Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A New Chanidae (Ostariophysii: Gonorynchiformes) from the Cretaceous of Brazil with Affinities to Laurasian Gonorynchiforms from Spain

  • Cesar R. L. Amaral,

    Affiliation Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, São Francisco Xavier, Maracanã, Brazil

  • Paulo M. Brito

    pbritopaleo@yahoo.com.br

    Affiliation Instituto de Biologia Roberto Alcântara Gomes, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, São Francisco Xavier, Maracanã, Brazil

A New Chanidae (Ostariophysii: Gonorynchiformes) from the Cretaceous of Brazil with Affinities to Laurasian Gonorynchiforms from Spain

  • Cesar R. L. Amaral, 
  • Paulo M. Brito
PLOS
x

Abstract

Based on specimens originally referred to as “Dastilbe minor”, a nomem-nudum, we describe a new genus of Chanidae †Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. which exhibits several diagnostic characters such as the absence of orbitosphenoid and basisphenoid, anteriorly displaced quadrate-mandibular articulation, laterally expanded supraneurals, an acute angle between the preopercular limbs, expansion at the angle between the preopercular limbs, and a curved maxillary articular process. Its occurrence and supposed relationship within the Chanidae reinforce the influence of the Mediterranean Tethys over the Gondwanan main rift system prior to the Aptian/Albian highstands.

Introduction

The breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea in the Middle Jurassic (∼175 Mya), creating the supercontinents Laurasia and Gondwana, and the subsequent breakup of Gondwana (∼90 Mya), were two of the most prominent paleogeographic events of the Phanerozoic.

Ever since the opening of the Caribbean Tethys and the establishment of at least intermittent connections between western Tethys and the eastern Pacific in the early Jurassic, a Tethyan fauna has had an influence in Gondwana. This influence is demonstrated by the occurrence and distribution of certain ammonites [1], bivalves [2], [3] and some genera of marine ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs and crocodiles [4][6]. A similar influence is found during the Cretaceous when geodynamic processes related to the fragmentation of Gondwana continued to promote the dispersal of Tethyan fauna not only along the Central Atlantic, but also within the western Gondwanan rift system, as suggested by the distribution of foraminifera [7], [8], several actinopterygians (e.g. †Macrosemiidae, †Pycnodontiformes, †Ionoscopiformes, †Semionotiformes, †Aspidorhynchiformes, †Ellimichthyiformes, †Pycnodontiformes, †Ichthyodectiformes, and Gonorynchiformes [8][11].

Among these Tethyan forms, Gonorynchiformes [12] is a teleost fish clade represented by fossil taxa from Early/Late Cretaceous and Paleocene deposits from the Americas, Africa, Middle East, and Europe, and with extant forms distributed in marine waters of the Indo-Pacific and South Atlantic Oceans, and in several freshwater biotopes of Africa [13][15]. The clade comprises three extant families: Chanidae, Gonorynchidae, and Kneriidae, represented in the Cretaceous deposits of South America uniquely by Chanidae.

Chanidae are divided in two subfamilies, the extant Chaninae and the exclusively fossil †Rubiesichthyinae. Today Chaninae are represented by a unique extant species, Chanos chanos Forskal, 1775 [16], the “milk-fish” or “bango” and by the Gondwanan fossil genera †Tharrhias Jordan & Branner, 1908 [17], †Dastilbe Jordan, 1910 [18], and †Parachanos Arambourg & Schneegans, 1935 [19], and the Laurasian †Aethalionopsis robustus Traquair, 1911 [20], from the Early/Late Cretaceous of Brazil, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, and Belgium respectively. The Laurasian †Rubiesichthyinae, until now represented by the genera †Rubiesichthys Wenz, 1984 [21] and †Gordichthys Poyato-Ariza, 1994 [22], have only been reported from the Early Cretaceous of Spain.

Here we describe a new genus and species of Chanidae from the Cretaceous of Brazil and consider its affinities with the Laurasian †Rubiesichthyinae from the Early Cretaceous of Spain. The holotype was collected from the Marizal Formation of the Tucano Basin, Northeastern Brazil, one of the sub-basins of the Recôncavo-Tucano-Jatobá Rift-System. The Marizal Formation is dated as Early Cretaceous (Aptian?) mainly based on palynomorphs [23]. The specimens were collected in 1962 near Cícero Dantas, in the state of Bahia (Figure 1) and identified as “Dastilbe minor” [24], a nomem-nudum recently regarded as a synonym of †Dastilbe crandalli [25]. The fossils are permanently housed in the collection of the Divisão de Geologia e Mineralogia do Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and registered under the acronym DGM.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Map of the Tucano Basin, State of Bahia, Brazil, indicating the location of the fossils localities of the Marizal Formation in Euclides da Cunha and Cícero Dantas.

Cretaceous strata in green.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g001

Methods

All the specimens described here come from the same general locality near the town of Cícero Dantas, and are mainly preserved as negative impressions in hard siltstone. Latex peels were made from the fossils to obtain specimens with positive relief for detailed study. Silicone molds and then polyester resin casts of the original peels were made, because resin casts are more durable than latex peels, which tend to deteriorate within a short time. No specific permits were required for the described field work. In Brazil, the unique obligation we have is to contact the Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (DNPM–The Brazilian Geological Survey) explaining that we are doing fieldwork and after that to curate fossils in an official public collection, what is the case of the studied specimens deposited in the collection of the Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral.

Nomenclatural Acts

The electronic version of this document does not represent a published work according to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the nomenclatural acts contained in the electronic version are not available under that Code from the electronic edition. Therefore, a separate edition of this document was produced by a method that assures numerous identical and durable copies, and those copies were simultaneously obtainable (from the publication date noted on the first page of this article) for the purpose of providing a public and permanent scientific record, in accordance with Article 8.1 of the Code. The separate print-only edition is available on request from PLoS by sending a request to PLoS ONE, 1160 Battery Street, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA along with a check for $ 10 (to cover printing and postage) payable to "Public Library of Science".

In addition, this published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the proposed online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix "http://zoobank.org/". The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C750C1CE-1223-4378-843B-52A88B407B98.

Results and Discussion

Systematic Palaeontology

Ostariophysii sensu Rosen & Greenwood, 1970 [12].

Gonorynchiformes sensu Rosen & Greenwood, 1970 [12].

Chanidae sensu Poyato-Ariza, 1996 [26].

Nanaichthys nov. gen

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:76B33275-4C05-4045-B482-F4D39BF6A7E8.

Derivation of name.

Nana, named after ‘Nàná Burukù’, ancient Orisha, goddess of the muddy and primordial waters, plus ichthys, fish in Greek.

Diagnosis.

As for the only known species below.

Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. sp

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E5A77C78-9E96-4AD9-8F8E-9CF5EFB9A96F.

Derivation of name.

The specific epithet longipinnus refers to the eleven elongate anal fin rays exhibited by the holotype.

Holotype.

DGM.1016-P. Almost complete specimen, displaying its left side (Figure 2).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. Holotype DGM.1016-P.

A) photograph; B) inversed peeling model; C) anatomical drawing. Scale bar equals 10 mm.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g002

Referred specimens.

DGM.1017-P, a collapsed and partially preserved specimen on its right side, and DGM.535-P (Figure 3), a partially preserved specimen on its left side which lacks the anterior part of the skull.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. DGM.535-P. Scale bar equals 5 mm.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g003

Horizon and type-locality.

The specimens come from outcrops of the Marizal Formation of the Central Tucano Basin, near the entrance of Cícero Dantas city, State of Bahia, Brazil.

Diagnosis.

Small-sized Chanidae, 48 mm total length (TL), with thirty-nine vertebrae; eleven anal fin rays, preopercule with an acute angle between horizontal and vertical processes; expanded posteroventral angle of the preopercular processes, and a small and curved articular process of the maxilla.

Description

The holotype of †Nanaichthys longipinnus (DGM.1016-P) measures 48 mm total length (TL) and 43 mm standard length (SL). The skull length is about 35% of the SL. The mouth is edentulous, and the mouth cleft is anteriorly oriented. The maximum depth of the body is reached at the origin of the dorsal fin and is about 20% of SL. The dorsal fin originates in the middle of the SL, and the pelvic fin originates beneath the anterior half of the dorsal fin. The caudal fin is somewhat forked, with the caudal peduncle at about 10% of the SL.

The frontals (Figure 4) are massive, forming the entire skull roof over the orbital region. They are wide through most of their length, with deep longitudinal grooves for the supraorbital sensory canal. The skull condition seems to be lateroparietal, and the frontals articulate posteriorly with the supraoccipital (Figure 4), which bears a small posterior crest. Laterally the frontals articulate with the marked pterotic and with the small and triangular autosphenotic (Figure 4). Anteriorly, the frontals articulate anterolaterally with the lateral ethmoids and anterolaterally with the supraorbital. A slender and edentulous parasphenoid (Figure 4) occurs in the middle of the orbital region. A small, triangular, and edentulous vomer (Figure 4) is present anterior to the parasphenoid.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. DGM.1016-P, Holotype.

A) photograph of the head region; B) inversed peeling model; C) anatomical interpretations. Abbreviations: Asph, autosphenotic; Brstg, branchiostegals; Cl, cleithrum; Fr, frontal; Hyo, hyomandibula; Den, dentary; Ecptg, ectopterygoid; Enptg, endopterygoid; Le, lateral ethmoid; Mtptg, metapterygoid; Mx, Maxilla; Op, opercle; Pa, left parietal; PMx, premaxilla; Pop, preopercle; Psph, parasphenoid; Pto, pterotic; Qua, quadrate; Sca+Cor, scapula + coracoids; Soc, supraocciptal; Sop, subopercle; Sor, supraorbital; Sym, sympletic; Vo, vomer. Scale bar equals 2 mm.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g004

The supraorbital (Figure 4) is partially preserved, exhibiting a broken lateral border. It is located anterolaterally to the frontals and seems to exhibit a concave-convex shape. Only the first infraorbital is preserved, as a thick and rectangular bone below the parasphenoid.

The jaws are edentulous. The premaxilla is concave-convex in shape (Figure 4) and exhibits the superior process broken, and a small oral process in contact with the maxilla. The maxilla (Figure 4) is club-like and presents a bulbous posterior region and a thin and small maxillary articular process. The dentary (Figure 4) is small and triangular, with a partially visible coronoid process reaching its maximum height in the middle of the dentary's length. The quadrate-mandibular articulation is anterior to the orbit. The quadrate (Figure 4) is triangular with an elongated posteroventral process. The sympletic (Figure 4) is small, slender, and posteriorly located with respect to the quadrate.

The hyomandibula (Figure 4) is robust, with a large dorsal head, an anteroventral process, and a small ventral process. The hyomandibula articulates with the neurocranium via a large facet comprising the autosphenotic and pterotic. Anteroventrally, the hyomandibula articulates with the wide metapterygoid (Figure 4). The endopterygoid (Figure 4) is partially preserved and seems to form the entire ventral wall of the orbit, articulating laterally with the slender ectopterygoid to delineate the orbital cavity.

The preopercle (Figure 4) is wide, with the preopercular sensory canal extending along its anterior border. Unlike the condition in other Chanidae (excluding members of the Rubiesichthyinae), this element exhibits an acute angle between horizontal and vertical processes and a long and narrow posteroventral expansion of the preopercular limbs. The horizontal process of the preopercle reaches the level of the middle of the orbit, not covering the quadrate-mandibular articulation.

The large and smooth opercle (Figure 4), corresponding to approximately one-third of the head length, articulates ventrally with the small and triangular subopercle (Figure 4) and anteriorly with the posterior border of the preopercle. The interopercle is present but almost totally covered and its shape cannot be determined in any of the specimens. Beneath the opercular series, the branchiostegals are visible; however, their number could not be determined precisely.

The pectoral girdle is robust and well ossified. The cleithrum (Figure 4) is triangular and posteriorly expanded, with the dorsal apex reaching the middle of the opercle dorsoventral height and the anterior apex reaching the postero-ventral expansion of the preopercle. The pectoral fin is formed by four radials and twelve segmented fin rays plus the first and small unsegmented ray. No post-cleithrum was found.

The well ossified pelvic bone is triangular, wide, and expanded where it articulates with the pelvic fin. The pelvic fin originates beneath the 18th vertebra and is formed by five radials. We could not determine the number of pelvic fin rays in any of the specimens examined.

The dorsal fin originates above the 16th vertebra and is formed by eleven segmented rays, with two smaller procurrent rays. The proximal pterygiophores are laterally expanded near the base of the dorsal fin. Small, halter-like distal pteriogiophores are present.

The anal fin, as exhibited by specimen DGM-535-P, is located beneath the 26th vertebra and is formed by elongate, laterally expanded proximal pterigiophores, small halter-like distal pterygiophores and eleven segmented and dichotomized fin rays (Figure 5), except for the small and unsegmented first ray.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. DGM.535-P.

A) photograph of anal fin; B) anatomical interpretation. Abbreviations: p.pr, proximal pterigiophore; m.pr, medial pterigiophore. Scale bar equals 1 mm.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g005

Thirty nine vertebrae were observed in the specimens DGM1016-P and DGM-535-P, with the first four partially overlapped by the dorsal border of the opercle. Eighteen pleural ribs are preserved as slender bones delineating the abdominal cavity. The six anterior supraneurals (Figure 4) are laterally expanded, but we cannot precise if the first one exhibits a posterior expansion. Three sets of intermuscular bones were observed along the entire body. The epineurals are forked, and the epicentrals and epipleurals are small rod-like bones.

The poorly preserved caudal fin of specimen DGM-535-P (Figures 6 and 7) seems forked. Its outline is formed by five dorsal and ventral unsegmented procurrent rays, reaching the level of the fourth preural centrum, and by twenty four segmented and dichotomizing rays (twelve for each lobe). The preural centra are fully ossified. The first preural vertebra is the first one to exhibit in its dorsal border a neural arch. Two independent ural centra, longer than high and smaller than the preural centra, seem to articulate with the second and third hypurals respectively. Six fan-shaped hypurals are present. Hypural 1, which is the largest of the series, is triangular and seems autogenous. The second hypural is smaller, half of hypural 1 width, and in contact with the first ural centrum. A diastema is present between the second and third hypurals. The hypural 3 is the large of the dorsal lobe and contact the second ural centrum. The anterior parts of the remaining three dorsal hypurals are poorly preserved, making interpretation of this region problematic. Two independent uroneurals are present but their posterior region is partially concealed by displaced fin rays. The first uroneural reaches the first preural centrum, and the second reaches the level of the first ural centrum. Two slender epurals were observed anterior to the first uroneural.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. DGM.535-P.

Photograph of caudal fin. Scale bar equals 1 mm.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g006

thumbnail
Figure 7. Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. DGM.535-P.

A) inversed caudal fin peeling; B) anatomical interpretation. Abbreviations: PU1, preural centrum 1; UN1-2, uroneurals 1–2; EP1-2, epurals 1–2; H1-6, hypurals 1–6; PHy, parhypural; U1-2, ural centrum 1–2; naPU1?, neural arch of preural centrum 1; r, displaced caudal rays. Scale bar equals 1 mm.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g007

The scales are very small, cycloid, with small longitudinal striated marks. No lateral line scales were observed.

Phylogenetics

We evaluated the phylogenetic relationships of this new taxon by a cladistic analysis based on a modified data matrix based on [15], with the inclusion of Nanaichthys. The modified matrix was run on PAUP 4b10 [27] with default options. We performed the same analysis performed by the previous authors but only with ACCTRAN optimization. Following Poyato-Ariza et al. [15] analyses, we excluded the taxa considered as problematic (cf. †Apulichthys,Erfoudichthys,Halecopsis,Leeceichthys, and †Sorbininardus), and treated as ordered the characters 3, 8, 13, 15, 33, 57, 77, 78, 82, 95, 97, 99, 100, and 102. The following characters were modified from their original coding.

7. Brush-like cranial intermuscular bones: absent (0); present (1). [15] coded Chanos chanos as lacking brush-like cranial intermuscular bones. Following [28] and based on new specimens studied herein, Chanos was re-coded with the state (1).

13. Relative position of the parietals: medioparietals (in full contact with each other along their midline) (0); mesoparietal (1); lateroparietal (completely separated from each other by the supraoccipital) (2). Following [29] and the description for the Kneriidae provided by [15], the character was re-coded as non-applicable (−) for Kneria and Parakneria.

14. Parietal portion of the supraorbital canal: absent (0); present (1). Following [30] where the parietal branch of the supraorbital canal was observed to pierce the parietal in Chanos, the character was re-coded to state (1).

18. Mesethmoid: wide and short (0); long and slender, with anterior elongate lateral extensions (1); large, with broad posterolateral wing-like expansions (2); elongate and thin (3). Following [29], where variation in mesethmoid morphology of Kneria and Parakneria was described, we consider this character in need of further investigation and decided to delete it from our analysis.

47. Ossified interhyal: present (0); absent as an independent ossification (1). The charater was re-coded to state (1) in Chanos, Kneria, and Parakneria following [29], which reported its absence in all three genera.

53. Shape of opercular bone in lateral view: rounded/oval (0); triangular (1); squarish or square (2). We added the character state (2) for the square-shaped opercular bone for Parakneria and re-coded Kneria as polymorphic with the states (0) and (2) as reported by [29].

73. Second abdominal centrum: as long as first (0); shorter than first (1). [31] observed the variability of this character in the Kneriidae, presumably associated with sexual dimorphism. We consider this character in need of further investigation and therefore it was deleted from our analysis.

89. Lateral line and supracleithrum: supracleithrum pierced through dorsal region (0); supracleithrum pierced through all its length (1); lateral line does not pierce supracleithrum. The state was re-coded to state (2) for both Kneria and Parakneria following [29], which observed that the lateral line does not pierce the supracleithrum in either genus.

95. Neural arch and spine of preural centrum one: both well developed, spine about half as long as preceding ones (0); arch complete and closed, spine rudimentary (1); arch open, no spine (2). [29] observed variation of the character state in Parakneria. Therefore, following these authors, Parakneria was re-coded as polymorphic, exhibiting both states (1) and (2). Chanos was re-coded herein as presenting the state (1) based on observed specimens.

97. Number of uroneurals: three (0); two or one (1); none (2). This character was deleted from our analysis. No gonorynchiforms lack uroneurals.

106. Hypural 5 (plus 6 if present) and second ural centrum: separate (0); articulating (1). Homology problems emerge when considering the second ural centrum, which articulates with hypurals 3 and 4 as presented by [25] for the genus †Dastilbe, †Tharrhias, and the undescribed fossil Chanidae presented by [25], as homologous with the second ural centrum in †Rubiesichthys which articulates with the hypural 5. Among the studied taxa, the apomorphic state is found only in †Rubiesichthys. Regarding these problems we consider this character in need of further investigation and it was deleted from our analysis.

The character states for †Nanaichthys are presented in Table 1 and Table S1. For further discussion regarding the characters, see [15].

thumbnail
Table 1. Character states for †Nanaichthys longipinnus. All the characters presented here correspond to those presented by [15].

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.t001

Our analysis running a heuristic search resulted in 84 most parsimonious trees with 233 steps (CI = 0.687, HI = 0.313 RI = 0.822, and RC = 0.564). The strict consensus of the obtained topologies (Figure 8) displays a total of 6 components. Here we consider the relationships of †Nanaichthys within component 6, the †Rubiesichthyinae.

thumbnail
Figure 8. Area cladogram and strict consensus tree of the Chanidae based on 84 four most parsimonious trees with 233 steps (CI = 0.687, HI = 0.313 RI = 0.822, and RC = 0.564).

Nodes 1) Gonorynchiformes; 4) Chanidae; 5) Chanini; 6) Rubiesichthyinae. Asterisks denote collapsed monophyletic clades not directly relevant to the discussion.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g008

Poyato-Ariza [26] reviewed the Chanidae and diagnosed †Rubiesichthyinae as chanids which exhibit a strongly curved border of the maxillary articular process, a maximum height of the mandible reached at the central region, an acute angle between the preopercular limbs with a posterior expansion between the angle of the limbs, and a posterior process in the middle zone of the posterior border of the first supraneural. Recently Poyato-Ariza et al. [15] reviewed Gonorynchiformes interrelationships and re-diagnosed the †Rubiesichthyinae as chanids which additionally exhibit a small and flat nasal bone, a supracleithrum pierced through its entire length by the lateral line, and teeth on vomer and parasphenoid.

In our analysis, the †Rubiesichthyinae (Figure 8, Node 6) is diagnosed by 5 characters: (1) nasal bone small and flat, (2) curved dorsal and ventral border of the maxillary articular process; (3) acute angle formed by the preopercular limbs, (4) presence of a posterior process on the posterior border of first supraneural, and (5) lateral line and supracleithrum pierced all through this length. This result mostly agrees with ACCTRAN results from [15] except for character 42 (presence of teeth on vomer and parasphenoid), which was coded as absent in ours. In our analysis, the presence of teeth on the vomer and parasphenoid is autapomorphic for the group formed by †Rubiesichthys plus †Gordichthys, although the character's presence is still unknown for †Rubiesichthys.

Additionally, our result presents †Nanaichthys longipinnus as the most basal †Rubiesichthyinae, primarily on the presence of a curved dorsal and ventral border of the maxillary articular process and on the acute angle formed by the preopercular limbs. However, we note that the states for the remaining three characters of the †Rubiesichthyinae (cf. a nasal bone small and flat; the presence of a posterior process on the posterior border of first supraneural; and the lateral line and supracleithrum pierced all through this length) could not be observed in Nanaichthys. Therefore we regard this as an artifact of the ACCTRAN analysis and consider that these three characters should be better regarded as unique synapomorphies for the group formed by †Rubiesichthys and †Gordichthys.

Finally, †Nanaichthys logipinnus differs from Dastilbe, its previous generic designation, mainly by the acute angle formed by the preopercular limbs, the posterior expansion at the angle between the preopercular limbs, and the anal fin exhibiting 11 fin-rays.

Biogeography

Although nowadays the spatial distribution of the extant Chanidae (cf. Chanos chanos) is exclusively related to the Indian and Pacific Oceans, the historical biogeography of the family seems to be related to the opening of the Caribbean/Mediterranean Tethys and the subsequent influx of the Tethyan fauna to several sedimentary basins related to the breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana (Figure 9).

thumbnail
Figure 9. Area cladogram of the Gonorynchiformes and Early Cretaceous Paleogeography.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.g009

The basal †Aethalionopsis robustus occurs in marine Early Cretaceous of Bernissart, Belgium. However, among the remaining subfamilies, except for the extant Chanos chanos, the Chaninae presents all other genera (cf. †Tharrhias, †Dastilbe and †Parachanos) in several Aptian/Albian rift-related basins from both Brazil and Africa (cf. Gabon and Equatorial Guinea). Previously the †Rubiesichthyniae was considered to have been restricted to Laurasian Early Cretaceous localities of Spain.

Nanaichthys longipinnus is the first †Rubiesichthyinae described for western Gondwana. Among the †Rubiesichthyinae, †Gordichthys was described by [22] from the Hauterivian-Barremian of Las Hoyas, Cuenca, Spain, while †Rubiesichthys was described by [21] from the Berriasian-Valanginian of Montsec, Lérida, Spain, and has also been reported from the Hauterivian-Barremian of Las Hoyas by [32] and [33].

The occurrence of †Nanaichthys in the Aptian Marizal Formation of Brazil postdates the occurrence of the Mediterranean rubiesichthyans, therefore dating the divergence between them and †Nanaichthys at least as Berriasian-Valanginian. Therefore, the occurrence of †Nanaichthys longipinnus from the Marizal Formation suggests a faunal exchange not only from the Caribbean Tethys through the development of epeiric seas over the continental terrains of the Gondwana (e.g., [34]), but also between the Mediterranean Tethys and Laurasia, and the main Gondwanan rift system, at a time preceding the Aptian/Albian highstands.

Conclusions

Nanaichthys longipinnus nov. gen. and sp. exhibits several characters that support its inclusion within the Gonorynchiformes as well as its placement in Chanidae. These include the absence of an orbitosphenoid and basisphenoid, an antero-ventral expansion in the hyomandibula, a quadrate-mandibular articulation anterior to the orbit, an elongated symplectic, a concave-convex premaxilla, laterally expanded anterior supraneurals not in contact with each other, and the expanded opercle at about one-third of the head length.

Our results support the affinities between †Nanaichthys longipinnus and the Laurasian rubiesichthyns from Spain, mainly based on the small and curved articular process of the maxilla, the acute angle formed by the preopercular limbs, and posterior expansion at the angle between the preopercular limbs.

Nanaichthys longipinnus differs from other †Rubiesichthyinae (cf. †Rubiesichthys gregallis and †Gordichthys conquensis) by presenting a combination of characters such as a gently (not strongly) curved maxillary process and the possession of eleven anal fin rays; from †Gordichthys in the body depth, vertebral count (39 for †Nanaichthys against 37 for †Gordichthys), and edentulous parasphenoid and vomer; and from †Rubiesichthys in body proportions, position of the dorsal, pelvic, and anal fins; and shape of the head, triangular in †Nanaichthys and elongated in †Rubiesichthys.

The proximity of †Nanaichthys longipinnus with the †Rubiesichthyinae from Spain reinforces the influence not only from the Caribbean Tethys but also from the Mediterranean Tethys and Laurasia prior to the Aptian/Albian marine transgressions over the continental terrains of Western Gondwana. This was probably influenced by the tectonically interconnected drainages that developed over the main rift axis prior to the well documented Aptian/Albian highstands.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Character states as presented by [15] with the inclusion of for † Nanaichthys longipinnus .

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037247.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Andrew A. Farke, Dr. Alison Murray, and an anonymous reviewer for the helpful comments on the manuscript during the review process. We are also grateful to Dr. David Martill and Dr. Jesus Alvarado-Ortega for critical comments on the first version of the manuscript, and Dr. Richard Pyle from the ZooBank for the LSID numbers.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CRLA PMB. Performed the experiments: CRLA PMB. Analyzed the data: CRLA PMB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PMB CRLA. Wrote the paper: CRLA PMB.

References

  1. 1. Smith PL (1983) The Pliensbachian ammonite Dayiceras dayiceroides and Early Jurassic paleogeography. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 20: 86–91.
  2. 2. Aberhan M (2001) Bivalve palaeobiogeography and the Hispanic Corridor: time of opening and effectiveness of a proto-Atlantic seaway. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 165: 375–394.
  3. 3. Hallam A (1983) Early and mid-Jurassic molluscan biogeography and the establishment of the central Atlantic seaway. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 43: 181–193.
  4. 4. Gasparini Z, Fernández M (2005) Jurassic marine reptiles in the Neuquén basin. In: Veiga GD, Spalletti LA, Howell JA, Schwarz E, editors. The Neuquén Basin, Argentina: A case study in sequence stratigraphy and basin dynamic. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 252: 279–294.
  5. 5. Gasparini Z, Pol D, Spalletti LA (2006) An unusual marine crocodyliform from the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary of Patagonia. Science 311: 70–73.
  6. 6. Gasparini Z, Fernández M, de la Fuente M, Salgado L (2007) Reptiles marinos jurássicos y cretácicos de la Patagonia argentina: su aporte al conocimiento de La herpetofauna mesozóica. In: Archangelski S, Sánchez TM, Tonni E, editors. Ameghiniana 50° Aniversario. Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, Publicación Especial 11: 125–136.
  7. 7. Koutsoukos EAM (1992) Late Aptian to Maastrichtian foraminiferal biogeography and paleooceanography of the Sergipe Basin, Brazil. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 92: 295–324.
  8. 8. Moody MJ, Maisey JG (1994) New Cretaceous marine vertebrates assemblages from north-weatern Venezuela and their significance. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 14: 1–8.
  9. 9. Schultze H-P, Stöhr D (1996) Vinctifer (Pisces, Aspidorhinchidae) aus der Unterkreide (oberes Aptium) von Kolumbien. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläeontologie 199: 395–415.
  10. 10. Alvarado-Ortega J, Brito PM (2010) A new ichthyodectiform (Actinopterygii, Teleostei) from the Lower Cretaceous Marizal Formation, northeast Brazil. Palaeontology 53: 297–306.
  11. 11. Brito PM, Alvarado-Ortega J (2008) A new species of Placidichthys (Halecomorphi: Ionoscopiformes) from the Lower Cretaceous Marizal Formation, northeastern Brazil, with a review of the biogeographical distribution of the Ophiopsidae. In: Cavin L, Longbottom A, Richter M, editors. Fishes and the break-up of Pangea. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. pp. 145–154.
  12. 12. Rosen DE, Greenwood PH (1970) Origin of the Weberian apparatus and the relationship of the ostariophysan and gonorynchiform fishes. American Muséum Novitates 2428: 1–25.
  13. 13. Grande T, Poyato-Ariza FJ (1999) Phylogenetic relationships of fossil and Recent gonorhynchiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, London 125: 197–238.
  14. 14. Grande T (1999) Revision of the genus Gonorynchus Scopoli 1777 (Teleostei: Ostariophysi). Copeia 2: 453–469.
  15. 15. Poyato-Ariza FJ, Grande T, Diogo R (2010) Gonorynchiform interrelationships: Historic overview, analysis, and revised systematics of the group. In: Grande T, Poyato-Ariza FJ, Diogo R, editors. Gonorynchiformes and ostariophysan relationships: a comprehensive review. pp. 226–337.
  16. 16. Forskal P (1775) Descriptiones animalium avium, amphibiorum, piscium, insectorum, vermium; quae in itinere oriental observait. Post mortem auctoris edidit Carsten Niebuhr. Hauniae. 220 p.
  17. 17. Jordan DS, Branner JC (1908) The Cretaceous fishes of Ceará, Brazil. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 52: 1–30.
  18. 18. Jordan DS (1910) Description of a collection of fóssil fishes from the bituminous shales of Riacho Doce. State of Alagoas, Brazil. Annual of the Carnegie Muséum l: 22–34.
  19. 19. Arambourg C, Schneegans D (1935) Poissons fossiles du Bassin Sédimentaire du Gabon. Annales de Paléontologie 24: 139–160.
  20. 20. Traquair RH (1911) Les poissons wealdiens de Bernissart. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 5(1908): 1–65.
  21. 21. Wenz S (1984) Rubiesichthys gregalis n. g., n. sp., Pisces, Gonorynchiformes, du Crétacé inférieur du Montsech (Province de Lérida, Espagne). Bulletin Muséum National Histoire Naturelle, Serie 4: 275–285.
  22. 22. Poyato-Ariza FJ (1994) A new Early Cretaceous gonorynchiform fish (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) from Las Hoyas (Cuenca, Spain). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, The University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas, 164: 1–37.
  23. 23. Brito IM (1979) Bacias sedimentares e formações pós-paleozóicas do Brasil. Editora Interciências, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 179 p.
  24. 24. Santos RS (1972) Peixes da Formação Marizal, Estado da Bahia, Tese de Pós-Doutorado não publicada. Instituto de Geociências da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil. 76 p.
  25. 25. Brito PM, Amaral CRL (2008) An overview of the specific problems of Dastilbe JORDAN, 1910 (Gonorynchiformes: Chanidae) from the Lower Cretaceous of western Gondwana. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 4 – homology and phylogeny. München (Pfeil). pp. 279–294.
  26. 26. Poyato-Ariza FJ (1996) A revision of the ostariophysan fish family Chanidae, with special reference to the Mesozoic forms. Palaeo Ichthyologica 6: 5–52.
  27. 27. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and others methods. Version 4b10. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  28. 28. Arratia G , Huaquín L (1995) Morphology of the lateral line system and of the skin of diplomystid and certain primitive loricarioid catfishes and systematics and ecological considerations. Bonner Zoological Monographs 36: 1–110.
  29. 29. Davis MP, Arratia G, Kaiser TMThe first fossil sheller (Gonorynchiformes: Kneriidae) from the Eocene lake of Mahenge (Tanzania).
  30. 30. Arratia G, Bagarinao T (2010) Early ossification and development of the cranium and paired girdles of Chanos chanos (Teleostei, Gonorynchiformes). In: Grande T, Poyato-Ariza FJ, Diogo R, editors. A comprehensive review of Gonorynchiformes and of ostariophysan Relationships: Enfield, NH (Science Publishers). pp. 71–104.
  31. 31. Grande T, Arratia G (2010) Morphological analysis of the gonorynchiform postcranial skeleton. In: Grande T, Poyato-Ariza FJ, Diogo R, editors. A comprehensive review of Gonorynchiformes and of ostariophysan relationships. Enfield, NH (Scientific Publishers, Inc.). pp. 38–70.
  32. 32. Sanz JL, Wenz S, Yébenes A, Estes R, Martínez-Delclòs X, et al. (1988) An Early Cretaceous faunal and floral continental assemblage: Las Hoyas fóssil-site (Cuenca, Spain). Geobios, 21: 611–631.
  33. 33. Poyato-Ariza FJ, Wenz S (1990) La ictiofauna española del Cretácico inferior. In: Civis Llovera J, Flores JA, editors. Actas de Paleontologia (Actas de las IV Jornadas de Paleontologia). Acta Salmanticensa, Biblioteca de lãs Ciências, Salamanca, Spain, 68: 299–311.
  34. 34. Brito PM, Meunier F, Leal ME (2007) Origine et diversification de l'ichthyofaune néotropicale: une revue. Cybium 31: 4–19.