Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Landscape of Transcriptional Deregulations in the Preeclamptic Placenta

Landscape of Transcriptional Deregulations in the Preeclamptic Placenta

  • Daniel Vaiman, 
  • Rosamaria Calicchio, 
  • Francisco Miralles
PLOS
x

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy disease affecting 5 to 8% of pregnant women and a leading cause of both maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity. Because of a default in the process of implantation, the placenta of preeclamptic women undergoes insufficient vascularization. This results in placental ischemia, inflammation and subsequent release of placental debris and vasoactive factors in the maternal circulation causing a systemic endothelial activation. Several microarray studies have analyzed the transcriptome of the preeclamptic placentas to identify genes which could be involved in placental dysfunction. In this study, we compared the data from publicly available microarray analyses to obtain a consensus list of modified genes. This allowed to identify consistently modified genes in the preeclamptic placenta. Of these, 67 were up-regulated and 31 down-regulated. Assuming that changes in the transcription level of co-expressed genes may result from the coordinated action of a limited number of transcription factors, we looked for over-represented putative transcription factor binding sites in the promoters of these genes. Indeed, we found that the promoters of up-regulated genes are enriched in putative binding sites for NFkB, CREB, ANRT, REEB1, SP1, and AP-2. In the promoters of down-regulated genes, the most prevalent putative binding sites are those of MZF-1, NFYA, E2F1 and MEF2A. These transcriptions factors are known to regulate specific biological pathways such as cell responses to inflammation, hypoxia, DNA damage and proliferation. We discuss here the molecular mechanisms of action of these transcription factors and how they can be related to the placental dysfunction in the context of preeclampsia.

Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy complication affecting approximately 5–8% of pregnant women and capable of causing both maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The disease develops after 20 weeks of gestational age and is characterized by elevated maternal blood pressure (140 mmHg/90 mmHg) and proteinuria (>300 mg/24h), endothelial cells (ECs) dysfunction and systemic inflammation [1]. In addition, PE can lead to eclampsia (when convulsions develop), and may be associated with the HELLP syndrome (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelet count). Both conditions may induce severe complications such as cerebral hemorrhage, lung edema or liver hemorrhage and rupture. PE symptoms appear after 20 weeks of gestational age, but sometimes much later by the end of pregnancy, and even, quite surprisingly, post-partum [2]. Those PEs who initiate early are generally more severe (blood pressure >160 mmHg/110 mmHg and proteinuria >300 mg/24h) and associated to a greater rate of intrauterine growth retardation and of iatrogenic prematurity.

Defective placentation is generally described as being at the root of the disease. Several studies have established that in the developing preeclamptic placenta, the normal process of trophoblast invasion and remodeling of the uterine maternal spiral arteries is impaired. This default in placental development in early pregnancy results in reduced placental perfusion, placental oxidative stress and inflammation, with subsequent release of placental factors and debris into the maternal circulation. These circulating factors are supposed to cause a widespread ECs activation leading to the multisystem dysfunction characteristic of the maternal syndrome of PE [3], [4]. Since the placenta plays a central role in the development of the disease, identifying the molecular mechanisms altered in the preeclamptic placenta comparatively to the non-pathologic placenta is fundamental to understand the initiation and evolution of this disease. In this context microarray-based genome-wide transcriptional profiling was used in several studies based on the comparison of the preeclamptic and non-pathologic placenta as reviewed by Louwen and collaborators [5]. In general, similar categories of differentially-expressed genes were reported including genes involved in: vascular regulation, inflammation, cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and cellular metabolism. However, in some cases the results appeared controversial in respect to some of the genes of interest. These differences may originate from the type of PE, the sampling of the placenta, the gestational age, ethnicity, mode of delivery, the microarray platforms and the filtering and statistical analysis. To overcome these differences we compared the lists of modified genes extracted from the publicly available datasets on microarray experiments concerning the preeclamptic placenta. The intersection of these gene-expression data sets, considering both up- and down-regulated genes, allowed obtaining a minimal list of genes which are consistently modified in PE. Then, we have used this consensus list to explore the transcriptional mechanisms involved in preeclampsia-specific placental dysfunction. This strategy has been used recently by Tapia and coworkers to identify with success transcription factors (TFs) involved in endometrial receptivity [6]. Transcriptional mechanisms control the expression of genes mainly through the action of TFs. These proteins bind to the DNA regulatory sequences of the genes at specific sites known as transcription factor binding sites (TFBS). Usually, the transcriptional activity of a gene requires the binding of several TFs, which act cooperatively to activate or repress transcription [7]. Therefore, we have used several bioinformatic tools allowing detecting over-representation of TFBS and of sets of TFBS in the promoters of genes. This way we identified a number of TFs which are likely involved in the regulation of the set of consistently modified genes in PE. These TFs may be instrumental in the transcriptomic modifications undergone by the preeclamptic placenta and their involvement in this disease can now be tested in the wet laboratory.

Materials and Methods

Data Sets used in this Study

We searched the public DataSets assembled from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository, to identify expression microarray datasets that compared the expression of preeclamptic versus normal placentas. The keywords: preeclampsia, placenta, microarrays and gene-expression, were used for this search. To be included in our study the microarray experiments had to be done with placental biopsies collected at delivery and at relatively comparable gestational ages (30–39 weeks). This allowed to identify six datasets (Table 1). The GEO accession numbers of the studies are: GSE10588, GSE4707, GSE30186, GSE25906, GSE24129 and GSE14722, [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. The data from each study were analyzed with Geo2R to identify genes significantly modified (P-value ≤0.05 and Log2 Fold Change = ±0.2). This generated a list of modified genes (up- and down-regulated) for each study. Subsequently the lists of modified genes were confronted using the GENOMATIX list comparison tool (Genomatix Software GmbH, Munich, Germany) to identify those genes which were consistently modified (up- or down-regulated genes). Those showing similar modification in at least 4 studies were considered relevant and included in two final lists (consistently up-regulated and down-regulated genes).

Functional Clustering

The list of genes consistently up- and down-regulated within the microarray datasets was submitted to the GENOMATIX GeneRanker tool for functional annotation and pathway analysis. This allowed gaining information on the biological significance of these genes.

Identification of Over-represented TFBS in the Proximal Promoter of the Genes Consistently Modified in the Preeclamptic Placenta

The sequences of the proximal promoter of the genes associated with the preeclamptic placenta were retrieved from the Data Base of Transcriptional Start Sites (DBTSS), [14]. For the purposes of this study the proximal promoter was defined as the region comprised within 1000 base pairs (bp) upstream and 200 bp downstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS). These sequences were used to search for potential TFBS using the following free softwares: CREMAG, a web tool that searches over-represented TFBS in a set of sequences using the TRANSFAC and JASPAR vertebrate position-weight matrices [15]. The analysis was performed with the default parameters. We used a 70% conservation threshold and a maximum number of 20 most conserved TFBSs in non-coding regions between 1000 bp upstream and 200 bp downstream of the TSS. TELIS (Transcription Element Listening System) is a Java server-side application which identifies transcription-factor binding motifs (TFBMs) that are over-represented among the promoters [16]. It consists of two parts: PromoterScan and PromoterStats. PromoterScan finds the number of occurrences of specific TFBMs in promoters and stores the results in MySQL database. PromoterStats uses z-statistics to find matrices which are over-represented (or under-represented) on the specific differentially expressed promoter set. The transcription factor affinity prediction (TRAP) method calculates the affinity of transcription factors for DNA sequences on the basis of a biophysical model [17]. This method has proven to be useful for several applications, including for determining which transcription factors have the highest affinity in a set of sequences [18]. TFM-explorer is a program for analyzing regulatory regions of eukaryotic genomes. It takes a set of co-regulated gene sequences, and search for locally over-represented TFBS [19]. The algorithm proceeds in two steps: (i) it scans sequences for detecting all potential transcription factor binding sites, using weight matrices from JASPAR or TRANSFAC. (ii) it extracts significant clusters (region of the input sequences associated with a factor) by calculating a score function. The web tool TOUCAN uses the MotifScanner algorithm to search for potential TFBS in a set of sequences using the TRANSFAC or JASPAR vertebrate databases. The information obtained from the MotifScanner is subsequently processed by the statistics function of TOUCAN to identify over-represented TFBS [20], [21]. We used several different TFBS prediction software’s because these bioinformatics tools usually generate a number of false positives. Thus, only TFBS predicted by more than one tool were considered as true positives.

Identification of Regulatory Modules

To identify common regulatory modules in a set of promoter sequences we used the Genomatix FrameWorker software. FrameWorker identifies significant complex models of TFBS present in the promoter sequences of a set of co-regulated genes. The models/FrameWorkers are defined as all the TFBs that occur in the same order and in a certain distance range in all (or a subset) of the input sequences. To determine the P-value of the models, a background promoter sequence set of 5000 human promoters is scanned with the models generated by the software. This allows calculating the probability to found the same models in a set of randomly selected promoters.

Transcription Factors Interaction

TFs interactions were identified through the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database v9.0. This database contains known and predicted physical and functional protein-protein interactions [22]. STRING was used in the protein mode, and only interactions based in experimental protein-protein interaction and curated databases with confidence levels over 0.5 were considered.

Results

Identification of Genes Consistently Associated with the Preeclamptic Placenta

The intersection of the lists of modified genes extracted from the microarray studies of the preeclamptic placenta yielded a short list of genes being consistently modified in the different studies. We identified a total 98 modified genes of which 67 were up-regulated and 31 down-regulated. Table 2 (up-regulated) and Table 3 (down-regulated) show a selection of consistently modified genes in PE (Complete lists are provided as Tables S1 and S2). The most consistently up-regulated genes were LEP and FLT1 (present in the totality of studies), followed by QPCT, SIGLEC6, ENG, BCL6, INHA, EBI3, PAPP2 and HTRA1 (found modified in five studies). The most consistently down-regulated gene modified in all the studies was CLDN1. Followed by genes present at least in four out of six studies including among others ABAT, SOD1, GCLM, APLN, ABCG2, and NR2F1.

thumbnail
Table 2. Partial list of consistently up-regulated genes in the preeclamptic placenta.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Partial list of consistently down-regulated genes in the preeclamptic placenta.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.t003

Functional Clustering Analysis

We then used the GENOMATIX Gene Ranker software to perform functional and network analysis of the consistently modified genes. This made it possible to identify functional gene classifiers (Table 4 and 5) and pathways (Table 6) that are significantly enriched in the preeclamptic placenta. Among the up-regulated genes the most significant functional categories were signaling and signal transduction, the regulation of biological quality, interferon-gamma biosynthetic process, the regulation of B cell differentiation and cell proliferation. The list of down-regulated genes was enriched in transcripts involved in the response to regulation of sulfur metabolism, blood vessel size and blood circulation, cellular homeostasis, and the responses to chemical stimulus and oxidative stress. The pathways with the highest scores include the peroxisome proliferative activated receptor alpha, lipid, hypoxia inducible factor 1, FMS like receptor tyrosine kinase 3 and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. In addition, we noticed that in at least three out of the six microarray studies some of the consistently modified genes in the preeclamptic placenta encode TFs. Among the up-regulated genes we found: LIMD1 (LIM domain-containing protein 1), BHLHE40 (Basic helix-loop-helix family member e40), VDR (Vitamin D 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor), CEBPA (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein, alpha), BCL6 (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 6), ARID3A (AT rich interactive domain 3A) and NRIP1 (Nuclear receptor interacting protein 1). Among the down-regulated genes: TFDP2 (Transcription factor Dp-2), ZFAND5 (Zinc finger, AN1-type domain 5), BHLHE41 (Basic helix-loop-helix family, member e41), and NR2F1 (Nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 1). These TFs were also included in further analyses.

thumbnail
Table 4. Biological processes annotation clusters for up-regulated genes as reported by the GENOMATIX webtool.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. Biological processes annotation clusters for down-regulated genes as reported by the GENOMATIX webtool.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.t005

Identification of Over-represented TFBS among the Consistently Modified Genes

Co-expressed groups of genes are expected to share regulatory elements which are responsible of the co-regulation. Thus, to identify the putative common regulatory elements the lists of up- and down-regulated genes were analyzed with bioinformatics tools. First the proximal promoter sequences of the genes (1000 bp up-stream and 200 bp downstream of the TSS) were retrieved from the DBTSS data base, and subsequently analyzed with several public TFBS detection tools: CREMAG, TELIS, TRAP, TFM-Explorer, and TOUCAN. Only those TFBS showing a P value ≤0.05 for their observed frequency versus their predicted frequency were considered. The results of these analysis are listed in Table 7 and Table 8. The most significant over-represented TFBS found in the up-regulated genes list correspond to NFkB (Nuclear factor kappa B), RREB1 (Ras responsive element binding protein 1), SP1 (Specificity protein 1), ARNT (Aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator), CREB1 (cAMP responsive element binding protein 1) and AP-2 (Activating enhancer-binding protein 2). In the down-regulated list the most significant over-represented TFBS are MZF1 (Myeloid zinc finger 1), E2F1 (E2F transcription factor 1), MEF2A (Myocyte enhancer factor 2A) and NFYA (Nuclear transcription factor Y, alpha). Some TFBS, such as SP1, E2F1, ARNT, and MZF1 appear over-represented in both up- and down-regulated genes.

thumbnail
Table 7. Transcription factor binding sites over-represented in the consensus list of up-regulated genes.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.t007

thumbnail
Table 8. Transcription binding sites over-represented in the consensus list of down-regulated genes.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.t008

Search for Regulatory Modules in TFs Consistently Modified in Preeclampsia

The intersection of the microarrays of preeclamptic placentas indicates that a few TFs appear consistently modified at the transcriptional level (either up- or down-regulated). Thus, these transcriptionally co-regulated TFs could share common regulatory elements in their promoters. These elements are often organized into defined motifs (frameworks) of two or more TFBs which are located in the promoter of the genes in a specific orientation, separated by a given distance and working in concert. We used the Genomatix FrameWorker software to identify putative regulatory modules among the TFs consistently modified in the preeclamptic placenta. Among the promoter sequences of the TFs consistently up-regulated we got seven significant models (i.e. modules) of three elements present in the promoter of five genes out of seven. The most significant model (P≤7.82×10−11) was composed of TFBs for the Zinc finger transcription factors EGRF (Early growth response family), E2FF (E2F-myc activator/cell cycle regulator) and ZF5F (binding site for the transcription factor Zfp161); (Figure 1A). In addition, an alternative regulatory module of two elements (EGRF and E2FF) was found present in the promoter of six out of the seven TFs consistently up-regulated in the preeclamptic placenta (P≤8.76×10−8). In the case of the consistently down-regulated TFs we found one highly significant model (P≤1.99×10−10) composed of six elements corresponding to TFBS for E2FF, RXRF (Retinoid × receptor heterodimer-binding sites), KLFS (Kruppel-like factors) and ZF02 (C2H2 zinc finger transcription factors 2). This module was present in the promoter of three out of four genes (Figure 1B).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Transcription factors modules in the promoter sequences of TFs consistently modified in PE.

The TFs consistently modified (either up- or down-regulated ) in PE were analyzed with the Genomatix FrameWorker software to identify common regulatory modules. (A) We identified seven common significant four-element modules in the promoters of five out of seven consistently up-regulated TFs. Here we show the most significant (P≤7.8×10−11) regulatory module composed of TFBs for EGRF, E2FF and ZF5F. (B) We identified one significant 6-element regulatory module (P≤1.9×10−10) in the promoters of tree out of four TFs down-regulated in the preeclamptic placenta. This module is composed of TFBS for E2FF, RXRF, KLFs and ZF02.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.g001

Transcription Factors Interactome

We used the STRING database to search for known interactions among the TFs identified as consistently modified in the preeclamptic placenta and also with those identified through our TFBS analysis. Subsequently, we used the STRING functions to extend the network and display close interacting factors. As shown in Figure 2, the majority of the TFs modified in the preeclamptic placenta including those inferred from the TFBS analysis present a close functional association. In addition, we identified that the transcription factor EP300 (E1A binding protein p300) is connected with the largest number of preeclampsia-associated TFs in an extended interaction network.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Transcription factors interaction network in the preeclamptic placenta.

TFs modified in the preeclamptic placenta were analyzed with STRING v9.0 to identify putative interactions. Blue lines represent the evidence for the association. The thickness of the line is proportional to the confidence level of the interaction. TFS found to be modified at the transcriptional level in the preeclamptic placenta appear in red (up-regulated) and green (down-regulated).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.g002

Discussion

The molecular basis of transcriptional alterations in the preeclamptic placenta remains elusive. Herein, we identified several TFs which are putatively involved in the regulation of genes that are consistently associated with PE. We started our analysis by intersecting publicly available datasets from microarrays analysis of preeclamptic placentas. This allowed building a consensus list of modified genes in the preeclamptic placenta. Of these, 67 were up-regulated and 31 down-regulated. The functional analysis identified several categories including: signaling, biological quality regulation, myeloid cell regulation, and cell proliferation among the up-regulated genes. Blood vessel regulation, blood circulation, cellular homeostasis and response to oxidative stress were the functional categories identified as enriched in the down-regulated genes. Consistently with preeclampsia pathophysiology, pathway analysis showed an over-representation of genes involved in peroxisome proliferative activated receptor alpha, lipid biosynthesis, hypoxia, and VEGF response. Subsequently, we extended our analysis by searching common TFs possibly involved in gene regulation in preeclamptic women’s placentas. Several bioinformatics tools detected over-represented TFBSs in the promoters of the PE-associated genes. Inside up-regulated genes promoters we found an over-representation of TFBSs for NFKB, SP1, RREB1, ARNT, CREB1 and AP-2. Conversely, among the down-regulated genes we found a prevalence of TFBSs for MZF-1, NFYA, E2F1 and MEF2A. Interestingly several transcriptionnally modified genes were themselves transcription factors. Below, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of action of all these TFs, and how they might be related to the placental dysfunction in the context of PE.

NFkB.

Belongs to the REL family of TFs which in mammals is composed of five members: RelA/p65, RelB, c-Rel, p50(NFkB1) and p52(NFkB2). NFkB proteins bind to kB sites as dimers, either homodimers or heterodimers, and can exert both positive and negative effects on gene transcription. Signaling mediated by NFkB stimulates inflammation, invasion, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation and it is also associated with apoptosis regulation [23]. NFkB is known to be involved in PE at several levels and in different cell types. Placental NFkB has been found activated nearly 10-fold in PE [24]. In vitro experiments show that oxidative stress, a hallmark of preeclamptic placenta, causes NFkB activation in a trophoblast-like cell line, which is enhanced by TNF-α [24]. In addition, trophoblast cells respond to TLR3 activation by signaling through both NFkB and IRF pathways resulting in expression of inflammatory mediators and, in particular, the PE-related anti-angiogenic factor sFLT-1 [25]. In endothelial cells (ECs) preeclamptic plasma up-regulates NFkB activity by 2.5-fold compared with normal plasma [26]. This results in ECs activation. Several factors in the preeclamptic plasma induce endothelial NFkB activation, including cytokines, lipid peroxides, peroxinitirites, and shed membrane microparticles (mainly derived from apoptotic cytotrophoblasts, leukocytes and platelets), [26], [27]. Increased endogenous activation of NFkB associated with TNF-α and IL-1β release has been detected in PBMC in PE as compared to normal pregnancies [28]. Several factors associated with PE have been shown to be able to induce NFkB activation including adiponectin, leptin, cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6), lipid peroxides, and agonistic auto-antibodies to the angiotensin II receptor type I (AT1-AA); [29], [30]. Moreover experiments studying placental ischemia-reperfusion in vitro and in vivo provide strong evidence indicating that oxidative stress and ROS production can activate the NFkB signalling pathway [31]. Activation of the NFkB pathway in the placenta, together with other stress signaling pathways (p38, MAPK, JNK), results in the placental production of inflammatory mediators, apoptotic debris, and anti-angiogenic mediators.

SP1.

is a ubiquitously expressed Zinc Finger TF that regulates the expression of thousands of genes implicated in the control of cellular processes. SP1 is also involved in chromatin remodeling through interactions with chromatin-modifying factors such as EP300 and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Although constitutively expressed, phosphorylation, acetylation, sumoylation, ubiquitylation, and glycosylation influence the transcriptional activity and stability of SP1 [32]. In the placenta, SP1 is involved in the differentiation of the cytotrophoblast and regulates the expression of several proteins including ID-1, Syncytin, the AT1 receptor, the 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11β-HSD2) and the pregnancy-specific glycoprotein 5, as well as several cullin genes involved in the dynamics of protein recycling [33]. Moreover, compound Sp1/Sp3 heterozygous mice show severely reduced spongiotrophoblast layer and a disorganized labyrinth layer. Within the spongiotrophoblast layer both spongiotrophoblast cells and trophoblast glycogen cells are reduced. Haploinsufficiency of both Sp1 and Sp3 also leads to a severe disruption of the normal labyrinth layer architecture [34]. In response to oxidative-stress induced by hypoxia, SP1 becomes activated and induces the expression of several factors including VEGFA, β-enolase, cyclooxygenase 2, and carbonic anhydrase 9. SP1 is also involved in the inflammatory response and, together with NFkB and AP-1, up-regulates the expression of VCAM1 and ICAM1 adhesion molecules, tumor growth factor (TGF-β) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFβ), and, finally, monocytes chemotactic protein-1 (MCP1) and osteopontin cytokines (28).

AP2.

The activator protein-2 (AP-2) family consists of five members, AP-2α, AP-2β, AP-2γ, AP-2δ, and AP-2ε, encoded by different genes. These isoforms can directly transactivate their target genes by binding the same GC-rich consensus sequence [35]. AP-2α and AP-2γ are expressed in the placenta, and they control syncytiotrophoblast-specific gene expression [36], [37]. In AP-2γ-deficient mice all derivatives of the throphoblast cells are formed, however both the embryo and the extraembryonic tissues are severely growth retarded. This growth retardation is based on a reduced proliferation of the cells of the ectoplacental cone and a reduced number of giant cells [38]. In addition, AP-2γ has been shown to regulate the genes for adenosine deaminase (ADA), human placental lactogen, and human chorionic gonadotropin-β [37], [39], [40]. The expressions of AP-2α and AP-2γ have been found elevated in the preeclamptic placentas in comparison with the gestational age-matched control placentas [41]. Moreover, the over expression of AP-2α or AP-2γ in an extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cell line, decreased its migratory and invasive abilities [41]. This was associated with reduced expression of protease activated receptor-1 and matrix metalloproteinases and a significant induction of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. The same study has shown that in this EVT cell line TNF-α (which is present at higher levels in PE) induces both AP-2α and AP-2γ expression. Thus, the over-representation of genes containing TFBS for AP-2 in our study is consistent with the reported increased expression of AP-2 in PE and its known role in trophoblasts genes regulation.

CREB1.

The cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1), a member of the leucine zipper family of DNA-binding proteins, is ubiquitously expressed and binds as a homodimer to the cAMP response element (CRE). In the placenta, CREB contributes to the regulation of PLGF gene expression [42]. Moreover in cytotrophoblast cells CREB, modulates human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) gene-expression by a direct protein-protein interaction with AP-2α [43]. Also, a recent study has shown that hCG added to cytotrophoblast cells lines (JEG-3, BeWo) or to placental explants induces endogenous leptin expression. This induction appears to be mediated by CREB [44].

ARNT (HIF-1β).

ARNT (aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator) is the beta subunit (HIF-1β) of the heterodimeric transcription factor, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). HIF-1 is a ubiquitous TF complex involved in the regulation of the cellular responses to oxygen deprivation (hypoxia). Under normoxic conditions the HIF-1α subunit is constitutively transcribed, translated and hydroxylated at multiple proline residues. This hydroxylation targets HIF-1α for proteasomal degradation. In hypoxia, mitochondria-derived ROS inhibits HIF-1α hydroxylation, enabling nuclear translocation, heterodimerization with the constitutively expressed ARNT (HIF-1β), binding to DNA, interaction with the co-activators p300/CBP and subsequent activation of hypoxia–responsive genes. In the developing placenta ARNT (HIF-1β) plays a critical role in cell differentiation [45]. Moreover, as a component of the HIF-1 complex ARNT (HIF-1β) regulates the expression of placental genes responsive to hypoxia. Studies in both preeclamptic patients and animal models have revealed the existence of hypoxia in the preeclamptic placenta [46], [47], [48]. Hypoxia in PE, is believed to be the consequence of shallow invasion of the decidua by the cytotrophoblasts resulting in impaired remodeling of the spiral arteries. This leads to reduced uteroplacental blood flow causing placental hypoxia, oxidative stress, and inflammation. The analysis of placental explants and in vitro studies on cytotrophoblasts have shown that several factors involved in the maternal manifestations of the preeclamptic syndrome are transcriptionally regulated by the HIF-1 complex including: Endothelin 1 [49], [50], Endoglin [51], the antiangiogenic factor sFLT-1 [52], Leptin [53], and the vasoconstrictors Urotensin II [54], Urocortin-2 and Urocortin-3 [55]. Therefore, the fact that the analysis of the promoters of consistently modified genes in PE reveals and over-representation of HIF-ANRT binding sites is consistent with the central role played by hypoxia in the development of PE.

RREB1.

is a zinc finger TF that binds to RAS-responsive elements (RREs) of gene promoters [56]. In the placenta, RREB1 is expressed in the extravillous cytotrophoblasts were it could be involved in pathological repression of the human leukocyte antigen G (HLAG). HLA-G is expressed in the human placenta and amnios, and plays an essential role in the maternal tolerance toward the fetus through the inhibition of the NK and T lymphocyte-mediated direct cytotoxicity. Both circulating HLA-G and HLA-G protein expressed in the extravillous cytototrophoblasts are reduced in PE [57], [58], possibly trough oxidative stress [59]. RREB1 can inhibit expression of HLA-G by binding to RREs within the HLA-G promoter [60]. RREB1 is also involved in the response to cellular stress as it binds to the p53 gene core promoter and up-regulates p53 transcription. One known effect of the oxidative stress in PE is to cause oxidative DNA damage [61]. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that RREB1 could activate p53 gene expression in the preeclamptic placenta. However, at present there are contradictory studies concerning the up-regulation of p53 in the preeclamptic placenta [62].

MZF1.

Myeloid zinc finger 1 (MZF1) is a member of the SCAN domain family of TFs. MZF1 is preferentially expressed in hematopoietic cells, and may be involved in the transcriptional regulation of hematopoietic-specific genes [63]. A putative role in placental physiology or pathology is currently unknown. However, the human placenta has been recognized to work as a hematopoietic organ during the embryonic and fetal development [64]. Increased hematopoietic activity in the preeclamptic placenta has been suggested [65]. On the other hand MZF1, together with SP1 and ZBTB7B has been involved in the regulation of the SERPINA3 in the cytotrophoblastic cell line JEG3 [66]. SERPINA3 is a serine protease inhibitor known to be up-regulated in human placental diseases (including PE) in association with a hypomethylation of the 5' region of the gene [67]. Over expression of SERPINA3 in JEG-3 cells, decreased cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix and to neighboring cells, but protects them from apoptosis.

E2F1.

The E2F family of TFs controls the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and DNA repair. In the context of PE, a recent study has reported the up-regulation of E2F1, together with several genes involved in cell cycle progression, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from severe preeclamptic women [68]. In our analysis we did not detect E2F1 among the consensus up-regulated genes in PE. However, we found that its partner, TFDP2, is down-regulated in the preeclamptic placentas. Thus down-regulation of TFDP2 might result in impaired DNA-binding of E2F1, and lead to the deregulation of genes controlled by the E2F1-TFDP2 complex. On the other hand, it has been reported that under hypoxic conditions E2F1 and p53 are up-regulated, and are able to down-regulate expression from the VEGF promoter [69]. The minimum VEGF promoter mediating transcriptional repression by E2F1, was found to be composed of an E2F1-binding site with four SP1 sites in close proximity. Of note, it is known that E2F1 and Sp1 proteins physically and functionally interact and show functional synergism in promoters having binding sites for both [70]. In ECs, E2F1 can induce the expression of FLT-1, KDR, and ANGPT2, through a mechanism involving VEGF stimulation, and both Histones and E2F1 acetylation [71]. Previous studies had shown that the expression of FLT-1 and KDR is regulated by Sp1 proteins. [72]. Thus, we find again the association between E2F1 and SP1 binding sites in the regulation of this antiangiogenic genes.

MEF2A.

(Myocyte enhancer factor 2A) belongs to the MADS (MCM1, agamous, deficiens, SRF) family of TFs and plays a pivotal role in the development of various organ systems, including the cardiovascular system [73]. The implication of this TF in placental development or in preeclampsia has not been studied. However, its role in the control of gene expression in smooth muscle cells (SMCs) and ECs suggests that it might be involved in the vascularization of the placenta. In vascular SMCs, MEF2A has been shown to be activated via reactive oxygen species and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. This leads to the induction of the transcription factor KLF5 in response to angiotensin II [74]. KLF5 has been found consistently up-regulated in cardiovascular diseases [75]. Within ECs, shear stress stimulates induction of KLF2 via the MEK5/ERK5/MEF2 pathway, which ultimately leads to MEF2A binding to and transactivating the KLF2 promoter [76]. KLF2, has been reported to be essential for the anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic functions of the endothelium [77]. The mechanisms by which KLF2 achieve its anti-inflammatory function are multiple and include inhibition of NFkB, activator protein-1 (AP-1), and activating transcription factor 2 (AP-2). Thus, the ROS produced in preeclamptic placenta could be involved in the activation of MEF2A in SMCs. On the other hand in the ECs, MEF2A activation could be part of an adaptive response seeking to protect the cells against inflammation and thrombosis (two characteristics of PE).

NFYA.

associates with a dimer composed of NF-YB, and NF-YC subunits, forming a trimer that binds to DNA. The complex recognizes the pentanucleotide CCAAT, a motif present in the promoter regions of many genes [78]. The DNA interaction of the complex occurs through NFYA, suggesting a role as the regulatory subunit. ROS play also an important role in NFY regulation [79]. When oxidized, NFYB forms homodimers remaining localized in the cytoplasms, as a consequence the formation of the trimer and subsequent DNA binding is impaired. NF-Y is known to interact with several TFs to mediate the synergistic activation of specific classes of promoters. The most frequent TFs partners of NFY include: SREBP, SP1, KLFs, OCT-1 and E2F1. NFY seems to be also involved in the response to cell stress. Thus, NFY directly controls the expression of TFs genes such as P53 (DNA-damage), XBP1, CHOP/DDIT3 (ER stress), and HSF1 (Heat shock), [78]. The role of NFY in the regulation of genes involved in the response to cell stress could represent a link between this TF and PE. In this sense, NFYA and OCT-1 (another TF which appears over-represented in our analysis) synergistically regulate a P53-independent induction of GADD45 subsequently to DNA-damage [80]. The GADD45 stress sensor protein has been suggested to be the link between placental stress and the pathogenesis of PE through the induction of FLt-1. Thus in stressed placental explants GADD45a initiated a signaling cascade culminating in FLt-1 induction [81].

In addition to the TFs identified by our bioinformatic TFBS analysis, some of the genes consistently modified in the preeclamptic placenta encode TFs. Among the up-regulated genes we found: LIMD1, BHLHE40, VDR, CEBPA, BCL6, ARID3A and NRIP1. Among the down-regulated genes: TFDP2, ZFAND5, BHLHE41, and NR2F1.

LIMD1 inhibits E2F-mediated transcription, and suppresses the expression of the majority of genes with E2F1-responsive elements [82]. The up-regulation of this TF in the preeclamptic placenta seems coherent with the detection of an over-representation of TFBS for E2F1 among the down-regulated genes. On the other hand, LIMD1 has been recently involved in the regulation of the hypoxia response through a mechanism involving HIF1-α degradation [83]. LIMD1 up-regulation in the preeclamptic placenta might result from a feed-back mechanism aiming to regulate the transcriptional activity of the HIF complex. BHLHE40 (DEC1/STRA13) is another TF up-regulated in PE, known to be expressed in the cytotrophoblasts and fibroblast cells of the placenta [84]. Its gene expression is regulated by various extracellular stimuli, such as growth factors, serum starvation, hormones, nutrients, cytokines, and hypoxia through HIF-1α activation. CEBPA (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha) coordinates proliferation arrest and the differentiation of trophoblastic cells [85]. CEBPA is known to activate the expression of the leptin gene [86]. Thus, the up-regulation of CEBPA is probably related to the increased expression of leptin (one of the most consistently modified genes in the PE placenta). BCL6 mediates transcriptional repression and interacts with components of histone deacetylase co-repressor complexes including N-CoR and SMRT [87]. It is involved in a multiple biological processes including: regulation of inflammatory response; negative regulation of cell growth; negative regulation of transcription, response to DNA damage stimulus, negative regulation of B cell apoptosis. It has been speculated that up-regulation of BCL6 in the preeclamptic placenta could be related to deregulated DNA-damage response, cell cycle arrest, cell survival and immune response in trophoblast cells [5]. ARID3A is a nuclear matrix-associated TF that stimulates immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) expression and Cyclin E1/E2F-dependent cell cycle progression. [88], [89]. NRIP1 (also known as RIP140) has been shown to bind and repress the transcriptional activity of several nuclear receptors including the estrogen receptors, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, the vitamin D receptor, thyroid hormone receptors, and estrogen-related receptors [90]. NRIP1 has a major role as co-regulator of genes involved in lipid and glucose metabolism, in heart, skeletal muscle, and liver. Its biological role in the placenta is currently unknown. However, we found in our study that the most significantly up-regulated pathways concern the peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor and lipids biosynthesis. Its implication in placental inflammation through its cooperation with NFkB is also possible. TFDP2 is a member of the E2F/DP family [91]. As mentioned above, it binds DNA cooperatively with E2F family members. The down-regulation of TFDP2 implies impaired E2F1 driven transcription, and seems to be coherent with the fact that TFBS for E2F1 are over-represented among the down-regulated genes in the PE placenta. ZFAND5 plays a role in the regulation of NFkB activation and apoptosis. Over-expression of ZFAND5 sensitizes cells to TNF-induced apoptosis [92]. BHLHE41 (DEC2/SHARP) is associated with the regulation of apoptosis, circadian rhythm and the response to hypoxia [93]. This TF binds to HIFs and promotes HIF proteasomal degradation by serving as the HIF-presenting factor to the proteasome independently from pVHL (von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor), hypoxia and the ubiquitination machinery. BHLHE41 therefore determines the intrinsic instability of HIF proteins to act in parallel to, and cooperate with, oxygen levels [94]. Therefore down-regulation of BHLHE41, is probably related to the up-regulation of hypoxia responsive genes in the PE placenta. NR2F1 (COUP-TFI) is a member of the orphan subfamily of nuclear receptors required for multiple physiologic and biologic functions, including heart and vascular system function and cholesterol/lipid homeostasis [95]. Little is known about a putative role of NR2F1 in the placenta. A study identified NR2F1 as a repressor of the hLHR (Luteinizing hormone receptor) gene transcription in JAR cells (issued from a human placental choriocarcinoma), [96]. In the placenta LH mediates gonadotropin signals and triggers intracellular responses that participate in maturation and function of the gonads as well as the regulation of steroidogenesis and gametogenesis. Nevertheless, we observe that TFBS for COUP are over-represented in the list of down-regulated genes in the PE placenta.

Another TF worth mentioning here is STOX1 (storkhead box 1). To date only two PE susceptibility genes have been identified (ACVR2A and STOX1). Of these, STOX1 encodes a winged-helix TF showing great similarity with the FOX family of TFs [97]. STOX1 has been found to be involved in trophoblast dysfunction in PE. Over-expression of STOX1 in the JEG-3 choriocarcinoma cell line (as a model for trophoblasts), deregulates many genes which are also modified in the preeclamptic placenta [98]. Transgenic mice over-expressing the human version of STOX1 develop a syndrome similar to severe human PE. During pregnancy, the mice undergo a steep increase in blood pressure, develop proteinuria and renal histology reveals accumulation of fibrin [99]. Here, we have compared the transcriptome of the JEG-3 cells over-expressing STOX1 and the list of consistently modified genes in PE and found a significant correlation (data not shown). Genes such as LEP, ENG, EBI3, FSTL3, SPAG4, LHB, TMEM45A, GCLM, TFDP2, or TSPAN12 that we find consistently modified in PE, are also transcriptionally modified in the JEG-3 over-expressing STOX1. The microarrays analyzed in the present study do not reveal any significant modifications in the transcriptional levels of STOX1. However, STOX1 is known to be post-transcriptionally regulated. When phosphorylated by Akt, the STOX1 protein is inhibited from entering the nucleus and subsequently degraded by ubiquitination. In the absence of phosphorylation STOX1 is addressed to the nucleus [97]. As the STOX1 DNA-binding domain shows great similarity to FOX transcription factors it has been proposed that STOX1 binds to the FOX binding sites in the promoters of target genes. In our analysis FOX binding sites are detected as over-represented among the consistently down-regulated genes.

Having identified a set of TFs which are likely involved in the transcriptional modifications of the preeclamptic placenta, we investigated the putative interactions within them. The interactomics analysis using the STRING software showed that most of these TFs present close interactions. Moreover, by extending the interaction network we found that many of them were strongly connected with a pivotal TF: EP300. This protein is ubiquitously expressed and functions as a scaffolding actor between the TFs and the RNA polymerase II. It functions also as a histone acetyltransferase that regulates transcription via chromatin remodeling [100]. Among others, it mediates cAMP-gene regulation by binding specifically to phosphorylated CREB protein [101]. EP300 has been also identified as a co-activator of HIF-1α, and, thus, plays a role in the stimulation of hypoxia-induced genes such as VEGF [102]. The loss of one functional copy of the gene causes a rare disease in infants, the Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. This disease is characterized by growth retardation, dysmorphic features, skeletal abnormalities and mental retardation [103]. Interestingly, three of the babies out of the seven reported cases, were born from women who developed preeclampsia during the pregnancy [104]. This suggests that there could be an association between EP300 heterozygotic deleterious mutations and PE. The interaction of EP300 with most of the TFs identified in our study enhances its possible implication in PE.

In summary, our study has identified a number of TFs which could be key regulators of the changes in gene expression observed in the preeclamptic placenta. This allows developing hypothesis about the molecular mechanisms at work in the diseased placenta. However, there are a number of limitations of our study which must be taken into consideration. We have drawn a list of consistently modified genes in PE from the publicly available microarray data sets. That corresponds to only six studies from a total of 20 published microarray studies on preeclampsia. Unfortunately, the datasets corresponding to the majority of studies have not been deposited in public databases. Moreover, the authors do not provide in their manuscripts complete lists of modified genes. The access to more datasets would have increased the statistical power of the study, and presumably identified even more striking commonalities. Another aspect to consider is that these microarray experiments were done on placental samples which are composed of different cell types. This heterogeneity can cause noise that disturbs the correct prediction of a co-regulated gene set, and hence of the TFs involved in their regulation. Finally, we arbitrarily chose to limit the size of the promoters to be analyzed to 1200 bp. We postulated that the TFs regulating the activity of the modified genes would bind TFBS close to the TSS (-1000/+200 bases). If we had chosen other promoter lengths we might get different results. In a previous study published in 2006, Vasarhelyi et al analyzed the promoters of genes found to be modified in preeclamptic placentas [105]. They reported an over-representation of TFBS corresponding to NFkB(p50), SREBP and E47. Except for NFkB, the TFs identified in their study are different to those reported here, these differences being probably due to the data used for the studies. Vasarhelyi et al extracted data from a number of studies performed between years 2002 to 2005 [47], [106], [107], [108]. At that time, microarrays offered only a partial covering of the human genome. Thus, we used more recent data corresponding to microarrays with full coverage of the human genome.

Despite all this caveats our study allowed to identify a number of TFs involved in PE. Although a few of them are found to be consistently modified in the preeclamptic placenta at the transcriptional level, many of the TFs identified by our study (NFkB, CREB, ARNT, SP1, E2F1, NFYA…) are regulated by post-transcriptional mechanisms. These post-transcriptional modifications (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, sumoylation, etc… ), can be triggered by cellular stresses which are known to be associated with PE such as hypoxia, inflammation, oxidative stress, DNA-damage, etc… The validity of the hypothesis raised by our bioinformatic study need to be confirmed by experimental studies analyzing the implication of these TFs (including their post-transcriptional modifications) in both, in vitro models and in vivo in preeclamptic placentas.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Complete list of consistently up-regulated genes in the preeclamptic placenta. The lists of up-regulated genes for each of the six preeclamptic placenta microarrays analyzed in this study were confronted using the GENOMATIX list comparison tool (Genomatix Software GmbH, Munich, Germany). This allowed to identify those genes which were consistently up-regulated. Those showing similar modification in at least 4 studies were considered relevant and included in a final list of consistently up-regulated genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.s001

(XLSX)

Table S2.

Complete list of consistently down-regulated genes in the preeclamptic placenta. The lists of down-regulated genes for each of the six preeclamptic placenta microarrays analyzed in this study were confronted using the GENOMATIX list comparison tool (Genomatix Software GmbH, Munich, Germany). This allowed to identify those genes which were consistently down-regulated. Those showing similar modification in at least 4 studies were considered relevant and included in a final list of consistently down-regulated genes.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065498.s002

(XLSX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DV FM. Performed the experiments: DV RC FM. Analyzed the data: DV RC FM. Wrote the paper: DV FM.

References

  1. 1. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R (2010) Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 376: 631–644. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60279-6
  2. 2. Sibai BM (2012) Etiology and management of postpartum hypertension-preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206: 470–475. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.002
  3. 3. James JL, Whitley GS, Cartwright JE (2010) Pre-eclampsia: fitting together the placental, immune and cardiovascular pieces. J Pathol 221: 363–378. doi: 10.1002/path.2719
  4. 4. Wang A, Rana S, Karumanchi SA (2009) Preeclampsia: the role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis. Physiology (Bethesda) 24: 147–158. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00043.2008
  5. 5. Louwen F, Muschol-Steinmetz C, Reinhard J, Reitter A, Yuan J (2012) A lesson for cancer research: placental microarray gene analysis in preeclampsia. Oncotarget 3: 759–773.
  6. 6. Tapia A, Vilos C, Marin JC, Croxatto HB, Devoto L (2011) Bioinformatic detection of E47, E2F1 and SREBP1 transcription factors as potential regulators of genes associated to acquisition of endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9: 14. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-14
  7. 7. Davidson EH (2006) The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution; Burlington M, editor. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.
  8. 8. Sitras V, Paulssen RH, Gronaas H, Leirvik J, Hanssen TA, et al. (2009) Differential placental gene expression in severe preeclampsia. Placenta 30: 424–433. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.01.012
  9. 9. Meng T, Chen H, Sun M, Wang H, Zhao G, et al. (2012) Identification of differential gene expression profiles in placentas from preeclamptic pregnancies versus normal pregnancies by DNA microarrays. OMICS 16: 301–311. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0066
  10. 10. Tsai S, Hardison NE, James AH, Motsinger-Reif AA, Bischoff SR, et al. (2011) Transcriptional profiling of human placentas from pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia reveals disregulation of sialic acid acetylesterase and immune signalling pathways. Placenta 32: 175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.11.014
  11. 11. Nishizawa H, Pryor-Koishi K, Kato T, Kowa H, Kurahashi H, et al. (2007) Microarray analysis of differentially expressed fetal genes in placental tissue derived from early and late onset severe pre-eclampsia. Placenta 28: 487–497. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2006.05.010
  12. 12. Nishizawa H, Ota S, Suzuki M, Kato T, Sekiya T, et al. (2011) Comparative gene expression profiling of placentas from patients with severe pre-eclampsia and unexplained fetal growth restriction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9: 107. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-107
  13. 13. Winn VD, Gormley M, Paquet AC, Kjaer-Sorensen K, Kramer A, et al. (2009) Severe preeclampsia-related changes in gene expression at the maternal-fetal interface include sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-6 and pappalysin-2. Endocrinology 150: 452–462. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0990
  14. 14. Suzuki Y, Yamashita R, Sugano S, Nakai K (2004) DBTSS, DataBase of Transcriptional Start Sites: progress report 2004. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D78–81. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh076
  15. 15. Piechota M, Korostynski M, Przewlocki R (2010) Identification of cis-regulatory elements in the mammalian genome: the cREMaG database. PLoS One 5: e12465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012465
  16. 16. Cole SW, Yan W, Galic Z, Arevalo J, Zack JA (2005) Expression-based monitoring of transcription factor activity: the TELiS database. Bioinformatics 21: 803–810. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti038
  17. 17. Roider HG, Kanhere A, Manke T, Vingron M (2007) Predicting transcription factor affinities to DNA from a biophysical model. Bioinformatics 23: 134–141. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl565
  18. 18. Roider HG, Manke T, O'Keeffe S, Vingron M, Haas SA (2009) PASTAA: identifying transcription factors associated with sets of co-regulated genes. Bioinformatics 25: 435–442. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn627
  19. 19. Tonon L, Touzet H, Varre JS (2010) TFM-Explorer: mining cis-regulatory regions in genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 38: W286–292. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq473
  20. 20. Aerts S, Van Loo P, Thijs G, Mayer H, de Martin R, et al. (2005) TOUCAN 2: the all-inclusive open source workbench for regulatory sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W393–396. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki354
  21. 21. Aerts S, Thijs G, Coessens B, Staes M, Moreau Y, et al. (2003) Toucan: deciphering the cis-regulatory logic of coregulated genes. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 1753–1764. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg268
  22. 22. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, et al. (2011) The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D561–568. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq973
  23. 23. Hayden MS, Ghosh S (2012) NF-kappaB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions. Genes Dev 26: 203–234. doi: 10.1101/gad.183434.111
  24. 24. Vaughan JE, Walsh SW (2012) Activation of NF-kappaB in placentas of women with preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 31: 243–251. doi: 10.3109/10641955.2011.642436
  25. 25. Nakada E, Walley KR, Nakada T, Hu Y, von Dadelszen P, et al. (2009) Toll-like receptor-3 stimulation upregulates sFLT-1 production by trophoblast cells. Placenta 30: 774–779. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.07.001
  26. 26. Takacs P, Kauma SW, Sholley MM, Walsh SW, Dinsmoor MJ, et al. (2001) Increased circulating lipid peroxides in severe preeclampsia activate NF-kappaB and upregulate ICAM-1 in vascular endothelial cells. FASEB J 15: 279–281. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0549fje
  27. 27. Cooke CL, Davidge ST (2002) Peroxynitrite increases iNOS through NF-kappaB and decreases prostacyclin synthase in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282: C395–402. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00295.2001
  28. 28. Luppi P, Tse H, Lain KY, Markovic N, Piganelli JD, et al. (2006) Preeclampsia activates circulating immune cells with engagement of the NF-kappaB pathway. Am J Reprod Immunol 56: 135–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2006.00386.x
  29. 29. Haugen F, Drevon CA (2007) Activation of nuclear factor-kappaB by high molecular weight and globular adiponectin. Endocrinology 148: 5478–5486. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0370
  30. 30. Dechend R, Viedt C, Muller DN, Ugele B, Brandes RP, et al. (2003) AT1 receptor agonistic antibodies from preeclamptic patients stimulate NADPH oxidase. Circulation 107: 1632–1639. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000058200.90059.b1
  31. 31. Cindrova-Davies T, Spasic-Boskovic O, Jauniaux E, Charnock-Jones DS, Burton GJ (2007) Nuclear factor-kappa B, p38, and stress-activated protein kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways regulate proinflammatory cytokines and apoptosis in human placental explants in response to oxidative stress: effects of antioxidant vitamins. Am J Pathol 170: 1511–1520. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061035
  32. 32. Tan NY, Khachigian LM (2009) Sp1 phosphorylation and its regulation of gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol 29: 2483–2488. doi: 10.1128/mcb.01828-08
  33. 33. Gascoin-Lachambre G, Buffat C, Rebourcet R, Chelbi ST, Rigourd V, et al. (2010) Cullins in human intra-uterine growth restriction: expressional and epigenetic alterations. Placenta 31: 151–157. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.11.008
  34. 34. Kruger I, Vollmer M, Simmons DG, Elsasser HP, Philipsen S, et al. (2007) Sp1/Sp3 compound heterozygous mice are not viable: impaired erythropoiesis and severe placental defects. Dev Dyn 236: 2235–2244. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21222
  35. 35. Mohibullah N, Donner A, Ippolito JA, Williams T (1999) SELEX and missing phosphate contact analyses reveal flexibility within the AP-2[alpha] protein: DNA binding complex. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 2760–2769. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.13.2760
  36. 36. Ito T, Nomura S, Okada M, Katsumata Y, Kikkawa F, et al. (2002) Ap-2 and Ikaros regulate transcription of human placental leucine aminopeptidase/oxytocinase gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 290: 1048–1053. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6325
  37. 37. Richardson BD, Langland RA, Bachurski CJ, Richards RG, Kessler CA, et al. (2000) Activator protein-2 regulates human placental lactogen gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol 160: 183–192. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(99)00209-9
  38. 38. Werling U, Schorle H (2002) Transcription factor gene AP-2 gamma essential for early murine development. Mol Cell Biol 22: 3149–3156. doi: 10.1128/mcb.22.9.3149-3156.2002
  39. 39. Johnson W, Jameson JL (1999) AP-2 (activating protein 2) and Sp1 (selective promoter factor 1) regulatory elements play distinct roles in the control of basal activity and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate responsiveness of the human chorionic gonadotropin-beta promoter. Mol Endocrinol 13: 1963–1975. doi: 10.1210/mend.13.11.0386
  40. 40. Shi D, Kellems RE (1998) Transcription factor AP-2gamma regulates murine adenosine deaminase gene expression during placental development. J Biol Chem 273: 27331–27338. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.42.27331
  41. 41. Kotani T, Iwase A, Ino K, Sumigama S, Yamamoto E, et al. (2009) Activator protein-2 impairs the invasion of a human extravillous trophoblast cell line. Endocrinology 150: 4376–4385. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1645
  42. 42. Depoix C, Tee MK, Taylor RN (2011) Molecular regulation of human placental growth factor (PlGF) gene expression in placental villi and trophoblast cells is mediated via the protein kinase a pathway. Reprod Sci 18: 219–228. doi: 10.1177/1933719110389337
  43. 43. Cheng HC, Shih HM, Chern Y (2002) Essential role of cAMP-response element-binding protein activation by A2A adenosine receptors in rescuing the nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth impaired by blockage of the MAPK cascade. J Biol Chem 277: 33930–33942. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m201206200
  44. 44. Maymo JL, Perez Perez A, Maskin B, Duenas JL, Calvo JC, et al. (2012) The Alternative Epac/cAMP pathway and the MAPK pathway mediate hCG induction of leptin in placental cells. PLoS One 7: e46216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046216
  45. 45. Adelman DM, Gertsenstein M, Nagy A, Simon MC, Maltepe E (2000) Placental cell fates are regulated in vivo by HIF-mediated hypoxia responses. Genes Dev 14: 3191–3203. doi: 10.1101/gad.853700
  46. 46. Lunell NO, Nylund LE, Lewander R, Sarby B (1982) Uteroplacental blood flow in pre-eclampsia measurements with indium-113m and a computer-linked gamma camera. Clin Exp Hypertens B 1: 105–117. doi: 10.3109/10641958209037184
  47. 47. Soleymanlou N, Jurisica I, Nevo O, Ietta F, Zhang X, et al. (2005) Molecular evidence of placental hypoxia in preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90: 4299–4308. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0078
  48. 48. Combs CA, Katz MA, Kitzmiller JL, Brescia RJ (1993) Experimental preeclampsia produced by chronic constriction of the lower aorta: validation with longitudinal blood pressure measurements in conscious rhesus monkeys. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169: 215–223. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90171-e
  49. 49. Yamashita K, Discher DJ, Hu J, Bishopric NH, Webster KA (2001) Molecular regulation of the endothelin-1 gene by hypoxia. Contributions of hypoxia-inducible factor-1, activator protein-1, GATA-2, AND p300/CBP. J Biol Chem 276: 12645–12653. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m011344200
  50. 50. Minchenko A, Caro J (2000) Regulation of endothelin-1 gene expression in human microvascular endothelial cells by hypoxia and cobalt: role of hypoxia responsive element. Mol Cell Biochem 208: 53–62.
  51. 51. Sanchez-Elsner T, Botella LM, Velasco B, Langa C, Bernabeu C (2002) Endoglin expression is regulated by transcriptional cooperation between the hypoxia and transforming growth factor-beta pathways. J Biol Chem 277: 43799–43808. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m207160200
  52. 52. Nevo O, Soleymanlou N, Wu Y, Xu J, Kingdom J, et al. (2006) Increased expression of sFlt-1 in in vivo and in vitro models of human placental hypoxia is mediated by HIF-1. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 291: R1085–1093. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00794.2005
  53. 53. Grosfeld A, Andre J, Hauguel-De Mouzon S, Berra E, Pouyssegur J, et al. (2002) Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 transactivates the human leptin gene promoter. J Biol Chem 277: 42953–42957. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m206775200
  54. 54. Gould PS, Gu M, Liao J, Ahmad S, Cudmore MJ, et al. (2010) Upregulation of urotensin II receptor in preeclampsia causes in vitro placental release of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 in hypoxia. Hypertension 56: 172–178. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.110.152074
  55. 55. Imperatore A, Rolfo A, Petraglia F, Challis JR, Caniggia I (2010) Hypoxia and preeclampsia: increased expression of urocortin 2 and urocortin 3. Reprod Sci 17: 833–843. doi: 10.1177/1933719110373147
  56. 56. Thiagalingam A, De Bustros A, Borges M, Jasti R, Compton D, et al. (1996) RREB-1, a novel zinc finger protein, is involved in the differentiation response to Ras in human medullary thyroid carcinomas. Mol Cell Biol 16: 5335–5345.
  57. 57. Steinborn A, Varkonyi T, Scharf A, Bahlmann F, Klee A, et al. (2007) Early detection of decreased soluble HLA-G levels in the maternal circulation predicts the occurrence of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation during further course of pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol 57: 277–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00475.x
  58. 58. Zhu X, Han T, Yin G, Wang X, Yao Y (2012) Expression of human leukocyte antigen-G during normal placentation and in preeclamptic pregnancies. Hypertens Pregnancy 31: 252–260. doi: 10.3109/10641955.2011.638955
  59. 59. Zhou X, Zhang GY, Wang J, Lu SL, Cao J, et al.. (2012) A novel bridge between oxidative stress and immunity: the interaction between hydrogen peroxide and human leukocyte antigen G in placental trophoblasts during preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206: 447 e447–416.
  60. 60. Flajollet S, Poras I, Carosella ED, Moreau P (2009) RREB-1 is a transcriptional repressor of HLA-G. J Immunol 183: 6948–6959. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902053
  61. 61. Kimura C, Watanabe K, Iwasaki A, Mori T, Matsushita H, et al.. (2012) The severity of hypoxic changes and oxidative DNA damage in the placenta of early-onset preeclamptic women and fetal growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
  62. 62. Crocker I (2007) Gabor Than Award Lecture 2006: pre-eclampsia and villous trophoblast turnover: perspectives and possibilities. Placenta 28 Suppl A: S4–13.
  63. 63. Bavisotto L, Kaushansky K, Lin N, Hromas R (1991) Antisense oligonucleotides from the stage-specific myeloid zinc finger gene MZF-1 inhibit granulopoiesis in vitro. J Exp Med 174: 1097–1101. doi: 10.1084/jem.174.5.1097
  64. 64. Barcena A, Kapidzic M, Muench MO, Gormley M, Scott MA, et al. (2009) The human placenta is a hematopoietic organ during the embryonic and fetal periods of development. Dev Biol 327: 24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.03.001
  65. 65. Centlow M, Carninci P, Nemeth K, Mezey E, Brownstein M, et al. (2008) Placental expression profiling in preeclampsia: local overproduction of hemoglobin may drive pathological changes. Fertil Steril 90: 1834–1843. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.030
  66. 66. Chelbi ST, Wilson ML, Veillard AC, Ingles SA, Zhang J, et al. (2012) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms collaborate to control SERPINA3 expression and its association with placental diseases. Hum Mol Genet 21: 1968–1978. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds006
  67. 67. Auer J, Camoin L, Guillonneau F, Rigourd V, Chelbi ST, et al. (2010) Serum profile in preeclampsia and intra-uterine growth restriction revealed by iTRAQ technology. J Proteomics 73: 1004–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.12.014
  68. 68. Rajakumar A, Chu T, Handley DE, Bunce KD, Burke B, et al. (2011) Maternal gene expression profiling during pregnancy and preeclampsia in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Placenta 32: 70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.10.004
  69. 69. O’Connor DJ, Lu X (2000) Stress signals induce transcriptionally inactive E2F-1 independently of p53 and Rb. Oncogene 19: 2369–2376. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203540
  70. 70. Lin SY, Black AR, Kostic D, Pajovic S, Hoover CN, et al. (1996) Cell cycle-regulated association of E2F1 and Sp1 is related to their functional interaction. Mol Cell Biol 16: 1668–1675.
  71. 71. Pillai S, Kovacs M, Chellappan S (2010) Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors by Rb and E2F1: role of acetylation. Cancer Res 70: 4931–4940. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0501
  72. 72. Higgins KJ, Abdelrahim M, Liu S, Yoon K, Safe S (2006) Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 expression in pancreatic cancer cells by Sp proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 345: 292–301. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.111
  73. 73. Potthoff MJ, Olson EN (2007) MEF2: a central regulator of diverse developmental programs. Development 134: 4131–4140. doi: 10.1242/dev.008367
  74. 74. Oishi Y, Manabe I, Imai Y, Hara K, Horikoshi M, et al. (2010) Regulatory polymorphism in transcription factor KLF5 at the MEF2 element alters the response to angiotensin II and is associated with human hypertension. FASEB J 24: 1780–1788. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-146589
  75. 75. Dong JT, Chen C (2009) Essential role of KLF5 transcription factor in cell proliferation and differentiation and its implications for human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 2691–2706. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0045-z
  76. 76. van Thienen JV, Fledderus JO, Dekker RJ, Rohlena J, van Ijzendoorn GA, et al. (2006) Shear stress sustains atheroprotective endothelial KLF2 expression more potently than statins through mRNA stabilization. Cardiovasc Res 72: 231–240. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.07.008
  77. 77. Atkins GB, Jain MK (2007) Role of Kruppel-like transcription factors in endothelial biology. Circ Res 100: 1686–1695. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000267856.00713.0a
  78. 78. Dolfini D, Gatta R, Mantovani R (2012) NF-Y and the transcriptional activation of CCAAT promoters. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 47: 29–49. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.628970
  79. 79. Nakshatri H, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Currie RA (1996) Subunit association and DNA binding activity of the heterotrimeric transcription factor NF-Y is regulated by cellular redox. J Biol Chem 271: 28784–28791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.46.28784
  80. 80. Jin S, Fan F, Fan W, Zhao H, Tong T, et al. (2001) Transcription factors Oct-1 and NF-YA regulate the p53-independent induction of the GADD45 following DNA damage. Oncogene 20: 2683–2690. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204390
  81. 81. Xiong Y, Liebermann DA, Holtzman EJ, Jeronis S, Hoffman B, et al. (2013) Preeclampsia-associated stresses activate Gadd45a signaling and sFlt-1 in placental explants. J Cell Physiol 228: 362–370. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24139
  82. 82. Sharp TV, Munoz F, Bourboulia D, Presneau N, Darai E, et al. (2004) LIM domains-containing protein 1 (LIMD1), a tumor suppressor encoded at chromosome 3p21.3, binds pRB and represses E2F-driven transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 16531–16536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407123101
  83. 83. Foxler DE, Bridge KS, James V, Webb TM, Mee M, et al. (2012) The LIMD1 protein bridges an association between the prolyl hydroxylases and VHL to repress HIF-1 activity. Nat Cell Biol 14: 201–208. doi: 10.1038/ncb2424
  84. 84. Meinhardt G, Husslein P, Knofler M (2005) Tissue-specific and ubiquitous basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors in human placental trophoblasts. Placenta 26: 527–539. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.09.005
  85. 85. Bamberger AM, Makrigiannakis A, Schroder M, Bamberger CM, Relakis C, et al. (2004) Expression pattern of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins C/EBP-alpha, C/EBP-beta and C/EBP-delta in the human placenta. Virchows Arch 444: 149–152. doi: 10.1007/s00428-003-0935-7
  86. 86. He Y, Chen H, Quon MJ, Reitman M (1995) The mouse obese gene. Genomic organization, promoter activity, and activation by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha. J Biol Chem 270: 28887–28891. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.48.28887
  87. 87. Basso K, Dalla-Favera R (2010) BCL6: master regulator of the germinal center reaction and key oncogene in B cell lymphomagenesis. Adv Immunol 105: 193–210.
  88. 88. Herrscher RF, Kaplan MH, Lelsz DL, Das C, Scheuermann R, et al. (1995) The immunoglobulin heavy-chain matrix-associating regions are bound by Bright: a B cell-specific trans-activator that describes a new DNA-binding protein family. Genes Dev 9: 3067–3082. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.24.3067
  89. 89. Webb CF, Bryant J, Popowski M, Allred L, Kim D, et al. (2011) The ARID family transcription factor bright is required for both hematopoietic stem cell and B lineage development. Mol Cell Biol 31: 1041–1053. doi: 10.1128/mcb.01448-10
  90. 90. Fritah A, Christian M, Parker MG (2010) The metabolic coregulator RIP140: an update. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 299: E335–340. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00243.2010
  91. 91. Hitchens MR, Robbins PD (2003) The role of the transcription factor DP in apoptosis. Apoptosis 8: 461–468. doi: 10.1023/a:1025586207239
  92. 92. Huang J, Teng L, Li L, Liu T, Chen D, et al. (2004) ZNF216 Is an A20-like and IkappaB kinase gamma-interacting inhibitor of NFkappaB activation. J Biol Chem 279: 16847–16853. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m309491200
  93. 93. Fujimoto K, Shen M, Noshiro M, Matsubara K, Shingu S, et al. (2001) Molecular cloning and characterization of DEC2, a new member of basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280: 164–171. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4133
  94. 94. Montagner M, Enzo E, Forcato M, Zanconato F, Parenti A, et al. (2012) SHARP1 suppresses breast cancer metastasis by promoting degradation of hypoxia-inducible factors. Nature 487: 380–384. doi: 10.1038/nature11207
  95. 95. Zhang Y, Dufau ML (2004) Gene silencing by nuclear orphan receptors. Vitam Horm 68: 1–48. doi: 10.1016/s0083-6729(04)68001-0
  96. 96. Zhang Y, Dufau ML (2000) Nuclear orphan receptors regulate transcription of the gene for the human luteinizing hormone receptor. J Biol Chem 275: 2763–2770. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2763
  97. 97. van Dijk M, Oudejans CB (2011) STOX1: Key Player in Trophoblast Dysfunction Underlying Early Onset Preeclampsia with Growth Retardation. J Pregnancy 2011: 521826. doi: 10.1155/2011/521826
  98. 98. Rigourd V, Chauvet C, Chelbi ST, Rebourcet R, Mondon F, et al. (2008) STOX1 overexpression in choriocarcinoma cells mimics transcriptional alterations observed in preeclamptic placentas. PLoS One 3: e3905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003905
  99. 99. Doridot L, Passet B, Mehats C, Rigourd V, Barbaux S, et al. (2013) Preeclampsia-Like Symptoms Induced in Mice by Fetoplacental Expression of STOX1 Are Reversed by Aspirin Treatment. Hypertension 61: 662–668. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.202994
  100. 100. Eckner R, Arany Z, Ewen M, Sellers W, Livingston DM (1994) The adenovirus E1A-associated 300-kD protein exhibits properties of a transcriptional coactivator and belongs to an evolutionarily conserved family. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 59: 85–95. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1994.059.01.012
  101. 101. Kasper LH, Lerach S, Wang J, Wu S, Jeevan T, et al. (2010) CBP/p300 double null cells reveal effect of coactivator level and diversity on CREB transactivation. EMBO J 29: 3660–3672. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.235
  102. 102. Kwon HS, Kim DR, Yang EG, Park YK, Ahn HC, et al. (2012) Inhibition of VEGF transcription through blockade of the hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha-p300 interaction by a small molecule. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22: 5249–5252. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.06.054
  103. 103. Rubinstein JH, Taybi H (1963) Broad thumbs and toes and facial abnormalities. A possible mental retardation syndrome. Am J Dis Child 105: 588–608. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1963.02080040590010
  104. 104. Tsai AC, Dossett CJ, Walton CS, Cramer AE, Eng PA, et al. (2011) Exon deletions of the EP300 and CREBBP genes in two children with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome detected by aCGH. Eur J Hum Genet 19: 43–49. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.121
  105. 105. Vasarhelyi B, Cseh A, Kocsis I, Treszl A, Gyorffy B, et al. (2006) Three mechanisms in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia suggested by over-represented transcription factor-binding sites detected with comparative promoter analysis. Mol Hum Reprod 12: 31–34. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gal001
  106. 106. Tsoi SC, Cale JM, Bird IM, Kay HH (2003) cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression profiles in human placenta: up-regulation of the transcript encoding muscle subunit of glycogen phosphorylase in preeclampsia. J Soc Gynecol Investig 10: 496–502. doi: 10.1016/s1071-55760300154-0
  107. 107. Reimer T, Koczan D, Gerber B, Richter D, Thiesen HJ, et al. (2002) Microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes in placental tissue of pre-eclampsia: up-regulation of obesity-related genes. Mol Hum Reprod 8: 674–680. doi: 10.1093/molehr/8.7.674
  108. 108. Pang ZJ, Xing FQ (2004) DNA microarrays detect the expression of apoptosis-related genes in preeclamptic placentas. J Perinat Med 32: 25–30. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2004.004