Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Sweepoviruses Cause Disease in Sweet Potato and Related Ipomoea spp.: Fulfilling Koch's Postulates for a Divergent Group in the Genus Begomovirus

  • Helena P. Trenado ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Helena P. Trenado, Anelise F. Orílio

    Affiliation Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” (IHSM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Algarrobo-Costa, Málaga, Spain

  • Anelise F. Orílio ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Helena P. Trenado, Anelise F. Orílio

    Affiliation Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” (IHSM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Algarrobo-Costa, Málaga, Spain

  • Belén Márquez-Martín,

    Affiliation Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” (IHSM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Algarrobo-Costa, Málaga, Spain

  • Enrique Moriones,

    Affiliation Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” (IHSM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Algarrobo-Costa, Málaga, Spain

  • Jesús Navas-Castillo

    Affiliation Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” (IHSM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Algarrobo-Costa, Málaga, Spain

Sweepoviruses Cause Disease in Sweet Potato and Related Ipomoea spp.: Fulfilling Koch's Postulates for a Divergent Group in the Genus Begomovirus

  • Helena P. Trenado, 
  • Anelise F. Orílio, 
  • Belén Márquez-Martín, 
  • Enrique Moriones, 
  • Jesús Navas-Castillo


Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and related Ipomoea species are frequently infected by monopartite begomoviruses (genus Begomovirus, family Geminiviridae), known as sweepoviruses. Unlike other geminiviruses, the genomes of sweepoviruses have been recalcitrant to rendering infectious clones to date. Thus, Koch's postulates have not been fullfilled for any of the viruses in this group. Three novel species of sweepoviruses have recently been described in Spain: Sweet potato leaf curl Lanzarote virus (SPLCLaV), Sweet potato leaf curl Spain virus (SPLCSV) and Sweet potato leaf curl Canary virus (SPLCCaV). Here we describe the generation of the first infectious clone of an isolate (ES:MAL:BG30:06) of SPLCLaV. The clone consisted of a complete tandem dimeric viral genome in a binary vector. Successful infection by agroinoculation of several species of Ipomoea (including sweet potato) and Nicotiana benthamiana was confirmed by PCR, dot blot and Southern blot hybridization. Symptoms observed in infected plants consisted of leaf curl, yellowing, growth reduction and vein yellowing. Two varieties of sweet potato, ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Promesa’, were infected by agroinoculation, and symptoms of leaf curl and interveinal loss of purple colouration were observed, respectively. The virus present in agroinfected plants was readily transmitted by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci to I. setosa plants. The progeny virus population present in agroinfected I. setosa and sweet potato plants was isolated and identity to the original isolate was confirmed by sequencing. Therefore, Koch's postulates were fulfilled for the first time for a sweepovirus.


Geminiviruses are a diverse group of plant viruses with circular single-stranded DNA genomes that are characterized by their unique, geminate particle structure. Four genera have been described, which differ in genome organization, host range and insect vector [1]. Geminiviruses that are transmitted by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci, with either bipartite or monopartite genomes, are included in the genus Begomovirus. Sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] (Convolvulaceae) is an important staple food crop which ranks as the seventh in terms of production [2]. It is vegetatively propagated and therefore prone to virus accumulation. Over 20 viruses are known to infect sweet potato, from the genera Carlavirus, Nepovirus, Cucumovirus, Enamovirus, Tospovirus, Ipomovirus, Potyvirus, Crinivirus, Begomovirus and Cavemovirus [3], [4].

Sweet potato leaf curl disease was first reported in Taiwan and Japan [5], [6], [7], and a similar disease was also observed in Israel [8]. These reports indicated that the causal agents were whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses. The first completely sequenced begomovirus infecting sweet potato was Sweet potato leaf curl virus (SPLCV), described in the USA [9], [10], [11]. To date, sweet potato leaf curl virus and related viruses have been found in many other countries, including Peru, Italy, Spain, China, Korea, Kenya, Uganda, India and Brazil [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. The name sweepoviruses has been suggested for the sweet potato begomoviruses [24]. This unique group clusters separately from the rest of the begomovirus species and appears to belong to a branch distinct from the Old and New World groups. This branch seems to represent one of the earliest points of divergence within this genus [16]. Several reports have described substantial yield losses in some sweet potato cultivars due to sweepoviruses [25], [26].

Obtaining infectious begomovirus clones is a relatively easy process that has been simplified in various ways following the development of the rolling circle amplification (RCA) methodology using φ29 DNA polymerase [27], [28], [29]. Nevertheless, the genomes of sweepoviruses have been recalcitrant to rendering infectious clones to date [10], [21]. Thus, Koch's postulates have not yet been fulfilled for any of the viruses in this group.

Three novel species of sweepoviruses have recently been described in Spain: Sweet potato leaf curl Lanzarote virus (SPLCLaV), Sweet potato leaf curl Spain virus (SPLCSV) and Sweet potato leaf curl Canary virus (SPLCCaV). SPLCLaV was first isolated from a sweet potato plant from Lanzarote (Canary Islands, Spain) and later found in the Malaga province of continental Spain [16]. In this investigation we report the construction of a complete tandem dimer genome clone of an isolate of SPLCLaV (ES:MAL:BG30:06) after partial digestion of an RCA product. The clone was successfully agroinoculated to Nicotiana benthamiana, I. nil, I. setosa, and sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Promesa’ plants, which became infected. The virus present in agroinfected plants was readily transmitted by the whitefly B. tabaci biotypes B and Q. Disease symptoms similar to those observed in nature occurred in inoculated sweet potato plants and the progeny of the viral clone was confirmed to be identical to the original isolate. Therefore, Koch's postulates were fulfilled for the first time for a sweepovirus.


A dimeric SPLCLaV clone is infectious to N. benthamiana, sweet potato and other Ipomoea species by agroinoculation

Following the methodology developed by Ferreira et al. [28] to clone begomovirus genomes following partial digestion of RCA products, we obtained a tandem dimeric clone in pBluescript SK(+) corresponding to the genome of SPLCLaV, isolate ES:MAL:BG30:06 (BG30), which was designated pDIM-BG30-7. Complete sequencing of the insert of this clone showed 100% nucleotide identity with the original BG30 isolate [16]. The insert was subcloned into the binary vector pBIN19, to render pDIM-BG30-7-BIN (Fig. 1), which was transformed in A. tumefaciens strains LBA4404 and GV3103. In preliminary experiments, stems and cotyledons of I. nil and I. setosa were agroinoculated using strain LBA4404 and, although no symptoms were observed in the inoculated plants, some of the I. setosa plants became infected, as determined by PCR (Table 1). One of the agroinfected I. setosa plants was used as a source of inoculum in successful whitefly transmission experiments using B. tabaci (see below). Agroinoculation experiments, carried out with strain GV3103 and various plant species, resulted in successful infection by SPLCLaV of N. benthamiana, I. setosa, I. nil, and sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Promesa’ plants. In this case, at 21 days post-inoculation (dpi), I. nil and I. setosa plants developed leaf deformation including curling, yellowing and growth reduction, while sweet potato and N. benthamiana plants remained asymptomatic. At late infection stages (∼35 dpi), I. nil and I. setosa plants showed vein yellowing and N. benthamiana plants showed yellowing, leaf curling and growth reduction (Fig. 2), but sweet potato remained asymptomatic. The symptoms in I. nil were more consistent and conspicuous than those in I. setosa. Symptoms of leaf curling in ‘Beauregard’ and the interveinal loss of purple pigmentation in ‘Promesa’ were sporadically observed when plants were kept in the growth chamber for 4–6 months post-inoculation (Fig. 2). None of the agroinoculated I. purpurea plants became infected with SPLCLaV. Infection in all the aforementioned hosts, including asymptomatic sweet potato plants, was confirmed by PCR and dot blot hybridization. In addition, Southern blot analysis using a probe to the CP gene of the BG30 isolate revealed the presence of the characteristic viral forms of begomovirus infection in agroinoculated I. nil, I. setosa, sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ and N. benthamiana plants, i.e., single-stranded genomic DNA and double-stranded replicative DNA forms (supercoiled, linear and open circular) (Fig. 3). None of the agroinoculated I. purpurea plants became infected. In an attempt to infect I. purpurea with the BG30 isolate, vines of this species were grafted with scions of agroinfected I. nil plants; although no symptoms were observed, two out of five grafted I. purpurea plants became infected with SPLCLaV, as shown by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 3).

Figure 1. Strategy to generate the infectious dimeric clone of SPLCLaV, pDIM-BG30-7-BIN.

(A) Genetic map of SPLCLaV, isolate ES:Mal:BG30:09, showing the BamHI restriction site used to generate a tandem dimeric clone after partial digestion of the RCA product obtained from an infected plant. (B) Dimeric SPLCLaV cloned in pBluescript SK(+) in E. coli (pDIM-BG30-7). (C) Dimeric SPLCLaV cloned in the binary vector pBIN19 in A. tumefaciens (pDIM-BG30-7-BIN).

Figure 2. Symptoms observed in plants agroinfected with the clone pDIM-BG30-7-BIN of SPLCLaV.

(A) Growth reduction, leaf curling and vein yellowing in I. nil. (B) Growth reduction, yellowing, leaf curling and vein yellowing in I. setosa. (C) Growth reduction, yellowing and leaf curling in N. benthamiana. (D) Leaf curling in sweet potato cv. ‘Beauregard’. (E) Loss of purple pigmentation in sweet potato cv. ‘Promesa’. Symptoms were recorded at 35 days (A–C) and 5 months (D, E) post-inoculation. H, healthy control plants.

Figure 3. Southern blot analysis of SPLCLaV infected plants.

DNA was isolated from I. nil (lanes 1–2), N. benthamiana (lanes 3–4), I. setosa (lanes 5–6) and sweet potato cv. ‘Beauregard’ (lanes 7–8) plants agroinfected with pDIM-BG30-7-BIN, and I. purpurea (lane 9–10) plant infected by grafting. Lanes 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 correspond to DNA digested with BamHI. Positions are indicated for the single-stranded genomic DNA (ss) and double-stranded replicative DNA forms [supercoiled (SC), linear (Lin) and open circular (OC)].

SPLCLaV isolate BG30 is transmissible by B. tabaci

To test the transmissibility of the cloned SPLCLaV isolate by B. tabaci biotype Q, an experiment was carried out using one agroinfected I. setosa plant. The progeny of the infectious SPLCLaV clone present in this plant was readily transmitted to I. nil and I. setosa test plants (Table 1). This was confirmed by the observation of symptoms (growth reduction, leaf curling and vein yellowing) and PCR. Additional experiments conducted with different plant hosts using different B. tabaci biotypes (Table 1) showed that both the Q and B biotypes could readily transmit SPLCLaV to I. nil and I. setosa, and one of 10 sweet potato ‘Promesa’ test plants could be infected using the Q biotype. None of the sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ and I. purpurea plants could be infected either using the Q or B biotype.Transmission did not occur when B. tabaci biotype S was used.

The SPLCLaV progeny population generated in I. setosa and sweet potato agroinfected plants is identical to the original isolate

The SPLCLaV progeny population present in an agroinfected sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ plant and in a whitefly-infected I. setosa plant was analyzed by sequencing clones derived after RCA amplification. Sequence analysis confirmed the 100% nucleotide identity of the virus present in the sweet potato plant with the original cloned isolate, whereas the virus present in the I. setosa plant contained only one nucleotide change at nucleotide 309 (G to T), which introduced an amino acid change at position 89 in the V2 gene (tryptophan to cysteine).


The availability of infectious clones for plant viruses has proved to be a powerful molecular tool for studying aspects of their biology, being essential for functional analysis of viral genes and their role in replication, pathogenesis and transmission. Infectious clones have also been used to facilitate the screening of germplasm for virus resistance. The agroinoculation of viral clones using binary vectors is a highly efficient process, and is widely used to infect plants with begomoviruses and other members of the family Geminiviridae [30], [31]. Although it has been demonstrated that a clone containing a single genome copy is sufficient to ensure infectivity for certain begomoviruses [32], [33], [34], [35], the use of clones with duplicate copies of the sequences involved in the initiation of replication generally increases infectivity [31], [33], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41]. Recently, a simple method for the construction of infectious begomovirus clones has been developed by cloning dimeric forms of the genome in a binary vector following partial digestion of the DNA obtained after rolling circle amplification with phage φ29 DNA polymerase [28], [29]. Despite the availability of relatively simple methodology for generating infectious clones of begomoviruses, which has been successfully applied to a large number of species, infectious clones were not obtained for any of the monopartite begomoviruses that infect Ipomoea spp., known as sweepoviruses. Therefore, Koch's postulates could not be demonstrated for observed diseases putatively attributed to these viruses. To our knowledge, at least two unsuccessful attempts to achieve infectivity from cloned sweepovirus DNA have been reported. Thus, the cloned genomic DNA of Sweet potato leaf curl Georgia virus (formerly Ipomoea leaf curl virus) obtained after excision from the plasmid vector and in vitro circularization, was not able to infect any of the 27 I. nil plants inoculated using electric discharge particle acceleration [10]. Similarly, infection was not achieved in biolistics experiments using RCA-amplified multimers of cloned DNA from several sweepoviruses from Brazil, assayed in N. benthamiana and several Ipomoea species [21]. In this work, a dimeric clone of a sweepovirus recently described in Spain, Sweet potato leaf curl Lanzarote virus [16], was constructed following rolling circle amplification of the genome DNA [27], partial digestion [28], and cloning in a standard binary vector. The resulting clone was shown to be infectious in N. benthamiana, I. nil, I. setosa and sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Promesa’ plants, and symptoms including leaf curling, yellowing, growth reduction, vein yellowing, and interveinal loss of purple colouration (in the case of ‘Promesa’) were observed in infected plants. Symptoms of vein yellowing and leaf curling have been reported for sweet potato under natural infections in plants from which sweepoviruses such as SPLCV [9], [11] and Ipomoea yellow vein virus (IYVV) [14], [15] were isolated. In previous studies, leaf symptoms were not observed in ‘Beauregard’ sweet potato plants naturally infected with SPLCV [9], [10], [25], although yield losses were associated with infection by this virus. Clark and Hoy [25] illustrated the potential importance of SPLCV infection in a field study carried out in Louisiana, USA, where they found a yield reduction of 25–30% in the cultivar ‘Beauregard’ when infected with this virus. Recently, similar results have been reported for ‘Beauregard’ and other cultivars in a field trial in South Carolina, USA, with a reduction in the average number of roots and the percentage of US#1 class roots per plant in the SPLCV-infected plants [26]. However, direct cause-effect for symptoms or yield losses associated with sweepovirus infection could not be demonstrated experimentally because infectious clones were not available. In preliminary experiments carried out with the SPLCLaV infectious clone (our unpublished results), although no significant difference was observed in total yield, SPLCLaV-infected sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ plants reduced the yield of Jumbo plus US#1 class roots, whereas they increased the yield of Large canner and Small canner classes, which are smaller and have less commercial value. Confirmation of these results would reinforce the need to control sweepovirus infection in sweet potato by incorporating specific diagnosis tests into sweet potato virus indexing protocols The practice carried out by farmers in some countries, whereby they select symptomless vine cuttings to propagate material from genotypes that have virus resistance, or rogue symptomatic plants from fields in an attempt to reduce viral disease [42], [43], can be compromised by asymptomatic sweepovirus infections [3].

The progeny of the infectious SPLCLaV clone was successfully transmitted by B. tabaci biotype Q and B from agroinfected I. setosa plants to healthy I. nil, I. setosa and sweet potato “Promesa” plants, demonstrating that a fully biologically active genome molecule was cloned. Although transmission assays were conducted with 40–50 whiteflies per plant, the transmission rate to sweet potato plants was very low, as found in other studies. It has been suggested that such low transmission rates may be a reflection of the low amino acid sequence identity between the coat protein of sweepoviruses and those of other begomoviruses [44]. SPLCV isolates from Taiwan and Japan were transmitted by B. tabaci only when a high number of insects were used per plant [5], [7]. In contrast, high rates of transmission (50–60%) of a sweepovirus isolate associated with Ipomoea crinkle leaf disease in Israel were obtained with batches of 50 whiteflies per test plant, whereas the transmission efficiency was 20–30% when using 10 whiteflies per plant [45]. Simmons et al. [46] suggested that females may be more efficient than males in vectoring SPLCV and that the efficiency of B. tabaci in acquiring and transmitting SPLCV to sweet potato is lower than in most other host–whitefly systems. On the other hand, the unsuccessful transmission of IYVV to I. indica using the Q, B, and S B. tabaci biotypes, led to the suggestion that in some cases sweepovirus could have lost the capacity for transmission in nature due to the continued vegetative propagation of its natural host plant [15].

In conclusion, the results of this investigation demonstrated that a sweepovirus clone was infectious by agroinoculation and induced symptoms in N. benthamiana, I. nil, I. setosa and two cultivars of sweet potato, ‘Beauregard’ and ‘Promesa’. The cloned virus was also transmissible by two biotypes of B. tabaci, and the viral progenies present in infected I. setosa and sweet potato plants were identical to the originally inoculated virus. Symptoms similar to those observed in naturally infected sweet potato plants were observed in experimentally infected plants, thus Koch's postulates were fulfilled for the first time for a disease caused by a sweepovirus belonging to a unique divergent group of the genus Begomovirus infecting sweet potato and other Ipomoea spp.

Materials and Methods

Virus source

The isolate of Sweet potato leaf curl Lanzarote virus (SPLCLaV) used in this study, ES:Mal:BG30:09 (BG30), was obtained from a sweet potato plant growing at Algarrobo (Málaga province, southern Spain) in 2006 and has since been maintained in our laboratory by periodical transmission by B. tabaci biotype Q in I. nil. The inoculated I. nil plant showed vein yellowing and leaf curling symptoms. The complete nucleotide sequence of isolate BG30 has been described previously [16].

Production of a dimeric clone

To generate dimeric clones of isolate BG30, we started from the rolling circle amplification (RCA) product obtained from the aforementioned I. nil plant and previously used for cloning and sequencing of that isolate [16]. The RCA product was used to generate a complete tandem dimer of the viral genome using the partial digestion method described by Ferreira et al. [28]. Briefly, about 6 µg of amplified DNA was digested with 4 U of BamHI, which cut at a single site in the viral genome, in a final volume of 60 µL at 37°C for 10 min. The DNA band corresponding in size to a dimer of the viral genome (∼5.6 Kbp) was recovered from a 0.8% agarose gel after electrophoresis. The recovered fragment was purified using the DNA Gel Extraction System (Millipore). The purified dimeric DNA fragment was ligated into the vector pBluescript SK(+) (Stratagene) previously digested with BamHI and dephosphorylated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Roche). The ligation product was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α cells by electroporation. A clone, designated pDIM-BG30-7, was selected and completely sequenced in an ABI 3700 automatic sequencer (Secugen, Madrid, Spain). The insert of the clone pDIM-BG30-7 was released by digestion with HindIII and XbaI and subcloned in the binary vector pBIN19. Clone pDIM-BG30-7-BIN, shown to contain a dimeric complete viral genome of isolate ES:Mal:BG30:09, was selected (Figure 1).


Clone pDIM-BG30-7-BIN was transferred to Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains LBA4404 and GV3101 by electroporation. Cultivated bacteria were resuspended in induction buffer (10 mM MES pH 5.8, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 µM acetosyringone) to obtain OD600 = 1. Plant were agroinoculated in the stem using a syringe with a 25 GA needle and agroinfiltrated into the leaves using the same syringe after removing the needle. Seedlings of I. nil, I. setosa and I. purpurea were agroinoculated at the cotyledon stage and seedlings of N. benthamiana at the 5 leaf stage. Sweet potato cuttings were agroinoculated when they had 2–3 newly developed leaves. Plants were kept in a growth chamber or an insect-free greenhouse for about 45 days and were usually tested for virus infection at 20 and 40 dpi.

Plant DNA extraction

Leaf samples (50–100 mg) were ground in the presence of 500 µL of extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl, 2% CTAB, 0.5 M glucose, 100 mM DTT, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, pH 8) at a speed set of 4.0 for 40 s in a FastPrep-24 homogenizer (MP Biomedicals). The homogenate was shaken at 200 rpm at 60°C for 1 h. Following the addition of 500 µL of chloroform:isoamyl (24∶1), the homogenate was shaken again at 200 rpm at room temperature for 5 min. After centrifugation at 20000 g at 4°C for 5 min, the supernatant (∼ 400 µL) was recovered, mixed with 0.8 volumes of isopropanol and centrifuged at 20000 g at 4°C for 10 min. The precipitated DNA was washed with 70% ethanol, dried, resuspended in 100 µL of water, and kept at −20°C until analysis.

Grafting inoculation

SPLCLaV isolate BG30 was transmitted by grafting vine segments of an agroinfected I. nil plant onto healthy I. purpurea seedlings.

Detection of SPLCLaV isolate BG30

The presence of SPLCLaV isolate BG30 DNA in inoculated plants was assessed by dot blot hybridization and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR), typically at 20 and 40 dpi. For dot blot hybridization, 1 µL of total DNA extracted from inoculated plants was applied to positively charged nylon membranes (Roche) and hybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled probe synthesized by PCR from clone pDIM-BG30-7. The insert was released from the vector by digestion with PstI and XbaI and used to amplify the coat protein (CP) gene by PCR with primers MA292 (+) (5′- CCYTAGGGTTCGAGCTVTGTTCGG -3′) and MA293 (-) (5′- TTTATTAATTDTTRTGCGAATC-3′) [16] incorporating DIG-dUTP with the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis System Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR detection was performed with primers MA292 and MA293 as previously described [16]. For Southern blot analysis, total DNA from inoculated plants (∼5 µg) was digested with BamHI, and separated by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis in TBE containing ethidium bromide for 3 h at 50 V. After depurination, denaturation and neutralization steps, DNA was transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche) by applying a vacuum (VacuGene XL, HealthCare) and fixed with ultraviolet light treatment (Crosslinker RPN 2500, Amersham Life Science). DNA was then hybridized with the aforementioned CP probe.

Whitefly transmission of the virus progeny from agroinfected plants

Transmission experiments were carried out using B. tabaci biotypes Q, B and S from healthy populations maintained in insect-proof screen cages (Table 1). The Q and B biotypes were reared on melon (Cucumis melo cv. ANC 42, La Mayora-CSIC seed bank) plants and the S biotype was reared on I. nil plants. In each experiment, about 2000 adult insects were released into a cage containing a SPLCLaV-agroinfected I. setosa plant, where they fed freely for 48 h. Then, they were transferred in groups of 40–50 to clamp cages (one per plant) and placed on healthy I. setosa, I. nil and sweet potato plants. I. nil and I. setosa plants were inoculated at the cotyledon stage and sweet potato plants were inoculated as cuttings with 2–3 newly developed leaves. After a transmission period of 48 h, the plants were sprayed with Confidor 20 LS (Imidacloprid 20 %) and Atominal 10 EC (Pyriproxyfen 10 %) and kept in a growth chamber or an insect-proof greenhouse and monitored for symptoms.

Characterization of the progeny begomovirus

Total DNA was isolated from two selected samples each consisting of 100 mg of symptomatic leaf tissue from I. setosa and sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ using the CTAB-based method described above. The I. setosa plant was inoculated with B. tabaci from an I. setosa plant agroinfected using strain LBA4404, and the sweet potato ‘Beauregard’ plant was agroinfected using strain GV3101. Amplification of begomovirus genome DNA was performed using rolling circle amplification (RCA) with φ29 DNA polymerase (TempliPhi kit, GE Healthcare). A 2814-bp fragment, corresponding to the full-length genome, was obtained from both samples by digestion of the RCA product with BamHI and cloned in pBlueScriptII SK+ (Stratagene). One clone per sample was selected and sequenced (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea). Sequence data were analysed using SeqMan and SeqBuilder and the nucleotide sequence identity was calculated using MegAlign based on the multiple sequence alignment obtained with Clustal V using default parameters (DNASTAR package, DNASTAR Inc.).


We would like to thank Remedios Tovar and María Victoria Martín for excellent technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JN-C. Performed the experiments: HPT AFO BM-M. Analyzed the data: HPT AFO BM-M JN-C. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EM JN-C. Wrote the paper: AFO JN-C.


  1. 1. Stanley J, Bisaro DM, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Fauquet CM, et al. (2005) Geminiviridae. In: Fauquet CM, Mayo MA, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA, editors. Virus taxonomy. Eighth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego, London: Elsevier Academic Press. pp. 301–326.
  2. 2. Loebenstein G (2009) Origin, distribution and economic importance. In: Loebenstein G, Thottappilly G, editors. The sweetpotato. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. pp. 9–12.
  3. 3. Valverde RA, Clark CA, Valkonen JP (2007) Viruses and virus disease complexes of sweetpotato. Plant Viruses 1: 116–126.
  4. 4. Cuellar WJ, De Souza J, Barrantes I, Fuentes S, Kreuze JF (2011) Distinct cavemoviruses interact synergistically with sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (genus Crinivirus) in cultivated sweet potato. J Gen Virol 92: 1233–1243.
  5. 5. Chung M-L, Liao C-H, Chen M-J, Chiu R-J (1985) The isolation, transmission, and host range of sweet potato leaf curl disease agent in Taiwan. Plant Prot Bull 27: 333–341.
  6. 6. Liang YG, Yang TC, Ko NJ (1990) Occurrence and diagnosis of geminiviruses in Taiwan. Plant Protec Bull (Taiwan) 32: 136–144.
  7. 7. Osaki T, Inouye T (1991) Transmission characteristics and cytopathology of a whitefly-transmitted virus isolated from sweet potato leaf curl disease. Bull Osaka Pref Univ Ser B 43: 17–19.
  8. 8. Cohen J, Loebenstein G (1991) Role of a whitefly-transmitted agent in infection of sweet potato by cucumber mosaic virus. Plant Dis 75: 291–292.
  9. 9. Lotrakul P, Valverde RA, Clark CA, Sim J, De La Torre R (1998) Detection of a geminivirus infecting sweet potato in the United States. Plant Dis 85: 1253–1257.
  10. 10. Lotrakul P, Valverde RA, Clark CA, Fauquet CM (2003) Properties of a begomovirus isolated from sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] infected with Sweet potato leaf curl virus. Rev Mex Fitopatol 21: 128–136.
  11. 11. Lotrakul P, Valverde RA (1999) Cloning of a DNA-A-like genomic component of sweet potato leaf curl virus : nucleotide sequence and phylogenetic relationships. Mol Plant Pathol On-Line. 28: Available: Accessed 2011 Sep.
  12. 12. Fuentes S, Salazar LF (2003) First report of Sweet potato leaf curl virus in Peru. Plant Dis 87: 98.93.
  13. 13. Wasswa P, Otto B, Maruthi MN, Mukasa SB, Monger W, et al. (2011) First identification of a sweet potato begomovirus (sweepovirus) in Uganda: characterization, detection and distribution. Plant Pathol. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02464.x.
  14. 14. Briddon RW, Bull SE, Bedford ID (2006) Occurrence of Sweet potato leaf curl virus in Sicily. Plant Pathol 55: 286–286.
  15. 15. Banks GK, Bedford ID, Beitia FJ, Rodriguez-Cerezo E, Markham PG (1999) A novel geminivirus of Ipomoea indica (Convolvulacae) from Southern Spain. Plant Dis 83: 486.
  16. 16. Lozano G, Trenado HP, Valverde RA, Navas-Castillo J (2009) Novel begomovirus species of recombinant nature in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and Ipomoea indica: taxonomic and phylogenetic implications. J Gen Virol 90: 2550–2562.
  17. 17. Luan YS, Zhang J, An LJ (2006) First Report of Sweet potato leaf curl virus in China. Plant Dis 90: 1111.
  18. 18. Luan YS, Zhang J, Liu DM, Li WL (2007) Molecular characterization of sweet potato leaf curl virus isolate from China (SPLCV-CN) and its phylogenetic relationship with other members of the Geminiviridae. Virus Genes 35: 379–385.
  19. 19. Miano DW, LaBonte DR, Clark CA, Valverde RA, Hoy MW, et al. (2006) First report of a begomovirus infecting sweetpotato in Kenya. Plant Dis 90: 832.
  20. 20. Prasanth G, Hegde V (2008) Occurrence of Sweet potato feathery mottle virus and Sweet potato leaf curl Georgia virus on sweet potato in India. Plant Dis 92: 311.
  21. 21. Paprotka T, Boiteux LS, Fonseca ME, Resende RO, Jeske H, et al. (2010) Genomic diversity of sweet potato geminiviruses in a Brazilian germplasm bank. Virus Res 149: 224–233.
  22. 22. Albuquerque LC, Inoue-Nagata AK, Pinheiro B, Ribeiro SG, Resende RO, et al. (2011) A novel monopartite begomovirus infecting sweet potato in Brazil. Arch Virol 156: 1291–1294.
  23. 23. Kwak HR, Kim MK, Chung MN, Lee SH, Park JW, et al. (2006) Virus disease incidences of sweet potato in Korea. Plant Pathol J 22: 239–247.
  24. 24. Fauquet CM, Stanley J (2003) Geminivirus classification and nomenclature: progress and problems. Ann App Biol 142: 165–189.
  25. 25. Clark CA, Hoy MW (2006) Effects of common viruses on yield and quality of Beauregard sweetpotato in Louisiana. Plant Dis 90: 83–88.
  26. 26. Ling K-S, Jackson DM, Harrison H, Simmons AM, Pesic-VanEsbroeck Z (2010) Field evaluation of yield effects on the U.S.A. heirloom sweetpotato cultivars infected by Sweet potato leaf curl virus. Crop Protec 29: 757–765.
  27. 27. Inoue-Nagata AK, Albuquerque LC, Rocha WB, Nagata T (2004) A simple method for cloning the complete begomovirus genome using the bacteriophage phi29 DNA polymerase. J Virol Methods 116: 209–211.
  28. 28. Ferreira PTO, Lemos TO, Nagata T, Inoue-Nagata AK (2008) One-step cloning approach for construction of agroinfectious begomovirus clones. J Virol Methods 147: 351–354.
  29. 29. Wu CY, Lai YC, Lin NS, Hsu YH, Tsai HT, et al. (2008) A simplified method of constructing infectious clones of begomovirus employing limited restriction enzyme digestion of products of rolling circle amplification. J Virol Methods 147: 355–359.
  30. 30. Grimsley N, Hohn T, Davies JW, Hohn B (1987) Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of infectious maize streak virus into maize plants. Nature 325: 177–179.
  31. 31. Elmer JS, Sunter G, Gardiner WE, Brand L, Browning CK, et al. (1988) Agrobacterium-mediated inoculation of plants with tomato golden mosaic virus DNAs. Plant Mol Biol 10: 225–234.
  32. 32. Stanley J, Towsend R (1986) Infectious mutants of cassava latent virus generated in vivo from intact recombinant DNA clones containing single copies of the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 14: 5981–5998.
  33. 33. Bonilla-Ramirez GM, Guevara-Gonzalez RG, Garzon-Tiznado JA, Ascencio-Ibáñez JT, Torres-Pacheco I, et al. (1997) Analysis of the infectivity of monomeric clones of pepper huasteco virus. J Gen Virol 78: 947–951.
  34. 34. Unseld S, Frischmuth T, Jeske H (2004) Short deletions in nuclear targeting sequences of African cassava mosaic virus coat protein prevent geminivirus twinned particle formation. Virology 318: 90–101.
  35. 35. Lapidot M, Weil G, Cohen L, Segev L, Gaba V (2007) Biolistic inoculation of plants with Tomato yellow leaf curl virus DNA. J Virol Methods 144: 143–148.
  36. 36. Chatani M, Matsumoto Y, Mizuta H, Ikegami M, Boulton MI, et al. (1991) The nucleotide sequence and genome structure of the geminivirus miscanthus streak virus. J Gen Virol 72: 2325–2233.
  37. 37. Donson J, Gunn HV, Woolston CJ, Pinner MS, Boulton MI, et al. (1988) Agrobacterium-mediated infectivity of clones digitaria streak vrius DNA. Virology 162: 248–250.
  38. 38. Stanley J, Frischmuth T, Ellwood S (1990) Defective viral DNA ameliorates symptoms of geminivirus infection in transgenic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 6291–6295.
  39. 39. Stenger DC, Revington GN, Stevenson MC, Bisaro DM (1991) Replicational release of geminivirus genomes from tandemly repeated copies evidence for rolling-circle replication of a plant viral DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 8029–8033.
  40. 40. Hayes RJ, Brough CL, Prince VE, Coutts RHA, Buck KW (1988) Infection of Nicotiana benthamiana with uncut cloned tandem dimers of tomato golden mosaic virus DNA. J Gen Virol 69: 209–218.
  41. 41. Fontes EPB, Eagle PA, Sipe PS, Luckow VA, Hanley-Bowdoin L (1994) Interaction between a geminivirus replication protein and origin DNA is essential for viral replication. J Biol Chem 269: 8459–8465.
  42. 42. Gibson RW, Mwanga ROM, Kasule S, Mpembe I, Carey EE (1997) Apparent absence of viruses in most symptomless field-grown sweet potato in Uganda. Ann App Biol 130: 481–490.
  43. 43. Gibson RW, Aritua V, Byamukama E, Mpembe I, Kayongo J (2004) Control strategies for sweet potato virus disease in Africa. Virus Res 100: 115–122.
  44. 44. Valverde RA, Sim J, Lotrakul P (2004) Whitefly transmission of sweet potato viruses. Virus Res 100: 123–128.
  45. 45. Cohen J, Milgram M, Antignus Y, Pearlsman M, Lachman O, et al. (1997) Ipomoea crinkle leaf curl caused by a whitefly-transmitted gemini-like virus. Ann App Biol131: 273–282.
  46. 46. Simmons AM, Ling KS, Harrison HF, Jackson DM (2009) Sweet potato leaf curl virus: Efficiency of acquisition, retention and transmission by Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Crop Protec 28: 1007–1011.