Aplastic anemia is characterized by a reduced hematopoietic stem cell number. Although GATA-2 expression was reported to be decreased in CD34-positive cells in aplastic anemia, many questions remain regarding the intrinsic characteristics of hematopoietic stem cells in this disease. In this study, we identified HOXB4 as a downstream target of GATA-2 based on expression profiling with human cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells infected with control or GATA-2 lentiviral shRNA. To confirm the functional link between GATA-2 and HOXB4, we conducted GATA-2 gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments, and HOXB4 promoter analysis, including luciferase assay, in vitro DNA binding analysis and quantitative ChIP analysis, using K562 and CD34-positive cells. The analyses suggested that GATA-2 directly regulates HOXB4 expression through the GATA sequence in the promoter region. Furthermore, we assessed GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression in CD34-positive cells from patients with aplastic anemia (n = 10) and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 13), and demonstrated that the expression levels of HOXB4 and GATA-2 were correlated in these populations (r = 0.6573, p<0.01). Our results suggested that GATA-2 directly regulates HOXB4 expression in hematopoietic stem cells, which may play an important role in the development and/or progression of aplastic anemia.
Citation: Fujiwara T, Yokoyama H, Okitsu Y, Kamata M, Fukuhara N, Onishi Y, et al. (2012) Gene Expression Profiling Identifies HOXB4 as a Direct Downstream Target of GATA-2 in Human CD34+ Hematopoietic Cells. PLoS ONE 7(9): e40959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040959
Editor: Andrew C. Wilber, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, United States of America
Received: March 30, 2012; Accepted: June 15, 2012; Published: September 24, 2012
Copyright: © Fujiwara et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The pathogenesis of aplastic anemia (AA) is complex and many questions remain unanswered. It has been proposed that immunological injury in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) leads to reduced numbers of stem cells in the bone marrow (BM) , , . Evidence supporting this suggestion was obtained from in vitro analysis of samples obtained from AA patients, as well as from clinical evidence that immunosuppressive therapy with drugs such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporin A is effective in 75% of AA cases , . On the other hand, the observation that some patients do not respond to immunosuppressive therapy, and may even develop myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia as a consequence of clonal evolution , suggests that the immunological aberration is not the sole mechanism of the disease. However, only limited information has emerged regarding potential intrinsic abnormalities of HSCs in AA, as most studies have focused on the extrinsic immunological abnormalities.
Hematopoiesis is intricately controlled by numerous transcription factors that control and coordinate the expression of lineage-specific genes . Foundational studies defined involvement of members of a family of developmental regulators, the GATA transcription factors , , , . GATA-1, GATA-2, and GATA-3 are termed as hematopoietic GATA factors, based on their important activities in controlling distinct and overlapping aspects of hematopoiesis . GATA-1 functions to promote the development of erythrocytes, megakaryocytes, eosinophils, and mast cells, and GATA-3 plays a role in T-lymphocyte development , , , , . On the other hand, GATA-2 functions early in hematopoiesis and is required for maintenance and expansion of HSCs and/or multipotent progenitors , , , , . Therefore, it is possible that changes in the GATA-2 expression level could lead to aberrant proliferation and differentiation of HSCs, and may be responsible for the development of AA. Previously, we demonstrated decreased expression of GATA-2 in CD34-positive cells in AA . This observation was confirmed in another study, which involved microarray-based transcriptional profiling in CD34-positive cells with AA . Therefore, we speculated that some stem cell-specific genes are aberrantly expressed as a consequence of GATA-2 downregulation in HSCs in AA, which could contribute to the development and/or progression of the disease.
(A) GATA-2 knockdown in human cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells. Anti-GATA-2 Western blotting analysis of whole-cell extract from cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells, infected with control or GATA-2 shRNA, respectively.Alpha-Tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR validation of array results (mean ± SE, n = 3). 28S mRNA was quantified as a control. (C) Gene Ontology analysis. Genes showing greater than or equal to 1.4-fold change based on microarray analysis and greater than or equal to 20 normalized expression values were included in the analysis. A Z-value of 2.0 was used as the standard cut-off value.
To examine this possibility, we conducted microarray analysis with human cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells infected with lentiviral shRNA specific to GATA-2. Among GATA-2-regulated genes, we focused on the HOXB4 gene as one of the causative candidate genes for AA. In the present study, we investigated the functional link between GATA-2 and HOXB4, and also examined correlation between GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression based on clinical specimens.
(A, B) Transient overexpression of GATA-2 in K562 cells. (A) Expression of Myc/His-tagged GATA-2 was confirmed by Western blotting. As a control, empty vector was independently transfected into K562 cells. Alpha-Tubulin was used as a loading control. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of HOXB4 mRNA in K562 cells overexpressing GATA-2 (mean ± SD, n = 4). mRNA levels were normalized relative to GAPDH. *p<0.05. (C, D) Stable GATA-2 overexpression in K562 cells. GATA-2 expression vector was transduced into K562 cells and 28 clones were established after selection with G418 (Sigma). (C) Western blotting to detect stable expression of exogenous Myc/His-tagged GATA-2 in K562 cells. The results of 3 representative clones (A1, A4, and A6) and 2 control clones are shown. Alpha-Tubulin was used as a loading control. (D) Correlation between GATA-2 and HOXB4 mRNA in each clone. mRNA expression was normalized relative to that of GAPDH, and the correlation of these genes was assessed by Spearman's rank correlation method. (E–F) GATA-2 knockdown in K562 cells. (E) Anti-GATA-2 Western blotting analysis of whole-cell extracts and (F) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of GATA-2 and HOXB4 (mean ± SE, n = 3), from K562 cells transfected with siRNA against human GATA-2 or control siRNA. Alpha-Tubulin was used as a loading control. mRNA levels were normalized relative to GAPDH. *p<0.05. (G) MSCV retroviral vector-mediated GATA-2 overexpression in cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed to detect GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression (mean ± SE, n = 3). mRNA levels were normalized relative to 28S. *p<0.05.
Materials and Methods
Patients involved in the analysis were diagnosed with AA (n = 10) or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (n = 13) in our institute or related hospitals . The severity of AA at the time of diagnosis was moderate (n = 7) or severe (n = 3). Diagnosis and assessment of disease severity were performed according to published criteria . Clinical samples were collected after obtaining written informed consent. The use of clinical samples as well as cord blood samples for the study was approved by the ethical committee of Tohoku University. Ethical considerations according to the declaration of Helsinki were followed.
(A) GATA-1 and GATA-2 ChIP-seq profile at HOXB4 in K562 cells. GATA-1 and GATA-2 signal map for HOXB4 was shown. Arrows, ChIP-seq peak locations relative to the start site of the respective GATA-1 target gene (kb). The ChIP-seq data were mined from data described by Fujiwara et al  and were analyzed with the integrated genome browser (IGB) (Affymetrix). (B) The 5′ upstream region of the human HOXB4 gene. The putative GATA-binding element is boxed. The translational initiation site is underlined. Two transcriptional start sites  are indicated by arrows. (C) Impact of GATA site deletion on HOXB4 promoter activity. We generated wild-type and −160/−157 GATA-deleted constructs fused to a luciferase reporter gene, and transient transfection assay was performed in K562 cells (mean ± SD, n = 3). *p<0.05. (D) GATA-2 knockdown in K562 cells. Anti-GATA-2 Western blotting analysis of whole-cell extract (left) and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of GATA-2 (right) from K562 cells, infected with control or GATA-2 shRNA, respectively. Alpha-Tubulin was used as a loading control, and GAPDH mRNA was quantified as a control. (E) Impact of GATA-2 deletion on HOXB4 promoter activity. HOXB4 promoter assay was conducted with K562 cells expressing control or GATA-2 shRNA (mean ± SD, n = 3). *p<0.05.
Cell lines and isolation of CD34-positive cells
K562 cells were maintained in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Methods for establishment of K562 cell lines stably expressing exogenous GATA-2 were described previously . GATA-2 expression vector was constructed using the coding region of human GATA-2 cloned into pcDNA(−)/Myc-His vector (Invitrogen) .
(A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Aliquots of 3 ug of nuclear extracts from K562 (lane 2) or GATA-2 expression vector-transfected (lanes 3–6) K562 cells were incubated with FITC-labeled oligomers including the GATA site at −160/−157 within the HOXB4 promoter in the absence (lanes 1–4) or presence (lanes 5–6) of a 100-fold molar excess of the indicated oligonucleotides. For GATA-2 overexpression, pcDNA(−)/Mys-His expression vector was used (Figures 2A, 2B). (B) Quantitative ChIP analysis of GATA-2 chromatin occupancy at HOXB4 promoter, GATA-2 −1.8 kb, and NECDIN promoter, with K562 cells (upper) and cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells (lower) (mean ± SD, n = 3).
CD34-positive cells were isolated from BM cells obtained from patients and human cord blood-derived mononuclear cells using a magnetic activated cell sorter (MACS) system (Miltenyi Biotec). StemPro-34 SFM (Invitrogen) supplemented with Stem Cell Factor (100 ng/mL), IL-3 (50 ng/mL), and GM-CSF (25 ng/mL) (R&D systems) was used for expansion of isolated CD34-positive cells.
Viral vectors and cell transduction
For GATA-2 knockdown in CD34-positive cells and K562 cells, pGIPZ lentiviral shRNAmir (Open Biosystems) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. After infection with CD34-positive cells, Puromycin (Sigma) was added to culture media for selection of the transduced cells for 96 h. For GATA-2 overexpression, retroviruses encoding human GATA-2, and their MSCV control, were produced by transfection of Platinum Retroviral Packaging Cell Lines (Cell Biolabs) with FuGene HD (Promega). Seventy-two hours after transfection, the viral supernatant was used for infection. After infection with CD34-positive cells, cell were incubated for 48 h and then harvested for the analysis.
Bone marrow cells were collected from 10 patients with AA and 13 patients with ITP after obtaining informed consent . Mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation. CD34-positive cells were then collected using the MACS system. GATA-2 and HOXB4 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis, and were normalized relative to GAPDH mRNA expression. The correlation of HOXB4 and GATA-2 mRNA expression in each sample was calculated with Spearman's rank correlation test.
siRNA-mediated knockdown of GATA-2
The antisense sequence of the siRNA for human GATA-2 was gugcugauguagugaccaaTT (B-Bridge International Inc.). AllStars Negative Control siRNA (Qiagen) was used as a control. A total of 200 pmol of siRNA was transfected into CD34-positive cells and K562 cells using an Amaxa Nucleofector kit (Amaxa Inc.). Cells were harvested after 24 h for CD34-positive cells and after 48 h for K562 cells (transfected twice at 0 and 24 h).
Real-time quantitative PCR and expression profiling
Total RNA was purified with TRIzol (Invitrogen), and cDNA was synthesized from 1.5 ug of purified total RNA using Superscript II (Invitrogen). Reaction mixtures (20 uL) for real-time quantitative RT-PCR consisted of 2 uL of cDNA, 10 uL of Power SYBR green master mix (Applied Biosystems) and appropriate primers. Primer sequences are available upon request. Product accumulation was monitored by measuring SYBR Green fluorescence and normalized relative to GAPDH or 28S mRNA.
For expression profiling, Human Oligo chip 25k (Toray) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Aliquots of 1 ug of total RNA were amplified with an Ambion Amino Allyl aRNA kit (Ambion), labeled with Amersham Cy5 Mono-Reactive Dye (GE Healthcare), and hybridized to the Human Oligo chip 25k array. Data were collected and normalized using a 3D-Gene Scanner 3000 system (Toray). For global normalization, background value was subtracted, and subsequently adjusted to the average signal value of 25. Each probe on the microarray was linked with specific Gene Ontology (GO) terms based on Oligo MicroArray DataBase system (OMAD) (Operon).
The DNA fragment of the HOXB4 gene promoter region, including 2 transcriptional start sites , was obtained from human genomic DNA of a healthy volunteer by PCR using the following primers: forward: 5′-CGCAGGTACCCTATGTAAATCCTGGTGT-3′ (spanning positions −262 to −279 from the translational start site); reverse: 5′-ACCCCTCGAGCGTTTTCCTGTTTCCGAA-3′ (−55 to −72 from the translational start site). These primers contain artificial restriction enzyme sites (KpnI and XhoI, respectively), and the amplified DNA fragments were inserted into the KpnI/XhoI sites of pGL3-Basic (Promega). GATA deletion construct was generated using a QuickChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) using the mutagenesis primer 5′-GTGAGCAGATTTCCTCGGGAATCGCAGGCG-3′.
To assay HOXB4 transcriptional activity, aliquots of 5×105 K562 cells (ATCC CCL-243)  were transfected with 1 ug of HOXB4 promoter construct and 50 ng of a Renilla luciferase reporter plasmid with FuGene 6 (Promega). After 24 h of incubation in culture media, the cells were harvested, and both firefly and Renilla luciferase activities in the cell extracts were determined using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega).
Electrophoretic mobility assay (EMSA)
Nuclear extracts were prepared by the method of Andrews and Faller . EMSA analysis was conducted essentially as described previously . The oligonucleotide sequences for the GATA site at −160/−157 were as follows: forward, 5′-GATTTCCTTATCCGGGAATC-3′; reverse, 5′-GATTCCCGGATAAGGAAATC-3′ (wild-type); and forward, 5′-GATTTCCTAAACGGGAATC-3′; reverse, 5′-GATTCCCGTTTAGGAAATC-3′ (GATA mutated).
Quantitative ChIP analysis
Antibodies for GATA-2 (H-116), Myc (9E10), and His probe (G-18) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Alpha-Tubulin (CP06) was obtained from Calbiochem. GATA-2 (ab22849) and rabbit control IgG were obtained from Abcam.
Western blotting analysis
Whole-cell extracts were prepared by boiling cells for 5 min in SDS sample buffer, and the samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore), as described previously . Detection was performed with ECL plus (GE Healthcare) and BioMAX XAR Film (Kodak).
Statistical significance was assessed by two-sided Student's t test. Potential correlations between HOXB4 and GATA-2 expression levels were examined by Spearman's rank correlation test. Z-score was calculated to rank the GO terms by the relative changes in gene expression.
Expression profiling identified HOXB4 as a GATA-2 downstream target gene
To identify GATA-2-regulated genes that may contribute to the pathophysiology of AA, we conducted expression profiling using human cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells infected with control and GATA-2 lentiviral shRNA. Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR revealed knockdown of GATA-2 protein and mRNA expression (Figures 1A, 1B). We first selected genes that showed 1) changes of more than 1.4-fold, and 2) more than 20 of normalized expression value, which yielded 1126 downregulated and 572 upregulated genes, respectively (Table S1). Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed significant downregulation of representative GATA-2 target genes, such as KIT and GFI1B (Figure 1B) . Gene Ontology analysis revealed significant enrichment for “signal transduction,” “regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent,” and “Metabolic process” (Figure 1C). In the present study, we focused on the HOXB4 gene for further analysis (Figure 1B), because HOXB4 has been reported to play an important role in inducing HSC expansion , . Furthermore, it has also been reported that restoring HOXB4 protein in HSCs of AA patients rescues growth potential .
GATA-2 regulates HOXB4 transcription
To determine whether GATA-2 and HOXB4 are functionally linked, we transiently transfected GATA-2 expression vector into K562 cells using an Amaxa Nucleofector kit (Figure 2A) and examined whether GATA-2 altered HOXB4 expression. This analysis indicated that GATA-2 significantly induced expression of HOXB4 (Figure 2B). We also examined whether the stable overexpression of GATA-2 affects HOXB4 expression. The levels of GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression in 28 clones were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Western blotting confirmed Myc/His-tagged GATA-2 protein expression in all 28 clones (Figure 2C). After analyzing GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression levels in 28 clones, we examined the correlation between their expression levels using the Spearman's rank correlation method. The analysis revealed a significant correlation between GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression (Figure 2D, r = 0.46, p<0.01). In addition, siRNA-mediated knockdown of endogenous GATA-2 in K562 cells significantly reduced HOXB4 expression (Figures 2E, 2F).
To further confirm whether GATA-2 regulates HOXB4 expression in human cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells, we conducted both overexpression and knockdown of GATA-2, using retroviral vector (MSCV) and siRNA, respectively, and confirmed that GATA-2 regulates HOXB4 expression (Figure 2G and Figure S1).
GATA-2 binds directly to the HOXB4 promoter and regulates its activity
Our recent ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing) analysis revealed a significant GATA-2, but not GATA-1, peak at the HOXB4 promoter in K562 cells (Figure 3A) , suggesting that GATA-2 directly regulates HOXB4 transcription through its promoter. Thus, we evaluated the sequence of the HOXB4 promoter and focused on the GATA sequence at −160/−157 (Figure 3B), which is conserved between human and mouse , and also across species based on the UCSC genome browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/). However, the surrounding sequence (GGATAA) does not completely coincide with a “canonical” GATA-1 binding motif, such as (A/T)GATA(A/G) or (C/G)(A/T)GATAA(G/A/C)(G/A/C) , , . As it has been demonstrated that the incomplete GATA motif, including GATA(A/G), could be bound by GATA-1 , we hypothesized that GATA-2 binds to the GATA sequence at −160/−157 of the HOXB4 promoter and confers a significant promoter activity. To test this possibility, we first conducted luciferase reporter assay in K562 cells using wild-type and GATA-deleted HOXB4 promoter constructs. As shown in Figure 3C, deletion of the GATA sequence significantly decreased reporter activity as compared to the wild-type promoter activity. Also, we analyzed if GATA-2 depletion could affect promoter activity of HOXB4. K562 cells were infected with control and GATA-2 lentiviral shRNA, and subsequently puromucin was added in culture media for selection. Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR revealed knockdown of GATA-2 protein and mRNA expression (Figures 3D). As shown in Figure 3E, GATA-2 knockdown significantly reduced the promoter activity of HOXB4.
Next, to assess whether GATA-2 binds to the GATA sequence of the HOXB4 promoter, EMSA analysis was conducted with nuclear extracts from K562 cells transiently overexpressing GATA-2. As shown in Figure 4A, a single major band was detected after incubation of nuclear extracts of K562 cells with a FITC-labeled oligonucleotide containing the −160/−157 GATA sequence (lane 2). The intensity of this band increased in proportion to the extent of GATA-2 overexpression (lanes 3–4) and the band intensity decreased considerably when a 100-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide was included in the binding reaction (lane 5). In contrast, a 100-fold excess of a GATA-mutated oligonucleotide (TATC to AAAC) did not affect DNA binding (lane 6). Quantitative ChIP analysis in both K562 and cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells revealed GATA-2 occupancy at the HOXB4 promoter region (Figure 4B). As a reference, we also examined GATA-2 occupancy at GATA-2 −1.8 kb and NECDIN promoter regions, which are considered positive and negative control sites, respectively (Figure 4B) . These results suggested that GATA-2 directly regulates HOXB4 expression via binding to the −160/−157 GATA sequence.
Significant correlation between GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression in clinical samples
To examine correlation between GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression, CD34-positive cells were isolated from BM mononuclear cells from 10 patients with AA and 13 patients with ITP after obtaining informed consent. We analyzed HOXB4 and GATA-2 mRNA levels by quantitative RT-PCR. As shown in Figure 5, we demonstrated that the expression of HOXB4 was significantly correlated with that of GATA-2 (r = 0.6573, p<0.01).
In addition to immunological destruction of HSCs, in principle, altered gene expression in HSCs in AA may be an important determinant of AA pathology. Previously, we reported the decreased expression of GATA-2 in CD34-positive BM cells , and similar results were observed in an independent study . In the present study, we identified the HOXB4 gene as a direct target of GATA-2 in HSCs. HOXB4 is predominantly expressed in HSCs and is particularly important for controlling HSC proliferation , , , . Therefore, we consider that downregulation of HOXB4 in CD34-positive cells appears to be related to one of the pathophysiological aspects of AA, i.e., a reduced HSC number.
We demonstrated that GATA-2 regulates HOXB4 mRNA level via direct binding to the −160/−157 GATA site of the HOXB4 promoter (Figures 2,3,4). However, as it appears that GATA-2 has relatively modest effect on HOXB4 transcription in our analysis, additional factors may also affect HOXB4 expression. It has been reported that the HOXB4 promoter region from −263 to −116 relative to the translational start site is important for the activity in K562 cells , and that thrombopoietin , NF-Y , and USF1/2 ,  regulate HOXB4 transcription through the promoter region. It is still unknown whether these factors, including GATA-2, regulate HOXB4 transcription redundantly or cooperatively in HSCs. NF-Y is known to be a constitutive and ubiquitous transcription factor , but it may participate in the regulation of some promoters in a lineage-specific manner by interacting with GATA-1 or GATA-2, such as those of globins, Gfi1b, KLF13, and FcgammaRIIA , , , , . Thus, GATA-2 may function in a cooperative manner with NF-Y to induce HOXB4 in HSCs.
Next, we demonstrated significant correlation between the expression of HOXB4 and GATA-2 in CD34-positive cells from patients of AA and ITP (Figure 5), suggesting a functional link between GATA-2 and HOXB4 in clinical samples. Furthermore, in the same series of samples, we also found that both HOXB4 and GATA-2 expression levels were significantly lower in CD34-positive cells from AA patients as compared to those from ITP patients (Figure S2). However, ITP patients might have a more active stem and progenitor compartment than normal controls, which would cause the differences in GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression to be exaggerated. Thus, further analyses are required to compare the expression of GATA-2 and HOXB4 in AA with ITP as opposed to CD34+ cells from healthy donors.
The mechanism underlying the decrease in GATA-2 expression in CD34-positive cells with AA is unclear. To date, several transcription factors and signaling molecules have been reported to induce and/or maintain GATA-2 expression in HSCs, such as Scl/TAL1 , Evi1 , Notch1 , BMP, and Wnt signaling . Furthermore, it has been reported that GATA-2 could be a target of epigenetic inactivation by DNA methylation . However, the significance of these factors in the pathogenesis of AA has not yet been evaluated. As shown in Figure 5, the significant correlation between GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression also suggested that HOXB4 might regulate GATA-2 expression. Among several studies enumerating candidate target genes of HOXB4 , , , , , Oshima et al  and Fan et al  recently demonstrated that HoxB4 functions as a master regulator of hematopoiesis by directly regulating multiple hematopoietic transcription factors, including Runx1, Scl/TAL1 and Gata2, through integrated analysis of HoxB4 binding and gene expression profiling in murine embryonic stem (ES) cells. Therefore, the pathogenesis of AA might be caused by a defect in regulatory network among hematopoietic transcription factors, which would result in the decrease of GATA-2 expression. Alternatively, it is also possible that some cytokines, which are thought to play an role in immune-mediated suppression of HSCs, participate in the regulation of GATA-2. In support of this, Xu et al. recently demonstrated that GATA-2 expression is reduced by interferon-gamma in an in vitro analysis based on mesenchymal stem cells . Further studies are required to elucidate the basis of GATA-2 downregulation in AA.
In summary, our results suggested that GATA-2 directly regulates HOXB4 expression in hematopoietic stem cells, which may play an important role in the development and/or progression of AA.
siRNA-mediated knockdown of GATA-2 in CD34+ cells derived from cord blood. siRNA-mediated GATA-2 knockdown in cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed to detect GATA-2 and HOXB4 expression (mean ± SE, n = 3). mRNA levels were normalized relative to 28S. *p<0.05.
HOXB4 expression is significantly decreased in CD34-positive cells in patients with AA and ITP. GATA-2 and HOXB4 mRNA levels were examined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis using CD34-positive cells from patients with AA (n = 10) and ITP (n = 13) (Figure 5). The levels of expression of these genes were normalized relative to GAPDH mRNA expression. Student's unpaired t test was used for statistical analyses.
Gene expression profiling by GATA-2 knockdown in cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells. A total of 1,126 upregulated and 572 downregulated genes after GATA-2 knockdown in cord blood-derived CD34-positive cells were shown. Each value was shown as global normalization value as described in Materials and Methods.
The authors would like to thank the members of Department of Hematology and Rheumatology for helpful discussion.
Conceived and designed the experiments: TF HY HH. Performed the experiments: TF HY Y. Okitsu MK SF. Analyzed the data: TF HY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Y. Onishi NF KI HH. Wrote the paper: TF HY ST EHB HH.
- 1. Solomou EE, Rezvani K, Mielke S, Malide D, Keyvanfar K, et al. (2007) Deficient CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ T regulatory cells in acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 110: 1603–1606. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-01-066258
- 2. Young NS, Scheinberg P, Calado RT (2008) Aplastic anemia. Curr Opin Hematol 15: 162–168. doi: 10.1097/moh.0b013e3282fa7470
- 3. Young NS, Bacigalupo A, Marsh JC (2010) Aplastic anemia: pathophysiology and treatment. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: S119–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.09.013
- 4. Bacigalupo A, Bruno B, Saracco P, Di Bona E, Locasciulli A, et al. (2000) Antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine, prednisolone, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for severe aplastic anemia: an update of the GITMO/EBMT study on 100 patients. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Working Party on Severe Aplastic Anemia and the Gruppo Italiano Trapianti di Midolio Osseo (GITMO). Blood 95: 1931–1934.
- 5. Orkin SH, Zon LI (2008) SnapShot: hematopoiesis. Cell 132: 712. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.013
- 6. Evans T, Reitman M, Felsenfeld G (1988) An erythrocyte-specific DNA-binding factor recognizes a regulatory sequence common to all chicken globin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 5976–5980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5976
- 7. Yamamoto M, Ko LJ, Leonard MW, Beug H, Orkin SH, et al. (1990) Activity and tissue-specific expression of the transcription factor NF-E1 multigene family. Genes Dev 4: 1650–1662. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1650
- 8. Harigae H (2006) GATA transcription factors and hematological diseases. Tohoku J Exp Med 210: 1–9. doi: 10.1620/tjem.210.1
- 9. Bresnick EH, Lee HY, Fujiwara T, Johnson KD, Keles S (2010) GATA switches as developmental drivers. J Biol Chem 285: 31087–31093. doi: 10.1074/jbc.r110.159079
- 10. Martin DI, Zon LI, Mutter G, Orkin SH (1990) Expression of an erythroid transcription factor in megakaryocytic and mast cell lineages. Nature 344: 444–447. doi: 10.1038/344444a0
- 11. Lim KC, Lakshmanan G, Crawford SE, Gu Y, Grosveld F, et al. (2000) Gata3 loss leads to embryonic lethality due to noradrenaline deficiency of the sympathetic nervous system. Nat Genet 25: 209–212.
- 12. Tsai FY, Keller G, Kuo FC, Weiss M, Chen J, et al. (1994) An early haematopoietic defect in mice lacking the transcription factor GATA-2. Nature 371: 221–226. doi: 10.1038/371221a0
- 13. Tsai FY, Orkin SH (1997) Transcription factor GATA-2 is required for proliferation/survival of early hematopoietic cells and mast cell formation, but not for erythroid and myeloid terminal differentiation. Blood 89: 3636–43.
- 14. Ezoe S, Matsumura I, Nakata S, Gale K, Ishihara K, et al. (2002) GATA-2/estrogen receptor chimera regulates cytokine-dependent growth of hematopoietic cells through accumulation of p21(WAF1) and p27(Kip1) proteins. Blood 100: 3512–3520. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1177
- 15. Rodrigues NP, Janzen V, Forkert R, Dombkowski DM, Boyd AS, et al. (2005) Haploinsufficiency of GATA-2 perturbs adult hematopoietic stem-cell homeostasis. Blood 106: 477–484. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-2989
- 16. Fujimaki S, Harigae H, Sugawara T, Takasawa N, Sasaki T, et al. (2001) Decreased expression of transcription factor GATA-2 in haematopoietic stem cells in patients with aplastic anaemia. Br J Haematol 113: 52–57. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02736.x
- 17. Zeng W, Chen G, Kajigaya S, Nunez O, Charrow A, et al. (2004) Gene expression profiling in CD34 cells to identify differences between aplastic anemia patients and healthy volunteers. Blood 103: 325–332. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0490
- 18. Camitta BM, Thomas ED, Nathan DG, Santos G, Gordon-Smith EC, et al. (1976) Severe aplastic anemia: a prospective study of the effect of early marrow transplantation on acute mortality. Blood 48: 63–70.
- 19. Harigae H, Okitsu Y, Yokoyama H, Fujiwara T, Inomata M, et al. (2006) Induction of erythroid-specific genes by overexpression of GATA-2 in K562 cells. Int J Hematol 84: 38–42. doi: 10.1532/ijh97.06020
- 20. Giannola DM, Shlomchik WD, Jegathesan M, Liebowitz D, Abrams CS, et al. (2000) Hematopoietic expression of HOXB4 is regulated in normal and leukemic stem cells through transcriptional activation of the HOXB4 promoter by upstream stimulating factor (USF)-1 and USF-2. J Exp Med 192: 1479–1490. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.10.1479
- 21. Andrews NC, Faller DV (1991) A rapid micropreparation technique for extraction of DNA-binding proteins from limiting numbers of mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 2499. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.9.2499
- 22. Fujiwara T, Harigae H, Okitsu Y, Takahashi S, Yokoyama H, et al. (2006) Expression analyses and transcriptional regulation of mouse nucleolar spindle-associated protein gene in erythroid cells: essential role of NF-Y. Br J Haematol 135: 583–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06340.x
- 23. Im H, Grass JA, Johnson KD, Boyer ME, Wu J, et al. (2004) Measurement of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Methods Mol Biol 284: 129–146. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-816-1:129
- 24. Fujiwara T, O'Geen H, Keles S, Blahnik K, Linnemann AK, et al. (2009) Discovering hematopoietic mechanisms through genome-wide analysis of GATA factor chromatin occupancy. Mol Cell 36: 667–681. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.001
- 25. Huang Z, Dore LC, Li Z, Orkin SH, Feng G, et al. (2009) GATA-2 reinforces megakaryocyte development in the absence of GATA-1. Mol Cell Biol 29: 5168–5180. doi: 10.1128/mcb.00482-09
- 26. Antonchuk J, Sauvageau G, Humphries RK (2002) HOXB4-induced expansion of adult hematopoietic stem cells ex vivo. Cell 109: 39–45. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00697-9
- 27. Klump H, Schiedlmeier B, Baum C (2005) Control of self-renewal and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells: HOXB4 on the threshold. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1044: 6–15. doi: 10.1196/annals.1349.002
- 28. Tang Y, Chen J, Young NS (2009) Expansion of haematopoietic stem cells from normal donors and bone marrow failure patients by recombinant hoxb4. Br J Haematol 144: 603–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07509.x
- 29. Brun AC, Björnsson JM, Magnusson M, Larsson N, Leveén P, et al. (2004) Hoxb4-deficient mice undergo normal hematopoietic development but exhibit a mild proliferation defect in hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 103: 4126–4133. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3557
- 30. Kirito K, Fox N, Kaushansky K (2003) Thrombopoietin stimulates Hoxb4 expression: an explanation for the favorable effects of TPO on hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 102: 3172–3178. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0944
- 31. Bungartz G, Land H, Scadden DT, Emerson SG (2012) NF-Y is necessary for hematopoietic stem cell proliferation and survival. Blood 119: 1380–1389. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-359406
- 32. Zhu J, Giannola DM, Zhang Y, Rivera AJ, Emerson SG (2003) NF-Y cooperates with USF1/2 to induce the hematopoietic expression of HOXB4. Blood 102: 2420–2427. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-01-0251
- 33. Mantovani R (1999) The molecular biology of the CCAAT-binding factor NF-Y. Gene 239: 15–27. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00368-6
- 34. Cassel DL, Subudhi SK, Surrey S, McKenzie SE (2000) GATA and NF-Y participate in transcriptional regulation of FcgammaRIIA in megakaryocytic cells. Blood Cells Mol Dis 26: 587–597. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.2000.0337
- 35. Fang X, Han H, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Li Q (2004) Developmentally specific role of the CCAAT box in regulation of human gamma-globin gene expression. J Biol Chem 279: 5444–5449. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m306241200
- 36. Huang DY, Kuo YY, Lai JS, Suzuki Y, Sugano S, et al. (2004) GATA-1 and NF-Y cooperate to mediate erythroid-specific transcription of Gfi-1B gene. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 3935–3946. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh719
- 37. Mitsuma A, Asano H, Kinoshita T, Murate T, Saito H, et al. (2005) Transcriptional regulation of FKLF-2 (KLF13) gene in erythroid cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1727: 125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2004.12.007
- 38. Yu X, Zhu X, Pi W, Ling J, Ko L, et al. (2005) The long terminal repeat (LTR) of ERV-9 human endogenous retrovirus binds to NF-Y in the assembly of an active LTR enhancer complex NF-Y/MZF1/GATA-2. J Biol Chem 280: 35184–35194. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m508138200
- 39. Yuasa H, Oike Y, Iwama A, Nishikata I, Sugiyama D, et al. (2005) Oncogenic transcription factor Evi1 regulates hematopoietic stem cell proliferation through GATA-2 expression. EMBO J 24: 1976–1987. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600679
- 40. Kumano K, Chiba S, Shimizu K, Yamagata T, Hosoya N, et al. (2001) Notch1 inhibits differentiation of hematopoietic cells by sustaining GATA-2 expression. Blood 98: 3283–3289. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.12.3283
- 41. Trompouki E, Bowman TV, Lawton LN, Fan ZP, Wu DC, et al. (2011) Lineage regulators direct BMP and Wnt pathways to cell-specific programs during differentiation and regeneration. Cell 147: 577–589. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.044
- 42. Kim MS, Chang X, Yamashita K, Nagpal JK, Baek JH, et al. (2008) Aberrant promoter methylation and tumor suppressive activity of the DFNA5 gene in colorectal carcinoma. Oncogene 27: 3624–3634. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1211021
- 43. Schiedlmeier B, Klump H, Will E, Arman-Kalcek G, Li Z, et al. (2003) High-level ectopic HOXB4 expression confers a profound in vivo competitive growth advantage on human cord blood CD34+ cells, but impairs lymphomyeloid differentiation. Blood 101: 1759–1768. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0767
- 44. Jiang J, Yu H, Shou Y, Neale G, Zhou S, et al. (2010) Hemgn is a direct transcriptional target of HOXB4 and induces expansion of murine myeloid progenitor cells. Blood 116: 71–719. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235341
- 45. Lee HM, Zhang H, Schulz V, Tuck DP, Forget BG (2010) Downstream targets of HOXB4 in a cell line model of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 116: 720–730. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-253872
- 46. Oshima M, Endoh M, Endo TA, Toyoda T, Nakajima-Takagi Y, et al. (2011) Genome-wide analysis of target genes regulated by HoxB4 in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells developing from embryonic stem cells. Blood 117: e142–150. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-323212
- 47. Fan R, Bonde S, Gao P, Sotomayor B, Chen C, et al.. (2012) Dynamic HoxB4 regulatory network during embryonic stem cell differentiation to hematopoietic cells. Blood In press.
- 48. Xu Y, Takahashi Y, Wang Y, Hama A, Nishio N, et al. (2009) Downregulation of GATA-2 and overexpression of adipogenic gene-PPARgamma in mesenchymal stem cells from patients with aplastic anemia. Exp Hematol 37: 1393–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2009.09.005