Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Diversity Analysis of Streptomycetes and Associated Phosphotranspherase Genes in Soil

Diversity Analysis of Streptomycetes and Associated Phosphotranspherase Genes in Soil

  • Paris Laskaris, 
  • Takuya Sekine, 
  • Elizabeth M. H. Wellington
PLOS
x

Abstract

An attempt was made to verify the observation that Streptomyces griseus was prevalent in soil based on isolation work. A genus-specific PCR was developed for Streptomyces based on the housekeeping gene atpD and used to investigate species diversity within selected soils. The presence of S. griseus was investigated to determine coexistence of resistance-only streptomycin phosphotransferase (strA) in the same soil as streptomycin producers. Two additional PCR-based assays were developed; one specific for strA in association with production, the other for more diverse strA and other related phosphotranferases. Both the S. griseus atpD and strA genes were below the PCR detection limit in all soils examined. A number of more diverse phosphotransferase genes were amplified, a minority of which may be associated with streptomycin production. We conclude that neither streptomycin producers nor S. griseus are prevalent in the fresh or chitin and starch-amended soils examined (less than 0.1% of soil actinobacteria). One of the soil sites had received plantomycin (active ingredient: streptomycin) and diversity studies suggested that this altered the streptomycete populations present in the soil.

Introduction

The Streptomyces genus is one of the most diverse taxa within the archaea and bacteria and currently contains approximately 591 species [1]. Streptomycete taxonomy had suffered from overspeciation, as producers of novel antibiotic compounds were described as new species and patented as part of the antibiotic discovery process [2]. Phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characters were used to classify streptomycetes, however different characters gave rise to different taxa [3] and the molecular approaches became established with DNA-DNA hybridization used for valid species description [4]. For large scale studies sequences used included the 16 S rRNA gene [5], [6], [7], [8] the 16 S–23 S intergenic spacer region [9], [10], [11] random amplified polymorphic DNA [12] and protein-coding genes such as rpoB (RNA polymerase β subunit) [13], [14] or trpB (tryptophan synthase β chain) [15]. These methods have now been superseded by multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA) [16], [17], [18], as the use of multiple gene sequences helps to buffer distortions on phylogeny generated by recombination [19].

The study of in-situ diversity of soil streptomycetes has not previously been undertaken, although streptomycetes in situ were reported as part of 16 S rRNA-based total microbial community studies [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Within genera, in situ diversity is problematic due to the conservation of the 16 S rRNA gene [4]. Typing methods, such as MLSA, requiring multiple sequences per strain are not feasible; therefore our aim was to find an alternative gene target to compare diversity in situ in soil with that previously described by strain cultivation methods. The atpD gene, encoding the ATP synthase beta chain, was used in a previous study for MLSA that demonstrated its sequence divergence was sufficient to provide higher phylogenetic resolution than the 16 S rRNA and allow the generation of streptomycete-specific primers [17].

A key feature of the streptomycetes is the high diversity of resistance genes found within the genus [26]. This resistome is undoubtedly associated with prolific antibiotic production [27]. The first actinobacterial antibiotic isolated was from a streptomycete, Streptomyces griseus [28]. A number of S. griseus strains possess the strA streptomycin resistance gene, a 6′ aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (APH(6′)), within the streptomycin biosynthetic gene cluster to avoid suicide [17]. The strA genes have coevolved in resistance-only and streptomycin-producing strains and strA appeared to be taxon-specific, with one exception in Streptomyces platensis strain CR50 which was attributed to horizontal gene transfer [17]. Streptomycin is used in horticulture to control Erwinia amylovora which causes fire blight in apple and pear trees and used to treat other bacterial infections [29]. The use of streptomycin in agriculture was responsible for driving increased prevalence of - mobile elements containing strA-strB, a 3′ and 6′ aminoglycoside phosphotransferase respectively, in phylloplane bacteria [30]. Another study found that the application of plantomycin, a mixture of streptomycin sulfate and tetracycline hydrochloride, in an orchard made no significant difference in the number of resistant streptomycete soil isolates, though streptomycin producers comprised a larger proportion of resistant streptomycete isolates in soils not amended with streptomycin [31]. We therefore hypothesized that the application of streptomycin would lead to a decrease in the ratio of streptomycin producers to resistance-only streptomycetes, as the latter would be selected for due to the larger quantities of streptomycin in soil. The prevalence of strA in the environment has not been examined. To address this, we extracted total community DNA (TCDNA) from a number of soils from which streptomycetes with strA genes were previously isolated [31] or that contained large numbers of actinobacteria [32]. We hypothesized that, since approximately 1% of randomly screened soil actinobacteria can synthesize streptomycin [33], both the strA gene and the streptomycin producers would be found across a variety of different soils. This study was carried out to determine whether there was an enhanced prevalence of non-producers to producers in soil to gain a wider perspective on the range of hosts carrying the strA gene. Selective isolation always carries some bias for the estimation of species distribution. High levels of streptomycin predominantly selected for producers, as non-producers were less resistant [17]. Direct molecular detection and diversity analysis allow a non-biased estimate of S. griseus distribution and strA diversity.

Materials and Methods

Site descriptions (Table 1)

The AR samples were taken from an experimental agricultural site in Dossenheim, Germany, where plantomycin (Neudorff Pharmaceuticals), containing streptomycin sulphate and tetracycline hydrochloride had been used for two years before sampling to control fireblight caused by the apple pathogen Erwinia amylovora. The solution contained 212 g streptomycin sulfate kg−1 and was applied at a rate of 1200 m3 ha−1 (0.06% solution) annually [31]. The CR samples consisted of the same soil taken in Germany without antibiotic application. The CW soil samples were taken from a chalky loam agricultural soil with a pH of 8.0, and the C soil from grassland, both originating from Cotswolds, England [34]. The 5A and 5B samples consisted of a sandy silt loam collected from an experimental field in Sourhope, Scotland [35]. The 602 soil was sampled from agricultural soil in Basilicata, Italy cropped with Triticum durum for four years where conventional fertilizer was used [32]. The 767, 770, 773, 774 and 777 samples originated from an experimental field area is Santomera, (38°2′N, 1°12′W, 130 m elevation) in south-east Murcia region, Spain containing a relatively bare area (5% coverage), a shrub growing area (25%), as well as a pine forest (Pinus halepensis Mill, plant coverage ca. 70%) whose soil had a silt loam texture [32]. The 403 and 415 were sandy soils originating from Cayo Blanco, Cuba [17]. The soils selected for this study (Table 1) either contained large amounts of actinobacteria (Skopelos, Cayo Blanco, Bacilicata, Santomeras, Sourhope) [32] or had streptomycetes possessing strA previously isolated from them (Cayo Blanco, Dossenheim, Cryfield) [31]. All necessary permits were obtained for the described field studies. The UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs provided a licence to import, move and keep prohibited soil (other than for chemical and physical analysis). Licence No. PHL 208/6372 (09/2010).

Preparation of soil microcosms

The soil water content was estimated by weight before and after water loss. 10 g of soil incubated at 105°C oven for 16 h, then cooled in a Dry-Seal Desiccator (Jenkons; Leighton Buzzard, UK) for 1 h. 10 g of non-dried soil was placed in a 50 ml Greiner centrifuge tube (Sigma-Aldrich) and enough water was added to bring the soil water content to 16%. 1% of the soil's weight in chitin (powdered α chitin from crab shells) and 1% in soluble starch (Analar) were added to select for streptomycetes. The tube was shaken until soil clumps broke up and the water, starch and chitin were well mixed. The tubes were placed in a 30°C incubator with their lids loose to allow the exchange of air and left to grow for 7 days in humid environment.

Microcosms were made with selected soils (Table 1) in order to select for streptomycetes and thus increase the probability of detecting strA. The AR and CR were sampled twice, to obtain higher resolution, the Santomera soils were sampled five times, once per site (767, 770, 773, 774, 777), the Cayo Blanco soils twice, again once per site (403, 415), and Skopelos (116) and Cryfield (W) were sampled once as soil was taken from a single site for them.

To prepare seeded soil microcosms, 10 g of soil was autoclaved twice and an S. griseus DSM 40236 spore suspension added to bring the soil water content to 16% and 107 spores g−1. The seeded universal bottles were placed in a 30°C incubator with their lids loose to allow the exchange of air and left to grow for 7 days in humid environment.

DNA extraction from soil

DNA was extracted from soil using the UltraClean Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MO-BIO) as stated in the manufacturer's instructions. To check the quality and amount of DNA, 5 µl of the eluate was electrophoresed. The DNA concentration was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (ND-1000, Nanodrop Technologies) and samples stored at −20°C.

Detection of strA and atpD

The strA and atpD PCR products from all microcosm soil DNA extracts were cloned and a random selection sequenced. The AR and CR soils were examined to determine whether the use of plantamycin at that site had selected for resistance. The blastn algorithm was used to identify the closest homologues to all the strA and atpD sequences on GenBank and these were included in the phylogenetic trees.

Reaction mixes were made with 25 µl PCR Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 2.5 µl DMSO, 2 µl of BSA (bovine serum albumin) and 100 pM of each primer (Table 2) in 50 µl total volume. The cycling protocol used was the same for all primers with only the annealing temperature varying (Table 2): 10 min denaturing step followed by 35 cycles of 60 s at 95°C, 45 s at TA and 90 s at 72°C followed by a final extension step for 10 min at 72°C. The PCR products were run on a 1% agarose gel and the product bands were cut out and extracted using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN; Venlo, Netherlands) as per manufacturer's instructions. The product was dialyzed for 15 min using 0.025 µm VSWP nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore; Billerica, MA, USA) placed on sterile water. PCR products were cloned using the PGEM T-easy vector system and plasmid DNA extracted using the QIAGEN Mini-prep kit as per the manufacturer's instructions to isolate single amplicons for sequencing. Sequencing was performed on 5 or 6 clones from each site, with approximately 30 sequences obtained from AR and CR to enable comparison of the effects of plantomycin addition. Sequencing utilized 50 ng of PCR product, 5.5 pM of primer and the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI PRISM 3130xl Genetic Analyzer as stated in the manufacturer's instructions. Both the SP6 and T7 primers were used for sequencing to ensure there were no sequencing errors. The sequences were submitted to GenBank with accession numbers JN695275 to JN695392 for the atpD sequences and JN695393 to JN695497 for the strA sequences.

Results

Screening of soils for streptomycete diversity using atpD

The atpD gene was successfully amplified from all the soils and enriched microcosms examined, indicating that streptomycetes were present at detectable levels. The atpD primers demonstrated high specificity to the Streptomyces genus. Only 3 out of 107 (2.8%) sequenced amplicons fell outside it; these belonged to the actinobacterial genus Nocardioides. After excluding the Nocardioides sequences, the amplicons were divided into three major groups (Group A, B, C) according to the nucleotide tree (Figure 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Diversity of cloned atpD sequences from all soil microcosms with markers from GenBank in bold.

(SP) = Confirmed streptomycin producer, (AP) = Confirmed producer of other aminoglycoside [51], [52]. Accession numbers in parentheses. The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method; the numbers besides the branches indicate the percentage bootstrap value of 10000 replicates. The scale bar indicates 10% nucleotide dissimilarity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035756.g001

The atpD sequences from the same area clustered together, especially in Group A and B, though not in C (Figure 1). There were significant differences in the frequencies of atpD sequences between the AR and CR sample sites for Groups A and C, suggesting that plantomycin application may have affected the composition of the streptomycete populations in terms of diversity. There were also significant differences in the number of strains forming part of Group A, B and C between different areas but not between different sample sites within a given area (with the exception of AR and CR soils) (Figure 2, Table 3). This demonstrates that the population composition of streptomycetes varies between different regions. None of the sequenced amplicons fell within the same clade as S. griseus. The remaining atpD sequences either clustered with other species, such as S. violaceoruber, or failed to cluster with known sequences at all (Figure 1).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Distribution of the atpD sequences isolated from each soil site on the 3 main groups identified on the nucleotide phylogenetic tree (Figure 1).

‘San’ indicates all the Santomera strains (767, 770, 773, 774, 777). Group A in white, B in light grey and C in dark grey. The Nocardioides sequences are not included.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035756.g002

thumbnail
Table 3. Level of significance, calculated using the χ2 test, of the differences in number of atpD sequences belonging to each group (A = Group A, B = Group B, C = Group C,) and strA sequences belonging to each group (1 = Group 1, 2 = Group 2, 3 = Group 3, O = others) between the main soil sites.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035756.t003

Screening of soils for strA diversity

Two primer sets were used to detect strA (Table 1); the F2/R3 pair which was specific for the strA gene associated with the streptomycin biosynthetic cluster and the F/R pair, which was able to amplify from more diverse homologues to streptomycin 6-phosphotransferase genes such as hydroxyurea phosphotransferases [17].

While atpD was detected in TCDNA from soil, both sets of strA primers failed to produce any amplicons, demonstrating that strA was present below the detection threshold of the PCR used [36]. The strA gene was successfully amplified from seeded microcosms constructed from all soils studied. No amplicons were generated from extracted soil microcosm DNA using the strA_F2/R3 primers, whereas the more conserved strA_F/R primers amplified products of the correct size, as did the atpD_F/R primers.

Phosphotransferase diversity detected using strA primers

All strA homologues that are part of an antibiotic gene cluster belonged to a single clade (Group 2) with a bootstrap value of 85 (Figure 3). Only 7 out of 105 sequenced amplicons (6.7%) belonged to this clade. Two Santomeras sequences formed a sister clade to a resistance-only S. griseus strA gene [17]. Four of the CR and an AR clone were in the same clade as the strA genes present in the streptomycin biosynthetic cluster of S. griseus DSM 40236 and S. platensis CR50, indicating that they may be associated with production. Of the remaining sequences, 40 (38%) formed a sister clade to S. violaceoruber DSM 40783 SCO4264 (Group 1) and 51 (49%) formed a sister clade to a putative hydroxyurea phosphotransferase gene hur from Saccharopolyspora erythraea (Group 3). In addition there were two clades composed of 3 (2.9%) and 2 (1.9%) sequences that fell outside those three main groupings and were placed in the Outlier grouping.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Phosphotransferase diversity in microcosm soil based on partial sequences derived from strA primers.

Marker sequences (from GenBank) in bold. (SP) = Confirmed streptomycin producer, (AP) = Confirmed producer of other aminoglycoside [51], [52]. Accession numbers in parentheses. The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method; the numbers besides the branches indicate the percentage bootstrap value of 10000 replicates. The scale bar indicates 10% nucleotide dissimilarity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035756.g003

Sequences belonging to Group 1, 2 and 3 were isolated from both AR and CR, while the Santomeras soils additionally contained all the Outliers. There appeared to be large differences between sites (Figure 4), however when analyzed statistically there were only significant differences for Group 1 and 3 in 2 samples (Table 3). From the remaining sampled soils, 2 of the W sequences fell in Group 1 and 7 in Group 3, all 5 Skopelos sequences belonged to Group 3 and all 12 CB sequences to Group 1. The strA phylogenetic tree structure (Figure 3) demonstrates a correlation between site and diversity. The diversity followed a biogeographical distribution, and there was little separation between different soil sites from within an area. The one exception was the significant difference in number of AR and CR sequences in Group 1 despite both sites being in Dossenheim (Figure 4, Table 3). There were also significant differences in the proportions of strA homologue groups between different soil sites, demonstrating that the composition of the populations of these genes varies across different regions.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Distribution of the strA homologues isolated from the three main soil sites on the 3 main groups identified on the nucleotide phylogenetic tree (Figure 3).

‘San’ indicates all the Santomera strains (767, 770, 773, 774, 777). ‘Outliers’ refers to the two minor clades that do not form part of the 3 main groupings. Group 1 is in white, Group 2 in light grey, Group 3 in dark grey and the Outliers in black.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035756.g004

Two of the sequences (AR d and AR w) contained frameshift mutations and one (CR zb) contained a stop codon. The remaining sequences varied from the S. griseus strA and the S. aureofaciens hur but produced valid peptides. There was considerable variation in the peptide sequences which extended to the Mg2+ binding motif (Table 4a) (S. griseus strA: VLHWDLHYEN and in S. aureofaciens hur: LLHWDLHFGN) and the putative nucleotide-binding domain (Table 4b) (S. griseus strA: VGDPGFDLWP and in S. aureofaciens hur: AGDPGFELLP) [37]. This suggests that some of these sequences are pseudogenes and the products of others have targets that differ from those of StrA and Hur.

thumbnail
Table 4. Divergence of the (a) Mg2+ binding domain and (b) putative nucleotide-binding domain in environmental sequences compared to the S. aureofaciens hur peptide.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035756.t004

Discussion

Use of the atpD housekeeper gene produced a tree with significant phylogenetic resolution. In addition, the majority of clades contained both sequences from TCDNA and characterized isolates, providing an insight into the in situ diversity of streptomycetes in soil. The atpD sequence data suggest that the most common streptomycin producer from isolation work, S. griseus DSM 40236 and its close relatives, is found at a low density in soil.However none of the cloned atpD genes matched or were related to S. griseus DSM 40236. The molecular detection limit for plant pathogenic streptomycetes, , in soil has been calculated to be 103 gene targets per gram of soil for the txtAB gene [38], 1.5×103 for the nec1 gene [39] and 102 for the 16 S gene [40], suggesting that S. griseus soil populations may be lower than these values even after enrichment with chitin and starch. Other studies also support this finding as TCDNA studies of 13 streptomycetes from soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau [41], 156 streptomycetes from prairie soil in the Cedar Creek Natural History Area [42], and an isolate study including 3204 isolates from Singapore rainforests [43] failed to detect S. griseus, while a TCDNA study of temperate forest soils from Italy found one S. griseus sequence among 22 streptomycetes [44], indicating that S. griseus is uncommon in soil.

Streptomycin producers are one of the most commonly isolated antibiotic producers from soil [33], however the current study failed to amplify any copies of strA that belong to the streptomycin gene cluster using either the S. griseus producer-specific primers or the more conserved strA primers. Therefore, despite its wide distribution, the streptomycin cluster is not common in soil streptomycetes at the sites examined. Streptomycin-resistant streptomycetes have been isolated from the Dossenheim soils using selective plates containing streptomycin [34]. The more diverse strA sequences were never found in isolates recovered from the same soils using streptomycin selection in a previous study [34]. The only gene, other than the S. griseus DSM 40236 strA, on the phosphotransferase tree whose function has been experimentally confirmed is the hur from S. aureofasciens which acts by phosphorylating the hydroxy group in the hydroxylamine moiety of hydroxyurea [45]. It has been speculated that its function in the natural environment is to inactivate an unknown aminoglycoside containing a domain resembling the hydroxylamine moiety [45]. The function of the other genes obtained from GenBank, e.g. SCO4264 and S. albulus NBRC 14147 orf24, is unknown; these were listed as putative hur genes due to their sequence homology with S. aureofasciens hur. The detection of a small number of closely related homologues to strA indicates that these genes, which may form part of an aminoglycoside biosynthetic cluster or be independent, are more common than the strA belonging to the S. griseus streptomycin cluster. Nonetheless, they comprise only a minority of the genes encoding aminoglycoside/hydroxyurea antibiotic resistance kinases from the APH_6_hur superfamily. Thus potential streptomycin resistance genes not associated with a biosynthetic cluster are found in low numbers in the examined soils, which is to be expected if the streptomycin biosynthetic cluster is also not abundant. The sequences within the clade containing aminoglycoside producer resistance genes are likely to phosphorylate aminoglycosides, however the function of the remaining genes is less certain as they cluster with phosphotransferase genes whose substrate is unknown. Three studies used PCR and cloning to detect the presence of the 2-deoxy-scyllo-inosose gene in TCDNA from Japanese soils (54 clones), and Pacific Ocean (34 clones). None of these sequences were closely related to the stsC gene from the streptomycin cluster, instead forming clades with genes from other biosynthetic clusters such as kanamycin or gentamycin [11], [46], [47].

There have been few attempts to determine the prevalence of APH genes in the environment which can both provide information on the frequency of resistant strains as well as assist in assessing the frequency of aminoglycoside producers. In an agricultural field site from Costa Rica, two from a set of 69 actinobacterial isolates (2.9%) possessed an strA homologue that was more closely related to the S. glaucescens strA, while none of the 48 clones from a coastal salt marsh from the USA were closely related to strA [37]. DNA extracted from three Swedish wastewater-associated environments were screened for the presence of the aminoglycoside resistance genes aac(6′)-Ie and aph(2″). The genes were detected at all the sites, though the soil had very low levels of the genes [48]. A BAC library containing 5.6 Gb of DNA extracted from soil contained 9 clones, of which 6 were AAC(6′), and none were APH genes [49]. The fungus/bacterium ratio, based on abundance of rRNA estimated to range from 0.2 for desert and 0.6 for prairie soil to 2 to 4 for forest soil (Assessment of Soil Microbial Community Structure by Use of Taxon-Specific Quantitative PCR Assays, Soil Microbial Community Responses to Multiple Experimental Climate Change Drivers), Assuming that an average bacterial chromosome is 4.5 Mb [50] and a fungus/bacterium ratio of 4 for the oak savanna examined in that study, it can be estimated that only 0.4% of soil bacteria have resistance to aminoglycosides due to enzymatic modification of the antibiotic. These findings agree with the results of this study and indicate that APH(6′) resistance genes are not prevalent in soil.

The streptomycin-treated and untreated sites demonstrated significant differences in the composition of both the strA gene and the atpD gene. The significantly lower number of strA sequences putatively associated with production suggests that other phosphotransferase genes are selected for in the presence of streptomycin, resulting in a relatively smaller population of streptomycin producers. In addition, the significant difference in the composition of atpD and strA sequences, despite the fact both sites were in the same region, suggests that the application of plantamycin may have caused alteration in the soil streptomycete populations, as there were no significant differences between the different Santomera sampling sites.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PL EMHW. Performed the experiments: PL TS. Analyzed the data: PL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PL EMHW. Wrote the paper: PL EMHW.

References

  1. 1. Euzeby JP (2012) List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature - Genus Streptomyces. Retrieved 20th of February, 2012, from http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/s/streptomycesb.html.
  2. 2. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EM, Sneath PH, et al. (1983) Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol 129: 1743–1813.
  3. 3. Anderson AS, Wellington EM (2001) The taxonomy of Streptomyces and related genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51: 797–814.
  4. 4. Staley JT (2006) The bacterial species dilemma and the genomic-phylogenetic species concept. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361: 1899–1909.
  5. 5. Goodfellow M, Kumar Y, Labeda DP, Sembiring L (2007) The Streptomyces violaceusniger clade: a home for Streptomycetes with rugose ornamented spores. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 92: 173–199.
  6. 6. Kataoka M, Ueda K, Kudo T, Seki T, Yoshida T (1997) Application of the variable region in 16 S rDNA to create an index for rapid species identification in the genus Streptomyces. FEMS Microbiol Lett 151: 249–255.
  7. 7. Kumar Y, Goodfellow M (2008) Five new members of the Streptomyces violaceusniger 16 S rRNA gene clade: Streptomyces castelarensis sp. nov., comb. nov., Streptomyces himastatinicus sp. nov., Streptomyces mordarskii sp. nov., Streptomyces rapamycinicus sp. nov. and Streptomyces ruanii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 1369–1378.
  8. 8. Liu Z, Shi Y, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Lu Z, et al. (2005) Classification of Streptomyces griseus (Krainsky 1914) Waksman and Henrici 1948 and related species and the transfer of ‘Microstreptospora cinerea’ to the genus Streptomyces as Streptomyces yanii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55: 1605–1610.
  9. 9. Hain T, Ward-Rainey N, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA (1997) Discrimination of Streptomyces albidoflavus strains based on the size and number of 16 S–23 S ribosomal DNA intergenic spacers. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47: 202–206.
  10. 10. Lanoot B, Vancanneyt M, Hoste B, Vandemeulebroecke K, Cnockaert MC, et al. (2005) Grouping of streptomycetes using 16 S-ITS RFLP fingerprinting. Research in Microbiology 156: 755–762.
  11. 11. Tamegai H, Kuki T, Udagawa Y, Aoki R, Nagaya A, et al. (2006) Exploration of genes that encode a carbocycle-forming enzyme involved in biosynthesis of aminoglycoside antibiotics from the environmental. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 70: 1711–1716.
  12. 12. Gharaibeh R, Saadoun I, Mahasneh A (2003) Evaluation of combined 16 S rDNA and strb1 gene targeted PCR to identify and detect streptomycin-producing Streptomyces. J Basic Microbiol 43: 301–311.
  13. 13. Kim BJ, Kim CJ, Chun J, Koh YH, Lee SH, et al. (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of the genera Streptomyces and Kitasatospora based on partial RNA polymerase beta-subunit gene (rpoB) sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 593–598.
  14. 14. Mun HS, Oh EJ, Kim HJ, Lee KH, Koh YH, et al. (2007) Differentiation of Streptomyces spp. which cause potato scab disease on the basis of partial rpoB gene sequences. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 30: 401–407.
  15. 15. Egan S, Wiener P, Kallifidas D, Wellington EM (2001) Phylogeny of Streptomyces species and evidence for horizontal transfer of entire and partial antibiotic gene clusters. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 79: 127–133.
  16. 16. Guo Y, Zheng W, Rong X, Huang Y (2008) A multilocus phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16 S rRNA gene clade: use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 149–159.
  17. 17. Laskaris P, Tolba S, Calvo-Bado L, Wellington EM (2010) Coevolution of antibiotic production and counter-resistance in soil bacteria. Environ Microbiol 12: 783–796.
  18. 18. Rong X, Huang Y (2009) Taxonomic evaluation of the Streptomyces griseus clade using multilocus sequence analysis and DNA-DNA hybridization, with proposal to combine 29 species and three subspecies as 11 genomic species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60: 696–703.
  19. 19. Hanage WP, Fraser C, Spratt BG (2005) Fuzzy species among recombinogenic bacteria. Bmc Biology 3: 6.
  20. 20. Babalola OO, Kirby BM, Le Roes-Hill M, Cook AE, Cary SC, et al. (2009) Phylogenetic analysis of actinobacterial populations associated with Antarctic Dry Valley mineral soils. Environ Microbiol 11: 566–576.
  21. 21. Chanal A, Chapon V, Benzerara K, Barakat M, Christen R, et al. (2006) The desert of Tataouine: an extreme environment that hosts a wide diversity of microorganisms and radiotolerant bacteria. Environ Microbiol 8: 514–525.
  22. 22. Holmes AJ, Bowyer J, Holley MP, O'Donoghue M, Montgomery M, et al. (2000) Diverse, yet-to-be-cultured members of the Rubrobacter subdivision of the Actinobacteria are widespread in Australian arid soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33: 111–120.
  23. 23. Smith JJ, Tow LA, Stafford W, Cary C, Cowan DA (2006) Bacterial diversity in three different Antarctic Cold Desert mineral soils. Microb Ecol 51: 413–421.
  24. 24. Stach JE, Maldonado LA, Ward AC, Goodfellow M, Bull AT (2003) New primers for the class Actinobacteria: application to marine and terrestrial environments. Environ Microbiol 5: 828–841.
  25. 25. Valenzuela-Encinas C, Neria-Gonzalez I, Alcantara-Hernandez RJ, Estrada-Alvarado I, Zavala-Diaz de la Serna FJ, et al. (2009) Changes in the bacterial populations of the highly alkaline saline soil of the former lake Texcoco (Mexico) following flooding. Extremophiles 13: 609–621.
  26. 26. D'Costa VM, McGrann KM, Hughes DW, Wright GD (2006) Sampling the antibiotic resistome. Science 311: 374–377.
  27. 27. Berdy J (2005) Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 58: 1–26.
  28. 28. Jones D, Metzger HJ, Schatz A, Waksman SA (1944) Control of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Experimental Animals by Streptomycin. Science 100: 103–105.
  29. 29. McManus PS, Stockwell VO, Sundin GW, Jones AL (2002) Antibiotic use in plant agriculture. Annual Review of Phytopathology 40: 443–+.
  30. 30. Sundin GW, Monks DE, Bender CL (1995) Distribution of the Streptomycin-Resistance Transposon Tn5393 among Phylloplane and Soil Bacteria from Managed Agricultural Habitats. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41: 792–799.
  31. 31. Tolba S, Egan S, Kallifidas D, Wellington EM (2002) Distribution of streptomycin resistance and biosynthesis genes in streptomycetes recovered from different soil sites. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42: 269–276.
  32. 32. Garcia C, Hernandez T (2004) Site Description. Retrieved 20th of February 2012, from http://www.soil-index.com/english/documents/dl/index_site_description.pdf.
  33. 33. Baltz RH (2006) Marcel Faber Roundtable: is our antibiotic pipeline unproductive because of starvation, constipation or lack of inspiration? J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33: 507–513.
  34. 34. Tolba S (2004) Distribution of streptomycin resistance and biosynthesis genes in streptomycetes recovered from different soil sites and the role of horizontal gene transfer in their dissemination. Coventry: University of Warwick.
  35. 35. Metcalfe AC, Krsek M, Gooday GW, Prosser JI, Wellington EM (2002) Molecular analysis of a bacterial chitinolytic community in an upland pasture. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 5042–5050.
  36. 36. Pontiroli A, Travis ER, Sweeney FP, Porter D, Gaze WH, et al. (2011) Pathogen quantitation in complex matrices: a multi-operator comparison of DNA extraction methods with a novel assessment of PCR inhibition. PLoS One 6: e17916.
  37. 37. Anderson AS, Clark DJ, Gibbons PH, Sigmund JM (2002) The detection of diverse aminoglycoside phosphotransferases within natural populations of actinomycetes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29: 60–69.
  38. 38. Qu X, Wanner LA, Christ BJ (2008) Using the TxtAB operon to quantify pathogenic Streptomyces in potato tubers and soil. Phytopathology 98: 405–412.
  39. 39. Manome A, Kageyama A, Kurata S, Yokomaku T, Koyama O, et al. (2008) Quantification of potato common scab pathogens in soil by quantitative competitive PCR with fluorescent quenching-based probes. Plant Pathology 57: 887–896.
  40. 40. Schlatter DC, Samac DA, Tesfaye M, Kinkel LL (2010) Rapid and specific method for evaluating Streptomyces competitive dynamics in complex soil communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 2009–2012.
  41. 41. Gundlapally SR, Garcia-Pichel F (2006) The community and phylogenetic diversity of biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau studied by molecular fingerprinting and intensive cultivation. Microb Ecol 52: 345–357.
  42. 42. Davelos AL, Xiao K, Samac DA, Martin AP, Kinkel LL (2004) Spatial variation in Streptomyces genetic composition and diversity in a prairie soil. Microb Ecol 48: 601–612.
  43. 43. Wang Y, Zhang ZS, Ruan JS, Wang YM, Ali SM (1999) Investigation of actinomycete diversity in the tropical rainforests of Singapore. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 23: 178–187.
  44. 44. Monciardini P, Sosio M, Cavaletti L, Chiocchini C, Donadio S (2002) New PCR primers for the selective amplification of 16 S rDNA from different groups of actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42: 419–429.
  45. 45. Kormanec J, Farkasovsky M, Potuckova L, Godar S (1992) A gene (hur) from Streptomyces aureofaciens, conferring resistance to hydroxyurea, is related to genes encoding streptomycin phosphotransferase. Gene 114: 133–137.
  46. 46. Aoki R, Nagaya A, Arakawa S, Kato C, Tamegai H (2008) Identification and diversity of putative aminoglycoside-biosynthetic aminotransferase genes from deep-sea environmental DNA. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72: 1388–1393.
  47. 47. Nagaya A, Takeyama S, Tamegai H (2005) Identification of aminotransferase genes for biosynthesis of aminoglycoside antibiotics from soil DNA. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69: 1389–1393.
  48. 48. Borjesson S, Dienues O, Jarnheimer PA, Olsen B, Matussek A, et al. (2009) Quantification of genes encoding resistance to aminoglycosides, beta-lactams and tetracyclines in wastewater environments by real-time PCR. Int J Environ Health Res 19: 219–230.
  49. 49. Riesenfeld CS, Goodman RM, Handelsman J (2004) Uncultured soil bacteria are a reservoir of new antibiotic resistance genes. Environ Microbiol 6: 981–989.
  50. 50. Casjens S (1998) The diverse and dynamic structure of bacterial genomes. Annu Rev Genet 32: 339–377.
  51. 51. DSMZ (2012) Catalogue of microorganisms. Braunschweig. Available: http://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/catalogue-microorganisms.html. Retrieved 20th of February 2012, 2012.
  52. 52. Wink J (2012) Compendium of Actinobacteria. Braunschweig. Retrieved 20th of February 2012, from http://www.gbif-prokarya.de/microorganisms/wink.html.
  53. 53. Calvo-Bado L (2009) Personal Communication.