Ankyrin repeat (ANK) C3HC4-type RING finger (RF) genes comprise a large family in plants and play important roles in various physiological processes of plant life. In this study, we identified 187 ANK C3HC4-type RF proteins from 29 species with complete genomes and named the ANK C3HC4-type RF proteins the XB3-like proteins because they are structurally related to the rice (Oryza sativa) XB3. A phylogenetic relationship analysis suggested that the XB3-like genes originated from ferns, and the encoded proteins fell into 3 major groups. Among these groups, we found that the spacing between the metal ligand position 6 and 7, and the conserved residues, which was in addition to the metal ligand amino acids, in the C3HC4-type RF were different. Using a wide range of protein structural analyses, protein models were established, and all XB3-like proteins were found to contain two to seven ANKs and a C3HC4-type RF. The microarray data for the XB3-like genes of Arabidopsis, Oryza sative, Zea mays and Glycine max revealed that the expression of XB3-like genes was in different tissues and during different life stages. The preferential expression of XB3-like genes in specified tissues and the response to phytohormone and abiotic stress treatments of Arabidopsis and Zea mays not only confirmed the microarray analysis data but also demonstrated that the XB3-like proteins play roles in plant growth and development as well as in stress responses. Our data provide a very useful reference for the identification and functional analysis of members of this gene family and also provide a new method for the genome-wide analysis of gene families.
Citation: Yuan X, Zhang S, Liu S, Yu M, Su H, et al. (2013) Global Analysis of Ankyrin Repeat Domain C3HC4-Type RING Finger Gene Family in Plants. PLoS ONE 8(3): e58003. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058003
Editor: Turgay Unver, Cankiri Karatekin University, Turkey
Received: November 13, 2012; Accepted: January 29, 2013; Published: March 13, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Yuan et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (31110103917), Natural Science Foundation of China (31170233) and National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB100706). The funders had roles in study design, data collection and analysis and decision to publish.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ankyrin repeat (ANK), which is a 33-residue motif in proteins consisting of two alpha helices separated by loops , is one of the most common protein domains and is widely distributed in organisms ranging from viruses to human . This domain was initially discovered in the two yeast cell-cycle regulators Swi6/Cdc10  and in the Drosophila signalling protein Notch ,and was named after the discovery of 24 copies of this sequence in the cytoskeletal protein ankyrin . The ANK, which is known to mediate protein-protein interactions , has been found in numerous proteins with diverse functions , .
The RING finger (RF) domain was first identified in a protein encoded by the Really Interesting New Gene  and was subsequently found in numerous key regulatory proteins , . RF is a member of the zinc finger domain protein family, which was first identified as a DNA-binding motif in the transcription factor TFIIIA from Xenopus laevis . Subsequently, this domain was identified as functionally binding to RNA , protein or lipid substrates . The RING-type is characterised by the presence of a cysteine-rich domain that coordinates two zinc atoms. In addition to the two canonical RING types (C3H2C3 or C3HC4), additional types of modified RING domains, known as RING-V, RING-D, RING-S/T, RING-G and RING-C2, were characterised on the basis of the spacing between their metal ligands or by the different substitutions at one or more of the metal ligand positions .
Many RF-containing proteins have E3 ligase role in ubiquitination reaction , , . The multi-step ubiquitination reaction is initiated by the ATP-dependent binding of ubiquitin, 76-amino acid polymers, to the E1 activation enzyme. The activated ubiquitin is then transferred to an E2 conjugating enzyme, which binds an E3 ligase that facilitates the transfer of ubiquitin to the substrate , . These three steps are repeated to attach multiple ubiquitin molecules to substrates . This E3 enzyme is responsible for recruiting the target protein for ubiquitination and, hence, confers specificity to the pathway. In fact, the Arabidopsis genome encodes only two E1 isoforms , approximately 40 E2 enzymes, and over 1, 400 putative E3 ligases . The existence of such a large number of E3 ligases suggests a high specificity of their target recognition, underscoring their importance for downstream signalling pathways. Among the predicted E3 ligases, 469 proteins contain 477 RING domains , which may function as the substrate-binding domain of these E3 ligases .
XB3 (XA21-binding protein 3), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a substrate for the XA21 serine and threonine kinase and is necessary for the full accumulation of the XA21 protein and for Xa21-mediated immunity . XB3 contains an ANK domain and a RF motif that are sufficient for its interaction with the kinase domain of XA21 and for its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, respectively . In Oryza sativa, the other ANK C3HC4-type RF proteins have been named XBOS . To date, studies demonstrate that the transcription levels of XB3, XBOS31, XBOS32 and XBOS35 can be regulated by hormones and stress , .
In Arabidopsis, five of the ANK C3HC4-type RF proteins have been named XBAT because they are structurally related to the Oryza sativa XB3 . XBAT32 and XBAT35 proteins have currently been assigned biological roles. XBAT32 positively regulates lateral root development  via the degradation of the ethylene biosynthetic enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 7 , thus down-regulating ethylene biosynthesis , and may also be implicated in ethylene-mediated responses to abiotic stresses, such as high salinity . In addition, XBAT35 defines a novel player in ethylene signalling that is involved in negatively regulating apical hook curvature, with alternative splicing controlling the dual targeting of this E3 ubiquitin ligase to the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments .
Here, we named a subgroup of the ANK C3HC4-type RF proteins the XB3-like proteins, which contain two to seven N-terminal ANK repeats and a conserved C3HC4-type RF domain. Recent draft genome sequences for plants offer the opportunity to investigate the XB3-like genes of plants using genomes that have only recently been completely sequenced. The objective of this study was to identify the complete set of XB3-like genes in sequenced plants using a bioinformatics approach. We first identified putative XB3-like proteins in 29 species,then analysed the phylogenetic relationships and structure of these proteins. We analysed the expression patterns of XB3-like genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza sative, Zea mays and Glycine max using microarray data and surveyed the expression patterns of the XB3-like genes in Arabidopsis and Zea mays as well as their responses to four phytohormones (6-BA, IAA, SA and ABA) and three abiotic stress mimis (NaCl, PEG and mannitol) treatments using real-time PCR. The results constitute a foundation for further functional analyses of each member of this gene family and also provide a new method for analysing gene families in multiple species.
Materials and Methods
Identification of XB3-like genes in plants
To identify members of the XB3-like gene family in plants, we collected the known XB3-like genes in Arabidopsis and Oryza sative and analysed the domains of the XB3-like peptide sequences using PFAM  and SMART tools . Three different approaches were then performed. First, all of the known Arabidopsis and Oryza sative XB3-like gene sequences were used as query sequences to perform multiple database searches against proteome and genome files downloaded from the Phytozome database (http://www.phytozome.net/) . Stand-alone versions of BLASTP and TBLASTN (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), which are available from NCBI, were used with an e-value cutoff of 1e-003 , . All protein sequences derived from the collected candidate XB3-like genes were examined using the domain analysis programs PFAM (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) with the default cutoff parameters. Second, we analysed the domains of all plant peptide sequences using a Hidden Markov Model (HMM)  analysis with PFAM searching. We then obtained the sequences with the PF12796 and PF13920 PFAM number, which contained a typical ANK domain and a C3HC4-type RING domain, from the plant genome sequences using a Perl-based script. Third, we analysed the domains of all the plant peptide sequences using SMART searching and selected the sequences with an ANK domain (SM00248) and RF structure (SM00184). Finally, all protein sequences were compared with known XB3-like proteins using ClustalX (http://www.clustal.org/) to verify the sequences that were candidate XB3-like proteins . The isoelectric points and molecular weights of XB3-like proteins were obtained with the help of proteomics and sequence analysis tools on the ExPASy Proteomics Server (http://expasy.org/) .
The phylogenetic analysis of XB3-like proteins in plants
XB3-like proteins sequences were aligned using the ClustalX program with BLOSUM30 as the protein weight matrix. The MUSCLE program (version 3.52) was also used to perform multiple sequence alignments to confirm the ClustalX results (http://www.clustal.org/) . Phylogenetic trees of the XB3-like protein sequences were constructed using the neighbour-joining (NJ) method of the MEGA5 program (http://www.megasoftware.net/) using the p-distance and complete deletion option parameters . The reliability of the obtained trees was tested using a bootstrapping method with 1000 replicates. The images of the phylogenetic trees were drawn using MEGA5.
Expression analyses of the XB3-like genes using GENEVESTIGATOR
Microarray expression data from various datasets were obtained using GENEVESTIGATOR (https://www.genevestigator.com/gv/) with the Arabidopsis, Oryza sative, Zea mays and Glycine max Gene Chip platform .
Plant material and growth conditions
Columbia 0 (Arabidopsis thaliana) and B73 (Zea mays) were used for this study. Unless stated otherwise, the seed germination and plant growth conditions were according to Guo et al . For the phytohormone treatments and abiotic stress assays, 12-day-old (Arabidopsis) or 5-day-old (Zea mays) wild type seedlings were transferred to liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium  and supplemented with different treatments (or solvent control) for 6 h with gentle shaking. The plant material was then frozen in liquid N2 and stored at −80°C.
RNA isolation and real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the frozen tissue using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was further purified using a Fermentas RNAeasy mini kit. RNA (1 µg) was used as a template for first strand cDNA synthesis using the Super Script First-Strand Synthesis system (Transgen). Real-time PCR was performed using gene-specific primers and the TranStart Green qPCR Super Mix (Transgen). Actin2  and 18S ribosomal RNA genes  were used as internal normalisation controls. Fold changes in gene expression were calculated using the ΔCt values. To identify preferentially expressed genes, a student-t test was performed. A gene in a given tissue was defined as preferentially expressed only if the expression value of the gene in this tissue was more than 2-fold and had a P value less than 0.05 compared to other tissues. Under phytohormone and abiotic treatments, genes that were up or down-regulated more than 1.2-fold and with P value less than 0.05 compared to control were considered as differentially expression. Details of the primers used are listed in Table 1.
Identification of XB3-like genes in plants
To identify XB3-like genes in plants, we first collected the known XB3-like genes from Arabidopsis (XBAT31, XBAT32, XBAT33, XBAT34, XBAT35) and Oryza sative (XB3, XBOS31, XBOS32, XBOS33, XBOS34, XBOS35, XBOS36) and analysed the XB3 domains and XBAT and XBOS peptides using the PFAM and SMART tools. Our result demonstrated that all twelve proteins contained a conserved C3HC4 RF domain and no fewer than two ANK domains (XBAT34 and XBAT35 contain two ANK domains; XBOS34 contains three ANK domains; XBAT31, XBAT32, XBAT33, XBOS31, XBOS33 and XBOS36 contain five ANK domains; and XB3, XBOS32 and XBOS35 contain six ANK domains; Fig. 1). We then used bioinformatics methods to gather extensive information regarding this family. A total of 187 genes encoding 187 XB3-like proteins were identified as potential members of the XB3-like gene family within the 29 plant genomes (no XB3-like gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii or Volvox carteri) that have been completely sequenced (Phytozome database: http://www.phytozome.net/; Table S1). Because there was no standard annotation assigned to these newly identified plant genes (not including Arabidopsis and Oryza sative), we assigned each of them an identity based on the gene identifier. Interestingly, a new XBOS gene (Os03g16780) was identified for the first time in Oryza sative using this method and named XBOS37 (Fig. 1).
The domains of the XB3-like protein were analysed using SMART searching, and the image was produced using DOG2.0.The gray box in the protein structure diagram represents the XB3-like proteins, the blue and the red boxes represent the ANK domain and C3HC4-type RF domain, respectively. The numbers under the proteins indicate the position of the domain.
In this study, we observed that the XB3-like gene family originated from the ferns and were identified in 27 species of land plants. The results suggested that the function of the XB3-like proteins may be involved in the morphological character of land plants and adaptations to survival in certain environments. Additionally, among the land plants, there are 2 (Ricinus communis and Medicago truncatula) to 14 (Panicum virgatum and Glycine max) XB3-like genes in every species, and most species possess more than five XB3-like proteins (Fig. 2). The protein length of the XB3-like gene family is from 327 aa (GmaXB32) to 632 aa (AcoXB35), and the isoelectric point is from 5.31 (PpaXB31) to 9.50 (SmoXB32) (Table S1).
The number in parentheses corresponds to the number of XB3-like genes in each species.
Phylogenetic relationships between the XB3-like family genes
To clarify the phylogenetic relationship among the XB3-like genes and to infer the evolutionary history of the gene family, the full-length protein sequences of the XB3-like family members in plants were used to construct a joint unrooted phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3A), from which it can be observed that the proteins fell into three major groups (group I to group III) with well-supported bootstrap values. Statistically, group I contains 81 members, group II contains 54 members and group III has 52 members. In addition, most plants contain 3 groups of XB3-like genes, except for Ricinus communis and Medicago truncatula, which only contains group I XB3-like genes.
(A) The phylogenetic tree of the plant XB3-like proteins. The amino acid sequences of the plant XB3 proteins were aligned using MUSCLE, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method in the MEGA 5 software. Each node has a number that indicates the bootstrap value for 1000 replicates. The scale bar represents 0.1 substitutions per sequence position. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of representative RING domains. Dashes denote the gaps introduced to maximise the alignment, asterisks indicate conserved residues and the black dots indicate residues conserved in all RING types.
Interestingly, we found that the C3HC4-type RF domain was conserved in each group. Previous studies have revealed that the RF domain forms a distinct so-called cross-brace structure in which metal ligand pairs 1 and 3 coordinate to bind one zinc ion and pairs 2 and 4 bind the second one. This special structure requires that the distance between metal ligands 1 and 2, 3 and 6 as well as 7 and 8 should be conserved while the distance between metal ligands 2 and 3, 6 and 7 can vary. An alignment of all C3HC4-type RF domains was performed (Fig. 3B). All three groups of XB3-like proteins contained two amino acids between metal ligands 1 and 2 as well as 7 and 8 (except for VviXB35), 11 amino acids between metal ligands 2 and 3, and 7 amino acids between metal ligands 3 and 6. However, the number of residues between metal ligands 6 and 7 was from 19 to 23 in group I, 21 to 24 in group II and 11 in group III, respectively (Table S2). In addition to the conserved metal ligand positions, a previous study demonstrated that other positions also display a high level of similarity in the RING domain of Arabidopsis. Notably, a Pro (P) residue is present right after metal ligand 7 in all three groups of XB3-like proteins, and an Arg (R) residue is present after metal ligand 8 in all identified proteins, except for ThaXB34. Meanwhile, the first residue before metal ligand 2 is always a Val (V) or Ile (I). In addition, the residue before metal ligand 4 is always a Gly (G) in group II proteins. The residue before metal ligand 8 is a Leu (L) in group I, a Phe (F) in group II and a Val (V) or Ile (I) in group III, respectively. Therefore, we hypothesise that proteins in the same group likely perform the same or similar functions in plants.
Classification of XB3 proteins based on ANK number
Based on the detailed results from the PFAM and SMART searches, the XB3-like proteins were classified into six groups based on their number of ANKs (Fig. 4A). The number of ANK was from 2 to 6 in group A to F. However, there was no significant difference in the length of the proteins in the six groups. The numbers of members in group A to F were 27, 20, 14, 91, 31 and 4, respectively (Table S1). In accordance with the trend of ANK domains in Arabidopsis and Oryza sative, the proteins containing five ANK domains are approximately 50% in the gene family. These results suggested that the function of the ANK domain, known to mediate protein-protein interactions, may be related to the number of ANKs.
The image was produced using DOG2.0. The gray box in the protein structure diagram represents the XB3-like proteins, and the blue and the red boxes represent ANK domains and C3HC4-type RF domains, respectively. (B) The classification of XB3-like proteins in plants.
Expression profiling of XB3-like genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza sative, Zea mays and Glycine max
To investigate the expression profiling of the XB3-like gene family in plants, we used bioinformatics methods to gather extensive microarray information regarding this family in the model plant Arabidopsis and in other crops (Oryza sative, Zea mays and Glycine max; Fig. 5). The developmental stages selected for the microarray analysis cover the entire life cycle. The sample number indicates the number of microarray analyses, and the dark and light colour shadings represent relative high or low expression levels of the XB3-like genes in different tissues, respectively.
The dark and light colour shadings represent relative high or low expression levels, respectively, of the XB3 genes in different tissues. (A) The expression profile of XB3-like genes in Arabidopsis. (B) The expression profile of XB3-like genes in Oryza sative. (C) The expression profile of XB3-like genes in Zea mays. (D) The expression profile of XB3-like genes in Glycine max.
In Arabidopsis, five members of the XB3-like gene family were identified: XBAT31, XBAT32, XBAT33, XBAT34 and XBAT35. In addition to XBAT32, four of these members demonstrated extensive expression levels in all of the developmental stages and tissues analysed (Fig. 5A), and XBAT31 had the highest expression level among the five genes, which had its highest expression in the senescent leaf, stem and flower (Fig. S1). In contrast, we found that the expression of XBAT32 was regionally in the root stele and anther. In Oryza sative, in addition to XB3, seven homologous genes were identified. Among these eight genes, XBOS33 and XBOS37 had the highest expression levels during the entire life cycle and in different tissues (Fig. S2). Additionally, high expression signals were detected for XBOS36 during stem elongation and for XBOS31 during the seedling and dough stage. In Zea mays, among the five XB3-like genes, ZmaXB34 had the highest expression level during the entire life cycle. In addition, the expression of ZmaXB31 was highest during the anthesis stage, and ZmaXB35 had its highest expression during the dough stage. In Glycine max, fourteen members of the XB3-like gene family were identified. GmaXB38 and GmaXB311 had the same expressional patterns and had their highest expression levels during the flowering stage, especially in flowers (Fig. S3). In addition, although GmaXB33 had a higher expression level than that of GmaXB313, the expression patterns of GmaXB33 and GmaXB313 were similar.
With the aim of revealing the XB3-like gene expression features, an analysis of preferential expression was performed using real-time PCR with gene-specific primers in Arabidopsis and Zea mays. In Arabidopsis, the predominant expression of XBAT31, XBAT34 and XBAT35 was in stem and leaf while XBAT32 and XBAT33 had their highest expression levels in flower (Fig. 6A). In Zea mays, ZmaXB34 was highly and extensively expressed (Fig. S4). High expression levels of ZmaXB32, ZmaXB33 and ZmaXB36 were observed in the root and seed while ZmaXB31 had its highest expression only in seed (Fig. 6B). These results demonstrated that the expression of XB3-like genes was extensive during different development stages and in different tissues.
(A) The spatial expression patterns of XB3-like genes in Arabidopsis seedlings (12-day-old seedlings). Root means of two-week-old seedlings. Stem means of six-week-old plants. Leaf means of four-week-old plants. Flower means opening flower. Representative experiments are shown and were performed three times. Each bar represents a mean±SEM (n = 3). (B) The spatial expression profile of XB3-like genes in Zea mays. Root means of four-week- old seedlings. Stem means of four-week-old seedlings. Leaf means of four-week-old plants. Ovary means one-day old ovary. Seed means 9-day-old seed. Representative experiments are shown and were performed three times. Each bar represents a mean±SEM (n = 3).
Responses of XB3-like genes to phytohormones and abiotic stress in Arabidopsis and Zea mays
Phytohormones play a critical role in plant growth and development. To investigate the potential function of the XB3-like gene family in plant, we surveyed the responses of XB3-like genes to phytohormones in Arabidopsis and Zea mays using real-time PCR. In Arabidopsis, all of the XB3-like genes were up-regulated by IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) and ABA (abscisic acid). In addition, four genes were induced by 6-BA (6-benzylaminopurine) (XBAT31, XBAT33, XBAT34 and XBAT35) and SA (salicylic acid) (XBAT31, XBAT32, XBAT34 and XBAT35) (Fig. 7A). However, all five examined genes were down-regulated by ABA, and three genes (ZmaXB31, ZmaXB33 and ZmaXB36) were down-regulated by 6-BA and IAA in Zea mays (Fig. 7B). Therefore, the results demonstrated that phytohormones affect the expression of XB3-like genes and suggest that these proteins may play roles in plant growth and development.
Twelve-day-old (Arabidopsis) or 5-day-old (Zea mays) wild type seedlings were transferred to liquid MS media supplemented with 5 µM 6-BA, 5 µM IAA, 100 µM SA, 100 µM ABA, 100 mM NaCl, 300 mM mannitol or 15% PEG 6000 (or solvent control) for 6 h with gentle shaking. Representative experiments are shown and were performed three times. Each bar represents a mean±SEM (n = 3).
Previous reports have revealed that ABA, as stress a hormone, mediates the plant's response to stress by its rapid accumulation, thus helping plant survival , . All of the ten genes mentioned above were affected by ABA, and we speculate that XB3-like genes may be involved in the signalling pathways triggered by abiotic stresses. To reveal the responses of these genes to different stresses, real-time PCR analysis was performed using the total RNA from the leaves of seedling treated with NaCl, PEG and mannitol (Fig. 7). The results demonstrated that all of the XB3-like genes in Arabidopsis were induced by NaCl, PEG and mannitol. In Zea mays, the expression of ZmaXB31, ZmaXB33 and ZmaXB36 were induced by NaCl and suppressed by PEG and mannitol. On the contrary, the transcription of ZmaXB32 and ZmaXB34 was suppressed by NaCl and induced by PEG and mannitol. These results suggest that the functions of XB3-like genes may be involved in responses to abiotic stresses in plants.
With the development of comparative genomics, it is now possible to analyse proteins from the same gene family among different species. To clarify the phylogenetic relationship among the XB3-like genes and to infer functions as well as the evolutionary history of this gene family, we identified 187 genes in 27 land plants with completely sequenced genomes. Notably, the XB3-like proteins originated from the ferns and are conserved in land plants (Fig. 2). These results infer that the structure of these proteins has been conserved and that these proteins are essential for plant survival on the land. In addition, we found that all of the XB3-like proteins fall into three groups in which there is a conserved spacing between the metal ligand positions and the conserved residues in addition to the metal ligand amino acids in the C3HC4-type RF, which are different among the three groups (Fig. 3). A previous study demonstrated that RF can bind to DNA, RNA, proteins or lipid substrates . Therefore, we speculated that the binding substrates of the proteins in the same group maybe similar.
Because XB3-like proteins appear to be conserved in terms of structure rather than in function, knowing the expression profiles of some XB3-like genes may provide clues to the function of XB3-like genes. Through the use of expression profile analyses in Arabidopsis, Oryza sative, Zea mays and Glycine max, the accumulation of XB3-like gene transcripts was demonstrated during different developmental stages and in different tissues (Fig. 5, 6). Therefore, the variability in the expression patterns of genes in the same family indicated that their roles might not be redundant and that these genes, which are preferentially expressed in specific tissues, may deserve further investigation for their functions. In addition, crops and the model plant Arabidopsis were used in this expression analysis. Therefore, the results from this study will be useful for further studying crop production.
The proteins of the XB3-like gene family, as identified in different plant species, are involved in various developmental processes, including signalling pathways, stress responses, and plant defences , , . As is known, phytohormones play important roles in plant growth and development as well as in stress tolerance , , , , . Some XB3-like genes in plants are affected by phytohormones and play roles in stress responses. For example, XB3 plays a role in resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae . The expression of XBOS31, XBOS32 and XBOS35 can be regulated by hormones as well as stresses. Auxin can induce the expression of XBAT32 . The transcription level of XBAT35 is up-regulated in response to exogenous glucose and NaCl as well as heat and cold stresses . In addition, the functions of other ANK-RF protein were demonstrated. KEEP ON GOING (KEG), a RING E3 ligase essential for Arabidopsis growth and development, is involved in ABA signalling . MjXB3, which is highly expressed in the petals of senescing four o′clock (Mirabilis jalapa) flowers, is involved in the coordination of the senescence program . The transcription of AdZFP1, which was isolated from drought-tolerant Artemisia desertorum, is induced by exogenous ABA and also by salinity, cold and heat, to some extent . Therefore, knowing the response of XB3-like genes to phytohormones and mimicking abiotic stress treatments may provide clues to their function. Through our transcriptional analysis of some of the XB3-like genes, we found that the expression of all the examined genes was affected by many phytohormones (Fig. 7). This result suggests that the XB3-like proteins likely play roles in plant growth and development. In addition, all ten genes are affected by ABA, which is a stress hormone , , specifically abiotic stress . Interestingly, we found that the expression of XB3-like genes was induced by salt and mimicked drought stress in Arabidopsis. However, in Zea mays, the expression of some XB3-like genes was induced by mimicking drought stress and suppressed by salt stress, and some XB3-like genes were induced by salt stress and suppressed by mimicking drought stress. Previous studies have revealed that salt and drought stress signal a transduction that consists of the ionic and osmotic homeostasis signalling pathway , . Therefore, our results infer that XB3-like genes are involved in responses to abiotic stresses, likely in different pathways in plants.
In conclusion, the preferential expression in specified tissues and the response to phytohormones and abiotic stress treatments of the XB3-like genes provide clues to the roles of these genes in signalling, growth and development. The systematic sequence analysis and expression profiles of the XB3-like genes will serve as a very useful reference for more detailed functional analyses and will be helpful in the selection of appropriate candidate genes for further studies and genetic engineering.
Spatial expression analysis of XB3 -like genes in Arabidopsis .
Spatial expression analysis of XB3 -like genes in Oryza sative .
Spatial expression analysis of XB3 -like genes in Glycine max .
Spatial expression analysis of XB3 -like genes in Zea mays .
The XB3-Like genes in plants.
Number and consensus of each group type C3HC4-RING domain identified in plants.
Conceived and designed the experiments: XY SZ. Performed the experiments: XY SZ SL MY. Analyzed the data: SZ XY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: XL H. Shu H. Su. Wrote the paper: XY SZ.
- 1. Michaely P, Tomchick DR, Machius M, Anderson RGW (2002) Crystal structure of a 12 ANK repeat stack from human ankyrinR. The EMBO journal 21: 6387–6396. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf651
- 2. Sedgwick SG, Smerdon SJ (1999) The ankyrin repeat: a diversity of interactions on a common structural framework. Trends in biochemical sciences 24: 311–316. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01426-7
- 3. Breeden L, Nasmyth K (1987) Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell 48: 389–397. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90190-5
- 4. Breeden L, Nasmyth K (1987) Similarity between cell-cycle genes of budding yeast and fission yeast and the Notch gene of Drosophila. Nature 329: 651–654. doi: 10.1038/329651a0
- 5. Lux SE, John KM, Bennett V (1990) Analysis of cDNA for human erythrocyte ankyrin indicates a repeated structure with homology to tissue-differentiation and cell-cycle control proteins. Nature 344: 36–42. doi: 10.1038/344036a0
- 6. Michaely P, Bennett V (1992) The ANK repeat: a ubiquitous motif involved in macromolecular recognition. Trends in cell biology 2: 127–129. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(92)90084-z
- 7. Bork P (1993) Hundreds of ankyrin-like repeats in functionally diverse proteins: mobile modules that cross phyla horizontally? Proteins 17: 363–374. doi: 10.1002/prot.340170405
- 8. Mosavi LK, Cammett TJ, Desrosiers DC, Peng ZY (2004) The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein science: a publication of the Protein Society 13: 1435–1448. doi: 10.1110/ps.03554604
- 9. Freemont PS, Hanson IM, Trowsdale J (1991) A novel cysteine-rich sequence motif. Cell 64: 483–484. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90229-r
- 10. Wu LC, Wang ZW, Tsan JT, Spillman MA, Phung A, et al. (1996) Identification of a RING protein that can interact in vivo with the BRCA1 gene product. Nature genetics 14: 430–440. doi: 10.1038/ng1296-430
- 11. Pawson T, Nash P (2003) Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science Signalling 300: 445. doi: 10.1126/science.1083653
- 12. Kaulen H, Pognonec P, Gregor PD, Roeder RG (1991) The Xenopus B1 factor is closely related to the mammalian activator USF and is implicated in the developmental regulation of TFIIIA gene expression. Molecular and cellular biology 11: 412–424.
- 13. Elenbaas B, Dobbelstein M, Roth J, Shenk T, Levine A (1996) The MDM2 oncoprotein binds specifically to RNA through its RING finger domain. Molecular Medicine 2: 439.
- 14. Berg JM, Shi Y (1996) The galvanization of biology: a growing appreciation for the roles of zinc. Science 271: 1081–1085. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5252.1081
- 15. Stone SL, Hauksdottir H, Troy A, Herschleb J, Kraft E, et al. (2005) Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant physiology 137: 13–30. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.052423
- 16. Liu J, Zhang D, Luo W, Yu J, Li J, et al. (2012) E3 ligase activity of XIAP RING domain is required for XIAP-mediated cancer cell migration, but not for its RhoGDI binding activity. PloS one 7: e35682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035682
- 17. Berrocal-Lobo M, Stone S, Yang X, Antico J, Callis J, et al. (2010) ATL9, a RING zinc finger protein with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity implicated in chitin- and NADPH oxidase-mediated defense responses. PloS one 5: e14426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014426
- 18. Vierstra RD (2003) The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, the complex last chapter in the life of many plant proteins. Trends in plant science 8: 135–142. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00014-1
- 19. Unver T, Turktas M, Budak H (2012) In Planta Evidence for the Involvement of a Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme (UBC E2 clade) in Negative Regulation of Disease Resistance. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11105-012-0502-y
- 20. Callis J, Vierstra RD (2000) Protein degradation in signaling. Current opinion in plant biology 3: 381–386. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00100-x
- 21. Hatfield PM, Gosink MM, Carpenter TB, Vierstra RD (1997) The ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1) gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 11: 213–226. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11020213.x
- 22. Kraft E, Stone SL, Ma L, Su N, Gao Y, et al. (2005) Genome analysis and functional characterization of the E2 and RING-type E3 ligase ubiquitination enzymes of Arabidopsis. Plant physiology 139: 1597–1611. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.067983
- 23. Smalle J, Vierstra RD (2004) The ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway. Annual review of plant biology 55: 555–590. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141801
- 24. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CAP (2009) RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annual review of biochemistry 78: 399–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809
- 25. Wang YS, Pi LY, Chen X, Chakrabarty PK, Jiang J, et al. (2006) Rice XA21 binding protein 3 is a ubiquitin ligase required for full Xa21-mediated disease resistance. The Plant cell 18: 3635–3646. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046730
- 26. Ma K, Xiao J, Li X, Zhang Q, Lian X (2009) Sequence and expression analysis of the C3HC4-type RING finger gene family in rice. Gene 444: 33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.05.018
- 27. Huang J, Zhao X, Yu H, Ouyang Y, Wang L, et al. (2009) The ankyrin repeat gene family in rice: genome-wide identification, classification and expression profiling. Plant molecular biology 71: 207–226. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9518-6
- 28. Nodzon LA, Xu WH, Wang Y, Pi LY, Chakrabarty PK, et al. (2004) The ubiquitin ligase XBAT32 regulates lateral root development in Arabidopsis. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology 40: 996–1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02266.x
- 29. Lyzenga WJ, Booth JK, Stone SL (2012) The Arabidopsis RING-type E3 ligase XBAT32 mediates the proteasomal degradation of the ethylene biosynthetic enzyme, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase 7. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology 71: 23–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2012.04965.x
- 30. Prasad ME, Schofield A, Lyzenga W, Liu H, Stone SL (2010) Arabidopsis RING E3 ligase XBAT32 regulates lateral root production through its role in ethylene biosynthesis. Plant physiology 153: 1587–1596. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156976
- 31. Prasad ME, Stone SL (2010) Further analysis of XBAT32, an Arabidopsis RING E3 ligase, involved in ethylene biosynthesis. Plant signaling & behavior 5: 1425–1429. doi: 10.4161/psb.5.11.13294
- 32. Carvalho SD, Saraiva R, Maia TM, Abreu IA, Duque P (2012) XBAT35, a Novel Arabidopsis RING E3 Ligase Exhibiting Dual Targeting of Its Splice Isoforms, Is Involved in Ethylene-Mediated Regulation of Apical Hook Curvature. Molecular plant doi: 10.1093/mp/sss048
- 33. Mistry J, Finn R (2007) Pfam: a domain-centric method for analyzing proteins and proteomes. Methods in molecular biology 396: 43–58. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-515-6:43
- 34. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P (2012) SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic acids research 40: D302–305. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr931
- 35. Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, et al. (2012) Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic acids research 40: D1178–1186. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr944
- 36. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of molecular biology 215: 403–410. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2
- 37. Peng X, Zhao Y, Cao J, Zhang W, Jiang H, et al. (2012) CCCH-type zinc finger family in maize: genome-wide identification, classification and expression profiling under abscisic acid and drought treatments. PloS one 7: e40120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040120
- 38. Wu X, Song C, Wang B, Cheng J (2002) [Hidden Markov model used in protein sequence analysis]. Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi 19: 455–458.
- 39. Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1998) Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. Trends in biochemical sciences 23: 403–405. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01285-7
- 40. Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, et al. (2003) ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic acids research 31: 3784–3788. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg563
- 41. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC bioinformatics 5: 113.
- 42. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular biology and evolution 28: 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
- 43. Grennan AK (2006) Genevestigator. Facilitating web-based gene-expression analysis. Plant physiology 141: 1164–1166. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.900198
- 44. Guo J, Zeng Q, Emami M, Ellis BE, Chen JG (2008) The GCR2 gene family is not required for ABA control of seed germination and early seedling development in Arabidopsis. PloS one 3: e2982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002982
- 45. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia plantarum 15: 473–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
- 46. Cerana M, Bonza M, Harris R, Sanders D, Michelis M (2006) Abscisic Acid Stimulates the Expression of Two Isoforms of Plasma Membrane Ca2+-ATPase in Arabidopsis thaliana Seedlings. Plant Biology 8: 572–578. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924111
- 47. Chao S, Sederoff R, Levings CS (1984) Nucleotide sequence and evolution of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene in maize mitochondria. Nucleic acids research 12: 6629–6644. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.16.6629
- 48. Ding Y, Avramova Z, Fromm M (2011) The Arabidopsis trithorax-like factor ATX1 functions in dehydration stress responses via ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. The Plant journal: for cell and molecular biology 66: 735–744. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04534.x
- 49. Zhang J, Jia W, Yang J, Ismail AM (2006) Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crops Research 97: 111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.08.018
- 50. Santner A, Estelle M (2009) Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature 459: 1071–1078. doi: 10.1038/nature08122
- 51. Depuydt S, Hardtke CS (2011) Hormone signalling crosstalk in plant growth regulation. Current Biology 21: R365–R373. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.013
- 52. Yuan Y, Liu Y, Wu C, Chen S, Wang Z, et al. (2012) Water Deficit Affected Flavonoid Accumulation by Regulating Hormone Metabolism in Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi Roots. PloS one 7: e42946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042946
- 53. Vanstraelen M, Benková E (2012) Hormonal Interactions in the Regulation of Plant Development. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 28. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155741
- 54. Gechev TS, Hille J (2012) Molecular basis of plant stress. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 1–3. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1086-2
- 55. Stone SL, Williams LA, Farmer LM, Vierstra RD, Callis J (2006) KEEP ON GOING, a RING E3 ligase essential for Arabidopsis growth and development, is involved in abscisic acid signaling. The Plant Cell Online 18: 3415–3428. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046532
- 56. Xu X, Jiang CZ, Donnelly L, Reid MS (2007) Functional analysis of a RING domain ankyrin repeat protein that is highly expressed during flower senescence. Journal of experimental botany 58: 3623–3630. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm212
- 57. Yang X, Sun C, Hu Y, Lin Z (2008) Molecular cloning and characterization of a gene encoding RING zinc finger ankyrin protein from drought-tolerant Artemisia desertorum. Journal of biosciences 33: 103–112. doi: 10.1007/s12038-008-0026-7
- 58. Kempa S, Krasensky J, Dal Santo S, Kopka J, Jonak C (2008) A central role of abscisic acid in stress-regulated carbohydrate metabolism. PloS one 3: e3935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003935
- 59. Seiler C, Harshavardhan VT, Rajesh K, Reddy PS, Strickert M, et al. (2011) ABA biosynthesis and degradation contributing to ABA homeostasis during barley seed development under control and terminal drought-stress conditions. Journal of experimental botany 62: 2615–2632. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq446
- 60. Todaka D, Nakashima K, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2012) Toward understanding transcriptional regulatory networks in abiotic stress responses and tolerance in rice. Rice 5: 6. doi: 10.1186/1939-8433-5-6
- 61. Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annual review of plant biology 53: 247.
- 62. Urano K, Kurihara Y, Seki M, Shinozaki K (2010) ‘Omics’ analyses of regulatory networks in plant abiotic stress responses. Current opinion in plant biology 13: 132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.006