Voice and Handgrip Strength Predict Reproductive Success in a Group of Indigenous African Females

Voice and Handgrip Strength Predict Reproductive Success in a Group of Indigenous African Females

  • Jeremy Atkinson, 
  • R. Nathan Pipitone, 
  • Agnieszka Sorokowska, 
  • Piotr Sorokowski, 
  • Mara Mberira, 
  • Astrid Bartels, 
  • Gordon G. Gallup Jr.
  • Published: August 3, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041811


Evolutionary accounts of human traits are often based on proxies for genetic fitness (e.g., number of sex partners, facial attractiveness). Instead of using proxies, actual differences in reproductive success is a more direct measure of Darwinian fitness. Certain voice acoustics such as fundamental frequency and measures of health such as handgrip strength correlate with proxies of fitness, yet there are few studies showing the relation of these traits to reproduction. Here, we explore whether the fundamental frequency of the voice and handgrip strength account for differences in actual reproduction among a population of natural fertility humans. Our results show that both fundamental frequency and handgrip strength predict several measures of reproductive success among a group of indigenous Namibian females, particularly amongst the elderly, with weight also predicting reproductive outcomes among males. These findings demonstrate that both hormonally regulated and phenotypic quality markers can be used as measures of Darwinian fitness among humans living under conditions that resemble the evolutionary environment of Homo sapiens. We also argue that these findings provide support for the Grandmother Hypothesis.


Growing evidence shows that many sexually dimorphic traits in humans convey adaptive (evolutionarily relevant) information. The voice seems to be one medium that provides such biological information. Individuals with attractive voices tend to have more attractive bodies [1], increased mating success [2], and show fewer deviations from bilateral symmetry [3]. Fundamental frequency (of which voice pitch is the acoustic percept) is a vocal parameter that correlates with perceptions of attractiveness and mate quality. Males with voices lower in fundamental frequency are rated by females as more attractive, dominant and masculine [4][9]. Females with voices higher in fundamental frequency (based on natural differences as well as experimental manipulation) are rated as more attractive [10][13] and have other characteristics that confer femininity [14]. Differences in vocal parameters are thought to be due to differences in testosterone exposure [15][18] for both males and females, and estrogen exposure in females [6], [19]. The degree of sexual dimorphism in human vocal traits as a consequence of testosterone exposure signals phenotypic quality [5], [14], [20] and reported mating success [21] in males. Among females, reproductive viability [5], [10], [19], reproductive development and health are also related to estrogen exposure [22], [23]. Recent reviews [24], [25] have summarized literature showing that the mere sound of a person’s voice conveys information about the speaker’s gender, age, body configuration, hormonal status, sexual behavior, strength, fertility, as well as subtle deviations from bilateral symmetry – all of which bear on health and fitness. Thus, differences in vocal traits among males and females appear to reflect real biological differences in reproductive potential.

Only one study to date has shown correlations between vocal acoustics and reproductive success (RS) in an environment resembling human evolutionary history; Apicella et al. [26] reported that male fundamental frequency predicted the number of living children ostensibly sired by male Hadza, an indigenous hunter-gatherer population living in Tanzania. However, paternity tests were not used, and complete assurance of paternity is therefore suspect. As the authors themselves acknowledge, the results could be due to increased paternal confidence, not necessarily increased RS. Among females, maternity is almost always certain, outside of maternity ward confusion in Western society. Thus, we hypothesize that males with a lower fundamental frequency and females with a higher fundamental frequency will have increased reproductive output within the present sample.

Handgrip strength (HGS) is both a sexually dimorphic trait and a robust marker of phenotypic quality, health, and an indirect measure of fitness [27]. Handgrip strength is related to masculine features and increased androgen exposure in males and is correlated with organizational (i.e., prenatal) effects of testosterone [28], as well as activational effects of testosterone in elderly [29], normal [30] and hypogonadal/low serum testosterone men [31][34]. Increases in HGS correlate with testosterone increases in pre-adolescent athletes [35], and to waking testosterone levels in physically active men [36]. Handgrip strength is heritable [37][40], and is an informative measure of a male’s overall physical prowess, social aggression, body morphology and sexual behaviour [27], [41], [42]. Additionally, HGS is correlated with lean muscle mass [43] and male facial attractiveness [42]. Handgrip strength is a vital component of upper body strength, which is a component of perceived male strength from voice ratings [44] and perceived fighting ability [45] in both Western and indigenous populations. Thus, we hypothesize that higher handgrip strength, after controlling for variables such as height and weight, will be correlated with increased reproductive output among males.

However, in addition to a clear androgen and genetic component, HGS is also a robust predictor of phenotypic quality in both sexes throughout a person’s entire life. For example, large scale cohort studies have determined that adult HGS is correlated with higher birth weight in both sexes, independent of adult body height and weight [46], [47], suggesting that adult HGS is a good measure of the quality of the prenatal environment for both sexes. Additionally, numerous studies have found that HGS is correlated with general measures of health in adults [48], as well as current nutritional status in men and women of all ages [49]. HGS is also an excellent predictor of longevity and health in the elderly. Higher HGS is associated with reduced elderly mortality and disability [50][56], and low HGS in adults is highly predictive of later-life mortality and disability levels [49], [56][60]. Handgrip strength predicts hospitalized patients’ protein loss [61] as well as bone mineral density in healthy subjects [62], [63], post-menopausal and/or elderly women [64], [65] and adolescent girls [66]. Higher HGS is correlated with reduced risk of cognitive diseases [67] and muted cognitive decline in seniors [68][73]. Therefore it is hypothesized that, within each sex, higher HGS will predict increased RS in both sexes due to the large and robust literature linking HGS to phenotypic quality.

There is also a theoretical a priori reason why HGS could be positively correlated with increased RS in females. The Grandmother Hypothesis posits that the extended post-menopausal lifespan in human females is an adaptive trait that enables women to assist and provision their children’s children [74][77]. Traditional investigations of the Grandmother Hypothesis have focused on RS differences in mothers based on the presence or absence of their mother [e.g., 78]. Another way to investigate the Grandmother Hypothesis is to determine whether phenotypic quality markers directly relating to older women’s ability to provide resources for their progeny’s children positively correlates with their RS. Handgrip strength is an excellent candidate for such a marker, as much of the investment grandmothers provide involves taking over the “most arduous domestic tasks” [79] faced by mothers. These tasks include collecting firewood and/or gathering and preparing hard-to-acquire food, such as tubers [80]. This help enables mothers to spend more time in direct childcare and to forage for easy-access food with their children [80], which in turn decreases infant mortality [75] and increases growth rate [74], increasing the quantity and quality of her offspring [79]. In many traditional populations, older women (which include grandmothers) provide hard-to-obtain resources for their families [80], whereas returns from hunting dramatically decrease in older males [81], [82] due in part to their faster rate of senescence [83]. Recent research has shown that male HGS senesces faster and earlier than female HGS [84], suggesting that the maintenance of HGS might be more evolutionary important for elderly females. Thus, we hypothesize that HGS will predict RS among elderly females, but not elderly males.

In summary, the present study investigated the relationship between RS and both fundamental frequency and HGS in an indigenous population, with particular attention to females as maternal confidence is not suspect. We also use several measures of reproductive output to assess genetic fitness to a fuller extent. Additionally, we use handgrip strength as a marker of phenotypic quality, and its potential to relate to the Grandmother Hypothesis.


Anthropometric, reproductive, and vocal samples were collected from the Himba (Ovahimba), who live in the northwest region of Namibia. The data were collected by the two Polish authors (P.S. and A.S.) and this research was approved by the Polish Ethical Committee at the University of Wroclaw, Poland. Our Namibian colleagues from The University of Namibia at Windhoek did not know of any law requiring ethical committee approval for a study involving anonymous, non-invasive data collection, therefore all ethical issues were handled by the University of Wroclaw. Because the population studied was illiterate, written consent could not be obtained, thus participants gave verbal consent and were told that their participation was voluntary and that they could quit at any time, without loss of monetary compensation. Obtaining verbal consent was also approved by the University of Wroclaw.

The Himba are one of the few ethnic groups in Africa who have preserved their traditional lifestyle, including wearing traditional clothing as well as maintaining most of the beliefs and customs of their ancestors [85]. They live a nomadic lifestyle contingent upon resources in and around the outskirts of Opuwo, an area rarely visited by tourists. All participants lived in small traditional villages, where only a few inhabitants (10 to 15 people, or 2 to 3 families) occupy each village. There is little contact with Western culture and no large-scale development. None of the villages we visited had access to contraceptives. Additionally, there is extremely limited access to formal education and modern medicine. However, a mobile school did make infrequent visits to some of the small villages. The Himba economy is based on livestock pasturing and supported by hunting, small-scale gardening and gathering [85]. Able-bodied Himba men spend the majority of time herding cattle and goats, while women perform most other tasks, including milking cows, constructing houses, fetching water from wells, and caring for children. All adults in the surrounding villages were invited to participate in the study. Participants were paid a small fee, equal to approximately $3 USD. Although the data were collected in one village, individuals who heard of the study and the monetary compensation came from neighbouring villages to participate. The final sample consisted of 54 females aged 18–80 (41.57±18.7) and 36 males aged 18–76 (50.36±18.1).

Generally speaking, we were less likely to encounter men in villages compared to women, as able-bodied men are usually herding. Women in the village confirmed our observations. Men that were available to participate were often elderly or physically weak (P.S., A.S., M.M., personal communication). Participating males were significantly older than participating females (t90 = 2.34, p = .021). Age was self-estimated by all subjects and was often based on personal events. The majority (84%) of the group was married and 42% of men had more than one wife. A total of 101 individuals participated in the study, with six participants under the age of 18, three statistical outliers, and two participants who did not provide a voice sample and were removed prior to analyses. Descriptive statistics can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables used in the study.


The participants were interviewed by a citizen of Namibia fluent in the local dialect. They were asked questions regarding their marital and reproductive history. Subjects were asked to indicate their total number of children and grandchildren, and the number still alive. From this latter number, a novel measure of RS, genetic vectors (GV), was calculated as follows: 1*(number of living children) + ½ *(number of living grandchildren). The number of grandchildren was halved to calculate a measure of genetic fitness based on the proportion of shared genes. Genetic vectors take into account the reproductive avenues available to an individual through their children and grandchildren and provides a reasonable estimation of lifetime fitness for an indigenous population that is subject to high levels of mortality (particularly infant mortality), has overlapping reproduction among generations and could only be measured at one specific time by researchers. Each GV of a participant has the potential to pass on their genes, thus both generations (children and grandchildren) are tallied. Final analyses were conducted on number of living children, and GV as well as the number of living grandchildren and the number of living grandchildren controlling for number of living children (this will assess offspring’s rate of producing grand-offspring) as dependent variables. Infant mortality was calculated from the number of deceased children over the total number of children born to the participants. Height, weight, and HGS were also assessed. A Riester Dynatest Hand Dynamometer was used to record HGS. Handgrip strength was taken three times for the dominant hand and the single highest result was recorded in bars (the bar being a unit of pressure equal to slightly more than one unit of Earth’s atmospheric pressure at sea level). For voice samples, participants were asked to speak into a dictation microphone and count from one to 10 in their native language. Audio files were recorded with 11 kHz, 16 bit mono and were adequate for extracting pertinent acoustic parameters. Acoustic analyses were conducted using Praat software [86] and involved measuring fundamental frequency using Praat’s autocorrelation algorithm. Fundamental frequency was calculated for each vowel across counting utterances from one to ten (Imue, imbari, indatu, ine, indano, hamboumue, hambombari, hambondatu, muviu, omurongo). Mean fundamental frequency values were then calculated and used in subsequent analyses.


Descriptive statistics for age, GV, number of living children, grandchildren, height, weight, mean fundamental frequency, and HGS values are shown in Table 1. Hierarchical regression models were used to assess the effects of targeted predictor variables on various measures of reproductive success. Prior to analysis, data were checked for normality and the presence of both univariate and multivariate outliers. Three males were dropped from the analysis due to having one of their RS Z-scores above 3.33 (p<.001); 2 for having a large number of children and one for having both a large number of children and a large number of grandchildren. All analyses conducted on males were re-analyzed using log-transformed values which did not change any of the results. The analyses of male participants using log transformed variables appears in the supporting information section (Supporting Information S1 and Table S1). All individuals under the age of 18 were removed from statistical analyses. The final analyses were conducted on 54 females and 36 males. All analyses used one-tailed tests for significance due to a priori predictions; higher fundamental frequency in females and lower fundamental frequency in males was hypothesized to correlate with RS measures and high handgrip strength within each sex was hypothesized to correlate with RS measures. Only 5 individuals in the sample (3 females and 2 males) reported a death of one or more of their children, making a statistical analysis of both mortality rates and number of births [e.g., 26] not feasible. This was likely due to a reticence on the part of participants to discuss child mortality, as opposed to low rates of child mortality among participants [87].

Similar to findings from Apicella et al. [26], there were linear and quadratic effects of age on RS variables (multiple R2 = .31; p = .001). Thus, age and age2 were entered into the first regression block for all analyses to control for their effects on RS variables prior to entering variables of interest. Height and weight were initially entered in the second block, but dropped from all subsequent models for females as they were non-significant predictors of RS variables after age and age2 had been incorporated (p>.30, whether entered individually or simultaneously). Fundamental frequency was then entered in the manner used by Apicella et al. [26]. Table 2 and 3 show all results for the hierarchical regression models for fundamental frequency in females and males predicting GV and number of living children. For females, fundamental frequency was a significant predictor of all RS variables (see Figure 1 and Table 4), including the number of living grandchildren (β.239; p<.05) and number of living grandchildren controlling for the number of living children (β = .168; p = .05). Full results revealing findings for height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and a discussion on controlling for these variables in relation to targeted predictor variables used in the present study can be found in the supporting information section (Supporting Information S1, Table S2 and Table S3).

Figure 1. The relationship between Himba female genetic vectors and fundamental frequency.

Residual values from regression of genetic vectors with age and age2 removed, plotted against differences in fundamental frequency. As fundamental frequency increased, so did Himba female genetic vectors, over and above age variables.


Table 2. Hierarchical regression analyses: Variables predicting genetic vectors and number of children (in parentheses) for females (N = 54).


Because height and weight correlate with HGS [21], the next model assessed the impact of HGS by using residual values of HGS, with the effects of height and weight removed. Residualized-HGS (r-HGS) remained a significant predictor of GV over and above age, fundamental frequency and body dimensions (see Figure 2). Fundamental frequency and r-HGS together explained 13.9% of the variance in GV and 13.5% of the variance in number of living children among females. Running the same regression without fundamental frequency revealed that r-HGS was a significant predictor of GV (β = .236; p = .035) and number of living children (β = .277; p = .024) but not number of grandchildren (β = −.074; p = .233), nor number of grandchildren controlling for the number of children (β = −.030 p = .860) in females. Fundamental frequency was not correlated with r-HGS for either sex (females; p = .765; males; p = .157) showing independent contributions of each variable in predicting GV and number of living children. This same analysis was conducted among younger females (49 and under & 39 and under), and fundamental frequency and r-HGS were not correlated (see Supporting Information S1).

Figure 2. The relationship between Himba female genetic vectors and handgrip strength.

Residual values from regression of genetic vectors with age, age2, and fundamental frequency removed, plotted against differences in handgrip strength residuals. As handgrip strength increased, so did Himba female genetic vectors, over and above the other predictor variables.


The same regression models applied to males revealed that neither fundamental frequency nor r-HGS predicted any of the four RS variables investigated (see Table 3 for GV and number of children results).

Table 3. Hierarchical regression analyses: Variables predicting genetic vectors and number of children (in parentheses) for males (N = 36).


To investigate whether these effects were retained in older females to assess the Grandmother Hypothesis, two models were constructed with age cut-offs at 40 and 50 years. Residualized HGS was recalculated among each age group in the same manner as with the whole sample. Among the 27 Himba women over the age of 39, r-HGS (β = .477; p = .017) and fundamental frequency (β = .422; p = .017) were significant predictors of GV. Residualized HGS (β = .6; p = .002) and fundamental frequency (β = .324; p = .048) were also significant predictor variables when using number of living children as the dependent variable. Fundamental frequency was also a significant predictor of the number of living grandchildren (β = .346; p = .024) and number of living grandchildren controlling for the number of living children (β = .277; p = .047), but r-HGS was not a significant predictor of these RS variables. Among the 19 women over the age of 49, r-HGS (β = .439; p = .035) and fundamental frequency (β = .529; p = .01) were significant predictors of GV. Residualized HGS (β = .582; p = .008) and fundamental frequency (β = .388; p = .025) were also significant predictors of the number of living children. In addition, fundamental frequency was a large and significant predictor of the number of living grandchildren (β = .500; p = .007) and the number of living grandchildren controlling for the number of living children (β = 0.425; p = .016).

Lastly, to examine the effects of r-HGS by itself for the 27 females over the age o 39, r-HGS was a significant predictor of living children and GV when entered into the regression model without fundamental frequency (number of living children; β = .613; p = .003, GV; β = .494; p = .015), but not for number of living grandchildren (β = .059; p = .074) nor number of living grandchildren controlling for number of living children (β = −.091; p = .634). For the 19 females over the age of 49, r-HGS was a significant predictor of the number of children (β = .599; p = .012), but not for GV (β = .461; p = .064), nor for number of grandchildren (β = .018; p = .467) nor of the number of grandchildren controlling for the number of children (β = .004; p = .987). All significant findings showing standardized regression coefficients for fundamental frequency and r-HGS predicting all four RS variables in females are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. Summary of significant findings (β = standardized regression coefficients) for fundamental frequency and residualized handgrip strength predicting reproductive success variables when entered simultaneously into regression models.



Female fundamental frequency and HGS were unique predictors of lifetime genetic fitness measures among indigenous Himba women. Females with higher-pitched voices and relatively stronger handgrip strengths tended to have higher reproductive outcomes. HGS was a robust predictor of both GV and number of living children, particularly among elderly females, which strongly suggests that HGS is a good measure of phenotypic quality and (Darwinian) successful ageing.

Past research has shown that females with a high voice pitch are rated as sounding younger, more attractive and more feminine [e.g., 6,10]. This trait has been proposed as a mate quality signal [5], [10], [19,] and is thought to be related to features of fitness. Among females, our results demonstrate a direct relationship between fundamental frequency and several measures of genetic fitness.

Although HGS is sexually dimorphic, it is important to emphasize that it remains an excellent indicator of physical and developmental health in both men and women [46], particularly in the elderly [49], [88] and was the largest predictor of the genetic vector variable and number of living children in this population. The Himba live under harsh environmental conditions where survival is dependent on the physical attributes of both sexes. However, increased female strength in this population does not necessarily imply increased masculinity (and thus decreased femininity), but rather signals overall vitality, health, and the ability to protect and provision offspring, particularly later in life. More importantly, these results provide evidence that the theoretically imposed dichotomy used in many indigenous mate preference studies, where a hypothetical male can either choose an attractive and feminine mate or a more masculine (and presumably “harder working”) mate, may be an overly simplified characterization of mate choice [e.g., 89] that neglects the role of phenotypic quality. In the present study, women with more feminine voices who were also stronger than would be expected, given their height, weight and age had more progeny. In essence, a Himba male could maximize his fitness by mating with a relatively strong and feminine mate. Our results are most parsimoniously explained by the wealth of evidence that links higher HGS to increased phenotypic quality in both sexes, particularly at later ages, as opposed to positing that Himba women with higher fitness have feminine voices but masculine bodies.

However, there were some limitations to HGS. It did not predict the number of grandchildren, with or without statistically controlling for the number of children, whereas fundamental frequency did, thus caution is warranted when interpreting the current results, particularly in relation to the Grandmother Hypothesis; These findings are not conclusive ‘proof’ of the Grandmother Hypothesis, but do provide evidence in support of the theory.

The current results suggest that assumption of sexually dimorphic traits only benefiting one sex may be unfounded. A premium has undoubtedly been placed on increased male strength during human evolution [e.g., 90,91], but having adequate levels of upper-arm or handgrip strength appears to be important for females as well, especially in indigenous environments that require both sexes to engage in strenuous manual labor for the majority of their lives. Among the Hadza, Hawkes et al. [80] found that among females, the hardest workers were grandmothers and great aunts who spent most of their day engaging in strenuous manual labor bringing home much needed food for their younger kin. Their efforts translated into faster growth rates of grandchildren [74] and increased survival rates during periods of food shortage [75]. Increased HGS would be vitally important in a Hadza female’s daily duties and could impact the quality and quantity of food gathered. Although the Himba are culturally distinct from the Hadza, they are undoubtedly united in their need to work hard to provide food for their family. Within this sample, stronger Himba mothers, particularly older mothers, had more children, possibly as a direct result of their strength.

Investigating evolutionary hypotheses among populations resembling those that prevailed during human evolutionary history may be more valid than comparable investigations in Western societies. This is important since the effects found in this study might be less pronounced in a modern population. Women from 1st world nations are less likely to be engaged in strenuous physical activities (e.g., sports, manual labor), which could lead to null findings between RS variables and HGS. This pattern has been found for height in 1st vs. 3rd world populations, where the benefits of being tall (or taller than average) are generally found for 1st world males and 3rd world females only [92][96] but not vice versa.

While the phenotypic quality and acoustic parameters we examined correlated with several measures of RS, no effects were found among males. These sex differences could be due to several factors. The male sample was smaller and significantly older, and potentially subject to non-random sampling as many younger, presumably able-bodied males were often absent from villages during the day to herd [85], personal observations of P.S., A.S. and M.M.]. Paternal certainty is another concern, particularly among indigenous cultures like the Himba where extra-paternity rates are high [87]. Another limitation of our dataset would be the reliance on retrospective reports. Child mortality rates were lower than expected, and the transformation of age into a numerical Western representation might have affected our results. In conjunction with limited visitation time, it is possible that the family history data were not completely accurate and thus caution is warranted when interpreting these results.

Residualized HGS was a significant predictor of the number of living children and GV in both groups of older females but did not predict the number of living grandchildren. Fundamental frequency was a significant predictor of all reproductive variables in both groups of older females. Although both age-truncated analyses had lower sample sizes, the relationship between strength, fundamental frequency and measures of reproductive success might be expected to diminish in older females, as the onset of menopause is associated with lower levels of cyclic hormones necessary to maintain normal vocal function [19] and other feminine mate quality features linked to reproductive potential. Additionally, in spite of other physiological changes at menopause, a growing body of evidence suggests that strength is well preserved in post-menopausal females. Although some research has shown that muscle mass and strength decline with age [e.g., 97], this may be due to senescence and inactivity [98], [99], and may not be due to menopause per se. Indeed, other studies have shown that handgrip strength is unaffected by menopause [100] and that ovarian testosterone levels (but not circulating testosterone levels) actually increase as a function of age in menopausal females [101]. Although a sedentary lifestyle leads directly to a decline in strength [97], the effect is mitigated by resistance training [99], [102], a history of manual labor [98] as well as proper nutrition and adequate protein intake [99]; the very conditions under which the Himba live. This environment, although different in some ways, does resemble the human environment of evolutionary adaptedness (certainly more so than First World environments). As such, there is a high physical workload for all females which continues well after reproductive age. This would tend to buffer against decreases in strength, which are more common in sedentary First World populations. Thus, our data show that older women who are stronger have higher measures of genetic fitness. Strength could be one of the proximal contributors to the ability of post-menopausal women to augment the fitness of their children and grandchildren, which lends support to the Grandmother Hypothesis. Therefore, not only should the presence or absence of elderly women be considered when investigating the Grandmother Hypothesis, but the type of help that can be obtained and the ability of a grandmother to engage in this help should be incorporated as well.

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate for the first time a relationship between several measures of female genetic fitness and fundamental frequency among a group of indigenous-living females. We also show that HGS, a well documented marker of phenotypic quality explains a significant amount of variance in several measures of female genetic fitness, particularly among elderly females, which we argue provides support for the Grandmother Hypothesis.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Z-scores for height, weight, fundamental frequency, HGS and r-HGS for the 3 outlier males and mahalanobis distance (D) for these variables. The critical value for D at k = 5 is 20.52 (p = .001).



Table S2.

Hierarchical regression analyses: Variables predicting genetic vectors and number of living children (in parentheses) for males (N = 36). Age and age2 were entered as control variables. Height and weight were entered as target variables.



Table S3.

Hierarchical regression analyses: Variables predicting genetic vectors and number of living children (in parentheses) for females (N = 54). Age and age2 were entered as control variables. Height and weight were entered as target variables.



Supporting Information S1.

Supplemental results include analyses of correlations between fundamental frequency and r-HGS in pre-menopausal women, z-scores and mahalanobis distance for acoustic and physical variables for male outliers, retaining male outliers using log-transformed variables, the effects of height and weight on RS variables for males and females, and a discussion of height and weight in the context of the present data.



Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RNP JA GGG PS. Performed the experiments: AS PS MM. Analyzed the data: RNP JA AB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AS JA PS MM AB. Wrote the paper: RNP JA GGG PS AS AB.


  1. 1. Hughes SM, Dispenza F, Gallup GG Jr (2004) Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evol Hum Behav 25: 295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.06.001
  2. 2. Hughes SM, Gallup GG Jr (2003) Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evol Hum Behav 24: 173–178. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00149-6
  3. 3. Hughes SM, Harrison MA, Gallup GG Jr (2002) The sound of symmetry: voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evol Hum Behav 23: 173–180.
  4. 4. Collins SA (2000) Men’s voices and women’s choices. Anim Behav 60: 773–780. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1523
  5. 5. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2005) Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies affect the attractiveness of human male voices. Anim Behav 69: 561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.012
  6. 6. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Law Smith MJ, Moore FR, DeBruine LM, et al. (2006) Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Horm Behav 49: 215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.004
  7. 7. Puts DA, Hodges CR, Cárdenas RA, Gaulin SJC (2007) Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evol Hum Behav 28: 340–344. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.002
  8. 8. Hodges-Simeon CR, Gaulin SJ, Puts DA (2010) Different vocal parameters predict perceptions of dominance and attractiveness. Hum Nat 21: 406–427. doi: 10.1007/s12110-010-9101-5
  9. 9. Puts DA, Apicella CL, Cardenas RA (2012) Masculine voices signal men’s threat potential in forager and industrial societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 279: 601–609. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0829
  10. 10. Collins S, Missing C (2003) Vocal and visual attractiveness are related in women. Anim Behav 6: 997–1004. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2123
  11. 11. Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Perrett DI (2008) The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women’s voices. Perception 37: 615–623. doi: 10.1068/p5514
  12. 12. Jones BC, Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Vukovic J (2008) Integrating cues of social interest and voice pitch in men’s preferences for women’s voices. Biol Lett 4: 192–194. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0626
  13. 13. Puts DA, Barndt JL, Welling LLM, Dawood K, Burriss RP (2011) Intrasexual competition among women: Vocal femininity affects perceptions of attractiveness and flirtatiousness. Pers Ind Diff 50: 111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.011
  14. 14. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Moore FR, Law Smith ML, et al. (2005) The voice and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality? Evol Hum Behav 26: 398–408. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.04.001
  15. 15. Harries M, Hawkins S, Hacking J, Hughes I (1998) Changes in the male voice at puberty: vocal fold length and its relationship to the fundamental frequency of the voice. J Laryngal Otol 112: 451–454. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100140757
  16. 16. Dabbs JM, Mallinger A (1999) High testosterone levels predict low voice pitch among men. Pers Indiv Differ 27: 801–804. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00272-4
  17. 17. Evans S, Neave N, Wakelin D (2006) Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: an evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biol Psych 72: 160–163. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.09.003
  18. 18. Evans S, Neave N, Wakelin D, Hamilton C (2008) The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiol Behav 93: 783–788. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.033
  19. 19. Abitbol J, Abitbol P, Abitbol B (1999) Sex hormones and the female voice. J Voice 13: 424–446. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80048-4
  20. 20. Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139: 603–622. doi: 10.1086/285346
  21. 21. Hodges-Simeon CR, Gaulin SJ, Puts DA (2011) Voice correlates of mating success in men: examining “contests” versus “mate choice” modes of sexual selection. Arch Sex Beh 40: 551–557. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9625-0
  22. 22. Alonso LC, Rosenfield RL (2002) Oestrogens and puberty. Best Pract Res Cl Endocr Metabol 16: 13–30. doi: 10.1053/beem.2002.0177
  23. 23. Vukovic J, Feinberg DR, BeBruine L, Smith FG, Jones BC (2010) Women's voice pitch is negatively correlated with health risk factors. J Evol Psychol 8: 217–225. doi: 10.1556/jep.8.2010.3.2
  24. 24. Gallup GG Jr, Frederick DA (2010) The science of sex appeal: An evolutionary perspective. Rev Gen Psychol 14: 240–250. doi: 10.1037/a0020451
  25. 25. Puts DA, Jones BC, DeBruine LM (2012) Sexual selection on human faces and voices. J Sex Research 49: 227–243. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.658924
  26. 26. Apicella CL, Feinberg DR, Marlowe FW (2007) Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biol Letters 3: 682–684. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0410
  27. 27. Gallup AC, O’Brien DT, White D, Wilson DS (2010) Handgrip strength and socially dominant behaviors in male adolescents. Evol Psychol 8: 229–243.
  28. 28. Fink B, Thanzami V, Seyde H, Manning JT (2006) Digit ratio and hand-grip strength in German and Mizos men: Cross-cultural evidence for an organizing effect of prenatal testosterone on strength. Am J Hum Biol 18: 776–782. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20549
  29. 29. Page ST, Amory JK, Bowman FD, Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM, et al. (2005) Exogenous testosterone (T) alone or with finasteride increases physical performance, grip strength, and lean body mass in older men with low serum T. J Clin Endocr Metabol. 90: 1502–1510. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1933
  30. 30. Griggs RC, Kingston W, Jozefowicz RF, Herr BE, Forbes G, et al. (1989) Effect of testosterone on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis. J Appl Physiol 66: 498–503.
  31. 31. Bhasin S, Storer TW, Berman N, Yarasheski KE, Clevenger B, et al. (1997) Testosterone replacement increases fat-free mass and muscle size in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocr Metabol 82: 407–413. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.2.3733
  32. 32. Wang C, Cunningham G, Dobs A, Iranmanesh A, Matsumoto AM, et al. (2004) Long-term testosterone gel (AndroGel) treatment maintains beneficial effects on sexual function and mood, lean and fat mass, and bone mineral density in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocr Metabol 5: 2085–2098. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032006
  33. 33. Soyupek F, Soyupek S, Perk H, Ozorak A (2008) Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: Effects on hand function. Urol Oncol 26: 141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.12.014
  34. 34. Gettler LT, Agustin SS, Kuzawa CW (2010) Testosterone, physical activity, and somatic outcomes among Filipino males. Am J Phys Anthropol 142: 590–599. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21282
  35. 35. Hansen L, Bangsbo J, Twisk J, Klausen K (1999) Development of muscle strength in relation to training level and testosterone in young male soccer players. Journal of Appl Physiol 87: 1141–1147.
  36. 36. Alibhai SM, Breunis H, Timilshina N, Johnston C, Tomlinson G, et al. (2010) Impact of androgen-deprivation therapy on physical function and quality of life in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 34: 5038–5045. doi: 10.1200/jco.2010.29.8091
  37. 37. Reed T, Fabsitz RR, Selby JV, Carmelli D (1991) Genetic influences and grip strength norms in the NHLBI twin study males aged 59–69. Ann Hum Biol 18: 425–432. doi: 10.1080/03014469100001722
  38. 38. Fredericksen H, Gaist D, Petersen HC, Hjelmborg J, McGue M, et al. (2002) Hand grip strength: A phenotype suitable for identifying genetic variants affecting mid- and late-life physical functioning. Genet Epidemiol 23: 110–122. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1127
  39. 39. Arden NK, Spector TD (1997) Genetic influences on muscle strength, lean body mass, and bone mineral density: A twin study. J Bone Miner Res 12: 2076–2081. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.12.2076
  40. 40. Tiainen K, Sipilä S, Alen M, Heikkinen E, Kaprio J, et al. (2004) Heritability of maximal isometric muscle strength in older female twins. J Appl Physiol. 173–80. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00200.2003
  41. 41. Gallup AC, White DD, Gallup GG Jr (2007) Handgrip strength predicts body morphology, aggression, and sexual behavior in males. Evol Hum Behav 28: 423–429. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.001
  42. 42. Shoup ML, Gallup GG Jr (2008) Men’s faces convey information about bodies and their behavior: What you see is what you get. Evol Psychol 6: 469–479.
  43. 43. Kallman DA, Plato CC, Tobin JD (1990) The role of muscle loss in the age-related decline of grip strength: Cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. J Gerontol 45: 82–88. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.3.m82
  44. 44. Sell A, Bryant GA, Cosmides L, Tooby J, Sznycer D, et al. (2010) Proc R Soc Lond B. 277: 3509–3518. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0769
  45. 45. Sell A, Cosmides L, Tooby J, Sznycer D, von Rueden C, et al. (2009) Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 575–584. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1177
  46. 46. Kuh D, Hardy R, Butterworth S, Okell L, Wadsworth M, et al. (2006) Developmental origins of midlife grip strength: findings from a birth cohort study. J Gerentol Biol Sci Med Sci 61: 702–706. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.7.702
  47. 47. Ridgway CL, Ong KK, Tammelin T, Sharp SJ, Ekelund U, et al. (2009) Birth size, infant weight gain, and motor development influence adult physical performance. Med Sci Spor Exerc 41: 1212–1221. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31819794ab
  48. 48. Geliebter A, Maher MM, Gerace L, Gutin B, Heymsfield SB, et al. (1997) Effects of strength or aerobic training on body composition, resting metabolic rate, and peak oxygen consumption in obese dieting subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 66: 557–563.
  49. 49. Norman K, Stobäus N, Gonzalez MC, Schulzke JD, Pirlich M (In press) Handgrip strength: Outcome predictor and marker of nutritional status. Clin Nutr. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.09.010
  50. 50. Rantanen T, Avlund K, Suominen H, Schroll M, Frändin K, et al. (2002) Muscle strength as a predictor of onset of ADL dependence in people aged 75 years. Aging Clin Exp Res 14: 10–15.
  51. 51. Laukkanen P, Heikkinen E, Kauppinen M (1995) Muscle strength and mobility as predictors of survival in 75–84-year-old people. Age Aging 24: 468–473. doi: 10.1093/ageing/24.6.468
  52. 52. Giampaoli S, Ferrucci L, Cecchi F, Lo Noce C, Poce A, et al. (1999) Hand-grip strength predicts incident disability in non-disabled older men. Age Aging 28: 283–288. doi: 10.1093/ageing/28.3.283
  53. 53. Rantanen T, Era P, Keikkinen E (1994) Maximal isometric strength and mobility among 75-year-old men and women. Age Ageing 23: 132–137. doi: 10.1093/ageing/23.2.132
  54. 54. Hughes S, Gibbs J, Dunlop D, Edelman P, Singer R, et al. (1997) Predictors of decline in manual performance in older adults. J Am Gerontol Soc 45: 905–910.
  55. 55. Rantanen T (2003) Muscle strength, disability and mortality. Scand J Med Sci Spor 13: 3–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00298.x
  56. 56. Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R (2010) Mortality Review Group; FALCon and HALCyon Study Teams. Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit Med J 341: c4467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4467
  57. 57. Rantanen T, Harris T, Leveille SG, Visser M, Foley D, et al. (2000) Muscle strength and body mass index as long-term predictors of mortality in initially healthy men. J Gerontol A: Biol Sci Med Sci 55: M168–73. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.3.m168
  58. 58. Rantanen T, Volpato S, Ferrucci L, Heikkinen E, Fried LP, et al. (2003) Handgrip strength and cause-specific and total mortality in older disabled women: Exploring the mechanism. J Am Geriat Soc 51: 636–41. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00207.x
  59. 59. Rantanen T, Masaki K, Foley D, Izmirlian G, White L, et al. (1998) Grip strength changes over 27 years in Japanese-American men. J Appl Physiol 85: 2047–53.
  60. 60. Willcox BJ, He Q, Chen R, Yano K, Masaki KH, et al. (2006) Midlife risk factors and healthy survival in men. J Am Med Assoc 15: 2343–50. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.19.2343
  61. 61. Windsor JA, Hill GL (1988) Grip strength: a measure of the proportion of protein loss in surgical patients. Brit J Surg 75: 880–882. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750917
  62. 62. Sinaki M, Opitz JL, Wahner HW (1974) Bone mineral content: Relationship to muscle strength in normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehab 55: 508–512.
  63. 63. Kaya A, Ozgocmen S, Ardicoglu O, Kamanli A, Gudul H (2005) Relationship between grip strength and hand bone mineral density in healthy adults. Arch Med Res 36: 603–606. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.03.026
  64. 64. Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E (1994) Grip strength and bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 9: 45–51. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090107
  65. 65. Bevier WC, Wiswell RA, Pyka G, Kozak KC, Newhall KM, et al. (1989) Relationship of body composition, muscle strength, and aerobic capacity to bone mineral density in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 4: 421–32. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040318
  66. 66. Foo LH, Zhang Q, Zhu K, Ma G, Hu X, et al. (2009) Low vitamin D status has an adverse influence on bone mass, bone turnover, and muscle strength in Chinese adolescent girls. J Nutr 139: 1002–1007. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.102053
  67. 67. Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Boyle PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA (2007) Grip strength and the risk of incident Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroepidemiology 29: 66–73. doi: 10.1159/000109498
  68. 68. Auyeung TW, Kwok T, Lee J, Leung PC, Leung J, et al. (2008) Functional decline in cognitive impairment–the relationship between physical and cognitive function. Neuroepidemiology 31: 167–73. doi: 10.1159/000154929
  69. 69. Taekema DG, Gussekloo J, Maier AB, Westendorp RG, de Craen AJ (2010) Handgrip strength as a predictor of functional, psychological and social health. A prospective population-based study among the oldest old. Age Ageing 39: 331–337. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq022
  70. 70. Boyle PA, Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA (2008) Physical frailty is associated with incident mild cognitive impairment in community-based older persons. J Am Geriat Soc 58: 248–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02671.x
  71. 71. Rogers SD, Jarrot SE (2008) Cognitive impairment and effects on upper body strength of adults with dementia. J Aging Phys Act 16: 61–68.
  72. 72. Puig-Domingo M, Serra-Prat M, Merino MJ, Pubill M, Burdoy E, et al. (2008) Muscle strength in the Mataró aging study participants and its relationship to successful aging. Aging Clin Exp Res 20: 439–46. doi: 10.1007/bf03325150
  73. 73. Deary IJ, Whalley LJ, Batty GD, Starr JM (2006) Physical fitness and lifetime cognitive change. Neurol 67: 1195–1200. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238520.06958.6a
  74. 74. Hawkes K, O’Connell JF, Blurton-Jones NG (1997) Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning, and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans. Curr Anthropol 38: 551–577. doi: 10.1086/204646
  75. 75. Hawkes K, O’Connell JF, Blurton-Jones NG, Alvarez H, Charnov EL (1998) Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 1336–1339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1336
  76. 76. Hawkes K (2003) Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity. Am J Hum Biol 15: 380–400. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.10156
  77. 77. Hawkes K (2004) The Grandmother Effect. Nature 428: 128–129. doi: 10.1038/428128a
  78. 78. Sear R, Mace R (2008) Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evol Hum Behav 29: 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.10.001
  79. 79. Gibson MA, Mace R (2005) Helpful grandmothers in rural Ethiopia: A study of the effect of kin on child survival and growth. Evol Hum Behav 26: 469–482. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.004
  80. 80. Hawkes K, O’Connell JF, Burton-Jones NG (1989) Hardworking Hadza grandmothers. In: Standen V, Foley R, editors. Comparative socioecology of mammals and man. London: Blackwell. 341–366.
  81. 81. Marlowe F (2010) The Hadza: Hunter-gatherers of Tanzania. University of California Press.
  82. 82. Kaplan H, Hill K, Lancaster J, Hurtado AM (2000) A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evol Anthr 9: 156–185. doi: 10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4<156::aid-evan5>;2-z
  83. 83. Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11: 398–411. doi: 10.2307/2406060
  84. 84. Vianna LC, Oliveira RB, Araújo CG (2007) Age-related decline in handgrip strength differs according to gender. J Strength Cond Res 21: 1310–1314. doi: 10.1519/r-23156.1
  85. 85. Malan JS (2004) Peoples of Namibia. Windhouk: Rhino Publishers.
  86. 86. Boersma P, Weenink D (2009) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.04). Available: Accessed 2009 January 28.
  87. 87. Scelza BA (2011) Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population. Biol Letters 7: 889–891. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0478
  88. 88. Bohannon RW (2008) Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 1: 3–10. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200831010-00002
  89. 89. Apicella CL, Feinberg DR (2009) Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 1077–1082. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1542
  90. 90. Frederick DA, Haselton MG (2007) Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Pers Soc Psych Bull 33: 1167–1183. doi: 10.1177/0146167207303022
  91. 91. Young RW (2003) Evolution of the human hand: The role of throwing and clubbing. J Anatomy 202: 165–174. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00144.x
  92. 92. Nettle D (2002) Women’s height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 1919–1923. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2111
  93. 93. Nettle D (2002) Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Hum Nat 13: 473–491. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1004-7
  94. 94. Sear R (2006) Height and reproductive success: How a Gambian population compares to the West. Hum Nat 17: 405–418. doi: 10.1007/s12110-006-1003-1
  95. 95. Sear R, Marlowe FW (2009) How universal are human mate choices? Size doesn’t matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate. Biol Letters 5: 606–609. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0342
  96. 96. Monden CWS, Smits J (2009) Maternal height and child mortality in 42 developing countries. Am J Phys Anthropol 21: 305–311. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20860
  97. 97. Asikainen TM, Suni JH, Pasanen ME, Oja P, Rinne MB, et al. (2006) Effect of brisk walking in 1 or 2 daily bouts and moderate resistance training on lower-extremity muscle strength, balance, and walking performance in women who recently went through menopause: A randomized controlled trial. Phys Therapy 86: 912–923.
  98. 98. Rantanen T, Sipilä S, Suominen H (1993) Muscle strength and history of heavy manual work among elderly trained women and randomly chosen sample population. Eur J Appl Phys Occup Phys 66: 514–517. doi: 10.1007/bf00634301
  99. 99. Maltais ML, Desroches J, Dionne IJ (2009) Changes in muscle mass and strength after menopause. J Musculoskelet Neural Intract 9: 186–197.
  100. 100. Preisinger E, Alacamlioglu Y, Saradeth T, Resch KL, Holzer G, et al. (1995) Forearm bone density and grip strength in women after menopause, with and without estrogen replacement therapy. Maturitas 21: 57–63. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(94)00857-4
  101. 101. Ala-Fossi SL, Maenpaa J, Aine R, Punnonen R (1998) Ovarian testosterone secretion during perimenopause. Maturitas 29: 239–245. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(98)00034-6
  102. 102. Orsatti FL, Nahas EAP, Maesta N, Nahas-Neto J, Burini RC (2008) Plasma hormones, muscle mass and strength in resistance-trained postmenopausal women. Maturitas 59: 394–404. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.04.002