Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Novel Thin NIPAM Gel Cassette Dosimeter for Photon-Beam Radiotherapy

  • Ling-Ling Hsieh ,

    llhsieh@ctust.edu.tw

    Affiliation Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Beitun District, Taichung City, Taiwan, Republic of China

  • Kai-Yuan Cheng,
  • Bor-Tsung Hsieh

A Novel Thin NIPAM Gel Cassette Dosimeter for Photon-Beam Radiotherapy

  • Ling-Ling Hsieh, 
  • Kai-Yuan Cheng, 
  • Bor-Tsung Hsieh
PLOS
x

Abstract

The response of thin polymer gel cassettes (called NIPAM gels) to ionizing radiation was investigated in this study. The NIPAM gels were prepared from gelatin, N-isopropyl acrylamide, tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphoniumchloride, and N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide. Gel cassettes were irradiated in a phantom using a linear accelerator, and the polymerization morphology of irradiated NIPAM gel was characterized using scanning electron microscopy. The dose-response sensitivity of the NIPAM gels was evaluated using the differences in optical densities. The optical densities were obtained using a computer-controlled CCD camera that was connected to a planar illumination source for acquisition of optical transmission images. The central axis depth dose profiles of the phantom were extracted, and a comparison with ionization chamber measurements demonstrated similarities in profiles. The sensitivity, linearity of the response, accuracy, and reproducibility of the polymer gel cassettes were acceptable. However, the profiles of the half-blocked field irradiation showed no significant dispersion in the visible region. This study also extensively investigated the spatial stability of the NIPAM gel. The results showed that the gel cassette response remains stable for up to three months after irradiation.

Introduction

Recent advances in radiotherapy have placed great importance on the development of dosimetric techniques [1][3]. Treatments such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery optimize the dose to the tumor volume while minimizing the dose to normal healthy tissues and surrounding critical structures, such as the optic chiasm, brain stem, and spinal cord. These treatments must be performed correctly and accurately because they are potentially dangerous and painful and may result in serious complications. Therefore, complete verification and 3D dosimetric techniques are required before treatment [4], [5]. A significant development occurred in 1993 [6] with the proposal of a polymer gel dosimeter. Ionizing radiation induces a number of free radicals from water hydrolysis to initiate a polymerization reaction of the monomers. The resulting polymer particles do not diffuse through the gel matrix, and the diffusion limitation that is associated with Fricke gels is overcome [7]. The two major advantages of polymer gel dosimeters are their ability to determine the integrated 3D dose distribution and their ability to adopt different shapes [8]. Polymer gel dosimeters are in the first phase of experimentation and require further improvement. In fact, good consistency of images after irradiation has been obtained (up to months), but the poor stability of the unirradiated gel matrix results in a strong dependence of the dosimeter response on the time between preparation and irradiation. Senden et al. proposed a new polymer gel, based on N-isopropyl acrylamide, which is a less toxic monomer and which he named the NIPAM polymer gel [9]. Since then, several studies on the development and improvement of polymer gels have been conducted. The dose response of the NIPAM gels is linear over a wide dose range. The polymerization process is also highly correlated to oxygen inhibition; the antioxidant tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride (THPC) reacts with the gelatin but not with the crosslinker N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide (Bis) [10]. The characteristics of the NIPAM gel (i.e. sensitivity, linearity, and temporal stability attainment) at various dose ranges necessitate further investigation for clinical treatment [11].

An ideal gel dosimeter and readout system should have a highly sensitive dose response with good linearity as well as low energy and dose rate dependence. Researchers have investigated several readout modalities in an attempt to obtain dose information from the polymer gel. Recently, approaches included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [12], optical computed tomography (OCT) [13], [14], x-ray computed tomography (CT) [15], and ultrasound [16]. It has been shown that MRI as a readout system has great potential to be a gel dosimeter in clinical radiation therapy. The weaknesses of MRI are its long image acquisition time and temperature sensitivity of the transverse relaxation time (T2). Its introduction into the clinical routine has been attempted but has often failed due to the high cost and low availability of imaging time on MRI scanners. Alternative readout methods, such as OCT systems with spatial resolutions of up to 100 µm [17], provide an inexpensive and easy-to-use alternative imaging modality. Their spatial resolution is based on the optical attenuation coefficient (or optical density per unit length), which depends on the degree to which the polymer micro-particles scatter light, and it is proportional to the absorbed dose. However, OCT approaches introduce novel challenges because of the inherent complications from index of refraction matching at interfaces, multiple scattering in polymer systems, etc. [18][20]. A convenient readout method is characterized by a combination of a plane illuminator and a non-uniform pixel sensitivity of the low-cost CCD camera. The method uses a CCD camera to detect grey-level (GL) images of the light, which are transmitted by gel dosimeters before and after irradiation. Although the optical analysis system has a spatial resolution of only 38 pixel/cm, which is less than OCT [21], it can be performed with a simpler and less expensive instrument. The suitable optical imaging apparatus is transportable and can be placed near the irradiation unit. Therefore, it is possible to complete a dosimeter analysis, as detection of all images only takes a few minutes.

The present study evaluated the feasibility of a thin-cassette design on a normoxic polymer gel dosimeter using NIPAM monomers. Gel dosimeters in the form of thin cassettes create the possibility of obtaining spatial dose distributions and measurements of each dose contribution in a radiation field. These advantages arise from the cassette's geometry, which results from stacking to obtain a solid phantom. This is convenient because thin gel cassette transmission images are detectable using a simple and reliable optical analysis.

Materials and Methods

Thin gel cassette preparation and irradiation

1. Thin gel cassette preparation.

The adopted NIPAM gel dosimeters were in the form of thin cassettes (Fig. 1) with a 3 mm thickness and a 12×6 cm2 surface area. The gel was contained in structures that consisted of two transparent polymethylmethacrylate sheets with a 1 mm thickness each. NIPAM gels were prepared by using 5% (all percentages by weight) gelatin (porcine, 300 Bloom Type A, Sigma-Aldrich) and allowing it to swell at room temperature in 87 wt% de-ionized water for 5 min (22±1°C). It was then heated to 45°C. As a result, the gelatin solution became clear and transparent. While stirring continuously, 3% N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide (Merck) and 5% NIPAM(97%, Sigma-Aldrich) were combined and heated at 45°C, taking approximately 15 min to dissolve. Subsequently, 10 mM THPC (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the solution as an antioxidant, and the solution was mixed for 2 min. Using a syringe, the NIPAM gel solution was introduced into holding structures of cassette through a small hole on top of gel cassette, before it started to gel. The gel cassette is composed of a 3 mm frame between two transparent sheets. The hole was sealed with silicone, to prevent leakage of oxygen into the gel. Finally, the thin gel cassette was wrapped with aluminum foil and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C to prevent light-induced pre-polymerization.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Thin cassette dosimeter containers.

The cassette dosimeter consisted of two 1 mm thick transparent polymethylmethacrylate sheets with a 12×6 cm2 surface area.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g001

2. Irradiation.

Gel cassettes were irradiated under graded doses for approximately 6 hours after they were manufactured, using the 6 MV photon beam from the Clinac 18 Varians linear accelerator (Linac) at a dose rate of 400 MU sec−1. The gel cassettes were inserted into a phantom, which is a cube composed of polystyrene layers with a space that is appropriate for gel cassette dosimeter insertion. Irradiations were performed under 10×10 cm2 and 1×1 cm2 fields at a source-surface distance of 100 cm. After irradiation, the gel cassettes were stored in a refrigerator for subsequent measurements.

Depth dose profiles in a cubic polystyrene phantom (20 cm side) were detected at the center of a 10×10 cm2 and 90° gantry angle irradiation, whereas the source-surface distance was 100 cm, the prescribed dose at the isocenter was 10 Gy. In this study, the dose-optical density difference Δ(OD) calibration curve was obtained by fitting the central axis depth–optical density difference Δ(OD) curve to the depth–dose profiles. The depth-dose profiles were measured in a separate experiment by scanning a 0.6 cm3 ionization chamber (PTW-30013, Farmer type, Germany) under the same conditions.

Oxygen contamination

The effects of oxygen were studied in three gel cassettes that were filled and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. These samples were not sealed at the upper border of the thin gel cassette, to expose the gels to air before irradiation. The gel cassettes were irradiated with up to 10 Gy, and all gel cassettes were imaged simultaneously 24 h after irradiation in a clinical 1.5 T MRI scanner (Siemens Symphony Tim system, Germany) with a multi-echo spin echo protocol. R2 ( = 1/T2) maps were calculated using MATLAB® software.

Instrumentations for thin gel cassette measurements and data analysis

Measurements were performed after irradiation. The gels were stored in a refrigerator at 4°C for 12 hours. The analytical instruments consisted of a planar illumination source, a CCD camera (12 bit, 4096 shades of gray) for the acquisition of optical transmission images, and a computer for CCD control and the storage and processing of acquired images. Gel cassettes were placed approximately 35 cm away from the lens and an interference filter was placed between the 48 mm camera lens and the CCD detector, to match the wavelength (∼630 nm) of the absorption peak. The images were analyzed within a 6×12 cm2 area, which included the gel cassette.

In CCD images, the matrix size covering the entire gel cassette is approximately 620×310. Therefore, the CCD system used in this study has a spatial resolution of ∼205 µm, whereas the maximum spatial resolution is typically 154 µm.

The following equation [22] reveals the absorbed dose, which was deduced from the light transmittance at ∼630 nm before and after irradiation:(1)Where Δ(OD) is the difference in the optical density and GLa and GLb are the gray-level (GL) values of the images detected before and after irradiation, respectively. Specific software was developed in the programming environment MATLAB (The Math Works Inc., Natick MA, USA) to identify the dose profiles.

Morphological analysis

The morphological details of freeze-dried specimens were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JEOL T330A) with an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. Specimens were coated with a gold metal layer to provide proper surface conduction.

Results and Discussion

Photography of radiation exposure

The NIPAM gel cassettes at two different absorbed radiation doses are shown in Fig. 2. The different radiation dose during the polymerization was an obvious factor for the quantity of crosslinked polymers. Based on the dose dependence of the NIPAM gels, the intensity of radiation at 10 Gy had a greater effect than radiation at 5 Gy.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Thin polymer gel cassettes after irradiation.

From left to right: 0 Gy (before irradiation), 5 Gy, and 10 Gy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g002

Morphological analysis

SEM determines the surface morphology of polymer gels with radiation polymerization. Microphotographs of the cross-sectional NIPAM gel samples at 500× are shown in Fig. 3. Non-irradiated NIPAM gels revealed a fibrous morphology (Fig. 3A). This fibrous structure gradually disappeared, and the layer structure reappeared after irradiation (Fig. 3B).

thumbnail
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the NIPAM gel.

A. non-irradiated NIPAM gel. (lateral view). B. irradiated NIPAM gel under a 10 Gy radiation dose. (lateral view).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g003

Dose response and depth dose distribution

Fig. 4 demonstrates the good linearity of the dose vs. the optical density differences Δ(OD) from 0 to 15 Gy. The slope represents a sensitivity of 0.012 Gy−1.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Variation in the optical density difference Δ(OD) versus dose.

The slope represents a sensitivity of 0.012 Gy−1 from 0 Gy to15 Gy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g004

The percent depth dose (PDD) profile of the NIPAM gel cassettes was obtained, and compared between the ionization chamber dosimeters (Fig. 5). The images of Δ(OD) that correspond to 3 mm thick polymer gel cassettes are shown in Fig. 5A. The on-axis PDD profiles of the NIPAM gels are compared with the profiles from the ionization chamber dosimeter (Fig. 5B). The experimental dose profiles in the polymer gel cassettes were similar to the ionization chamber depth dose profiles, which showed a general effect of polymerization. The calculated maximum percentage depth dose of NIPAM gel is close to the measured PDD curves of calibrated ionization chambers. We evaluated the accuracy of the depth dose profiles with gel cassettes and an ionization chamber. The results for the gel cassettes are shown in Fig. 5C and have an average absolute dose discrepancy as low as 4.07%. The energy and dose-rate dependence of the NIPAM gel, assumed in the literature [23],The maximum sensitivity difference was reported to be 33% for dose rates from 100 to 500 cGymin−1 and 10% for X-ray energy from 6 MV to 15 MV. Although the energy dependence is minor, there is a slight dose rate dependence. However, good correspondence is obtained with the CCD camera readout, as evidenced by the small discrepancy with respect to the reference depth dose profiles.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Comparison between the depth-dose profiles of the NIPAM gel cassette and the ionization chamber.

A. Depth-dose profiles extracted from the Δ(OD) center on the surface of the 3 mm-thick NIPAM polymer gel cassette. B. On-axis percent depth dose profiles of the NIPAM gel cassette and the ionization chamber in the phantom after exposure to radiation of 10 Gy. C. Dose differences between gel and ion chamber measurements for the curves in B.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g005

Fig. 6 illustrates spin-spin relaxation rate (R2) values derived from gel cassettes, which had not been sealed at the upper border to allow for exposure to air before irradiation. Oxygen contamination inhibited front polymerization of the NIPAM gel cassette, resulting in a border effect that was almost 14 mm in width. This occurs as a uniform baseline with an R2 of approximately 0.7 s−1. Beyond this point, the concentration of oxygen declines to values below the amount required for complete inhibition, and R2 rapidly increases to a maximum 2.0, which results in lower maximum R2 values than those in cassettes sealed at the upper border. The oxygen contamination can have a significant influence on the R2 response. The percentage differences between maximum R2 values for cassettes not sealed or sealed at the upper border is approximately 28.6%, which may translate to a maximum dose discrepancy of up to approximately 60% depth dose at low depths, when using ionization chamber calibration. The results in this study were similar to those previously reported in the literature [24]. Therefore, a border effect was detected because the dosimeters were not well-sealed. Some oxygen entered into the gel cassette and inhibited the polymerization, which resulted in the consequent local loss in sensitivity [25].

thumbnail
Figure 6. R2 profile of gel cassette dosimeters unsealed at the upper border, which were exposed to air before irradiation.

Compare oxygen containment in gel cassettes dosimeters sealed and unsealed at the upper border and exposed to air. Cassettes were stored in a refrigerator at 4°C before irradiation and were scanned 24 h after irradiation. R2 profiles are derived along the cassette axis, each gel cassette sample received a dose of 10 Gy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g006

Temporal stability of the NIPAM gel cassettes

The temporal stability of the gel cassettes after irradiation is indicative of their clinical applicability. Differences in sensitivity and linearity were measured at various periods after irradiation. Table 1 shows the temporal variation of the gel cassettes, which had a deviation in the sensitivity of less than 5% at almost 90 days post irradiation. In addition, the deviation in the linearity of the gel cassettes was less than 1% at almost 90 days post-irradiation. According to Senden et al. [9], the chemical reaction may persist for up to 24 h after irradiation because of the continuous polymerization reaction that is caused by the long-lived radicals. The results of the current experiment demonstrated that the stability of the NIPAM gel persisted for up to three months post-irradiation. Furthermore, Fig. 7 presents the CCD camera images and profiles for the same gel cassette exposed to 15 Gy at different times post-irradiation. The intensity around regions of the field was 0.89 (normalized pixel value). The values of the original response (created by exposure to the radiation) dropped slightly to an average value of 0.86 (normalized pixel value) after 504 hr. Contrary to the enhancement at the edge, a decrease of only approximately 3.3% was observed in the apparent response at the center of the radiation field. Therefore, the NIPAM gel appears to be very stable.

thumbnail
Figure 7. CCD camera image and profiles for the same gel cassette exposed to 15 Gy at different time post-irradiation.

A. CCD camera image relative to 0.67 h and 504 h after irradiation. B. The dose intensity in the central region of an irradiated gel cassette was observed for doses equal to 15 Gy and measured 0.67, 24 h, 164 h, and 504 h after irradiation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g007

Spatial stability

The dose profiles of the samples were half-block field-irradiated to assess the spatial stability of the NIPAM gel cassettes (Fig. 8). Profiles of the NIPAM gel dosimeter across an irradiated/non-irradiated transition border (longitudinal direction) of a half-blocked field were assessed. The profiles exhibited an edge aggregation of approximately 5 mm when irradiated to 10 Gy. Polymerization pushes the edge of the boundary of the irradiated region toward the non-irradiated region, which leads to a narrowing of the penumbra [26]. No significant dispersion in the visible region was detected.

thumbnail
Figure 8. Image of a partially irradiated thin polymer gel cassette.

A. Image of a partially irradiated polymer gel cassette. B. Dose profiles in the central axis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031836.g008

Conclusions

The utilization of NIPAM gel cassettes as photon-beam dosimeters demonstrated good linearity from 0 Gy to approximately 15 Gy. Moreover, the optical response of the NIPAM gels remained unaltered for at least 90 days after irradiation, and no significant enhancement of the edge of radiation field was observed. The dose profiles of the gel cassettes reveal a good correspondence when obtained with CCD camera readout. This is evident from the small discrepancy with respect to the reference depth dose profiles from the ionization chamber, thereby confirming the reliability of this method.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank the assistance of photon-beam irradiation from the department of Radiation Oncology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung Veterans,Taiwan.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LLH KYC. Performed the experiments: LLH. Analyzed the data: LLH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BTH. Wrote the paper: LLH.

References

  1. 1. Schreiner LJ (2009) Where does gel dosimetry fit in the clinic? J Phys Conf Ser 164: 012001.LJ Schreiner2009Where does gel dosimetry fit in the clinic?J Phys Conf Ser164012001
  2. 2. Hayashi SI, Yoshioka MS, Kiyofumi H, Takahiro K, McAuley KB, et al. (2010) A study on the role of gelatin in methacrylic-acid-based gel dosimeters. Radiat Phys Chem 79(7): 803–808.SI HayashiMS YoshiokaH. KiyofumiK. TakahiroKB McAuley2010A study on the role of gelatin in methacrylic-acid-based gel dosimeters.Radiat Phys Chem797803808
  3. 3. Lodwick C (2011) Clinical Dosimetry Measurements in Radiotherapy. Health Phys 100(4): 444–445.C. Lodwick2011Clinical Dosimetry Measurements in Radiotherapy.Health Phys1004444445
  4. 4. Fenkell L, Kaminsky I, Breen S, Huang S, Prooijen MV, et al. (2008) Dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the cervical esophagus. Radiother Oncol 89(3): 287–291.L. FenkellI. KaminskyS. BreenS. HuangMV Prooijen2008Dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the cervical esophagus.Radiother Oncol893287291
  5. 5. Otto K (2008) Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys 35(1): 310–317.K. Otto2008Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.Med Phys351310317
  6. 6. Maryanski MJ, Gore JC, Kennan RP, Schulz RJ (1993) NMR relaxation enhancement in gels polymerized and cross-linked by ionizing radiation: a new approach to 3D dosimetry by MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 11(2): 253–258.MJ MaryanskiJC GoreRP KennanRJ Schulz1993NMR relaxation enhancement in gels polymerized and cross-linked by ionizing radiation: a new approach to 3D dosimetry by MRI.Magn Reson Imaging112253258
  7. 7. Baldock C, Burford RP, Billingham N, Wagner GS, Patval S, et al. (1998) Experimental procedure for the manufacture and calibration of polyacrylamide gel(PAG) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 43: 695–702.C. BaldockRP BurfordN. BillinghamGS WagnerS. Patval1998Experimental procedure for the manufacture and calibration of polyacrylamide gel(PAG) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiation dosimetry.Phys Med Biol43695702
  8. 8. Baldock C, De Deene Y, Doran S, Ibbott G, Jirasek A, et al. (2010) Polymer gel dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 55: R1–R63.C. BaldockY. De DeeneS. DoranG. IbbottA. Jirasek2010Polymer gel dosimetry.Phys Med Biol55R1R63
  9. 9. Senden RJ, Jean PD, McAuley KB, Schreiner LJ (2006) Polymer gel dosimeters with reduced toxicity: a preliminary investigation of the NMR and optical dose response using different monomers. Phys Med Biol 51(14): 3301–3314.RJ SendenPD JeanKB McAuleyLJ Schreiner2006Polymer gel dosimeters with reduced toxicity: a preliminary investigation of the NMR and optical dose response using different monomers.Phys Med Biol511433013314
  10. 10. Jirasek A, Hilts M, Shaw C, Baxter P (2006) Experimental properties of THPC based normoxic polyacrylamide gels for use in x-ray computed tomography gel dosimetry. J Phys Conf Ser 56: 263–267.A. JirasekM. HiltsC. ShawP. Baxter2006Experimental properties of THPC based normoxic polyacrylamide gels for use in x-ray computed tomography gel dosimetry.J Phys Conf Ser56263267
  11. 11. Chang YJ, Hsieh BT, Liang JA (2011) A systematic approach to determine optimal composition of gel used in radiation therapy. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A 652(1): 783–785.YJ ChangBT HsiehJA Liang2011A systematic approach to determine optimal composition of gel used in radiation therapy.Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A6521783785http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.09.097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.09.097.
  12. 12. Crescenti RA, Scheib SG, Schneider U, Gianolini S (2007) Introducing gel dosimetry in a clinical environment: Customization of polymer gel composition and magnetic resonance imaging parameters used for 3-D dose verifications in radiosurgery and intensity modulated radiotherapy. Med Phys 34(4): 1286–1297.RA CrescentiSG ScheibU. SchneiderS. Gianolini2007Introducing gel dosimetry in a clinical environment: Customization of polymer gel composition and magnetic resonance imaging parameters used for 3-D dose verifications in radiosurgery and intensity modulated radiotherapy.Med Phys34412861297
  13. 13. Maryanski MJ, Ranade MK (2001) Laser micro-beam CT scanning of dosimetry gels. Proc SPIE 4320: 764–774.MJ MaryanskiMK Ranade2001Laser micro-beam CT scanning of dosimetry gels.Proc SPIE4320764774
  14. 14. Massillon-JL G, Minniti R, Soares CG, Maryanski MJ, Robertson S (2010) Characteristics of a new polymer gel for high-dose gradient dosimetry using a micro optical CT scanner. Appl Radiat Isot 68(1): 144–154.G. Massillon-JLR. MinnitiCG SoaresMJ MaryanskiS. Robertson2010Characteristics of a new polymer gel for high-dose gradient dosimetry using a micro optical CT scanner.Appl Radiat Isot681144154
  15. 15. Hilts M, Audet C, Duzenli C, Jirasek A (2000) Polymer gel dosimetry using x-ray computed tomography: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 45: 2559–2571.M. HiltsC. AudetC. DuzenliA. Jirasek2000Polymer gel dosimetry using x-ray computed tomography: a feasibility study.Phys Med Biol4525592571
  16. 16. Mather ML, Whittaker AK, Baldock C (2002) Ultrasound evaluation of polymer gel dosimeters. Phys Med Biol 47: 1449–1458.ML MatherAK WhittakerC. Baldock2002Ultrasound evaluation of polymer gel dosimeters.Phys Med Biol4714491458
  17. 17. Massillon-JL G, Minniti R, Mitch MG, Maryanski MJ, Soares CG (2009) The use of gel dosimetry to measure the 3D dose distribution of a 90Sr/90Y intravascular brachytherapy seed. Phys Med Biol 54: 1661–1672.G. Massillon-JLR. MinnitiMG MitchMJ MaryanskiCG Soares2009The use of gel dosimetry to measure the 3D dose distribution of a 90Sr/90Y intravascular brachytherapy seed.Phys Med Biol5416611672
  18. 18. Kelly RG, Jordan KJ, Battista JJ (1998) Optical CT reconstruction of 3D dose distributions using the ferrous-benzoic-xylenol (FBX) gel dosimeter. Med Phys 25(9): 1741–1750.RG KellyKJ JordanJJ Battista1998Optical CT reconstruction of 3D dose distributions using the ferrous-benzoic-xylenol (FBX) gel dosimeter.Med Phys25917411750
  19. 19. Oldham M, Siewerdsen JH, Kumar S, Wong J, Jaffray DA (2003) Optical-CT gel-dosimetry I: Basic investigations. Med Phys 30: 623–624.M. OldhamJH SiewerdsenS. KumarJ. WongDA Jaffray2003Optical-CT gel-dosimetry I: Basic investigations.Med Phys30623624
  20. 20. Doran SJ, Koerkamp KK, Bero MA, Jenneson P, Morton EJ, et al. (2001) A CCD based optical CT scanner for high-resolution 3D imaging of radiation dose distributions: equipment specifications, optical simulations and preliminary results. Phys Med Biol 46(12): 3191–3213.SJ DoranKK KoerkampMA BeroP. JennesonEJ Morton2001A CCD based optical CT scanner for high-resolution 3D imaging of radiation dose distributions: equipment specifications, optical simulations and preliminary results.Phys Med Biol461231913213
  21. 21. Gambarini G, Gomarasca G, Marchesini R, Pecci LA, Pirola , et al. (1999) Three-dimensional determination of absorbed dose by spectrophotometric analysis of ferrous-sulphate agarose gel. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A 422: 643–648.G. GambariniG. GomarascaR. MarchesiniLA PecciPirola1999Three-dimensional determination of absorbed dose by spectrophotometric analysis of ferrous-sulphate agarose gel.Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A422643648http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00975-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00975-9.
  22. 22. Gambarini G, Carrara M, Gay S, Tomatis S (2006) Dose imaging with gel-dosimeters layers: optical analysis and dedicated software. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 120: 144–147.G. GambariniM. CarraraS. GayS. Tomatis2006Dose imaging with gel-dosimeters layers: optical analysis and dedicated software.Radiat Prot Dosimetry120144147
  23. 23. Chang KY, Shih TY, Hsieh BT, Chang SJ, Liu YL, et al. (2010) Investigation of the dose characteristics of an n-NIPAM gel dosimeter with computed tomography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A 652: 775–778.KY ChangTY ShihBT HsiehSJ ChangYL Liu2010Investigation of the dose characteristics of an n-NIPAM gel dosimeter with computed tomography.Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res., Sect A652775778http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.09.099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.09.099.
  24. 24. Sedaghat M, Bujold R, Lepage M (2010) Impact of oxygen on the accuracy and precision of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters. J Phys Conf Ser 250: 1–5.M. SedaghatR. BujoldM. Lepage2010Impact of oxygen on the accuracy and precision of normoxic polymer gel dosimeters.J Phys Conf Ser25015
  25. 25. De Deene Y (2004) Essential characteristics of polymer gel dosimeters. J Phys Conf Ser 3: 34–57.Y. De Deene2004Essential characteristics of polymer gel dosimeters.J Phys Conf Ser33457
  26. 26. De Deene Y, Reynaert N, De Wagter C (2001) On the accuracy of monomer/polymer gel dosimetry in the proximity of a high dose rate 192-Ir source. Phys Med Biol 46: 2801–2825.Y. De DeeneN. ReynaertC. De Wagter2001On the accuracy of monomer/polymer gel dosimetry in the proximity of a high dose rate 192-Ir source.Phys Med Biol4628012825