Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Diversity and Taxonomy of Endophytic Xylariaceous Fungi from Medicinal Plants of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae)

  • Juan Chen,

    Affiliation Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Li-Chun Zhang,

    Affiliation Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Yong-Mei Xing,

    Affiliation Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Yun-Qiang Wang,

    Affiliation Botanical Garden of Xishuangbanna South Medicine, Jinghong, Yunnan, People’s Republic of China

  • Xiao-Ke Xing,

    Affiliation Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Da-Wei Zhang,

    Affiliation Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Han-Qiao Liang,

    Affiliation Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

  • Shun-Xing Guo

    sxguo2006@yahoo.com.cn

    Affiliation Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Diversity and Taxonomy of Endophytic Xylariaceous Fungi from Medicinal Plants of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae)

  • Juan Chen, 
  • Li-Chun Zhang, 
  • Yong-Mei Xing, 
  • Yun-Qiang Wang, 
  • Xiao-Ke Xing, 
  • Da-Wei Zhang, 
  • Han-Qiao Liang, 
  • Shun-Xing Guo
PLOS
x

Abstract

Dendrobium spp. are traditional Chinese medicinal plants, and the main effective ingredients (polysaccharides and alkaloids) have pharmacologic effects on gastritis infection, cancer, and anti-aging. Previously, we confirmed endophytic xylariaceous fungi as the dominant fungi in several Dendrobium species of tropical regions from China. In the present study, the diversity, taxonomy, and distribution of culturable endophytic xylariaceous fungi associated with seven medicinal species of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) were investigated. Among the 961 endophytes newly isolated, 217 xylariaceous fungi (morphotaxa) were identified using morphological and molecular methods. The phylogenetic tree constructed using nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit of ribosomal DNA (LSU), and beta-tubulin sequences divided these anamorphic xylariaceous isolates into at least 18 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The diversity of the endophytic xylariaceous fungi in these seven Dendrobium species was estimated using Shannon and evenness indices, with the results indicating that the dominant Xylariaceae taxa in each Dendrobium species were greatly different, though common xylariaceous fungi were found in several Dendrobium species. These findings implied that different host plants in the same habitats exhibit a preference and selectivity for their fungal partners. Using culture-dependent approaches, these xylariaceous isolates may be important sources for the future screening of new natural products and drug discovery.

Introduction

Since the discovery of Taxol, an anticancer drug from endophytic fungi, such as Taxomyces andreanae, Pestalotia spp. and Pestalotiopsis spp. [1], [2], endophytes as novel sources of phytochemicals and bioactive substances with promising medicinal and agricultural application have attracted much attention from mycologists and chemists worldwide [3][5]. Endophytic fungi can directly enhance plant growth, increase the host plants’ adaptability to such diverse conditions as dry, cold, and high-salt environments, and help to resist pathogen damage [6], as well as being able to alter the community structure [7] and antioxidant activity of the host plants [8]. Recently, based on their good antimicrobial activity, more attention has been given to the potential of exploiting endophytic fungi for novel antibiotics [9][11]. Endophytic fungi are ubiquitous and diverse in plants, and it is estimated that there are approximately 1 million species worldwide [12]; however, only a fraction has been described and explored to date. Although the complex relationship between endophytic fungi and saprophytic and pathogenic fungi has been studied [12][14], their authentic function in ecological systems remains elusive.

Xylariaceae is one of the largest and most widely distributed families of Xylariales (Ascomycota), with approximately 85 genera and at least 1340 species [15]. The members of this family are usually considered to be saprophytic, but some taxa have been described as endophytic or pathogenic [16], [17], with a few species being associated with termites [18]. In the past thirty years, a number of studies have reported on the taxonomy, phylogenetic reconstruction, ecology, and relationship between xylariaceous fungal teleomorph and anamorph stages, including work on endophytic xylariaceous fungi [19][28]. Moreover, a series of new compounds have been isolated from Xylariaceae species and demonstrated good antimicrobial or anticancer bioactivity, particularly endophytic Xylaria [29][32]. Endophytic xylariaceous fungi were also recently investigated from many herbs and woody plants, such as liverworts [33], Lepanthes and Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) [34], [35], Piper (Piperaceae) [36], Pinus and Picea (Pinaceae) [37] and mangroves [32]. In a previous study, we assessed the diversity of endophytic fungi from Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) and found that xylariaceous fungi were among the dominant taxa in the roots of tropical epiphytic Orchidaceae plants [38]. However, their diversity, taxonomy and the specificity of their relationship with host plants remains unaddressed. In the present study, the culturable endophytic xylariaceous fungi isolated from Dendrobium were examined for their morphological characters and DNA sequences to reveal their diversity and distribution in their host plants. Using a culture-dependent approach, these xylariaceous isolates will be important sources for the future screening of new natural products and drug discovery.

Results

Fungal Isolation and Identification

A total of 961 culturable endophytic fungi were isolated from seven species of Dendrobium. The isolation rate of endophytic fungi in each plant species is listed in Table 1. Most of the isolates were asexual mycelial fungi and rarely produced diagnostically morphological characters, such as conidia or ascospores and basidiospores, thus DNA sequences were selected as the main tool to identify these fungi. Based on morphological and molecular results, 870 strains were identified as belonging to at least 9 orders, 25 genera, and approximately 60 species. The remaining 91 strains can not be identified to the genus level by DNA sequences because no ITS sequences matching with high similarity in the GenBank database could be found. In the original 961 cultures, the xylariaceous taxa had the highest isolation frequency, 22.58% (217/961), followed by Fusarium at 10.71% (103/961), Colletotrichum at 6.55% (63/961), and Phomopsis at 4.37% (42/961). Thus, xylariaceous fungi as the dominant group were further analyzed.

thumbnail
Table 1. The isolation rate of endophytic fungi from each Dendrobium species in the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.t001

The morphological examinations of the xylariaceous fungi were performed according to the description of Callan & Rogers [19][21]. Some representative strains were incubated on 2.5% oatmeal agar (OA) at 20°C and 12 h of fluorescent light per day for stromatal and conidial production. The newly isolated 217 xylariaceous strains were divided into at least 13 morphotypes based on their cultural characters (e.g., colony color and surface morphology, stromatal production and conidial and conidiophore morphology) (Table 2, Figure 1), and at least 18 possible operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were recognized by phylogenetic analyses (Table 3, Figure 2). The estimation of the Shannon-Weiner diversity index based on the number of OTUs showed that D. nobile presented the highest Xylaria species diversity among the seven plant species (1.68), followed by D. chrysanthum (1.47) and D. chrysotoxum (1.46) (Table 3). Furthermore, D. nobile showed a higher evenness index (0.94). The similarity index of the Xylariaceae taxa between D. fimbriatum and D. crystallinum (67%) was higher than that between D. chrysanthum and D. crystallinum (60%) (Table 4).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Colony morphology of xylariaceous endophytes on oatmeal agar isolated from Dendrobium in this study.

a. 5063 after two weeks; b. 5054 after two weeks; c. 5129 after two weeks; d. 5268 after two weeks; e. 5071 after two weeks; f. 5311 after two weeks; g. 5147 after two weeks; h. 5147 after four weeks on PDA; i–j. 5165 after two weeks and five weeks; k–l. 5128 after two weeks and five weeks; m–n. 5306 after two weeks and five weeks; o–p. 5089 after two weeks and five weeks; q. 5327 after two weeks; r. 5120 after five weeks; s. 5341 after two weeks; t. Coiled hypha, conidiophore and conidia of 5341 after five weeks.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Bayesian 90% majority-rule tree for endophytic Xylariaceae isolated from Dendrobium from 5.8S-ITS2 sequences.

Values above branches represent posterior probabilities (≥90%) and values below branches are bootstrap values (≥50%) from 1000 replicates. Sequences generated by this study are those numbers with “5” initials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.g002

thumbnail
Table 3. Distribution of xylariaceous endophytes in the seven Dendrobium species in the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. The similarity index of xylariaceous fungal in seven Dendrobium species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.t004

Phylogenetic Analyses

From each morphotype group, we selected 1–3 representative xylariaceous strains to analyze their ITS, nrLSU and β-tubulin sequences. We newly acquired 53 ITS, 49 nrLSU, and 36 β-tubulin sequences; the GenBank accession numbers are shown in Table S1. Based on the primary ITS and β-tubulin blast results from the GenBank database, of the 217 newly isolated xylariaceous endophytes, 63 strains were closely matched to sequences from Nemania spp., 6 strains were similar to sequences from Annulohypoxylon spp., 4 strains were closely related to sequences from Nodulisporium spp., and the remaining 144 strains were closely matched to the sequences from members of the Xylaria genus (Table 3).

Phylogenetic analyses of the newly isolated xylariaceous strains were performed based on the ITS, nrLSU, and β-tubulin sequences. For the ITS analysis, only 5.8S-ITS2 was used because of the high divergence of the ITS1 region.

The 5.8S-ITS2 dataset consisted of 125 aligned sequences, containing 339 characters, and 89 were phylogenetically informative sites. The majority rule tree from the Bayesian analyses is shown in Figure 2. The newly isolated xylariaceous endophytes were clustered into several taxonomic groups of the family, representing at least 18 OTUs (Figure 2). Three OTUs (OTU16-OTU18) belong to members of the Xylaria sister genera in Xylariaceae, including Annulohypoxylon, Nodulisporium, and Daldinia. The strains identified as Nemania were separated into two OTUs (OTU4 and OTU15) in the tree, and the other 13 OTUs mainly represent species of the Xylaria genus. The phylogenetic analysis and blast search showed that approximately 19 species of Xylariaceae were isolated and that Nemania diffusa, N. bipapillata, X. arbuscula, and X. grammica were the most commonly isolated xylariaceous endophytes from the roots of Dendrobium from southwestern China.

The alignment of the nrLSU sequence data, consisting of 93 sequences, contained 780 nucleotides and 133 parsimony-informative sites. The phylogenetic trees generated using Bayesian analyses (BA) and maximum parsimony (MP) analyses have similar topology, thus only the tree from the BA is shown in Figure 3. The tree constructed from the LSU sequences clustered all the newly isolated Xylariaceae fungi into 8 clades, representing 12 OTUs, which correspond to OTUs 1–5, 7, 11–14, 16, and 18 in the ITS tree. OTUs 6, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 in the ITS tree do not form a well-supported single group in the nrLSU phylogenetic tree. In addition, the members of each OTU in the nrLSU tree are similar to those in the 5.8S-ITS2 tree, but their placement is not exactly consistent with that in the 5.8S-ITS2 tree.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Bayesian 90% majority-rule tree for endophytic Xylariaceae isolated from Dendrobium from nrLSU rDNA sequences.

Numbers above branches indicate posterior probabilities (≥90%) and numbers below branches are bootstrap values (≥50%) from 1000 replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.g003

The β-tubulin matrix contained 100 aligned sequences, 946 total characters, and 355 parsimony-informative characters. The resulting phylogeny (Figure 4) reveal that all the xylariaceous taxa analyzed formed two large groups, representing members of the Xylaria genus (with Nemania nested in it) and other related genera in Xylariaceae (e.g., Hypoxylon, Annulohypoxylon, and Daldinia). The xylariaceous endophytes formed 9 clades and represented 15 OTUs. We were unable to amplify the β-tubulin region for the taxa of OTU6 and OUT15 in the ITS tree.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Bayesian 90% majority-rule tree for endophytic Xylariaceae isolated from Dendrobium from beta-tubulin sequences.

Numbers above branches indicate posterior probabilities (≥90%) and numbers below branches are bootstrap values (≥50%) from 1000 replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.g004

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, each Dendrobium species was associated with at least 3 OTUs of xylariaceous endophytes (Table 3 and Figure 2). The endophytic xylariaceous fungi associated with D. nobile are members of 6 OTUs (OTUs 4, 5, 7, 10, 13, and 15), and those associated with D. chrysotoxum are members of 9 OTUs (OTUs 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 16–18). OTU15 (Nemania spp.) was found in four of seven Dendrobium species (D. nobile, D. fimbriatum, D. chrysanthum and D. crystallinum), and X. arbuscula (OTU5) and X. grammica (OTU12) were also commonly detected in four to five species of Dendrobium. In addition, xylariaceous OTU7 and OTU13 were restricted to associations with D. nobile, and OTU2 and OTU8–9 were each also restricted to a single Dendrobium species, D. chrysotoxum and D. fimbriatum, respectively.

Although several Dendrobium species were found to share a common Xylaria species in this study, the dominant Xylaria taxa in each Dendrobium species were different except for D. crystallinum and D. chrysanthum. The dominant Xylaria of D. nobile, D. fimbriatum, D. chrysotoxum, D. falconeri, and D. aphyllum were OTU7 (28%), OTU2 (48.78%), OTU11 (53.85%), OTU3 (50%) and OTU14 (46.15%), respectively. D. crystallinum and D. chrysanthum presented the same dominant xylariaceous fungi (OTU 15, Nemania spp.), and the rate was 58.53% and 42.12%, respectively.

Discussion

Endophytic Xylariaceae have been reported as common, sometimes dominant fungi within the microbiological flora of the roots of tropical Orchidaceae plants [34], [35], [39]. Our analyses showed that xylariaceous fungi, as non-mycorrhizal fungi, are very abundant and diverse in the roots of Dendrobium species.

Morphology is the most reliable way for identification of xylariaceous fungi [27]. However, it is difficult to delimitate endophytes (including endophytic xylariaceous) based on morphology because most of endophytes do not produce sexual states in culture [16]. Rogers [19] and Callan & Rogers [20] have provided a useful method for anamorph production and a key to the identification of certain European xylariaceous species in culture. We attempted to induce the formation of conidia in culture on 2.5% oatmeal agar media (OA) under irregular light, but only a few strains formed stroma after 6 weeks. The possible explains could be that the strains we isolated do not form conidiophores or conidia under the currently cultural condition or that the production of their conidia requires more than 6 weeks of incubation time. Another reason is that, although our strains are similar to the species originally described from Europe, possibly, they are endemic to Asia and the asexual characteristics of the European species are dissimilar. Petrini & Petrini (1985) have recognized that colony growth rate, color, and stromatic structure formation as relatively stable diagnostic characters for delimiting xylariaceous species at the intragenus level in culture compared to conidiophore morphology and the size and shape of conidia [16]. The validity of morphotypes as taxonomic groups was further verified by ribosomal DNA sequences (ITS) [40]. In the present study, some xylariaceous strains isolated in our study were preliminarily grouped into morphotypes by the colony characters and hyphal strands.

Molecular techniques have become the most powerful and indispensable tools in identification, community diversity, and phylogeny studies of endophytic fungi, including endophytic Xylaria species [22][26]. Meanwhile, KoKo et al. (2011) also showed that identifying endophytes by blasting with GenBank sequences often resulted in the wrong naming of taxa and therefore any results must be treated with caution [41]. Thus, the reference sequences downloaded from GenBank database for blasting and conducting phylogenetic tree in this study were mostly published in previous studies [25][27], [42]. Among DNA markers, the ITS region is most commonly used for species delimitation. Recently, the ITS region has been confirmed to be applicable as a fungal barcode, and it is able to identify successfully a broad range of fungi (approximately 70%) [43]. However, Hsieh et al. reported that ITS sequences were unsuitable for addressing phylogenetic relationships in Xylariaceae at the genus level [25]. Consistent with the previous study [25], we found that it was difficult to align the ITS sequences of the taxa due to the high variability of the ITS1 region. Thus, only the 5.8S-ITS2 region was selected for phylogenetic tree construction. The intra-group topology of the tree generated using 5.8S- ITS2 was similar to those based on LSU and β-tubulin except for a low intergroup resolution, because there are relatively fewer characters contained in the 5.8S-ITS2 dataset compared to other two datasets.

The mycorrhizal specificity of orchids has been reported, and mycorrhizal symbiosis partners were usually found to be fungi belonging to Tulasnellaceae, Ceratobasidiaceae, Sebacinales, and ectomycorrhizal Russulaceae and Tuberaceae [44], [45]. However, the specificity of non-mycorrhizal endophytes, particularly xylariaceous fungi, in orchid plants is not fully understood. It is difficult to determine the level of specificity in the interaction between host plants and their endophytic fungi because of the endophytic diversity and the limitation of the current research methods [39], though a number of previous studies have demonstrated that endophytic fungi host-specificity was common [46], [47]. In the present study, we found that some endophytic Xylariaceae were exclusively detected in specific host plants. For example, OTU7 and OTU13 were uniquely detected in the roots of D. nobile, whereas OTU2 and OTU8-9 were specifically found in the roots of D. chrysotoxum and D. fimbriatum, respectively. Based our limited samples, these findings might imply that non-mycorrhizal endophytic Xylariaceae have host specificity and selectivity to some extent. However, the endophyte community is dynamic, and seasonal changes and host age will likely influence the species composition [48]. Therefore, the endophytic xylariaceous specificity of Orchidaceae should be estimated using both cultural-dependent and culture-independent methods, such as environmental PCR, for a given habitat and growth stage and sample size.

Moreover, the present study indicated that the dominant Xylariaceae taxa in each Dendrobium species were different, though several Dendrobium species shared a common Xylaria species. D. fimbriatum and D. chrysotoxum have a close phylogenetic relationship [49], while in the present study, the two species were colonized by different xylariaceous fungi, indicating that different host plants in the same habitat might have preference and selectivity for their fungal partner.

Xylariaceous fungi are highly abundant in the medicinal plants of Dendrobium, but their ecological function has remained unclear to date. Davis et al. [33] have mentioned that xylariaceous fungi in liverworts might be mutualistic with their host, although the association of Xylaria as mycorrhizal fungi in orchid plants has yet to be confirmed. Moreover, endophytic fungi play an important role in regulating the production of secondary metabolites in their host plants and may increase the concentrations of total alkaloids and polysaccharides in Dendrobium [50]. Accordingly, the secondary metabolites of these rich xylariaceous taxa in Dendrobium should be widely explored, and the relationship between the endophytic Xylaria species and the quality of Dendrobium as a medicinal herb need to be extensively investigated.

Materials and Methods

Dendrobium Plants

Healthy seven Dendrobium species, D. nobile, D. fimbriatum, D. chrysotoxum, D. chrysanthum, D. falconeri, D. aphyllum and D. crystallinum, were collected from an area of tropical rainforest at the Xishuangbanna, Jinghong City, Yunnan Province, southwestern China in 2009. Plants were identified based on the description of Chen et al [51]. The wild plant samples we studied are very precious medicinal plants and nearly extinct in China. Based on the consideration on the conservation of both the plant and fungal resources, we had to collect only a few individuals per species.

Fungal Isolation and Identification

Endophytic fungi were obtained after surface-sterilization of the plant tissues [38]. Symptomless roots of each plant species were rinsed in a sequence distilled water for 1 min, 75% ethanol for 30 s, 3% NaClO for 1 min, and 75% ethanol for 30 s and then rinsed in sterile distilled water three times. Each root was then cut into 2–3 mm sections and placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA). The isolates were subcultured on OA medium for morphological identification and conidial production. The plant samples and fungal isolations are listed in Table 1.

The identification of a representative endophyte culture as a xylariaceous fungus was initially based on the characters of colony and mycelium, according to the description of Petrini & Petrini [16] and Callan & Rogers [20]. These xylariaceous cultures were preliminarily classified into different morphotypes. In addition, internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), large subunit ribosomal RNA (nrLSU), and β-tubulin sequences were employed for identification.

DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Phylogenetic Analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from pure mycelia using the E.Z.N.A. Fungal DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Doraville, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The PCR amplification followed Chen et al. [37]. The primer pairs ITS 1 and ITS 4 for the ITS sequences, primer pairs LROR and LR7 for the nrLSU sequences [52] and primer pairs T1 and T22 for β-tubulin [53] were used. The sequences obtained were blasted against the GenBank sequences of known members of Xylariaceae, and selected related sequences with high similarity were downloaded for further phylogenetic analyses. The sources for the reference sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses are mostly those reported by Hsieh et al. [25], [42], Okane et al. [23], [26], and Tang et al. [24]. All the sequences were aligned using Clustal X 1.83 [54]. The phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA5 [55] for maximum parsimony analyses (MP) and MrBayes 3.1.2. [56] for Bayesian analyses (BA) on same dataset of 5.8S-ITS2, LSU, and β-tubulin. For the BA analysis, the best-fitted evolutionary model was estimated using MrModeltest version 2.3 [57]. The Bayesian analyses was performed with uniform priors for 2,000,000–5,000,000 generations and sampled every 1000 generations. A probability of 90% was considered significant.

Data Statistical Analyses

The isolation ration (F) was calculated by the formula F = number of fragments colonized by fungi/total number of fragments examined. To compared the specificity and distribution of the xylariaceous species in the seven Dendrobium species, the Shannon-Weiner diversity index (H′) and evenness index (E′) were calculated based on the number of OTUs using the following two formulas, respectively: H′ = −Σ(pi ×lnpi) and E′ = H′/lnS (S indicates the total number of species) [58].

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Genbank accession numbers of sequences obtained in our lab (5054–5371) and other sequences used in phylogenetic analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058268.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Ji-Yue Chen of Xishuangbanna tropical botanical garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Dr. Hui Wang of Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for assistants in sample collection.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JC SXG. Performed the experiments: JC LCZ YMX DWZ HQL. Analyzed the data: JC SXG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JC SXG YQW. Wrote the paper: JC XKX SXG.

References

  1. 1. Stierle A, Strobel G, Stierle D (1993) Taxol and taxane production by Taxomyces andreanae, an endophytic fungus of Pacific yew. Science 260: 214–216.
  2. 2. Strobel G, Yang XS, Sears J, Kramer R, Sidhu RS, et al. (1996) Taxol from Pestalotiopsis microspora, an endophytic fungus of Taxus wallachiana. Microbiology 142: 435–440.
  3. 3. Aly AH, Debbab A, Kjer J, Proksch P (2010) Fungal endophytes from higher plants: a prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products. Fungal Divers 41: 1–16.
  4. 4. Aly AH, Debbab A, Proksch P (2011) Fungal endophytes: unique plant inhabitants with great promises. Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol 90: 1829–1845.
  5. 5. Aly AH, Debbab A, Proksch P (2011) Fifty years of drug discovery from fungi. Fungal Divers 50: 3–19.
  6. 6. Waller F, Achatz B, Baltruschat H, Fodor J, Becker K, et al. (2005) The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance, and higher yield. PNAS 102: 13386–13391.
  7. 7. Purahong W, Hyde KD (2011) Effects of fungal endophytes on grass and non-grass litter decomposition rates. Fungal Divers 47: 1–7.
  8. 8. Hamilton CE, Bauerle TL (2012) A new currency for mutualism? Fungal endophytes alter antioxidant activity in hosts responding to drought. Fungal Divers 54: 39–49.
  9. 9. Debbab A, Aly AH, Proksch P (2011) Bioactive secondary metabolites from endophytes and associated marine derived fungi. Fungal Divers 49: 1–12.
  10. 10. Debbab A, Aly AH, Proksch P (2012) Endophytes and associated marine derived fungi–ecological and chemical perspectives. Fungal Divers 57: 45–83.
  11. 11. Radić N, Strukelj B (2012) Endophytic fungi-The treasure chest of antibacterial substances. Phytomedicine 19: 1270–1284.
  12. 12. Ganley RJ, Brunsfeld SJ, Newcombe G (2004) A community of unknown, endophytic fungi in western white pine. PNAS 101: 10107–10112.
  13. 13. Promputtha I, Lumyong S, Dhanasekaran V, McKenzie EH, Hyde KD, et al. (2007) A phylogenetic evaluation of whether endophytes become saprotrophs at host senescence. Microb Ecol 53: 579–590.
  14. 14. Sun X, Guo LD, Hyde KD (2011) Community composition of endophytic fungi in Acer truncatum and their role in decomposition. Fungal Divers 47: 85–95.
  15. 15. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th ed. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
  16. 16. Petrini L, Petrini O (1985) Xylariaceous Fungi as Endophytes. Sydowia 38: 216–234.
  17. 17. Edwards RL, Jonglaekha N, Kshirsagar A, Maitland DJ, Mekkamol S, et al. (2003) The Xylariaceae as phytopathogens. Recent Res Devel Plant Sci: 1–19.
  18. 18. Guedegbe HJ, Miambi E, Pando A, Roman J, Houngnandan P, et al. (2009) Occurrence of fungi in combs of fungus-growing termites (Isoptera: Termitidae, Macrotermitinae) Mycol Res. 113: 1039–1045.
  19. 19. Rogers JD (1985) Anamorphs of Xylaria: Taxonomic Considerations. Sydowia 38: 255–262.
  20. 20. Callan BE, Rogers JD (1990) Teleomorph-anamorph connections and correlations in some Xylaria species. Mycotaxon 36: 343–369.
  21. 21. Callan BE, Rogers JD (1993) A synoptic key to Xylaria species from continental United States and Canada based on cultural and anamorphic features. Mycotaxon 46: 141–154.
  22. 22. Peláez F, González V, Platas G, Sánchez-Ballesteros J, Rubio V (2008) Molecular phylogenetic studies within the family Xylariaceae based on tibosomal DNA sequences. Fungal Divers 31: 111–134.
  23. 23. Okane I, Srikitikulchai P, Toyama K, Laessoe T, Sivichai S, et al. (2008) Study of endophytic Xylariaceae in Thailand: diversity and taxonomy inferred from rDNA sequence analyses with saprobes forming fruit bodies in the field. Mycoscience 49: 359–372.
  24. 24. Tang AMC, Jeewon R, Hyde KD (2009) A re-evaluation of the evolutionary relationships within the Xylariaceae based on ribosomal and protein-coding gene sequences. Fungal Divers 34: 127–155.
  25. 25. Hsieh HM, Lin CR, Fang MJ, Rogers DJ, Fournier J, Lechat C, Ju YM (2010) Phylogenetic status of Xylaria subgenus Pseudoxylaria among taxa of the subfamily Xylarioideae (Xylariaceae) and phylogeny of the taxa involved in the subfamily. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 957–969.
  26. 26. Okane I, Srikitikulchai P, Tabuchi Y, Sivichai S, Nakagiri A (2012) Recognition and characterization of four Thai Xylariaceous fungi inhabiting various tropical foliages as endophytes by DNA sequences and host plant preference. Mycoscience 53: 122–132.
  27. 27. Chareprasert S, Abdelghany MT, EI-Sheikh HH, Ahmed AF, Khalil AM, et al. (2012) Xylariaceae on the fringe. Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 53: 229–41.
  28. 28. Suwannasai N, Whalley MA, Whalley AJS, Thienhirun S, Sihanonth P (2012) Ascus apical apparatus and ascospore charaters in Xylariaceae. IMA fungus 3: 125–133.
  29. 29. Liu K, Ding X, Deng B, Chen W (2010) 10-Hydroxycamptothecin produced by a new endophytic Xylaria sp., M20, from Camptotheca acuminata. Biotechnology Letters 32: 689–693.
  30. 30. Siriwach R, Kinoshita H, Kitani S, Igarashi Y, Pansuksan K, et al. (2011) Xylaropyrone, a new γ-pyrone from the endophytic fungus Xylaria feejeensis MU18. The Journal of Antibiotics 64: 217–219.
  31. 31. Hacioglu N, Akata I, Dulger B (2011) Antimicrobial potential of Xylaria polymorpha (Pers.) Grev. African Journal of Microbiology Research 5: 728–730.
  32. 32. Klaiklay S, Rukachaisirikul V, Sukpondma Y, Phongpaichit S, Buatong J, et al. (2012) Metabolites from the mangrove-derived fungus Xylaria cubensis PSU-MA34. Arch Pharm Res 35: 1127–1131.
  33. 33. Davis EC, Franklin JB, Shaw AJ, Vilgalys R (2003) Endophytic Xylaria (Xylariaceae) among liverworts and angiosperms: phylogenetics, distribution, and symbiosis. Am J Bot 90: 1661–1667.
  34. 34. Bayman P, Lebrón LL, Tremblay RL, Lodge DJ (1997) Variation in endophytic fungi from roots and leaves of Lepanthes (Orchidaceae). New Phytol 135: 143–149.
  35. 35. Yuan Z, Chen Y, Yang Y (2009) Diverse non-mycorrhizal fungal endophytes inhabiting an epiphytic, medicinal orchid (Dendrobium nobile): estimation and characterization. World J Micribiol Biotechnol 25: 295–303.
  36. 36. Silva GH, de Oliveirac CM, Telesb HL, Paulettid PM, Gamboa IC, et al. (2010) Sesquiterpenes from Xylaria sp., an endophytic fungus associated with Piperaduncum (Piperaceae). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874390010000546 Phytochemistry Letters 3: 164–167.
  37. 37. Guo LD, Huang GR, Wang Y, He WH, Zheng WH, et al. (2003) Molecular identification of white morphotype strains of endophytic fungi from Pinus tabulaeformis. Mycol Res 107: 680–688.
  38. 38. Chen J, Hu KX, Hou XQ, Guo SX (2011) Endophytic fungi assemblages from 10 Dendrobium medicinal plants (Orchidaceae). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27: 1009–1016.
  39. 39. Bayman P, Otero JT (2006) Microbial endophytes of orchid roots. In: Schulz B, Boyle C, Sieber T (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer, New York, 153–173.
  40. 40. Lacap DC, Hyde KD, Liew ECY (2003) An evaluation of the fungal ‘morphotype’ concept based on ribosomal DNA sequences. Fungal Divers 12: 53–66.
  41. 41. KoKo TW, Stephenson SL. Bahkali AH, Hyde KD (2011) From morphology to molecular biology: can we use sequence data to identify fungal endophytes? Fungal Divers 50: 113–120.
  42. 42. Hsieh HM, Ju YM, Rogers JD (2005) Molecular phylogeny of Hypoxylon and closely related genera. Mycologia 97: 844–865.
  43. 43. Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spougea JL, et al. (2012) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. PNAS 109: 6241–624627.
  44. 44. Dearnaley JDW (2007) Further advances in orchid mycorrhizal research. Mycorrhiza 17: 475–486.
  45. 45. Martos F, Munoz F, Pailler T, Kottke I, Gonneau C, et al. (2012) The role of epiphytism in architecture and evolutionary constraint within mycorrhizal networks of tropical orchids Molecular Ecology. 21: 5098–5109.
  46. 46. Arnold AE, Henk DA, Eells RL, Lutzoni F, Vilgalys R (2007) Diversity and phylogenetic affinities of foliar fungal endophytes in loblolly pine inferred by culturing and environmental PCR. Mycologia 99: 185–206.
  47. 47. Botella L, Diez JJ (2011) Phylogenic diversity of fungal endophytes in Spanish stands of Pinus halepensis. Fungal Divers 47: 9–18.
  48. 48. Sieber TN (2007) Endophytic fungi in forest trees: are they mutualists? Fungal Biology Reviews 21: 75–89.
  49. 49. Yuan ZQ, Zhang JY, Liu T (2009) Phylogenetic relationship of China Dendrobium species based on the sequence of the internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA. Biologia plantarum 53: 155–158.
  50. 50. Chen XM, Guo SX (2005) Effects of four species of endophytic fungi on the growth and polysaccharide and alkaloid contents of Dendrobium nobile.. China J Chin Mater Med 30: 253–257.
  51. 51. Chen SC, Tsi ZH, Luo YB (1999) Native orchids of China in color. Science Press, Beijing, 1–416.
  52. 52. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications Academic Press, New York, 315–322.
  53. 53. O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E (1997) Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 7: 103–116.
  54. 54. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analyse tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876–4882.
  55. 55. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739.
  56. 56. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1527–1574.
  57. 57. Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
  58. 58. de Errasti A, Carmarάn CC, Novas MV (2010) Diversity and significance of fungal endophytes from living stems of naturalized trees from Argentina. Fungal Divers 41: 29–40.