Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Imperfect Isolation: Factors and Filters Shaping Madagascar’s Extant Vertebrate Fauna

  • Karen E. Samonds ,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, United States of America

  • Laurie R. Godfrey,

    Affiliation Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Jason R. Ali,

    Affiliation Department of Earth Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

  • Steven M. Goodman,

    Affiliations Department of Zoology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, Association Vahatra, Antananarivo, Madagascar

  • Miguel Vences,

    Affiliation Department of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

  • Michael R. Sutherland,

    Affiliation Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Mitchell T. Irwin,

    Affiliation Department of Anthropology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, United States of America

  • David W. Krause

    Affiliation Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America

Imperfect Isolation: Factors and Filters Shaping Madagascar’s Extant Vertebrate Fauna

  • Karen E. Samonds, 
  • Laurie R. Godfrey, 
  • Jason R. Ali, 
  • Steven M. Goodman, 
  • Miguel Vences, 
  • Michael R. Sutherland, 
  • Mitchell T. Irwin, 
  • David W. Krause


Analyses of phylogenetic topology and estimates of divergence timing have facilitated a reconstruction of Madagascar’s colonization events by vertebrate animals, but that information alone does not reveal the major factors shaping the island’s biogeographic history. Here, we examine profiles of Malagasy vertebrate clades through time within the context of the island’s paleogeographical evolution to determine how particular events influenced the arrival of the island’s extant groups. First we compare vertebrate profiles on Madagascar before and after selected events; then we compare tetrapod profiles on Madagascar to contemporary tetrapod compositions globally. We show that changes from the Mesozoic to the Cenozoic in the proportions of Madagascar’s tetrapod clades (particularly its increase in the representation of birds and mammals) are tied to changes in their relative proportions elsewhere on the globe. Differences in the representation of vertebrate classes from the Mesozoic to the Cenozoic reflect the effects of extinction (i.e., the non-random susceptibility of the different vertebrate clades to purported catastrophic global events 65 million years ago), and new evolutionary opportunities for a subset of vertebrates with the relatively high potential for transoceanic dispersal potential. In comparison, changes in vertebrate class representation during the Cenozoic are minor. Despite the fact that the island’s isolation has resulted in high vertebrate endemism and a unique and taxonomically imbalanced extant vertebrate assemblage (both hailed as testimony to its long isolation), that isolation was never complete. Indeed, Madagascar’s extant tetrapod fauna owes more to colonization during the Cenozoic than to earlier arrivals. Madagascar’s unusual vertebrate assemblage needs to be understood with reference to the basal character of clades originating prior to the K-T extinction, as well as to the differential transoceanic dispersal advantage of other, more recently arriving clades. Thus, the composition of Madagascar’s endemic vertebrate assemblage itself provides evidence of the island's paleogeographic history.


Madagascar has long been recognized as one of the world’s highest biodiversity priorities [1]; its extant vertebrate terrestrial and freshwater vertebrate assemblages are highly distinctive and have high levels of species endemism across groups [2]. However, within some clades, Madagascar’s fauna is taxonomically imbalanced and species-poor. Among mammals, for instance, Madagascar shows conspicuous absences relative to typical African sub-Saharan faunas; if recent introductions by humans are excluded, only seven extant and subfossil placental orders are represented: Bibymalagasia, Afrosoricida, Primates, Chiroptera, Carnivora, Rodentia, and Cetartiodactyla. Similar patterns of disproportionate absences exist in other vertebrate higher taxa (e.g., [3][5]). Furthermore, many forms occupy phylogenetic positions that are basal relative to continental members of their respective groups [3], [6], [7].

With regard to direct evidence of the rich vertebrate fauna that once existed, the island is well known for its fossil assemblages (e.g., [8][10]). However, the fossil record is largely constrained to three main intervals in Madagascar’s Mesozoic/Cenozoic history – Late Triassic to mid-Jurassic, Late Cretaceous, and Late Pleistocene/Holocene – thus, leaving huge gaps. One gap is particularly critical to the biogeographic origins of the extant fauna - that spanning most of the Cenozoic, which is when many of the extant groups arrived and subsequently evolved (e.g., reviews by [11][13]).

On the early side of this gap, a diverse fossil assemblage (including, ray-finned fishes, anurans, turtles, snakes, non-ophidian squamates [‘lizards’], crocodyliforms, birds, and mammals, as well as sauropod and non-avian theropod dinosaurs) from the Late Cretaceous (70–65 million years ago, Ma) is now well-documented from the Maevarano Formation of northwestern Madagascar [10]. With the possible exception of a podocnemidid turtle (cf. Erymnochelys; [14]), the low-level fossil vertebrate taxa described from the Maevarano Formation could not be considered as candidates involved in the ancestry of clades represented in either the subfossil or in the extant fauna of Madagascar [15], [16].

On the recent side of the gap, the earliest Cenozoic vertebrate specimens (with the exception of some mid-Eocene nearshore marine fossils; e.g., [17]) are “subfossils” less than 80,000 years old [18]. Thousands of bones have been described from Late Pleistocene and Holocene deposits including those of crocodylians, turtles, lemurs, bats, carnivorans, rodents, pygmy hippopotamuses, the aardvark-like Plesiorycteropus, and various birds, such as the flightless elephant birds (e.g., [9], [19][21]). These remains are, for the most part, too recent to contribute direct information to debates concerning the biogeographic origins of Madagascar’s extant vertebrate fauna; their existence generally adds to our knowledge of vertebrate clade origins in Madagascar in the same manner as do extant vertebrates (i.e., through molecular phylogenetics, phylogenomics, biogeographic analysis, etc.). It is by using such analytical tools that some vertebrate groups (e.g., microhylid frogs, oplurid lizards, boid and xenotyphlopid snakes) that are not represented in the Mesozoic fossil record of Madagascar are nevertheless inferred to have arrived (or originated) there prior to the K-T extinctions, but not without contention, while most others (e.g., other frogs, snakes, lizards, many birds, and all mammals) are thought to have arrived after this event, when Madagascar was fully isolated. It is this type of evidence that overwhelmingly supports a greater role for dispersal than vicariance in explaining the island’s extant vertebrate fauna. Current evidence lends little support for the vicariance scenario for most of the island’s extant vertebrate clades [13], [22].

These inferences, though important, focus only on the two endpoints – clade origins and their modern or subfossil descendants. What is missing from our current understanding is an examination of temporal change in Madagascar’s vertebrate fauna – specifically how changes in clade representation correlate with particular paleogeographical events, and how the history of changes in vertebrate clade representation, by itself, informs our understanding of the island’s global isolation.

This is the primary goal of this paper. We examine Madagascar’s changing vertebrate clade profiles (percentages of fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals) through time within the context of its geologic history, to evaluate the extent of the island’s biogeographic isolation and the principal factors that have molded the composition of its extant (and subfossil) vertebrate fauna. We conclude that two events in particular, the end-Cretaceous extinctions and the shift in prevailing ocean current flow in the mid-Miocene, help to explain observed changes in the representation of the major groups of vertebrates (and in the characteristics of that vertebrate fauna). We also infer that the composition of Madagascar’s extant and subfossil vertebrate fauna owes more to events that occurred after the K-T extinction than to its history of colonization and evolution during the Mesozoic.

Materials and Methods

Data reflecting our current understanding of the biogeographic history of the extant Malagasy vertebrate fauna and key geological, geophysical, and paleoceanographic information were compiled to address impacts on Madagascar’s vertebrate fauna by two key events – the mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary and the shift in prevailing ocean flow during the Miocene [23].

For each Malagasy vertebrate “clade” (defined as a group of Malagasy species descended from a single ancestral species that arrived on Madagascar either via dispersal or vicariance), we recorded class, time of arrival, ancestor type (obligate freshwater, terrestrial, facultative swimmer, volant), overwater dispersal ability, geographic source area, occurrence in the Malagasy fossil record (Mesozoic or Quaternary), and whether there are representative extant members (Table S1). With a few exceptions, dispersal ability was coded as either dispersal-disadvantaged (obligate freshwater or terrestrial), or dispersal-advantaged (facultative swimmer or volant). Vertebrate profiles were then compared before and after specific events. Estimates of arrival time and source area were drawn from either published clock dates, or from molecular phylogenies combined with cladograms based on morphological data (some including fossil taxa). The prevailing direction of ocean current at the time of colonization was only scored for clades arriving during the Cenozoic owing to the limited availability of paleocurrent modeling for earlier times. We used SPSS (version 20) and Stata SE (version 11) to explore changes in class, geographic source, dispersal advantage, locomotor type, and percentage extinct, from before to after the selected events. In addition to providing standard Pearson’s chi-square values for each row-by-column frequency table, we present Fisher’s exact test results. The latter is preferable to traditional Pearson’s chi-square or the maximum likelihood test for independence when one or more anticipated values are small, particularly when expected values are less than five in one or more of the cells, or when marginal values are strikingly uneven. Fortunately, Fisher’s exact test is a combinatorially exhaustive calculation that provides the exact probability of finding any given result (or more extreme difference) by chance alone [24]. As it is an exact test, it delivers a probability value without degrees of freedom. We also used SPSS’s loglinear function to elucidate the simultaneous effects of geographic source, vertebrate class, and time.

Tetrapod representation (percentages of amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals) was also compiled globally (based on counts of families recorded by [25], [26]) and within Madagascar (based on counts of inferred independent arrivals) for three periods (the Late Cretaceous, Paleogene, and Neogene). For Madagascar, some analyses involve “profiles” (the inferred fauna present at a given time interval, while others use “arrivals” (the group of clades arriving within that time interval). Our goal here was to evaluate the degree to which Madagascar was insulated from the rest of the world by addressing a series of questions. Is Madagascar’s tetrapod diversity today (or during the very recent past) more a by-product of its dispersal history during the Cenozoic or of its earlier vicariance history? In other words, is the character of Madagascar’s tetrapod fauna ancient? Do the tetrapod clades arriving during the Cenozoic match (in percentage class representation) Cenozoic clades outside of Madagascar? To evaluate similarities and differences over time, we calculated assemblage proximities based on vector correlations and produced a dendrogram showing the average linkages of seven vertebrate assemblages –Madagascar in the Late Cretaceous, Paleogene, Neogene and Quaternary, and the globe during the Late Cretaceous, Paleogene and Neogene (Sahney’s tetrapod familial counts at 70, 35, and 10 million years ago) [25].


Before and at the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary

Rifting of madagascar from africa.

At approximately 165 Ma, the southern supercontinent of Gondwana split into a western block composed of Africa and South America, and an eastern entity made up of Madagascar, Seychelles, the Indian subcontinent, Antarctica, and Australia [27], [28]. During this spreading phase, which lasted until about 116 Ma [29], the approximately N-S aligned Davie Ridge Fracture Zone, which bisects the Mozambique Channel, operated as a dextral (far-side-moves-to-the-right) transform fault [30]. Consequently, ocean floor was generated and spread in the western Somali Basin (Fig. 1), east of modern-day Kenya-Tanzania, as well as in the Mozambique and Enderby Basins (between southern Madagascar and Antarctica). It is worth noting that, for most of this time, eastern Africa and western Madagascar would have been close, as East Gondwana migrated slowly southwards relative to its western counterpart. Only after the M11 magnetic period ( = magnetochron) (∼136 Ma [31]), did the gap between the two landmasses grow more rapidly ([28]; see their Fig. 13).

Figure 1. Simplified bathymetric map of the western and central Indian Ocean, and adjacent Southern Ocean.

Note that the 0–200 m bathymetric interval around Antarctica is not portrayed due to a lack of detailed information in the areas adjacent to the continent. Based on the GEBCO [153] chart.

Isolation of indo-Madagascar.

The isolation of Indo-Madagascar (a landmass including Madagascar, Seychelles, and the Indian subcontinent that existed for some 30 million years) from its former Gondwanan neighbors was largely completed by ∼115 Ma as the southeastern part of the subcontinent peeled away from the Gunnerus Ridge-Enderby Land margin of eastern Antarctica [32]. Perhaps of most relevance for this study is the fact that Madagascar has been in the same position relative to mainland Africa ever since, separated by a minimum distance of 400 km.

Kerguelen plateau.

For some time, based on the paleogeographic reconstructions and inferences of Hay et al. [33], it has been proposed that South America and Indo-Madagascar were indirectly linked via Antarctica and the now largely submerged Kerguelen Plateau (Fig. 1), thereby potentially explaining the close relationships of various latest Cretaceous taxa on the two disjunct land masses (e.g., [15], [16], [34][36]). Recently, the Kerguelen Plateau land-bridge hypothesis was explored in two publications [32], [37]. Based on available geological data, and drawing upon geophysical modeling, the 2011 study included four detailed paleogeographical reconstructions: mid-Early Cretaceous, 120.4 Ma; Early/Late Cretaceous boundary, 99.6 Ma; mid-Late Cretaceous, 83.5 Ma; and end-Late Cretaceous, 67.7 Ma. The critical findings were that large portions of the Kerguelen Plateau may have been emergent up until the Early/Late Cretaceous boundary but that Indo-Madagascar was still separated from the closest emergent parts of this plateau by some 1,900 km. Furthermore, by 95–90 Ma, only small portions of the terrain could have been above sea level in a vast and still expanding southern Indian Ocean. Another critical aspect is that the plateau never directly abutted Antarctica – the highs on the edifice being separated from the continent by deep waters over the Princess Elizabeth Trough, a barrier that would have been >300 km wide. Therefore, any terrestrial animals passing between Antarctica and Indo-Madagascar during the middle and Late Cretaceous could not have passed via a land-bridge; they would have needed to make substantial overwater journeys. Correspondingly, Ali & Krause [32] demonstrated with stratigraphically calibrated phylogenies that those latest Cretaceous Malagasy vertebrates judged to be obligatorily terrestrial and poor overwater dispersers (e.g., large dinosaurs, notosuchian crocodyliforms) had long ghost lineages, extending into the Early Cretaceous, thereby indicating that their ancestors had likely arrived on Indo-Madagascar before it was isolated from the rest of Gondwana.

Separation of the indian subcontinent from madagascar.

Separation of the Indian subcontinent and Madagascar occurred approximately 88 Ma [38], [39]. During the final part of the Cretaceous, the Indian subcontinent and Madagascar might have been indirectly “connected” by land on Providence Bank and Amirante Ridge [as well as the Seychelles Block; 27], but such a route was likely broken by expanses of ocean several tens to a few hundred km in width.

K-T boundary extinction.

A catastrophic, global, mass extinction occurred at the boundary between the Cretaceous and Tertiary, with >75% of the world’s species going extinct [40]. The event is widely attributed to an asteroid impact in Mexico (e.g., [41]), though other associated global effects such as massive volcanic eruptions, acid rain, atmospheric dust, temperature and sea level changes also likely played a critical role in these extinctions [42].

The formation of the Deccan traps in northwestern India between 60 and 68 million years ago (eruptions that may have lasted less than 30,000 years total) also likely contributed to the extinctions at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, releasing sulfur dioxide and other volcanic gasses into the atmosphere [43]. The proximity of the Deccan traps to Madagascar, and the associated ash falls and depleted photosynthesis likely played a major role in the extinction of the island’s groups.

Relevant biogeographic events.

Various archaic groups of actinopterygian fishes inhabited Madagascar's freshwaters prior to the Cenozoic, comprising at least three families that have a Cretaceous fossil record but are now locally extinct (Lepisosteidae, Phyllodontidae, and Pycnodontidae). The origins in Madagascar of five families of more derived actinopterygians represented in the extant fauna (Aplocheilidae, Bedotiidae, Cichlidae, Clupeidae, and Mugilidae) are usually also reconstructed in this time period [44][48]. An ancient Gondwanan origin has also been reconstructed for an enigmatic group of cave-dwelling fish (i.e., Milyeringidae) that very recently have been demonstrated to represent a compelling example of Australian-Malagasy sister relationships [49], [50]. For the extant fish groups, our analysis is based on the prevailing assumption of ancient vicariance; one recent study indicates a possible younger origin of these fishes (see below) [51]. Two amphibian groups may also have ancient biogeographic links: a Late Cretaceous giant ceratophryine frog with South American affinities that has no living representatives on Madagascar [52], and some of the island’s microhylid frogs (the clade composed of Cophylinae and Scaphiophryninae, and the endemic Mantellidae; [51], [53]).

Malagasy podocnemidid turtles are attributed to Mesozoic vicariance, as they share close phylogenetic affinities to turtles from South America [36]. A lower jaw of cf. Eremnochelys from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar [14] supports this scenario; these fossils represent the only Cretaceous occurrence of a genus currently represented in the extant Malagasy vertebrate fauna [10]. The bothremydid turtle Kinkonychelys is also described from the Late Cretaceous [54], as well as Sokatra, a more basal pelomedusoid [55]. Kinkonychelys is interesting biogeographically in that it is nested within a tribe (Kurmademydini) that is otherwise only known from India, thus reflecting the relatively recent physical connections between Madagascar and the Indian subcontinent (at 85–90 Ma).

The first definitive record of Mesozoic lizards from Madagascar is a questionably-identified cordylid lizard from the Late Cretaceous [10]; representatives of the Cordylidae are today restricted to sub-Saharan Africa. Other Late Cretaceous reptiles include at least four species of notosuchian and two species of neosuchian crocodyliforms [56][58], three species of basal snakes [59], two species of sauropod dinosaurs [60], and three species of non-avian theropod dinosaurs [61][63]; none of these taxa appears to be relevant to the ancestry of extant Malagasy clades. Based on molecular evidence, other extant Malagasy reptiles whose ancestors are thought to have arrived before the K-T boundary include oplurid lizards and boid snakes [36], and the endemic family of Malagasy blind snakes Xenotyphlopidae [64]. Additionally, zonasaurine gerrhosaurid lizards are thought to have arrived through a single dispersal event from Africa approximately 66 Ma [65].

The ancestral stocks of all of the island’s flightless or flight-limited birds (e.g., Aepyornithidae, Mesitornithidae) are thought to have inhabited the island during the Mesozoic, as they either have phylogenetic affinities to taxa on southern continents or Asia, or belong to lineages with inferred minimal geological vicariance ages of 100–80 Ma [66] (but see discussion in [67] suggesting a Miocene arrival for some taxa). To date, however, the Late Cretaceous fossil record provides little support for vicariance; it has yielded only a very primitive avifauna, comprised of at least six basal (non-neornithine) taxa [68], [69].

The Mesozoic record of mammals from Madagascar is limited to a Jurassic australosphenidan [70] and several Late Cretaceous non-placental taxa, none of which played a role in the ancestry of the extant clades of placental mammals that live on the island today [16], [71][73].

For several extant clades of Malagasy vertebrates assumed to have arisen through Mesozoic vicariance, the relationships or divergence ages are contentious. While some molecular timetrees have reconstructed the ages of the three main freshwater percomorph families (cichlids, bedotiids, aplocheiloids) as Mesozoic (e.g., [74]), others have favored their origin in the Paleogene [51], [75]. A recent molecular analysis of teleost fishes (based on a large number of nuclear genes) [76] obtains relatively young Cenozoic ages for the percomorph radiation that are at odds with the orthodox view of an ancient vicariant origin of these animals in Madagascar. Near et al. [76] also provide compelling evidence of prior overestimation of divergence dates by mtDNA analyses (such as those of [74]). On the other hand, for fishes like the Malagasy cave-dwelling freshwater eleotrids (Typhleotris, an endemic genus sister to the Australian Milyeringa), a long-distance marine dispersal is hard to imagine [49]. A more in-depth analysis of this question is necessary. Similarly, affinities of the giant Cretaceous frog Beelzebufo to South American ceratophryids are supported by osteological characters [52] but are in disagreement with hypotheses of younger origins of this Neotropical family [77]. Malagasy boid and xenotyphlopid snakes might be slightly younger as well and could have arrived in Madagascar around the K-T boundary or shortly thereafter [51].

After the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary Until the Mid-Miocene

Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum.

The beginning of the Eocene (55.8 Ma) was marked by a dramatic global climatic perturbation [78], which lasted around 200,000 years [79]. The change appears to have been rapid; within a few thousand years, sea-surface temperatures increased by 5–9°C [78], [80][83]. The temperature shift coincided with rapid range changes for terrestrial plants and the elimination of large numbers of benthic foraminiferan species, while other taxa such as planktonic foraminifers, dinoflagellates, and mammals flourished.

Grand coupure/Mongolian remodeling.

The Eocene/Oligocene boundary was marked by an extreme lowering of temperature and sea level in Europe and Asia, concurrent with the beginning of the formation of the Antarctic ice cap [84], [85]. This change in climate coincided with large-scale extinctions and faunal turnover.

Establishment of the current monsoon pattern.

The monsoon system that currently affects South, Southeast, and East Asia probably initiated at or near the start of the Miocene. This is supported by the coincident onset of desertification in Asia [86] and a marked influx of clastic sediments to Asia’s marginal basins and oceans [87]. Furthermore, Cenozoic deposits in China reveal a marked shift in plant cover at the Oligocene-Miocene boundary [88]. By 15 Ma, the modern oceanic circulation pattern was likely well established.

Beginning of ocean current shift.

The tipping point for the change to the “modern” circulation in the Southwest Indian Ocean [89] probably occurred during the mid-Miocene when Madagascar’s northern extremity (now at 12°S) began to impinge upon the South Equatorial Current, which flows E to W across the Indian Ocean basin, its southern edge presently being positioned at ∼17°S [90], [91]. Plate modeling suggests that this occurred ∼20 Ma [23]. Prior to this, and from at least the start of the Cenozoic [23], the W to E flow around Madagascar at the height of each austral summer was 13–23 cm/s between NE Mozambique-SE Tanzania and Madagascar. Such speeds would have enabled mammals adrift on rafts (e.g., vegetation mats, trees) off eastern Africa the potential to cross the Mozambique Channel in as few as 30 days.

Relevant biogeographic events.

There is compelling evidence for dispersal of hyperoliid frogs from Africa to Madagascar at 19–30 Ma (Heterixalus) and from Madagascar to the Seychelles at 11–21 Ma (Tachycnemis). These genera are highly nested among African genera and a molecular clock estimate places their divergence within the Cenozoic [92], [93]; slightly older dates for their origin [51] might be due to the use of different African representatives in the timetree. The endemic subfamily Dyscophinae is thought to have dispersed to Madagascar via India between 39–76 Ma [53], [94]. Closest relatives of the Mantellidae are mainly Asian; their phylogenetically nested position suggests dispersal from India, probably during the Early Paleocene [53], [95].

Chameleons are hypothesized to have originated on Madagascar [7], and to have experienced subsequent and repeated Cenozoic dispersals to continental Africa and to Comoros [7], [51]. Recent work has demonstrated a further dispersal from Africa to the Seychelles 34–38 Ma [96], [97] and postulated origins in Africa rather than Madagascar [97]. The Malagasy gecko Blaesodactylus is thought to have arrived during the Paleocene-Eocene [98]. Most skinks arrived through dispersal from Africa [99], while one (e.g., Cryptoblepharus) appears to be the result of a single overwater dispersal from Australia or Indonesia, with subsequent colonization of continental Africa, Mauritius, and the Comoros [100].

Evidence suggests that most lamprophiid snakes share affinities with African taxa, and reached Madagascar <31 Ma [101]. Typhlophid snakes are also thought to have arrived after the K-T boundary, as Typhlops has a molecular divergence time 59–63 Ma [64].

Bird groups arriving after the Cretaceous, but before the mid-Miocene, include the families Bernieridae, Campephagidae, Eurylaimidae, Psittacidae, and Vangidae [102][106]. These events are reconstructed as dispersals from multiple geographic areas and, in some cases, multiple dispersals within families [107].

Molecular work provides strong evidence that Madagascar’s four extant non-volant native mammal groups – lemuroids, carnivorans, tenrecs, and nesomyine rodents – arrived between the end-Cretaceous and the mid-Miocene, probably all from Africa. Lemurs arrived first (50–54 Ma), followed by tenrecs (25–42 Ma), carnivorans (19–26 Ma), and then nesomyine rodents (20–24 Ma) [108][112]. African affinities currently seem to be clear for all four clades, but have been debated for lemuroids and carnivorans [113]; but see critique by [114].

The Malagasy Holocene subfossil record contains a bizarre mammal with unclear affinities: Plesiorycteropus. This highly distinct and unusual genus is placed in its own order (Bibymalagasia [19]). Historically, the mammalian groups with which it was thought to be allied are all ancient, suggesting a very old origin, likely through vicariance. However, some analyses [115], [116] suggest a sister taxon relationship with extant aardvarks (Orycteropus), nested within the Afrotheria [117], which would support a more recent African origin.

Three families of bats (Emballonuridae, Myzopodidae, and Nycteridae) have molecular divergence times within the Paleogene [118]. However, because these times are all maxima, it is difficult to determine when the colonizations occurred, as actual arrival dates may have been more recent.

After the Mid-Miocene

Shift in ocean currents in the SW indian ocean.

Paleoceanographic modeling indicates that the present-day E to W surface-water direction in the SW Indian Ocean, which is not conducive to Africa-to-Madagascar migrations, was in operation by at least 15 Ma (Fig. 2; [89]). This appears to have brought about a major change in the ability of obligate rafters (dispersal-disadvantaged animals) to colonize Madagascar [13], [23].

Figure 2. Simplified bathymetric map of the Mozambique Channel area.

The relative positions of Madagascar, Mozambique, and nearby islands are shown in (a), while (b) shows a bathymetric cross-section along the Davie Ridge. Red dots on (a) indicate the two ends of the cross-section. Even if elements of the ridge were subaerial, the deep, broad troughs widely separating the peaks would have posed formidable barriers to obligatorily terrestrial animals.

Intensity of the monsoon system.

The monsoon system has not remained stable and data from drill cores from the Arabian Sea indicate that it became more intense during the Late Miocene [119], [120].

Relevant biogeographic events.

The amphibian Ptychadena mascareniensis is thought to have arrived on Madagascar through overwater dispersal from Africa during the Plio-Pleistocene and subsequently introduced by humans to the Mascarene and Seychelles islands [121], [122]. Both extant and subfossil tortoises are thought to have arrived during this time [123]. Palkovacs et al. [124] suggest that Madagascar was colonized by tortoises once, 17.5–11.5 Ma, and from which species subsequently dispersed to other western Indian Ocean islands.

The extant Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) and the subfossil Voay robustus [125] are not closely related to the island’s Late Cretaceous crocodyliforms [56]; evidence suggests that both recent forms arrived through dispersal from Africa after the mid-Miocene, likely through two independent events. Voay is closely related to the African dwarf horned crocodile (Osteolaemus), while the Malagasy Crocodylus niloticus cannot be specifically distinguished from its counterpart in mainland Africa [125][128].

The house geckos Hemidactylus mercatorius and H. playcephalus, once believed to have been translocated to Madagascar by humans, are now thought to have arrived through two separate events prior to human colonization of the island [98]. One genus of lamprophiid snakes (Mimophis) is also thought to have colonized Madagascar during this time (<13 Ma [101]). Most bird groups also arrived after the mid-Miocene, including the families Dicruridae, Motacillidae, Nectarinidae, Pycnonotidae, and certain Strigidae, Sturnidae, and Zosteropidae [107], [129][133].

Hippopotamuses are believed to have arrived in the latest Cenozoic, but not via human agency [21], [134] and, according to historical accounts, persisted after humans arrived [135]. Despite having been common in Madagascar during the Holocene, the three endemic Malagasy hippopotamus species are now extinct. Hippopotamus laloumena and H. lemerlei are related to the Nile hippopotamus (H. amphibius; [134]), while Hexaprotodon guldbergi [136] is more closely related to the Liberian pygmy hippopotamus (He. liberiensis; [137]); hence, a minimum of two overwater crossings from Africa is implied.

The only other mammals to arrive during this period are bats. Most families are thought to have colonized Madagascar during the last 15 Ma, many probably during the last 5 Ma [138]. Colonization events include three within Hipposideridae, at least eight within Molossidae, three within Pteropodidae, and four within Vespertilionidae [118], [139][142]. Bats therefore show a different pattern from non-volant endemic mammals; they contain species nested within distantly-related families, some with cosmopolitan distributions [118], having arrived through multiple dispersal events from at least two source continents.

Lastly, a number of wild mammal species (e.g., shrews, wild pigs, rats) are thought to have been introduced to the island by early human settlers (Table 1; [143][145]; these taxa were excluded from our analysis. Details of their arrivals are unknown, and it is possible that some of them arrived via overwater dispersal prior to human colonization.

Table 1. Taxa probably introduced by early human settlers in the Holocene (last 2,000 years).

Profile Summary and Comparative Synthesis

Of the 99 vertebrate “arrivals” to Madagascar tabulated here, some have left no Holocene descendants; however, at least 73 of these have given rise to members of Madagascar’s extant vertebrate fauna and an additional five clades (Aepyornithidae, Hippopotamus, Hexaprotodon, Plesiorycteropus, and Voay) that survived into the Quaternary but are now extinct (Fig. 3). The 73 extant vertebrate clades include six clades of bony fishes, five amphibians, 17 reptiles, 18 birds, and 27 mammals (Table S1). In Table 2 we present the dominant clade profile changes across the K-T boundary and in Table 3 the same for the Cenozoic (especially before and after the direction of dominant ocean currents shifted during the mid-Miocene).

Figure 3. Timetable summarizing major paleogeographical and paleoclimatic events relevant to the biogeographic history of Madagascar.

Table includes a non-exhaustive summary of vertebrate taxa that arrived or were present on the island during four major intervals (as in [13]; herein, taxa from the second and third period were merged for analysis). The box for the Jurassic-Cretaceous shows extinct fossil taxa that were present in Madagascar in the Late Cretaceous, plus extant taxa reconstructed to have existed during this time. Subsequent boxes show taxa that are estimated to have arrived on the island during the respective interval, with each image representing one (or rarely two) endemic Malagasy clades. Extinct taxa are marked with † (in parentheses if taxon is extinct on Madagascar but surviving elsewhere). Red font marks taxa that might be of younger origin according to some molecular estimates. Maps show changing landmass configurations and patterns of vertebrate appearance in or colonization of Madagascar by time slice and proportion of dominant colonizer types (unadjusted frequencies in percent, after [13]).

Table 2. Comparison of vertebrates arriving before and after the K-T boundary.

Across the K-T boundary.

Vertebrate class representation among arrivals changes significantly from before to after the K-T boundary (Table 2). Prior to this period, reptiles represent 51.4% of the arriving vertebrate clades, followed by fishes (25.7%), birds (8.6%), mammals (8.6%), and amphibians (5.7%). After the K-T boundary, mammals (44.3%) and birds (27.9%) dominate among arrivals, followed by reptiles (21.3%) and, finally, amphibians (6.6%).

The extant vertebrate fauna reflects these shifts –78.6% of the Quaternary (including extant) clades that are apparently derived from the Mesozoic Malagasy fauna are reptiles or fishes, while 72.1% of those that derive from Cenozoic arrivals are mammals or birds. Of the 75 Quaternary vertebrate clades scored (an additional 3 were not included, as they could not be reliably scored for arrival time), 100% (27/27) of the mammalian clades, 89.5% (17/19) of the bird clades, 80% (4/5) of the amphibian clades, and 72.2% (13/18) of the reptilian clades derive from Cenozoic colonizers, while none of the fishes (0/6) do (Table 2).

Of the 35 vertebrate lineages known or hypothesized to have arrived during the Mesozoic, 22 (62.9%) are now extinct (although one of these, Aepyornithidae, was still extant in the Late Quaternary) and 13 (37.1%) are still extant. Of the 61 vertebrate clades hypothesized to have arrived during the Cenozoic, only four (6.6%) are now extinct. This difference is highly significant statistically (Table 2). The 22 extinct clades known only from the Mesozoic fossil record may have succumbed to extinction at the K-T boundary, though the virtual absence of Cenozoic terrestrial fossils largely precludes direct testing of this hypothesis.

For vertebrate clades arriving in the Mesozoic, the likelihood of clade extinction varies by class. Fishes are most likely to have survived (66.7%, or 6/9 clades), while tetrapods show much higher losses, with only 26.9% (7/26 clades) surviving to the present. Within tetrapods, however, there is no class-related extinction bias. The relative percentages of amphibian, reptilian, avian and mammalian clades do not differ significantly between survivors and those that became extinct (Table 2). Reptiles dominate both (71.4% of the surviving Mesozoic tetrapod clades and 68.4% of the extinct Mesozoic tetrapod clades).

Within the cenozoic.

The tetrapod arrivals from Africa (72.9% of all colonizers) and Asia (Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia combined; 23.7% of all colonizers) during the Cenozoic differed in vertebrate class composition (Table 3). Vertebrate colonizers arriving from Africa are predominantly mammals (55.8%) and reptiles (23.3%), while vertebrate colonizers arriving from Asia are predominantly birds (71.4%). Amphibians represent only 7.0% of Cenozoic tetrapod colonizers, with 50% arriving from Africa and 50% from Asia. Almost all of Madagascar’s Cenozoic mammalian colonizers (96% or 24/25) arrived from continental Africa. The same applies to reptiles (90.9% or 10/11), but not to birds. Only 41.2% of avian colonizers (7/17) arrived from Africa.

This source difference in class profile appears to have been unaffected by the shift in direction of the ocean currents that occurred during the mid-Miocene. Both before and after the shift in ocean currents, mammals and reptiles were more likely than birds to have arrived from Africa. Furthermore, both before and after the mid-Miocene, between two-thirds and three- quarters of colonizers arrive from Africa, and one-quarter to one-fifth from Asia (Table 3). In other words, there is a significant source-by-class interaction, but there is no significant source-by-class-by-time interaction, as demonstrated using a hierarchical loglinear model.

There are no significant changes in the class composition of arriving tetrapods across the mid-Miocene (Table 3). Changes in the relative percentages of vertebrate colonizers belonging to different classes are small. Prior to the mid-Miocene, the percentages of bird (25.9%) and reptile (25.9%) colonizers are identical; mammals (37.0%) surpass both, and all three, in turn, each well surpass amphibians (11.1%). After the mid-Miocene, the dominance of mammalian colonizers increases (50.0%), and avian colonizers (29.4%) are significantly more common than reptilian (17.6%) and amphibian (2.9%) colonizers. However, the overall pattern is the same, with mammals arriving in the highest numbers, followed by birds and reptiles, and then amphibians.

There are no significant changes in the geographic source of the colonizers from before to after the mid-Miocene. During the Cenozoic but prior to the shift in ocean currents, 65.4% of vertebrate colonizers arrived from Africa, while 26.9% arrived from the Indian subcontinent or Southeast Asia, and trivial percentages from elsewhere. After the mid-Miocene, 78.8% of colonizers arrived from Africa, and 21.2% arrived from the Indian subcontinent or Southeast Asia. Despite poor conditions for west-to-east overwater dispersal after the mid-Miocene, colonizers continued to arrive in high numbers. Indeed, during the 15 million years after the mid-Miocene, 34 colonizers arrived; this contrasts with the inferred 27 colonizers that arrived over 50.5 million years of the Cenozoic prior to the mid-Miocene (see reference [13] for discussion of the implications of this patterns for clade extinction, and ghost lineages).

What, then, was the effect of the shift in ocean currents? The important changes from before to after the mid-Miocene are a reduction in the percentage of dispersal-disadvantaged taxa colonizing Madagascar, and a substantial increase in the percentage of volant taxa (Table 3). Dispersal-advantaged taxa move from having had a small advantage (51.9%) to a large advantage (97.1%). Thus, whereas class and source representation remains almost constant, the type of bird and mammal colonizers changes. After the mid-Miocene, most of the mammals that arrived were bats or facultative swimmers instead of terrestrial rafters.

On average, over the entire Cenozoic, volant colonizers outnumber terrestrial ones by a ratio of approximately 2∶1, and they outnumber facultative swimming colonizers by a ratio of over 7∶1. However, these ratios are not constant throughout the Cenozoic. Prior to the mid-Miocene, the ratio of volant to terrestrial colonizers is approximately 1∶1, whereas after the mid-Miocene the ratio is 6∶1. All facultative swimmers appear to have arrived during the latter period, when, like terrestrial rafters, they are outnumbered by volant colonizers (5∶1). In all, most (78.9%) of the known terrestrial colonizers arrived when currents favored west-to-east dispersal from Africa (prior to the mid-Miocene), while only 32.4% of the known volant colonizers arrived during this period.

Figure 4 shows a dendrogram of seven vertebrate assemblages (Madagascar during the Late Cretaceous, Paleogene, Neogene, and Quaternary, and the globe during the Late Cretaceous, Paleogene and Neogene). Each assemblage is represented by the percentages of tetrapod clades belonging to each of four classes: amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. The dendrogram is specifically based on the Pearson correlations between these assemblages’ percent profiles. There are two main clusters – the Cretaceous and the Cenozoic assemblages. The first has only two members – the Cretaceous of Madagascar and the global Cretaceous. The second cluster comprises all of the Cenozoic assemblages including the Quaternary of Madagascar. Madagascar’s Quaternary tetrapod clades as well as its subsets of colonizers from the Paleogene and Neogene resemble (in percentages of amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals) corresponding global values, supporting the view that most of Madagascar’s Quaternary terrestrial vertebrates derive from transoceanic dispersal (and not vicariance) (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Dendrogram based on the correlations between assemblages or the averages of assemblages, joining clusters for which the average similarity between members is the greatest.

Each group is a vector comprised of 4 numbers (the percentages of amphibian, reptile, bird, and mammal families, or in the case of the Cenozoic for Madagascar, the percentages of clades belonging to each class known or inferred to have arrived independently).

Discussion and Conclusions

Our assessment has yielded insights into the factors that shaped the accumulation of Madagascar’s extant vertebrate fauna. Two events, (1) a mass extinction at the end of the Mesozoic and (2) a shift in ocean current direction in the mid-Miocene, have been particularly important. Whereas we tend to think of Madagascar as an isolated “sanctuary of nature”, it is perhaps better perceived as an experiment in differential extinction and filtration. As “filtration conditions” have changed over time (overlain on environmental change, shifts in tempo and mode of evolution, and the speciation and extinction of Malagasy and global vertebrate clades), the numbers and types of colonizers arriving from outside have correspondingly shifted.

Though there is little direct evidence, the K-T mass extinction likely affected Madagascar as it did the rest of the world. Very few vertebrate classes are represented in both the Mesozoic and the late Quaternary deposits of Madagascar. Only one low-level taxon represented in Mesozoic deposits (cf. Erymnochelys) is still represented in the extant vertebrate fauna of Madagascar. Of the vertebrate clades known (on the basis of fossil evidence) or inferred (on the basis of molecular evidence) to have arrived in the Mesozoic, only 37.1% are still extant, whereas over 90% of clades reconstructed as having arrived during the Cenozoic are still extant. Some of the Mesozoic clades may have survived the K-T event, but then succumbed to background clade extinction, but this is unlikely to account for the large difference in the taxonomic composition of the Mesozoic and Quaternary vertebrate faunas.

The striking difference between fishes and other vertebrates in percent survival across the K-T boundary requires explanation. We scored nine families of freshwater fish, three of which are known from Mesozoic deposits and are extinct, and six of which are inferred to have existed in the Mesozoic, but are still extant. This inferred clade survival rate (66.7%) is more than twice that of other vertebrate classes arriving in the Mesozoic. Two possible explanations should be considered. First, researchers studying responses of vertebrates to the asteroid impact and other insults (e.g., volcanic gasses, etc.) at the end of the Cretaceous have noted the unusual resilience of freshwater fishes (e.g., [146], [147]), suggesting that perhaps fishes were more protected from the insults that drove the extinction of more exposed, terrestrial vertebrates. Second, fish may have been less likely to have competitors arriving in the Cenozoic, unlike terrestrial and volant groups. Alternatively, it is possible that the extant freshwater fishes of Madagascar do not derive from Mesozoic ancestors in Madagascar but instead derive from colonizers in the early Cenozoic (see [51]); however this scenario would require crossing a large saltwater barrier. Even if only a few of the fish clades that we scored as descended from Mesozoic ancestors truly arrived, instead, during the early Cenozoic, this would greatly affect our inference regarding the vulnerability of fishes to extinction. We consider amphibians and freshwater fishes highly dispersal-disadvantaged, but this view may be wrong for fishes.

The shift in ocean current during the mid-Miocene affected the probability of successful colonization of different types of vertebrates. Early Cenozoic ocean conditions were conducive to rafting west-to-east from Africa to Madagascar by obligatorily terrestrial (dispersal-disadvantaged) forms, but as the Cenozoic progressed and both Madagascar and continental Africa drifted northward, dispersal-advantaged colonizers gained advantage over dispersal-disadvantaged colonizers. This bias became even more pronounced after the mid-Miocene change in prevailing ocean current direction from west-to-east to east-to-west [13].

What needs to be better understood is the dynamic of changes in Madagascar’s vertebrate biodiversity from the Mesozoic to the end of the Cenozoic (i.e., simultaneously examining the roles of colonization, and mass and background extinctions). The global diversity of tetrapod families is greater now than ever before, with shifts in the relative abundance of tetrapod classes over time [25], [26]. Madagascar had been isolated as an island for over 25 million years at the time of the K-T extinction. It was already distant from the nearest major landmasses with the Indian subcontinent far to the north. What is remarkable is that, despite Madagascar’s isolation since 25 million years prior to the K-T event, subsequent changes in the relative proportions of tetrapod classes on this island paralleled these changes elsewhere – amphibians dominate in the Paleozoic, reptiles in the Mesozoic, and birds and mammals in the Cenozoic, thus bearing testimony to a fundamental lack of isolation of Madagascar from the rest of the world. The relative proportions of Malagasy tetrapods belonging to each of these groups during the Mesozoic correlates strongly with global values, and the very different relative proportions of Malagasy Cenozoic colonizers correlate with the global values for relative abundance of tetrapod families during the Cenozoic.

Within volant groups, bats show a pattern strikingly different from that seen in birds. Malagasy bats arrive overwhelmingly from Africa (the closest source), while birds appear to have less constrained dispersal abilities, arriving from multiple geographic areas, some of which are quite distant. Pteropus is the one exception within Malagasy bats [148]; it is absent from the African mainland, and found on islands in the western Indian Ocean, including Madagascar, as well as Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and Australia [149]. Interestingly, Pteropus also inhabits the island of Pemba where it is separated from the African mainland by only 56 km [150].

While flight has clearly given bats a dispersal advantage compared to terrestrial animals, for most bat groups the power of flight does not appear to have conferred unconstrained dispersal abilities; distance apparently matters more to bats than it does to birds. Flight performance and aerodynamic flight efficiency appear to be limited by phylogenetic constraints; birds are acknowledged to fly longer distances, travel at faster speeds, and more often display migratory behavior than bats [151]. The perception that bats are able to disperse freely appears to have been based in part on the fact that many forms now recognized as distinct taxa [149] were historically grouped under one name, leading to artificial similarity of neighboring faunas. As stated by Andersen ([152], p. lxxvii), “the power of flight no doubt would enable a bat to spread over a much larger area than non-flying Mammalia, but, as a matter of fact, only in a very few cases is there any reason to believe that it has caused it to do so.” Further studies examining the different constraints on bat vs. bird dispersal, as well as the role of storms and cyclonic winds into these events, will yield important insights into this discussion.

In summary, we have shown that the biodiversity of tetrapod colonizers on Madagascar reflects that of the major vertebrate groups on other landmasses, shifting from reptiles to birds and mammals during the transition from the Mesozoic to the Cenozoic. The shift in class composition of arriving clade ancestors after the K-T boundary underscores the importance of overwater dispersal in shaping Madagascar’s extant biodiversity. Madagascar is not simply an isolated island harboring a relict, reptile-rich fauna, but rather it reflects a shift in relative vertebrate taxonomic diversity in temporal synchrony with the rest of the globe. Whereas extant Malagasy fishes appear to derive from Mesozoic ancestors, all extant mammals and almost 95% of extant bird clades derive from Cenozoic colonizers. Two-thirds to four-fifths of extant amphibian and reptile clades are Cenozoic in origin. Madagascar’s vertebrate fauna has been shaped by a combination of vicariance and dispersal, but dispersal explains the presence of the majority of the island’s extant vertebrate fauna.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Database summarizing biogeographic scenarios of Madagascar’s vertebrate fauna. Class was scored as 1 = Osteichthyes, 2 = Amphibia, 3 = Reptilia, 4 = Aves, 5 = Mammalia. Animals were scored as 1 = extinct or 2 = extant. Time was scored as 1 = Pre K-T, 2 = Post K-T to mid-Miocene, and 3 = mid Miocene to present. Source was scored as 1 = Gondwana, 2 = Indo-Madagascar, 3 = Africa, 4 = India or SE Asia. Malagasy fossil record was scored as 1 = none, 2 = Mesozoic, 3 = Quaternary. Type of ancestor was scored as 1 = obligate freshwater, 2 = terrestrial, 3 = facultative swimmer, 4 = volant. Ocean current direction at time of arrival was coded as 1 = favoring dispersal from Africa, 2 = favoring dispersal from Asia. Dispersal ability was coded as 1 = dispersal-disadvantaged (obligate freshwater or terrestrial), 2 = dispersal-advantaged (facultative swimmer or volant). Exceptions to these categorizations of dispersal-advantaged and disadvantaged taxa are provided in footnotes.



The authors are grateful to various Malagasy institutions, especially the Department of Paleontology and Biological Anthropology, University of Antananarivo and the Institute for the Conservation of Tropical Environments (ICTE) for administrative and logistical support, and Madagascar National Parks, the Ministry of Energy and Mines, the Ministry of Higher Education, and the Ministry of Environment and Forests for research permits. We thank Peter Clift and Graeme Eagles for sharing information. Dr. Prosanta Chakrabarty and one anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KES LRG MRS DWK. Performed the experiments: KES LRG MRS DWK. Analyzed the data: KES LRG MRS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KES LRG JRA SMG MV MTI DWK. Wrote the paper: KES LRG JRA SMG MV MTI DWK.


  1. 1. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonesca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.
  2. 2. Goodman SM, Benstead JP (2005) Updated estimates of biotic diversity and endemism for Madagascar. Oryx 39: 73–77.
  3. 3. Reinthal PN, Stiassny MLJ (1991) The freshwater fishes of Madagascar: a study of an endangered fauna with recommendations for a conservation strategy. Conservation Biology 5: 231–242.
  4. 4. Raxworthy CJ, Nussbaum RA (1997) Biogeographic patterns of reptiles in eastern Madagascar. In: Goodman SM, Patterson BD, editors. Natural Change and Human Impact in Madagascar. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. 124–141.
  5. 5. Glaw FM, Vences M (2003) Introduction to Amphibians. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP, editors. The Natural History of Madagascar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 883–898.
  6. 6. Stiassny MLJ, de Pinna M (1994) Basal taxa and the role of cladistic patterns in the evaluation of conservation priorities: a view from freshwater. In: Forey PL, Humphries CJ, Vane-Wright RI, editors. Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 235–249.
  7. 7. Raxworthy C, Forstner M, Nussbaum R (2002) Chameleon radiation by oceanic dispersal. Nature 415: 784–787.
  8. 8. Flynn JJ, Wyss AR (2003) Mesozoic terrestrial vertebrate faunas: the early history of Madagascar’s vertebrate diversity. In: Goodman S, Benstead J, editors. The Natural History of Madagascar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 34–40.
  9. 9. Godfrey LR, Jungers WL (2003) The extinct sloth lemurs. Evolutionary Anthropology 12: 252–263.
  10. 10. Krause DW (2003) Late Cretaceous vertebrates of Madagascar: a window into Gondwanan biogeography at the end of the age of the dinosaurs. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP, editors. The Natural History of Madagascar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 40–47.
  11. 11. Yoder AD, Nowak MD (2006) Has vicariance or dispersal been the predominant force in Madagascar? Only time will tell. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 37: 405–431.
  12. 12. Dewar RE, Richard AF (2012) Madagascar: a history of arrivals and what happened, and what will happen next. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 41: 495–517.
  13. 13. Samonds KE, Godfrey LR, Ali JR, Goodman SM, Vences M, et al. (2012) Spatial and temporal arrival patterns of Madagascar's vertebrate fauna explained by distance, ocean currents, and ancestor type. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 5352–5357.
  14. 14. Gaffney E, Forster C (2003) Side-necked turtle lower jaws (Podocnemididae, Bothremydidae) from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation of Madagascar. American Museum Novitates 3397: 1–13.
  15. 15. Krause DW, Rogers RR, Forster CA, Hartman JH, Buckley GA, et al. (1999) The Late Cretaceous vertebrate fauna of Madagascar: Implications for Gondwanan Paleobiogeography. GSA Today 9: 1–7.
  16. 16. Krause DW, O'Connor PM, Rogers KC, Sampson SD, Buckley GA, et al. (2006) Late Cretaceous terrestrial vertebrates from Madagascar: implications for Latin American biogeography; 2006. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 93: 178–208.
  17. 17. Samonds KE, Zalmout IS, Irwin MT, Krause DW, Rogers RR, et al. (2009) Eotheroides lambondrano, new middle Eocene seacow (Mammalia, Sirenia) from the Mahajanga Basin, northwestern Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29: 1233–1243.
  18. 18. Samonds KE (2007) Late Pleistocene bat fossils from Anjohibe Cave, northwestern Madagascar. Acta Chiropterologica 9: 39–65.
  19. 19. MacPhee RDE (1994) Morphology, adaptations, and relationships of Plesiorycteropus, and a diagnosis of a new order of eutherian mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 220: 1–214.
  20. 20. Burney DA, James HF, Grady FV, Jean-Gervais Rafamantanantsoa R, Wright HT, et al. (1997) Environmental change, extinction and human activity: evidence from caves in NW Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 24: 755–767.
  21. 21. Samonds KE, Parent SN, Muldoon KM, Crowley E, Godfrey LR (2010) Rock matrix surrounding subfossil lemur skull yields diverse collection of mammalian subfossils: implications for reconstructing Madagascar’s paleoenvironments. Malagasy Nature 4: 1–16.
  22. 22. Agnarsson I, Kuntner M (2012) The generation of a biodiversity hotspot: biogeography and phylogeography of the western Indian Ocean islands. In: Anamthawat-Jonsson K, editor. Current Topics in Phylogenetics and Phylogeography of Terrestrial and Aquatic Systems. Rijeka: InTech Publishers. 33–82.
  23. 23. Ali JR, Huber M (2010) Mammalian biodiversity on Madagascar controlled by ocean currents. Nature 463: 653–656.
  24. 24. Agresti A (1990) Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  25. 25. Sahney S, Benton MJ, Ferry PA (2010) Links between global taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on land. Biology Letters 6: 544–547.
  26. 26. Benton MJ (2010) The origins of modern biodiversity on land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 3667–3679.
  27. 27. Ali JR, Aitchison JC (2008) Gondwana to Asia: plate tectonics, paleogeography and the biological connectivity of the Indian sub-continent from the Middle Jurassic through latest Eocene (166–35 Ma). Earth-Science Reviews 88: 145–166.
  28. 28. Eagles G, Konig M (2008) A model of plate kinematics in Gondwana breakup. Geophysical Journal International 173: 703–717.
  29. 29. Schettino A, Scotese CR (2005) Apparent polar wander paths for the major continents (200 Ma to the present day): a palaeomagnetic reference frame for global plate tectonic reconstructions. Geophysical Journal International 163: 727–759.
  30. 30. Rabinowitz PD, Coffin MF, Falvey D (1983) The separation of Madagascar and Africa. Science 220: 67–69.
  31. 31. Gradstein F, Ogg J, Smith A, editors (2005) A Geologic Time Scale 2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 589 p.
  32. 32. Ali JR, Krause DW (2011) Late Cretaceous bioconnections between Indo-Madagascar and Antarctica: refutation of the Gunnerus Ridge causeway hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography 38: 1855–1872.
  33. 33. Hay WW, DeConto RM, Wold CN, Willson KM, Voigt S, et al.. (1999) An alternative global Cretaceous paleogeography. In: Barrera E, Johnson C, editors. Evolution of the Cretaceous Ocean-Climate System: Geological Society of America Special Paper. 1–74.
  34. 34. Krause DW, Hartman JH, Wells NA (1997) Late Cretaceous vertebrates from Madagascar: implications for biotic change in deep time. In: Goodman SM, Patterson BD, editors. Natural Change and Human Impact in Madagascar. Washington D. C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. 3–43.
  35. 35. Sampson SD, Witmer LM, Forster CA, Krause DW, O'Connor PM, et al. (1998) Predatory dinosaur remains from Madagascar: implications for the Cretaceous biogeography of Gondwana. Science 280: 1048–1051.
  36. 36. Noonan BP, Chippendale PT (2006) Vicariant origin of Malagasy reptiles supports Late Cretaceous Antarctic landbridge. American Naturalist 168: 730–741.
  37. 37. Ali JR, Aitchison JC (2009) Kerguelen Plateau and the Late Cretaceous southern-continent bioconnection hypothesis: tales from a topographical ocean. Journal of Biogeography 36: 1778–1784.
  38. 38. Melluso L, Sheth HC, Mahoney JJ, Morra V, Petrone CM, et al. (2009) Correlations between silicic volcanic rocks of the St Mary's Islands (southwestern India) and eastern Madagascar: implications for Late Cretaceous India-Madagascar reconstructions. Journal of the Geological Society 166: 283–294.
  39. 39. Storey M, Mahoney JJ, Saunders AD, Duncan RA, Kelley SP, et al. (1995) Timing of hot spot-related volcanism and the breakup of Madagascar and India. Science 267: 852–855.
  40. 40. Jablonski D (1994) Extinctions in the fossil record (and discussion). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 344: 11–17.
  41. 41. Morgan J, Lana C, Kersley A, Coles B, Belcher C, et al. (2006) Analyses of shocked quartz at the global K-P boundary indicate an origin from a single, high-angle, oblique impact at Chicxulub. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 251: 264–279.
  42. 42. Alvarez LW, Alvarez W, Asaro F, Michel HV (1980) Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction. Science 208: 1095–1108.
  43. 43. Keller G, Adatte T, Gardin S, Bartolini A, Bajpai S (2008) Main Deccan volcanism phase ends near the K–T boundary: evidence from the Krishna-Godavari Basin, SE India. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 268: 293–311.
  44. 44. Gottfried M, Krause D (1998) First record of gars (Lepisosteidae, Actinopterygii) on Madagascar: Late Cretaceous remains from the Mahajanga Basin. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18: 275–279.
  45. 45. Sparks JS (2004) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the Malagasy and South Asian cichlids (Teleostei: Perciformes: Cichlidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 599–614.
  46. 46. Sparks JS, Smith WL (2004) Phylogeny and biogeography of the Malagasy and Australian rainbowfishes (Teleostei: Melanotaenioidei): Gondwanan vicariance and evolution in freshwater. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 719–734.
  47. 47. Sparks JS, Smith WL (2004) Phylogeny and biogeography of cichlid fishes (Teleostei: Perciformes: Cichlidae). Cladistics 20: 501–517.
  48. 48. Sparks JS, Smith WL (2005) Freshwater fishes, dispersal ability, and nonevidence: “Gondwana Life Rafts” to the rescue. Systematic Biology 54: 158–165.
  49. 49. Chakrabarty P, Davis MP, Sparks JS (2012) The first record of a trans-oceanic sister-group relationship between obligate vertebrate troglobites. PLoS ONE 7: e44083.
  50. 50. Sparks JS, Chakrabarty P (2012) Revision of the endemic Malagasy cavefish genus Typhleotris (Teleostei: Gobiiformes: Milyeringidae), with discussion of its phylogenetic placement and description of a new species. American Museum Novitates 3764: 1–28.
  51. 51. Crottini A, Madsen O, Poux C, Strauss A, Vieites DR, et al. (2012) A vertebrate timetree elucidates the biogeographic pattern of a major biotic change around the K-T boundary in Madagascar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 5358–5363.
  52. 52. Evans SE, Jones MEH, Krause DW (2008) A giant frog with South American affinities from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 2951–2956.
  53. 53. van der Meijden A, Vences M, Hoegg S, Boistel R, Channing A, et al. (2007) Nuclear gene phylogeny of narrow-mouthed toads (Family: Microhylidae) and a discussion of competing hypotheses concerning their biogeographical origins. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 1017–1030.
  54. 54. Gaffney ES, Krause DW, Zalmout IS (2009) Kinkonychelys, a new side-necked turtle (Pelomedusoides: Bothremydidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. American Museum Novitates 3662: 1–25.
  55. 55. Gaffney ES, Krause DW (2011) Sokatra, a new side-necked turtle (Late Cretaceous, Madagascar) and the diversification of the main groups of Pelomedusoides. American Museum Novitates 3728: 1–28.
  56. 56. Buckley G, Brochu C, Krause D, Pol D (2000) A pug-nosed crocodyliform from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Nature 405: 941–944.
  57. 57. Rasmusson Simons EL, Buckley GA (2009) New material of “Trematochampsaoblita (Crocodyliformes,Trematochampsidae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29: 599–604.
  58. 58. Krause DW, Kley NJ (2010) Simosuchus clarki (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30: 236 pp.
  59. 59. LaDuke TC, Krause DW, Scanlon JD, Kley NJ (2010) A Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) snake assemblage from the Maevarano Formation, Mahajanga Basin, Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30: 109–138.
  60. 60. Curry-Rogers K, Forster C (2001) The last of the dinosaur titans: a new sauropod from Madagascar. Nature 412: 530–534.
  61. 61. Sampson S, Carrano M, Forster C (2001) A bizarre predatory dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Nature 409: 504–506.
  62. 62. Sampson SD, Krause DW (2007) Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 8: 184 pp.
  63. 63. Forster CA, Sampson SD, Chiappe LM, Krause DW (1998) The theropod ancestry of birds: new evidence from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Science 279: 1915–1919.
  64. 64. Vidal N, Marin J, Morini M, Donnellan S, Branch W, et al.. (2010) Blindsnake evolutionary tree reveals long history on Gondwana. Biology Letters doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0220.
  65. 65. Raselimanana AP, Noonan B, Karanth KP, Gauthier J, Yoder AD (2009) Phylogeny and evolution of Malagasy plated lizards. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50: 336–344.
  66. 66. Fain MG, Houde P (2004) Parallel radiations in the primary clades of birds. Evolution 58: 2558–2573.
  67. 67. Bibi F, Shabel A, Kraatz B, Stidham T (2006) New fossil ratite (Aves: Palaeognathae) eggshell discoveries from the late Miocene Baynunah Formation of the United Arab Emirates, Arabian Peninsula. Palaeontologia Electronica 9.1.2A.
  68. 68. Forster CA, Chiappe LM, Krause DW, Sampson SD (1996) The first Cretaceous bird from Madagascar. Nature 382: 532–534.
  69. 69. O’Connor PM, Forster CA (2010) A Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) avifauna from the Maevarano Formation, Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30: 1178–1201.
  70. 70. Flynn JJ, Parrish JM, Rakotosamimanana B, Simpson WF, Wyss AR (1999) A Middle Jurassic mammal from Madagascar. Nature 401: 57–60.
  71. 71. Krause DW, Prasad GVR, von Koenigswald W, Sahni A, Grine FE (1997) Cosmopolitanism among Gondwanan Late Cretaceous mammals. Nature 390: 504–507.
  72. 72. Krause DW (2001) Fossil molar from a Madagascan marsupial. Nature 412: 497–498.
  73. 73. Krause DW (2013) Gondwanatheria and ?Multituberculata from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences In press.
  74. 74. Azuma Y, Kumazawa Y, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Nishida M (2008) Mitogenomic evaluation of the historical biogeography of cichlids toward reliable dating of teleostean divergences. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 215.
  75. 75. Vences M, Freyhof J, Sonnenberg R, Kosuch J, Veith M (2001) Reconciling fossils and molecules: Cenozoic divergence of cichlid fishes and the biogeography of Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography 28: 1091–1099.
  76. 76. Near TJ, Eytan RI, Dornburg A, Kuhn KL, Moore JA, et al. (2012) Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 13698–13703.
  77. 77. Ruane S, Pyron RA, Burbrink FT (2011) Phylogenetic relationships of the Cretaceous frog Beelzebufo from Madagascar and the placement of fossil constraints based on temporal and phylogenetic evidence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 274–285.
  78. 78. Kennett J, Stott L (1991) Abrupt deep-sea warming, palaeoceanographic changes and benthic extinctions at the end of the Palaeocene. Nature 353: 225–229.
  79. 79. Röhl U, Bralower T, Norris R, Wefer G (2000) New chronology for the late Paleocene thermal maximum and its environmental implications. Geology 28: 927–930.
  80. 80. Norris RD, Röhl U (1999) Carbon cycling and chronology of climate warming during the Palaeocene/Eocene transition. Nature 401: 775–778.
  81. 81. Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, Thomas E, Billups K (2001) Trends, rythmns, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to Present. Science 292: 686–693.
  82. 82. Thomas DJ, Zachos JC, Bralower TJ, Thomas E, Bohaty S (2002) Warming the fuel for the fire: evidence for the thermal dissociation of methane hydrate during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum. Geology 30: 1067–1070.
  83. 83. Wing SL, Harrington GJ, Smith FA, Bloch JI, Boyer DM, et al. (2005) Transient floral change and rapid global warming at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Science 5750: 993–996.
  84. 84. Hooker JJ, Collinson ME, Sille NP (2004) Eocene-Oligocene mammalian faunal turnover in the Hampshire Basin, UK: calibration to the global time scale and the major cooling event. Journal of the Geological Society 161: 161–172.
  85. 85. Meng J, McKenna MC (1998) Faunal turnovers of Palaeogene mammals from the Mongolian Plateau. Nature 394: 364–367.
  86. 86. Guo Z, Ruddiman W, Hao Q, Wu H, Qiao Y, et al. (2002) Onset of Asian desertification by 22 Myr ago inferred from loess deposits in China. Nature 416: 159–163.
  87. 87. Clift PD (2006) Controls on the erosion of Cenozoic Asia and the flux of clastic sediment to the ocean. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 241: 571–590.
  88. 88. Sun X, Wang P (2005) How old is the Asian monsoon system? - palaeobotanical records from China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 222: 181–222.
  89. 89. Herold N, Huber M, Müller RD, Seton M (2012) Modeling the Miocene climatic optimum: ocean circulation. Paleoceanography 27: PA1209.
  90. 90. de Ruijter W, Ridderinkhof H, Schouten M (2005) Variability of the southwest Indian Ocean. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 363: 63–76.
  91. 91. Schott FA, Xie SP, McCreary JP (2009) Indian Ocean circulation and climate variability. Reviews of Geophysics 47: 46.
  92. 92. Vences M, Kosuch J, Glaw F, Bohme W, Veith M (2003) Molecular phylogeny of hyperoliid treefrogs: biogeographic origin of Malagasy and Seychellean taxa and re-analysis of familial paraphyly. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 41: 205–215.
  93. 93. Vences M, Vieites DR, Glaw F, Brinkmann H, Kosuch J, et al. (2003) Multiple overseas dispersal in amphibians. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270: 2435–2442.
  94. 94. Van Bocxlaer IV, Roelants K, Biju S, Nagaraju J, Bossuyt F (2006) Late Cretaceous vicariance in Gondwanan amphibians. PLoS ONE 1: e74.
  95. 95. Kurabayashi A, Sumida M, Yonekawa H, Glaw F, Vences M, et al. (2008) Phylogeny, recombination, and mechanisms of stepwise mitochondrial genome reorganization in mantellid frogs from Madagascar. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 874–891.
  96. 96. Townsend TM, Tolley KA, Glaw F, Böhme W, Vences M (2011) Eastward from Africa: palaeocurrent-mediated chameleon dispersal to the Seychelles islands. Biology Letters 7: 225–228.
  97. 97. Tolley KA, Townsend TM, Vences M (2013) Large-scale phylogeny of chameleons suggests African origins and Eocene diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. In press.
  98. 98. Vences M, Wanke S, Vieites DR, Branch WR, Glaw F, et al. (2004) Natural colonization or introduction? Phylogeographical relationships and morphological differentiation of house geckos (Hemidactylus) from Madagascar. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 83: 115–130.
  99. 99. Crottini A, Dordel J, Köhler J, Glaw F, Schmitz A, et al. (2009) A multilocus phylogeny of Malagasy scincid lizards elucidates the relationships of the fossorial genera Androngo and Cryptoscincus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53: 345–350.
  100. 100. Rocha S, Carretero MA, Vences M, Glaw F, Harris DJ (2006) Deciphering patterns of transoceanic dispersal: the evolutionary origin and biogeography of coastal lizards (Cryptoblepharus) in the Western Indian Ocean region. Journal of Biogeography 33: 13–22.
  101. 101. Nagy Z, Joger U, Wink M, Glaw F, Vences M (2003) Multiple colonization of Madagascar and Socotra by colubrid snakes: evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial gene phylogenies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270: 2613–2621.
  102. 102. Beresford P, Barker FK, Ryan PG, Crowe TM (2005) African endemics span the tree of songbirds (Passeri): molecular systematics of several evolutionary 'enigmas'. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272: 849–858.
  103. 103. Fuchs J, Cruaud C, Couloux A, Pasquet E (2007) Complex biogeographic history of the cuckoo-shrikes and allies (Passeriformes : Campephagidae) revealed by mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 138–153.
  104. 104. Reddy S, Driskell A, Rabosky DL, Hackett SJ, Schulenberg TS (2012) Diversification and the adaptive radiation of the vangas of Madagascar. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 2062–2071.
  105. 105. Wright TF, Schirtzinger EE, Matsumoto T, Eberhard JR, Graves GR, et al. (2008) A multilocus molecular phylogeny of the parrots (Psittaciformes): support for a Gondwanan origin during the Cretaceous. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 2141–2156.
  106. 106. Jønsson KA, Fabre P-H, Fritz SA, Etienne RS, Ricklefs RE, et al. (2012) Ecological and evolutionary determinants for the adaptive radiation of the Madagascan vangas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 6620–6625.
  107. 107. Warren BH, Bermingham E, Prys-Jones RP, Thebaud C (2006) Immigration, species radiation and extinction in a highly diverse songbird lineage: white-eyes on Indian Ocean islands. Molecular Ecology 15: 3769–3786.
  108. 108. Yoder AD, Burns MM, Zehr S, Delefosse T, Veron G, et al. (2003) Single origin of Malagasy Carnivora from an African ancestor. Nature 421: 734–737.
  109. 109. Poux C, Madsen O, Glos J, de Jong WW, Vences M (2008) Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Malagasy tenrecs: influence of data partitioning and taxon sampling on dating analyses. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 102.
  110. 110. Horvath JE, Weisrock DW, Embry SL, Fiorentino I, Balhoff JP, et al. (2008) Development and application of a phylogenomic toolkit: resolving the evolutionary history of Madagascar's lemurs. Genome Research 18: 489–499.
  111. 111. Poux C, Madsen O, Marquard E, Vieites DR, de Jong WW, et al. (2005) Asynchronous colonization of Madagascar by the four endemic clades of primates, tenrecs, carnivores, and rodents as inferred from nuclear genes. Systematic Biology 54: 719–730.
  112. 112. Springer MS, Meredith RW, Gatesy J, Emerling CA, Park J, et al. (2012) Dynamics and historical biogeography of primate diversification inferred from a species supermatrix. PLoS ONE 7: e49521.
  113. 113. Masters JC, de Wit MJ, Asher RJ (2006) Reconciling the origins of Africa, India and Madagascar with vertebrate dispersal scenarios. Folia Primatologica 77: 399–418.
  114. 114. Stevens NJ, Heesy CP (2006) Malagasy primate origins: phylogenies, fossils, and biogeographic reconstructions. Folia Primatologica 77: 419–433.
  115. 115. Asher R, Novacek M, Geisler J (2003) Relationships of endemic African mammals and their fossil relatives based on morphological and molecular evidence. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 10: 131–194.
  116. 116. Horovitz I (2004) Eutherian mammal systematics and the origins of South American ungulates as based on postcranial osteology. In: Dawson MR, Lillegraven JA, editors. Fanfare for an Uncommon Paleontologist: Papers in Honor of Malcolm C McKenna: Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History. 63–79.
  117. 117. Redi CA, Garagna S, Zuccotti M, Capanna E (2007) Genome size: a novel genomic signature in support of Afrotheria. Journal of Molecular Evolution 64: 484–487.
  118. 118. Teeling EC, Springer MS, Madsen O, Bates P, O'Brien SJ, et al. (2005) A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307: 580–584.
  119. 119. Kroon D, Steens T, Troelstra SR (1991) Onset of monsoonal related upwelling in the western Arabian Sea as revealed by planktonic foraminifers. In: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Prell W, Niitsuma N, al , editors. 117: 257–264.
  120. 120. Prell W, Kutzbach J (1992) Sensitivity of the Indian monsoon to forcing parameters and implications for its evolution. Nature 360: 647–653.
  121. 121. Vences M, Kosuch J, Rodel MO, Lotters S, Channing A, et al. (2004) Phylogeography of Ptychadena mascareniensis suggests transoceanic dispersal in a widespread African-Malagasy frog lineage. Journal of Biogeography 31: 593–601.
  122. 122. Measey GJ, Vences M, Drewes RC, Chiari Y, Melo M, et al. (2007) Freshwater paths across the ocean: molecular phylogeny of the frog Ptychadena newtoni gives insights into amphibian colonization of oceanic islands. Journal of Biogeography 34: 7–20.
  123. 123. Caccone A, Amato G, Gratry O, Behler J, Powell J (1999) A molecular phylogeny of four endangered Madagascar tortoises based on mtDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 1–9.
  124. 124. Palkovacs EP, Gerlach J, Caccone A (2002) The evolutionary origin of Indian Ocean tortoises (Dipsochelys). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 216–227.
  125. 125. Brochu CA (2007) Morphology, relationships, and biogeographical significance of an extinct horned crocodile (Crocodylia, Crocodylidae) from the Quaternary of Madagascar. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150: 835–863.
  126. 126. Brochu CA (2003) Phylogenetic approaches toward crocodilian history. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 31: 357–397.
  127. 127. Bickelmann C, Klein N (2009) The late Pleistocene horned crocodile Voay robustus (Grandidier & Vaillant, 1872) from Madagascar in the Museum fur Naturkunde Berlin. Fossil Record 12: 13–21.
  128. 128. Amato G, DeSalle R, Blum MJ (2010) Molecular assessment of population differentiation and individual assignment potential of Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) populations. Conservation Genetics 11: 1435–1443.
  129. 129. Voelker G (2002) Systematics and historical biogeography of wagtails: dispersal versus vicariance revisited. Condor 104: 725–739.
  130. 130. Warren BH, Bermingham E, Bowie RCK, Prys-Jones RP, Thebaud C (2003) Molecular phylogeography reveals island colonization history and diversification of western Indian Ocean sunbirds (Nectarinia: Nectariniidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 67–85.
  131. 131. Warren BH, Bermingham E, Prys-Jones RP, Thebaud C (2005) Tracking island colonization history and phenotypic shifts in Indian Ocean bulbuls (Hypsipetes: Pycnonotidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 271–287.
  132. 132. Zuccon D, Cibois A, Pasquet E, Ericson PGP (2006) Nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data reveal the major lineages of starlings, mynas and related taxa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 333–344.
  133. 133. Pasquet E, Pons JM, Fuchs J, Cruaud C, Bretagnolle V (2007) Evolutionary history and biogeography of the drongos (Dicruridae), a tropical Old World clade of corvoid passerines. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 158–167.
  134. 134. Stuenes S (1989) Taxonomy, habits and relationships of the sub-fossil Madagascan hippopotamuses, Hippopotamus lemerlei and H. madagascariensis. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 9: 241–268.
  135. 135. Godfrey LR (1986) The tale of the tsy-aomby-aomby. The Sciences 26: 48–51.
  136. 136. Fovet W, Faure M, Guérin C (2011) Hippopotamus guldbergi n. sp.: Révision du statut d’Hippopotamus madagascariensis Guldberg, 1883, après plus d’un siècle de malentendus et de confusions taxonomiques. Zoosystema 33: 61–82.
  137. 137. Boisserie J-R (2005) The phylogeny and taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): a review based on morphology and cladistic analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 143: 1–26.
  138. 138. Goodman SM (2011) Les chauves-souris de Madagascar. Antananarivo: Association Vahatra. 129 p.
  139. 139. Russell AL, Goodman SM, Cox MP (2008) Coalescent analyses support multiple mainland-to-island dispersals in the evolution of Malagasy Triaenops bats (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae). Journal of Biogeography 35: 995–1003.
  140. 140. O'Brien J, Mariani C, Olson L, Russell AL, Say L, et al. (2009) Multiple colonisations of the western Indian Ocean by Pteropus fruit bats (Megachiroptera: Pteropodidae): the furthest islands were colonised first. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51: 294–303.
  141. 141. Lamb JM, Ralph TMC, Naidoo T, Taylor PJ, Ratrimomanarivo F, et al. (2011) Toward a molecular phylogeny for the Molossidae (Chiroptera) of the Afro-Malagasy region. Acta Chiropterologica 13: 1–16.
  142. 142. Goodman SM, Chan L, Nowak M, Yoder A (2010) Phylogeny and biogeography of western Indian Ocean Rousettus (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae). Journal of Mammalogy 91: 593–606.
  143. 143. Hutterer R, Tranier M (1990) The immigration of the Asian house shrew (Suncus murinus) into Africa and Madagascar. In: Peters G, Hutterer R, editors. Vertebrates in the Tropics. Bonn: Museum Alexander Koenig. 309–319.
  144. 144. Goodman SM, Ganzhorn JU, Rakotondravony D (2003) Introduction to the mammals. In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP, editors. The Natural History of Madagascar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1159–1186.
  145. 145. Omar H, Adamson EAS, Bhassu S, Goodman SM, Soarimalala V, et al. (2011) Phylogenetic relationships of Malayan and Malagasy pygmy shrews of the genus Suncus (Soricomorpha: Soricidae) inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 59: 237–243.
  146. 146. Sheehan PM, Fastovsky DE (1992) Major extinctions of land-dwelling vertebrates at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary, eastern Montana. Geology 20: 556–560.
  147. 147. Cavin L (2001) Effects of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary event on bony fishes. In: Buffetaut E, Koeberl C, editors. Geological and Biological Effects of Impact Events. Berlin: Springer. 141–158.
  148. 148. Chan LM, Goodman SM, Nowak MD, Weisrock DW, Yoder AD (2011) Increased population sampling confirms low genetic divergence among Pteropus (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) fruit bats of Madagascar and other western Indian Ocean islands. PLoS Currents: Tree of Life. 2011 Mar 22 [last modified: 2012 Apr 4]. Edition 1. doi: 10.1371/currents.RRN1226.
  149. 149. Simmons NB (2005) Order Chiroptera. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM, editors. Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 312–529.
  150. 150. Entwistle A, Corp N (1997) Status and distribution of the Pemba flying fox Pteropus voeltzkowi. Oryx 31: 135–142.
  151. 151. Muijres FT, Johansson LC, Bowlin MS, Winter Y, Hedenström A (2012) Comparing aerodynamic efficiency in birds and bats suggests better flight performance in birds. PLoS ONE 7: e37335.
  152. 152. Andersen K (1912) Catalogue of the Chiroptera in the collections of the British Museum I. Megachiroptera. London: British Museum (Natural History).
  153. 153. GEBCO (2003) General Bathrymetric Chart of the Oceans Digital Atlas (GDA). Liverpool: British Oceanographic Data Centre.
  154. 154. Kosuch J, Vences M, Dubois A, Ohler A, Bohme W (2001) Out of Asia: mitochondrial DNA evidence for an oriental origin of tiger frogs, genus Hoplobatrachus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 398–407.
  155. 155. Vargas-Ramírez M, Vences M, Branch WR, Daniels SR, Glaw F, et al. (2010) Deep genealogical lineages in the widely distributed African helmeted terrapin: evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (Testudines: Pelomedusidae: Pelomedusa subrufa). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56: 428–440.
  156. 156. Hingston M, Goodman SM, Ganzhorn JU, Sommer S (2005) Reconstruction of the colonization of southern Madagascar by introduced Rattus rattus. Journal of Biogeography 32: 1549–1559.
  157. 157. Duplantier J-M, Orth A, Catalan J, Bonhomme F (2002) Evidence for a mitochondrial lineage originating from the Arabian peninsula in the Madagascar house mouse (Mus musculus). Heredity 89: 154–158.