Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Population-Based CD4 Counts in a Rural Area in South Africa with High HIV Prevalence and High Antiretroviral Treatment Coverage

  • Abraham Malaza ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Abraham Malaza, Joël Mossong

    Affiliation Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  • Joël Mossong ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Abraham Malaza, Joël Mossong

    jmossong@africacentre.ac.za

    Affiliation Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  • Till Bärnighausen,

    Affiliations Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Johannes Viljoen,

    Affiliation Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  • Marie-Louise Newell

    Affiliations Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom

Population-Based CD4 Counts in a Rural Area in South Africa with High HIV Prevalence and High Antiretroviral Treatment Coverage

  • Abraham Malaza, 
  • Joël Mossong, 
  • Till Bärnighausen, 
  • Johannes Viljoen, 
  • Marie-Louise Newell
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the variability of CD4 counts in the general population of sub-Saharan Africa countries affected by the HIV epidemic. We investigated factors associated with CD4 counts in a rural area in South Africa with high HIV prevalence and high antiretroviral treatment (ART) coverage.

Methods

CD4 counts, health status, body mass index (BMI), demographic characteristics and HIV status were assessed in 4990 adult resident participants of a demographic surveillance in rural KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa; antiretroviral treatment duration was obtained from a linked clinical database. Multivariable regression analysis, overall and stratified by HIV status, was performed with CD4 count levels as outcome.

Results

Median CD4 counts were significantly higher in women than in men overall (714 vs. 630 cells/µl, p<0.0001), both in HIV-uninfected (833 vs. 683 cells/µl, p<0.0001) and HIV-infected adults (384.5 vs. 333 cells/µl, p<0.0001). In multivariable regression analysis, women had 19.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.1–22.9) higher CD4 counts than men, controlling for age, HIV status, urban/rural residence, household wealth, education, BMI, self-reported tuberculosis, high blood pressure, other chronic illnesses and sample processing delay. At ART initiation, HIV-infected adults had 21.7% (95% CI 14.6–28.2) lower CD4 counts than treatment-naive individuals; CD4 counts were estimated to increase by 9.2% (95% CI 6.2–12.4) per year of treatment.

Conclusions

CD4 counts are primarily determined by sex in HIV-uninfected adults, and by sex, age and duration of antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected adults. Lower CD4 counts at ART initiation in men could be a consequence of lower CD4 cell counts before HIV acquisition.

Introduction

CD4 counts are important indicators of HIV disease progression [1], [2] and for initiating and monitoring antiretroviral treatment (ART) [3], [4]. Yet, little is known about the variability of CD4 counts in the general population of sub-Saharan Africa countries affected by the HIV epidemic [5]. Studies in sub-Saharan Africa that have investigated CD4 counts either had relatively small sample sizes [6], [7], or used convenience sampling in workers [8][13], in reproductive and general health care seekers [12], [14][18], in blood donors [14], [19], in HIV counselling and testing attendees [20][22], or in healthy volunteers [23], [24]. To our knowledge, the three large population-based studies reporting CD4 data did not aim to evaluate demographic and health factors that might be associated with CD4 cell counts [25][27].

In HIV-uninfected individuals, and across populations, CD4 cell counts have been shown to vary with demographic, environmental, immunological and genetic factors [17]. Current exposures to infectious diseases and behavioural factors have also been associated with variations in CD4 cell counts in HIV-uninfected populations [28]. Infections such as pneumonia and tuberculosis (TB) have been associated with decreased CD4 cell counts [29], while higher CD4 counts have been associated with female sex and smoking [8], [17], [30], [31]. Laboratory platform [32] and timing in the day of blood sampling [33] are also known to influence CD4 cell counts. CD4 cell countsIn studies in developed countries, black race, low body mass index (BMI), increasing age and injecting drug use have been associated with lower CD4 counts [30]. Healthy African and Asian populations living in Europe have lower CD4 counts than their European and Caucasian counterparts [11], [28], and significant variations of CD4 cells within African populations have been described [8], [14], [17]. Using data from a population-based demographic and health surveillance in a rural setting in South Africa, we quantify CD4 counts overall and by HIV and treatment status and explore other factors associated with CD4 counts.

Methods

Setting and Surveillance

The study took place from May to December 2010, as part of the longitudinal population-based HIV and health surveillance conducted by the Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies in rural uMkhanyakude district of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa [34]. Individuals are eligible for HIV surveillance if they are reported to be member of a household within a defined geographic demographic surveillance area (DSA) even if non-resident at the time of surveillance. Membership is self-defined on the basis of links to other household members and residency is based on residing at a physical structure within the surveillance area at a particular point in time. For this analysis, the study population consisted of adult (>15 years) residents of the DSA.

Ethics Statement

Informed written consent was obtained from all adult eligible persons aged 15 year or older for participation in the individual health surveillance and to provide a small blood sample for HIV analysis for research purposes. As permitted by the regulatory framework governing research in South Africa at the time of the study [35], we obtained written informed consent from adolescents aged 15–17 years themselves. Similar to other HIV surveys and surveillance, such as the DHS, the individual health surveillance currently does not reveal HIV results to participants, but instead provides information on location and opening hours of the public-sector HIV counselling and testing facilities, where rapid HIV tests are offered free of charge [36].

We obtained information on ART initiation and duration by linking study participants with the local HIV treatment and care programme database, which is housed at the Africa Centre, and which information can be linked to that of the individual health surveillance at an individual level using a range of variables including surname, first names, date of birth, sex, South African I.D. number, closest clinic, mother’s name and date of death. After linkage, all individual level data were de-identified to prevent analysts working with the data from identifying any of the individuals. Participant names and South African identification numbers are replaced with an anonymous surveillance system number, which analysts cannot link back to the individual participants [37].

Ethical approval for the individual health surveillance (reference BF233/09) and for the linkage between the individual health surveillance and HIV treatment and care programme databases (reference E134/06) was obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC) of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, and renewed on an annual basis. The BREC was aware that some of the surveillance participants were minors and approved the age range of participation.

Sample Collection and Laboratory Methods

Following informed consent, finger prick blood was taken by specifically trained fieldworkers and stored in 2 EDTA-coated 500 µl micro-capillary tubes at room temperature until processing. Samples taken from Monday to Thursday were processed within 24 hours and samples taken from Fridays to Sunday were processed on the following Tuesday. Approximately 60 µl whole blood was aliquoted for CD4 cell count enumeration (FACSCalibur flow cytometer; Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, California, USA). Cells and plasma were harvested from the remaining sample. HIV status was assessed on plasma by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (SD BIOLINE HIV 1/2 3.0, Standard Diagnostics Inc., Kyonggi-do, Korea).

Data Analysis

Medians of CD4 counts between groups were compared using Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test. For regression analyses, we performed a natural logarithm transformation of CD4 counts to remove skewness [31] and make the distribution more normal [38]. We chose logarithmic transformation over square or cubic root transformation, because regression coefficients are easier to interpret.

To investigate factors associated with CD4 counts we performed a multiple linear regression of natural logarithm-transformed CD4 counts against age, sex, HIV status, ART, duration of ART, place of residence (rural, peri-urban, urban), household wealth quintiles, educational attainment, self-reported illnesses (TB, high blood pressure or other serious illness in the last 12 months), body-mass index (BMI) as reported previously [39], and sample processing delay (less than 48 hours for samples collected Monday to Thursday vs. more than 48 hours for samples collected on Friday-Sunday). The multiple regression analysis was repeated after stratifying by HIV status. Duration of ART in years was calculated using the date of ART initiation in the HIV treatment and care programme database and the health surveillance study visit in 2010. Demographic and social data about survey participants were available from the Africa Centre household surveillance [34]. Data analysis and graphics were produced in STATA 11.0 (State Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Comparison with other Studies

To compare our results with those in other sub-Saharan settings, studies of CD4 cell counts in adult populations were identified in PubMed, using the key words “CD4”, “adult”, “HIV”, “survey”, “Africa”. References in relevant publications were checked to identify additional studies.

Results

13,253 adult residents were contacted during a home visit and invited to participate in the health surveillance between May and December 2010. Of these, 5990 (45.2%) agreed to provide microcapillary blood samples for HIV antibody and CD4 measurements. A CD4 measurement could not be determined for 982 samples, primarily because of blood clotting (800 samples) and insufficient sample volume (144 samples). A further 15 samples were excluded due to indeterminate HIV ELISA results, leaving a total sample size of 4,993 participants with complete data, of whom 3,432 (69%) were women and 1,561 (31%) men. The median age was 31 years (IQR (inter-quartile range) 20–50), significantly higher (p<0.0001) in women (35 y., IQR 22–52) than in men (23 y., IQR 18–43). Overall prevalence of HIV among participants was 26.2% (1,310/4,993); among female participants, HIV prevalence was30.4% (1,044/3,432) and among male participants, HIV prevalence was 17.0% (266/1,561). The median CD4 count (see Figure 1A and 1B for sex-specific histograms) was 687 cells/µl (IQR 484–904), significantly higher in women than in men (714 vs. 630 cells/µl, p<0.0001). The overall proportion of individuals with a CD4 count below treatment eligibility thresholds of 200 and 350 cells/µl, was 4.2% and 13.5%, respectively.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Histogram of CD4 count distributions in the study population by HIV infection status.

Total female (A) and male (B) participants; HIV-uninfected female (C) and male (D) participants; HIV-infected female (E) and male (F) participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070126.g001

The median CD4 count was significantly higher (p<0.0001) in HIV-uninfected individuals (775 cells/µl, IQR 608–974) than in HIV-infected individuals (374 cells/µl, IQR 253–529), for both women (Figure 1C and 1E) and men (Figure 1D and 1F). The difference in CD4 counts between women and men was significant in HIV-uninfected (833 vs. 683 cells/µl, p<0.0001) and HIV-infected adults (384.5 vs. 333 cells/µl, p<0.0001). Figure 2 shows that sex differences were observed throughout almost all age groups and that in HIV-negative persons CD4 counts tended to increase slightly with age. Overall, 14.8% and 45.1% of 1,310 HIV-infected adults had CD4 counts below the treatment eligibility criteria of 200 and 350 cells/µl, respectively. In HIV-uninfected individuals, 0.4% and 2.3% had CD4 counts below 200 and 350 cells/µl, respectively.

thumbnail
Figure 2. CD4 counts are higher in women than in men after stratifying by HIV status throughout all age groups except in older HIV-infected adults, where sample sizes are too small.

Data points represent means and whiskers represent 95% confidence intervals of CD4 counts within HIV-status and age group strata.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070126.g002

Among the 1,310 HIV-infected individuals, 391 (29.9%) had been initiated on ART in the HIV Treatment and Care Programme for a median duration of 2.3 years (IQR 1.1–3.5). The median CD4 count in the treated group was 367 cells/µl (IQR, 255–511 cells/µl) compared to 377 cells/µl (IQR, 252–542 cells/µl) in treatment-naive group (p = 0.60). Sex-specific differences in CD4 count remained statistically significant after stratifying by HIV and treatment status (see Table 1). Of the 919 treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals, 137 (14.9%) and 414 (45.0%), had CD4 counts below treatment eligibility thresholds of 200 and 350 cells/µl, respectively. Figure 3 shows that mean CD4 counts in HIV-positive persons on treatment tended to increase almost linearly with longer durations of ART.

thumbnail
Figure 3. CD4 counts in HIV-positive adults increase after longer durations of antiretroviral treatment.

Data points represent mean and whiskers represent 95% confidence intervals of CD4 counts within 6 monthly treatment duration strata.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070126.g003

thumbnail
Table 1. CD4 summary statistics by sex, HIV status and antiretroviral treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070126.t001

In univariate analysis of log-transformed CD4 counts, in line with the large sample size, all examined explanatory variables were significantly associated with CD4 cell counts (Table 2). In multiple regression analysis, sex, HIV infection, ART initiation, ART duration and sample processing delay were all strongly associated with CD4 counts at significance levels of p<0.001. Allowing for age, HIV and ART status, place of residence, household wealth, educational attainment, self-reported diagnosis of chronic diseases and BMI and sample processing delay, women had on average 19.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.1–22.9) higher CD4 counts than men. HIV-infected individuals had on average CD4 counts that were 54.0% (95% CI 52.4–55.6) lower than those of HIV-uninfected individuals. HIV-infected individuals were estimated to have on average 21.7% (95% CI 14.6–28.2) lower CD4 counts at ART initiation (i.e. corresponding to zero years of treatment) than treatment-naive individuals and CD4 count levels increased on average by 9.2% (95% CI 6.2–12.4) with every year of treatment after initiation. Samples collected from Fridays to Sundays (with a processing delay greater than 48 hours) which account for 17.5% of all samples collected had 11% (95% CI 8.2–13.8) lower CD4 counts than samples collected from Mondays to Thursdays (which were processed the day after collection). Excluding these samples from the analysis had no effect on coefficient estimates of explanatory variables (data not shown).

thumbnail
Table 2. Univariate and multiple regression coefficients (standard errors) relating natural log-transformed CD4 counts to explanatory variables (N = 4993).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070126.t002

Although the association of CD4 counts with persons aged 35–44, higher educational attainment and self-reported chronic disease was statistically significant, an analysis stratified by HIV status shows these factors to be significant for HIV-infected adults only (see Table 3). Place of residence, household wealth, self-reported TB, high blood pressure diagnosis in the past year and obesity were not independently associated with CD4 cell counts in either HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected adults. Stratifying by HIV status did not modify the effect of sex, but did modify the effect of age on CD4 cell counts. In HIV-negative adults, CD4 cell counts increased gradually up to age 64, whereas in HIV-positive adults, the association with age is more complicated, possibly reflecting differing age-related patterns of HIV acquisition and of ART uptake and retention.

thumbnail
Table 3. Multiple regression coefficients (standard errors) relating natural log-transformed CD4 counts to explanatory variables after stratification by HIV infection status.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070126.t003

Discussion

This study is the first to describe population-based estimates of CD4 distributions in a rural, high HIV prevalence setting where nearly a third of HIV-infected adults are on antiviral treatment. Overall, the median CD4 count of 687 cells/µl in this population was relatively low, which is not surprising given the high HIV prevalence (26.1%) in our study population. The median CD4 count of 775 cells/µl in HIV-negative adults was comparable to that observed in other sub-Saharan countries (see Table 4), although there is substantial variance in reported average CD4 cell counts.

thumbnail
Table 4. Median CD4 counts in HIV-negative adults and significant determinants of CD4 counts in sub-Saharan Africa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070126.t004

We found CD4 cell counts to be consistently higher in women than in men, by approximately 20 percent and independent of HIV/ART status, which is consistent with previously published studies reporting higher average CD4 counts in women than in men (see Table 4). In principle, there could be multiple reasons why HIV-infected men have lower CD4 counts than women in HIV-testing and care settings. This includes lower rates of HIV-testing, lower rates of repeat-testing, lower acceptance of linkage to HIV-care after a positive result, and a faster CD4 decline. All of these are conditional on being infected with HIV. However, they cannot explain the observed proportional difference of CD4-levels in HIV-negative women and men after controlling for age and other variables we measured.

In the absence of treatment, HIV disease progression rates have not been reported to differ substantially between men and women [40]. Reports from HIV treatment programmes usually include fewer men than women, with men having a lower CD4 when accessing treatment, which has been taken to suggest that men access treatment at a later stage [41], [42]. However, our results would suggest caution in such interpretation as we show that men tend to have lower CD4 counts than women irrespective of HIV and ART status. This then raises the question whether lower absolute CD4 counts in men have the same meaning as the same CD4 count in women, or whether the absolute level differences are somehow compensated for functionally. Further research is needed to assess CD4 functional capacity at a given absolute level for men and women, the results of which would then further inform the discussion whether HIV treatment eligibility criteria should vary by sex.

We estimated that HIV-infected adults initiating ART had substantially lower CD4 cell counts than treatment-naive HIV infected adults (median 377 cells/µl, IQR 252–542). This finding is expected considering that our study was conducted in 2010, when the eligibility criteria in South Africa were to initiate treatment below a CD4 count threshold of 200 cells/µl in the absence of other criteria. For comparison, from the local Hlabisa HIV treatment and care programme data, median CD4 cell count at first presentation in 2010/11 was 263 cells/µl (IQR 136–444), and median baseline CD4 cell count prior to ART initiation was 145 cells/µl (IQR 76–201) [43]. Although comparisons must be treated with caution because of differing sample collection, transport conditions, storage and laboratory equipment, this finding suggests that, on average, HIV disease progression in our HIV-positive study participants was less advanced than in patients seeking care in clinics.

Our results also mirror to some extent those of another recent study which suggested that a significant proportion of persons initiating HAART under routine conditions in South Africa fail to restore CD4 cell count rapidly despite adequate virologic response [44]. Our study suggests that persons who initiate with low CD4 counts do recover, and that the duration of recovery to levels above the 350 cells/µl threshold could take some time assuming a constant CD4 count recovery per year of treatment. Additional research is clearly warranted to further investigate the dynamics of CD4 cell reconstitution following ART at an individual and population level.

CD4 counts in the current study were lower than those observed in other African populations in Ethiopia, Botswana, Nigeria and Uganda [8], [14], [20], [26], but women in our population had higher CD4 counts than women in Tanzania and both men and women in our study had higher CD4 counts than those reported in a sentinel surveillance cohort in Botswana [14]. This variation across studies and geographical regions may be explained partially by differences in study populations, such as age, ethnicity, the proportion of individuals who smoke and prevalence of underlying diseases, all of which have been shown to be associated with differences in CD4 counts [8], [29], [45]. Differences between studies may be due in part to a lack of adjustment for confounding due to other important risk factors, such as age and cigarette smoking.

Our study had several limitations. First, although study participation levels (45.2%) were high considering that it involves providing a blood sample for research purposes, there was scope for bias. On the one hand, recent work in our setting has shown that young, female and HIV-uninfected adults were more likely to consent to participate in individual health surveillance. Young HIV-uninfected women (who tend to have relatively high CD4 counts) are likely to be somewhat overrepresented in our study nested within individual health surveillance [36]. On the other hand, HIV-infected persons receiving ART or enrolled in pre-ART care were less likely (adjusted odds of 0.75 and 0.62, respectively [36]) than HIV-uninfected persons to participate in individual health surveillance. Moreover, persons receiving ART or enrolled in pre-ART care with CD4 counts ≤200 cells/µl were less likely to participate than persons with CD4 counts >200 cells/µl HIV-infected persons. Thus, persons who have accessed HIV treatment and care and have low CD4 counts are likely to be underrepresented in our sample. For theses, caution should be applied to generalise our findings to other rural populations in Southern Africa.

Second, some of the characteristics (TB, high blood pressure, chronic illness) we evaluated were derived from self report. Although self-reported chronic illnesses have not been validated against clinical assessment in our setting, self-assessments of general health have been found to be strong predictors of short-term but not long-term mortality [46].

Third, data on smoking was not captured in our study, as such we were unable to assess the association of smoking with CD4 counts in this population. In our setting, the prevalence of current smoking in 2003 was substantially higher in men (24%) than in women (2%), such that smoking could potentially be a confounder of the observed sex differences in CD4 cell counts. As smoking is associated with higher CD4 counts in HIV-negative persons [31], sex differences in CD4 counts are likely to be higher among HIV-negative non-smokers.

Finally, our study illustrates that population-based whole blood sample collection in a rural setting has its own challenges. Approximately 13% of collected blood samples could not be tested for CD4 counts due to blood clotting, despite the fact that microcapillaries were coated with anticoagulants. In a logistic regression with clotting as the dependent variable and using the same independent explanatory variables as in our main analysis (i.e. age, sex, location, wealth, education, sample processing delay, TB, high blood pressure, other chronic diseases, BMI), we find that rural (OR 1.96, p<0.001) and peri-urban (OR 1.75, p<0.001) location of the participant home were significantly associated with increased risk of blood clotting after controlling for age and sex, while sample processing delay was not significantly (p = 0.162) associated with clotting. One explanation could be that rural locations are a proxy for longer transport times of samples back to the Africa Centre or for poor road conditions and higher sample agitation. Regardless of the causes of blood clotting, which warrant further investigation, participants from rural and peri-urban areas would thus also be slightly under-represented in our study sample.

Similarly, due to operational reasons related to the rural location, 17.5% of our samples had a delay longer than 48 hours before being processed in the laboratory, which resulted in somewhat lower CD4 measurements. The manufacturer recommendation is to test samples within 48 hours of collection, but it may be longer if blood stabilizers are included in the tube [47]. Our study suggests that population-based CD4 measurements in rural settings can be influenced by both transport conditions and sample storage and processing delays which should be minimized.

In conclusion, we have described for the first time CD4 distributions at a population level in a rural South African setting. Sex, HIV-infection and duration of ART were the most important determinants of CD4 cell counts. Despite high ART coverage in this setting, a large fraction of the population have low CD4 cell counts that put them at increased risk of opportunistic infections like TB [48]. The findings in this study are thus useful for monitoring the impact of the roll-out of ART at a population level, and in particular whether and to what extent CD4 cell counts of HIV-positive persons on treatment have recovered to normal ranges.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the help of Colin Newell in providing data and to Makandwe Nyirenda and Portia Mutevedzi for technical assistance. We also thank all community participants, data collectors and processors, Africa Centre virology laboratory and the support staff of the Africa Centre.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AM TB ML. Performed the experiments: AM JV. Analyzed the data: AM JM TB. Wrote the paper: AM JM TB JV ML.

References

  1. 1. Levy JA (1993) HIV pathogenesis and long-term survival. AIDS 7: 1401–1410.
  2. 2. Gottlieb GS, Sow PS, Hawes SE, Ndoye I, Redman M, et al. (2002) Equal plasma viral loads predict a similar rate of CD4+ T cell decline in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1- and HIV-2-infected individuals from Senegal, West Africa. J Infect Dis 185: 905–914.
  3. 3. World Health Organization website. Available: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/rapid_advice_art.pdf. Accessed 2013 June 24.
  4. 4. Cozzi Lepri A, Phillips AN, d'Arminio Monforte A, Castelli F, Antinori A, et al. (2001) When to start highly active antiretroviral therapy in chronically HIV-infected patients: evidence from the ICONA study. AIDS 15: 983–990.
  5. 5. Williams BG, Korenromp EL, Gouws E, Schmid GP, Auvert B, et al. (2006) HIV infection, antiretroviral therapy, and CD4+ cell count distributions in African populations. J Infect Dis 194: 1450–1458.
  6. 6. Lisse IM, Poulsen AG, Aaby P, Knudsen K, Dias F (1996) Serial CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte counts and associated mortality in an HIV-2-infected population in Guinea-Bissau. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 13: 355–362.
  7. 7. Kelly P, Zulu I, Amadi B, Munkanta M, Banda J, et al. (2002) Morbidity and nutritional impairment in relation to CD4 count in a Zambian population with high HIV prevalence. Acta Trop 83: 151–158.
  8. 8. Abuye C, Tsegaye A, West CE, Versloot P, Sanders EJ, et al. (2005) Determinants of CD4 counts among HIV-negative Ethiopians: role of body mass index, gender, cigarette smoking, khat (Catha Edulis) chewing, and possibly altitude? J Clin Immunol 25: 127–133.
  9. 9. Kassu A, Tsegaye A, Petros B, Wolday D, Hailu E, et al. (2001) Distribution of lymphocyte subsets in healthy human immunodeficiency virus-negative adult Ethiopians from two geographic locales. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 8: 1171–1176.
  10. 10. Kassa E, Rinke de Wit TF, Hailu E, Girma M, Messele T, et al. (1999) Evaluation of the World Health Organization staging system for HIV infection and disease in Ethiopia: association between clinical stages and laboratory markers. AIDS 13: 381–389.
  11. 11. Tsegaye A, Wolday D, Otto S, Petros B, Assefa T, et al. (2003) Immunophenotyping of blood lymphocytes at birth, during childhood, and during adulthood in HIV-1-uninfected Ethiopians. Clin Immunol 109: 338–346.
  12. 12. Aina O, Dadik J, Charurat M, Amangaman P, Gurumdi S, et al. (2005) Reference values of CD4 T lymphocytes in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adult Nigerians. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12: 525–530.
  13. 13. Urassa W, Bakari M, Sandstrom E, Swai A, Pallangyo K, et al. (2004) Rate of decline of absolute number and percentage of CD4 T lymphocytes among HIV-1-infected adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS 18: 433–438.
  14. 14. Bussmann H, Wester CW, Masupu KV, Peter T, Gaolekwe SM, et al. (2004) Low CD4+ T-lymphocyte values in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults in Botswana. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11: 930–935.
  15. 15. Klose N, Coulibaly B, Tebit DM, Nauwelaers F, Spengler HP, et al. (2007) Immunohematological reference values for healthy adults in Burkina Faso. Clin Vaccine Immunol 14: 782–784.
  16. 16. Mandala WL, MacLennan JM, Gondwe EN, Ward SA, Molyneux ME, et al. (2010) Lymphocyte subsets in healthy Malawians: implications for immunologic assessment of HIV infection in Africa. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 125: 203–208.
  17. 17. Mair C, Hawes SE, Agne HD, Sow PS, N'Doye I, et al. (2008) Factors associated with CD4 lymphocyte counts in HIV-negative Senegalese individuals. Clin Exp Immunol 151: 432–440.
  18. 18. Lovvorn AE, Patnaik P, Walker CJ, Kwok C, Van Der Pol B, et al. (2010) Variations in CD4 cell counts among HIV-uninfected and infected women in Uganda and Zimbabwe. International Journal of STD and AIDS 21: 342–345.
  19. 19. Urassa WK, Lyamuya EF, Mbena E, Kagoma C, Bredberg Raden U, et al. (1996) Immunohaematological findings in healthy and HIV-1 infected adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. East Afr Med J 73: 670–674.
  20. 20. Oladepo DK, Idigbe EO, Audu RA, Inyang US, Imade GE, et al. (2009) Establishment of reference values of CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte subsets in healthy Nigerian adults. Clin Vaccine Immunol 16: 1374–1377.
  21. 21. Ngowi BJ, Mfinanga SG, Bruun JN, Morkve O (2009) Immunohaematological reference values in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adolescent and adults in rural northern Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis 9: 1.
  22. 22. Tugume SB, Piwowar EM, Lutalo T, Mugyenyi PN, Grant RM, et al. (1995) Hematological reference ranges among healthy Ugandans. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2: 233–235.
  23. 23. Zekeng L, Sadjo A, Meli J, Kaptue L, Mpoudi Ngole E, et al. (1997) T lymphocyte subset values among healthy Cameroonians. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 14: 82–83.
  24. 24. Lawrie D, Coetzee LM, Becker P, Mahlangu J, Stevens W, et al. (2009) Local reference ranges for full blood count and CD4 lymphocyte count testing. S Afr Med J 99: 243–248.
  25. 25. Adoga MP, Pennap GR, John PA, Shawulu PT, Kaba SV, et al. (2012) CD4- and CD3-T lymphocyte reference values of immunocompetent urban and rural subjects in an African nation. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 76: 33–38.
  26. 26. Lugada ES, Mermin J, Kaharuza F, Ulvestad E, Were W, et al. (2004) Population-based hematologic and immunologic reference values for a healthy Ugandan population. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 11: 29–34.
  27. 27. Auvert B, Males S, Puren A, Taljaard D, Carael M, et al. (2004) Can highly active antiretroviral therapy reduce the spread of HIV?: A study in a township of South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 36: 613–621.
  28. 28. Clerici M, Butto S, Lukwiya M, Saresella M, Declich S, et al. (2000) Immune activation in Africa is environmentally-driven and is associated with upregulation of CCR5. Italian-Ugandan AIDS Project. AIDS 14: 2083–2092.
  29. 29. Aldrich J, Gross R, Adler M, King K, MacGregor RR, et al. (2000) The effect of acute severe illness on CD4+ lymphocyte counts in nonimmunocompromised patients. Archives of Internal Medicine 160: 715–716.
  30. 30. Tollerud DJ, Clark JW, Brown LM, Neuland CY, Pankiw-Trost LK, et al. (1989) The influence of age, race, and gender on peripheral blood mononuclear-cell subsets in healthy nonsmokers. J Clin Immunol 9: 214–222.
  31. 31. Maini MK, Gilson RJ, Chavda N, Gill S, Fakoya A, et al. (1996) Reference ranges and sources of variability of CD4 counts in HIV-seronegative women and men. Genitourin Med 72: 27–31.
  32. 32. Karcher H, Bohning D, Downing R, Mashate S, Harms G (2006) Comparison of two alternative methods for CD4+ T-cell determination (Coulter manual CD4 count and CyFlow) against standard dual platform flow cytometry in Uganda. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 70: 163–169.
  33. 33. Bekele Y, Mengistu Y, de Wit TR, Wolday D (2011) Timing of blood sampling for CD4 T-cell counting influences HAART decisions. Ethiop Med J 49: 187–197.
  34. 34. Tanser F, Hosegood V, Bärnighausen T, Herbst K, Nyirenda M, et al. (2008) Cohort Profile: Africa Centre Demographic Information System (ACDIS) and population-based HIV survey. Int J Epidemiol 37: 956–962.
  35. 35. Zuch M, Mason-Jones AJ, Mathews C, Henley L (2012) Changes to the law on consent in South Africa: implications for school-based adolescent sexual and reproductive health research. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 12: 3.
  36. 36. Bärnighausen T, Tanser F, Malaza A, Herbst K, Newell ML (2012) HIV status and participation in HIV surveillance in the era of antiretroviral treatment: a study of linked population-based and clinical data in rural South Africa. Tropical Medicine and International Health 17: e103–110.
  37. 37. Houlihan CF, Bland RM, Mutevedzi PC, Lessells RJ, Ndirangu J, et al. (2011) Cohort profile: Hlabisa HIV treatment and care programme. Int J Epidemiol 40: 318–326.
  38. 38. Yu LM, Easterbrook PJ, Marshall T (1997) Relationship between CD4 count and CD4% in HIV-infected people. Int J Epidemiol 26: 1367–1372.
  39. 39. Malaza A, Mossong J, Bärnighausen T, Newell ML (2012) Hypertension and Obesity in Adults Living in a High HIV Prevalence Rural Area in South Africa. PLoS One 7: e47761.
  40. 40. Nicastri E, Angeletti C, Palmisano L, Sarmati L, Chiesi A, et al. (2005) Gender differences in clinical progression of HIV-1-infected individuals during long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 19: 577–583.
  41. 41. Mutevedzi PC, Lessells RJ, Heller T, Bärnighausen T, Cooke GS, et al. (2010) Scale-up of a decentralized HIV treatment programme in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: does rapid expansion affect patient outcomes? Bull World Health Organ 88: 593–600.
  42. 42. Cornell M, Schomaker M, Garone DB, Giddy J, Hoffmann CJ, et al. (2012) Gender Differences in Survival among Adult Patients Starting Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa: A Multicentre Cohort Study. PLoS medicine 9: e1001304.
  43. 43. Lessells R, Mutevedzi PC, Iwuji C, Newell ML Reduction in early mortality on antiretroviral therapy for adults in rural South Africa since change in CD4+ cell count eligibility criteria. JAIDS (in press).
  44. 44. Julg B, Poole D, Ghebremichael M, Castilla C, Altfeld M, et al. (2012) Factors predicting discordant virological and immunological responses to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 clade C infected Zulu/Xhosa in South Africa. PLoS One 7: e31161.
  45. 45. Messele T, Rinke de Wit TF, Brouwer M, Aklilu M, Birru T, et al. (2001) No difference in in vitro susceptibility to HIV type 1 between high-risk HIV-negative Ethiopian commercial sex workers and low-risk control subjects. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 17: 433–441.
  46. 46. Olgiati A, Bärnighausen T, Newell ML (2012) Do self-assessments of health predict future mortality in rural South Africa? The case of KwaZulu-Natal in the era of antiretroviral treatment. Tropical Medicine and International Health 17: 844–853.
  47. 47. Westerman LE, Kohatsu L, Ortiz A, McClain B, Kaplan J, et al. (2010) A quality management systems approach for CD4 testing in resource-poor settings. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 134: 556–567.
  48. 48. Lawn SD, Myer L, Edwards D, Bekker LG, Wood R (2009) Short-term and long-term risk of tuberculosis associated with CD4 cell recovery during antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. AIDS 23: 1717–1725.
  49. 49. Crampin AC, Mwaungulu FD, Ambrose LR, Longwe H, French N (2011) Normal Range of CD4 Cell Counts and Temporal Changes in Two HIVNegative Malawian Populations. Open AIDS J 5: 74–79.
  50. 50. Zeh C, Amornkul PN, Inzaule S, Ondoa P, Oyaro B, et al. (2011) Population-based biochemistry, immunologic and hematological reference values for adolescents and young adults in a rural population in Western Kenya. PLoS One 6: e21040.
  51. 51. Levin A, Brubaker G, Shao JS, Kumby D, O'Brien TR, et al. (1996) Determination of T-lymphocyte subsets on site in rural Tanzania: results in HIV-1 infected and non-infected individuals. Int J STD AIDS 7: 288–291.