Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Super Energy Mitigation Nanostructure at High Impact Speed Based on Buckyball System

  • Jun Xu,

    Affiliation Columbia Nanomechanics Research Center, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Yibing Li,

    Affiliation State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety & Energy, Department of Automotive Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

  • Yong Xiang ,

    xichen@columbia.edu (XC); xiang@uestc.edu.cn (YX)

    Affiliation State Key Lab of Electronic Thin Films and Integrated Devices, School of Energy Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Xi Chen

    xichen@columbia.edu (XC); xiang@uestc.edu.cn (YX)

    Affiliations Columbia Nanomechanics Research Center, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, International Center for Applied Mechanics, SV Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China

A Super Energy Mitigation Nanostructure at High Impact Speed Based on Buckyball System

  • Jun Xu, 
  • Yibing Li, 
  • Yong Xiang, 
  • Xi Chen
PLOS
x

Abstract

The energy mitigation properties of buckyballs are investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. A one dimensional buckyball long chain is employed as a unit cell of granular fullerene particles. Two types of buckyballs i.e. C60 and C720 with recoverable and non-recoverable behaviors are chosen respectively. For C60 whose deformation is relatively small, a dissipative contact model is proposed. Over 90% of the total impact energy is proven to be mitigated through interfacial reflection of wave propagation, the van der Waals interaction, covalent potential energy and atomistic kinetic energy evidenced by the decent force attenuation and elongation of transmitted impact. Further, the C720 system is found to outperform its C60 counterpart and is able to mitigate over 99% of the total kinetic energy by using a much shorter chain thanks to its non-recoverable deformation which enhances the four energy dissipation terms. Systematic studies are carried out to elucidate the effects of impactor speed and mass, as well as buckyball size and number on the system energy mitigation performance. This one dimensional buckyball system is especially helpful to deal with the impactor of high impact speed but small mass. The results may shed some lights on the research of high-efficiency energy mitigation material selections and structure designs.

Introduction

Protection of materials and devices under high-speed impact, whose most critical task is energy mitigation and absorption [1][3], poses a major challenge in engineering. For ballistic loading, i.e. high impact speed with small impact mass, the force attenuation should be the priority [4] to effectively mitigate impact energy. Woven fabric composites [5][8], sandwich structure [9][11], metal foams [12][14] and nanomaterials [15][21] are widely used for energy mitigation upon high speed impact, which primarily consume the impact energy through widespread failure or extensive deformation.

Granular material arranging in a chain-like structure [22], [23] is attractive for force attenuation, and such a discrete system effectively responds to impact loading via stress wave propagation across various interfaces to reduce the transmitted force. Pioneering work on the characteristics of the solitary wave propagation in a homogeneous chain of metallic spheres based on the Hertz contact law was established by Nesterenko [24]. Since then, many contributions have been put forward to refine the chain system for outstanding energy damping ability, including the material and geometrical parameters [25], [26], arrangements [27], [28], and model parameterizations of different granular materials [29][31].

Recently, with the development of nanomaterial, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [21], [32] have been one of the promising candidates for impact energy absorption thanks to its ultra-high modulus and strength [33][35]. Buckyballs, another branch of fullerene family, also have high potential for energy mitigation owing to their excellent mechanical properties and unique morphology [36], [37]. According to our previous work [20], [38], the progressive buckling and densification in response to impact loading, as well as the particular non-recoverable portraits of larger buckyballs, may help to dissipate and absorb intense stress waves. Thus, inspired by granular materials, it is envisioned that the stacking of nano-sized buckyballs could exhibit excellent energy mitigation capabilities.

In this paper, two representative buckyballs C60 and C720 stacked in one-dimensional chain-like system are chosen to study the mechanical behavior subject to high speed impact. For the small C60 buckyball chain, an analytical model based on the Hertz contact law is suggested by analogy to the fundamental Nesterenko's model. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are employed to study the transmitted force history and the peak force attenuation. Stress wave propagation characteristics are also investigated such that system effective response is evaluated. For the giant C720 buckyball chain, MD simulations are used to compute the contact forces on the impactor and receiver, as well as the stress wave propagation. Further, the effect of the impact mass and speed on the system performance is thoroughly studied to fully unveil the energy mitigation mechanism. Finally, buckyballs with various sizes are embedded into the chain system to explore the particle size effect on the energy dissipation ability.

Computational Model and Method

Small and large buckyballs behave differently upon impact: the smaller ones are often resilient while the larger ones exhibit non-recovery phenomenon after unloading [38]. In this study, C60 and C720 are selected to represent “recoverable buckyball” and “non-recoverable buckyball” respectively. In continuum modeling, buckyballs are assumed to share the same effective Young's modulus E = 5 TPa and nominal wall thickness t = 0.66 nm [38]. The densities of C720 and C60 are and respectively. The other basic physical parameters of C720 and C60 are listed in Ref. [20].

To simulate a granular system, we assume the identical buckyballs are packed in a simple cubic manner such that the stress wave would be confined within one dimension (effects caused by different packaging arrangements have been discussed in Ref [38]). We have shown that the system deformation mode and the energy absorption/mitigation ability are independent of the arrangement number in both vertical and horizontal lineups in previous work [38]. In addition, preliminary simulation also reveals that system with multi-column stacking has no obvious difference in deformation behavior and unit energy absorption rate. Thus, by taking advantage of symmetry, a long chain of buckyball system is simulated. The “long chain” is set to be at least 20 times in length than its width, and a typical system contains 100 buckyballs. The computational cell is illustrated in Figure 1, where the buckyball system subjects to the impact of a rigid left plate with incident energy Eimpactor and the impact speed is varied from 100 m/s to 1000 m/s which is conventionally considered as high impact speed domain, mainly aiming at the ballistic impact related problem. Mass changing falls into the domain where the maximum strain is large enough while the temperature rising of the buckyball caused by the kinetic energy is below 800 K when buckyball may remain stable. A rigid and fixed right plate serves as a receiver which would indicate the energy mitigation capability of the protective system (the buckyball chain is sandwiched between the plates). Force histories on the left and right plates are recorded.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Illustration of one-dimensional buckyball chain setup as an impact protector.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g001

A full atomistic description of the buckyball is used. MD simulation is performed based on LAMMPS (large-scale atomic/molecular massively parallel simulator) platform with the NVE ensemble (micro-canonical ensembles) [39] after running initial equilibrium. A pairwise Lennard-Jones (L-J) potential term is added to the buckyball potential to account for the steric and van der Waals carbon–carbon interactions where is the depth of the potential well between carbon-carbon atoms; is the finite distance where the carbon-carbon potential is zero; is the distance between the two carbon atoms. Here, L-J parameters for the carbon atoms of the buckyball are and as used in the original parameterization of Girifalco [40] and Van der Waals interaction governs in the plate-buckyball interaction. Carbon atoms are employed to make both the impactor and receiver plates with varying masses in the following simulation to set various loading conditions (varying impactor mass) while the interactions between the plates and buckyballs remain as carbon-carbon ones. Details of the simulation methods are described elsewhere [38]. To simulate the long one dimensional chain, four L-J walls with the same parameters are set as four sides of the simulation box to provide necessary lateral constraints from simple cubic packing. A time integration step of 1 fs is used and periodical boundary conditions are applied in the x,y plane to eliminated the boundary effect.

Representative Impact Behavior

Dynamic response of C60 chain system

1 Hertzian model.

Interactions between particles in the one-dimensional chain system subject to contact loading may be treated based on the Hertz law [24]. Similar to granular particles, each C60 molecule in the chain system undergoes relatively small deformation without any buckling or bifurcation. In addition, the characteristic time where is the radius of C60 and is the wave speed [24]. Therefore, the Hertz contact law still approximately holds for the dynamic response of C60 chain system.

Consider a one dimensional chain of N same C60s with mass , radius and Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio in contact without any precompression. The Hertzian contact law between neighboring buckyballs and could be expressed as [41](1)where F is the contact force, referring the elastic coefficient, is deformation, x2, x1 are coordinates of two neighboring buckyball centers (); , and are the effective Young's modulus and effective radius respectively. By replacing the coordinate by the displacement of the ith buckyball from its equilibrium position in the chain, the equation of motion for each buckyball may be further written as(2)This is widely used for granular materials.

2 MD simulation of one-dimensional C60 chain.

The forces on both impactor and receiver plates are normalized as , and the representative impact force attenuation for 100 C60 particles is shown in Figure 2 (where the positive value stands for compression force along the impact velocity direction). A sharp and narrow impact pulse is initiated once the top plate collides with the buckyball system and it drops to nearly zero at about 0.02 ns (), indicating that the compressive stress wave is traveling towards the receiver. The receiver does not experience any force until the stress wave arrives at (shown in Figure 2); from which the average traveling speed of the stress wave is estimated as and thus the system equivalent modulus is for the specific impact loading condition (impact energy of 6.49 eV and impact speed of 500 m/s). Once the stress wave reaches the receiver, it reflects back and if it successfully travels back to the impactor, a secondary impact impulse would form at (shown in Figure 2) and thus causes the speed of the ricochet impactor increase again. The peak transmitted force on the receiver is about 42.27% of the original peak force on the impactor, after force attention of 100 C60 buckyballs. About 93.75% of the impactor kinetic energy (i.e. impact energy) is dissipated by the system, therefore, one may define the energy mitigation rate as . The effect of buckyball number on the energy mitigation rate is discussed later.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Normalized force time history and impactor velocity history of C60 chain containing 100 buckyballs, when the impact energy is 6.49 eV and impact speed is 500 m/s.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g002

According to the force equilibrium and mass continuity, the stress of a particular mass point during the wave propagation is [42], and the relation between stress and (at the interface of buckyball and the rigid plate respectively) may be expressed as [42](3)where and are densities and and are wave speeds of the material on the two sides of the interface respectively. Similarly, the stress wave speed may be written as [42](4)Since the receiver is fixed as a rigid body in this study, , such that and which means that the stress wave propagates back to impactor at the same speed. After the reflective wave travels through 100 C60 buckyballs, the magnitude of force on impactor reduces to 21.95% of the original force. On the other hand, the transmitted force pulse duration is about 5.4 times of that on the impactor, i.e. , showing a prominent stress wave mitigation effect. The major energy mitigation effect results from the stress wave attenuation caused by the reflections among buckyball walls, similar as that found in previous research in granular system [22], [25], [29], [30], [43], as well as the van der Waals interactions between buckled layers and similar energy absorption mechanism revealed in carbon nanotubes in Ref. [17], [18], [44]. In addition, about 1.5% of the impact energy may be converted to the kinetic energy of the atoms within C60.

3 Dissipative Hertzian model.

As the method adopted in Ref [45] to include the dissipation term to Eq. (2), from MD simulation, the following relationship can be fitted:(5)where , the second term implies dissipation which is fitted based on the force-displacement curve at large deformation in our previous study [20], [38] and its coefficient . This relationship is valid for systems with large number of C60 buckyballs at all loading conditions as long as the Hertzian contact law holds. Figure 3 shows the maximum force on the ith ball, , of the dissipative model (Eq. (5)), which is consistent with the MD results of C60 chains.

thumbnail
Figure 3. The normalized force distribution on selected buckyballs in C60 and C720 chain systems.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g003

Dynamic response of C720 chain system

The large non-recoverable deformation of C720 makes the Hertzian contact law invalid. The energy mitigation behaviors are investigated using MD simulations. Typical normalized force history curves of the impactor and receiver are shown in Figure 4, where 100 C720 are studied. In terms of stress wave traveling, its average speed is , and thus the system equivalent Young's modulus is , which means the C720 chain system is more “compliant” than C60. In our previous work, the “non-recovery” phenomenon is proven to be only strain determined, regardless of the impact mass and velocity [38]. During preliminary simulations, we also confirm that the “non-recovery” phenomenon in C540 is impact-condition independent.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Normalized force history and impactor velocity history of C720 chain containing 100 buckyballs, when the impact energy is 6.49 eV and impact speed is 500 m/s.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g004

From energy mitigation perspective, a very sharp initial impulse is attenuated to a much milder and longer impulse. The ratio of the peak magnitude and duration between the original and transmitted impulses are (where the subscript r and i refer to the receiver and impactor respectively) and . The force reduction and duration elongation are much higher than that in C60 chain system due to the buckled-through shape of C720 during impact. Therefore, van der Waals interactions between buckled and “stickered” layers may contribute more energy dissipation compared to its counterpart in C60 system due to the un-recoverable deformation. Also, with the buckled morphorlogy of C720, the covalent potential energy also increase via the consumption of external impact energy. Moreover, about 12% of the impact energy could be mitigated in the form of atom kinetic energy which also contributes the superiority of energy dissipation for C720 system. The power-law-like dissipative model for contact force attenuation at various buckyballs still applies (see Fig. 3), indicating a fast force decay along the wave propagation direction. In the meantime, over 99% of the impact energy is mitigated to the kinetic energy and strain energy of buckyballs.

Parametric Study and Discussions

A parametric study is carried out where the impact speed is varied from 100 m/s to 1000 m/s, and the impact mass per carbon atom is varied at  = 1.73 to 13.87 for both the C60 and C720 chains containing 100 buckyballs. The initial impact speed is normalized as (where and are used for C60 and C720 chains respectively); the stress wave propagation speed (calculated based on the time when the wave transmits through the chain, which is dependent on the number of buckyballs) is normalized as . The corresponding fitting curves of the suggested models are also shown in Figures 5 and 6.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Force reduction ratio and normalized wave propagation speed under various impact speeds () with fixed impact mass (), as well as various impact masses () with fixed impact speed () for C60 chain system containing 100 buckyballs.

Nonlinear models are suggested to fit the computational data.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g005

thumbnail
Figure 6. Force reduction ratio and normalized wave propagation speed under various impact speeds () with fixed impact mass (), as well as various impact masses () with fixed impact speed () for C720 chain system containing 100 buckyballs.

Nonlinear models are suggested to fit the computational data.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g006

Effects of initial impact speed and mass on C60 chain

1 Force attenuation.

The force reduction ratio and normalized wave propagation speed are two indices employed to evaluate the mitigation properties, shown in Figure 5. Following Reid and Peng [46], the enhanced dynamic stress can be expressed as(6)where is the crushing strength of buckyball and the is the material strain attained behind the wave front. v is the particle velocity at a certain time t. By keeping the impact mass constant, the particle velocity, [46]. Assuming the contact area keeps a constant as , one may come to . Thus, the force reduction ratio under a fixed impact mass (but different impact velocities) is(7)where k is the linear coefficient between and . Alternatively, under this condition, we may fit the equation in the form of(8)where a is material-related parameter and from Figure 5 it yields for the present system.

One may also regard the buckyball system as a non-linear spring damping system whose stiffness is only slightly affected by the mass of the impactor. Such a damping system reduces the force in the receiver by extending the functioning time over a longer time period. When the impact speed remains the same but impact mass is different, the following form is fitted to describe the force attenuation(9)where and for the present system.

Eqs. (8) and (9) in together reveal that the one-dimensional C60 chain system has a better mitigation performance under the condition of higher impact speed with smaller mass, in terms of the force attenuation to alleviate the transmitted load on objects to be protected.

2 System equivalent Young's modulus.

The system equivalent Young's modulus may be characterized via the elongation of wave propagation speed. The mitigation behavior is still dominated by impact energy, which means that changing the impactor mass or speed may vary the mitigation performance. The ratio between dynamic stress and static stress for rate-sensitive material may be expressed as [47](10)where is the strain rate, D and q are constants for a particular material. With the relation between stress and Young's modulus as well as the strain rate and velocity, one may fit the normalized wave propagation speed with varying impact speed (yet same impact mass) in the form of(11)where and . Combining the two equations above yields the relationship under various impact masses (but same impact speed):(12)where , and through the best fitting.

Note that when the number of buckyballs in the system increases, the effective system rigidity becomes smaller due to the longer stress wave transmission. Therefore, the fitted formula for calculating the stress wave speed and the corresponding equivalent rigidity are only valid for this specific system under subscribed loading conditions. However, these parametric values may become numerically convergent under certain impact mass once the number of buckyball reaches the threshold value which is discussed later.

Effect of initial impact speed and mass on C720 chain

1 Force attenuation.

To evaluate the energy mitigation performance of C720 chain, the force reduction ratio and normalized wave propagation speed are employed in Figure 6. The value reduces sharply in the relatively low impact speed domain and becomes stable once the impact speed exceeds over 500 m/s. Eq. (8) still applies with via best fitting.

Due to the non-recoverable deformation of C720, the impact mass poses stronger influence over the force reduction ratio because the larger mass makes the first few buckyballs easier to buckle. With the impactor mass increasing, the force reduction is also more prominent than that in C60 chain system. Similarly, Eq. (10) may be applied with and .

4.2.2 System equivalent Young's modulus.

Similarly, we may also take the form of Eqs. (11) and (12) to describe the system equivalent rigidity based on stress wave propagation speed. With the impact speed increases, the average wave propagation speed also increases, leading to a much stiffer system in terms of rigidity. In Eq. (11), the fitting parameters are and for the C720 buckyball system. By taking the derivative of Eq. (11), the variation rate in C60 is more prominent than that of C720, indicating that C60 exhibit even higher effective stiffness than C720 under very high impact speed situations. The fitting of Eq. (12) yields , and for the C720 chain system, indicating that the effect of impactor mass is less on C720 than that on C60 chain. Again, these fitted equations are only valid for the protective system with particular number of buckyball under the specific loading conditions. System rigidity would also alter accordingly if any of the corresponding factors change.

Effect of buckyball size

The ratio between the initial and transmitted impulse duration, , is also an important indicator for energy mitigation. The buckling forces for larger size buckyballs are smaller, owing to the buckling phenomenon. Figure 7 shows the relation between and normalized buckyball diameter at the impact speed of 500 m/s with the same impactor mass per carbon atom. The sizes of all buckyball involved here are labeled in Figure 7. The values decay in a power-law manner as the buckyball size increases. More importantly, a sudden drop is observed between C320 and C540 where the non-recovery phenomenon starts to appear. Once the buckyballs stay in a buckled morphology, the layered and densified structure would create more barriers to transmit the stress waves and the waves are attenuated through the wave reflection among interfaces of buckled shapes. The numerical results may be fitted as(13)

thumbnail
Figure 7. The impulse duration ratios between the impactor and receiver for various buckyballs including C60, C180, C240, C320, C540 and C720 by normalized buckyball radii at the impact speed of 500 m/s with the same value in each buckyball.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g007

Effect of buckyball number

As aforementioned, with the change of buckyball number within the protective system, stress wave propagation characteristics as well as the equivalent system rigidity alters, which may influence the energy mitigation ability of the system for both C60 and C720 systems. The energy mitigation rate is calculated for systems with buckyball numbers varying from 1 to 200 under the specific impact condition. In Figure 8, one may clearly observe that nonlinear increase on with the buckyball number for both systems. The increasing rate becomes much milder in longer buckyball chains, indicating that there may be a certain length threshold beyond which the system acquires high-efficiency impact wave mitigation. In addition, to reach the same mitigation ability, fewer buckyballs are needed to for larger particles; for example, the system with about 20 C720 buckyballs may mitigate over 99% of the impactor kinetic energy (i.e. ), whereas it would take about 80 C60 buckyballs to reach , showing another superiority of C720 system without the system mass and volume constrain in application.

thumbnail
Figure 8. Relations between energy absorption rate and buckyball number for both C60 and C720 systems at the impact speed for C60 chain system and for C720 chain system, and the impact mass of for both systems.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064697.g008

From systematic simulations, one may also summarize an empirical law at the impact speed for C60 chain system and for C720 chain system, and the impact mass of for both systems to describe the relation between buckyball number N (N>0) and as(14)and Eq. (14) may serve as a guidance for engineering design.

Concluding Remarks

In this paper, the impact mitigation characteristics of a long one dimensional buckyball chain are investigated, which can be extended to granular buckyballs of simple cubic packing. Representative small and large buckyballs, i.e. C60 and C720 under high speed impact loadings are studied. The impact energy, size and number of buckyballs, are varied in a systematic manner. With relatively small elastic deformations of C60 buckyballs during impact, a mechanical model based on Hertz contact law is proposed, with critical parameters calibrated via MD simulations for given impact loading conditions. Energy mitigation is illustrated through force impulse history difference between the impact and receiver. The stress wave propagation speed, the reduction of peak impulse force, and the impulse duration ratio are studied to reveal the dynamic response of the system. The major energy dissipation mechanism for the buckyball chain is the wave reflection among the deformation layers, covalent potential energy, van der Waals interactions as well as the atomistic kinetic energy. These terms may have higher contribution to energy dissipation in C720 system with non-recoverable morphologies. Moreover, Buckyball systems are investigated under various impact speeds and impact masses. The smaller mass and higher impact speed results in a higher impulse force attenuation effect, as well as higher system stiffness and shorter wave propagation time. Over 99% and 90% of impact energy for C720 and C60 chain systems could be mitigated under particular impact conditions respectively and thus a promising buckyball based stress wave mitigation system is suggested. The results may shed lights on the research and development of novel impact/blast protection system.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JX YX XC. Performed the experiments: JX YL. Analyzed the data: JX XC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JX YX XC. Wrote the paper: JX XC.

References

  1. 1. Mahfuz H, Zhu YH, Haque A, Abutalib A, Vaidya U, et al. (2000) Investigation of high-velocity impact on integral armor using finite element method. International Journal of Impact Engineering 24: 203–217. doi: 10.1016/s0734-743x(99)00047-0
  2. 2. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. International Journal of Impact Engineering 24: 277–298. doi: 10.1016/s0734-743x(99)00153-0
  3. 3. Jones N (2010) Energy-absorbing effectiveness factor. International Journal of Impact Engineering 37: 754–765. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.01.008
  4. 4. Lopatnikov SL, Gama BA, Haque MJ, Krauthauser C, Gillespie JW (2004) High-velocity plate impact of metal foams. International Journal of Impact Engineering 30: 421–445. doi: 10.1016/s0734-743x(03)00066-6
  5. 5. Nilakantan G, Gillespie JW (2012) Ballistic impact modeling of woven fabrics considering yarn strength, friction, projectile impact location, and fabric boundary condition effects. Composite Structures 94: 3624–3634. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.030
  6. 6. Ha-Minh C, Boussu F, Kanit T, Crepin D, Imad A (2011) Analysis on failure mechanisms of an interlock woven fabric under ballistic impact. Engineering Failure Analysis 18: 2179–2187. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.07.011
  7. 7. Hou YQ, Sun BZ, Gu BH (2011) An analytical model for the ballistic impact of three dimensional angle-interlock woven fabric penetrated by a rigid cylindro-spherical projectile. Textile Research Journal 81: 1287–1303. doi: 10.1177/0040517511399966
  8. 8. Cuong HM, Kanit T, Boussu F, Imad A (2011) Numerical multi-scale modeling for textile woven fabric against ballistic impact. Computational Materials Science 50: 2172–2184. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.029
  9. 9. Tan CY, Akil HM (2012) Impact response of fiber metal laminate sandwich composite structure with polypropylene honeycomb core. Composites Part B-Engineering 43: 1433–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.036
  10. 10. Xia F, Wu XQ (2010) Work on Impact Properties of Foam Sandwich Composites with Different Structure. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials 12: 47–62. doi: 10.1177/1099636209106256
  11. 11. Xu J, Li YB, Chen X, Ge DY, Liu BH, et al. (2011) Automotive windshield - pedestrian head impact: Energy absorption capability of interlayer material. International Journal of Automotive Technology 12: 687–695. doi: 10.1007/s12239-011-0080-2
  12. 12. Qin QH, Wang TJ (2011) Low-velocity heavy-mass impact response of slender metal foam core sandwich beam. Composite Structures 93: 1526–1537. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.11.018
  13. 13. Vaidya UK, Pillay S, Bartus S, Ulven CA, Grow DT, et al. (2006) Impact and post-impact vibration response of protective metal foam composite sandwich plates. Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing 428: 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.114
  14. 14. Lopatnikov SL, Gama BA, Haque MJ, Krauthauser C, Gillespie JW, et al. (2003) Dynamics of metal foam deformation during Taylor cylinder-Hopkinson bar impact experiment. Composite Structures 61: 61–71. doi: 10.1016/s0263-8223(03)00039-4
  15. 15. Mylvaganam K, Zhang LC (2006) Energy absorption capacity of carbon nanotubes under ballistic impact. Applied Physics Letters 89. doi: 10.1063/1.2356325
  16. 16. Pan H, Zhang YW, Shenoy VB, Gao HJ (2011) Ab Initio Study on a Novel Photocatalyst: Functionalized Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanotube. Acs Catalysis 1: 99–104. doi: 10.1021/cs100045u
  17. 17. Yang XD, He PF, Gao HJ (2012) Competing elastic and adhesive interactions govern deformation behaviors of aligned carbon nanotube arrays. Applied Physics Letters 101. doi: 10.1063/1.4739414
  18. 18. Yang XD, He PF, Gao HJ (2011) Modeling frequency- and temperature-invariant dissipative behaviors of randomly entangled carbon nanotube networks under cyclic loading. Nano Research 4: 1191–1198. doi: 10.1007/s12274-011-0169-y
  19. 19. Xu BX, Liu L, Zhou QL, Qiao Y, Xu J, et al. (2011) Energy Dissipation of Nanoporous MFI Zeolite Under Dynamic Crushing. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 8: 881–886. doi: 10.1166/jctn.2011.1768
  20. 20. Xu J, Sun Y, Li Y, Xiang Y, Chen X (2013) Molecular dynamics simulation of impact response of buckyballs. Mechanics Research Communications 49: 8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.01.003
  21. 21. Lu W, Punyamurtula VK, Qiao Y (2011) An energy absorption system based on carbon nanotubes and nonaqueous liquid. International Journal of Materials Research 102: 587–590. doi: 10.3139/146.110377
  22. 22. Grujicic M, Pandurangan B, Bell WC, Bagheri S (2012) Shock-Wave Attenuation and Energy-Dissipation Potential of Granular Materials. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 21: 167–179. doi: 10.1007/s11665-011-9954-8
  23. 23. Park J, Palumbo DL (2009) Damping of Structural Vibration Using Lightweight Granular Materials. Experimental Mechanics 49: 697–705. doi: 10.1007/s11340-008-9181-x
  24. 24. Nesterenko VF (2001) Dynamics of heterogeneous materials. New Yor, NY, USA: Springer.
  25. 25. Manjunath M, Awasthi AP, Geubelle PH (2012) Wave propagation in random granular chains. Physical Review E 85. doi: 10.1103/physreve.85.031308
  26. 26. Antypov D, Elliott JA, Hancock BC (2011) Effect of particle size on energy dissipation in viscoelastic granular collisions. Physical Review E 84. doi: 10.1103/physreve.84.021303
  27. 27. Spannuth MJ, Mueggenburg NW, Jaeger HM, Nagel SR (2004) Stress transmission through three-dimensional granular crystals with stacking faults. Granular Matter 6: 215–219. doi: 10.1103/physreve.66.031304
  28. 28. Mueggenburg NW, Jaeger HM, Nagel SR (2002) Stress transmission through three-dimensional ordered granular arrays. Physical Review E 66. doi: 10.1103/physreve.66.031304
  29. 29. Kruyt NP, Agnolin I, Luding S, Rothenburg L (2010) Micromechanical study of elastic moduli of loose granular materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 58: 1286–1301. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.06.003
  30. 30. Carretero-Gonzalez R, Khatri D, Porter MA, Kevrekidis PG, Daraio C (2009) Dissipative Solitary Waves in Granular Crystals. Physical Review Letters 102. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.102.024102
  31. 31. Sen S, Hong J, Bang J, Avalos E, Doney R (2008) Solitary waves in the granular chain. Physics Reports-Review Section of Physics Letters 462: 21–66. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.10.007
  32. 32. Gui XC, Wei JQ, Wang KL, Cao AY, Zhu HW, et al. (2010) Carbon Nanotube Sponges. Advanced Materials 22: 617–+. doi: 10.1002/adma.200902986
  33. 33. Wang CM, Zhang YY, Xiang Y, Reddy JN (2010) Recent Studies on Buckling of Carbon Nanotubes. Applied Mechanics Reviews 63. doi: 10.1115/1.4001936
  34. 34. Chandraseker K, Mukherjee S (2007) Atomistic-continuum and ab initio estimation of the elastic moduli of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Computational Materials Science 40: 147–158. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.11.014
  35. 35. Yakobson BI, Brabec CJ, Bernholc J (1996) Nanomechanics of carbon tubes: Instabilities beyond linear response. Physical Review Letters 76: 2511–2514. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.76.2511
  36. 36. Man ZY, Pan ZY, Ho YK (1995) The rebounding of C60 on graphite surface: a molecular dynamics simulation. Physics Letters A 209: 53–56. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00768-7
  37. 37. Pan ZY, Man ZY, Ho YK, Xie J, Yue Y (1998) Energy dependence of C60–graphite surface collisions. Journal of Applied Physics 83: 4963–4967. doi: 10.1063/1.367298
  38. 38. Xu J, Li Y, Xiang Y, Chen X (2013) Investigation of Energy Absorption Ability of Buckyball C720 at Low Impact Speed Based on Molecular Dynamic Simulation. Nanoscale Research Letters 8: 54. doi: 10.1186/1556-276x-8-54
  39. 39. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 117: 1–19. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039
  40. 40. Girifalco LA, Hodak M (2002) Van der Waals binding energies in graphitic structures. Physical Review B 65. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.65.125404
  41. 41. Johnson KL (1985) Contact Mechanics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  42. 42. Lu G, Yu TX (2003) Energy absorption of structures and materials: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.
  43. 43. Daraio C, Nesterenko VF, Herbold EB, Jin S (2006) Energy trapping and shock disintegration in a composite granular medium. Physical Review Letters 96. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.96.058002
  44. 44. Fraternali F, Blesgen T, Amendola A, Daraio C (2011) Multiscale mass-spring models of carbon nanotube foams. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 59: 89–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.09.004
  45. 45. Herbold EB, Nesterenko VF (2007) Solitary and shock waves in discrete strongly nonlinear double power-law materials. Applied Physics Letters 90. doi: 10.1063/1.2751592
  46. 46. Reid SR, Peng C (1997) Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood. International Journal of Impact Engineering 19: 531–570. doi: 10.1016/s0734-743x(97)00016-x
  47. 47. Cowper GR, Symonds PS (1957) Strain hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Brown University Division of Applied Mathematics