Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Photolyase-Like Protein from Agrobacterium tumefaciens with an Iron-Sulfur Cluster

  • Inga Oberpichler ,

    Affiliation Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Botany I, Karlsruhe, Germany

  • Antonio J. Pierik,

    Affiliation Philipps University, Institute of Cytobiology and Pathology, Core facility for Protein Spectroscopy, Marburg, Germany

  • Janine Wesslowski,

    Affiliation Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Botany I, Karlsruhe, Germany

  • Richard Pokorny,

    Affiliation Philipps University, Plant Physiology and Photobiology, Marburg, Germany

  • Ran Rosen,

    Affiliation Agentek (1987) Ltd. Atidim Scientific Park, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Michal Vugman,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Fan Zhang,

    Affiliation Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Botany I, Karlsruhe, Germany

  • Olivia Neubauer,

    Affiliation Humboldt University Berlin, Institute for Microbiology, Berlin, Germany

  • Eliora Z. Ron,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Alfred Batschauer,

    Affiliation Philipps University, Plant Physiology and Photobiology, Marburg, Germany

  • Tilman Lamparter

    Affiliation Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Botany I, Karlsruhe, Germany

A Photolyase-Like Protein from Agrobacterium tumefaciens with an Iron-Sulfur Cluster

  • Inga Oberpichler, 
  • Antonio J. Pierik, 
  • Janine Wesslowski, 
  • Richard Pokorny, 
  • Ran Rosen, 
  • Michal Vugman, 
  • Fan Zhang, 
  • Olivia Neubauer, 
  • Eliora Z. Ron, 
  • Alfred Batschauer


Photolyases and cryptochromes are evolutionarily related flavoproteins with distinct functions. While photolyases can repair UV-induced DNA lesions in a light-dependent manner, cryptochromes regulate growth, development and the circadian clock in plants and animals. Here we report about two photolyase-related proteins, named PhrA and PhrB, found in the phytopathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens. PhrA belongs to the class III cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) photolyases, the sister class of plant cryptochromes, while PhrB belongs to a new class represented in at least 350 bacterial organisms. Both proteins contain flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) as a primary catalytic cofactor, which is photoreduceable by blue light. Spectral analysis of PhrA confirmed the presence of 5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate (MTHF) as antenna cofactor. PhrB comprises also an additional chromophore, absorbing in the short wavelength region but its spectrum is distinct from known antenna cofactors in other photolyases. Homology modeling suggests that PhrB contains an Fe-S cluster as cofactor which was confirmed by elemental analysis and EPR spectroscopy. According to protein sequence alignments the classical tryptophan photoreduction pathway is present in PhrA but absent in PhrB. Although PhrB is clearly distinguished from other photolyases including PhrA it is, like PhrA, required for in vivo photoreactivation. Moreover, PhrA can repair UV-induced DNA lesions in vitro. Thus, A. tumefaciens contains two photolyase homologs of which PhrB represents the first member of the cryptochrome/photolyase family (CPF) that contains an iron-sulfur cluster.


Photolyases are enzymes that repair UV-induced DNA lesions by using light energy. They can either repair CPDs, or pyrimidine-pyrimidone (6-4) photoproducts in single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as well as in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) [1]. Photolyases share high sequence similarity with cryptochromes (CRYs), which are blue/UV-A light photoreceptors that regulate growth, development and circadian rhythm in plants or act as transcriptional repressors of the circadian clock in mammals and some insects [2], [3].

Members of the CPF are widely distributed in all three kingdoms of life [1], [4]. According to their functions, they can be divided into three major classes: CPD photolyases, (6-4) photolyases and CRYs. Phylogenetically, the groups are further divided into the class I to class III CPD photolyases, plant CRYs, DASH CRYs, as wells as animal type I and II CRYs, respectively [4][7]. Animal CRYs are closely related to (6-4) photolyases, while plant CRYs form a sister group of the class III CPD photolyases. According to the present study, the CPF must be expanded by an additional class, which comprises, besides other proteins, PhrB from A. tumefaciens. We named this new class Fe-S bacterial cryptochromes and photolyases (FeS-BCPs). Interestingly, we identified FeS-BCP sequences in at least 350 bacterial organisms including many human and plant pathogens such as Vibrio cholerae and Pseudomonas syringae.

Photolyases generally bind two chromophores of which the catalytic FAD cofactor is common to all members [8][10]. The second chromophore in photolyases usually serves as photoantenna by absorbing light and transferring the excitation energy to the catalytic cofactor. So far, MTHF (pterin type), 8-hydroxy-7,8-didemethyl-5-deazariboflavin (8-HDF, deazaflavin type), FMN or FAD antennae have been found [1], [11], [12]. The FAD can be present either in the catalytic inactive, fully oxidized and semireduced radical states or in the catalytic active, fully reduced state. Reduction of the oxidized states to the fully reduced form in vitro is achieved by illumination of the enzyme in the presence of reducing agents. This process, known as photoactivation, involves the excitation of the flavin and subsequent electron hole hopping along the chain of three Trp residues (Trp triad) to the proteins surface, where the cationic or deprotonated neutral radical of surface Trp is reduced by a reductant in solution [13]. Whether photolyases need this type of photoactivation in vivo is a matter of debate [14]. The Trp triad is highly conserved in all CPF branches [15][19] but not in class II CPD photolyases where a tryptophan dyad was proposed to take over the same function [20]. In contrast, the FeS-BCPs seem to completely lack any Trp triad (this study).

We characterized two photolyase-related proteins PhrA and PhrB from A. tumefaciens regarding their spectral properties and demonstrate that PhrA repairs CPD lesions very efficiently in vitro, while both, PhrA and PhrB, seem to be required for in vivo photoreactivation. The main emphasis of this study was obtaining more information on the novel class of FeS-BCPs by phylogenetic analysis, structure prediction and spectroscopy, which led to the identification of an iron-sulfur cluster in PhrB.

Results and Discussion

Agrobacterium tumefaciens contains two photolyase-like proteins

By screening the A. tumefaciens genome for sequences with homology to photoreceptors we and others have already identified one cryptochrome/photolyase-related protein [5], [21], [22], which we named PhrA (gi: 17739623). An A. tumefaciens mutant in which phrA was knocked out has been used for physiological assays in an earlier study [21]. The second photolyase homolog has been found by transposon mutagenesis in a screen for light regulation of motility. Under the test condition, wild type cells showed a reduced motility in light as compared to darkness. Eight transposon mutants showed comparable motility in light and in darkness. The insertion loci of all mutants were sequenced and the results are summarized in Table 1. In the mutant t1, the fliI gene (gi: 17934468) is interrupted. This mutation resulted in a non-motile phenotype with no visible flagella, in accordance with an earlier study [23]. The mutants t4 and t7 displayed the same motility as the wild-type in darkness irrespective of the light conditions, while the motilities of mutants t2, t3, t5, t6 and t8 were lower compared to the wild type in darkness. In the t5 mutant, the transposon was inserted into a gene annotated as photolyase-related protein. Sequence comparison showed that this protein is indeed homolog to known photolyases and CRYs although BLAST searches for Escherichia coli photolyase homologs failed to identify this protein in A. tumefaciens. We named the gene product PhrB (gi: 15158416). Results of the mutant studies suggested that PhrB might serve as a photoreceptor for light-regulated motility. The assumption that PhrB could act as photoreceptor is in line with recent finding on the regulation of photosynthesis gene transcription in Rhodobacter sphaeroides by CryB [24], which is a close homolog of A. tumefaciens PhrB.

PhrA is a member of the CPD III photolyases, PhrB belongs to a new class termed FeS-BCPs

We performed multiple sequence alignments (Fig. S1) and phylogenetic studies (Fig. 1). According to these studies, the CPF may be divided into seven classes: CPD photolyases class I to III, DASH CRYs, (6-4) photolyases together with animal CRYs, plant CRYs and a new class, named FeS-BCPs. PhrA is a close homolog of the lately characterized Caulobacter crescentus photolyase (Fig. 1), both belonging to the CPD class III photolyases, the sister group of plant CRYs [5].

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of the cryptochrome/photolyase family.

Protein sequences were aligned using ClustalX [61], 2.0.12 and the phylogenetic tree was constructed with PHYLIP. For details see materials and methods. Different bootstrap values are highlighted with different grey bars. The species names are abbreviated as follows: (Arabidopsis thaliana (Arath), Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Agrtu), Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS 571 (Azoca), Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 (Braja), Caulobacter crescentus (Caucr), Drosophila melanogaster (Drome), Escherichia coli (Escco), Homo sapiens (Homsa), Oceanocaulix alexandrii (Oceal), Oryza sativa (Orysa), Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 (Rhosp), Rhodopseudomonas palustris (Rhopa), Sphingomonas sp. SKA58 (Sphsp), Sulfolobus tokodaii str. 7 (Sulto), Synechococcus elongatus PCC 6301 (Synel), Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (S6803), Thermus thermophilus HB8 (Theth), Vibrio cholerae (Vibch), Xenopus laevis (Xenla), Cry: cryptochrome, DASH: DASH cryptochrome, PL64: (6-4) photolyase, Phr: photolyase, Plr: photolyase-related protein, CPD: cyclobutan pyrimidine dimer, FeS-BCP: iron-sulfur cluster containing bacterial cryptochromes and photolyases.

PhrB belongs to a yet undescribed phylogenetic class which is more distant to other proteins of the family (Fig. 1). Besides PhrB, this class comprises CryB from R. sphaeroides [24], as well as representatives in pathogens such as V. cholerae (gi: 15600828) or P. syringae (gi: 71735364), all together in 150 and 8 genera of eubacteria and euarchaea, respectively. To check for unique structural elements of FeS-BCPs, we performed a 3D homology modeling of PhrB using the prediction server PS2 [25] and the crystal structure of cry1 from Arabidopsis thaliana (PDB entry 1U3D) as a template. The model showed a very similar Cα-backbone fold to known crystal structures of photolyases and CRYs [19], [26][30]. However, the Trp residues of the classical electron transfer route (e.g. W306, W359 and W382 in E. coli photolyase; [16]) are missing in PhrB and its homologs (Fig. 2). An alternative tryptophan dyad shown for CPD class II photolyases (e.g. W360 and W381 in Methanosarcina mazei Mm0852; [20]), which further branches into at least two possible routes (i.e. either W388 or Y345 in M. mazei Mm0852), is also missing in PhrB. Alternatively, photoreduction of FAD with the participation of Tyr residues has been reported for some class I and (6-4) photolyases [31]. Altogether, six Trps and seven Tyrs are conserved in FeS-BCP proteins. These residues are highlighted in red (Trps) and yellow (Tyrs) in the 3D homology model of PhrB superimposed onto the E. coli photolyase structure (PDB entry 1DNP; Fig. 2A). However, there is no classical Trp-triad for the reduction of the FAD cofactor predicted by the PhrB homology model and may thus not exist in FeS-BCPs. An alternative pathway involving Trp and Tyr residues for the reduction of the FAD cofactor is also unlikely due to predicted distances larger than 10 Å between any Trp and Tyr residues.

Figure 2. Three dimensional homology model of PhrB.

The model was constructed with PS2 [25] using the A. thaliana Cry1 PHR crystal structure (PDB: 1U3D) as template. (A) Predicted overall structure of PhrB aligned to the E. coli CPD I photolyase (PDB entry 1DNP). Blue: E. coli chromophores (FAD, MTHF) and Trp-triad; red: conserved Trp residues in FeS-BCPs; yellow: conserved Tyr residues in FeS-BCPs; green: conserved Cys residues in FeS-BCPs. (B) Conserved lesion contacting sites of CPD or (6-4) photolyases and PhrB. Numbers display the residue position in E. coli CPD photolyase, A. thaliana (6-4) photolyase and A. tumefaciens PhrB. (C) Predicted PhrB structure (Cys350 to Asp507) aligned to the S. cerevisiae PriL CTD. (D) Close up of the (4Fe-4S) cluster (yellow) coordinated by four conserved Cys residues in PriL (red) and the conserved Cys residues in PhrB (green). (E) Schematic display of FAD (blue) and (FeS) cluster (yellow) binding region in the (6-4) photolyase from A.thaliana (Arath (6-4)), PhrB from A. tumefaciens (Agrtu PhrB), the CPD I photolyase from E. coli (Escco CPDI) and in the primase large subunit from S. cerevisae (Sacce PriL). Numbers display the protein length in amino acids. (F) Level of amino acid conservation in FeS-BCPs for the region of the (FeS) cluster coordination, constructed with WebLogo (

As revealed by the superimposition of the PhrB homology model onto the structures of E. coli CPD I photolyase (PDB entry 1DNP) and A. thaliana (6-4) photolyase (PDB entry 3FY4), residues contacting the respective DNA lesion in PhrB are ambiguous (Fig. 2B). One of the two active-site His residues conserved in (6-4) photolyases is found also in PhrB (His366) and other FeS-BCPs (Fig. S1), whereas CPD I photolyases possess an Asn at this position [32], [33]. The other active-site His in (6-4) photolyases is replaced by a Met residue [34]. In PhrB, a Leu is found at the corresponding position but all FeS-BCPs have a conserved Met residue next to it (Met371 in PhrB, Fig. S1 and 2B). A Glu residue that is hydrogen-bonded to the 5′ Pyr of the lesion in CPD photolyases is replaced by a Gln306 in PhrB, which is also conserved in (6-4) photolyases [29], [34]. Thus, the specificity of FeS-BCPs for the respective lesion type (CPD or (6-4)) cannot be clearly drawn from the comparison above.

It was recently reported that the C-terminal domains of the large subunit of archaeal and eukaryotic primases (PriL-CTD) reveal a striking structural similarity to the active site region of photolyases and CRYs [35]. The region of similarity includes four cysteine residues necessary for the coordination of a (4Fe-4S) cluster in PriL-CTD [35][37]. PhrB also possess four clustered Cys residues at positions 350, 438, 441 and 454 (Fig. 2A and 2D) which are completely conserved in all FeS-BCPs (Fig. 2F). In FeS-BCPs, Cys1 is 86 to 89 amino acids away from Cys2, which is 2 amino acids in distance to Cys3. Between Cys3 and Cys4 12 to 15 amino acids are located. This pattern for the conserved Cys residues resembles more that of archaeal - than that of eukaryotic primases. Moreover, a superimposition of the PhrB homology model onto the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PriL-CTD structure (PDB entry 3LGB) shows that Cys350 and Cys438 in PhrB occupy similar positions as Cys336 and Cys434 in the yeast PriL-CTD (Fig. 2C and 2D), although the positions and orientations of the other two Cys residues in the model does not exactly match with a cubiform geometry of a (4Fe-4S) clusters, as e.g. in the primase structure. Considering that the true tertiary structure is often slightly different from a homology model, the four conserved Cys residues in FeS-BCPs might be suitably positioned for the coordination of an iron-sulfur cluster. Moreover, besides the four conserved Cys residues, there is no other Cys in the C-terminal region of PhrB.

Photoreduction of PhrA and PhrB

Purified recombinant PhrA appears as a yellow chromoprotein. Figure 3A shows the absorption spectra of PhrA after incubation in darkness and at different time points after blue light illumination. The absorption spectrum of dark-adapted PhrA is characterized by a maximum at 380 nm, and shoulders at 400 and 470 nm. The latter shoulder is indicative for an oxidized FAD chromophore. Blue light irradiation in the presence of DTT results in an absorption decrease between 450 and 470 nm, attributed to the loss of oxidized FAD. The transient rise in absorption with maxima at 580 nm and 625 nm indicates the formation of the neutral radical form of FAD. Upon prolonged irradiation the absorption of the neutral radical decreases, indicative for the formation of the fully reduced FAD state. The light minus dark difference spectra (Fig. 3B) more clearly reveal these light-induced redox changes of the FAD cofactor without being masked by the strong absorption at 380 nm (Fig. 3A). This latter absorption peak in PhrA is attributed to the antenna cofactor which is most probably 5, 10-methenyltetrahydrofolate (MTHF; [38]). Reported MTHF absorption maxima in photolyases range from 377 nm for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae [39] to 390 nm for the Neurospora crassa enzyme [40]. 8-HDF can be excluded as its absorption maximum is at 440 nm [1]. Moreover, the recombinant enzymes were expressed in E. coli, which is not producing 8-HDF [1]. Based on the absorption values at 280 nm, 380 nm, and 470 nm and the known extinction coefficients of the apoenzyme, MTHF and oxidized FAD, a nearly stoichiometric ratio of both cofactors to the PhrA apoprotein was determined.

Figure 3. UV-vis spectroscopic characterization and photoreduction of A. tumefaciens PhrA and PhrB.

(A, C) Initial spectra were measured for samples kept at 4°C in darkness for 24 h. Thereafter, spectra were taken at different time points after blue light (BL, 470 nm, 100 µmol m−2 s−1) irradiation from 1 min to 120 min for PhrA (A, B), and from 1 min to 180 min plus following 60 minutes of shorter wavelength blue light (405 nm, 150 µmol m−2 s−1) for PhrB (C, D). The insets show an expanded scale of the absorption spectra in the 510 nm–710 nm range. (B, D) Light minus dark difference spectra calculated by subtracting the absorption spectra of the PhrA or PhrB sample kept in the dark from the absorption spectra of samples illuminated by BL at each time point.

Heterologously expressed and purified PhrB has a brownish color. Figure 3C and 3D shows the absorption and difference spectra of PhrB kept in darkness and treated with blue light for different time periods. The absorption spectrum after dark incubation has maxima at 384 and 420 nm and shoulders at 435 and 470 nm. These absorption characteristics derive from two components: protein-bound FAD and a chromophore with rather broad bands which has significant absorption at 500–700 nm (see below). Blue light illumination resulted in an absorption decrease in the 345 nm to 500 nm range. Upon prolonged irradiation, a single broad absorption peak with a maximum at 415 nm remained (Fig. 3C). The difference spectra (Fig. 3D) show that the FAD cofactor in PhrB is photoreduced to the fully reduced FAD state as well.

The overall shape of the PhrB absorption spectrum differs from that of pterin-type photolyases or that of deazaflavin-type photolyases. For PhrB we found the highest spectral similarity with CryB from R. sphaeroides [24]. These authors showed that CryB comprises, in addition to FAD, another cofactor that is different from other flavins or MTHF but the cofactor remained unidentified. The absorption spectrum of PhrB also resembles that of the electron transfer flavoprotein-ubiquinone oxidoreductase [41]. This flavoprotein contains FAD and a (4Fe-4S) cluster as cofactors, which both contribute to the absorption in the spectral region of interest [41]. Proteins containing a (4Fe-4S) cluster and lacking flavin, such as bacterial ferredoxins, high-potential iron-sulfur proteins (HiPIPs) or the spore photoproduct lyase SplG, are characterized by a broad absorption extending up to 700 nm with one or several bands in the 300–500 nm range [42], [43]. A shift of the absorption maximum to a longer wavelength is seen for PhrB (415–420 nm) in comparison to PhrA (380 nm). The contribution of the extinction coefficient for PhrB at around 410 nm, determined by difference spectra, indicate 10,000 to 15,000 M−1 cm−1. Published extinction coefficients of (4Fe-4S) clusters at 410 nm vary between 11,900 M−1 cm−1 and 15,000 M−1 cm−1 [42][45]. Moreover, a significant absorption in the entire visible range was observed for PhrB under all conditions (Fig. 3C). These findings suggest that the second chromophore could be a (4Fe-4S) cluster.

PhrB contains an (4Fe-4S) cluster

Chemical analysis on as-isolated PhrB gave an iron and sulfide content of 3.9±0.4 atoms iron and 2.7±0.2 moles sulfide per mol protein. The latter value might be underestimated since protein molecules with broken-down clusters retain Fe but can inadvertently loose H2S. Since the superposition of other cofactors in the visible spectral range complicated direct detection of the Fe-S cluster, we employed EPR spectroscopy. Except for a weak organic radical signal, PhrB did not exhibit EPR signals in the dithionite-treated, anaerobically photoreduced and as isolated form, but upon brief treatment with potassium ferricyanide a strong signal with g-values of 2.057, 2.004 and 1.981 developed (Fig. 4). The signal was detected between 4 and 30 K, but broadened beyond detection at higher temperature. PhrA lacked EPR signals with the exception of a weak flavin radical signal. EPR linewidths, g-values and microwave power of half-saturation (15 mW at 10 K) of PhrB are unlike the parameters for radicals, but are typical for EPR signals of spin-coupled paramagnetic ions in Fe-S clusters. Double integration versus a Cu2+ standard gave 0.6 spin-coupled centers per PhrB, so the signal cannot derive from a contaminant but is from a moiety present in almost stoichiometric proportion. The likely source of the signal is a Fe-S cluster composed of approximately 4 Fe and 3 S2− ions, based on the chemical analysis. Occurrence of an EPR signal in the oxidized form excludes (2Fe-2S)1+/2+ and (4Fe-4S)1+/2+ clusters as in plant or bacterial ferredoxins. This leaves two possibilities: (3Fe-4S)0/1+ or (4Fe-4S)2+/3+ clusters occurring in aconitase and high potential iron-sulfur proteins (HiPIP), respectively. These Fe-S clusters have an EPR signal upon oxidation (Fig. 4, lowest traces) with EPR spectral properties similar with, but not identical to oxidized PhrB. The situation is reminiscent of human and yeast primases [46], [47] where crystal structure and elemental analysis is in agreement with a (4Fe-4S)2+ cluster in the native state, but EPR signals upon oxidation are neither like regular (3Fe-4S)1+ clusters in aconitase nor like (4Fe-4S)3+ clusters in HiPIP. For Bacillus subtilis AddAB helicase/nuclease [48], which contains a (3Fe-4S) or (4Fe-4S) cluster, similar EPR spectroscopic observations were made. In summary, we propose that PhrB contains a (4Fe-4S)2+ cluster which upon oxidation is converted to EPR active species.

Figure 4. PhrB contains an Fe-S cluster.

X band EPR spectra of PhrB and PhrA (normalized to equal protein concentration). Photoreduction was for 5 min under anaerobic conditions with white light (slide projector). Incubation with sodium dithionite (2 mM) or potassium ferricyanide (2 mM) was for 5 min at 23°C. For comparison the EPR spectra of (3Fe-4S)1+ in aconitase (H2O2-treated yeast mitochondria) and of the (4Fe-4S)3+ cluster in Allochromatium vinosum HiPIP are shown (arbitrary scaling). EPR conditions: microwave power, 0.2 mW; microwave frequency 9.458 GHz; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 1.25 mT; temperature, 15 K.

This is the first experimental evidence that a member of the CPF contains an iron-sulfur cluster. Iron-sulfur clusters are well known for their role in electron transfer reactions of photosynthesis and respiration. Furthermore several DNA repair enzymes like MutY [49], endonuclease III [50], DNA helicases [51] and spore photoproduct lyases [43], [44] contain iron-sulfur clusters. MutY and endonuclease III are involved in base excision repair and are proposed to use their (4Fe-4S) clusters for efficient lesion detection [52]. DNA repair helicases, such as XPD and FancJ, belong to the group of nucleotide excision repair enzymes. The iron-sulfur clusters in both are found within a conserved domain near the N-terminus that serves to separate DNA strands as the protein translocates along the DNA [51]. Spore photoproduct lyases repair a special type of lesions, so-called spore photoproducts [53], [54] which are unique to spore-forming microorganisms [55], [56]. Buis et al. [44] suggested that the repair mechanism in this case involves a reduced (4Fe-4S)1+ cluster and S-adenosylmethionine as catalytic cofactor, with a mechanism in which the 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical is reversibly generated. The (4Fe-4S) cluster in PhrB may be involved in electron transfer to the FAD cofactor or alternatively may play a role in the recognition process similar to other (4Fe-4S) cluster enzymes involved in DNA repair.

In vivo photoreactivation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens depends on both, PhrA and PhrB

To test for photolyase activity of PhrA and PhrB, we performed in vivo tests with wild type A. tumefaciens cells and the phrA and phrB mutants (Fig. 5A). As in the classical photoreactivation tests, cells were treated with UV-B irradiation and subsequently placed in darkness or photoreactivating white light. The effect of photorepair was best seen after 5 min UV-B treatment, where 21±4% cells survived in darkness and 56±5% survived after photoreactivation (Fig. 5A). The survival rate of the phrA mutant was, irrespective of photoreactivating light, lower than that of the wild type kept in darkness after UV-B treatment. Thus, lack of PhrA cannot be compensated by PhrB. This may be indicative for a weak CPD-repair activity of PhrB or for the repair of (6-4) photoproducts by PhrB. Such (6-4) lesions constitute only 10–20% of the total photoproducts, compared to CPDs, which make up 80–90% of the photolesions [1]. Alternatively, the PhrA activity or expression might be regulated by PhrB. The phrB mutant showed a strongly attenuated photoreactivation (26±3% survival), much less efficient than that of the wild type (56±5% survival). The survival rate of the photoreactivated phrB mutant was 17% above the phrB dark control. Thus, a photorepair activity, most likely mediated by PhrA, can be still detected in this mutant. These results indicate that both PhrA and PhrB are involved in photoreactivation. For CryB, the close R. sphaeroides homolog of PhrB, in vivo photoreactivation tests with the knock out mutant revealed also a reduced photoreactivation in comparison to the wild type [57].

Figure 5. Photorepair of UV-lesions.

(A) In vivo photoreactivation test. A. tumefaciens cells of the wild type (WT), the phrA and the phrB mutant were spread on LB agar plates, irradiated with UV-B light for 5 min and immediately transferred to darkness (−) or subjected to photoreactivating white light (+). Mean values of CFU ± SE; n = 8 to 14. (B and C) In vitro repair of pyrimidine dimers by PhrA and PhrB. Thymine dimers were created by UV-C illumination of the DNA substrate (first row, +/− UV-C), mixed with enzyme (second row) and incubated for the indicated times in photoreactivating blue light (405 nm, 150 µmol m−2 s−1) or in darkness (*) (third row). Photorepaired DNA can be digested by MseI (fourth row, +/− MseI). Shown are representative gels from three independent repair experiments using PhrA or PhrB.

PhrA repairs in vitro UV-C damaged dsDNA

To test whether PhrA and PhrB are capable of binding and repairing CPD lesions in dsDNA, we performed in vitro studies with recombinant proteins and UV-C treated dsDNA probes containing such lesions (Fig. 5B and 5C). It should be noted that the probe used here comprises 15 sites with at least two neighboring pyrimidines and is therefore heterogeneous in regard to the number, type and position of CPDs formed by UV-C. However, each strand contains only one T<>T dimer within the MseI recognition sequence. Thus, a restriction site restoration assay can be used to monitor the photorepair process, although the actual number of repaired lesions can be substantially higher compared to the number of restored MseI sites. The reaction mixtures of experiments shown in Fig. 5B and 5C contained 400 nM DNA and 17 nM PhrA or PhrB, respectively. Within one hour of blue light treatment at 4°C, PhrA repaired all damaged MseI sites whereas without photoreactivating light no repair was detected (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, we tested the repair of CPDs and T(6-4)T photoproducts in a UV-treated single-stranded oligo(dT)18 spectrophotometrically at 265 nm and 325 nm. In such an assay photoreduced PhrA was found to repair up to 75% of CPDs in ssDNA within one hour but no T(6-4)T photoproducts, detected as an absorption increase at 265 nm (data not shown). Hence, PhrA fulfils all the characteristics of a bona-fide CPD photolyase – it can bind to and repair CPDs in ssDNA as well as in dsDNA. When PhrB was used in the restriction site restoration assay, damaged DNA was apparently not repaired (Fig. 5C). The same result was found for a very high PhrB to probe ratio of 20∶1. Moreover, the repair of CPDs or T(6-4)T photoproducts in single-stranded oligo(dT)18 by photoreduced PhrB was tested. Again, no clear repair of UV-damaged DNA was detected (data not shown). It is possible that a hitherto unidentified accessory protein is required, which enhances binding and/or catalytic activity of PhrB. Thus, under the tested conditions no in vitro repair of these lesions in ssDNA and dsDNA by PhrB was observed.


A. tumefaciens contains two different types of photolyase homologs which are both required for photorepair activity in vivo. These two proteins are found at evolutionary exposed positions: While PhrA belongs to a sister group of plant CRYs and its further analyses could contribute to our understanding of plant CRY evolution, PhrB belongs to a newly characterized group of the CPF that contains an iron-sulfur cluster besides the conserved FAD as cofactors. We eagerly await structural characterization for experimental distances between the cofactors. From thissuch results a more precise conclusion on the function or a discrimination between electron transfer and DNA recognition function can be drawn.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Bacterial strains used in this study were A. tumefaciens C58 harboring the Ti nopaline plasmid (DSMZ - the German Resource Centre for Biological Material,, its knockout mutants phrA [21] and phrB (this study) as well as following E. coli strains: XL1 blue (Stratagene), ER2566 (NEB) for recombinant expression and BW20767 [58] for transposon mutagenesis. Bacteria were grown at 14–37°C (E. coli) and 28°C (A. tumefaciens) in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Depending on the resistance, 50 µg/ml kanamycin (Kan), 250 µg/ml spectinomycin (Spc), 100 µg/ml rifampicin (Rif) or 100 µg/ml ampicillin (Amp) were added.

Transposon mutagenesis, mutant screen and transposon insertion cloning

Transposon mutagenesis was performed as previously described [59]. Briefly, plasmids were transferred into A. tumefaciens recipients by conjugation from E. coli BW20767 carrying the plasmid pRL27. To this end, donor and recipient strains were grown to an OD600 of around 0.8, mixed and collected by filtration using a 0.45 µm analytical filter (Nalgene). This filter was incubated overnight at 28°C on LB agar medium containing Kan. After incubation, the cells were resuspended in liquid LB medium and plated onto LB medium containing Kan and Rif for selection of A. tumefaciens cells that gained the transposon plasmid pRL27 by conjugation.

The screen for A. tumefaciens mutants with altered motility was performed on soft agar plates. Bacteria were grown on solid media containing Kan, transferred with a tooth pick onto LB plates containing 0.3% agar and incubated for 24 hours in white light (Osram L 36 W/765 cool daylight, 150 µmol m−2 s−1) or in darkness.

One step cloning of Tn5-RL27 insertions was performed as described in Larsen et al. [59]. Genomic DNA from a transposon-induced mutant was digested with BamHI and subsequently treated with T4 DNA ligase for introduction into E. coli DH5α/λpir. Transposon junction plasmids were isolated from selected transformants and subjected to sequencing using the transposon specific primers tpnRL17–1 and tpnRL13–2 (Table S1). There have been no new data created for deposition in the GenBank. Sequences were then compared to the protein sequence database (GenBank) using the BlastX algorithm [60] for identification of the mutated gene (Table 1). The Tn5-RL27 insertions were confirmed by Southern blot analysis using the digoxygenin labelling system (Roche).

Sequence analyses

All sequences of photolyase-related proteins were retrieved from public databases via the National Center for Biotechnology Information web site ( Multiple sequence alignments were carried out using ClustalX [61], version 2.0.12 and ClustalW2 ( For the construction of the phylogenetic tree, a ClustalX alignment was performed with 37 selected prototypical sequences. In the “multiple alignment parameters”, the “gap opening” was set to 50 and the “BLOSUM series” was selected as weight matrix. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with the PHYLIP program package version 3.6 (Z) using the SEQBOOT, PROTDIST, FITCH and CONSENSE utilities with default parameters and drawn with iTOL [62]. The number of bootstrapping datasets was set to 100. The abbreviations of species names are given in the legend of Fig. 1.

Recombinant expression of PhrA and PhrB

For the cloning of a PhrA expression vector, the gene phrA (gi: 15156266, accession: AAK87020) was PCR-amplified with Taq polymerase (Sigma), using the primers phrA 5′, phrA 3′ (Table S1) and genomic A. tumefaciens DNA as template. Purified PCR products were cloned into the linear pQE30UA expression vector (Qiagen) and transformed into E. coli XL1 blue cells. For cloning of an expression vector for PhrB, the gene phrB (gi: 15158416; accession: AAK88685) was PCR-amplified with Phusion polymerase (NEB) using genomic DNA as template and the primers phrB NdeI 5′ and phrB NotI 3′ (Table S1). The NdeI/NotI digested and purified PCR product was ligated into the corresponding restriction sites of vector pET-21b (Novagen/Merck) and transformed into E. coli ER2566 cells. The expression vectors encode for a protein with an N-terminal His6-tag (phrA) or a C-terminal 6× His6-tag (phrB). Correct cloning was confirmed by DNA sequencing. There have been no new data created for deposition in the GenBank.

For protein expression, bacteria were grown in 3 litres LB with Amp at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.6 to 0.8. Thereafter, the cells were shaken at 14°C (PhrA) or 28°C (PhrB). Expression was induced by the addition of isopropyl β-D- thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 100 µm. After one (PhrB) or three days (PhrA) of expression, cells were collected by centrifugation and washed with extraction buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, 5 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl, 10% w/v glycerol, pH 7.8), centrifuged again and resuspended in the same buffer. Cells were disrupted using a French pressure cell 1300 bar and the cell debris was pelleted at 4°C and 25,000 g for 10 min. Ammonium sulphate precipitation was performed by adding 93% (final volume) of AmS buffer (3.3 M ammonium sulphate, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.8) to the protein solution. Precipitated proteins were pelleted at 25,000 g for 30 min, resuspended in the wash buffer (WB: 50 mM Tris/HCl, 10 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl, 10% w/v glycerol, pH 7.8) and centrifuged again. Supernatant was applied to a WB-equilibrated column packed with Ni2+-NTA agarose matrix (Qiagen). After washing the column with WB, bound protein was eluted with elution buffer (EB: 50 mM Tris/HCl, 250 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl, 10% w/v glycerol, pH 7.8). The eluate was concentrated by ammonium sulphate precipitation and the protein was resuspended in extraction buffer. PhrB was then subjected to size-exclusion chromatography using a 200 ml Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column (GE Healthcare) and the extraction buffer for separation. PhrB containing fractions were again subjected to an ammonium sulphate precipitation and resuspended in the extraction buffer.

Characterization of PhrA and PhrB by UV-vis spectroscopy

Spectrophotometric measurements of recombinant proteins were performed in a Jasco V550 photometer at 4°C. PhrA or PhrB were incubated for 24 h in darkness at 4°C in order to get the fully oxidized FAD cofactor. Thereafter, 10 mM and 20 mM DTT (final concentration) was added to PhrA and PhrB solutions, respectively. For photoreduction, we used either a light emitting diode with a maximum emission wavelength of 470 nm (HLMP-HB57-LMC, Avago Technologies) and a light intensity of 55 µmol m−2 s−1 or a light emitting diode with an emission maximum at 405 nm (GB333UV1C/L1, Farnell Diodes) and a light intensity of 100 µmol m−2 s−1. Spectra were taken at different time points ranging from 1 min to120 min of 470 nm illumination for PhrA and from 1 min to 180 min of 470 nm illumination followed by additional 0–60 min of 405 nm illumination for PhrB. The difference spectra were calculated by subtracting the absorption spectra of the dark-incubated proteins from the absorption spectra after blue light illumination. For the calculation of the cofactor to protein ratios, absorption values at 280 nm, 380 nm, and 470 nm and the known extinction coefficients of the apoenzyme, MTHF, and oxidized FAD (FADox) (εApo 280 nm 122,310 M−1 cm−1, εFADox 280 nm 17,638 M−1 cm−1, εFADox 380 nm 8917 M−1 cm−1, εFADox 470 nm 9429 M−1 cm−1, εMTHF 280 nm 9895 M−1 cm−1, εMTHF 380 nm 23050 M−1 cm−1) were used.

Determination of iron and acid-labile sulphide in PhrB

To estimate the concentration of iron in protein solutions, a protocol modified from Rad et al. [63] was used. A 100 µl protein solution (35 µM) dissolved in the extraction buffer was mixed with 5 µl concentrated HCl and heated for 10 min to 80°C to release the cofactors. Control reactions contained either PhrA or FAD at the same concentrations or buffer only. After 10 min of centrifugation at 13,000 g, 100 µl of the supernatant were mixed with 1.3 ml of 500 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.5, 100 µl 5% ascorbic acid and 400 µl of 0.1% bathophenanthroline disulphonic acid was added. The reactions were incubated for 1 h at room temperature and centrifuged again (10 min at 13,000 g). The absorption of the reaction mixture was measured in the 250–650 nm range. A standard curve was constructed using the Fe2+ solutions (ammonium ferrous sulphate hexahydrate) in the range of 0–500 µM.

EPR spectroscopy

PhrA (28 µM) and PhrB (13 µM) in extraction buffer were shock-frozen in quartz tubes with liquid nitrogen. EPR spectra were recorded with a Bruker EMX-6/1 EPR spectrometer with ER-041 XG X band microwave bridge, standard universal TE102 rectangular cavity, ER-041-1161 microwave frequency counter, ER-070 6-inch magnet and EMX-032T Hall probe. Samples were kept at low temperature with an ER-4112HV Oxford Instruments variable temperature helium flow cryostat. The WINEPR software supplied by the manufacturer was used for data collection, subtraction of baselines and conversion into ASCII format.

In vivo photorepair tests

To test for in vivo photorepair, A. tumefaciens cells of the wild type, the phrA and phrB mutant were grown in LB medium at 28°C to an OD600 nm of 0.3. The cell suspensions were diluted 1∶100,000 and 50 µl were spread on LB agar plates. The plates were irradiated with UV-B light (Philips TL40/W12; 50 cm distance) for the indicated times. Half of the plates were immediately transferred to darkness, the other half was subjected to photoreactivating white light (80–100 µmol m−2 s−1) for 30 minutes. The plates were incubated for two days in darkness at 28°C and the number of colonies was determined.

In vitro photolyase activity

Synthesis of the dsDNA probe was performed by PCR using the partially overlapping primers probe 5′, probe 3′ (Table S1) and Taq polymerase (NEB) (no extra template). The predicted sequence of the PCR product is: 5′ATAGGACGATGCTGGATGTCGAGGTGTCGTTAATGTGGAGCTGTAGGTCGTACTATACGG 3′. It contains a single MseI site (underlined) overstretching a T-T dimer but represents a heterogeneous mixture of duplexes in regard to the number, type and position of CPDs. The PCR products were supplemented with 20% acetone and degassed for 15 min with argon. CPDs were created by illuminating the probe for 4 h with UV-C on ice (UV-C: GE Healthcare, G15T87B, 15 W; 10 cm distance). Acetone was then removed by heating for 10 min to 65°C. Proteins had been photoreduced immediately before the repair assay by blue light to achieve their reduced flavin state. The repair assay was performed in following repair buffer: 50 mM Tris/Cl, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 100 µg ml−1 BSA, 10% (w/v) glycerol pH 7.6 at 4°C. After an incubation of 20 min in the dark on ice, each reaction mixture was divided into 2 parts. One part was illuminated with 150 µmol m−2 s−1 of 405 nm blue light (GB333UV1C/L1, Farnell Diodes), the other part was kept in the dark. Aliquots were taken at the indicated time points. Subsequently, proteins were inactivated by heating to 95°C for 10 min and the DNA probe was digested with MseI (NEB). DNA with a T<>T dimer in the MseI site cannot be cleaved by the restriction enzyme in contrast to the photorepaired probe. After electrophoresis on 4% TBE agarose gels (NuSieve, Lonza), DNA bands were visualized by SYBR Safe fluorescence (Invitrogen). Several control reactions, such as digested undamaged DNA as well as digested and undigested damaged DNA, were included in each set of experiment. The repair of thymine dimers in single-stranded DNA was monitored photometrically using a T<>T containing oligo(dT)18. To this end, CPDs and T(6-4)T photoproducts were created by illuminating the oligo(dT)18 for 4 h with UV-C on ice (UV-C: GE Healthcare, G15T87B, 15 W; 10 cm distance). A CPD does essentially not absorb at 265 nm while the repaired thymines do. Thus, a repair of CPDs is indicated by an absorbance increase at 265 nm [64]. In contrast, T(6-4)T photoproducts absorb at 325 nm and the decrease in absorbance at 325 nm corresponds to the repair of (6-4) photoproducts [65].

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Sequence alignment of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens cryptochrome/photolyase member proteins (AgrtuPhrA and AgrtuPhrB) with representatives of all major classes of the CPF. Highlighted in red are the conserved Trp residues of the electron-transfer chain (W382–W359–W306 in EsccoPhr1) and those of a proposed alternative electron-transfer chain for CPD II photolyases (W394–W387–W366 in ArathPlr2; modified from [20]). The conserved Trp and Tyr (Y) residues of the FeS-BCPs are highlighted in light blue, the conserved Cys residues, coordinating most likely the (4Fe-4S) cluster, in green. Abbreviations: A. thaliana (Arath), A. tumefaciens (Agrtu) Caulobacter crescentus (Caucr), D. melanogaster (Drome), E. coli (Escco), H. sapiens (Homsa), Oceanocaulix alexandrii (Oceal), O. sativa (Orysa), Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 (Rhosp), Sphingomonas sp. SKA58 (Sphsp), Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 (S6803) and V. cholerae (Vibch)). Sequence alignment was generated using ClustalW2.



Table S1.

Sequencing and PCR primers.




We thank Gregor Rottwinkel for fruitful discussions; Sybille Wörner for excellent technical support; Andy Kahles and Benjamin Faist for the establishment of the in vivo repair assay and Tanja Rublack for the optimization of the PhrA expression (KIT).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AJP RP EZR AB TL IO. Performed the experiments: AJP JW RR MV FZ ON IO. Analyzed the data: AJP JW RP IO. Wrote the paper: AJP RP AB TL IO.


  1. 1. Sancar A (2003) Structure and function of DNA photolyase and cryptochrome blue-light photoreceptors. Chem Rev 103: 2203–2237.
  2. 2. Cashmore AR (2003) Cryptochromes: enabling plants and animals to determine circadian time. Cell 114: 537–543.
  3. 3. Yuan Q, Metterville D, Briscoe AD, Reppert SM (2007) Insect cryptochromes: gene duplication and loss define diverse ways to construct insect circadian clocks. Mol Biol Evol 24: 948–955.
  4. 4. Lin C, Todo T (2005) The cryptochromes. Genome Biol 6: 220.
  5. 5. Ozturk N, Kao YT, Selby CP, Kavakli IH, Partch CL, et al. (2008) Purification and characterization of a type III photolyase from Caulobacter crescentus. Biochemistry 47: 10255–10261.
  6. 6. Heijde M, Zabulon G, Corellou F, Ishikawa T, Brazard J, et al. (2010) Characterization of two members of the cryptochrome/photolyase family from Ostreococcus tauri provides insights into the origin and evolution of cryptochromes. Plant Cell Environ 33: 1614–1626.
  7. 7. Bayram O, Braus GH, Fischer R, Rodriguez-Romero J (2010) Spotlight on Aspergillus nidulans photosensory systems. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 900–908.
  8. 8. Sancar A, Sancar GB (1984) Escherichia coli DNA photolyase is a flavoprotein. J Mol Biol 172: 223–227.
  9. 9. Jorns MS, Sancar GB, Sancar A (1984) Identification of a neutral flavin radical and characterization of a second chromophore in Escherichia coli DNA photolyase. Biochemistry 23: 2673–2679.
  10. 10. Todo T, Kim ST, Hitomi K, Otoshi E, Inui T, et al. (1997) Flavin adenine dinucleotide as a chromophore of the Xenopus (6-4) photolyase. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 764–768.
  11. 11. Ueda T, Kato A, Kuramitsu S, Terasawa H, Shimada I (2005) Identification and characterization of a second chromophore of DNA photolyase from Thermus thermophilus HB27. J Biol Chem 280: 36237–36243.
  12. 12. Fujihashi M, Numoto N, Kobayashi Y, Mizushima A, Tsujimura M, et al. (2007) Crystal structure of archaeal photolyase from Sulfolobus tokodaii with two FAD molecules: implication of a novel light-harvesting cofactor. J Mol Biol 365: 903–910.
  13. 13. Byrdin M, Sartor V, Eker APM, Vos MH, Aubert C, et al. (2004) Intraprotein electron transfer and proton dynamics during photoactivation of DNA photolyase from E. coli: review and new insights from an “inverse” deuterium isotope effect. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenergetics 1655: 64–70.
  14. 14. Kavakli IH, Sancar A (2004) Analysis of the role of intraprotein electron transfer in photoreactivation by DNA photolyase in vivo. Biochemistry 43: 15103–15110.
  15. 15. Kanai S, Kikuno R, Toh H, Ryo H, Todo T (1997) Molecular evolution of the photolyase-blue-light photoreceptor family. J Mol Evol 45: 535–548.
  16. 16. Aubert C, Vos MH, Mathis P, Eker APM, Brettel K (2000) Intraprotein radical transfer during photoactivation of DNA photolyase. Nature 405: 586–590.
  17. 17. Brudler R, Hitomi K, Daiyasu H, Toh H, Kucho K, et al. (2003) Identification of a new cryptochrome class. Structure, function, and evolution. Mol Cell 11: 59–67.
  18. 18. Byrdin M, Eker APM, Vos MH, Brettel K (2003) Dissection of the triple tryptophan electron transfer chain in Escherichia coli DNA photolyase: Trp382 is the primary donor in photoactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 8676–8681.
  19. 19. Brautigam CA, Smith BS, Ma Z, Palnitkar M, Tomchick DR, et al. (2004) Structure of the photolyase-like domain of cryptochrome 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 12142–12147.
  20. 20. Kiontke S, Geisselbrecht Y, Pokorny R, Carell T, Batschauer A, et al. (2011) Crystal structures of an archaeal class II DNA photolyase and its complex with UV-damaged duplex DNA. EMBO J. Epub ahead of print.
  21. 21. Oberpichler I, Rosen R, Rasouly A, Vugman M, Ron EZ, et al. (2008) Light affects motility and infectivity of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Environ Microbiol 10: 2020–2029.
  22. 22. Kleine T, Lockhart P, Batschauer A (2003) An Arabidopsis protein closely related to Synechocystis cryptochrome is targeted to organelles. Plant J 35: 93–103.
  23. 23. Deakin WJ, Parker VE, Wright EL, Ashcroft KJ, Loake GJ, et al. (1999) Agrobacterium tumefaciens possesses a fourth flagelin gene located in a large gene cluster concerned with flagellar structure, assembly and motility. Microbiology 145: 1397–1407.
  24. 24. Hendrischk AK, Fruhwirth SW, Moldt J, Pokorny R, Metz S, et al. (2009) A cryptochrome-like protein is involved in the regulation of photosynthesis genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Mol Microbiol 74: 990–1003.
  25. 25. Chen CC, Hwang JK, Yang JM (2006) PS(2): protein structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W152–W157.
  26. 26. Park HW, Kim ST, Sancar A, Deisenhofer J (1995) Crystal-structure of DNA photolyase from Escherichia coli. Science 268: 1866–1872.
  27. 27. Tamada T, Kitadokoro K, Higuchi Y, Inaka K, Yasui A, et al. (1997) Crystal structure of DNA photolyase from Anacystis nidulans. Nat Struct Biol 4: 887–891.
  28. 28. Pokorny R, Klar T, Essen LO, Batschauer A (2005) Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of cryptochrome 3 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 61: 935–938.
  29. 29. Maul MJ, Barends TRM, Glas AF, Cryle MJ, Domratcheva T, et al. (2008) Crystal structure and mechanism of a DNA (6-4) photolyase. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 47: 10076–10080.
  30. 30. Hitomi K, DiTacchio L, Arvai AS, Yamamoto J, Kim ST, et al. (2009) Functional motifs in the (6-4) photolyase crystal structure make a comparative framework for DNA repair photolyases and clock cryptochromes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 6962–6967.
  31. 31. Aubert C, Mathis P, Eker APM, Brettel K (1999) Intraprotein electron transfer between tyrosine and tryptophan in DNA photolyase from Anacystis nidulans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 5423–5427.
  32. 32. Hitomi K, Nakamura H, Kim ST, Mizukoshi T, Ishikawa T, et al. (2001) Role of two histidines in the (6-4) photolyase reaction. J Biol Chem 276: 10103–10109.
  33. 33. Essen LO, Klar T (2006) Light-driven DNA repair by photolyases. Cell Mol Life Sci 63: 1266–1277.
  34. 34. Mees A, Klar T, Gnau P, Hennecke U, Eker APM, et al. (2004) Crystal structure of a photolyase bound to a CPD-like DNA lesion after in situ repair. Science 306: 1789–1793.
  35. 35. Sauguet L, Klinge S, Perera RL, Maman JD, Pellegrini L (2010) Shared active site architecture between the large subunit of eukaryotic primase and DNA photolyaseLSphotolyase. PLoS One 5:
  36. 36. Vaithiyalingam S, Warren EM, Eichman BF, Chazin WJ (2010) Insights into eukaryotic DNA priming from the structure and functional interactions of the 4Fe-4S cluster domain of human DNA primase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13684–13689.
  37. 37. Agarkar VB, Babayeva ND, Pavlov YI, Tahirov TH (2011) Crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of human DNA primase large subunit: implications for the mechanism of the primase-polymerase α switch. Cell Cycle 10: 926–931.
  38. 38. Johnson JL, Hammalvarez S, Payne G, Sancar GB, Rajagopalan KV, et al. (1988) Identification of the second chromophore of Escherichia coli and yeast DNA photolyases as 5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 2046–2050.
  39. 39. Sancar GB, Smith FW, Heelis PF (1987) Purification of the yeast PHR1 photolyase from an Escherichia coli overproducing strain and characterization of the intrinsic chromophores of the enzyme. J Biol Chem 262: 15457–15465.
  40. 40. Eker APM, Yajima H, Yasui A (1994) DNA photolyase from the fungus Neurospora crassa. Purification, characterization and comparison with other photolyases. Photochem Photobiol 60: 125–133.
  41. 41. Swanson MA, Usselman RJ, Frerman FE, Eaton GR, Eaton SS (2008) The iron-sulfur cluster of electron transfer flavoprotein-ubiquinone oxidoreductase is the electron acceptor for electron transfer flavoprotein. Biochemistry 47: 8894–8901.
  42. 42. Stephens PJ, Thomson AJ, Dunn JBR, Keiderling TA, Rawlings J, et al. (1978) Circular dichroism and magnetic circular dichroism of iron-sulfur proteins. Biochemistry 17: 4770–4778.
  43. 43. Pieck JC, Hennecke U, Pierik AJ, Friedel MG, Carell T (2006) Characterization of a new thermophilic spore photoproduct lyase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (SplG) with defined lesion containing DNA substrates. J Biol Chem 281: 36317–36326.
  44. 44. Buis JM, Cheek J, Kalliri E, Broderick JB (2006) Characterization of an active spore photoproduct lyase, a DNA repair enzyme in the radical S-adenosylmethionine superfamily. J Biol Chem 281: 25994–26003.
  45. 45. Shen G, Balasubramanian R, Wang T, Wu Y, Hoffart LM, et al. (2007) SufR coordinates two (4Fe-4S)2+, 1+ clusters and functions as a transcriptional repressor of the sufBCDS operon and an autoregulator of sufR in cyanobacteria. J Biol Chem 282: 31909–31919.
  46. 46. Klinge S, Hirst J, Maman JD, Krude T, Pellegrini L (2007) An iron-sulfur domain of the eukaryotic primase is essential for RNA primer synthesis. Nat Struct Mol BiolBiol 14: 875–877.
  47. 47. Weiner BE, Huang H, Dattilo BM, Nilges MJ, Fanning E, et al. (2007) An ironiron-sulfur cluster in the C-terminal domain of the p58 subunit of human DNA primase. J Biol Chem 282: 33444–33451.
  48. 48. Yeeles JTP, Cammack R, Dillingham MS (2009) An ironiron-sulfur cluster is essential for the binding of broken DNA by AddAB-type helicase-nucleases. J Biol Chem 284: 7746–7755.
  49. 49. Michaels ML, Pham L, Nghiem Y, Cruz C, Miller JH (1990) MutY, an adenine glycosylase active on G-A mispairs, has homology to endonuclease-III. Nucleic Acids Res 18: 3841–3845.
  50. 50. Cunningham RP, Asahara H, Bank JF, Scholes CP, Salerno JC, et al. (1989) Endonuclease-III is an iron-sulfur protein. Biochemistry 28: 4450–4455.
  51. 51. Rudolf J, Makrantoni V, Ingledew WJ, Stark MJR, White MF (2006) The DNA repair helicases XPD and FancJ have essential iron-sulfur domains. Mol Cell 23: 801–808.
  52. 52. Boal AK, Genereux JC, Sontz PA, Gralnick JA, Newman DK, et al. (2009) Redox signaling between DNA repair proteins for efficient lesion detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 15237–15242.
  53. 53. Munakata N, Rupert CS (1972) Genetically controlled removal of “spore photoproduct” from deoxyribonucleic acid of ultraviolet-irradiated Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol 11: 192–198.
  54. 54. Munakata N, Rupert CS (1974) Dark repair of DNA containing “spore photoproduct” in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Gen Genet 130: 239–250.
  55. 55. Donella JE, Setlow RB (1965) Thymine photoproducts but not thymine dimers found in ultraviolet-irradiated bacterial spores. Science 149: 308–310.
  56. 56. Varghese AJ (1970) 5-Thyminyl-5,6-dihydrothymine from DNA irradiated with ultraviolet light. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 38: 484–490.
  57. 57. Hendrischk AK, Braatsch S, Glaeser J, Klug G (2007) The phrA gene of Rhodobacter sphaeroides encodes a photolyase and is regulated by singlet oxygen and peroxide in a sigma(E)-dependent manner. Microbiology 153: 1842–51.
  58. 58. Metcalf WW, Jiang WH, Daniels LL, Kim SK, Haldimann A, et al. (1996) Conditionally replicative and conjugative plasmids carrying lacZ alpha for cloning, mutagenesis, and allele replacement in bacteria. Plasmid 35: 1–13.
  59. 59. Larsen RA, Wilson MM, Guss AM, Metcalf WW (2002) Genetic analysis of pigment biosynthesis in Xanthobacter autotrophicus Py2 using a new, highly efficient transposon mutagenesis system that is functional in a wide variety of bacteria. Arch Microbiol 178: 193–201.
  60. 60. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410.
  61. 61. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The Clustal_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 4876–4882.
  62. 62. Letunic I, Bork P (2007) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23: 127–128.
  63. 63. Rad AM, Janic B, Iskander AS, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Arbab AS (2007) Measurement of quantity of iron in magnetically labeled cells: comparison among different UV/VIS spectrometric methods. Bio Techniques 43: 627–628.
  64. 64. Kao YT, Saxena C, Wang L, Sancar A, Zhong D (2005) Direct observation of thymine dimer repair in DNA by photolyase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 16128–16132.
  65. 65. Blais J, Douki T, Vigny P, Cadet J (1994) Fluorescence quantum yield determination of pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoadducts. Photoch Photobiol 59: 402–404.