Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Mitogen- and Stress-Activated Protein Kinases 1 and 2 Are Required for Maximal Trefoil Factor 1 Induction

  • Protiti Khan,

    Affiliation Manitoba Institute of Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    ⨯
  • Bojan Drobic,

    Affiliation Manitoba Institute of Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    ⨯
  • Beatriz Pérez-Cadahía,

    Affiliation Manitoba Institute of Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    ⨯
  • Shannon Healy,

    Affiliation Manitoba Institute of Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    ⨯
  • Shihua He,

    Affiliation Manitoba Institute of Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    ⨯
  • James R. Davie

    davie@cc.umanitoba.ca

    Affiliation Manitoba Institute of Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

    ⨯

Abstract

Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases 1 and 2 (MSK1 and MSK2), activated downstream of the ERK- and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways are involved in cell survival, proliferation and differentiation. Following mitogenic or stress stimuli, they mediate the nucleosomal response, which includes phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 (H3S10ph) coupled with transcriptional activation of immediate-early genes. While MSK1 and MSK2 are closely related, their relative roles may vary with cellular context and/or stimuli. However, our knowledge of MSK2 recruitment to immediate-early genes is limited, as research has primarily focused on MSK1. Here, we demonstrate that both MSK1 and MSK2, regulate the phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate induced expression of the breast cancer marker gene, trefoil factor 1 (TFF1), by phosphorylating H3S10 at its 5′ regulatory regions. The MSK-mediated phosphorylation of H3S10 promotes the recruitment of 14-3-3 isoforms and BRG1, the ATPase subunit of the BAF/PBAF remodeling complex, to the enhancer and upstream promoter elements of TFF1. The recruited chromatin remodeling activity leads to the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain phosphorylation at the TFF1 promoter, initiating TFF1 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Moreover, we show that MSK1 or MSK2 is recruited to TFF1 regulatory regions, but as components of different multiprotein complexes.

Citation: Khan P, Drobic B, Pérez-Cadahía B, Healy S, He S, Davie JR (2013) Mitogen- and Stress-Activated Protein Kinases 1 and 2 Are Required for Maximal Trefoil Factor 1 Induction. PLoS ONE 8(5): e63189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189

Editor: Chunhong Yan, Albany Medical College, United States of America

Received: January 16, 2013; Accepted: March 28, 2013; Published: May 13, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Khan et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported with funding from Canadian Cancer Society [2010–700323] (http://www.cancer.ca/), a Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (http://www.cbcf.org/), and a Canadian Institute of Health Research [MOP-9186] (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/) to J.R.D., a Canada Research Chair (http://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/home-accueil-eng.aspx) to J.R.D., a UMGF/CancerCare Manitoba (http://www.cancercare.mb.ca/home/) Studentship Award to P.K., a Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute Terry Fox Foundation studentship to B.D., and Manitoba Health Research Council (http://mhrc.mb.ca/) Fellowships to B.P-C and S.H. The authors acknowledge the strong support of the Manitoba Institute of Child Health and CancerCare Manitoba Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinases 1 and 2 (MSK1 and MSK2) are activated downstream of the ERK- and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal transduction pathways, following exposure to various stimulants or stresses including cytokines, growth factors, pharmacological mitogens or UV irradiation. They are involved in cell survival, proliferation and differentiation [1]–[3]. The crucial role that MSKs play in tumor formation was demonstrated in a study showing that MSK1/2 knockout mice developed significantly fewer skin tumors than wild-type mice in a two-stage chemical carcinogenesis model [4]. Moreover, it was demonstrated that when MSK1 was knocked down in the metastatic Hras1-transformed murine fibroblast cell line Ciras-3, these cells lost their capability for anchorage-independent growth, thereby losing their malignant phenotype [5].

Once activated, MSKs phosphorylate downstream targets, including transcription factors and chromatin substrates. Phosphorylation of the NH2-terminal tail of histone H3 at serine 10 or serine 28 and phosphorylation of nucleosome-binding protein HMGN1 at serine 6 are among the downstream events mediated by MSKs and have been collectively termed the ‘nucleosomal response’ [6]. This H3 phosphorylation event is rapidly inducible and is associated with transcriptional activation of immediate-early (IE) genes, such as Jun, Fos, Fosl1 and Cox-2 [7], [8]. H3S10ph and H3S28ph are implicated in upstream promoter chromatin remodeling that is required for initiation of transcription [7], [9]. However, it has yet to be shown if the nucleosomal response is involved in enhancer remodeling.

The MSKs share 61.5% identity in their amino acid sequences (Fig. S1), and there is evidence that they do not have redundant functions. For example, in primary embryonic fibroblasts exposed to mitogenic and stress stimuli MSK1 and MSK2 both contributed to CREB activation and the nucleosomal response. However, the nucleosomal response was more impacted in MSK2 than in MSK1 knockout fibroblasts [6], [10]. MSK2, but not MSK1 was also shown to be critical for UV-induced phosphorylation of NFκB p65 in MDA-MB-231 cells [11]. In contrast, cocaine-stimulated H3 phosphorylation and IE gene induction were dependent on MSK1 in striatal neurons [12]. Additionally, MSK1 and MSK2 expression profiles in various normal and cancer tissues and cell lines appeared to differ between each other [13]. Another study indicated that murine primary embryonic fibroblasts had higher levels of MSK2 than embryonic stem cells, where MSK2 could not be detected [10]. However, most studies either focused on MSK1 or did not distinguish between MSK1 and MSK2 as they used double MSK1/MSK2 knockout mice [14]–[18]. Thus, our knowledge of MSK2 recruitment to IE genes is lacking.

In the cases of MSK1- and MSK2-co-mediated responses, it is currently unknown whether MSK1 and MSK2 act together or separately to induce the expression of IE genes, whether they target the same genes or the same alleles, or if they are components of the same complexes. To address these questions, we investigated the mitogenic induction of the trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) gene by the phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). TFF1, encoding a secretory protein with proinvasive and angiogenic effects, has an elevated expression in estrogen receptor α positive (ER+) breast cancers [19]–[21]. TFF1 protein is a marker for ER+, well-differentiated, low-grade breast cancers (about 65% of all breast cancers) [22], [23]. The TFF1 gene is regulated by an enhancer located 10.5 kb upstream of the transcription initiation site [24]. Transcription factors and coactivators associated with the enhancer and upstream promoter element (UPE) are involved in the transcriptional activation of the TFF1 gene [25], [26]. Both estrogen and phorbol esters (e.g. TPA) can mediate the expression of the TFF1 gene, albeit via different mechanisms [27]. The chromatin remodeling events taking place at the TFF1 UPE have been extensively studied in estrogen-driven induction of TFF1 [28]–[30], whereas phorbol ester induction of TFF1 is not as well understood. Previously, we reported that TPA addition to MCF-7 breast cancer cells cultured under estrogen-free serum starved conditions resulted in the recruitment of MSK1 to the TFF1 UPE, along with increased H3S10ph (but not H3S28ph) and H3 acetylation (H3K9acK14ac) levels [27]. However, the recruitment of MSK2 or the mechanistic consequences of H3S10 phosphorylation in the context of the TPA-induced TFF1 transcriptional activation have not been explored. Recruitment of MSK1 and/or MSK2 at the TFF1 enhancer region was not examined.

Here, we show that MSK1 and MSK2 belong to different multiprotein complexes but both mediate chromatin remodeling that is required at the enhancer and UPE for TPA-induced initiation of TFF1 expression in MCF-7 breast cancer epithelial cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture Conditions

Human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and ZR75 (ATCC) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 mg/ml), and 0.3% glucose in 37°C humidified incubator with 5% CO2. MCF-7 cells were grown up to 85% confluence and then cultured in phenol red-free DMEM supplemented with penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 mg/ml), 0.3% glucose, 0.1% (v/v) bovine serum albumin and apo-transferrin (10 µg/ml) for 72 h in order to drive the cell population into G0-G1. Cells were either untreated or treated with 100 nM TPA for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. In inhibition studies, cells were pretreated with MAPK inhibitor UO126 (10 µM), or MSK inhibitor H89 (10 µM) for 30 min alone or followed by treatment with TPA.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and re-ChIP Assays

Following TPA treatment, MCF-7 cells were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. After harvesting, the cells were resuspended in cell lysis buffer [7]. After 10 min rotation at 4°C the cellular material was spun at 2000×g for 10 min to obtain the nuclei. The nuclear pellet was resuspended in micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 0.25 M sucrose, 75 mM NaCl, plus phosphatase/protease inhibitors) and A260 was measured. In order to obtain ∼150 bp DNA fragments, 2.5U of MNase per A260 of nuclear suspension was added in the presence of 3 mM CaCl2 and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. The MNase reaction was stopped by the addition of EDTA pH 8.0 (5 mM final concentration). In order to release nuclear material, the samples were adjusted to 0.5% SDS and rotated for 1 h at room temperature. Insoluble material was pelleted at 2000×g for 10 min and the soluble material was diluted to 0.1% SDS with radio immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer along with phosphatase/protease inhibitors. Twelve A260 of protein G-Sepharose (Pierce) pre-cleared MCF-7 lysate was incubated with 12 µl of anti-MSK1 (Sigma-Aldrich, M5437) or anti-MSK2 (Invitrogen, 38-5300), anti-H3S10ph (Santa Cruz, sc-8656-R), anti-H3S10phK14ac (Milipore, 07–081), anti-14-3-3ε (Santa Cruz, sc-1020), anti-14-3-3ζ (Santa Cruz, sc-1019), anti-BRG1 (Milipore, 07–478), anti-RNAPII S5ph (AbCam, ab5131-50) or anti-RNAPII (Santa Cruz, sc-899) overnight at 4°C. Magnetic protein G Dynabeads (Invitrogen) were added for 2 h at 4°C. For re-ChIP assays, after the elution of first ChIP, the samples were diluted 10 times with dilution buffer (15 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.1, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl) and subjected to the ChIP procedure again. Negative control included performing ChIP/re-ChIP assays without adding antibody. DNA–protein fragments were processed as previously described [31], [32]. Input and ChIP/re-ChIP DNAs were quantified using PicoGreen assay. Equal amounts of input, ChIP (0.1 ng) or re-ChIP (0.05 ng) DNA were used to perform SYBR Green real time PCR on iCycler IQ5 (BioRad). The enrichment was calculated as follows: Fold enrichment = R(Ct input – Ct ChIP), where R is the rate of amplification. Values for each time point were normalized to time 0 values. Primer sequences targeted the regions indicated in Fig. 2A. Primers were designed using Oligo5 software and are available upon request. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed paired Student’s t-test.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Distribution of MSK1/2, H3S10ph, H3S10phK14ac, 14-3-3ε/ζ, BRG1, RNAPolIIS5ph, and RNAPolII at regulatory and coding regions of TFF1 in response to TPA.

A. Schematic representation of TFF1 gene structure. Black bars underneath the map show regions amplified in the ChIP assay. Each region is labeled according to the 5′ position of the forward primer relative to the transcription start site. The exons are represented by black boxes, while the binding sites of relevant transcription factors located in the amplified enhancer (−10476) and UPE (−429) regions are displayed. C/EBP, CCAAT-enhancer binding protein; Sp1, GC box that is a binding site for the Sp family of transcription factors; ERE, estrogen response element; AP1 constitutes a combination of dimers formed of members of the JUN, FOS and ATF families of transcription factors. Asterisk indicates a putative binding site. B. ChIP assays were performed using antibodies against MSK1, MSK2 or H3S10ph on formaldehyde-crosslinked mononucleosomes prepared from serum-starved MCF-7 cells either untreated (0′ TPA) or treated with TPA for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. Equal amounts of input and immunoprecipitated DNA were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. Enrichment values are the mean of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. C. ChIP experiments were performed as in B, using antibodies against H3S10phK14ac, 14-3-3ε or 14-3-3ζ. D. ChIP experiments were performed as in B and C, using antibodies against BRG1, RNAPII S5ph or total RNAPII. *P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001, ns = P≥0.05 (Student’s paired t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.g002

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting

MCF-7 cells were harvested and lysed by sonication in cold lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.5% NP-40, protease and phosphatase inhibitors). Cell-free lysate was collected by centrifugation (11950×g, 10 min, 4°C), and protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Pierce). Five hundred micrograms of total cell extract were mixed overnight with 4 µg anti-MSK1, 8 µg anti-MSK2 or 4 µg control IgG (pre-immune rabbit) antibodies. Forty microliters of protein A/G sepharose beads were added the next day and mixed for 2 h at 4°C. One tenth of unbound material was set aside for PAGE analysis. Beads were washed three times with cold lysis buffer by centrifugation (2000×g, 5 min, 4°C), and eluted by incubation in SDS-PAGE buffer (15 min/92°C). Input (50 µg), unbound, bound, and nonspecific (rabbit IgG IP) samples were resolved on 8%-SDS PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-MSK1 (1 h at room temperature, 1∶8000 dilution in 5% milk in TBST) or anti-MSK2 (overnight at 4°C, 1∶500 dilution in 5% milk in TBST) antibodies. Immunolabeled bands were detected using Western-Lightning Plus-ECL Reagent (Perkin Elmer).

RNA Isolation and Real Time RT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA from untreated and treated MCF-7 cells was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). RNA (0.4 or 0.8 µg) was used for cDNA conversion (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR reactions were performed on iCycler IQ5 (BioRad) using SYBR Green for labeling. Fold change in RNA levels was normalized to cyclophilin33 (CYP33) or GAPDH levels in untreated and treated samples. Primer sequences were designed using Oligo5 software and are available upon request. Primers targeted exon 3 of TFF1 and exon 2 of CYP33.

Generation of Transient MSK1 and MSK2 Knockdown MCF-7 Cells

MCF-7 cells were seeded at 2.5×105 cells per well in 6-well plates and allowed to adhere for 24 h. The medium was replaced with antibiotic-free DMEM containing 5% FBS and the cells were left for 1 h. Cells were then transfected with 50 nM scramble (Non-targeting Pool), human MSK1 (RPS6KA5, NM_182398) or MSK2 (RPS6KA4, NM_001006944) ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNA (Thermo Scientific-Dharmacon), using 8 µl/well INTERFERin transfection reagent (Polyplus). Transfection overlay was carried out for 48 h, followed by an additional round of siRNA transfection identical to the first one. Eighteen h following the second siRNA transfection, the medium was replaced with serum-free and phenol-free DMEM for 72 h to reach serum starvation conditions. Following serum starvation, both scramble and MSK1siRNA or MSK2 siRNA knockdown cells were treated with 100 nM TPA for 0, 15, 30, 45 or 60 min. Following induction with TPA, the medium was removed and cells washed 2X with 1X PBS and harvested by scraping. Samples were micro-centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min, and PBS supernatant removed by aspiration. Pellets were frozen at −80°C prior to processing for RNA extraction. For each trial, a set of scramble, MSK1 and MSK2 siRNA treated wells were set aside for protein extraction and analysis of protein knockdown by immunoblot using antibodies against MSK1 (Sigma, M5437), MSK2 (Invitrogen, 38-5300), or actin for a loading control (A5441).

Immunofluoresence of MSK1 and MSK2

Indirect immunolocalization was performed as described previously [31]. Goat polyclonal antibodies against MSK1 (1∶100, Santa Cruz, sc-9392) and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against MSK2 (1∶100, Invitrogen, 38-5300) were used as the primary antibodies. Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) and Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti-goat IgG (Invitrogen) were used as the secondary antibodies. DNA was counterstained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The coverslips were mounted onto glass slides using Prolong Gold anti-fade reagent (Invitrogen). Primary-antibody-omission control experiments demonstrated the specificity of the antibodies used. Digital images were captured with Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope and AxioCam HRm camera. The stacked images were captured with 100 slices at stepwise of 200 nm. The deconvolution analysis of stacked images was done with the AxioVision software (Carl Zeiss).

Alignment of Human MSK1 and MSK2 Amino Acid Sequences

MSK1, also known as RPS6KA5 (ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-5) and MSK2 or RPS6KA4 amino acid sequence entries #075582 and #075676 from the UniProtKB database, respectively were aligned using the freeware ClustalX (Fig. S1). Annotation was generated by the freeware GeneDoc.

Results

MSK1 and MSK2 are in Different Complexes

Immunoblot analyses of MCF-7 cell lysate show that both MSK1 and MSK2 are expressed in these breast cancer cells (Fig. 1A), in agreement with previously published immuno-histochemistry data [13]. To determine if MSK1 and MSK2 are found in the same protein complex, we performed immunoprecipitation assays using antibodies against each MSK isoform. Fig. 1A shows that following incubation of MCF-7 cell lysates with anti-MSK1 antibodies, MSK1 was recovered in the immunoprecipitated fraction as expected, while most of MSK2 was found in the immunodepleted fraction. Likewise, following incubation with anti-MSK2 antibodies, MSK1 was in immunodepleted fraction, while most MSK2 was in the immunoprecipitated fraction. Note that neither MSK1 nor MSK2 could be detected in the IgG negative control fraction (Fig. 1A). These results show that MSK1 and MSK2 have a very low level of association, that is the majority of MSK1 and MSK2 are not in the same multiprotein complex in MCF-7 cells. The differential localization of MSK1 and MSK2 in either IP or ID fractions also indicated that the antibodies against MSK1 and MSK2 were specific to each isoform (Fig. 1A).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. MSK1 and MSK2 are in different complexes.

A. MCF-7 cell lysate (500 µg) was incubated with anti-MSK1 (rabbit, Sigma; 4 µg) or anti-MSK2 (rabbit, Invitrogen; 2 µg) antibodies. The immunoprecipitates (IP) and equivalent volumes of lysate (Input), immunodepleted (ID) fractions, and IgG control (IgG), corresponding to 50 µg of lysate, were loaded onto SDS-8% polyacrylamide gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunochemically stained with anti-MSK1 or anti-MSK2 antibodies. B. MCF-7 cells grown on coverslips were serum starved and then treated with or without TPA as described in Materials and Methods. The cells were fixed and immunostained with antibodies against MSK1 and MSK2, and co-stained with DAPI. Spatial distribution was visualized by fluorescence microscopy and image deconvolution was done by AxioVision software. Yellow signal in the merged images indicates colocalization. Bar, 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.g001

MSK1 and MSK2 localization was assessed by immunofluoresence using antibodies specific to each kinase isoform (Fig. 1B). In either serum starved or TPA induced (30 min) conditions, MSK1 and MSK2 did not colocalize. To verify this finding, we also tested another ER+ breast cancer cell line, ZR75 for MSK1 and MSK2 localization and found that MSK1 and MSK2 also did not associate in these cells under serum starvation or TPA induction conditions (Fig. S2). Taken together, these data indicate that MSK1 and MSK2 have a low level of association by immunoprecipitation and do not colocalize in the cell, thereby suggesting that the majority of MSK1 and MSK2 exist in distinct complexes.

Recruitment of MSK1 and MSK2 to TFF1 Gene Regions in Response to ERK-MAPK Signaling

Here, we used the high-resolution chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay to determine the MSK1, MSK2 and H3S10ph distribution along the regulatory and coding regions of the TFF1 gene in response to ERK-MAPK signaling. The regions chosen for analysis are shown in Fig. 2A. Following stimulation of serum starved MCF-7 cells with TPA for 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min, nuclei from formaldehyde treated cells were isolated, and the chromatin was processed to mononucleosomal length with MNase [7]. Upon induction with TPA, the association and dissociation of MSK1 and MSK2 with the TFF1 enhancer (−10476) and UPE (−429) followed similar time courses (Fig. 2B). Binding of both H3 kinases to the TFF1 enhancer and UPE peaked at 30 min following TPA stimulation of MCF-7 cells. There was no TPA-induced association of MSK1 and MSK2 with the TFF1 coding region (+2045 and +4147) (Fig. 2B). As MSK1 and MSK2 target the H3 N-terminal tails, we used antibodies against H3S10ph to immunoprecipitate formaldehyde-crosslinked mononucleosomes from quiescent MCF-7 cells treated with TPA. The positioning of H3S10ph at the regulatory and coding regions of TFF1 mirrors that of MSK1 and MSK2; H3S10ph levels are present and inducible only at the regulatory regions and not at the coding region of TFF1 (Fig. 2B).

Association of 14-3-3 Proteins with TFF1 Regulatory Regions in Response to ERK-MAPK Signaling

Several isoforms of 14-3-3 proteins have been identified as “readers” of H3S10ph signatures at the chromatin of inducible genes [33]. The binding affinity of 14-3-3 isoforms for H3S10ph has been reported to be more stable if the K14 residue is acetylated [34], [35]. H3S10phK14ac is also associated with transcriptional activation [6]. With this in mind, we performed ChIP assays with antibodies against H3S10phK14ac to determine the distribution of this dual H3 modification along the TFF1 gene. Fig. 2C shows that TPA rapidly increased H3S10phK14ac levels at the enhancer and UPE regulatory regions, but not the coding region of TFF1. Since 14-3-3 isoforms are downstream effectors of H3S10phK14ac [33], we immunoprecipitated mononucleosomal chromatin from formaldehyde-crosslinked TPA-stimulated MCF-7 cells with antibodies against 14-3-3ε and 14-3-3ζ. Upon TPA induction, recruitment of 14-3-3ε/ζ isoforms mirrored the positioning of H3S10phK14ac at both 5′ regulatory regions of TFF1, but not at the coding region (Fig. 2C), suggesting that MSK mediates H3 modifications and the subsequent recruitment of proteins that recognize those nucleosomal chromatin signatures at the regulatory regions of inducible genes.

ERK-MAPK-induced Recruitment of BAF/PBAF Chromatin Remodeling Complex and RNA Polymerase II at TFF1 Gene Regions

Chromatin of inducible genes requires not only histone modifications, but also simultaneous rapid remodeling in order to allow access of transcription factors and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) to specific DNA sequences [36]. BAF/PBAF chromatin remodeling complexes (human homologs of SWI/SNF, [37]) have been implicated in localized remodeling of nucleosomes to allow binding of various factors which aid in the initiation of transcription [30]. Positioning of chromatin remodelers is polarized towards the 5′ end of inducible genes [38], [39]. However, distribution of chromatin remodelers along TFF1 gene in response to ERK-MAPK signaling has not been studied. We performed the high resolution ChIP assay with antibodies against BRG1, the ATPase subunit of BAF/PBAF remodeling complex, in TPA-treated MCF-7 cells. Fig. 2D shows that TPA stimulation of MCF-7 cells increased the loading of BRG1 at the enhancer and UPE regulatory regions of TFF1, while there was no binding of BRG1 to the coding region. Presence of BRG1 at the promoter region of TFF1 suggests that the local chromatin might be favorable for RNAPII binding. Therefore, we performed ChIP assays with an antibody against the initiation-engaged form of RNAPII that is phosphorylated at serine 5 (RNAPII S5ph) or an antibody that does not differentiate between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of RNAPII (total RNAPII). Fig. 2D shows that TPA treatment of MCF-7 cells increased the levels of RNAPII S5ph and RNAPII at the promoter region of TFF1. Binding of either RNAPII S5ph or RNAPII was not detected at the enhancer region. Furthermore, RNAPII antibody, which recognizes all forms of RNAPII, detected inducible positioning of RNAPII along the coding region of TFF1 (Fig. 2D).

TPA-induced MSK1 or MSK2 Co-occupancy with H3S10ph at TFF1 Regulatory Regions

To determine whether MSK1 co-occupies the enhancer and UPE with H3S10ph, we performed sequential ChIP assays (re-ChIP) with mononucleosomes prepared from TPA- treated and formaldehyde-cross linked MCF-7 cell lysates. Fig. 3 demonstrates that MSK1 is simultaneously present with H3S10ph at enhancer and UPE regions of TFF1 gene after 30 min of TPA stimulation. Similarly, MSK2 can also be found with H3S10ph at both the enhancer and UPE of TFF1 (Fig. 3). These results indicate that the MSK1 or MSK2 present at the regulatory regions of TFF1 are catalytically active and therefore mediate phosphorylation of H3S10 at these regions. The phosphoserine recognizing 14-3-3 proteins can bind to H3S10ph [33] and may recruit other proteins, such as components of the BAF/PBAF remodeling complex to aid in transcriptional activation [7]. Here we performed re-ChIP assays with anti-14-3-3ζ and BRG1 antibodies at the enhancer and UPE region of TFF1 (Fig. 3). TPA was able to induce co-occupancy of 14-3-3ζ and BRG1 at the enhancer and UPE regions of TFF1. Together these results show that either MSK1 or MSK2 recruited to the TFF1 UPE and enhancer phopshorylates H3 at S10, leading to the binding of 14-3-3ε/ζ and recruitment of BRG1.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. TPA-induced co-occupancy of MSK1/H3S10ph, MSK2/H3S10ph and 14-3-3ζ/BRG1 at regulatory regions of TFF1.

Re-ChIP experiments were performed on formaldehyde-crosslinked mononucleosomes prepared from serum-starved MCF-7 cells either untreated or treated with TPA for 30 min. The antibodies were used as indicated in the graph. Equal amounts of input and immunoprecipitated DNA were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. The enrichment values of the TFF1 enhancer (-10476) and UPE (-429) sequences are the mean of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. *P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001 (Student’s paired t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.g003

H89 Inhibition of MSK-mediated Nucleosomal Response at the Regulatory Regions of the TFF1 Gene

At a concentration of 10 µM, the MSK inhibitor H89 has been shown to selectively inhibit the nucleosomal response [8]. To validate the role of the MSK-mediated nucleosomal response in the TPA-induced transcription of TFF1, we performed real time RT-PCR on cDNA isolated from TPA-treated MCF-7 cells that were previously exposed or not to H89. Fig. 4A shows that TPA induced the expression of TFF1, with the expression peaking at 45 min after TPA stimulation. Presence of H89 decreased TFF1 expression in response to TPA (Fig. 4A). Conversely, H89 did not affect the expression of cyclophilin 33 (CYP33) (data not shown). To determine if TFF1 transcription was inhibited by H89 at the initiation level, we analyzed the effect of H89 on the occupancy of the initiation-engaged form of RNAPII (RNAPII S5ph) at the regulatory regions. Fig. 4B shows that RNAPII S5ph was not present at the TFF1 promoter following H89 treatment. These results suggest that MSKs mediate chromatin-remodeling events resulting in the initiation of TFF1 transcription. In support of this implication, we found that TPA-induced expression of TFF1 was abolished by the ERK1/2 inhibitor UO126, but was not affected by the PKA inhibitor RpcAMP (data not shown).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 4. Effect of H89 on TPA-induced expression, nucleosomal response and chromatin remodeling of TFF1.

Serum-starved MCF-7 cells were pre-treated or not with H89 prior to TPA stimulation for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. A. Total RNA was isolated and quantified by real time RT-PCR. Fold change values, normalized to CYP33 expression levels and time 0 values, are the mean of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. B. Formaldehyde-crosslinked mononucleosomes were prepared and used in ChIP assays with antibodies against RNAPII S5ph. Equal amounts of input and immunoprecipitated DNAs were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. The enrichment values of the TFF1 enhancer (−10476) and UPE (−429) sequences are the mean of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. C. Serum-starved MCF-7 cells were pre-treated or not with H89 prior to TPA stimulation for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. Formaldehyde-crosslinked mononucleosomes were prepared and used in ChIP assays with antibodies against MSK1, MSK2, H3S10ph, H3S10phK14ac, 14-3-3ε, 14-3-3ζ, and BRG1. Equal amounts of input and immunoprecipitated DNAs were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. The enrichment values of the TFF1 enhancer (-10476) and UPE (-429) sequences are the mean of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. *P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001, ns = P≥0.05 (Student’s paired t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.g004

Since MSKs mediate the nucleosomal response, we wanted to examine the events occurring at the regulatory regions of TFF1 in the presence of H89. We exposed quiescent MCF-7 cells with H89 for 30 min, prior to TPA stimulation and performed ChIP assays. Fig. 4C shows that H89 pre-treatment of MCF-7 cells markedly decreased TPA-induced recruitment of MSK1 and MSK2 at the enhancer and UPE regulatory regions of TFF1. The levels of H3S10ph and H3S10phK14ac were also dramatically reduced in the presence of H89. Similarly, TPA-induced binding of phospho-H3 effectors, 14-3-3ε and 14-3-3ξ was abolished at the enhancer and UPE regions of TFF1. Prior exposure of MCF-7 cells to H89 prevented TPA-induced association of BRG1 with both regulatory regions of TFF1 (Fig. 4C).

Attenuated TPA-induced Expression of TFF1 in MSK1 or MSK2 Knockdown MCF-7 Cells

Since H89 inhibits the activities of MSK1 and MSK2, we individually knocked down MSK1 and MSK2 to evaluate the contribution of each enzyme to the TPA-induced expression of TFF1. MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with MSK1 siRNA, MSK2 siRNA or scramble (non-targeting) siRNA. Levels of residual MSK1 and MSK2 protein in MSK1 or MSK2 knockdown and control MCF-7 cells were determined by immunoblot analyses (Fig. 5A). The average knockdown values in three separate experiments were 66±14% (81% for the experiment shown in Fig 5A) for MSK1 and 93±1% for MSK2. MSK2 levels were unaltered in MSK1 knockdown MCF-7 cells, and conversely, MSK1 levels were not affected by MSK2 knockdown. MSK1 or MSK2 knockdown and control MCF-7 cells were serum-starved and stimulated with TPA for various periods of time. The graph in Fig. 5B shows the average TPA-induced expression of TFF1 in MSK1 knockdown compared to control MCF-7 cells, from three separate experiments. MSK1 knockdown resulted in a 50% reduction of TFF1 expression. TPA-induced expression of TFF1 in MSK2 knockdown was similarly decreased compared to control MCF-7 cells. (Fig.5C). These results indicate that both MSK1 and MSK2 contribute to the TPA-induced expression of TFF1 in MCF-7 cells. We have recapitulated these results using ZR75 cells in which TFF1 expression was markedly reduced by MSK1 or MSK2 siRNA transient knockdown (Fig. S3).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 5. MSK1 and MSK2 activity contribution to TPA-induced TFF1 expression.

A. Levels of MSK1 and MSK2 in transient MSK1 or MSK2 knockdown and scramble control (SC) MCF-7 cells were analyzed by immunoblotting. Actin was used as loading control. Note that MSK1 (7 µg, rabbit, Sigma) antibody was used at a higher titer than MSK2 (2.5 µg, rabbit, Invitrogen). B, C. Serum-starved transient MSK1 or MSK2 knockdown and scramble control MCF-7 cells were treated with TPA for 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. Total RNA was isolated and quantified by real time RT-PCR. Fold change values, normalized to GAPDH expression levels and time 0 values, are the mean of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. *P≤0.05 (Student’s paired t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.g005

Knockdown of MSK1 or MSK2 does not Change AP1 Protein Levels

We show that MSK1 and MSK2 are recruited to the TFF1 enhancer and UPE regions in response to TPA. The TFF1 UPE contains DNA binding elements for transcription factors, including the activator protein 1 (AP1). AP1 constitutes a combination of dimers formed by members of the JUN, FOS and ATF families of transcription factors. We have previously shown that mutation of the AP1 binding site abrogated the TPA-induced transcriptional response of a reporter gene under the control of the TFF1 promoter, demonstrating the requirement for the AP1 site [27]. We also showed that JUN was recruited to the TFF1 UPE in response to TPA [27]. Furthermore, in mouse fibroblast cells, JUN was found to be part of the MSK1 complex (unpublished data). These observations imply that the recruitment of MSKs to TFF1 UPE is mediated by transcription factors like JUN. We have previously reported that in Hras1-transformed mouse fibroblasts, the transcription of AP1 family members JUN and FRA-1 are affected by MSK inhibition and that knockdown of MSK1 leads to a reduction of JUN and FRA-1 protein levels [5]. AP1 is required for its own expression, as well as TFF1 expression [24], [40]. To determine whether knockdown of MSK1 or MSK2 changed the levels of AP1 members, we performed an immunoblot analyses of JUN and FOS from cell lysates of control and MSK knockdown cells. Fig. 6 shows that neither MSK1 nor MSK2 knockdown altered the levels of JUN and FOS. These observations provide evidence that the attenuated TPA-induced expression of the TFF1 gene in MSK1 or MSK2 knockdown cells is not a consequence of reduced AP1.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 6. FOS and JUN levels do not change with MSK1 or MSK2 knockdown in MCF-7 cells.

MCF-7 cells were treated with scramble, MSK1, or MSK2 siRNA, serum starved for 72 h, and treated with TPA for 0 or 45 min. Protein lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting using antibodies against MSK1 (rabbit, Sigma), MSK2 (rabbit, Abcam ab99411), JUN, or FOS. Actin was used as a loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.g006

Discussion

Our studies demonstrate that MSK1 and MSK2 contribute to the TPA-induced expression of TFF1 in MCF-7 cells. Moreover, we show for the first time that MSK1 and MSK2 are involved in nucleosome remodeling at an enhancer.

MSK1 and MSK2 are often both expressed in mammalian cells, and there is evidence that these two kinases have different functions. Adding to this knowledge, we show that MSK1 and MSK2 are in distinct nuclear locations and in separate complexes in breast cancer cells. However, either kinase can associate with the TFF1 enhancer and promoter regions and phosphorylate H3 at S10. As with immediate-early genes in mouse fibroblasts, the MSK-induced H3S10ph and H3S10phK14ac are limited to the regulatory regions of the TFF1 gene and are not found within the gene body. Most likely, transcription factors such as AP1 recruit MSK1 or MSK2 and anchor these enzymes such that only the H3 in nucleosomes in the immediate vicinity of the kinases will be modified. Such restrictions in MSK activity then localize the recruitment of 14-3-3ε/ζ and the BAF/PBAF remodeling complex, resulting in localized chromatin remodeling events which support further transcription factor binding and formation of a productive pre-initiation complex [7].

The requirement of both MSK1 and MSK2 in the TPA-induction of the TFF1 gene in human breast cancer cells is clearly shown in studies with the MSK inhibitor H89 and in the MSK1 and MSK2 knockdown cells. There are several possible explanations for the requirement of both enzymes for maximal induction of the TFF1 gene. First, MSK1 and MSK2 levels could be limiting, such that both are required for maximal TPA-induced expression of TFF1. Secondly, MSK1 and MSK2 might be recruited to TFF1 UPE and enhancer by different transcription factors (such as different AP1 complexes). Thirdly MSK1 and MSK2 may participate in the activation of each other. The activation of MSK1 and MSK2 is a multi-step process that has not been completely elucidated [41], [42]. The MSK1 activation model postulates that after being phosphorylated by active ERK1/2 or p38 MAPK, MSK1 C-terminal kinase domain phosphorylates Ser 212 in the N-terminal kinase domain and Ser 376 and Ser 381 in the linker region between the two domains. Once phosphorylated, MSK1 N-terminal domain is able to phosphorylate substrates as well as three sites at the C-terminus. Perhaps, MSK2 is involved in the phosphorylation of MSK1 Ser 212, Ser 376 and Ser 381 residues. Reciprocally, MSK1 might contribute to the phosphorylation of MSK2 corresponding Ser residues. Regardless of the mechanism(s), our study shows that MSK1 and MSK2 are both required for full TPA-induction of the immediate early gene TFF1.

TFF1 protein is known to enhance the migration, invasion, and metastatic potential of breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo [19], [43]. A recent study has reported that the mechanism of increased breast cancer migration/invasiveness involves MAPK-induced MSK1 recruitment to the Snail promoter, via activation of the CXCL5-CXCR2 chemotaxis ligand-receptor pathway [44]. The induction of Snail leads to transcriptional repression of E-cadherin and the induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell migration [45], [46]. Interestingly, the forced expression of TFF1 in DU145 prostate cancer cells led to increased expression of Snail as well as decreased expression of E-cadherin [47]. Additionally, MSK1-mediated Snail production in breast cancer cells may lead to increased metastasis of breast cancer cells to bone tissue [44]. Therefore, the mechanism of MSK-mediated TFF1 gene transcription in breast cancer may hold important insights into breast cancer progression and merits further study.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Alignment of MSK1 and MSK2 amino acid sequences. Identical amino acids are shaded in black. Numbering above the sequence indicates position in MSK1, and numbering on the right side indicates position in MSK1 or MSK2. The blue bar represents the epitope recognized by the MSK1 antibody used in these studies, while the red bar represents the epitope region recognized by the MSK2 antibody.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

MSK1 and MSK2 do not colocalize in ZR75 cells. ZR75 cells grown on coverslips were serum starved and then treated with or without TPA as described in Materials and Methods. The cells were fixed and immunostained with antibodies against MSK1 and MSK2, and co-stained with DAPI. Spatial distribution was visualized by fluorescence microscopy and image deconvolution was done by AxioVision software. Yellow signal in the merged images indicates colocalization. Bar, 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

MSK1 and MSK2 activity contribute to TPA-induced TFF-1 expression in ZR75 cells. A. Serum-starved transient MSK1 or MSK2 knockdown and scramble control ZR75 cells were treated with TPA for 0 or 45 min. Total RNA was isolated and quantified by real time RT-PCR. Fold change values, normalized to GAPDH expression levels and time 0 values, are the mean of three independent experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. B. Quantification of MSK1 protein levels in scramble treated or MSK1 siRNA treated cells in A. MSK1 levels were normalized to β-actin levels and are the mean of three independent experiments, where the error bars represent the standard deviation. Protein expression values are expressed as Integrated Density Values (IDV) C. Quantification of MSK2 protein levels in scramble treated or MSK2 siRNA treated cells in A. MSK2 levels were normalized to β-actin and are the mean of three independent experiments, where error bars represent the standard deviation. *P≤0.05 (Student’s paired t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063189.s003

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Geneviève Delcuve for preparation of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PK BD BP SHealy JRD. Performed the experiments: PK BD BP SHealy SHe. Analyzed the data: PK BD BP SHealy SHe. Wrote the paper: PK BD BP SHealy.

References

  1. 1. Arthur JS (2008) MSK activation and physiological roles. Front Biosci 13: 5866–5879.
  2. 2. Vermeulen L, Berghe WV, Beck IM, De BK, Haegeman G (2009) The versatile role of MSKs in transcriptional regulation. Trends Biochem Sci 34: 311–318.
  3. 3. Healy S, Khan P, He S, Davie JR (2012) Histone H3 phosphorylation, immediate-early gene expression, and the nucleosomal response: a historical perspective. Biochem Cell Biol 90: 39–54.
  4. 4. Chang S, Iversen L, Kragballe K, Arthur JS, Johansen C (2011) Mice lacking MSK1 and MSK2 show reduced skin tumor development in a two-stage chemical carcinogenesis model. Cancer Invest 29: 240–245.
  5. 5. Perez-Cadahia B, Drobic B, Espino PS, He S, Mandal S, et al. (2011) Role of MSK1 in the malignant phenotype of Ras-transformed mouse fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 286: 42–49.
  6. 6. Soloaga A, Thomson S, Wiggin GR, Rampersaud N, Dyson MH, et al. (2003) MSK2 and MSK1 mediate the mitogen- and stress-induced phosphorylation of histone H3 and HMG-14. EMBO J 22: 2788–2797.
  7. 7. Drobic B, Perez-Cadahia B, Yu J, Kung SK, Davie JR (2010) Promoter chromatin remodeling of immediate-early genes is mediated through H3 phosphorylation at either serine 28 or 10 by the MSK1 multi-protein complex. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 3196–3208.
  8. 8. Thomson S, Clayton AL, Hazzalin CA, Rose S, Barratt MJ, et al. (1999) The nucleosomal response associated with immediate-early gene induction is mediated via alternative MAP kinase cascades: MSK1 as a potential histone H3/HMG-14 kinase. EMBO J 18: 4779–4793.
  9. 9. Vicent GP, Ballare C, Nacht AS, Clausell J, Subtil-Rodriguez A, et al. (2008) Convergence on chromatin of non-genomic and genomic pathways of hormone signaling. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 109: 344–349.
  10. 10. Wiggin GR, Soloaga A, Foster JM, Murray-Tait V, Cohen P, et al. (2002) MSK1 and MSK2 are required for the mitogen- and stress-induced phosphorylation of CREB and ATF1 in fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 22: 2871–2881.
  11. 11. Jacks KA, Koch CA (2010) Differential regulation of mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1 and -2 (MSK1 and MSK2) by CK2 following UV radiation. J Biol Chem 285: 1661–1670.
  12. 12. Brami-Cherrier K, Valjent E, Herve D, Darragh J, Corvol JC, et al. (2005) Parsing molecular and behavioral effects of cocaine in mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1-deficient mice. J Neurosci 25: 11444–11454.
  13. 13. Berglund L, Bjorling E, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Asplund A, et al. (2008) A genecentric human protein atlas for expression profiles based on antibodies. Mol Cell Proteomics 7: 2019–2027.
  14. 14. Darragh J, Soloaga A, Beardmore VA, Wingate AD, Wiggin GR, et al. (2005) MSKs are required for the transcription of the nuclear orphan receptors Nur77, Nurr1 and Nor1 downstream of MAPK signalling. Biochem J 390: 749–759.
  15. 15. Chwang WB, Arthur JS, Schumacher A, Sweatt JD (2007) The nuclear kinase mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1 regulates hippocampal chromatin remodeling in memory formation. J Neurosci 27: 12732–12742.
  16. 16. Chandramohan Y, Droste SK, Arthur JS, Reul JM (2008) The forced swimming-induced behavioural immobility response involves histone H3 phospho-acetylation and c-Fos induction in dentate gyrus granule neurons via activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate/extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen- and stress-activated kinase signalling pathway. Eur J Neurosci 27: 2701–2713.
  17. 17. Roze E, Betuing S, Deyts C, Marcon E, Brami-Cherrier K, et al. (2008) Mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1 deficiency is involved in expanded-huntingtin-induced transcriptional dysregulation and striatal death. FASEB J 22: 1083–1093.
  18. 18. Ananieva O, Darragh J, Johansen C, Carr JM, McIlrath J, et al. (2008) The kinases MSK1 and MSK2 act as negative regulators of Toll-like receptor signaling. Nat Immunol 9: 1028–1036.
  19. 19. Prest SJ, May FE, Westley BR (2002) The estrogen-regulated protein, TFF1, stimulates migration of human breast cancer cells. FASEB J 16: 592–594.
  20. 20. Rodrigues S, Van Aken E, Van Bocxlaer S, Attoub S, Nguyen QD, et al. (2003) Trefoil peptides as proangiogenic factors in vivo and in vitro: implication of cyclooxygenase-2 and EGF receptor signaling. FASEB J 17: 7–16.
  21. 21. Rodrigues S, Attoub S, Nguyen QD, Bruyneel E, Rodrigue CM, et al. (2003) Selective abrogation of the proinvasive activity of the trefoil peptides pS2 and spasmolytic polypeptide by disruption of the EGF receptor signaling pathways in kidney and colonic cancer cells. Oncogene 22: 4488–4497.
  22. 22. Corte MD, Tamargo F, Alvarez A, Rodriguez JC, Vazquez J, et al. (2006) Cytosolic levels of TFF1/pS2 in breast cancer: Their relationship with clinical-pathological parameters and their prognostic significance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 96: 63–72.
  23. 23. Lacroix M (2006) Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer 13: 1033–1067.
  24. 24. Nunez AM, Berry M, Imler JL, Chambon P (1989) The 5′ flanking region of the pS2 gene contains a complex enhancer region responsive to oestrogens, epidermal growth factor, a tumour promoter (TPA), the c-Ha-ras oncoprotein and the c-jun protein. EMBO J 8: 823–829.
  25. 25. Giamarchi C, Solanas M, Chailleux C, Augereau P, Vignon F, et al. (1999) Chromatin structure of the regulatory regions of pS2 and cathepsin D genes in hormone-dependent and -independent breast cancer cell lines. Oncogene 18: 533–541.
  26. 26. Carroll JS, Liu XS, Brodsky AS, Li W, Meyer CA, et al. (2005) Chromosome-wide mapping of estrogen receptor binding reveals long-range regulation requiring the forkhead protein FoxA1. Cell 122: 33–43.
  27. 27. Espino PS, Li L, He S, Yu J, Davie JR (2006) Chromatin modification of the trefoil factor 1 gene in human breast cancer cells by the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Cancer Res 66: 4610–4616.
  28. 28. Sewack GF, Hansen U (1997) Nucleosome positioning and transcription-associated chromatin alterations on the human estrogen-responsive pS2 promoter. J Biol Chem 272: 31118–31129.
  29. 29. Kim J, Petz LN, Ziegler YS, Wood JR, Potthoff SJ, et al. (2000) Regulation of the estrogen-responsive pS2 gene in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 74: 157–168.
  30. 30. Metivier R, Penot G, Hubner MR, Reid G, Brand H, et al. (2003) Estrogen receptor-alpha directs ordered, cyclical, and combinatorial recruitment of cofactors on a natural target promoter. Cell 115: 751–763.
  31. 31. He S, Sun JM, Li L, Davie JR (2005) Differential intranuclear organization of transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3. Mol Biol Cell 16: 4073–4083.
  32. 32. Li L, Davie JR (2008) Association of Sp3 and estrogen receptor alpha with the transcriptionally active trefoil factor 1 promoter in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 105: 365–369.
  33. 33. Macdonald N, Welburn JP, Noble ME, Nguyen A, Yaffe MB, et al. (2005) Molecular basis for the recognition of phosphorylated and phosphoacetylated histone H3 by 14-3-3. Mol Cell 20: 199–211.
  34. 34. Walter W, Clynes D, Tang Y, Marmostein R, Mellor J, et al. (2008) 14-3-3 interaction with histone H3 involves dual modification pattern of phosphoacetylation. Mol Cell Biol.
    • 35. Winter S, Simboeck E, Fischle W, Zupkovitz G, Dohnal I, et al. (2008) 14-3-3 proteins recognize a histone code at histone H3 and are required for transcriptional activation. EMBO J 27: 88–99.
    • 36. Kim SI, Bresnick EH, Bultman SJ (2009) BRG1 directly regulates nucleosome structure and chromatin looping of the alpha globin locus to activate transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 6019–6027.
    • 37. Clapier CR, Cairns BR (2009) The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 273–304.
    • 38. Vicent GP, Ballare C, Nacht AS, Clausell J, Subtil-Rodriguez A, et al. (2006) Induction of progesterone target genes requires activation of Erk and Msk kinases and phosphorylation of histone H3. Mol Cell 24: 367–381.
    • 39. Euskirchen GM, Auerbach RK, Davidov E, Gianoulis TA, Zhong G, et al. (2011) Diverse roles and interactions of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex revealed using global approaches. PLoS Genet 7: e1002008.
    • 40. Angel P, Hattori K, Smeal T, Karin M (1988) The jun proto-oncogene is positively autoregulated by its product, Jun/AP-1. Cell 55: 875–885.
    • 41. McCoy CE, Campbell DG, Deak M, Bloomberg GB, Arthur JS (2005) MSK1 activity is controlled by multiple phosphorylation sites. Biochem J 387: 507–517.
    • 42. McCoy CE, Macdonald A, Morrice NA, Campbell DG, Deak M, et al. (2007) Identification of novel phosphorylation sites in MSK1 by precursor ion scanning MS. Biochem J 402: 491–501.
    • 43. Amiry N, Kong X, Muniraj N, Kannan N, Grandison PM, et al. (2009) Trefoil factor-1 (TFF1) enhances oncogenicity of mammary carcinoma cells. Endocrinology 150: 4473–4483.
    • 44. Hsu YL, Hou MF, Kuo PL, Huang YF, Tsai EM (2012) Breast tumor-associated osteoblast-derived CXCL5 increases cancer progression by ERK/MSK1/Elk-1/Snail signaling pathway. Oncogene.
      • 45. Yuen HF, Chan YK, Grills C, McCrudden CM, Gunasekharan V, et al. (2011) Polyomavirus enhancer activator 3 protein promotes breast cancer metastatic progression through Snail-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Pathol 224: 78–89.
      • 46. Taube JH, Herschkowitz JI, Komurov K, Zhou AY, Gupta S, et al. (2010) Core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition interactome gene-expression signature is associated with claudin-low and metaplastic breast cancer subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 15449–15454.
      • 47. Bougen NM, Amiry N, Yuan Y, Kong XJ, Pandey V, et al. (2013) Trefoil factor 1 suppression of E-CADHERIN enhances prostate carcinoma cell invasiveness and metastasis. Cancer Lett 332: 19–29.