Acellular Bone Marrow Extracts Significantly Enhance Engraftment Levels of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Mouse Xeno-Transplantation Models

Kazem Zibara; Rima Hamdan; Leila Dib; Steen Sindet-Pedersen; Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja; Ali Bazarbachi; Marwan El-Sabban

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040140

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) derived from cord blood (CB), bone marrow (BM), or mobilized peripheral blood (PBSC) can differentiate into multiple lineages such as lymphoid, myeloid, erythroid cells and platelets. The local microenvironment is critical to the differentiation of HSCs and to the preservation of their phenotype in vivo. This microenvironment comprises a physical support supplied by the organ matrix as well as tissue specific cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. We investigated the effects of acellular bovine bone marrow extracts (BME) on HSC in vitro and in vivo. We observed a significant increase in the number of myeloid and erythroid colonies in CB mononuclear cells (MNC) or CB CD34+ cells cultured in methylcellulose media supplemented with BME. Similarly, in xeno-transplantation experiments, pretreatment with BME during ex-vivo culture of HSCs induced a significant increase in HSC engraftment in vivo. Indeed, we observed both an increase in the number of differentiated myeloid, lymphoid and erythroid cells and an acceleration of engraftment. These results were obtained using CB MNCs, BM MNCs or CD34⁺ cells, transplanted in immuno-compromised mice (NOD/SCID or NSG). These findings establish the basis for exploring the use of BME in the expansion of CB HSC prior to HSC Transplantation. This study stresses the importance of the mechanical structure and soluble mediators present in the surrounding niche for the proper activity and differentiation of stem cells.

Citation: Zibara K, Hamdan R, Dib L, Sindet-Pedersen S, Kharfan-Dabaja M, Bazarbachi A, et al. (2012) Acellular Bone Marrow Extracts Significantly Enhance Engraftment Levels of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Mouse Xeno-Transplantation Models. PLoS ONE 7(7): e40140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040140

Editor: Dimas Tadeu Covas, University of Sao Paulo - USP, Brazil

Received: April 2, 2012; Accepted: June 1, 2012; Published: July 2, 2012

Copyright: © 2012 Zibara et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: K.Z. was supported by a grant from Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research (LNCSR). This work was supported by MC2 research grant from Biotek APS, Denmark. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors declare the funding source “Biotek APS, Denamrk.” The authors have no competing interests whatsoever (employment, consultancy, patents, products in development or marketed products, etc.) with the commercial funding source. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an established treatment for patients with various hematological malignancies, with an increasing frequency of procedures worldwide [1]. The source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) used for HSCT includes bone marrow (BM), cord blood (CB), or mobilized peripheral blood (PBSC).

In the allogeneic HSCT setting, CB represents an ideal cell source as it is readily available in large numbers and is associated with a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) [2]. The major drawback for the use of CB is the relatively limited number of HSC limiting its use to pediatric patients less than 40 kg of bodyweight when using a single cord unit [3]. To overcome this limitation, pooling of double cord is an alternative in adult patients [4]. This approach, however, has several limitations including difficulty in finding compatible CB units. As a result, ex-vivo expansion of the pool of HSCs from a single CB unit represents the ideal approach to expand applicability of CB for HSCT. It is important to note that the use of double CB units leads to a similar rate of GvHD compared to grafts from healthy donors [5].

In the autologous HSCT setting, the major source for HSC is mobilized PBSC that are collected by aphaeresis and cryopreserved [6]. These cells contain not only stem cells but also more mature committed progenitors and precursors that participate to early engraftment. Ex-vivo expansion of the pool of committed progenitors and precursors prior to the administration of PBSC could result in faster engraftment, hence reducing length of hospital stay and potentially result in cost savings.

The in vivo local microenvironment is critical to support the differentiation of stem cells or to sustain the phenotype of the stem cell-derived in vitro differentiated cells [7], [8]. This local microenvironment comprises a physical support supplied by the organ matrix as well as tissue specific factors. In previous studies [9], we demonstrated that acellular organ extracts induce tissue specific differentiation of BM derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). We first showed that acellular bovine or equine bone extracts induce osteoblatic differentiation of human bone marrow derived MSC. We also demonstrated that acellular cartilage extracts (derived from meniscus and joint cartilage) induce chondrocytic differentiation of BM derived MSC (unpublished data).

In this study, we investigated the effects of acellular bovine BME on hematopoietic progenitor development in methylcellulose assays and in HSC engraftment in xeno-transplantation models. We show that BME induce and stimulate the growth of myeloid and erythroid colonies in methylcellulose cultures of CB or BM mononuclear cells or CD34 positive cells. Importantly, we also demonstrate that ex-vivo pretreatment of HSC with BME significantly improve and accelerate their in vivo engraftment in xeno-transplantation models in NOD/SCID and NSG mice. These results support the use of BME in the expansion of CB and PBSC hematopoietic progenitors and/or HSC prior to HSCT.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Consent forms detailing the use of human cord blood (CB) and bone marrow (BM) in our experimental protocol were approved by the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUB-MC) Institutional Review Board (IRB). All animal experiments were approved by the AUB Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Animals were handled under pathogen-free sterile conditions, maintained under micro-isolators, and fed sterile food. Finally, this study was performed in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki.

Human Cord Blood and Bone Marrow Cells

Samples of CB were obtained from discarded placental and umbilical tissues, after informed consent from delivering mothers attending the AUB-MC. BM cells were collected after informed consent of patients attending the hospital for BM aspirations. Bone marrow samples were derived from patients diagnosed with Hodgkin disease or Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas, who had routine BM assessment as staging for their disease and who were found to have a normal bone marrow. CB and BM were collected in tubes containing EDTA, sodium citrate or heparin, and were processed within 24 hours.

Purification of MNCs by Ficoll

Fresh samples of CB were diluted 1∶3 in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM, GIBCO-BRL, Life Technologies, Saint Aubin, France) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies). Samples were enriched for mononuclear cells (MNC) by centrifugation on Ficoll/Hypaque (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden). This step of density gradient centrifugation would allow the purification of MNCs from red blood cells and neutrophils. These cells were either used immediately for the experiments described below or cryopreserved in 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma GmbH, Roedermark, Germany) in FBS. Later, cryopreserved cells were thawed at 37°C, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in medium for the specific experiment. After thawing, cell viability was monitored by Trypan blue dye exclusion.

Isolation of CD34⁺ Cell Populations

Enrichment of HSCs was obtained by isolation of the CD34⁺ fraction from BM cells collected from free of disease patients after informed consent. MS columns and µMACS magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Surrey, UK) or EasySep columns (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) were used for this purpose. Using a magnetic separation procedure, the CD34⁺ fraction of HSCs was positively selected by labeling with a CD34 antibody that is anchored to magnetic beads. As a result, about one million CD34 positively selected cells were isolated from 100 million BM MNCs. Purity of the isolated fraction was measured by flow cytometry and was always determined to be greater than 90%. Data acquisition and analysis was performed with CellQuest or Diva softwares from Becton Dickinson (BD, New Jersey, USA) or with FlowJo software (Treestar, Oregon, USA).

Bovine Bone Marrow Extracts (BME)

Extracts are sterile acellular lyophilizates from bovine BM matrix and were supplied by Ossacur AG, (Oberstenfeld, Germany). This new technology is based on the extraction of extracellular matrix proteins from animal tissue and contains a mixture of all growth factors and cytokines within the matrix. Briefly, extracts were prepared, aseptically, from bone marrow of disease-free, young (<12 months old) calves of closed herds. Bone marrows were pulverized and delipidated with acetone for 60 min at 4°C. The resulting particles were demineralized in 0.6 N hydrochloric acid for 60 min at 4°C. Particles were then washed in deionized water, extracted with 4 M guanidine hydrochloride and ultrafiltered using 3 K nominal molecular cut-off membranes. Extracts were then reconstituted in water from the initial stock solution in order to have a final concentration of 0.0138 mg/ml. This concentration was selected based on previous liquid culture experiments, which showed optimum differentiation results (data not shown).

Culturing and Treatment of MNCs and CD34⁺ Cells

MNCs were cultured, in 25 cm² Falcon dishes, in Iscove’s modified Dublecco’s medium (IMDM, GIBCO-BRL, Life Technologies,) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 7 days. On the other hand, about 20,000 CD34⁺ cells were seeded in 6-well plates and suspended at 10⁵ cells/mL in serum-free StemSpan H3000 culture medium (Stem Cell Technologies). The CD34+ cells were supplemented with SCF (25 ng/mL) and G-CSF (10 ng/mL) recombinant human factors for 13 days (Invitrogen, Life Technologies). Cells were treated with BME, diluted with culture medium to have a final concentration of 0.0138 mg/ml. Control cells were left un-treated, i.e. without the addition of BME. Cell suspensions were incubated at 37°C in a 5%CO2/95% air atmosphere, after which they were collected, washed in IMDM, counted by Trypan blue exclusion, analyzed for progenitor and stem cells, and engrafted into NOD-SCID or NSG mice.

Colony Forming Cell (CFC) Assay

CD34⁺ cells from each CB sample were suspended in IMDM/10% FBS and plated on methylcellulose-based media (HSC002, HSC003, and HSC004, R & D systems, Lille, France), with or without the addition of BME. The human methylcellulose base media HSC002 contains 1.3% methylcellulose, 25% FBS, 2% BSA, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 5×10⁻⁵M beta-mercaptoethanol. The human methylcellulose complete media HSC003 contains the basic HSC002 media and is supplemented by rh-SCF (50 ng/mL), rh-GM-CSF (10 ng/mL), rh-IL-3 (10 ng/mL), and rh-Epo (3 U/mL). The human methylcellulose complete media HSC004 is similar to HSC003 media but without Epo. Cells were plated, in duplicate, at a final concentration of 100 cells/9.6 cm² dish. Colonies consisting of CFU-GM (Granulocyte Macrophage), CFU-E/BFU-E (Erythroid), and CFU-GEMM (Granulocyte Erythroid Macrophage Megakaryocyte) were counted at days 14–16 under an inverted microscope.

Mice

NOD/SCID (NOD.CB17-Prkdc^scid/J) and NSG mice (NOD.Cg-Prkdc^scid Il2rg^tm1Wjl/SzJ) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Maine, USA).

Conditioning Regimen

We used the alkylating agent, busulfan (Busilvex, Pierre Fabre, Boulogne, France), as conditioning regimen for transplantation. Busulfan is a cell cycle non-specific drug that functions similarly to total body irradiation (TBI). It provides equivalent sensitivity to the standard irradiation regimen conditioning protocol in immune-compromised mice, as demonstrated by HSC detection, evaluated by limiting dilution analysis of SRC [10]. Mice aged 6–10 weeks received intra-peritoneal (ip) injection of Busulfan at a dose of 22 mg/kg, for 3 consecutive days before transplantation. HSCs are then injected intravenously.

Transplantation of Isolated Cells into NOD/SCID or NSG Mice

Purified cell populations (MNCs or CD34⁺), at the indicated dose, were transplanted by tail-vein intravenous (iv) injection into Busilvex treated mice according to standard protocols. Briefly, human cells were suspended in 250 µl IMDM tissue culture medium (Sigma) containing 1% human serum albumin (HSA, ZLB Behring GmbH, Marburg, Germany). Groups of five mice each, received a dose of viable human CB MNCs (1.5×10⁶, 3×10⁶, or 4×10⁶ cells/mouse). If purified CD34⁺ cells were used, mice were transplanted with 50×10³ cells/mouse. The effect of BME on engraftment was studied by culturing the same amount of cells with or without BME for 7 days.

Mice Sacrifice and Collection of Samples

Mice were sacrificed at 3 or 6 weeks after transplantation. Mice were euthanized by Isoflurane inhalation (Abbot Laboratories, Kent, UK) then cervical dislocation. BM was collected from the long bones of the two posterior limbs (femurs, tibiae, and iliac crests) by flushing with IMDM containing 10% FBS. Single cell suspensions were prepared by drawing the BM cells through a 27-gauge needle, then expelling them back through the needle and through a nylon mesh (70 µ strainers, BD).

Flow Cytometry and Assessment of Engraftment

Collected BM samples from NOD/SCID or NSG mice were stained with various human specific monoclonal antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry, after 3 or 6 weeks of transplantation. Briefly, approximately 10⁵ cells were suspended in 50 µl of PBS/5% FCS/5% human serum for 30 min at 4°C, in order to block Fc receptors. Cells were then washed in PBS containing 10%FBS, and incubated with monoclonal antibodies at a concentration of 5 µg/ml for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were stained with human specific FITC-conjugated anti-CD33, PE-conjugated anti-CD19 and Phycoerythrin-Cyanin 5 (PE-Cy5/PC5)-conjugated anti-CD45. Cells were also stained with human specific FITC-conjugated anti-CD235a (Glycophorin A), PE-conjugated anti-CD36 and Peridinin-Chlorophyll-Protein complex (PerCP)-conjugated anti-CD45 antibodies. Following staining, cells were washed in PBS/5% FBS and analyzed on a flow cytometer (BD FACSCalibur or BD FACSCanto, New Jersey, USA). Gates were set up to exclude nonviable cells and debris. For each mouse analyzed, an aliquot of cells was also stained with isotype control mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) conjugated to FITC, PE, PC5 or PerCP (mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, or IgM; Becton-Dickinson). BM cells from an untransplanted mouse were stained in parallel as a negative control. Fluorescence levels excluding greater than 99% of the cells in these negative controls were considered to be positive and specific for human staining. About 50,000 events were collected for data analysis. Data acquisition was done using SciQuest or Diva softwares from Becton Dickinson while data analysis was performed on flowJo (Treestar, USA). The level of engraftment (i.e. % of human cells) in the BM of NOD/SCID or NSG mice was then measured by adding the engraftment levels from the human leukocytes population (CD45⁺ cells) in addition to immature erythroblasts (CD45⁻CD36⁺CD235a⁺). Furthermore, multi-lineage differentiation of human cells in murine BM was also determined. Indeed, human CD45⁺ cells were further gated based on characteristic forward and side scatter properties into lymphoid and myeloid populations. Multi-lineage engraftment is defined by the presence of separate CD45⁺CD33⁺ (myeloid) and CD45⁺CD19⁺ (lymphoid) populations with appropriate scatter characteristics. Moreover, erythroid populations made up of immature erythroblasts (CD45⁻CD36⁺CD235a⁺) or mature RBC’s (CD45⁻CD36⁻CD35a⁺) were also determined as explained in previous publications [10], [11]. Finally, in order to confirm human engraftment, murine BM cells were also stained with murine specific FITC-conjugated anti-CD45. The engraftment pattern of mice transplanted with purified CD34⁺ cells was similar to what is observed after transplantation of unsorted CB cells. CD45 and CD34 antibodies were purchased from Becton Dickinson (NJ, USA). All other antibodies were from Beckman Coulter (California, USA). It’s important to note that myeloid and B lymphoid reconstitution can be easily attained in NOD-SCID and NSG mice by the transplantation of human HSCs. Several reports have suggested that T cells may be able to develop in the thymus of NOD-SCID mice transplanted with human CD34 cells. In particular, van der Loo et al. succeeded in repopulating a mouse thymus with human cells by administering G-CSF and stem cell factor. However, most of the T cells were double positive (DP) cells, and a functional analysis of these T cells has not been completed [12]. Recently, Yahata et al reported a new model for the study of T-Lymphocytes in the NOD/Shi-scid, IL2-Receptor gamma null mouse background [13].

Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as individual data or as the mean±SD. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Student’s t-test in order to determine statistical significance. Paired t-test was used for methylcellulose experiments. The p value was determined and values for p<0.05 or p<0.001 were considered significant. The Microsoft Excel and SPSS Packages were used to perform statistical analysis.

Results

Bone Marrow Extracts Enhance Hematopoietic Colony Formation

We first investigated the effect of acellular BME on the proliferation and differentiation of CB hematopoietic progenitors using colony-forming assays in methylcellulose. A total of 20,000 CB MNCs from each patient (n = 6) were plated on different types of methylcellulose-based media (HSC002, HSC003, and HSC004), in the presence or absence of BME (CB+BME or CB, respectively). In HSC002 media, which does not contain any added growth factors, the addition of BME increased the number of CFU-G/M colonies by 1.7-fold (Figure 1A, upper panel). In HSC003 media, which contains SCF, GM-CSF, IL3 and Epo, the addition of BME resulted in a significant increase of approximately 1.5 fold in the number of myeloid colonies (CFU-G/M), erythroid colonies (BFU-E) and mixed colonies (CFU-GEMM) (p<0.05 for all colony types) (Figure 1A, middle panel). Finally, in HSC004 which contains SCF, GM-CSF and IL3, BME increased the number of myeloid colonies by at least 2-fold (Figure 1A, lower panel). Similar results were obtained when positively selected CB CD34⁺ cells were used. Indeed, when 100 CD34⁺ cells from each CB sample (n = 4), were plated on the basic methylcellulose media without any added factors (HSC002), myeloid colonies (CFU-G/M) appeared only in the presence of BME (Figure 1B, upper panel). Moreover, addition of BME resulted in a significant increase of myeloid colonies (2 fold) in HSC003 and HSC004 (p<0.001), of erythroid colonies in HSC003 (p<0.001), and of GEMM in HSC003 (p<0.05) (Figure 1B, middle and lower panels). Since HSC002 and HSC004 media presented neither CFU-GEMM nor BFU-E (erythroid) colonies, we may speculate that BME do not contain any EPO activity. Overall, BME increased the number of myeloid and erythroid colonies in methylcellulose culture from both CB MNC and CB CD34⁺ cells.

Download:

Figure 1. Bone marrow extracts enhance hematopoietic colony formation.

A) About 20,000 CB MNCs from each patient were plated on methylcellulose-based media (HSC002, HSC003, and HSC004), in the presence or absence of BME (CB+BME or CB, respectively). Methylcellulose media contained no growth factors (HSC002), SCF+GM-CSF+IL3+Epo (HSC003), or SCF+GM-CSF+IL3 without Epo (HSC004). Colony forming units (CFU) consisting of CFU-G/M (Granulocyte or Macrophage or both), CFU-E/BFU-E (Erythroid), and CFU-GEMM (Granulocyte Erythroid Macrophage Megakaryocyte) were counted at day 16 using an inverted microscope. Data represents an average of 6 different samples. B) A total of 100 CB CD34+ cells from each patient were plated on methylcellulose media (HSC002, HSC003, and HSC004), in the presence or absence of BME (CB+BME or CB, respectively) as described above. Data represents an average of 4 samples used in the study. Paired TTest was used for statistical significance (*: p<0.05, **: p<0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040140.g001

Bone Marrow Extracts Enhance Human Cord Blood Derived Mononuclear Cell Engraftment in Immune-deficient Mice

The current models for assessment of transplantable human HSCs are based on the use of immune-deficient mice such as NOD/SCID [14] (NOD.CB17-Prkdc^scid/J) and NSG [15] (NOD.Cg-Prkdc^scid Il2rg^tm1Wjl/SzJ) mice strains. NOD/SCID mice are characterized by low NK cell activity [16], in addition to B-cell, T-cell, and complement defects. NSG mice represent a more permissive xeno-transplantation model generated from NOD/SCID and the IL-2 receptor gamma c (CD132) knock-out mice and characterized by complete lack of NK activity.

A representative example of the data in an NSG mouse is shown in Figure 2. At six weeks, the percentage of engraftment (CD45⁺ fraction) increased from 5% in an NSG mouse injected with untreated CB MNC cells to about 24% in a mouse injected with cells treated with BME. This increase in engraftment was mainly due to an increase in the number of myeloid cells (CD33⁺, R4 region), which represented more than 90% of engrafted cells. Finally, the percentage of engraftment due to immature erythroblasts increased from around 1.11% in the mouse injected with untreated CB MNC cells to around 2.92% in the mouse injected with CB MNC treated with BME (Figure 2).

Download:

Figure 2. Multilineage engraftment of human CB MNC in NSG mice.

In this study, NOD/SCID or NSG mice received iv busulfan conditioning followed by iv injection of CB MNC or CD34⁺ cells that were previously cultured in vitro for 7 days, in the presence or absence of BME. This figure represents NSG mice which received iv injection of 3×10⁶ CB MNC according to the same protocol. Mice were sacrificed and bone marrow cells were harvested from femurs, tibia and pelvis and examined for multilineage engraftment by flow cytometry according to the following gating strategy: A) Live cells were first gated using forward scatter versus side scatter plots (R1 region). The three plots represent mice injected with saline (negative control), CB, or CB+BME; respectively. B) Human leucocytes were then gated using human CD45 staining (pan-leukocyte marker, R2 region). C) From CD45⁺ gate (R2 region), cells were then examined for multi-lineage engraftment defined by the presence of separate lymphoid (CD45⁺CD19⁺, R3 region) and myeloid (CD45⁺CD33⁺, R4 region) populations. D) The population of CD45⁻ cells were gated in order to determine the erythroid populations. Indeed, erythroid populations made up of mature RBCs (CD45⁻CD36⁻CD235a⁺, R5 region) or immature erythroblasts (CD45⁻CD36⁺CD235a⁺, R6 region) were also determined. It’s important to note that the CD36⁺CD235a⁻ population, which is not present in the controls, does not represent immature erythroblasts but are CD45+ mature cells. The percent engraftment was defined as the total number of leucocytes and immature erythroblasts (CD45⁺ and CD45⁻CD36⁺CD235a⁺ cells).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040140.g002

Two groups of NOD/SCID mice (n = 5 each) received CB MNCs that were put in culture for 7 days, in the presence or absence of BME. A third group (n = 5) served as a negative control and was injected a saline solution. Mice were sacrificed six weeks after transplantation. The percentage of engraftment, as determined by the human pan leucocytic CD45 marker, significantly increased from 3% in the mice that have received untreated CB MNC cells to more than 10% in the mice which received CB MNC cells cultured in the presence of BME (p<0.05) (Figure 3, upper panel). When subpopulations were examined, the increase in engraftment was significant for the myeloid populations (p<0.05) but not for lymphoid cells (Figure 3, lower panel). Similar results were obtained in NSG mice (n = 4 for each group) which received CB MNCs that were put in culture for 7 days, in the presence or absence of BME. The percentage of engraftment, at 6 weeks of transplantation, significantly increased from 5% in the mice that have received cells cultured without BME to 20% in the mice that received cells cultured with BME (p<0.05) (Figure 4, upper panel). When subpopulations were examined, the increase in engraftment was significant for both myeloid (p<0.05) and lymphoid (p<0.05) populations (Figure 4, lower panel).

Download:

Figure 3. Bone marrow extracts enhance human cord blood derived mononuclear cell engraftment in NOD/SCID mice.

Two groups of NOD/SCID mice (n = 5 each) received 3×10⁶ CB MNCs previously cultured for 7 days, in the presence or absence of BME. A third group (n = 5) served as a negative control and were injected with saline. Mice were sacrificed six weeks after transplantation. A) The percentage of engraftment was determined using the human pan leukocyte CD45 marker. B) The contribution of myeloid and lymphoid populations to total human leukocyte engraftment was determined using CD33, CD19 and CD45 markers, respectively. *: p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040140.g003

Download:

Figure 4. Bone marrow extracts enhance human cord blood derived mononuclear cell engraftment in NSG mice.

Two groups of NSG mice (n = 4 each) received 1.5×10⁶ CB MNCs previously cultured for 7 days, in the presence or absence of BME. A third group (n = 5) served as a negative control and was injected with saline. Mice were sacrificed six weeks after transplantation. A) The percentage of engraftment was determined using the human pan leukocyte CD45 marker. B) The contribution of myeloid and lymphoid populations to total human leukocyte engraftment was determined using CD33, CD19 and CD45 markers, respectively. *: p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040140.g004

In order to assess erythroid engraftment, the percentage of engraftment was measured at three weeks instead of six weeks. The time point at 3 weeks allows seeing engraftment due to immature erythroblasts and RBC’s. NSG mice (n = 3 for each group) received CB MNCs that were put in culture for 7 days, in the presence or absence of BME. In these conditions, the percentage of engraftment significantly increased from 12% in the mice that have received cells cultured without BME to 27% in the mice that received cells cultured with BME (p<0.05) (Figure 5, upper panel). When subpopulations were examined, the increase in engraftment was only significant for immature erythroblasts (CD45⁻CD36⁺, p<0.05) (Figure 5, lower panel).

Download:

Figure 5. Bone marrow extracts enhance human erythroid engraftment in NSG mice.

Two groups of NSG mice (n = 3 each) received 4×10⁶ CB MNCs previously cultured for 7 days, in the presence or absence of BME. A third group (n = 5) served as a negative control and was injected with saline. Mice were sacrificed three weeks after transplantation. A) The percentage of engraftment was determined using the human pan leukocyte CD45 marker. B) The contribution of myeloid, lymphoid and erythroid populations to total human leukocyte engraftment was determined using CD33, CD19, CD36 and CD45 markers, respectively. *: p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040140.g005

Bone Marrow Extracts Enhance Human Bone Marrow Derived CD34 Positive Cells Engraftment in Immune-deficient Mice

We then investigated the effect of BME on positively selected CD34 cells derived from normal human bone marrow, using the immune-deficient NSG mice model. Two groups of NSG mice (n = 5 each) received 50×10³ CD34 positive cells that were put in culture for 13 days in the presence or absence of BME. A third group (n = 5) served as a negative control and was injected a saline solution. Mice were sacrificed six weeks after transplantation. The percentage of engraftment, as determined by the human pan leucocyte CD45 marker, significantly increased from 8% in the mice that have received untreated CD34 positive cells to more than 31% in the mice that received CD34 positive cells cultured in the presence of BME (p<0.05) (Figure 6, upper panel). When subpopulations were examined, the increase in engraftment was significant for both myeloid (p<0.05) and immature erythroblasts (p<0.05) populations but not for lymphoid cells (Figure 6, lower panel).

Download:

Figure 6. Bone marrow extracts enhance human bone marrow derived CD34 positive cells engraftment in immunodeficient mice.

Two groups of NSG mice (n = 5 each) received 50×10³ bone marrow derived CD34 positive cells previously cultured for 13 days, in the presence or absence of BME. A third group (n = 5) served as a negative control and was injected with saline. Mice were sacrificed six weeks after transplantation. A) The percentage of engraftment was determined using the human pan leukocyte CD45 marker. B) The contribution of myeloid, lymphoid and erythroid populations to total human leukocyte engraftment was determined using CD33, CD19, CD36 and CD45 markers, respectively. *: p<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040140.g006

Discussion

Traditionally allogeneic HSCT was offered only to patients with available HLA-matched sibling donors. Introduction of unrelated donors whether using unmanipulated BM, mobilized PBSC or CB has certainly expanded applicability of allogeneic HSCT to patients with various hematologic diseases. Use of umbilical CB cells offers several advantages such as immediate availability, lack of risks to donors, and a lower incidence of GVHD despite the presence of significant HLA disparity. Expanding applicability of allogeneic HSCT using CB cells, particularly to adult patients, has been faced with several challenges including a limited number of available progenitor HSCs in a single CB unit and a delayed hematopoietic cell engraftment. For instance, adult patients undergoing CB allogeneic HSCT have a high likelihood of non-relapse mortality during the early post transplantation phase mainly due to poor recovery of blood counts as a result of the lower number of progenitor HSC compared to BM or PBSC [17]. Transplantation of two partially HLA-matched umbilical CB units is feasible and facilitates performing the procedure in adult patients [18]. However, identification of two compatible CB units is not always possible. Accordingly, ex vivo expansion methods to increase cell dose of single CB units represents an unmet need to continue to offer potentially curative allogeneic HSCT to otherwise deadly hematologic and non-hematologic diseases.

Increasing evidence supports a vital role of the local microenvironment in vivo in the differentiation of stem cells and for the maintenance of the phenotype of differentiated cells. This local microenvironment comprises a physical support supplied by the organ matrix/marrow as well as tissue specific factors such as cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. It is now clear that ECM-based control of the cell may also occur through multiple physical mechanisms, such as ECM geometry, ECM elasticity, or mechanical signals transmitted from the ECM to the cells [19] in addition to the interactions of ECM ligands with cell surface receptors [20]. We have previously demonstrated [9] that acellular organ “extracts” induce tissue specific differentiation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). Indeed we showed that acellular bovine or equine bone extracts induce osteoblatic differentiation of human BM derived MSC. In addition, cartilage (meniscus and joint) extracts specifically caused the differentiation of MSCs into chondrocytes, with no cross-reactivity to bone. Differentiation markers of either bone- or cartilage- induced differentiation of MSCs were selective and tissue-specific. In this study we postulated that extracts originating from BM should contain factors involved in differentiation and maintenance of HSCs.

We investigated the effects of acellular bovine BME on hematopoietic progenitor development in vitro, using methylcellulose colony formation assays and engraftment potential of ex vivo treated cells in vivo, using immune-deficient mice models. We show that the local microenvironment stimulates the growth of myeloid and erythroid colonies in methylcellulose cultures and is critical for in vivo engraftment of HSC in xeno-transplantation models. Indeed, the following several lines of evidence support the above statements: (1) We observed a significant increase of at least 2-fold in the number of myeloid and erythroid colonies in CB MNCs cultured in methylcellulose media supplemented with BME, when compared to cells cultured without BME. (2) A similar increase of about 2-fold in the number of CFU-G/M, CFU-GEMM and BFU-E was also observed when CB CD34⁺ cells were used. (3) Pretreatment with BME during ex-vivo culturing of HSCs induces an increase in the level of engraftment in vivo in xeno-transplantation mice models (NOD/SCID and NSG). (4) This increase in engraftment levels is supported by an increase in the number of differentiated cells. (5) The effect of BME on multi-lineage engraftment and HSC transplantation in vivo was confirmed using CB MNCs, BM MNCs and especially CD34⁺ cells, using both mice models. (6) MNCs and CD34+ cells were cultured for only 1 week or 13d, respectively, instead of the 2–3 weeks used by others. This new method, using BME, with reduced period of culturing time leads to a maximum yield of progenitor, precursor and differentiated cells. (7) Finally, it’s important to note that engraftment in the different conditions tested was due not only to myeloid cells, but also to immature erythroblasts.

In an attempt to elucidate whether the differentiation of stem cells in vitro using BME is due to endogenous differentiation factors, different factors were analyzed by Bioscientia GmbH (Ingelheim, Germany). The following results were obtained: Epo (11.3 mIU/mL), IL-2 (2.2 pg/mL), IL-3 (1.3 pg/mL), IL-6 (<1.0 pg/mL), and IL-10 (1.9 pg/mL). Epo concentrations were well below the 20^th percentile, which reflects insufficient levels to explain the observed erythropoiesis. Since Epo levels in HSC0003 is in vast excess to that present in our extract, therefore the data suggests that other unknown factors (such as ECM, growth factors, etc…) should be implicated in differentiation.

CB transplants are usually associated with delayed engraftment and consequently increased rates of infectious complications due to the relatively low number of progenitor cells in the graft [21]. Therefore, different methods of ex vivo expansion of CB have been used in order to deliver higher cell doses and improved outcomes [22]. In fact, a major goal of ex vivo expansion is the production of optimal number of HSCs for transplantation as well as an enough number of specific progenitor cells for rapid recovery from pancytopenia. Different teams have now published promising reports of CB progenitors expanded in liquid cultures [23], [24], [25]. These include the use of different cocktails of cytokines (such as SCF, IL-3, IL-6, G-CSF, TPO, and Flt-3 ligand), marrow-derived mesenchymal cells [26], [27], Notch ligand expansion [28], bioreactors [29], or different stromal [30] co-culture conditions. Usually, ex vivo expansion is performed on whole CB units; which is then infused alongside with an un-manipulated CB [29], [31], [32], [33]. New expansion methods attempt to develop serum-free culture systems [34], [35], optimize culture conditions [36], [37], use histone deacetylases [38] which promote self-renewal, use glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3 inhibitors [39] which maintain HSC pluripotency, or use tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) [40] which modulates the proliferation and differentiation of primitive hematopoietic progenitors. Moreover, another new system currently being used is the DIDECO “Pluricell System” which is a commercially available closed device composed of an expansion chamber and a kit of certified reagents that allow haematopoietic stem cell expansion [41]. Recently, de Lima et al [33] has shown that TEPA (also called StemEx) attenuates the differentiation of ex vivo cultured HSCs resulting in preferential expansion of early progenitors. In a recent phase I/II trial on CD133+ CB HSCs cultured in media containing TEPA, together with SCF, FLT-3 ligand, IL-6, and TPO, nine out of ten patients showed engraftment with an increase of CD34+ cell count, better median time to neutrophil, better platelet engraftment, and no cases of grades 3–4 acute GvHD. Indeed, it has been shown that time to neutrophil engraftment is strongly associated with CD34+ cell dose.

By mimicking the niche, BME were added to our cells prior to their implantation into the mice, which proved to produce an increase in the number of differentiated progenitors and an increase in the engraftment levels. As compared to other currently tested expansion methods, one advantage of our system is that BME were used without the addition of any cytokines, which significantly reduces the cost. A further advantage of our system is that the expansion of cells, after incubation with BME, was not selective of the short-term (low quality) HSCs at the expense of the long-term (high quality) reconstituting HSC. This statement is supported by the engraftment after 6 weeks. However, expansion of the short-term progenitors is also clinically useful since it helps in initial recovery (short-term hematopoietic reconstitution) and especially when combined with un-manipulated CB. However, in order to clearly confirm self-renewal and long term reconstitution from HSCs (LT-SRC), further studies need to be performed using secondary transplantation or engraftment at 12–18 weeks. A third advantage of our system is that cells were cultured for only 1 week for MNCs (or approx. 13 days in the case of CD34+ cells) instead of the 2–3 weeks period used by others [23], [26], [33], which minimizes the risks associated with long term tissue culture such as genetic instability or bacterial and fungal contamination.

These results establish the basis for exploring the use of BME in the expansion of CB progenitors and/or HSC prior to HSCT. It is conceivable that a mixture of an ex-vivo expanded/differentiated pool with an untreated pool will result in improved short term and long term reconstitution. This study stresses the importance of the mechanical structure and soluble mediators present in the surrounding niche for the proper activity and differentiation of stem cells.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr Rami Mahfouz and Dr Ayad Eddaoudi for their precious help in the flow software analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KZ SSP AB MES. Performed the experiments: KZ RH LD. Analyzed the data: KZ RH AB MES. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AB MES. Wrote the paper: KZ MKD AB MES.

References

1. Wingard JR, Hsu J, Hiemenz JW (2010) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an overview of infection risks and epidemiology. Infect Dis Clin North Am 24(2): 257–272.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Mohty M, Apperley JF (2010) Long-term physiological side effects after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 229–236.
3. Gyurkocza B, Rezvani A, Storb RF (2010) Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: the state of the art. Expert Rev Hematol 3(3): 285–299.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Gluckman E, Ruggeri A, Volt F, Cunha R, Boudjedir K, et al. (2011) Milestones in umbilical cord blood transplantation. Br J Haematol 154(4): 441–447.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Stanevsky A, Shimoni A, Yerushalmi R, Nagler (2010) A Double umbilical cord blood transplant: more than a cell dose? Leuk Lymphoma 51(6): 975–982.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Bensinger W, DiPersio JF, McCarty JM (2009) Improving stem cell mobilization strategies: future directions. Bone Marrow Transplant 43(3): 181–195.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Ruscetti FW, Akel S, Bartelmez SH (2005) Autocrine transforming growth factor-beta regulation of hematopoiesis: many outcomes that depend on the context. Oncogene 24(37): 5751–5763.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Nagasawa T, Omatsu Y, Sugiyama T (2011) Control of hematopoietic stem cells by the bone marrow stromal niche: the role of reticular cells. Trends Immunol 32(7): 315–320.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. El-Sabban ME, El-Khoury H, Hamdan-Khalil R, Sindet-Pedersen S, Bazarbachi A (2007) Xenogenic bone matrix extracts induce osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Regenerative Medecine 2(4): 383–390.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Robert-Richard E, Ged C, Ortet J, Santarelli X, Lamrissi-Garcia I, et al. (2006) Human cell engraftment after busulfan or irradiation conditioning of NOD/SCID mice. Haematologica 91(10): 138.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Mazurier F, Doedens M, Gan OI, Dick JE (2003) Rapid myeloerythroid repopulation after intrafemoral transplantation of NOD-SCID mice reveals a new class of human stem cells. Nat Med 9(7): 959–963.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Van der Loo JC, Hanenberg H, Cooper RJ, Luo FY, Lazaridis EN, et al. (1998) Nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mouse as a model system to study the engraftment and mobilization of human peripheral blood stem cells. Blood 92(7): 2556–2570.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Yahata T, Ando K, Nakamura Y, Ueyama Y, Shimamura K, et al. (2002) Functional Human T Lymphocyte Development from Cord Blood CD34+ Cells in Nonobese Diabetic/Shi- scid, IL-2 Receptor γ Null Mice. J Immunol 169(1): 204–209.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Shultz LD, Schweitzer PA, Christianson SW, Gott B, Schweitzer IB, et al. (1995) Multiple Defects of Innate and Adaptive Immunologic Function in NOD/LtSz-scid Mice. J Immunol 154(1): 180–191.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Shultz LD, Lyons BL, Burzenski LM, Gott B, Chen X, et al. (2005) Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2Rγnull mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol 174(10): 6477–6489.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Kollet O, Peled A, Byk T, Ben-Hur H, Greiner D, et al. (2000) beta2 microglobulin-deficient (B2m null) NOD/SCID mice are excellent recipients for studying human stem cell function. Blood 95(10): 3102–3105.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, et al. (2004) Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N Engl J Med 351(22): 2265–2275.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, Blazar BR, McGlave PB, et al. (2005) Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy. Blood 105(3): 1343–1347.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, et al. (2009) Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5(1): 17–26.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Daley WP, Peters SB, Larsen M (2008) Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. J Cell Sci 121(3): 255–264.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Gluckman E, Rocha V, Arcese W, Michel G, Sanz G, et al. (2004) Factors associated with outcomes of unrelated cord blood transplant: guidelines for donor choice. Exp Hematol 32(4): 397–407.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Tung SS, Parmar S, Robinson SN, de Lima M, Shpall EJ (2010) Ex vivo expansion of umbilical cord blood for transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 23(2): 245–257.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Shpall EJ, Quinones R, Giller R, Zeng C, Baron AE, et al. (2002) Transplantation of ex vivo expanded cord blood. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 8(7): 368–376.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Ivanovic Z, Duchez P, Chevaleyre J, Vlaski M, Lafarge X, et al. (2011) Clinical-scale cultures of cord blood CD34(+) cells to amplify committed progenitors and maintain stem cell activity. Cell Transplant 20(9): 1453–1463.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Milpied N, Dazey B, Ivanovic Z, Duchez P, Vigouroux S, et al. (2011) Rapid and sustained engraftment of a single allogeneic ex-vivo expanded cord blood unit (CBU) after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in adults: Preliminary results of a prospective trial. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 118: Abstract 486.
26. McNiece I, Harrington J, Turney J, Kellner J, Shpall EJ (2004) Ex vivo expansion of cord blood mononuclear cells on mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotherapy 6(4): 311–317.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Kelly SS, Sola CB, de Lima M, Shpall E (2009) Ex vivo expansion of cord blood. Bone Marrow Transplant 44(10): 673–681.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Delaney C, Varnum-Finney B, Aoyama K, Brashem-Stein C, Bernstein ID (2005) Dose-dependent effects of the Notch ligand Delta1 on ex vivo differentiation and in vivo marrow repopulating ability of cord blood cells. Blood 106(8): 2693–2699.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Jaroscak J, Goltry K, Smith A, Waters-Pick B, Martin PL, et al. (2003) Augmentation of umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation with ex vivo-expanded UCB cells: results of a phase 1 trial using the AastromReplicell System. Blood 101(12): 5061–5067.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Bakhshi T, Zabriskie RC, Bodie S, Kidd S, Ramin S, et al. (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells from the Wharton’s jelly of umbilical cord segmentsprovide stromal support for the maintenance of cord blood hematopoietic stem cells during long-term ex vivo culture. Transfusion 48(12): 2638–2644.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Pecora AL, Stiff P, Jennis A, Goldberg S, Rosenbluth R, et al. (2000) Prompt and durable engraftment in two older adult patients with high risk chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) using ex vivo expanded and unmanipulated unrelated umbilical cord blood. Bone Marrow Transplant 25(7): 797–799.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Pecora AL, Stiff P, LeMaistre CF, Bayer R, Bachier C, et al. (2001) A phase II trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the AastromReplicell system for augmentation of low-dose blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 28(3): 295–303.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. de Lima M, McMannis J, Gee A, Komanduri K, Couriel D, et al. (2008) Transplantation of ex vivo expanded cord blood cells using the copper chelatortetraethylenepentamine: a phase I/II clinical trial. Bone Marrow Transplant 41(9): 771–778.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Lazzari L, Lucchi S, Porretti L, Montemurro T, Giordano R, et al. (2001) Comparison of different serum-free media for ex vivo expansion of HPCs from cord blood using thrombopoietin, Flt-3 ligand, IL-6, and IL-11. Transfusion 41(5): 718–719.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Yao CL, Feng YH, Lin XZ, Chu IM, Hsieh TB, et al. (2006) Characterization of serum-free ex vivo-expanded hematopoietic stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood CD133+ cells. Stem Cells Dev 15(1): 70–78.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Mohamed AA, Ibrahim AM, El-Masry MW, Mansour IM, Khroshied MA, et al. (2006) Ex vivo expansion of stem cells: defining optimum conditions using various cytokines. Lab Hematol 12(2): 86–93.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Yao CL, Chu IM, Hsieh TB, Hwang SM (2004) A systematic strategy to optimize ex vivo expansion medium for human hematopoietic stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells. Exp Hematol 32(8): 720–727.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Young JC, Wu S, Hansteen G, Du C, Sambucetti L, et al. (2004) Inhibitors of histone deacetylases promote hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Cytotherapy 6(4): 328–336.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Sato N, Meijer L, Skaltsounis L, Greengard P, Brivanlou AH (2004) Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat Med 10(1): 55–63.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Peled T, Landau E, Mandel J, Glukhman E, Goudsmid NR, et al. (2004) Linear polyamine copper chelatortetraethylenepentamine augments long-term ex vivo expansion of cord blood-derived CD34+ cells and increases their engraftment potential in NOD/SCID mice. Exp Hematol 32(6): 547–555.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Astori G, Adami V, Mambrini G, Bigi L, Cilli M, et al. (2005) Evaluation of ex-vivo expansion and engraftment in NOD-SCID mice of umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells using the DIDECO “Pluricell System” Bone Marrow Transplant 35(11): 1101–1106.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Wingard JR, Hsu J, Hiemenz JW (2010) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an overview of infection risks and epidemiology. Infect Dis Clin North Am 24(2): 257–272.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Mohty M, Apperley JF (2010) Long-term physiological side effects after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 229–236.

[ref3] 3. Gyurkocza B, Rezvani A, Storb RF (2010) Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: the state of the art. Expert Rev Hematol 3(3): 285–299.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Gluckman E, Ruggeri A, Volt F, Cunha R, Boudjedir K, et al. (2011) Milestones in umbilical cord blood transplantation. Br J Haematol 154(4): 441–447.
View Article
Google Scholar

[9] View Article

[10] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Stanevsky A, Shimoni A, Yerushalmi R, Nagler (2010) A Double umbilical cord blood transplant: more than a cell dose? Leuk Lymphoma 51(6): 975–982.
View Article
Google Scholar

[12] View Article

[13] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Bensinger W, DiPersio JF, McCarty JM (2009) Improving stem cell mobilization strategies: future directions. Bone Marrow Transplant 43(3): 181–195.
View Article
Google Scholar

[15] View Article

[16] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Ruscetti FW, Akel S, Bartelmez SH (2005) Autocrine transforming growth factor-beta regulation of hematopoiesis: many outcomes that depend on the context. Oncogene 24(37): 5751–5763.
View Article
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Nagasawa T, Omatsu Y, Sugiyama T (2011) Control of hematopoietic stem cells by the bone marrow stromal niche: the role of reticular cells. Trends Immunol 32(7): 315–320.
View Article
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. El-Sabban ME, El-Khoury H, Hamdan-Khalil R, Sindet-Pedersen S, Bazarbachi A (2007) Xenogenic bone matrix extracts induce osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Regenerative Medecine 2(4): 383–390.
View Article
Google Scholar

[24] View Article

[25] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Robert-Richard E, Ged C, Ortet J, Santarelli X, Lamrissi-Garcia I, et al. (2006) Human cell engraftment after busulfan or irradiation conditioning of NOD/SCID mice. Haematologica 91(10): 138.
View Article
Google Scholar

[27] View Article

[28] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Mazurier F, Doedens M, Gan OI, Dick JE (2003) Rapid myeloerythroid repopulation after intrafemoral transplantation of NOD-SCID mice reveals a new class of human stem cells. Nat Med 9(7): 959–963.
View Article
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Van der Loo JC, Hanenberg H, Cooper RJ, Luo FY, Lazaridis EN, et al. (1998) Nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mouse as a model system to study the engraftment and mobilization of human peripheral blood stem cells. Blood 92(7): 2556–2570.
View Article
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Yahata T, Ando K, Nakamura Y, Ueyama Y, Shimamura K, et al. (2002) Functional Human T Lymphocyte Development from Cord Blood CD34+ Cells in Nonobese Diabetic/Shi- scid, IL-2 Receptor γ Null Mice. J Immunol 169(1): 204–209.
View Article
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Shultz LD, Schweitzer PA, Christianson SW, Gott B, Schweitzer IB, et al. (1995) Multiple Defects of Innate and Adaptive Immunologic Function in NOD/LtSz-scid Mice. J Immunol 154(1): 180–191.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Shultz LD, Lyons BL, Burzenski LM, Gott B, Chen X, et al. (2005) Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2Rγnull mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells. J Immunol 174(10): 6477–6489.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Kollet O, Peled A, Byk T, Ben-Hur H, Greiner D, et al. (2000) beta2 microglobulin-deficient (B2m null) NOD/SCID mice are excellent recipients for studying human stem cell function. Blood 95(10): 3102–3105.
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, et al. (2004) Outcomes after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia. N Engl J Med 351(22): 2265–2275.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, Blazar BR, McGlave PB, et al. (2005) Transplantation of 2 partially HLA-matched umbilical cord blood units to enhance engraftment in adults with hematologic malignancy. Blood 105(3): 1343–1347.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, et al. (2009) Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5(1): 17–26.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Daley WP, Peters SB, Larsen M (2008) Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. J Cell Sci 121(3): 255–264.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Gluckman E, Rocha V, Arcese W, Michel G, Sanz G, et al. (2004) Factors associated with outcomes of unrelated cord blood transplant: guidelines for donor choice. Exp Hematol 32(4): 397–407.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Tung SS, Parmar S, Robinson SN, de Lima M, Shpall EJ (2010) Ex vivo expansion of umbilical cord blood for transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 23(2): 245–257.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Shpall EJ, Quinones R, Giller R, Zeng C, Baron AE, et al. (2002) Transplantation of ex vivo expanded cord blood. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 8(7): 368–376.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Ivanovic Z, Duchez P, Chevaleyre J, Vlaski M, Lafarge X, et al. (2011) Clinical-scale cultures of cord blood CD34(+) cells to amplify committed progenitors and maintain stem cell activity. Cell Transplant 20(9): 1453–1463.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Milpied N, Dazey B, Ivanovic Z, Duchez P, Vigouroux S, et al. (2011) Rapid and sustained engraftment of a single allogeneic ex-vivo expanded cord blood unit (CBU) after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in adults: Preliminary results of a prospective trial. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 118: Abstract 486.

[ref26] 26. McNiece I, Harrington J, Turney J, Kellner J, Shpall EJ (2004) Ex vivo expansion of cord blood mononuclear cells on mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotherapy 6(4): 311–317.
View Article
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Kelly SS, Sola CB, de Lima M, Shpall E (2009) Ex vivo expansion of cord blood. Bone Marrow Transplant 44(10): 673–681.
View Article
Google Scholar

[76] View Article

[77] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Delaney C, Varnum-Finney B, Aoyama K, Brashem-Stein C, Bernstein ID (2005) Dose-dependent effects of the Notch ligand Delta1 on ex vivo differentiation and in vivo marrow repopulating ability of cord blood cells. Blood 106(8): 2693–2699.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Jaroscak J, Goltry K, Smith A, Waters-Pick B, Martin PL, et al. (2003) Augmentation of umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation with ex vivo-expanded UCB cells: results of a phase 1 trial using the AastromReplicell System. Blood 101(12): 5061–5067.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Bakhshi T, Zabriskie RC, Bodie S, Kidd S, Ramin S, et al. (2008) Mesenchymal stem cells from the Wharton’s jelly of umbilical cord segmentsprovide stromal support for the maintenance of cord blood hematopoietic stem cells during long-term ex vivo culture. Transfusion 48(12): 2638–2644.
View Article
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Pecora AL, Stiff P, Jennis A, Goldberg S, Rosenbluth R, et al. (2000) Prompt and durable engraftment in two older adult patients with high risk chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) using ex vivo expanded and unmanipulated unrelated umbilical cord blood. Bone Marrow Transplant 25(7): 797–799.
View Article
Google Scholar

[88] View Article

[89] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Pecora AL, Stiff P, LeMaistre CF, Bayer R, Bachier C, et al. (2001) A phase II trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the AastromReplicell system for augmentation of low-dose blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 28(3): 295–303.
View Article
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. de Lima M, McMannis J, Gee A, Komanduri K, Couriel D, et al. (2008) Transplantation of ex vivo expanded cord blood cells using the copper chelatortetraethylenepentamine: a phase I/II clinical trial. Bone Marrow Transplant 41(9): 771–778.
View Article
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Lazzari L, Lucchi S, Porretti L, Montemurro T, Giordano R, et al. (2001) Comparison of different serum-free media for ex vivo expansion of HPCs from cord blood using thrombopoietin, Flt-3 ligand, IL-6, and IL-11. Transfusion 41(5): 718–719.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Yao CL, Feng YH, Lin XZ, Chu IM, Hsieh TB, et al. (2006) Characterization of serum-free ex vivo-expanded hematopoietic stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood CD133+ cells. Stem Cells Dev 15(1): 70–78.
View Article
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Mohamed AA, Ibrahim AM, El-Masry MW, Mansour IM, Khroshied MA, et al. (2006) Ex vivo expansion of stem cells: defining optimum conditions using various cytokines. Lab Hematol 12(2): 86–93.
View Article
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Yao CL, Chu IM, Hsieh TB, Hwang SM (2004) A systematic strategy to optimize ex vivo expansion medium for human hematopoietic stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells. Exp Hematol 32(8): 720–727.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Young JC, Wu S, Hansteen G, Du C, Sambucetti L, et al. (2004) Inhibitors of histone deacetylases promote hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Cytotherapy 6(4): 328–336.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Sato N, Meijer L, Skaltsounis L, Greengard P, Brivanlou AH (2004) Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat Med 10(1): 55–63.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Peled T, Landau E, Mandel J, Glukhman E, Goudsmid NR, et al. (2004) Linear polyamine copper chelatortetraethylenepentamine augments long-term ex vivo expansion of cord blood-derived CD34+ cells and increases their engraftment potential in NOD/SCID mice. Exp Hematol 32(6): 547–555.
View Article
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Astori G, Adami V, Mambrini G, Bigi L, Cilli M, et al. (2005) Evaluation of ex-vivo expansion and engraftment in NOD-SCID mice of umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells using the DIDECO “Pluricell System” Bone Marrow Transplant 35(11): 1101–1106.
View Article
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Human Cord Blood and Bone Marrow Cells

Purification of MNCs by Ficoll

Isolation of CD34+ Cell Populations

Bovine Bone Marrow Extracts (BME)

Culturing and Treatment of MNCs and CD34+ Cells

Colony Forming Cell (CFC) Assay

Mice

Conditioning Regimen

Transplantation of Isolated Cells into NOD/SCID or NSG Mice

Mice Sacrifice and Collection of Samples

Flow Cytometry and Assessment of Engraftment

Statistical Analysis

Results

Bone Marrow Extracts Enhance Hematopoietic Colony Formation

Bone Marrow Extracts Enhance Human Cord Blood Derived Mononuclear Cell Engraftment in Immune-deficient Mice

Bone Marrow Extracts Enhance Human Bone Marrow Derived CD34 Positive Cells Engraftment in Immune-deficient Mice

Discussion

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

References

Isolation of CD34⁺ Cell Populations

Culturing and Treatment of MNCs and CD34⁺ Cells