Advertisement

Proteomic Analysis of Oesophagostomum dentatum (Nematoda) during Larval Transition, and the Effects of Hydrolase Inhibitors on Development

  • Martina Ondrovics ,

    Martina.Ondrovics@vetmeduni.ac.at

    Affiliation: Department of Pathobiology, Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

  • Katja Silbermayr,

    Affiliation: Department of Pathobiology, Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

  • Makedonka Mitreva,

    Affiliations: Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America

  • Neil D. Young,

    Affiliation: Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli,

    Affiliation: VetCore Facility for Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

  • Robin B. Gasser,

    Affiliation: Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  • Anja Joachim

    Affiliation: Department of Pathobiology, Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Proteomic Analysis of Oesophagostomum dentatum (Nematoda) during Larval Transition, and the Effects of Hydrolase Inhibitors on Development

  • Martina Ondrovics, 
  • Katja Silbermayr, 
  • Makedonka Mitreva, 
  • Neil D. Young, 
  • Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli, 
  • Robin B. Gasser, 
  • Anja Joachim
PLOS
x
  • Published: May 22, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063955

Abstract

In this study, in vitro drug testing was combined with proteomic and bioinformatic analyses to identify and characterize proteins involved in larval development of Oesophagostomum dentatum, an economically important parasitic nematode. Four hydrolase inhibitors ο-phenanthroline, sodium fluoride, iodoacetamide and 1,2-epoxy-3-(pnitrophenoxy)-propane (EPNP) significantly inhibited (≥90%) larval development. Comparison of the proteomic profiles of the development-inhibited larvae with those of uninhibited control larvae using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and subsequent MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis identified a down-regulation of 12 proteins inferred to be involved in various larval developmental processes, including post-embryonic development and growth. Furthermore, three proteins (i.e. intermediate filament protein B, tropomyosin and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase) inferred to be involved in the moulting process were down-regulated in moulting- and development-inhibited O. dentatum larvae. This first proteomic map of O. dentatum larvae provides insights in the protein profile of larval development in this parasitic nematode, and significantly improves our understanding of the fundamental biology of its development. The results and the approach used might assist in developing new interventions against parasitic nematodes by blocking or disrupting their key biological pathways.

Introduction

Parasitic roundworms (nematodes) of animals and humans are of major socioeconomic importance worldwide [1][5]. Of these nematodes, the soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus, Trichuris trichiura and Ascaris spp. are estimated to infect almost one sixth of the global human population [6], [7]. Also parasites of livestock, including species of Haemonchus, Ostertagia, Teladorsagia, Trichostrongylus and Oesophagostomum, collectively cause substantial economic losses estimated at billions of dollars per annum, due to poor productivity, failure to thrive, deaths and the cost of anthelmintic treatment [8][11]. In addition to their socioeconomic impact, widespread resistance in nematodes of livestock against the main classes of anthelmintics [12][14] has stimulated research toward designing alternative intervention and control strategies against these parasites. Central to this effort should be the discovery of new drug targets through an improved understanding of the fundamental biology of parasite development.

Despite the advances in ‘-omics’ and computer-based technologies [15], and extensive studies of the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [16][18], there is a paucity of information on developmental processes in parasitic nematodes of animals, particularly those of the order Strongylida, which are of major socioeconomic importance. Numerous studies (reviewed in [19]) show that the porcine nodule worm, Oesophagostomum dentatum, is a unique model for studying fundamental developmental and reproductive processes in strongylid nematodes because of its short life cycle and, particularly, an ability to maintain worms in vitro for weeks through multiple moults.

The life cycle of O. dentatum is simple and direct [20]. Unembryonated eggs are released in host faeces and develop into free-living, first- and second-stage larvae (L1s and L2s, respectively). Feeding on nutrients and microbes in the faecal matter, they develop into the infective, third-stage larvae (L3s) which are protected within a cuticular sheath. These larvae migrate from the faeces into the surrounding environment (pasture or soil), where the porcine host ingests them. Once ingested, the L3s exsheath in the small intestines of the pig en route to the large intestine. Upon reaching the large intestine, they burrow into the mucosal layer of the intestinal wall and subsequently produce lesions. Within the submucosa, the L3s moult to fourth-stage larvae (L4s) [21] and evoke an immune response that results in the encapsulation of the larvae in raised nodular lesions, made up mainly of aggregates of neutrophils and eosinophils [22]. Following the transition to the L4s, the larvae emerge from the mucosa within 6–17 days. The parasite undergoes another cuticular moult, subsequently maturing to an adult. The pre-patent period of O. dentatum is ~17–20 days [23], although longer periods have been observed [20].

Recent transcriptomic studies [15], [24] have provided first insights into the molecular biology of different developmental stages of O. dentatum, leading to the characterization of a range of structural and functional molecules. In some studies of nematodes [25][31], various hydrolases (including cysteine, metallo-, serine and aspartic proteases, and pyrophosphatases) have been identified as key molecules likely to play essential and specific roles in parasite development, cuticle collagen processing and/or moulting processes and thus represent potential drug targets for nematocides. Having available a practical in vitro culture system for O. dentatum [32], [33] provides a unique opportunity to assess the effects of specific and selective inhibitors on protein expression in this parasite. In the present study, we selected inhibitors of the most relevant hydrolase groups involved in the development and moulting of parasitic nematodes [25][27], [30], [31], [34], [35], based on their ability to inhibit these processes without affecting viability and motility. We investigated the effects of these hydrolase inhibitors on the (phenotypic) proteomic profile of O. dentatum during its transition from the L3 to L4 stage using an integrated two-dimensional gel electrophoretic, mass spectrometric and bioinformatic approach, taking advantage of all of the currently available transcriptomic datasets for this parasitic nematode.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Experiments were conducted in accordance with the Austrian Animal Welfare Regulations and approved (permit GZ 68.205/103-II/10b/2008) by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna and the Ministry of Science.

Parasite Material

A monospecific strain (OD-Hann) of O. dentatum was maintained routinely in experimentally infected pigs at the Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. The faeces were collected to harvest L3s from coprocultures [23] and stored in distilled water at 11°C for a maximum of six months.

Larval Development Inhibition Assay

The effects of seven different hydrolase inhibitors (Table 1) on larval development were assessed; the inhibitors included ο-phenanthroline monohydrate (1,10-phenanthroline; Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), a metalloprotease inhibitor; sodium fluoride (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), a pyrophosphatase inhibitor; iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), a cysteine protease inhibitor; 1,2-epoxy-3-(pnitrophenoxy)-propane (EPNP; Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) and pepstatin A (Sigma-Aldrich), two aspartic protease inhibitors; and 4-(2-Aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF; Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland) and aprotinin (Sigma-Aldrich), two serine protease inhibitors. Ensheathed L3s were purified using a small-scale agar gel migration technique [23], [36] and then exsheathed in 12% (v/v) hypochlorite at 22°C [23]. The exsheated L3s were maintained in culture in 24-well plates (100 L3s/well) containing 1 ml of cultivation medium containing LB broth and 10% pig serum [37]. Plates were incubated at 38.5°C and 10% CO2 for 14 days, with a change of medium on days 4 and 11. To determine the effect of the different inhibitors on the development and moulting of the L3 to L4 stage of O. dentatum, the seven inhibitors were added (individually) to replicate cultures at ascending concentrations (ο-phenanthroline 3.125 µM–2 mM; sodium fluoride 0.5 mM–10 mM; iodoacetamide 5 µM–500 mM; EPNP 100 µM–4 mM; pepstatin A 0.05 µM–175 µM; AEBSF 250 µM–1 mM; aprotinin 0.77 µM–1.16 mM; see Table 1). The percentage of developed L4s was determined on days 4, 7, 10 and 14. Phenotypes (viability, motility and mortality) were recorded at 100x magnification using an inverted light microscope (Diaphot 300, Nikon Corporation). Each inhibitor and each control were run in triplicate, and the respective solvent controls were included in each assay.

thumbnail
Table 1. List of the hydrolase inhibitors tested.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.t001

To test for the reversibility of inhibition of development, the larvae were first cultured for seven days in medium containing inhibitors at concentrations with a known inhibitory effect of ≥90%. Then, the medium was replaced with inhibitor-free medium following several washes, and the larvae maintained until day 14.

Protein Extraction

L3s of O. dentatum (n = 500,000), cultured in vitro for four days with or without the effective hydrolase inhibitors, were harvested, washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4), snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to fine powder with mortar and pestle pre-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Proteins were resuspended in ice-cold 10% (v/v) TCA in acetone at −20°C and precipitated for 90 min. After precipitation, proteins were centrifuged at 4°C at 17,500 g for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet washed twice with chilled (−20°C) 100% acetone and centrifuged to remove any traces of TCA. Finally, acetone was removed by evaporation at 22°C. Proteins were resuspended overnight in 250–500 µl solubilisation buffer [7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% (w/v) 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2​-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate(CHAPS; Carl Roth) and 30 mM Tris-Base (Carl Roth)] at 22°C. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 241,800 g at 20°C for 30 min. The supernatant was collected and the total protein content of each sample determined [38] using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.

Two-dimensional Electrophoresis

For separation in the first dimension, an aliquot of 120 µg of parasite protein was diluted in a final volume of 300 µl of rehydration solution [8 M urea, 2% (w/v) CHAPS, 12.7 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 2% immobilized pH gradient (IPG) buffer 3–10 non-linear (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Freiburg, Germany)] and used to rehydrate 13 cm IPG strips with a non-linear gradient pH 3–10 (Immobiline, GE Healthcare Life Sciences) for 18 h at 22–24°C. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was carried out (300 V ascending to 3,500 V for 90 min, followed by 3,500 V for 18 h) using a Multiphor II electrophoresis chamber (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). After IEF, the IPG strips were incubated at 22°C for 20 min in an equilibration buffer (6 M urea, 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl-sulphate (SDS), 30% (v/v) glycerol, 150 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 64 mM DTT). A second equilibration was performed in the same buffer, except that DTT was replaced by 135 mM iodoacetamide. The IPG strips were then washed with deionized water. In the second dimension, SDS-PAGE was performed in vertical slab gels (1.5 mm; T = 12%, C = 2.6%, 1.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 10% SDS) under reducing conditions at 15 mA for 15 min, followed by 25 mA in a Protean II electrophoresis chamber (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA). Gels were stained with silver [39]. Two technical replicates and one biological replicate were run for each treatment. Gels were scanned using the program ImageMaster™ 2D platinum v.7.0 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Proteins that were significantly (p≤0.05) differentially expressed were selected for further analyses by mass spectrometry combined with bioinformatics.

Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Protein spots were excised manually from silver-stained two-dimensional electrophoretic (2-DE) gels. ‘Negative’ control spots were also excised from blank regions of each gel and processed in parallel. Spots were washed, reduced with DTT and alkylated with iodoacetamide. In-gel digestion with trypsin (Trypsin Gold, Mass Spectrometry Grade, Promega, Madison, USA) was carried out [40]. In order to enhance peptide ionisation and the sensitivity of mass spectrometry, dried peptides were de-salted using Zip-Tips µC18 (Millipore, Billerica, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Spotting and Mass Spectrometry

Peptides were annotated using a Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation Tandem Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) mass spectrometer (Ultraflex II; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in MS and MS/MS modes. De-salted peptides (0.5 µl) were spotted on to a disposable AnchorChip MALDI target plate pre-spotted with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (PAC target; Bruker Daltonics). MS spectral data were acquired from the samples and a MS/MS list was generated for further analysis based on the most intense ions present (trypsin and major keratin ions were excluded). Spectra processing and peak annotation were carried out using FlexAnalysis and Biotools (Bruker Daltonics).

Data Analysis

All peptide mass fingerprint (PMF) data were refined using MS/MS data. Protein sequence matches with a significant MS/MS score (p<0.05) were used for further analysis. Ion mass data and amino acid sequences characterized from processed spectra were compared with data in public eukaryotic databases, including an inferred protein database of O. dentatum (www.nematode.net), the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant (nr) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using the following search parameters: global modifications carbamido-methylation on cysteine; variable modifications oxidation on methionine; peptide mass tolerance = 100 ppm; MS/MS tolerance = 1 Da; one missed cleavage allowed. The programs Proteinscape (v.2.1; Bruker Daltonics) and MASCOT (www.matrixscience.com) were used for data management and analyses. Proteins identified by MS were annotated based on their closest homologue (BLASTp, E-value cut-off ≤1×10−5) in the UniProt database and Gene Ontology (GO). Subsequent GO analyses were performed using the AmiGO BLAST tool [41]. Protein sequences were also mapped to known biological pathways (KOBAS algorithm) [42] using BLASTp (E-value cut-off ≤10−5) based on sequence homology to molecules in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database [43].

Statistical Analysis

Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS (v.20.0) for windows. To test for significant differences in the percentage of L4 development, the development-inhibited groups and the controls were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

Testing of Inhibitors

We assessed the inhibitory effects of each compound on the development from the exsheathed L3 to the L4 stage of O. dentatum (Figure 1) by culturing larvae for 14 days in medium containing seven different hydrolase inhibitors (Table 1). A significant inhibitory effect (p≤0.01) was detected for four of the seven hydrolase inhibitors tested. By adding iodoacetamide (125 µM), the development of L3s to L4s was inhibited by 93.9±5.1% compared with untreated controls. The addition of 1.4 mM EPNP resulted in 93.0±5.6% inhibition. Complete inhibition of nematode development was achieved by adding 12.5 µM o-phenanthroline to the in vitro cultures. Sodium fluoride (5 mM) resulted in a 90.8±3.2% inhibition. No significant inhibitory effect was observed for the aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin A or either serine protease inhibitors (AEBSF and aprotinin) tested (data not shown). The addition of higher concentrations of each of the four inhibitory compounds did not result in an increased inhibitory effect, but did lead to a higher mortality of larvae. The reversibility of the inhibitory effect of each inhibitor was assessed. The removal of iodoacetamide, EPNP, o-phenanthroline and sodium fluoride resulted in 90.5%, 85.6%, 89.5%, and 106.3%, respectively, of L3s developing through to L4s with respect to the controls.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Error bar plot of the tested hydrolase inhibitors with a significant inhibitory effect on larval development of O. dentatum larvae cultured in vitro.

O. dentatum larvae were cultured in vitro for 14 days with or without enzyme inhibitors, and the percentage of L3s that developed to L4s was determined on days 4, 7, 10 and 14. The addition of four different enzyme inhibitors (o-phenanthroline, sodium fluoride, iodoacetamide and EPNP) to cultivation media resulted in a significant (p≤0.01) developmental inhibition of O. dentatum larvae when compared with untreated controls.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.g001

Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoretic Analysis

We explored the induced changes in the O. dentatum larval proteome, following treatment with inhibitors and associated inhibition of development. For this purpose, protein extracts were prepared from whole worms for 2-DE; the average recovery was 7.4 µg protein per 1,000 larvae. The results of 2-DE showed that the protein expression profile varied between the development-inhibited and control cultures. Protein spots were distributed throughout the whole pH range (3–10), but more spots were in the neutral and acidic pH ranges. The proteins differentially expressed between the development-inhibited and the control larvae were displayed and then annotated.

Annotation of Proteins

The significantly (p≤0.05) differentially expressed spots were excised from the 2-DE gels, digested with trypsin and then analysed by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS. The most intense spot (no. 13) representing an actin isoform was present on all gels, was constitutively expressed and was thus selected as reference spot. This approach allowed us to reproducibly resolve 29 spots representing 22 different proteins (Figure 2, Tables 2 and 3), of which 21 (except spots 2 and 3) shared sequence homology to individual conceptually translated proteins of O. dentatum. Spots 2 and 3 had significant amino acid sequence homology to propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha-chain of C. elegans (Table 2). Both spots independently yielded a significant MASCOT MS/MS score of 166.4 (spot 2) and 148.5 (spot 3), inferring that these results are highly reliable.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Two-dimensional electrophoretic gel of O. dentatum L3s displaying protein spots, non wild-type RNAi phenotypes in Caenorhabditis elegans linked to gene homologues in O. dentatum and the effect of inhibitors (i.e. P, o-phenanthroline; S, sodium fluoride; I, iodoacetamide; E, 1,2 epoxy-3-(pnitrophenoxy)-propane) on protein expression in development-inhibited larvae (↓, down-regulation; ↑, up-regulation; ↔, no difference; -, not studied).

Significantly (p≤0.05) differentially expressed protein spots selected for mass spectrometric analyses are numbered. Applying 2-DE analysis followed by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS resulted in the identification of 29 spots representing 22 different proteins. Protein homologues were identified in the UniProt database and are indicated [UniProt ID; Species]. RNAi phenotypes were linked to 13 of 29 homologues in C. elegans: Mov, Movement variant; Let, Lethal; Emd, Embryonic development variant; Ped, Postembryonic development variant; Ors, Organism segment morphology variant; Ohm, Organism homeostasis metabolism variant; Res, Reproductive system physiology variant; Cob, Cell organization biogenesis variant; Cdi, Cell division variant; Age, Life span variant.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Annotation of the different protein spots inferred for O. dentatum and MALDI-TOF-MS/MS results.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Protein homologues for the different spots.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.t003

Homology-based Search

The amino acid sequences predicted from contigs (Table 2) were searched against nematode molecules in the UniProt database. At least one nematode homologue was identified for each O. dentatum sequence using an E-value cut-off of ≤2×10−50. UniProt BLAST scores of sequence similarity for each sequence (for the five best matches) ranged from 731 to 2771. Homologous proteins were identified in other strongylid species (e.g., species of Cyathostominae, Haemonchus contortus, Angiostrongylus cantonensis, A. duodenale and/or N. americanus) as well as in related orders, such as the Rhabditida (e.g., Caenorhabditis spp.), Spirurida (e.g., Brugia malayi and/or Dracunculus medinensis) and Ascaridida (e.g., Ascaris suum) (Table 2; Table S1). These results confirmed correct spectra assignments for individual spots (nos. 2–8, 11, 12, 20 and 21) with significant MASCOT MS/MS scores for homologues in other species of nematodes (cf. Tables 2 and 3). All assigned contigs had homologous proteins in C. elegans. Thirteen of 29 protein spots (44.8%) were linked to distinct ‘non-wildtype’ double-stranded RNA interference (RNAi) phenotypes (Figure 2; Table S2) recorded in at least two different experiments (cf. WormBase): lethality (n = 10), defects in embryonic development (n = 10), organism homeostasis metabolism (n = 8), physiology of the reproductive system (n = 7), movement (n = 4) and post-embryonic development (n = 4). In C. elegans, no ‘non-wildtype’ RNAi phenotypes for O. dentatum homologues of the LIM domain protein, propionyl-CoA carboxylase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase GTP, troponin T, 4-hydroxybutyrate coenzyme A transferase, calreticulin, disorganised muscle protein 1, probable voltage-dependant anion-selective channel, aspartyl protease inhibitor, phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein, peroxiredoxin and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase have yet been reported in more than two different experiments (cf. WormBase).

KEGG Analysis

To further categorize key differentially expressed proteins and identify specific pathways in which these proteins are predicted to be involved, homologues to curated proteins in the KEGG database were identified (see Tables S3 and S4). In depth analysis revealed ‘cellular processes’, ‘genetic information processing’ and ‘metabolism’ as the three main protein classification terms (Table S3A). The class ‘cellular processes’, including the subclass ‘cytoskeleton proteins’ comprised the structural protein actin (spots 13 and 14). The KEGG classification ‘genetic information processing’ (including several subclasses) was linked to four proteins (representing 18.2% of all proteins), namely heat shock 70 kDa protein (HSP-70; spots 7 and 8), heat shock 60 kDa protein (HSP-60; spot 10), calreticulin (spot 12) and actin (spots 13 and 14). Seven proteins (representing 31.8% of all proteins) could be assigned to the class ‘metabolism’ and represented enzymes. Six of the seven enzymes [namely propionyl-CoA carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.3; spots 2 and 3), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase GTP (EC 4.1.1.32; spots 4 and 5), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.13; spot 15), malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.31; spots 17 and 18), pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 (EC 1.2.4.1; spot 22) and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (EC 5.2.1.8; spot 29)] are involved in various pathways linked to amino acid, carbohydrate and/or energy metabolism.

The KEGG pathway classification included the biological pathway terms ‘cellular processes’ (n = 4), ‘environmental information processing’ (n = 2), ‘genetic information processing’ (n = 3), ‘metabolism’ (n = 5) and ‘organismal systems’ (n = 5) (Table S3B). No annotation was found in the KEGG database for nine proteins (representing 36.4% of all proteins), including LIM domain protein (spot 1), intermediate filament protein B (spot 6), troponin T (spot 9), 4-hydroxybutyrate coenzyme A transferase (spot 11), tropomyosin (spot 16), receptor for activated protein kinase C 1 (RACK-1, spot 19), disorganised muscle protein 1 (DIM-1; spots 20 and 21), aspartyl protease inhibitor (spot 25) and phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein (spot 27).

Gene Ontology (GO) Analysis

In order to better understand the biological processes and molecular functions in which the identified proteins are inferred to be involved, GO analyses were performed using the AmiGO BLAST tool. Of the 22 proteins, 19 (86.4%) could be assigned to GO classifications associated with biological processes and 18 proteins (81.8%) were assigned to certain molecular functions. Only GO annotations found in related nematode species (particularly C. elegans) were taken into account using a cut-off of p≤2×10−25 (see Tables S5 and S6). GO classification analysis revealed associations of the proteins identified to a range of biological processes (Table S5A), including ‘reproduction’ (n = 8), ‘metabolic process’ (n = 10), ‘cellular process’ (n = 9), ‘multicellular organismal growth’ (n = 11), ‘developmental process’ (n = 11), ‘growth’ (n = 11), ‘locomotion’ (n = 8), ‘response to stimulus’ (n = 8), ‘localization’ (n = 4) and ‘biological regulation’ (n = 8). Most proteins assigned to the GO term ‘metabolic process’ related to ‘cellular metabolic process’ (representing 70% of the enzymes identified). No GO classifications for biological processes were found for three of the 22 proteins, namely DIM-1 (spots 20 and 21), aspartyl protease inhibitor (spot 25) and phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein (spot 27). ‘binding’ (n = 11) and ‘catalytic activity’ (n = 10) were the two main functional GO categories (Table S5B); additional GO categories included ‘structural molecule activity’ (n = 2), ‘transporter activity’ (n = 1) and ‘antioxidant activity’ (n = 1). In depth analysis revealed that the majority (63.6%) of proteins assigned to ‘binding’ are involved in ‘protein binding’ processes. No GO annotation for molecular functions was found for troponin T (spot 9), DIM-1 (spots 20 and 21), aspartyl protease inhibitor (spot 25) or phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein (spot 27).

Discussion

Drug resistance represents a major concern in the control of parasitic nematodes [12][14], [44]. Therefore, much research is directed towards the development of new agents in the treatment of nematode infections. Proteins involved in fundamental developmental processes in nematodes represent promising targets for the design of new and selective interventions. Hence, this study aimed at identifying and characterizing proteins involved in the larval development of O. dentatum, a model organism representative of parasitic nematodes of major socioeconomic impact. We applied an integrative approach combining in vitro drug testing with proteomic and bioinformatic analyses to provide first insights into larval development in O. dentatum.

To generate a development-inhibited phenotype for O. dentatum, hydrolase inhibitors were selected based on their ability to impede the moulting and development of larvae without affecting their viability and motility. Enzyme inhibitors were tested to cover the most relevant hydrolase classes known to be involved in the highly sophisticated moulting process in various nematode species [25][27], [30], [31], [34], [35]. Significant inhibition of moulting and development has been described previously in a range of nematodes and could be confirmed in O. dentatum for the three inhibitors, ο-phenanthroline [27], [34], [45], sodium fluoride [25], [26] and iodoacetamide [28]. The inhibitory effect of EPNP had not been tested before on the development of nematode larvae. In malaria parasites, however, this protease inhibitor disintegrates gametocyte membranes [46], and it has been used frequently as an inhibitor of peptidases of the A1 family [47]. This is particularly interesting, since the other aspartic protease inhibitor tested, pepstatin A, was neither effective in our model nor in related nematodes [27], [34], probably due to its limited half-life.

Since the development of nematode larvae and the sophisticated moulting process require a series of structural, biochemical, metabolic and physiological changes, we assumed that the proteins essential for fundamental developmental processes in development-inhibited larvae are less abundantly expressed compared with those of uninhibited controls in which normal development occurred. Thus, protein spots that were significantly differentially expressed between development-inhibited and control larvae were subjected to mass spectrometric and bioinformatic analyses. Using this approach, we identified 29 spots representing 22 different proteins. Several spots located at different positions in the same gel were inferred to be distinct protein isoforms or the same protein with varying post-translational modifications. Furthermore, 27 out of 29 identified spots were encoded in O. dentatum contigs derived from ESTs generated by 454 sequencing (FLX GS20 sequencer) [48] and analyzed using an advanced bioinformatic pipeline [49] for the interference of key biological processes [50], such as development and moulting. The O. dentatum contigs were further subjected to homology-based functional annotation. All O. dentatum amino acid sequences characterised had homologous proteins in other nematodes, including species from the orders Strongylida, Rhabditida, Spirurida, and Ascaridida.

The proteins identified and annotated included structural and cytoskeletal proteins (intermediate filament protein B, troponin T, actin, tropomyosin, DIM-1), enzymes involved in metabolism (propionyl-CoA carboxylase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase GTP, 4-hydroxybutyrate coenzyme A transferase, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, malate dehydrogenase, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1, ‘probable voltage-dependent anion-selective channel’ and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase), stress-associated peptides (HSP-60, HSP-70, calreticulin and peroxiredoxin), regulatory and interacting peptides (LIM domain protein, RACK-1, 14-3-3 protein and phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein) and one protease-inhibiting protein (aspartyl protease inhibitor). The expression of the vast majority (n = 19) of the 22 proteins identified was down-regulated in the development-inhibited group compared with controls, whereas three proteins (DIM-1, LIM domain protein and phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein) were shown to be up-regulated. We functionally annotated 19 (86.4%) of 22 protein sequences using GO and established pathway associations for 14 (63.6%) of 22 sequences in KEGG. The annotation of the 22 proteins revealed specific roles in larval developmental processes for intermediate filament protein B, HSP-70, troponin T, HSP-60, calreticulin, actin, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, tropomyosin, malate dehydrogenase, RACK-1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 and 14-3-3 protein. The expression of all 12 proteins was down-regulated in the development-inhibited larvae compared with controls. This finding indicates important roles for these proteins in nematode development.

KEGG analysis identified seven proteins (propionyl-CoA carboxylase, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase GTP, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, malate dehydrogenase, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1, peroxiredoxin and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase) as enzymes involved in amino acid, carbohydrate and/or energy metabolic pathways. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxy kinase GTP, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, malate dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 are known to be involved in the glucose associated energy metabolic pathways in nematodes [51][54], whereas propionyl-CoA carboxylase is involved in fatty acid synthesis [55]. The ‘probable voltage-dependent anion-selective channel’ protein likely plays pivotal roles in the parasite’s metabolisms, since it is involved in calcium signalling pathways and ion transport [56]. Peroxiredoxins are a ubiquitous family of antioxidant proteins and contribute to the oxidative-stress response of multicellular organisms. In nematodes, antioxidant enzymes and stress-associated proteins are central to the protection against oxygen radicals [57]. The expression of all enzymes and all stress-associated proteins identified in our study was down-regulated in development-inhibited larvae compared with larvae exhibiting physiological moulting and growth patterns. We hypothesize that the moulting process is accompanied by increased energy consumption as well as augmented metabolic and physiological activities. These changes were particularly evident when the protein profiles of larvae with physiological developmental patterns were compared with those whose moulting had been inhibited with one of the abovementioned hydrolase inhibitors, respectively.

Intermediate filament protein B, actin, troponin T, tropomyosin and DIM-1 are structural proteins ubiquitously expressed in all eukaryotic cells. They play essential roles in myofibril assembly and muscle contraction [58][60], and provide structure and stability [61][63]. In C. elegans (wild type strain of variation Bristol N2), the silencing of the gene encoding for tropomyosin, lev-11, results in embryonic lethality and worms that are paralyzed and showed abnormal muscle filament assembly [64], [65]. The over-expression of DIM-1 in the development-inhibited larvae might be a response to the reduced expression of the other structural proteins identified. Thus, DIM-1 could be part of a regulatory system and might be over-expressed to ensure stability and structure in O. dentatum larvae. The multifaceted and crucial functions of the abovementioned proteins indicate their importance in fundamental developmental processes. Interestingly, the two structural proteins, namely intermediate filament protein B and tropomyosin are known to play pivotal roles in the moulting process of C. elegans by remodelling the attachments between the muscle, the hypodermis and the exoskeleton [16], [18]. Additionally, the protein peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase is proposed to be involved in the moulting process in nematodes [66]. Besides their function as molecular chaperones and their involvement in stress responses and cell signalling [67][69], peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases of C. elegans are responsible for proper collagen biosynthesis [66] during the moulting process. These proteins represent a large multi-gene family which has also been identified in B. malayi as well as in other parasitic and free-living nematodes, including Onchocerca volvulus, H. contortus, Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. elegans [67], [70][72]. Interestingly, we observed a down-regulation of expression of the proteins intermediate filament protein B, tropomyosin and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, all homologues of which are involved in the moulting process in C. elegans. The moulting- and development-inhibited larvae expressed these three proteins to a lesser extent compared with the control larvae, which exhibited normal development and need the involvement of the moulting-associated proteins to accomplish the initiation and completion of their moulting. These three proteins, that are known to be involved in the moulting process, represent particularly promising candidate drug targets against parasitic nematodes, since they are essential for one of the most determining parts in the parasite’s development, appear to be conserved across nematode species and are not present in the mammalian host (pig).

Two proteins, LIM domain protein and phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein (PEBP), are associated with ion and lipid binding, respectively. LIM domain proteins are essential in a variety of fundamental biological processes [73] by mediating protein-protein interactions [74]. PEBPs are highly conserved and function in lipid binding, serine protease inhibition [75] and the regulation of several signalling pathways, such as the MAP kinase [76] and the NF-kappaB [77] pathways. Members of the PEBP family include the Ov-16 antigen of O. volvulus [78] and the excretory-secretory antigen 26 of Toxocara canis [79]. In B. malayi, a homologue of this protein is highly abundant in excretory/secretory products [72], [80]. Since both of these proteins were over-expressed in the development-inhibited O. dentatum, we hypothesize that the addition of the hydrolase inhibitors might lead to an up-regulation of specific interactions and signalling pathways, for reasons that remain to be elucidated. These modified processes might be associated with an increased involvement of LIM domain protein and phosphatidylethanol-amine binding protein, in which they might fulfil various protein interaction and/or pathway regulatory functions.

Conclusion

The findings of this study support the hypothesis that, in development-inhibited larvae of O. dentatum, proteins essential for developmental processes are less abundantly expressed compared with the uninhibited controls. Twelve proteins putatively involved in various larval developmental processes as well as three proteins involved in the moulting process were identified to be down-regulated in the moulting- and development-inhibited O. dentatum larvae. A better understanding of such key developmental processes paves the way to new interventions against parasitic nematodes by blocking or disrupting key biological pathways in them. Thus, this study provides a foundation on which future research on fundamental developmental processes in parasitic nematodes could be built. Furthermore, the present findings enable us to focus on specific proteins involved in the moulting cascade in O. dentatum. In future studies, the protein expression of exsheathed, ensheathed and moulting O. dentatum larvae could be compared using DIGE technologies [81] and supported by real-time PCR analysis of transcription. We aim to identify and characterize proteins involved in the moulting process and assess their merit as drug targets. The discovery of new drug targets is of particular importance, considering the increasing prevalence and distribution of drug resistance in parasitic nematodes of major socioeconomic importance.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Detailed list of protein homologues including the five best matches for each protein identification. The table lists the the ID number of the Oesophagostomum dentatum contig (Contig ID) and the individual protein identities (Protein identity), the five highest scoring putative proteins identified in homology-based search using the UniProt database (Protein homologue), the species in which these proteins occur (Species), the UniProt accession number of these proteins (UniProt ID), the score for sequence similarity (Score), the per cent of sequence identity (Identitiy [%]) and the expectation value (E-value).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.s001

(PDF)

Table S2.

RNAi phenotypes in Caenorhabditis elegans for homologous gene/s in Oesophagostomum dentatum.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.s002

(PDF)

Table S3.

A, B. KEGG pathway analysis of the proteins identified.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.s003

(PDF)

Table S4.

Detailed list of the protein assignments to KEGG BRITE protein families and to KEGG biological pathways.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.s004

(PDF)

Table S5.

A, B. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the proteins identified.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.s005

(PDF)

Table S6.

Gene Ontology (GO) assigments of proteins identified. The conceptually translated amino acid sequences of the identified Oesophagostomum dentatum contigs were applied to GO analyses using the AmiGO tool. Only annotations found in related nematode species were taken into account using a cut-off of p≤2×10−25.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063955.s006

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Mag. Katharina Nöbauer and Dr Karin Hummel (VetCore, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria) for their technical support in mass spectrometric analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MO KS AJ. Performed the experiments: MO. Analyzed the data: MO NDY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MM ERF RBG AJ. Wrote the paper: MO KS NDY RBG AJ.

References

  1. 1. De Silva NR, Brooker S, Hotez PJ, Montresor A, Engels D, et al. (2003) Soil-transmitted helminth infections: Updating the global picture. Trends Parasitol 19: 547–551. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2003.10.002
  2. 2. Artis D (2006) New weapons in the war on worms: Identification of putative mechanisms of immune-mediated expulsion of gastrointestinal nematodes. Int J Parasitol 36: 723–733. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.02.011
  3. 3. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, et al. (2006) Soil-transmitted helminth infections: Ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet 367: 1521–1532. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68653-4
  4. 4. Brooker S, Clements AC, Bundy DA (2006) Global epidemiology, ecology and control of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Adv Parasitol 62: 221–261. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(05)62007-6
  5. 5. Nikolaou S, Gasser RB (2006) Prospects for exploring molecular developmental processes in Haemonchus contortus. Int J Parasitol 36: 859–868. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.04.007
  6. 6. Hotez PJ, Fenwick A, Savioli L, Molyneux DH (2009) Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases. Lancet 373: 1570–1575. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60233-6
  7. 7. Harhay MO, Horton J, Olliaro PL (2010) Epidemiology and control of human gastrointestinal parasites in children. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 8: 219–234. doi: 10.1586/eri.09.119
  8. 8. Newton SE, Munn EA (1999) The development of vaccines against gastrointestinal nematode parasites, particularly Haemonchus contortus. Parasitol Today 15: 116–122. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(99)01399-x
  9. 9. McLeod RS (1995) Costs of major parasites to the Australian livestock industries. Int J Parasitol 25: 1363–1367. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(95)00071-9
  10. 10. Smith G (1997) The economics of parasite control: Obstacles to creating reliable models. Vet Parasitol 72: 437–449. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00109-x
  11. 11. Coles GC (2001) The future of veterinary parasitology. Vet Parasitol 98: 31–39. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00421-6
  12. 12. Sutherland IA, Leathwick DM (2011) Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of cattle: A global issue? Trends Parasitol 27: 176–181. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2010.11.008
  13. 13. Kaplan RM (2004) Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: A status report. Trends Parasitol 20: 477–481. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.08.001
  14. 14. Wolstenholme AJ, Fairweather I, Prichard R, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Sangster NC (2004) Drug resistance in veterinary helminths. Trends Parasitol 20: 469–476. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.07.010
  15. 15. Cantacessi C, Campbell BE, Jex AR, Young ND, Hall RS, et al. (2012) Bioinformatics meets parasitology. Parasite Immunol 34: 265–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2011.01304.x
  16. 16. Frand AR, Russel S, Ruvkun G (2005) Functional genomic analysis of C. elegans molting. PLoS Biol 3: e312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030312
  17. 17. Jeong PY, Na K, Jeong MJ, Chitwood D, Shim YH, et al. (2009) Proteomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Mol Biol 519: 145–169. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-281-6_10
  18. 18. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, et al. (2003) Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421: 231–237. doi: 10.1038/nature01278
  19. 19. Gasser RB, Cottee PA, Nisbet AJ, Ruttkowski B, Ranganathan S, et al. (2007) Oesophagostomum dentatum - potential as a model for genomic studies of strongylid nematodes, with biotechnological prospects. Biotechnol Adv 25: 281–293. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.01.008
  20. 20. Kotlàn A (1948) Studies on the life-history and pathological significance of Oesophagostomum spp. of the domestic pig. Acta Vet Hung 1: 14–30.
  21. 21. McCracken RM, Ross JG (1970) The histopathology of Oesophagostomum dentatum infections in pigs. J Comp Pathol 80: 619–623. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(70)90061-7
  22. 22. Stockdale PH (1970) Necrotic enteritis of pigs caused by infection with Oesophagostomum spp. Br Vet J 126: 526–530. doi: 10.1136/vr.84.25.646
  23. 23. Talvik H, Christensen CM, Joachim A, Roepstorff A, Bjørn H, et al. (1997) Prepatent periods of different Oesophagostomum spp. isolates in experimentally infected pigs. Parasitol Res 83: 563–568. doi: 10.1007/s004360050298
  24. 24. Cantacessi C, Campbell BE, Gasser RB (2012) Key strongylid nematodes of animals - impact of next-generation transcriptomics on systems biology and biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 30: 469–488. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.016
  25. 25. Islam MK, Miyoshi T, Kasuga-Aoki H, Isobe T, Arakawa T, et al. (2003) Inorganic pyrophosphatase in the roundworm Ascaris and its role in the development and molting process of the larval stage parasites. Eur J Biochem FEBS 270: 2814–2826. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03658.x
  26. 26. Islam MK, Miyoshi T, Yamada M, Tsuji N (2005) Pyrophosphatase of the roundworm Ascaris suum plays an essential role in the worm's molting and development. Infect Immun 73: 1995–2004. doi: 10.1128/iai.73.4.1995-2004.2005
  27. 27. Rhoads ML, Fetterer RH, Urban JF Jr (1998) Effect of protease class-specific inhibitors on in vitro development of the third- to fourth-stage larvae of Ascaris suum. J Parasitol 84: 686–690. doi: 10.2307/3284570
  28. 28. Rhoads ML, Fetterer RH, Urban JF (2001) Jr (2001) Cuticular collagen synthesis by Ascaris suum during development from the third to fourth larval stage: Identification of a potential chemotherapeutic agent with a novel mechanism of action. J Parasitol 87: 1144–1149. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[1144:ccsbas]2.0.co;2
  29. 29. Lustigman S, McKerrow JH, Shah K, Lui J, Huima T, et al. (1996) Cloning of a cysteine protease required for the molting of Onchocerca volvulus third stage larvae. J Biol Chem 271: 30181–30189. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.47.30181
  30. 30. Guiliano DB, Hong X, McKerrow JH, Blaxter ML, Oksov Y, et al. (2004) A gene family of cathepsin L-like proteases of filarial nematodes are associated with larval molting and cuticle and eggshell remodeling. Mol Biochem Parasitol 136: 227–242. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.03.015
  31. 31. Stepek G, McCormack G, Birnie AJ, Page AP (2011) The astacin metalloprotease moulting enzyme NAS-36 is required for normal cuticle ecdysis in free-living and parasitic nematodes. Parasitology 138: 237–248. doi: 10.1017/s0031182010001113
  32. 32. Joachim A, Ruttkowski B, Daugschies A (2001) Comparative studies on the development of Oesophagostomum dentatum in vitro and in vivo. Parasitol Res 87: 37–42. doi: 10.1007/s004360000305
  33. 33. Daugschies A, Watzel C (1999) The development of histotropic larvae of Oesophagostomum dentatum under various conditions of cultivation. Parasitol Res 85: 158–161. doi: 10.1007/s004360050527
  34. 34. Rhoads ML, Fetterer RH, Urban JF (1997) Jr (1997) Secretion of an aminopeptidase during transition of third- to fourth-stage larvae of Ascaris suum. J Parasitol 83: 780–784. doi: 10.2307/3284267
  35. 35. Ford L, Guiliano DB, Oksov Y, Debnath AK, Liu J, et al. (2005) Characterization of a novel filarial serine protease inhibitor, Ov-SPI-1, from Onchocerca volvulus, with potential multifunctional roles during development of the parasite. J Biol Chem 280: 40845–40856. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m504434200
  36. 36. Daugschies A (1995) Oesophagostomum dentatum: Population dynamics and synthesis of prostanoids by histotropic stages cultured in vitro. Exp Parasitol 81: 574–583. doi: 10.1006/expr.1995.1151
  37. 37. Joachim A, Ruttkowski B (2008) Cytosolic glutathione S-transferases of Oesophagostomum dentatum. Parasitology 135: 1215–1223. doi: 10.1017/s0031182008004769
  38. 38. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999
  39. 39. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ (1987) Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis 8: 93–99. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150080203
  40. 40. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M (1996) Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 68: 850–858. doi: 10.1021/ac950914h
  41. 41. Carbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, et al. (2009) AmiGO: Online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 25: 288–289. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn615
  42. 42. Xie C, Mao X, Huang J, Ding Y, Wu J, et al. (2011) KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 39: W316–22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr483
  43. 43. Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27
  44. 44. Roos MH (1997) The role of drugs in the control of parasitic nematode infections: Must we do without? Parasitology 114: 137–144.
  45. 45. Hotez P, Haggerty J, Hawdon J, Milstone L, Gamble HR, et al. (1990) Metalloproteases of infective Ancylostoma hookworm larvae and their possible functions in tissue invasion and ecdysis. Infect Immun 58: 3883–3892.
  46. 46. Sologub L, Kuehn A, Kern S, Przyborski J, Schillig R, et al. (2011) Malaria proteases mediate inside-out egress of gametocytes from red blood cells following parasite transmission to the mosquito. Cell Microbiol 13: 897–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01588.x
  47. 47. Tang J (1971) Specific and irreversible inactivation of pepsin by substrate-like epoxides. J Biol Chem 246: 4510–4517.
  48. 48. Mitreva M, Mardis ER (2009) Large-scale sequencing and analytical processing of ESTs. Methods Mol Biol 533: 153–187. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-136-3_8
  49. 49. Cantacessi C, Mitreva M, Jex AR, Young ND, Campbell BE, et al. (2010) Massively parallel sequencing and analysis of the Necator americanus transcriptome. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000684
  50. 50. Mitreva M, Zarlenga DS, McCarter JP, Jasmer DP (2007) Parasitic nematodes - from genomes to control. Vet Parasitol 148: 31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.05.008
  51. 51. Klein RD, Winterrowd CA, Hatzenbuhler NT, Shea MH, Favreau MA, et al. (1992) Cloning of a cDNA encoding phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase from Haemonchus contortus. Mol Biochem Parasitol 50: 285–294. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(92)90226-a
  52. 52. Inoue T, Yatsuki H, Kusakabe T, Joh K, Takasaki Y, et al. (1997) Caenorhabditis elegans has two isozymic forms, CE-1 and CE-2, of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase which are encoded by different genes. Arch Biochem Biophys 339: 226–234. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.9813
  53. 53. Huang YJ, Walker D, Chen W, Klingbeil M, Komuniecki R (1998) Expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase isoforms during the aerobic/anaerobic transition in the development of the parasitic nematode Ascaris suum: Altered stoichiometry of phosphorylation/inactivation. Arch Biochem Biophys 352: 263–270. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0596
  54. 54. McElwee JJ, Schuster E, Blanc E, Thornton J, Gems D (2006) Diapause-associated metabolic traits reiterated in long-lived daf-2 mutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev 127: 458–472. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.10.002
  55. 55. Wakil SJ, Stoops JK, Joshi VC (1983) Fatty acid synthesis and its regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 52: 537–579. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.002541
  56. 56. De Pinto V, Messina A, Lane DJ, Lawen A (2010) Voltage-dependent anion-selective channel (VDAC) in the plasma membrane. FEBS Lett 584: 1793–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.02.049
  57. 57. Olahova M, Taylor SR, Khazaipoul S, Wang J, Morgan BA, et al. (2008) A redox-sensitive peroxiredoxin that is important for longevity has tissue- and stress-specific roles in stress resistance. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 19839–19844. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805507105
  58. 58. Krause M, Wild M, Rosenzweig B, Hirsh D (1989) Wild-type and mutant actin genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol 208: 381–392. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90503-2
  59. 59. Ohtsuki I, Maruyama K, Ebashi S (1986) Regulatory and cytoskeletal proteins of vertebrate skeletal muscle. Adv Protein Chem 38: 1–67. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60525-2
  60. 60. Myers CD, Goh PY, Allen TS, Bucher EA, Bogaert T (1996) Developmental genetic analysis of troponin T mutations in striated and nonstriated muscle cells of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 132: 1061–1077. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.6.1061
  61. 61. Francis R, Waterston RH (1991) Muscle cell attachment in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 114: 465–479. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.3.465
  62. 62. Hapiak V, Hresko MC, Schriefer LA, Saiyasisongkhram K, Bercher M, et al. (2003) Mua-6, a gene required for tissue integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans, encodes a cytoplasmic intermediate filament. Dev Biol 263: 330–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.08.001
  63. 63. Rogalski TM, Gilbert MM, Devenport D, Norman KR, Moerman DG (2003) DIM-1, a novel immunoglobulin superfamily protein in Caenorhabditis elegans, is necessary for maintaining bodywall muscle integrity. Genetics 163: 905–915.
  64. 64. Williams BD, Waterston RH (1994) Genes critical for muscle development and function in Caenorhabditis elegans identified through lethal mutations. J Cell Biol 124: 475–490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.4.475
  65. 65. Anyanful A, Sakube Y, Takuwa K, Kagawa H (2001) The third and fourth tropomyosin isoforms of Caenorhabditis elegans are expressed in the pharynx and intestines and are essential for development and morphology. J Mol Biol 313: 525–537. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5052
  66. 66. Page AP, Johnstone IL (2007) The cuticle. WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology: 1–15.
  67. 67. Page AP, MacNiven K, Hengartner MO (1996) Cloning and biochemical characterization of the cyclophilin homologues from the free-living nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochem J 317 (Pt 1): 179–185.
  68. 68. Bell A, Monaghan P, Page AP (2006) Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerases (immunophilins) and their roles in parasite biochemistry, host-parasite interaction and antiparasitic drug action. Int J Parasitol 36: 261–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.11.003
  69. 69. Galat A, Metcalfe SM (1995) Peptidylproline cis/trans isomerases. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 63: 67–118. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(94)00009-x
  70. 70. Page AP, Winter AD (1998) A divergent multi-domain cyclophilin is highly conserved between parasitic and free-living nematode species and is important in larval muscle development. Mol Biochem Parasitol 95: 215–227. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(98)00096-6
  71. 71. Yatsuda AP, Krijgsveld J, Cornelissen AW, Heck AJ, de Vries E (2003) Comprehensive analysis of the secreted proteins of the parasite Haemonchus contortus reveals extensive sequence variation and differential immune recognition. J Biol Chem 278: 16941–16951. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m212453200
  72. 72. Hewitson JP, Harcus YM, Curwen RS, Dowle AA, Atmadja AK, et al. (2008) The secretome of the filarial parasite, Brugia malayi: Proteomic profile of adult excretory-secretory products. Mol Biochem Parasitol 160: 8–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.02.007
  73. 73. Bach I (2000) The LIM domain: Regulation by association. Mech Dev 91: 5–17. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00314-7
  74. 74. Dawid IB, Breen JJ, Toyama R (1998) LIM domains: Multiple roles as adapters and functional modifiers in protein interactions. Trends Genet 14: 156–162. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01424-3
  75. 75. Hengst U, Albrecht H, Hess D, Monard D (2001) The phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein is the prototype of a novel family of serine protease inhibitors. J Biol Chem 276: 535–540. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m002524200
  76. 76. Corbit KC, Trakul N, Eves EM, Diaz B, Marshall M, et al. (2003) Activation of raf-1 signaling by protein kinase C through a mechanism involving raf kinase inhibitory protein. J Biol Chem 278: 13061–13068. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m210015200
  77. 77. Yeung KC, Rose DW, Dhillon AS, Yaros D, Gustafsson M, et al. (2001) Raf kinase inhibitor protein interacts with NF-kappaB-inducing kinase and TAK1 and inhibits NF-kappaB activation. Mol Cell Biol 21: 7207–7217. doi: 10.1128/mcb.21.21.7207-7217.2001
  78. 78. Lobos E, Altmann M, Mengod G, Weiss N, Rudin W, et al. (1990) Identification of an Onchocerca volvulus cDNA encoding a low-molecular-weight antigen uniquely recognized by onchocerciasis patient sera. Mol Biochem Parasitol 39: 135–145. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(90)90016-f
  79. 79. Gems D, Ferguson CJ, Robertson BD, Nieves R, Page AP, et al. (1995) An abundant, trans-spliced mRNA from Toxocara canis infective larvae encodes a 26-kDa protein with homology to phosphatidylethanolamine-binding proteins. J Biol Chem 270: 18517–18522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.31.18517
  80. 80. Bennuru S, Semnani R, Meng Z, Ribeiro JM, Veenstra TD, et al. (2009) Brugia malayi excreted/secreted proteins at the host/parasite interface: Stage- and gender-specific proteomic profiling. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000410
  81. 81. Alban A, David SO, Bjorkesten L, Andersson C, Sloge E, et al. (2003) A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics 3: 36–44. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200390006