes, mRNA expressions of transcription factors for Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg, i.e., T-bet, GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), RAR-related orphan receptor γ (RORγ), and Forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3), respectively, were also detected.
Results
2.1 Magnetic Fields Inhibit Tumor Growth
We first examined the biological effects of low-frequency MF on the tumor-bearing mice. The survival rate of mice in each group was calculated after exposure to MF for 30 days and recovery for 40 days. The results showed that there was no significant difference of mortality in the control and control+MF groups during exposure to MF for 30 days. However, by the end of the experiment, the mortality of mice in the tumor group reached 100%, while the survival rate of mice in tumor+MF group was 19.5% (n = 28, p<0.05) (Fig. 1A). It is thus evident that there was a significant different mortality between tumor group and tumor+MF group (P = 0.03) using log-rank test.
When tumors were removed and measured after exposure to MF for 30 days, it was showed that tumor growth (including tumor volume and tumor weight) was significantly inhibited in tumor +MF group compared with that in tumor group (n = 9, p<0.01) (Fig. 1B). Hematoxylin and eosin staining showed that more intratumoral leukocyte populations were found in tumor group than that in tumor+MF group. Immunohistochemical staining of Ki67, which presents proliferating cells, showed that Ki67+ cells were found more in tumor group than that in tumor+MF group (Fig. 1C and 1D). These data together suggest that MF exposure may inhibit tumor proliferation and prolong survival of tumor-bearing mice.
2.2 Magnetic Fields Reverse Levels of Cytokines in Plasma of Tumor-bearing Mice
To test the effects of MF on cytokines, the levels of 27 cytokines were quantitated in the plasma panels by cytokine assay. Compared with control group, IL-6 and G-CSF were elevated about 2-fold in tumor group (Fig. 2A, B). After exposure to MF for 30 days, levels of IL-6 and G-CSF in tumor+MF group were reverted to those in control group (Fig. 2A, B). Moreover, IL-12, an antitumor cytokine [22], was significantly increased in tumor +MF group (Fig. 2C). However, keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC), an important chemokine involved in the proliferation and metastasis of tumor, was increased in tumor group, while it was declined in tumor +MF group (Fig. 2D). For other cytokines, including IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, Rantes and TNF-α (Fig. 2E–K), significant changes were not observed between tumor group and tumor+MF group.
(A) Statistical analyses of survival after subcutaneous challenge of Balb/c mice with H22 cells and treated with magnetic fields using log-rank test. Mice were treated by magnetic fields (MF) for 30 days, 2 h per day, and cared without magnetic fields for another 40 days. (B) The mean mass and volume of tumor for each group after treatment with magnetic fields 30 days. ***P<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test. The Hematoxylin and eosin staining (C, 10×) and immunohistochemical staining of Ki67 (D) in tumors.
2.3 Effect of Magnetic Fields on Innate Immune Cells
The above experiment showed that MF elevated IL-12 levels in the plasma of tumor-bearing mice. Since IL-12 is one of the special cytokines secreted by macrophage, so macrophage in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) was analyzed. The results showed that MF treatment decreased the number of F4/80+ macrophages in tumor-bearing mice (n = 10, p<0.01) (Fig. 3A, B). In addition, the change of dendritic cell (DC) was tested after exposure to MF. The results showed that the profile of DC characterized by CD11c+ expression in PBMC had no difference in these groups (Fig. 4A). However, after exposure to MF, both the population of CD11c+CD40+ DC (n = 10, p<0.05) (Fig. 4B,C) and tumor infiltrating CD11c+ DC (n = 9, p<0.01) (Fig. 4D) were significantly increased. These data indicated that MF may change the distribution of innate immune cells in tissues.
Bio-Plex was used to analyze cytokine/chemokine changes in mice plasma, (A) IL-6, (B) granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), (C) IL-12p40, (D) Keratinocyte-derived Chemokine (KC), (E) IL-1α, (F) IL-1β, (G) IL-2, (H) IL-3, (I)IL-4, (J)Rantes, and (K) TNF-α (±s.e.m.). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, or ns = No significant difference.
(A) Proportion of F4/80+ macrophage cells in PBMC was detected by flow cytometry. (B) The mean proportion of F4/80+ macrophage cells in PBMC for each group (Mean ± s.e.m.). **P<0.01.
2.4 Effect of Magnetic Fields on T Lymphocytes
We then analyzed the profiles of T lymphocytes in PBMC. As shown in Fig. 5A and 5B, CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes populations were higher in tumor+MF group than those in tumor group (n = 9, p<0.05). These results suggest that MF may promote the development of T lymphocytes.
Proportion of CD11c+ DC (A) and CD11c+CD40+ DC (B) in PBMC was detected by flow cytometry. (C) The mean proportion of CD11c+CD40+ DC in PBMC for each group (Mean ± s.e.m.). (D) The mean proportion of CD11c+CD40+ DC in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes for each group (Mean ± s.e.m.). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 or ns = No significant difference.
Usually, CD4+ Th cells can be roughly classified into Th1, Th2, Th17 and Regulatory T cells (Treg cells). We thus further analyzed the effect of MF on the distribution of T cell subsets from mouse spleen. As shown in Fig. 6A and 6B, MF increased Th17 cell subpopulation but decreased Treg cell subpopulation (n = 9, p<0.01). By measuring mRNA expression levels of the given transcription factors of T lymphocyte, T-bet, GATA3, RORγ and Foxp3, the results showed that Foxp3 mRNA expression levels indeed was decreased (n = 9, p<0.01), but RORγ expression was too little to detect its change (Fig. 6C). These results suggest that MF may regulate Th17/Treg balance to shift toward a Th17-type and inhibit development of Treg cells in spleen. As has been reported, Treg cells can block the immune surveillance during tumorigenesis by inhibit the function of effective T cells (Teff). Furthermore, we found that MF down-regulated the inhibitory function of Treg cells on Teff (Fig. 6D), suggesting MF may promote the anti-tumor effect of immune system through reducing Treg. In addition, the spleen plays an important role in active immune response through humoral and cell-mediated pathways. As shown in Fig. 6E, enlarged spleen was observed in tumor-bearing mice, which may be exerted by H22 tumor cells, while this enlargement could be reduced by MF.
(A) Proportion of CD4+ T cells in PBMC was detected by flow cytometry. (B) The mean proportion of CD4+ T cells in PBMC for each group (Mean ± s.e.m.). (C) Proportion of CD8+ T cells in PBMC was detected by flow cytometry. (D) The mean proportion of CD8+ T cells in PBMC for each group (Mean ± s.e.m.). *P<0.05.
Discussion
In the recent decades, the biological effects of MF have been widely investigated. Several hypotheses were advanced to explain the molecular mechanism of MF on cancer. However, these hypotheses on the antitumor activity of MF mainly based on the experimental results from cell lines in vitro. In the present study, we showed that survival time of mice was prolonged and the growth of tumors was inhibited by 7.5 Hz MF at a flux density of 0.4 T. When the levels of cytokines and the distribution of immune cells in tumor-bearing mice were detected, we found that MF could change the function and distribution of both innate immune cells and adaptive immune cells. Especially, MF could alter the population and function of T subsets in spleen. These data suggest that MF may inhibit tumor growth through improving immune function in the tumor-bearing mice.
Our previous study had demonstrated that the proliferation of cancer cells could be inhibited by 7.5 Hz MF at a flux density of 0.4 T in vitro [10]. Consistently, we here found that tumor growth was also inhibited and the survival rate was elevated after exposure to this MF in vivo. Similar result also had been reported in mice inoculated with the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma [9]. It is thus evident that the MF (0.4 T, 7.5 Hz) indeed could inhibit tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, which suggest that the MF may be useful to treat patients with some cancers.
Immune cells may exert their functions through secretion of cytokines. Therefore, we first detected the effect of on cytokine secretion. Usually, IL-6 and G-CSF are known as pro-inflammatory cytokines. IL-6 signaling can function as a regulator of tumor cell proliferation in cancer [23], [24], while G-CSF is thought to promote tumor angiogenesis via increasing circulating endothelial progenitor cells and Gr1+CD11b+ cells in cancer animal models [25]. Moreover, IL-12 is an anti-tumor cytokine and mediates enhancement of the cytotoxic activity of NK cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes to eliminate cancer cell [26]. In addition, chemokines such as KC was involved in the processes of angiogenesis and tumorigenesis [27]. In the tumor-bearing mice, the levels of IL-6, G-CSF and KC were elevated. Strikingly, after exposure of the tumor-bearing mice to MF, the levels of IL-6, G-CSF and KC were decreased, while IL-12 was increased. These results indicated that the MF can regulate the expression of some cytokines and chemokines so as to inhibit the proliferation and tumorigenesis in tumor-bearing mice.
It has been found that the functions of macrophages can be changed in 1 mT MF for 45 min [28]. It has been known that macrophage can be divided into M1- and M2- like macrophage. M1-like macrophage can help to eliminate and M2-like macrophage can be beneficial to the tumor growth [29]. IL-12 is a specific cytokine secreted by M1-like macrophage [30], and the expression level of IL-12 is associated with the percentage of M1-like macrophage in F4/80+ macrophage. In tumor group, the percentage of F4/80+macrophage was increased, while the level of IL-12 was equal to the normal mice. So we presume that the increased macrophage may be the M2-like macrophage in tumor group. However, after exposure to MF, the percentage of macrophage was decreased, while the expression of IL-12 was increased. So the increased macrophage might be the M1-like macrophage. These findings suggested that the MF may induce the differentiation of macrophage toward M1-like macrophage to eliminate tumor.
MF enhanced the expression of CD40 in DC. CD40 is a co-stimulatory molecule and can activate CD4+ T lymphocytes via CD40-CD40L interaction, and help the cytotoxicity of CD8+ T lymphocytes [31]. Bistolfi had found that MF can induce microvilli carpeted in the plasma membrane of several types of cells including DC [32]. The carpeted microvilli had been exhibited to connect DC-T cell interaction [33]. Although little known about the relation between microvilli and CD40, but these studies suggest that MF may enhance DC-T cell interaction to eliminate cancer cell.
MF could increased percentage of T lymphocytes. In tumor-bearing mice there was an obviously high proportion of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells after exposure to MF. However, Salerno et al., [34] found that MF can transiently decrease CD4+T cell proliferation in vitro. We hypothesized the increasing proportion of CD4+T cell may be attributed to the recruitment of M1-like macrophage and CD11c+CD40+ DC for CD4+T cell in vivo, which needs further research to prove.
Although these accumulated data proved that MF could activate the innate and adaptive immune, but it is yet needs to further explore about the biological effects of MF on immnue system. It is possible that MF may affect the differentiation and polarization of immune cells and the secretion of cytokines through regulating their relative gene expressions. it is also possible that MF may change microRNA profile, which is thought to regulte the function of many cells including immune cells. In addition, the effects of MF on the immune system of different trait mice also needs to be clarified. Normal mice, node mice and SCID (severe combind immuno deficiency) mice should be used to explore the detailed target of MF, since they represent normal immune system, T-cell function deficient condition and T/B function combined deficient condition, respectively.
In conclusion, our present study demonstrates that low-frequency MF could raise the survival rate and inhibite tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, the MF suppressed tumor-induced production of IL-6, G-CSF and KC, and enhanced the level of IL-12. Furthermore, MF exposure was associated with activation of macrophages and dendritic cells, enhanced profiles of CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes, the balance of Th17/Treg and reduced inhibitory function of Treg cells in tumor-bearing mice. Taken together, these results suggest that the inhibitory effect of MF on tumor growth may be attributed to the improvement of immune function in the tumor-bearing mice and magnetotherapy may be a potential anti-cancer therapy.
Materials and Methods
4.1 Ethics Statement
This study was carried out strictly accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All efforts were made to minimize suffering. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Drum Tower Hospital ethics committee (No. 2012113105, Date 2012/3/2).
4.2 Experimental Magnetic Fields
The construction of experimental magnetic fields has been described previously [10]. Briefly, two pairs of fan-shaped NdFeB permanent magnets (N45, Innuovo, Dongyang, China) were embedded into a circular iron plate and arranged to establish MF. The bottom two magnets rotated at certain frequency driven by a step motor, which was controlled using a functional signal generator. The top two magnets rotated synchronously due to the strong magnetic interaction. Magnetic flux density was measured at the target site using a gauss meter (HT201, Hengtong, Shanghai, China). MF at the target site is alternative pulses with a maximum flux density of about 0.4 T and a fixed frequency of 7.5 Hz. As shown in Fig. 7, mice were placed in the middle of the magnets in a lucent and breathable box. There was an internal column in the center of the box, and mice were put between external column (D = 20 cm) and internal column (D = 8 cm). Mice can move freely in the box. Ten mice can simultaneously be exposed in this MF exposure set-up. The magnetic field was rotated clockwise. This instrument was fabricated by the National Laboratory of Solid Microstructures, Nanjing University (Nanjing, China). Control mice were placed in a similar apparatus except that there were two rotating iron plates instead of magnets, thus lacking a MF, sham MF.
(A) Flow cytometry analysis of Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg cell populations in spleen. (B) Summarized data of Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg cell populations in spleen. (C) mRNA expression of T-bet, GATA3, RORγ and Foxp3 in splenic lymphocytes were detected by qPCR. (D) Inhibitory function of Treg cells in each group were detected by mixed lymphocyte reaction. (E) The mean mass of spleen for each group (Mean ± s.e.m.). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, or ns = No significant difference.
4.3 Animals and Experimental Groups
4–6 week-old female Balb/c mice from same parents were purchased from the Animal Research Center of Yangzhou University, PR China. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in a temperature-controlled room (24°C), on a 12-h/12-h light and dark cycle. Standard laboratory pelleted formula and tap water were provided. Each group of mice was housed in separate rack-mounted wire cages. All the cages were placed in the same shelf. A quick death procedure by cervical dislocation was uniformly performed in all animals. The experiments were conducted according to institutional animal ethics guidelines. All efforts were made to minimize suffering.
For construct the implanting tumor mice model, 1×106 H22 hepatocarcinoma cells were subcutaneously injected into the armpit region of 6–8 week-old Balb/c mice. At the beginning, Mice (n = 96) were randomly divided into four groups: Control group (n = 10), normal mice exposed to sham MF; Control+MF group (n = 10), normal mice exposed to MF; Tumor group (n = 38), the mice were subcutaneously injected with H22 hepatocarcinoma cells and exposed to sham MF; Tumor+MF group (n = 38), the mice were subcutaneously injected with H22 hepatocarcinoma cells and exposed to MF. After three days subcutaneously injected with cancer cells, mice were exposed to sham MF or MF (0.4 T, 7.5 Hz) for 30 days, the exposure time was 2 h per day. The descriptive statistics of mice were shown in Table S1. 10 mice in each group were sacrificed on day 33. Cardiac blood was collected from each mouse and centrifuged at 450×g for 20 min. Plasma was obtained and stored at −70°C until use. The tumor and spleen was removed and measured from each mouse. Part of each spleen was used to flow cytometry analysis, and others were used to isolate RNA. The remaining mice were used to observe the survival time (Tumor group n = 28, Tumor+MF group n = 28). The operators were blinded to the group of mice during all the experiments.
4.4 Immunohistochemistry Analysis
Tumor tissues were harvested, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, dehydrated, bisected, mounted in paraffin, and sectioned. Hydrated sections were stained using Hematoxylin/Eosin. IHC was carried out with antibodies specific for Ki67 using rabbit anti-mouse Ki67 (1∶1600, Dako Cytomation, Denmark).
4.5 Cytokine Assay
Serums were analyzed for cytokines using a high-sensitivity mouse cytokine assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 50 µl of cytokine standards or samples were incubated with 50 µl of anti-cytokine conjugated beads in 96-well filter plates for 30 min at room temperature with shaking. Plates were then washed by vacuum filtration three times with 100 µl wash buffer, 25 µl of diluted detection biotinylated antibody was added, and plates were incubated for 30 min at 25°C with shaking. After washing for three times, 50 µl of streptavidin-phycoerythrin was added, and the plates were incubated for 10 min at room temperature with shaking. Finally, plates were washed by vacuum filtration three times, and beads were suspended in 125 µl of assay buffer. Data were acquired using a Luminex system (Luminex-100, Bio-Rad) and analyzed using Manager software (V4.1, Bio-Rad). The minimum detection concentration was 0.2 pg/ml. Each sample was assayed in duplicate, and cytokine standards supplied by the manufacturer were run on each plate. In all cases tested, comparable elevations were observed using the Luminex-based multiplex assays. The cytokine assay allows detecting the following cytokines and chemokines: IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12(p40), IL-12(p70), IL-13, IL-17, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, KC, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, Rantes and TNF-α.
4.6 Flow Cytometry
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) were collected from mice and isolated from heparinized peripheral blood of the studied subjects by standard FicollePaque (General Electric Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) density centrifugation.
For the collection of splenic cells, single-cell suspension were dissociated by gently pressing the organ through a fine, 50 µm-nylon mesh, and cells were collected by centrifugation at 300×g for 5 min. Erythrocytes were removed by treating the splenic cells with red blood cell lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1.0 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetie Acid (EDTA), pH 7.2) for 5 min and washing twice with cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS).
For immune cells detection, 1×106 cell were suspended in PBS and incubated with related anti-mouse antibodies for 30 min at 4°C, then washed twice with fluorescence activating cell sorter (FACS) washing buffer. Data were acquired on FACS Vantage SE (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and analyzed with CellQuest software (CellQuest Pro, Becton Dickinson). The following antibodies used for flow cytometry: anti-F4/80-PE, anti-CD3-PE-Cy5.5, anti-CD4-FITC, anti-CD8-PE, anti-CD11c-PE, anti-CD40-APC, anti-IFNγ-APC, anti-IL4-APC, anti-IL17-APC, anti-CD25-PE, anti-Foxp3-APC and anti-isotype-specific control Anti-bodies were purchased from eBioscience (eBioscience, San Diego, CA).
4.7 Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (Q-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A total of 1 µg RNA was used as the template for single strand cDNA synthesis utilizing random primers and the Primescript reverse transcriptase (M-MLV, Takara, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Q-PCR was performed for target genes. The primers used in this study were list in Table 1. The cDNA was amplified using SYBR green PCR Mix (iTAP, Bio-Rad) on a step-one plus sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), programmed for 95°C for 10 min, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. For the dissociation curve, reactions were incubated at 95°C for 1 min, and ramp up from 55°C to 95°C with a heating rate of 0.1°C/sec and continuous fluorescence measurement. Relative gene expression quantifications were calculated according to the comparative Ct method using β-actin as an internal standard and commercial RNA (Clontech) as calibrators. The stability ofβ-actin was confirmed in preliminary experiments. Gene expression was analysed with the StepOne software and quantified by the formula 2−ΔΔCt.
4.8 Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction (MLRs)
Treg cells were obtained using magnetic isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) according to the instructions. The others cells were used as effective cells (Teff). Teff were stimulated with phytohemagglutinin (5 ug/ml) and were seeded in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Corning, Life Sciences) with 1640 medium supplemented with 5% FBS, and 20 IU/mL IL2. Treg cells treated with mitomycin C were added into coculture wells with the concentration of 1∶100 (1×103 Treg cells), 5∶100(5×103 Treg cells) and 10∶100 (10×103 Treg cells), respectively. Cell proliferation was measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation after the coculture of three days. Each experiment was repeated three times.
4.9 Statistical Evaluation
Values were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U test to compare the mean values between two groups. In case of survival curve, the data were analyzed by the log-rank test. Values of P<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS 11.5 software program (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YH TW YN. Performed the experiments: YN YC YM LW ZX. Analyzed the data: YN TW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YD WW. Wrote the paper: YN YH TW.
References
- 1. Davanipour Z, Sobel E (2009) Long-term exposure to magnetic fields and the risks of Alzheimer’s disease and breast cancer: Further biological research. Pathophysiology 16(2–3): 149–156.
- 2. Hug K, Grize L, Seidler A, Kaatsch P, Schüz J (2010) Parental occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields and childhood cancer: a German case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 171(1): 27–35.
- 3. Saito T, Nitta H, Kubo O, Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi N, et al. (2010) Power-frequency magnetic fields and childhood brain tumors: a case-control study in Japan. J Epidemiol 20(1): 54–61.
- 4. Chung MK, Yu WJ, Kim YB, Myung SH (2010) Lack of a co-promotion effect of 60 Hz circularly polarized magnetic fields on spontaneous development of lymphoma in AKR mice. Bioelectromagnetics 31(2): 130–139.
- 5. Lee HJ, Gimm YM, Choi HD, Kim N, Kim SH, et al. (2010) Chronic exposure of Sprague-Dawley rats to 20 kHz triangular magnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol 86(5): 384–389.
- 6. Mariucci G, Villarini M, Moretti M, Taha E, Conte C, et al. (2010) Brain DNA damage and 70-kDa heat shock protein expression in CD1 mice exposed to extremely low frequency magnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol 86(8): 701–710.
- 7. Koh EK, Ryu BK, Jeong DY, Bang IS, Nam MH, et al. (2008) A 60-Hz sinusoidal magnetic field induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells through reactive oxygen species. Int J Radiat Biol 84(11): 945–955.
- 8. Mannerling AC, Simkó M, Mild KH, Mattsson MO (2010) Effects of 50-Hz magnetic field exposure on superoxide radical anion formation and HSP70 induction in human K562 cells. Radiat Environ Biophys 49(4): 731–741.
- 9. Novikov VV, Novikov GV, Fesenko EE (2009) Effect of weak combined static and extremely low-frequency alternating magnetic fields on tumor growth in mice inoculated with the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. Bioelectromagnetics 30(5): 343–351.
- 10. Wang T, Nie Y, Zhao S, Han Y, Du Y, et al. (2011) Involvement of midkine expression in the inhibitory effects of low-frequency magnetic fields on cancer cells. Bioelectromagnetics 32(6): 443–452.
- 11. Tofani S, Barone D, Cintorino M, de Santi MM, Ferrara A, et al. (2001) Static and ELF magnetic fields induce tumor growth inhibition and apoptosis. Bioelectromagnetics 22(6): 419–4128.
- 12. Tofani S, Barone D, Berardelli M, Berno E, Cintorino M, et al. (2003) Static and ELF magnetic fields enhance the in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of cis-platin against lewis lung carcinoma, but not of cyclophosphamide against B16 melanotic melanoma. Pharmacol Res 48(1): 83–90.
- 13. Miyakoshi J (2005) Effects of static magnetic fields at the cellular level. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3): 213–223.
- 14. Swann JB, Smyth MJ (2007) Immune surveillance of tumors. J Clin Invest 117(5): 113711–46.
- 15. Zou W (2005) Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat Rev Cancer 5(4): 263–274.
- 16. Ostrand-Rosenberg S (2008) Immune surveillance: a balance between protumor and antitumor immunity. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18(1): 11–18.
- 17. Simko M, Mattsson MO (2004) Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields as effectors of cellular responses in vitro: possible immune cell activation. J Cell Biochem 93(1): 83–92.
- 18. Yamaguchi S, Ogiue-Ikeda M, Sekino M, Ueno S (2006) Effects of pulsed magnetic stimulation on tumor development and immune functions in mice. Bioelectromagnetics 27(1): 64–72.
- 19. Frahm J, Lantow M, Lupke M, Weiss DG, Simkó M (2006) Alteration in cellular functions in mouse macrophages after exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 99(1): 168–177.
- 20. Cakir DU, Yokus B, Akdag MZ, Sert C, Mete N (2009) Alterations of hematological variations in rats exposed to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (50 Hz). Arch Med Res 40(5): 352–356.
- 21. Gobba F, Bargellini A, Scaringi M, Bravo G, Borella P (2009) Extremely low frequency-magnetic fields (ELF-EMF) occupational exposure and natural killer activity in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Sci Total Environ 407(3): 1218–1223.
- 22. Smyth MJ, Taniguchi M, Street SE (2000) The anti-tumor activity of IL-12: mechanisms of innate immunity that are model and dose dependent. J Immunol 165(5): 2665–2670.
- 23. Heikkila K, Ebrahim S, Lawlor DA (2008) Systematic review of the association between circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6) and cancer. Eur J Cancer 44(7): 937–945.
- 24. Hodge DR, Hurt EM, Farrar WL (2005) The role of IL-6 and STAT3 in inflammation and cancer. Eur J Cancer 41(16): 2502–2512.
- 25. Okazaki T, Ebihara S, Asada M, Kanda A, Sasaki H, et al. (2006) Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor promotes tumor angiogenesis via increasing circulating endothelial progenitor cells and Gr1+CD11b+ cells in cancer animal models. Int Immunol 18(1): 1–9.
- 26. Presky DH, Yang H, Minetti LJ, Chua AO, Nabavi N, et al. (1996) A functional interleukin 12 receptor complex is composed of two beta-type cytokine receptor subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(24): 14002–14007.
- 27. Wang D, Wang H, Brown J, Daikoku T, Ning W, et al. (2006) CXCL1 induced by prostaglandin E2 promotes angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. J Exp Med 203(4): 941–951.
- 28. Simkó M, Droste S, Kriehuber R, Weiss DG (2001) Stimulation of phagocytosis and free radical production in murine macrophages by 50 Hz electromagnetic fields. Eur J Cell Biol 80(8): 562–566.
- 29. Biswas SK, Mantovani A (2010) Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol 11(10): 889–896.
- 30. Minton K (2011) Macrophages: a transcription factor to call their own. Nat Rev Immunol 11(2): 74.
- 31. Schoenberger SP, Toes RE, van der Voort EI, Offringa R, Melief CJ (1998) T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40-CD40L interactions. Nature 393(6684): 480–483.
- 32. Bistolfi F (2007) Extremely Low-Frequency Pulsed Magnetic Fields and Multiple Sclerosis: Effects on Neurotransmission Alone or Also on Immunomodulation? Building a Working Hypothesis. The Neuroradiology Journal 20: 676–693.
- 33. Fisher PJ, Bulur PA, Vuk-Pavlovic S, Prendergast FG, Dietz AB (2008) Dendritic cell microvilli: a novel membrane structure associated with the multifocal synapse and T-cell clustering. Blood 112(13): 5037–5045.
- 34. Salerno S, La Mendola C, Lo Casto A, Mamone G, Caccamo N, et al. (2006) Reversible effect of MR and ELF magnetic fields (0.5 T and 0.5 mT) on human lymphocyte activation patterns. Int J Radiat Biol 82(2): 77–85.