Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Antimonial Resistance in Leishmania donovani Is Associated with Increased In Vivo Parasite Burden

  • Manu Vanaerschot,

    Affiliations Unit of Molecular Parasitology, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium, Laboratory for Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium

  • Simonne De Doncker,

    Affiliation Unit of Molecular Parasitology, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

  • Suman Rijal,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal

  • Louis Maes,

    Affiliation Laboratory for Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium

  • Jean-Claude Dujardin ,

    jcdujardin@itg.be

    Affiliations Unit of Molecular Parasitology, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium, Laboratory for Microbiology, Parasitology and Hygiene, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium

  • Saskia Decuypere

    Affiliation Unit of Molecular Parasitology, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium

Antimonial Resistance in Leishmania donovani Is Associated with Increased In Vivo Parasite Burden

  • Manu Vanaerschot, 
  • Simonne De Doncker, 
  • Suman Rijal, 
  • Louis Maes, 
  • Jean-Claude Dujardin, 
  • Saskia Decuypere
PLOS
x

Abstract

Leishmania donovani is an intracellular protozoan parasite that causes visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Antimonials (SSG) have long been the first-line treatment against VL, but have now been replaced by miltefosine (MIL) in the Indian subcontinent due to the emergence of SSG-resistance. Our previous study hypothesised that SSG-resistant L. donovani might have increased in vivo survival skills which could affect the efficacy of other treatments such as MIL. The present study attempts to validate these hypotheses. Fourteen strains derived from Nepalese clinical isolates with documented SSG-susceptibility were infected in BALB/c mice to study their survival capacity in drug free conditions (non-treated mice) and in MIL-treated mice. SSG-resistant parasites caused a significant higher in vivo parasite load compared to SSG-sensitive parasites. However, this did not seem to affect the strains' response to MIL-treatment since parasites from both phenotypes responded equally well to in vivo MIL exposure. We conclude that there is a positive association between SSG-resistance and in vivo survival skills in our sample of L. donovani strains which could suggest a higher virulence of SSG-R strains compared to SSG-S strains. These greater in vivo survival skills of SSG-R parasites do not seem to directly affect their susceptibility to MIL. However, it cannot be excluded that repeated MIL exposure will elicit different adaptations in these SSG-R parasites with superior survival skills compared to the SSG-S parasites. Our results therefore highlight the need to closely monitor drug efficacy in the field, especially in the context of the Kala-azar elimination programme ongoing in the Indian subcontinent.

Introduction

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a major public health challenge in Sudan, Brazil, Bangladesh, India and Nepal where 90% of all VL cases occur, but is also prevalent in many other countries in Africa, South-America, Southern Europe and Asia [1]. In the Indian subcontinent, VL is caused by Leishmania donovani and is transmitted by sand flies. Since the disease is lethal if left untreated, treatment is one of the major pillars in the fight against VL. Pentavalent antimonials (SSG) are used worldwide as the first-line treatment against VL since many years, but ever increasing failure of SSG in some regions has urged the authorities of India, Nepal and Bangladesh to abandon this treatment and replace it with the oral drug miltefosine (MIL). The use of MIL in combination with early diagnosis and vector control are currently the major pillars of the Kala-azar elimination programme in the Indian subcontinent [2].

SSG-treatment failure in India and Nepal has been linked to SSG-resistant parasites [3], [4], but the exact mechanism of SSG-resistance is as yet unclear and presumably multifactorial [5][9]. SSG is known to reinforce the killing mechanisms of macrophages, the host cells of Leishmania, which contributes to the elimination of the intracellular parasites [8]. Hence, it is conceivable that SSG-resistant parasites have acquired superior skills to survive within the macrophage compared to SSG-sensitive parasites. Based on the results of our previous study in which SSG-sensitive and SSG-resistant model strains were characterised on different levels, we hypothesised that SSG-resistant strains are better equipped to survive in vivo compared to SSG-sensitive strains [10]. In the present study, this hypothesis was tested using a large sample of L. donovani strains which is representative for the parasite populations circulating in VL-endemic Nepal. In addition, the response to MIL-treatment of these strains with documented differential SSG-susceptibility was assessed in the BALB/c mouse model. The latter allowed evaluating whether the hypothesised superior in vivo survival skills of SSG-resistant parasites affect the efficacy of alternative treatments such as MIL.

Materials and Methods

1. Ethical statements

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients and in the case of children, from the parents or guardians. The study was approved by the institutional ethical review boards of the Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu, Nepal, and the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Mouse care and experimental procedures were performed under approval of the Animal Ethic Committee of the Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp (approval ID PAR-018/2) and were in compliance with the national and international laws for the protection and welfare of animals.

2. Parasites

The L. (L.) donovani strains described in Table 1 were isolated from bone marrow aspirates from confirmed VL patients recruited at the B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal [4]. The patients received a full supervised treatment course of sodium antimony gluconate (SAG) (Albert David Ltd, Calcutta) of 20 mg/kg/day i.m. for 30 days and were followed-up for clinical and parasitological evaluation at the end of treatment and at 3, 6 and 12 months after start of treatment. The clinical isolates were identified as L. donovani by PCR-RFLP analysis of cysteine proteinase b [11]. All isolates were cloned using the micro-drop method to obtain homogenous working parasite populations [12] and were subsequently tested for their SSG-susceptibility in an in vitro amastigote model exposing the parasite to 4 different SSG concentrations between 3 and 60 µg/ml SSG for 72 hours as described elsewhere [10]. The ED50 was then calculated using non-linear regression (sigmoidal dose response curve with variable slope). Every susceptibility test included the SSG-susceptible reference strain BPK206/0cl10 in order to determine the activity index of each strain (i.e. the ratio of the ED50 of the tested strain to the ED50 of the sensitive reference strain). A strain with an activity index of 3 or higher is considered to be SSG-resistant as described elsewhere [4].

3. In vivo infections

In vivo infections were performed as described elsewhere [10]. Briefly, female BALB/c isogenic mice were infected with 107 stationary phase promastigotes and randomly allocated into 42 groups of five (3 groups for each of the 14 strains). For the MIL-treatment study, mice were dosed orally at 10 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days, a dose known to cause 50% reduction in the hepatic parasite burden [13], starting at day 12 post-infection. MIL was kindly provided by Aeterna Zentaris GmbH (Germany). Mice were sacrificed at day 12 (non-treated group only) and day 20 (treated and non-treated group) post-infection to assess the parasite load in liver and spleen; two time points where the parasite burden showed to peak during L. donovani infection in previous experiments [10].

4. Quantification of parasite load and parasite response to in vivo MIL-treatment

Liver and spleen samples were collected and processed for quantification of L. donovani as described elsewhere [10]. In summary, DNA was extracted and assessed by 2 quantitative PCRs that were run on a LightCycler 480 (Roche): one targeting kDNA to quantify Leishmania and one targeting the single copy gene neurotrophin 3 of mice to quantify the amount of murine cells present in each sample. The parasite burden is described by a normalised amount of Leishmania per fixed unit of mouse cells, which allows comparison of parasite load between tissues. The resulting calibrated normalised relative quantities were calculated using qbaseplus (Biogazelle) [14] and exported to GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software) to determine the area under the infection curve (day 12 to day 20), a measure for the total parasite burden between day 12 and day 20 in infected BALB/c mice. The efficacy of MIL-treatment was evaluated by calculating the percentage of parasite clearance, i.e. the liver parasite load at day 20 of the MIL-treated group versus the non-treated control group.

Results

1. In vitro SSG-susceptibility

Firstly, the fourteen L. donovani strains derived from Nepalese clinical isolates were tested for their SSG-susceptibility: 8 strains were typed as in vitro sensitive to SSG (SSG-S) and 6 strains showed to be in vitro resistant to SSG (SSG-R) (Table 1).

2. In vivo parasite burden

In a previous study, SSG-R model strains showed to cause higher in vivo parasite burdens in BALB/c mice compared to the SSG-S-strain [10]. In the current validation study, all SSG-S strains caused a similar parasite burden both in the liver and the spleen (Fig. 1). In contrast, SSG-R strains displayed a much more heterogeneous infection profile and an average 8-fold higher parasite burden in the liver and 3-fold higher parasite burden in the spleen compared to SSG-S strains (Fig. 1). Important to note is that the infection level in the spleen followed similar trends as in the liver, but was in average around 100 fold lower. All data is available in supporting information file Data S1.

thumbnail
Figure 1. In vivo parasite load in liver and spleen of BALB/c mice caused by SSG-R and SSG-S strains.

(A) Heat map showing mean parasite load in the liver and spleen* of infected mice at day 12 and day 20 post infection. *: spleen values were 100-times multiplied to allow easy comparison with liver in the heat map. (B) Total in vivo parasite load in infected mice calculated from the area under the day 12 to day 20 infection curve (AUC). P-values were calculated using the Mann Whitney U test. Horizontal bars indicate the mean and error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. The SSG-S strains show a homogenous infection profile in both the liver and spleen of infected BALB/c mice. Even though some variation is observed in the SSG-R group, analyses on both datasets indicate that SSG-R parasites cause a significant higher parasite burden in BALB/c mice compared to SSG-S parasites.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023120.g001

3. In vivo efficacy of MIL-treatment

To assess whether or not the higher infection burden caused by SSG-R strains also affects their response to in vivo MIL-treatment, infected mice were treated orally with MIL. In general, SSG-R and SSG-S strains responded similarly to in vivo MIL-treatment (mean ± SEM: 96.14±2.30% clearance for the SSG-S group compared to 87.02±6.71% clearance for the SSG-R group in the liver and 97.70±1.75% clearance for SSG-S strains versus 94.09±3.62% clearance for SSG-R strains in the spleen), although some outliers in both groups were observed (Fig. 2). All data is available in supporting information file Data S1.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Percentage of miltefosine induced parasite clearance in the liver (A) and spleen (B) of infected BALB/c mice.

In general, mice infected with SSG-S and SSG-R strains do not differ significantly in their response to miltefosine treatment (p>0.05, Mann Whitney U test). Horizontal bars indicate the mean and error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023120.g002

Discussion

In the present work, we tested the hypothesis that SSG-R L. donovani have a better chance for survival in vivo compared to SSG-S L. donovani [10]. Results obtained with the current sample of 14 clinical L. donovani strains strengthen the hypothesis.

SSG-R strains showed a more variable and markedly higher capacity to cause in vivo infection compared to SSG-S strains, hereby suggesting a higher virulence of SSG-R strains. Even taking the limitations of a VL mouse model into account, these findings are in agreement with a study that showed an increased parasite burden in VL patients that eventually showed no response to SSG-treatment [15]. In another study, we also characterised the metacyclogenic capacity (a differentiation process essential for transmission and infectivity) of most of the strains which were analysed here. We could demonstrate that SSG-R strains develop on average twice as many metacyclic infectious parasites compared to SSG-S strains [16]. The higher metacyclogenic capacity of SSG-R strains could explain at least partly the characteristic higher parasite burden of SSG-R strains observed here. However, additional traits at the intracellular amastigote level might very well be co-responsible to maintain this initial advantage at the start of infection. Host cell manipulation is a well-known trait of L. donovani and a recent study demonstrated that SSG-R L. donovani specifically evolved extra mechanisms to manipulate its host cell to avoid SSG-induced stress [17]. Such adaptations would not only allow the parasites to survive better under SSG-pressure, but would also favour their survival in drug free conditions as observed here in vivo. The higher virulence of natural SSG-R L. donovani strains could very well contribute their general fitness. This is in contrast to in vitro induced pentamidine- or glibenclamide-resistant L. mexicana strains which had respectively a similar or decreased infectivity compared to the wild type [18], [19]. We cannot exclude that L. mexicana behaves differently compared to L. donovani under SSG-drug pressure. However, we believe that the differences between our study and to the 2 models resistant to other drugs discussed above might be due to the ‘host cell manipulation’ mode of action specific for SSG. In addition, we report on natural resistance which could differ significantly from in vitro induced resistance [20].

In a second part of the study, we tested whether the higher in vivo survival capacity of SSG-R strains could threaten the long term efficacy of other drugs. In theory, the higher the parasite load in one particular patient, the harder it is to clear the parasite load in that patient by drug treatment [15]. We comparatively evaluated the efficacy of MIL to clear SSG-S and SSG-R strain infections in BALB/c mice: SSG-R and SSG-S strains seemed to be equally well cleared by MIL from the spleen and liver of infected mice. This is in agreement with the in vitro MIL-susceptible phenotype of the parent isolates of which some of these strains were derived [21]. These findings are also consistent with clinical reports of successful MIL-treatment of SSG-failure patients during a phase-2 trial of MIL in India [22]. Indian studies did show that some natural SSG-S strains tend to have a higher in vitro tolerance to MIL compared to SSG-S strains [23] and some strains were successfully made resistant to MIL by in vitro exposure in the lab [13], [24][26]. However, importantly, natural MIL-R strains have not been identified in the field yet (unpublished results).

To conclude, our results suggest that SSG-R L. donovani have a higher virulence compared to SSG-S L. donovani. Whether or not this can have an impact on the long term efficacy of MIL in the Indian subcontinent is not entirely clear from our data on single exposure to MIL. Therefore, monitoring the efficacy of MIL in regions were SSG-R strains were reported to be highly prevalent is of the upmost importance for the current Kala-azar elimination programme to undertake swift action and switch to new treatment regimens [27] if necessary.

Supporting Information

Data S1.

Strain specific data of in vivo infections in untreated and MIL-treated mice.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023120.s001

(XLS)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MV J-CD SD. Performed the experiments: MV SDD SD. Analyzed the data: MV SD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SR. Wrote the paper: MV SDD SR LM J-CD SD.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization (2002) World health report, 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life - annex 3: burden of disease in DALYs by cause, sex and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2001.
  2. 2. Chappuis F, Sundar S, Hailu A, Ghalib H, Rijal S, et al. (2007) Visceral leishmaniasis: what are the needs for diagnosis, treatment and control? Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 873–882.
  3. 3. Lira R, Sundar S, Makharia A, Kenney R, Gam A, et al. (1999) Evidence that the high incidence of treatment failures in Indian kala-azar is due to the emergence of antimony-resistant strains of Leishmania donovani. J Infect Dis 180: 564–567.
  4. 4. Rijal S, Yardley V, Chappuis F, Decuypere S, Khanal B, et al. (2007) Antimonial treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: are current in vitro susceptibility assays adequate for prognosis of in vivo therapy outcome? Microbes Infect 9: 529–535.
  5. 5. Ashutosh , Sundar S, Goyal N (2007) Molecular mechanisms of antimony resistance in Leishmania. J Med Microbiol 56: 143–153.
  6. 6. Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH (2006) Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 19: 111–126.
  7. 7. Cunningham ML, Fairlamb AH (1995) Trypanothione reductase from Leishmania donovani. Purification, characterisation and inhibition by trivalent antimonials. Eur J Biochem 230: 460–468.
  8. 8. Mookerjee BJ, Mookerjee A, Sen P, Bhaumik S, Sen P, et al. (2006) Sodium antimony gluconate induces generation of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide via phosphoinositide 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in Leishmania donovani-infected macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50: 1788–1797.
  9. 9. Wyllie S, Cunningham ML, Fairlamb AH (2004) Dual action of antimonial drugs on thiol redox metabolism in the human pathogen Leishmania donovani. J Biol Chem 279: 39925–39932.
  10. 10. Vanaerschot M, Maes I, Ouakad M, Adaui V, Maes L, et al. (2010) Linking in vitro and in vivo survival of clinical Leishmania donovani strains. PLoS ONE 5: e12211.
  11. 11. Quispe Tintaya KW, Ying X, Dedet JP, Rijal S, De Bolle X, et al. (2004) Antigen genes for molecular epidemiology of leishmaniasis: polymorphism of cysteine proteinase B and surface metalloprotease glycoprotein 63 in the Leishmania donovani complex. J Infect Dis 189: 1035–1043.
  12. 12. Van Meirvenne N, Janssens PG, Magnus E (1975) Antigenic variation in syringe passaged populations of Trypanosoma (Trypanozoon) brucei. 1. Rationalization of the experimental approach. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 55: 1–23.
  13. 13. Seifert K, Perez-Victoria FJ, Stettler M, Sanchez-Canete MP, Castanys S, et al. (2007) Inactivation of the miltefosine transporter, LdMT, causes miltefosine resistance that is conferred to the amastigote stage of Leishmania donovani and persists in vivo. Int J Antimicrob Agents 30: 229–235.
  14. 14. Hellemans J, Mortier G, De PA, Speleman F, Vandesompele J (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8: R19.
  15. 15. Thakur CP, Mitra DK, Narayan S (2003) Skewing of cytokine profiles towards T helper cell type 2 response in visceral leishmaniasis patients unresponsive to sodium antimony gluconate. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 97: 409–412.
  16. 16. Ouakad M, Vanaerschot M, Rijal S, Sundar S, Speybroeck N, et al. (2011) Increased metacyclogenesis of antimony-resistant Leishmania donovani clinical lines. Parasitology. In press.
  17. 17. Haldar AK, Yadav V, Singhal E, Bisht KK, Singh A, et al. (2010) Leishmania donovani isolates with antimony-resistant but not -sensitive phenotype inhibit sodium antimony gluconate-induced dendritic cell activation. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000907.
  18. 18. Sereno D, Lemesre JL (1997) In vitro life cycle of pentamidine-resistant amastigotes: stability of the chemoresistant phenotypes is dependent on the level of resistance induced. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41: 1898–1903.
  19. 19. Silva N, Camacho N, Figarella K, Ponte-Sucre A (2004) Cell differentiation and infectivity of Leishmania mexicana are inhibited in a strain resistant to an ABC-transporter blocker. Parasitology 128: 629–634.
  20. 20. Decuypere S, Rijal S, Yardley V, De DS, Laurent T, et al. (2005) Gene expression analysis of the mechanism of natural Sb(V) resistance in Leishmania donovani isolates from Nepal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 4616–4621.
  21. 21. Yardley V, Croft SL, De DS, Dujardin JC, Koirala S, et al. (2005) The sensitivity of clinical isolates of Leishmania from Peru and Nepal to miltefosine. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73: 272–275.
  22. 22. Jha TK, Sundar S, Thakur CP, Bachmann P, Karbwang J, et al. (1999) Miltefosine, an oral agent, for the treatment of Indian visceral leishmaniasis. N Engl J Med 341: 1795–1800.
  23. 23. Kumar D, Kulshrestha A, Singh R, Salotra P (2009) In vitro susceptibility of field isolates of Leishmania donovani to Miltefosine and amphotericin B: correlation with sodium antimony gluconate susceptibility and implications for treatment in areas of endemicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 835–838.
  24. 24. Perez-Victoria FJ, Castanys S, Gamarro F (2003) Leishmania donovani resistance to miltefosine involves a defective inward translocation of the drug. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47: 2397–2403.
  25. 25. Perez-Victoria FJ, Sanchez-Canete MP, Seifert K, Croft SL, Sundar S, et al. (2006) Mechanisms of experimental resistance of Leishmania to miltefosine: Implications for clinical use. Drug Resist Updat 9: 26–39.
  26. 26. Seifert K, Matu S, Javier Perez-Victoria F, Castanys S, Gamarro F, et al. (2003) Characterisation of Leishmania donovani promastigotes resistant to hexadecylphosphocholine (miltefosine). Int J Antimicrob Agents 22: 380–387.
  27. 27. Sundar S, Sinha PK, Rai M, Verma DK, Nawin K, et al. (2011) Comparison of short-course multidrug treatment with standard therapy for visceral leishmaniasis in India: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377: 477–486.