Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Translocated LPS Might Cause Endotoxin Tolerance in Circulating Monocytes of Cystic Fibrosis Patients

  • Rosa del Campo ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Rosa del Campo, Eriel Martínez

    Affiliation Servicio de Microbiología and CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

  • Eriel Martínez ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Rosa del Campo, Eriel Martínez

    Affiliations EMPIREO Research S.L., Madrid, Spain, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Carlos del Fresno,

    Affiliation Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Raquel Alenda,

    Affiliation Department of Inmunology, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal and IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain

  • Vanesa Gómez-Piña,

    Affiliations EMPIREO Research S.L., Madrid, Spain, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Irene Fernández-Ruíz,

    Affiliation Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • María Siliceo,

    Affiliation Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Teresa Jurado,

    Affiliation Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Victor Toledano,

    Affiliation Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Francisco Arnalich,

    Affiliation Service of Internal Medicine, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Francisco García-Río,

    Affiliation Service of Respiratory Diseases, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

  • Eduardo López-Collazo

    Affiliation Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, IdiPAZ, ‘La Paz’ Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Translocated LPS Might Cause Endotoxin Tolerance in Circulating Monocytes of Cystic Fibrosis Patients

  • Rosa del Campo, 
  • Eriel Martínez, 
  • Carlos del Fresno, 
  • Raquel Alenda, 
  • Vanesa Gómez-Piña, 
  • Irene Fernández-Ruíz, 
  • María Siliceo, 
  • Teresa Jurado, 
  • Victor Toledano, 
  • Francisco Arnalich


Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is an inherited pleiotropic disease that results from abnormalities in the gene codes of a chloride channel. The lungs of CF patients are chronically infected by several pathogens but bacteraemia have rarely been reported in this pathology. Besides that, circulating monocytes in CF patients exhibit a patent Endotoxin Tolerance (ET) state since they show a significant reduction of the inflammatory response to bacterial stimulus. Despite a previous description of this phenomenon, the direct cause of ET in CF patients remains unknown. In this study we have researched the possible role of microbial/endotoxin translocation from a localized infection to the bloodstream as a potential cause of ET induction in CF patients. Plasma analysis of fourteen CF patients revealed high levels of LPS compared to healthy volunteers and patients who suffer from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Experiments in vitro showed that endotoxin concentrations found in plasma of CF patients were enough to induce an ET phenotype in monocytes from healthy controls. In agreement with clinical data, we failed to detect bacterial DNA in CF plasma. Our results suggest that soluble endotoxin present in bloodstream of CF patients causes endotoxin tolerance in their circulating monocytes.


The incidence of Endotoxin Tolerance (ET), defined as a state of reduced responsiveness to an endotoxin challenge after a primary bacterial insult [1], has been reported in the settings of several diseases including sepsis, trauma, and coronary syndromes [2][5].

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a complex disease that affects essentially all exocrine epithelia [6]. CF results from abnormalities in the gene that codes for the chloride channel termed CF Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR), which belongs to the extended family of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter ATPases [6]. This transmembrane glycoprotein is expressed in some epithelia, and controls chloride flux across cell surfaces. In addition, it down-regulates transepithelial sodium transport, regulates calcium-activated chloride channels and potassium channels, and may also serve important functions in exocytosis. Some clinical features of CF include injuries of primary organs (pancreas, sinus, liver, intestine and exocrine pancreas) and secondary complications such as malnutrition and diabetes. However, morbidity and mortality of CF patients are usually the result of chronic lower airway bacterial infections and inflammation of the lungs. Repeated episodes of polymicrobial infection in these patients cause a progressive deterioration of lung tissue, a decline in pulmonary function and, ultimately, respiratory failure and death in 90% of CF patients. In this regard, the observed high frequency of pathogen colonization in these patients points to a significant deficiency of their innate immune system [6], [7].

A number of studies conducted so far have focused on local and resident cells (e.g. lung epithelial cells and neutrophils), and most of them described a defective secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [8]. Our previous findings revealed a patent ET status in circulating monocytes (Ms) isolated from CF patients [9], [10]. These cells are unable to mount a standard inflammatory response after ex vivo endotoxin challenge. Besides that, we also have noticed other main features of ET status in their M∅s (e.g. high phagocytosis ability and poor antigen presentation) [9], [10]. Additionally, a low expression of TREM-1 at cell surface has been detected in circulating CF-Ms [9]. This orphan receptor magnifies the inflammation after TLR activation in myeloid cells and is implicated in a number of inflammatory pathologies [11]. The low levels of TREM-1 expression in circulating CF Ms partially justify the non-responsiveness state in CF patients.Nevertheless, the answer to the question “Why are circulating cells from CF patients tolerant?” is largely unknown.

The translocations of microorganisms and/or microbial products have been previously described in other pathologies, such as HIV, Inflammatory Bowel Disease and pancreatitis [12][14]. Microbial translocation also occurs after damage to the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. after cholecystectomy) resulting in systemic immune deregulation [15], [16]. The quantity of LPS, the major component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, is frequently associated with the degree of bacterial translocation in several diseases [13], [17], [18]. In the particular case of CF pathology, bacteremia has been rarely described and the levels of circulating soluble LPS have yet to be determined [19].

The goal of the present study was to analyze a possible role of circulating soluble LPS on the ET status in CF patients. To accomplish this we first corroborated the ET status in a cohort of fourteen CF patients. Second, we quantified the plasma levels of LPS in these patients and the data were compared to healthy controls and patients who suffer from Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). We also evaluated the presence of bacterial DNA or viable cells. Finally, we determined if LPS concentrations found in CF plasma were enough to induce ET in human monocytes in vitro.


Circulating monocytes from CF patients exhibit an Endotoxin Tolerant phenotype

According to our previous reports [9], [10] circulating Ms isolated from CF patients fail to mount an appropriate inflammatory response in the presence of Gram-negative endotoxin. The reported “ET-signature” (IL10high/IL12low/IL23low) was corroborated in this new cohort of CF patients (n = 14) (Fig. 1A–1C) as well as a low TNFα production after ex vivo LPS challenge (Fig. 1D). However, endotoxin tolerance was detected neither in healthy controls (n = 11) nor in patients suffering from the respiratory disease COPD (n = 8). A group of septic patients used as positive control was included in our study (n = 8). Additionally, cells from CF as well as sepsis patients showed high phagocytosis ability and impaired antigen presentation (Fig. 1E and 1F), both are main features of an endotoxin tolerant phenotype [1], [10]. Note that a set of other cytokines and chemokines (IL6, CCL3, CCL4, CCL20 and CCL22) were checked to verify the ET status of CF patients (data not shown).

Figure 1. Circulating monocytes from CF patients exhibit an Endotoxin Tolerant phenotype.

Monocytes from healthy controls (HC, n = 11), CF patients (CF, n = 14), COPD patients (n = 8) and sepsis patients (n = 8) were isolated from circulation and cultured in the presence or not of 10 ng/ml LPS for 3 h. Then, cells were harvested and mRNA levels of IL10 (A), IL12p40 (B) and IL23p19 (C) were determined by real-time Q-PCR. The ratios [gene]/[β-actin] are depicted. *, p<0.01, LPS vs. none. (D) Concentrations of TNFα were determined by ELISA in supernatants of cultures after 24 h of stimulation with 10 ng/ml LPS. *, p<0.05 LPS vs. none. (E) Cultures of circulating Ms from healthy controls (HC, n = 11), CF (n = 14) and sepsis (n = 8) patients were exposed to GFP-labelled E. coli DH5α bacteria for 1 h according to the protocol described in Materials and Methods. Next, adherent cells were harvested and cell internalization was analyzed by flow cytometry. Percentage of green-positive cells is given, *, p<0,05 vs. HC. (F) Heterologous human lymphocytes isolated from healthy volunteers were labelled with the membrane stain PKH2 green fluorescent cell linker kit. Following ex vivo LPS stimulation of monocytes/macrophages isolated from healthy controls (HC, n = 11), CF (n = 14) and sepsis (n = 8) patients for 24 h, stained lymphocytes were added to the plates as responder cells in a relation of 1∶5. After three days, non adherent cells were harvested, and lymphocyte proliferation was assessed by flow cytometry as loss of green fluorescence intensity in the CD3+ gate. The fold induction is shown (*, p<0.05 vs HC).

Significant levels of bacterial endotoxin are detected in the plasma of CF patients

Having established that CF patients suffer from an ET status, no strong evidence has reported the cause of this phenomenon. In the case of sepsis the presence of circulating traces of endotoxin or viable pathogen itself provides an explanation for their endotoxin tolerance. However, in general terms CF patients suffer a local rather than a systemic infection [20]. Others authors have reported noteworthy levels of microbial products in the circulation of HIV patients, a fact that correlates to systemic immune deregulation in chronic HIV infection [17], [21][23]. In those patients detected endotoxins probably derived from the gastrointestinal tract and have an impact on the innate immune control. These reports prompted us to study the presence of LPS in the plasma of CF patients. As shown in figure 2A, significant levels of endotoxin were detected in CF plasma (∼0.3 ng/ml). In contrast, low quantities of endotoxin were reported in both healthy controls and COPD patients (∼0.05 ng/ml). These data suggested a role for endotoxin in the generation of an ET status in these patients. In fact, in a global analysis including all groups, we found that endotoxin concentrations inversely correlated to the inflammatory response after an ex vivo LPS challenge (Fig. 2B–2C). Those Ms from patients with high levels of LPS (CF and sepsis) were unable to produce significant TNFα quantities after ex vivo LPS challenge (Fig. 2B). Similar results were obtained when the expression of IL23p19 mRNA was analysed (Fig. 2C). In contrast, LPS concentration correlates with high IL10 mRNA expression after ex vivo endotoxin stimulation (Fig. 2D). In addition, a significant correlation (R2∼0.7) was obtained when CF patients were analyzed (Fig. 2B–2D, insets). Note that two CF-patients were not included in the analysis (insets) because their LPS concentration was very low (<0.1 ng/mL) in comparison to the rest of the patients enrolled. However, their innate response after ex vivo LPS-challenge were consistent the observed tendency.

Figure 2. Circulating endotoxin levels correlates with the refractory state in CF patients.

(A) Levels of LPS were tested by LAL kit endpoint-QCL1000 (see Materials and Methods) in plasma from controls (HC, n = 11), CF (n = 14), COPD (n = 8) and sepsis (n = 8) patients (*, p<0.01). Circulating monocytes from healthy controls (HC, n = 11), CF patients (CF, n = 14), COPD patients (n = 8) and sepsis patients (n = 8) were isolated and cultured in presence of 10 ng/mL of LPS for 24 h (B), and 3 h (C and D). Next, levels of TNFα production were analysed by ELISA in the supernatant of cultures (B) or cells were harvested and mRNA of IL23p19 and IL10 were quantified by real time Q-PCR (C and D), (B–D, insets). Linear regression analysis was applied in each case to obtain best linear equation with CF only (R2 is given).

A metagenonic analysis of CF plasma suggests the absence of microbes in the circulation of these patients

The detected levels of LPS in plasma of CF patients suggested the presence of microbes in this fluid. Similarly to the case of HIV patients, the source of plasma endotoxin could be bacteria translocation from the gastrointestinal tract [22], [23]. In addition, due to chronic airways colonization that these patients suffer, their lungs could be an alternative source of microbial translocation. To test this hypothesis we studied the putative presence of bacteria in CF plasma using a universal 16S rRNA PCR (seeMaterial and Methods). Consistent negative PCR results were obtained for the CF plasma since no bands were visualized in an Acrylamide Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (Fig. 3). In addition, negative standard blood cultures were observed in duplicate fresh plasmas from these patients (data not shown).

Figure 3. Serum from CF patients does not exhibit bacterial DNA.

A metagenomic assay was performed using the plasma from seven CF patients randomly selected. DNA was extracted from 200 µl of plasma and analyzed following the protocol described in Material and Methods. Positive amplicons were visualized on Acrylamide DGGE gels stained with ethidium bromide. Line 1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO-1 strain, lines 2-8 CF serum samples and line 9 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 33591 strain.

Sera from Cystic Fibrosis patients induce a patent down regulation of the inflammatory response in healthy control Ms

In order to demonstrate that levels of endotoxin detected in plasma from CF patients could be a cause of the observed ET, we cultured human Ms isolated from healthy controls in presence of supplemental sera from CF patients (50% of total volume). After 48 hours, dishes were washed twice and fresh medium was added. Then, cells were challenged with LPS for 24 hours and the production of TNFα and IL6 was evaluated at the supernatant of each culture (see the experimental design in figure 4A). In those cultures “pre-treated” with sera from CF patients but no with controls both, TNFα and IL6 exhibited a marked down regulation of its expression, after LPS challenge (Fig. 4B and 4C). Moreover, we have also proven that LPS doses found in CF sera induce ET in healthy monocytes. To test that Ms were pre-stimulated with different doses of LPS, including those detected in CF patients, for six hours. Then, cells were washed and kept in completed medium for 16 hours. Next, a standard LPS dose (10 ng/ml) was added and production of TNFα and IL6 were evaluated 24 hours after in the supernants of these cultures (see the scheme in figure 4 D). Note that this experimental design was previously established by us as a solid human model for endotoxin tolerance [1], [10]. Data shown in figure 4E and 4F demonstrate that the endotoxin concentrations detected in the plasma of CF patients are sufficient to induce an ET state in human circulating monocytes (∼0.3 ng/ml, figure 2A). In this way, we noticed a down regulation of both TNFα and IL6 generation when cells were re-challenged with a standard dose of LPS. Additionally, IL23p19 mRNA expression is also down regulated and IL10mRNA shows a patent increase. Others markers of ET phenotype were also checked and showed a tolerant behavior (data not shown).

Figure 4. Concentrations of LPS detected in CF patients induce ET in healthy control Ms.

(A) Schematic representation of the employed experimental design. Monocytes, isolated from healthy controls, were cultured in presence of sera from CF patients (n = 14) and controls (n = 5) for 48 hours. Then, cultures were washed and fresh complete medium and LPS (10 ng/ml) added for 24 h. Next, TNFα (B) and IL6 (C) production were analyzed by ELISA in the supernatants. (D) Schematic representation of the employed endotoxin tolerance model (see Materials and Methods and ref. [10]). Cultures of monocytes, isolated from healthy controls, were pretreated with indicated LPS doses for 6 h. Then, cultures were washed and kept in complete medium for 16 h. After this period of recovery, the cultures were re-challenged with 10 ng/mL of LPS for 24 h (E) or 3 h (F). Next, TNFα and IL6 (E) production were analyzed by ELISA in the supernatants of the cultures and cells were harvested and mRNA of IL10 and IL23p19 were quantified by real time Q-PCR (F).


Endotoxins are the most potent microbial mediator implicated in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock [24]. In particular LPS, a lipopolysaccharide located on outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, has been postulated as the major immunogenic factor of this kind of bacteria. It is well known that small amounts of endotoxin may be released in a soluble form during multiplication or bacterial lyses mediated by complement, lysozyme, phagocytic digestion or antibiotic treatment [25]. A sudden release of large quantities of LPS into the bloodstream starts the generation of a potentially lethal array of inflammatory mediators in circulation. Conversely, a systematic o repetitive release of low levels of LPS into the bloodstream could generate an effect in mononuclear cells known as endotoxin tolerance [1]. Previous research revealed a patent endotoxin tolerance state in circulating monocytes from CF patients. Two studies on two different cohorts of CF patients demonstrated that their peripheral Ms share all the determinant features of ET, including the IL pattern of expression (IL10high/IL12low/IL23low), high phagocytosis ability and impaired antigen presentation [9], [10].

Herein we have analysed a possible role of circulating cell-free LPS in ET induction in fourteen CF patients. We report significant higher concentrations of LPS in CF plasma than in healthy controls and COPD patients. The ET status in our cohort of CF patients was corroborated by monocyte unresponsiveness to LPS exposure. As we and others previously demonstrated, the observed refractory state in CF is not secondary to impaired LPS recognition by circulating CF-Ms. The cell surface molecules TLR4 and CD14, together with the MD2 expression, are not affected in these cells [9], [26]. Therefore, we postulate that the ET status in CF patients is due to the presence of circulating endotoxin. In order to prove this hypothesis, we pretreated control human monocytes with a range of LPS doses including the concentrations found in CF plasma (∼0.3 ng/mL). Next, these cultures were challenged with a standard concentration of LPS, following an ET-model reported before (see ref. [10]). Our data indicated that a concentration of LPS higher than 0.25 ng/mL was enough to induce a refractory state in healthy control cells. In contrast, those doses found in healthy controls and COPD patients (<0.25 ng/mL) did not provoke an ET. In addition, the “pre-treatment” with sera from CF patients but not controls provokes a significant down-regulation of the inflammatory responses after LPS-challenge (Fig. 4A–4C). Collectively, these results suggest that the circulating LPS may cause the unresponsiveness state of Ms in CF patients.

As we referred above, endotoxemia has been described in other pathologies, and has been frequently associated to bacteremia [27]. However, circulating infection rarely has been reported in CF pathology. In line with these data, we were unable to detect bacterial DNA in the plasma of our cohort of CF patients. This apparent discordance, on one hand the presence of LPS and, on the other hand, the absence of circulating bacteria in CF patients, could be explained by the high antibodies titres found in CF serum, especially against to the main colonizing bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa [28]. In addition, other authors have reported significant amounts of soluble LPS released during bacteria elimination [29], [30]. This endotoxin, like other bacterial detritus, can be absorbed in part from the intestinal lumen by human enterocytes. After bacterial death, their cellular components might be separate into their elements and LPS could cross the gastrointestinal barrier directly into blood like other food nutrients do.

Despite our assays not having clarified the actual source of the LPS detected in CF patients, we have speculated with two not mutually exclusive hypotheses. First, due to the chronic bacterial colonization CF patients' lungs suffer; endotoxin translocation from that organ could be a potential source of circulating LPS. Note that these patients exhibited an inefficiency of the mucociliary system during the clearance of microorganisms progressing in the lower respiratory track [6], [7]. Second, because intestinal inflammation is also a constant feature in CF-patients [31], and this can induce an increased epithelial permeability [32], the gastrointestinal tract is another putative starting place for LPS in the circulation of CF patients. In this line, studies of CF patients' small intestines have reported an increase in mononuclear cells in the duodenum [33] and the enhancement of luminal albumin, immunoglobulins, eosinophil cationic protein, neutrophil elastase, interleukin-1ß, and interleukin-8 [32] detection. The cause of intestinal inflammation in humans with CF is unknown, but around 40% of CF patients have been reported to have microbial overgrowth in the small intestine [34], [35].

Data presented here seems to convey that circulating LPS could be a marker for endotoxin tolerance grade exhibited by CF patients, and may open new avenues of research in the clinical strategies followed during systemic infection in CF patients. In summary, our findings suggest that circulating endotoxin contributes decisively to the ET status in CF patients. The determination of the precise source of circulating LPS awaits further studies.

Materials and Methods

Patients and healthy controls

CF patients.

We studied 14 non-smoker adults diagnosed with CF on the basis of established criteria (clinical phenotype, sweat testing and CFTR genotyping), who had not used corticosteroids within the three months previous to the study. Exclusion criteria included a history of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), asthma or other active lung disease, mental or physical handicap, or other significant diseases such as diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, ischemic or valvular cardiopathy or neuromuscular disease.

None of the subjects had an experienced an exacerbation of respiratory tract infection within the previous four weeks. The following clinical variables were collected on each subject: CFTR-genotype, exacerbations in the last year, microorganisms in sputum, and usual therapy. Standard, calibrated scales and stadiometers were used to determine height, weight and body mass index (BMI). Spirometry (FEV1 and FVC) was performed with a MasterScope System (Viasys Healthcare, Würtzburg, Germany) according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria [36]. Results were expressed as percentage of normal values, using best postbronchodilator measurements. Predicted values were calculated from the equations for adults of the European Community for Steel and Coal [37]. See table 1.

COPD patients.

Eight clinically stable patients with moderate-severe COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1 <80% of predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC)≤70%) [38] were selected. Exclusion criteria included a history of asthma, other active lung disease, mental or physical handicap, or other significant diseases, such as congestive heart failure, ischemic or valvular cardiopathy or neuromuscular disease. None of the subjects had experienced an exacerbation or respiratory tract infection within the previous four weeks, and none of them showed significant bronchodilator reversibility (either >12% of baseline FEV1 or >200 ml). No subject has had oral corticosteroid therapy for at least three months.

Septic patients.

Eight septic patients were consecutively admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine at the Hospital “La Paz” with microbiologically confirmed bacteremia (positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli) secondary to urinary tract infection, who met the diagnostic criteria for sepsis by consensus conference definition [39]. Blood samples were taken within 4–8 h after blood culture collection, when they met the sepsis criteria for the first time. The following exclusion criteria were imposed: malignancy and chronic inflammatory diseases, treatments with steroids or immunosuppressive drugs during the last month, hepatic failure (serum aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase level>100 IU/L; prothrombin time<60%, total bilirubin level>60 lmol/L), renal insufficiency (plasma creatinine level>200 lmol/L), AIDS, virus B or C hepatitis, gestation, and over 70 years of age.

Additionally, eleven age-matched healthy volunteers without personal history of CF or other significant illness were included as controls. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects enrolled. This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (‘La Paz’ Hospital Ethics Committee).

Abs and reagents

The following antibodies were used: anti-CD3-PE (Becton Dickinson; CA, USA); anti-CD14-APC (Miltenyi Biotec; CA, USA). The medium used for cell culture was Dulbecco's MEM from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK). LPS from Salmonella abortus was a kind gift from Dr. Galanos (Max-Planck-Insitut für Immunobiologie, Freiburg, Germany). All other reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MI, USA), unless otherwise stated.

PBMC isolation and cell culture

Starting from peripheral blood from CF, COPD, septic patients or healthy volunteers, adherent cells were purified following the same protocol employed for buffy coats in previous reports from our laboratory [5], [9], [10], [40][42]. Note that plasmas from these patients were collected for other analysis. The composition of the adherent population was analyzed by FACS (∼92% of CD14). Once plated, cells were exposed or not to LPS for various times according to particular experiments. All reagents used for cell culture were endotoxin-free, as assayed with the Limulus Amebocyte test (Cambrex; North Brunswick, NJ, USA).

Endotoxin Tolerance model with human monocytes

Once seeded, adherent cells were treated or not with indicated concentrations of LPS during the “time of tolerization” (ttol = 8 h). After that, cells were washed three times with PBS and kept in complete medium for different times through the phase called “time of recovery” (trec = 16 h). Then cells were re-stimulated or not with 10 ng/ml of LPS for 24 hours. Note that this model was established by our group in a previous study [10].

RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Cells were washed once with PBS and their RNA was isolated using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription of 1 µg of RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA).

mRNA quantification

Gene expression levels were analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) using the LightCycler system from Roche Diagnostics and cDNA obtained as described above. Q-PCR was performed using a QuantiMix Easy SYG kit from Biotools (Madrid, Spain) and specific primers. Results were normalized to the expression of the β-actin, and the cDNA copy number of each gene of interest was determined using a seven-point standard curve as we described before [5], [9], [10], [40][42].


The sequences of oligonucleotides used and their annealing temperatures are:

IL-10: sense 5′-ATG CCC CAA GCT GAG AAC CA-3′, antisense 5′-TCT CAA GGG GCT GGG TCA GC-3′ (58°C);

IL12p40: sense 5′-GAC ATT CAG TGT CAA AGC AGC A-3′, antisense 5′-CCT TGT TGT CCC CTC TGA CTC T-3′ (64°C);

IL23p19: sense 5′-GTT CCC CAT ATC CAG TGT GG-3′, antisense 5′-GAG GCT TGG AAT CTG CTG AG-3′ (60°C);

β-actin; sense 5′-GTG GGG CGC CCC AGG CAC CA-3′, antisense 5′-CTC CTT AAT GTC ACG CAC GAT TTC-3′ (60°C).

All primers were synthesized, desalted, and purified by Bonsai Biotech (Madrid, Spain).

ELISA for TNFα and IL6

Concentrations of TNF-α in supernatants were determined using the ELISA development kit supplied by PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). IL-6 levels in supernatants were determined with a commercial ELISAs purchased from Bender MedSystem (Burlingame, CA, USA).

Phagocytosis of bacteria assay

We followed protocols previously described by de las Heras and co-workers [43] or da Silva and co-workers [44].

Proliferation assay

We followed a protocol previously described by Hernández-Fuentes and co-workers and Adam and co-workers [45], [46].

Endotoxin quantification

The LPS concentrations were determined in 200 µl of plasma using a kit based on a Limulus amaebocyte extract (LAL kit endpoint-QCL1000, Cambrex BioScience, Walkersville, MD). Determinations were done five times per sample.

Metagenomic assay

DNA was extracted from 200 µl of plasma using a QIAamp tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and a universal bacteria set of primers for 16S rRNA (sense 5′-ATT AGA TAC CCT GGT AGT CCA-3′ and antisense 5′-AGG CCC GGG AAC GTA TTC AC-3′) were used yielding an amplicon size of ca. 550 bp. All PCRs were carried out in a final volume of 50 µl containing 100 ng of DNA, 0.5 µM of each primer, 0.2 mM of dNTPs, 100 ng/ml of BSA, 3 mM of MgCl2, and 2 U of FastStart Taq polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The thermal cycling conditions used were as follows: an initial DNA denaturation step at 95°C for 7 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 52°C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 45 s. Positive amplicons were visualized in both 0.8% agarose gels and separated in vertical electrophoresis polyacrylamide gels (8%) at 60°C; the urea-formamide denaturating gel gradient (33–43%) was submitted to 130 V during 330 min. Gels were visualized with ethidium bromide.

Data analysis

The number of patients or experiments analyzed is indicated in each figure. In the case of in vitro assays, data were collected from a minimum of three experiments to calculate the mean ± SD and the statistical significance was calculated using the unpaired Student's test and differences were considered significant at p values<0.05 using Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Also ANOVA analysis following of a Turkey test was performed.


We thank Dr. Sylvia Hottinger-Craig for proofreading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EL-C RdC EM. Performed the experiments: RdC EM CdF RA VG-P IF-R TJ VT MS. Analyzed the data: EL-C RdC EM FA FG-R. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: FA FG-R. Wrote the paper: EL-C.


  1. 1. Biswas SK, Lopez-Collazo E (2009) Endotoxin tolerance: new mechanisms, molecules and clinical significance. Trends in Immunology 30: 475–487.
  2. 2. Ertel W, Kremer JP, Kenney J, Steckholzer U, Jarrar D, et al. (1995) Downregulation of proinflammatory cytokine release in whole blood from septic patients. Blood 85: 1341–1347.
  3. 3. Cavaillon J-M, Adrie C, Fitting C, Adib-Conquy M (2003) Endotoxin tolerance: is there a clinical relevance? Journal of Endotoxin Research 9: 101–107.
  4. 4. Monneret G, Venet F, Pachot A, Lepape A (2008) Monitoring Immune Dysfunctions in the Septic Patient: A New Skin for the Old Ceremony. Mol Med 14: 64–78.
  5. 5. del Fresno C, Soler-Rangel L, Soares-Schanoski A, Gómez-Piña V, González-León MC, et al. (2007) Inflammatory responses associated with acute coronary syndrome up-regulate IRAK-M and induce endotoxin tolerance in circulating monocytes. Journal of Endotoxin Research 13: 39–52.
  6. 6. Ratjen F, Döring G (2003) Cystic fibrosis. The Lancet 361: 681–689.
  7. 7. Matsui H, Grubb BR, Tarran R, Randell SH, Gatzy JT, et al. (1998) Evidence for periciliary liquid layer depletion, not abnormal ion composition, in the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis airways disease. Cell 95: 1005–1015.
  8. 8. Hartl D, Latzin P, Hordijk P, Marcos V, Rudolph C, et al. (2007) Cleavage of CXCR1 on neutrophils disables bacterial killing in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Nat Med 13: 1423–1430.
  9. 9. del Fresno C, Gómez-Piña V, Lores V, Soares-Schanoski A, Fernández-Ruiz I, et al. (n.d.) Monocytes from Cystic Fibrosis Patients Are Locked in an LPS Tolerance State: Down-Regulation of TREM-1 as Putative Underlying Mechanism. PLoS ONE 3:
  10. 10. del Fresno C, García-Rio F, Gómez-Piña V, Soares-Schanoski A, Fernández-Ruíz I, et al. (2009) Potent Phagocytic Activity with Impaired Antigen Presentation Identifying Lipopolysaccharide-Tolerant Human Monocytes: Demonstration in Isolated Monocytes from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. The Journal of Immunology 182: 6494–6507.
  11. 11. Molloy EJ (2009) Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells (TREM) family and the application of its antagonists. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov 4: 51–56.
  12. 12. Estes JD, Harris LD, Klatt NR, Tabb B, Pittaluga S, et al. (2010) Damaged Intestinal Epithelial Integrity Linked to Microbial Translocation in Pathogenic Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Infections. PLoS Pathog 6:
  13. 13. Caradonna L, Amati L, Magrone T, Pellegrino NM, Jirillo E, et al. (2000) Enteric bacteria, lipopolysaccharides and related cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease: biological and clinical significance. J Endotoxin Res 6: 205–214.
  14. 14. Ammori BJ, Fitzgerald P, Hawkey P, McMahon MJ (2003) The early increase in intestinal permeability and systemic endotoxin exposure in patients with severe acute pancreatitis is not associated with systemic bacterial translocation: molecular investigation of microbial DNA in the blood. Pancreas 26: 18–22.
  15. 15. Schietroma M, Carlei F, Cappelli S, Amicucci G (2006) Intestinal permeability and systemic endotoxemia after laparotomic or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 243: 359–363.
  16. 16. Schietroma M, Carlei F, Cappelli S, Pescosolido A, Lygidakis NJ, et al. (2007) Effects of cholecystectomy (laparoscopic versus open) on PMN-elastase. Hepatogastroenterology 54: 342–345.
  17. 17. Brenchley JM, Price DA, Schacker TW, Asher TE, Silvestri G, et al. (2006) Microbial translocation is a cause of systemic immune activation in chronic HIV infection. Nat Med 12: 1365–1371.
  18. 18. Cooke KR, Olkiewicz K, Erickson N, Ferrara JLM (2002) The role of endotoxin and the innate immune response in the pathophysiology of acute graft versus host disease. J Endotoxin Res 8: 441–448.
  19. 19. Fahy JV, Keoghan MT, Crummy EJ, Fitzgerald MX (1991) Bacteraemia and fungaemia in adults with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Infection 22: 241–245.
  20. 20. Cantón R, del Campo R (2010) Cystic fibrosis: deciphering the complexity. Clin Microbiol Infect 16: 793–797.
  21. 21. Brenchley JM, Price DA, Douek DC (2006) HIV disease: fallout from a mucosal catastrophe? Nat Immunol 7: 235–239.
  22. 22. Haynes BF (2006) Gut microbes out of control in HIV infection. Nat Med 12: 1351–1352.
  23. 23. Paiardini M, Frank I, Pandrea I, Apetrei C, Silvestri G (2008) Mucosal immune dysfunction in AIDS pathogenesis. AIDS Rev 10: 36–46.
  24. 24. van der Poll T, Opal SM (2008) Host-pathogen interactions in sepsis. Lancet Infect Dis 8: 32–43.
  25. 25. Hurley JC (1992) Antibiotic-Induced Release of Endotoxin: A Reappraisal. Clinical Infectious Diseases 15: 840–854.
  26. 26. Muir A, Soong G, Sokol S, Reddy B, Gomez MI, et al. (2004) Toll-like receptors in normal and cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 30: 777–783.
  27. 27. Stumacher RJ, Kovnat MJ, McCabe WR (1973) Limitations of the usefulness of the Limulus assay for endotoxin. N Engl J Med 288: 1261–1264.
  28. 28. Brett MM, Ghoneim AT, Littlewood JM (1990) Serum IgA antibodies against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 65: 259–263.
  29. 29. Rietschel ET, Kirikae T, Schade FU, Mamat U, Schmidt G, et al. (1994) Bacterial endotoxin: molecular relationships of structure to activity and function. FASEB J 8: 217–225.
  30. 30. Holzheimer RG (1998) The significance of endotoxin release in experimental and clinical sepsis in surgical patients — Evidence for antibiotic-induced endotoxin release? Infection 26: 77–84.
  31. 31. Bruzzese E, Raia V, Gaudiello G, Polito G, Buccigrossi V, et al. (2004) Intestinal inflammation is a frequent feature of cystic fibrosis and is reduced by probiotic administration. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20: 813–819.
  32. 32. Smyth RL, Croft NM, O'Hea U, Marshall TG, Ferguson A (2000) Intestinal inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 82: 394–399.
  33. 33. Raia V, Maiuri L, de Ritis G, de Vizia B, Vacca L, et al. (2000) Evidence of chronic inflammation in morphologically normal small intestine of cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Res 47: 344–350.
  34. 34. Lewindon PJ, Robb TA, Moore DJ, Davidson GP, Martin AJ (1998) Bowel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis: importance of breath testing. J Paediatr Child Health 34: 79–82.
  35. 35. O'Brien S, Mulcahy H, Fenlon H, O'Broin A, Casey M, et al. (1993) Intestinal bile acid malabsorption in cystic fibrosis. Gut 34: 1137–1141.
  36. 36. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, et al. (2005) Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 26: 319–338.
  37. 37. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, et al. (1993) Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl 165–40.
  38. 38. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Ma P, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS (2001) Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and World Health Organization Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD): executive summary. Respir Care 46: 798–825.
  39. 39. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, et al. (2009) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. 1992. Chest 136: e28.
  40. 40. Escoll P, del Fresno C, GarcI[combining acute accent]a L, Vallés G, LendI[combining acute accent]nez MJ, et al. (2003) Rapid up-regulation of IRAK-M expression following a second endotoxin challenge in human monocytes and in monocytes isolated from septic patients. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 311: 465–472.
  41. 41. del Fresno C, Otero K, Gómez-García L, González-León MC, Soler-Ranger L, et al. (2005) Tumor Cells Deactivate Human Monocytes by Up-Regulating IL-1 Receptor Associated Kinase-M Expression via CD44 and TLR4. The Journal of Immunology 174: 3032–3040.
  42. 42. Gómez-Piña V, Soares-Schanoski A, Rodríguez-Rojas A, del Fresno C, García F, et al. (2007) Metalloproteinases Shed TREM-1 Ectodomain from Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Human Monocytes. The Journal of Immunology 179: 4065–4073.
  43. 43. de las Heras B, Hortelano S, Girón N, Bermejo P, Rodríguez B, et al. (2007) Kaurane diterpenes protect against apoptosis and inhibition of phagocytosis in activated macrophages. Br J Pharmacol 152: 249–255.
  44. 44. Pinheiro da Silva F, Aloulou M, Skurnik D, Benhamou M, Andremont A, et al. (2007) CD16 promotes Escherichia coli sepsis through an FcR[gamma] inhibitory pathway that prevents phagocytosis and facilitates inflammation. Nat Med 13: 1368–1374.
  45. 45. Adams AB, Pearson TC, Larsen CP (2003) Heterologous immunity: an overlooked barrier to tolerance. Immunol Rev 196: 147–160.
  46. 46. Hernandez-Fuentes MP, Warrens AN, Lechler RI (2003) Immunologic monitoring. Immunol Rev 196: 247–264.