The financial cost of missed appointments is so great that even a small percentage reduction in Did Not Attend (DNA) rate could save significant sums of money. Previous studies have identified many factors that predict DNA rate, including patient age, gender, and transport options. However, it is not obvious how healthcare providers can use this information to improve attendance, as such factors are not under their control. One factor that is under administrative control is appointment scheduling. Here we asked whether DNA rate could be reduced by altering scheduling policy. In Study 1, we examined attendance records for 4,538,294 outpatient hospital appointments across Scotland between January 1st 2008 and December 31st 2010. DNA rate was highest for Mondays (11%), lowest for Fridays (9.7%), and decreased monotonically over the week (Monday-Friday comparison [χ2(1, N = 1,585,545) = 722.33, p<0.0001]; Relative Risk Reduction 11.8%). This weekly decline was present for male and female patient groups of all ages, but was steeper for younger age groups. In Study 2, we examined attendance records for 10,895 appointments at a single GP clinic in Glasgow. Here again, DNA rate was highest for Mondays (6.2%), lowest for Fridays (4.2%), and decreased monotonically over the week (Monday-Friday comparison [χ2(1, N = 4767) = 9.20, p<0.01]; Relative Risk Reduction 32.3%). In two very different settings, appointments at the beginning of the week were more likely to be missed than appointments at the end of the week. We suggest that DNA rate could be significantly reduced by preferentially loading appointments onto high-attendance days.
Citation: Ellis DA, Jenkins R (2012) Weekday Affects Attendance Rate for Medical Appointments: Large-Scale Data Analysis and Implications. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51365. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051365
Editor: Tobias Preis, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Received: August 16, 2012; Accepted: November 1, 2012; Published: December 13, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Ellis, Jenkins. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This study was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), http://www.esrc.ac.uk. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The Did Not Attend (DNA) rate for outpatient appointments at UK hospitals is approximately 12% , in line with other nations . These missed appointments cost the UK health system an estimated £600 M per year . This figure is so large that even small reductions in DNA rate could save significant sums. For example, cutting non-attendance by a tenth (from 12% to 10.8%) would cut the annual cost by a tenth (from £600 M to £540 M). In other words, an absolute reduction in DNA rate of just 1.2% could save £60 M per year. Improving attendance would also reduce health risk to patients –.
Despite longstanding interest in the causes of missed appointments, practical recommendations for reducing their prevalence are scarce. This is partly because the causes of non-attendance are not well understood. Previous studies have often reported conflicting results –, possibly due to their reliance on small samples from disparate settings [4 5 11–13]. Nevertheless, there is some consensus on a number of determinants . These include patient factors such as age [7 9 15], gender [11 16 17], and transport logistics [8 11 18], as well as clinic or practitioner factors such as booking efficiency [5 19–22] and staff-patient rapport [21 23 24]. Common to many of these factors is that they do not suggest any straightforward intervention strategies. The age, gender, and transport options of patients are outside of the healthcare provider’s control; and changes in institutional practice can be costly to implement due to additional equipment or procedural requirements (e.g. telephone reminders ).
Here we propose that Did Not Attend (DNA) rates could be cheaply reduced by modifying appointment allocation strategy. Recent psychological studies have shown that different days of the week evoke distinct emotional responses . Monday is most negative, Friday is most positive, and emotional tone brightens steadily over the intervening days. Given that attending a medical appointment may place additional burdens on the patient (e.g. organising work absence or travel logistics; confronting unpleasant treatment ), we hypothesised that the contrasting emotional characters of different weekdays might translate to contrasting attendance rates. Specifically, we expected DNA rate follow the psychological peaks and troughs of the weekly cycle, with emotionally positive days boosting patient resilience and improving attendance .
To test this hypothesis we conducted two independent analyses, the first based on national outpatient data across Scottish hospitals, and the second based on attendance data from a general practitioners’ (GP) clinic in Glasgow, Scotland. To anticipate, we found the predicted pattern in both data sets: DNA rates were significantly higher on Mondays than on Fridays, and showed a graded decrease over the week. The data imply that millions of pounds could be saved by preferentially loading appointments onto high attendance days.
All patient data used in our studies was anonymous. For Study 1, our request for dates of missed and attended appointments cleared Information Services Division Scotland ethical procedures, and the dataset was delivered in anonymous form. IRB approval was not required for the study.
Study 1: National Outpatient Data
Information Services Division Scotland provided a complete record of outpatient hospital appointments for the whole of Scotland, from January 1st 2008 to December 31st 2010 (4,538,294 appointments in total). To our knowledge, this is the largest corpus of data for which DNA rates have been analysed. Weekend appointments were infrequent (<2% of cases) and were excluded from the analysis. To test for a weekly trend in non-attendance, we categorised the remaining 4,463,369 appointments according to weekday, and calculated DNA rates (i.e. the percentage of appointments that were missed) separately for each weekday.
Table 1 shows DNA rate as a function of weekday. As can be seen from the table, DNA rate is highest on Mondays (11%), lowest on Fridays (9.7%), and declines monotonically through the week (Relative Risk Reduction 11.8%). Chi-square comparison of the frequency of attended versus non-attended appointments revealed a highly reliable difference between Monday and Friday [χ2(1, N = 1,585,545) = 722.33, p<0.0001].
Table 2 shows DNA rates in Study 1 separately for male and female patients and for different age bands. The overall demographic trends are consistent with those in previous studies. DNA rates were generally higher for males than for females, and highest overall for young males [14 16 28]. Importantly, the decline in DNA rate over the week is seen in both male and female patients, and in all age bands. Note however that the steepness of decline varies with patient age. Specifically, weekday predicts DNA rate more strongly in younger patients than in older patients.
To establish the generality of the basic effect, and to examine its relevance for scheduling policy in individual clinics, we next conducted a similar weekday analysis based on data from a single general practice.
Study 2: Single Practice Data
A General Practitioners’ (GP) clinic in Glasgow, Scotland made available a complete anonymous record of their appointment scheduling for January 1st 2009 to December 31st 2009 (10,895 appointments in total). Note that the practice in question did not normally schedule GP appointments for Tuesdays or weekends, and these days were excluded from the analysis. Percentage DNA rates for the remaining weekdays were calculated as in Study 1.
As can be seen from Table 3, the weekday pattern is strikingly similar to that seen in Study 1. Overall DNA rate was again highest for Mondays (6.2%), lowest for Fridays (4.2%), and decreased over the intervening days (Relative Risk Reduction 32.3%). Chi-square analysis to compare the frequency of attended versus non-attended appointments confirmed that the difference between Monday and Friday was statistically highly robust [χ2(1, N = 4767) = 9.20, p<0.01].
In two large datasets, we found that DNA rates for medical appointments declined monotonically over the week. This pattern was present for both male and female patients and in all age groups, but was stronger in younger age groups. Importantly, it also generalised across national hospital and single practice settings.
Although the present study does not address the causes of the weekday effect directly, we note that the pattern seen here in real world attendance rates echoes the pattern seen in emotional responses to weekday cues . In line with our predictions, attendance was systematically higher on days that elicit emotionally positive associations (e.g. Friday), and lower on days that elicit emotionally negative associations (e.g. Monday). These findings raise the possibility that medical appointments may be harder to face on some weekdays than on others. This interpretation chimes with the many psychological reasons that patients give for non-attendance (e.g. fear of bad news , fear of unpleasant treatment , negative relationships with staff [23 25]). A complete explanation will require further study. For now, the data clearly show that appointments at the beginning of the week were missed more often than those at the end of the week. This observation suggests a simple strategy for reducing non-attendance: where practicable, load appointments towards the end of a week. Interestingly, the actual loading pattern in the hospital data (but not the single practice data) was opposite to this. That is, appointments were disproportionately loaded to the beginning of a week, where DNA rates are highest (see Table 2). The contrast between ideal and actual scheduling patterns underscores the practical value of our analysis: Significant health and financial savings could be achieved simply by changing the distribution of appointments over the week.
We note that the effect of weekday on DNA rate in Study 1 is numerically smaller than the effect of patient gender (overall Monday-Friday difference 1.3%, Relative Risk Reduction 11.8%; overall Male-Female difference 2.5%, Relative Risk Reduction 20.8%). Importantly however, appointment allocation policy can be changed easily, whereas the gender of patients can not. For this reason, we suggest that the weekday effect is of greater practical significance despite its smaller size.
For several reasons, we believe that the effect of weekday on DNA rates should be of interest to practitioners, managers, and politicians alike. First, it points to clear recommendations that can be easily acted upon, as outlined above. Second, it brings attendance problems under the control of the service provider, rather than relying on education or punishment of the patient [15 17]. Third, changing appointment allocation policy should be inexpensive compared with other approaches to reducing DNA rate, as it does not require any additional equipment or procedures (cf. telephone or text reminders [29 30]). Finally, reductions in DNA rate achieved through reminder schemes and through scheduling improvements may be additive, if these very different approaches target separable causes of non-attendance (e.g., forgetting and motivation, respectively).
A straightforward trial of the weekday effect in a clinical setting could involve shifting appointments from Mondays to Fridays, and comparing overall attendance rates before and after this intervention. We would very interested to hear of any such trials. For now, we show that weekday predicts likelihood of attendance for medical appointments. Exploiting this weekday effect could save money and improve patient care.
We thank Information Services Division (ISD) Scotland and a GP clinic in Glasgow for granting access to anonymous attendance data.
Conceived and designed the experiments: RJ DAE. Analyzed the data: DAE. Wrote the paper: DAE RJ.
- 1. Committee of Public Accounts (1995) 42nd Report. National health service outpatients services in England and Wales. London: Stationery Office.
- 2. Goldbart AD, Dreiher J, Vardy DA, Alkrinawi S, Cohen AD (2009) Nonattendance in pediatric pulmonary clinics: an ambulatory survey. BMC Pulm Med 9: 12.
- 3. Dr Foster website. Available: http://www.drfosterhealth.co.uk/features/outpatient-appointment-no-shows.aspx. Accessed 2012 Nov 11.
- 4. Gucciardi E (2008) A systematic review of attrition from diabetes education services: strategies to improve attrition and retention research. Can J Diabetes Care 32: 53–65.
- 5. Murdock A, Rogers C, Lindsay H, Tham T (2002) Why do patients not keep their appointments? Prospective study in a gastroenterology outpatient clinic. J Roy Soc Med 95: 284–286.
- 6. Weinger K, McMurrich S, Yi J, Lin S, Rodriguez M (2005) Psychological characteristics of frequent short-notice cancellers of diabetes medical and education appointments. Diabetes Care 28: 1791–1793.
- 7. Lehmann T, Lehmann A, Olivet M, Stalder H (2007) Missed appointments at a Swiss university outpatient clinic. Public Health 121: 790–799.
- 8. Neilsen KM, Faergeman O, Foldspang A, Larsen ML (2008) Cardiac rehabilitation: health characteristics and socio-economic status among those who do not attend. Eur J Public Health 18: 479–483.
- 9. Cashman S, Savageau J, Lemay C, Ferguson W (2004) Patient health status and appointment keeping in an urban community health center. J Health Care Poor U 15: 474–488.
- 10. Masuda Y, Kubo A, Kokaze A, Yoshida M, Sekiguchi K, et al. (2006) Personal features and dropout from diabetic care. Environ Health Prev Med 11: 115–119.
- 11. Farley R, Wade T, Birchmore L (2003) Factors influencing attendance at cardiac rehabilitation among coronary heart disease patients. Eur J Cardiovas Nurs 2: 205–212.
- 12. Woodward V (1998) Non-attendance at a nurse-run asthma clinic. J Clin Nurs 7: 380–381.
- 13. Killaspy H, Banerjee S, King M, Lloyd M (2000) Prospective controlled study of psychiatric out-patient non-attendance. Characteristics and outcome. Brit J Psychiat 176: 160–165.
- 14. Paterson BL, Charlton P, Richard S (2010) Non-attendance in chronic disease clinics: a matter of non-compliance? J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn 2: 63–74.
- 15. Hussain-Gambles M, Neal R, Dempsey O, Lawlor D, Hodgson J (2004) Missed appointments in primary care: questionnaire and focus group study of health professionals. Brit J Gen Pract 54: 108–113.
- 16. Frankel S, Farrow A, West R (1989) Non-attendance or non-invitation? A case study of failed outpatient appointments. BMJ 298: 1343–1345.
- 17. Waller J, Hodgkin P (2000) Defaulters in general practice: who are they and what can be done about them. Fam Pract 17: 252–253.
- 18. Neal RD, Hussain-Gambles M, Allgar VL, Lawlor DA, Dempsey O (2005) Reasons for and consequences of missed appointments in general practice in the UK: questionnaire survey and prospective review of medical records. BMC Fam Pract 6: 47.
- 19. Mason C (1992) Non-attendance at out-patient clinics: a case study. J Adv Nurs 17: 554–560.
- 20. McCarthy K, McGee H, O’Boyle C (2000) Outpatient clinic waiting times and non-attendance as indicators of quality. Psychol Health Med 5: 287–293.
- 21. Martin C, Perfect T, Mantle G (2005) Non-attendance in primary care: the views of patients and practices on its causes, impact and solutions. Fam Pract 22: 638–643.
- 22. Casey R, Quinlan M, Flynn R, Grainger R, McDermott T, et al. (2007) Urology out-patient non-attenders: are we wasting our time? Irish J Med Soc 176: 305–308.
- 23. Lacy NL, Paulman A, Reuter MD, Lovejoy B (2004) Why we don’t come: Patient perceptions on no-shows. Ann Fam Med 2: 541–545.
- 24. Lawson V, Lyne P, Harvey J (2005) Understanding why people with type 1 diabetes do not attend for specialist advice: a qualitative analysis of the views of people with insulin-dependent diabetes who do not attend diabetes clinic. J Health Psychol 10: 409–423.
- 25. ImpAct website. Available: http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/ImpAct/imp06/i6-5.html. Accessed 2012 Nov 11.
- 26. Ellis DA, Jenkins R (2011) I keep thinking it’s Thursday: Cognitive confusions over the day of the week. Paper presented at Experimental Psychology Society, July 6–8, 2011, Nottingham, UK.
- 27. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL (2004) Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol 86: 320–333.
- 28. Beauchant S, Jones R (1997) Socio-economic and demographic factors in patient non-attendance. Brit J Healthc Manage 3: 523–528.
- 29. Sharp DJ, Hamilton W (2001) Non-attendance at general practices and outpatient clinics. BMJ 323: 1081–1082.
- 30. Hasvold PE, Wootton R (2011) Use of telephone and SMS reminders to improve attendance at hospital appointments: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 17; 358–64.