Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Correlation between In Vivo Biofilm Formation and Virulence Gene Expression in Escherichia coli O104:H4

  • Rim Al Safadi,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • Galeb S. Abu-Ali,

    Affiliation: Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America

  • Rudolph E. Sloup,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • James T. Rudrik,

    Affiliation: Michigan Department of Community Health, Bureau of Laboratories, Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • Christopher M. Waters,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • Kathryn A. Eaton,

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America

  • Shannon D. Manning

    Affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

Correlation between In Vivo Biofilm Formation and Virulence Gene Expression in Escherichia coli O104:H4

  • Rim Al Safadi, 
  • Galeb S. Abu-Ali, 
  • Rudolph E. Sloup, 
  • James T. Rudrik, 
  • Christopher M. Waters, 
  • Kathryn A. Eaton, 
  • Shannon D. Manning
  • Published: July 25, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041628


The emergence of novel pathogens poses a major public health threat causing widespread epidemics in susceptible populations. The Escherichia coli O104:H4 strain implicated in a 2011 outbreak in northern Germany caused the highest frequency of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and death ever recorded in a single E. coli outbreak. Therefore, it has been suggested that this strain is more virulent than other pathogenic E. coli (e.g., E. coli O157:H7). The E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain possesses multiple virulence factors from both Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing E. coli (STEC) and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), though the mechanism of pathogenesis is not known. Here, we demonstrate that E. coli O104:H4 produces a stable biofilm in vitro and that in vivo virulence gene expression is highest when E. coli O104:H4 overexpresses genes required for aggregation and exopolysaccharide production, a characteristic of bacterial cells residing within an established biofilm. Interrupting exopolysaccharide production and biofilm formation may therefore represent effective strategies for combating future E. coli O104:H4 infections.


The 2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain caused the highest frequency of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and deaths ever recorded. The number of HUS cases and deaths was 2.4 and 1.4 times higher in the E. coli O104:H4 outbreak, respectively, than the number reported for 350 E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks between 1982 and 2001 in the U.S. These 350 E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks resulted in 8,598 cases, 354 cases of HUS and 40 deaths in the U.S. [1], while over 3,816 cases were reported in the 2011 E. coli O104:H4 outbreak, with 845 cases of HUS and 54 deaths [2]. The underlying mechanism behind the apparent increase in O104:H4 virulence is not known, though several bacterial factors have been implicated.

The E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain harbors multiple virulence genes from both Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing E. coli (STEC) and enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC). It carries the phage-borne gene encoding Stx2, the primary virulence factor of STEC and enterohemorrhagic E. coli [3]. Stx2 targets globotriaosyl ceramide receptors in the kidney that contribute to HUS and death in some cases [4]. O104:H4 also possesses the EAEC virulence plasmid (pAA) carrying genes for type I aggregative adherence fimbriae (AAF) [5] that mediate colonization [6] and biofilm formation [7]. AAF expression is induced by AggR, which was implicated in the global regulation of EAEC virulence by controlling expression of a dispersin (aap) that allows movement across the intestinal mucosa [8], and an ABC transporter system used for dispersin export [9]. O104:H4 also produces the Shigella enterotoxin 1 (ShET1) and Pic serine protease [5], two chromosomally encoded EAEC virulence factors. ShET1 induced fluid accumulation in rabbit ileal loops [10], while Pic facilitated intestinal colonization by enabling the bacterium to utilize mucus as a growth substrate [11]. Because this combination of factors has not previously been observed in pathogenic E. coli, the role that they play in colonization and pathogenesis is not known.

Here, we compared the virulence and level of colonization between the E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain and an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak strain in vivo using germ-free mice and quantified virulence gene expression post-infection. These data enhance our understanding of the mechanism used by the E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain to colonize the host and contribute to toxin-mediated disease.


E. coli O104:H4 Colonization in Germ-free Mice

Five mice were inoculated with 8×106 CFU of O104:H4 and euthanized seven days post inoculation (PI). Clinical presentation, colonization density, cecal weight, and hisopathology data were compared to the five mice inoculated with 1.0×106 CFU of O157:H7 five days PI. Several clinical signs including lethargy, weight loss, dehydration, and low urine specific gravity, a measure of reduced kidney function, were observed in O157:H7-infected mice; all mice developed renal acute tubular necrosis (ATN). O104:H4-infected mice displayed fewer signs of infection with no signs of renal ATN seven days PI.

Interestingly, the cecal colonization density was significantly higher in O104:H4-infected mice seven days PI (mean: 4.4×1011 CFU/g) versus O157:H7-infected mice five days PI (mean: 1.67×1010) (P = 0.016). It is possible, however, that the difference in colonization density between the mice infected with the same strain is due to varying infection periods (Fig. S1). Histological examination of the cecum demonstrated bacterial aggregation in O104:H4-infected mice that was not apparent in O157:H7-infected mice (Fig. 1). Based on this finding, we hypothesized that the aggregative adherence observed at seven days PI represents the early stage of a biofilm.

Figure 1. Histological examination of cecal tissue.

Arrows highlight A) bacterial aggregation associated with the mucus layer in the cecum of E. coli O104:H4-infected mouse 11–272, and B) bacteria associated with the cecal mucosa in E. coli O157:H7-infected mouse 11–437. Cells were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and magnified 1000x.


Biofilm Formation by E. coli O104:H4

To determine whether O104:H4 expresses genes important for biofilm formation in vivo, we quantified expression of aggR and pic that are unique to O104:H4. No difference in pic expression was observed in vivo at seven days PI relative to in vitro planktonic growth, whereas aggR was 13.3 fold lower in vivo than in vitro (Table S1). Gene expression was also examined for pgaA, the first gene in the pgaABCD operon that is responsible for poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (PGA) synthesis in E. coli [12]. At seven days PI, the overall level of pgaA expression was similar in O104:H4 relative to O157:H7 at five days (Table S2). Differences in expression between the two strains, however, were observed in vivo versus planktonic growth in vitro. The average level of pgaA expression in O104:H4 was 5.0 fold higher in vivo, while no significant difference was observed for O157:H7.

Importantly, O104:H4 also exhibited robust biofilm formation in vitro in both static and flow based assays. For the static assay, biofilms were allowed to form on the sides and bottom of the wells of a microtiter plate. After removal of planktonic cells, biofilms were stained with crystal violet followed by quantification of retained dye by measuring the optical density (OD) at 595 nm. O104:H4 had a 7.3-fold greater level of biofilm formation compared with O157:H7 in this assay (1.33+/−0.19 versus 0.18+/−0.02, respectively). Growth of O104:H4 in a flow cell for 16 hours resulted in a 20 µm biofilm (Fig. 2) with complex structures including microcolonies and water channels that permit nutrient and oxygen transport into the biofilm. These data further demonstrate that the O104:H4 outbreak strain readily forms biofilms when grown in non-planktonic conditions that favor biofilm formation; such conditions do not support biofilm formation in O157:H7.

Figure 2. E. coli O104:H4 forms thick biofilms in vitro.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed the presence of microcolonies (green) following growth of E. coli O104:H4 (TW16133) for 16 hours in a flow cell. Black space represents conduits or channels used for nutrient transport within the biofilm, while the z-axis denotes the thickness.


E. coli O104:H4 and Renal Disease in Germ-free Mice

Two additional groups of five mice were inoculated with O104:H4 for 13–15 days to increase the likelihood of biofilm formation in vivo. The groups received 2.8×106 CFU and 1.0×107 CFU of O104:H4 and were euthanized 15 and 13 days PI, respectively. Two mice died one day PI, but the remaining eight mice became colonized at comparable levels in the cecum (Fig. S1). Unlike seven days PI, a lengthier infection resulted in renal ATN in six of the eight mice, though considerable variation in the severity of the kidney lesions was observed across mice (Table S3). Because Stx2 production contributes to renal ATN in mice [13], it is likely that variation in disease severity is due to the differential production of Stx2 in vivo.

In vivo Expression of Bacterial Genes

In vivo stx2 expression, which represents a marker for Stx2 production [14], was quantified to examine its relationship with disease severity. There was considerable variation in stx2 induction between mice at each time point. Average in vivo stx2 expression in O104:H4 was 2.3 fold lower than in O157:H7 at seven and five days PI (Table S2). The lengthier infection resulted in an average 2,146-fold increase in stx2 expression for O104:H4 at 13–15 versus seven days PI (Fig. 3, Table S3). It is therefore possible that the increased and prolonged expression of stx2 may partly explain the high frequencies of HUS observed during the O104:H4 outbreak.

Figure 3. Variation in bacterial gene expression among mice challenged with E. coli O104:H4 for 13–15 days.

Y-axis represents the fold change in cecal gene expression levels among eight mice infected with E. coli O104:H4 at 13–15 days post infection relative to mice infected for seven days. The inset highlights the four mice with fold change values that cannot be visualized using the y-axis in the larger histogram. Broken bars indicate a large change in the y-axis value, while the x-axis refers to the mouse identification number.


In vivo stx2 expression was highly correlated with expression of both aggR (Pearson correlation coefficient (CC): 0.97; P<0.0001) and pgaA (CC: 0.97; P<0.0001), but there was no correlation between expression and cecal colonization density. Average induction of aggR increased 5,721-fold (range: 13.7- to 14,247.2-fold) at 13–15 versus seven days PI, while pgaA increased 1,700-fold (range: 12- to 4, 301-fold). Furthermore, pgaA expression was on average 3,640-fold higher (range: 23.6- to 11,141.7-fold) at 13–15 days PI relative to in vitro growth (Fig. 4, Table S4). Collectively, these data suggest that a stable biofilm with high levels of exopolysaccharide production forms in vivo, as determined by pgaA expression, and is correlated with both aggR and stx2 expression.

Figure 4. Variation in pgaA expression among mice challenged with E. coli O104:H4 for 13–15 days relative to planktonic growth in vitro.

The Y-axis represents the fold change in cecal gene expression levels while the x-axis is the mouse identification number.


A significant increase in gene expression was also observed for pic and set, which encodes ShET1, between seven and 13–15 days PI (Fig. 3). Average induction of pic was 245-fold (2.8- to 553.2-fold) higher at 13–15 days PI relative to seven days, while set increased 626-fold (2.7- to 2,032-fold). Comparable expression levels were observed for all four virulence genes at 13–15 days PI relative to growth in vitro, though the fold change was lower than what was observed for 13–15 versus seven days PI (Table S4). Like stx2, expression of pic (CC: 0.85; P = 0.008) and set (CC: 0.93; P = 0.0005) were highly correlated with aggR at 13–15 days PI as well as pgaA, though the correlation was not as strong. These data suggest that both the host environment and biofilm formation, which is likely due to pgaA expression followed by aggR induction, play an important role in the transcription of other O104:H4 virulence genes.

Gene Expression and Disease Severity

Expression of aggR was also correlated with disease severity in mice based on the extent of renal ATN (CC: 0.70; P = 0.05). The two mice with an over 12,000-fold increase in aggR expression, for instance, had the highest levels of stx2 expression (Fig. 3) and most extensive renal necrosis (Table S2). Mouse number 11.272, however, had high levels of both aggR and stx2 but less extensive renal necrosis. Weight and age at inoculation, colon necrosis score, cecum weight, cecal colonization density, and weight loss were not correlated with aggR expression or renal ATN, suggesting that Stx2 production is most important for kidney disease development.


The results described herein provide insight into the mechanism of E. coli O104:H4 pathogenesis. Specifically, formation of a biofilm in vivo contributes to enhanced virulence gene expression and an increased likelihood of kidney damage. These observations were not noted for mice infected with E. coli O157:H7, which colonized in single layers displaying the characteristic pattern of intimate attachment to the epithelia [15], [16] via genes encoded on the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) [17]. The E. coli O104:H4 outbreak strain, however, lacks the LEE but has the pAA [5], which is important for aggregative adherence and biofilm formation [7]. The in vivo aggregation of O104:H4 in germ free mice was similar to the aggregative adherence patterns observed previously in HEp-2 cells for O104:H4 [5] and other EAEC strains [18]. Similar to observations of EAEC infections in gnotobiotic piglets [19], O104:H4 aggregation also appeared to be associated with the mucus layer, thereby lending support to the idea that the mechanism of pathogenesis differs considerably between the two strain types.

Consistent with prior studies, mice infected with O157:H7 developed kidney lesions by five days PI [13], [20]. By contrast, kidney lesions were not observed in O104:H4-infected mice until 13–15 days PI. These findings support the observation that E. coli O157:H7 contributes to rapid onset of disease in mice [13], [20] and support reports that the incubation period in humans for O157:H7 and O104:H4 infections is four and eight days, respectively [2], [21]. The lengthier incubation period of O104:H4 is consistent with reports suggesting that biofilm-associated infections have longer incubation periods [22].

Although there was evidence of O104:H4 biofilms in vivo at seven days PI, the level of pgaA expression increased by up to 4,301-fold at 13–15 days PI suggesting that an extensive biofilm had formed over the two week period. Prior studies have demonstrated that the PGA exopolysaccharide, the primary component of the self-produced extracellular matrix of a biofilm, is critical for maintaining the structure of biofilms [12]. Our data suggest that the O104:H4 strain expresses genes important for biofilm formation during in vivo infection but that O157:H7 does not. Because PGA facilitates the transition from temporary to permanent bacterial attachment [23], increased in vivo pgaA expression at seven days also supports the hypothesis that biofilm formation is an important first step in E. coli O104:H4 pathogenesis. In addition, a 14,247-fold average increase in expression of aggR, a global regulator of virulence genes, was observed in vivo at 13–15 versus seven days PI. This delayed induction of aggR suggests that conditions do not necessarily favor biofilm gene activation in germ-free mice prior to seven days PI. Once induced, however, AggR may initiate a positive feedback loop that results in its own amplification [24], a mechanism that may partly explain the marked increase in aggR expression levels observed at 13–15 days PI. This increased expression of aggR likely results in enhanced production of AAF, which contribute to biofilm formation [7]. Such coordinated expression of virulence genes is another example of concerted regulation of virulence to produce a ‘balanced pathogenicity’ effect, as was recently described in enteropathogenic E. coli [25].

Based on these findings, we hypothesize that O104:H4 biofilms begin to form in germ-free mice by seven days PI and that these biofilms are capable of producing low levels of exopolysaccharide. The production of exopolysaccharide likely induces aggR, which was repressed in vivo at seven days PI relative to planktonic growth in vitro, and contributes to aggR autoactivation and the subsequent production of AAF. Over time, enhanced fimbriae production and other colonization factors likely contribute to the formation of a more stable biofilm capable of excreting high levels of exopolysaccharide. Future mutagenesis studies, however, are needed to directly test the role of both aggR and pgaA in biofilm formation and E. coli O104:H4 pathogenesis.

It is important to note that there was considerable variation in bacterial gene induction across mice as well as a wide range in gene expression levels. Nonetheless, expression of all five genes was significantly higher in all mice infected with O104:H4 for 13–15 days PI relative to mice infected for seven days and in vitro. The higher level of induction at 13–15 days PI relative to seven days PI and to in vitro growth suggests that specific signals within the host play an important role in virulence gene expression. The observed correlation between aggR, pgaA and stx2 is also noteworthy because induction of stx2 is important for renal ATN development. Two mice with an over 12,000-fold increase in aggR expression in vivo at 13–15 versus seven days PI, for example, also had a 4,900-fold increase in stx2 expression. While there was a correlation between aggR expression and ATN, this correlation was likely driven by the two mice with the largest increase in aggR and stx2 expression over time. One mouse, 11.272, showed markedly high levels of aggR and stx2, but had a low ATN score. It is possible that in this mouse transcription of stx2 did not correlate with toxin production, which was demonstrated in prior studies [14], [26], or that the transmission of Stx2 across the intestinal barrier differed. It is also possible that there is a threshold in mice such that gene expression over a certain value does not linearly correlate with disease outcome. Nevertheless, these data suggest that the factors influencing biofilm formation and disease progression likely vary across hosts.

Like humans, individual mice colonized by the same bacterial strain differed in clinical presentation. Such differences may be due to variation in immune and inflammatory responses and in the type of microbial communities, nutrients and environmental cues available in the gastrointestinal tract. Because germ-free mice lack resident microbiota and have an immature immune response, it is likely that variation in host susceptibility is due to innate responses impacting the ability of bacteria to communicate with each other (quorum sensing) and/or to form biofilms in vivo. Survival within a biofilm protects bacteria from host defenses and decreases the effectiveness of antibiotics [27], which is due in part to nutrient limitation responses [28]. Limited nutrient availability was previously shown to enhance stx2 expression in E. coli O157:H7 [26] and may explain the observed correlation between aggR and stx2 expression. Moreover, the type I AAF of EAEC were shown to induce host inflammatory responses [29] and disrupt epithelial cell barrier function [30], which may more readily permit the penetration of toxins to the intestinal submucosa and facilitate their absorption.

Although most of these bacterial responses represent strategies for E. coli O104:H4 to survive in the complex host environment, they are inadvertently enhancing bacterial virulence. This increased virulence that results from survival within a biofilm may have implications for other biofilm-forming, toxin-producing pathogens as well. Importantly, several mice were colonized with high levels of O104:H4, but in the absence of markers demonstrating significant biofilm formation, the severity of these infections was reduced. Interrupting exopolysaccharide production and biofilm formation could represent an effective strategy that can be used to combat future E. coli O104:H4 infections.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

E. coli O104:H4, strain TW16133, was isolated by a clinical microbiology laboratory in Michigan from a patient infected during travel to Germany and deposited into the Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH) strain collection. Because STEC is a notifiable disease in the state of Michigan, informed consent was not obtained by the patient. The Institutional Review Board of Michigan State University and the MDCH approved the study protocol. The isolate was anonymized and stripped of all patient identifiers before use in the experiments described herein. Approval to use germ-free mice was granted by the University Committee on Use and Care of Animals at the University of Michigan in accordance with guidelines from the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International whose regulations are based on the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the National Institutes of Health.

Bacterial Strains

Following isolation, the E. coli O104:H4, strain TW16133, was confirmed to be the outbreak strain via pulsed field gel electrophoresis, stx profiling, and pAA detection. E. coli O157:H7 EDL933 [31] was used for comparison.

Murine Challenge Experiments

Germ free Swiss-Webster mice, 3–4 weeks of age, were obtained from the University of Michigan breeding colony where they are maintained in soft-sided bubble isolators and are free of exposure to all bacterial, fungal, viral, and parasitic organisms. Mice were aseptically transferred to sterile microisolator cages and housed in a sterile laminar flow hood; both the food and water given to the mice were sterile.

Ten mice were inoculated via oral gavage with O157:H7 or O104:H4 as described [13] and euthanized at five and seven days PI, respectively. Surgical procedures were performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia in order to minimize suffering. All mice were bacteriologically sterile, except for being colonized with O104:H4, as was verified by terminal aerobic and anaerobic cultures as well as Gram stains of feces and cecal contents. Mice infected with O157:H7 were euthanized earlier than O104:H4-infected mice because all mice became moribund by five days PI. Eight additional O104:H4-infected mice were euthanized at 13 or 15 days PI. Bacterial colonization (cfu/g cecal contents) was quantified by plate dilution on LB agar. Following formalin fixation and histological examination of cecal and kidney tissues, the extent of renal ATN was scored as follows: no tubular necrosis (0); necrotic tubules rarely present (1); necrotic tubules in many fields (2); and necrotic tubules in most fields (3). Tissues were blinded for scoring. Colonization densities of O157:H7- and O104:H4-infected mice were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test (two-tailed).


Isolates were grown overnight in LB and diluted (OD600 = 0.05) in DMEM with 0.45% glucose. Tissue culture plates were inoculated and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 16 hours, washed, and stained with crystal violet for 10 min. Wells were washed and dried, and the crystal violet was solubilized with ethanol for 45 min. The biofilm biomass was estimated at OD595; all assays were performed in quadruplicate, repeated three times and the standard deviation was calculated. For growth in a flow cell, O104:H4 was inoculated (OD600 = 0.05) and exposed to DMEM at 0.5 ml/min for 16 hours at 37°C as described [32]. Cells were fixed, stained with 20 µM Syto 9, and visualized using an Axioskop2 microscope (Zeiss).

Bacterial Gene Expression

To quantify gene expression in vivo, bacterial RNA was isolated from murine cecal contents using a modified hot-phenol extraction protocol [33] and purified with the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). For in vitro expression, strains were grown in DMEM with glucose and NaHCO3 (OD600 = 0.65) prior to RNA extraction. cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription as highlighted in our prior study [34]. Three independent RNA populations were extracted per sample/strain and cDNA was generated from the same amount of RNA (1 ug) from each sample to avoid bias that may be introduced by differences in bacterial colonization densities that can proportionally affect the amount of RNA. qPCR was performed in triplicate utilizing six primer sets (Table S5); the 16 S rRNA gene, rrsH, was used for normalization and transcription differences were calculated as described [34]. Fold changes ≥2 were considered biologically significant.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Cecal colonization levels (cfu/g of cecal contents) in germ-free mice infected with E. coli O104:H4 at 7 days and 13–15 days post infection (PI) relative to mice infected with E. coli O157:H7.



Table S1.

Fold-change differences in gene expression in germ-free mice infected with E. coli O104:H4 seven days post infection relative to E. coli O104:H4 in vitro growth.



Table S2.

Fold-change differences in gene expression in germ-free mice infected with E. coli O104:H4 at 7 days post infection relative to mice infected with E. coli O157:H7 at 5 days post infection.



Table S3.

Fold-change differences in E. coli O104:H4 gene expression in vivo 13–14 days post infection as compared to seven days PI and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) scores.



Table S4.

Relative differences in E. coli O104:H4 gene expression in vivo 13–14 days post infection as compared to growth in vitro .



Table S5.

Primers used for quantitative RT-PCR.




We thank Sara Poe and Chriss Vowles for technical support and Drs. Walter Esselman, H. Dele Davies, Patricia Somsel, Martha Mulks and the anonymous reviewers for scholarly input.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SDM RA GSA RES JTR CMW KAE. Performed the experiments: RA RES KAE. Analyzed the data: SDM RA GSA RES CMW KAE. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GSA JTR CMW KAE. Wrote the paper: SDM RA GSA RES JTR CMW KAE.


  1. 1. Rangel JM, Sparling PH, Crowe C, Griffin PM, Swerdlow DL (2005) Epidemiology of Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreaks, United States, 1982–2002. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 603–609.
  2. 2. Frank C, Werber D, Cramer JP, Askar M, Faber M, et al. (2011) Epidemic Profile of Shiga-Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak in Germany. N Engl J Med.
  3. 3. Karmali MA, Petric M, Lim C, Fleming PC, Arbus GS, et al. (1985) The association between idiopathic hemolytic uremic syndrome and infection by verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis 151: 775–782.
  4. 4. Lingwood CA (1996) Role of verotoxin receptors in pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol 4: 147–153.
  5. 5. Bielaszewska M, Mellmann A, Zhang W, Kock R, Fruth A, et al. (2011) Characterisation of the Escherichia coli strain associated with an outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Germany, 2011: a microbiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 11: 671–676.
  6. 6. Nataro JP (2005) Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli pathogenesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 21: 4–8.
  7. 7. Sheikh J, Hicks S, Dall’Agnol M, Phillips AD, Nataro JP (2001) Roles for Fis and YafK in biofilm formation by enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 41: 983–997.
  8. 8. Sheikh J, Czeczulin JR, Harrington S, Hicks S, Henderson IR, et al. (2002) A novel dispersin protein in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Clin Invest 110: 1329–1337.
  9. 9. Baudry B, Savarino SJ, Vial P, Kaper JB, Levine MM (1990) A sensitive and specific DNA probe to identify enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, a recently discovered diarrheal pathogen. J Infect Dis 161: 1249–1251.
  10. 10. Fasano A, Noriega FR, Maneval DR Jr, Chanasongcram S, Russell R, et al. (1995) Shigella enterotoxin 1: an enterotoxin of Shigella flexneri 2a active in rabbit small intestine in vivo and in vitro. J Clin Invest 95: 2853–2861.
  11. 11. Harrington SM, Sheikh J, Henderson IR, Ruiz-Perez F, Cohen PS, et al. (2009) The Pic protease of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli promotes intestinal colonization and growth in the presence of mucin. Infect Immun 77: 2465–2473.
  12. 12. Itoh Y, Rice JD, Goller C, Pannuri A, Taylor J, et al. (2008) Roles of pgaABCD genes in synthesis, modification, and export of the Escherichia coli biofilm adhesin poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. J Bacteriol 190: 3670–3680.
  13. 13. Eaton KA, Friedman DI, Francis GJ, Tyler JS, Young VB, et al. (2008) Pathogenesis of renal disease due to enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in germ-free mice. Infect Immun 76: 3054–3063.
  14. 14. Neupane M, Abu-Ali GS, Mitra A, Lacher DW, Manning SD, et al. (2011) Shiga toxin 2 overexpression in Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains associated with severe human disease. Microb Pathog 51: 466–470.
  15. 15. Jerse AE, Yu J, Tall BD, Kaper JB (1990) A genetic locus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 7839–7843.
  16. 16. Kenny B, DeVinney R, Stein M, Reinscheid DJ, Frey EA, et al. (1997) Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells. Cell 91: 511–520.
  17. 17. McDaniel TK, Jarvis KG, Donnenberg MS, Kaper JB (1995) A genetic locus of enterocyte effacement conserved among diverse enterobacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 1664–1668.
  18. 18. Nataro JP, Kaper JB, Robins-Browne R, Prado V, Vial P, et al. (1987) Patterns of adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells. Pediatr Infect Dis J 6: 829–831.
  19. 19. Tzipori S, Montanaro J, Robins-Browne RM, Vial P, Gibson R, et al. (1992) Studies with enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in the gnotobiotic piglet gastroenteritis model. Infect Immun 60: 5302–5306.
  20. 20. Wadolkowski EA, Sung LM, Burris JA, Samuel JE, O’Brien AD (1990) Acute renal tubular necrosis and death of mice orally infected with Escherichia coli strains that produce Shiga-like toxin type II. Infect Immun 58: 3959–3965.
  21. 21. Riley LW (1987) The epidemiologic, clinical, and microbiologic features of hemorrhagic colitis. Annu Rev Microbiol 41: 383–407.
  22. 22. Burmolle M, Thomsen TR, Fazli M, Dige I, Christensen L, et al. (2010) Biofilms in chronic infections - a matter of opportunity - monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 59: 324–336.
  23. 23. Agladze K, Wang X, Romeo T (2005) Spatial periodicity of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm microstructure initiates during a reversible, polar attachment phase of development and requires the polysaccharide adhesin PGA. J Bacteriol 187: 8237–8246.
  24. 24. Morin N, Tirling C, Ivison SM, Kaur AP, Nataro JP, et al. (2010) Autoactivation of the AggR regulator of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in vitro and in vivo. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 58: 344–355.
  25. 25. Dean P, Scott JA, Knox AA, Quitard S, Watkins NJ, et al. (2010) The enteropathogenic E. coli effector EspF targets and disrupts the nucleolus by a process regulated by mitochondrial dysfunction. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000961.
  26. 26. Leenanon B, Elhanafi D, Drake MA (2003) Acid adaptation and starvation effects on Shiga toxin production by Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Food Prot 66: 970–977.
  27. 27. Brown MR, Allison DG, Gilbert P (1988) Resistance of bacterial biofilms to antibiotics: a growth-rate related effect? J Antimicrob Chemother 22: 777–780.
  28. 28. Nguyen D, Joshi-Datar A, Lepine F, Bauerle E, Olakanmi O, et al. (2011) Active starvation responses mediate antibiotic tolerance in biofilms and nutrient-limited bacteria. Science 334: 982–986.
  29. 29. Harrington SM, Strauman MC, Abe CM, Nataro JP (2005) Aggregative adherence fimbriae contribute to the inflammatory response of epithelial cells infected with enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Cell Microbiol 7: 1565–1578.
  30. 30. Strauman MC, Harper JM, Harrington SM, Boll EJ, Nataro JP (2010) Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli disrupts epithelial cell tight junctions. Infect Immun 78: 4958–4964.
  31. 31. Perna NT, Plunkett G III, Burland V, Mau B, Glasner JD, et al. (2001) Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nature 409: 529–533.
  32. 32. Sambanthamoorthy K, Gokhale AA, Lao W, Parashar V, Neiditch MB, et al. (2011) Identification of a novel benzimidazole that inhibits bacterial biofilm formation in a broad-spectrum manner. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55: 4369–4378.
  33. 33. Samuel BS, Gordon JI (2006) A humanized gnotobiotic mouse model of host-archaeal-bacterial mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 10011–10016.
  34. 34. Abu-Ali GS, Ouellette LM, Henderson ST, Lacher DW, Riordan JT, et al. (2010) Increased adherence and expression of virulence genes in a lineage of Escherichia coli O157:H7 commonly associated with human infections. PLoS One 5: e10167.