A key event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) species in the brain, derived from the sequential cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases. Based on a systems biology study to repurpose drugs for AD, we explore the effect of lansoprazole, and other proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), on Aβ production in AD cellular and animal models. We found that lansoprazole enhances Aβ37, Aβ40 and Aβ42 production and lowers Aβ38 levels on amyloid cell models. Interestingly, acute lansoprazole treatment in wild type and AD transgenic mice promoted higher Aβ40 levels in brain, indicating that lansoprazole may also exacerbate Aβ production in vivo. Overall, our data presents for the first time that PPIs can affect amyloid metabolism, both in vitro and in vivo.
Citation: Badiola N, Alcalde V, Pujol A, Münter L-M, Multhaup G, Lleó A, et al. (2013) The Proton-Pump Inhibitor Lansoprazole Enhances Amyloid Beta Production. PLoS ONE 8(3): e58837. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058837
Editor: Stephen D. Ginsberg, Nathan Kline Institute and New York University School of Medicine, United States of America
Received: December 11, 2012; Accepted: February 7, 2013; Published: March 8, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Badiola et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The present work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PSE-010000-2009-1; BIO2010-22073) and by the own fund of each institute, and the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: Albert Pujol and Mireia Coma are employed by Anaxomics Biotech. However, there are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. Many molecular lesions have been detected in AD, but one of the major pathological hallmarks is the extracellular deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides in the brain , that results in oxidative and inflammatory damage, which in turn leads to energy failure and synaptic dysfunction . Formation of Aβ species is caused by the sequential cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by two proteases, β-secretase, also called β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), and γ-secretase. Aβ40 is the major secreted form while Aβ42 has been suggested to be the main pathological species in AD pathogenesis , although other truncated Aβ peptides might also contribute substantially to toxicity and amyloidogenesis .
Several studies support the hypothesis that classic fibrillar amyloid plaques are deleterious to the brain, showing that the subpopulation of dense-core Aβ plaques in particular, the so-called neuritic plaques, are intimately associated with local dendritic spine loss, changes in neurites, and gliosis in AD and mouse models , . However, the total number of amyloid plaques do not correlate well with the severity of illness  or with loss of neurons , arguing against a direct causal effect of plaques on cognition or neuronal cell death in AD.
More recently, an alternative hypothesis has been growing and gaining support, based on the idea that the toxic component is within the soluble fraction. There is data showing that soluble forms of Aβ correlate more closely with dementia severity than fibrillar Aβ , , ,  and that Aβ oligomers alter dendritic spine density and affect hippocampal synaptic plasticity in vivo , , , , . Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that brain oligomeric Aβ, but not total amyloid plaque burden, correlates with neuronal loss and astrocyte inflammatory response in APP/Tau transgenic mouse model . In this context, several studies show the presence of Aβ oligomers in CSF of AD patients, while not in healthy individuals, and also the direct correlation of oligomers with cognitive impairment , , .
Despite all the efforts put on AD research over the past years, there are no effective treatments to prevent, halt or cure the disease. Indeed, there are only four FDA-approved drugs for AD treatment, although they mainly provide a symptomatic improvement and are unable to stop the disease progression . This prompted us to use the therapeutic performance mapping system (TPMS)  to explore potential novel indications of marketed drugs to modify the biology of AD. In brief, the TPMS is a top-down systems biology approach with potential applications in drug repositioning . Starting from the clinical effects produced by different therapeutic compounds (both, positive and negative), we first split them into causative physiological motifs and identified the responsible molecular effectors, which were then mapped onto the disease-related cell network. We afterwards established different relationships between drug targets and effector proteins in the network that are used for training a classifier, with capacity for predicting and scoring novel potential indications on AD of totally unrelated drugs. The complete results of this study will be published elsewhere . Interestingly, the TPMS analysis suggested that lansoprazole could act as a strong potential modulator of the processes involved in amyloid-β pathology.
Lansoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drug widely used in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and other conditions where inhibition of gastric secretion may be beneficial , . PPIs are generally well tolerated, and adverse effects are relatively infrequent , . Yet, chronic administration of PPIs is becoming increasingly common, and there is a growing concern about potential unexplored adverse effects from such long-term therapy .
In this study, we explore the effects of lansoprazole, and other PPIs, on β-amyloid production in a well-established cellular model of amyloid pathology, with special attention to the effect over the different Aβ species. We assess the in vivo relevance of our findings in wild-type (wt) and AD triple transgenic (3xTg-AD) mice and we ultimately speculate about the potential mechanisms underlying the observed alterations.
Materials and Methods
We maintained Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, stably transfected with both wild-type (wt) human APP and PS1 (PS70 cells; ), in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (GIBCO® Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO®), 25 µg/mL of puromycin and 200 µg/mL of G418 antibiotics (Sigma-Aldrich).
For Aβ production analysis, we seeded PS70 cells in 12-well plates at a density of 150,000 cells per well and we subsequently treated for 24 h with lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole or esomeprazole (Sigma-Aldrich) at different concentrations. We used the γ–secretase inhibitor DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester, Sigma-Aldrich) at 2 µM as a positive control. Lastly, we collected and stored cell culture supernatants at −80°C until further use.
Analysis of Aβ Peptides by ELISA
We quantified human Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels by human β-amyloid (1–42) and (1–40) ELISA kits (Wako Pure Chemical Industries), respectively. We loaded 100 µL of conditioned media on every assay. For 3xTg-AD mouse brain extracts we previously diluted them 1/40 in standard buffer and then we loaded following manufacturer’s protocol. We measured rodent Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels with ELISA kits (IBL International) according to manufacturer’s protocol.
Mass Spectrometry of Aβ Species
We used W0-2antibody and Protein-G Sepharose beads to immunoprecipitate human Aβ from conditioned media. We washed Sepharose beads twice in PBS and twice in 100 mM ammonium acetate. We then eluted Aβ twice with 300 µl of 50% acetic acid and vacuum-dried. Finally, we resuspended the samples in 10 µl of 33% acetonitrile containing 0.1% tri-fluoric acetic acid and ultrasonicated. Afterwards we analyzed Aβ species by MALDI-MS on sinapinic acid matrix with an UltraflexII TOF/TOF (BrukerDaltonics).
Animals and Treatments
All animals were housed in an animal facility that is fully compliant with the European policy on the use of Laboratory Animals. Experimental protocols were approved by the Parc Científic of Barcelona Committee and meet the European and Spanish guidelines of animal experimentation.
We treated both female 3xTg-AD mice (Charles River) and non-transgenic mice (B6129SF1/J) at 7 month of age for 5 consecutive days with an intraperitoneal injection of lansoprazole. We diluted and administered lansoprazole in 10% DMSO and 18% of encapsin (2-hydroxipropil beta-cyclodextrine), at 20 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg, respectively. At the end point, we sacrificed mice 5 h after the last treatment and we froze each hemisphere in liquid nitrogen and stored them at −80°C.
Brain Soluble Aβ Extraction
We thawed non-transgenic mouse brains on ice in 3× (w/v) 0.2% of diethylamine (DEA) and 50 mM of NaCl buffer with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete® EDTA-free, Roche), and then we homogenized them. We subsequently centrifuged homogenates at 100.000 g for 1 h at 4°C. Finally, we collected the supernatants, and neutralized them by addition of 1∶10 volume of 0.5 M Tris-HCl pH 6.8. We stored samples at −80°C as DEA-soluble Aβ fractions.
We thawed 3xTg-AD mouse brains on ice in 3× (w/v) 2% SDS with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete® EDTA-free, Roche) and then we homogenized them. Next, we centrifuged homogenates at 100.000 g for 1 h at 4°C. Finally, we collected the supernatants and we stored samples at −80°C as SDS-soluble Aβ fractions.
We determined lysate protein concentration using the Bio-Rad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories). We loaded 20–40 µg of each cell lysate and electrophoresed in 10% Tris-glycine gels for Western blot analysis. For Aβ species detection, supernatants we run in 11% urea gels. For the immunoblotting we incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: rabbit polyclonal anti-C-terminal APP (Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal anti-BACE (catalytic domain, Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-sAPPβ (IBL), 6E10 (against Aβ 1–16, Covance) or mouse monoclonal anti-actin (Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies. Afterwards, we incubated with either an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody plus enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Millipore), or with an infrared fluorescent-labelled secondary antibody (IRDye, Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, PA) for 1 h at room temperature.
All data are shown as mean ± SD. Statistical tests included one-way ANOVA for repeated measures and t-test when appropriate.
Results and Discussion
Lansoprazole and Other PPIs Increase Aβ Levels in AD-like Cellular Models
To investigate the potential effect of lansoprazole on Aβ production, we treated PS70 Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing both wild-type human APP and presenilin 1 (PS1) with increasing concentrations of lansoprazole for 24 h. We first used the MTT reduction assay as a proxy to determine whether the tested concentrations caused cell toxicity, which was not the case below 50 µM (data not shown), in agreement with previous studies . We subsequently measured the Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in conditioned media of cultures by specific ELISA immunoassays. We observed that Aβ40 levels in the conditioned media increased after treatments above 10 µM (Figure 1A), up to 2-fold increase in the amount of Aβ40 with respect to the vehicle-treated cultured cells. Furthermore, we observed a dose-dependent increase in Aβ42 between 5 µM and 50 µM (Figure 1A), with more than 200% Aβ42 increase at 25 µM and over 300% when treated with 50 µM. As expected, cells treated with the γ–secretase inhibitor N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) showed negligible levels of Aβ. These results indicate that lansoprazole treatment increase Aβ production at commonly used concentrations , , , , , which in turn are comparable to other Aβ inducers such as the calcium ionophore A23187, which increases the production of Aβ approximately 3-fold , or caffeine (at millimolar concentrations), that increases Aβ levels until 4-fold . In addition, we have observed an Aβ42 increase of over 250% compared to vehicle in cell cultures treated at 50 µM lansoprazole, while fenofibrate, a potent Aβ42 raising Aβ38 lowering compound, generates an increase of 125% at the same concentration . Overall, these findings provide further evidence about the accuracy of the TPMS to predict pharmacological alterations in Aβ metabolism.
A, Treatment of PS70 cells with lansoprazole at different concentrations (250 nM–50 µM) for 24 h increased Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels, as measured by ELISA immunoassays (n = 6± SD) p<0.05 (+), p<0.01 (*). B, Similar treatment with omeprazole, pantoprazole and esomeprazole at different concentrations (5 µM–50 µM) also increased Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels (n = 4± SD) p<0.05 (+), p<0.01 (*).
To check whether these results could also be extrapolated to other PPIs, we examined the effect of compounds of the same drug class on Aβ production. Omeprazole is one of the most widely prescribed drugs worldwide, which is administered as a racemic mixture of its two enantiomers, S-omeprazole (esomeprazole) and R-omeprazole. Similarly, pantoprazole is also broadly used because of its relatively long duration of action compared with other PPIs, and its lower propensity to become activated in slightly acidic body compartments . Since the chemical structures and pharmacological targets of the four PPIs are very similar, our TPMS computational analyses also predicted an effect of these compounds on the Aβ metabolism. Thus, we decided to investigate the effect of omeprazole, pantoprazole and esomeprazole within 5 µM and 50 µM range, based on our previous results. Although the increase in Aβ40 was non-homogeneous for the 3 drugs, they did show a dose-dependent increase in Aβ42 levels (Fig. 1B), achieving up to 175% increase. Hence, these results suggest that the modulation of Aβ production is a shared feature among the PPI drug class.
Lansoprazole Might Modulate the γ-secretase Complex
To gain a deeper insight in the relative formation of Aβ species induced by lansoprazole, we conducted an Aβ-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry analysis of high dose lansoprazole-conditioned media. Different Aβ species are generated because γ–secretase has multiple APP cleavage sites. The main produced species is Aβ40 and, to a lower extent, Aβ38 and Aβ42. Intriguingly, small molecule drugs called γ–secretase modulators (GSM) are able to shift the γ–secretase cleavage site, being classified as straight GSMs when they lower Aβ42 and rise Aβ38 , or as inverse GSMs (iGSM) when they do the opposite , , . Interestingly, our MALDI-MS analysis revealed a considerably altered Aβ peptide pattern in cells treated with lansoprazole at 50 µM. The relative levels of Aβ42 increased whereas the relative levels of Aβ38 decreased (Figure 2A). Intriguingly, there was also an increase in Aβ37. As expected, the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT completely abrogated Aβ production, showing no Aβ peaks. We further confirmed the Aβ42 increase and Aβ38 decrease by Western blot (Figure 2B). Therefore, attending to the results obtained with lansoprazole in the Aβ species production shift, one possible explanation would be that lansoprazole might act as an inverse GSM.
A, MALDI-MS analysis of Aβ-immunoprecipitated species from conditioned PS70 supernatants. Cells treated with lansoprazole at 50 µM for 24 h showed a significant increase on Aβ42 compared to vehicle spectrum. DAPT treated cells were used as a negative control, showing none Aβ species as expected. B, Western blot analysis of the different Aβ species present in treated PS70 supernatants. A decrease on Aβ38 and increase on Aβ42 was detected in conditioned media of treated cells with lansoprazole at 50 µM for 24 h. Short and long exposures are shown for better visualization. C, Aβ40/42 levels in conditioned media from treated PS70 cells were measured by ELISA immunoassays (n = 3± SD) p<0.01 (*). Cells treated with both lansoprazole at 50 µM and R-flurbiprofen at 200 µM for 24 h displayed reduced Aβ42 levels when compared to lansoprazole-only treated cells, indicating the lansoprazole is capable to counteract the R-flurbiprofen Aβ42 lowering effect. D, Western blot analysis of APP and BACE1 protein levels in total lysates, showing no differences between treated and non-treated cells. A representative experiment is shown (n = 3 independent experiments). E, Western blot analysis of sAPPβ and sAPPα protein levels in conditioned media. The immunoblot shows an increase in sAPPβ in conditioned media from cells treated with lansoprazole. A representative experiment is shown (n = 3 independent experiments).
To further investigate this hypothesis, we wanted to test if lansoprazole was able to counterbalancing the Aβ42-lowering capability of R-flurbiprofen, a well characterized non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that acts as straight GSM , . NSAIDs are widespread used due to the prevalence of diseases in the aging population and to their crucial role as effective antipyretic analgesics in a wide spectrum of conditions and diseases ranging from a common cold to rheumatoid arthritis . However, they are known to disrupt the mucosal resistance to gastric acid through several mechanisms including suppression of prostaglandin production and are thus associated with adverse events such as gastric or duodenal ulcers. For that reason, the co-administration with PPIs is strongly recommended in certain circumstances , . Notably, albeit we can find straight and inverse GSM modulators within NSAIDs, the former have been considered as very interesting therapeutic agents in AD, since they can lower Aβ42 without perturbing the cyclooxygenase (COX) activity, the principal pharmacological target of NSAIDs , .
As expected, cells treated with R-flurbiprofen showed decreased Aβ42 levels while cells treated with lansoprazole increased Aβ42 levels (Figure 2C). Interestingly, when the two drugs were combined, lansoprazole blocked the Aβ42 decrease induced by R-flurbiprofen. Therefore, these results suggest that concomitant administration of PPIs with NSAIDs may neutralize the Aβ42 lowering effect provided by NSAIDs, at least in cell culture.
Taken together, these findings suggest that lansoprazole increase Aβ42 production similarly to other described iGSMs. Nevertheless, alternative mechanisms related to APP dimerization processes could also play a role in the observed changes of Aβ42 levels .
Lansoprazole Might Increase BACE1 and Meprin β Protease Activities
The putative iGSM activity of lansoprazole could explain the increase of Aβ42 coupled to a decrease of Aβ38, but it cannot account for the rise of Aβ40. Hence, we wanted to investigate other possible effects of lansoprazole on Aβ production. The APP can be processed by two different pathways: the non-amyloidogenic pathway, involving α-secretase and γ-secretase activities, and the amyloidogenic pathway, requiring BACE1 and γ-secretase . If the first cleavage is performed by α-secretase, soluble APPα (sAPPα) and APP C83 C-terminal fragments are generated, and the consecutive cleavage by γ-secretase produces the p3 peptides, which are non-amylodogenic. On other hand, when APP is first cleaved by BACE1, soluble APPβ (sAPPβ) and APP C99 fragments are otherwise generated, and γ-secretase cleavage ultimately generates Aβ peptides and the amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain (AICD) fragments.
To explore how lansoprazole was able to increase Aβ37 and Aβ40 levels, we first tested whether it increased APP or BACE1 protein levels, since higher amounts of Aβ substrate or processing enzyme would certainly explain the increase in Aβ production , . However, we did not observe any significant change in the protein expression levels of either protein (Figure 2D). We then interrogated if lansoprazole could enhance BACE1 activity instead, and measured the generation of sAPPβ, a BACE1 cleavage product. Interestingly, we observed that lansoprazole promoted sAPPβ production, suggesting an increase of BACE1 activity. In contrast, sAPPα remained unaffected by lansoprazole treatment (Figure 2E).
In addition, the mass spectra also revealed a slight increase of the Aβ2-37, Aβ2-40 and Aβ2-42 species (Fig. 2A), which could be accounted for the meprin β metalloprotease, recently identified as an APP cleaving enzyme at the p2 position . Variations in the media pH induced by lansoprazole could thus boost this protease activity, generating Aβ2-x peptides.
Overall, these findings suggest that lansoprazole may not only modulate γ-secretase, but also seems to increase BACE1 activity, boosting the Aβ species production that would be eventually reflected in Aβ40 and Aβ37 increased levels. Nevertheless, since the PPIs are known to be irreversible inhibitors of H+/K+ ATPase, lansoprazole-induced variations in the media pH may also affect the activity of other proteases, such as meprin β, and ultimately affecting Aβ production, particularly Aβ2-x species.
Acute Treatment with Lansoprazole Increases Aβ Levels in Both wt and AD Mouse Models
Our results would not go beyond a cellular curiosity if lansoprazole could not cross the blood brain barrier. However, it has been reported that it can indeed cross it and exert its effects in brain tissue . Thus, to determine whether lansoprazole is capable of altering Aβ production in the brain, we conducted short-term intraperitoneal administration in wt and AD triple-transgenic (3xTg-AD) mouse models, like in previous studies  (Figure 3). 3xTg-AD mice overexpress human tau and APP in a mutant PS1 knock-in background, and present both plaque and tangle pathologies in an age-related manner . Even though, acute treatments do not enable an evaluation of histopathological or cognitive alteration, since changes in Aβ plaque burden or cognitive impairment usually occur after a long and sustained treatment of at least 2–3 months. Yet, 8-month age transgenic mice typically contain few Aβ plaques but they have significant amounts of intracellular and soluble Aβ , being a suitable age to test changes in soluble Aβ.
A, Non-transgenic mice were treated 5 consecutive days with 100 kg/mg of lansoprazole (n = 10). Soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 from brain extracts were measured by ELISA (n = 10± SD) p<0.05 (+). Lansoprazole increased Aβ40 levels in non-transgenic mice. B, 3xTg-ADwere treated 5 consecutive days with 100 kg/mg of lansoprazole (n = 6). Soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 from brain extracts were measured by ELISA (n = 6± SD) p<0.05 (+), p<0.01 (*). Lansoprazole increased soluble Aβ40 levels in 3xTg-AD mice in a dose-dependent manner.
We used administration doses of 20 mg/kg/day and 100 mg/kg/day. When compared to the equivalent doses in human , the administered concentrations are far below the LC50 (5000 mg/Kg) and comparable to the doses prescribed to treat certain pathologies, such as the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, 180 mg/day . We found that, indeed, acute treatment with 100 mg/kg/day intraperitoneally administered lansoprazole increased soluble Aβ40 levels in healthy, non-transgenic mice (Figure 3A). Levels of soluble Aβ42 were also slightly increased, although they did not reach statistical significance. In the case of 3xTg-AD mice, short-term treatment with 20 mg/kg/day or 100 mg/kg/day of lansoprazole dramatically raised soluble Aβ40 levels in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3B). Interestingly, Aβ40 production was higher than in non-transgenic mice, attaining almost to the 250% rise at 100 mg/kg/day. Similarly to the non-transgenic mice, we also observed a moderate increase in soluble Aβ42 levels, although they were not statistically significant either. In order to contextualize the relevance of the effects shown in mice at doses used in this study, it is worth to mention that a recent patent proposes a daily dose up to 400 mg of lansoprazole to inhibit tumor growth in humans . Using the body surface area (BSA) normalization method , the conversion of the 20 mg/Kg and 100 mg/Kg mouse doses into equivalent human doses results in around 100 mg/day and 486 mg/day, respectively. Interestingly, we found an increase of Aβ levels in 3xTg-AD mice treated with 20 mg/Kg/day of lansoprazole, providing evidence of a clear effect at human prescribed equivalent doses.
The differences observed in the Aβ40/Aβ42 levels between cellular and mouse models could be partially explained by the Aβ quantization, since we only measured extracellular Aβ in cells, while we measured both extracellular and intracellular Aβ species in brain homogenates. Despite these differences, our findings demonstrate that lansoprazole is able to augment Aβ production both in vitro and in vivo models, with an exacerbated effect in AD models.
Our results reveal that lansoprazole, in addition to its known inhibitory effect on gastric acid production, has an effect on Aβ generation. Although the underlying mechanisms remain elusive, our observations show that lansoprazole increases Aβ37, Aβ40 and Aβ42 and lowers Aβ38 levels in an AD-like cell model. In addition, the increase of sAPPβ and the lack of changes in APP and BACE1 protein levels seem to indicate that lansoprazole would not only modulate the γ-secretase complex, but also increase BACE1 activity.
Taken together, we hypothesize that lansoprazole could inversely modulate the γ-secretase activity by shifting the APP cleavage site, resulting in higher Aβ42 and lower Aβ38 levels (Figure 4). Moreover, it might also increase the activity of other pH-dependent proteases, such as BACE1, raising total Aβ production and particularly reflected in the raise of Aβ37 and Aβ40 levels, or meprin β, boosting Aβ2-x species. Nevertheless, further experiments are needed to better understand the role of lansoprazole in Aβ production and specifically to unveil its underlying mechanisms.
Aβ peptides are produced from the consecutive cleavage of APP by BACE1 (β-secretase) and γ-secretase. The first cleavage generates soluble APPβ (sAPPβ) and the C99 C-terminal fragment, while the subsequent one releases Aβ peptides and the amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain (AICD). In basal conditions (left), a variety of Aβ species are formed. Conversely, when cells are treated with lansoprazole (right), BACE1 activity could be increased, generating more sAPPβ and C99 fragments and subsequently increasing the overall Aβ production. Lansoprazole also could act as an inverse GSM, shifting the γ–secretase cleavage, augmenting Aβ42 and reducing Aβ38. Together, lansoprazole is able to increase Aβ37, Aβ40 and Aβ42 species and decrease Aβ38.
Notwithstanding, from a more clinical perspective, since PPIs are commonly used drugs, it would be interesting to perform epidemiologic studies to investigate whether the long-term use of PPIs could have any detrimental impact on AD, particularly in aged chronic recipients. Recent studies have actually reported potential inappropriate prescriptions (PIM) in aged people with dementia , where PPIs appeared among the most prevalent PIMs when used at maximum therapeutic dosage for more than 8 weeks .
We believe that our data demonstrate for the first time that lansoprazole and other PPIs can increase Aβ not only in cell cultures but also in mice. These results can serve as a catalyst for further studies in order to evaluate whether the treatment with PPIs may have an impact on AD pathology.
Conceived and designed the experiments: NB AL MC MS-L PA. Performed the experiments: NB VA AP LMM. Analyzed the data: NB AL MC MS-L AP PA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GM. Wrote the paper: NB MS-L PA.
- 1. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ (2002) The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 297: 353–356. doi: 10.1126/science.1072994
- 2. Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM (2010) Alzheimer's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 362: 329–344. doi: 10.1056/nejmra0909142
- 3. Younkin SG (1998) The role of Aβ42 in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Physiology-Paris 92: 289–292. doi: 10.1016/s0928-4257(98)80035-1
- 4. Wiltfang J, Esselmann H, Bibl M, Smirnov A, Otto M, et al. (2002) Highly conserved and disease-specific patterns of carboxyterminally truncated Aβ peptides 1–37/38/39 in addition to 1–40/42 in Alzheimer's disease and in patients with chronic neuroinflammation. Journal of Neurochemistry 81: 481–496. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00818.x
- 5. Meyer-Luehmann M, Stalder M, Herzig MC, Kaeser SA, Kohler E, et al. (2003) Extracellular amyloid formation and associated pathology in neural grafts. Nat Neurosci 6: 370–377. doi: 10.1038/nn1022
- 6. Spires-Jones TL, Meyer-Luehmann M, Osetek JD, Jones PB, Stern EA, et al. (2007) Impaired spine stability underlies plaque-related spine loss in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Am J Pathol 171: 1304–1311. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.070055
- 7. Ingelsson M, Fukumoto H, Newell KL, Growdon JH, Hedley-Whyte ET, et al. (2004) Early Abeta accumulation and progressive synaptic loss, gliosis, and tangle formation in AD brain. Neurology 62: 925–931. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000115115.98960.37
- 8. Gomez-Isla T, Hollister R, West H, Mui S, Growdon JH, et al. (1997) Neuronal loss correlates with but exceeds neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 41: 17–24. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410106
- 9. Gong Y, Chang L, Viola KL, Lacor PN, Lambert MP, et al. (2003) Alzheimer's disease-affected brain: Presence of oligomeric β ligands (ADDLs) suggests a molecular basis for reversible memory loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 10417–10422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834302100
- 10. Lue L-F, Kuo Y-M, Roher AE, Brachova L, Shen Y, et al. (1999) Soluble Amyloid β Peptide Concentration as a Predictor of Synaptic Change in Alzheimer's Disease. The American Journal of Pathology 155: 853–862. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65184-x
- 11. McLean CA, Cherny RA, Fraser FW, Fuller SJ, Smith MJ, et al. (1999) Soluble pool of Abeta amyloid as a determinant of severity of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 46: 860–866. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199912)46:6<860::aid-ana8>3.0.co;2-m
- 12. Pitschke M, Prior R, Haupt M, Riesner D (1998) Detection of single amyloid beta-protein aggregates in the cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer's patients by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Nat Med 4: 832–834. doi: 10.1038/nm0798-832
- 13. Cleary JP, Walsh DM, Hofmeister JJ, Shankar GM, Kuskowski MA, et al. (2005) Natural oligomers of the amyloid-beta protein specifically disrupt cognitive function. Nat Neurosci 8: 79–84. doi: 10.1038/nn1372
- 14. Lambert MP, Barlow AK, Chromy BA, Edwards C, Freed R, et al. (1998) Diffusible, nonfibrillar ligands derived from Abeta1–42 are potent central nervous system neurotoxins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 6448–6453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6448
- 15. Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ (2007) Aβ Oligomers – a decade of discovery. Journal of Neurochemistry 101: 1172–1184. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04426.x
- 16. Shrestha BR, Vitolo OV, Joshi P, Lordkipanidze T, Shelanski M, et al. (2006) Amyloid beta peptide adversely affects spine number and motility in hippocampal neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci 33: 274–282. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.07.011
- 17. Haass C, Selkoe DJ (2007) Soluble protein oligomers in neurodegeneration: lessons from the Alzheimer's amyloid [beta]-peptide. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 101–112. doi: 10.1038/nrm2101
- 18. DaRocha-Souto B, Scotton TC, Coma M, Serrano-Pozo A, Hashimoto T, et al. (2011) Brain oligomeric beta-amyloid but not total amyloid plaque burden correlates with neuronal loss and astrocyte inflammatory response in amyloid precursor protein/tau transgenic mice. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 70: 360–376. doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e318217a118
- 19. Fukumoto H, Tokuda T, Kasai T, Ishigami N, Hidaka H, et al. (2010) High-molecular-weight β-amyloid oligomers are elevated in cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer patients. The FASEB Journal 24: 2716–2726. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-150359
- 20. Shankar GM, Li S, Mehta TH, Garcia-Munoz A, Shepardson NE, et al. (2008) Amyloid-[beta] protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer's brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat Med 14: 837–842. doi: 10.1038/nm1782
- 21. Wang-Dietrich L, Funke SA, Kühbach K, Wang K, Besmehn A, et al.. (2013) The Amyloid-β Oligomer Count in Cerebrospinal Fluid is a Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease.
- 22. Lleó A, Greenberg SM, Growdon JH (2006) Current Pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer's Disease. Annual Review of Medicine 57: 513–533. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131442
- 23. Mas J, Pujol A, Farrés J, Aloy P (2010) Methods and Systems for identifying molecules or processes of biological interest by using knowledge discovery in biological data. Patent. United States of America.
- 24. Pujol A, Mosca R, Farres J, Aloy P (2010) Unveiling the role of network and systems biology in drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 31: 115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.11.006
- 25. Coma M, Pujol A, Gomis F, Oliva B, Lleó A, et al.. (2011) New combination therapies for treating neurological disorders. Patent. United States of America.
- 26. Londong W, Barth H, Dammann HG, Hengels KJ, Kleinert R, et al. (1991) Dose-related healing of duodenal ulcer with the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 5: 245–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1991.tb00025.x
- 27. Satoh H, Inatomi N, Nagaya H, Inada I, Nohara A, et al. (1989) Antisecretory and antiulcer activities of a novel proton pump inhibitor AG-1749 in dogs and rats. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 248: 806–815.
- 28. Arnold R (1994) Safety of proton pump inhibitors: an overview. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 8 Suppl 165–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1994.tb00265.x
- 29. Lai K-C, Chu K-M, Hui W-M, Wong BC-Y, Hu WH-C, et al. (2005) Celecoxib compared with lansoprazole and naproxen to prevent gastrointestinal ulcer complications. The American Journal of Medicine 118: 1271–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.04.031
- 30. Sheen E, Triadafilopoulos G (2011) Adverse Effects of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 56: 931–950. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1560-3
- 31. Xia W, Zhang J, Perez R, Koo EH, Selkoe DJ (1997) Interaction between amyloid precursor protein and presenilins in mammalian cells: Implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94: 8208–8213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.8208
- 32. Nakagawa S, Arai Y, Kishida T, Hiraoka N, Tsuchida S, et al. (2012) Lansoprazole Inhibits Nitric Oxide and Prostaglandin E2 Production in Murine Macrophage RAW 264.7 Cells. Inflammation 35: 1062–1068. doi: 10.1007/s10753-011-9412-7
- 33. Damaj B (2009) Methods to inhibit tumor cell growth by using proton pump inhibitors. Patent. United States of America.
- 34. Schulz-Geske S, Erdmann K, Wong RJ, Stevenson DK, Schroder H, et al. (2009) Molecular mechanism and functional consequences of lansoprazole-mediated heme oxygenase-1 induction. World J Gastroenterol 15: 4392–4401. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4392
- 35. Takagi T, Naito Y, Okada H, Ishii T, Mizushima K, et al. (2009) Lansoprazole, a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Mediates Anti-Inflammatory Effect in Gastric Mucosal Cells through the Induction of Heme Oxygenase-1 via Activation of NF-E2-Related Factor 2 and Oxidation of Kelch-Like ECH-Associating Protein 1. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 331: 255–264. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.152702
- 36. Tanigawa T, Watanabe T, Higuchi K, Machida H, Okazaki H, et al. (2009) Lansoprazole, a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Suppresses Production of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Interleukin-1β Induced by Lipopolysaccharide and Helicobacter Pylori Bacterial Components in Human Monocytic Cells via Inhibition of Activation of Nuclear Factor-κB and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition 45: 86–92. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.08-267
- 37. Querfurth HW, Selkoe DJ (1994) Calcium ionophore increases amyloid beta peptide production by cultured cells. Biochemistry 33: 4550–4561. doi: 10.1021/bi00181a016
- 38. Querfurth HW, Jiang J, Geiger JD, Selkoe DJ (1997) Caffeine Stimulates Amyloid β-Peptide Release from β-Amyloid Precursor Protein-Transfected HEK293 Cells. Blackwell Science Ltd. 1580–1591.
- 39. Kukar T, Murphy MP, Eriksen JL, Sagi SA, Weggen S, et al. (2005) Diverse compounds mimic Alzheimer disease-causing mutations by augmenting Abeta42 production. Nat Med 11: 545–550. doi: 10.1038/nm1235
- 40. Moreira Dias L (2009) Pantoprazole: A Proton Pump Inhibitor. Clinical Drug Investigation 29: 3–12. doi: 10.2165/1153121-s0-000000000-00000
- 41. Weggen S, Eriksen JL, Das P, Sagi SA, Wang R, et al. (2001) A subset of NSAIDs lower amyloidogenic Abeta42 independently of cyclooxygenase activity. Nature 414: 212–216. doi: 10.1038/35102591
- 42. Abdul-Hay SO, Edirisinghe P, Thatcher GRJ (2009) Selective modulation of amyloid-β peptide degradation by flurbiprofen, fenofibrate, and related compounds regulates Aβ levels. Journal of Neurochemistry 111: 683–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06355.x
- 43. Narlawar R, Perez Revuelta BI, Baumann K, Schubenel R, Haass C, et al. (2007) N-Substituted carbazolyloxyacetic acids modulate Alzheimer associated gamma-secretase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 17: 176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.09.061
- 44. Geerts H (2007) Drug evaluation: (R)-flurbiprofen–an enantiomer of flurbiprofen for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. IDrugs 10: 121–133.
- 45. Morihara T, Chu T, Ubeda O, Beech W, Cole GM (2002) Selective inhibition of Aβ42 production by NSAID R-enantiomers. Journal of Neurochemistry 83: 1009–1012. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01195.x
- 46. Pilotto A, Sancarlo D, Addante F, Scarcelli C, Franceschi M (2009) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in the elderly. Surg Oncol 19: 167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.11.014
- 47. Lazzaroni M, Gabriele Bianchi P (2009) Management of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Toxicity: Focus on Proton Pump Inhibitors. Drugs 69: 51–69. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969010-00004
- 48. Vonkeman H, Fernandes R, van der Palen J, van Roon E, van de Laar M (2007) Proton-pump inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk for bleeding and perforated gastroduodenal ulcers attributable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a nested case-control study. Arthritis Research & Therapy 9: R52. doi: 10.1186/ar2207
- 49. Lleo A, Galea E, Sastre M (2007) Molecular targets of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 1403–1418. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6516-1
- 50. Richter L, Munter L-M, Ness J, Hildebrand PW, Dasari M, et al. (2010) Amyloid beta 42 peptide (Aβ42)-lowering compounds directly bind to Aβ and interfere with amyloid precursor protein (APP) transmembrane dimerization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 14597–14602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003026107
- 51. Li Y, Zhou W, Tong Y, He G, Song W (2006) Control of APP processing and Aβ generation level by BACE1 enzymatic activity and transcription. The FASEB Journal 20: 285–292. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4986com
- 52. Bien J, Jefferson T, Causevic M, Jumpertz T, Muenter L, et al.. (2012) The metalloprotease meprin beta generates amino terminal truncated Abeta-peptide species. J Biol Chem.
- 53. Rojo LE, Alzate-Morales J, Saavedra IN, Davies P, Maccioni RB (2010) Selective Interaction of Lansoprazole and Astemizole with Tau Polymers: Potential New Clinical Use in Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 19: 573–589.
- 54. Oddo S, Caccamo A, Shepherd JD, Murphy MP, Golde TE, et al. (2003) Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron 39: 409–421. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00434-3
- 55. Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N (2008) Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. The FASEB Journal 22: 659–661. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9574lsf
- 56. Pospai D, Cadiot G, Forestier S, Ruszniewski P, Coste T, et al. (1998) [Effectiveness and safety of lansoprazole in the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. First six months of treatment]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 22: 801–808.
- 57. Parsons C, Johnston S, Mathie E, Baron N, Machen I, et al. (2012) Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People with Dementia in Care Homes: A Retrospective Analysis. Drugs & Aging 29: 143–155. doi: 10.2165/11598560-000000000-00000