Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

BmTGIF, a Bombyx mori Homolog of Drosophila DmTGIF, Regulates Progression of Spermatogenesis

  • Pengjie Zhang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Pengjie Zhang, Guangli Cao

    Affiliation School of Biology and Basic Medical Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China

  • Guangli Cao ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Pengjie Zhang, Guangli Cao

    Affiliations School of Biology and Basic Medical Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China, National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China

  • Jie Sheng,

    Affiliation School of Biology and Basic Medical Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China

  • Renyu Xue,

    Affiliations School of Biology and Basic Medical Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China, National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China

  • Chengliang Gong

    Affiliations School of Biology and Basic Medical Science, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China, National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China

BmTGIF, a Bombyx mori Homolog of Drosophila DmTGIF, Regulates Progression of Spermatogenesis

  • Pengjie Zhang, 
  • Guangli Cao, 
  • Jie Sheng, 
  • Renyu Xue, 
  • Chengliang Gong


TG-interacting factor (TGIF) in Drosophila consists of two tandemly-repeated genes, achintya (Dmachi) and vismay (Dmvis), which act as transcriptional activators in Drosophila spermatogenesis. In contrast, TGIF in humans is a transcriptional repressor that binds directly to DNA or interacts with corepressors to repress the transcription of target genes. In this study, we investigated the characteristics and functions of BmTGIF, a Bombyx mori homolog of DmTGIF. Like DmTGIF, BmTGIF is predominantly expressed in the testes and ovaries. Four alternatively spliced isoforms could be isolated from testes, and two isoforms from ovaries. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction indicated BmTGIF was abundantly expressed in the testis of 3rd instar larvae, when the testis is almost full of primary spermatocytes. The results of luciferase assays indicated that BmTGIF contains two adjacent acidic domains that activate the transcription of reporter genes. Immunofluorescence assay in BmN cells showed that the BmTGIF protein was located mainly in the nucleus, and paraffin sections of testis showed BmTGIF was grossly expressed in primary spermatocytes and mature sperms. Consistent with the role of DmVis in Drosophila development, BmTGIF significantly affected spermatid differentiation, as indicated by hematoxylin-eosin staining of paraffin sections of testis from BmTGIF-small interfering RNA (siRNA)-injected male silkworms. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggested that BmTGIF interacted with BmAly, and that they may recruit other factors to form a complex to regulate the genes required for meiotic divisions and spermatid differentiation. The results of this analysis of BmTGIF will improve our understanding of the mechanism of spermatid differentiation in B. mori, with potential applications for pest control.


Homeodomain proteins were first discovered in Drosophila where they are responsible for regulating segment identity. They have subsequently been found in diverse species and multiple organisms as transcription factors, such as members of the HOX family, where they play important roles in the regulation of tissue-specific and developmental processes [1−5]. The homeodomain comprising about 60 amino acids is a conserved module in proteins, and consists of three helices [1], [6].The first two helices are usually involved in protein-protein interactions, which can alter the DNA-binding specificity [7−9], while the third helix, which regulates DNA-binding, usually binds to relatively simple DNA sequences. The third position of the conserved WF_N sequence in helix 3 has been shown to be important for determining the DNA-binding sequence specificity. PBC, HOX and Prep1 proteins contain a glycine, glutamine and isoleucine amino acid at this position, respectively [10−12]. Homeodomain proteins can be classified into different groups based on the homeodomain sequence, the flanking amino acids, and the other regions. One such group is the TALE group [1], the superfamily homeodomain proteins of which are characterized by the presence of three amino acids between helix 1 and helix 2, resulting in a 63-amino acid homeodomain, instead of the more typical 60. The three amino acids in the PBC TALE subgroup are Leu Ser Asn [13], compared to Arg Tyr Asn in the TG-interacting factor (TGIF) subgroup [14]. Although there are three amino acids between the first two helices, the insertion is unlikely to affect DNA-binding, and may conversely play a role in protein-protein interactions [13], [15], [16]. The TALE homeodomain proteins are an ancient family represented in organisms as diverse as yeast and humans. They act as transcription factors, usually together with other transcription factors, and exert their effects on the expression of required genes by both activating and repressing their transcriptional activities [7], [12], . Members of this superfamily of proteins include yeast MATα2 [22], maize Knotted-1 [23], Caenorhabditis elegans ceh-25, the fly Iroquois complex genes [24], the human protooncogene PBX 1 [19], [21], and the transcription factors TGIF [10] and MEIS 1 [20].

TGIF, which has been identified as a transcription factor in many distinct pathways, forms a subgroup of TALE homeodomain proteins. TGIF was first identified as a transcriptional repressor that competed with retinoid receptors for binding to the retinoid response element (RXRE) of the cellular retinol binding protein II (CRBP II) gene, resulting in reduced expression of the CRBP II gene. The consensus sequence responsible for binding to TGIF has been determined in vitro [10]. Apart from binding to the DNA-binding sequence alone via its homeodomain, TGIF has also been shown to work with Smad proteins, which are critical transcription factors, in response to transforming growth factor β signaling, to repress the transcriptional activity of target genes [10], . In humans, mutations in TGIF are associated with holoprosencephaly (HPE), a severe genetic disease affecting craniofacial development [30], [31]. Recent studies in Drosophila have demonstrated that dTGIF is transcriptional activator of genes required for spermatogenesis. Loss of function mutations in dTGIF resulted in arrest of testis development at the primary spermatocyte stage, prior to entering meiotic divisions and spermatid differentiation, and also in delayed egg laying [14], [32], [33].

Spermatogenesis represents a dramatic example of developmental control of gene expression, and many genes required for this process are only switched on in this cell type. Some are germline-specific homologs of ubiquitously-expressed genes, e.g., β2 tubulin and the mitochondrial fusion protein fzo [34], [35], while others are spermatogenesis specific genes, e.g., protamine and gonadal [36], [37]. Drosophila spermatogenesis is maintained from the larval stage to adult life, and all stages of differentiation occur in a single adult testis [38]. Also in Drosophila, several reports have shown that meiotic divisions and spermatid differentiation are mediated by the activity of meiotic-arrest genes, although the initiation of spermiogenesis is independent of meiotic divisions. A few meiotic-arrest-class genes have been studied to date in Drosophila, including always early (aly), cannonball (can), meiosis I arrest (mia), spermatocyte arrest (sa), no-hitter (nht), cookie monster (comr), achintya/vismay (achi/vis), matotopetli (topi) and tombola (tomb) [33], .

In the silkworm Bombyx mori, spermatogenesis has been well studied at the ultrastructural level [45], [46]. Six mitotic divisions of a spermatogonial cell produce a cyst of 64 primary spermatocytes,which immediately undergo premeiotic S stage. They then enter an extended G2 period, following by meiotic divisions and consequently generates a cyst with 256 spermatids. Although the molecular mechanism of Drosophila spermatogenesis has been extensively investigated, the situation in Lepidoptera is less well known [47], [48]. The genome sequence of B. mori, as a model of Lepidopteran insect, has been well established [49], [50], and many genes related to growth, development, metamorphosis, immunologic response, and fibroin synthesis have been well studied. However, little is known regarding genes related to spermatogenesis. Like Drosophila, spermatogenesis in B. mori also occurs throughout larval and adult life, from spermatogonia in newly-hatched silkworms to mature sperm in the moth. Unfortunately, the mechanisms that regulate cell-cycle progression and cellular differentiation of testis development in B. mori have not been elucidated in detail. In this study, we characterized BmTGIF, a homolog of the Drosophila meiotic-arrest gene DmVis, and demonstrated that BmTGIF also acts as a meiotic-arrest gene regulating meiotic progressions and spermatid differentiation.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Kunming mice were obtained from the Center for Experimental Animal, Soochow University (Certificate No. 20020008, Grade II), and the animals tolerated the subcutaneous injection well, no deaths occurred in the procedure. The Ethical Committee of Soochow University specifically approved the current study.

Insects and Cell Culture

The non-diapausing Dazao strain of B. mori was used for RNA interference studies. Larvae were reared on fresh mulberry leaves at 25°C. The BmN cell line derived from the ovary of silkworms was cultured at 25°C in TC-100 insect medium (US Biological) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, USA).

RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was isolated from the testes of fifth instar silkworm larvae using a total RNA Isolation Kit (TaKaRa, DaLian, China), followed by treatment with DNaseI to remove possible contamination with genomic DNA. cDNA was synthesized by PrimeScript™ Reverse Transcriptase (TaKaRa), following standard instructions.

Cloning and Sequencing of the BmTGIF Gene

The BmTGIF gene-specific primers BmTGIF-1 and BmTGIF-2 contain BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites at their 5′ ends, respectively. The primers were designed according to the hypothetical BmTGIF gene cDNA sequence, which was obtained through in silico cloning based on DmVis protein sequences (GenBank accession no. AAO41402), using the tBLASTn program ( Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out using the synthesized cDNA as a template and the paired primers BmTGIF-1/BmTGIF-2. The PCR product was subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis and the recombinant plasmids were sequenced after the recovered PCR product was cloned into the vector pMD19-T (TaKaRa).

PCR was also carried out with primers BmTGIF-1/BmTGIF-3 to analyze alternatively-spliced isoforms of BmTGIF. The sequences were deposited in GenBank.

Bioinformatics Analysis

A homology search and multiple alignments were carried out using BLAST ( and the ClustalW software program [51], respectively. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 5.0 and the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [52], based on the TGIF entire protein sequences retrieved from GenBank. The validity of the various branches of the trees was tested by bootstrapping using 500 replicates.

BmTGIF-L Expression in Escherichia coli and BmTGIF-L Antibody Preparation

The BmTGIF PCR product (1.1 kb) (BmTGIF-L) was digested with BamHI/EcoRI and ligated with the expression vector pET-28a(+) (Novagen) to generate the recombinant plasmid pET-28a(+)-BmTGIF-L. Fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli strain BL21. The recombinant protein purified using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagene, Shanghai, China) was used to immunize Kunming mice (Soochow University, Suzhou, China) by subcutaneous injection. The prepared antibody was then identified by Western blotting.

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western Blotting

The bacterium transformed with pET-28a (+)-BmTGIF was mixed with 2 × SDS loading buffer (0.1 mol/L TrisCl, 0.2 mol/L dithiothreitol, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 4% β-mercaptoethanol) and boiled in 100°C water for 5 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 g for 3 min, the supernatant was electrophoresed on acrylamide gels. The stacking and separating gels were 5% (v/v) and 12% (v/v), respectively. The gel for protein staining was treated with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250. The gel for Western blotting was transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane using an electrophoretic transfer cell. Western blotting was then performed using a prepared mouse anti-BmTGIF-L primary antibody and a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Biosynthesis Biotechnology, Beijing, China).

Western blotting was also used to detect BmTGIF in testes and ovaries, about 20 testes and ovaries were independently dissected using protein lysis buffer, the lysates of them were then put into 2×SDS sample buffer for SDS-PAGE followed by western blotting detection.

Expression Analysis

For BmTGIF expression profile analysis, RNA was extracted from heads, hemocytes, midgut, fat bodies, malpighian tubules, silk glands, testes and ovaries of B. mori. cDNAs were synthesized by reverse transcription with 1 µg of this RNA, using PrimeScript™ Reverse Transcriptase (TaKaRa). Before reverse transcription, the mRNA samples were fully digested with RNase-free DNaseI to avoid genomic DNA contamination. Primers ReTGIF-1 and ReTGIF-2 were designed based on the cDNA sequences. ReBmactin3-1 and ReBmactin3-2 were used as primers for amplifying the housekeeping gene B. mori actin A3, used as an internal control. PCR was carried out according to the following program: one cycle at 95°C for 3 min; 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 59°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s; one final cycle at 72°C for 10 min. The product was then analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) was used to determine the expression levels of BmTGIF-L in the testes at different stages using primers ReTGIF-1/ReTGIF-2 and ReBmactin3-1/ReBmactin3-2. A 20-µl volume containing 0.2 µg cDNA, 5 pmol of each primer, and 10 µL of SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (ABI, USA) was used for Q-PCR reaction. Q-PCR was carried out using a real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR System (ABI 7300) according to the following program: one cycle at 50°C for 2 min; one cycle at 95°C for 10 min; 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 1 min; one final cycle for dissociation at 95°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 95°C for 15 sec. This experiment was repeated three times.

To determine the relative amounts of the various alternatively-spliced isoforms in the testes at the beginning of the fifth instar larvae, Q-PCR was carried out using different primer pairs of FJ643616, FJ913885, FJ913886, and GQ120180.

Luciferase Reporter Assay

A plasmid pSK-IE(S) containing the B. mori nucleopolyhedrovirus ie-1 promoter (GenBank accession No. AY616665) was used to generate luciferase assay plasmids pIE-A1, pIE-A2 and pIE-A1+2. In these plasmids, the protein sequence corresponding to the acidic domains 1 (A1, at position 190–268 of the longest BmTGIF isoform), 2 (A2, at position 282–360 of the longest BmTGIF isoform) and 1+2 (A1+A2) of BmTGIF that containing the initiation codon ATG and stop codon TAG. A luciferase gene (luc) was cloned into the plasmid pSK-IE containing the ie-1 promoter with the TGIF target sequence CTGTCAA to generate the firefly luciferase reporter plasmid pIE-luc. pSK-IE was used as a blank control, and the internal control luciferase plasmid pRL-TK [53], in which the Renilla luciferase gene (Rluc) is driven by the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) promoter.

BmN cells were cotransfected with the plasmid pIE-luc (1 µg) and the other above-mentioned plasmids (2 µg) using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). At 60 h post-transfection, the cells were harvested and the luciferase activities were measured using a luminometer (GLOMAX-MULTI JR, Promega) and a Dual-Lucy Assay Kit (Vigorous, China). Various doses of plasmid pIE-A2 (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 µg) were tested to detect dose-dependent effects of BmTGIF on luciferase activity. All luciferase assay experiments were performed with co-transfection of Renilla (pRL-TK) (100 ng) as an internal control. Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and the data represent means ± SD of three independent experiments after normalization to Renilla activity.


The BmTGIF-specific siRNA-4 (sense: 5′ ccguuacacuacacgaucutt 3′, antisense: 5′ agaucguguaguguaacggtt 3′) which targeted exon 3 of BmTGIF-L, was synthesized by Gima Corporation (Shanghai, China). A total number of 40 silkworm larvae were injected with 1 µg of BmTGIF-siRNA-4 per larva at the first day of the third, fourth and fifth instars, and reared on fresh mulberry at 25°C. The expression level of BmTGIF-L in the testes of injected larvae at the end of the fifth instar was estimated by Q-PCR. Meanwhile, Blank controls that raised normally and NC-siRNA (sense: 5′ uucuccgaacgugucacgutt 3′, antisense: 5′ acgugacacguucggagaatt 3′) were tested. Besides detecting the BmTGIF-L mRNA level among them, Western blotting was also used to detect the BmTGIF-L protein production.

Immunofluorescence and Histochemical Observations

BmN cells and paraffin sections of testes at pupal stage (10 days after pupation) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, then rinsed with 0.01 M PBST (0.05% Tween-20 in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline) and incubated with a mouse anti-BmTGIF-L antibody at 4°C overnight. At the same time, BmN cells/paraffin sections of testes were incubated with pre-immune antiserum as a negative control. After rinsing three times with 0.01 M PBST, the BmN cells/paraffin sections were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Tiangen) at 37°C for 1 h, then observed by fluorescence microscopy after removing the non-combined FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).

For histochemical observations, the larvae were injected with 1 µg of BmTGIF-siRNA-4 per larva at the beginning of the third, fourth and fifth instars. The testes were dissected from the injected larvae at the beginning, at the end of the fifth instar larvae, and at 10 days after pupation, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. The sections were then stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) solution for observation. Uninjected blank controls were prepared simultaneously.


Approximately 30 testes were dissected in 100 ml RIPA buffer(50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP40, and 1 mM PMSF) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and 2.5 mM Na3VO4 (Sigma). Testes extracts were obtained by removing cell debris by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 3 min, and the lysates were then precleared with pre-immune antiserum (Kunming mice) for 30 min, and protein G Plus/Protein A Agarose for a further 30 min. Precelared proteins and BmTGIF antibody were mixed at 1∶100 dilution and incubated at 4°C overnight, followed by addition of 50 µl protein G Plus/Protein A Agarose Suspension (Calbiochem, Germany) and incubation for an additional 3 h. Samples were then washed three times with washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) and the immune complexes were mixed with sample-loading buffer (0.1 mol/L TrisCl, 0.2 mol/L dithiothreitol, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.2% bromophenol blue, 4% β-mercaptoethanol) for 5 min at 100°C and analyzed by SDS–PAGE. Western blotting was performed with anti-BmAly antibody (1∶100) and secondary HRP-conjugated antibody (Amersham Biosciences). Conversely, testes extracts were incubated with BmAly antibody (saved in our laboratory) for SDS-PAGE. Western blotting with BmTGIF antibody was performed simultaneously. For controls, the protein samples were obtained by mixing testes extracts with pre-immune antiserum (Kunming mice) and protein G Plus/Protein A Agarose. Western blotting was performed as same as above mentioned.


Splicing of BmTGIF gene in Testes and Ovaries

The BmTGIF gene sequence was obtained by in silico cloning. Primer pairs BmTGIF-1/BmTGIF-2 were designed according to the hypothetical BmTGIF gene cDNA sequence, and used for cloning the BmTGIF gene. Three specific products (1.1, 0.47 and 0.32 kb) were amplified from testes cDNA, but only one product (1.1 kb) from ovary cDNA. Sequencing results showed that the ovary sequence was the same as the largest fragment from the testes, 1083 bp (FJ643616), encoding a protein (BmTGIF-L) with 360 amino acid residues. The two smaller fragments of 315 (FJ913885), and 468 (FJ913886) bp encoded proteins BmTGIF-MS1 and BmTGIF-MS2, of 104 and 155 amino acid residues, respectively. To investigate other possible isoforms, an internal primer BmTGIF-3 was designed according to the BmTGIF-L sequence. PCR was carried out with the primer pairs BmTGIF-1/BmTGIF-3 and a 0.24-kb fragment was amplified from sexual gland cDNA. Sequencing showed that this fragment was 240 bp (GQ120180), and the sequence differed from the sequences mentioned above.

To analyze the protein products derived from BmTGIF we used the anti-BmTGIF-L antibody in western blotting experiments. A band with apparent molecular mass of ∼55 kDa (BmTGIF-L) was detected in both the lysates of testes and ovaries (Fig. 1C). However, other spliced isoforms were not detected in the testes and ovaries, this maybe ascribed to the expression level of other spliced isforms that was too low to be detected.

Figure 1. The gene structure and expression patterns of BmTGIF in sexual glands.

(A) The BmTGIF gene structure and alternative splicing products determined at mRNA level by complete sequencing of the following cDNAs: FJ643616 (BmTGIF-L), FJ913885 (BmTGIF-MS1), FJ913886 (BmTGIF-MS2), and GQ120180 (BmTGIF-S). The numbers are indicated above, the distances are indicated below. The juctions of alternative spliced variants are marked as indicated. The gene of BmTGIF is located at a contig BABH01028865 of B. mori genome, predicted E6c and E7 was obtained by blasting FJ643616 with ESTs of B. mori, resulting three ESTs (CK564126, DC564285, DB674187) could be assembled together. The predicted E6c and E7 are boxed with dashed line to distinguish from the sequenced exons. ORF of BmTGIF was indicated in the schematic, consisting of six exons as a molecular weight of 1083 nt. HD (homeodomain) locates at the position of 310 to 480 nt, which spans parts of E2 and E3. The primers used to detect the alternative splicing products was named P1 (BmTGIF-1), P2 (BmTGIF-2), and P3 (BmTGIF-3) as indicated in Table 1, locating at 5′ terminal of exon 1, 3′ terminal of exon 6, and 3′ terminal of exon 5, respectively. In testes (♂), all the four spliced variants were found; while in ovaries (♀), only FJ643616 (BmTGIF-L) and GQ120180 (BmTGIF-S) were detected. As for GQ120180, there maybe two spliced isoforms existed, by which exon E5b ligated to end, the two predicted alternative spliced ways for GQ120180 were marked with dashed line. (B) Prokaryotic expression and Western blotting for BmTGIF polyclonal antibody specificity. M, protein marker; lane 1, SDS-PAGE of Pet-28a (+)-BmTGIF expressed in E. coli BL21, a specific band was detected at about 52 kDa; lane 2, E. coli strain BL21 transformed with Pet-28a (+); lane 1′, Western blotting was performed with primary antibody mouse anti-BmTGIF-L followed by secondary antibody HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. A prominent band corresponding to lane 1 occurred; lane 2′, Western blotting corresponding to lane 2. (C) The alternative splicing products were determined at protein level by western blotting using BmTGIF-L antibody. In both testes and ovaries, only the product of BmTGIF-L is observed that appears to migrate slightly slower than the predicted 40 kDa, about 55 kDa; the reason for this maybe glycosylation or other modifications after translation.

Blast search showed that FJ643616 was overlapped with EST sequences (CK564126, DC564285, DB674187) and followed by 119 bp of 3′ untranslated region. The BmTGIF cDNA sequence with 3′ untranslated region was compared to the genomic sequence of B. mori using the BlastN program ( The results showed that the genomic sequence of BmTGIF was completely located in a genomic DNA fragment (BABH01028865) (Fig. 1A); The open reading frame (ORF) of the longest isoform BmTGIF-L (FJ643616) has six exons, both exon 6c and exon 7 were untranslated sequence; while exons 3–5 are in the sequence FJ643616, but not in the sequence of BmTGIF-MS1 (FJ913885). ORF of BmTGIF-MS1 was composed of exon 1, exon 2a, exon 2b and exon 6b in FJ643616. Exons 3–4 in the sequence of FJ643616 were not in BmTGIF-MS2 (FJ913886), while exon 2 of BmTGIF-MS2 was composed of exon 2a, exon 2b and exon 2c in FJ643616, exon 3 and 4 of BmTGIF-MS2 were exon 5b and exon 6 in FJ643616, respectively. In the BmTGIF-S sequence, its 5′ terminal sequence was composed of exon 1, 2a and 5b of sequence FJ643616, but the splicing form at 3′ terminal was undetermined, if exon 5b was followed by exon 6b, the deduced ORF of BmTGIF was 342 bp in length, encoding a protein with 113 amino acid residues, if exon 5b was followed by exon 6, the stop codon TGA was appeared at 3′ terminal of exon 7, the deduced ORF of BmTGIF was 477 bp in length, encoding a protein with 158 amino acid residues.

Protein Expression in E. coli and BmTGIF Antibody Preparation

E. coli transformed with pET-28a(+)-BmTGIF were induced with isopropyl-β-D-thio-galactoside for a further 6 h at 37°C after reaching the logarithmic phase. Harvested bacteria were subjected to SDS-PAGE to detect BmTGIF-L expression, and a specific band of about 52 kDa representing 6×His-BmTGIF fusion protein was detected (Fig. 1B, lane 1), indicating that BmTGIF was correctly expressed in E. coli. The recombinant protein was then purified using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagene), and was used to immunize mice to prepare polyclonal antibody.

Western blotting was used to assess the efficacy of the prepared mouse anti-BmTGIF antibody. As expected, a specific band representing the 6×His-BmTGIF fusion protein was also detected at the position of the recombinant protein (Fig. 1B, lane 1′), indicating that the prepared antibody was suitable for further studies.

BmTGIF-L is a TALE Homeodomain Protein

Sequence comparisons of BmTGIF proteins showed that the 66 (exon 1, 2a) amino acid residues at the amino-terminal were conserved among the four BmTGIF isoforms, while 32 (exon 6b) amino acid residues at the carboxy-terminal were conserved among three BmTGIF isoforms (BmTGIF-L, BmTGIF-MS1 and BmTGIF-MS2).

Structural analysis showed that there were three helices (positions 95–160), a carboxy terminal to the helices (positions 161–176) (Fig. 2A), and two acidic domains (positions 190–268 and 282–360) in the BmTGIF-L protein, while three amino acid residues (RYN), a characteristic sequence of TALE superfamily homeodomain proteins, were also located between helix 1 and helix 2 (Fig. 2A). Moreover, WF_N, the key residue between F and N residues that is usually considered to be important in determining the DNA-binding-sequence specificity [11], [54], [55], was present in helix 3 (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2. Sequence analysis of BmTGIF.

(A) Sequence comparison showed that the homeodomain and adjacent carboxy-terminal region are conserved among the tested species. Vertical line indicates the carboxy-terminal limit of the homeodomain; the TALE amino acids, RYN, which are characteristic of the TGIF families are indicated by a black box; the DNA-binding-determining residue between F and N in WFIN are indicated by a red box. (B) The full amino acid sequences of TGIF were used to construct the phylogenetic tree using a NJ program with bootstrapping using 500 replicates. The bootstrap values are shown on each internal node. Bm, Bombyx mori; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Nv, Nasonia vitripennis; Ag, Anopheles gambiae; Am, Apis mellifera; Hs, Homo sapiens; Mm, Mus musculus; Dr, Danio rerio; Aa, Aedes aegypti; Cq, Culex quinquefasciatus; Tc, Tribolium castaneum; Ph, Pediculus humanus corporis; Dp, Daphnia pulex; Xl, Xenopus laevis.

The deduced amino acid sequence of BmTGIF-L was aligned with those of 13 other species. BmTGIF-L shared 38.5, 41.9, 36.1, 34.0, 52.0, 45.4, 38.8, 32.3, 31.5, 30.2, 30.5, 33.3 and 32.5% similarity with TGIF of Aedes aegypti (XP_001653660), Culex quinquefasciatus (XP_001849992), Anopheles gambiae (XP_308755), D. melanogaster (NP_725182), Tribolium castaneum (NP_001153689), Apis mellifera (XP_001122713), Pediculus humanus corporis (XP_002425861), Nasonia vitripennis (NP_001153690), Daphnia pulex (EFX88970), Xenopus laevis (NP_001087637), Danio rerio (NP_955861), Homo sapiens (NP_068581) and Mus musculus (NP_775572), respectively. Although the sequence identities of the TGIF proteins from different species were not high, three conserved helixes and one adjacent C-domain were prominent (Fig. 2A).

Based on the high degree of similarity of the homeodomain and the key amino acid for determining DNA-binding specificity between BmTGIF and other homologs, we speculate that BmTGIF may have the same function as DmTGIF, and may bind to the same DNA sequence.

To investigate the evolutionary relationship between TGIF proteins in different species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the NJ method, based on the amino acid sequence of TGIF. The TGIF gene from different insect species gathered together, while the vertebrate genes formed another group (Fig. 2B).

BmTGIF was Expressed in Hemocytes and Head, as well as Testis and Ovary

In Drosophila, DmVis is expressed abundantly in testis and ovary, and its expression profile indicates that it is present from embryogenesis to adulthood [32]. BmTGIF-L transcripts were expressed in various tissues, except midgut, and predominantly in testes, ovaries and hemocytes (Fig. 3A). Q-PCR showed that BmTGIF-L expression in the testis was higher in third instar larvae (Fig. 3B), when primary spermatocytes occupy most of the chamber of the testis, compared to other stages. In addition, the expression levels of the four isoforms of BmTGIF relative to B. mori actin A3 in testes were estimated by Q-PCR, and BmTGIF-MS1 demonstrated the highest expression level, being 3, 2 and 1.3 times higher than BmTGIF-L, BmTGIF-S and BmTGIF-MS2, respectively (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3. Expression profiles of BmTGIF.

(A) RT-PCR analysis of BmTGIF-mRNA in various B. mori tissues. Total RNA from each tissue was used for cDNA synthesis. PCR products amplified with gene-specific primers (Table 1) for BmTGIF and Bmactin A3 were analyzed on 1% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. (B) Q-PCR analysis of BmTGIF mRNA at different stages of testis development. Testes were dissected from silkworms at the times indicated, and cDNA was synthesized as described in (A). The BmTGIF expression levels were normalized against the housekeeping cytoplasmic β-actin expression levels. (C) The relative amounts of alternatively-spliced isoforms were detected by Q-PCR using specific primers (Table 1). cDNAs were synthesized using total RNA extracted from testes at day 5 of fifth instar larvae. BmTGIF expression levels were analyzed as described in (B).

BmTGIF-L Contains Two Acidic Activation Domains

Human TGIF is a transcriptional repressor that effectively represses the transcriptional activity of several genes at their promoters [10], . In contrast to human TGIF, however, DmVis is a transcriptional activator [14]. It was therefore of interest to determine if BmTGIF was a transcriptional activator or repressor. A1 (at positions 190–268) and A2 (at positions 283–360), the two acidic regions (Fig. 4A) of BmTGIF-L, were assigned based on the similarity to the acidic regions in DmVis. A1 and A2 differed in the percentage of acidic residues; the percentage of acidic residues in A1 is higher than that in A2. We constructed luciferase assay plasmids pIE-A1, pIE-A2 and pIE-A1+2 (Fig. 4B) and tested the effect of the acidic regions on a luciferase reporter (pIE-luc). As shown in Fig. 4C, transfection of BmN cells with these constructs containing the acidic regions of BmTGIF-L together with the pIE-luc reporter increased transcriptional activation of the reporter compared with the pIE construct alone (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, luciferase activity elevated by pIE-A2 occurred in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4D). Together, these results demonstrated that BmTGIF-L contains two acid-rich transcriptional activation domains.

Figure 4. BmTGIF contains two acidic activation domains.

(A) The two acidic regions are boxed within the full amino acid sequence of BmTGIF, the first acidic region is designated as A1, and the second acidic region is designated as A2. (B) A series of constructs containing acidic domains (homeodomain not included), that fused directly to downstream of BmNPV ie-1 promoter of pIE were created. (C) The acidic domains constructs (2 µg) were cotransfected into BmN cells with the pIE-luc reporter (2 µg) which containing luc gene fused to 3′ end of BmNPV ie-1 promoter in pIE plasmid, together with the control reporter plasmid pRL-TK (200 ng). The transfected cells were lysed for luciferase assay at 60 h post-transfection. Luciferase activity (mean ± standard deviation of triplicate transfections) is shown, together with the activity in cells expressing pIE alone. (D) pIE-luc reporter plasmid (1 µg) was cotransfected with pRL-TK (100 ng) and pIE-A2 (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 µg) constructs in BmN cells as indicated, the relative luciferase activity is shown in arbitrary units.

Effect of BmTGIF siRNA Injection into Silkworm Larvae on the Development of Sperm Cells

In order to understand the functions of the BmTGIF gene, BmTGIF-specific siRNA (BmTGIF-siRNA-4) located at exon 3 of BmTGIF-L, was injected into silkworm larvae at the beginning of the third, fourth and fifth instars to silence the expression of the BmTGIF gene. The level of BmTGIF-L mRNA in the testes at the end of the fifth instar larvae was estimated by Q-PCR. The level of BmTGIF-L decreased by about 50% in the larvae injected with BmTGIF-siRNA-4 compared to that in the blank control and NC group (Fig. 5A). Moreover, The BmTGIF-L protein production in the larvae injected with BmTGIF-siRNA-4 was relatively lower than that in the blank control and NC group (Fig. 5A). We were therefore, interested to know if paraffin sections of testes injected with BmTGIF-specific siRNA showed the meiotic-arrest phenotype of testis development. Spermatogonium born at the apical tip of first instar surround the teloblast, they undergo six rounds of synchronous mitotic divisions to produce cysts of 64 primary spermatocysts, the primary spermatocysts then enter a extended G2 phase characterized by a little increase in cell volume followed by the first meiotic division to produce larger cysts of secondary spermatocysts, which enter the second meiotic division resulting sperm bundle that containing mature sperms (B). The development of sperm cells in the testes of larvae injected with BmTGIF siRNA-4 was later than that in blank controls (Fig. 5C and 5D). At the beginning of the fifth instar, the testis chamber in the blank control was full of larger primary spermatocytes organized into 64-cell cysts, indicating that meiotic division was progressing. In contrast, the testis in the BmTGIF siRNA-4 group was filled with large spermatogonia and smaller primary spermatocytes, a specialized stage that precedes meiotic divisions (Fig. 5C). Fig. 5D shows the results of histochemical staining of dissected testes at the end of the fifth instar. In the blank control group, primary spermatocytes had mostly developed into secondary spermatocytes, and many spermatids were observed far from the apical tip of the testes. In the testes of larvae injected with BmTGIF siRNA-4, however, a block of primary spermatocytes still remained near the cellula apicalis (Fig. 5D). This phenomenon was also observed at the pupal stage of larvae injected with BmTGIF siRNA-4 (Fig. 5E). As shown in Fig. 5E, a number of secondary spermatocytes (ss) developed more slowly than control group, the size of secondary spermatocyte cysts was obviously smaller compared to control group. Overall, these results suggest that progression of spermatid development could be arrested by repressing the expression of BmTGIF-L gene.

Figure 5. RNAi effect of BmTGIF-specific siRNA-4.

(A) Effect of injecting BmTGIF-specific siRNA-4 into silkworm larvae at the beginning of the third, fourth and fifth instars. Relative amounts of BmTGIF mRNA in blank control, NC and BmTGIF-siRNA-4 groups were analyzed by Q-PCR at day 3 of fifth instar in triplicate, the BmTGIF mRNA level was normalized against the housekeeping cytoplasmic β−actin mRNA level. Lower panel represents BmTGIF protein detected in blank control, NC and BmTGIF-siRNA-4 group by western blotting using BmTGIF-L antibody, corresponding lanes marked by 1, 2, and 3, respectively. (B) A concise schematic showing the progression of spermatogenesis in B. mori. Spermatogonium born at the apical tip of first instar surround the teloblast, they undergo six rounds of synchronous mitotic divisions to produce cysts of 64 primary spermatocysts, the primary spermatocysts then enter an extended G2 phase characterized by a little increase in cell volume followed by the first meiotic division to produce larger cysts of secondary spermatocysts, which enter the second meiotic division resulting sperm bundle that containing mature sperms. (C), (D), and (E) represent the effects of RNAi on testis development in silkworms at the beginning of the fifth instar, the end of the fifth instar, and 10 days after pupation, respectively. spg, spermatogonium; ps, primary spermatocytes; ss, secondary spermatocytes; sp, cysts of spermatids; ms, mature sperms formed in sperm bundle. Original magnification = ×40.

Subcellular Localization of BmTGIF-L in BmN Cells and Testis

The results of immunofluorescence showed that BmTGIF-L in BmN cells was distributed mainly in the nucleus, overlaid with DNA (Fig. 6A), while it was expressed in primary spermatocytes and mature sperms in the testis of the pupal stage (Fig. 6B). DAPI labeling suggested that BmTGIF-L was tightly associated with DNA in primary spermatocytes (Fig. 6B). On the contrary, no green fluorescence was observed in BmN cells and testis using pre-immune serum.

Figure 6. Immunofluorescent images of BmTGIF expression in BmN cells (A) and testis at 10 days after pupation (B).

Immunostaining was performed with mouse anti-BmTGIF-L antibody, followed by treatment with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. The nuclei of BmN cells and testis were treated with DAPI (blue), and examined under an inverted fluorescence microscope. In both (A) and (B), from left to right, green fluorescence for FITC-treated BmTGIF protein, DAPI-treated nuclei, and the overlay images. The primary spermatocytes (large arrow) and mature sperm (small arrow) also showed prominent BmTGIF expression. Primary spermatocytes (large arrow) also showed strong DAPI labeling, overlaid with FITC staining. For controls, pre-immune serum was used as the primary antibody. Original magnification for BmN cells = ×200, for testis = ×40.

BmTGIF-L and BmAly Exist in a Complex in Testes

Many proteins, including DmAly, DmComr, DmVis, DmTomb and DmTopi, are coexpressed in the nuclei of Drosophila primary spermatocytes where they work together to form a complex to regulate the activation of genes required for spermatid development [33], . To test if BmTGIF-L could interact with BmAly (GenBank accession no.GQ999610), a protein encoded by a meiotic-arrest gene in B. mori, immunoprecipitation using the anti-BmTGIF-L antibody was carried out to detect co-immunoprecipitation of BmAly and BmTGIF. As shown in Fig. 7, BmTGIF-L appeared to coprecipitate with BmAly. In the reciprocal experiment, immunoprecipitation with anti-BmAly antibodies and blotting with anti-BmTGIF-L also showed co-immunoprecipitation of BmAly and BmTGIF-L. In contrast, in control group using pre-immune antiserum, none of BmAly and BmTGIF-L was detected. These results suggest that these two proteins are present in a complex during spermatid development in B. mori.

Figure 7. BmTGIF-L co-immunoprecipitated with BmAly.

Extracts from wild-type testes were immunoprecipitated with anti-BmTGIF-L/pre-immune antiserum, run on SDS-PAGE gels, and subjected to Western blotting with anti-BmAly antibody, and vice versa. In the IP experiment using BmTGIF-L and BmAly anti body, BmAly and BmTGIF were observed at the specific bands, about 72 and 55 kDa, respectively. However, none of BmAly and BmTGIF-L were observed when IP using pre-immune antiserum. M, marker; input, input samples obtained from bombyx mori testes were immunoprecipitated with specific antibody in IP experiment, then run on SDS-PAGE; WB: western blotting for detecting the specific bands indicated.


TGIF has been shown to be a transcription factor, responsible for activating or repressing the transcriptional activation of target genes via interacting with co-activators or co-repressors [10], [14], [25], [27], [28], . The results of this study indicate that the B. mori homolog of DmTGIF, BmTGIF-L, has high similarity with TGIFs in the two conserved domains, and acts as a transcriptional coactivator of target genes. Furthermore, BmTGIF was located mainly in the nuclei of cultured BmN cells derived from ovary, and was highly expressed in primary spermatocytes. In addition, BmTGIF and BmAly may form a complex involved in regulating spermatogenesis.

In Drosophila spermatogenesis, DmVis has been classified into the group of meiotic-arrest genes, and interacts with other meiotic-arrest genes controlling meiotic divisions and spermatid differentiation. Mutation of DmVis resulted in failed transcriptional activation of many genes required for sperm manufacture and of some genes required for entry into meiotic divisions, causing arrest of testis development at the primary spermatocyte stage [14], [32], [33], . However, spermatogenesis in B. mori has been less well studied, though previous studies have identified an activator of Hsp90 ATPase (BmAHA1) [62] and a meiotic-arrest gene termed Bmaly (GenBank accession no.GQ999610).

Alignment of TGIF across a number of species suggests the existence of two highly conserved domains; the homeodomain and a 20-amino-acid block directly carboxy terminal to the homeodomain [14], [32]. The highest homologies are found within the homeodomain and the region carboxy-terminal to it in BmTGIF-L and DmVis. In particular, the characteristic RYN residues and the DNA-binding-determining residue within the conserved WF_N sequence [11] are identical, suggesting that BmTGIF-L may have the same characteristics, bind to the same DNA sequence, and perform similar functions to DmVis. Previous studies showed that DmVis was expressed from embryogenesis through to adulthood, and there were two alternative spliced products of DmVis. Drosophila testes predominantly express the larger (DmVisL), whereas ovaries predominantly express the shorter (DmVisS) [32]. In addition, DmVisL and DmVisS are required for Drosophila spermatogenesis, and transgenic flies containing either DmVisL or DmVisS are sufficient to partially rescue Df(2R)pingpong, which is a mutant lacking both Dmachi and Dmvis (a meiotic-arrest gene) [33]. The current study demonstrated that BmTGIF-L was also expressed in hemocytes and head, as well as in testis and ovary. Additionally, B. mori testes and ovaries expressed four and two alternatively-spliced products, respectively, from the BmTGIF transcription unit; whereas only the BmTGIF-L protein product was detected in testes and ovaries. The reason to interpret this maybe that: the lower titer of antibody of anti-BmTGIF to other isoforms, or the other spliced isforms can not be translated to proteins, or the detection limit of Western blotting, while the other alternative spliced isoforms were translated into few protein which is too less to be detected. In summary, these differed from the splicing pattern of dTGIF, suggesting that BmTGIF and dTGIF may have similar functions, but that BmTGIF may function at a large extent, and exert its action via more complicated mechanisms. Analysis of the phylogenetic tree could explain the functional difference between BmTGIF and dTGIF, which do not occur together in a subgroup. Recent studies of human TGIF have shown that only one isoform was abundantly expressed in various tissues and developmental stages, even though it possesses 12 alternatively-spliced isoforms, distinguished according to their 5′ cDNA sequences [63]. Additionally, reports of mouse TGIF2 indicate that an intron retained in the coding sequence of the second exon can be spliced out to produce two alternatively-spliced isoforms created by both alternate splicing and phosphorylation [60]. Interestingly, we found four alternatively-spliced variants (BmTGIF-L, BmTGIF-MS1, BmTGIF-MS2 and BmTGIF-S) in testes, and two (BmTGIF-L and BmTGIF-S) in ovaries. However, only BmTGIF-L had the conserved domain corresponding to dTGIF, suggesting that the other three isoforms did not have similar functions to dTGIF. Moreover, the expression levels of the alternative splicing forms were quite different. It is possible that this difference in expression levels between the spliced variants may contribute to their various functions, and the action of BmTGIF-L might be regulated by BmTGIF-MS1, BmTGIF-MS2 and BmTGIF-S, though further studies are needed to confirm this speculation.

The results of Q-PCR showed that BmTGIF-L was abundantly expressed in the testes of third instar larvae, when the testis is almost full of primary spermatocytes prior to the onset of meiotic divisions. The expression pattern of BmTGIF-L thus correlates well with that of DmVis [32], suggesting that BmTGIF-L may act at an earlier step like DmVis in the hierarchy of B.mori spermatogenesis. Moreover, BmTGIF was predominantly located in the nuclei of BmN cells, consistent with the functional state of DmVis. In contrast, immunostaining of BmTGIF in testes on day 10 of the pupal period strongly detected BmTGIF mRNA signals in mature sperms as well as primary spermatocytes, suggesting BmTGIF is present from pre- to postmeiotic stages, and could thus contribute to the regulation of meiotic divisions and post-meiotic differentiation, especially morphological changes of spermatids. Large amounts of DmVis, however, are transcribed before meiosis, and levels decrease dramatically at the post-meiotic stages [33].

Human TGIF and TGIF2 usually interact with corepressor proteins to repress the transcription of target genes [10], [27], [28], [58]. In contrast, Drosophila TGIFs have been reported to act as transcriptional activators that can activate gene expression whether bound to DNA directly, or tethered to DNA by the heterologous GBD [14]. Acidic activation domains are common in transcriptional regulators [64]. In the current study, luciferase reporter assays using constructs containing BmTGIF-L acidic domains suggested that the two acidic domains of BmTGIF-L might play the role of coactivator to enhance transcription.

Many meiotic-arrest genes have been reported in Drosophila, and these have been classified into two classes based on the mechanism by which they control the accumulation of twine. The aly class (including aly, comr, achi/vis, topi and tomb) regulates the transcription of twine, while the can class (including can, mia and sa) post-transcriptionally regulates twine production [33], . However, the aly class controls both the processes of meiotic divisions and spermatid differentiation. The mechanism by which they regulate meiotic cell cycle progression and cellular differentiation may be as follows: Achi/Vis, Topi and Tomb enter the nucleus independently, and Aly and Comr are imported into the nucleus together and form a stable complex. The complex then interacts with Tomb. Achi/Vis and Topi bind to the target promoters via specific DNA sequences, and later recruit Aly, Comr and Tomb to form an entire complex. This entire complex then recruits the NURD histone deacetylase chromatin remodeling complex and fully promotes transcription [43], [44]. During B. mori spermatogenesis, many factors must work together to trigger the male meiosis and spermatid differentiation programs. This speculation is partially supported by the co-immunoprecipitation of BmTGIF-L and BmAly by an anti- BmTGIF-L antibody, and vice versa. However, it is likely that unknown factors interact with BmTGIF-L and BmAly to form a complex to activate fully the programs of meiosis and spermatid differentiation in B. mori. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism responsible for controlling the meiosis and spermatid differentiation programs.

Mutations in hTGIF and DmVis cause HPE and arrest of Drosophila testis development at the primary spermatocyte stage, respectively. Our detailed examination of BmTGIF-RNAi silkworms showed an apparent decline of BmTGIF mRNA levels compared to blank controls and NC group though the protein production was relatively lower. In addition, paraffin sections of testes of larvae injected with BmTGIF-siRNA-4 exhibited developmental retardation, though this differed from the prominent arrest phenotype of Drosophila testis in the pingpong mutant. Taken together, these results suggest that BmTGIF-L regulates the progression of meiotic divisions and spermatid differentiation in B.mori, similar to the role played by DmVis in Drosophila spermatogenesis.


We thank Dr. Zhengguo Wei of Soochow Universtiy for providing the internal control luciferase plasmid pRL-TK.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PZ GC CG. Performed the experiments: PZ JS. Analyzed the data: PZ CG RX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CG RX GC. Wrote the paper: PZ CG.


  1. 1. Gehring WJ, Affolter M, Burglin T (1994a) Homeodomain proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 63: 487–526.
  2. 2. Lawrence PA, Morata G (1994) Homeobox genes: their function in Drosophila segmentation and pattern formation. Cell 78: 181–189.
  3. 3. McGinnis W, Krumlauf R (1992) Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68: 283–302.
  4. 4. Panganiban G, Rubenstein JL (2002) Developmental functions of the Distal-less/Dlx homeobox genes. Development 129: 4371–4386.
  5. 5. Trainor PA, Krumlauf R (2001) Hox genes, neural crest cells and branchial arch patterning. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13: 698–705.
  6. 6. Gehring WJ, Qian YQ, Billeter M, Furukubo-Tokunaga K, Schier AF, et al. (1994b) Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell 78: 211–223.
  7. 7. Jacobs Y, Schnabel CA, Cleary ML (1999) Trimeric association of Hox and TALE homeodomain proteins mediates Hoxb2 hindbrain enhancer activity. Mol Cell Biol 19: 5134–5142.
  8. 8. Knoepfler PS, Lu Q, Kamps MP (1996) Pbx-1 Hox heterodimers bind DNA on inseparable half-sites that permit intrinsic DNA binding specificity of the Hox partner at nucleotides 3′ to a TAAT motif. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 2288–2294.
  9. 9. Mann RS, Chan SK (1996) Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. Trends Genet 12: 258–262.
  10. 10. Bertolino E, Reimund B, Wildt-Perinic D, Clerc R (1995) A novel homeobox protein which recognizes a TGT core and functionally interferes with a retinoid-responsive motif. J Biol Chem 270: 31178–31188.
  11. 11. Treismann J, Gönczy P, Vashishtha M, Harris E, Desplan C (1989) A single amino acid can determine the DNA binding specificity of homeodomain proteins. Cell 59: 553–562.
  12. 12. Berthelsen J, Zappavigna V, Mavilio F, Blasi F (1998b) Prep1, a novel functional partner of Pbx proteins. EMBO J 17: 1423–1433.
  13. 13. Passner JM, Ryoo HD, Shen L, Mann RS, Aggarwal AK (1999) Structure of a DNA-bound Ultrabithorax-Extradenticle homeodomain complex. Nature 397: 714–719.
  14. 14. Hyman C, Bartholin L, Newfeld S, Wotton D (2003) Drosophila TGIF proteins are transcriptional activators. Mol Cell Biol 23: 9262–9274.
  15. 15. Burglin TR (1997) Analysis of TALE superclass homeobox genes (MEIS,PBC, KNOX, Iroquois, TGIF) reveals a novel domain conserved between plants and animals. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4173–4180.
  16. 16. Piper DE, Batchelor AH, Chang CP, Cleary ML, Wolberger C (1999) Structure of a HoxB1-Pbx1 heterodimer bound to DNA: role of the hexapeptide and a fourth homeodomain helix in complex formation. Cell 96: 587–597.
  17. 17. Asahara H, Dutta S, Kao HY, Evans RM, Montminy M (1999) Pbx-Hox heterodimers recruit coactivator-corepressor complexes in an isoform-specific manner. Mol Cell Biol 19: 8219–8225.
  18. 18. Berthelsen J, Zappavigna V, Ferretti E, Mavilio F, Blasi F (1998) The novel homeoprotein Prep1 modulates Pbx-Hox protein cooperativity. EMBO J 17: 1434–1445.
  19. 19. Kamps MP, Murre C, Sun XH, Baltimore D (1990) A new homeobox gene contributes the DNA binding domain of the t(1;19) translocation protein in pre-B ALL. Cell 60: 547–555.
  20. 20. Moskow JJ, Bullrich F, Huebner K, Daar IO, Buchberg AM (1995) Meis1, a PBX1-related homeobox gene involved in myeloid leukemia in BXH-2 mice. Mol Cell Biol 15: 5434–5443.
  21. 21. Nourse J, Mellentin JD, Galili N, Wilkinson J, Stanbridge E, et al. (1990) Chromosomal translocation t(1;19) results in synthesis of a homeobox fusion mRNA that codes for a potential chimeric transcription factor. Cell 60: 535–545.
  22. 22. Astell CR, Ahlstrom-Jonasson L, Smith M, Tatchell K, Nasmyth KA, et al. (1981) The sequence of the DNAs coding for the mating-type loci of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 27: 15–23.
  23. 23. Vollbrecht E, Veit B, Sinha N, Hake S (1991) The developmental gene Knotted-1 is a member of a maize homeobox gene family. Nature 350: 241–243.
  24. 24. Gómez-Skarmeta JL, Diez del Corral R, de la Calle-Mustienes E, Ferré-Marcó D, Modolell J (1996) Araucan and caupolican, two members of the novel iroquois complex, encode homeoproteins that control proneural and vein-forming genes. Cell 85: 95–105.
  25. 25. Sharma M, Sun Z (2001) 5′TG3’ interacting factor interacts with Sin3A and represses AR-mediated transcription. Mol Endocrinol 15: 1918–1928.
  26. 26. Wotton D, Knoepfler PS, Laherty CD, Eisenman RN, Massague J (2001) The Smad transcriptional corepressor TGIF recruits mSin3. Cell Growth Differ 12: 457–463.
  27. 27. Wotton D, Lo RS, Lee S, Massague J (1999a) A Smad transcriptional corepressor. Cell 97: 29–39.
  28. 28. Wotton D, Lo RS, Swaby LA, Massague J (1999b) Multiple modes of repression by the Smad transcriptional corepressor TGIF. J Biol Chem 274: 37105–37110.
  29. 29. Wotton D, Massague J (2001) Smad transcriptional corepressors in TGF beta family signaling. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 254: 145–164.
  30. 30. Gripp KW, Wotton D, Edwards MC, Roessler E, Ades L, et al. (2000) Mutations in TGIF cause holoprosencephaly and link NODAL signalling to human neural axis determination. Nat Genet 25: 205–208.
  31. 31. Overhauser J, Mitchell HF, Zackai EH, Tick DB, Rojas K, et al. (1995) Physical mapping of the holoprosencephaly critical region in 18p11.3. Am. J Hum Genet 57: 1080–1085.
  32. 32. Ayyar S, Jiang JQ, Collu A, White-Cooper H, White R (2003) Drosophila TGIF is essential for developmentally regulated transcription in spermatogenesis. Development 30: 2841–2852.
  33. 33. Wang ZH, Mann RS (2003) Requirement for two nearly identical TGIF-related homeobox genes in Drosophila spermatogensis. Development 130: 2853–2865.
  34. 34. Kemphues KJ, Kaufman TC, Raff RA, Raff EC (1982) The testis-specific b-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31: 655–670.
  35. 35. Hales KG, Fuller MT (1997) Developmentally regulated mitochondrial fusion mediated by a conserved novel predicted GTPase. Cell 90: 121–129.
  36. 36. Peschon JJ, Behringer RR, Brinster RL, Palmiter RD (1987) Spermatid-specific expression of protamine 1 in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 5316–5319.
  37. 37. Schulz RA, Miksch JL, Xie XL, Cornish JA, Galewsky S (1990) Expression of the Drosophila gonadal gene: alternative promoters control the germ-line expression of monocistronic and bicistronic gene transcripts. Development 108: 613–622.
  38. 38. Fuller MT (1993) Spermatogenesis. Spermatogenesis. In The Development of Drosophila (ed.M. Bate and A. Martinez-Arias). Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. pp71–147.
  39. 39. Lin TY, Viswanathan S, Wood C, Wilson PG, Wolf N, et al. (1996) Coordinate developmental control of the meiotic cell cycle and spermatid differentiation in Drosophila males. Development 122: 1331–1341.
  40. 40. Hiller MA, Lin TY, Wood C, Fuller MT (2001) Developmental regulation of transcription by a tissue-specific TAF homolog. Genes Dev 15: 1021–1030.
  41. 41. White-Cooper H, Leroy D, MacQueen A, Fuller MT (2000) Transcription of meiotic cell cycle and terminal differentiation genes depends on a conserved chromatin associated protein, whose nuclear localisation is regulated. Development 127: 5463–5473.
  42. 42. Jiang JQ, White-Cooper H (2003) Transcriptional activation in Drosophila spermatogenesis involves the mutually dependent function of aly and a novel meiotic arrest gene cookie monster. Development 130: 563–573.
  43. 43. Perezgazga L, Jiang JQ, Bolival B, Hiller M, Benson E, et al. (2004) Regulation of transcription of meiotic cell cycle and terminal differentiation genes by the testis-specific Zn finger protein matotopetli. Development 131: 1691–1702.
  44. 44. Jiang JQ, Benson E, Bausek N, Doggett K, White-Cooper H (2007) tombola, a tesmin/TSO1 family protein, regulates transcriptional activation in the Drosophila male germline and physically interacts with Always early. Development 134: 1549–1559.
  45. 45. Yamashiki N, Kawamura N (1998) Behavior of centrioles during meiosis in the male silkworm, Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera). Dev Growth Differ 40: 619–630.
  46. 46. Kawamura N, Yamashiki N, Saitoh H, Sahara K (2000) Peristaltic squeezing of sperm bundles at the late stage of spermatogenesis in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Morph 246: 53–58.
  47. 47. Shimoda M, Kubo-Irie M, Ohta K, Irie M, Mohri H (2007) Spermatogenesis in the testes of diapause and non-diapause pupae of the sweet potato hornworm, Agrius convolvuli (L.) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Zoolog Sci 24: 1036–1044.
  48. 48. Polanska MA, Ciuk MA, Cymborowski B, Bebas P (2005) Germ cell death in the testis and its relation to spermatogenesis in the wax moth, Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), effects of facultative diapause. J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol 303: 1013–1029.
  49. 49. Xia QY, Zhou ZY, Lu C, Cheng DJ, Dai FY, et al. (2004) A draft sequence for the genome of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori). Science 306: 1937–1940.
  50. 50. Xiang ZH, Mita K, Xia QY, Wang J, Morishita S, et al. (2008) The genome of a lepidopteran model insect, the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 38: 1036–1045.
  51. 51. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.
  52. 52. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406–425.
  53. 53. Ho CK, Strauss JF (2004) Activation of the control reporter plasmids pRL-TK and pRL-SV40 by multiple GATA transcription factors can lead to aberrant normalization of transfection efficiency. BMC Biotechnol. 4: 10.
  54. 54. Phillips CL, Stark MR, Johnson AD, Dahlquist FW (1994) Heterodimerization of the yeast homeodomain transcriptional regulators alpha 2 and a1 induces an interfacial helix in alpha 2. Biochemistry 33: 9294–9302.
  55. 55. Sprules T, Green N, Featherstone M, Gehring K (2000) Conformational changes in the PBX homeodomain and C-terminal extension upon binding DNA and HOX-derived YPWM peptides. Biochemistry 39: 9943–9950.
  56. 56. Bartholin L, Powers SE, Melhuish TA, Lasse S, Weinstein M, et al. (2006) TGIF inhibits retinoid signaling. Mol Cell Biol 26: 990–1001.
  57. 57. Imoto I, Pimkhaokham A, Watanabe T, Saito-Ohara F, Soeda E, et al. (2000) Amplification and overexpression of TGIF2, a novel homeobox gene of the TALE superclass, in ovarian cancer cell lines. Biochem. Biophys Res Commun 276: 264–270.
  58. 58. Melhuish TA, Gallo CM, Wotton D (2001) TGIF2 interacts with histone deacetylase 1 and represses transcription. J Biol Chem 276: 32109–32114.
  59. 59. Melhuish TA, Wotton D (2000) The interaction of C-terminal binding protein with the Smad corepressor TG-interacting factor is disrupted by a holoprosencephaly mutation in TGIF. J Biol Chem 275: 39762–39766.
  60. 60. Melhuish TA, Wotton D (2006) The Tgif2 gene contains a retained intron within the coding sequence. BMC Mol Biol 47 7: 2.
  61. 61. Yang Y, Hwang CK, D’Souza UM, Lee SH, Junn E, et al. (2000) Three-amino acid extension loop homeodomain proteins Meis2 and TGIF differentially regulate transcription. J Biol Chem 275: 20734–20741.
  62. 62. Miyagawa Y, Lee JM, Maeda T, Koga K, Kawaguchi Y, et al. (2005) Differential expression of a Bombyx mori AHA1 homologue during spermatogenesis. Insect Mol Biol 14: 245–253.
  63. 63. Hamid R, Patterson J, Brandt SJ (2008) Genomic structure, alternative splicing and expression of TG-interacting factor, in human myeloid leukemia blasts and cell lines. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1779: 347–355.
  64. 64. Ma J, Ptashne M (1987) A new class of yeast transcriptional activators. Cell 51: 113–119.