Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Organizational and Functional Status of the Y-linked Genes and Loci in the Infertile Patients Having Normal Spermiogram

  • Anju Kumari,
  • Sandeep Kumar Yadav,
  • Sher Ali

    Affiliation: Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India

Organizational and Functional Status of the Y-linked Genes and Loci in the Infertile Patients Having Normal Spermiogram

  • Anju Kumari, 
  • Sandeep Kumar Yadav, 
  • Sher Ali
  • Published: July 23, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041488


Male fertility is an orchestrated interplay of loci on the Y chromosome with a number of genes from across the other chromosomes. In this context, micro-deletions in the Y chromosome have been correlated with spermatogenic failure often leading to infertility. However, causes of infertility in the patients with the normal spermiogram have remained unclear and therefore pose another level of challenge. In the present study, we analyzed 64 STSs, studied different Y-linked genes and loci and conducted single nucleotide variant (SNV) analyses in 31 infertile males with normal spermiogram along with 67 normal fertile males (NFMs) to gain an insight into the organization of their Y chromosome. Further, employing quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), we studied copy number variation of DYZ1 arrays and three genes and mutational status of SRY by direct sequence analyses. STS analyses of the AZFa, b and c regions in these patients showed known and new mutations. Further, copies of DAZ and BPY2 in the patients were found to be affected compared to those in NFMs. All the patients had normal copy number of the SRY however its sequence analysis (in silico) showed mutations in eight patients. In four of these eight patients, SRY mutations resulted into truncated proteins. Similarly, DYZ1 analysis showed micro-deletions and it's much reduced copy number as compared to those in NFMs. Present study in males with unexplained infertility revealed deletions similar to those observed in oligospermic and azoospermic patients. Thus, there are some common but still unknown factors underlying infertility in these patients irrespective of their spermatogenic status. This work is envisaged to augment DNA diagnosis, proving beneficial in the context of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and genetic counselling.


Human infertility is a major concern affecting about 15% global population of the reproductive age group [1]. Among the causes of infertility, in half of the cases, male partners are traced to be responsible [2]. A perusal of literature suggests the involvement of the aberrant Y chromosome in the male infertility [3]. The Y-chromosome is male specific, constitutively haploid and inherited by son from the father. The pseudo-autosomal regions (PARs) comprise 3 Mb of the entire Y-chromosome (∼70 Mb) and have homology with the X- chromosome. However, the male specific region of the Y-chromosome (MSY) is devoid of any homology either with the X chromosome or the autosomes thus, escaping meiotic recombination [4]. On account of this, the frequency of mutations and genetic defects in the “intrinsically haploid” genes of the Y-chromosome is quite high as compared to that in X-chromosomal and autosomal genes. Consequently, Y-linked mutations have adverse effects on spermatogenesis and/or normal sperm function [5]. Further, in the absence of recombination of the Y-chromosome, these mutations are faithfully inherited.

Owing to the presence of eight palindromes containing different ampliconic sequences, the MSY reportedly recombine within the region [6], [7] resulting in several large scale Y-chromosomal deletions, detected frequently in the infertile men [8][11]. In several studies, falling sperm count and overall deterioration of the semen quality have been reported [12][16]. Regardless of the various studies on the male in/fertility, the exact mechanism(s) is still unclear. Apart from the genetic factors, environment and life style are also considered to have a role in male in/fertility [17][20]. Among the infertile patients, broadly, there exist two populations; the first in which the male infertility is correlated with decreased sperm count (assessed according to WHO guidelines, 2010 [21]), motility and morphology. The second population comprises males, who despite having a normal spermiogram are infertile. For the second population, analysis at molecular level may highlight the genetic reasons behind their unexplained phenotype. Such studies would reveal the factors which may not be responsible for the spermatogenesis per say, but play a crucial role in the male in/fertility.

The deletions in the euchromatic portion of the Yq have been linked to spermatogenic failures [22]. Three regions, referred to as “Azoospermia factors” AZFa (in proximal Yq), AZFb and AZFc (in the distal Yq euchromatin) have been defined as spermatogenic loci [23]. These AZF loci are molecularly screened and mapped for the possible deletions using conserved sequence tagged sites (STSs). Deletions in various AZF regions have been correlated with different phenotypes such as AZFa region to Sertoli-cell-only syndrome [24][26], AZFb region to interruption in meiosis-I resulting in spermatogenic arrest [23] and AZFc region to hypospermatogenesis leading ultimately to severe oligospermia and azoospermia [27]. Further, AZFc and DAZ deletions are well documented in the context of spermatogenic failure resulting in infertility [28], [29].

DYZ1 region comprising ∼3.4 kb repeat arrays of about 3000–4300 copies [30] in a normal male constitutes approximately 40% of the Y-chromosome [31]. Each array predominantly contains a pentanucleotide repeat motif 5′TTCCA3′. DYZ1 doesn't recombine; therefore the mutations in the arrays remain unaltered and make it an ideal candidate for studying length and copy number variations. Copy number of this array was found to be drastically affected in cases of repeated abortion, prostate cancer, males exposed to natural background radiation [30] and heavy metals such as groundwater arsenic [32]. Intronless gene SRY, located on the short arm of the Y-chromosome encodes a protein, which plays an imperative role in initiating sex determination of the fetus. Mutations in this gene have been linked to various disorders like gonadal dysgenesis and sex reversed cases.

Due to the non-recombining nature of the Y-chromosome, its mutational load may get inherited to the subsequent generations. Therefore, before opting for assisted reproductive technology (ART), the Y-chromosome may be analyzed for micro-deletions, if any. The AZF micro-deletions in the patients can be considered as premutations for the complete loss of the Y-chromosome in their sperms thereby increasing the chances to have an XO offspring [33]. These deletions also result in reduction of the normal Y bearing sperms and an increase in nullisomic and disomic (XY) sperms [34]. Such sperms if used for intracytoplasmic injection of the eggs (ISCI) would make the embryos prone to genetic disorders and chromosomal aneuploidies like 45X and 45 XXY. Thus, screening for deletions of the Y-chromosome has prognostic value and implications on subsequent therapeutic options.

Owing to the envisaged correlation between infertility and molecular abnormalities of the Y-chromosome, we studied 31 males with unexplained infertility, having normal spermiograms (according to WHO parameters). Sixty seven NFMs were included as controls. We discerned the status of the Y-linked STSs/loci spanning the AZF regions. Further, we assessed status of the DAZ genes by SNV analysis and conducted qPCR to ascertain its copy numbers. Molecular analysis of the SRY was conducted for its intactness, sequence variation and copy number status by STS mapping, sequencing analyses and qPCR, respectively. Similarly, copy number and mutational status of the DYZ1 arrays were also analyzed in the context of male in/fertility.


Sequence Tagged Site (STS) Mapping of AZF region

AZFa: variable deletions were observed: AZFa region was analyzed for HERV mediated recombination using 12 STSs (Table S1). The first HERV recombination event results in deletion of STSs sY1064, sY1065, sY1182, sY1183, sY1184, sY1185 and sY1186. The second recombination event involves deletion of STSs sY1180, sY1181, sY1064, sY1065 and sY1182. The AZFa region was found to be intact in all the NFMs. The details of the AZFa analyses for patients are shown in Figure 1. Patients AS-6, AS-9, AS-12, AS-13 and AS-16 showed deletion of STSs sY1065, sY1182, sY1183, sY1184, sY1185 and sY1186, a pattern which resembles second HERV mediated deletion except sY1064 that was found to be intact in them. Therefore, to analyze further the deletion breakpoint in these patients, we used STSs between sY1064 and sY1065 including those for genes USP9Y and DBY (Figure 1D). Five primer pairs across USP9Y gene including STSs sY1316 and sY1317 and three primer pairs for DBY consisting STS sY1234 were used for all the patients. The patients AS-9, AS-16 and AS-22 showed deletion of USP9Y. The sY1316 and sY1317 were found to be deleted in two and three patients, respectively (Figure 1D). DBY1 STS was found to be deleted in patients AS (3–12, 14–22 and 25) and DBY2 STS, in patients AS-9, AS-16 and AS-22. Patients AS (2, 9, 16, 17 and 22) were found to have sY1234 deleted, indicating that possible deletion breakpoint in these patients' lies within the DBY. The findings of AZFa screening in the present study indicate that USP9Y and DBY genes possibly play a crucial role in the male in/fertility though the mechanism remains unclear. Also, some patients showed random micro-deletions across the AZFa region. In addition to this, STSs sY1251 (present at the boundary between Centromere and Yq) and sY1231 (located in UTY exon 9) were found to be intact in all the patients, except, AS-9 which showed absence of sY1231 (Table S2). Interestingly, sY1181 was found to be deleted in all the patients except AS-13, but its functional significance remained unclear.

Figure 1. STS mapping of AZFa region.

(A) Diagrammatic illustration of the AZFa showing positions of Provirus A and B regions. The brown and orange bars represent homologous sequences responsible for recombination. (B) STSs employed in mapping of the AZFa region. (C) Results of AZFa STS mapping using genomic DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes of the infertile males. NFM signifies the pattern of STS analyses results in normal fertile males. Presence of the corresponding STSs in the patients are indicated by solid line and the gaps denote the absence of the same; patient IDs are shown on the left side. (D) Results of STSs analyses between sY1064 and sY1065. (+) and (−) indicate the presence and absence of the STS analyzed, respectively.


AZFb: distinct micro-deletions were seen across the patients: The AZFb region in the patients was analyzed using 7 STSs. The NFMs were positive for all the seven STSs. A diagrammatic illustration of AZFb STS screening is shown in Figure 2B. The STSs sY129 and sY113 were found to be deleted in most of the patients. These deletions were confirmed by slot blot hybridization (data not shown). Patients AS-9 and AS-16 showed complete AZFb deletion phenotype as reported earlier [35]. RBMY gene specific STSs werefound to be intact in all the patients except in AS-9, AS-16 and AS-17.

Figure 2. STS mapping of AZFb and c regions.

(A) Diagrammatic illustration of human Y-chromosome. (B) Results of STS analyses of AZFb region. STSs analyzed are shown on the top and the patients' ID is shown on the left side. (C) Results of STS analyses of AZFc region. The different ampliconic regions present in the AZFc region are shown on the top by different colour coding; b1, b2, b3 and b4 are the blue amplicons; g1, g2, g3 and g4 are the green amplicons, likewise r1, r2, r3 and r4 amplicons are in red and gr amplicons in grey. The yellow coloured P1.1 and P1.2 comprise Palindrome 1. The STSs studied for AZFc region, are shown below the ampliconic regions. The presence and absence of STSs in the patients are indicated by solid line and gap, respectively.


AZFc: gr/gr and b2/b3 phenotypes were detected in some patients: The AZFc region was analyzed using 20 landmark STSs (Table S1). In NFMs, all the STSs were present. But eight patients AS (7, 9, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21 and 27) showed absence of sY1291 (gr/gr deletion) and twelve patients AS (3–6, 9–12, 14, 16, 22 and 29) showed absence of sY1191 [b2/b3 (g1/g3)] deletion).These gr/gr or b2/b3 (g1/g3) deletion involved loss of two DAZ copies and one BPY2 copy. The sY1197 was found to be deleted in patient AS-9 and sY283 deleted in patient 29 (Figure 2C). The details of deletions in all the patients are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Frequency of the deletions in various AZF regions observed in the infertile males.

X-axis depicts the deletions observed in different regions of the Y chromosome. The numerical values above the blue and orange bars represent the total number of infertile patients analyzed and number of patients showing the deletions, respectively.


Further, exonic regions of different genes were also studied using specific primers (Table S3). Among these, CDY1 gene remained unaltered but CDY2 was affected in 12 patients (Table S2). Also, two patients AS-9 and AS-16 showed deletions of TTTY17, RPS4Y, XKRY and VCY genes (Table S2).

SNV analyses showed altered DAZ copies

SNV analyses of the AZFc region showed partial deletions of DAZ gene copies in SNVI, SNVII, SNVIII (sY586), SNVIV, sY587, SNVVI and sY581 (Table 1). The Fsp1 digested fragments of SNVI and MboI digested fragments of SNVII distinguish DAZ4 and DAZ1, respectively from other DAZ copies. Similarly, the TaqI digested fragments of SNVIII (sY586) and AluI digested fragments of SNVIV discern DAZ2 from other DAZ copies. DraI digested fragments of SNVV (sY587) identified DAZ1/DAZ2 from DAZ3/DAZ4, AflIII digested fragments distinguished the DAZ4 from the rest of the copies and the Sau3A digested fragments of sY581 differentiated DAZ1/DAZ4 from DAZ2/DAZ3 [11], [28], [36]. The samples, in which the SNV analyses showed different pattern than that of the NFMs (absence of any of the allele) were selected for sequence analyses. The sequencing results of the amplified SNV PCR products in these samples were found to be in accordance with that of the different digested patterns. DAZ SNV1 in patients AS (5, 10, 11, 14, 22 and 29) showed presence of allele “A” only. After sequencing, FspI site was found to be deleted in these patients due to point mutation (G>A). Similarly, patients AS-20, AS-21 and AS-27 showed presence of allele B only for DAZ SNVII; sequencing showed G>A mutation which created an MboI site. Presence of allele B of DAZ SNVIII (sY586) and SNVIV in patients AS-20, AS-21 and AS-27 was due to T>C point mutation resulting in formation of TaqI and AluI sites, respectively, both indicating the absence of DAZ2 copy in these samples. Patients AS (3–6, 10–12, 14, 22 and 29) showed presence of allele A in DAZ SNVVI. Sequencing revealed G>T mutation in AflIII restriction site responsible for this phenotype. STS Y-DAZ3 was analyzed to ensure presence of the DAZ3 copy which was found to be deleted in Patients AS (3–6, 10–12, 14, 22 and 29). The sY152 analyzed for DAZ (1+4) was present in all the patients except in AS-9 and 16 (Table S2). Thus, SNVs analyses helped to uncover the status of the mutations in the DAZ genes and their copy number variation.

Table 1. Summary of the results of AZFc region based on the SNVs analysis.


Sequencing of SRY showed nucleotide variations

All NFMs and patients' samples showed presence of SRY gene. The SRY sequences of the patients' were submitted to GenBank (Banklt) and their accession numbers are given in Table S4. Multiple alignments of the SRY sequence of the representative patients with that of normal male are shown in Figure S1. Patients showing differences at the nucleotide level were analyzed in silico to know whether these changes correspond to some alterations in the SRY protein post-translation (using Transeq) and again aligning them to normal SRY peptide. Sequence analyses showed that patients AS (1–8, 10, 12–14, 16, 20–27, 30 and 31) have identical SRY CDS compared to that in the normal males. Mutations at the nucleotide level in some patients affect the CDS of the SRY gene (Table 2). A diagrammatic illustration of functionally important regions of the SRY is shown in Figure 4A. Patients AS-17 and AS-29 showed mutations in the HMG box and KPNBI interacting region. In the patient AS-11, mutations were confined to KPNBI interacting region whereas in AS-9, the same was observed in the SLC9A3R2V interacting region. No such mutations were observed in the SRY of the NFMs.

Figure 4. Diagram illustrating positions of important regions and qPCR amplification plot of the SRY.

(A) Diagrammatic illustration of the functionally important regions of the SRY exon, based on the information retrieved from Pubmed. 59–136 AA are sufficient for interaction with KPNB1, SOX-TCF_HMG-box present in 59–130AA, contain HMG box and is known to bind minor groove of DNA. 61–77AA are required for nuclear localization and form N terminal nuclear localization signal (N-NLS) of SRY. 107–139 AA are sufficient for interaction with EP300, 130–136 AA are required for nuclear localization (C-terminal NLS) and 136 AA is required for acetylation. 138–155AA and 198–204 AA are necessary for interaction with ZNF208 isoform KRAB-O and interaction with SLC9A3R2V, respectively. (B) Representative qPCR amplification plot of SRY in the infertile patients and normal fertile males. ΔCt = 1 represents one copy of the SRY.


Table 2. Details of SRY mutations observed in the patients.


Deletions and copy number variations were detected in the DYZ1 arrays

Primer combinations (PC) used for deletion screening of DYZ1 are explained in the “Methods” section. In all the NFMs, DYZ1 arrays were found to be intact. Amongst the patients studied, AS-9 and AS-16 showed absence of amplicons for PC-1 (3378 bp), 2 (266 bp) and 4 (2095 bp). Patients AS-8 and AS-16 showed deletion of 1564 bp with PC-3. Patient AS-16 showed deletion of 2056 bp and 1612 bp with PC-5 and PC-9, respectively. Patients AS-16 and AS-27 showed deletion of 773 bp with PC-7. Furthermore, the DYZ1 copies were found to vary in the range of 19–2546, which was much below the normal range. The copy number of the NFMs ranged between 2600–4851. The representative amplification plot and standard curve along with the DYZ1 copy number of different patients are given in Figure 5A, B and C. The reduced copy number of DYZ1 array was significantly correlated with the infertility status of the patients.

Figure 5. Copy number analysis of the DYZ1 arrays by qPCR.

(A) and (B) show representative amplification plot and the standard curves, respectively. (C) represents the copy numbers of DYZ1 arrays across the infertile males.


Copy number status of SRY, DAZ and BPY2 genes

The representative amplification plots for SRY, BPY2 and DAZ copy number calculations are shown in Figure 4B, 6A, 6B and 7A and B, respectively. The copy number of SRY across the patients was found to be one, similar to that of NFMs. Copy number of BPY2 gene in these patients varied from 2–3, while NFMs showed 3 copies. DAZ was found to vary between 0–4 copies across the patients. The copy numbers of DAZ and BPY2 genes by TaqMan assays was found to be in accordance with our SNV analysis. The frequencies of the copy number variations in BPY2 and DAZ, across the patients are shown in Figures 6C and 7C, respectively. Table 3 summarizes the details of the copy numbers of these genes in the patients. The patients showed a significant correlation with the reduced copy numbers of BPY2 and DAZ genes.

Figure 6. Copy number estimation of BPY2 gene.

(A) and (B) show representative qPCR amplification plots for BPY2. ΔCt = 0.6 and ΔCt = 0 correspond to three and two copies of the BPY2, respectively (for details on calculations please see “Methods” section). (C) Bar graph shows the frequency of occurrence of 3 and 2 copies across the patients studied.


Figure 7. Copy number analysis of DAZ gene.

(A) and (B) are showing the representative qPCR amplification plots for DAZ. ΔCt = −1 and ΔCt = 0 denote four and two copies of DAZ, respectively (for details on calculations please see “Methods” section). (C) Bar graph showing distribution of the DAZ copies across the infertile patients analyzed.


Table 3. Copy number status of BPY2, DAZ and SRY based on qPCR.



The human Y-chromosome is male specific and known to harbour genes, important for fertility. Micro-deletions across the Y-chromosome especially AZF regions have been argued to be the causes of spermatogenic failure leading to infertility. Deletions in the AZFa region are considered to be responsible for the reduced sperm count [9]. However, in the present study, we found micro-deletions across the AZFa region of the infertile males having normal sperm count (Figure 1). Deletions of USP9Y and DBY genes have been associated with spermatogenic failures [37], [38], [39]. Although USP9Y and DBY deletions alone are not considered to be the major causes of infertility, but construed to be fine tuners of the process of normal spermatogenesis along with other key players [40], [41], [42]. We observed deletions of the USP9Y and DBY genes in the infertile patients with normal spermiogram. Thus, besides these genes, still other unknown factors are involved with the fertility failure.

Apart from AZFa region, we also observed some micro-deletions in the AZFb region. Partial AZFb deletions have been reported in oligospermic and azoospermic males, suggesting a correlation between reduced sperm count and AZFb deletions [35]. Our results indicate that sY113 and sY129 deletions (Figure 2B) in AZFb found in most of the patients may be involved along with other key players causing infertility in males with apparently normal spermiogram.

The AZFc region is considered as a “hotspot” as most of the infertile cases showed partial deletions (gr/gr, b1/b3, b2/b3 and b3/b4) across this region [10], [34]. Among these, b2/b3 deletions are known to occur in equal frequency in NFMs and infertile patients [43], [44]. Besides these reports, frequency of the b2/b3 deletions was found to be more in the infertile males as compared to that in normal ones [45]. In the present study, none of the normal fertile males showed b2/b3 deletions and the prevalence of b2/b3 deletions in the infertile males was 12/31. Some reports showed profound gr/gr deletion differences between patients and NFMs and considered these deletions significant for male in/fertility [10], [34], [44], [46][48]. On the contrary, reports are there that gr/gr deletions are not exclusive to infertile males [43], [45], [49], [50]. However, after thorough reappraisal of the earlier reports, it was recapitulated that these deletions are more common in the infertile males as compared to that in NFMs [51]. In the present study none of the NFMs showed gr/gr deletions but eight patients showed such deletions.

The SNV analyses showed that copies of the DAZ and BPY2 are affected in some patients (17/31), confirming further b2/b3 and gr/gr deletions in these patients. The copy number of the two genes DAZ and BPY2 was found to be normal in 14/31 patients and all the fertile controls. There are disputes about the reciprocity of DAZ copy number variations and infertility; on one hand the DAZ copies were affected in the infertile males with reduced sperm count [52], [53], conversely the DAZ1/DAZ2 copies were missing in the infertile males as well as in the normal control samples [50]. Thus, deletions of gr/gr, DAZ and BPY2 may not be directly associated with the spermatogenic failures but play an imperative role in determining the male fertility. One possible explanation for the same can be that these genes are also playing crucial role during post sperm formation.

Co-expression of CDY1 and CDY2 was thought to be necessary for the formation of spermatids and spermatozoa [54]. CDY2 expresses during all the stages of spermatogenesis, while CDY1 expression remains limited to spermatids and spermatozoa. Therefore, the absence of either of them might affect fertility. In the present study, CDY2 is found to be affected highlighting its association with infertility.

Mutations in the SRY have been reported in sex reversed cases and gonadal dysgenesis [55][62]. Though, the copy number of SRY in the patients was found to be normal but showed some sequence variations (Table 2). No such mutations were observed in the SRY of NFMs implicating possible role of the SRY protein in fertility. Mutations in the patients AS-11, 17 and 29 are in the KPNB1 interacting region. KPNB1 (Karyopherin (importin) beta 1) subunit plays important role in nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of the proteins. The import of proteins containing a classical nuclear localization signal (NLS) requires the NLS import receptor, a heterodimer of importin alpha and beta subunits. The importin beta docks the complex at the cytoplasmic side of the nuclear pore complex [63], [64]. The HMG box of SRY is essential for binding to and bending of DNA, as well as for transport of the protein into the nucleus [65]. Therefore, any mutation in the importin beta interacting region and HMG box may lead to poor transport of the SRY protein. Also, SRY is proposed to switch the foetal development towards maleness by initiating testis differentiation. Owing to this fact, we infer that the mutations observed in the infertile males are likely to be de novo somatic variations instead of sporadic changes. Analysis of the samples from the males of the previous generation would have resolved this issue. However, owing to logistic constraints, the same were unavailable for the present study. Thus, besides sex differentiation, SRY may have a possible role in determining normal fertility of the males.

Further, we found that the DYZ1 array is also affected in the infertile males. The copy number of DYZ1 array in all the infertile males, with a single exception of AS-19 (DYZ1 copies = 2546) was drastically reduced. Therefore, we hypothesize that the DYZ1 in the heterochromatic region may be necessary for the structural and functional integrities of the Y-chromosome. The heterochromatic region is non-coding and thus considered unnecessary. However, substantial deletions of DYZ1 copies may prove to be detrimental if they include the adjoining functional genes. The reduced copy number of DYZ1 in the infertile males provides direct evidence about its biological significance though the mechanism and consequence(s) of deletion remains unclear.

Male fertility is regulated by a number of genes thus highlighting the complexities of spermatogenesis. In the absence of involvement of a single gene, the accurate DNA diagnosis would remain a challenge. Nonetheless, detailed information is envisaged to be useful to assess the structural and functional status of the Y-chromosome in the context of IVF, DNA diagnostics and ART. Assessment of Y micro-deletions in the infertile patients is particularly relevant for genetic counselling of the infertile couples.

This work demonstrates that infertility in the human males having normal spermiogram is caused due to aberrations of the several Y chromosome linked genes and loci including DYZ1 region. Thus, semen samples used for IVF and ART may be checked for all the possible candidate genes and loci for their normal status. In addition, follow up information may be made available to fine tune the genotype-phenotype correlation in the context of in/fertility.


Ethics Statement

Present study was approved both, by the Institutional Human Ethical Committee of the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi and the Bio-Ethical Committee, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) and semen samples were collected from the patients as a diagnostic practice with their informed consent. Most of the patients gave their oral consents as being illiterate villagers. Owing to this, their verbal consents were faithfully recorded. Subsequently, the same was duly reported to both the committees and final approval to conduct the present study was obtained.


Of all the couples reporting at the Department of Endocrinology, J.N. Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), Aligarh, thirty one infertile males (median age 32 years) were included in the present study. These couples were not able to conceive following twelve months or more of unprotected intercourse. Both the partners were examined for routine tests. The female partners were found to be normal with respect to their ovulation, hormonal tests (FSH, estrogen and progesterone), tubal and uterine assessment. For the male partners routine semen analyses for sperm count, motility and viability were performed in accordance with WHO (2010) criteria. All the patients were found to be normal with respect to the above parameters. Thus, these patients suffered primary infertility with unexplained causes. The details of the patients with respect to their semen parameters are given in Table S5. The persons having any chromosomal abnormalities (PBL karyotyping), congenital absence of vas deferens, known infertility caused by cystic fibrosis, testicular tumours or undergoing chemotherapy and radiotherapy were excluded from the present study. PBLs in excess of the diagnostic requirements were processed for genomic DNA isolation. Sixty seven NFMs were also included in the present study as controls. All the NFMs had normal spermiogram that were found to be in accordance with the WHO criteria [21].

Sequence Tagged Site (STS) Mapping of the AZF region

AZF region of the Y-chromosome was analysed for micro-deletions using STS end point PCR amplification. A total of 64 STSs were selected from the MSY Breakpoint mapper for screening the AZFa, b, c regions in the patients and control samples (Table S1). PCR conditions for the same can be retrieved from the NCBI ( The end point PCR amplifications were performed in 25 µl reaction volumes containing 5X Go Taq reaction buffer (Promega Madison, USA), 200 µM dNTPs (Bio Basic Inc. Toronto, Canada), 1 IU Go Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, USA) and 100 ng of genomic DNA. Primers for β-actin and sY14 (Table S3) were used for ascertaining the quality of genomic DNA samples. Genomic DNA samples from PBLs of NFMs were used as positive controls for STS mapping. Genomic DNA from female and a reaction without template were included as negative controls for each STS. The amplified products were resolved on agarose gels of appropriate concentrations (depending upon the size of the amplicons) and stained with ethidium bromide to view under UV. Each STS reaction was carried out thrice before confirming the same to be negative.

Single Nucleotide Variants (SNV) analyses

The AZFc region was further analyzed for 7 SNVs in the DAZ region [28], [36] and one SNV each for GOLY1, BPY2 and TTTY4 (Table 1) by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Besides, three landmark STSs DAZ-RRM3 (for DAZ1 and DAZ4), Y-DAZ3 (for DAZ3) and DAZ 1+4 (sY152) were screened in the DAZ region. The primer sequences, accession numbers, product sizes and restriction enzymes used for SNV analyses are given in Table S6. Standard PCR conditions were followed for the analysis of the SNVs and each SNV reaction was performed in a 50 µl reaction volume. An aliquot of 10 µl from each amplified PCR products was analyzed on agarose gel for the presence of respective fragment. Upon confirmation, the remaining PCR product was precipitated by addition of 5 µl of 3 M sodium acetate and 150 µl of absolute ethanol and incubated at −70°C for 3 hours. Subsequently, this was pelleted down at 13,000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C, washed in 70% ethanol and dissolved in 10 µl water. The purified PCR amplicons were further subjected to restriction digestion using appropriate restriction enzyme and buffer. The digests were resolved on 3% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV.

PCR amplification, Cloning and Sequencing of SRY

Three sets of primers SRY1, SRY2 and sY14 (see details in Table S3) were used to study SRY. Primer pair SRY1, encompassing HMG box region of the human SRY was used to amplify genomic DNA from the different patients and products were resolved on agarose gel. The resolved amplicons were then sliced and eluted using gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Eluted DNA was cloned in pGEM®-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, USA). Five recombinant clones each, from all the patients and NFMs were sequenced on Applied Biosystems 3130xl genetic analyzer using ABI PRISM®Big Dye®terminator v 3.1 cycle sequencing kits (Life technologies, California, USA). PCR conditions were set as 96°C for 1 minute, followed by 25 cycles each consisting of 96°C for 10 seconds, 50°C for 5 seconds, and 60°C for 4 minutes. After cycle sequencing, extension products were purified to remove any unincorporated dye-labelled terminators using ethanol-sodium acetate precipitation method followed by washing in 70% ethanol. Hi-Di™ Formamide (Life technologies, California, USA) was added, samples were heat denatured, chilled on ice and loaded on ABI 3130xl genetic analyzer. The sequences were analyzed using Run 3130xl Data Collection Software v3.0, Sequencing Analysis 5.3.1 and Generunner. The SRY sequences of the patients and NFMs were aligned to the reference sequence in GenBank (NM_003140.1) using online tool ClustalW.

Analysis of DYZ1

DYZ1 arrays in different patients were screened by end point PCR for their intactness. Details of primers and their combinations are listed in the tables S3 and S7, respectively. The copy numbers of the DYZ1 arrays of the patients were calculated by qPCR based on absolute quantification method using genomic DNA as template and SYBR green dye (Life technologies, California, USA). The qPCR reactions were performed on Sequence Detection System-7500 (Life technologies, California, USA). Ten fold dilutions of cloned DYZ1 plasmid (∼3.4 Kb HaeIII digest) were used for generating standard curve starting with 20 crore (2×108) copies. All the reactions were carried out in triplicates using three different concentrations of the template DNA of each patient along with the control samples. The standard curves had a slope of −3.3 to −3.5 and R2 value of >0.99. Copies of the DYZ1 arrays were calculated by extrapolation of the standard curve obtained with known copies of the recombinant plasmid.

Copy number calculation of SRY, DAZ and BPY2 genes

Copy number of the SRY, DAZ and BPY2 were calculated using TaqMan probes for the respective genes. SRY (assay Id. Hs00243216_s1), DAZ (assay Id. Hs00414014_m1) and BPY2 (SARBPYF (forward primer) TGGAGTCTGCCAAAACAAGGG, SARBPYR (reverse primer) CAGAGCAGGAGAGTCTCATCAC and SARBPYP (Probe) 6FAM-CACATATTGCGGAGTCCAGCACCCAGG-MGB) assays were procured from ABI, USA. All the reactions were performed in triplicates on Sequence Detection System, 7500 (Life technologies, California, USA). The copy number was calculated using method (ΔCt = Difference in threshold cycle between test sample and endogenous control). The autosomal gene RNase P was used as an internal control.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Sigma Plot11.0. We tested the observed differences in the copy number of BPY2, DAZ and DYZ1 between the infertile males and NFMs using Fisher's exact test. A p-value 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant for the test.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Alignment of SRY sequences from representative patients with the reference sequence from the GenBank (NM_003140.1). The asterisk (*) below the sequence indicates the identical bases and the gaps indicate deletion of the nucleotide or putative mutations. The rectangular boxes are highlighting the insertions or deletions and the encircled red coloured bases are showing the nucleotide substitutions.



Table S1.

Details of the STSs used for screening deletions of the AZF a, b and c regions.



Table S2.

Summary of representative candidate genes and STSs analyzed.



Table S3.

Details of the primers used for end point PCR analyses.



Table S4.

GeneBank accession numbers for cloned SRY sequences of the patients.



Table S5.

Clinical details of the patients' semen samples.



Table S6.

Details of the SNVs studied for DAZ , GOLY-SNV-1 , BPY2 and TTTY4 genes.



Table S7.

List of the DYZ1 primers used for end point PCR, their corresponding amplicon sizes and reaction conditions.




We thank Prof. Jamal Ahmad, Department of Endocrinology, AMU, Aligarh for kindly providing the samples used in the present study. We also thank the patients for their consent, thereby enabling us to undertake this study and Khem Singh Negi for technical assistance. Equipment donation from the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany, is gratefully acknowledged. SA is grateful to Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, Government of India, for the award of J. C. Bose National Fellowship.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AK SA. Performed the experiments: AK SKY. Analyzed the data: AK SA. Wrote the paper: AK SA.


  1. 1. Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, et al. (2002) Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril 77: 873–882. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03105-9
  2. 2. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, et al. (1991) Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988–1989). Hum Reprod 6: 811–816.
  3. 3. Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O (1976) Localization of factors controlling spermatogenesis in the nonfluorescent portion of the human Y chromosome long arm. Hum Genet 34: 119–124. doi: 10.1007/bf00278879
  4. 4. Lahn BT, Page DC (1997) Functional coherence of the human Y chromosome. Science 278: 675–680. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.675
  5. 5. Hargreave TB (2000) Genetic basis of male fertility. British Medical Bulletin 56: 650–671. doi: 10.1258/0007142001903454
  6. 6. Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Skaletsky H, Brown LG, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, et al. (2001) The AZFc region of the Y chromosome features massive palindromes and uniform recurrent deletions in infertile men. Nat Genet 29: 279–286. doi: 10.1038/ng757
  7. 7. Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Hillier L, et al. (2003) The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature 423: 825–837. doi: 10.1038/nature01722
  8. 8. Blanco P, Shlumukova M, Sargent CA, Jobling MA, Affara N, et al. (2000) Divergent outcomes of intrachromosomal recombination on the human Y chromosome: male infertility and recurrent polymorphism. J Med Genet 37: 752–758. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.10.752
  9. 9. Sun C, Skaletsky H, Rozen S, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E, et al. (2000) Deletion of Azoospermia factor a (AZFa) region of human Y chromosome caused by recombination between HERV15 proviruses. Hum Mol Genet 9: 2291–2296. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.hmg.a018920
  10. 10. Repping S, Skaletsky H, Brown L, van Daalen SK, Korver CM, et al. (2003) Polymorphism for a 1.6-Mb deletion of the human Y chromosome persists through balance between recurrent mutation and haploid selection. Nat Genet 35: 247–251. doi: 10.1038/ng1250
  11. 11. Fernandes S, Paracchini S, Meyer LH, Floridia G, Tyler-Smith C, et al. (2004) A large AZFc deletion removes DAZ3/DAZ4 and nearby genes from men in Y haplogroup N. Am J Hum Genet 74: 180–187. doi: 10.1086/381132
  12. 12. Nelson CM, Bunge RG (1974) Semen analysis: evidence for changing parameters of male fertility potential. Fertil Steril 25: 503–507.
  13. 13. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE (1992) Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ 305: 609–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6854.609
  14. 14. Van-Waeleghem K, De Clercq N, Vermeulen L, Schoonjans F, Comhaire F (1996) Deterioration of sperm quality in young healthy Belgian men. Hum Reprod 11: 325–329. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.2.325
  15. 15. Irvine S, Cawood E, Richardson D, MacDonald E, Aitken J (1996) Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years. BMJ 312: 467–71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7029.467
  16. 16. Swan SH, Elkin EP, Fenster L (2000) The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934–1996. Environ Health Perspect 108: 961–966. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108961
  17. 17. Moghissi KS, Wallach EE (1983) Unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 39: 5–21.
  18. 18. Negro-Vilar A (1993) Stress and other environmental factors affecting fertility in men and women: overview. Environ Health Perspect 101: 59–64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s259
  19. 19. Sharpe RM, Franks S (2002) Environment, lifestyle and infertility–an inter-generational issue. Nat Cell Biol 4: 33–40. doi: 10.1038/ncb-nm-fertilitys33
  20. 20. Younglai EV, Holloway AC, Foster WG (2005) Environmental and occupational factors affecting fertility and IVF success. Hum Reprod Update 11: 43–57. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh055
  21. 21. World Health Organization (2010) WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of Human Semen, Fifth edition. World Health Organization Press Geneva.
  22. 22. Foresta C, Moro E, Ferlin A (2001) Y chromosome micro-deletions and alterations of spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev 22: 226–239. doi: 10.1210/edrv.22.2.0425
  23. 23. Vogt PH, Edelmann A, Kirsch S, Henegariu O, Hirschmann P, et al. (1996) Human Y chromosome azoospermia factors (AZF) mapped to different subregions in Yq 11. Hum Mol Genet 5: 233–943. doi: 10.1093/hmg/5.7.933
  24. 24. Blagosklonova O, Fellmann F, Clavequin MC, Roux C, Bresson JL (2000) AZFa deletions in Sertoli cell-only syndrome: a retrospective study. Mol Hum Reprod 6: 795–799. doi: 10.1093/molehr/6.9.795
  25. 25. Foresta C, Moro E, Rossi A, Rossato M, Garolla A, et al. (2000) Role of the AZFa candidate genes in male infertility. J Endocrinol Invest 23: 646–651.
  26. 26. Kamp C, Huellen K, Fernandes S, Sousa M, Schlegel PN (2001) et al. High deletion frequency of the complete AZFa sequence in men with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod 7: 987–994. doi: 10.1093/molehr/7.10.987
  27. 27. Ferlin A, Arredi B, Foresta C (2006) Genetic causes of male infertility. Reprod Toxicol 22: 133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.04.016
  28. 28. Fernandes S, Huellen K, Goncalves J, Dukal H, Zeisler J, et al. (2002) High frequency of DAZ1/DAZ2 gene deletions in patients with severe oligozoospermia. Mol Hum Reprod 8: 286–298. doi: 10.1093/molehr/8.3.286
  29. 29. Navarro-Costa P, Pereira L, Alves C, Gusmão L, Proença C, et al. (2007) Characterizing partial AZFc deletions of the Y chromosome with amplicon-specific sequence markers. BMC Genomics 8: 342. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-342
  30. 30. Pathak D, Premi S, Srivastava J, Chandy SP, Ali S (2006) Genomic instability of the DYZ1 repeat in patients with Y chromosome anomalies and males exposed to natural background radiation. DNA Res 13: 103–109. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsl002
  31. 31. Ali S, Hasnain SE (2003) Genomics of the human Y-chromosome association with male infertility. Gene 321: 25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2003.08.006
  32. 32. Ali S, Ali S (2010) Genetic integrity of the human Y chromosome exposed to groundwater arsenic. BMC Med Genomics 3: 35. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-3-35
  33. 33. Vogt PH (2004) Genomic heterogeneity and instability of the AZF locus on the human Y chromosome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 224: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2004.06.008
  34. 34. Ferlin A, Garolla A, Foresta C (2005) Chromosome abnormalities in sperm of individuals with constitutional sex chromosomal abnormalities. Cytogenet Genome Res 111: 310–316. doi: 10.1159/000086905
  35. 35. Ferlin A, Moro E, Rossi A, Dallapiccola B, Foresta C (2003) The human Y chromosome's azoospermia factor b (AZFb) region: sequence, structure, and deletion analysis in infertile men. J Med Genet 40: 18–24. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.1.18
  36. 36. Saxena R, de Vries JW, Repping S, Alagappan RK, Skaletsky H, et al. (2000) Four DAZ genes in two clusters found in the AZFc region of the human Y chromosome. Genomics 67: 256–267. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6260
  37. 37. Brown GM, Furlong RA, Sargent CA, Erickson RP, Longepied G, et al. (1998) Characterisation of the coding sequence and fine mapping of the human DFFRY gene and comparative expression analysis and mapping to the Sxrb interval of the mouse Y chromosome of the Dffry gene. Hum Mol Genet 7: 97–107. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.1.97
  38. 38. Foresta C, Ferlin A, Moro E (2000) Deletion and expression analysis of AZFa genes on the human Y chromosome revealed a major role for DBY in male infertility. Hum Mol Genet 9: 1161–1169. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.8.1161
  39. 39. Lee KH, Song GJ, Kang IS, Kim SW, Paick JS, et al. (2003) Ubiquitin-specific protease activity of USP9Y, a male infertility gene on the Y chromosome. Reprod Fertil Dev 15: 129–133. doi: 10.1071/rd03002
  40. 40. Sun C, Skaletsky H, Birren B, Devon K, Tang Z, et al. (1999) An azoospermic man with a de novo point mutation in the Y-chromosomal gene USP9Y. Nat Genet 23: 429–32.
  41. 41. Krausz C, Degl'Innocenti S, Nuti F, Morelli A, Felici F, et al. (2006) Natural transmission of USP9Y gene mutations: a new perspective on the role of AZFa genes in male fertility. Hum Mol Genet 15: 2673–2681. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl198
  42. 42. Luddi A, Margollicci M, Gambera L, Serafini F, Cioni M, et al. (2009) Spermatogenesis in a man with complete deletion of USP9Y. N Engl J Med 60: 881–885. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0806218
  43. 43. Hucklenbroich K, Gromoll J, Heinrich M, Hohoff C, Nieschlag E, et al. (2005) Partial deletions in the AZFc region of the Y chromosome occur in men with impaired as well as normal spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod 20: 191–197. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh558
  44. 44. Lynch M, Cram DS, Reilly A, O'Bryan MK, Baker HW, et al. (2005) The Y chromosome gr/gr subdeletion is associated with male infertility. Mol Hum Reprod 11: 507–512. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah191
  45. 45. Wu B, Lu NX, Xia YK, Gu AH, Lu CC, et al. (2007) A frequent Y chromosome b2/b3 subdeletion shows strong association with male infertility in Han-Chinese population. Hum Reprod 22: 1107–1113. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del499
  46. 46. Machev N, Saut N, Longepied G, Terriou P, Navarro A, et al. (2004) Sequence family variant loss from the AZFc interval of the human Y chromosome, but not gene copy loss, is strongly associated with male infertility. J Med Genet 41: 814–825. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.022111
  47. 47. Giachini C, Guarducci E, Longepied G, Degl'Innocenti S, Becherini L, et al. (2005) The gr/gr deletion(s): a new genetic test in male infertility?. J Med Genet 42: 497–502. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.028191
  48. 48. Giachini C, Nuti F, Marinari E, Forti G, Krausz C (2007) Partial AZFc deletions in infertile men with cryptorchidism. Hum Reprod 22: 2398–2403. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem186
  49. 49. Fernando L, Gromoll J, Weerasooriya TR, Nieschlag E, Simoni M (2006) Y-chromosomal micro-deletions and partial deletions of the Azoospermia Factor c (AZFc) region in normozoospermic, severe oligozoospermic and azoospermic men in Sri Lanka. Asian J Androl 8: 39–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00100.x
  50. 50. Stouffs K, Tournaye H, Van der Elst J, Haentjens P, Liebaers I, et al. (2008) Do we need to search for gr/gr deletions in infertile men in a clinical setting?. Hum Reprod 23: 1193–1199. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den069
  51. 51. Tüttelmann F, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Nieschlag E, Simoni M (2007) Gene polymorphisms and male infertility—a meta-analysis and literature review. Reprod Biomed Online 15: 643–658. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60531-7
  52. 52. Moro E, Ferlin A, Yen PH, Franchi PG, Palka G, et al. (2000) Male infertility caused by a de novo partial deletion of the DAZ cluster on the Y chromosome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 4069–4073. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.11.6929
  53. 53. Ferlin A, Bettella A, Tessari A, Salata E, Dallapiccola B, et al. (2004) Analysis of the DAZ gene family in cryptorchidism and idiopathic male infertility. Fertil Steril 81: 1013–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.053
  54. 54. Kleiman SE, Yogev L, Hauser R, Botchan A, Bar-Shira Maymon B, et al. (2003) Members of the CDY family have different expression patterns: CDY1 transcripts have the best correlation with complete spermatogenesis. Hum Genet 113: 486–492. doi: 10.1007/s00439-003-0990-9
  55. 55. Alvarez-Nava F, Soto M, Borjas L, Ortiz R, Rojas A, et al. (2001) Molecular analysis of SRY gene in patients with mixed gonadal dysgenesis. Ann Genet 44: 155–159. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3995(01)01081-4
  56. 56. Li B, Zhang W, Chan G, Jancso-Radek A, Liu S, et al. (2001) Human sex reversal due to impaired nuclear localization of SRY. A clinical correlation. J Biol Chem 276: 46480–46484. doi: 10.1074/jbc.c100388200
  57. 57. Fernandez R, Marchal JA, Sanchez A, Pasaro E (2002) q11→pter). Hum Genet 111: 242–246. doi: 10.1007/s00439-002-0767-6
  58. 58. Shahid M, Dhillion VS, Jain N, Hedau S, Diwakar S, et al. (2004) Two new novel point mutations localized upstream and downstream of the HMG box region of the SRY gene in three Indian 46,XY females with sex reversal and gonadal tumour formation. Mol Hum Reprod 10: 521–526. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah071
  59. 59. Phillips NB, Jancso-Radek A, Ittah V, Singh R, Chan G, et al. (2006) SRY and human sex determination: the basic tail of the HMG box functions as a kinetic clamp to augment DNA bending. J Mol Biol 358: 172–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.060
  60. 60. Marchina E, Gambera A, Spinelli E, Clerici P, Scagliola P, et al. (2009) Identification of a new mutation in the SRY gene in a 46,XY woman with Swyer syndrome. Fertil Steril 91: 932 e937–932 e911. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1722
  61. 61. Shahid M, Dhillon VS, Khalil HS, Haque S, Batra S, et al. (2010) A SRY-HMG box frame shift mutation inherited from a mosaic father with a mild form of testicular dysgenesis syndrome in Turner syndrome patient. BMC Med Genet 11: 131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-11-131
  62. 62. Paliwal P, Sharma A, Birla S, Kriplani A, Khadgawat R (2011) Identification of novel SRY mutations and SF1 (NR5A1) changes in patients with pure gonadal dysgenesis and 46,XY karyotype. Mol Hum Reprod 17: 372–378. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gar002
  63. 63. Gorlich D, Kostkat S, Kraftt R, Dingwall C, Laskey RA, et al. (1995) Two different subunits of importin cooperate to recognize nuclear localization signals and bind them to the nuclear envelope. Curr Biol 5: 383–392. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00079-0
  64. 64. Bonifaci N, Moroianu J, Radu A (1997) Blobel (1997) Karyopherin b2 mediates nuclear import of a mRNA binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 5055–5060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5055
  65. 65. Sinclair A (2001) Eleven years of sexual discovery. Genome Biology 2: 4017.1–4017.3.
  66. 66. de Dunnen JT, Antonarakis E (2001) Nomenclature for the description of human sequence variations. Hum Genet 109: 121–124. doi: 10.1007/s004390100505