Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Wide Range of Mercury Contamination in Chicks of Southern Ocean Seabirds

  • Pierre Blévin,

    Affiliation: Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villiers-en-Bois, France

  • Alice Carravieri,

    Affiliation: Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villiers-en-Bois, France

  • Audrey Jaeger,

    Affiliation: Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villiers-en-Bois, France

  • Olivier Chastel,

    Affiliation: Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villiers-en-Bois, France

  • Paco Bustamante,

    Affiliation: Littoral, Environnement et Sociétés, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France

  • Yves Cherel

    Affiliation: Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villiers-en-Bois, France

Wide Range of Mercury Contamination in Chicks of Southern Ocean Seabirds

  • Pierre Blévin, 
  • Alice Carravieri, 
  • Audrey Jaeger, 
  • Olivier Chastel, 
  • Paco Bustamante, 
  • Yves Cherel
  • Published: January 17, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054508


Using top predators as sentinels of the marine environment, Hg contamination was investigated within the large subantarctic seabird community of Kerguelen Islands, a remote area from the poorly known Southern Indian Ocean. Chicks of 21 sympatric seabirds presented a wide range of Hg concentrations, with the highest contaminated species containing ~102 times more feather Hg than the less contaminated species. Hence, Kerguelen seabirds encompass the whole range of chick feather Hg values that were previously collected worldwide in poorly industrialized localities. Using stable isotopes, the effects of foraging habitats (reflected by δ13C) and trophic positions (reflected by δ15N) on Hg concentrations were investigated. Species-related Hg variations were highly and positively linked to feather δ15N values, thus highlighting the occurrence of efficient Hg biomagnification processes within subantarctic marine trophic webs. By contrast, Hg contamination overall correlated poorly with feeding habitats, because of the pooling of species foraging within different isotopic gradients corresponding to distinct seabird habitats (benthic, pelagic, neritic and oceanic). However, when focusing on oceanic seabirds, Hg concentration was related to feather δ13C values, with species feeding in colder waters (lower δ13C values) south of Kerguelen Islands being less prone to be contaminated than species feeding in northern warmer waters (higher δ13C values). Within the context of continuous increase in global Hg emissions, Kerguelen Islands that are located far away from anthropogenic sources can be considered as an ideal study site to monitor the temporal trend of global Hg contamination. The present work helps selecting some seabird species as sentinels of environmental pollution according to their high Hg concentrations and their contrasted foraging ecology.


Mercury (Hg) is a highly toxic non-essential metal that negatively influences humans and wildlife [1], [2]. In birds, mercury’s adverse effects are far-ranging, with impacts on reproduction being usually the end-point of more direct effects on behaviour, neurology, endocrinology and development [2]. Overall, Hg derives from both natural and anthropogenic sources, but human activities have increased the global amount of Hg cycling around the world by a factor of three to five [3]. Owing to its high volatility and long atmospheric residence time, Hg reaches remote areas through long-range atmospheric transport, thus contaminating oceanic islands and polar and sub-polar regions [4], [5]. Once deposited in aquatic ecosystems, inorganic Hg is subject to biotic reaction (methylation) carried out by microorganisms [6]. Thereafter, methylmercury (Me-Hg), the persistent and highly toxic form of Hg, is assimilated by living organisms via food intake, bioaccumulates in individuals and biomagnifies within food webs from lower to higher trophic levels [7]. Hence, top predators have been used to monitor Hg contamination in various aquatic ecosystems [8], with still limited existing information for significant parts of the world ocean, including the southern Indian Ocean [9].

Seabirds are useful bio-indicators of environmental pollution, including Hg contamination because they are long-lived animals that prey at the top of the marine food webs [8], [10]. Feathers are the most attractive avian tissue to sample because, in many cases, they contain most of the Hg body burden and are considered as the main route for Hg elimination [8]. Hg accumulated and stored within soft tissues between moults is transferred and sequestered in the growing feathers and cannot thus be re-incorporated into living tissues. Feather sampling has also the benefit to be non-destructive.

Here, we investigated feather Hg concentrations within the large community of seabirds that breed in Kerguelen Islands, a remote subantarctic archipelago from the Southern Ocean [11]. The seabird assemblage is mainly composed of penguins and Procellariiformes, including the very long-lived and slow-moulting albatrosses that are amongst the most Hg contaminated vertebrate species [12]. Kerguelen seabirds feed on a large diversity of prey (crustaceans, cephalopods and fish) and use contrasted foraging strategies that include benthic and pelagic feeding as well as foraging in neritic and oceanic waters, with the oceanic birds ranging from the warmer subtropical to the colder Antarctic waters (Table 1). The distribution of Hg species in the main oceanic water masses is still poorly documented, with a complete lack of information from Kerguelen waters. However, a recent investigation on Hg speciation within the Southern Ocean revealed a poleward increase in the concentrations of total Hg and Me-Hg in surface waters to some of the highest Me-Hg concentrations so far observed in the open ocean [13]. This Me-Hg increase most likely results from a strong net Hg methylation in the hypoxic zone of the water column in Antarctic waters [13].

Table 1. Species, foraging habitats and diets during the chick-rearing period, and durations of the chick rearing period of seabirds at Kerguelen Islands.


In a first descriptive step, Hg was determined in 21 seabird species to assess contamination levels of marine ecosystems within the poorly known southern Indian Ocean. In a second explanatory step, the effect of differences of seabird foraging ecology on feather Hg concentration was tested, because ingestion of food is the main route of Hg exposure in birds [10]. The respective roles of habitats and diets were tested by using the isotopic niche as a proxy of the trophic niche of the species, with the ratios of stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) reflecting their foraging habitats and trophic positions, respectively [14]. The isotopic method was already validated in the area, with seabird δ13C values indicating their latitudinal foraging grounds and depicting offshore versus inshore consumers [15], [16] and their δ15N values increasing with trophic level [17]. Taking into account the species’ foraging ecology, we make the following predictions. Firstly, feeding habitat (δ13C) should shape seabird Hg contamination, because Hg is not homogeneously distributed in marine ecosystems. For example, (i) benthic foragers should have relatively high feather Hg concentrations in relation to the substantial production of Me-Hg in coastal marine sediments [6], and (ii) oceanic foragers should be more contaminated in cold than in warm waters, in relation to the latitudinal gradient in the bioavailability of Me-Hg in the Southern Ocean [13]. Secondly, Hg should magnify within subantarctic food webs, which means that seabirds with the highest trophic positions (δ15N) should show the highest feather Hg concentrations. Finally, the longer the chick rearing period, the higher the chick feather Hg concentrations should be, because much of the dietary Hg accumulated in soft tissues is mobilized and excreted into growing feathers [18].

Most previous investigations on pollutants in birds were conducted on adults that present some disadvantages related to their foraging areas, moult schedule and migration patterns. Instead, we focused on chicks as indicators and sentinels of contamination [10]. Firstly, young birds that have not yet fledged have obtained all of their food from their parents who forage in the vicinity of the breeding colonies at that time. The chick Hg concentrations and stable isotope signatures thus reflect those of the adult foraging ecology during the chick-rearing period, a period during which feeding information (chick diet and adult foraging grounds) were previously collected using complementary methods (i.e. dietary analysis and bio-logging [19]). Secondly, the integration period is almost identical for Hg and stable isotopes in body feathers of chicks, because (i) Hg accumulated during the chick-rearing period is excreted during the pre-fledging moult, and (ii) feather isotope ratios reflect diet at the time of feather synthesis [20]. Thirdly, since all chick feathers were grown almost simultaneously, both Hg and stable isotopes are fairly homogeneous in the plumage of pre-fledglings [8], [21], while sequential moult in adults induces larger Hg concentrations in the first than in the late growing feathers [22].

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Animals were cared for in accordance with the guidelines of the ethics committee of the Institut Polaire Français Paul Emile Victor that approved fieldwork in the present study (Program no. 109, H. Weimerskirch).

Study Area, Species and Sample Collection

Fieldwork was carried out from 2003 to 2012 on Kerguelen archipelago (49°21′S, 70°18′E), which is located in the southern part of the Subantarctic Zone, in the immediate vicinity of the Polar Front [23]. The Southern Ocean was defined as the ocean south the Subtropical Front and the Subantarctic and Antarctic Zones, as the zones between the Subtropical and Polar Fronts, and between the Polar Front and Antarctica, respectively (Fig. 1). Chicks from 21 seabird species belonging to 4 orders and 7 families were sampled, totalizing 280 individuals (n = 7–22 per species). Sampling was conducted at different locations of the archipelago, depending on the species’ breeding sites. Most neritic seabirds were studied in colonies close to the open sea, but two species (the southern rockhopper penguin and common diving petrel) were sampled at Mayes Island that is located within a large bay (closed sea) where the parent birds feed. Body feathers were collected from the lower back of large chicks at fledging, i.e. at the end of the breeding season. Once collected, feathers were stored dry in sealed plastic bags and analysed at the University of La Rochelle, France.

Figure 1. Location of the Kerguelen Islands and of the main oceanic fronts and zones in the southern Indian Ocean.

Abbreviations: STF, Subtropical Front; PF, Polar Front; STZ, Subtropical Zone; SAZ, Subantarctic Zone; AZ, Antarctic Zone [23].


Sample Analyses

Prior to chemical analysis, all body feathers were cleaned of surface lipids and contaminants using a 2:1 chloroform: methanol solution for 2 min followed by two successive methanol rinses. They were then cut with scissors into small fragments. A first sub-sample of homogenized feathers was oven dried for 48 hr at 50°C and then analyzed in an advanced Hg analyzer spectrophotometer (Altec AMA 254). Hg determination involved evaporation of Hg by progressive heating until 800°C under oxygen atmosphere for 2′30 min and subsequent amalgamation on a gold trap. The net was heated to liberate the collected Hg that was measured by UV atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Samples were analysed for total Hg, which approximates the amount of Me-Hg since essentially all Hg in feathers is under organic form [24], [25], [26]. All analyses were repeated 2–3 times until having a relative standard deviation <10%. Accuracy was checked using certified reference material (Tort-2 Lobster Hepatopancreas, NRC, Canada; mean 0.27±0.06 µg•g−1 dry mass). Our measured values were 0.24±0.01 µg•g−1 dry mass, n = 56. Blanks were analysed at the beginning of each set of samples and the detection limit of the method was 0.005 µg•g−1dry mass.

A second sub-sample of homogenized feathers was weighed (~0.3 mg) with a microbalance and packed into a tin container. Relative abundance of C and N isotopes were determined with a continuous flow mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Delta V Advantage) coupled to an elemental analyzer (Thermo Scientific Flash EA 1112). Results are presented in the δ notation relative to Vienna PeeDee Belemnite and atmospheric N2 for δ13C and δ15N, respectively. Replicate measurements of internal laboratory standards (acetanilide) indicate measurement errors <0.10‰ for both δ13C and δ15N values.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical tests were performed using R 2.7.1 [27]. All samples submitted to statistical tests were first checked for normality and homogeneity of variances by means of Shapiro-Wilk and Fisher tests, respectively. Depending on the results, parametric or non-parametric tests were used. A significance level of α <0.05 was used for all tests. Values are means ± SD.

In univariate analyses, correlations between Hg and continuous explanatory variables (feather δ13C and δ15N values, and the duration of the chick rearing period) were tested using Pearson correlations. In multivariate analyses, the influence of species and continuous explanatory variables on feather Hg concentrations were investigated using General Linear Models (GLMs). Feather Hg concentrations were log transformed and the models were constructed with a normal distribution and an identity link function. Explanatory variables were defined as follows: species as a factor, and feather δ15N, δ13C values, and the duration of the chick rearing period as covariates. The influence of the sampling year on Hg concentrations was not incorporated in model selection, since, as most species were sampled in only one year (Table 2), the year effect is confounded by the species effect. Noticeably however, two species (the Kerguelen petrel and subantarctic skua) that were sampled twice did not present significant inter-annual differences in feather Hg concentrations (data not shown).

Table 2. Chick feather Hg, δ13C and δ15N values of Kerguelen seabirds.


Biologically relevant models were constructed by incorporating the different variables and their interactions. Continuous variables that were significantly correlated were not included in the same models. The most parsimonious models were selected according to the bias-adjusted Akaïke’s Information Criterion (AICc), which is a small-sample bias adjustment [28], [29]. As a general guideline, if AICc values differ by more than 2, the model with the lowest AICc value is the most accurate, whereas models with AICc values differing by less than 2 are fairly similar in their ability to describe the data, and the model including the least number of parameters (the simplest) is the most accurate [30]. The likelihood of a model, referred to as the Akaïke weight (wi) was estimated following Johnson and Omland [31] (Table 3). The wi can be interpreted as approximate probabilities that the model i is the best one for the observed data, given the candidate set of models. Model fit was assessed by a chi-square goodness-of-fit test [32], and residuals were checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test and Q-Q plot. The coefficient of determination R2adj was calculated for each model [31] (Table 3).

Table 3. AICc model ranking for feather Hg concentrations within the Kerguelen seabird community (see text for details).



Univariate analysis showed that total Hg contamination varied widely within the seabird community, with chick feather Hg concentrations differing significantly between species (Kruskal-Wallis, H = 260.23, P<0.001, n = 21). Mean Hg concentrations ranged from 0.05±0.01 to 5.31±1.12 µg•g−1 dry mass in South-Georgian diving-petrels and northern giant petrels, respectively (Table 2). The lowest chick feather Hg concentration occurred in a common diving-petrel and the highest in a wandering albatross (0.04 and 8.43 µg•g−1, respectively).

No overall significant correlation between feather Hg and δ13C values was found (Pearson correlation, r = 0.08, t = 1.31, P = 0.19, n = 280), while feather Hg concentration was highly significantly and positively correlated with δ15N values (r = 0.48, t = 9.19, P<0.001). Feather Hg concentration was also significantly and positively related to the duration of the chick rearing period (r = 0.26, t = 4.54, P<0.001). Furthermore, feather δ15N and δ13C values were positively correlated (r = 0.63, t = 10.24, P<0.001), and they were significantly related to the duration of the chick rearing period (r = 0.12 and 0.35, t = 2.10 and 6.33, p = 0.037 and <0.001 for δ13C and δ15N values, respectively). When focusing on oceanic seabirds (12 species and 158 individuals) a highly significant and positive correlation was found between feather Hg and both δ13C (r = 0.61, t = 9.68, p<0.001) and δ15N values (r = 0.80, t = 16.90, P<0.001) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Relationship between chick feather Hg concentrations (means ± SD; µg•g−1 dry mass) and (a) foraging habitat (chick feather δ13C) and (b) trophic position (chick feather δ15N) of oceanic species.

Filled diamonds and empty circles refer to oceanic and other species, respectively. See Table 1 for species abbreviations.


In multivariate analyses, the most parsimonious GLM model selected by AICc values included the effects of species and δ15N (Table 3) in explaining Hg concentrations in body feathers. Indeed, Hg concentrations differed significantly among species (F20, 258 = 217, P<0.001) and were significantly and positively related to their δ15N values (F1, 278 = 2776, P<0.001). The second-ranked model included an effect of species, δ13C and their interaction, but it had a low likelihood when compared to the first-ranked model (Table 3). Models including the duration of the chick rearing period had also a low likelihood, thus explaining poorly feather Hg concentrations when compared to species and feather δ15N values.


To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate Hg contamination in such a large number of sympatric seabirds. It completes the few works previously conducted in the southern Atlantic [33], [34] and the southern Pacific Oceans [35], [36], thus partly filling the gap of knowledge from the southern Indian Ocean sector [9]. The study adds a substantial number of seabird chicks that were either not previously investigated (n = 16) or inadequately sampled (n = 4) [35], with only data from wandering albatross [37] being available in the scientific literature (Table 4).

Table 4. An overall synthesis of Hg concentrations (means ± SD with ranges in parentheses; µg•g−1 dry mass) in body feathers of seabird chicks.


Statistical analyses pointed out the important effect of species, feeding habits (δ15N) and foraging habitats (δ13C) on chick feather Hg concentrations, which, by contrast, are little explained by the duration of the chick rearing period. However, univariate analysis showed a positive relationship between Hg contamination and the duration of the chick- rearing period, the most likely explanation being that assimilated Hg accumulates during chick growth over weeks and months and is ultimately excreted in newly grown feathers at the end of the period [18]. The positive co-variation between the duration of the chick rearing period and δ15N likely results from the longer chick rearing period of large seabirds (e.g. albatrosses) that feed at higher trophic positions than smaller species with shorter growth period (e.g. petrels).

Feather Hg Concentrations: Comparison with Other Species and Areas

Kerguelen seabird chicks presented a wide range of Hg concentrations, with the highest contaminated species containing ~102 times (two orders of magnitude) more feather Hg than the less contaminated species. Both the lowest and highest Hg values occurred in flying birds, with contamination levels of the flightless penguins ranging from low to intermediate values. No other feather Hg concentrations are available from Kerguelen seabirds, but a preliminary analysis conducted on internal tissues of adults of five species of zooplankton-eating petrels [9] ranked the species in the same decreasing order than in the present study, with blue petrels containing more Hg than prions and diving petrels. In the same way, the decreasing order is roughly the same in the only other comparable investigations that were conducted on seabirds breeding in the southern Atlantic Ocean [33], [37]. Feather Hg was higher in albatrosses and giant petrels, intermediate in the white-chinned petrel and lower in the blue petrel, prions and diving petrels. Hg concentrations were however much higher in south Atlantic Procellariiformes than in the present study [33], with the most likely explanation being that work was conducted on adult birds, not on chicks. Indeed, adult birds have consistently higher feather Hg concentrations than their chicks [38]. Adults have a longer period to assimilate and accumulate metals from their food between two successive moults, whereas chicks only have the several weeks (to months) of the chick-rearing period [39].

A review of the existing literature on seabird chicks (Table 4) shows that mean feather Hg concentration can reach very high values in acutely polluted areas (up to 36.4 µg•g−1 for common terns in the German North Sea). Elsewhere, however, Hg concentration ranges from 0.05 to 5.6 µg•g−1 (the sooty tern and black-footed albatross, respectively). This range is remarkably similar to that from the present investigation, indicating that seabirds from only one location (Kerguelen) encompass the whole range of values that were collected worldwide in poorly industrialized areas. Consequently, comparison of Hg levels between distant locations using seabirds as sentinels of environmental contamination necessitates collecting feathers from many species, because a small subset could not be fully representative of the whole seabird assemblage, and thus of the surrounding marine environment.

At the species level, chick feather Hg concentrations from Kerguelen seabirds fall within the concentration range reported for similar species elsewhere. The wandering albatross from South Georgia [37], presented identical Hg concentrations than chicks from Kerguelen, and the taxonomically closely-related but spatially distant Scottish great skua and Kerguelen subantarctic skua showed almost similar feather Hg concentrations, depending on breeding colonies (Table 4). At the community level, only two previous investigations on chick Hg contamination included more than five sympatric species and both were conducted in tropical waters of the Pacific (Midway Atoll, six species [40]) and the Indian Oceans (the Seychelles, seven species [38]). Based on feather Hg concentrations, the Kerguelen seabird community compares well with the Midway Atoll assemblage (0.34–5.57 µg•g−1) that also includes albatrosses, i.e. the species group that contains the highest feather Hg concentrations among seabirds [12] (Table 4). By contrast (and excluding albatross data), chick feather Hg concentrations were overall higher in Kerguelen species than in seabirds from the Seychelles (0.15–0.70 µg•g−1) and La Réunion (0.07–0.42 µg•g−1 [41]), thus suggesting higher Me-Hg bioavailability in subantarctic than in tropical waters of the Indian Ocean. The hypothesis remains to be investigated because there is a paucity of information on mercury speciations in marine waters, and more specifically, on the sources of Me-Hg to marine consumers, including seabirds and their prey [6], [13].

Potential Adverse Effect

One of the key problems in environmental toxicology is to interpret the impact of observed contaminant concentrations. In general, Hg levels of 1.5–18 µg•g−1 dry mass in eggs are sufficient to cause decreased egg mass, embryo malformations, lower hatchability, decreased chick growth, and lowered chick survival [42]. The threshold levels in feathers of negative effects to chicks is currently unknown, but laboratory and field studies on adult birds indicate that feather Hg concentrations of 2.4 to 40 µg•g−1 are associated with adverse effects, with the commonest used toxicity threshold being 5 µg•g−1 [42], [43]. Feather Hg concentrations of most Kerguelen seabirds are below this threshold, but some individuals from four species showed higher levels. Namely, 64%, 50%, 33% and 13% of chicks of subantarctic skuas, northern giant petrels, wandering albatrosses and grey petrels, respectively, exceeded the threshold value and were thus potentially threatened by Hg (Fig. 3). However, those levels are difficult to interpret because chicks showed no observed obvious ill effects. Moreover, seabirds cope efficiently with high Hg concentrations in their prey through efficient detoxification processes and, hence, they are expected to have higher toxicity thresholds than terrestrial birds [36]. Nonetheless, such comparisons are invaluable to use seabirds as sentinels of ecosystem health, because it provides ways to identify not only the species the more at risk, but also the species that would be useful as bio-indicators [10].

Figure 3. Feather Hg concentrations (µg•g−1 dry mass) of individual chicks from the six most contaminated species from the Kerguelen seabird community.

See text for toxicity threshold and Table 1 for species abbreviations. BBA illustrates the most contaminated species of the assemblage with all individual values being below the threshold value.


Feather Hg Concentrations, Diet and Trophic Levels

As expected, the overall statistical analysis indicated a δ15N effect on feather Hg concentrations within the Kerguelen seabird community. The positive correlation verifies our hypothesis stating that Hg concentration should increase with trophic level, because δ15N is a proxy of consumers’ trophic position [44]. Noticeably, the relationship was partially hindered by pooling species that forage in distinct habitats (neritic vs. oceanic and benthic vs. pelagic) marked by different isotopic baselines. Within this context, the positive correlation between Hg and δ15N is particularly relevant. Indeed, the relationship was even stronger when looking at oceanic seabirds only (Fig. 2). The feather δ15N values of the 12 oceanic species ranged from 8.8‰ (the crustacean-eater South Georgian diving petrel) to 14.2‰ (the squid-eater wandering albatross), which, assuming a trophic enrichment factor of 2.7‰ for carnivorous organisms [45], corresponds to ~3 trophic levels. The corresponding feather Hg values indicated an 86-fold Hg enrichment within the oceanic seabird assemblage. Accordingly, Hg contents of pelagic organisms from the Southern Ocean (including Kerguelen Islands) increase in the order crustaceans <fish ≤ squids < seabirds [9], [33], [46]. Hence, while patterns of Hg accumulation in food webs of the open ocean are largely unknown [6], the present work highlights the occurrence of efficient Hg biomagnification processes in subantarctic waters of the southern Indian Ocean that merit further oceanographic investigations.

The subantarctic skua was clearly an outlier species within the Kerguelen seabird assemblage, with chick Hg concentration being high when compared to feather δ15N, and, to a lesser extent, δ13C values (Table 2). At the study site, adult skuas forage on land where they feed their chicks almost exclusively with small seabirds, mainly blue petrels [47]. Feather δ15N value of skua chicks agrees with a blue petrel-based diet, being 2.7‰ 15N-enriched when compared to blood of their prey (author’s unpublished data). The skua Hg content is also in agreement with feeding on blue petrels, because petrel muscle contains disproportionately more total Hg than fish and crustaceans [9], [46]. High petrel Hg contamination is likely to result from the combination of two life-history traits of the species: (i) blue petrels are long-lived animals [48] and are thus prone to Hg bioaccumulation over the long-term, and (ii) they prey on crustaceans and mesopelagic fish [49], [50], with the latter containing high Hg concentrations [46], [51]. The trophic explanation of the high Hg levels of subantarctic skua chicks therefore suggests that seabirds feeding on other seabirds are at risk to accumulate critical pollutant loads. Indeed, Scottish great skuas feeding predominantly on other seabirds contain more Hg than those feeding on fish [52], [53], but with no negative effects on breeding performance and survival [54].

Feather Hg Concentrations and Foraging Habitats

Univariate analysis indicated no δ13C effects on feather Hg concentrations within the Kerguelen seabird community, and, in multivariate analysis, species and δ15N produced the best model. This result seems to contradict our hypothesis that foraging habitat should play an important role in shaping seabird Hg contamination. However, the large range of seabird δ13C values indicates that, again, species that forage within different isoscapes were pooled, thus resulting in a confounding effect [15] for the interpretation of feather Hg concentrations. For example, the five seabirds with δ13C values ≥ 18‰ were all neritic species feeding either along the shoreline (the kelp gull) or on pelagic (the southern rockhopper penguin and common diving petrel) or benthic prey (the gentoo penguin and Kerguelen shag) (Table 1). The relatively high feather Hg concentrations in feathers of the two latter species are in agreement with the Me-Hg-enrichment of coastal benthic areas [6]. Noticeably, the two species feeding in the closed sea (the southern rockhopper penguin and common diving petrel) and the sibling species foraging in the open sea (the macaroni penguin and South Georgian diving petrel, respectively) have low feather Hg concentrations. Such low levels can be related to a crustacean-based diet and suggest that no significant inshore/offshore gradient occurs in the availability of Me-Hg in pelagic waters surrounding the Kerguelen Islands.

At a larger spatial scale, the importance of foraging habitat is exemplified by the positive correlation between feather Hg concentrations and δ13C values in oceanic seabirds. Taken into account the latitudinal δ13C gradient within the Southern Ocean [15], [16], the relationship indicates that species foraging in cold waters south of Kerguelen Islands are less prone to be contaminated than species feeding in northern warmer waters. This finding does not fit well with the only study on Hg speciation in the Southern Ocean showing higher Me-Hg concentrations in Antarctic than in subantarctic and subtropical waters [13]. This mismatch reinforces the need to better document the bioavailability of Me-Hg in the main oceanic and neritic water masses and to determine the levels of Hg contamination of seabirds breeding in the north (e.g. Amsterdam Islands) and south (e.g. Adélie Land) of the Kerguelen Archipelago to confirm or not this latitudinal trend both at the bottom and at the top of the marine trophic webs.


The pattern of Hg contamination of Kerguelen seabirds is remarkable due to its wide range of values, but the circumpolar annular structure of the Southern Ocean [55] suggests it may be generalized to other subantarctic localities. The source of Hg in subantarctic waters is still poorly known, but it ultimately derives mostly from anthropogenic contamination, because (i) human activities have increased emissions to the atmosphere by approximately a factor of 3, and (ii) atmospheric deposition is the dominant input term in the world ocean [6], including the Southern Ocean [13]. Since global Hg emissions will increase in the future, Hg contamination will increase as well in remote areas [56]. Hence, Kerguelen Archipelago, together with other isolated islands located far away from anthropogenic sources, can be considered as ideal study sites to monitor the temporal trend of global Hg contamination. Our study allows selecting chicks of some seabirds as sentinels of environmental pollution according to their high Hg concentrations with relatively low variances and to their contrasted foraging ecology. Three representative species are the gentoo penguin (benthic neritic forager), black-browed albatross (pelagic neritic forager) and light-mantled sooty albatross (southern oceanic forager). Despite its larger variance in Hg concentrations, the wandering albatross (northern oceanic forager) must also be included, because this iconic seabird is known to be among the most Hg contaminated vertebrate species [36], [57].


The authors thank the numerous fieldworkers who helped with collecting seabird feathers at the different breeding sites, and C. Churlaud for her assistance during Hg analyses. F. Capoulun, M. Connan, T. Cook and A. Maglio prepared some isotopic samples and G. Guillou run all of them.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YC P. Bustamante OC. Performed the experiments: P. Blévin AJ. Analyzed the data: P. Blévin AC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: P. Bustamante. Wrote the paper: YC P. Blévin.


  1. 1. Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. AMBIO 36: 12–19. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[12:eoemot];2
  2. 2. Grandjean P, Satoh H, Murata K, Eto K (2010) Adverse effects of methylmercury: environmental health research implications. Environ Health Persp 118: 1137–1145. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901757
  3. 3. Selin NE (2009) Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: a review. Annu Rev Environ Resourc 34: 43–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314
  4. 4. Fitzgerald WF, Engstrom DR, Mason RP, Nater EA (1998) The case for atmospheric mercury contamination in remote areas. Environ Sci Technol 32: 1–7. doi: 10.1021/es970284w
  5. 5. Ebinghaus R, Kock HH, Temme C, Einax JW, Löwe AG, et al. (2002) Antarctic springtime depletion of atmospheric mercury. Environ Sci Technol 36: 1238–1244. doi: 10.1021/es015710z
  6. 6. Fitzgerald WF, Lamborg CH, Hammerschmidt CR (2007) Marine biogeochemical cycling of mercury. Chem Rev 107: 641–662. doi: 10.1021/cr050353m
  7. 7. Morel FMM, Kraepiel AML, Amyot M (1998) The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29: 543–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.543
  8. 8. Monteiro LR, Furness RW (1995) Seabirds as monitors of mercury in the marine environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 80: 851–870. doi: 10.1007/bf01189736
  9. 9. Bocher P, Caurant F, Miramand P, Cherel Y, Bustamante P (2003) Influence of the diet on the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in zooplankton-eating petrels at Kerguelen archipelago, Southern Indian Ocean. Polar Biol 26: 759–767. doi: 10.1007/s00300-003-0552-6
  10. 10. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2004) Marine birds as sentinels of environmental pollution. EcoHealth 1: 263–274. doi: 10.1007/s10393-004-0096-4
  11. 11. Weimerskirch H, Zotier R, Jouventin P (1989) The avifauna of the Kerguelen Islands. Emu 89: 15–29. doi: 10.1071/mu9890015
  12. 12. Thompson DR, Furness RW, Lewis SA (1993) Temporal and spatial variation in mercury concentrations in some albatrosses and petrels from the sub-Antarctic. Polar Biol 13: 239–244. doi: 10.1007/bf00238759
  13. 13. Cossa D, Heimbürger LE, Lannuzel D, Rintoul SR, Butler ECV, et al. (2011) Mercury in the Southern Ocean. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75: 4037–4052. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.001
  14. 14. Newsome SD, Martinez del Rio C, Bearhop S, Phillips DL (2007) A niche for isotopic ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5: 429–436. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[429:anfie];2
  15. 15. Cherel Y, Hobson KA (2007) Geographical variation in carbon stable isotope signatures of marine predators: a tool to investigate their foraging areas in the Southern Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 329: 281–287. doi: 10.3354/meps329281
  16. 16. Jaeger A, Lecomte VJ, Weimerskirch H, Richard P, Cherel Y (2010) Seabird satellite tracking validates the use of latitudinal isoscapes to depict predators’ foraging areas in the Southern Ocean. Rapid Comm Mass Spectr 24: 3456–3460. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4792
  17. 17. Cherel Y, Fontaine C, Richard P, Labat JP (2010) Isotopic niches and trophic levels of myctophid fishes and their predators in the Southern Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 55: 324–332. doi: 10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0324
  18. 18. Lewis SA, Furness RW (1991) Mercury accumulation and excretion in laboratory reared black-headed gull Larus ridibundus chicks. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 21: 316–320. doi: 10.1007/bf01055352
  19. 19. Cherel Y, Weimerskirch H, Trouvé C (2000) Food and feeding ecology of the neritic-slope forager black-browed albatross and its relationships with commercial fisheries in Kerguelen waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 207: 183–199. doi: 10.3354/meps207183
  20. 20. Hobson KA, Clark RG (1992) Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes I: turnover of 13C in tissues. Condor 94: 181–188. doi: 10.2307/1368807
  21. 21. Jaeger A, Connan M, Richard P, Cherel Y (2010) Use of stable isotopes to quantify seasonal changes of trophic niche and levels of population and individual specialisation in seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40: 269–277. doi: 10.3354/meps08380
  22. 22. Furness RW, Muirhead SJ, Woodburn M (1986) Using bird feathers to measure mercury in the environment: relationships between mercury content and moult. Mar Pollut Bull 17: 27–30. doi: 10.1016/0025-326x(86)90801-5
  23. 23. Park YH, Gambéroni L (1997) Cross-frontal exchange of Antarctic intermediate water and Antarctic bottom water in the Crozet Basin. Deep-Sea Res II 44: 963–986. doi: 10.1016/s0967-0645(97)00004-0
  24. 24. Thompson DR, Furness RW (1989) Comparison of the levels of total and organic mercury in seabird feathers. Mar Pollut Bull 20: 577–579. doi: 10.1016/0025-326x(89)90361-5
  25. 25. Kim EY, Murakami T, Saeki K, Tatsukawa R (1996) Mercury levels and its chemical form in tissues and organs of seabirds. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 30: 259–266. doi: 10.1007/bf00215806
  26. 26. Bond AL, Diamond AW (2009) Total and methyl mercury concentrations in seabird feathers and eggs. Arch. Environ. Contam Toxicol 56: 286–291. doi: 10.1007/s00244-008-9185-7
  27. 27. R Development Core Team (2008) A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  28. 28. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on information theory (eds B.N Petrov & F. Csaki), vol 1, 267–281. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
  29. 29. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
  30. 30. Lebreton JD, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62: 67–118. doi: 10.2307/2937171
  31. 31. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013
  32. 32. Lancelot R, Lesnoff M (2005) Sélection de modèles avec l’AIC et critères d’information dérivés.​Fiches/AIC_v3.pdf.
  33. 33. Anderson ORJ, Phillips RA, McDonald RA, Shore RF, McGill RAR, et al. (2009) Influence of trophic position and foraging range on mercury levels within a seabird community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 375: 277–288. doi: 10.3354/meps07784
  34. 34. Muirhead SJ, Furness RW (1988) Heavy metal concentrations in the tissues of seabirds from Gough Island, South Atlantic Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 19: 278–283. doi: 10.1016/0025-326x(88)90599-1
  35. 35. Lock JW, Thompson DR, Furness RW, Bartle JA (1992) Metal concentrations in seabirds of the New Zealand region. Environ Pollut 75: 289–300. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(92)90129-x
  36. 36. Stewart FM, Phillips RA, Bartle JA, Craig J, Shooter D (1999) Influence of phylogeny, diet, moult schedule and sex on heavy metal concentrations in New Zealand Procellariiformes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 178: 295–305. doi: 10.3354/meps178295
  37. 37. Becker PH, González-Solís J, Behrends B, Croxall J (2002) Feather mercury levels in seabirds at South Georgia: influence of trophic position, sex and age. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243: 261–269. doi: 10.3354/meps243261
  38. 38. Catry T, Ramos JA, Le Corre M, Kojadinovic J, Bustamante P (2008) The role of stable isotopes and mercury concentrations to describe seabird foraging ecology in tropical environments. Mar Biol 155: 637–647. doi: 10.1007/s00227-008-1060-6
  39. 39. Burger J (1993) Metals in avian feathers: bioindicators of environmental pollution. Rev Environ Toxicol 5: 203–311.
  40. 40. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2000) Metal levels in feathers of 12 species of seabirds from Midway Atoll in the northern Pacific Ocean. Sci Total Environ 257: 37–52. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00496-4
  41. 41. Kojadinovic J, Bustamante P, Churlaud C, Cosson RP, Le Corre M (2007) Mercury in seabird feathers: Insight on dietary habits and evidence for exposure levels in the western Indian Ocean. Sci Total Environ 384: 194–204. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.018
  42. 42. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1997) Risk, mercury levels, and birds: relating adverse laboratory effects to field biomonitoring. Environ Res 75: 160–172. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1997.3778
  43. 43. Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR, Yates DE, Hanson W, et al. (2008) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology 17: 69–81. doi: 10.1007/s10646-007-0168-7
  44. 44. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83: 703–718. doi: 10.2307/3071875
  45. 45. Vanderklift MA, Ponsard S (2003) Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis. Oecologia 136: 169–182. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1270-z
  46. 46. Bustamante P, Bocher P, Cherel Y, Miramand P, Caurant F (2003) Distribution of trace elements in the tissues of benthic and pelagic fish from the Kerguelen Islands. Sci Total Environ 313: 25–39. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00265-1
  47. 47. Mougeot F, Genevois F, Bretagnolle V (1998) Predation on burrowing petrels by the brown skua (Catharacta skua lönnbergi) at Mayes Island, Kerguelen. J Zool 244: 429–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00047.x
  48. 48. Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2003) Climate and density shape population dynamics of a marine top predator. Proc R Soc B 270: 2111–2116. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2488
  49. 49. Cherel Y, Bocher P, Trouvé C, Weimerskirch H (2002) Diet and feeding ecology of blue petrels Halobaena caerulea at Iles Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 228: 283–299. doi: 10.3354/meps228283
  50. 50. Connan M, Mayzaud P, Trouvé C, Barbraud C, Cherel Y (2008) Interannual dietary changes and demographic consequences in breeding blue petrels from Kerguelen Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 373: 123–135. doi: 10.3354/meps07723
  51. 51. Monteiro LR, Costa V, Furness RW, Santos RS (1996) Mercury concentrations in prey fish indicate enhanced bioaccumulation in mesopelagic environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 141: 21–25. doi: 10.3354/meps141021
  52. 52. Bearhop S, Phillips RA, Thompson DR, Waldron S, Furness RW (2000) Variability in mercury concentrations of great skuas Catharacta skua: the influence of colony, diet and trophic status inferred from stable isotope signatures. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 195: 261–268. doi: 10.3354/meps195261
  53. 53. Bearhop S, Waldron S, Thompson D, Furness R (2000) Bioamplification of mercury in great skua Catharacta skua chicks: the influence of trophic status as determined by stable isotope signatures of blood and feathers. Mar Pollut Bull 40: 181–185. doi: 10.1016/s0025-326x(99)00205-2
  54. 54. Thompson DR, Hamer KC, Furness RW (1991) Mercury accumulation in great skuas Catharacta skua of known age and sex, and its effects upon breeding and survival. J Appl Ecol 28: 672–684. doi: 10.2307/2404575
  55. 55. Orsi AH, Whitworth III T, Nowlin Jr WD (1995) On the meridional extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Deep-Sea Res I 42: 641–673. doi: 10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-w
  56. 56. Streets DG, Zhang Q, Wu Y (2009) Projections of global mercury emissions in 2050. Environ Sci Technol 43: 2983–2988. doi: 10.1021/es802474j
  57. 57. Hindell MA, Brothers N, Gales R (1999) Mercury and cadmium concentrations in the tissues of three species of southern albatrosses. Polar Biol 22: 102–108. doi: 10.1007/s003000050396
  58. 58. Bost CA, Zorn T, Le Maho Y, Duhamel G (2002) Feeding of diving predators and diel vertical migration of prey: king penguins’ diet versus trawl sampling at Kerguelen Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 227: 51–61. doi: 10.3354/meps227051
  59. 59. Lescroel A, Bost CA (2005) Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 302: 245–261. doi: 10.3354/meps302245
  60. 60. Tremblay Y, Cherel Y (2000) Benthic and pelagic dives: a new foraging behaviour in rockhopper penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 204: 257–267. doi: 10.3354/meps204257
  61. 61. Ridoux V (1994) The diets and dietary segregation of seabirds at the subantarctic Crozet Islands. Mar. Ornithol. 22: 1–192.
  62. 62. Delord K, Cotté C, Péron C, Marteau C, Pruvost P, et al. (2010) At-sea distribution and diet of an endangered top predator: relationship between white-chinned petrels and commercial longline fisheries. Endang Species Res 13: 1–16. doi: 10.3354/esr00309
  63. 63. Cherel Y, Bocher P, De Broyer C, Hobson KA (2002) Food and feeding ecology of the sympatric thin-billed Pachyptila belcheri and Antarctic P. desolata prions at Iles Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 228: 263–281. doi: 10.3354/meps228263
  64. 64. Bocher P, Cherel Y, Hobson KA (2000) Complete trophic segregation between South Georgian and common diving petrels during breeding at Iles Kerguelen. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 208: 249–264. doi: 10.3354/meps208249
  65. 65. Watanabe YY, Takahashi A, Sato K, Viviant M, Bost CA (2011) Poor flight performance in deep-diving cormorants. J Exp Biol 214: 412–421. doi: 10.1242/jeb.050161
  66. 66. Stahl JC, Mougin JL (1986) Le régime alimentaire du goéland dominicain Larus dominicanus de l’île de la Possession, archipel Crozet (46°25′S, 51°45′E). L’Oiseau et la RFO 56: 287–291.
  67. 67. Bargagli R, Monaci F, Sanchez-Hernandez JC, Cateni D (1998) Biomagnification of mercury in an Antarctic marine coastal food web. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 169: 65–75. doi: 10.3354/meps169065
  68. 68. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2000) Metals in albatross feathers from Midway Atoll: influence of species, age, and nest location. Environ Res A 82: 207–221. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1999.4015
  69. 69. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2000) Metals in Laysan albatrosses from Midway Atoll. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 38: 254–259. doi: 10.1007/s002449910033
  70. 70. Gochfeld M, Gochfeld DJ, Minton D, Murray Jr BG, Pyle P, et al. (1999) Metals in feathers of Bonin petrel, Christmas shearwater, wedge-tailed shearwater, and red-tailed tropicbird in the Hawaiian Islands, northern Pacific. Environ Monit Assess 59: 343–358.
  71. 71. Becker PH (2000) Mercury levels in pink-footed shearwaters (Puffinus creatopus) breeding on Mocha Island, Chile. Ornitol Neotrop 11: 165–168.
  72. 72. Gochfeld M (1980) Mercury levels in some seabirds of the Humboldt Current, Peru. Environ Pollut A 22: 197–205. doi: 10.1016/0143-1471(80)90014-8
  73. 73. Monteiro LR, Furness RW, del Nevo AJ (1995) Mercury levels in seabirds from the Azores, mid-north Atlantic Ocean. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 28: 304–309. doi: 10.1007/bf00213106
  74. 74. Monteiro LR, Granadeiro JP, Furness RW, Oliveira P (1999) Contemporary patterns of mercury contamination in the Portuguese Atlantic inferred from mercury concentrations in seabird tissues. Mar Environ Res 47: 137–156. doi: 10.1016/s0141-1136(98)00110-x
  75. 75. Bond AL, Diamond AW (2009) Mercury concentrations in seabird tissues from Machias Seal Island, New Brunswick, Canada. Sci Total Environ 407: 4340–4347. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.04.018
  76. 76. Moreno R, Jover L, Velando A, Munilla I, Sanpera C (2011) Influence of trophic ecology and spatial variation on the isotopic fingerprints of seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 442: 229–239. doi: 10.3354/meps09420
  77. 77. Stewart FM, Phillips RA, Catry P, Furness RW (1997) Influence of species, age and diet on mercury concentrations in Shetland seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 151: 237–244. doi: 10.3354/meps151237
  78. 78. Goutner V, Furness RW, Papakonstantinou K (2000) Mercury in feathers of Audoin’s gull (Larus audouinii) chicks from northeastern Mediterranean colonies. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39: 200–204. doi: 10.1007/s002440010097
  79. 79. Sanpera C, Ruiz X, Moreno R, Jover L, Waldron S (2007) Mercury and stable isotopes in feathers of Audoin’s gulls as indicators of feeding habits and migratory connectivity. Condor 109: 268–275. doi: 10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[268:masiif];2
  80. 80. Becker PH, Henning D, Furness RW (1994) Differences in mercury contamination and elimination during feather development in gull and tern broods. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 27: 162–167. doi: 10.1007/bf00214258
  81. 81. Kahle S, Becker PH (1999) Bird blood as bioindicator for mercury in the environment. Chemosphere 39: 2451–2457. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00154-x
  82. 82. Burger J (1996) Heavy metal and selenium levels in feathers of Franklin’s gulls in interior north America. Auk 113: 399–407. doi: 10.2307/4088906
  83. 83. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1999) Heavy metals in Franklin’s gull tissues: age and tissue differences. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 673–678. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620180413
  84. 84. Burger J, Gochfeld M, Jeitner C, Burke S, Volz CD, et al. (2009) Mercury and other metals in eggs and feathers of glaucous-winged gulls (Larus glaucescens) in the Aleutians. Environ Monit Assess 152: 179–194. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0306-6
  85. 85. Burger J (1995) Heavy metal and selenium levels in feathers of herring gulls (Larus argentatus): differences due to year, gender, and age at Captree, Long Island. Environ Monit Assess 38: 37–50. doi: 10.1007/bf00547125
  86. 86. Burger J (1997) Heavy metals and selenium in herring gulls (Larus argentatus) nesting in colonies from eastern Long Island to Virginia. Environ Monit Assess 48: 285–296. doi: 10.1007/bf00547125
  87. 87. Thompson DR, Becker PH, Furness RW (1993) Long-term changes in mercury concentrations in herring gulls Larus argentatus and common terns Sterna hirundo from the German North Sea coast. J Appl Ecol 30: 316–320. doi: 10.2307/2404633
  88. 88. Furness RW, Thompson DR, Becker PH (1995) Spatial and temporal variation in mercury contamination of seabirds in the North Sea. Helgoländer Meeresun 49: 605–615. doi: 10.1007/bf02368386
  89. 89. Wenzel C, Gabrielsen GW (1995) Trace element accumulation in three seabird species from Hornøya, Norway. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29: 198–206. doi: 10.1007/bf00212971
  90. 90. Burger J, Nisbet ICT, Gochfeld M (1994) Heavy metal and selenium levels in feathers of known-aged common terns (Sterna hirundo). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 26: 351–355. doi: 10.1007/bf00203562
  91. 91. Nisbet ICT, Montoya JP, Burger J, Hatch JJ (2002) Use of stable isotopes to investigate individual differences in diets and mercury exposures among common terns Sterna hirundo in breeding and wintering grounds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 242: 267–274. doi: 10.3354/meps242267
  92. 92. Gochfeld M (1980) Tissue distribution of mercury in normal and abnormal young common terns. Mar Pollut Bull 11: 362–377. doi: 10.1016/0025-326x(80)90284-2
  93. 93. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1992) Trace element distribution in growing feathers: Additional excretion in feather sheaths. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 23: 105–108. doi: 10.1007/bf00226002
  94. 94. Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Takekawa JY, Iverson SA (2008) Survival of postfledging Forster’s terns in relation to mercury exposure in San Francisco Bay. Ecotoxicol 17: 789–801. doi: 10.1007/s10646-008-0237-6
  95. 95. Tavarez PC, Monteiro LR, Lopes RJ, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, et al. (2005) Variation of mercury contamination in chicks of little tern Sterna albifrons in southwest Europe: brood, age, and colony related effects. Bull. Environ. Contam Toxicol 74: 177–183. doi: 10.1007/s00128-004-0565-z
  96. 96. Tavarez PC, Kelly A, Lopes RJ, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, et al. (2007) The influence of dietary specialization and trophic status on mercury levels in two species using common coastal wetlands, Himantopus himantopus and Sterna albifrons. Ardeola 54: 275–288.
  97. 97. Monticelli D, Ramos JA, Tavares PC, Bataille B, Lepoint G, et al. (2008) Diet and foraging ecology of roseate terns and lesser noddies breeding sympatrically on Aride Island, Seychelles. Waterbirds 31: 231–240. doi: 10.1675/1524-4695(2008)31[231:dafeor];2
  98. 98. Burger J, Shukla T, Dixon C, Shukla S, McMahon MJ, et al. (2001) Metals in feathers of sooty tern, white tern, gray-backed tern, and brown noddy from islands in the north Pacific. Environ Monit Assess 71: 71–89.
  99. 99. Burger J (1993) Metals in feathers of brown noddy (Anous stolidus): evidence for bioaccumulation or exposure levels? Environ Monit Assess 24: 181–187. doi: 10.1007/bf00547986
  100. 100. Burger J, Gochfeld M (1995) Biomonitoring of heavy metals in the Pacific Basin using avian feathers. Environ Toxicol Chem 14: 1233–1239. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620140716