Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Functionality of the Paracoccidioides Mating α-Pheromone-Receptor System

  • Jéssica A. Gomes-Rezende,

    Affiliations: Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal

  • Ana G. Gomes-Alves,

    Affiliations: Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal

  • João F. Menino,

    Affiliations: Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal

  • Marco A. Coelho,

    Affiliation: Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos (CREM), Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal

  • Paula Ludovico,

    Affiliations: Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal

  • Paula Gonçalves,

    Affiliation: Centro de Recursos Microbiológicos (CREM), Departamento de Ciências da Vida, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal

  • Mark H. J. Sturme,

    Affiliations: Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal

  • Fernando Rodrigues

    Affiliations: Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal

Functionality of the Paracoccidioides Mating α-Pheromone-Receptor System

  • Jéssica A. Gomes-Rezende, 
  • Ana G. Gomes-Alves, 
  • João F. Menino, 
  • Marco A. Coelho, 
  • Paula Ludovico, 
  • Paula Gonçalves, 
  • Mark H. J. Sturme, 
  • Fernando Rodrigues
  • Published: October 4, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047033


Recent evidence suggests that Paracoccidioides species have the potential to undergo sexual reproduction, although no sexual cycle has been identified either in nature or under laboratory conditions. In the present work we detected low expression levels of the heterothallic MAT loci genes MAT1-1 and MAT1-2, the α-pheromone (PBα) gene, and the α- and a-pheromone receptor (PREB and PREA) genes in yeast and mycelia forms of several Paracoccidioides isolates. None of the genes were expressed in a mating type dependent manner. Stimulation of P. brasiliensis MAT1-2 strains with the synthetic α-pheromone peptide failed to elicit transcriptional activation of MAT1-2, PREB or STE12, suggesting that the strains tested are insensitive to α-pheromone. In order to further evaluate the biological functionality of the pair α-pheromone and its receptor, we took advantage of the heterologous expression of these Paracoccidioides genes in the corresponding S. cerevisiae null mutants. We show that S. cerevisiae strains heterologously expressing PREB respond to Pbα pheromone either isolated from Paracoccidioides culture supernatants or in its synthetic form, both by shmoo formation and by growth and cell cycle arrests. This allowed us to conclude that Paracoccidioides species secrete an active α-pheromone into the culture medium that is able to activate its cognate receptor. Moreover, expression of PREB or PBα in the corresponding null mutants of S. cerevisiae restored mating in these non-fertile strains. Taken together, our data demonstrate pheromone signaling activation by the Paracoccidioides α-pheromone through its receptor in this yeast model, which provides novel evidence for the existence of a functional mating signaling system in Paracoccidioides.


Paracoccidioides species are thermodimorphic ascomycete fungi that occur in a non-pathogenic mycelial form at environmental temperatures (below 25°C), and switch to a pathogenic multiple-budding yeast-form at the mammalian host temperature (37°C). This fungus is the etiological agent of paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM), a systemic mycosis that is prevalent in Latin America and has high incidence in Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil [1], [2]. Host infection occurs through inhalation of infective airborne conidia (asexual spores) or mycelial propagula from the environment that differentiates into the pathogenic yeast form in the lungs and may disseminate to other organs, thereby producing a disseminated mycosis [3].

While many studies have addressed key virulence factors (reviewed in [4]) and the cell cycle of P. brasiliensis [5], several other basic aspects of its biology still remain to be elucidated, in particular its ecology and whether or not it is capable of sexual reproduction. Sexual structures have not been observed for this fungus and it is therefore thought to only reproduce asexually. This is in contrast to the phylogenetically closely related dimorphic fungus Histoplasma capsulatum, which exhibits a clear heterothallic sexual reproduction mode [6], [7]. The absence of a sexual cycle has been noted for over 20% of fungal species [8], which is surprising considering the proposed advantages of a sexual cycle over solely asexual reproduction [9], [10]. Nonetheless, in the last decade several studies have uncovered extant sexual cycles in several pathogenic fungi that were previously considered to be “asexual” (viz. Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis) [11][14]. C. albicans was shown to undergo mating in vitro as well as in vivo in a mammalian host [11], [12]. The identification of sexual reproduction in A. fumigatus required lengthy incubations of mating pairs under particular conditions [13], though a recent study identified some highly fertile A. fumigatus strains, that were capable of completing the sexual cycle more rapidly [15]. Moreover, a study by Pyrzak et al [16] showed that low transcriptional activity of mating-type regulators might be the cause of the low fertility observed in A. fumigatus. These studies suggest that the discovery of sexual reproduction in asexual fungi may require specific culturing conditions, and show as well that fungi may have regulatory constraints that hinder expression of the mating system.

Even though sexual reproduction has not yet been observed in Paracoccidioides, there are indications that it may occur. Firstly, phylogenetic and population genetics studies of Paracoccidioides species brought to light the existence of four different phylogenetic lineages, namely: S1 (species 1 from Brazil, Venezuela, Peru, Paraguay and Argentina), PS2 (phylogenetic species from Brazil and Venezuela), PS3 (phylogenetic species from Colombia), and the “Pb01-like” group, the latter of which has been proposed to constitute a new species named Paracoccidioides lutzii [17], [18]. Genealogical analysis of isolates from these lineages presented evidence for genetic recombination within and between lineages of the Paracoccidioides genus [17], indicative of sexual reproduction. Additional support for the existence of a sexual cycle came from the identification of two idiomorphic mating-type genes (MAT1-1 and MAT1-2) in Paracoccidioides isolates, exhibiting high similarities to mating-type genes of other filamentous ascomycetes [19], [20]. A 1:1 distribution of the MAT loci was observed among the isolates consistent with a heterothallic sexual reproduction mode, and gene expression of MAT genes was confirmed. Torres et al. also tested in vitro mating of opposite mating types of Paracoccidioides under different conditions, but were unable to confirm the production of true sexual structures [20]. This could mean that the production of functional sexual structures requires additional stimuli and/or different environmental conditions or that Paracoccidioides mating mechanisms are not functioning efficiently at a genetic or biochemical level. Besides the identification of two MAT idiomorphs [19], [20], MAT1-1 comprising an α-domain gene and MAT1-2 containing an HMG gene, whole genome sequencing of three Paracoccidioides isolates further revealed the presence of most components of the mating-pheromone mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and meiosis specific genes described in other fungi [21], [22]. The MAPK pathway involved in sexual reproduction is well described in S. cerevisiae and conserved among fungi (Figure 1A and B). This pathway is activated when the mating pheromone binds to the respective membrane receptor, leading to the dissociation of the Gα subunit of the G-protein coupled to the membrane receptor. The cascade is composed of Ste20 (protein kinase), Ste11 (MAP kinase kinase kinase), Ste7 (MAP kinase kinase) and Fus3 and Kss1 (MAP kinases). These kinases are supported on a scaffold provided by the Ste5 protein. The signal from this cascade is transferred to Far1 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) and Ste12 (transcription factor) leading to transcription of mating-related genes [21]. Paracoccidioides harbors all the components of the cascade found in S. cerevisiae, except for the Ste5 and Far1 homologs [22] (Figure 1B). In this work, we identified a non-annotated gene encoding a mating α-pheromone (PBα) and evaluated its expression in Paracoccidioides, as well as the expression of its cognate α-pheromone receptor (PreB). As the observation of mating in Paracoccidioides remains elusive, despite the apparent availability of the entire genetic makeup required for pheromone signaling, associated with the fact that genetic tools for functional studies in this fungus are limited [23], [24], we set out to determine whether or not components of the mating-pheromone signaling would be able to function in the heterologous host S. cerevisiae.

Figure 1. The genome of Paracoccidioides encodes an α-pheromone.

(A) Mating pheromone signaling pathway described in S. cerevisiae [21]. (B) S. cerevisiae mating pheromone signaling pathway components and the homologous genes annotated in Paracoccidioides and A. fumigatus databases. Genes not annotated in databases are denoted N.A. (C) Alignment of α-pheromone precursor peptide sequences from Paracoccidioides strains and H. capsulatum. The Kex2 peptidase recognition site (KR) and the mature pheromone are indicated by blue and red boxes, respectively.


Although mating gene expression could not be induced in the tested P. brasiliensis MAT1-2 strains stimulated with synthetic Pbα pheromone, we were able to provide evidence for the functionality of the Pbα pheromone and its receptor PreB in the heterologous expression host S. cerevisiae. Our study provides a framework for further studies into the functionality of mating components present in Paracoccidioides aiming to identify potential restrictions at the molecular level that reduce mating fertility in this pathogenic fungus.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Culture Conditions

Paracoccidioides and S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. S. cerevisiae deletion strains were obtained from the EUROSCARF deletion strain collection. For maintenance, S. cerevisiae strains were grown at 30°C on YEPD solid medium (0.5% yeast extract, 1% peptone, 2% glucose and 2% agar) or YNB minimal medium dropout plates (6.7% Yeast Nitrogen Base without amino acids, 2% glucose and 2% agar), supplemented to meet auxotrophic requirements. For experimental procedures, S. cerevisiae strains were grown in YEPD or YNB broth at 26°C and 150 rpm. Paracoccidioides yeast strains were maintained at 37°C by periodic subculturing on brain heart infusion (BHI) solid medium supplemented with 1% glucose (1.6% agar). For assays the yeast form was grown in BHI broth supplemented with 1% glucose at 37°C and 200 rpm. The mycelium form was grown in synthetic McVeigh Morton (MMcM) medium [25] at 24°C, 150 rpm. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Lysogeny broth (LB) medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% NaCl) at 37°C, 220 rpm, and supplemented with selective antibiotics where appropriate.

Table 1. Strains used in this study.


Construction of a MF(α)1/2 Double Mutant in S. cerevisiae

For heterologous expression of the Paracoccidioides α-pheromone (Pbα) in S. cerevisiae, a double mutant for both S. cerevisiae α-pheromones MF(α)1 and MF(α)2 genes was constructed. To obtain a double mutant with two different antibiotic resistance cassettes replacing the MF(α)1 and MF(α)2 genes, we first replaced the geneticin cassette (KanMx) in S. cerevisiae strain BY4742 ΔMF(α)2 by a hygromycin B cassette (hph). To this end plasmid pAG34, carrying the hph gene under the control of a TEF promoter and terminator, was used. This plasmid allows for homologous recombination of the hph cassette with the KanMX cassette in EUROSCARF deletion strains, as this cassette carries the same TEF promoter and terminator. Plasmid pAG34 was digested with restriction enzyme XhoI (FastDigest, Fermentas), and subsequently transformed in strain BY4742 ΔMF(α)2 using the lithium acetate method as described [26]. Transformants were isolated on medium with hygromycin as a selective marker. Replacement of the KanMX cassette in gene MF(α)2 by a hph cassette was confirmed by PCR. Subsequently, the strain BY4742 ΔMF(α)1 was transformed with the hph cassette with MF(α)2 flanking regions (amplified using primers MFα2-HR-HPH-Fw and MFα2-HR-HPH-Rev, and Phusion DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes)). Double mutants for the MF(α)1/2 genes of S. cerevisiae were isolated on YEPD selective plates (supplemented with hygromycin and geneticin) and correct genomic insertion was confirmed by PCR. PCR reactions were performed with primers described in Table S1, using the DyNAzyme II DNA polymerase kit (Finnzymes) and genomic DNA from transformants as a template.

Construction of Heterologous Expression Plasmids

All vectors reported in this study are listed in Table 2. For heterologous expression of Paracoccidioides mating-related genes the tetracycline-repressed expression vectors pCM189 (low-copy) and pCM190 (high-copy) were used, both containing the uracil marker (URA3). P. brasiliensis α-pheromone (GenBank accession number JX429928) and PREB genes were amplified from Pb01 mycelium-specific cDNA, using proof-reading Phusion DNA Polymerase (Finnzymes). The amplified PCR products included short terminal sequences homologous to the vector cloning site, to allow for cloning by homologous recombination (primers - Table S1). PCR products and linearized vectors were transformed in the respective S. cerevisiae deletion strain BY4741 ΔSTE2 (for PREB) or AGΔScα (for Paracoccidioides α-pheromone). PREB cloned in the low-copy vector pCM189 was designated pLPreB, while Paracoccidioides α-pheromone cloned in both low and multi-copy vectors, were designated pLPbα and pMPbα, respectively. Transformants were isolated on YNB uracil dropout medium and confirmed by PCR. PCR reactions were performed with primers described in Table S1, using the DyNAzyme II DNA polymerase kit (Finnzymes) and genomic DNA from transformants as a template.

Table 2. Plasmids used in this study.


Identification of Paracoccidioides Mating-related Genes

Identification of Paracoccidioides mating-related genes was performed using BLAST searches against a genome database of isolates Pb01, Pb03 and Pb18, available at the Broad Institute ( In order to identify the α-pheromone gene we performed TBLASTN searches against Paracoccidioides transcripts and genomic sequences (E-value cut-off 1e-1) using the precursor protein sequence of the Histoplasma capsulatum α-pheromone PPG1 as a query (GenBank: ACU27365.1). Subsequently, transcript hits were translated in all six reading frames using ORF Finder, to identify the position and reading frame of the pheromone sequence. The a and α pheromone receptor genes (PREA and PREB, respectively) are annotated by the Broad Institute and the genes involved in the intracellular signaling pathway were obtained after performing a BLASTN using the known sequences of other ascomycete fungi. Pheromone receptor topology was predicted using TMHMM 2.0 and visualized with TMRPres2D.

To confirm the in silico identified sequences for the Paracoccidioides α-pheromone and PreB, their respective transcript sequences were amplified from cDNA (primers - Table S1) using a combination of DyNAzyme II and Phusion DNA polymerases (Finnzymes). The PCR products were cloned with the TOPO TA Cloning Kit for sequencing (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Plasmid was extracted from E. coli strain DH5α using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced at STAB VIDA (Portugal). Alpha-pheromone transcript sequences have been deposited at GenBank under accession numbers JX429928 and JX429929.

Growth Arrest Assays

For growth arrest assays the mature Paracoccidioides α-pheromone (Pbα – WCTRPGQGC) was synthesized at Metabion (Germany) and synthetic S. cerevisiae α-pheromone (MFα - WHWLQLKPGQPMY) was obtained from GenScript (USA). Halo assays to monitor pheromone-induced growth arrest were performed to establish the biological activity of Pbα in a S. cerevisiae STE2 deletion strain expressing the Paracoccidioides α-pheromone receptor PreB (AGLPreB). The strains S. cerevisiae BY4741 and AGLPreB were grown for 16 hrs in YNB minimal drop-out medium (supplemented with the appropriate amino acids) to an optical density at 640 nm (OD640) of 1.0 to 1.4. Yeast cells at 106 and 5×106 cells/ml were embedded in soft agar (0.8%), spread on YEPD plates and dried. Subsequently, 10 µl of synthetic Pbα or MFα (at 2 mg/mL), and 10 µl of Pbα pheromone extracted from P. brasiliensis cultures and from AGLPbα was spotted on plates and incubated for 16–24 h at 30°C. Halo development was monitored and halo areas measured. Each experiment was repeated four times.

Cell growth arrest upon pheromone stimulation was also assessed by measuring Colony Forming Units (CFUs) at different time points along incubation with synthetic pheromones. Cultures at an initial concentration of 3.3×107 cells/ml were incubated with Pbα (4 and 40 µg/ml) for strain AGLPreB or MFα (2 and 20 µg/ml) for strain BY4741. At indicated time-points samples were taken and serial dilutions plated on the respective selective media. CFU values were determined after 48 hours of incubation at 30°C. Growth rate constants (µ) were determined from the respective CFU growth curves.

Shmoo Assay

Different strains of S. cerevisiae were grown in YNB minimal drop-out medium (supplemented with the appropriate amino acids) to an optical density at 640 nm (OD640) of 1.0 to 1.4. Cells were resuspended in YEPD to 4×106 cells/mL and incubated at 26°C with either Pbα (at 4 and 40 µg/mL) or MFα (at 2 and 20 µg/mL), respectively. The percentage of cell-shmooing was determined at different times and cell images were taken on a Zeiss Axioskop equipped with a Carl Zeiss AxioCam (Carl Zeiss, Jena). Shmoo counts were done for 200–300 cells, and each experiment was repeated five times.

α-pheromone Isolation

α-pheromone from Pb01/Pb03 and Pb01/ATCC60855 mycelium co-cultures, Pb01, ATCC60855, Pb03 and T8B1 mono-culture or AGLPbα culture was extracted using the resin Amberlite® XAD®2, according to the protocol described elsewhere [27]. In brief, resin was washed in distilled water and conditioned for α-factor isolation in methylene chloride-methanol (1:3 v/v). Pheromone isolation from Paracoccidioides mycelium co-cultures was performed by direct addition of resin to the co-cultures and incubation of co-cultures for 14 days at 24°C, 150 rpm. For Pbα pheromone extraction from AGLPbα the resin was directly added to a stationary phase culture and incubated for 2 days at 30°C, 200 rpm. After incubations, resin was washed several times with distilled water to remove mycelium or yeast cells and α-pheromone subsequently extracted by incubation in 40% methanol for 2 hrs at 40°C. Methanol extracts were dried using SpeedVac lyophilisation and resuspended in sterile distilled water.

Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Strains BY4741 and AGLPreB were grown in YNB minimal drop-out medium YNB (supplemented with the appropriate amino acids) to an optical density at 640nm (OD640) of 1.0–1.4. Cells were resuspended in YEPD to 4×106 cells/mL and incubated at 26°C with either Pbα or MFα at 40 or 20 µg/mL, respectively. Cell cycle analysis was performed for different time points. Cell treatment was adapted from Fortuna et al. [28]. Briefly, cells were fixed by resuspending in 500 µl 70% ethanol, and subsequently centrifuged and washed with 1 mL of sodium citrate buffer (50 mM pH 7.5). Cells were resuspended in 850 µl of sodium citrate buffer and 125 µl of RNase A (2 mg/mL in Tris-EDTA pH 8.0) and incubated at 50°C for 1 h. After the addition of 50 µl of proteinase K (20 mg/mL) samples were incubated at 50°C for 1 h. Cells were transferred to a cytometry tube and stained overnight at 4°C with SYBR Green I (final concentration ranging 0.01X to 100X in Tris-EDTA pH 8.0). Triton X-100 (0.25% v/v in 50 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 7.5) was added and the sample was sonicated with three consecutive ultrasound pulses at 40W for 2 sec with an interval of 2 sec between each pulse. Cell cycle analysis was performed by flow cytometry (FCM) on a BD™ LSR II flow cytometer. A minimum of 50,000 cells per sample were acquired at low/medium flow rate. Offline data were analyzed with the flow cytometry analysis software package FlowJo 7.6.1. Each experiment was repeated four times.

Quantitative Mating Assays

Quantitative mating assays were performed based on the protocol by Guthrie and Fink [29]. Cells were grown in YNB minimal drop-out medium (supplemented with the appropriate amino acids) to exponential phase. Cells were mixed on a 0.45 µm pore membrane (Amersham Hybond-N nylon membranes, GE Healthcare), using a vacuum filtration system (TPP), at different concentrations (1× corresponds to 1.5×107 cells). Membranes were placed on the surface of YEPD plates and incubated at 30°C for 5 hrs. For mating assays with the addition of the synthetic pheromone, cells were not filtrated, but incubated in YEPD media for 5 hrs. Cells were resuspended in sterile water and plated on YNB drop-out plates without methionine and lysine to select for diploids, and on plates without methionine or lysine in order to select for haploid cells. Mating efficiency was calculated as [30]:

Real-time-PCR Gene Expression Analysis and Pbα Pheromone Induction

For basal expression analysis yeast cultures were inoculated from a single colony and grown to exponential phase, by incubation for 7 days at 37°C, 200 rpm, during which medium was refreshed once after 4 days. Mycelium cultures were obtained by incubating these yeast cultures for 7 days at 24°C, 150 rpm, to allow for complete yeast-to-mycelium conversion. Total RNA was extracted from Paracoccidioides yeast and mycelial cells using Trizol (Invitrogen) standard method for cellular disruption, complemented with heat shock treatment (45 min at 65°C followed by 60 min at −80°C) and bead-beating using 0.1 mm silica/zirconium beads. Total RNA was treated with DNase I (Ambion) and DNA-free total RNA (1 µg) reverse transcribed using the DyNAmo™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Finnzymes). cDNA samples were used as templates in order to measure the basal level expression of the MAT1-1, MAT1-2, PREA, PREB, GPA1, STE4, STE18, STE20, STE50, STE11, STE7, KSS1, STE12 and α-pheromone genes in yeast and mycelium. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad), and qRT-PCR amplification performed using the Sso Fast EvaGreen Supermix kit (Bio-Rad), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For all samples DNA contamination was discarded, as the utilization of the isolated RNA as a template gave no amplification in qRT-PCR. The thermal cycling conditions comprised: initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 sec and primer annealing and elongation for 5 sec at appropriate temperature. After PCR cycling, melt-curves were obtained from 65–95°C at 0.5°C increments.

For pheromone induction experiments, Paracoccidioides strains were grown as mycelium to exponential phase in MMcM medium [25] and synthetic Pbα pheromone was added to 50 µg/mL. Samples were taken at intervals, and RNA extraction and real-time PCR were performed as described above. All measurements were performed in triplicate and relative expression levels determined using the ΔCT method [31] versus β-tubulin (TUB2) as a reference gene [32]. The primers used are listed in Table S1.

Statistical Analysis

Data are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean of at least four independent repetitions of each assay. The statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS program version 19 and GraphPad software.


The Paracoccidioides sp. Genome Encodes a Mating α-pheromone

The genome of Paracoccidioides harbors most of the mating- and meiosis-specific genes, with the exception of S. cerevisiae STE5 and FAR1 homologues [22] (Figure 1). Interestingly, while the genus appears to be heterothallic, based on the presence of either the MAT1-1 or MAT1-2 idiomorph in all strains examined, all three fully sequenced isolates (Pb01, Pb03 and Pb18) encode both the receptors for the mating a-pheromone (PreA) and the α-pheromone (PreB). The corresponding mating pheromone genes were however not annotated. To this end we used the α-pheromone precursor sequence of the phylogenetically closely related species Histoplasma capsulatum (PPG1: GenBank ACU27365.1) as a query to perform a TBLASTN database search in all six reading frames against transcripts and genomic sequences of P. brasiliensis/P. lutzii. Results showed an ORF encoding an α-pheromone homologue in P. lutzii Pb01 and P. brasiliensis Pb03 and Pb18 (data not shown). To evaluate the biological significance of this in silico predicted pheromone gene we confirmed the sequence of cDNA generated from P. lutzii Pb01 and P. brasiliensis ATCC60855 mycelium cultures (Figure S1). Sequence analysis of the genomic DNA and the cDNA revealed that the pheromone gene appears to be interrupted by an intron of 79 bp (Figure S1), where exon-intron boundaries obey the canonical GT-AG rule [33].

The alignment between the Histoplasma and Paracoccidioides precursor pheromone protein sequences (Figure 1C) showed highly conserved regions along the entire sequence (53% identity), and both contain a Kex2 protease (prototypical eukaryotic prohormone-processing enzyme) recognition sequence (KR). Cleavage at this site would release the mature pheromone sequence (WCTRPGQGC), which shows an identity of 100% with H. capsulatum and 77% with A. fumigatus, respectively, and contains residues that are conserved among other fungal α-pheromones in general [34]. The predicted small ORF encoding the α-pheromone (designated PBα) overlaps with the annotated hypothetical genes PAAG_00855, PABG_01384 and PADG_03979 of Pb01, Pb03 and Pb18 respectively, and for Pb01 the PBα gene is located on the opposite DNA strand of PAAG_00855.

Mating-related Gene Expression in Paracoccidioides sp. Yeast and Mycelium

As described above, Paracoccidioides harbors most genes implicated in mating, but it has not been demonstrated that this fungus undergoes a sexual cycle. Therefore we set out to assess if Paracoccidioides isolates produce mating-specific transcripts. To this end, expression levels of the in silico identified mating-related genes were monitored by qRT-PCR in yeast and mycelial cultures of strains representing both mating types (MAT1-1 and MAT1-2), and including isolates for each of the four phylogenetic groups previously described (Figure 2) [17], [18]. Expression of Paracoccidioides MAT1-1 or MAT1-2 genes under basal conditions was shown to occur at low levels in both yeast and mycelium (Figure 2). For the strains encoding the MAT1-1 idiomorph, expression of the α-pheromone and the a-pheromone receptor PREA was expected, whereas for MAT1-2 strains a-pheromone and the α-pheromone receptor PREB expression was envisaged. However, instead we observed low expression levels of both receptors in strains of both mating-types. The MAT1-1 strains expressed both pheromone receptors at low levels but there is a clear difference between yeast and mycelial forms (Figure 2E, G). Although overall expression is low, the MAT1-2 strains show significantly higher expression levels of both receptors (PREA and PREB) in the mycelium when compared with the yeast form (Figure 2F, H). Moreover, the MAT1-2 strains in mycelial form have higher expression levels of both receptors when compared to the MAT1-1 strains. Previous studies have shown that some heterothallic ascomycetes express pheromone receptors in a mating-type independent manner, as is the case for A. fumigatus, Neurospora crassa and Candida glabrata [35][37]. Similarly, the α-pheromone is expressed by strains of both mating-types, although with higher values for the MAT1-1 strains (Figure 2C, D). In addition, the expression levels the α-pheromone are significantly higher in the mycelium form, with the exception of Pb03 (Figure 2C, D). However, expression levels are very low for all strains, except for Pb01 that shows a high level of expression in mycelium form.

Figure 2. Paracoccidioides expresses the α-pheromone and the a- and α-receptor genes independently of the mating type.

Mating gene expression of Paracoccidioides MAT1-1 strains (Pb01 and T8B1) and MAT1-2 strains (ATCC60855 and Pb03) in yeast (Y) and mycelial (M) form. Expression levels of MAT1-1 (A) and MAT1-2 (B), PBα (B, C), PREB (E, F) and PREA (G, H) genes were measured. Error bars are indicated, and asterisks show significant differences (*p<0.05 or **p<0.01).


The α-pheromone does not Elicit Mating Response in Paracoccidioides

To assess the biological activity of the identified α-pheromone of Paracoccidioides sp. we tested the ability of a synthetic peptide identical to the predicted mature pheromone to trigger a transcriptional response of mating-related genes in P. brasiliensis MAT1-2 strains ATCC60855 and Pb03 in mycelium form. Our data show that expression of MAT1-2, PREB and STE12 genes did not increase upon pheromone stimulation in P. brasiliensis ATCC60855 (Figure 3A) and Pb03 (data not shown). Taking into consideration that MAT1-1 strains also express PREB, we further evaluate the transcriptional response of P. lutzii Pb01 to the α-pheromone. Our results show that, as for the MAT1-2 strains, the pheromone did not trigger a transcriptional response of the MAT-related genes analysed (Figure 3B). The non-response of Paracoccidioides species to α-pheromone led us to question whether or not the molecular players involved in the signalling cascade were being expressed under basal condition in mycelium form. Our data shows that all the components (Figure 1 A) are expressed at low levels (Figure 3 C–K). Moreover, comparative analysis of the expression levels (Figure 2 and 3) highlight that in particular the upper components of the signalling cascade (PREB, GPA1, STE4 and STE18) show the lowest expression levels, which could explain the inability of Paracoccidioides to respond to the α-pheromone.

Figure 3. α-pheromone does not induce mating gene expression in Paracoccidioides.

Mating gene expression at different time points in P. brasiliensis ATCC60855 (A) and P. lutzii Pb01 (B) in mycelium form, upon induction with 50 µg/mL of synthetic Pbα pheromone. Basal expression levels of MAPK signaling pathway components in the mycelium form of P. brasiliensis Pb03 and ATCC60855 (MAT1-2) and P. lutzii Pb01 (MAT1-1) (C-K). Error bars are indicated, and asterisks show significant differences (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).


To further evaluate the functionality of the pair α-pheromone and its cognate receptor PreB and considering the observed low mating gene expression and the inability to induce pheromone signaling in Paracoccidioides, we continued our studies using the well established S. cerevisiae system as a heterologous model.

Paracoccidioides α-pheromone Promotes shmoo Formation in S. cerevisiae Expressing α-pheromone Receptor

To assess the functionality of the predicted Paracoccidioides α-pheromone in the heterologous model S. cerevisiae, the PREB gene, encoding the α-pheromone receptor, was cloned into a constitutive expression vector and was used to transform a S. cerevisiae ste2 null mutant. The resulting strain is hereafter referred to as AGLPreB.

In S. cerevisiae, it is known that after pheromone recognition, the opposite mating type cell develops projections called shmoos, characterized by a polarized growth along a pheromone gradient towards a mating partner [38]. Therefore, the response of AGLPreB cells to synthetic Pbα (WCTRPGQGC) was first monitored by observation of shmoo formation. Maximum shmoo formation was observed after 5 h for AGLPreB exposed to synthetic Pbα (Figure 4C, D, E, F), with a decrease after 9 h (Figure 4E). A similar pattern was observed for the wild-type S. cerevisiae MATa strain BY4741 upon exposure to the cognate synthetic α-pheromone (MFα) (Figure 4A, B, E). We also examined the potential for inter-species signalling between α-pheromones and receptors from S. cerevisiae and Paracoccidioides. Our data shows that the responses were species-specific since the synthetic Pbα was unable to induce shmoo formation through activation of Ste2, while synthetic MFα failed to activate PreB (data not shown). Overall these data demonstrate the effectiveness of the Pbα pheromone in the activation of PreB, and establish the proficiency of S. cerevisiae as a heterologous system to study Paracoccidioides mating machinery, paving the way for further studies.

Figure 4. α-pheromone activates PreB receptor and induced shmoo formation in the S. cerevisiae model.

Shmoo formation in S. cerevisiae BY4741 induced with 20 µg/ml synthetic MFα pheromone after 0 and 5 hrs induction (A and B), and S. cerevisiae AGLPreB induced with 40 µg/ml synthetic Pbα pheromone after 0 and 5 hrs induction (C and D). Quantification of shmoo formation using S. cerevisiae BY4741 stimulated with MFα (2 µg/mL) or S. cerevisiae AGLPreB stimulated with Pbα (4 µg/mL) (E). Induction of S. cerevisiae AGLPreB using Pbα pheromone extracted from P. lutzii Pb01 monoculture or Paracoccidioides co-cultures (Pb01/Pb03 and Pb01/Pb60855), Pbα pheromone extracted from AGMPbα culture, as well stimulation with the synthetic Pbα pheromone (40 µg/mL) (F). Error bars are indicated, and asterisks show significant differences (*p<0.05, ***p<0.001).


As shown previously, expression of PBα in Paracoccidioides is independent of mating type (Figure 2). However, it could not be discounted that mating type-specific post-transcriptional mechanisms contribute to the production of a fully functional pheromone. Hence, we also investigated if strains of both mating-types could express a functional α-pheromone. For this, Pbα was isolated from the supernatants of Paracoccidioides cell cultures of Pb01, Pb03, ATCC60855 and T8B1 as well as various co-cultures. Pbα pheromone extracted from P. brasiliensis strains Pb03, T8B1 and ATCC60855 did not trigger shmoo formation in strain AGLPreB (data not shown). However, Pbα extracted from Paracoccidioides co-cultures Pb01/Pb03 and Pb01/Pb60855 as well as from the Pb01 mono-culture, induced shmoo formation in AGLPreB (Figure 4F) in a manner dependent on the expression of PREB (not shown). Moreover, Pbα isolated from the supernatant of S. cerevisiae cultures overexpressing PBα (AGMPbα strain) also induced shmoo formation (Figure 4F). The quantification of shmoo formation revealed an induction ranging from 1% to 10%, and was significantly higher for pheromone isolated from co-cultures (Figure 4F). Taken together, the data presented suggests that at least P. lutzii Pb01 produces an active α-pheromone.

The Paracoccidioides α-pheromone Induces Cell Cycle and Growth Arrest in S. cerevisiae Expressing the α-pheromone Receptor

Efficient cell fusion during mating requires cell synchronization, which is achieved by cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase, ultimately resulting in growth arrest [39]. Pheromone-induced growth and cell cycle arrest were assessed in strain AGLPreB exposed to Pbα (Figure 5). Our results show that AGLPreB undergoes growth arrest, with increased halo areas upon exposure to higher amounts of synthetic pheromone (Figure 5B–D, H). Pbα extracted from strain Pb01 cultures (Figure 5A) also induced growth arrest, while this was not the case for MAT1-1 strain T8B1 or MAT1-2 strains Pb60855 and Pb03 (data not shown). These results are in line with those obtained for the same set of strains for the induction of shmoo formation. In addition, Pbα isolated from S. cerevisiae AGMPbα cultures also resulted in halo formation (Figure 5 E), confirming that S. cerevisiae is capable of producing a functional Pbα pheromone.

Figure 5. α-pheromone activates PreB receptor, inducing growth and cell cycle arrest in the S. cerevisiae model.

Halo formation in S. cerevisiae AGLPreB stimulated with Pbα pheromone extracted from P. lutzii Pb01 monoculture (A); stimulated with 0.8, 4.0 and 40 µg synthetic Pbα pheromone (B–D respectively) or Pbα pheromone extracted from S. cerevisiae AGMPbα (E). S. cerevisiae BY4741 stimulated with 10 µg synthetic MFα (F) and with 20 µg synthetic Pbα (G). Quantification of growth inhibition zones (cm2) upon exposure to α-pheromones. Halos were recorded after 24 hrs of incubation and standard deviations indicated by error bars (H). Cell cycle arrest analysis for S. cerevisiae BY4741 upon addition of synthetic MFα (20 µg/ml) (I) and S. cerevisiae AGLPreB upon addition of synthetic Pbα pheromone (40 µg/ml) (J). (K–N) FCM profiles of α-pheromone-induced cell cycle arrest in haploid cells showing n and 2 n nuclear DNA content: BY4741 induced with 20 µg synthetic MFα (K–L) and S. cerevisiae AGLPreB induced with 40 µg synthetic Pbα pheromone (M–N). Growth rate evaluation of either S. cerevisiae BY4741 (O) or AGLPreB (P) upon addition of the cognate synthetic α-pheromone. Error bars are indicated, and asterisks show significant differences (*p<0.05, **p<0.01).


Flow cytometric analysis of DNA content demonstrated pheromone-induced cell cycle arrest, as indicated by the increase of the G0/G1 DNA peak (n) after the addition of Pbα synthetic pheromone to the AGLPreB strain (Figure 5J, M and N). The maximum cell cycle arrest was achieved 60 min after pheromone stimulation, with an increase of ≈30% of cells arrested in the G1-phase. Growth arrest was also confirmed by the decrease of cell growth rate upon pheromone stimulation (Figure 5P).

Identical results were obtained for wild-type S. cerevisiae exposed to its cognate synthetic MFα pheromone (Figure 5F, H, I, K, L and O).

Heterologous Expression of Paracoccidioides α-pheromone and its Receptor PreB Restore the Mating Ability of the Corresponding S. cerevisiae Null Mutants

We have demonstrated that the PBα gene from Paracoccidioides encodes a functional α-pheromone that signals through its cognate receptor PreB, using S. cerevisiae as a host model. To evaluate the proficiency of the heterologous mating system we investigated the ability of the Paracoccidioides pheromone-receptor system to rescue mating of cognate S. cerevisiae mutants. Thus, a S. cerevisiae double null mutant for the MFα(1/2) genes expressing the PBα gene (using low and medium-copy number vectors in strains AGLPbα and AGMPbα, respectively) was crossed with the PREB-expressing strain AGLPreB. Resulting diploid cells were scored by the acquisition of both methionine and lysine prototrophy. Mating efficiency was higher for crosses between AGLPreB and AGMPbα (medium-copy plasmid) compared to crosses using AGLPbα (low-copy plasmid) (Figure 6A). Mating efficiencies were, in general, relatively low for the heterologous mating pairs (below 10%), similar to those described for other heterologous systems expressed in S. cerevisiae [40], compared with 50% diploids observed for the control system (S. cerevisiae wild-type strains). These results, together with those obtained with mixtures of AGLPbα and AGLPreB at different cell number ratios, suggested that α-pheromone was a limiting factor for mating (Figure 6A). To assess this, we evaluated mating following the addition of exogenous synthetic pheromone at different concentrations to the BY4742 and AGLPreB mating cross. The results obtained show a dose response effect, although the mating efficiencies are still low (Figure 6B). A similar assay for the heterologously expressed Ste2 homolog from C. albicans previously showed diploid formation of up to 80% [41], although it has to be noted that the C. albicans homolog CaSte2 is more similar to Ste2 than PreB (36 vs 28% identity).

Figure 6. α-pheromone and its cognate receptor functionally complement mating in the corresponding S. cerevisiae mutants.

Mating efficiency of S. cerevisiae null mutants, expressing Paracoccidioides α–pheromone (AGLPbα and AGMPbα) and its cognate receptor (AGLPreB), crossed at different ratios after incubation for 5 hrs (A). (B) Mating efficiency after 5 hrs incubation of S. cerevisiae strains AGΔScα and AGLPreB, upon the addition of different concentrations of Paracoccidioides synthetic α-pheromone. Error bars are indicated, and asterisks show significant differences (*p<0.05).



In this work, we investigated the functionality of the sexual reproduction machinery of the genus Paracoccidioides. We demonstrate that the genomes of these fungi encode a functional α-pheromone that is able to activate its cognate receptor PreB, but we also show that P. brasiliensis ATCC60855 and Pb03, both MAT1-2 strains, as well as the MAT1-1 strain P. lutzii Pb01 are apparently insensitive to α-pheromone. This suggests that pheromone signalling is somehow blocked in these Paracoccidioides strains, probably due to low transcription levels of the upper components of the signalling pathway.

Notably, we could demonstrate that P. lutzii Pb01 expresses a functional α-pheromone. The identified mature pheromone sequence was shown to be identical to the one described in H. capsulatum, although the precursor was slightly different. In both Paracoccidioides and Histoplasma the precursor peptide encodes only one copy of the mature pheromone, which is in contrast to the majority of ascomycetes that encode two or more copies of the mature pheromone in the precursor [34].

The predicted α-pheromone and its cognate receptor were individually overexpressed in S. cerevisiae null mutants of the homologous genes (constructed in strains of opposite mating types), and the functionality of this signaling pair was confirmed by their ability both to restore the hallmarks of pheromone signaling (shmoo induction and cell cycle and growth arrest) and to complement (at least partially) the mating deficiency of the host. Moreover, we investigated the specificity of the α-pheromone–receptor interaction that regulates the pheromone-sensing pathway. We demonstrate that there is considerable specificity in the interaction of Ste2 and PreB receptors with their cognate pheromone ligands. Thus, incubation of BY4741 and AGLPreB with Pbα and MFα synthetic pheromones respectively did not show evident shmoo formation, cell cycle and growth arrest, contrarily to what was observed when stimulation was performed with the corresponding pheromone. The observed pheromone specificity can be attributed to the differences in protein sequences and topology of Ste2 and PreB. In particular the N-terminal region and trans-membrane domain 1, which have been implicated in pheromone binding [42], show low similarity between these receptors (Figure S2).

Functioning of the Paracoccidioides α-pheromone/α-pheromone receptor pair in the heterologous host was evident, although the observed mating efficiencies were low. Similar low mating efficiencies of heterologously expressed mating genes in S. cerevisiae models have been shown in other studies [40], [41]. Interestingly, also expression of endogenous pheromones and pheromone receptors leads to reduced mating efficiencies that are most probably related to the expression system used [40]. In addition, the low identity between PreB and Ste2 (28%) might cause a less efficient interaction of the PreB receptor with the pheromone-response pathway G-protein of the host. In fact, topology predictions for these α-pheromone receptors suggested that the third intracellular loop, important for the interaction of Ste2 with the G-protein, is different. Nevertheless, the known essential markers in the third intracellular loop needed for the activation of the intracellular mating pathway in S. cerevisiae are shared between Ste2 and PreB. In particular, the two essential amino acids R233 and F241 in Ste2 [43] are also present and separated by the same number of amino acids in PreB (R223 and F231), and the triplet LGL is located at the same position in between these residues for both receptors (Figure S2). The topology prediction however places phenylalanine residue F231 into the transmembrane domain of PreB. Furthermore, the second loop in PreB is much longer than that of Ste2, which can also contribute to a general structural alteration of the intracellular receptor domain that culminates in a reduced signaling efficiency. Accordingly, PbGPA1 was unable to rescue the mating ability of the corresponding S. cerevisiae GPA1 null mutant. However, mating was rescued by simultaneous expression of both PREB and PbGPA1 in a S. cerevisiae double mutant (Figure S3).

In the heterologous mating experiments we could show that α-pheromone was a limiting factor because higher concentration of pheromone resulted in increased mating efficiency. Even so, with the exogenous addition of the synthetic Pbα pheromone at a very high concentration, a mating efficiency of only 3.7% was achieved. It is likely that either the binding affinity of the ligand for the receptor or the interaction of the receptor with the signal transduction pathway, or both, contribute to the reduced pheromone bioactivity. Further studies are therefore needed, eventually using pheromone analogs, to evaluate their ability to activate the signaling machinery.

One of the most revealing aspects of the current work is the demonstration of the biochemical proficiency of the pheromone-signaling machinery of Paracoccidioides genus, at the level of α-pheromone and its receptor, while at the same time signaling seems to be impaired. In fact, our results also show that mating gene expression in Paracoccidioides species is very low, especially the upper components of the signalling cascade (PREB, GPA1, STE4 and STE18). Moreover, expression of mating-related genes was not inducible through stimulation with synthetic Paracoccidioides α-pheromone. This could suggest that due to the low basal gene expression the number of PreB receptor molecules present on the cell surface is too low to elicit a mating response, as well as the other components of the signaling pathway. Therefore, further research is underway to identify the environmental conditions that stimulate mating gene expression, as well as to detect low frequency mating events in this fungal pathogen via genetic approaches with dominant-marked strains. The confirmation of a sexual cycle in Paracoccidioides and the molecular characterization of its mating system are of major importance, since it will provide essential knowledge on basic biological and evolutionary aspects of these fungi. In addition, identification of sexual mechanisms will support genetic studies in this fungus and this information will contribute valuable new insights into the long-standing problem of sexuality/asexuality, which has not been fully elucidated in many fungi.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Alignment of α-pheromone cDNA sequences of P. lutzii Pb01 and P. brasiliensis ATCC60855 and partial genomic DNA sequence (minus strand) of the predicted ORF PAAG_00855 from P. lutzii Pb01. The location of the stop codon of PAAG_00855 is indicated by a red box. Nucleotides in the minus strand DNA sequence of PAAG_00855 obeying the canonical mRNA splicing motifs are underlined. Nucleotide translation to pheromone precursor is shown below the DNA sequence. Splicing of the 79 bp intron results in the proline (P) codon CCC detected in the cDNA (boxed positions).



Figure S2.

Topology of α-pheromone receptor Ste2 from S. cerevisiae (A), PreB from P. lutzii Pb01 (B), and PreB from H. capsulatum (C). Topology predictions were made using TMHMM Software and visualization done using the TMRPres2D tool. Essential residues for Gpa1 interaction of Ste2 in the third intracellular loop (IL3) are highlighted in red. Regions and residues involved in pheromone recognition and specificity of Ste2 are highlighted in blue. Corresponding regions and putative residues in PreB are indicated in similar colors.



Figure S3.

Mating efficiencies of S. cerevisiae null mutants heterologously expressing the Paracoccidioides α-pheromone receptor PreB and G-protein PbGpa1. Strains and plasmids used in mating assays (A). Mating efficiencies of mate pairs (B). Mating assays were performed as described in the Materials and Methods. PbGpa1 on its own is not able to restore mating in a BY4741_GPA1 strain, but the Paracoccidioides α-pheromone receptor PreB and G-protein PbGpa1 collectively restore the mating ability in the corresponding S. cerevisiae double mutant.



Table S1.

Primers used in this study. Sequences for homologous recombination (HR) in S. cerevisiae are indicated by shading. Start and stop codons are underlined.



Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FR MHJS PG MAC PL. Performed the experiments: JAGR AGGA JFM MHJS. Analyzed the data: FR MHJS PG MAC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FR. Wrote the paper: FR MHJS PG MAC JAGR AGGA.


  1. 1. Brummer E, Castaneda E, Restrepo A (1993) Paracoccidioidomycosis: an update. Clin Microbiol Rev 6: 89–117.
  2. 2. Restrepo A, McEwen JG, Castañeda E (2001) The habitat of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: how far from solving the riddle? Med Mycol 39: 233–241. doi: 10.1080/mmy.
  3. 3. McEwen JG, Bedoya V, Patiño MM, Salazar ME, Restrepo A (1987) Experimental murine paracoccidiodomycosis induced by the inhalation of conidia. J Med Vet Mycol 25: 165–175. doi: 10.1080/02681218780000231
  4. 4. Puccia R, Vallejo MC, Matsuo AL, Longo LV (2011) The Paracoccidioides cell wall: past and present layers towards understanding interaction with the host. Front Microbiol 2: 257. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00257
  5. 5. Almeida AJ, Martins M, Carmona JA, Cano LE, Restrepo A, et al. (2006) New insights into the cell cycle profile of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Fungal Genet Biol 43: 401–409. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.01.012
  6. 6. Kwon-Chung KJ (1972) Sexual stage of Histoplasma capsulatum. Science 175: 326. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4019.326
  7. 7. Kwon-Chung KJ (1973) Studies on Emmonsiella capsulata. I. Heterothallism and development of the ascocarp. Mycologia 65: 109–121. doi: 10.2307/3757791
  8. 8. Dyer PS, O’Gorman CM (2011) A fungal sexual revolution: Aspergillus and Penicillium show the way. Curr Opin Microbiol 14: 649–654. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.10.001
  9. 9. Lee SC, Ni M, Li W, Shertz C, Heitman J (2010) The evolution of sex: a perspective from the fungal kingdom. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74: 298–340. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00005-10
  10. 10. Nielsen K, Heitman J (2007) Sex and virulence of human pathogenic fungi. Adv Genet 57: 143–173. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2660(06)57004-x
  11. 11. Hull CM, Raisner RM, Johnson AD (2000) Evidence for mating of the “asexual” yeast Candida albicans in a mammalian host. Science 289: 307–310. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5477.307
  12. 12. Magee BB, Magee PT (2000) Induction of mating in Candida albicans by construction of MTLa and MTLalpha strains. Science 289: 310–313. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5477.310
  13. 13. O’Gorman CM, Fuller HT, Dyer PS (2009) Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 457: 471–474. doi: 10.1038/nature07528
  14. 14. Porman AM, Alby K, Hirakawa MP, Bennett RJ (2011) Discovery of a phenotypic switch regulating sexual mating in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida tropicalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 21158–21163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112076109
  15. 15. Sugui JA, Losada L, Wang W, Varga J, Ngamskulrungroj P, et al. (2011) Identification and characterization of an Aspergillus fumigatus “supermater” pair. mBio 2: e00234–11. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00234-11
  16. 16. Pyrzak W, Miller KY, Miller BL (2008) Mating type protein Mat1–2 from asexual Aspergillus fumigatus drives sexual reproduction in fertile Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryot Cell 7: 1029–1040. doi: 10.1128/ec.00380-07
  17. 17. Matute DR, McEwen JG, Puccia R, Montes BA, San-Blas G, et al. (2006) Cryptic speciation and recombination in the fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis as revealed by gene genealogies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 65–73. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj008
  18. 18. Teixeira MM, Theodoro RC, de Carvalho MJ, Fernandes L, Paes HC, et al. (2009) Phylogenetic analysis reveals a high level of speciation in the Paracoccidioides genus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 52: 273–283. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.04.005
  19. 19. Li W, Metin B, White TC, Heitman J (2010) Organization and evolutionary trajectory of the mating type (MAT) locus in dermatophyte and dimorphic fungal pathogens. Eukaryot Cell 9: 46–58. doi: 10.1128/ec.00259-09
  20. 20. Torres I, García AM, Hernández O, González A, McEwen JG, et al. (2010) Presence and expression of the mating type locus in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis isolates. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.11.005
  21. 21. Butler G (2010) Fungal sex and pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev 23: 140–159. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00053-09
  22. 22. Desjardins CA, Champion MD, Holder JW, Muszewska A, Goldberg J, et al. (2011) Comparative genomic analysis of human fungal pathogens causing paracoccidioidomycosis. PLoS Genet 7: e1002345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002345
  23. 23. Almeida AJ, Carmona JA, Cunha C, Carvalho A, Rappleye CA, et al. (2007) Towards a molecular genetic system for the pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Fungal Genet Biol 44: 1387–1398. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.04.004
  24. 24. Almeida AJ, Cunha C, Carmona JA, Sampaio-Marques B, Carvalho A, et al. (2009) Cdc42p controls yeast-cell shape and virulence of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Fungal Genet Biol 46: 919–926. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.08.004
  25. 25. Restrepo A, Jiménez BE (1980) Growth of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast phase in a chemically defined culture medium. J Clin Microbiol 12: 279–281.
  26. 26. Gietz RD, Woods RA (2006) Yeast transformation by the LiAc/SS Carrier DNA/PEG method. Method Mol Biol 313: 107–120. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-958-3:107
  27. 27. Strazdis JR, MacKay VL (1982) Reproducible and rapid methods for the isolation and assay of a-factor, a yeast mating hormone. J Bacteriol 151: 1153–1161.
  28. 28. Fortuna M, Sousa MJ, Corte-Real M, Leão C, Salvador A, et al.. (2001) Cell cycle analysis of yeasts., in Curr Protoc Cytom. 2001.
  29. 29. Guthrie C, Fink GR (2004) Guide to yeast genetics and molecular and cell biology. 2004, San Diego: Academic Press.
  30. 30. Gonçalves-Sá J, Communication and choice in yeast mating. 2010, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica.: Lisbon. p. 109.
  31. 31. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-dd Ct) method. Methods 25: 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
  32. 32. Marques ER, Ferreira ME, Drummond RD, Felix JM, Menossi M, et al. (2004) Identification of genes preferentially expressed in the pathogenic yeast phase of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, using suppression subtraction hybridization and differential macroarray analysis. Mol Genet Genomics 271: 667–677. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1016-6
  33. 33. Breathnach R, Chambon P (1981) Organization and expression of eucaryotic split genes coding for proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 50: 349–383. doi: 10.1146/
  34. 34. Martin SH, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ, Steenkamp ET (2011) Causes and consequences of variability in peptide mating pheromones of ascomycete fungi. Mol Biol Evol 28: 1987–2003. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr022
  35. 35. Muller H, Hennequin C, Gallaud J, Dujon B, Fairhead C (2008) The asexual yeast Candida glabrata maintains distinct a and alpha haploid mating types. Eukaryot Cell 7: 848–858. doi: 10.1128/ec.00456-07
  36. 36. Paoletti M, Rydholm C, Schwier EU, Anderson MJ, Szakacs G, et al. (2005) Evidence for sexuality in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr Biol 15: 1242–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.045
  37. 37. Pöggeler S, Kück U (2001) Identification of transcriptionally expressed pheromone receptor genes in filamentous ascomycetes. Gene 280: 9–17. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00786-7
  38. 38. Gustin MC, Albertyn J, Alexander M, Davenport K (1998) MAP kinase pathways in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62: 1264–1300.
  39. 39. Cherkasova V, Lyons DM, Elion EA (1999) Fus3p and Kss1p control G1 arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a balance of distinct arrest and proliferative functions that operate in parallel with Far1p. Genetics 151: 989–1004.
  40. 40. Gonçalves-Sá J, Murray A (2011) Asymmetry in sexual pheromones is not required for ascomycete mating. Curr Biol 21: 1337–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.054
  41. 41. Janiak AM, Sargsyan H, Russo J, Naider F, Hauser M, et al. (2005) Functional expression of the Candida albicans alpha-factor receptor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fungal Genet Biol 42: 328–338. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.01.006
  42. 42. Konopka JB, Jenness DD (1991) Genetic fine-structural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha-pheromone receptor. Cell Regul 2: 439–52. doi: 10.1091/mbc.2.6.439
  43. 43. Clark CD, Palzkill T, Botstein D (1994) Systematic mutagenesis of the yeast mating pheromone receptor third intracellular loop. J Biol Chem 269: 8831–8841.
  44. 44. Morais FV, Barros TF, Fukada MK, Cisalpino PS, Puccia R (2000) Polymorphism in the gene coding for the immunodominant antigen gp43 from the pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. J Clin Microbiol 38: 3960–3966.
  45. 45. Gomez BL, Nosanchuk JD, Diez S, Youngchim S, Aisen P, et al. (2001) Detection of melanin-like pigments in the dimorphic fungal pathogen Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in vitro and during infection. Infect Immun 69: 5760–5767. doi: 10.1128/iai.69.9.5760-5767.2001