Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Plasma-Derived Exosomal Survivin, a Plausible Biomarker for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer

  • Salma Khan,

    Affiliation Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

  • Jessica M. S. Jutzy,

    Affiliation Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

  • Malyn May A. Valenzuela,

    Affiliation Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

  • David Turay,

    Affiliation Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

  • Jonathan R. Aspe,

    Affiliation Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

  • Arjun Ashok,

    Affiliation Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

  • Saied Mirshahidi,

    Affiliation Cancer Center and Department of Microbiology and Biospecimen Laboratory, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

  • Dan Mercola,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America

  • Michael B. Lilly,

    Current address: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America

    Affiliation Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine and Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America

  • Nathan R. Wall

    nwall@llu.edu

    Affiliation Center for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States of America

Plasma-Derived Exosomal Survivin, a Plausible Biomarker for Early Detection of Prostate Cancer

  • Salma Khan, 
  • Jessica M. S. Jutzy, 
  • Malyn May A. Valenzuela, 
  • David Turay, 
  • Jonathan R. Aspe, 
  • Arjun Ashok, 
  • Saied Mirshahidi, 
  • Dan Mercola, 
  • Michael B. Lilly, 
  • Nathan R. Wall
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Survivin is expressed in prostate cancer (PCa), and its downregulation sensitizes PCa cells to chemotherapeutic agents in vitro and in vivo. Small membrane-bound vesicles called exosomes, secreted from the endosomal membrane compartment, contain RNA and protein that they readily transport via exosome internalization into recipient cells. Recent progress has shown that tumor-derived exosomes play multiple roles in tumor growth and metastasis and may produce these functions via immune escape, tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Furthermore, exosome analysis may provide novel biomarkers to diagnose or monitor PCa treatment.

Methods

Exosomes were purified from the plasma and serum from 39 PCa patients, 20 BPH patients, 8 prostate cancer recurrent and 16 healthy controls using ultracentrifugation and their quantities and qualities were quantified and visualized from both the plasma and the purified exosomes using ELISA and Western blotting, respectively.

Results

Survivin was significantly increased in the tumor-derived samples, compared to those from BPH and controls with virtually no difference in the quantity of Survivin detected in exosomes collected from newly diagnosed patients exhibiting low (six) or high (nine) Gleason scores. Exosome Survivin levels were also higher in patients that had relapsed on chemotherapy compared to controls.

Conclusions

These studies demonstrate that Survivin exists in plasma exosomes from both normal, BPH and PCa subjects. The relative amounts of exosomal Survivin in PCa plasma was significantly higher than in those with pre-inflammatory BPH and control plasma. This differential expression of exosomal Survivin was seen with both newly diagnosed and advanced PCa subjects with high or low-grade cancers. Analysis of plasma exosomal Survivin levels may offer a convenient tool for diagnosing or monitoring PCa and may, as it is elevated in low as well as high Gleason scored samples, be used for early detection.

Introduction

Worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer death in males [1], [2]. Increasing age, ethnicity and family history are the only established risk factors and there are no known preventable risk factors established to date [2]. Prostate cancers (PCa) are generally slow-growing malignancies that are characterized by an imbalance in the rates of cell division and cell death [3]. Surgery and radiation therapy are effective for localized disease but there is no effective treatment strategy for recurrent or metastatic PCa that has failed surgery, radiation or hormonal therapy [4]. An important challenge to develop treatments that are more effective depends upon our understanding of the molecular mechanism(s) of PCa progression, which will lead us to identify many potential therapeutic target genes and processes that are involved in apoptosis, cell proliferation, metastasis, and growth factor signaling. Total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has revolutionized PCa screening and has resulted in an overall decrease in PCa metastasis and death [5]. Unfortunately, the application of PSA screening has also led to over-detection and overtreatment as PSA is neither cancer specific nor a surrogate for the biologic behavior of PCa [5], [6]. Elevations in PSA levels can reflect a cancer presence but can also be present as a result of infection, chronic inflammation or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) [7], [8]. BPH has been shown to exist in greater than 70% of men over the age of 70 but is not considered to be a precursor of prostate cancer though they frequently coexist [9]. It is therefore necessary to continue to screen for biomarkers that are cancer-specific and that are detectable early in the course of the disease.

The processes of both cell survival and cell death have involved highly regulated signaling pathways that are currently the subject of intense investigation. It is known that regulation of apoptosis has a central role in the development of prostate cancer and its progression to an androgen-independent state, which is due, in part to up regulation of antiapoptotic genes after androgen deprivation [10][12]. Several lines of evidence suggest that one of the main events associated with progression after therapeutic failure is increased resistance to apoptosis [13], [14], mainly due to the up regulation of antiapoptotic genes, including Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1 [15], and Survivin [16]. Survivin, an inhibitor-of-apoptosis (IAP) protein family member, is associated with PCa development, progression, and drug resistance [17][20]. Recent evidence indicates that the overexpression of Survivin in PCa tumors is associated with poor prognosis and increased tumor recurrence [21]. In contrast, it has also been shown that knockdown of survivin expression by siRNAs enhances the chemosensitivity of prostate cancer cells, reducing tumorigenicity [22].

Traditionally, Survivin has been viewed as a cytoplasmic or nuclear protein. Recently, Survivin has been also shown to exist extracellularly, contained in small membrane bound vesicles known as exosomes [23], [24]. Exosomes are present in serum and urine and contain a wide range of proteins and RNAs and represent their tissue of origin making them a possible source or pool of novel PCa biomarkers [25]. Consistent with Survivin's association with unfavorable clinicopathological parameters, extracellular trafficking of Survivin throughout the tumor microenvironment could be responsible for augmenting the aggressive status of a tumor while prohibiting or minimizing therapeutic results. We have recently shown that exosome-bound Survivin protein can be secreted by cancer cells and be taken up by surrounding cells, producing a field effect that confers a general stress-survival phenotype.

Our present study was designed to investigate the existence of exosomal Survivin in the plasma of PCa patients with a variety of PCa presentations and to compare its exosomal expression levels to those found in control volunteers with no diagnosis of cancer and to patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia or BPH. For the past 25 years the Gleason grading system has been used to help evaluate the prognosis of men with prostate cancer. Together with other parameters, prostate cancer has been staged as a means to predict prognosis and guide therapy [26]. Extracellular Survivin was found highly expressed in the plasma exosomes of PCa patients exhibiting Gleason scores of 6 (low) and 9 (high), and in patients who had relapsed on chemotherapy. However, there were no significant differences in Survivin levels between subjects with low or high Gleason scores. In addition, though exosomes containing Survivin were found in the serum from patients with a diagnosis of BPH, the overall level was significantly lower than that found in the plasma from PCa patients. We believe that in addition to diagnostic markers, prognostic, predictive and therapeutic markers are needed to act as surrogate endpoints in forecasting disease severity, choosing treatments, and monitoring responses to therapies [27][30]. Our demonstration of exosomal Survivin in the plasma of patient with newly diagnosed low-grade PCa provides a rationale for studies to investigate the utility of exosomal Survivin as an early, easily measured biomarker for PCa diagnosis. Exosomal Survivin may also be studied as a biomarker to monitor treatment of subjects with advanced PCa.

Results

Plasma levels of Survivin in healthy controls and PCa patients

Survivin was detectable in the plasma from all healthy control subjects and PCa patients. The measurement results of plasma Survivin in normal healthy controls and PCa patients are shown in Figure 1A. The mean plasma Survivin levels were significantly different between the healthy control subjects (61.5 pg/ml in controls [n = 10]) and the different cancer patient groups (Gleason 6 = 401.7 pg/ml [n = 10], Gleason 9 = 375.2 pg/ml [n = 10], and subjects resistant to the the chemotherapy agent Taxotere = 410 pg/ml [n = 8]; P<0.05 for each comparison vs. control). When the Survivin levels were compared among the three groups of PCa patients in two-way comparisons, none were significantly different from the others.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Quantification of Survivin levels in PCa plasma (A) and serum (B) samples by ELISA.

A. Survivin levels were measured in plasma derived from Gleason 6 (n = 10), Gleason 9 (n = 10), and Taxotere-resistant subjects (n = 8). B. Survivin levels were measured in serum derived from BPH (n = 20), and PCa (n = 19). Comparisons were accomplished using MANOVA with normal healthy controls (n = 10 and 6 respectively). (**, p<0.05, ***, p<0.001; statistically significant).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.g001

Survivin can be collected from serum taken from healthy controls, BPH and PCa Patients

Like what has been measured above in plasma, Survivin was also detectable in the serum from patients having no prior diagnosis of cancer as well as in patients having the diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and those diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) (Figure 1B). The mean serum Survivin levels were significantly (P<0.001) higher in the PCa subjects (150 pg/ml [n = 19]) than in the serum processed from normal controls (59.7 pg/ml [n = 6]) and from BPH patients (55 pg/ml [n = 21]).

Plasma and Serum Survivin in PCa patients exists in an exosomal pool

We have previously demonstrated that cultured PCa cells release Survivin into the extracellular milieu within exosomes [23]. These small, membrane-vesicles are also known to occur in the plasma as well as serum of cancer patients [31], [32]. Exosomes were therefore collected by differential centrifugation, and quantitated using the acetylcholinesterase enzymatic assays as we and others have previously described [24], [33]. The mean plasma exosome levels were significantly different between the healthy control subjects and the different cancer patients groups (P<0.001) whereas significant differences in exosome quantity were not found among the PCa patient sample groups (Figure 2A). This was also the case when comparing the exosome quantities found in BPH and PCa samples to that of the healthy control subjects (Figure 2B). Interestingly, there appears to be a measureable difference in Survivin and in exosomes depending upon the source as both Survivin and exosome quantities were higher when purified from plasma then when purified from serum.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Exosomal contents in PCa patients plasma (A) and serum (B) samples by using the acetylcholinesterase activity assay.

A. Exosome levels were measured in plasma derived from Gleason 6 (n = 10), Gleason 9 (n = 10), and Taxotere-resistant subjects (n = 8). B. Exosome levels were measured in serum derived from BPH (n = 20), and PCa (n = 19). Comparisons were accomplished using MANOVA with normal healthy controls (n = 10 and 6 respectively). (**, p<0.05, ***, p<0.001; statistically significant).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.g002

Plasma-derived exosomes contain Survivin

Exosomes were characterized by immunoblotting for the amount of Survivin protein and Lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1). LAMP1 is a known exosome protein which is commonly used to ensure proper Western blot loading [24], [34], [35]. Exosomes isolated from PCa patient plasma exhibited enhanced Survivin loads compared to exosomes isolated from controls (Figure 3). Western blot analysis showed that little exosomal Survivin was detectable in plasma samples collected from six controls having no previous diagnosis of cancer in comparison to the exosome-specific protein Lamp1 (Figure 3A). In contrast, exosomes isolated from all twenty pre-treatment PCa subjects contained high amounts of Survivin protein compared to LAMP1 protein levels (Figure 3B). Interestingly, there was no significant difference in exosomal Survivin content between patients with Gleason 6 PCa and those with Gleason 9 PCa (Figure 3C) when normalized against Lamp1 (p<0.05).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Western Blot Analysis of exosomal Survivin in untreated PCa plasmas.

A. Antibodies for Survivin and Lamp1 were used for Western blotting of control patient-purified exosomal protein. B. Both Survivin and Lamp1 antibodies were detected in the Western Blotting of exosomes-derived from Gleason 6 and Gleason 9. C. Proportion analysis of Survivin density to Lamp1 density were shown in both Gleason 6, and Gleason 9 with normal healthy controls (**, p<0.05, statistically significant) with no significance recorded between Gleason 6 and Gleason 9 plasma-derived exosomes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.g003

Differential expression of Survivin exists in BPH and PCa-derived exosomes

As above, exosomes collected from BPH and PCa patient serums were characterized by immunoblotting for Survivin and LAMP1 protein (Figure 4A). Exosomes isolated from PCa and BPH patient serums exhibited enhanced Survivin loads compared to exosomes isolated from controls (Figure 4A, Figure 4B and Figure S1). Interestingly, though Survivin was detected in most and elevated in certain BPH patients, its overall level was significantly less than that found in PCa and there was no significant difference measured between BPH and control patient serums (Figure 4B).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Western Blot Analysis of exosomal Survivin in normal control, BPH and untreated PCa serum samples.

A. Antibodies for Survivin and Lamp1 were used for Western blotting of patient-purified exosomal protein. B. Proportion analysis of Survivin density to Lamp1 density were shown in both BPH and PCa with normal healthy controls (**, p<0.05, ***, p<0.001; statistically significant) with no significance recorded between normal controls and BPH.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.g004

PCa patients with disease progression express high levels of exosomal Survivin

Lastly, we evaluated exosomes collected from PCa patients who experienced disease progression while on treatment with chemotherapy. Like in our Gleason patient exosomes, Western blotting showed Survivin protein levels (Figure 5A) were markedly higher when compared to cancer-free control subjects, which was confirmed to be significant after densitometric analysis (Figure 5B).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Western Blot Analysis of exosomal Survivin and Lamp1 in Taxotere-resistant PCa patients.

A. Survivin and Lamp1 antibodies were shown positive. B. Densitometric analysis of Survivin/Lamp1 expression in a healthy control (normal) and chemoresistance (CR) cases (**, p<0.05, statistically significant).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.g005

Clinical and pathological characteristics

Pretreatment data regarding initial plasma Survivin and PSA levels and Gleason scores were acquired for the patients studied. These pathological characteristics are detailed in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4. In all, eight cases of prostate cancer recurrence after conventional treatment, ten cases of Gleason 6, ten cases of Gleason 9, (Table 1); and ten control cases (Table 2) were collected with plasmas analyzed. PSA from the plasma (clinical report) and from the ultracentrifuge-purified exosomes showed that though the protein concentrations were not identical, there was similarity in the trend of plasma to plasma-derived exosome PSA values. Importantly, Survivin amounts though significantly less in the exosomes were more consistent across the patients evaluated, and given the sensitivity of the ELISA, picograms for Survivin compared to nanograms for the PSA, is more accurate.

thumbnail
Table 1. Survivin ELISA and PSA levels of plasma from Chemo-resistance, Gleason 6, and Gleason 9 patients are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Survivin ELISA and PSA levels of plasma from controls with no diagnosis of cancer.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Survivin ELISA and PSA levels of Sera from BPH patients are shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Survivin ELISA and PSA levels of Sera from Prostate Cancer patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.t004

Further studies using sera instead of plasma were performed on six controls, twenty BPH cases (Table 3) and 19 additional PCa cases (Table 4). Like before, ELISA results from Survivin provided a more sensitive and stable quantitation than did the ELISA for PSA. Quantitation from the sera of BPH patients showed an average of 52.9 pg/ml Survivin and 1.3 ng/ml PSA. In comparison, when evaluated from PCa patients, Survivin averaged 149 pg/ml and PSA averaged 0.3 ng/ml (Tables 3 and 4). BPH numbers for both Survivin and PSA are nearly 3 fold lower than in the PCa patient sera. Unfortunately, purchased BPH samples did not come with the clinical PSA ELISA quantities that we have from the PCa cases (Table 3).

Correlations of Survivin with PSA

Of the patient's plasma/serum samples evaluated for Survivin, all samples (Gleason 6, Gleason 9, recurrence, or PCa samples) exhibited greater than 100 pg/mL Survivin (Table 5). In contrast, only 60% of Gleason 6, 80% of Gleason 9 plasmas and 84% of PCa sera had a PSA of greater than 4 ng/mL. Recurrent patient plasmas all had greater than 4 ng/mL. In control plasmas and BPH sera, no sample had a Survivin concentration greater than 100 pg/mL and no PSA concentration greater than 4 ng/mL (Table 5).

Discussion

Prostate carcinoma resists apoptosis with altered expression of both pro- and antiapoptotic proteins, thereby bypassing internal surveillance checkpoints, thriving in unfavorable microenvironments, and acquiring an invasive phenotype [20]. Recent studies suggest that inhibition of apoptosis, rather than enhanced cellular proliferation, is a critical trait that contributes to prostate carcinogenesis. Among the regulators of PCa apoptosis, interest recently has focused on Survivin, a multifunctional member of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) gene family that counteracts cell death and controls mitotic progression. Selective overexpression of Survivin has been associated with higher tumor grade, advanced disease stage, rapid tumor progression, short patient survival, and resistance to therapy in patients with various malignancies [17][19].

Survivin exists in a number of subcellular locations such as the mitochondria, cytoplasm, and nucleus. Recently it has also been found in the extracellular space [23], [24]. We have shown that extracellular Survivin exists in multimolecular complexes which include heat shock proteins [24]. Furthermore, we have also shown that these complexes reside in or on exosomes, and that cancer treatment can enhance release of such exosomes from cancer cells [24]. Extracellular Survivin is able to mediate a pro-survival field effect through its secretion by cancer cells and uptake by surrounding normal and transformed cells [23]. Linking extracellular Survivin's ability to enhance cellular proliferation, survival and tumor cell invasion with a membrane-protective trafficking modality provides additional support for the hypothesis that Survivin plays a pivotal role in the pathobiology of cancer cell growth and protection from therapeutic interventions.

Several previous studies have examined the plasma levels of Survivin in cancer patients [36], [37]. In adult T-cell leukemia and the supernatants from in vitro cultures of solid-tumor cells, the levels of Survivin protein was low compared to the cellular Survivin protein and mRNA levels [37]. This finding resulted in the conclusion that Survivin protein levels in plasma do not reflect cellular Survivin levels. Furthermore, Survivin plasma levels were evaluated compared to alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection (HCV) with and without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [36]. Though not concluded to be as reliable in these studies as AFP, Survivin levels were determined to be measurable and significant in patients suffering with HCV and measurable but not significant in those with HCC. Though not entirely clear, these results could be explained by the finding that HCV-infected HCC cells became more resistant to cell death and thus Survivin release compared to control or HCV-infected cells alone [36].

The prostate specific antigen (PSA) assay has been controversially utilized in prostate cancer screening though initially it was envisioned as a tool for evaluating treatment response [38]. Its use as a screening tool was driven by both the US prostate cancer burden and a need to detect its presence at a time that would allow for curative treatment to begin. Unfortunately, its use is believed to have led to both over diagnosis and overtreatment and hence the urgent need for novel biomarkers to be found to supplement PSA for management and treatment [39]. Exosomal Survivin measurements may provide another plasma-based assay for the presence of PCa. In the present study, we have identified for the first time that exosomes containing Survivin can be purified from plasma collected from patients with a diagnosis of PCa. Although there was little difference in exosome quantity, exosomal Survivin levels were higher in exosomes purified from PCa patients than from the sera of normal controls. In addition, in this study and that performed by others [36], [37], plasma-quantitated Survivin in samples taken from patients with no confirmed cancer diagnosis, also had reduced Survivin levels compared to PCa patient sera. The source of this exosomal Survivin pool, though unclear, may originate in immune cells [40] such as lymphocytes [41], monocytes [42] and dendritic cells [34], all Survivin containing cells [43] which have been shown to release exosomes. Survivin expression is associated with established features of biologically aggressive prostate carcinoma, such as higher final Gleason score and metastasis to regional lymph nodes [20]. In our study we found that patients who had failed treatment with Taxotere had elevated levels of exosomal Survivin. In addition, and of special interest, we found that patients presenting with either mid (Gleason 6) or high (Gleason 9) Gleason scores exhibited higher exosomal Survivin levels with no significant difference in Survivin content between them. Our findings, though more robust in the plasma we studied appear in agreement with what has been found with urine, tumor exosomes and PSA [31]. In these studies, urine exosome PSA is described as present in 20 of 24 PCa specimens while in our hands, tumor exosome Survivin is found in 47 of 47 specimens. Whether or not cancer treatment will affect tumor exosome Survivin levels has yet to be evaluated.

In this current study, we provide compelling evidence that circulating Survivin may be a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker for human PCa. Our results indicate that Survivin, analyzed directly from serum/plasma or from serum/plasma-derived exosomes, was lower in patients with BPH and healthy controls than in men with PCa. Survivin levels did not change, being consistently high, with regard to Gleason score and patients having recurrence, suggesting that Survivin levels could be used for early detection and could perhaps one day more accurately differentiate BPH from PCa. Comparing patients with and without tumors, but both having high PSA values will also be an important next step, as in our hands all the BPH samples we have acquired have relatively non-cancer PSA values [44].

The role of exosomal Survivin is still unknown. It is possible that a therapy-stressed, cellular release of exosomes containing Survivin and other antiapoptotic proteins, RNAs or miRNAs is performed as a final attempt to protect themselves from the stress that exists within the tumor microenvironment. Larger studies with more events and longer follow-up will be required to develop a more definitive statement regarding the association of Survivin expression in exosomes or in the tumor microenvironment with prostate carcinoma progression and as importantly, metastasis and survival. These findings will provide a rationale for further evaluation of exosomal Survivin and its role in resistance to androgen-based therapy in prostate carcinoma and raise the possibility of targeted combination therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

Our finding that Survivin, a unique human inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP), has intercellular transport and signaling capabilities is significant. Consistent with Survivin's association with unfavorable clinicopathological parameters, trafficking Survivin throughout the tumor microenvironment can drive the aggressive status of the tumor, prohibiting or minimizing therapeutic results. In our current work we show that though the overall number of exosomes being shed into patient plasma does not significantly change during the development of cancer, the level of Survivin in those exosomes increases significantly. Importantly, progression from mid- to late-stage does not drive an appreciable Survivin increase indicating that Survivin may prove useful as a biomarker for earlier detection of prostate cancer. Indeed, Survivin-based testing, performed on tumor-exosomes, will allow molecular-based diagnosis that in time may also aid in therapy decisions and disease response surveillance leading to better management of prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

Patient Plasma and Serum

Plasma samples were collected from ten healthy male volunteers, and twenty-eight PCa patients. Plasma from twenty PCa subjects was obtained from the specimen bank of the SPECS consortium which is an observational clinical trial which utilizes prostate tissue and clinical values obtained by informed consent to derive gene signatures predictive of outcome at the time of diagnosis. SPECS is directed by Dr. Dan Mercola from the University of California, Irvine. Samples were pre-prostatectomy plasma randomly selected from ten low-grade PCa cases (Gleason 6) and ten high-grade PCa cases (Gleason 9). In addition, plasma from eight advanced-disease PCa patients participating in a second-line chemotherapy trial was also collected. These patients had failed chemotherapy with Taxotere. Nineteen serum samples were collected from PCa patients and six controls through the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Biospecimen Laboratory at Loma Linda Universities Cancer Center. Twenty BPH samples were purchased from Bioserve Biotechnologies, Beltsville, MD. Bioserve Biotechnologies as provider of these samples is covered as defined in the HIPPA Act of 1996 as is providing them to us with a limited data set of protected health information.

Blood was collected in vacuum tubes containing sodium heparin. The tubes were centrifuged at 2000 g×7 minutes, and the plasma was then removed and aliquoted for storage at −80°C. All samples were obtained in the course of IRB-approved studies, following the documentation of informed consent in accordance with university policy at both Loma Linda University and the University of California at Irvine.

Human Survivin Immunoassay

Whole plasma samples were subjected to a commercially available human Survivin Immunoassay (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) using the manufacturer's instructions in order to quantitate Survivin concentrations.

Exosome Isolation

Plasma microvesicles were isolated as previously described, with minor modifications [45]. Thawed, cryopreserved plasma (2 ml) was centrifuged for 30 min at 500× g, 45 min at 12,000× g and 18 h at 110,000× g. Pellets were resuspended in a large volume of PBS, filtered through a 0.22-µm filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and centrifuged at 110,000× g for 1 h. Microvesicle pellets were washed once in a large volume of PBS, centrifuged at 110,000× g for 1 h and re-suspended in 50–200 ml of PBS. The amount of 110,000× g pellet proteins recovered was measured using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Exosomes were used as fresh preparations for immunoblotting or were conserved at −80°C for later use. For serum samples, the commercially available ExoQuick (SBI, Mountain View, CA) was employed as described by the vendor. Briefly, 100 µL of serum was incubated with 100 µL of ExoQuick solution followed by a 2 hr incubation at 4°C followed by centrifugation at 1500× g for 30 minutes. After centrifugation the exosomes appear as a beige or white pellet at the bottom of the vessel which is then reconstituted with 500 µL of dH2O.

Exosome quantification

To quantify the amount of exosomes released, we assessed the activity of acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme that is associated with these vesicles. Acetylcholinesterase activity was assessed as described by Savina et al. [46]. Briefly, 40 µl of the exosome fraction was suspended in 110 µl of PBS. 37.5 ml of this PBS-diluted exosome fraction was then added to individual wells on a 96-well flat-bottomed microplate. 1.25 mM acetylthiocholine and 0.1 mM 5,50-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) were then added to exosome fractions in a final volume of 300 µl, and the change in absorbance at 412 nm was monitored every 5 min for 30 min.

Human PSA Immunoassay

Isolated exosomes from patients' plasma were subjected to human Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) using a PSA Immunoassy (American Research Products, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) kit following the manufacturer's instructions in order to quantitate PSA concentrations in exosomes.

Western Blot Analysis

For Western blot analysis, cells or exosomal preparations were lysed using lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1% NP40, 0.25% DOC, 150 mM NaCl2, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml Aprotinin/leupeptin/pepstatin, 20 mM NaF, 0.2 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), H2O). For protein concentrations the BCA assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL) was used. Proteins from exosomes (20–40 µg) were separated using 12% Bis–Tris polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and probed using the following antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-LAMP1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and rabbit polyclonal anti-Survivin (Novus, Littleton, CO). Secondary antibodies (IR-Dye conjugated) were goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (LICOR, Lincoln, Nebraska). Immunoreactive bands were detected using the Odyssey Imaging System (LICOR, Lincoln, Nebraska) and quantified using ImageQuant software.

Statistical Analysis

Multiple comparisons among different groups were calculated by using Multiple Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). Student t-test (two-tailed) was used to evaluate the significance of changes between control groups and experimental groups. Probability values P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Western Blot Analysis of exosomal Survivin in normal control, BPH and untreated PCa serum samples. Antibodies for Survivin and Lamp1 were used for Western blotting of patient-purified exosomal protein.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046737.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Center for Health Disparities & Molecular Medicine for resource support of this project and the Graduate Students that it involved. Also, we would like to thank the Department of Medicine at the University of California, Irvine for sample acquisition as well as Loma Linda Universities Cancer Center & San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Biospecimen Laboratory.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NRW SK. Performed the experiments: SK JMSJ MMAV DT JRA AA. Analyzed the data: SK DM MBL NRW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SM DM MBL NRW. Wrote the paper: SK NRW.

References

  1. 1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60: 277–300.
  2. 2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90.
  3. 3. Lu S, Liu M, Epner DE, Tsai MJ (1999) Androgen regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 gene through an androgen response element in the proximal promoter. Mol Endocrinol 13: 376–384.
  4. 4. Klein EA, Kupelian PA (2003) Localised prostate cancer: radiation or surgery? Urol Clin North Am 30: 315–330.
  5. 5. Shariat SF, Semjonow A, Lilja H, Savage C, Vickers AJ, et al. (2011) Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers. Acta Oncol 50 Suppl 1: 61–75.
  6. 6. Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, et al. (2003) Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 169: 517–523.
  7. 7. Bjartell A, Montironi R, Berney DM, Egevad L (2011) Tumour markers in prostate cancer II: diagnostic and prognostic cellular biomarkers. Acta Oncol 50 Suppl 1: 76–84.
  8. 8. Freedland SJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Eisenberger M, Dorey FJ, et al. (2005) Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 294: 433–439.
  9. 9. Chang RT, Kirby R, Challacombe BJ (2012) Is there a link between BPH and prostate cancer? Practitioner 256: 13–16, 12.
  10. 10. Guo Z, Dai B, Jiang T, Xu K, Xie Y, et al. (2006) Regulation of androgen receptor activity by tyrosine phosphorylation. Cancer Cell 10: 309–319.
  11. 11. Zhang M, Latham DE, Delaney MA, Chakravarti A (2005) Survivin mediates resistance to antiandrogen therapy in prostate cancer. Oncogene 24: 2474–2482.
  12. 12. Li Y, Che M, Bhagat S, Ellis K, Kucuk O, et al. (2004) Regulation of gene expression and inhibition of experimental prostate cancer bone metastasis by dietary genistein. Neoplasia 6: 354–363.
  13. 13. Denmeade SR (1996) Apoptotic pathways in normal prostate and prostate cancer. Prostate 1: 120–125.
  14. 14. Howell SB (2000) Resistance to apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Mol Urol 4: 225–229.
  15. 15. Krajewska M, Krajewski S, Epstein JI, Shabaik A, Sauvageot J, et al. (1996) Immunohistochemical analysis of bcl-2, bax, bcl-X, and mcl-1 expression in prostate cancers. Am J Pathol 148: 1567–1576.
  16. 16. Altieri DC (2003) Survivin, versatile modulation of cell division and apoptosis in cancer. Oncogene 22: 8581–8589.
  17. 17. Kishi H, Igawa M, Kikuno N, Yoshino T, Urakami S, et al. (2004) Expression of the survivin gene in prostate cancer: correlation with clinicopathological characteristics, proliferative activity and apoptosis. J Urol 171: 1855–1860.
  18. 18. Krajewska M, Krajewski S, Banares S, Huang X, Turner B, et al. (2003) Elevated expression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9: 4914–4925.
  19. 19. Koike H, Sekine Y, Kamiya M, Nakazato H, Suzuki K (2008) Gene expression of survivin and its spliced isoforms associated with proliferation and aggressive phenotypes of prostate cancer. Urology 72: 1229–1233.
  20. 20. Shariat SF, Lothan Y, Saboorian H, Khoddami SM, Roehrborn CG, et al. (2004) Survivin expression is associated with features of biologically aggressive prostate carcinoma. Cancer 100: 751–757.
  21. 21. Nakahara T, Takeuchi M, Kinoyama I, Minematsu T, Shirasuna K, et al. (2007) YM155, a novel small-molecule survivin suppressant, induces regression of established human hormone-refractory prostate tumor xenografts. Cancer Res 67: 8014–8021.
  22. 22. Shen J, Liu J, Long Y, Miao Y, Su M, et al. (2009) Knockdown of survivin expression by siRNAs enhances chemosensitivity of prostate cancer cells and attenuates its tumorigenicity. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 41: 223–230.
  23. 23. Khan S, Aspe JR, Asumen MG, Almaguel F, Odumosu O, et al. (2009) Extracellular, cell-permeable survivin inhibits apoptosis while promoting proliferative and metastatic potential. Brit J Cancer 100: 1073–1086.
  24. 24. Khan S, Jutzy JMS, Aspe JR, McGregor DW, Neidigh JW, et al. (2011) Survivin is released from cancer cells via exosomes. Apoptosis 16: 1–12.
  25. 25. Duijvesz D, Luider T, Bangma CH, Jenster G (2011) Exosomes as biomarker treasure chests for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 59: 823–831.
  26. 26. Fine SW, Epstein JI (2008) A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score. J Urol 179: 1335–1338 discussion 1338–1339.
  27. 27. Mikolajczyk SD, Song Y, Wong JR, Matson RS, Rittenhouse HG (2004) Are multiple markers the future of prostate cancer diagnostics? Clin Biochem 37: 519–528.
  28. 28. Fradet Y (2009) Biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis: beyond prostate-specific antigen. Curr Opin Urol 19: 243–246.
  29. 29. Fiorentino M, Capizzi E, Loda M (2010) Blood and tissue biomarkers in prostate cancer: state of the art. Urol Clin North Am 37: 131–141 Table of Contents.
  30. 30. Ploussard G, de la Taille A (2010) Urine biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 7: 101–109.
  31. 31. Mitchell PJ, Welton J, Staffurth J, Court J, Mason MD, et al. (2009) Can urinary exosomes act as treatment response markers in prostate cancer? J Transl Med 7: 4.
  32. 32. Koumangoye RB, Sakwe AM, Goodwin JS, Patel T, Ochieng J (2011) Detachment of breast tumor cells induces rapid secretion of exosomes which subsequently mediate cellular adhesion and spreading. PLoS One 6: e24234.
  33. 33. Johnstone RM (2006) Exosomes biological significance: A concise review. Blood Cells Mol Dis 36: 315–321.
  34. 34. Quah BJ, O'Neill HC (2005) The immunogenicity of dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Blood Cells Mol Dis 35: 94–110.
  35. 35. Bhatnagar S, Shinagawa K, Castellino FJ, Schorey JS (2007) Exosomes released from macrophages infected with intracellular pathogens stimulate a proinflammatory response in vitro and in vivo. Blood 110: 3234–3244.
  36. 36. El-Attar HA, Kandil MH, El-Kerm YM, El-Ghandour MK (2010) Comparison of serum survivin and alpha fetoprotein in Egyptian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis C viral infection. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11: 897–903.
  37. 37. Sugahara K, Uemura A, Harasawa H, Nagai H, Hirakata Y, et al. (2004) Clinical relevance of survivin as a biomarker in neoplasms, especially in adult T-cell leukemias and acute leukemias. Int J Hematol 80: 52–58.
  38. 38. Croswell JM, Kramer BS, Crawford ED (2011) Screening for prostate cancer with PSA testing: current status and future directions. Oncology (Williston Park) 25: 452–460, 463.
  39. 39. Mazzola CR, Ghoneim T, Shariat SF (2011) [Emerging biomarkers for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer]. Prog Urol 21: 1–10.
  40. 40. Iero M, Valenti R, Huber V, Filipazzi P, Parmiani G, et al. (2008) Tumour-released exosomes and their implications in cancer immunity. Cell Death Differ 15: 80–88.
  41. 41. Clayton A, Turkes A, Navabi H, Mason MD, Tabi Z (2005) Induction of heat shock proteins in B-cell exosomes. J Cell Sci 118: 3631–3638.
  42. 42. Valenti R, Huber V, Iero M, Filipazzi P, Parmiani G, et al. (2007) Tumor-released microvesicles as vehicles of immunosuppression. Cancer Res 67: 2912–2915.
  43. 43. Fukuda S, Pelus LM (2006) Survivin, a cancer target with an emerging role in normal adult tissues. Mol Cancer Ther 5: 1087–1098.
  44. 44. Williams RM, Naz RK (2010) Novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for prostate cancer. Front Biosci (Schol Ed) 2: 677–684.
  45. 45. Caby MP, Lankar D, Vincendeau-Scherrer C, Raposo G, Bonnerot C (2005) Exosomal like vesicles are present in human blood plasma. Int Immunol 17: 879–887.
  46. 46. Savina A, Furlan M, Vidal M, Colombo MI (2003) Exosome release is regulated by a calcium-dependent mechanism in K562 cells. J Biol Chem 278: 20083–20090.