Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Common and Distinct Roles of Juvenile Hormone Signaling Genes in Metamorphosis of Holometabolous and Hemimetabolous Insects

  • Barbora Konopova ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Barbora Konopova, Vlastimil Smykal

    Affiliation Biology Center, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

  • Vlastimil Smykal ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Barbora Konopova, Vlastimil Smykal

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Biology, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

  • Marek Jindra

    jindra@entu.cas.cz

    Affiliation Biology Center, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic

Common and Distinct Roles of Juvenile Hormone Signaling Genes in Metamorphosis of Holometabolous and Hemimetabolous Insects

  • Barbora Konopova, 
  • Vlastimil Smykal, 
  • Marek Jindra
PLOS
x

Abstract

Insect larvae metamorphose to winged and reproductive adults either directly (hemimetaboly) or through an intermediary pupal stage (holometaboly). In either case juvenile hormone (JH) prevents metamorphosis until a larva has attained an appropriate phase of development. In holometabolous insects, JH acts through its putative receptor Methoprene-tolerant (Met) to regulate Krüppel-homolog 1 (Kr-h1) and Broad-Complex (BR-C) genes. While Met and Kr-h1 prevent precocious metamorphosis in pre-final larval instars, BR-C specifies the pupal stage. How JH signaling operates in hemimetabolous insects is poorly understood. Here, we compare the function of Met, Kr-h1 and BR-C genes in the two types of insects. Using systemic RNAi in the hemimetabolous true bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus, we show that Met conveys the JH signal to prevent premature metamorphosis by maintaining high expression of Kr-h1. Knockdown of either Met or Kr-h1 (but not of BR-C) in penultimate-instar Pyrrhocoris larvae causes precocious development of adult color pattern, wings and genitalia. A natural fall of Kr-h1 expression in the last larval instar normally permits adult development, and treatment with an exogenous JH mimic methoprene at this time requires both Met and Kr-h1 to block the adult program and induce an extra larval instar. Met and Kr-h1 therefore serve as JH-dependent repressors of deleterious precocious metamorphic changes in both hemimetabolous and holometabolous juveniles, whereas BR-C has been recruited for a new role in specifying the holometabolous pupa. These results show that despite considerable evolutionary distance, insects with diverse developmental strategies employ a common-core JH signaling pathway to commit to adult morphogenesis.

Introduction

Winged insects have evolved diverse modes of metamorphosis [1]. Hemimetabolous insects such as grasshoppers, true bugs or cockroaches develop from larvae (also called nymphs) that resemble adults, possess externally growing wing pads, and metamorphose during the final molt by acquiring perfect wings and genitalia. In contrast, larvae of holometabolous insects including flies, butterflies or beetles can differ dramatically from the adults. They undergo a two-stage “complete” metamorphosis (holometaboly), first forming an intermediate called the pupa before changing into a winged adult. Holometaboly has evolved from hemimetaboly and, judging by the number of known species, has become the most successful developmental strategy on land [2].

In both hemimetabolous and holometabolous insects, the developmental switch between juvenile and adult forms depends on juvenile hormone (JH), a sesquiterpenoid produced by the corpora allata gland [3]. The presence of JH in pre-final larval instars ensures that the next molt, promoted by ecdysteroids, produces another, only a larger larva [4], [5]. At an appropriate stage, a natural drop of JH secretion permits metamorphosis. Experimental removal of JH at earlier times activates the metamorphic program prematurely, whereas supply of ectopic JH to final-instar larvae or pupae causes repetition of larval or pupal instars, respectively [6][8].

Although the anti-metamorphic effect of JH was discovered in the hemimetabolous true bug, Rhodnius prolixus, [9], [10], our knowledge on the molecular mode of JH action almost exclusively derives from studies in holometabolans. JH signals through its putative intracellular receptor, the bHLH-PAS protein Methoprene-tolerant (Met), originally identified in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster [11], [12]. In the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, loss of Met triggers pupation of larvae during pre-final instars [13] – a classic precocious metamorphosis phenotype caused by deficiency of JH itself [14]. In response to JH, Met regulates expression of transcription factor genes Krüppel-homolog 1 (Kr-h1) and Broad-Complex (BR-C) [15][18], and loss of Kr-h1 also elicits precocious metamorphosis of beetle larvae [17]. BR-C is dispensable in holometabolous larvae until the onset of metamorphosis, when it specifies pupal features [16], [19][23]. Upon pupation both BR-C and Kr-h1 are naturally down-regulated by the absence of JH to allow adult development [16][18], [20], [22]. Of the three JH-signaling genes, BR-C has been functionally studied in hemimetabolous insects, where, unlike in holometabolans, it is required for development of the embryonic germ band [24], [25] and for anisometric growth of the larval wing pads [26].

To provide a direct comparison of JH signaling in holometaboly and hemimetaboly, we have examined the function of Met, Kr-h1 and BR-C in the hemimetabolous firebug, Pyrrhocoris apterus (true bugs, Hemiptera). We show that despite the diverse developmental strategies and the vast evolutionary distance between them, transduction of the anti-metamorphic JH signal relies on the common-core elements, Met and Kr-h1. In both insect types, Kr-h1 acts as a strictly JH- and Met-dependent repressor of metamorphosis. In contrast, the function of BR-C has changed from promoting progressive development of hemimetabolous larvae to a new role in specifying the holometabolous pupa.

Results

JH Signaling Genes Are Conserved in Insects with Diverse Types of Development

As the first step towards functional comparison between holometaboly and hemimetaboly, we have isolated cDNAs encoding the putative JH receptor Met (JN416984) and its target genes Kr-h1 (JN416987) and BR-C (JN416990), from Pyrrhocoris apterus, and Met (JN416985) and Kr-h1 (JN416988) cDNAs from another true bug, Rhodnius prolixus. Alignments amongst the orthologs reveal conservation of the main functional domains (Fig. S1), namely the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) region and two Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domains in Met, eight zinc-finger motifs in Kr-h1, and a Broad-Tramtrac-Bric-a-brac (BTB) domain followed by one of the alternative zinc-finger isoforms (Z2) in BR-C. Therefore, the three JH signaling genes are common to insect orders developing through holometaboly and hemimetaboly. In fact, their conservation predates the origin of metamorphosis, as we have found Met (JN416986), Kr-h1 (JN416989) and BR-C (JN416991) orthologs in the firebrat, Thermobia domestica, a representative of the primitive lineage of non-metamorphosing wingless insects (Fig. S1).

Developmental Regulation of the JH-Response Genes in Pyrrhocoris

The firebug invariantly undergoes four larval molts demarcating five larval instars (L1–L5), followed by a metamorphic molt, which produces an adult possessing external genitals and wings with a specific color pattern. Maintenance of the larval state in Pyrrhocoris requires JH, as has been demonstrated by removal of the JH-producing corpora allata gland (allatectomy) from penultimate (L4) larvae [27]. Conversely, metamorphosis is permitted by a natural decline in JH titer during the last larval instar (L5), as supplying L5 larvae with JH mimics induces an extra larval stage (reference [28] and this work).

We examined how expression of Met, Kr-h1 and BR-C during Pyrrhocoris development correlates with this regulation by JH. From embryogenesis to adulthood, Met mRNA persisted without major fluctuations through all larval stages (Fig. 1). Such a constitutive presence agrees with the presumed JH receptor role of Met and with the ability of L5 larvae that naturally lack JH to respond to exogenous JH mimics by forming an extra larval instar. Temporal profiles of Kr-h1 and BR-C were more dynamic. Both transcripts reached their highest levels during the second half of embryogenesis, then BR-C oscillated throughout larval development, whereas Kr-h1 was not detected in last-instar larvae, L5 (Fig. 1A). A more detailed profile revealed that upon ecdysis to L5, BR-C mRNA decreased but remained expressed to adulthood, while Kr-h1 expression plummeted from its L4 level by more than 50-fold and was virtually undetectable for the first six days of L5 until the next rise, likely induced by a new surge of JH in pharate adults (Fig. 1B). Allatectomy of adult Pyrrhocoris females drastically reduced Kr-h1 mRNA (494-fold, n = 3), confirming that Kr-h1 transcription absolutely requires the natural source of JH. The expression pattern suggested that Kr-h1 prevents metamorphosis until the final larval instar, when the Kr-h1-free (and JH-free) period may be necessary to initiate metamorphosis.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Developmental expression of Pyrrhocoris JH signaling genes.

A) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR on total RNA from embryos (26 temperature cycles) or larvae (28 cycles) of indicated stages. d3, d5, mid- and late-L4 instar larvae, respectively. B) Relative mRNA levels on successive days of larval development were assessed with qRT-PCR and normalized to rp49 mRNA. Dashed lines mark ecdyses to L4, L5 and adult stages. Values are mean ± SD from three measurements on RNA isolated from individual animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.g001

Kr-h1 Is a Met-Dependent Repressor of Precocious Adult Development in Pyrrhocoris Larvae

To test whether Met and Kr-h1 are indeed required to maintain the juvenile character of hemimetabolous larvae, we utilized systemic RNAi in Pyrrhocoris. Injection of Met dsRNA into early-L4 larvae caused an 86% knockdown of Met mRNA (Fig. 2B), followed by precocious appearance of adult attributes after the ensuing molt, which would have otherwise produced an L5 larva (Fig. 2C and Table 1). Despite their smaller body size compared to normal adults, Met(RNAi) males had external genitals (Fig. 2C). Instead of the solid black and fully attached L5 wing pads, these adultoids developed small but movable, articulated wings, liberated from the scutellum and the tergites. The black melanin pigment disappeared from specific regions of these wings to leave black spots and edges on the red background, a pattern only seen in adults (Fig. 2C). On the thorax, the notum expanded posteriorly and also displayed an adult-specific color pattern. Like in adults, abdominal cuticle tanned with melanin. We did not determine whether particular regions of the cuticle, produced by individual epidermal cells, were purely adult or whether they had a mixed larval-adult identity, so this intriguing possibility remains [29]. Unable to molt again, all L5 adultoids were terminally arrested.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Loss of Met or Kr-h1 causes precocious metamorphosis in Pyrrhocoris larvae.

A) Larvae newly ecdysed to the L4 instar were injected with control (egfp) or Met dsRNA. B) Efficacy of Met mRNA depletion and its effect on expression of Kr-h1 and BR-C expression were determined by qRT-PCR three days after injection of Met dsRNA (gray columns) relative to egfp dsRNA controls (open columns) arbitrarily set to 100%. Values are mean ± SD from n = 5 animals. C) Met, Kr-h1 and BR-C RNAi phenotypes after ecdysis to the L5 stage as compared to control L5 larvae and adults (left two columns). Animals in the top row are to the same scale; the middle and bottom rows show details of wings and of the ventral abdomen, respectively. Precocious adult attributes upon Met and Kr-h1 RNAi include color-patterned articulated wings (arrows) separated from the scutellum (s), extended notum (open arrowheads) with two posterior black spots, external male genitals (solid arrowheads), and dark abdominal cuticle (asterisks). Compared to control L5, BR-C(RNAi) larvae display retarded wing growth but no precocious adult development. For quantitative data see Table 1. (Scale bars: A and C, top row, 3 mm; C, middle row, 1 mm; C, bottom row, 2 mm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Loss of Met or Kr-h1 triggers precocious adult development in Pyrrhocoris larvae.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.t001

Kr-h1 mRNA levels were reduced by 90% in L4 larvae subjected to Met RNAi (Fig. 2B), demonstrating that Kr-h1 in Pyrrhocoris was a Met-dependent target gene as in Tribolium [15], [17]. This reduction paralleled the natural fall of Kr-h1 expression upon ecdysis to L5 (Fig. 1B), suggesting that the normal function of Met during the L4 stage is to respond to endogenous JH by maintaining high expression of Kr-h1, which in turn prevents adult development. Consistent with this prediction, larvae injected with Kr-h1 dsRNA at the L4 stage formed L5 adultoids similar to Met(RNAi) animals (Fig. 2C and Table 1). Occasionally their wings grew larger than upon Met RNAi, and some individuals only showed part of the adult color pattern (Fig. 2C). Clearly, the loss-of-function phenotypes of both genes were in good concert and demonstrated precocious metamorphosis of Pyrrhocoris larvae.

To verify the function of Kr-h1 in an independent system, we performed RNAi in the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius, the very model in which juvenile hormone had been postulated nearly eight decades ago [9], [10]. Upon molting to the L4 penultimate instar, all Rhodnius larvae (n = 20) injected with Kr-h1 dsRNA at the previous L3 instar showed accelerated growth of wings and genitals (Fig. 3), both typical hallmarks of adult morphogenesis.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Precocious development of adult features after Kr-h1 RNAi in the blood sucking bug, Rhodnius prolixus.

When subjected to Kr-h1 dsRNA injection as L3 larvae, the animals displayed abnormal growth and venation of wing lobes after molting to the L4 stage (right) as compared to control L4 larvae. We also noticed premature development of external genitals in Kr-h1(RNAi) animals (arrowhead).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.g003

In contrast to Met and Kr-h1, injection of BR-C dsRNA into Pyrrhocoris L4 larvae produced no signs of premature adult development (Fig. 2C and Table 1). BR-C RNAi administered early during the L4 instar reduced BR-C mRNA levels to 17.7±2.0% (n = 5 animals) and caused either lethality at the end of the L4 instar or compromised growth of the wing pads in animals that successfully molted to the L5 instar (Table 1). A similar wing defect was observed after ecdysis to the L4 instar in 100% of animals (n = 22) that had been given BR-C dsRNA as L3 larvae. The retarded wing growth was previously shown for BR-C RNAi in the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus [26]. When compared to Kr-h1, BR-C mRNA expression was neither as strongly dependent on Met at the L4 instar (Fig. 2B) nor did it completely cease upon ecdysis to L5 (Fig. 1B). Therefore, Kr-h1 but not BR-C functions as a JH- and Met-dependent repressor of hemimetabolous metamorphosis.

Met and Kr-h1 Mediate the Anti-Metamorphic Effect of Methoprene

When treated with JH mimics, final instar Pyrrhocoris larvae fail to metamorphose to adults and instead repeat the larval program in the succeeding supernumerary “L6” instar [28]. We achieved the same effect by topical treatment of early-L5 larvae with the JH mimic methoprene (Fig. 4A,B) in 100% (n = 18) of animals. In this background we then tested whether Met and Kr-h1 mediated the response to the exogenous JH activity.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Met and Kr-h1 mediate the anti-metamorphic effect of exogenous JH mimic.

A–D) Animals received either control (egfp), Met or Kr-h1 dsRNA as late-L4 larvae, followed by mock (acetone) or JH mimic (methoprene) treatment early at the L5 instar. Bottom row shows ventral view of the abdomens. Acetone-treated larvae produced normal adults (A). Methoprene induced a supernumerary larval instar (L6) whose wing pads remained black and attached to the tergites, while the abdominal cuticle tanned only partly (B). Knockdown of Met (C) or Kr-h1 (D) prior to methoprene treatment restored normal adult development. E) Ectopic Met-dependent induction of Kr-h1 and BR-C by methoprene at the L5 instar. Relative mRNA levels of Kr-h1 and BR-C in the abdominal epidermis of animals injected with control (egfp) or Met dsRNA and subjected to hormonal treatment as described above were assessed on day 4 of the L5 instar. Values are mean ± SD from n = 5 animals. Note that the much higher Kr-h1 induction (left) is on the logarithmic scale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.g004

When Met was silenced by dsRNA injection at the end of the L4 instar, the following application of methoprene no longer perturbed adult development in 96% (n = 23) of treated animals, and these rescued adults were externally indistinguishable from controls receiving no methoprene (Fig. 4A,C). The “status-quo” effect of methoprene was likewise prevented by Kr-h1 RNAi (Fig. 4D) in 12 out of 13 animals. Therefore, both Met and its target Kr-h1 were necessary for the capacity of methoprene to block metamorphosis and induce the L6 larva. In addition, neither Met nor Kr-h1 appeared to be required for the normal L5-to-adult transition, since dsRNA injection to late-L4 larvae, as opposed to RNAi applied early during the L4 stage, did not interfere with metamorphosis. This result corresponded with the natural absence of Kr-h1 expression during most of the final larval instar (Fig. 1B).

The above data indicated that the Met-dependent reiteration of the larval program, induced by methoprene, occurred via ectopic transcriptional re-activation of Kr-h1 during the L5 instar. Indeed, levels of Kr-h1 mRNA in the epidermis (or in the whole body, data not shown) of mid-L5 larvae, which had been treated with methoprene as L4, exceeded levels normally observed at the L5 instar by 125-fold (Fig. 4E). This induction was the opposite to the natural drop of Kr-h1 expression upon L4 to L5 ecdysis (Fig. 1B), and it was abolished by Met RNAi (Fig. 4E). By contrast, BR-C mRNA was only induced 4.5-fold with methoprene, again in a Met-dependent manner (Fig. 4E). The striking difference in the fold mRNA induction between Kr-h1 and BR-C did not result from difference in the mRNA levels induced by methoprene but from the extremely low expression of Kr-h1 in mid-L5 larvae (Fig. 1).

Discussion

The likely JH receptor Met and its targets Kr-h1 and BR-C play key roles during holometabolous insect metamorphosis. Our present data afford a direct comparison with how the three genes function in the ancestral hemimetabolous development (Fig. 5). We provide three lines of evidence that the JH-free and Kr-h1-free period in the final larval instar (L5) of the Pyrrhocoris bug is critical for adult transition: (i) administration of methoprene to L5 larvae induces Met-dependent Kr-h1 expression and an extra larval stage, (ii) this phenotype is averted if Met or Kr-h1 are silenced prior to methoprene treatment, and (iii) premature suppression of Kr-h1, either direct or through depletion of Met, triggers precocious adult development. Therefore, the JH/Met-dependent Kr-h1 activity ensures the larval program, and only when JH disappears from the blood in the last larval instar, transcription of Kr-h1 ceases for six days to create an opportunity for adult transition (Figs. 1B and 5). Interestingly, the same-length time window for adult commitment was previously defined as a methoprene-sensitive period during the final larval instar of the Rhodnius bug [30]. Kr-h1 now provides a molecular determinant of that window.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Regulation of hemimetaboly and holometaboly.

Pyrrhocoris (left) and Tribolium (right) cartoons signify the main innovations – postponement of wing development and the resting pupal stage in holometabolans. The absence of JH-dependent Kr-h1 expression in pupae and final instar hemimetabolous larvae (gray shaded areas) is prerequisite to adult development in both types of metamorphosis, supporting the view that these final juvenile stages of both insects types may be homologous [1], [35]. The orange shaded area marks a period of low Kr-h1 activity in the absence of JH, which is necessary to permit partial metamorphosis during the pupal molt, specified by the newly acquired function of BR-C in holometabolans. Gene expression profiles for Pyrrhocoris and Tribolium are from Figure 1B and from [17], respectively. JH and ecdysteroid titers are from Blattella germanica [34] (left) and Manduca sexta [5] (right).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.g005

Similar regulation applies to holometaboly. In pre-terminal instars of Tribolium larvae, Met and Kr-h1 respond to JH by blocking precocious metamorphosis [13], [17]. By mid-final larval instar, expression of Kr-h1 declines to reappear at the pupal molt, this time together with BR-C mRNA (Fig. 5). While the transient down-regulation of Kr-h1 permits partial metamorphosis (pupation), its co-expression with BR-C likely ensures that development does not go too far. This is suggested by appearance of not only pupal but also of adult features in Tribolium larvae subjected to Kr-h1 or BR-C RNAi [16], [17], [22], [23]. After the pupal program has been installed, a JH-free period ensures that both Kr-h1 and BR-C, acting downstream of Kr-h1 in this context [17], [18], are shut down in order for adult morphogenesis to take place (Fig. 5). Giving exogenous JH or its mimics to pupae will re-activate both genes and block adult development [16][18], [20].

While the function of Kr-h1 as a JH-induced repressor of adult morphogenesis is clearly a common trait of holometaboly and hemimetaboly, the role of BR-C is not. Studies on the hemimetabolan Oncopeltus bug have revealed BR-C requirement during embryogenesis and for the anisometric growth of larval wing pads but no BR-C expression or function connected with metamorphosis [24], [26]. Conversely, BR-C is essential for pupal development but not at earlier stages in representatives of four holometabolan insect orders [16], [19][22]. The delay of BR-C activity until the pupal stage in Holometabola has been ascribed to an early surge of JH during embryogenesis, which is thought to preserve the seemingly undeveloped (“embryonic”) nature of holometabolous larvae [24], [31][33]. However, while BR-C is necessary for hemimetabolous embryogenesis [24], [25], its function has not been causally linked with JH in insect embryos.

Unlike in Oncopeltus, BR-C expression continues, albeit at a lower rate, throughout the last larval instar of Pyrrhocoris or another hemimetabolan, the cockroach Blattella germanica, in the absence of JH [34] (Fig. 5). Consistent with this pattern, our data show that compared to Kr-h1, expression of BR-C much less depends on JH and that in contrast to Kr-h1 or Met, removal of BR-C cannot accelerate metamorphosis in bug larvae. The changed need for BR-C function from hemimetabolous embryos and larvae to holometabolous metamorphosis suggests that during the evolution of holometaboly, BR-C has been recruited for the new function in specifying the pupal state.

Kr-h1 is intimately regulated by JH and Met to safeguard juveniles of both hemimetabolous and holometabolous insects against precocious and hence fatal metamorphic changes. Therefore, regardless of the disparate life histories, insects undergoing both types of metamorphosis use a common signaling pathway to commit to adult development. The parallel timing of the critical down-regulation of Kr-h1 in the final-instar Pyrrhocoris larva and in the holometabolous pupa (Fig. 5) supports the view that these stages represent ontogenetically homologous units [1], [35], rather than hypotheses building on the assumption that the pupa has originated via compression of all hemimetabolous larval instars into one [24], [32], [33].

Materials and Methods

Insects

Pyrrhocoris apterus (short-winged form) was maintained at 25°C and a photoperiod of 18 h light to 6 h dark, on dry linden seeds and was supplemented with water. Eggs were collected daily and larvae of particular instars were identified based on the size of the body and wing pads; staging within instars relied on measuring time after ecdysis.

cDNA Cloning

Partial sequences for Pyrrhocoris Met, Kr-h1 and BR-C genes were isolated by using touch-down nested RT-PCR with degenerate primers (Table S1), mapping to conserved domains. cDNA ends of selected genes were amplified with the GeneRacer Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

mRNA Expression Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from Pyrrhocoris embryos, whole larvae or abdominal epidermis with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After TURBO DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX) treatment, 2 µg of RNA were used for cDNA synthesis with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Relative transcript levels were measured by quantitative RT-PCR using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix kit and the C1000 Thermal Cycler (both from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). All data were normalized to the relative levels of ribosomal protein (Rp49) mRNA as described [36]. Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S2.

RNAi and Methoprene Treatments

dsRNAs comprising 952 bp (Met), 844 bp (Kr-h1) and 1026 bp (BR-C) of the Pyrrhocoris cDNA sequences and control dsRNAs encoding the EGFP and MalE proteins (720 bp and 901 bp, respectively) were synthesized by using the T3 and T7 MEGAscript kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Approximately 2–5 µg of dsRNA (depending on the size of larvae) were injected into the abdomen of CO2-anesthesized bugs. For JH mimic treatment, late-L4 stage Pyrrhocoris larvae were injected with dsRNA and within 2–3 hours after ecdysis to the L5 instar, a 4-µl drop of acetone-diluted 0.3 mM methoprene (VUOS, Pardubice, Czech Republic) or acetone alone (control) was applied on their dorsal side.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Conservation of JH signaling genes. Alignments of Met (A), Kr-h1 (B) and BR-C (C) protein sequences from insects representing diverse developmental strategies. Holometaboly: the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera); the silk moth Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera); the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera); the honey bee Apis melifera (Hymenoptera); the lacewing Chrysopa perla (Neuroptera). Hemimetaboly: true bugs Pyrrhocoris apterus, Rhodnius prolixus and Oncopeltus fasciatus (Hemiptera); the cockroach Blattella germanica (Blattodea); the louse Pediculus humanus corporis (Phthiraptera). The thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera), represents neometaboly, an aberrant type of hemimetaboly with multiple resting stages. The firebrat, Thermobia domestica (Zygentoma), represents a basal lineage of wingless insects without metamorphosis (ametaboly). Dm_Met, Dm_Gce, and Bm_Met1, Bm_Met2 are products of paralogous Met genes that have duplicated independently in the Drosophila and Bombyx lineages, respectively. Database accession numbers for the aligned Met proteins (A) are NP_511126.2 (Drosophila melanogaster Met), NP_511160.1 (Drosophila melanogaster Gce), XP_001660262.1 (Aedes aegypti), BAJ05085.1 (Bombyx mori Met1), BAJ05086.1 (Bombyx mori Met2), ABR25244.1 (Tribolium castaneum), XP_395005.3 (Apis melifera), JN416984 (Pyrrhocoris apterus), JN416985 (Rhodnius prolixus), XP_002430841.1 (Pediculus humanus corporis), and JN416986 (Thermobia domestica). Accession numbers for the Kr-h1 proteins (B) are CAA06544.2 (Drosophila melanogaster), XP_001863529.1 (Culex quinquefasciatus), NP_001129235.1 (Tribolium castaneum), NP_001011566.1 (Apis melifera), BAJ41258.1 (Frankliniella occidentalis), JN416987 (Pyrrhocoris apterus), JN416988 (Rhodnius prolixus), XP_002428656.1 (Pediculus humanus corporis), and JN416989 (Thermobia domestica). Accession numbers for the BR-C proteins (C) are CAA38476.1 (Drosophila melanogaster), AAS80327.1 (Aedes aegypti), BAD23979.1 (Bombyx mori), joined ABW91135.1 and ABW91137.1 (Tribolium castaneum), ABW91140.1 (Chrysopa perla), BAJ41241.1 (Frankliniella occidentalis), JN416990 (Pyrrhocoris apterus), ABA02191.1 (Oncopeltus fasciatus), CBJ05858.1 (Blattella germanica), and joined GQ983556.1 and JN416991 (Thermobia domestica).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.s001

(PDF)

Table S1.

Degenerate primers for isolation of Met , Kr-h1 and BR-C cDNAs from Pyrrhocoris apterus , Rhodnius prolixus and Thermobia domestica .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.s002

(PDF)

Table S2.

Primers for RT-PCR expression analysis of Pyrrhocoris apterus Met , Kr-h1 and BR-C mRNAs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028728.s003

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank David Dolezel for sharing Pyrrhocoris culture and information on gene sequences, Jan Erhart for Rhodnius, Magdalena Hodkova for allatectomy, Martina Hajduskova for insect drawings, and Aida Svestkova for technical help.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BK MJ. Performed the experiments: VS BK MJ. Analyzed the data: VS BK MJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: VS BK MJ. Wrote the paper: MJ.

References

  1. 1. Sehnal F, Svacha P, Zrzavy J (1996) Evolution of insect metamorphosis. In: Gilbert LI, Tata JR, Atkinson BG, editors. Metamorphosis. Postembryonic reprogramming of gene expression in amphibian and insect cells. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 3–58.F. SehnalP. SvachaJ. Zrzavy1996Evolution of insect metamorphosis.LI GilbertJR TataBG AtkinsonMetamorphosis. Postembryonic reprogramming of gene expression in amphibian and insect cellsSan DiegoAcademic Press358
  2. 2. Kristensen N (1999) Phylogeny of endopterygote insects, the most successful lineage of living organisms. Eur J Entomol 96: 237–253.N. Kristensen1999Phylogeny of endopterygote insects, the most successful lineage of living organisms.Eur J Entomol96237253
  3. 3. Gilbert LI, Granger NA, Roe RM (2000) The juvenile hormones: historical facts and speculations on future research directions. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 30: 617–644.LI GilbertNA GrangerRM Roe2000The juvenile hormones: historical facts and speculations on future research directions.Insect Biochem Mol Biol30617644
  4. 4. Nijhout H (1994) Insect hormones. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 267 p.H. Nijhout1994Insect hormonesPrincetonPrinceton University Press267
  5. 5. Riddiford L (1994) Cellular and molecular actions of juvenile hormone. I. General considerations and premetamorphic actions. Adv Insect Physiol 24: 213–274.L. Riddiford1994Cellular and molecular actions of juvenile hormone. I. General considerations and premetamorphic actions.Adv Insect Physiol24213274
  6. 6. Fukuda S (1944) The hormonal mechanism of larval molting and metamorphosis in the silkworm. J Fac Sci Tokyo Univ sec IV 6: 477–532.S. Fukuda1944The hormonal mechanism of larval molting and metamorphosis in the silkworm.J Fac Sci Tokyo Univ sec IV6477532
  7. 7. Wigglesworth V (1954) The physiology of insect metamorphosis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 152 p.V. Wigglesworth1954The physiology of insect metamorphosisCambridgeCambridge University Press152
  8. 8. Williams C (1961) The juvenile hormone. II. Its role in the endocrine control of molting, pupation, and adult development in the Cecropia silkworm. Biol Bull 116: 323–338.C. Williams1961The juvenile hormone. II. Its role in the endocrine control of molting, pupation, and adult development in the Cecropia silkworm.Biol Bull116323338
  9. 9. Wigglesworth V (1934) The physiology of ecdysis in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). II. Factors controlling moulting and “metamorphosis.” Quart J Micr Sci 77: 191–222.V. Wigglesworth1934The physiology of ecdysis in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). II. Factors controlling moulting and “metamorphosis.”Quart J Micr Sci77191222
  10. 10. Wigglesworth V (1936) The function of the corpus allatum in the growth and reproduction of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). Quart J Micr Sci 79: 91–121.V. Wigglesworth1936The function of the corpus allatum in the growth and reproduction of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera).Quart J Micr Sci7991121
  11. 11. Wilson TG, Fabian J (1986) A Drosophila melanogaster mutant resistant to a chemical analog of juvenile hormone. Dev Biol 118: 190–201.TG WilsonJ. Fabian1986A Drosophila melanogaster mutant resistant to a chemical analog of juvenile hormone.Dev Biol118190201
  12. 12. Ashok M, Turner C, Wilson TG (1998) Insect juvenile hormone resistance gene homology with the bHLH-PAS family of transcriptional regulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 2761–2766.M. AshokC. TurnerTG Wilson1998Insect juvenile hormone resistance gene homology with the bHLH-PAS family of transcriptional regulators.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A9527612766
  13. 13. Konopova B, Jindra M (2007) Juvenile hormone resistance gene Methoprene-tolerant controls entry into metamorphosis in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10488–10493.B. KonopovaM. Jindra2007Juvenile hormone resistance gene Methoprene-tolerant controls entry into metamorphosis in the beetle Tribolium castaneum.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1041048810493
  14. 14. Minakuchi C, Namiki T, Yoshiyama M, Shinoda T (2008) RNAi-mediated knockdown of juvenile hormone acid O-methyltransferase gene causes precocious metamorphosis in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. FEBS J 275: 2919–2931.C. MinakuchiT. NamikiM. YoshiyamaT. Shinoda2008RNAi-mediated knockdown of juvenile hormone acid O-methyltransferase gene causes precocious metamorphosis in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum.FEBS J27529192931
  15. 15. Parthasarathy R, Tan A, Palli SR (2008) bHLH-PAS family transcription factor methoprene-tolerant plays a key role in JH action in preventing the premature development of adult structures during larval–pupal metamorphosis. Mech Dev 125: 601–616.R. ParthasarathyA. TanSR Palli2008bHLH-PAS family transcription factor methoprene-tolerant plays a key role in JH action in preventing the premature development of adult structures during larval–pupal metamorphosis.Mech Dev125601616
  16. 16. Konopova B, Jindra M (2008) Broad-Complex acts downstream of Met in juvenile hormone signaling to coordinate primitive holometabolan metamorphosis. Development 135: 559–568.B. KonopovaM. Jindra2008Broad-Complex acts downstream of Met in juvenile hormone signaling to coordinate primitive holometabolan metamorphosis.Development135559568
  17. 17. Minakuchi C, Namiki T, Shinoda T (2009) Krüppel homolog 1, an early juvenile hormone-response gene downstream of Methoprene-tolerant, mediates its anti-metamorphic action in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev Biol 325: 341–350.C. MinakuchiT. NamikiT. Shinoda2009Krüppel homolog 1, an early juvenile hormone-response gene downstream of Methoprene-tolerant, mediates its anti-metamorphic action in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum.Dev Biol325341350
  18. 18. Minakuchi C, Zhou X, Riddiford LM (2008) Krüppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1) mediates juvenile hormone action during metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev 125: 91–105.C. MinakuchiX. ZhouLM Riddiford2008Krüppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1) mediates juvenile hormone action during metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster.Mech Dev12591105
  19. 19. Kiss I, Beaton AH, Tardiff J, Fristrom D, Fristrom JW (1988) Interactions and developmental effects of mutations in the Broad-Complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118: 247–259.I. KissAH BeatonJ. TardiffD. FristromJW Fristrom1988Interactions and developmental effects of mutations in the Broad-Complex of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics118247259
  20. 20. Zhou X, Riddiford LM (2002) Broad specifies pupal development and mediates the “status quo” action of juvenile hormone on the pupal-adult transformation in Drosophila and Manduca. Development 129: 2259–2269.X. ZhouLM Riddiford2002Broad specifies pupal development and mediates the “status quo” action of juvenile hormone on the pupal-adult transformation in Drosophila and Manduca.Development12922592269
  21. 21. Uhlirova M, Foy BD, Beaty BJ, Olson KE, Riddiford LM, et al. (2003) Use of Sindbis virus-mediated RNA interference to demonstrate a conserved role of Broad-Complex in insect metamorphosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15607–15612.M. UhlirovaBD FoyBJ BeatyKE OlsonLM Riddiford2003Use of Sindbis virus-mediated RNA interference to demonstrate a conserved role of Broad-Complex in insect metamorphosis.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1001560715612
  22. 22. Suzuki Y, Truman JW, Riddiford LM (2008) The role of Broad in the development of Tribolium castaneum: implications for the evolution of the holometabolous insect pupa. Development 135: 569–577.Y. SuzukiJW TrumanLM Riddiford2008The role of Broad in the development of Tribolium castaneum: implications for the evolution of the holometabolous insect pupa.Development135569577
  23. 23. Parthasarathy R, Tan A, Bai H, Palli SR (2008) Transcription factor broad suppresses precocious development of adult structures during larval–pupal metamorphosis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Mech Dev 125: 299–313.R. ParthasarathyA. TanH. BaiSR Palli2008Transcription factor broad suppresses precocious development of adult structures during larval–pupal metamorphosis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum.Mech Dev125299313
  24. 24. Erezyilmaz DF, Rynerson MR, Truman JW, Riddiford LM (2010) The role of the pupal determinant broad during embryonic development of a direct-developing insect. Dev. Genes Evol 219: 535–544.DF ErezyilmazMR RynersonJW TrumanLM Riddiford2010The role of the pupal determinant broad during embryonic development of a direct-developing insect. Dev.Genes Evol219535544
  25. 25. Piulachs M-D, Pagone V, Bellés X (2010) Key roles of the Broad-Complex gene in insect embryogenesis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40: 468–475.M-D PiulachsV. PagoneX. Bellés2010Key roles of the Broad-Complex gene in insect embryogenesis.Insect Biochem Mol Biol40468475
  26. 26. Erezyilmaz DF, Riddiford LM, Truman JW (2006) The pupal specifier broad directs progressive morphogenesis in a direct-developing insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 6925–6930.DF ErezyilmazLM RiddifordJW Truman2006The pupal specifier broad directs progressive morphogenesis in a direct-developing insect.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A10369256930
  27. 27. Sláma K (1965) Effect of hormones on growth and respiratory metabolism in the larvae of Pyrrhocoris apterus L. (Hemiptera). J Insect Physiol 11: 113–122.K. Sláma1965Effect of hormones on growth and respiratory metabolism in the larvae of Pyrrhocoris apterus L. (Hemiptera).J Insect Physiol11113122
  28. 28. Sláma K, Williams CM (1965) Juvenile hormone activity for the bug Pyrrhocoris apterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 54: 411–414.K. SlámaCM Williams1965Juvenile hormone activity for the bug Pyrrhocoris apterus.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A54411414
  29. 29. Willis J, Rezaur R, Sehnal F (1982) Juvenoids cause some insects to form composite cuticles. J Embryol Exp Morph 71: 25–40.J. WillisR. RezaurF. Sehnal1982Juvenoids cause some insects to form composite cuticles.J Embryol Exp Morph712540
  30. 30. Nijhout H (1983) Definition of a juvenile hormone-sensitive period in Rhodnius prolixus. J Insect Physiol 29: 669–677.H. Nijhout1983Definition of a juvenile hormone-sensitive period in Rhodnius prolixus.J Insect Physiol29669677
  31. 31. Novak V (1966) Insect hormones. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. 478 p.V. Novak1966Insect hormonesLondonMethuen & Co. Ltd478
  32. 32. Truman JW, Riddiford LM (1999) The origins of insect metamorphosis. Nature 401: 447–452.JW TrumanLM Riddiford1999The origins of insect metamorphosis.Nature401447452
  33. 33. Truman JW, Riddiford LM (2002) Endocrine insights into the evolution of metamorphosis in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47: 467–500.JW TrumanLM Riddiford2002Endocrine insights into the evolution of metamorphosis in insects.Annu Rev Entomol47467500
  34. 34. Belles X (2011) Origin and evolution of insect metamorphosis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. X. Belles2011Origin and evolution of insect metamorphosisChichesterJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  35. 35. Hinton H (1963) The origin and function of the pupal stage. Proc R Ent Soc Lond 38: 77–85.H. Hinton1963The origin and function of the pupal stage.Proc R Ent Soc Lond387785
  36. 36. Dolezel D, Zdechovanova L, Sauman I, Hodkova M (2008) Endocrine-dependent expression of circadian clock genes in insects. Cell Mol Life Sci 65: 964–969.D. DolezelL. ZdechovanovaI. SaumanM. Hodkova2008Endocrine-dependent expression of circadian clock genes in insects.Cell Mol Life Sci65964969