Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Early Nutrition and Weight Gain in Preterm Newborns and the Risk of Retinopathy of Prematurity

  • Deborah K. VanderVeen ,

    deborah.vanderveen@childrens.harvard.edu

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Camilia R. Martin,

    Affiliation Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Reshma Mehendale,

    Affiliation Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Elizabeth N. Allred,

    Affiliations Neuroepidemiology Unit, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Olaf Dammann,

    Affiliations Neuroepidemiology Unit, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Perinatal Neuroepidemiology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

  • Alan Leviton,

    Affiliations Neuroepidemiology Unit, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • for the ELGAN Study Investigators

    Investigators of the ELGAN Study are provided in the Acknowledgments.

Early Nutrition and Weight Gain in Preterm Newborns and the Risk of Retinopathy of Prematurity

  • Deborah K. VanderVeen, 
  • Camilia R. Martin, 
  • Reshma Mehendale, 
  • Elizabeth N. Allred, 
  • Olaf Dammann, 
  • Alan Leviton, 
  • for the ELGAN Study Investigators
PLOS
x

Abstract

Objective

To identify nutritional and weight gain limitations associated with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) severity among very preterm newborns.

Patients and Methods

1180 infants <28 weeks GA at birth with ROP examination results were grouped and analyzed by quartile of weekly total calorie, carbohydrate, protein, and lipid intake, as well as growth velocity between postnatal days 7 and 28 (adjusted for GA and birth weight Z-score). ROP was categorized by development of no, mild (<prethreshold), type 2, or type 1 ROP, as well as markers of ROP severity including stage 3 ROP, zone 1 disease, and plus disease. Associations between nutritional intake and ROP severity were compared.

Results

Greater risk for Type 1 ROP (risk/95% confidence intervals) was found for infants with lowest quartile receipt of lipids (2.1/1.1, 3.8), total calories (2.2/1.4, 3.6), and carbohydrates (1.7/1.1, 2.9). Development of zone 1 ROP was associated with lipid or total calorie intake in the lowest quartile, and development of stage 3 ROP was associated with lowest quartile of total calorie intake. Growth velocity in the lowest quartile was associated with increased risk of any ROP, including type 1 ROP.

Conclusion

The risk of developing severe ROP in extremely premature infants might be reduced by improving nutritional support, specifically targeting lipids and total calories, and perhaps by improving weight gain.

Introduction

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a neovascular disease of the retina found in very premature infants, can result in life-long visual limitations. Identifying the antecedents of ROP provides additional information on relevant pathogenic mechanisms involved and has the potential to help reduce the occurrence of this disease and its consequences. [1].

Early nutritional support is a critical part of optimizing growth and development in the premature infant, including normal retinal vascularization. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 is important for normal infant growth [2][4] and retinal vascularization, [5][8] and is regulated by total caloric and protein intake. [2] Lipid emulsions are an important part of nutritional support; omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids have been shown to suppress inflammatory factors and contribute to antiangiogenic and neuroprotective mechanisms in the retina. [9][13] Early weight gain is an important marker of nutritional status, and poor postnatal weight gain has been associated with an increased risk of severe ROP. [14][17] Algorithms have been developed that employ postnatal weight gain and IGF levels to predict development of severe ROP. [18], [19].

Premature infants enrolled in the ELGAN (extremely low gestational age newborn) Study had assessments of nutritional support (carbohydrate, protein, lipids, and total calories) and weight measurements during the first 28 days of life. We evaluated the relationships between components of early nutritional support and weight gain with markers of ROP severity in this at-risk population.

Patients and Methods

Sample

The ELGAN Study, a prospective cohort study designed to identify characteristics and exposures that increase the risk of structural and functional neurologic disorders, enrolled 1506 extremely low gestational age newborns (birth between 23 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation) at one of 14 participating institutions between 2002–2004. [20] The enrollment and consent processes were approved by the individual institutional review boards, and research conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents and/or legal guardians of all infants enrolled in the study.

Of these newborns, 1187 had their weight recorded on days 7 and 28, as well as nutrition information collected on days selected for analysis (days 3, 7, 14, and 21). The gestational age, birth weight, and other perinatal characteristics of 1064 of these 1187 infants are presented elsewhere. [21] Results of retinal examinations were available for 1180 of these infants. The enrollment and consent processes were approved by the individual institutional review boards.

Infant Characteristics

Gestational age (GA) estimates were based on a hierarchy of the quality of available information with estimates based on the dates of embryo retrieval or intrauterine insemination or fetal ultrasound before the 14th week of gestation (62%) as the most desirable. Next most desirable in sequential order were estimates based on a fetal ultrasound at 14 or more weeks of gestation (29%), last menstrual period without fetal ultrasound (7%), and GA recorded in the log of the NICU (1%).

Nutrition Data

Detailed nutritional data were collected daily for the first 7 postnatal days, then weekly on days 14, 21, and 28. [22] Type and volume of intravenous solutions (including composition of parenteral nutrition) as well as type and volume of enteral feedings (including caloric additives) were routinely recorded. All nutritional practice variables summarize nutritional intake from both parenteral and enteral routes.

Nutrient information was calculated for the macronutrients protein, carbohydrates, and fats. These totals were calculated by multiplying the daily total volume of the diet by the macronutrient content as specific on the nutritional label for all formula types and nutritional additives, such as powdered proteins or fat oils. For breast milk, we calculated nutritional intake using values for mature milk (Ross Neonova system, version 4.5, 1999) since by 14 days the composition of preterm milk and term milk are similar. Although human milk composition can be very dynamic, it was not feasible in this study to capture the composition of every breast milk sample provided to the infants.

Total kilocalories per day were divided by the birth weight until the birth weight was surpassed, then by the weight on the day the nutritional information was collected. The final units for the macronutrient calculations were kcals/kg/day. For analysis, we categorized the mean total nutrient (g/kg/day) and mean total calories (kcal/kg/day) on each of four selected days (3, 7, 14 and 21) into quartiles.

Weight Change

Body weight was measured each day in the first postnatal week, then on days 14, 21 and 28. The rate in growth is expressed as g/kg/day. Because ELGANs tend to lose weight during the first postnatal week [23] our measure of weight gain was calculated for the interval between days 7 and 28 [((wt28-wt7)/wt7)/(28-7) 1000×g/kg/day]. We categorized this measure of weight gain into quartiles.

Eye Examinations

Retinal examinations were performed by ophthalmologists experienced in ROP screening. Participating ophthalmologists helped prepare a manual and data collection form, and then participated in efforts to minimize observer variability. Definitions of terms were those accepted by the International Committee for Classification of ROP. [24] In keeping with guidelines, [25][26] the first ophthalmologic examination was within the 31st to 33rd post-menstrual week. Follow-up exams were as clinically indicated until normal vascularization began in zone III.

For purposes of discussion, prethreshold ROP is defined as any ROP in zone 1, stage 2 ROP in zone 2 with plus disease, or stage 3 ROP in zone 2 with or without plus disease. Prethreshold ROP is designated as type 1 or type 2 ROP, [27] as follows:

Type 1 ROP:

  • zone I, any stage ROP with plus disease;
  • zone I, stage 3 ROP without plus disease; or
  • zone II, stage 2 or 3 ROP with plus disease.

Type 2 ROP

  • zone I, stage 1 or 2 ROP without plus disease or
  • zone II, stage 3 ROP without plus disease.

During the study period, criteria for treatment of ROP varied, due to participation in the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) randomized trial, or due to subsequent changes in treatment recommendations [27][28]. We did not evaluate need to treat as a separate indicator of severity, since some eyes of infants in the ELGAN study received treatment for high-risk prethreshold or type 1 ROP, while others received treatment only when threshold ROP developed. Threshold ROP was defined as 5 contiguous or 8 cumulative clock hours of stage 3 ROP with plus disease in zone 1 or 2, so all cases previously designated as threshold or near threshold ROP are included in the current classification of type 1 ROP.

In this analysis, we categorized ROP severity in four ways: no ROP, mild ROP (<prethreshold), type 2 ROP, and type 1 ROP. Additional markers of severity were noted as≥stage 3 ROP, zone I disease, and presence of plus disease. The comparison groups in these analyses include infants with no or mild ROP.

Statistical Analyses

We evaluated two hypotheses. First, infants who received nutrition (i.e., protein, carbohydrate, fat and total calories) in the lowest quartile are not at increased risk of any measure of ROP severity. Second, infants in the lowest quartile of weight gain are not at increased risk of any indicator of ROP severity.

We evaluated these hypotheses in two ways. One set of analyses was characterized by logistic regression models of each level of severity compared to the referent group of children who did not have any ROP. To account for the possibility that infants born at a particular hospital are more like each other than like infants born at other hospitals, a hospital cluster term was included in all of these models. [29].

Because each level of severity is mutually exclusive and each is appropriately compared to the same referent group of infants without any ROP, we also created multinomial (aka polytomous or polychotomous) logistic regression models. [30], [31] Multinomial models do not allow a cluster term to be included.

All models adjusted for gestational age category (23–24, 25–26, 27 weeks), and birth weight Z-score category (<−2, ≥ −2 to<−1, ≥ −1 to 0, ≥0). We calculated odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) with the aid of the logistic regression models.

By and large, the two sets of analyses provided similar findings. For economy of space we present only results obtained with the multinomial models.

Results

Of the 1180 infants studied, 876 (74%) developed ROP (Table 1). Thirty percent (359/1180) developed prethreshold ROP, and 13% (156/1180) developed Type 1 ROP. ROP≥ stage 3 developed in 345 infants; zone 1 disease was present in 89 infants.

Figure 1 shows the distribution of mean total nutrients and calories received on days of life 3, 7, 14 and 21. Not only was the median amount of carbohydrates received by children who had no ROP higher than those who developed ROP, but the more severe the ROP, the lower the median. A similar pattern was seen for median total fat, and mean total calories, but not for median total protein. In contrast to the linear relationships between the levels of some nutrients and ROP severity, no such pattern was seen between weight gain between days 7 and 28 and ROP severity.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Box and whiskers displays of total carbohydrate, protein, and fat (g/kg/day), total calories (kcal/kg/day), and growth velocity (g/kg/day) among children classified by ROP severity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064325.g001

Table 2 displays the risk of ROP for infants whose receipt of each nutrient or calorie intake was in the lowest quartile, adjusted for gestational age and birth weight Z-score. Increased risk of type 1 ROP was found for infants in the lowest quartile for carbohydrate, fat, and total calorie intake. Increased risk of≥stage 3 ROP was found for infants in the lowest quartile of total calorie intake, and increased risk of zone 1 ROP was found for infants in the lowest quartile of fat or total calorie intake. Receipt of low amounts of protein was not associated with appreciably increased risk of any ROP severity.

thumbnail
Table 2. The risks (and 95% confidence intervals) of the ROP level identified on the left among infants whose receipt of the nutrient or calories at the top of each column was in the lowest quartile relative to the risk among children whose receipt was in the top 3 quartiles.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064325.t002

Unlike Table 2, Table 3 shows the three lower quartiles for growth velocity, which provided an opportunity to see if a dose-response characterized the findings. Weight gain in the lowest quartile was associated with increased risk of all stages of ROP, including type 1ROP. Less limited weight gains were not associated with increased risk of any severity level of ROP.

thumbnail
Table 3. The risks (and 95% confidence intervals) of the ROP level identified on the left among infants classified by the quartile of their weight gain between days 7 and 28 relative to the risk among children whose weight gain was in the highest quartile.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064325.t003

Males and females did not differ in nutritional intake, growth velocity, or ROP risk.

Discussion

In this cohort of extremely low gestational age newborns, intake of total calories, lipids, and carbohydrates in the lowest quartile, measured on postnatal days 3,7,14, and 21, was associated with increased risk of type 1 ROP. Similarly, infants with growth velocity in the lowest quartile were at higher risk of developing any ROP, including type 1 ROP. These findings raise the possibility that improving the early nutrition of these infants may help prevent development of sight-threatening ROP.

In a previous report from the ELGAN Study, the intake of protein and fat were within the generally accepted dietary goals for ELGANs, while the goals for intake of carbohydrate and total calories were not achieved. [22] Controversy continues about what nutritional targets should be in preterm newborns. [32][36] While growth velocities were maintained above 15 mg/kg/day, most infants had a weight Z-score on day 28 that was lower than at birth. This might be viewed as an indicator of extra-uterine growth failure. Not surprisingly, infants who received protein, fat, and carbohydrate amounts in the lowest quartile on day 7 were more likely than their peers to have growth velocity in the lowest quartile. We do not know why delivery of these nutrients was suboptimal. While it is possible to observe associations between low nutrition and co-morbidities, determining whether the suboptimal delivery of nutrients contributed to development of ROP or whether co-morbidities caused the poor dietary intake is beyond the scope of information collected for this study.

Receipt of higher amounts of intravenous fat emulsion (2 g/kg/day; Intralipid) during the first week of life has been associated with decreased rates of ROP. [9] Our observation that infants in the lowest quartile for lipid intake were at increased risk of prethreshold ROP supports this finding. The quantity but not quality of lipid intake was recorded, so it is possible that some newborns experienced lipid component deficiencies known to be important for retinal vascular development and stability, such as the omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). [12], [37] Parenteral lipid supplements given in the United States do not contain DHA, and the addition of DHA to infant formula commenced near the beginning of this study period (2002). Even those who received breast milk early did not have amounts recorded or DHA concentration analyzed.

Poor postnatal weight gain is a predictor of severe ROP. [14][19], [38][41] The WINROP algorithm, which measures a cumulative slowdown in weight gain, has a high sensitivity (90–100%) for detecting infants at risk of developing prethreshold ROP. A caveat to assessment of weight gain alone is the need to distinguish those infants who have non-physiologic weight gain, such as weight gain from body edema, hydrocephalus, or other causes. Infants who develop proliferative ROP often have co-morbidities such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia and necrotizing enterocolitis, which might limit nutrition and weight gain. In light of the associations between IGF-1 blood concentrations and weight gain as well as ROP risk [5][8], [18] it is possible that low weight gain is not in the causal chain leading to ROP, but instead is merely an indicator of IGF-1 concentration, which might be in the causal chain. While IGF-1 concentration is unlikely to influence administration of nutrients, it may influence utilization of existing nutrients.

Although many studies have reported low weight gain as a risk factor for ROP (Table 4), and one clinical trial has assessed the contribution of intravenous fat emulsions to reducing ROP risk, this is the first observational study of suboptimal early nutrition as a risk factor for indicator of ROP severity in ELGANs. We found infants receiving the lowest quartile of lipid, carbohydrate, and total calories to be at increased risk of type 1 ROP. Higher amounts of lipid emulsion in the early days of postnatal life, in addition to DHA supplementation, could theoretically reduce ROP risk. Since higher amounts of IV lipid appear to be well tolerated, and given the importance of DHA in retina and brain development [42][46], this seems to be an important nutritional component to target. Additionally, maximizing total caloric intake to support early growth appears to show promise of reducing risk of prethreshold ROP.

thumbnail
Table 4. Characteristics of the eight studies that evaluated low weight gain as a risk factor for ROP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064325.t004

The strengths of this study include the large number of infants studied, enrollment on the basis of well defined gestational age, a protocol with standardized assessments, and prospective collection of nutritional data. Additionally, ROP exams were performed by experienced examiners and ROP data collection occurred in a prospective and standardized fashion. Limitations include less than ideal information about dietary fat components and mode of nutrient delivery.

Conclusion

Low intake of lipids, carbohydrates, and total calories was associated with increased risks of sight-threatening ROP in this cohort of ELGANs. Together with previous reports that low weight gain is also a risk factor for ROP, this finding suggests that efforts to improve the nutritional intake and weight gain of the most vulnerable newborns might reduce the burden of sight-limiting ROP.

Supporting Information

File S1.

List of all Institutional Review Boards that approved the ELGAN study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064325.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the contributions of ELGAN Study subjects, and their parents, as well as those of their colleagues.

The ELGAN Study Investigators are: Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA: Bavesh Shah, William Seefield; Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA: Linda J. Van Marter; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA: Robert M. Insoft, Tony Fraioli; Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA: Cynthia Cole, John M. Fiascone, Caroline Baumal; U Mass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA: Francis Bednarek, Robert Gise; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT: Richard Ehrenkranz, Kathleen Stoessel; Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC: T. Michael O’Shea, Grey Weaver; University Health System of Eastern Carolina, Greenville, NC: Stephen C. Engelke, Elaine Price Schwartz; North Carolina Children’s Hospital, Chapel Hill, NC: Carl Bose, David Wallace: Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital, Grand Rapids, MI: Mariel Poortenga, Patrick Droste; Sparrow Hospital, Lansing, MI: I. Nicholas Olomu, Linda Angell; Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI: Nigel Paneth, Padmani Karna; University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago IL: Michael D. Schreiber, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Kourous Rezaei; William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI: Daniel Batton, Michael Trese, Antonio Capone Jr.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DKV CRM ENA OD AL. Performed the experiments: DKV CRM ENA OD AL. Analyzed the data: DKV RM CRM ENA OD AL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DKV RM CRM ENA OD AL. Wrote the paper: DKV RM CRM ENA OD AL.

References

  1. 1. Heidary G, Vanderveen D, Smith LE (2009) Retinopathy of prematurity: current concepts in molecular pathogenesis. Semin Ophthalmol 24(2): 77–81.
  2. 2. Engström E, Niklasson A, Wikland KA, Ewald U, Hellström A (2005) The role of maternal factors, postnatal nutrition, weight gain, and gender in regulation of serum IGF-I among preterm infants. Pediatr Res 57(4): 605–610.
  3. 3. Lo HC, Tsao LY, Hsu WY, Chen HN, Yu WK, et al. (2002) Relation of cord serum levels of growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, leptin, and interleukin-6 with birth weight, birth length, and head circumference in term and preterm neonates. Nutrition 18(7–8): 604–608.
  4. 4. Pirazzoli P, Cacciari E, De Iasio R, Pittalis MC, Dallacasa P, et al. (1997) Developmental pattern of fetal growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I, growth hormone binding protein and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed77(2): F100–104.
  5. 5. Hellström A, Engström E, Hård AL, Albertsson-Wikland K, Carlsson B, et al. (2003) Postnatal serum insulin-like growth factor I deficiency is associated with retinopathy of prematurity and other complications of premature birth. Pediatrics 112(5): 1016–1020.
  6. 6. Hellström A, Perruzzi C, Ju M, Engström E, Hård AL, et al. (2001) Low IGF-I suppresses VEGF-survival signaling in retinal endothelial cells: direct correlation with clinical retinopathy of prematurity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(10): 5804–5808.
  7. 7. Hikino S, Ihara K, Yamamoto J, Takahata Y, Nakayama H, et al. (2001) Physical growth and retinopathy in preterm infants: involvement of IGF-I and GH. Pediatr Res 50(6): 732–736.
  8. 8. Smith LE (2005) IGF-1 and retinopathy of prematurity in the preterm infant. Biol Neonate 88(3): 237–244.
  9. 9. Drenckpohl D, McConnell C, Gaffney S, Niehaus M, Macwan KS (2008) Randomized trial of very low birth weight infants receiving higher rates of infusion of intravenous fat emulsions during the first week of life. Pediatrics 122(4): 743–751.
  10. 10. SanGiovanni JP, Chew EY (2005) The role of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in health and disease of the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 24(1): 87–138.
  11. 11. Sapieha P, Joyal JS, Rivera JC, Kermorvant-Duchemin E, Sennlaub F, et al. (2010) Retinopathy of prematurity: understanding ischemic retinal vasculopathies at an extreme of life. J Clin Invest 120(9): 3022–3032.
  12. 12. Pawlik D, Lauterbach R, Turyk E (2011) Fish-oil fat emulsion supplementation may reduce the risk of severe retinopathy in VLBW infants. Pediatrics 127(2): 223–228.
  13. 13. Connor KM, SanGiovanni JP, Löfqvist C, Aderman CM, Chen J, et al. (2007) Increased dietary intake of omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces pathological retinal angiogenesis. Nat Med. 13(7): 868–873.
  14. 14. Allegaert K, Vanhole C, Casteels I, Naulaers G, Debeer A, et al. (2003) Perinatal growth characteristics and associated risk of developing threshold retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS 7(1): 34–37.
  15. 15. Wallace DK, Kylstra JA, Phillips SJ, Hall JG (2000) Poor postnatal weight gain: a risk factor for severe retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS. 4(6): 343–347.
  16. 16. Hellström A, Hård AL, Engström E, Niklasson A, Andersson E, et al. (2009) Early weight gain predicts retinopathy in preterm infants: new, simple, efficient approach to screening. Pediatrics 123(4): e638–645.
  17. 17. Fortes Filho JB, Bonomo PP, Maia M, Procianoy RS (2009) Weight gain measured at 6 weeks after birth as a predictor for severe retinopathy of prematurity: study with 317 very low birth weight preterm babies. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247(6): 831–836.
  18. 18. Löfqvist C, Hansen-Pupp I, Andersson E, Holm K, Smith LE, et al. (2009) Validation of a new retinopathy of prematurity screening method monitoring longitudinal postnatal weight and insulinlike growth factor I. Arch Ophthalmol. 127(5): 622–627.
  19. 19. Löfqvist C, Andersson E, Sigurdsson J, Engström E, Hård AL, et al. (2006) Longitudinal postnatal weight and insulin-like growth factor I measurements in the prediction of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 124(12): 1711–1718.
  20. 20. O’Shea TM, Allred EN, Dammann O, Hirtz D, Kuban KC, et al. (2009) The ELGAN study of the brain and related disorders in extremely low gestational age newborns. Early Hum Dev 85(11): 719–725.
  21. 21. Chen ML, Allred EN, Hecht JL, Onderdonk A, VanderVeen D, et al. (2011) Placenta Microbiology and Histology, and The Risk for Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 52(10): 7052–8.
  22. 22. Martin CR, Brown YF, Ehrenkranz RA, O’Shea TM, Allred EN, et al. (2009) Nutritional practices and growth velocity in the first month of life in extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 124(2): 649–657.
  23. 23. Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA, Fanaroff AA, Donovan EF, et al. (1999) Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 104(2 Pt 1): 280–289.
  24. 24. The Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity (1984) An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 102(8): 1130–1134.
  25. 25. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity (2001) Pediatrics. 108(3): 809–811.
  26. 26. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity (2013) Pediatrics. 131: 189–195.
  27. 27. Early Treatment For Retinopathy Of Prematurity Cooperative Group (2003) Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121(12): 1684–1694.Begg MD, Parides MK (2003).
  28. 28. Fielder AR (2003) Preliminary results of treatment of eyes with high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity in the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121(12): 1769–1771.
  29. 29. Begg MD, Parides MK (2003) Separation of individual-level and cluster-level covariate effects in regression analysis of correlated data. Stat Med 22(16): 2591–2602.
  30. 30. Dubin N, Pasternack BS (1986) Risk assessment for case-control subgroups by polychotomous logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 123(6): 1101–1117.
  31. 31. Liang KY, Zeger S (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73: 13–22.
  32. 32. Simmer K, Rao SC (2005) Early introduction of lipids to parenterally-fed preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005256.
  33. 33. Premji SS, Fenton TR, Sauve RS (2006) Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003959.
  34. 34. Premji S, Fenton T, Sauve R (2006) Does amount of protein in formula matter for low-birthweight infants? A Cochrane systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 30(6): 507–514.
  35. 35. Klenoff-Brumberg HL, Genen LH (2003) High versus low medium chain triglyceride content of formula for promoting short term growth of preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002777.
  36. 36. Henderson G, Fahey T, McGuire W (2005) Calorie and protein-enriched formula versus standard term formula for improving growth and development in preterm or low birth weight infants following hospital discharge. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004696.
  37. 37. Sapieha P, Stahl A, Chen J, Seaward MR, Willett KL, et al. (2011) 5-Lipoxygenase metabolite 4-HDHA is a mediator of the antiangiogenic effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Sci Transl Med 3(69): 69ra12.
  38. 38. Binenbaum G, Ying GS, Quinn GE, Dreiseitl S, Karp K, et al. (2010) A clinical prediction model to stratify retinopathy of prematurity risk using postnatal weight gain. Pediatrics 127(3): e607–614.
  39. 39. Wu C, Vanderveen DK, Hellström A, Löfqvist C, Smith LE (2010) Longitudinal postnatal weight measurements for the prediction of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 128(4): 443–447.
  40. 40. Hård AL, Löfqvist C, Fortes Filho JB, Procianoy RS, Smith L, et al. (2010) Predicting proliferative retinopathy in a Brazilian population of preterm infants with the screening algorithm WINROP. Arch Ophthalmol 128(11): 1432–1436.
  41. 41. Wu C, Löfqvist C, Smith LE, VanderVeen DK, Hellström A, et al. (2012) Importance of early postnatal weight gain for normal retinal angiogenesis in very preterm infants: a multicenter study analyzing weight velocity deviations for the prediction of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 130(8): 992–9.
  42. 42. Connor WE, Neuringer M, Reisbick S (1992) Essential fatty acids: the importance of n-3 fatty acids in the retina and brain. Nutr Rev 50(4 (Pt 2)): 21–29.
  43. 43. Lucas A, King F, Bishop NB (1992) Postdischarge formula consumption in infants born preterm. Arch Dis Child 67(6): 691–692.
  44. 44. Lucas A, Bishop NJ, King FJ, Cole TJ (1992) Randomised trial of nutrition for preterm infants after discharge. Arch Dis Child 67(3): 324–327.
  45. 45. Furman L, Taylor G, Minich N, Hack M (2003) The effect of maternal milk on neonatal morbidity of very low-birth-weight infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(1): 66–71.
  46. 46. Porcelli PJ, Weaver RG Jr (2010) The influence of early postnatal nutrition on retinopathy of prematurity in extremely low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 86(6): 391–6.