Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Novel Strain D5 Isolated from Acacia confusa

Abstract

We isolated a novel strain D5 from nodules of Acacia confusa. Under strict sterile conditions the strain could successfully nodulate Acacia confusa, A. crassicarpa and A. mangium, with nitrogenase activity ranging from 18.90 to 19.86 nmol·g−1·min−1. In the phylogenetic tree based on a complete 16S rRNA gene sequence, the sequence of strain D5 shared 99% homology with that of four species of genus Pseudomonas. The 685 bp nodA fragment amplified from strain D5 shared 95% homology with the nodA sequence of 9 species of genus Bradyrhizobium, with a genetic distance of 0.01682. The 740 bp nifH gene fragment was amplified from strain D5. This strain D5 nifH gene and Bradyrhizobium spp. formed a branch, showing 98% homology and a genetic distance of 0. The homology between this branch and the Bradyrhizobium spp. DG in another branch was 99%, with a genetic distance of 0.007906. These results indicate that this strain D5 is a new type of nitrogen-fixing bacterium.

Introduction

In the recently years, many new genera and species of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing microorganisms of legumes have been discovered using emerging new technology [1]. Currently 56 species, 11 genera symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria have been identified, including not only traditional rhizobia that belong to genera Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Azorhizobium and Agrobacterium, but also some symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria that have previously been categorized as non-symbiotic: some species in Phyllobacterium, Ochrobacterum, and Methylobacterium can all grow symbiotically with legumes and fix nitrogen [2][6]. The discovery of these “non-traditional” rhizobia has greatly enriched the studies on nitrogen-fixing symbiosis.

Acacia is a generic name for all the arbor plants in subfamily Mimosoideae, genus Acacia. So far, Rhizobia strains have been successfully isolated and purified from the root nodules of species including A. melanoxylon, A. impdexa, A. dealbata, A. mearnsii, A. auriculiformis, A. mangium, A. crassccarp, A. mangium×A. auriculiformis, A. confusa, and A. cincinnata, and their physiological, biochemical properties and stress resistance have been studied [7][14], showing a diversity of symbiotic Rhizobia of A. spp.

Lajudie [15] examined the rhizobia isolated from Acacia in Senegal of the Sudan and found that they belonged to Sinorhizobium and Mesorhizobium, respectively. Zhang et al. [16] characterized 115 phenotypes of 60 rhizobia strains in genus A. senegal and found that at a mean genetic distance of 0.725 (which seperates Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium) these rhizobia could be divided into 19 strains. Trinick [17][19] reported that rhizobia isolated from Acacia are of fast-growing type; some strains were close to fast-growing Rhizobium meliloti. Lv et al. [20] sequenced and analyzed the complete 16S rDNA and the nifA gene fragment of Rhizobia strain HJ06 from A. crassicarpa; they showed that in the phylogenetic tree constructed with the 16S rDNA sequence of strain HJ06, strain HJ06 belonged to a Rhizobium branch, and the cloned nifA gene fragment shared 99.3% homology with Klebsiella pneumoniae. Huang et al. [21] performed comparative cluster analysis on the complete 16S rDNA sequence of strain JJ06 from A. cincinnata, and found that this strain was phylogenetically located on the Mesorhizobium branch. Wang et al. [22] conducted a phylogenetic study on 9 strains of rhizobia isolated from Acacia using partial sequences of two housekeeping genes atpD and glnII, and compared the result with the phylogenetic tree constructed with 16S rDNA gene sequence; the results showed that Rhizobia isolated from A. mangium in Fujian and Guangdong belonged to Mesorhizobium, whereas strain isolated from A. confusa in Guangdong belonged to Bradyrhizobium.

Guangxi is located in the north tropical and Subtropical area, the geological condition of which supports life greatly. Thus biodiversity in this region is massive, including that of the microorganisms in the soil. As alien species, A. spp. may exchange information including genetic information with local species in addition to adapting to the local environment when cultivated in Guangxi. In particular, gene exchange is extremely likely to happen among strains in species such as Acacia rhizobia that show relatively large phylogenetic variations. Aside from transitional Acacia rhizobia, are there endophytic bacteria that are “non-traditional Rhizobia” but are symbiotic with Acacia plant and can nodulate to fix nitrogen? In this study, a “non-traditional” rhizobia, strain D5 isolated from A. confusa was investigated in depth. Inoculation and cross inoculation of this strain were performed under strict sterile conditions, and the nitrogenase activities of its nodules were measured; the complete 16S rRNA sequence of strain D5 and its nodA and nifH gene sequences were examined for symbiotic nodulation genes and nitrogen-fixing genes, and the phylogenetic position of this strain and the homology of its nodA and nifH genes were analyzed. Our findings are of great significance in accurately revealing the diversity and the phylogenetic position of Acacia rhizobia and in searching for potential lateral gene transfer and gene recombination, thus provides a scientific basis for researches that truly uncover phylogenetic relationships in biological systems.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Nodulation of strain D5 inoculated plants.

A. Acacia confusa, B. Acacia crassicarpa, C. Acacia mangium, D. Glycine max, and E. Control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049236.g001

Results

Inoculation and Cross-inoculation of Strain D5 and Nitrogenase Activity

Under strict sterile conditions, brown spherical nodules were observed 90 d after strain D5 was nodulated to A. confusa (Fig. 1A), A. crassccarp (Fig. 1B) and A. mangium (Fig. 1C), and all these nodules exhibited nitrogenase activity (Table 1). No nodules were observed in inoculated Glycine max (Linn.) Merr. (Fig. 1D, Table 1) and in the control plants (Fig. 1E, Table 1) that were not inoculated or inoculated with other Pseudomonas strains.

thumbnail
Table 1. The nodulation rates of strain D5 inoculated Acacia confusa, A. crassicarpa, A. mangium, and Glycine max, and the corresponding nitrogenase activities of root nodules.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049236.t001

The 16S rRNA Sequence of Strain D5 and the its Phylogenetic Analysis

The PCR amplification product of strain D5 was around 1.5 kb as detected from the agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 2). The completed sequence was 1470 bp. We submitted this sequence to the GeneBank and obtained a record number as D5.sqn 16S_rRNA JX162029.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Phylogenetic dendrogram of strain D5 based on 16S rRNA gene sequence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049236.g003

thumbnail
Figure 5. Phylogenetic dendrogram of strain D5 nodA sequence.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049236.g005

thumbnail
Figure 7. Phylogenetic dendrogram of strain D5 nifH gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049236.g007

As seen from the phylogenetic tree based on the16S rRNA sequence, strain D5 and 8 strains of Pseudomonas were in the same branch. Strain D5 had a genetic distance very close to Pseudomonas putida (EU275363), P. sp. DK4 (EU158318), P. sp. AUTH 28 (FR725962) and P. sp. 12C (AY689083). The homology was 99%. Strain D5 also had a very close distance to P. stutzeri (AY364327), P. stutzeri GAPP4 (GU396288), P. stutzeri AT11 (JQ621964), and P. stutzeri (AB682251), while traditional rhizobia were located in another branch, far from genus of Pseudomonas (Figure 3). As the criterion for diving plants into species using the 16S rRNA sequence similarity is set at homology no less than 98% [23], our result has confirmed that strain D5 belongs to Pseudomonas.

PCR Amplification Results of Homology Analysis of nodA Gene Fragment

nodA belongs to common nodulation genes, and is one of the key nodulation genes of Rhizobia. The presence or absence of nodA determines whether a plant can be nodulated. Figure 4 shows the electrophoretogram of the PCR products of the 685 bp nodA fragment amplified from strain D5. We submitted the sequence to the GeneBank and obtained a sequence number as D5.sqn nodA JX162031. The phylogenetic tree showed that the nodA sequence of strain D5 was at the same branch as B. elkanii (AB610461), B. elkanii (HQ259488), B. elkanii (HQ259471), B. sp. (AJ430728), B. elkanii (AJ300251), B. elkanii (AB610460), B. elkanii (AM117554), B. elkanii (U04609) and B. elkanii (AB610459); the sequence homology between the nodA sequence of strain D5 and that of these bacteria was 95%, and the genetic distance was 0.01682 (Figure 5).

PCR Amplification Results of Homology Analysis of nifH Gene Fragment

nifH is a structural gene of nitrogenase. The presence or absence of nifH determines whether a plant can fix nitrogen. Figure 6 shows the electrophoretogram of the PCR products of the 740 bp nifH fragment amplified from strain D5. We submitted the sequence to the GeneBank and obtained a sequence number as D5.sqn nifH JX162030. As shown in the phylogenetic tree constructed with strain D5 nifH gene (Figure 7), strain D5 nifH gene and B. sp. (HQ259550) formed a branch; the homology between them was 98%, and the genetic distance was 0. The homology between this branch and another B. sp. DG (HM063961.1) was 99%, and the genetic distance was 0.007906.

Discussion

Currently there are six genera of bacteria that can nodulate legumes, including Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Allorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, and Azorhizobium [24]. Strain D5 is isolated from the nodules of A. confusa, yet it does not belong to any of these six genera. Based on the Blast result of its complete 16S rRNA sequence and the phylogenetic tree constructed with the 16S rRNA sequence, strain D5 belongs to Pseudomonas. This study shows that under strict sterile conditions, strain D5 can successfully nodulate A. confusa, A. crassicarpa and A. mangium, and the nodules all have nitrogenase activity; nodA nodulation gene and nifH nitrogen-fixing gene are amplified from strain D5, suggesting that there is a diversity of endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacteria symbiotic with A. spp., and demonstrating there are strains in Pseudomonas that contain symbiotic nodulation gene and nitrogen-fixing gene. This has not been reported previously.

In the 1980’s, P. stutzeri A1501 was isolated from the root soil of Chinese southern rice; whole genome “shotgun” method was used to complete the whole genome sequencing of this bacterium, and the genome structure and function were analyzed [25]. That was the first non-legume symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacterium whose whole genome sequencing analysis was ever completed in the world. Nitrogenase-related genes in P. stutzeri A1501 have been cloned [26][29], however its nodulation genes have not been studied.

Bradyrhizobium that shares 95% homology with the nodA gene and 98% homology with the nifH gene of strain D5 belonging to Pseudomonas is a slow-growing genus of rhizobia. A relatively high homology between certain specific gene of two bacterial strains that belong to different genera may be due to horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between bacteria. HGT can occur through transformation (bacteria absorbing free DNA), conjugation (between bacteria, mediated by plasmid) and transduction (between bacteria and virus). Rhizobia plasmids carry genes related to functions including nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixing, and are transferrable [30]. Studies have shown that rhizobia plasmids can be replicated and expressed in non-rhizobia including P. aeruginosa [31] and Agrobacterium tumefaciens [32]. Why is there the high homology between the nodA and nifH genes of strain D5 and those of Bradyrhizobium? One possible explanation could be that the symbiotic nodulation gene nodA and the nitrogen-fixing gene nifH carried by rhizobia plasmids are transferred between bacteria through conjugation, and that these genes are replicated and expressed in strain D5, equipping strain D5 with the ability to nodulate plants and fix nitrogen. To test this hypothesis further investigations on Bradyrhizobium plasmids and the mechanism of its conjugation with strain D5 are needed. This study sets foundation for future research, and provides scientific basis for investigations on HGT and gene recombination.

Materials and Methods

Strain

Strain D5 was isolated from nodules of A. confusa. The sampling location was at Chongzuo, Guangxi (21°36′ to 23°22′ N and 106°33′ to 108°6′ E). There is a wide stratigraphic distribution of limestone in this region. The sample was collected from a shallow and dry soil horizon.

The stored strain was cultured in a shaking flask containing YMB medium for 5∼7 d (28°C, 120 r/min) to be activated [14].

Inoculation and Cross-inoculation Experiments

The inoculation experiments were performed under strict sterile conditions. The inoculated plants were A. confusa, A. crassicarpa, A. mangium and Glycine max (Linn.) Merr. To avoid infections caused by microorganisms in the soil, Acacia seeds were directly collected from the trees; they were then subject to surface sterilization twice as follows: soaked in 75% ethanol for 1–2 min, rinsed by sterile water for 4 times, soaked in 0.1% acidic mercuric chloride solution for 7–8 min, rinsed by sterile water for 6 times. Inoculation of strain D5 and seedling cultivation was carried out in fully enclosed settings. In each plant 2 ml logarithmic-phase culture of strain D5 was used for inoculation, and 10 plants for each species were used. Plants that were not inoculated or inoculated with other Pseudomonas strains were used as the control [33].

Measurement of Nitrogenase Activity

The nodules of A. confusa are relatively small in size. In order to avoid loss of nitrogenase activity when removing the nodules from the plants, the intact root system containing the nodules was placed in a 10 ml small bottle, and acetylene reduction method was used to measure nitrogenase activity. Each measurement was repeated twice. Un-inoculated root systems were used as controls. The nitrogenase activity was calculated using the following formula [33]:

E (nmol C2H4·g−1 biomass·min−1) = K×ethylene peak height for sample (µV) × volume of reaction bulb (µL)/ethylene peak height for standard (µV) × loading volume of sample ethyne (µL) × biomass (g) × reaction time (min), where, K is a constant.

Total DNA Extraction from the Strain

Bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit manufactured by Beijing Tiangen Bio Inc. was used for total DNA extraction. First 2 ml logarithmic-phase culture of strain D5 was centrifuged at 10000 rpm to collected precipitated biomass; DNA was extracted following the kit instruction and then subject to 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis; the absorption values of the nucleic acids were used for concentration and purity measurements.

PCR of 16S rRNA

The primers used were as follows: forward primer Pf (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCA TGG CTC AG-3′), and reverse primer Pr (5′-TAC GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACTT-3′).

The totals volume of PCR mixture was 50 µl, including: template DNA 2 µl, 10 µmol/L forward primer Pf and reverse primer Pr 2 µl each, 10×PCR buffer 5 µl, 2.5 mmol/L dNTP 4 µl, Taq polymerase 2U; dd H2O was added to make a total volume of 50 µl.

Reaction conditions: denaturation: 96°C 2 min, denaturation: 95°C 40 s, renaturation: 54°C 50 s, extension 72°C 1.5 min, 30 cycles, extension: 72°C 5 min.

PCR of nodA Gene

Forward primer for nodA gene amplification was nodA-1(5′-TGC RGT GGA ARN TRN NCT GGG AAA-3′), and the reverse primer was nodA-2(5′-GGN CCG TCR TCR AAW GTC ARG TA-3′).

The totals volume of PCR mixture was 25 µl, including: template DNA 2 µl, 10 µmol/L forward primer nodA-1 and reverse primer nodA-2 1 µl each, 10×PCR buffer 2.5 µl, 2.5 mmol/L dNTP 2 µl, Taq polymerase 1U; dd H2O was added to make a total volume of 25 µl.

Reaction conditions: denaturation: 94°C 5 min, denaturation: 94°C 30 s, annealing: 50°C 45 s, extension 72°C 60 s, 34 cycles, extension: 72°C 5 min.

PCR of nifH Gene

Forward primer for nifH gene was nifH-f (5′-AAA GGY GGW ATC GGY AAR TCC ACC AC-3′), and the reverse primer was nifH-r (5′-TTG TTS GCS GCR TAC ATS GCC ATC AT-3′).

The totals volume of PCR mixture was 25 µl, including: template DNA 2 µl, 10 µmol/L forward primer nifH-f and reverse primer nifH-r 1 µl each, 10×PCR buffer 2.5 µl, 2.5 mmol/L dNTP 2 µl, Taq polymerase 1U; dd H2O was added to make a total volume of 25 µl.

Reaction conditions: denaturation: 94°C 3 min, denaturation: 94°C 45 s, renaturation: 65°C 45 s, extension 72°C 2 min, 33 cycles, extension: 72°C 7 min.

Examination of PCR Products

After PCR reaction was over, 2.5 µl amplification sample was loaded to 1.2% agarose gel for electrophoresis at 100 V. Amplification samples showing bright, pure, specific electrophoretic bands were sent to Beijing Sainuo Biotech Service Inc. for sequencing.

Gene Sequence Analysis

We logged into NCBI to access GenBank for sequence similarity analysis and homology comparison of the obtained 16S rRNA, nodA and nifH gene sequences. We then used CLUSTALX for multiple sequence comparison, and MEGA4.0 software to construct the phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA, nodA or nifH gene sequence. Reference strains and their accession numbers used for sequence similarity and homology comparisons were all from GenBank.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BLH. Performed the experiments: CQL YLZ. Analyzed the data: YLZ RH. Wrote the paper: CQL BLH.

References

  1. 1. Trujillo ME, Willems A, Abril A, Planchuelo AM, Rivas R, et al. (2005) Nodulation of Lupinus albus by Strains of Ochrobactrum lupinisp. nov. Appled and Environmental Microbiology 71(3): 1318–1327.
  2. 2. Moulin L, Munive A, Dreyfus B, Boivin-Masson C (2001) Nodulation of legumes by members of the beta-subclass of proteobacteria. Nature 411: 948–950.
  3. 3. Chen WM, Laevens S, Lee TM, Coenye T, DeVos P, et al. (2001) Ralstonia taiwanensis sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of Mimosa species and sputum of a cystic fibrosis patient. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51(5): 1729–1735.
  4. 4. Vandamme P, Goris J, Chen WM, de Vos P, Willems A (2002) Burkholderiatuberum sp. nov. and Burkholderia phymatum sp. nov., nodulate the roots of tropical legumes. Syst. Applied Microbiology 25(4): 507–512.
  5. 5. Zurdo-Pineiro JL, Rivas R, Trujillo ME, Vizcaino N, Carrasco JA, et al. (2007) Ochrobactrum cytisi sp. nov., isolated from nodules of Cytisus scoparius in Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57(4): 784–788.
  6. 6. Mantelin S, Saux MF, Zakhia F, Béna G, Bonneau S, et al. (2006) Emended description of the genus Phyllobacterium and description of fournovel species associated with plant roots: Phyllobacterium bourgognense sp. nov., Phyllobacterium ifriqiyense sp. nov., Phyllobacterium legum inum sp. nov. and Phyllobacterium brassicacearum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evo Microbiol 56(4): 827–839.
  7. 7. Lu CQ, Huang BL, Wei YL, Wu B, Ye JR (2003) Biological characteristic of the indigenous Rhizobia isolated from Acacia spp. In GuangXi. Microbiology 30(4): 1–5.
  8. 8. Huang BL, Lu CQ, Wei YL, Ye JR, Wu B, et al. (2004) A Study on some tolerance to stresses of Acacia Rhizobium. Journal of NanJing Forestry University 28(1): 29–32.
  9. 9. Shang JH, Kang LH, Luo YP, Jiang YG, Ma HB (2005) Study of medium optimization of Acacia Rhizobium and nitrogenase Activity. Biotechnology 15(1): 72–74.
  10. 10. Shang JH, Kang LH, Luo YP, Jiang YG, Ma HB (2005) Medium optimization of Acacia Rhizobia and phosphobacteria and the study of phosphate-dissolving ability. Forest Reaearch 18(2): 177–182.
  11. 11. Wei YL, Huang BL, Lv CQ, Zhang H, Fan LQ, et al. (2006) Biological characteristics of Rhizobiain Acacia mangium. Journal of Northwest Forestry University 21(5): 120–124.
  12. 12. Wang XD, Kang LH, Mao HL, Jiang YG, Ma HB (2006) Study on antibiotic resistance and plasmid profiles of two high efficient strains of Rhizobium sp. Acacia. Biotechnology 16(1): 24–26.
  13. 13. Fan LQ, Wu QB, Huang BL, Lv CQ, Xie YC (2007) Biological characteristics of rhizobia in Acacia cincinnata. Ecologic Science 26(2): 107–110.
  14. 14. Lv CQ, Lu JK, Huang BL, Sun YS, Li XH (2008) Biological characteristics of the rhizobia isolated from Acacia confusa grew in the karst environment. Microbiology 35(2): 215–219.
  15. 15. de Lajudie P, Willems A, Nick G, Moreira F, Molouba F, et al. (1998) Characterization of tropical tree rhizobia and description of Mesorhizbium plurifarium sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48(2): 369–382.
  16. 16. Wang SY, Yang XL, Li HF, Liu J (2006) Diversity of rhizobium bacteria isolated from the root-nodules of Leguminous trees. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 46(1): 132–135.
  17. 17. Trinick MJ (1965) Medicago sativa nodulation with Leucaena leucocephala root nodule bacteria. Aust. J. Sci.27: 263 264.
  18. 18. Trinick MJ (1968) Nodulation of tropical legumes specificity in the rhizobium symbiosis of Leucaena leucocepha. Experimental Agriculture 4: 243–253.
  19. 19. Trinick MJ (1980) Relationship amongst the fast growing rhizobia Leucaena leucocepha app. J.Appl.Bacteriol 49: 39–53.
  20. 20. Lv CQ, Huang BL, Zhuang PL, Wu B (2006) 16S rDNA and nifA gene sequence analysis of rhizobium strain HJ06 isolated from Acacia crassicarpa. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 14(1): 19–24.
  21. 21. Huang BL, Lu CQ, Yu YC, Zhang H, Wu B (2006) 16S rDNA sequence analysis of representative strains HJ06 and JJ06 of two rhizobia isolated from Acacia crassicarpa and A.cincinnata. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 28(5): 102–106.
  22. 22. Wang FQ, Zhang YF, Liu J, Song AD, Liu QJ, et al. (2008) Comparison of phylogeny analysis methods for rhizobia asolated from Albizia spp., Acacia spp.and Leucaena leucocephala. Acta Microbiologica Sinica 48(1): 1–7.
  23. 23. Yi YJ, Yin HQ, Luo K, Liu XD, Liu EM (2007) Isolation and identification of endophytic Brevibacillus brevis and its biocontrol effect against tobacco bacterial wilt. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica 37(3): 301–306.
  24. 24. Chen WX, Wang ET, Chen WF (2004) The relationship between the symbiotic promiscuity of rhizobia and legumes and their geographical environments. Scientia Agricultura Sinca, 37(1): 81∼86.
  25. 25. Yan YL, Yang J, Dou Y, Ping SZ, Wang YP, et al. (2008) Genome structure and functional annotation of nitrogen-fixing Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 10(5): 45–52.
  26. 26. Desnoues N, Lin M, Guo X, Ma L, Ricardo CL, et al. (2003) Nitrogen fixation genetics and regulation in a Pseudomonas stutzeri strain associated with rice. Microbiology 149: 2251–2262.
  27. 27. Yan Y, Yang J, Dou Y, Chen M, Ping S, et al. (2008) Nitrogen fixation island and rhizosphere competence traits in the genome of the root-associated Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105(21): 7564–7569.
  28. 28. Xie Z, Dou Y, Ping S, Chen M, Wang GY, et al. (2006) Interaction between NifL and NifA in the nitrogen fixing Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501. Microbiology 152: 3535–3542.
  29. 29. He S, Chen M, Xie Z, Yan Y, Li H, et al.. (2008) Involvement of GlnK, a P (II) protein, in control of nitrogen fixation and ammonia assimilation in Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501. Arch Microbiol. DO I, 10. 1007/s00203–008–0354-x.
  30. 30. Miao LR, Zhou JC (2007) Advance on the study of rhizobial plasmid. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University 26(3): 428–434.
  31. 31. Plazinski J, Rolfe BG (1985) Sym plasmid genes of Rhizobium trifolii expressed in Lignobacter and Pseudomonas strains. J Bacteriol 162(3): 1261–1269.
  32. 32. Hooykaas PJ, Brussel AA, Dulk-ras H (1981) Sym plasmid of Rhizobium trifolii expressed in different rhizobial species and Agrobacterium fumefaciers. Nature 291: 351–353.
  33. 33. Hang BL, Lu CQ, Wu B, Fan LQ (2007) A rhizobia strain isolated from root nodule of gymnosperm podocarpus macrophyllus. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences 50(2): 228–233.