Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Genetic Variation of the Ghrelin Signalling System in Individuals with Amphetamine Dependence

  • Petra Suchankova ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Petra Suchankova, Elisabet Jerlhag

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    ⨯
  • Elisabet Jerlhag ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Petra Suchankova, Elisabet Jerlhag

    elisabet.jerlhag@pharm.gu.se

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    ⨯
  • Nitya Jayaram-Lindström,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    ⨯
  • Staffan Nilsson,

    Affiliation Department of Mathematical Statistics, Institute of Mathematical Sciences at Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

    ⨯
  • Kjell Toren,

    Affiliation Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    ⨯
  • Annika Rosengren,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    ⨯
  • Jörgen A. Engel,

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    ⨯
  • Johan Franck

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    ⨯

Abstract

The development of amphetamine dependence largely depends on the effects of amphetamine in the brain reward systems. Ghrelin, an orexigenic peptide, activates the reward systems and is required for reward induced by alcohol, nicotine, cocaine and amphetamine in mice. Human genetic studies have shown that polymorphisms in the pre-proghrelin (GHRL) as well as GHS-R1A (GHSR) genes are associated with high alcohol consumption, increased weight and smoking in males. Since the heritability factor underlying drug dependence is shared between different drugs of abuse, we here examine the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in the GHRL and GHSR, and amphetamine dependence. GHRL and GHSR SNPs were genotyped in Swedish amphetamine dependent individuals (n = 104) and controls from the general population (n = 310). A case-control analysis was performed and SNPs and haplotypes were additionally tested for association against Addiction Severity Interview (ASI) composite score of drug use. The minor G-allele of the GHSR SNP rs2948694, was more common among amphetamine dependent individuals when compared to controls (pc = 0.02). A significant association between the GHRL SNP rs4684677 and ASI composite score of drug use was also reported (pc = 0.03). The haplotype analysis did not add to the information given by the individual polymorphisms. Although genetic variability of the ghrelin signalling system is not a diagnostic marker for amphetamine dependence and problem severity of drug use, the present results strengthen the notion that ghrelin and its receptor may be involved in the development of addictive behaviours and may thus serve as suitable targets for new treatments of such disorders.

Citation: Suchankova P, Jerlhag E, Jayaram-Lindström N, Nilsson S, Toren K, Rosengren A, et al. (2013) Genetic Variation of the Ghrelin Signalling System in Individuals with Amphetamine Dependence. PLoS ONE 8(4): e61242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061242

Editor: Huiping Zhang, Yale University, United States of America

Received: November 9, 2012; Accepted: March 7, 2013; Published: April 8, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Suchankova et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council (grant numbers 30207123, K2006-21X-04247-33-3 and 2009-2782), the Swedish National Drug Policy Coordinator (a government agency), and the Stockholm County Council. The Swedish brain foundation, LUA/ALF (grant no. 148251) from the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Alcohol research council of the Swedish alcohol retailing monopoly and the foundations of Adlerbertska, Fredrik and Ingrid Thuring, Tore Nilsson, Längmanska, Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg, Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren, Knut and Alice Wallenberg, Magnus Bergvall, Anérs, Jeansons, Åke Wiberg, NovoNordisk and the Swedish Society of Medicine. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Amphetamine and its derivatives are widely abused drugs and amphetamine dependence is of great concern in today's society. The development of drug dependence, such as for amphetamine, largely depends on the effects of amphetamine in the brain reward systems including the mesolimbic dopamine system (for review see [1]). These systems are important in mediating the rewarding properties of natural incentives, e.g. food, as well as of drugs, such as alcohol and amphetamine [2]–[4]. The drug response to amphetamine is heterogeneous and depends on factors such as expectancies of the drug, psychiatric disorders or personality traits, gender differences as well as genetics (for review see [5]). The heritability factor underlying drug dependence is shared between different drugs of abuse [6]–[8], and we hypothesize that ghrelin and its receptor, growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1A), may be common denominators.

Ghrelin, a circulating orexigenic stomach-derived hormone, regulates energy homeostasis mainly via hypothalamic GHS-R1A [9]–[13]. Centrally or peripherally administered ghrelin has also been shown to activate the reward systems, specifically the cholinergic-dopaminergic reward link [14]–[18], and may thereby increase the incentive value of motivated behaviours such as food seeking. Supportively, ghrelin signalling has been implicated in hedonic feeding as well as in food-motivated behaviours [19]–[24].

In addition, central ghrelin signalling is required for the reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse as supported by preclinical findings (for review see [25] or [26]). Specifically, a GHS-R1A antagonist attenuates the rewarding properties of alcohol, nicotine, cocaine and amphetamine as measured by locomotor stimulation, accumbal dopamine release and condition place preference [27]–[29]. In rodents, ghrelin has been shown to enhance cocaine-induced locomotor stimulation, to condition a place preference for cocaine and to induce cocaine-seeking behaviours [30]–[32]. Moreover, ghrelin increases, and a GHS-R1A antagonist decreases the consumption and operant self-administration of alcohol in rodents [28], [33], [34].

We have obtained support for these preclinical data in human genetic studies in which single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in the pre-proghrelin (GHRL) as well as GHS-R1A (GHSR) genes were associated with high alcohol consumption, increased weight and smoking in males as well as with personality traits related to alcohol use disorder in males with an alcohol use disorder [35]–[37]. Additionally, associations between a GHRL haplotype and paternal heredity of alcohol use disorder in females as well as increased weight in alcohol dependent males has been reported [37]. Haplotypes of the ghrelin signalling system have also been linked to increased sucrose consumption [23]. Given the shared genetic contribution to drug abuse, that polymorphisms in ghrelin related genes are associated with alcohol intake and smoking and that GHS-R1A antagonists blocks amphetamine-induced reward in mice, we hypothesise that genetic variations in the GHRL and GHSR may be associated with amphetamine dependence in humans. Thus, in the present association study SNPs and haplotypes of the GHRL and GHSR were investigated in Swedish individuals with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, (DSM-IV) diagnosis of amphetamine dependence and who had additionally been assessed using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI).

Methods

Subjects

All individuals with a history of amphetamine dependence (26 women, 78 men) were recruited at the Stockholm Centre for Dependency Disorders (Beroendecentrum Stockholm), Sweden. The individuals had a DSM-IV diagnosis of amphetamine dependence and reported amphetamine as their primary drug of choice. They did not have a current diagnosis of any other major psychiatric disorders (such as bipolar, schizophrenia) or major somatic disorder (e.g. heart disease). Subjects testing positive for any other illicit substance were excluded. Data on nicotine use was not systematically collected on all patients, however, a majority (85%) were dependent on nicotine. The mean age of the patients was 40.3 years (SD 10.5, range 20–60). All patients gave their written informed consent to the study and the protocol was approved by the regional ethics review board at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

The control subjects consist of individuals (214 women, 96 men) randomly selected among a larger sample of low alcohol consuming individuals (i.e. self-reported alcohol consumption of 0.3–2.3 g alcohol/day) recruited for the INTERGENE study (see [36] for detailed description of this selection). These controls are Caucasians and did not self-report any drug use. However, 54 (out of 308 i.e. 17.8%) reported that they were current smokers. INTERGENE is a population based research program with the main objective of assessing the INTERplay between GENEtic susceptibility and environmental factors in the risk of developing chronic diseases in western Sweden [38]–[40]. The mean age of the selected control subjects was 56.6 years (SD 13.5, range 20–76). All control subjects gave their written informed consent to the study and the protocol was approved by the regional ethics review board at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Clinical Assessment

The individuals in the present study are Caucasians and fulfilled the diagnosis of amphetamine dependence based on the DSM-IV criteria. In addition to the DSM-IV interview, patient alcohol and drug usage patterns were measured via the Addiction Severity Interview (ASI), a structured interview which maps the severity and duration of dependence across seven sub-scales [41]. 27 subjects were not interviewed with the ASI. All individuals included had the DSM-IV diagnosis of current amphetamine dependence. They did not have co-diagnosis of any other substance dependence (Table 1). 51 of 62 individuals met ASI criteria for previous heavy alcohol consumption (more than 4 drinks for women and 5 for men, per occasion) in the past year. The urine toxicology of the patients confirmed that all patients were current D/L-amphetamine users. The average length of use was 13 years of regular usage (>4 days per week). Consumption ranged between 1–2 grams per occasion (average consumption of 6 grams per week). These amounts are typical for chronic amphetamine dependent individuals treated at the clinic. See table 1 for data on patient substance abuse characteristics.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Patient Substance Abuse Characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061242.t001

SNP selection and genotyping

The Tag SNP selection procedure has been described in detail previously [37]. Briefly, genotyping data for the pro-ghrelin and GHS-R1A genes for the Caucasian CEPH population was downloaded from the International Haplotype Mapping Project web site (http://www.hapmap.org). Six Tag SNPs in the pro-ghrelin gene (rs4684677, rs42451, rs35680, rs3491141, rs696217, and rs26802) and four Tag SNPs in the GHS-R1A gene (rs2948694, rs572169, rs2232165, and rs495225) were selected by using the Tagger function in the Haploview software with the r2 set to a minimum of 0.80 (for their location and the SNPs which they tag). Out of these SNPs rs4684677 rs3491141, rs696217, rs572169, and rs495225 were force-included due to previous studies (for refs, see [37]).

The genotyping procedure has been described in detail previously [37]. Human genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples from both patients and controls using the QIAamp 96 DNA Blood Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The studied SNPs were genotyped from the obtained genomic DNA using TaqMan Pre-Designed SNP Genotyping Assays® (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) using the TaqMan Allelic Discrimination technology [42]. In the TaqMan Pre-Designed SNP Genotyping Assays® a polymerase chain reaction amplifies the region around the SNPs. This polymerase chain reaction also includes two oligonucleotide probes, specific for one SNP allele each. These probes are labelled with one fluorescent reporter dye each (VIC and FAM) at one end and a quencher that absorbs fluorescence at the other end. When the DNA polymerase extends the newly synthesized DNA strand, it cleaves any probe that is tightly bound to the DNA, causing an increase in fluorescence. After polymerase chain reaction amplification the signal strength of each reporter molecule is measured and displayed in a scatter plot with the fluorescence of the probes are plotted on the X- and Y-axis. Given that each point represents one sample the genotype of each sample can be determined. For details on the studied Tag SNPs and the TaqMan assay ID, see table 2.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Studied Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061242.t002

Statistical analyses

Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed for all genotyped SNPs in cases and controls separately. Allele frequencies were compared between amphetamine dependent patients and controls using Chi2-test. Homogeneity of odds ratios was tested with a Breslow-Day test. The possible influence of the studied SNPs on the ASI composite score of drug use was investigated using linear regression with sex and age as covariates.

For each gene, haplotype analyses were performed including all SNPs using stepwise logistic regression in the case-control analysis and linear regression including sex and age as covariates in the ASI composite score of drug use analysis. Haplotype frequencies were estimated using the expectation-maximisation algorithm [43]. A significance level of 0.05 was used. Due to LD between SNPs correction for multiple testing was carried out using 10 000 permutations in each gene (i.e. six in GHRL and four in GHSR1). Corrected p-values are designated as pc. The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS for Mac (Version 19.0.0.1, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and HelixTree (Version 6.3, Golden Helix, Bozeman, MT, USA).

Results

All studied SNPs in both the patient and control group had a HWE p-value>0.01. As seen in table 3, the minor allele of the rs2948694 SNP located in intron 1 of the GHSR gene was associated with amphetamine dependence (pc = 0.02, allelic OR 1.84). When men and women were analysed separately for rs2948694 the ORs were 1.48 and 2.11 respectively, but not significantly different (p = 0.5). When the control group was split into non-smokers and current smokers the minor allele frequencies were 10.0% and 13.0% respectively. Pairwise comparisons of the three groups then gave: Amphetamine users vs smokers (OR = 1.47,p = 0.25), smokers vs non-smokers (OR = 1.33, p = 0.37) and amphetamine users vs non-smokers (OR = 1.96, p = 0.004).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Distribution of minor allele frequencies (%) of the studied SNPs in controls and in amphetamine dependent individuals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061242.t003

Single marker analysis also showed association between the minor allele (90Leu) of the GHRL SNP rs4684677 and increased ASI composite scores for drug use (table 4).

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Association between ASI composite score for drug use among amphetamine dependent individuals and GHRL and GHSR SNPs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061242.t004

Although associations were found both between a haplotype in the GHSR gene and diagnosis as well as a haplotype in the GHRL gene and ASI composite scores for drug use these analyses did not contribute to additional information next to the single marker analysis.

Discussion

The present study is, to our knowledge, the first investigating the GHRL and GHSR genes, encoding ghrelin and its receptor, in relation to amphetamine dependence and problem severity of drug use. We found that the minor allele of a SNP located in GHSR (rs2948694) is associated with amphetamine dependence. This finding was strengthened by the fact that the control smokers had an allele frequency intermediate between non-smokers and patients. We also found a significantly higher ASI drug composite score in patients carrying the minor allele of a GHRL SNP (rs4684677).

Common neurobiological mechanisms for the rewarding properties of both drugs of abuse and food have been suggested in both animal and human studies [4], [44], [45], and the ghrelin signalling system could be one of the mediators of this effect. This may be one reason for the high co-morbidity between eating disorders and drug dependence [46]. Both preclinical and human genetic findings have previously suggested an important role for GHS-R1A in drug-induced reward (vide infra). Specifically, the ability of alcohol, nicotine, cocaine as well as amphetamine to induce locomotor stimulation, increase accumbal dopamine release and to condition a place preference, are attenuated by GHS-R1A antagonists in mice [28], [29], [47]. Previous human genetic studies have reported association between SNPs and haplotypes of the GHSR gene and heavy alcohol consumption as well as body mass index in heavy alcohol consuming individuals [37]; smoking and type II alcohol dependence in women [36] as well as with self-directedness in alcohol dependent individuals [35]. Collectively, these data suggest that GHS-R1A may be involved in drug reward, drug intake as well as characteristic traits of addictive behaviours and the receptor may therefore be a potential target for treatment of various addictions. It has been suggested that either the constitutive activity of the GHS-R1A [48] or the ability of the GHS-R1A to form a heterodimer with dopamine D1-like or D2 receptors [49], [50] may affect the set point of the mesolimbic dopamine system. The functional role of the studied SNP is not known and the significance of these results cannot be determined. However, we hypothesize that the SNP in the GHS-R1A gene could, tentatively, influence the activity of tegmental dopamine neurons and thereby influence the ability of these dopamine neurons to be activated by addictive drugs. However, this needs to be further elucidated.

We also found that patients with the uncommon variant (90Leu) of the GHRL SNP (rs4684677) have higher ASI composite scores for drug use. Our previous human genetic studies have reported associations between SNPs and haplotypes of the GHRL gene and body mass index in heavy alcohol consuming individuals [37]; paternal alcohol dependence and withdrawal symptoms in female alcohol-dependent individuals [36] and with self-transcendence in alcohol dependent individuals [35], and ghrelin may thus be implicated in mechanisms underlying drug use. Preclinical data support an important role of ghrelin in drug intake and drug-reward. In mice, ghrelin administration into brain ventricles or locally into reward nodes (ventral tegmental area or laterodorsal tegmental area) increases the intake of alcohol [28] and alcohol-induced reward is attenuated in ghrelin knockout mice [47]. Moreover, the ability of cocaine to increase locomotor activity and condition a place preference is enhanced by ghrelin in mice and high plasma levels of ghrelin is associated with cocaine-seeking behaviours in rats [30]–[32]. Although hypothetical, it could be speculated that this SNP, if resulting in higher ghrelin levels, could lead to drug seeking or craving, as ghrelin plasma levels have been previously shown to be higher during alcohol abstinence [51] and craving for alcohol [52].

Interestingly ghrelin and its receptor appear to be important for reward in general. Specifically, suppression of the GHS-R1A reduces reward induced by, the intake of and motivation to consume palatable foods [21], [22]. It has also been shown that ghrelin and its receptor regulates the intake of and motivation to consume sucrose and saccharin [24], [53], [54], at the level of the mesolimbic dopamine system [55]. Human functional magnetic resonance imaging studies show that ghrelin administration increases the natural response to food in reward related areas, including the mesolimbic dopamine system [56]. In addition, human genetic findings show an association between a haplotype in the GHRL gene and high sucrose consumption [23]. Taken together with the data regarding ghrelin, the GHS-R1A and drugs of abuse it may be suggested that ghrelin and its receptor may have an important role in regulating reward in general and that GHS-R1A may be a potential target for new treatments of addictive behaviours such as compulsive overeating.

The current study is faced with limitations, the main being the small sample size, the possibility of a type 1 error and population stratifications. Therefore our study should be considered as a pilot study and additional studies replicating our data are warranted. Another confounding factor may be that the controls self-reported nicotine and alcohol usage via a questioner. Unreported usage of addictive drugs could therefore tentatively affect the obtained results. Additionally, the modest sample size may limit the power to detect effects. However, the consistency in our findings where a SNP in GHSR and GHRL were associated with amphetamine dependence and ASI drug composite score, may suggests an important role for ghrelin and its receptor in drug dependence. Given previous reports showing associations between the studied SNPs and heavy alcohol-use as well as smoking [37] and the comorbidity between amphetamine, alcohol and nicotine dependence, we cannot rule out the possibility of an interaction between the studied SNPs and alcohol and/or nicotine dependence. Additionally, the functional value of the studied SNPs is yet to be determined. Although our research is highly hypothesis driven, the findings reported here must be regarded as preliminary until replicated.

In conclusion, even though genetic variability of ghrelin and its receptor is not diagnostic marker for amphetamine dependence and problem severity of drug use, the present results still strengthen the notion that ghrelin and the GHS-R1A are involved in some of the mechanisms underlying the development of addictive behaviours.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ingrid Dahlin, Margareta Gard-Hedander, Else-Britt Hillner and Mona Seibt Palmér for expert assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EJ JAE JF NJL AR KT. Performed the experiments: JF NJL AR KT PS. Analyzed the data: PS SN. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JAE EJ JF NJL AR KT. Wrote the paper: EJ PS JAE NJL SN AR KT JF.

References

  1. 1. Pierce RC, Kumaresan V (2006) The mesolimbic dopamine system: the final common pathway for the reinforcing effect of drugs of abuse? Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 30: 215–238.
  2. 2. Engel JA, Fahlke C, Hulthe P, Hard E, Johannessen K, et al. (1988) Biochemical and behavioral evidence for an interaction between ethanol and calcium channel antagonists. Journal of neural transmission 74: 181–193.
  3. 3. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ (2002) Role of dopamine in drug reinforcement and addiction in humans: results from imaging studies. Behavioural pharmacology 13: 355–366.
  4. 4. Di Chiara G (2005) Dopamine in disturbances of food and drug motivated behavior: a case of homology? Physiology & behavior 86: 9–10.
  5. 5. Haile CN, Kosten TR (2009) The potential of pharmacogenomics to treat drug addiction. Pharmacogenomics 10: 1883–1886.
  6. 6. Tsuang MT, Lyons MJ, Meyer JM, Doyle T, Eisen SA, et al. (1998) Co-occurrence of abuse of different drugs in men: the role of drug-specific and shared vulnerabilities. Archives of general psychiatry 55: 967–972.
  7. 7. Kendler KS, Aggen SH, Tambs K, Reichborn-Kjennerud T (2006) Illicit psychoactive substance use, abuse and dependence in a population-based sample of Norwegian twins. Psychological medicine 36: 955–962.
  8. 8. Kendler KS, Prescott CA, Myers J, Neale MC (2003) The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women. Archives of general psychiatry 60: 929–937.
  9. 9. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, et al. (1999) Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 402: 656–660.
  10. 10. Tschöp M, Smiley DL, Heiman ML (2000) Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents. Nature 407: 908–913.
  11. 11. Horvath TL, Diano S, Sotonyi P, Heiman M, Tschop M (2001) Minireview: ghrelin and the regulation of energy balance–a hypothalamic perspective. Endocrinology 142: 4163–4169.
  12. 12. Kojima M, Kangawa K (2005) Ghrelin: structure and function. Physiological reviews 85: 495–522.
  13. 13. Cheung WW, Mao P (2012) Recent advances in obesity: genetics and beyond. ISRN Endocrinol 2012: 536905.
  14. 14. Abizaid A, Liu ZW, Andrews ZB, Shanabrough M, Borok E, et al. (2006) Ghrelin modulates the activity and synaptic input organization of midbrain dopamine neurons while promoting appetite. J Clin Invest 116: 3229–3239.
  15. 15. Jerlhag E, Egecioglu E, Dickson SL, Andersson M, Svensson L, et al. (2006) Ghrelin stimulates locomotor activity and accumbal dopamine-overflow via central cholinergic systems in mice: implications for its involvement in brain reward. Addict Biol 11: 45–54.
  16. 16. Jerlhag E, Egecioglu E, Dickson SL, Douhan A, Svensson L, et al. (2007) Ghrelin administration into tegmental areas stimulates locomotor activity and increases extracellular concentration of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. Addict Biol 12: 6–16.
  17. 17. Jerlhag E (2008) Systemic administration of ghrelin induces conditioned place preference and stimulates accumbal dopamine. Addict Biol 13: 358–363.
  18. 18. Quarta D, Di Francesco C, Melotto S, Mangiarini L, Heidbreder C, et al. (2009) Systemic administration of ghrelin increases extracellular dopamine in the shell but not the core subdivision of the nucleus accumbens. Neurochem Int 54: 89–94.
  19. 19. Dickson SL, Hrabovszky E, Hansson C, Jerlhag E, Alvarez-Crespo M, et al. (2010) Blockade of central nicotine acetylcholine receptor signaling attenuate ghrelin-induced food intake in rodents. Neuroscience 171: 1180–1186.
  20. 20. Egecioglu E, Jerlhag E, Salome N, Skibicka KP, Haage D, et al. (2010) Ghrelin increases intake of rewarding food in rodents. Addict Biol 15: 304–311.
  21. 21. Disse E, Bussier AL, Veyrat-Durebex C, Deblon N, Pfluger PT, et al. (2010) Peripheral ghrelin enhances sweet taste food consumption and preference, regardless of its caloric content. Physiology & behavior 101: 277–281.
  22. 22. Perello M, Sakata I, Birnbaum S, Chuang JC, Osborne-Lawrence S, et al. (2010) Ghrelin increases the rewarding value of high-fat diet in an orexin-dependent manner. Biological psychiatry 67: 880–886.
  23. 23. Landgren S, Simms JA, Thelle DS, Strandhagen E, Bartlett SE, et al. (2011) The ghrelin signalling system is involved in the consumption of sweets. PloS one 6: e18170.
  24. 24. Skibicka KP, Hansson C, Alvarez-Crespo M, Friberg PA, Dickson SL (2011) Ghrelin directly targets the ventral tegmental area to increase food motivation. Neuroscience 180: 129–137.
  25. 25. Leggio L (2010) Role of the ghrelin system in alcoholism: Acting on the growth hormone secretagogue receptor to treat alcohol-related diseases. Drug news & perspectives 23: 157–166.
  26. 26. Dickson SL, Egecioglu E, Landgren S, Skibicka KP, Engel JA, et al. (2011) The role of the central ghrelin system in reward from food and chemical drugs. Molecular and cellular endocrinology 340: 80–87.
  27. 27. Jerlhag E, Egecioglu E, Dickson SL, Engel JA (2010) Ghrelin receptor antagonism attenuates cocaine- and amphetamine-induced locomotor stimulation, accumbal dopamine release, and conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2010: 415–422.
  28. 28. Jerlhag E, Egecioglu E, Landgren S, Salome N, Heilig M, et al. (2009) Requirement of central ghrelin signaling for alcohol reward. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 11318–11323.
  29. 29. Jerlhag E, Engel JA (2011) Ghrelin receptor antagonism attenuates nicotine-induced locomotor stimulation, accumbal dopamine release and conditioned place preference in mice. Drug and alcohol dependence 117: 126–131.
  30. 30. Wellman PJ, Davis KW, Nation JR (2005) Augmentation of cocaine hyperactivity in rats by systemic ghrelin. Regulatory peptides 125: 151–154.
  31. 31. Davis KW, Wellman PJ, Clifford PS (2007) Augmented cocaine conditioned place preference in rats pretreated with systemic ghrelin. Regulatory peptides 140: 148–152.
  32. 32. Tessari M, Catalano A, Pellitteri M, Di Francesco C, Marini F, et al. (2007) Correlation between serum ghrelin levels and cocaine-seeking behaviour triggered by cocaine-associated conditioned stimuli in rats. Addict Biol 12: 22–29.
  33. 33. Kaur S, Ryabinin AE (2010) Ghrelin receptor antagonism decreases alcohol consumption and activation of perioculomotor urocortin-containing neurons. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research 34: 1525–1534.
  34. 34. Landgren S, Simms JA, Hyytia P, Engel JA, Bartlett SE, et al. (2012) Ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1A) antagonism suppresses both operant alcohol self-administration and high alcohol consumption in rats. Addiction biology 17: 86–94.
  35. 35. Landgren S, Berglund K, Jerlhag E, Fahlke C, Balldin J, et al. (2011) Reward-related genes and personality traits in alcohol-dependent individuals: a pilot case control study. Neuropsychobiology 64: 38–46.
  36. 36. Landgren S, Jerlhag E, Hallman J, Oreland L, Lissner L, et al. (2010) Genetic variation of the ghrelin signaling system in females with severe alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34: 1519–1524.
  37. 37. Landgren S, Jerlhag E, Zetterberg H, Gonzalez-Quintela A, Campos J, et al. (2008) Association of pro-ghrelin and GHS-R1A gene polymorphisms and haplotypes with heavy alcohol use and body mass. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32: 2054–2061.
  38. 38. Berg C, Lappas G, Wolk A, Strandhagen E, Toren K, et al. (2009) Eating patterns and portion size associated with obesity in a Swedish population. Appetite 52: 21–26.
  39. 39. Berg CM, Lappas G, Strandhagen E, Wolk A, Toren K, et al. (2008) Food patterns and cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Swedish INTERGENE research program. The American journal of clinical nutrition 88: 289–297.
  40. 40. Berg CM, Lissner L, Aires N, Lappas G, Toren K, et al. (2005) Trends in blood lipid levels, blood pressure, alcohol and smoking habits from 1985 to 2002: results from INTERGENE and GOT-MONICA. European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology 12: 115–125.
  41. 41. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, et al. (1992) The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of substance abuse treatment 9: 199–213.
  42. 42. Livak KJ (1999) Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5′ nuclease assay. Genetic analysis : biomolecular engineering 14: 143–149.
  43. 43. Excoffier L, Slatkin M (1995) Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Molecular biology and evolution 12: 921–927.
  44. 44. Thiele TE, Navarro M, Sparta DR, Fee JR, Knapp DJ, et al. (2003) Alcoholism and obesity: overlapping neuropeptide pathways? Neuropeptides 37: 321–337.
  45. 45. Cummings DE, Naleid AM, Figlewicz Lattemann DP (2007) Ghrelin: a link between energy homeostasis and drug abuse? Addiction biology 12: 1–5.
  46. 46. Bulik CM, Sullivan PF, Carter FA, Joyce PR (1997) Lifetime comorbidity of alcohol dependence in women with bulimia nervosa. Addictive behaviors 22: 437–446.
  47. 47. Jerlhag E, Landgren S, Egecioglu E, Dickson SL, Engel JA (2011) The alcohol-induced locomotor stimulation and accumbal dopamine release is suppressed in ghrelin knockout mice. Alcohol 45: 341–347.
  48. 48. Holst B, Cygankiewicz A, Jensen TH, Ankersen M, Schwartz TW (2003) High constitutive signaling of the ghrelin receptor–identification of a potent inverse agonist. Mol Endocrinol 17: 2201–2210.
  49. 49. Jiang H, Betancourt L, Smith RG (2006) Ghrelin amplifies dopamine signaling by cross talk involving formation of growth hormone secretagogue receptor/dopamine receptor subtype 1 heterodimers. Molecular endocrinology 20: 1772–1785.
  50. 50. Kern A, Albarran-Zeckler R, Walsh HE, Smith RG (2012) Apo-ghrelin receptor forms heteromers with DRD2 in hypothalamic neurons and is essential for anorexigenic effects of DRD2 agonism. Neuron 73: 317–332.
  51. 51. Kim DJ, Yoon SJ, Choi B, Kim TS, Woo YS, et al. (2005) Increased fasting plasma ghrelin levels during alcohol abstinence. Alcohol Alcohol 40: 76–79.
  52. 52. Leggio L, Ferrulli A, Cardone S, Nesci A, Miceli A, et al. (2012) Ghrelin system in alcohol-dependent subjects: role of plasma ghrelin levels in alcohol drinking and craving. Addiction biology 17: 452–464.
  53. 53. Finger BC, Schellekens H, Dinan TG, Cryan JF (2011) Is there altered sensitivity to ghrelin-receptor ligands in leptin-deficient mice?: importance of satiety state and time of day. Psychopharmacology 216: 421–429.
  54. 54. Landgren S, Engel JA, Hyytia P, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. (2011) Expression of the gene encoding the ghrelin receptor in rats selected for differential alcohol preference. Behavioural brain research 221: 182–188.
  55. 55. Skibicka KP, Dickson SL (2011) Ghrelin and food reward: the story of potential underlying substrates. Peptides 32: 2265–2273.
  56. 56. Malik S, McGlone F, Bedrossian D, Dagher A (2008) Ghrelin modulates brain activity in areas that control appetitive behavior. Cell metabolism 7: 400–409.