Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Clinical Effects and Antivenom Dosing in Brown Snake (Pseudonaja spp.) Envenoming — Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-14)

  • George E. Allen,

    Affiliation: Emergency Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

  • Simon G. A. Brown,

    Affiliation: Centre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, Royal Perth Hospital and the University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

  • Nicholas A. Buckley,

    Affiliations: Medical Professorial Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital Medical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, NSW Poisons Information Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Sydney, Australia

  • Margaret A. O’Leary,

    Affiliations: Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, Department of Clinical Toxicology and Pharmacology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia

  • Colin B. Page,

    Affiliations: NSW Poisons Information Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Sydney, Australia, Department of Clinical Toxicology and Pharmacology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

  • Bart J. Currie,

    Affiliation: Menzies School of Health Research and Northern Territory Clinical School, Darwin, Australia

  • Julian White,

    Affiliation: Department of Toxinology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

  • Geoffrey K. Isbister, for the ASP Investigators

    Affiliations: NSW Poisons Information Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Sydney, Australia, Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia, Department of Clinical Toxicology and Pharmacology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia

Clinical Effects and Antivenom Dosing in Brown Snake (Pseudonaja spp.) Envenoming — Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-14)

  • George E. Allen, 
  • Simon G. A. Brown, 
  • Nicholas A. Buckley, 
  • Margaret A. O’Leary, 
  • Colin B. Page, 
  • Bart J. Currie, 
  • Julian White, 
  • Geoffrey K. Isbister



Snakebite is a global health issue and treatment with antivenom continues to be problematic. Brown snakes (genus Pseudonaja) are the most medically important group of Australian snakes and there is controversy over the dose of brown snake antivenom. We aimed to investigate the clinical and laboratory features of definite brown snake (Pseudonaja spp.) envenoming, and determine the dose of antivenom required.

Methods and Finding

This was a prospective observational study of definite brown snake envenoming from the Australian Snakebite Project (ASP) based on snake identification or specific enzyme immunoassay for Pseudonaja venom. From January 2004 to January 2012 there were 149 definite brown snake bites [median age 42y (2–81y); 100 males]. Systemic envenoming occurred in 136 (88%) cases. All envenomed patients developed venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), with complete VICC in 109 (80%) and partial VICC in 27 (20%). Systemic symptoms occurred in 61 (45%) and mild neurotoxicity in 2 (1%). Myotoxicity did not occur. Severe envenoming occurred in 51 patients (38%) and was characterised by collapse or hypotension (37), thrombotic microangiopathy (15), major haemorrhage (5), cardiac arrest (7) and death (6). The median peak venom concentration in 118 envenomed patients was 1.6 ng/mL (Range: 0.15–210 ng/mL). The median initial antivenom dose was 2 vials (Range: 1–40) in 128 patients receiving antivenom. There was no difference in INR recovery or clinical outcome between patients receiving one or more than one vial of antivenom. Free venom was not detected in 112/115 patients post-antivenom with only low concentrations (0.4 to 0.9 ng/ml) in three patients.


Envenoming by brown snakes causes VICC and over a third of patients had serious complications including major haemorrhage, collapse and microangiopathy. The results of this study support accumulating evidence that giving more than one vial of antivenom is unnecessary in brown snake envenoming.


Snake envenoming is a major problem in many parts of the world. [1] It has been estimated that there are over 440,000 snake envenomings and 20,000 deaths every year. [2] Although antivenom is the major treatment for snake bite there are ongoing issues with the effectiveness and dose of antivenom, and deaths continue to occur despite antivenom and good supportive care, even in developed countries. [3].

The widely distributed elapid genus of brown snakes (Pseudonaja spp.) (Figure 1) accounts for the majority of cases of severe envenoming and deaths from snakebite in Australia. [4] The correct dose of brown snake antivenom has been the subject of considerable debate and change over time. Antivenom is expensive and has a limited shelf life making it difficult for rural hospitals to maintain adequate supplies, particularly if large doses are being recommended. [5] Antivenom also has the potential for anaphylactic reactions [6] and serum sickness making it important to balance treatment benefit with the risk of adverse reactions.

Brown Snake Antivenom has been available from CSL Ltd. since 1956 and one vial (1000 Units) is aimed at neutralising the average yield of venom from one milking of an eastern brown snake (Pseudonaja textilis); one unit (1 U) of antivenom is defined as the amount required to neutralise 0.01 mg of dried venom [7], [8]. This dose is therefore expected to cover the most extreme theoretical possibility that the venom yield on milking is completely injected by the snake bite (i.e. the venom glands are almost completely emptied and no venom is left on the skin) and this amount is completely absorbed (i.e. none is inactivated locally in the tissues mast cell and macrophage responses). However, measurement of venom concentrations in vivo provide a better estimate of the actual venom load in human bite cases. Recent studies in Australian snakebite have found venom concentrations in patients that suggest a much smaller typical venom load and that usually only a small proportion of the venom reaches the central circulation. [9], [10].

Although it is well known that the main feature of brown snake envenoming is venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), [11], [12], [13] less common clinical effects are not well defined. [14] Major haemorrhage causing death has received widespread publicity, and early collapse and cardiac arrest also appear to be an important cause of death from brown snake envenoming. [15], [16].

Here we report a large series of proven brown snake envenoming cases to better describe the clinical syndrome of brown snake envenoming and to determine whether one vial of brown snake antivenom is sufficient to treat brown snake envenoming.


This study was part of the Australian snakebite project (ASP) which prospectively recruits suspected and definite snake bite patients from more than one hundred hospitals across Australia and referrals from all major Australian poison centres. We reviewed all cases of definite brown snake envenoming. The recruitment, design and data collection have been described previously. [6], [17] Approval was obtained from several Human Research and Ethics Committees to cover all involved institutions.

Patient demographics, laboratory results, clinical effects, treatments and outcomes are all documented as part of ASP onto our case report forms that are faxed by the treating doctor to the study coordinating centre where the data is entered into a relational database. Where possible, patient serum is collected pre and post antivenom administration, centrifuged, and stored at −80°C for venom concentration quantification.

Patients were included in this study if the snake was identified by an expert or if brown snake venom was detected in the serum. All cases recruited to ASP between January 2004 and January 2012 were reviewed if they were identified as possible brown snake bites or envenoming cases based on expert snake identification, positive snake venom detection kit (sVDK) for brown snake venom, or clinical suspicion. Cases of VICC positive for tiger snake or taipan venom on sVDK on bite site or urine, but found to be negative in the serum for either venom were then tested with formal venom-specific enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for brown snake, and included if positive. The sVDK was not used as an inclusion criterion in the absence of expert snake identification or brown snake venom detected with venom-specific enzyme immunoassay.

Cases were classified into envenomation syndromes: VICC (complete or partial), myotoxicity, thrombotic microangiopathy and systemic symptoms, as previously described. [17] Complete VICC is defined as undetectable fibrinogen and/or raised D-Dimer (at least 10 times the assay cut-off or >2.5 mg/L) and an international normalised ratio (INR) >3. Partial VICC is defined as low but detectable fibrinogen, elevated D-Dimer and a maximum INR <3. Other defined clinical effects were haemorrhage (type of haemorrhage; major haemorrhage was defined as an intracranial haemorrhage, large gastrointestinal haemorrhage with a drop in haemoglobin or any other life-threatening haemorrhage), early hypotensive collapse, cardiac arrest, seizure, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and troponin concentrations. Treatment, complications and adverse events were analysed, including systemic hypersensitivity reactions to antivenom, which were defined as anaphylaxis if they met NIAID/FAAN consensus criteria for this diagnosis, [18] and defined as severe according to the grading system developed by Brown. [19].

Bite locations were converted into latitude and longitude coordinates using, to plot a distribution map. In line with recent taxonomic revisions, [20] cases were divided into Pseudonaja species groupings based on non-overlapping geographical regions: P. textilis (Eastern Australia); P. nuchalis (‘Top End’, Northern Territory) and ‘Western Australia’ including P. modesta, P. mengdeni and P. affinis. Locations outside these regions or where there was significant overlap were not included in this sub-group analysis.

All antivenom used in the study was equine F(ab’)2 and was manufactured by CSL Ltd. The dose of antivenom is defined as the amount administered before the first available post-antivenom blood sample for venom-specific enzyme immunoassay. Polyvalent antivenom contains on average the equivalent of eight vials of brown snake antivenom, based on a study of CSL terrestrial snake antivenoms. [21] In patients given polyvalent antivenom the dose was converted to the equivalent number of brown snake antivenom vials using this 8 to 1 conversion. The total dose was also calculated for each patient receiving further antivenom.

Methods for the enzyme immunoassay have previously been described. [10] Polyclonal antibodies (IgG) to brown snake venom raised in rabbits are used, with detection by biotinylated antibodies and streptavidin horseradish peroxidase. The limit of detection for brown snake venom was 0.15 ng/ml. The peak pre-antivenom venom concentration is reported where available. An enzyme immunoassay using labelled anti-Horse IgG was also used to detect antivenom in patient serum to confirm antivenom administration.

Medians, interquartile ranges (IQR) and ranges are used to report continuous data, and proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For the enzyme immunoassay standard curves were fitted by linear and non-linear regression using both Excel and Prism 5.03 for Windows [GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA,].


There were 226 possible brown snake bites recruited to ASP and 149 of these were definite brown snake bites by our definition and included in our analysis, 13 of which were non-envenomed. Of the excluded patients, 73 patients had no pre-antivenom serum available for testing and four patients had no brown snake venom detected but had either Notechis sp. or Tropidechis carinatus venom detected. The snake was identified in 20 of the 136 envenomed patients.

Demographics of the 136 patients with definite brown snake envenoming are summarised in Table 1. The median patient age was 42 years (IQR: 25 to 53, Range: 2 to 81) and the majority were male (100; 74%). The distribution of bite locations is shown in Figure 2. Most bites occurred in Queensland, Western Australia and New South Wales with only one case in Victoria. Most patients were bitten while undertaking yard work or gardening (40), when walking or in the bush (44), or intentionally interacting with the snake (41); only eight patients were bitten indoors.

Figure 2. Distribution of definite brown snake bites including envenomed patients (+) and non-envenomed patients(•).

The clinical effects of the 136 envenomed patients are summarised in Table 2. VICC occurred in all patients, systemic symptoms in 61 patients (45%), mild neurotoxicity in only two patients (2%) and myotoxicity in none. There were six deaths, five of which occurred following an early cardiac arrest and subsequent multi-organ failure/hypoxic injury and one from an intracranial haemorrhage (Table 3). Severe envenoming occurred in 51 (38%) of patients which includes collapse/hypotension, seizure, cardiac arrest, major haemorrhage, thrombotic microangiopathy or death. The grouping of patients into each clinical syndromes including the numbers in each group is shown in Figure 3. Local effects were minor in all cases, with local pain in 70 (51%) and fang marks in 98 (72%).

Figure 3. Number of patients with partial or complete venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC), collapse or no collapse, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), major haemorrhage and death.

Table 2. Clinical features of the 136 patients with definite brown snake envenoming.

Complete VICC developed in 109 patients (80%) and partial VICC in 27 (20%). The median time to recovery of complete VICC to an INR of less than 2 was 15.5 hours (IQR: 11.5 to 19.4 hr; n = 105). Three patients died with an INR greater than 2 and one patient was discharged with an INR of 3.1. The median time from complete VICC to a normal INR (<1.3) was 23.3 hours (IQR: 18.3 to 37.3 hr; n = 83). Twenty two patients were discharged with an INR of 1.3 or greater. Major haemorrhage occurred in five cases, three gastrointestinal haemorrhages and two intracranial haemorrhages both associated with hypertension. Table 4 provides a comparison between patients with VICC and partial VICC which shows that more severe effects occurred in patients with complete VICC except thrombotic microangiopathy which occurred with similar frequency in partial VICC.

Table 4. Comparison of the clinical effects between patients with complete VICC and partial VICC.

Early collapse and/or hypotension occurred in 37 patients. In 19 patients with a known time of collapse this occurred a median of 30 minutes (range: 2 to 90 min) after the bite. Cardiac arrest occurred in seven patients with collapse and four of these were fatal. Non-fatal cardiac arrests received prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Eight patients of the 37 had generalised seizures, seven of which were hypotensive immediately prior to the seizure. No ventricular arrhythmias were reported at the time of collapse or cardiac arrest. Two patients had atrial fibrillation.

ECG and troponins were not routinely done in all patients. Three patients with early collapse had abnormal electrocardiograms (ST segment depression, atrial fibrillation and widespread T wave inversions). Troponin was measured in only 24 patients; the median troponin was somewhat higher in the 12 who had collapsed than the 12 who did not [0.7 µg/L (range: 0.05 to 22.4 µg/L) vs. 0.17 µg/L (0.01 to 2.4 µg/L)].

Fifteen patients (11%) developed thrombotic microangiopathy with thrombocytopenia and fragmented red blood cells in all 15 cases, acute renal failure with anuria/oliguria in ten cases and an abnormal creatinine without renal failure in five. One patient developed acute renal impairment without significant thrombocytopenia but had severe environmental hyperthermia. Another nine patients had an abnormal creatinine without all the features of thrombotic microangiopathy.

Two patients had mild neurotoxicity. One developed ptosis prior to having an intracerebral haemorrhage. The second had unusual and fluctuating neurological findings including ptosis, lateral gaze diplopia, bulbar weakness, dysphonia and facial weakness.

Venom concentrations and clinical effects were similar between the three groupings of brown snakes (Eastern or P. textilis, Northern and Western; Table 5) except more cases of hypotensive collapse and cardiac arrest occurred in the eastern group.

Table 5. Details of the three patients with low venom concentrations after their initial dose of antivenom.

Bite site swabs were tested using the sVDK in 117 envenomed patients and were positive for brown snake venom in 98 (84%), negative in 18 and inconclusive in one. A urine sVDK was done in 45 patients and was positive for brown snake venom in 40 and negative in 5.

Pre-treatment serum samples were available in 131 envenomed cases and eight non-envenomed patients. Venom was not detected in any of the eight non-envenomed patients. The median peak venom concentration in the envenomed patients was 1.6 ng/mL (IQR: 0.6 to 5 ng/mL; range 0.15 to 210 ng/mL). There were no significant differences in brown snake venom concentrations between different groups of Pseudonaja sp. There was a significant difference in peak venom concentrations between patients who developed complete VICC compared with partial VICC (Table 5). The median peak concentration in patients developing collapse, cardiac arrest or death was not notably higher than for other patients (Table 6).

Table 6. Comparison venom concentrations for different clinical effects/severity and different Pseudonaja species groupings.

Antivenom was given in 128 envenomed patients with a median initial dose of two vials (IQR 2 to 5, Range 1 to 40). Further doses were given in 25 patients and the total dose in all patients was a median of two vials (IQR 2 to 5, Range 1 to 40). Twenty five patients received only one vial of antivenom initially, and five of these received a second dose of one vial (3), two vials (1) and eight vials (1). Clinical effects were similar in patients receiving an initial dose of one vial compared with more than one vial, including the frequency of collapse. Outcomes were similar between patients receiving an initial dose or a total dose of one vial and those receiving greater than one vial, including the time to recovery of VICC (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The median brown snake venom concentration of those receiving an initial dose of one vial was not significantly different to those receiving more than one vial [0.9 ng/ml (IQR: 0.3 to 5.3 ng/ml) vs. 2 ng/ml (IQR: 0.6 to 5.6 ng/ml; p = 0.26).

Figure 4. Time to recovery of VICC to an INR <2 comparing patients receiving and initial antivenom dose of one vial (N = 18, blue line), two vials (N = 43, green line), or three or more vials (N = 43, red line).

Figure 5. Time to recovery of VICC to an INR <2 comparing patients receiving a total antivenom dose of one vial (N = 15, blue line), two vials (N = 38, green line), or three or more vials (N = 51, red line).

Post-treatment samples were available in 115 patients given antivenom. Free venom was not detected in 112 patients, including in 16 patients after only one vial of antivenom. Three patients had low concentrations of venom detected post-antivenom (0.4 to 0.9 ng/ml) [Table 5]. Thirty eight of the 73 excluded possible brown snake bites had post-treatment samples available and free venom was not detected in any, including 12 patients receiving one vial of antivenom.

Eight envenomed patients were not given antivenom, seven had only partial VICC and one presented late with VICC. The venom concentrations for 5 of the 8 patients who had serial blood samples available shows venom concentrations decreasing over 20 to 40 hours (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Plots of venom concentration versus time in five of the eight patients who were not given antivenom.

Four patients had anaphylaxis and 13 had skin-only reactions. There were no severe cases of anaphylaxis.


In this series of over a hundred cases of brown snake envenoming, VICC occurred in every case and was partial in 20% of cases. Neurotoxicity was mild and rare, and myotoxicity did not occur. Cardiovascular effects were common with hypotensive collapse occurring in over a quarter of patients, although non-fatal and fatal cardiac arrests were uncommon. Deaths in all but one case were attributed to early pre-hospital collapse and cardiac arrest. Clinical outcomes following one vial of antivenom were similar to those found with larger doses and venom was only detected in three cases following antivenom and these concentrations were very low and the coagulopathy was improving (Table 5).

The study emphasizes the importance of cardiovascular effects in brown snake envenoming. Although these effects are well recognised in brown snake envenoming the frequency and severity have not been well quantified in the past. Five of six deaths were a result of an early pre-hospital cardiac arrest/collapse which is unlikely to be treatable with antivenom. A recent animal study suggests that the collapse in Australasian elapids is a result of hypotension following vasodilation due to the release of endogenous mediators, and is not cardiac in origin. [22].

Unfortunately ECGs and troponins were not routinely collected, but there were moderately elevated troponins in patients with collapse, and these appeared generally higher than those seen in patients who did not have a collapse. Further detailed investigation of patients with and without collapse is required to determine if the elevated troponin is secondary to the collapse, rather than a primary cardiac event.

Thrombotic microangiopathy occurred in 11% of cases and was characterised by thrombocytopenia, acute renal impairment and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia as evidenced by fragmented red blood cells and anaemia. [23] An unusual association was that thrombotic microangiopathy was just as frequent in partial VICC compared to VICC and not associated with cardiovascular collapse in those patients with VICC.

The study also confirmed that neurotoxicity was rare in brown snake envenoming in humans, and only results in minor effects. This is consistent with recent studies of brown snake venom, [24] which showed the presynaptic neurotoxin in brown snake venom is far less potent than that in taipan venom, and constitutes a much smaller proportion of the venom. [24].

The study demonstrates some of the difficulties with correlating the clinical effects in humans with the composition of the venom. A number of studies have identified the important venom proteins in P. textilis venom. [25], [26] Some of these venom proteins play a key role in human envenoming, such as the prothrombin activator Pseutarin C. Pseutarin C is a potent procoagulant in vitro [27] and is the cause of VICC seen in patients in this study. However, some toxins identified in the venom, such as the presynaptic neurotoxin textilotoxin, and other long and short chain post-synaptic neurotoxins, do not appear to play an important role in human envenoming as evidenced by the lack of neurotoxicity in the majority of patients. The quantity and potency of the textilotoxin explains the lack of neurotoxicity in part. [24] However, it remains unclear why post-synaptic neurotoxins identified in the venom [25] do not result in neurotoxicity. [28] A number of other toxins found in P. textilis venom, such as textilinin, [25] do not appear to play a role in human envenoming. Finally, further study is required to determine the toxic mechanisms and specific toxins that cause the cardiovascular effects and thrombotic microangiopathy, which we have shown to be characteristic of brown snake envenoming.

The geographical distribution of brown snake envenoming was notable with only one case in Victoria. Most brown snake bites occurred in North-Eastern Australia and Western Australia (Figure 2) and in these regions brown snake envenoming is likely to be the most important cause of snake envenoming. A comparison of three Pseudonaja groupings suggests that they are similar clinically and produce similar venom concentrations, which refutes previous suggestions that brown snakes from Western Australia cause more severe envenoming or inject more venom.

Published opinions and guidelines have offered conflicting advice on antivenom dosing. [5], [7], [8], [29], [30] This case series supports that the much higher doses recommended previously are unnecessary and indeed shows that one vial of brown snake antivenom was sufficient, with similar recovery and outcomes compared with patients receiving larger doses. This is consistent with recent in vitro studies showing that one vial binds all circulating venom up to a concentration of 100 ng/ml [7] and will neutralise the procoagulant effects. [27] In addition, no further doses are required.

Previous recommendations of larger doses of brown snake antivenom have been based on either the incorrect assumption that ongoing coagulopathy is due to inadequate antivenom, [5] or that the average venom yield used for calculating antivenom quantities was lower than that found in more recent milking studies. [31] However, even if brown snakes delivered 10 times the CSL calculated average venom yield, one vial should still be sufficient based on recent in vitro clotting studies. [7], [27] Unlike older animal work suggesting larger antivenom doses, [29], [32] these studies used venom at clinically relevant concentrations and show neutralisation of venom concentrations measured in this clinical study, with antivenom concentrations equivalent to dosing with one vial. [7], [27].

We were unable to determine the proportion of brown snake bites that result in envenoming. The small proportion of non-envenomed cases in this series was due to the fact that if venom was not detected in blood most patients were excluded. Snake collection and identification by an expert was uncommon. Another limitation is the lack of routine cardiovascular investigation, including the regular collection of ECG and troponin data that were not specifically part of the research protocol or current clinical practice. In future it will be important for troponins and ECGs to be done in patients following collapse.

This series confirms that VICC occurs in all brown snake envenoming cases, and over a third of patients develop complications related to envenoming (early collapse, major haemorrhage, thrombotic microangiopathy). The results of this study support accumulating evidence that giving more than one vial of antivenom is unnecessary in brown snake envenoming.


On behalf of the ASP clinical investigators who recruited patients to the study: Yusuf Nagree (Armadale Hospital), Michael Taylor (Albury Hospital), Conrad Macrokanis (Broome Hospital), Gary Wilkes and Adam Coulson (Bunbury Hospital), Chris Barnes (Bundaberg Hospital), Robert Bonnin, Richard Whitaker and Lambros Halkidis (Cairns Base Hospital), Geoff Isbister (Calvary Mater Newcastle), Nicholas Buckley (Canberra Hospital), Randall Greenberg (Dubbo Base Hospital), Mark Storey (Flinders Medical Centre), Rod Ellis (Fremantle Hospital), David Spain (Gold Coast Hospital), Dan Bitmead and Kenny Tay (Ipswich Hospital), Mark Miller (John Hunter Hospital), Paul Bailey (Joondalup Hospital), Chris Gavaghan (Lismore Base Hospital), Anna Holdgate (Liverpool and Campbelltown Hospitals), Kent McGregor (Logan Hospital), Todd Fraser (Mackay Hospital), Peter Garrett, Paul Negus (Nambour Hospital), Colin Page (Princess Alexandria Hospital), Peter Thompson (Rockhamptom Hospital), Rod Ellis (Rockingham Hospital), Bart Currie (Royal Darwin Hospital), Simon Brown and David McCoubrie (Royal Perth Hospital), Ovidu Pascui (Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital), Nick Ryan (Tamworth Hospital), Katie Mills (Toowoomba Hospital), Ben Close (Townsville Hospital), Naren Gunja (Westmead Hospital). We acknowledge the many referrals from the National Poison Centre Network and clinical toxicologists and help of the many other nurses, doctors and laboratory staff in recruiting patients and collecting samples. We thank Leonie Calver for her help in recruiting and randomising patients; Renai Kearney for data entry and follow up of patient information and medical records; and Ellen MacDonald for assistance in ethics applications and data collection. We also thank Joseph Sambono and Jenna Allen for reading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GKI SGAB BJC NAB. Performed the experiments: GA GKI SGAB NAB JW BJC CBP MAO. Analyzed the data: GA GKI NAB SGAB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MAO. Wrote the paper: GA GKI MAO NAB SGAB JW BJC CBP.


  1. 1. Warrell DA (2010) Snake bite. Lancet 375: 77–88. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61754-2
  2. 2. Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, et al. (2008) The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoSMed 5: e218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218
  3. 3. Isbister GK (2010) Antivenom efficacy or effectiveness: the Australian experience. Toxicology 268: 148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.09.013
  4. 4. Sutherland SK, Leonard RL (1995) Snakebite deaths in Australia 1992–1994 and a management update. Medical Journal of Australia 163: 616–618.
  5. 5. Yeung JM, Little M, Murray LM, Jelinek GA, Daly FF (2004) Antivenom dosing in 35 patients with severe brown snake (Pseudonaja) envenoming in Western Australia over 10 years. Medical Journal of Australia 181: 703–705. doi: 10.1016/s0271-7964(08)70459-2
  6. 6. Isbister GK, Brown SG, MacDonald E, White J, Currie BJ (2008) Current use of Australian snake antivenoms and frequency of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis. Medical Journal of Australia 188: 473–476.
  7. 7. Isbister GK, O’Leary MA, Schneider JJ, Brown SG, Currie BJ (2007) Efficacy of antivenom against the procoagulant effect of Australian brown snake (Pseudonaja sp.) venom: In vivo and in vitro studies. Toxicon 49: 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.09.007
  8. 8. White J (2001) CSL Antivenom Handbook. Melbourne: CSL Ltd.
  9. 9. Gan M, O’Leary MA, Brown SG, Jacoby T, Spain D, et al. (2009) Envenoming by the rough-scaled snake (Tropidechis carinatus): a series of confirmed cases. Medical Journal of Australia 191: 183–186.
  10. 10. Kulawickrama S, O’Leary MA, Hodgson WC, Brown SG, Jacoby T, et al. (2010) Development of a sensitive enzyme immunoassay for measuring taipan venom in serum. Toxicon 55: 1510–1518. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.03.003
  11. 11. Currie BJ (2004) Snakebite in tropical Australia: a prospective study in the “Top End” of the Northern Territory. Medical Journal of Australia 181: 693–697. doi: 10.1016/s0271-7964(08)70462-2
  12. 12. White J (2003) Elapid Envenomation. In: Covacevich J, Davie P, Pearn J, editors. Toxic Plants and Animals: A guide for Australia. Brisbane: Queensland Museum.
  13. 13. Jelinek GA, Breheny FX (1990) Ten years of snake bites at Fremantle Hospital. Medical Journal of Australia 153: 658–661.
  14. 14. Henderson A, Baldwin LN, May C (1993) Fatal brown snake (Pseudonaja textilis) envenomation despite the use of antivenom. Medical Journal of Australia 158: 709–710.
  15. 15. Currie BJ (2000) Snakebite in tropical Australia, Papua New Guinea and Irian Jaya. Emergency Medicine 12: 285–294. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2000.00150.x
  16. 16. Jelinek GA, Hamilton T, Hirsch RL (1991) Admissions for suspected snake bite to the Perth adult teaching hospitals, 1979 to 1988. Medical Journal of Australia 155: 761–764.
  17. 17. Isbister GK, White J, Currie BJ, O’Leary MA, Brown SG (2011) Clinical effects and treatment of envenoming by Hoplocephalus spp. snakes in Australia: Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-12). Toxicon 58: 634–640. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2011.09.013
  18. 18. Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF Jr, Bock SA, et al. (2006) Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report–Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 117: 391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1303
  19. 19. Brown SG (2004) Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 114: 371–376. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.04.029
  20. 20. Skinner A, Donnellan SC, Hutchinson MN, Hutchinson RG (2005) A phylogenetic analysis of Pseudonaja (Hydrophiinae, Elapidae, Serpentes) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37: 558–571. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.06.020
  21. 21. O’Leary MA, Isbister GK (2009) Commercial monovalent antivenoms in Australia are polyvalent. Toxicon 54: 192–195. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.04.004
  22. 22. Chaisakul J, Isbister GK, Konstantakopoulos N, Tare M, Parkington HC, et al. (2012) In vivo and in vitro cardiovascular effects of Papuan taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus) venom: Exploring “sudden collapse”. Toxicol Lett.
  23. 23. Isbister GK (2010) Snakebite doesn’t cause disseminated intravascular coagulation: coagulopathy and thrombotic microangiopathy in snake envenoming. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis 36: 444–451. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254053
  24. 24. Barber CM, Isbister GK, Hodgson WC (2012) Solving the ‘Brown snake paradox’: In vitro characterisation of Australasian snake presynaptic neurotoxin activity. Toxicol Lett 210: 318–323. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.02.001
  25. 25. Birrell GW, Earl S, Masci PP, de Jersey J, Wallis TP, et al. (2006) Molecular diversity in venom from the Australian Brown snake, Pseudonaja textilis. MolCell Proteomics 5: 379–389. doi: 10.1074/mcp.m500270-mcp200
  26. 26. Rao VS, Kini RM (2002) Pseutarin C, a prothrombin activator from Pseudonaja textilis venom: its structural and functional similarity to mammalian coagulation factor Xa-Va complex. ThrombHaemost 88: 611–619. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3839
  27. 27. Isbister GK, Woods D, Alley S, O’Leary MA, Seldon M, et al. (2010) Endogenous thrombin potential as a novel method for the characterization of procoagulant snake venoms and the efficacy of antivenom. Toxicon 56: 75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.03.013
  28. 28. Kuruppu S, Smith AI, Isbister GK, Hodgson WC (2008) Neurotoxins from Australo-Papuan elapids: a biochemical and pharmacological perspective. Crit RevToxicol 38: 73–86. doi: 10.1080/10408440701703964
  29. 29. Sprivulis P, Jelinek GA, Marshall L (1996) Efficacy and potency of antivenoms in neutralizing the procoagulant effects of Australian snake venoms in dog and human plasma. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 24: 379–381.
  30. 30. (2007) Snakebite and Spiderbite Clinical Management Guidelines. In: Health, editor. Sydney: NSW Health.
  31. 31. Mirtschin PJ, Dunstan N, Hough B, Hamilton E, Klein S, et al. (2006) Venom yields from Australian and some other species of snakes. Ecotoxicology 15: 531–538. doi: 10.1007/s10646-006-0089-x
  32. 32. Tibballs J, Sutherland S (1991) The efficacy of antivenom in prevention of cardiovascular depression and coagulopathy induced by brown snake (Pseudonaja) species venom. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 19: 530–534.