Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Populus Superoxide Dismutase Gene Family and Its Responses to Drought Stress in Transgenic Poplar Overexpressing a Pine Cytosolic Glutamine Synthetase (GS1a)

  • Juan Jesús Molina-Rueda,

    Current address: Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America

  • Chung Jui Tsai,

    Affiliation Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources and Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America

  • Edward G. Kirby

    ekirby@andromeda.rutgers.edu

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America

The Populus Superoxide Dismutase Gene Family and Its Responses to Drought Stress in Transgenic Poplar Overexpressing a Pine Cytosolic Glutamine Synthetase (GS1a)

  • Juan Jesús Molina-Rueda, 
  • Chung Jui Tsai, 
  • Edward G. Kirby
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Glutamine synthetase (GS) plays a central role in plant nitrogen assimilation, a process intimately linked to soil water availability. We previously showed that hybrid poplar (Populus tremula X alba, INRA 717-1B4) expressing ectopically a pine cytosolic glutamine synthetase gene (GS1a) display enhanced tolerance to drought. Preliminary transcriptome profiling revealed that during drought, members of the superoxide dismutase (SOD) family were reciprocally regulated in GS poplar when compared with the wild-type control, in all tissues examined. SOD was the only gene family found to exhibit such patterns.

Results

In silico analysis of the Populus genome identified 12 SOD genes and two genes encoding copper chaperones for SOD (CCSs). The poplar SODs form three phylogenetic clusters in accordance with their distinct metal co-factor requirements and gene structure. Nearly all poplar SODs and CCSs are present in duplicate derived from whole genome duplication, in sharp contrast to their predominantly single-copy Arabidopsis orthologs. Drought stress triggered plant-wide down-regulation of the plastidic copper SODs (CSDs), with concomitant up-regulation of plastidic iron SODs (FSDs) in GS poplar relative to the wild type; this was confirmed at the activity level. We also found evidence for coordinated down-regulation of other copper proteins, including plastidic CCSs and polyphenol oxidases, in GS poplar under drought conditions.

Conclusions

Both gene duplication and expression divergence have contributed to the expansion and transcriptional diversity of the Populus SOD/CCS families. Coordinated down-regulation of major copper proteins in drought-tolerant GS poplars supports the copper cofactor economy model where copper supply is preferentially allocated for plastocyanins to sustain photosynthesis during drought. Our results also extend previous findings on the compensatory regulation between chloroplastic CSDs and FSDs, and suggest that this copper-mediated mechanism represents a common response to oxidative stress and other genetic manipulations, as in GS poplars, that affect photosynthesis.

Introduction

Inorganic nitrogen (N) is the most limiting nutrient affecting the growth of forest trees. As N uptake is influenced by soil water availability [1], [2], this problem is exacerbated by increasingly frequent episodes of drought in many regions of the world due to ongoing climate change [3]. In addition to the adverse effects on mineral nutrient uptake, drought causes oxidative stress in plants, including poplar [4], [5]. As such, the drought stress response is tightly coupled with the antioxidant defense system and cellular redox regulation [6].

Glutamine synthetase (GS) plays a central role in assimilation of ammonium into amino acids and other reduced N compounds in plants. Consistent with the central importance of N metabolism in plant growth and development, hybrid poplar (Populus tremula X alba, INRA 717-1B4) expressing ectopically the pine glutamine synthetase gene (GS1a) exhibited several pleiotropic phenotypes of agronomic significance. These include increased growth [7], [8], increased nitrogen use efficiency [9], altered wood chemistry [10], and of particular relevance to the present investigation, enhanced tolerance to drought [11].

The superoxide dismutases (SODs) constitute a first line of defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS) [12]. SODs are metalloenzymes that catalyze the dismutation of ion superoxide into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide [13]. The superoxide radical is a ROS whose production increases under abiotic and biotic stresses, including drought [14]. Thus, SODs play a critical role in protecting plant tissues from ROS [12]. SODs are classified according to their metal cofactors and/or subcellular distribution. The predominant forms of SOD in plants are mitochondrial manganese SODs (MnSODs), cytosolic copper/zinc SODs (Cu/ZnSODs), chloroplastic Cu/ZnSODs, and iron SODs (FeSODs) [15]. In addition, plant SODs have been localized in peroxisomes, glyoxysomes [16], vacuoles, the nucleus [17], and the extracellular matrix [18]. Expression of plant SOD genes is regulated by developmental and environmental cues, including hormones [19], [20], high light and UV [15], and drought [21]. Recent work at the molecular level has shown that SOD expression can be modulated by alternative splicing [18], [22] and microRNAs [23], [24]. Transgenic plants that over-express SOD genes display a range of phenotypes depending on the targeted SOD isoform, the level of transgene expression, and subcellular localization. Reported phenotypic effects include enhanced tolerance to oxidative stresses, such as drought and salinity [25][27].

Considering the relevant role of the SODs in drought tolerance, we have undertaken in silico characterization of the SOD gene family in poplar and assessed transcript levels for the SOD gene family in various tissues of GS transgenic and wild type poplars subjected to drought treatments. Furthermore, we have detected the activities of the major poplar SODs in gel assays. Our results show that drought tolerant GS poplars have altered SOD expression when compared with the wild type under drought conditions. The putative roles of the poplar SOD gene family and the use of specific SODs as marker(s) of drought tolerance are proposed.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Stress Treatments

Hybrid poplar (Populus tremula X P. alba, INRA 717-1B4) expressing ectopically the pine glutamine synthetase gene (GS1a) were generated and maintained as previously described [7]. Water stress treatments and conditions of recovery from water stress were as described in El-Khatib et al. [11]. Rooted cuttings (9–12 months old) were planted in 6-inch pots containing a peat-based commercial growth medium (Metro-Mix 200, Scotts, Marysville, OH) without supplementary nutrients and raised in a growth chamber supplying a 16 h photoperiod (24–26°C). Soil samples were weighed after drying overnight at 60°C and volumetric soil moisture contents (θ) were calculated. Nonlinear regression (SigmaPlot v4.01, SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used to relate θ to soil water potential (ψsoil): ψsoil = 0.9031+1.305 ln(θ–0.1081) (R2 = 0.98; P<0.0001). This allowed conversion of θ, estimated with a time-domain-reflectrometry (TDR) soil moisture meter (Theta Meter, Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, U.K.), to track changes in soil water throughout the experiment. We used soil water potential as a proxy measure of plant water status. Plants were watered every day until θ was between 50 and 55%, equivalent to a soilwater potential of –1 to 0 MPa for well-watered conditions. Drought stress was applied to plants by withholding irrigation for 7 days, by which time θ was between 15 and 20%, equivalent to a soil water potential of –2 to–3 MPa. This level of water stress typically resulted in a decline in leaf stomatal conductance in wild type poplars from 0.138 mol m−2s−1 (SE 0.025) for well-watered leaves to 0.018 mol m−2s−1 (SE 0.002) during drought conditions (unpublished data). After the drought treatment, plants were watered every day for 5 days recovering the well-watered conditions in soil. Plants heights ranged from 45 to 55 cm at the collection day.

Sequence Analysis

Published Arabidopsis and Populus SODs (NCBI) were used to search the P. trichocarpa genome v2.2 (www.phytozome.net) by BLAST [28]. Open reading frames, exon-intron predictions, and 3′-UTRs were manually examined and analyzed against publicly available poplar ESTs. Theoretical molecular weights and isoelectric points for the predicted proteins were calculated using the Expasy server (http://expasy.org/tools/pi_tool.html) [29]. Pairwise sequence similarities were calculated individually using the EBI EMBOSS Pairwise Sequence Alignment server (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/emboss/align/). The similarity of a group was calculated as the mean of all individual pairwise comparisons within that group. The similarity between groups was calculated as the mean of all between-group pairwise comparisons.

The alignments in Figure 1 were prepared using ClustalX 2.0.12 [30]. Boxshade 3.21 (www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html) was used to mark identity and similarity boxes and consensus lines in amino acid alignments. The Neighbor-joining tree was constructed using the Muscle alignment program implemented in MEGA version 5 [31], with partial deletion to handle alignment gaps, and 1000 bootstrap iterations. Poplar SOD gene nomenclature in this paper was assigned considering its phylogenetic relationship with the published nomenclature for the Arabidopsis SOD gene family [15].

thumbnail
Figure 1. Alignment of predicted SOD and CCS amino acid sequences from Populus trichocarpa and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Blue boxes in the amino termini and underlined sequences in carboxy termini represent predicted transit peptides (see Table 1 for details). Alignments were generated using ClustalX 2.0.12 [30]. Boxes showing identical (black) and similar (grey) amino acids and the consensus sequence were included in the alignment by Boxshade 3.21 (www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html). A. CSD and CCS alignment. Amino acids involved in copper binding for CCSs in the consensus region MXCXXC [51] are marked with pluses (+) in their amino termini. Amino acids involved in metal binding for CSD group [52] are marked with asterisks (*). B. MSD and FSD alignment. Metal ligands [53] and the tyrosine residue essential for catalytic activity [22] are marked with asterisks (*) and tail arrows (), respectively. The primary candidates for distinguishing MSD from FSD [72] are indicated with solid arrowheads. Tryptophan residues within this region may confer H2O2 sensitivity in FSDs [73].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.g001

TargetP 1.1 [32] (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/) was used for general subcellular localization prediction of poplar SODs and CCSs. Following the recommendation of Emanuelsson et al. [32], proteins predicted as “other” (other than chloroplast, mitochondria or secreted) by the TargetP 1.1 were further analyzed by TMHMM 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) to assess transmembrane helices. Sequences predicted as “secretory” or had low reliability (RC≥4) were further analyzed using SignalP 4.0 [33] (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). ChloroP 1.1 [34](http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP/) and MITOPROT [35] were used to produce a detailed report for chloroplast- and mitochondria-targeted proteins, respectively. PTS1 [36] (http://www.mendel.imp.ac.at/mendeljsp/sat/pts1/PTS1predictor.jsp) was used for peroxisomal protein predictions.

qPCR

RNA extraction was carried out as described in Liao et al. [37]. RNA was extracted from two biological replicates consisting of pooled samples from 5 individual plants from 2 replicate experiments. Each experiment assessed the GS transgenic line (line 4–29) and the wild type control. Quality of the RNA was assessed both on agarose gels and spectrophotometrically. Although no contamination by genomic DNA was detected on gels, all RNA samples were treated with DNases (Turbo DNA Free kit of Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin TX), following the manufacturer’s protocol, and stored at −80°C for up to three months. For cDNA synthesis, the iScript Select cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) was used with both random and oligo dT primers using 3 µg of total RNA per reaction (80 µL), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNAs were stored at −20°C for up to six months.

Quantitative PCR was performed using a LightCycler 480 (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis IN) using Roche SYBR Green I Master mix prepared according to the manufacturer’s specifications. qPCR reactions were carried out in 20 µL volumes containing 10 ng cDNA and 0.5 µM primers. A total of 45 cycles were run per program: denaturing was at 95°C for 10 sec, annealing at 58°C for 15 sec, and extension was at 72°C for 12 seconds in each cycle.

P. trichocarpa genome sequences and Populus EST sequences (P. tremula and P. alba) were used in the design of the primers for qPCR (Table S1). The forward primers were designed within the coding regions and the reverse primers were designed in 3′ UTRs. Primer quality was evaluated using Prime3Plus (www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/) [38]. All amplicons were between 155 and 305 bp. Sequences of the resulting amplicons were validated by sequencing the RT-qPCR product. Relative transcript levels were determined against three validated reference genes: actin, elongation factor 1β and ubiquitin [39], using GeNorm [40] (Figure S1). Quantitative cycles were estimated using LinRegPCR (v 11.1) [41]. In all cases, two biological replicates were used, each with three technical replicates.

Cluster 3.0 [42] and Java TreeView [43] programs were used as the computational and graphical environment for analyzing correlations from RT-qPCR expression data. The heat map was generated using Heat Mapper Plus (Bio-Array Resource for Plant Biology; http://bar.utoronto.ca/welcome.htm).

Determination of SOD Activities

In order to provide assessment of qualitative differences in activities of the various SODs in GS transgenic and control leaves, proteins were extracted from three biological replicates (individual plants) in two replicate experiments and on native protein gels. Proteins were extracted by mixing one part of liquid nitrogen-ground tissue with two parts of extraction buffer [50 mM KH2PO4 pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% (w/v) Triton X-100, and 0.05% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol] and incubated on ice for 10 min. Samples were centrifuged at 13,000 g for 12 min at 4°C and protein concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically [44] using BSA as a standard. The protocol of Weydert and Cullen [45] was followed to assess SOD activities using native gels (acrylamide and bis-acrylamide solution (29∶1) 12%, w/v; 1.5 mm thickness) with slight modifications. Gels were first run at 20 mA for one hour, followed by 30 mA for two hours, after which the electrophoresis buffer was replaced. The gels were then run at 40 mA for 20 min after run-off of the dye front. Seventy-five micrograms total protein was found optimal for protein separation. Assays of the three SOD activities (Cu/ZnSODs, MnSODs, and FeSODs) were performed using specific inhibitors (KCN and H2O2), as previously described [46]. Gels were scanned, negative images were obtained, and intensities of bands were measured using Image J 1.43 [47].

Results

In silico Characterization of the SOD Gene Family in Populus

Twelve putative SODs were identified in the P. trichocarpa genome (Phytozome) by BLAST using Arabidopsis and poplar sequences functionally annotated as SODs in the NCBI database as queries. To propose a nomenclature for the poplar SOD gene family, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using predicted amino acid sequences from Populus and Arabidopsis (Figure 2). Arabidopsis is the only plant for which the SOD gene family has been fully characterized [15]. In Arabidopsis the SOD family consists of seven members: three Cu/ZnSODs (AtCSDs), one MnSOD (AtMSD), and three FeSODs (AtFSDs). The three groups formed separate clusters in the phylogenetic tree with strong bootstrap support, in accordance with their distinct metal cofactor requirements (Figure 2). Seven poplar SODs were classified as Cu/ZnSODs in three strongly supported sub-groups (PtCSD1, PtCSD2, and PtCSD3) corresponding to their putative Arabidopsis orthologs. The PtCSD1 sub-group contains two highly similar isoforms, PtCSD1.1 and PtCSD1.2 (96.1% amino acid sequence similarity, Figure S2), derived from the recent (Salicoid) whole-genome duplication [48] (Plant Genome Duplication Database [http://chibba.agtec.uga.edu/duplication/]). They share high similarity (91–92%) to the putative ortholog, AtCSD1 (Figure S2). The PtCSD2 sub-group contains three SODs, PtCSD2.1, PtCSD2.2a and PtCSD2.2b, two of which are nearly identical (PtCSD2.2a and PtCSD2.2b; 99.5% similarity). PtCSD2.1 and PtCSD2.2b (87.2% similarity) were derived from the Salicoid whole-genome duplication (Plant Genome Duplication Database), whereas PtCSD2.2a likely originated from PtCSD2.2b via an independent duplication event. The PtCSD2s share 75–80% amino acid sequence similarity with the Arabidopsis ortholog, AtCSD2. The third sub-group also contains a genome duplicate, PtCSD3.1 and PtCSD3.2, with high similarity with one another (96.2%) and with the Arabidopsis AtCSD3 (82–84%).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of Populus trichocarpa (Pt) and Arabidopsis thaliana (At) SODs based on predicted amino acid sequences.

The neighbor-joining tree was generated using Mega 5.05 [31]. The bootstrap method with 1000 replicates was used as a test of the phylogeny. The three groups identified include the copper/zinc SODs (triangles), manganese SODs (squares), and iron SODs (circles). Poplar and Arabidopsis sequences are marked with solid and empty symbols, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.g002

The MnSOD group is the smallest of the three, with two poplar members, PtMSD1 and PtMSD2 (93.0% similarity), derived from genome-wide duplication. They share 86–87% similarity with their Arabidopsis ortholog AtMSD. The FeSOD group contains equal numbers of Populus and Arabidopsis SODs in two sub-clusters. One poplar isoform grouped with AtFSD3 (66.9% similarity) with very strong bootstrap support, and was designated PtFSD3. The other two were derived from genome-wide duplication; one appeared to be a partial sequence. The full-length isoform (POPTR_0015s12190) was most similar to AtFSD2 (77.5%: Figure S2), thus designated PtFSD2.1, whereas the truncated gene model (POPTR_0012s11400) was named PtFSD2.2. Manual inspection identified five miss-annotated introns and five exons (Figure S3). The curated gene model contained nine exons (versus four in the Phytozome-predicted model), similar to PtFSD2.1. However, one of the exons in PtFSD2.2 harbored two single-nucleotide insertions relative to PtFSD2.1 (shaded residues in Figure S3), the first of which led to a premature stop codon. This suggests that PtFSD2.2 may represent a pseudogene. The lone member AtFSD1 shares 57% amino acid sequence similarity with AtFSD2, and they were derived from an older, Brassicaceae-specific (β) duplication event (Plant Genome Duplication Database). Consistent with this, no apparent Populus ortholog of AtFSD1 was identified.

Copper chaperones for Cu/ZnSODs (CCS) were included in this work, since CCS are required for Cu/ZnSOD activity in Arabidopsis [49]. Two putative CCSs homologous to the Arabidopsis AtCCS were identified in the Populus genome, and were designated PtCCS1 and PtCCS2. They appear derived from whole-genome duplication, and shared 90.7% similarity with each other, and 77–79% with AtCCS (Figure S2). Like several of the SODs, transcript levels of both CCS genes were significantly altered in the GS poplar relative to the wild type under drought, based on our microarray studies (data not shown).

Taken together, our analysis showed that multiple gene duplication events contributed to the expansion of the Populus SOD and CCS families. This resulted in the overall greater numbers of poplar genes in each SOD/CCS group than the number of orthologs found in Arabidopsis, except for the iron SOD group.

Gene Structure of Populus and Arabidopsis SODs and CCSs

The exon-intron structure was largely conserved among Populus and Arabidopsis Cu/ZnSOD genes, with two exceptions. The exons 4 and 5 were fused in PtCSD1.1 and PtCSD1.2, whereas the second exon was split into two in the CSD2 group (Figure 3A). The length of exon 1 in the CSD2 group is more than twice as long as exon 1 in the other Cu/ZnSOD groups, due to the presence of putative chloroplast targeting sequence (see below). The gene structure of CCSs is distinct from that of the Cu/ZnSODs, but is conserved between Populus and Arabidopsis (Figure 3A). The poplar and Arabidopsis MnSOD genes have similar structures (Figure 3B). Gene structure conservation between Populus and Arabidopsis was also observed for the FeSOD genes, except for the 5′ region that differed among the subgroups (Figure 3B). The lone AtFSD1 is the shortest, lacking any putative subcellular targeting sequence (see below), perhaps consistent with its origin from a lineage-specific duplication event. Relative to FSD1, FSD2 genes contain two additional exons, and FSD3 genes, one, at the 5′-end. Across all SOD/CCS groups, many of the introns were longer in the Populus genes than in the Arabidopsis homologs, consistent with the genome-wide trend reported earlier [50].

thumbnail
Figure 3. Gene structure (exons and introns) of Populus trichocarpa and Arabidopsis thaliana SODs and CCSs.

A. Gene structure for CSDs and CCSs. B. Gene structure for MSDs and FSDs. Exons, shown with squares, and introns shown as lines, are drawn to scale. Similar or equivalent exons based on similarities in their encoding amino acid sequences have the same color within each group (CCSs, CSDs, MSDs and FSDs).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.g003

Conserved Sequence Motifs and Subcellular Localization Prediction

In order to assess conservation of key amino acids for active sites and metal binding domains in the poplar SODs and CCSs, the sequences were divided into two groups for alignment: the Cu/Zn binding group including Cu/ZnSODs and CCSs (Figure 1A), and the manganese and iron binding group (Figure 1B). In both groups, all residues previously shown to be involved in metal cofactor binding [51][53] are conserved in the poplar proteins (the truncated PtFSD2.2 was excluded from this analysis).

The N-terminal regions were less conserved in both groups, harboring putative transit peptides for subcellular targeting. Several programs, including TargetP 1.1 (for multi-compartments prediction [32]), ChloroP1.1 (for chloroplastic targeting, [54]), MITOPROT (for mitochondrial prediction [55]), and the PTS1 predictor (for peroxisomal targeting signal prediction [46]), were used to predict subcellular localization (Table 1). Within the Cu/ZnSODs, the CSD2 group with extended N-termini (Figure 1A and Figure 3A) was predicted to be chloroplast-localized (Table 1). Neither the CSD1 nor CDS3 groups possess recognizable transient peptides for chloroplastic or mitochondrial targeting or secretory proteins. The PTS1 predictor indicated a possible peroxisomal localization for PtCSD3.2 and AtCSD3, with some level of uncertainty (termed “twilight zone”, see [36]). Thus, PtCSD3.2 and AtCSD3 were predicted to be cytosolic or have predicted peroxisomal targeting, while PtCSD3.1 and the CSD1 group were predicted to be cytosolic (Table 1). Our predictions for the Arabidopsis CSDs are consistent with those reported earlier [15]. The most consistent subcellular prediction for the CCSs was chloroplast, as reported for AtCCS [54]. In addition, the PTS1 predictor classified PtCCS2 and AtCCS as targeted to the peroxisomes, with PtCCS1 receiving a similar prediction in the “twilight zone”. Moreover, the second methionine in the two poplar and the Arabidopsis CCSs is conserved, and it has been suggested as a second translational start site from which a cytosolic isoform can be produced [55]. Thus, the CCS proteins were predicted to be either cytosolic, chloroplastic, or peroxisomal (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Predicted characteristics of SOD and CCS amino acid sequences from Populus trichocarpa and Arabidopsis thaliana.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.t001

All members of the MnSOD group were predicted to be localized in the mitochondria (Table 1). The consensus target prediction for the FeSOD2s and FeSOD3s was chloroplast-targeting (Table 1). The lone AtFSD1 member did not show any transient peptide signal, and was therefore predicted to be cytosolic. Similar predictions for the AtFSDs have been reported [15]. In general, the predicted subcellular localizations, pI values, and amino acid sequence lengths for poplar and Arabidopsis SOD proteins are similar (Table 1).

Transcript Levels of SOD and CCS Genes in Wild Type and GS Transgenic Poplars

Transcript levels of the poplar SOD and CCS genes were investigated using RT-qPCR. Sink leaves, source leaves, young stem, main roots and fine roots from plants subjected to well-watered, drought and drought recovery conditions were analyzed. Transcripts for all genes were detected in all tissues examined, as shown for the wild type in Figure 4, although levels of PtFSD2.2 and PtCSD1.2 transcripts were barely detectable (quantification cycles of 30 and 34 in RT-qPCR, respectively), hence they were removed from further analysis. The PtCSD2s, PtFSD2.1 and PtFSD3 exhibited leaf-biased expression across treatments. PtCSD2.2 and PtFSD2.1 were two of the most abundant SOD transcripts in our analysis. PtCSD1.1, PtCCSs and PtMSDs showed no clear tissue specificity. The PtCSD3 pair differed in their tissue distribution patterns, with PtCSD3.1 transcript levels being higher in green tissues than in roots, and PtCDS3.2 showing more uniform transcript levels across all tissues (Figure 4).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Relative transcript levels of poplar SODs and CCSs in various tissues under well-watered, drought, and recovery conditions.

Transcript levels were measured by RT-qPCR and normalized against three reference genes (see Methods; Figure S1). Sink leaves (SiL), source leaves (SoL), stems (Stm), main roots (RA) and fine roots (RB) were analyzed. Values represent means of two biological replicates with standard deviations. A two-way ANOVA of observed transcript levels of SOD genes (all tissues vs. water availability) is provided in Table S2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.g004

In comparing transcriptional responses to well-watered, drought, and recovery conditions, most SOD/CCS genes showed transcriptional responses to drought compared to the well-watered condition (Figure 4 and Table S2). Fewer genes showed significant changes in transcript profiles during recovery when compared with the well-watered condition (Figure 4 and Table S2). In general, greater transcriptional responses were observed in leaves, when compared to other tissues investigated (Figure 4). Likewise, the response due to GS-overexpression was weak when compared with the wild type under well-watered or recovery conditions (Figure 5 and Table S3). However, drought stress triggered considerable differences in transcript levels of SOD/CCS genes between wild type and GS poplars (Figure 5 and Table S3). Cluster analysis revealed two distinct expression patterns (Figure 5). One group, consisting of PtCSD1.1, PtCSD2s and PtCCSs, showed a clear trend of lower transcript abundance in GS transgenics than in the wild type during drought. The second group consisting of PtCSD3s, PtMSDs and PtFSDs, showed the opposite trend: increased expression in GS transgenics. Consistent with the microarray findings (Figure S4), the response of PtFSD2.1 (up-regulation in GS poplar) and PtCSD2s (down-regulation in GS poplar) was particularly notable and wide-spread among tissues.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Relative transcript abundance of poplar SODs and CCSs comparing transgenic GS and wild-type poplars under well-watered, drought or recovery conditions.

Values represent the log ratio of transcript levels (transgenics/wild type) (RT-qPCR data; as for Figure 4) for visualization by the Heat Mapper Plus tool (http://bar.utoronto.ca/welcome.htm). Samples are sorted by conditions (well-watered, drought, and recovery) and by tissue [sink leaves (SiL), source leaves (SoL), stems (Stm), main roots (RA) and fine roots (RB)]. Gene descriptors are colored according to the predicted subcellular localizations (see Table 1) and arranged according to the clustering pattern obtained using the Cluster 3 and Java TreeView programs (see Methods). Genes with significant differences between WT and GS transgenic across tissues under drought stress condition (Table S3) are underlined.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.g005

Altered SOD Activities in Drought-stressed GS Poplar

SOD activities were determined by in-gel assays using proteins isolated from leaves of wild type and two GS transgenic lines (Figure 6). Four main bands showing SOD activity were detected. By using specific inhibitors [46], two bands were confirmed as showing FeSOD activity (FeSODa and FeSODb) and two bands showed Cu/ZnSOD activity (Cu/ZnSODa and Cu/ZnSODb). No consistent differences were observed in SOD activity between transgenic and wild type plants under well-watered conditions (data not shown), but significant differences in SOD activities were detected in drought-stressed source leaves of GS transgenic vs. wild type (Figure 6). FeSODb, Cu/ZnSODa and Cu/ZnSODb activities in source leaves were significantly different between transgenic and the wild type control (P<0.05; two-way ANOVA), with activity of the iron SOD higher in GS transgenic leaves than in the wild type (43% increase) while the Cu/Zn SOD a and b activities decreased (38% and 46% decrease respectively). These results are in line with the transcript-level response. Taken together, SOD transcript and protein activity assays support the initial microarray observation that some Cu/ZnSOD and FeSOD members exhibited differential expression responses to GS transgenic manipulation under drought conditions.

thumbnail
Figure 6. SOD activities as detected by in-gel assays.

Total proteins were extracted from source and sink leaves of two transgenic lines (T1 and T2) and wild type control plants (WT) grown under drought conditions. A total of 75 µg protein was loaded per well. Iron and Cu/Zn SOD proteins were identified using specific inhibitors as described by Fridovich [46].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.g006

Discussion

The Populus genome contains two CCS and 12 SOD genes, including all major groups of SODs (Cu/ZnSOD, MnSOD and FeSOD) conserved in plants [15]. Relative to Arabidopsis, the Populus CCS/SOD families are about twice as large, due to duplication in all but one gene (FSD3). This is in sharp contrast to the predominantly single-copy nature of the Arabidopsis CCS/SOD orthologs (except AtFSD1), even though Arabidopsis has experienced two rounds of recent (α and β) whole-genome duplication versus one (Salicoid duplication) in Populus [56]. The preferential duplicate retention of essentially the entire complement of SODs and CCSs in Populus may hint at their importance in the response of woody perennials to oxidative stress. While expression of some duplicates, e.g., PtCSD2s and PtMSDs, remained similar in the tissues examined, patterns of transcript distribution of the other SOD pairs appeared to have diverged. For example, transcript levels of PtCSD3.2 were more evenly distributed across tissues, whereas PtCSD3.1 exhibited a biased expression in green tissues. In many cases, transcript levels, rather than tissue distribution patterns per se, have diverged between duplicate genes, with one copy showing higher expression than the other. The most notable examples are PtCSD1s, PtCSD3s, PtCCSs, and PtFSD2s. In the case of the PtFSD2 pair, the poorly expressed copy (PtFSD2.2) is predicted to encode a truncated protein. This suggests that PtFSD2.2 might have undergone pseudogenization following duplication, and may no longer be functional. Together, our data provide evidence that gene duplication/retention and, in some cases, differential regulation of duplicates have both contributed to the expansion and transcriptional diversity of the Populus SOD/CCS families, especially under stress conditions.

Transcript levels were highest for the chloroplast-localized SOD isoforms, e.g., PtCSD2s, PtCCSs, and PtFSD2.1, and these isoforms were also the ones that differed the most between GS poplar and the wild type under drought (Figures 4 and 5). Interestingly, the PtCSD2/PtCCS and PtFSD2.1 genes showed opposite patterns in response to drought, with the PtCSD2/PtCCS groups strongly down-regulated, and PtFSD2.1 up-regulated in GS poplar relative to the wild type. Down-regulation of plastidic CSDs with concomitant up-regulation of plastidic FSDs has also been reported in a number of species grown under Cu-limiting conditions [57][59]. It was suggested that suppression of Cu/ZnSOD during Cu-deficiency allows allocation of the Cu cofactor to plastocyanin, a major Cu-containing protein in the stroma, in order to sustain photosynthesis [54]. In Arabidopsis, this model was further supported by coordinated down-regulation of AtCCS in response to Cu-limitation [54]. Simultaneous induction of plastidic FeSOD is thought to protect chloroplasts against oxidative damage [57], as has been frequently reported in plants [60], [61]. In the case of GS poplars, net photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll contents were higher relative to the wild type, both before and during drought [7], [11]. This is consistent with an increased demand of Cu cofactor for photosynthetic electron transfer, and may occur at the expense of Cu/ZnSOD expression and protein accumulation, as observed in GS poplars. Thus, our results suggest that the Cu-modulated compensatory regulation between chloroplastic Cu/ZnSOD and FeSOD may be a common response to oxidative stress or transgenic manipulations that affect the photosynthesis.

The cytosolic CSD1 and plastidic CSD2 and CCS are known to be regulated by microRNA 398 (miR398) [23], [49]. Although miRNAs were not investigated in the present study, stimulation of poplar miR398s by drought may be expected based on the strong down-regulation of their predicted targets, PtCSD1s, PtCSD2s and PtCCSs [62], [63], as has been reported for Medicago [64]. Another important yet relatively less emphasized role of miR398 is its involvement in the regulation of Cu homeostasis [65]. miRNA398 itself is negatively regulated by Cu, and its predicted targets, CDS1, CDS2, CCS and COX5b (mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 5b) are Cu-containing proteins [49], [65]. Because metal homeostasis is closely coupled to cellular redox status and antioxidant defense, Yamasaki et al. [65] proposed that miR398 may be involved in the regulation of copper homeostasis.

The above analysis suggests that enhanced drought resistance of the GS poplars may involve altered Cu homeostasis and miRNA regulation. In addition to the miR398 targets (PtCSD1s, PtCSD2s and PtCCSs), several chloroplast-localized polyphenol oxidases (PPOs), another major Cu protein family in poplar [66], were down-regulated in GS poplars (Figure S4). Populus PPOs were recently shown to be Cu-regulated by a new Cu-responsive miRNA, miR1444 [66]. The concept of coordinated down-regulation of major Cu proteins (CSD1, CSD2, CCS and PPO) by Cu-responsive miR398 and miR1444 is consistent with the Cu cofactor economy model in which Cu is diverted to plastocyanins, thus sustaining the increased photosynthetic rates observed in GS poplars [11]. Interestingly, miR398 was also found to be regulated by nutrient deficiencies, including N [67]. Taken together, our results suggest that, as a result of altered N metabolism and enhanced photosynthesis, drought tolerance in the GS poplars involves Cu- and miRNA-mediated antioxidant regulation.

SOD expression has also been reported to be regulated by ethylene. Kurepa et al. showed that ACC treatment of tobacco leaves increased transcript levels of an iron SOD and decreased transcript levels of a copper SOD [19]. GS poplars show higher levels of glutamine and glutamate, as well as γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) ([9] and data not shown). GABA is a non-proteinogenic amino acid often induced under biotic and abiotic stress conditions [68]. Kathiresan et al. reported that GABA stimulates ethylene biosynthesis in sunflower leaves [69]. Furthermore, glutamate decarboxylase, the principle enzyme in GABA biosynthesis, and ACC synthase and ACC oxidase show highly correlated expression patterns in pine [70]. Transcription of jasmonate-related genes is also affected by ectopic expression of GS in poplar tissues (manuscript in preparation). Thus, the present study shows that enhanced drought tolerance observed in GS poplars is accompanied by differential SOD gene expression patterns (i.e. higher iron SOD and lower Cu/Zn SOD expression) and suggests a relationship between GS expression and altered hormone homeostasis and GABA metabolism.

Conclusions

The SOD/CCS families are significantly expanded in Populus relative to Arabidopsis, although both species have experienced independent rounds of whole genome duplication since they last shared a common ancestor. All but one of the SOD/CCS genes retained duplicated copies following whole genome duplication in Populus, while only one such pair was retained in Arabidopsis. Expression analysis revealed that some of the Populus paralogs have already diverged in their transcript abundance, tissue distribution patterns and/or stress response. We observed a coordinated down-regulation of the plastidic PtCDS2s and up-regulation of the plastidic PtFSDs, at the mRNA as well as activity levels, in drought-stressed GS transgenics. This is consistent with preferential allocation of Cu cofactor to plastocyanin to sustain high rates of photosynthesis in the GS transgenics under drought as previously reported. The model is further supported by down-regulation of several chloroplastidic PPOs, another major Cu protein, in the GS poplar during drought conditions. Our results suggest that alterations in N metabolism in GS transgenics cause differential regulation of genes involved in ROS protection under drought conditions leading to drought tolerance observed in the transgenics. Cu homeostasis and antioxidant regulation in response to altered N metabolism in the GS poplars need to be further investigated.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Expression of poplar reference genes selected for RT-qPCR analysis across all tissues and conditions in the present study. The three reference genes were selected according to Vandesompele et al. [40] and validated as reference genes: elongation factor 1β (EF1β), actin (ACT), and ubiquitin (UBQ). Samples for sets 1 and 2 are ordered as follows: sink leaf, source leaf, stem, main root and fine roots in well-watered, drought and recovery. Values for pairwise variation for the three reference genes (V3) considering their expression in all samples, were calculated using geNorm. V3 values obtained (0.098 and 0.13 for the first and second replicates, respectively) were lower than the cut-off (0.15) proposed by Vandesompele et al. [40]. Values are presented as quantitative cycles (Cq) for each of the three reference genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Similarity matrix for deduced Arabidopsis and poplar SOD amino acid sequences. Similarities between protein sequences were calculated based on pairwise alignments using the EMBOSS Pairwise Alignment Algorithms (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/emboss/align/).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Proposed exon sequences for PtFSD2.2 after manual curation using the PtFSD2.1 gene model found in Phytozome. Nucleotide insertions are shown in shade. The premature stop codon is underlined in exon six.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.s003

(TIFF)

Figure S4.

Whole-genome microarray analysis (Agilent Populus whole genome array; 4x44K platform) of genes differentially expressed between wild type and GS transgenics. Differential expression was determined by p-values adjusted with the SLIM method [74], with a fold-change cut-off of two. Relative expression (log ratio of GS/wild type) in four tissues [sink leaves (SiL), source leaves (SoL), stems (Stm) and main roots (RA)] during drought was shown, with red indicating up-regulation and blue, down-regulation in the GS transgenics. Two biological replicates were included. Genes annotated as superoxide dismutase are listed in bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.s004

(TIF)

Table S1.

Proposed poplar SOD gene nomenclature based on SODs described for Arabidopsis thallaina [15] and forward and reverse primers used for RT-qPCR analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.s005

(DOCX)

Table S2.

Two-way ANOVA of observed transcript levels of SOD genes (all tissues vs. water availability) in wild type plants. Genes are sorted by P-values. Genes with P-values ≤0.05 appear in bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.s006

(DOCX)

Table S3.

Two-way ANOVA of observed transcript levels of SOD genes between the two genotypes across all tissues in each growth condition. Genes are sorted by P-values. Genes with P-values ≤0.05 appear in bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056421.s007

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Mr. Walter Preiss is gratefully acknowledged for greenhouse support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JJMR EGK. Performed the experiments: JJMR EGK. Analyzed the data: JJMR EGK CJT. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EGK CJT. Wrote the paper: JJMR EGK CJT.

References

  1. 1. Lower SS, Orians CM (2003) Soil nutrients and water availability interact to influence willow growth and chemistry but not leaf beetle performance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 107: 69–79 Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00037.x.
  2. 2. Quaye A, Laryea K, Mickson-Abeney S (2009) Soil Water and Nitrogen Interaction Effects on Maize (Zea mays L.) Grown on a Vertisol. Forestry, Horticulture, and Soil Science 3: 1–11.
  3. 3. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Marquis M, Averyt K, et al.. (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. 4. Marron N, Maury S, Rinaldi C, Brignolas F (2006) Impact of drought and leaf development stage on enzymatic antioxidant system of two Populus deltoides × nigra clones. Annals of Forest Science 63: 323–327
  5. 5. Lei Y, Yin C, Li C (2006) Differences in some morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskii. Physiologia Plantarum 127: 182–191. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00638.x. Accessed 9 March 2012.
  6. 6. Cruz de Carvalho M (2008) Drought stress and reactive oxygen species. Plant signaling & behavior 3: 156–165.
  7. 7. Gallardo F, Fu J, Canton F, Garcia-Gutierrez A, Canovas F, et al. (1999) Expression of a conifer glutamine synthetase gene in transgenic poplar. Planta 210: 19–26 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10592028.
  8. 8. Jing ZP, Gallardo F, Pascual MB, Sampalo R, Romero J, et al.. (2004) Improved growth in a field trial of transgenic hybrid poplar overexpressing glutamine synthetase. New Phytologist 164: 137–145. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01173.x. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  9. 9. Man H-M, Boriel R, El-Khatib R, Kirby EG (2005) Characterization of transgenic poplar with ectopic expression of pine cytosolic glutamine synthetase under conditions of varying nitrogen availability. The New phytologist 167: 31–39. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15948827. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  10. 10. Coleman HD, Cánovas FM, Man H, Kirby EG, Mansfield SD (2012) Enhanced expression of glutamine synthetase (GS1a) confers altered fibre and wood chemistry in field grown hybrid poplar (Populus tremula X alba) (717–1B4). Plant biotechnology journal in press: 1–7. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672155. Accessed 8 June 2012.
  11. 11. el-Khatib RT, Hamerlynck EP, Gallardo F, Kirby EG (2004) Transgenic poplar characterized by ectopic expression of a pine cytosolic glutamine synthetase gene exhibits enhanced tolerance to water stress. Tree physiology 24: 729–736 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15123444.
  12. 12. Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS (2002) Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. Journal of experimental botany 53: 1331–1341 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11997379.
  13. 13. McCord J, Fridovich I (1969) Superoxide dismutase: an enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J Biol Chem 244: 6049–6055.
  14. 14. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant physiology and biochemistry: PPB/Société française de physiologie végétale 48: 909–930. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20870416. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  15. 15. Kliebenstein DJ, Monde R A, Last RL (1998) Superoxide dismutase in Arabidopsis: an eclectic enzyme family with disparate regulation and protein localization. Plant physiology 118: 637–650 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=34840&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  16. 16. Sandalio LM, Del Río LA (1988) Intraorganellar distribution of superoxide dismutase in plant peroxisomes (glyoxysomes and leaf peroxisomes). Plant physiology 88: 1215–1218 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1055743&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  17. 17. Pradedova EV, Isheeva OD, Salyaev RK (2009) Superoxide dismutase of plant cell vacuoles. Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology 3: 24–32. Available: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1134/S1990747809010048. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  18. 18. Srivastava V, Srivastava MK, Chibani K, Nilsson R, Rouhier N, et al.. (2009) Alternative splicing studies of the reactive oxygen species gene network in Populus reveal two isoforms of high-isoelectric-point superoxide dismutase. Plant physiology 149: 1848–1859. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2663752&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 9 March 2012.
  19. 19. Kurepa J, Hérouart D, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1997) Differential Expression of CuZn- and Fe-Superoxide Dismutase Genes of Tobacco during Development, Oxidative Stress, and Hormonal Treatments. Plant Cell Physiol 38: 463–470.
  20. 20. Bowler C, Alliotte T, Loose M De, Montagu M Van, Inze D (1989) The induction of manganese superoxide dismutase in response to stress in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia. The EMBO journal 8: 31–38.
  21. 21. Wu G, Wilen R, Robertson A J, Gusta LV (1999) Isolation, Chromosomal Localization, and Differential Expression of Mitochondrial Manganese Superoxide Dismutase and Chloroplastic Copper/Zinc Superoxide Dismutase Genes in Wheat. Plant physiology 120: 513–520.
  22. 22. Feng W, Hongbin W, Bing L, Jinfa W (2006) Cloning and characterization of a novel splicing isoform of the iron-superoxide dismutase gene in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant cell reports 24: 734–742. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16220344. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  23. 23. Sunkar R, Kapoor A, Zhu J (2006) Posttranscriptional Induction of Two Cu/Zn Superoxide Dismutase Genes in Arabidopsis Is Mediated by Downregulation of miR398 and Important for Oxidative Stress Tolerance. The Plant Cell 18: 2051–2065
  24. 24. Dugas DV, Bartel B (2008) Sucrose induction of Arabidopsis miR398 represses two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutases. Plant molecular biology 67: 403–417. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18392778. Accessed 6 March 2012.
  25. 25. Kim MD, Kim Y-H, Kwon S-Y, Yun D-J, Kwak S-S, et al.. (2010) Enhanced tolerance to methyl viologen-induced oxidative stress and high temperature in transgenic potato plants overexpressing the CuZnSOD, APX and NDPK2 genes. Physiologia plantarum 140: 153–162. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20553417. Accessed 12 March 2012.
  26. 26. Wang F-Z, Wang Q-B, Kwon S-Y, Kwak S-S, Su W-A (2005) Enhanced drought tolerance of transgenic rice plants expressing a pea manganese superoxide dismutase. Journal of Plant Physiology 162: 465–472. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0176161704002391. Accessed 26 March 2012.
  27. 27. Wang YC, Qu GZ, Li HY, Wu YJ, Wang C, et al.. (2010) Enhanced salt tolerance of transgenic poplar plants expressing a manganese superoxide dismutase from Tamarix androssowii. Molecular biology reports 37: 1119–1124. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19830589. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  28. 28. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic acids research 25: 3389–3402 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=146917&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  29. 29. Wilkins MR, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Sanchez JC, Williams KL, et al. (1999) Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ) 112: 531–552 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027275.
  30. 30. Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan P, et al.. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23: 2947–2948. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17846036. Accessed 10 March 2012.
  31. 31. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al.. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular biology and evolution 28: 2731–2739. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3203626&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 29 February 2012.
  32. 32. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2007) Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nature protocols 2: 953–971. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17446895. Accessed 15 March 2012.
  33. 33. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2011) SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nature methods 8: 785–786. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21959131. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  34. 34. Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Von Heijne G (1999) ChloroP, a neural network-based method for predicting chloroplast transit peptides and their cleavage sites. Protein science: a publication of the Protein Society 8: 978–984 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2144330&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  35. 35. Claros MG, Vincens P (1996) Computational method to predict mitochondrially imported proteins and their targeting sequences. European journal of biochemistry/FEBS 241: 779–786 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8944766.
  36. 36. Neuberger G, Maurer-Stroh S, Eisenhaber B, Hartig A, Eisenhaber F (2003) Prediction of Peroxisomal Targeting Signal 1 Containing Proteins from Amino Acid Sequence. Journal of Molecular Biology 328: 581–592. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002228360300319X. Accessed 25 June 2012.
  37. 37. Liao Z, Chen M, Guo L, Gong Y, Tang F, et al.. (2004) Rapid Isolation of High-Quality Total RNA from Taxus and Ginkgo. Preparative Biochemistry and Biotechnology 34: 209–214. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1081/PB-200026790. Accessed 6 May 2012.
  38. 38. Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, et al.. (2007) Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic acids research 35: W71–4. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1933133&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 5 March 2012.
  39. 39. Brunner AM, Yakovlev I, Strauss SH (2004) Validating internal controls for quantitative plant gene expression studies. BMC plant biology 4: 14. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=515301&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 1 March 2012.
  40. 40. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, et al. (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome biology 3: RESEARCH0034 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=126239&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  41. 41. Ruijter JM, Ramakers C, Hoogaars WMH, Karlen Y, Bakker O, et al.. (2009) Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data. Nucleic acids research 37: e45. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2665230&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 12 March 2012.
  42. 42. De Hoon MJL, Imoto S, Miyano S (2002) Statistical analysis of a small set of time-ordered gene expression data using linear splines. Bioinformatics 18: 1477–1485.
  43. 43. Saldanha AJ (2004) Java Treeview–extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20: 3246–3248. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15180930. Accessed 20 March 2012.
  44. 44. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254.
  45. 45. Weydert CJ, Cullen JJ (2010) Measurement of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase in cultured cells and tissue. Nature protocols 5: 51–66. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2830880&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 10 March 2012.
  46. 46. Fridovich I (1975) Superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem 44: 147–159.
  47. 47. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics international 11: 36–42.
  48. 48. Tuskan G a, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, et al.. (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science (New York, NY) 313: 1596–1604. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16973872. Accessed 9 March 2012.
  49. 49. Cohu CM, Abdel-Ghany SE, Gogolin Reynolds K a, Onofrio AM, Bodecker JR, et al.. (2009) Copper delivery by the copper chaperone for chloroplast and cytosolic copper/zinc-superoxide dismutases: regulation and unexpected phenotypes in an Arabidopsis mutant. Molecular plant 2: 1336–1350. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19969519. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  50. 50. Jiang K, Goertzen LR (2011) Spliceosomal intron size expansion in domesticated grapevine (Vitis vinifera). BMC research notes 4: 52. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3058033&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 28 July 2012.
  51. 51. Pufahl R (1997) Metal Ion Chaperone Function of the Soluble Cu(I) Receptor Atx1. Science 278: 853–856. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.278.5339.853. Accessed 12 March 2012.
  52. 52. Bordo D, Djinovic K, Bolognesi M (1994) Conserved patterns in the Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase family. Journal of Molecular Biology 238: 366–386.
  53. 53. Van Camp W, Bowler C, Villarroel R, Tsang EW, Van Montagu M, et al. (1990) Characterization of iron superoxide dismutase cDNAs from plants obtained by genetic complementation in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87: 9903–9907 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=55282&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  54. 54. Abdel-Ghany SE, Burkhead JL, Gogolin K a, Andrés-Colás N, Bodecker JR, et al.. (2005) AtCCS is a functional homolog of the yeast copper chaperone Ccs1/Lys7. FEBS letters 579: 2307–2312. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15848163. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  55. 55. Wintz H, Vulpe C (2002) Plant copper chaperones. Biochemical Society transactions 30: 732–735.
  56. 56. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, et al.. (2011) Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97–100. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21478875. Accessed 15 July 2012.
  57. 57. Abdel-Ghany SE, Müller-Moulé P, Niyogi KK, Pilon M, Shikanai T (2005) Two P-Type ATPases Are Required for Copper Delivery in Arabidopsis thaliana Chloroplasts. The Plant Cell 17: 1233–1251
  58. 58. Tewari RK, Kumar P, Sharma PN (2006) Antioxidant responses to enhanced generation of superoxide anion radical and hydrogen peroxide in the copper-stressed mulberry plants. Planta 223: 1145–1153. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16292566. Accessed 30 July 2012.
  59. 59. Cohu CM, Pilon M (2007) Regulation of superoxide dismutase expression by copper availability. Physiologia Plantarum 129: 747–755. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00879.x. Accessed 29 July 2012.
  60. 60. Tsang EW, Bowler C, Hérouart D, Van Camp W, Villarroel R, et al. (1991) Differential regulation of superoxide dismutases in plants exposed to environmental stress. The Plant cell 3: 783–792 Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=160045&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
  61. 61. Myouga F, Hosoda C, Umezawa T, Iizumi H, Kuromori T, et al.. (2008) A heterocomplex of iron superoxide dismutases defends chloroplast nucleoids against oxidative stress and is essential for chloroplast development in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell 20: 3148–3162. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2613658&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  62. 62. Jia X, Wang W-X, Ren L, Chen Q-J, Mendu V, et al.. (2009) Differential and dynamic regulation of miR398 in response to ABA and salt stress in Populus tremula and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant molecular biology 71: 51–59. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19533381. Accessed 8 March 2012.
  63. 63. Lu Y, Feng Z, Bian L, Xie H, Liang J (2011) miR398 regulation in rice of the responses to abiotic and biotic stresses depends on CSD1 and CSD2 expression. Functional Plant Biology 38: 44–53.
  64. 64. Trindade I, Capitão C, Dalmay T, Fevereiro MP, Santos DM Dos (2010) miR398 and miR408 are up-regulated in response to water deficit in Medicago truncatula. Planta 231: 705–716. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012085. Accessed 19 July 2012.
  65. 65. Yamasaki H, Abdel-Ghany SE, Cohu CM, Kobayashi Y, Shikanai T, et al.. (2007) Regulation of copper homeostasis by micro-RNA in Arabidopsis. The Journal of biological chemistry 282: 16369–16378. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17405879. Accessed 29 July 2012.
  66. 66. Ravet K, Danford FL, Dihle A, Pittarello M, Pilon M (2011) Spatiotemporal analysis of copper homeostasis in Populus trichocarpa reveals an integrated molecular remodeling for a preferential allocation of copper to plastocyanin in the chloroplasts of developing leaves. Plant physiology 157: 1300–1312. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3252168&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 13 July 2012.
  67. 67. Hsieh L-C, Lin S-I, Shih AC-C, Chen J-W, Lin W-Y, et al.. (2009) Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis by deep sequencing. Plant physiology 151: 2120–2132. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2785986&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 19 July 2012.
  68. 68. Roberts MR (2007) Does GABA Act as a Signal in Plants? Plant signaling & behavior 2: 408–409. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01526.x. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  69. 69. Kathiresan A, Tung P, Chinnappa C, Reid D (1997) y-Aminobutyric Acid Stimulates Ethylene Biosynthesis in Sunflower. Plant physiology 115: 129–135.
  70. 70. Molina-Rueda JJ, Pascual MB, Cánovas FM, Gallardo F (2010) Characterization and developmental expression of a glutamate decarboxylase from maritime pine. Planta 232: 1471–1483. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20859639. Accessed 29 March 2012.
  71. 71. Man H, Pollmann S, Weiler EW, Kirby EG (2011) Increased glutamine in leaves of poplar transgenic with pine GS1a caused greater anthranilate synthetase α-subunit (ASA1) transcript and protein abundances: an auxin-related mechanism for enhanced growth in GS transgenics? Journal of experimental botany 62: 4423–4431. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3170542&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 16 May 2012.
  72. 72. Parker MW, Blake CC (1988) Iron- and manganese-containing superoxide dismutases can be distinguished by analysis of their primary structures. FEBS letters 229: 377–382 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3345848.
  73. 73. Yamakura F (1984) Destruction of tryptophan residues by hydrogen peroxide in iron-superoxide dismutase. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 122: 635–641.
  74. 74. Wang H-Q, Tuominen LK, Tsai C-J (2011) SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 27: 225–231 Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21098430.