Direct and Inverted Repeats Elicit Genetic Instability by Both Exploiting and Eluding DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Systems in Mycobacteria

Ewelina A. Wojcik; Anna Brzostek; Albino Bacolla; Pawel Mackiewicz; Karen M. Vasquez; Malgorzata Korycka-Machala; Adam Jaworski; Jaroslaw Dziadek

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051064

Abstract

Repetitive DNA sequences with the potential to form alternative DNA conformations, such as slipped structures and cruciforms, can induce genetic instability by promoting replication errors and by serving as a substrate for DNA repair proteins, which may lead to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, the contribution of each of the DSB repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA), to this sort of genetic instability is not fully understood. Herein, we assessed the genome-wide distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in the Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Escherichia coli genomes, and determined the types and frequencies of genetic instability induced by direct and inverted repeats, both in the presence and in the absence of HR, NHEJ, and SSA. All three genomes are strongly enriched in direct repeats and modestly enriched in inverted repeats. When using chromosomally integrated constructs in M. smegmatis, direct repeats induced the perfect deletion of their intervening sequences ∼1,000-fold above background. Absence of HR further enhanced these perfect deletions, whereas absence of NHEJ or SSA had no influence, suggesting compromised replication fidelity. In contrast, inverted repeats induced perfect deletions only in the absence of SSA. Both direct and inverted repeats stimulated excision of the constructs from the attB integration sites independently of HR, NHEJ, or SSA. With episomal constructs, direct and inverted repeats triggered DNA instability by activating nucleolytic activity, and absence of the DSB repair pathways (in the order NHEJ>HR>SSA) exacerbated this instability. Thus, direct and inverted repeats may elicit genetic instability in mycobacteria by 1) directly interfering with replication fidelity, 2) stimulating the three main DSB repair pathways, and 3) enticing L5 site-specific recombination.

Citation: Wojcik EA, Brzostek A, Bacolla A, Mackiewicz P, Vasquez KM, Korycka-Machala M, et al. (2012) Direct and Inverted Repeats Elicit Genetic Instability by Both Exploiting and Eluding DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Systems in Mycobacteria. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064

Editor: Arthur J. Lustig, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, United States of America

Received: July 26, 2012; Accepted: October 29, 2012; Published: December 10, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 Wojcik et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the State Committee for Scientific Research (contract N303 3582 33), European Regional Development Fund under the Operational Programme Innovative Economy, grant POIG.01.01.02-10-107/09, and in part from the National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health contract HHSN261200800001E and CA093729. E.W. was partially supported by the European Social Fund and the national budget of Poland. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The first genome of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain was sequenced in 1998 [1] and since then additional strains, including other species of the Mycobacterium genus have been sequenced, with 24 M. tuberculosis complete genomes currently available (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/genomes/166) [2]–[4]. Sequence analyses of these genomes revealed considerable conservation overall, with as much as 99.95% identity between M. tuberculosis and M. bovis [4], the main difference being the presence and distribution of repeat elements, including insertion sequences (IS), direct repeats (DR) and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units, a locus containing variable numbers of tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTR). Indeed, because of the high variability in location and sequence, these and other repetitive elements have served as a tool for molecular typing of M. tuberculosis in human isolates [5], [6].

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs), a subset of DNA motifs comprising short tandem repeats of 1–6 nucleotide units, are distributed throughout the mycobacterial genomes at an average of 220–230 tracts per kb [7]. SSRs have been shown to exhibit higher mutation rates than genome-wide average, in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes [8]–[14]. This distinct property has in part been associated with the ability of SSRs to adopt alternative DNA conformations (non-B DNA), in addition to the canonical right-handed B-form [15]–[19], and to promote slipped misalignment and other replication errors during DNA synthesis [20], [21].

Studies over the past few decades have revealed that various types of DNA sequences, in addition of SSRs, may adopt non-B DNA conformations, including DRs (which can form slipped/hairpin structures), inverted repeats (IRs, cruciform structures), polypurine•polypyrimidine tracts with mirror symmetry (triplex conformations), alternating purine-pyrimidine tracts (left-handed Z-DNA) and four closely-spaced runs of 3–5 guanines (G-quadruplexes) [15], [22]–[28]. In addition to a regulatory role during transcription [29]–[32], non-B DNA structures have been implicated in causing genetic instability, including deletions, translocations, and single base substitutions, associated with human disease etiology [16], [22], [33].

The molecular mechanisms underlying the genetic instability induced by repetitive DNA sequences remain to be fully elucidated; however, proteins involved in replication, transcription, and DNA repair pathways have been implicated, by either generating or processing strand breaks in proximity of the repeats [16], [34]–[41]. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) lead to cell death if left unrepaired, and homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) are considered the two main pathways for processing DSBs. Thus, the detection of microhomologies at breakpoints of deletions and translocations induced by repetitive DNA has prompted speculation that NHEJ serves as the major pathway for the repair of repetitive DNA-dependent genetic instabilities [30], [42].

Little is known of the genome-wide distribution of repetitive DNA motifs in mycobacteria and their processing by DNA repair systems. We and others have shown that, in addition to HR, mycobacteria possess a prototypical NHEJ apparatus encoded by evolutionarily conserved ku and ligD genes [41], [43]–[48], as well as a single-strand annealing (SSA) pathway [49]. Herein, we conducted genome-wide in silico investigations in M. smegmatis, M. tuberculosis, and E. coli to identify potential non-B DNA-forming repeats, and report that both mycobacterial species are strongly enriched in DRs and IRs. M. smegmatis and E. coli were used as model systems to investigate the roles of DRs and IRs in inducing deletions, both in wild-type strains and in strains deficient in the common HR pathway or the mycobacterial-specific NHEJ and SSA functions, using both integrated and episomal systems. In M. smegmatis, DRs elicited deletions of the intervening sequence even in the absence of functional HR, NHEJ or SSA, whereas both types of repeat induced large deletions, particularly in the DSB repair-deficient strains, in the order ΔNHEJ>ΔHR>ΔSSA. In addition, both DRs and IRs stimulated L5 site-specific recombination at the attB site, causing loss of the integrated constructs at much higher frequencies than the non-repeat-containing constructs (which did not carry DR or IR sequences). In E. coli, DRs were inert, whereas IRs induced negative supercoiling-dependent and HR-dependent deletions, suggesting a role for non-B DNA structure formation and replication, respectively.

We conclude that, on the one hand, repetitive DNA motifs may pose a challenge to genome stability in mycobacteria, which respond by employing their DSB repair functions. On the other hand, by acting upon a large pool of repetitive sequences, DNA repair may contribute to genomic diversity and adaptation.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and cell culture conditions

The bacterial strains are listed in Table S1. Mycobacterial strains were cultured in 8 g/L NB (Nutrient Broth, Difco) and 10 g/L glucose. As required, further additions included: 0.2% Tween-80 (pH 6.0–6.2), 50 µg/mL hygromycin (Hyg), 7.5 µg/mL gentamycin (Gm, 25 µg/mL if used together with kanamycin), and 25 µg/mL kanamycin (Km). E. coli strains were cultured in LB media (10 g/L trypton, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl, pH 7.0). As required, further additions included 100 µg/mL ampicillin (Amp), 200 µg/mL Hyg, 10 µg/mL Gm (50 µg/mL if used together with Km) and 50 µg/mL Km.

Cloning

Constructs were engineered on the basis of the pMV206Km E. coli/Mycobacterium shuttle vector and the pMV306Km mycobacterial integration vector (Figure S1). Specifically, the hph gene (Hyg^R) was disrupted by cloning synthetic oligonucleotides, comprising either two pairs of IRs or two DR units, within the EcoRI site of the gene using standard protocols. DRs and IRs were further separated by cloning the aacC1 gene (Gm^R) in orientations A and B. This resulted in two pairs of IRs or one pair of DRs, on either side of the aacC1 gene. The disrupted hph was also flanked, 5′ and 3′ respectively, by the aph (Km^R) and lacZ (conferring blue color) genes (Figure 1). This yielded two sets of plasmids: pDR^IA, pDR^IB, pIR^IA, pIR^IB and pDR^EA, pDR^EB, pIR^EA, pIR^EB (^I, integrated; ^E episomal) (Table S2). The plasmid sequencing data have been deposited in GenBank with the following accession numbers: BankIt1574770 pDR^EA JX993915, BankIt1574770 pDR^EB JX993916, BankIt1574770 pDR^IA JX993917, BankIt1574770 pDR^IB JX993918, BankIt1574770 pIR^EA JX993919, BankIt1574770 pIR^EB JX993920, BankIt1574770 pIR^IA JX993921, BankIt1574770 pIR^IB JX993922.

Download:

Figure 1. Key features of integration and self-replicating constructs.

Panel A, Oligo^IR and Oligo^DR constructs. The hph (Hyg^R, dark blue) gene was interrupted by two pairs of IRs (top) or one pair of DRs (bottom; black and maroon arrows over blue/red) flanking the aacC1 (Gm^R, green) gene in both orientations (A and B). These cassettes were further flanked by the aph (Km^R, orange) gene on the left and the lacZ (blue color, light blue) gene on the right. Panel B, detailed DNA sequence of the IRs and DRs and the relevant restriction sites (EcoRI and ScaI) used during cloning. Note that because the sequence is given in the 5′→3′ direction with respect to the hph gene, the map is opposite to that shown in Panel A.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.g001

Constructs were used to engineer E. coli and mycobacterial strains. The plasmids, or chromosomal DNA, of mycobacterial transformants were recovered and analyzed as described [50]. To determine the extent to which the IR and DR sequences induced genetic instability, PCR analyses were performed to identify loss-of-function of the aacC1 and hph genes. In addition, PCR analyses and Southern blot hybridization were employed to assess the instabilities at the attB region of the mycobacterial genome. For the Southern blots, a hybridization probe was generated by PCR and labeled by a non-radioactive primer extension system (DIG-labeling system, Amersham). The primers used for PCR amplification are listed in Table S3.

To perform unmarked deletions of recBCD genes in M. smegmatis we used a suicidal recombination delivery vector based on p2NIL. The recombination vector carried the region upstream from recC together with its 5′ end and the region downstream of recD with its 3′ fragment cloned together (Figure S2). Finally, the PacI screening cassette from pGOAL17 was inserted into the constructs, resulting in the suicide delivery vector pMK212, which was then used to engineer the ΔrecBCD M. smegmatis strain (Table S1), as described previously [51], [52]. The resultant mutant strain was verified by PCR and Southern blot hybridization (Figure S2).

Protocol for assessing genetic instabilities caused by DR and IR sequences in M. smegmatis and E. coli

Constructs (Figures 1 and S1) were introduced into the appropriate M. smegmatis and E. coli strains and blue, Km^R and Gm^R colonies were selected. Plasmid instability was determined on non-selective plates by overnight (E. coli) or 48 h (M. smegmatis) growth of Km^R, Gm^R and blue colony-forming units (CFUs) on LB/NB agar plates, which were then washed-out and plated at the appropriate dilutions on LB/NB agar plates supplemented with either 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoxyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) or Hyg. CFUs from X-gal plates were further transferred by replica plating on four LB/NB agar plates that contained the following indicators: 1) Km plus Hyg; 2) Km plus Gm; 3) Km alone and 4) X-gal (Figure S3). The number of ensuing individual CFUs was counted and used for statistical analyses. The frequencies of mutations from 3–6 experiments were analyzed statistically using either the χ² test on 2×2 contingency tables, the z-test or the pair-wise Holm-Sidak test. The Holm-Sidak test was used for the frequency data with standard deviations. In the case where the data were obtained from replica plating, the low numbers of CFUs per plate were cumulatively added (comparing to about 1,000 CFUs from the plates with no selection) and analyzed by the chi square test or the z-test, since these allow comparisons between observed and expected observations.

Identification of repeat elements in bacterial genomes

Putative non-B DNA-forming motifs, including tandem repeats, DRs, IRs, R•Y tracts and quadruplex-forming motifs were identified in the genomes of M. tuberculosis, M. smegmatis, and E. coli using the criteria reported in Table S4. In the case of IRs, the spacing between repeats was set to ≤20 bases, since cruciform formation tends to be discouraged by large loops (i.e. the bases separating the repeats). By contrast, no minimum loop size is known to prevent direct repeats from interacting; therefore, we allowed any space between DRs. The complete genome sequences of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (NC_000962), M. smegmatis str. mc²155 (NC_008596), and E. coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655 (NC_000913) were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ftp server at ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/. Tandem repeats were analyzed by the mreps software [53], DRs were identified according to the repeat-match algorithm of the MUMmer package [54], IRs were screened with the palindrome program of the EMBOSS package [55] and the R•Y and quadruplex-forming motifs were identified using in-house Perl scripts. To determine whether the numbers and lengths of repeats were greater than expected by chance, we compared the observed distributions with those predicted by reshuffling the respective genome sequences 1,000 times using shuffleseq (EMBOSS).

Results

DRs and IRs are overrepresented in mycobacterial genomes

Repetitive DNA sequences, including tandem repeats, DRs, IRs, G-rich regions, and R•Y tracts with mirror symmetry are abundant in many genomes and have been implicated in inducing genomic instability, in part through the formation of DNA strand breaks triggered by the transient formation of non-B DNA conformations [14]–[17], [33], [38], [56]–[58]. To identify such structure-forming sequences in mycobacteria, we conducted in silico genome-wide searches for repetitive motifs (Table S4) in the reference genomes of M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis, and E. coli.

For each repeat type, we assessed if the numbers and lengths of repeats were greater than expected by chance alone. Hence, we compared the observed genome-wide distributions with those predicted by randomly reshuffling the chromosomal sequences, which generates Gaussian ensembles of repeat numbers as a function of length. Note that for sets of repeats, such as the set of >24 IS1096 elements in the M. smegmatis mc²155, each element was counted as one repeat. For DRs, the maximum lengths of the predicted sequences did not exceed ∼20–25 bases, whereas the observed length distributions showed the presence of repeats up to thousands of bp in all three genomes, with a gradual decline in the number of sequences as a function of length (Figure 2A, C and E). We found that 1,146,588 nt of DRs (33.58% of the total length of all DRs) accounted for 165 genes annotated to the PE, PE-PGRS, and PPE families in the M. tuberculosis genome, whereas only 12,575 nt of DRs (0.13% of the total length of all DRs) in 10 such annotated genes were found in the M. smegmatis genome. Thus, the PE and PPE gene families contribute to the distribution of DRs substantially more in M. tuberculosis than in M. smegmatis. Transposons also contributed to the high number of DRs, particularly in mycobacteria, although this is unlikely to fully account for the differences between mycobacteria and E. coli.

Download:

Figure 2. Direct and inverted repeats are overrepresented in mycobacterial and E. coli genomes.

Genome-wide distributions of DRs and IRs. Panels A and B, E. coli K12; panels C and D, M. smegmatis; panels E and F, M. tuberculosis; left panels, direct repeats (DR); right panels, inverted repeats (IR); x-axes, length of repeats in nucleotides; y-axes, number of repeats; open symbols, predicted random distributions; closed symbols, observed distributions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.g002

IRs were found to be overrepresented in the three bacterial species (Figure 2B, D and F); however, both the difference between the predicted and observed maxima in bp lengths (Figure 2 and Table S5) and the maximum numbers of observed sequences (Figure 2, maximum y-axis values) were ∼3 orders of magnitude smaller for IRs than for DRs (maxima in bp lengths near y = 10⁰ was ∼14 bp vs. ∼19–32 bp, i.e. ∼2-fold difference for IRs and ∼23 bp vs. ∼1,697–55,473 bp, i.e. ∼50–2,000-fold difference for DRs; max. y-axes = ∼250–460 bp for IRs and ∼40,000–400,000 bp for DRs).

Tandem repeats only accounted for a small proportion (9% in E. coli, 4% in M. tuberculosis, and 3% in M. smegmatis) of all DRs (Table S5), such that ∼60,000 (E. coli), ∼190,000 (M. tuberculosis) and ∼585,000 (M. smegmatis) non-tandem DRs exist in these genomes. Hence, the genome-wide potential for genomic instability due to DR interactions, such as during replication, is ∼3 to 10-fold higher in the two mycobacterial species than in E. coli. For G-quadruplex, Z-DNA, and triplex-forming sequences, no differences were observed between the predicted and observed distributions (data not shown). In summary, a significantly greater number of long DRs than expected by chance alone, along with a modest enrichment in IRs, are present in the three bacterial species, particularly in the mycobacterial genomes, which may serve as substrate for genomic instability.

DRs induce precise deletion of the intervening sequence in mycobacteria but not in E. coli

To assess the contribution of DRs and IRs to deletions in mycobacterial genomes, synthetic constructs were engineered and integrated in M. smegmatis by L5 site-specific recombination at the attB site [59]. Two pairs of IRs (Oligo^IR) (Figure 1A), each predicted to fold into a cruciform structure comprising a 16 and 18 bp stem with an EcoRI (GAATTC) site in the center (Figure 1B), or a 38-bp DR (Oligo^DR) (Figure 1), also containing an EcoRI site in the center, were cloned within the hph gene so as to abrogate the Hyg^R phenotype (Figure 1). We reasoned that repair of DSBs or resumption of arrested replication forks within the IRs or DRs would be assisted by the homologous EcoRI single-stranded loop of cruciforms (Oligo^IR), or the 38-bp DR sequences, thereby leading to the precise deletion of the cloned inserts and reconstitution of the hph gene. The aacC1 gene conferring Gm^R was also cloned in both orientations between the DRs and IRs with the purpose of detecting imprecise deletions that would otherwise not confer Hyg^R. Oligo^IR and Oligo^DR were further flanked by the aph (Km^R) and lacZ genes to allow for scoring large deletions further away from the repeats through the loss of Km^R and blue color (Figure 1A).

Selection for Hyg^R CFUs indicating on precise deletion within repeated sequences yielded frequencies of 6.9±2.2 and 5.8±2.5×10⁻⁶ for pDR^IA and pDR^IB (superscript I stands for integrated), respectively, which harbored the Oligo^DR constructs and the aacC1 (Gm^R) gene in either orientation [A (pDR^IA) or B (pDR^IB); Figure 3A]. By contrast, no CFUs were obtained out of ∼8.5×10⁹ plated cells when Oligo^IR was integrated in pIR^IA (aacC1 in orientation A), pIR^IB (aacC1 in orientation B) or in the control pC^I, which is devoid of DR or IR sequences (Figure 3A). Thus, the 38-bp DR in Oligo^DR stimulated the rate of deletion of the intervening sequence (precise deletions) by at least 1,000-fold (p = 0,001 for pDR^IA, p = 0,003 for pDR^IB), regardless of the orientation of the internal aacC1 gene. The Hyg^R phenotype was confirmed by PCR analyses using hph-specific primers (Figure S4 and Table S3).

Download:

Figure 3. Oligo^DR and Oligo^IR induce genetic instabilities in M. smegmatis and E. coli.

Panel A, reconstitution of hph (Hyg^R) gene through the precise deletion of the aacC1 (Gm^R) is only detected with the integrated Oligo^DR, but not Oligo^IR, in M. smegmatis. x-axis, M. smegmatis mc²155 strains: pC^I, pMV306KmHyg::Gm (control); pIR^IA, pMV306KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^AlacZ; pIR^IB, pMV306KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^BlacZ; pDR^IA, pMV306KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^AlacZ; pDR^IB, pMV306KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^BlacZ; y-axis, frequencies of Hyg^R CFUs: asterisks, p<0.05 (pair-wise Holm-Sidak test for pIR^IA, pIR^IB, pDR^IA, pDR^IB against pC^I). Panel B, large deletions occur in both the integrated Oligo^DR and Oligo^IR constructs in M. smegmatis. x-axis, as in Panel A; y-axis, percent Gm^S (black bars), Km^S (light grey bars), and white (dark grey bars) CFUs; IR, Oligo^IR; DR, Oligo^DR.; asterisks, p<0.05 (χ² test of pIR^IA, pIR^IB, pDR^IA, pDR^IB against pC^I, z-test of pIR^IA against pIR^IB and pDR^IA against pDR^IB). Panel C, Oligo^IR induces deletions in a supercoiling-dependent manner in E. coli. Percent Gm^S and Km^S CFUs in E. coli strains containing various steady-state levels of negative supercoil density. x-axis, E. coli strains carrying the self-replicating Oligo^IR (pIR^EA) or Oligo^DR (pDR^EA) vectors: JTT1, wild-type; RS2, topA mutant, higher negative supercoil density than JTT1; SD2, topA and gyrB mutant, lower negative supercoil density than JTT1; y-axis, percent Gm^S and Km^S CFUs, geometric mean (+/−SD) from 100 CFUs obtained from 3 independent experiments; black bars, Oligo^IR (pIR^EA); grey bars, Oligo^DR (pDR^EA); asterisks, p<0.05 (χ² test of SD7 against RS2 and RS2 against JTT1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.g003

Next, we investigated whether the Oligo^DR-stimulated precise deletions were specific to M. smegmatis. To address this, the control, direct (Oligo^DR) and inverted (Oligo^IR) repeat-containing inserts were transformed in both E. coli and M. smegmatis using a self-replicating episomal plasmid system (Figure S1 and Table S2). In M. smegmatis, both the control (pC^E; superscript E, episomal) and the Oligo^IR-containing plasmids (pIR^EA and pIR^EB) yielded Hyg^R CFUs at frequencies of 2.2±0.3 and 2.4±0.3×10⁻⁷, respectively (Figure S5). However, the Oligo^DR-containing plasmids in pDR^EA and pDR^EB led to an ∼1,000-fold increase (p = 0,001) in Hyg^R CFUs to ∼2.0±0.7 and 2.5±1.0×10⁻⁴, respectively (Figure S5), in agreement with the data obtained from the integrated system. By contrast, no Hyg^R CFUs were rescued in E. coli with any of the self-replicating plasmids. Hence, we conclude that 1) the ∼1,000-fold stimulation of precise deletions elicited by the 38-bp DRs was specific to M. smegmatis; and 2) both the integrated and episomal plasmid systems were concordant in revealing this type of mutational event.

IRs and DRs induce large deletions in both M. smegmatis and E. coli

The lack of Hyg^R CFUs in the presence of Oligo^IR and the induction of precise deletions by Oligo^DR in M. smegmatis but not in E. coli raised the question as to whether the sequences were able to form the predicted cruciform and looped-out structures, or whether differences in the repair or replication systems between these two species (such as the presence of NHEJ in M. smegmatis) were involved. To address these possibilities, M. smegmatis carrying the integrated Oligo^IR (pIR^IA and pIR^IB) or Oligo^DR (pDR^IA and pDR^IB) constructs were screened for large deletions by the loss of Km^R or blue phenotypes caused by the inactivation of the aph and lacZ genes, respectively (Figure 1). Km^S CFUs were detected at approximately 0.8% in the control pC^I (Figure 3B). However, a significant 3- to 4-fold increase in Km^S and white CFUs was observed in the presence of either Oligo^IR or Oligo^DR (p = 0,0005 for pIR^IA, p = 0,01 for pIR^IB, p = 0,001 for pDR^IA, p = 0,01 for pDR^IB), depending on the orientation of the internal aacC1 (Figure 3B). Specifically, orientation A in pIR^IA (Oligo^IR) and pDR^IA (Oligo^DR), in which the hph and accC1 genes were transcribed from complementary strands, yielded greater instabilities (p = 0,03) than the alternative orientation B (Figures 1A and 3B). These results support the conclusion that both IRs and DRs were able to induce large deletions in M. smegmatis. Moreover, the greater instability observed by divergent transcription of the aacC1 and hph genes (orientation A, Figure 1A) was consistent with our expectation, since this enables the accumulation of greater negative supercoiling during RNA polymerase translocation than same-sense transcription, which should favor B-DNA to non-B DNA structural transitions [60], [61].

To assess whether the IRs and DRs were giving rise to non-B DNA structures, Oligo^IR (pIR^EA and pIR^EB) and Oligo^DR (pDR^EA and pDR^EB) were transformed as self-replicating plasmids into isogenic E. coli strains that, because of mutations in the gyrase and topoisomerase I genes (Table S1), contained different steady-state levels of negative supercoiling. The use of E. coli strains deficient in gyrase/topoisomerases is a convenient and well-documented tool to address the requirement of torsional stress on the transitions between B-DNA and non-B DNA structures [62], [63]. In the wild-type JTT1 strain, in the presence of Oligo^IR ∼2±1% CFUs were found to be Gm^S and Km^S as a result of large deletions (Figure 3C). In the RS2 strain, which sustains higher levels of negative supercoil densities than JTT1, a significant increase (p = 0,02) in Gm^S and Km^S (7±1%) CFUs was observed, whereas in the SD7 strain, which is characterized by low levels of negative supercoil densities, a significant reduction (p = 0,002) in deletions (as assessed by Gm^S and Km^S (1±0%) CFUs) compared to RS2 was revealed (Figure 3C). Alternatively, no differences in the fractions of Gm^S and Km^S CFUs were noted in these strains for the Oligo^DR-containing plasmids (Figure 3C).

These results are consistent with the conclusion that the IRs in Oligo^IR were able to fold into cruciform structures, which then served as substrates for the generation of large deletions, both in E. coli and M. smegmatis. The lack of induction of large deletions by Oligo^DR in E. coli suggests that the distant repeats were either prevented from interacting to give rise to slipped structures or, if DNA secondary structures were formed, they were resolved in an error-free manner. Alternatively, differences in DNA replication-dependent misalignment between the repeats might have been involved. In summary, DRs were substantially more mutagenic in M. smegmatis than in E. coli.

The precise deletions stimulated by DRs in M. smegmatis occur independently of NHEJ, HR and SSA

In addition to HR, a conserved pathway for the repair of DSBs in most organisms, M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis (but not E. coli) also express an NHEJ activity that uses Ku and DNA ligase D (LigD) to process DSBs [44], [64], [65] without the need for large regions of sequence homology. Thus, we investigated whether the precise deletions induced by the chromosomally integrated Oligo^DR in M. smegmatis (Figure 3A) involved either the HR or the NHEJ pathways. To this end, we employed mutant strains (Table S1) in which either one or both DNA repair pathways were inactivated [45], [46]. Knocking out the NHEJ pathway in the Δ(ku ligD) M. smegmatis mutant did not significantly impair the ability of Oligo^DR [pDR^IA (p = 0,5) and pDR^IB (p = 0,2)] to stimulate precise deletions, as assessed by the number of Hyg^R CFUs (Figure 4A).

Download:

Figure 4. Deletions occur independently of NHEJ and HR in M. smegmatis.

Panel A, precise deletions stimulated by DRs occur independently of NHEJ and are increased in the absence of RecA. x-axis, M. smegmatis strains: wt/pDR^IA, wild-type/pMV306KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^AlacZ; Δku, Δku/pDR^IA; Δ(ku ligD), ΔkuΔligD/pDR^IA; ΔrecA, ΔrecA/pDR^IA; Δ(recA ku ligD), ΔrecAΔkuΔligD/pDR^IA; y-axis, frequencies of Hyg^R CFUs; asterisks, p<0.05 (pair-wise Holm-Sidak test for mutant strains against wild-type). Panel B, large deletions are stimulated by HR (RecA) in E. coli. x-axis, E. coli strains carrying the self-replicating Oligo^IR vector pIR^EA; wt, KMBL1001; ΔrecA, Top10 mutant; asterisks, p<0.05 (χ² test of mutant strains against wild-type). Panels C and D, large deletions occur independently of NHEJ and HR in M. smegmatis. x axis, M. smegmatis strains; y-axis, percent Km^S (black bars) or Gm^S (grey bars) CFUs. Panel C, M. smegmatis strains: wt/pC^E, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Gm (control); wt/pIR^EA, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^AlacZ; Δ(ku ligD), ΔkuΔligD/pIR^EA; ΔrecA, ΔrecA/pIR^EA. Panel D, M. smegmatis strains: wt/pC^E, as in Panel D; wt/pDR^EA, wild-type/pMV306KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^AlacZ; Δ(ku ligD), ΔkuΔligD/pDR^EA; ΔrecA, ΔrecA/pDR^EA (asterisks, p<0.05 (χ² test of mutant strains against wild-type).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.g004

RecA is a critical protein that facilitates the strand exchange reaction during HR [66]. In the absence of RecA (Δrec M. smegmatis), Oligo^DR-dependent precise deletions were significantly enhanced (∼5-fold; p = 0,0006 for pDR^IA, p = 0,00001 for pDR^IB) relative to the wild-type strain (Figure 4A). This indicates that strand invasion is not required for direct repeat recombination, but in fact may prevent these events. Similar findings have been reported in yeast and mammalian cells [67], [68]. In addition, the ΔrecA-dependent enhancement of precise deletions was not compromised in the absence of NHEJ in the Δ(recA ku ligD) M. smegmatis triple mutant. These results indicate that neither HR nor NHEJ were involved in the process(es) that deleted the sequences separating the distant DRs. Recently, a third DNA repair pathway based on single-strand annealing (SSA) has been reported in M. smegmatis [49], which complements HR and NHEJ in processing DSBs at short DRs, and which relies on a dedicated RecBCD complex for end-resection. The ΔrecBCD M. smegmatis mutant strains (ΔrecBCD/pDR^EA, aacC1 in orientation A, ΔrecBCD/pDR^EB, aacC1 in orientation B), in which the entire RecBCD operon was ablated, yielded precise deletions at frequencies that were indistinguishable from the wild-type strains (wt/pDR^EA and wt/pDR^EB), (Figure S6). This was in contrast with the results obtained with Oligo^IR (ΔrecBCD/pIR^EA and ΔrecBCD/pIR^EB), in which the fractions of precise deletions increased (p = 0,01) relative to the wild-type strains (wt/pIR^EA and wt/p IR^EB) ∼8- to 10-fold (Figure 5). Thus, we conclude that none of the three canonical DSB repair mechanisms, HR, NHEJ and SSA, was required for generating precise deletions between the distant DRs of Oligo^DR in M. smegmatis. In contrast, RecBCD was involved in preventing precise deletions between the distant pairs of IRs in Oligo^IR.

Download:

Figure 5. Precise deletions and SSA.

RecBCD deficiency increases the frequency of precise deletions between IRs. Panels A and B, x-axis, M. smegmatis strains; y-axis, frequencies of Hyg^R CFUs; asterisks, p<0.05 (pair-wise Holm-Sidak test for ΔrecBCD M. smegmatis against wild-type). Panel A, wt/pC^E, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Gm (control); wt/pIR^EA, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^AlacZ; ΔrecBCD/pIR^EA, ΔrecBCD/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^AlacZ. Panel B, wt/pC^E, as in Panel A; wt/pIR^EB, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^B; ΔrecBCD/pIR^EB, ΔrecBCD/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^B.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.g005

IRs and DRs induced the excision of Oligo^IR and Oligo^DR by activating L5 site-specific recombination

In an effort to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying the stimulation of large deletions by DRs and IRs in M. smegmatis (Figure 3B), we analyzed the attB loci of 118 white and Km^S mutant CFUs by PCR, Southern hybridization, and DNA sequencing (Figure S7), including 3 CFUs from the control wt/pC^I and 115 CFUs from strains harboring Oligo^DR (pDR^IA and pDR^IB) or Oligo^IR (pIR^IA and pIR^IB). These 115 CFUs comprised 31 wild-type, 38 Δku, 30 Δ(ku ligD), and 16 ΔrecA M. smegmatis strains. In all 118 cases, the entire integrated plasmid was deleted, whereas the attB sequences were precisely reconstituted. Integration of mycobacteriophage L5 is catalyzed primarily by the phage-encoded tyrosine integrase (Int-L5) and the host-encoded protein, mIHF, whereas the excision reaction during the prophage lytic cycle depends upon the recombination directionality factor (RDF), the product of phage gene 36 (Xis-L5) [69]. Our results suggest that DRs and IRs acted as stimulators of mycobacteriophage L5 site-specific recombination.

HR and NHEJ guard against DNA nucleolytic processing triggered by DR and IR sequences

Because of the stimulation of L5-dependent recombination by the DR and IR sequences, we used Oligo^IR (pIR^EA and pIR^EB) and Oligo^DR (pDR^EA and pDR^EB) as self-replicating plasmids, which uncouples the repeats from L5 site-specific recombination, to compare the interaction of DRs and IRs with the host DNA repair systems (M. smegmatis and E. coli). Thus, we determined the numbers of Gm^S, Km^S and/or white CFUs in wild-type and mutant strains lacking components of HR (M. smegmatis and E. coli), NHEJ (M. smegmatis), or SSA (M. smegmatis). In the Top10 E. coli mutant strain (Table S1), absence of RecA significantly repressed the instabilities induced by Oligo^IR (pIR^IA and pIR^IB) ∼10-fold (p = 0,0008 and p = 0,00001, respectively) relative to the wild-type KMBL1001, from 2.8±1.0% to undetectable levels (Figure 4B). This implies that RecA, and thus HR (or other RecA dependent processes, such as the induction of an SOS response and/or the regulation of translesion DNA synthesis), was involved in IR-dependent deletions. The wild-type M. smegmatis strain mc²155 harboring the control vector (pC^E, no DR or IR sequences) gave rise to spontaneous Km^S or Gm^S colonies at frequencies of ∼20% (Figure 4C and D), 30- to 40-fold more frequently than pC^I (the corresponding wild-type strain harboring the integrated control vector, Figure 3B), and ∼7-fold higher than in E. coli (Figure 4B). A 20% plasmid loss after 48 h culture on nonselective media was expected for this plasmid system, which is based on the pAL5000 origin from M. fortuitum. pAL5000-containing vectors are commonly used for growth in E. coli, mycobacteria, and for the expression of foreign antigens in recombinant BCG vaccines [70]–[74]. Plasmid DNA was not detectable by DNA isolation or by PCR analysis in white M. smegmatis mutant colonies sensitive to Km and Gm, implying that DNA was processed by nucleases and, thus, plasmid was lost. The presence of Oligo^IR (pIR^EA) significantly increased the fractions of Km^S/Gm^S ∼3-fold (p = 0,00001) (Figure 4C), supporting the conclusion that, as in E. coli (Figure 3C), cruciform structures were extruded from the IRs and triggered instability through DSBs. Absence of RecA (ΔrecA M. smegmatis, Figure 4C) led to a further increase (to ∼67–79%, p = 0,00001) in the fraction of Km^S/Gm^S colonies. Similarly, absence of Ku and LigD in Δ(ku ligD) M. smegmatis resulted in loss (p = 0,00001) of the Km/Gm resistance genes in the majority of the bacterial population. Thus, in contrast to E. coli, in which HR enhanced IR-induced instabilities, NHEJ and HR displayed a protective role in M. smegmatis.

The 38-bp DRs in the self-replicating Oligo^DR (pDR^EA) also stimulated (∼2-fold; p = 0,00001) short deletions that disrupted the aacC1 (Gm^R) gene in M. smegmatis (Figure 4D); however, no induction of large deletions into the flanking aph (Km^R) gene (and therefore plasmid loss) was observed (Figure 4D). The number of Gm^S or Km^S CFUs that lost plasmids increased significantly (to 66–93%; p = 0,00001) in the absence of either HR (ΔrecA M. smegmatis) or NHEJ (Δ (ku ligD) M. smegmatis). We postulate that DSBs, which were left unrepaired in strains defective in RecA or NHEJ proteins in M. smegmatis, may have been responsible for the increase in DNA processing and subsequent plasmid loss. In summary, we conclude that both NHEJ and HR served a critical role in repairing DSBs induced by slipped DNA-forming DRs and cruciform-forming IR sequences in M. smegmatis.

Discussion

Herein, we report that the reference genomes of two mycobacterial species, M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis, are strongly enriched in DRs and IRs. By using two synthetic constructs harboring DRs and IRs, we addressed whether these repetitive motifs may elicit genomic instability in M. smegmatis, a model organism that carries all three (HR, NHEJ and SSA) DSB repair pathways. We also used E. coli strains, since these enable a direct relationship between repeat DNA-induced genetic instability and negative supercoiling, a topological state known to favor B-DNA to non-B-DNA structural transitions [62], [63], [75]. E. coli and M. smegmatis represent quite different model systems with regard to DNA metabolism and DNA repair mechanisms. Specifically, M. smegmatis, as well as other mycobacteria, are devoid of genes encoding the highly conserved mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MutS and MutL, suggesting a lack in postreplicative MMR [1], [2], [76], [77], whereas E. coli is devoid of genes encoding the conserved two-component core NHEJ enzymes, Ku and LigD, leaving the processing of incompatible DSBs to alternative mechanisms [78]–[80].

We report four findings. First, the 38-bp DRs in Oligo^DR strongly induced the precise deletion of their ∼1 kb intervening sequence even in the absence of functional DSB repair in M. smegmatis. Whereas RecA-independent slipped mispairing between tandem repeats is a well-recognized mechanism leading to replication errors [12], [81], the ability of the M. smegmatis replication apparatus to relocate at distant DRs unassisted by canonical DSB repair proteins has not been reported, to our knowledge. Absence of RecA, both alone or in combination with NHEJ deficiency, favored this process, suggesting that either HR prevented deletions or that binding of RecA to single-stranded DNA (either because of looping-out following DR interactions or because of arrested replication forks [82]), inhibited primer relocation. In contrast to Oligo^DR, precise deletions between the two IRs in Oligo^IR were considerably less abundant, being detected only upon loss of the RecBCD operon.

The only mechanism through which hph gene reconstitution could have occurred in Oligo^IR was by precisely rejoining the two EcoRI sites that separated the two halves of the gene (Figure 1). Based on the E. coli mutant data (Figure 3C), in which Oligo^IR-induced instabilities increased in a supercoiling-dependent manner, we speculate that both IRs were able to fold into cruciform structures; these then underwent strand breaks at the single-stranded EcoRI sequences, which were repaired by microhomology-mediated end-fusion between the two IRs. Because this type of event was stimulated in the absence of RecBCD, we propose that EcoRI-specific DSBs were processed through the SSA pathway in the wild-type strains and by the NHEJ machinery in the ΔSSA strains [41]. In E. coli, the absence of precise deletions in IR-containing constructs is consistent with the lack of canonical NHEJ. Thus, SSA would appear to compete effectively with NHEJ in processing repeat-induced strand-breaks in mycobacteria.

Second, both DRs and IRs incited int-L5 site-specific recombination in M. smegmatis. The instability of integrated constructs by L5 integrase activity has been reported [83]; we document a strong stimulation of this process by DRs and IRs. In M. smegmatis, the directionality of mycobacteriophage L5 integration and excision reactions is governed by the phage recombination directionality factor (RDF) Xis-L5, a small 56 amino acid helix-turn-helix peptide that bends Xis-L5 DNA recognition targets in proximity to attR [69]. Xis-L5 does not participate directly in the excision reaction, but instead acts as an architectural protein. We speculate that, if a role for Xis-L5 were to stabilize attR and attL site interaction leading to synapsis, then such interaction may be facilitated by flexible hinges along the DNA chain at local non-B DNA conformations, such as those formed by slipped and cruciform structures at DRs and IRs, respectively. Other mechanisms are possible, including bidirectional DNA nuclease activity from the DNA secondary structures into the site-specific recombination sites. Regardless of the mechanism involved, it is clear that DR and IR sequences strongly stimulate L5 site-specific recombination.

Third, absence of HR and NHEJ, (ΔNHEJ>ΔHR), resulted in extensive DNA processing and plasmid loss in M. smegmatis, indicating that both pathways play important roles in protecting genome integrity from the destabilizing effects of DRs and IRs. In this regard, a contrasting effect was observed between M. smegmatis and E. coli, since in the latter abrogation of the HR pathway in the ΔrecA strains led to greater genomic stability. The reasons for these differences remain to be clarified.

Fourth, DRs are the most abundant type of repetitive motif in the M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis genomes. Short repetitive motifs are a hallmark of insertion sequence (IS) integration sites in mycobacteria. Duplications, deletions and genome shuffling play major roles in driving genomic diversity and evolution, and mycobacterial IS elements, such as IS1096 and IS6110, are believed to contribute to such rearrangements [84], [85]. We found 165 genes annotated to PE, PE-PGRS and PPE families in M. tuberculosis, for a maximum contribution to the total length of DRs of 8.2%. In M. smegmatis, only 10 such genes were found. The PE and PPE families of proteins confer pathogenic advantage to M. tuberculosis, and antigenic variation may result in part from the interactions between the PE/PPE proteins and the emergence of new or rare MHC alleles in the host genome [86]. Thus, it is possible that duplication of these gene families might have been exploited, and therefore maintained, through positive selection as a means to increase diversity through recombination, and perhaps avoid gene decay during evolutionary time in M. tuberculosis. A second class of genetic elements thought to generate mosaicism in mycobacteria is represented by mycobacteriophages; at least sixty-two different genomes of these obligate parasites known to infect M. smegmatis mc²155 have been sequenced [87]. Short repetitive motifs in the bacterial host, such as the 36 DR integration hotspot [88], represent common sites for the integration and excision of such elements, and both mycobacterial DNA repair proteins, such as LigD and Ku [89], and phage integrases may cooperate to carry out the insertion and excision reactions [90]. Mycobacteriophages are characterized by a substantial degree of mosaicism, including the occasional acquisition of mycobacterial sequences, such as the MetE gene in the Giles genome [91], [92]. Such mosaicism is thought to arise in part through lateral gene transfer (LGT). A comparison between the M. tuberculosis genome and its relatives M. marinum and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis suggests that at least 80 distinct regions have been acquired by M. tuberculosis through LGT, along with genome downsizing, in the course of its adaptation from an environmental ancestor to a specialized human pathogen [93]. Our results raise the possibility that the abundant repetitive elements in mycobacteria might instigate recombination events between the host and mycobacteriophage genomes, contributing to LGT. In summary, we demonstrate that DR and IR sequences lead to genomic instability in M. smegmatis by eliciting a diverse repertoire of cellular responses, including interactions with DNA repair pathways (HR, NHEJ and SSA) and the mycobacteriphage L5 site-specific recombination apparatus. Thus, these results provide support for a much broader range of cellular responses to repetitive DNA sequences and their putative secondary structures than previously anticipated, and suggest future studies aimed at addressing the evolutionary aspects and origins of repetitive sequences.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Cloning strategy. The hph gene (Hyg^R) in the pMV206Km and pMV306Km vectors was disrupted by introducing synthetic oligonucleotides, comprising either two pairs of inverted repeats (IRs) or two direct repeat (DR) units, within an internal EcoRI site of the gene. DRs and IRs were further separated by cloning the aacC1 (Gm^R) gene in orientations A and B. This resulted in two pairs of IRs and one pair of DRs, on either side of the aacC1. The disrupted hph was also flanked, 5′ and 3′ respectively, by the aph (Km^R) and lacZ (blue color) genes. Pag85, promoter for the lacZ gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Construction of M. smegmatis ΔrecBCD strain by replacement of the wild-type recBCD operon with a mutant sequence. Panel A, the chromosomal location of recBCD is represented by arrows. The restriction sites (BamHI and ClaI) used for cleaving chromosomal DNA are shown. The restriction DNA fragment and the size of the internal deletion in the mutated copies are shown by thin black arrows. The probe used for Southern blot hybridization is displayed by a grey rectangle. Panel B, Southern blot hybridization. Lane 1, M. smegmatis mc²155; lane 2, M. smegmatis recBCD and ΔrecBCD; lanes 3, 4, M. smegmatis ΔrecBCD. Arrows, DNA restriction fragments expected for the M. smegmatis wild-type recBCD (982 bp) and ΔrecBCD (1601 bp) strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Protocol for assessing genetic instabilities caused by the Oligo^DR and Oligo^IR sequences in E. coli and M. smegmatis. From the top, competent cells were transformed with Oligo^DR (pDR^IA, pDR^IB, pDR^EA, pDR^EB) or Oligo^IR (pIR^IA, pIR^IB, pIR^EA, pIR^EB) vectors and plated on LB (E. coli) or NB (M. smegmatis) media containing gentamycin (Gm), kanamycin (Km) and X-gal. CFUs were harvested, plated on non-selective media and grown for 24 h (E. coli) or 48 h (M. smegmatis) to select for mutants. Cells were then washed and plated at the appropriate dilutions on LB/NB agar plates supplemented with either 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoxyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) or hygromycin (Hyg). Colonies from X-gal plates were transferred by replica plating on four LB/NB agar plates, as follows: 1) Km plus Hyg, 2) Km plus Gm, 3) Km and 4) X-gal.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

Oligo^DR induces precise deletions between DRs that reconstitute an intact hph gene (Hyg^R). Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products using hph specific primers on DNA isolated from Hyg^R colonies. Lane 1, 1-kb DNA ladder; lane 2, M. smegmatis carrying pDR^IA (Hyg^S, Gm^R); lanes 3–12, selected Hyg^R and Gm^S M. smegmatis mutant CFUs harboring pDR^IA or pDR^IB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s004

(TIF)

Figure S5.

Reconstitution of hph (Hyg^R) within the self-replicating Oligo^DR and Oligo^IR in M. smegmatis. x-axis, M. smegmatis mc²155 strains: pC^E, pMV206KmHyg::Gm (control); pIR^EA, pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^AlacZ; pIR^EB, pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^IRGm^BlacZ; pDR^EA, pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^AlacZ; pDR^EB, pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^B; y-axis, frequencies of Hyg^R CFUs; asterisks, P<0.05 (pair-wise Holm-Sidak test of pIR^EA, pIR^EB, pDR^EA, pDR^EB against pC^E).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s005

(TIF)

Figure S6.

Precise deletions and SSA. M. smegmatis ΔRecBCD strains process precise deletions between DRs with similar efficiencies as the wild-type strain. Panel A and B, x-axis, M. smegmatis strains; y-axis, frequencies of Hyg^R CFUs. Panel A, x-axis, wt/pC^E, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Gm (control); wt/pDR^EA, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^AlacZ; ΔrecBCD/pDR^EA, ΔrecBCD/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^AlacZ. Panel B, x-axis, wt/pC^E, as in Panel A; wt/pDR^EB, wild-type/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^BlacZ; ΔrecBCD/pDR^EB, ΔrecBCD/pMV206KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^BlacZ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s006

(TIF)

Figure S7.

The bacteriophage L5 integrase excises the DR- and IR-containing constructs integrated at the attB sites. Analysis of the attB region of selected mutants using Southern blot hybridization. Panel A, scheme of the plasmids integrated at the attB site of M. smegmatis mc²155. SalI, restriction sites used for DNA cleavage showing the 1,883 bp SalI fragment detectable by the Southern blot hybridization probe in the wild-type strain and the DNA fragments (grey arrows) generated by SalI cleavage in the integrated plasmid. Panel B, Southern blot hybridization. Lane 1, M. smegmatis mc²155; lane 2, M. smegmatis mc²155/pDR^IA (pMV306KmHyg::Oligo^DRGm^AlacZ); lanes 3, 4, 6, 9–17, Km^S, Gm^S and white mutant CFUs from M. smegmatis mc²155/pDR^IA; lanes 5, 7–8, Km^R, Gm^S and blue mutant CFUs from M. smegmatis carrying pDR^IA. Red arrows, DNA restriction fragments expected for the wild-type strain (1,883 bp) and for M. smegmatis mc²155/pDR^IA (4,698 bp and 1,185 bp).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s007

(TIF)

Table S1.

Bacterial strains, sources and genetic features.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s008

(RTF)

Table S2.

List of plasmids, general description, genetic markers and sources/references.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s009

(RTF)

Table S3.

Primer sequences used for PCR amplification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s010

(RTF)

Table S4.

Criteria used for in silico analyses of repetitive elements in bacterial genomes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s011

(RTF)

Table S5.

Statistics of in silico searches of repeats genome-wide.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051064.s012

(RTF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Robert D. Wells for fruitful discussions and suggestions and to Dr. Jack R. Collins for support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: A. Bacolla JD EAW. Performed the experiments: EAW A. Brzostek MKM PM. Analyzed the data: EAW JD A. Bacolla PM AJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JD A. Bacolla PM KMV. Wrote the paper: EAW JD A. Bacolla.

References

1. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, et al. (1998) Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393: 537–544.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Cole ST, Eiglmeier K, Parkhill J, James KD, Thomson NR, et al. (2001) Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus. Nature 409: 1007–1011.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Fleischmann RD, Alland D, Eisen JA, Carpenter L, White O, et al. (2002) Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J Bacteriol 184: 5479–5490.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, Medina N, Mansoor H, et al. (2003) The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 7877–7882.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Dahle UR, Sandven P, Heldal E, Caugant DA (2003) Continued low rates of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Norway. J Clin Microbiol 41: 2968–2973.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Filliol I, Motiwala AS, Cavatore M, Qi W, Hazbon MH, et al. (2006) Global phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis: insights into tuberculosis evolution, phylogenetic accuracy of other DNA fingerprinting systems, and recommendations for a minimal standard SNP set. J Bacteriol 188: 759–772.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Sreenu VB, Kumar P, Nagaraju J, Nagarajam HA (2007) Simple sequence repeats in mycobacterial genomes. J Biosci 32: 3–15.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Akgun E, Zahn J, Baumes S, Brown G, Liang F, et al. (1997) Palindrome resolution and recombination in the mammalian germ line. Mol Cell Biol 17: 5559–5570.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Collick A, Drew J, Penberth J, Bois P, Luckett J, et al. (1996) Instability of long inverted repeats within mouse transgenes. EMBO J 15: 1163–1171.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Gordenin DA, Lobachev KS, Degtyareva NP, Malkova AL, Perkins E, et al. (1993) Inverted DNA repeats: a source of eukaryotic genomic instability. Mol Cell Biol 13: 5315–5322.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Leach DR (1994) Long DNA palindromes, cruciform structures, genetic instability and secondary structure repair. Bioessays 16: 893–900.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Lovett ST (2004) Encoded errors: mutations and rearrangements mediated by misalignment at repetitive DNA sequences. Mol Microbiol 52: 1243–1253.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Cooper DN, Bacolla A, Ferec C, Vasquez KM, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, et al. (2011) On the sequence-directed nature of human gene mutation: The role of genomic architecture and the local DNA sequence environment in mediating gene mutations underlying human inherited disease. Hum Mutat 32: 1075–1099.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Wells RD, Dere R, Hebert ML, Napierala M, Son LS (2005) Advances in mechanisms of genetic instability related to hereditary neurological diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 3785–3798.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Wells RD (2007) Non-B DNA conformations, mutagenesis and disease. Trends Biochem Sci 32: 271–278.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Wang G, Vasquez KM (2006) Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability. Mutat Res 598: 103–119.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Wojciechowska M, Napierala M, Larson JE, Wells RD (2006) Non-B DNA conformations formed by long repeating tracts of myotonic dystrophy type 1, myotonic dystrophy type 2, and Friedreich's ataxia genes, not the sequences per se, promote mutagenesis in flanking regions. J Biol Chem 281: 24531–24543.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Mirkin SM (2007) Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature 447: 932–940.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Liu G, Chen X, Bissler JJ, Sinden RR, Leffak M (2010) Replication-dependent instability at (CTG)×(CAG) repeat hairpins in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 6: 652–659.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Liu G, Bissler JJ, Sinden RR, Leffak M (2007) Unstable spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (ATTCT*(AGAAT) repeats are associated with aberrant replication at the ATX10 locus and replication origin-dependent expansion at an ectopic site in human cells. Mol Cell Biol 27: 7828–7838.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Seier T, Padgett DR, Zilberberg G, Sutera VA Jr, Toha N, et al. (2011) Insights into mutagenesis using Escherichia coli chromosomal lacZ strains that enable detection of a wide spectrum of mutational events. Genetics 188: 247–262.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Bacolla A, Wells RD (2004) Non-B DNA conformations, genomic rearrangements, and human disease. J Biol Chem 279: 47411–47414.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Bacolla A, Wells RD (2009) Non-B DNA conformations as determinants of mutagenesis and human disease. Mol Carcinog 48: 273–285.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Jaworski A, Hsieh WT, Blaho JA, Larson JE, Wells RD (1987) Left-handed DNA in vivo. Science 238: 773–777.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Wells RD (1997) Triplet repeat diseases in man, microbes, and molecules. Am J Psychiatry 154: 887.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Wells RD, Wartell RM (1974) The influence of nucleotide sequence on DNA properties. In: Kornberg HL, Phillips DC, Burton K, editors. Biochemistry of Nucleic Acids. Baltimore: University Park Press. pp. 41–64.
27. Voineagu I, Freudenreich CH, Mirkin SM (2009) Checkpoint responses to unusual structures formed by DNA repeats. Mol Carcinog 48: 309–318.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Campbell NH, Patel M, Tofa AB, Ghosh R, Parkinson GN, et al. (2009) Selectivity in ligand recognition of G-quadruplex loops. Biochemistry 48: 1675–1680.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Kumar P, Yadav VK, Baral A, Saha D, Chowdhury S (2011) Zinc-finger transcription factors are associated with guanine quadruplex motifs in human, chimpanzee, mouse and rat promoters genome-wide. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 8005–8016.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Zhao J, Bacolla A, Wang G, Vasquez KM (2010) Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 43–62.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Oh DB, Kim YG, Rich A (2002) Z-DNA-binding proteins can act as potent effectors of gene expression in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16666–16671.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Wang G, Vasquez KM (2007) Z-DNA, an active element in the genome. Front Biosci 12: 4424–4438.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Bacolla A, Jaworski A, Larson JE, Jakupciak JP, Chuzhanova N, et al. (2004) Breakpoints of gross deletions coincide with non-B DNA conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14162–14167.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Lin Y, Wilson JH (2011) Transcription-induced DNA toxicity at trinucleotide repeats: double bubble is trouble. Cell Cycle 10: 611–618.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Seriola A, Spits C, Simard JP, Hilven P, Haentjens P, et al. (2011) Huntington's and myotonic dystrophy hESCs: down-regulated trinucleotide repeat instability and mismatch repair machinery expression upon differentiation. Hum Mol Genet 20: 176–185.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. McMurray CT (2010) Mechanisms of trinucleotide repeat instability during human development. Nat Rev Genet 11: 786–799.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Voineagu I, Surka CF, Shishkin AA, Krasilnikova MM, Mirkin SM (2009) Replisome stalling and stabilization at CGG repeats, which are responsible for chromosomal fragility. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 226–228.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Gatchel JR, Zoghbi HY (2005) Diseases of unstable repeat expansion: mechanisms and common principles. Nat Rev Genet 6: 743–755.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Jaworski A, Blaho JA, Larson JE, Shimizu M, Wells RD (1989) Tetracycline promoter mutations decrease non-B DNA structural transitions, negative linking differences and deletions in recombinant plasmids in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 207: 513–526.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Wang G, Vasquez KM (2009) Models for chromosomal replication-independent non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability. Mol Carcinog 48: 286–298.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Kha DT, Wang G, Natrajan N, Harrison L, Vasquez KM (2010) Pathways for double-strand break repair in genetically unstable Z-DNA-forming sequences. J Mol Biol 398: 471–480.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Kurahashi H, Inagaki H, Ohye T, Kogo H, Kato T, et al. (2006) Chromosomal translocations mediated by palindromic DNA. Cell Cycle 5: 1297–1303.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Della M, Palmbos PL, Tseng HM, Tonkin LM, Daley JM, et al. (2004) Mycobacterial Ku and ligase proteins constitute a two-component NHEJ repair machine. Science 306: 683–685.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Gong C, Bongiorno P, Martins A, Stephanou NC, Zhu H, et al. (2005) Mechanism of nonhomologous end-joining in mycobacteria: a low-fidelity repair system driven by Ku, ligase D and ligase C. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 304–312.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Korycka-Machala M, Brzostek A, Rozalska S, Rumijowska-Galewicz A, Dziedzic R, et al. (2006) Distinct DNA repair pathways involving RecA and nonhomologous end joining in Mycobacterium smegmatis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 258: 83–91.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Pitcher RS, Green AJ, Brzostek A, Korycka-Machala M, Dziadek J, et al. (2007) NHEJ protects mycobacteria in stationary phase against the harmful effects of desiccation. DNA Repair 6: 1271–1276.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Stephanou NC, Gao F, Bongiorno P, Ehrt S, Schnappinger D, et al. (2007) Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks. J Bacteriol 189: 5237–5246.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Muttucumaru DGN, Parish T (2004) The molecular biology of recombination in mycobacteria: what do we know and how can we use it? Curr Issues Mol Biol 6: 145–158.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Gupta R, Barkan D, Redelman-Sidi G, Shuman S, Glickman MS (2011) Mycobacteria exploit three genetically distinct DNA double-strand break repair pathways. Mol Microbiol 79: 316–330.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Madiraju MV, Qin MH, Rajagopalan M (2000) Development of simple and efficient protocol for isolation of plasmids from mycobacteria using zirconia beads. Lett Appl Microbiol 30: 38–41.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Brzostek A, Pawelczyk J, Rumijowska-Galewicz A, Dziadek B, Dziadek J (2009) Mycobacterium tuberculosis is able to accumulate and utilize cholesterol. J Bacteriol 191: 6584–6591.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Pawelczyk J, Brzostek A, Kremer L, Dziadek B, Rumijowska-Galewicz A, et al. (2011) AccD6, a key carboxyltransferase essential for mycolic acid synthesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is dispensable in a nonpathogenic strain. J Bacteriol 193: 6960–6972.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Kolpakov R, Bana G, Kucherov G (2003) mreps: Efficient and flexible detection of tandem repeats in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3672–3678.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, et al. (2004) Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5: R12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16: 276–277.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Lin Y, Hubert L Jr, Wilson JH (2009) Transcription destabilizes triplet repeats. Mol Carcinog 48: 350–361.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Raghavan SC, Lieber MR (2004) Chromosomal translocations and non-B DNA structures in the human genome. Cell Cycle 3: 762–768.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Wells RD, Ashizawa T (2006) Genetic instabilities and neurological diseases. San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic Press.
59. Parish T, Stoker NG (2000) Use of a flexible cassette method to generate a double unmarked Mycobacterium tuberculosis tlyA plcABC mutant by gene replacement. Microbiology 146: 1969–1975.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Bowater RP, Chen D, Lilley DM (1994) Elevated unconstrained supercoiling of plasmid DNA generated by transcription and translation of the tetracycline resistance gene in eubacteria. Biochemistry 33: 9266–9275.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Dayn A, Malkhosyan S, Mirkin SM (1992) Transcriptionally driven cruciform formation in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 5991–5997.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Napierala M, Bacolla A, Wells RD (2005) Increased negative superhelical density in vivo enhances the genetic instability of triplet repeat sequences. J Biol Chem 280: 37366–37376.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
63. Bacolla A, Jaworski A, Connors TD, Wells RD (2001) Pkd1 unusual DNA conformations are recognized by nucleotide excision repair. J Biol Chem 276: 18597–18604.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Gong C, Martins A, Bongiorno P, Glickman M, Shuman S (2004) Biochemical and genetic analysis of the four DNA ligases of mycobacteria. J Biol Chem 279: 20594–20606.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
65. Shuman S, Glickman MS (2007) Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 852–861.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
66. Krishna R, Prabu JR, Manjunath GP, Datta S, Chandra NR, et al. (2007) Snapshots of RecA protein involving movement of the C-domain and different conformations of the DNA-binding loops: crystallographic and comparative analysis of 11 structures of Mycobacterium smegmatis RecA. J Mol Biol 367: 1130–1144.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
67. Stark JM, Pierce AJ, Oh J, Pastink A, Jasin M (2004) Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9305–9316.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
68. McDonald JP, Rothstein R (1994) Unrepaired heteroduplex DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is decreased in RAD1 RAD52-independent recombination. Genetics 137: 393–405.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
69. Lewis JA, Hatfull GF (2003) Control of directionality in L5 integrase-mediated site-specific recombination. J Mol Biol 326: 805–821.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
70. Stolt P, Stoker NG (1997) Mutational analysis of the regulatory region of the Mycobacterium plasmid pAL5000. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3840–3846.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
71. Basu A, Chawla-Sarkar M, Chakrabarti S, Das Gupta SK (2002) Origin binding activity of the Mycobacterial plasmid pAL5000 replication protein RepB is stimulated through interactions with host factors and coupled expression of repA. J Bacteriol 184: 2204–2214.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
72. Basu A, Chatterjee S, Das Gupta SK (2012) Evolutionary link between the mycobacterial plasmid pAL5000 replication protein RepB and the extracytoplasmic function family of sigma factors. J Bacteriol 194: 1331–1341.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
73. Griffin S, Williamson AL, Chapman R (2009) Optimisation of a mycobacterial replicon increases foreign antigen expression in mycobacteria. Tuberculosis 89: 225–232.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
74. Dennehy M, Williamson AL (2005) Factors influencing the immune response to foreign antigen expressed in recombinant BCG vaccines. Vaccine 23: 1209–1224.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
75. Majchrzak M, Bowater RP, Staczek P, Parniewski P (2006) SOS repair and DNA supercoiling influence the genetic stability of DNA triplet repeats in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 364: 612–624.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
76. Springer B, Sander P, Sedlacek L, Hardt WD, Mizrahi V, et al. (2004) Lack of mismatch correction facilitates genome evolution in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol 53: 1601–1609.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
77. Mizrahi V, Andersen SJ (1998) DNA repair in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. What have we learnt from the genome sequence? Mol Microbiol 29: 1331–1339.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
78. Dos Vultos T, Mestre O, Tonjum T, Gicquel B (2009) DNA repair in Mycobacterium tuberculosis revisited. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 471–487.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
79. Bowater R, Doherty AJ (2006) Making ends meet: repairing breaks in bacterial DNA by non-homologous end-joining. PLoS Genet 2: e8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
80. Chayot R, Montagne B, Mazel D, Ricchetti M (2010) An end-joining repair mechanism in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 2141–2146.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
81. Sinden RR, Hashem VI, Rosche WA (1999) DNA-directed mutations. Leading and lagging strand specificity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 870: 173–189.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
82. Courcelle J, Hanawalt PC (2001) Participation of recombination proteins in rescue of arrested replication forks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli need not involve recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8196–8202.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
83. Springer B, Sander P, Sedlacek L, Ellrott K, Bottger EC (2001) Instability and site-specific excision of integration-proficient mycobacteriophage L5 plasmids: development of stably maintained integrative vectors. Int J Med Microbiol 290: 669–675.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
84. Wang XM, Galamba A, Warner DF, Soetaert K, Merkel JS, et al. (2008) IS1096-mediated DNA rearrangements play a key role in genome evolution of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Tuberculosis 88: 399–409.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
85. Coros A, DeConno E, Derbyshire KM (2008) IS6110, a Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex-specific insertion sequence, is also present in the genome of Mycobacterium smegmatis, suggestive of lateral gene transfer among mycobacterial species. J Bacteriol 190: 3408–3410.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
86. McEvoy CR, Cloete R, Muller B, Schurch AC, van Helden PD, et al. (2012) Comparative analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pe and ppe genes reveals high sequence variation and an apparent absence of selective constraints. PLoS One 7: e30593.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
87. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell DA, Peebles CL, Al-Atrache Z, et al. (2011) Expanding the diversity of mycobacteriophages: insights into genome architecture and evolution. PLoS One 6: e16329.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
88. Caimi K, Cataldi A (2004) A fragment of 21 ORFs around the direct repeat (DR) region of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is absent from the other sequenced mycobacterial genomes: implications for the evolution of the DR region. Comp Funct Genomics 5: 116–122.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
89. Pitcher RS, Tonkin LM, Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Green AJ, et al. (2006) Mycobacteriophage exploit NHEJ to facilitate genome circularization. Mol Cell 23: 743–748.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
90. Aniukwu J, Glickman MS, Shuman S (2008) The pathways and outcomes of mycobacterial NHEJ depend on the structure of the broken DNA ends. Genes Dev 22: 512–527.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
91. Hatfull GF, Cresawn SG, Hendrix RW (2008) Comparative genomics of the mycobacteriophages: insights into bacteriophage evolution. Res Microbiol 159: 332–339.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
92. Morris P, Marinelli LJ, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF (2008) Genomic characterization of mycobacteriophage Giles: evidence for phage acquisition of host DNA by illegitimate recombination. J Bacteriol 190: 2172–2182.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
93. Stinear TP, Seemann T, Harrison PF, Jenkin GA, Davies JK, et al. (2008) Insights from the complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium marinum on the evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Genome Res 18: 729–741.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, et al. (1998) Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393: 537–544.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Cole ST, Eiglmeier K, Parkhill J, James KD, Thomson NR, et al. (2001) Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus. Nature 409: 1007–1011.
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Fleischmann RD, Alland D, Eisen JA, Carpenter L, White O, et al. (2002) Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J Bacteriol 184: 5479–5490.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, Medina N, Mansoor H, et al. (2003) The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 7877–7882.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Dahle UR, Sandven P, Heldal E, Caugant DA (2003) Continued low rates of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Norway. J Clin Microbiol 41: 2968–2973.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Filliol I, Motiwala AS, Cavatore M, Qi W, Hazbon MH, et al. (2006) Global phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis: insights into tuberculosis evolution, phylogenetic accuracy of other DNA fingerprinting systems, and recommendations for a minimal standard SNP set. J Bacteriol 188: 759–772.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Sreenu VB, Kumar P, Nagaraju J, Nagarajam HA (2007) Simple sequence repeats in mycobacterial genomes. J Biosci 32: 3–15.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Akgun E, Zahn J, Baumes S, Brown G, Liang F, et al. (1997) Palindrome resolution and recombination in the mammalian germ line. Mol Cell Biol 17: 5559–5570.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Collick A, Drew J, Penberth J, Bois P, Luckett J, et al. (1996) Instability of long inverted repeats within mouse transgenes. EMBO J 15: 1163–1171.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Gordenin DA, Lobachev KS, Degtyareva NP, Malkova AL, Perkins E, et al. (1993) Inverted DNA repeats: a source of eukaryotic genomic instability. Mol Cell Biol 13: 5315–5322.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Leach DR (1994) Long DNA palindromes, cruciform structures, genetic instability and secondary structure repair. Bioessays 16: 893–900.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Lovett ST (2004) Encoded errors: mutations and rearrangements mediated by misalignment at repetitive DNA sequences. Mol Microbiol 52: 1243–1253.
View Article
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Cooper DN, Bacolla A, Ferec C, Vasquez KM, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, et al. (2011) On the sequence-directed nature of human gene mutation: The role of genomic architecture and the local DNA sequence environment in mediating gene mutations underlying human inherited disease. Hum Mutat 32: 1075–1099.
View Article
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Wells RD, Dere R, Hebert ML, Napierala M, Son LS (2005) Advances in mechanisms of genetic instability related to hereditary neurological diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 3785–3798.
View Article
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Wells RD (2007) Non-B DNA conformations, mutagenesis and disease. Trends Biochem Sci 32: 271–278.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Wang G, Vasquez KM (2006) Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability. Mutat Res 598: 103–119.
View Article
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Wojciechowska M, Napierala M, Larson JE, Wells RD (2006) Non-B DNA conformations formed by long repeating tracts of myotonic dystrophy type 1, myotonic dystrophy type 2, and Friedreich's ataxia genes, not the sequences per se, promote mutagenesis in flanking regions. J Biol Chem 281: 24531–24543.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Mirkin SM (2007) Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature 447: 932–940.
View Article
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Liu G, Chen X, Bissler JJ, Sinden RR, Leffak M (2010) Replication-dependent instability at (CTG)×(CAG) repeat hairpins in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 6: 652–659.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Liu G, Bissler JJ, Sinden RR, Leffak M (2007) Unstable spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (ATTCT*(AGAAT) repeats are associated with aberrant replication at the ATX10 locus and replication origin-dependent expansion at an ectopic site in human cells. Mol Cell Biol 27: 7828–7838.
View Article
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Seier T, Padgett DR, Zilberberg G, Sutera VA Jr, Toha N, et al. (2011) Insights into mutagenesis using Escherichia coli chromosomal lacZ strains that enable detection of a wide spectrum of mutational events. Genetics 188: 247–262.
View Article
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Bacolla A, Wells RD (2004) Non-B DNA conformations, genomic rearrangements, and human disease. J Biol Chem 279: 47411–47414.
View Article
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Bacolla A, Wells RD (2009) Non-B DNA conformations as determinants of mutagenesis and human disease. Mol Carcinog 48: 273–285.
View Article
Google Scholar

[68] View Article

[69] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Jaworski A, Hsieh WT, Blaho JA, Larson JE, Wells RD (1987) Left-handed DNA in vivo. Science 238: 773–777.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Wells RD (1997) Triplet repeat diseases in man, microbes, and molecules. Am J Psychiatry 154: 887.
View Article
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Wells RD, Wartell RM (1974) The influence of nucleotide sequence on DNA properties. In: Kornberg HL, Phillips DC, Burton K, editors. Biochemistry of Nucleic Acids. Baltimore: University Park Press. pp. 41–64.

[ref27] 27. Voineagu I, Freudenreich CH, Mirkin SM (2009) Checkpoint responses to unusual structures formed by DNA repeats. Mol Carcinog 48: 309–318.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Campbell NH, Patel M, Tofa AB, Ghosh R, Parkinson GN, et al. (2009) Selectivity in ligand recognition of G-quadruplex loops. Biochemistry 48: 1675–1680.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Kumar P, Yadav VK, Baral A, Saha D, Chowdhury S (2011) Zinc-finger transcription factors are associated with guanine quadruplex motifs in human, chimpanzee, mouse and rat promoters genome-wide. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 8005–8016.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Zhao J, Bacolla A, Wang G, Vasquez KM (2010) Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution. Cell Mol Life Sci 67: 43–62.
View Article
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Oh DB, Kim YG, Rich A (2002) Z-DNA-binding proteins can act as potent effectors of gene expression in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16666–16671.
View Article
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Wang G, Vasquez KM (2007) Z-DNA, an active element in the genome. Front Biosci 12: 4424–4438.
View Article
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Bacolla A, Jaworski A, Larson JE, Jakupciak JP, Chuzhanova N, et al. (2004) Breakpoints of gross deletions coincide with non-B DNA conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14162–14167.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Lin Y, Wilson JH (2011) Transcription-induced DNA toxicity at trinucleotide repeats: double bubble is trouble. Cell Cycle 10: 611–618.
View Article
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Seriola A, Spits C, Simard JP, Hilven P, Haentjens P, et al. (2011) Huntington's and myotonic dystrophy hESCs: down-regulated trinucleotide repeat instability and mismatch repair machinery expression upon differentiation. Hum Mol Genet 20: 176–185.
View Article
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. McMurray CT (2010) Mechanisms of trinucleotide repeat instability during human development. Nat Rev Genet 11: 786–799.
View Article
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Voineagu I, Surka CF, Shishkin AA, Krasilnikova MM, Mirkin SM (2009) Replisome stalling and stabilization at CGG repeats, which are responsible for chromosomal fragility. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 226–228.
View Article
Google Scholar

[108] View Article

[109] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Gatchel JR, Zoghbi HY (2005) Diseases of unstable repeat expansion: mechanisms and common principles. Nat Rev Genet 6: 743–755.
View Article
Google Scholar

[111] View Article

[112] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Jaworski A, Blaho JA, Larson JE, Shimizu M, Wells RD (1989) Tetracycline promoter mutations decrease non-B DNA structural transitions, negative linking differences and deletions in recombinant plasmids in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 207: 513–526.
View Article
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Wang G, Vasquez KM (2009) Models for chromosomal replication-independent non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability. Mol Carcinog 48: 286–298.
View Article
Google Scholar

[117] View Article

[118] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Kha DT, Wang G, Natrajan N, Harrison L, Vasquez KM (2010) Pathways for double-strand break repair in genetically unstable Z-DNA-forming sequences. J Mol Biol 398: 471–480.
View Article
Google Scholar

[120] View Article

[121] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Kurahashi H, Inagaki H, Ohye T, Kogo H, Kato T, et al. (2006) Chromosomal translocations mediated by palindromic DNA. Cell Cycle 5: 1297–1303.
View Article
Google Scholar

[123] View Article

[124] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Della M, Palmbos PL, Tseng HM, Tonkin LM, Daley JM, et al. (2004) Mycobacterial Ku and ligase proteins constitute a two-component NHEJ repair machine. Science 306: 683–685.
View Article
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Gong C, Bongiorno P, Martins A, Stephanou NC, Zhu H, et al. (2005) Mechanism of nonhomologous end-joining in mycobacteria: a low-fidelity repair system driven by Ku, ligase D and ligase C. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 304–312.
View Article
Google Scholar

[129] View Article

[130] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Korycka-Machala M, Brzostek A, Rozalska S, Rumijowska-Galewicz A, Dziedzic R, et al. (2006) Distinct DNA repair pathways involving RecA and nonhomologous end joining in Mycobacterium smegmatis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 258: 83–91.
View Article
Google Scholar

[132] View Article

[133] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Pitcher RS, Green AJ, Brzostek A, Korycka-Machala M, Dziadek J, et al. (2007) NHEJ protects mycobacteria in stationary phase against the harmful effects of desiccation. DNA Repair 6: 1271–1276.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Stephanou NC, Gao F, Bongiorno P, Ehrt S, Schnappinger D, et al. (2007) Mycobacterial nonhomologous end joining mediates mutagenic repair of chromosomal double-strand DNA breaks. J Bacteriol 189: 5237–5246.
View Article
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Muttucumaru DGN, Parish T (2004) The molecular biology of recombination in mycobacteria: what do we know and how can we use it? Curr Issues Mol Biol 6: 145–158.
View Article
Google Scholar

[141] View Article

[142] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Gupta R, Barkan D, Redelman-Sidi G, Shuman S, Glickman MS (2011) Mycobacteria exploit three genetically distinct DNA double-strand break repair pathways. Mol Microbiol 79: 316–330.
View Article
Google Scholar

[144] View Article

[145] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Madiraju MV, Qin MH, Rajagopalan M (2000) Development of simple and efficient protocol for isolation of plasmids from mycobacteria using zirconia beads. Lett Appl Microbiol 30: 38–41.
View Article
Google Scholar

[147] View Article

[148] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Brzostek A, Pawelczyk J, Rumijowska-Galewicz A, Dziadek B, Dziadek J (2009) Mycobacterium tuberculosis is able to accumulate and utilize cholesterol. J Bacteriol 191: 6584–6591.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Pawelczyk J, Brzostek A, Kremer L, Dziadek B, Rumijowska-Galewicz A, et al. (2011) AccD6, a key carboxyltransferase essential for mycolic acid synthesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is dispensable in a nonpathogenic strain. J Bacteriol 193: 6960–6972.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Kolpakov R, Bana G, Kucherov G (2003) mreps: Efficient and flexible detection of tandem repeats in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3672–3678.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, et al. (2004) Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5: R12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16: 276–277.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Lin Y, Hubert L Jr, Wilson JH (2009) Transcription destabilizes triplet repeats. Mol Carcinog 48: 350–361.
View Article
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Raghavan SC, Lieber MR (2004) Chromosomal translocations and non-B DNA structures in the human genome. Cell Cycle 3: 762–768.
View Article
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Wells RD, Ashizawa T (2006) Genetic instabilities and neurological diseases. San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic Press.

[ref59] 59. Parish T, Stoker NG (2000) Use of a flexible cassette method to generate a double unmarked Mycobacterium tuberculosis tlyA plcABC mutant by gene replacement. Microbiology 146: 1969–1975.
View Article
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Bowater RP, Chen D, Lilley DM (1994) Elevated unconstrained supercoiling of plasmid DNA generated by transcription and translation of the tetracycline resistance gene in eubacteria. Biochemistry 33: 9266–9275.
View Article
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Dayn A, Malkhosyan S, Mirkin SM (1992) Transcriptionally driven cruciform formation in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 5991–5997.
View Article
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Napierala M, Bacolla A, Wells RD (2005) Increased negative superhelical density in vivo enhances the genetic instability of triplet repeat sequences. J Biol Chem 280: 37366–37376.
View Article
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Bacolla A, Jaworski A, Connors TD, Wells RD (2001) Pkd1 unusual DNA conformations are recognized by nucleotide excision repair. J Biol Chem 276: 18597–18604.
View Article
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Gong C, Martins A, Bongiorno P, Glickman M, Shuman S (2004) Biochemical and genetic analysis of the four DNA ligases of mycobacteria. J Biol Chem 279: 20594–20606.
View Article
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Shuman S, Glickman MS (2007) Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 852–861.
View Article
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Krishna R, Prabu JR, Manjunath GP, Datta S, Chandra NR, et al. (2007) Snapshots of RecA protein involving movement of the C-domain and different conformations of the DNA-binding loops: crystallographic and comparative analysis of 11 structures of Mycobacterium smegmatis RecA. J Mol Biol 367: 1130–1144.
View Article
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] Google Scholar

[ref67] 67. Stark JM, Pierce AJ, Oh J, Pastink A, Jasin M (2004) Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9305–9316.
View Article
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] Google Scholar

[ref68] 68. McDonald JP, Rothstein R (1994) Unrepaired heteroduplex DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is decreased in RAD1 RAD52-independent recombination. Genetics 137: 393–405.
View Article
Google Scholar

[199] View Article

[200] Google Scholar

[ref69] 69. Lewis JA, Hatfull GF (2003) Control of directionality in L5 integrase-mediated site-specific recombination. J Mol Biol 326: 805–821.
View Article
Google Scholar

[202] View Article

[203] Google Scholar

[ref70] 70. Stolt P, Stoker NG (1997) Mutational analysis of the regulatory region of the Mycobacterium plasmid pAL5000. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3840–3846.
View Article
Google Scholar

[205] View Article

[206] Google Scholar

[ref71] 71. Basu A, Chawla-Sarkar M, Chakrabarti S, Das Gupta SK (2002) Origin binding activity of the Mycobacterial plasmid pAL5000 replication protein RepB is stimulated through interactions with host factors and coupled expression of repA. J Bacteriol 184: 2204–2214.
View Article
Google Scholar

[208] View Article

[209] Google Scholar

[ref72] 72. Basu A, Chatterjee S, Das Gupta SK (2012) Evolutionary link between the mycobacterial plasmid pAL5000 replication protein RepB and the extracytoplasmic function family of sigma factors. J Bacteriol 194: 1331–1341.
View Article
Google Scholar

[211] View Article

[212] Google Scholar

[ref73] 73. Griffin S, Williamson AL, Chapman R (2009) Optimisation of a mycobacterial replicon increases foreign antigen expression in mycobacteria. Tuberculosis 89: 225–232.
View Article
Google Scholar

[214] View Article

[215] Google Scholar

[ref74] 74. Dennehy M, Williamson AL (2005) Factors influencing the immune response to foreign antigen expressed in recombinant BCG vaccines. Vaccine 23: 1209–1224.
View Article
Google Scholar

[217] View Article

[218] Google Scholar

[ref75] 75. Majchrzak M, Bowater RP, Staczek P, Parniewski P (2006) SOS repair and DNA supercoiling influence the genetic stability of DNA triplet repeats in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 364: 612–624.
View Article
Google Scholar

[220] View Article

[221] Google Scholar

[ref76] 76. Springer B, Sander P, Sedlacek L, Hardt WD, Mizrahi V, et al. (2004) Lack of mismatch correction facilitates genome evolution in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol 53: 1601–1609.
View Article
Google Scholar

[223] View Article

[224] Google Scholar

[ref77] 77. Mizrahi V, Andersen SJ (1998) DNA repair in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. What have we learnt from the genome sequence? Mol Microbiol 29: 1331–1339.
View Article
Google Scholar

[226] View Article

[227] Google Scholar

[ref78] 78. Dos Vultos T, Mestre O, Tonjum T, Gicquel B (2009) DNA repair in Mycobacterium tuberculosis revisited. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 471–487.
View Article
Google Scholar

[229] View Article

[230] Google Scholar

[ref79] 79. Bowater R, Doherty AJ (2006) Making ends meet: repairing breaks in bacterial DNA by non-homologous end-joining. PLoS Genet 2: e8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[232] View Article

[233] Google Scholar

[ref80] 80. Chayot R, Montagne B, Mazel D, Ricchetti M (2010) An end-joining repair mechanism in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 2141–2146.
View Article
Google Scholar

[235] View Article

[236] Google Scholar

[ref81] 81. Sinden RR, Hashem VI, Rosche WA (1999) DNA-directed mutations. Leading and lagging strand specificity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 870: 173–189.
View Article
Google Scholar

[238] View Article

[239] Google Scholar

[ref82] 82. Courcelle J, Hanawalt PC (2001) Participation of recombination proteins in rescue of arrested replication forks in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli need not involve recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8196–8202.
View Article
Google Scholar

[241] View Article

[242] Google Scholar

[ref83] 83. Springer B, Sander P, Sedlacek L, Ellrott K, Bottger EC (2001) Instability and site-specific excision of integration-proficient mycobacteriophage L5 plasmids: development of stably maintained integrative vectors. Int J Med Microbiol 290: 669–675.
View Article
Google Scholar

[244] View Article

[245] Google Scholar

[ref84] 84. Wang XM, Galamba A, Warner DF, Soetaert K, Merkel JS, et al. (2008) IS1096-mediated DNA rearrangements play a key role in genome evolution of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Tuberculosis 88: 399–409.
View Article
Google Scholar

[247] View Article

[248] Google Scholar

[ref85] 85. Coros A, DeConno E, Derbyshire KM (2008) IS6110, a Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex-specific insertion sequence, is also present in the genome of Mycobacterium smegmatis, suggestive of lateral gene transfer among mycobacterial species. J Bacteriol 190: 3408–3410.
View Article
Google Scholar

[250] View Article

[251] Google Scholar

[ref86] 86. McEvoy CR, Cloete R, Muller B, Schurch AC, van Helden PD, et al. (2012) Comparative analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis pe and ppe genes reveals high sequence variation and an apparent absence of selective constraints. PLoS One 7: e30593.
View Article
Google Scholar

[253] View Article

[254] Google Scholar

[ref87] 87. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell DA, Peebles CL, Al-Atrache Z, et al. (2011) Expanding the diversity of mycobacteriophages: insights into genome architecture and evolution. PLoS One 6: e16329.
View Article
Google Scholar

[256] View Article

[257] Google Scholar

[ref88] 88. Caimi K, Cataldi A (2004) A fragment of 21 ORFs around the direct repeat (DR) region of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is absent from the other sequenced mycobacterial genomes: implications for the evolution of the DR region. Comp Funct Genomics 5: 116–122.
View Article
Google Scholar

[259] View Article

[260] Google Scholar

[ref89] 89. Pitcher RS, Tonkin LM, Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Green AJ, et al. (2006) Mycobacteriophage exploit NHEJ to facilitate genome circularization. Mol Cell 23: 743–748.
View Article
Google Scholar

[262] View Article

[263] Google Scholar

[ref90] 90. Aniukwu J, Glickman MS, Shuman S (2008) The pathways and outcomes of mycobacterial NHEJ depend on the structure of the broken DNA ends. Genes Dev 22: 512–527.
View Article
Google Scholar

[265] View Article

[266] Google Scholar

[ref91] 91. Hatfull GF, Cresawn SG, Hendrix RW (2008) Comparative genomics of the mycobacteriophages: insights into bacteriophage evolution. Res Microbiol 159: 332–339.
View Article
Google Scholar

[268] View Article

[269] Google Scholar

[ref92] 92. Morris P, Marinelli LJ, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF (2008) Genomic characterization of mycobacteriophage Giles: evidence for phage acquisition of host DNA by illegitimate recombination. J Bacteriol 190: 2172–2182.
View Article
Google Scholar

[271] View Article

[272] Google Scholar

[ref93] 93. Stinear TP, Seemann T, Harrison PF, Jenkin GA, Davies JK, et al. (2008) Insights from the complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium marinum on the evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Genome Res 18: 729–741.
View Article
Google Scholar

[274] View Article

[275] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and cell culture conditions

Cloning

Protocol for assessing genetic instabilities caused by DR and IR sequences in M. smegmatis and E. coli

Identification of repeat elements in bacterial genomes

Results

DRs and IRs are overrepresented in mycobacterial genomes

DRs induce precise deletion of the intervening sequence in mycobacteria but not in E. coli

IRs and DRs induce large deletions in both M. smegmatis and E. coli

The precise deletions stimulated by DRs in M. smegmatis occur independently of NHEJ, HR and SSA

IRs and DRs induced the excision of OligoIR and OligoDR by activating L5 site-specific recombination

HR and NHEJ guard against DNA nucleolytic processing triggered by DR and IR sequences

Discussion

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

IRs and DRs induced the excision of Oligo^IR and Oligo^DR by activating L5 site-specific recombination