APC/CCdh1-Mediated Degradation of the F-Box Protein NIPA Is Regulated by Its Association with Skp1
NIPA (Nuclear Interaction Partner of Alk kinase) is an F-box like protein that targets nuclear Cyclin B1 for degradation. Integrity and therefore activity of the SCFNIPA E3 ligase is regulated by cell-cycle-dependent phosphorylation of NIPA, restricting substrate ubiquitination to interphase. Here we show that phosphorylated NIPA is degraded in late mitosis in an APC/CCdh1-dependent manner. Binding of the unphosphorylated form of NIPA to Skp1 interferes with binding to the APC/C-adaptor protein Cdh1 and therefore protects unphosphorylated NIPA from degradation in interphase. Our data thus define a novel mode of regulating APC/C-mediated ubiquitination.
Citation: von Klitzing C, Huss R, Illert AL, Fröschl A, Wötzel S, Peschel C, et al. (2011) APC/CCdh1-Mediated Degradation of the F-Box Protein NIPA Is Regulated by Its Association with Skp1. PLoS ONE 6(12): e28998. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028998
Editor: Pierre-Antoine Defossez, Université Paris-Diderot, France
Received: December 22, 2010; Accepted: November 19, 2011; Published: December 20, 2011
Copyright: © 2011 von Klitzing et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by a DFG (Deutsch Forschungsgemeinschaft, www.dfg.de) grant to J.D. (SFB456). FB is supported by a DFG grant (Emmy Noether Program) and the German cancer aid. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Cell cycle transitions are regulated by the temporally controlled activity of kinase cascades and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of key regulatory proteins. Two types of E3 ligase complexes, the Cullin-RING E3 ligases, including SCF (Skp1/Cullin/F-box protein) complexes and anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C), are essential for regulating cell cycle progression , .
Activation of the APC/C is dependent on mitosis-specific phosphorylation of several subunits – and on the sequential binding of the WD-repeat-containing proteins, Cdc20 and Cdh1 , , which are thought to recruit substrates to the core enzyme.
Targeting of substrates by the APC/C depends on short destruction motifs in their primary sequence. The most commonly found sequences are the destruction-box (D-box, RxxL) ,  and the KEN-box (KENxxxN) . However, recent reports have revealed several other motifs apart from these canonical sites –.
NIPA (nuclear interaction partner of ALK) was originally identified by our group as a human nuclear protein in a screen for interaction partners of the activated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) receptor tyrosine kinase . We subsequently characterized NIPA as an F-box like protein that defines a ubiquitin E3 ligase (SCFNIPA) which targets nuclear cyclin B1 for degradation and thereby contributes to the timing of mitotic entry. Intriguingly, phosphorylation of NIPA in late G2 phase leads to dissociation of NIPA from the SCF core complex, thus restricting activity of the SCFNIPA complex to interphase , . Here, we report that phosphorylated NIPA is degraded at mitotic exit in an APC/CCdh1-dependent manner. This degradation is regulated by the cell-cycle-dependent binding of NIPA to the SCF core-protein Skp1 and represents a novel mode of regulating APC/C-mediated ubiquitination.
The phosphorylated form of NIPA is degraded in late mitosis
Previous studies revealed phosphorylation of NIPA starting in late G2 phase of the cell cycle and peaking at the G2/M boundary (Fig. S1 and ref. ). After the G2/M transition, NIPA phosphorylation and expression levels decline precipitously upon entry into G1 and an unphosphorylated form of NIPA reappears later in G1 (Fig. 1A, lanes 1–5). Treatment of the cells with the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) after release from prometaphase prevented accumulation of the non-phosphorylated form of NIPA in G1 (Fig. 1A, lanes 6–10). This result indicates that the appearance of the lower form of NIPA is due to new protein synthesis rather than dephosphorylation of the upper form of NIPA and thus suggests that the phosphorylated form of NIPA is degraded in late mitosis. Remarkably, phosphorylated NIPA was degraded simultaneously with Cdc20, Cyclin B1 and Cyclin A, three known mitotic substrates of the APC/C (Fig. 1B).
To investigate whether NIPA degradation may be regulated by ubiquitination, we tested whether NIPA is polyubiquitinated in vivo. Therefore, cells were transfected with Flag-NIPA, HA-ubiquitin or with both. The transfected cells were treated with MG132 prior to harvesting. Immunoblotting detected high molecular weight ubiquitin conjugates in the Flag-NIPA immuno-complex in the presence of MG132 (Fig. 1C). To determine whether proteasomal function is required for NIPA degradation, NIPA-overexpressing cells were treated with cyclohexamide and the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Proteasome inhibition resulted in significant stabilization of NIPA (Fig. 1D). These results provide evidence that the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway controls the destruction of NIPA.
NIPA is a substrate of APC/CCdh1
Since NIPA degradation occurs simultaneously with other APC/C-targets, we examined whether APC/C is required for NIPA degradation. To this end, we prepared extracts with high APC/C-activity and depleted APC/C from the extracts with antibody against Cdc27, a core subunit of APC/C, prior to in vitro degradation assays. We observed that exogenous, not Skp1-bound 35S-labeled NIPA was destroyed in the extract with APC/C activity, but was stabilized in the extract depleted by the Cdc27 antibody (Fig. 2A, upper panel). Western blot analysis confirmed that Cdc27 was successfully removed from the extract (Fig. 2A, lower panel).
The APC activator proteins Cdc20 and Cdh1 directly bind to their substrates to recruit them to the APC core complex –. To examine whether NIPA binds to one of these WD40 proteins in vivo, we performed co-immunoprecipitation studies. We found that NIPA binds to Cdh1 but not to Cdc20 (Fig. 2B, 2C and Fig. S2), suggesting that Cdh1 may mediate APC/C-dependent degradation of NIPA. Importantly, we were not able to show binding of NIPA and Cdh1 when only low expression of NIPA was observed (data not shown; see discussion).
To test whether NIPA was a substrate of APC/C, we examined whether immuno-purified APC/C directly catalyzed the ubiquitination of NIPA in vitro. NIPA was ubiquitinated by the APC/C in vitro and this ubiquitination was promoted by the addition of Cdh1 (Fig. 2D and 2E). The absence of the high-molecular weight forms of NIPA in samples in which E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme was omitted from the reaction confirms that they present ubiquitin conjugates of NIPA (Fig. 2F).
To examine whether APC/CCdh1 regulates NIPA stability in vivo, we studied the kinetics of NIPA degradation after a decrease of APC/C activity through knockdown of Cdh1. Hela cells were transfected with small interfering RNA targeted to Cdh1 or a control siRNA and arrested at prometaphase. Mitotic cells were then released into fresh media and examined at various timepoints thereafter. We observed that knockdown of Cdh1 resulted in a significant stabilization of the phosphorylated form of endogenous NIPA, indicating that APC/CCdh1 indeed promotes degradation of NIPA at the exit of mitosis (Fig. 2G).
To further substantiate the role of Cdh1 in regulating the degradation of NIPA in vivo, we overexpressed Cdh1 in cells stably expressing a Flag-NIPA construct. Following transfection, cells were synchronized by nocodazole treatment with a subsequent release from the mitotic block. We found that overexpression of Cdh1 clearly accelerated the degradation of NIPA during the mitotic exit phase (Fig. 2H). This suggests that Cdh1 acts as a rate-limiting factor for the degradation of phosphorylated NIPA.
Together, these observations suggest that APC/CCdh1 mediates degradation of NIPA in mitotic exit.
Identification of NIPA domains required for its degradation
Previous studies revealed that the APC/C recognizes particular destruction motifs in its substrates. By sequence analysis, we identified two putative D-box-like motifs in NIPA, whereof the second motif is conserved throughout human, mouse and Xenopus laevis (Fig. 3A,B). No other known putative Cdh1 recognition motifs were further identified. Mutation of these two D-box-like motifs leads to a decreased in vitro ubiquitination by the APC/CCdh1 (Fig. 3C), indicating that these motifs are functional degradation motifs. However, the D-box mutant was not stabilized in vivo during mitotic exit (data not shown). The second D-box motif partially overlaps with the nuclear localization signal of NIPA and mutation of this putative degradation motif leads to cytoplasmic relocalization of the NIPA protein (Fig. S3), likely interfering with proper ubiquitination of NIPA.
In vitro binding assays identified amino acids 395–402 of NIPA as the relevant Cdh1-binding site (Fig. S4). This region also harbors the nuclear localization signal and the substrate binding site for Cyclin B1 , .
Binding to Skp1 protects NIPA from APC/CCdh1-mediated ubiquitination
The APC/CCdh1 complex is active from late anaphase until late in G1. As unphosphorylated NIPA accumulates during this period of the cell cycle, a mechanism should exist, which protects the unphosphorylated form of NIPA from degradation, while phosphorylated NIPA is readily targeted by the APC/CCdh1 complex. Since the phosphorylation status of NIPA regulates its binding to the SCF core protein, we hypothesized that the binding to Skp1 might control stability of NIPA. In accordance with this hypothesis, a mutant of NIPA, which is impaired in its binding to Skp1 by a mutation in the F-Box motif , has a significantly reduced stability compared to the wildtype protein (Fig. 4A). This reduced stability is associated with a more efficient ubiquitination of this mutant in vivo (Fig. 4B).
We therefore next tested whether binding to Skp1 protects NIPA from degradation in vitro. To this end, in vitro translated Flag-NIPA was incubated with purified GST-Skp1 to allow binding prior to in vitro degradation assays. As shown in Figure 4C, pre-incubation with GST-Skp1 protects NIPA from degradation in G1-synchronized cell extracts. Furthermore, addition of purified Skp1 to in vitro ubiquitylation reactions greatly reduced APC/CCdh1-mediated in vitro ubiquitylation of NIPA (Fig. 4D). These results suggest that binding to Skp1, rather than phosphorylation of NIPA itself, regulates degradation of NIPA by the APC/CCdh1 complex.
To further define the mechanism by which Skp1 regulates NIPA degradation, we investigated whether Skp1 and Cdh1 compete for binding with NIPA. To this end, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assays of Flag-NIPA and HA-Cdh1 in cells overexpressing Skp1 or not. As shown in Figure 4E, co-expression of Skp1 inhibits binding of NIPA and Cdh1.
We thus conclude that binding of NIPA to Skp1 protects it from APC/CCdh1-mediated degradation by interfering with the interaction of NIPA with Cdh1. Phosphorylation of NIPA, however, leads to dissociation of NIPA from Skp1 and therefore allows recognition of NIPA by the APC/CCdh1-complex and consequently degradation of NIPA. This provides a mechanistic explanation of how unphosphorylated NIPA is able to accumulate during G1 phase of the cell cycle, while phosphorylated NIPA is targeted by the APC/CCdh1-complex.
At the G2/M transition, the NIPA F-box protein is phosphorylated on several serine residues . This phosphorylation leads to dissociation of the SCFNIPA E3 ligase. In late mitosis, the phosphorylated form of NIPA disappears, while simultaneously a nonphosphorylated form of NIPA emerges.
Here we show that the phosphorylated form of NIPA is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in late mitosis. It has been shown before that certain F-Box proteins are themselves ubiquitinated and degraded. Initially, this was attributed to an auto-ubiquitination reaction of the F-Box proteins . However, for the two F-Box proteins Skp2 and Tome-1 an SCF-independent, but rather APC/CCdh1-dependent degradation was shown recently –. Here, we further establish NIPA as a target of the APC/CCdh1 in vitro and in vivo.
The APC/CCdh1 is active during the G1 phase. However, unphosphorylated NIPA accumulates during this phase of the cell cycle, indicating that the APC/CCdh1 exclusively ubiquitinates the phosphorylated form of NIPA, while the unphosphorylated form is protected from recognition by the APC/CCdh1.
This regulation of an APC/C substrate by phosphorylation is remarkable since it was assumed until recently that APC/C-mediated ubiquitination is regulated by the activity of the ligase itself. Nevertheless, several reports recently showed a regulation of APC/C-mediated ubiquitination by substrate modification (for example see refs. 25–27). For NIPA we show however, that not phosphorylation itself, but the phosphorylation-induced dissociation from the SCF core protein Skp1 targets NIPA for degradation. In line with this model, mutation of the F-Box like motif in NIPA, which abolishes its binding to Skp1, greatly reduces the stability of the NIPA protein.
Wei et al. reported that a Skp2 F-box mutant that cannot form SCF complexes is a better APC/CCdh1 substrate than wild-type Skp2 in vivo . Strikingly, APC/CCdh1-mediated ubiquitination of Skp2, similarly to NIPA, is regulated by timely phosphorylation of Skp2 . However, it seems that this phosphorylation of Skp2 does not influence its binding to the SCF core complex , , therefore the cell-cycle dependent ubiquitination of Skp2 by the APC/C does not appear to be regulated by its interaction with Skp1. Nevertheless, APC/C-mediated ubiquitination of Skp2 and other substrates might not be regulated by phosphorylation itself, but rather by phosphorylation-induced modifications of interactions which regulate APC/C-dependent ubiquitination as we have shown here for NIPA.
Despite exclusive degradation of the phosphorylated form of NIPA in late mitosis and G1, we were able to show APC/CCdh1-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of the unphosphorylated form in vitro. This finding further supports the theory that phosphorylation of NIPA itself has no impact on its availability for the APC/C.
Similarly, we were able to observe ubiquitination of unphosphorylated NIPA and its interaction with Cdh1 in vivo. However, this was only possible if large amounts of NIPA were overexpressed, indicating that ubiquitination of unphosphorylated NIPA can only take place if NIPA is present in excess compared to the levels of Skp1. This finding further supports our theory that Skp1 protects NIPA from degradation by interfering with recruitment of Cdh1.
We identified two putative destruction motifs in NIPA. Mutation of these motifs leads to a decreased Cdh1-dependent in vitro ubiquitination compared to the wildtype NIPA protein, indicating a role of these motifs for Cdh1-dependent ubiquitination. However, we were not able to show a stabilization of the mutant protein in vivo. This might be due to the fact that mutation of the second D-box motif leads to cytoplasmic relocalization of NIPA, likely interfering with proper ubiquitination of NIPA. Nonetheless, further as yet unidentified degradation motifs might be important for efficient degradation of NIPA in vivo.
In summary, our results provide evidence that the F-Box like protein NIPA is degraded in late mitosis in an APC/CCdh1-dependent manner. We further show that binding to the SCF core complex protects NIPA from APC/C-mediated degradation, leading to exclusive degradation of the phosphorylated form of NIPA. We thus define a novel mode of controlling degradation of F-Box proteins, providing an additional layer of control over APC/C-mediated ubiquitination.
Materials and Methods
Plasmids, Antibodies and immunological procedures
Details of the construction of various NIPA plasmids are available from the authors upon request. Point mutations of the NIPA cDNA and deletion mutants were prepared using the Quickchange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). HA-tagged Cdh1 and Cdc20 plasmids were kindly provided by M. Pagano and pcDNA3.1-Skp1 was provieded by Z–Q. Pan. pCMV-HA-Ubiquitin was a generous gift provided by W. Krek.
Anti-CDH1 antibody (Ab-2) was from Calbiochem and anti-Skp1 antibody was from Zymed. Anti-Flag and anti-β-Actin antibodies were from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-CDC20 (H175), anti-CDC27 (AF3.1), anti-Cyclin A (H-432), anti-Cyclin B1 (H-433), anti-HA (Y-11) antibodies were from Santa Cruz. Anti-NIPA antibody was described before . Immunoblot analysis and immunoprecipitations were performed as described .
Cell Culture, Synchronization, Transfection and Treatment with Drugs
HeLa, NIH3T3 and HEK293T cells were cultivated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 2 mM L-glutamine. Transient transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) transfection reagents. Stable NIH 3T3 cell lines have been described before . Cells were synchronized in prometaphase by sequential culture with 2 mM thymidine for 12 h and 500 ng/ml nocodazole for 10–12 h.
To inhibit protein synthesis, cells were cultured in the presence of 50 µg/ml cycloheximide and to inhibit proteasomal degradation, cells were cultured in the presence of 10 µM MG132.
siRNAs were purchased from Proligo and transfected into subconfluent HeLa cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The target sequence of Cdh1 siRNA was 5′-AATGAGAAGTCTCCCAGTCAG-3′ . A firefly luciferase siRNA served as control.
GST-fusion proteins and pull-down assays
Skp1, NIPA wt and all NIPA deletion mutants were expressed in E.coli (BL-21) using pGEX vectors (Amersham) and purified on Glutathion-S-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). If required, purified proteins were eluted with 20 mM glutathione in 100 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 120 mM NaCl.
For GST pull-down assays, 30 µl of in vitro translated, 35S-labeled Cdh1 was incubated with glutathione beads containing bound NIPA wt, NIPA deletion mutants or GST alone in binding buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail) for 1 h at 4°C. Bound fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE prior to autoradiography.
In vivo ubiquitination
For detection of in vivo ubiquitin-conjugates of ectopic NIPA, HEK293T cells were cotransfected with HA-tagged Ubiquitin and Flag-NIPA constructs. Cells were treated with either MG132 or DMSO 6 h before harvesting. Cell lysates were supplemented with denaturation buffer (1 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 0.5 mM EDTA, 1% SDS final concentration) and denatured for 10 min at 95°C prior to immunoprecipitation with agarose-bound anti Flag antibody.
In vitro ubiquitination assays
The APC/C was purified from exponentially growing HeLa cells as described before . 35S-labeled NIPA was prepared by in vitro translation using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate (TNT, Promega). The labeled substrate was added to the in vitro ubiquitination reaction mix containing 40 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.6, 0.7 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mg/ml ubiquitin, 10 µg/ml ubiquitin aldehyde, 0.84 µg/ml E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme, 10 µg/ml UbcH10, 0.1 µg/ µl cycloheximide an ATP-generating system and APC/C-loaded beads. If indicated, baculovirus-produced Cdh1 was added to the reaction.
The reaction was incubated at 30°C and fractions were taken at indicated timepoints and diluted in SDS-sample buffer. The ubiquitinated forms of NIPA were analyzed by SDS-PAGE prior to autoradiography.
In vitro degradation assays
Early G1 synchronized HeLa cells were harvested and the cell pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0,5%, Triton X-100, 20 mM Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4 (pH 7.5), 10 mM sodiumpyrophosphate (pH 7.0), 1 mM sodiumorthovanadate, 20 mM sodium-fluoride, 1 mM glycerol-2-phosphate and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete; Roche)).
For degradation assays, the clarified supernatant was supplemented with 1.5 mg/ml ubiquitin, 0.1 mg/ml cycloheximide, 20 mM DTT, 1 mM MgCl2 and an energy mix. 36 microliters of the extract was then added to four microliter of 35S-labeled substrate synthesized by in vitro translation (Promega). Reactions proceeded at 30°C for the indicated times, and the extent of degradation was determined by autoradiography.
In the immunodepletion assay, anti-Cdc27 or preimmuneserum and protein G beads were added to the extract for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was used for degradation assays. A portion of the extract was processed for Western blot analysis.
NIPA is phosphorylated in mitosis. Hela cells were synchronized in prometaphase by a sequential thymidine-nocodazole block. Cell extracts were either treated with acid potato phosphatase or left untreated and analyzed by immunoblotting using an anti-NIPA antibody.
NIPA interacts with Cdh1. Myc-NIPA and either HA-Cdh1 or HA-Cdc20 were expressed in HEK293T cells, and MG132 was added 6 h before the cells were collected. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated (IP) with an antibody against HA-tag and analysed by immunoblotting.
The Dbox-like motifs in NIPA. (A) Overlap of the NLS and the Dbox2 motif in NIPA; amino acids 390–409 of the NIPA protein are shown. (B) Mutation of the Dbox2 motif interferes with correct nuclear localization of NIPA. Immunofluorescence of NIH/3T3 cells expressing Flag-tagged NIPA constructs.
Mapping of the Cdh1-binding site in NIPA. (A) schematic presentation of the NIPA deletion mutants assayed in (B). Binding of Cdh1 is indicated as +: binding similar to NIPAwt; -: no significant binding. C3HC: Zinc-finger motif; NLS: nuclear localization signal. (B) GST pulldown assays using various GST-NIPA deletion constructs and 35S-labelled, in vitro translated Cdh1.
We thank M. Pagano for the Cdh1 and Cdc20 cDNA. W. Krek provided the pCMV-HA-ubiquitin construct and Z–Q. Pan kindly provided the Skp1 cDNA.
Conceived and designed the experiments: CvK JD. Performed the experiments: CvK FB AF SW RH. Analyzed the data: CvK FB ALI CP JD. Wrote the paper: CvK JD.
- 1. Skaar JR,Pagano M (2009) Control of cell growth by the SCF and APC/C ubiquitin ligases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21: 816–824.
- 2. Sumara I,Maerki S,Peter M (2008) E3 ubiquitin ligases and mitosis: embracing the complexity. Trends Cell Biol 18: 84–94.
- 3. Kraft C,Herzog F,Gieffers C,Mechtler K,Hagting A,et al. (2003) Mitotic regulation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by phosphorylation. Embo J 22: 6598–6609.
- 4. Golan A,Yudkovsky Y,Hershko A (2002) The cyclin-ubiquitin ligase activity of cyclosome/APC is jointly activated by protein kinases Cdk1-cyclin B and Plk. J Biol Chem 277: 15552–15557.
- 5. Rudner AD,Murray AW (2000) Phosphorylation by Cdc28 activates the Cdc20-dependent activity of the anaphase-promoting complex. J Cell Biol 149: 1377–1390.
- 6. Kotani S,Tanaka H,Yasuda H,Todokoro K (1999) Regulation of APC activity by phosphorylation and regulatory factors. J Cell Biol 146: 791–800.
- 7. Visintin R,Prinz S,Amon A (1997) CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278: 460–463.
- 8. Schwab M,Lutum AS,Seufert W (1997) Yeast Hct1 is a regulator of Clb2 cyclin proteolysis. Cell 90: 683–693.
- 9. Glotzer M,Murray AW,Kirschner MW (1991) Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349: 132–138.
- 10. King RW,Glotzer M,Kirschner MW (1996) Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates. Mol Biol Cell 7: 1343–1357.
- 11. Pfleger CM,Kirschner MW (2000) The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev 14: 655–665.
- 12. Crane R,Kloepfer A,Ruderman JV (2004) Requirements for the destruction of human Aurora-A. J Cell Sci 117: 5975–5983.
- 13. Reis A,Levasseur M,Chang HY,Elliott DJ,Jones KT (2006) The CRY box: a second APCcdh1-dependent degron in mammalian cdc20. EMBO Rep 7: 1040–1045.
- 14. Araki M,Yu H,Asano M (2005) A novel motif governs APC-dependent degradation of Drosophila ORC1 in vivo. Genes Dev 19: 2458–2465.
- 15. Bassermann F,Frescas D,Guardavaccaro D,Busino L,Peschiaroli A,et al. (2008) The Cdc14B-Cdh1-Plk1 axis controls the G2 DNA-damage-response checkpoint. Cell 134: 256–267.
- 16. Ouyang T,Bai RY,Bassermann F,von Klitzing C,Klumpen S,et al. (2003) Identification and characterization of a nuclear interacting partner of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (NIPA). J Biol Chem 278: 30028–30036.
- 17. Bassermann F,von Klitzing C,Munch S,Bai RY,Kawaguchi H,et al. (2005) NIPA defines an SCF-type mammalian E3 ligase that regulates mitotic entry. Cell 122: 45–57.
- 18. Bassermann F,von Klitzing C,Illert AL,Munch S,Morris SW,et al. (2007) Multisite phosphorylation of nuclear interaction partner of ALK (NIPA) at G2/M involves cyclin B1/Cdk1. J Biol Chem 282: 15965–15972.
- 19. Sorensen CS,Lukas C,Kramer ER,Peters JM,Bartek J,et al. (2001) A conserved cyclin-binding domain determines functional interplay between anaphase-promoting complex-Cdh1 and cyclin A-Cdk2 during cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol 21: 3692–3703.
- 20. Schwab M,Neutzner M,Mocker D,Seufert W (2001) Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. Embo J 20: 5165–5175.
- 21. Hilioti Z,Chung YS,Mochizuki Y,Hardy CF,Cohen-Fix O (2001) The anaphase inhibitor Pds1 binds to the APC/C-associated protein Cdc20 in a destruction box-dependent manner. Curr Biol 11: 1347–1352.
- 22. Zhou P,Howley PM (1998) Ubiquitination and degradation of the substrate recognition subunits of SCF ubiquitin-protein ligases. Mol Cell 2: 571–580.
- 23. Wei W,Ayad NG,Wan Y,Zhang GJ,Kirschner MW,et al. (2004) Degradation of the SCF component Skp2 in cell-cycle phase G1 by the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 428: 194–198.
- 24. Bashir T,Dorrello NV,Amador V,Guardavaccaro D,Pagano M (2004) Control of the SCF(Skp2-Cks1) ubiquitin ligase by the APC/C(Cdh1) ubiquitin ligase. Nature 428: 190–193.
- 25. Ayad NG,Rankin S,Murakami M,Jebanathirajah J,Gygi S,et al. (2003) Tome-1, a trigger of mitotic entry, is degraded during G1 via the APC. Cell 113: 101–113.
- 26. Rodier G,Coulombe P,Tanguay PL,Boutonnet C,Meloche S (2008) Phosphorylation of Skp2 regulated by CDK2 and Cdc14B protects it from degradation by APC(Cdh1) in G1 phase. Embo J 27: 679–691.
- 27. Bashir T,Pagan JK,Busino L,Pagano M (2010) Phosphorylation of Ser72 is dispensable for Skp2 assembly into an active SCF ubiquitin ligase and its subcellular localization. Cell Cycle 9: 971–974.
- 28. Boutonnet C,Tanguay PL,Julien C,Rodier G,Coulombe P,et al. (2010) Phosphorylation of Ser72 does not regulate the ubiquitin ligase activity and subcellular localization of Skp2. Cell Cycle 9: 975–979.
- 29. Duyster J,Baskaran R,Wang JY (1995) Src homology 2 domain as a specificity determinant in the c-Abl-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal repeated domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 1555–1559.
- 30. Donzelli M,Squatrito M,Ganoth D,Hershko A,Pagano M,et al. (2002) Dual mode of degradation of Cdc25 A phosphatase. Embo J 21: 4875–4884.
- 31. Amador V,Ge S,Santamaria PG,Guardavaccaro D,Pagano M (2007) APC/C(Cdc20) controls the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of p21 in prometaphase. Mol Cell 27: 462–473.