Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Identification of Fast-Evolving Genes in the Scleractinian Coral Acropora Using Comparative EST Analysis

  • Akira Iguchi ,

    Affiliation Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan

  • Chuya Shinzato,

    Affiliation Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa, Japan

  • Sylvain Forêt,

    Affiliation ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and Coral Genomics Group, School of Pharmacy and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

  • David J. Miller

    Affiliation ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and Coral Genomics Group, School of Pharmacy and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Identification of Fast-Evolving Genes in the Scleractinian Coral Acropora Using Comparative EST Analysis

  • Akira Iguchi, 
  • Chuya Shinzato, 
  • Sylvain Forêt, 
  • David J. Miller


To identify fast-evolving genes in reef-building corals, we performed direct comparative sequence analysis with expressed sequence tag (EST) datasets from two acroporid species: Acropora palmata from the Caribbean Sea and A. millepora from the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Comparison of 589 independent sequences from 1,421 A. palmata contigs, with 10,247 A. millepora contigs resulted in the identification of 196 putative homologues. Most of the homologous pairs demonstrated high amino acid similarities (over 90%). Comparisons of putative homologues showing low amino acid similarities (under 90%) among the Acropora species to the near complete datasets from two other cnidarians (Hydra magnipapillata and Nematostella vectensis) implied that some were non-orthologous. Within 86 homologous pairs, 39 exhibited dN/dS ratios significantly less than 1, suggesting that these genes are under purifying selection associated with functional constraints. Eight independent genes showed dN/dS ratios exceeding 1, while three deviated significantly from 1, suggesting that these genes may play important roles in the adaptive evolution of Acropora. Our results also indicated that CEL-III lectin was under positive selection, consistent with a possible role in immunity or symbiont recognition. Further studies are needed to clarify the possible functions of the genes under positive selection to provide insight into the evolutionary process of corals.


One of the main aims of evolutionary biology is to understand the genetic basis of adaptive change [1], [2]. Genes associated with adaptive evolution often show relatively high rates of evolutionary change and are under selection [3], [4]. This is often inferred from the number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (amino acid replacement changes; dN) significantly exceeding the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (silent changes; dS), an indication of accumulated amino acid changes (so-called “fast-evolving genes”). Although there is no a priori reason to expect genes showing higher levels of amino acid change to play important roles in morphological and developmental processes [5], positive selection has often been detected in genes involved in the co-evolutionary race, such as immune response, host-pathogen interactions, and reproduction – processes where protein-protein interactions are involved [6][8]. Therefore, the identification of fast-evolving genes can contribute to the understanding of the genetic bases of adaptive evolution, and thus provide insights into ecological niche partitioning and phenomena involved in the co-evolutionary race.

Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) is one of the most widespread, abundant, and species-rich of coral genera [113][180 species; 9,10]. Acropora species are highly diverse in terms of both morphological and ecological characteristics (e.g., habitat depth [10]). However, previous studies using neutral molecular markers were unable to detect fixed species-specific genetic differences among most Acropora species, likely due to introgressive hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting [11][13]. In sea urchins, the bindin protein is one of the dominants of gamete specificity and has been shown to be subject to positive selection [14]. Molecular markers based on the bindin gene delineate species boundaries more clearly than do other (neutral) molecular markers due to the rapid coalescence within a species [15]. In the same way, fast-evolving genes may provide some insight into the evolutionary process in the case of corals such as Acropora. In addition, the identification of molecules involved in symbiosis and pathogen recognition are likely to be fundamental importance in terms of understanding the genetic bases of coral bleaching and diseases which are the threats to the survival of corals [16]. Given that in the other animals the molecules involved in these processes are under positive selection, fast-evolving genes are good targets to uncover the molecular mechanisms of these phenomena in corals.

To date, there have been only three reports of genes under positive selection from corals - fluorescent proteins [17], ferritin [18] and tachylectin-2 [19]. However, the availability of significant bodies of expressed sequence tag (EST) data for two Acropora species (A. millepora, A. palmata; 18,20) provides an opportunity to perform more extensive searches for fast-evolving genes in this genus [16].

To this end, we have conducted the first extensive search for fast-evolving genes in the coral Acropora using direct comparative sequence analysis based on two Acropora EST datasets, focusing to some extent on taxonomically restricted genes because such genes might be involved in lineage- or species-specific traits [21] and thus provide species-specific molecular markers. In addition, we examined whether the CEL-III lectin is also under positive selection in Acropora on the basis that this gene may be involved in immunity or symbiosis in A. millepora [22], either of which might lead the gene to be under positive selection.

Materials and Methods

Selection of candidate sequences, BLAST and positive selection analyses

Using 1421 Cap3 assembled EST sequences based on 4,017 ESTs from A. palmata (, BLASTX analysis was performed (e-value cut-off 1e−5) against the GenBank (NR: 976 hits) and Swissprot (manually curated protein sequences: 139 hits) databases. On the basis of these searches, a total of 149 A. palmata contigs matching only sequences of unknown or unnamed proteins (13) and hypothetical ones (136) were selected for further analysis. In addition, 440 A. palmata contigs with no significant matches in either database were selected, on the basis that these taxonomically restricted genes might be involved in coral-specific traits. The resulting set of 589 non-redundant A. palmata contigs were compared (using TBLASTX [23]) to the A. millepora (10,247 ESTs), Nematostella vectensis (166,595 ESTs), and Hydra magnipapillata (163,221 ESTs) EST datasets using the COMPAGEN comparative genomics platform ( An e-value<10−10 was adopted as a cutoff for presumed orthology. Levels of amino acid sequence similarity were based on TBLASTX results.

Correct frame positions were estimated based on nucleotide sequences that were translated correctly in each of A. palmata and A. millepora through the following website: dN and dS values of the nucleotide sequences of the open reading frames (ORFs) from both species were calculated using the sequences for which correct translations were possible for both species. To assess whether the dN/dS ratio was significantly different from 1, the Nei-Gojobori Jukes-Cantor method [24] was implemented, which uses a Z-test to determine whether dN/dS is significantly different from 1. These analyses were performed using MEGA ver. 4 [25]. Domain searches were performed using the Pfam database (

CEL-III lectin analysis

Previously, two CEL-III lectins were reported from A. millepora [22]. Based on these sequences, we identified two CEL-III lectins in A. palmata (CL1132Contig, CL2457: and one in A. hyacinthus (isotig11646: The five coral CEL-III lectin sequences were aligned with that of the sea cucumber CEL-III (accession number: AB109017) using ClustalW [26]; in some cases complete ORFs were not available, but the available data (139–144 amino acids) encompass most of the protein sequence. The Clustal alignment was visualised using the Boxshade server at:

To perform phylogenetic analysis, the best-fit model of protein evolution was selected by ProtTest 2.4 [27], and the JTT+G model [28] was selected using the Akaike information criterion. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed by PhyML 3.0 [29]. The starting trees were computed using BioNJ and the topologies were optimized by nearest neighbour interchange and sub-tree pruning and regrafting. Support for each phylogenetic tree was tested by bootstraping (100 replicates). Bayesian analyses were performed using MrBayes v3.1.2 [30]. We conducted the analyses by 2 runs with 4 chains from a random starting tree that was run for 2,000,000 generations. The log-likelihood scores stabilized after 10,000 generations within and among these four independent analyses. Therefore, we discarded the initial 10,000 generations from each run and sampled 1 of every 100 generations from the remaining 1,990,000 generations (19,901 trees: across all four independent analyzes) to calculate posterior probabilities for each branch in the Bayesian tree. Based on the phylogenetic tree, with three Acropora CEL-III lectins (CL1132Contig, A049E7, and isotig11646) we performed site model analysis by CODEML, implemented in PAML v4.2 [31] using simple and complex models (M0: NSsites = 0; M1a: NSsites = 1; M2a: NSsites = 2; M7: NSsites = 7; M8: NSsites = 8; M8a: NSsites = 8, fix_omega = 1, omega = 1). Likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) were performed to compare two models. The negative of twice the difference between models (−2Δ(Log likelihood)) was used to approximate the χ2 value and the LRT was conducted by comparing −2Δ(Log likelihood) to the χ2 distribution with the degree of freedom estimated as the difference of parameters between models (critical values to be 5.99 and 9.21 at 5% and 1%; df = 2). When the LRT was significant, a Bayes Empirical Bayes (BEB) was used to identify amino acid sites under positive selection.


Direct comparative sequence analysis of cnidarian ESTs

Of the 589 A. palmata contigs matching only unknown or unnamed proteins, hypothetical ones or with no significant non-cnidarian matches in the databases, 196 had putative orthologs in A. millepora. The amino acid similarities of 98 gene pairs for which correct translation positions were available (longer translation) were examined. The amino acid similarities among these homologous pairs ranged from 33.6% to 100% (average 89.5%; Fig. 1), with 74 and 24 sequences demonstrating greater than and less than 90% similarity, respectively (Fig. 1). Sequences giving low amino acid similarities between Acropora species were subjected to BLAST analysis performed against the EST datasets of Hydra magnipapillata and Nematostella vectensis. Several of the 13 A. palmata matching only unknown, unnamed, or hypothetical proteins and with <90% amino acid similarity with A. millepora were found to have better matches in H. magnipapillata and N. vectensis than in A. millepora and were hence excluded from further consideration (Table 1; <76.8% amino acid similarities in A. millepora).

Figure 1. Distribution of the number of amino acid similarities in 98 Acropora milleporaA. palmata homologous pairs.

Table 1. Amino acid similarity and E value of ESTs between Acropora palmata and A. millepora, Hydra magnipapillata, Nematostella vectensis.

To identify genes likely to be under positive selection, dN and dS values were calculated based on 86 putatively orthologous pairs of sequences from the two Acropora species (hypothetical protein: 52 exceeding 76.8% amino acid similarity; no-hit: 34 exceeding 72.7%). The distribution of dN and dS from the 86 homologous pairs is shown in Figure 2. Almost all of the homologous pairs (78) showed a dN/dS ratio <1. Among these, 39 homologous pairs had dN/dS ratios significantly <1. Eight independent homologous pairs had dN/dS ratios >1 and three (CL226Contig1, CL338Contig1, and CL504Contig1, all of which showed no-hit) exhibited a significant deviation from 1 (Table 2). The proteins encoded by these eight candidate genes contain no known domains on the basis of comparison with the Pfam database. The average of dN/dS values was 0.424. Twenty five homologous pairs had dN/dS ratios >0.424 and 6 ones of these (CL7Contig1, CL16Contig1, CL226Contig1, CL338Contig1, CL504Contig1) were significantly deviated from 0.424.

Figure 2. Number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (dN) plotted against the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (dS) in 86 Acropora milleporaA. palmata putative homologous pairs.

The line shows the neutral expectation (dN = dS).

The CEL-III lectin is under positive selection

Comparison of the CEL-III lectin dataset implies that A049E7 (A. millepora), CL1132Contig (A. palmata), and isotig11646 (A. hyacinthus) are orthologous (Figs. 3 and 4). Based on previous phylogenetic analyses of the genus Acropora species [12], the Caribbean species A. palmata forms an outgroup to Indo-Pacific Acropora species including A. millepora and A. hyacinthus. Thus, based on the alignment of the three putatively orthologous Acropora CEL-III lectins (CL1132Contig, A049E7, and isotig11646), site model analysis was performed, which implied that Acropora CEL-III lectins are under significant positive selection (Table 3). The models that allow ω>1 were statistically supported in the comparison of M1a and M2a (−2Δ(Log likelihood) = 14.494, df = 2, p<0.01) and M7 and M8 (−2Δ(Log likelihood) = 14.594, df = 2, p<0.01) at 99% confidence. BEB analysis identified five amino acid sites under positive selection (Table 3), one of which was located near the 12β-strand of subdomain 1γ (Fig. 3; [34]). Three sites under positive selection were concentrated around the 13β-strand and H3 310 helix of subdomain 1, and another was near the 17β-strand of subdomain 2α.

Figure 3. Boxshade alignment of five coral CEL-III lectins and sea cucumber CEL-III.

Dark grey boxes are β-strands of subdomain 1γ, grey boxes are those of subdomain 2α, and bright grey boxes are those of subdomain 2γ. White boxes show 310 helices. The numbers of boxes are in accordance with Uchida et al. [34].

Figure 4. Phylogenetic relationship of CEL-III lectins inferred from ML and Bayesian analyses.

Numbers beside nodes indicate ML/Bayesian posterior bootstrap probabilities.

Table 3. Log-likelihood values and the estimates of parameters under models with variable ω ratios in three coral CEL-III genes.


The direct comparative sequence analysis of Acropora ESTs revealed that most of the homologous pairs are highly similar at the amino acid level (Fig. 1), although several homologous pairs showing lower amino acid similarities were also found (Fig. 1). Of 196 putatively orthologous pairs of sequences in the two Acropora species, 98 were selected for further analysis on the basis of unambiguous start codons and long ORFs in both cases. To examine the possibility that some of the sequence pairs with <90% amino acid similarity between the two were not orthologous, the Acropora sequences were subjected to BLAST analyses against the EST datasets of Hydra magnipapillata and Nematostella vectensis. Several of the A. palmata sequences had better matches in H. magnipapillata and N. vectensis than in A. millepora (Table 1) leading to these being excluded from further consideration. The absence of A. millepora orthologs of these A. palmata genes is presumably due to the incomplete nature of the public EST dataset for A. millepora. Of the 86 homologous pairs for which the dN and dS were examined, 39 showed dN/dS ratios significantly less than 1, suggesting that these genes are under purifying selection associated with functional constraints. Eight independent genes showed dN/dS ratios exceeding 1 and three exhibited a significant deviation from 1. These fast-evolving genes are ideal targets for examining the genetic bases of adaptive evolution of Acropora. Further research is needed to clarify the functional roles of these candidate genes under positive selection.

Our analysis showed that coral CEL-III lectins are under positive selection. CEL-III lectins have been reported from the sea cucumber Cucumaria echinata [32], A. millepora [22], and the hydrozoan Clytia hemisphaerica [33]. A crystal structure is available for the sea cucumber CEL-III [34], enabling us to infer how the sites under positive selection are likely to affect the structure and function of the CEL-III lectin. From the alignment of sea cucumber and coral CEL-III lectins, we found that most of the sites under positive selection were concentrated around the Ca2+ binding region of domain 1 of sea cucumber CEL-III, which is thought to play an important role in the recognition of carbohydrate chains (Fig. 3; [34]). Thus, changes in this region may be adaptive for CEL-III to recognize various types of carbohydrate structures of non-self cells.

Lectins have frequently been implicated in innate immunity [35]. Grasso et al. [22] reported that the A049-E7 CEL-III lectin is expressed on the side of A. millepora larvae and primary polyps that is exposed to the environment, suggesting that it may be involved in the recognition of microorganisms for self-defence. It has often been reported that immunity related genes are under positive selection [6]; thus, our results support a possible role of CEL-III lectins of Acropora in immunity. In corals, several studies suggest the involvement of lectin in coral-algal symbiosis [36], [37]. Sea cucumber CEL-III lectin is a Ca2+-dependent and galactose-specific lectin [32]. Wood-Charlson et al. [37] suggested that the α-galactose residue is one of the carbohydrates constituting potential recognition ligands for lectin/glycan interactions in symbiosis of coral larvae. Therefore, the Acropora CEL-III lectins may also be involved in coral-algal symbiosis, which could induce positive selection of Acropora CEL-III lectins via a co-evolutionary race. Kvennefors et al. [38] reported the existence of mannose-binding lectin in A. millepora and its possible role in pathogen and symbiont recognition as an ancient innate immune system [39]. The functional roles of coral CEL-III lectins in both immunity and symbiosis processes should be pursued in future studies.

In conclusion, by performing direct comparative sequence analysis with cnidarian EST datasets, we identified several candidate genes under positive selection. Although the dN/dS ratios of most homologous pairs were <1, the possibility that these homologs are fast-evolving genes cannot be ruled out that these homologues are non-fast-evolving gene candidates, because Caribbean and Indo-Pacific Acropora species are genetically distinct and deeply branched [12]. Thus, the hallmarks of positive selection might be obscured by neutral nucleotide changes. Given that evaluating dN/dS using average values of dN and dS is highly conservative [40], a more sensitive approach (e.g., site model analysis) with sequences of multiple species would be useful to assess whether genes showing higher dN/dS ratios are under positive selection or relaxed negative selection. There is also the possibility that the genes showing higher dN/dS may be just outliers that have become fixed due to small effective population sizes [5]. In fact, the effective population sizes of some Acropora species may be limited by high variation of reproductive success, periodic mass mortality by coral bleaching or predation by crown-of-thorns starfish [41], therefore, some coral species may have experienced demographic bottlenecks. The comparison of candidate genes under positive selection obtained using multiple neighbouring species are important both to clarify their significance in adaptive evolution of this genus as well as to assess whether these candidate genes are indeed orthologous between the two Acropora species examined in this study. The ongoing coral genome project (Shinzato, personal communication) will provide the opportunity to confirm that the target genes originate from coral itself rather than from other components of the association, and will allow the use of a more rigorous genome wide approach to surveying candidate genes under positive selection (Shinzato, personal communication). An important next step will be to investigate the expression patterns of these fast-evolving genes to better characterise their function and regulation.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AI. Performed the experiments: AI CS. Analyzed the data: AI CS SF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AI CS SF DJM. Wrote the paper: AI DJM.


  1. 1. Feder ME, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Nature Rev Genet 4: 649–655.
  2. 2. Lee CE, Mitchell-Olds T (2006) Preface to the special issue: ecological and evolutionary genomics of populations in nature. Mol Ecol 15: 1193–1196.
  3. 3. Biswas S, Akey JM (2006) Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends in Genet 22: 437–446.
  4. 4. Turner TL, Hahn MW, Nuzhdin SV (2005) Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae. PLoS Biol 3: e285.
  5. 5. Hughes AL (2007) Looking for Darwin in all the wrong places: the misguided quest for positive selection at the nucleotide sequence level. Heredity 99: 364–373.
  6. 6. Hughes AL, Nei M (1988) Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature 335: 167–170.
  7. 7. Swanson WJ, Nielsen R, Yang Q (2003) Pervasive adaptive evolution in mammalian fertilization proteins. Mol Biol Evol 20: 18–20.
  8. 8. Woolhouse MEJ, Webster JP, Domingo E, Charlesworth B, Levin BR (2002) Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nature Genet 32: 569–577.
  9. 9. Veron JEN (2000) Corals of the world. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia.
  10. 10. Wallace CC (1999) Staghorn Corals of the World: A Revision of the Genus Acropora. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
  11. 11. Hatta M, Fukami H, Wang W, Omori M, Shimoike K, et al. (1999) Reproductive and genetic evidence for a reticulate evolutionary history of mass spawning corals. Mol Biol Evol 16: 1607–1613.
  12. 12. van Oppen MJH, Mcdonald BJ, Willis B, Miller DJ (2001) The evolutionary history of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) based on a mitochondrial and nuclear marker: Reticulation incomplete lineage sorting, or morphological convergence? Mol Biol Evol 18: 1315–1329.
  13. 13. Willis BL, van Oppen MJH, Miller DJ, Vollmer SV, Ayre DJ (2006) The role of hybridization in the evolution of reef corals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 489–517.
  14. 14. Metz EC, Palumbi SR (1996) Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein Bindin. Mol Biol Evol 13: 397–406.
  15. 15. Palumbi SR (2009) Speciation and the evolution of gamete recognition genes: pattern and process. Heredity 102: 66–76.
  16. 16. Forêt S, Kassahn K, Grasso LC, Hayward DC, Iguchi A, et al. (2007) Genomic and microarray approaches to coral reef conservation biology. Coral Reefs 26: 475–486.
  17. 17. Field SF, Bulina MY, Kelmanson IV, Bielawski JP, Matz MV (2006) Adaptive evolution of multicolored fluorescent proteins in reef-building corals. J Mol Evol 62: 332–339.
  18. 18. Schwarz JA, Brokstein PB, Voolstra C, Terry AY, Miller DJ, et al. (2008) Coral life history and symbiosis: Functional genomic resources for two reef building Caribbean corals, Acropora palmata and Montastraea faveolata. BMC Genomics 9: 97.
  19. 19. Hayes ML, Eytan RI, Hellberg ME (2010) High amino acid diversity and positive selection at a putative coral immunity gene (tachylectin-2). BMC Evol Biol 10: 150.
  20. 20. Kortschak RD, Samuel G, Saint R, Miller DJ (2003) EST analysis of the cnidarian Acropora millepora reveals extensive gene loss and rapid sequence divergence in the model invertebrates. Cur Biol 16: 2190–2195.
  21. 21. Khalturin K, Hemmrich G, Fraune S, Augustin R, Bosch TC (2009) More than just orphans: are taxonomically-restricted genes important in evolution? Trends Genet 25: 404–413.
  22. 22. Grasso LC, Maindonald J, Rudd S, Hayward DC, Saint R, et al. (2008) Microarray analysis identifies candidate genes for key roles in coral development. BMC Genomics 9: 540.
  23. 23. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410.
  24. 24. Nei M, Gojobori T (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3: 418–426.
  25. 25. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599.
  26. 26. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680.
  27. 27. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D (2005) Bioinformatics 21: 2104–2105.
  28. 28. Jones D, Taylor W, Thornton J (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Computer Applications in the Biosciences (CABIOS) 8: 275–282.
  29. 29. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. (2010) New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0.” Systematic Biol 59: 307–321.
  30. 30. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
  31. 31. Yang Z (2007) PAML 4: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586–1591.
  32. 32. Hatakeyama T, Kohzaki H, Nagatomo H, Yamasaki N (1994) Purification and characterization of four Ca2+-dependent lectins from the marine invertebrate, Cucumaria echinata. J Biochem (Tokyo) 116: 209–214.
  33. 33. Forêt S, Knack B, Houliston E, Momose T, Manuel M, et al. (2010) New tricks with old genes: the genetic bases of novel cnidarian traits. Trends Genet 26: 154–158.
  34. 34. Uchida T, Yamasaki T, Eto S, Sugawara H, Kurisu G, et al. (2004) Crystal structure of the hemolytic lectin CEL-III isolated from the marine invertebrate Cucumaria echinata: implications of domain structure for its membrane pore-formation mechanism. J Biol Chem 279: 37133–37141.
  35. 35. Fujita T, Matsushita M, Endo Y (2004) The lectin-complement pathway-its role in innate immunity and evolution. Immunol Rev 198: 185–202.
  36. 36. Jimbo M, Yonohara T, Koike K, Koike K, Sakai R, et al. (2000) The D-galactose-binding lectin of the octocoral Sinularia lochmodes: characterization and possible relationship to the symbiotic dinoflagellates. Comp Biochem Physiol B 125: 227–236.
  37. 37. Wood-Charlson EM, Hollingsworth LL, Krupp DA, Weis VM (2006) Lectin/glycan interactions play a role in recognition in a coral/dinoflagellate symbiosis. Cell Microbiol 8: 1985–1993.
  38. 38. Kvennefors EC, Leggat W, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Degnan BM, Barnes AC (2008) An ancient and variable mannose-binding lectin from the coral Acropora millepora binds both pathogens and symbionts. Dev Comp Immunol 32: 1582–1592.
  39. 39. Kvennefors EC, Leggat W, Kerr CC, Ainsworth TD, Hoegh-Guldberg O, et al. (2010) Analysis of evolutionarily conserved innate immune components in coral links immunity and symbiosis. Dev Comp Immunol 34: 1219–1229.
  40. 40. Nielesen R (2005) Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet 39: 197–218.
  41. 41. Márquez LM, van Oppen MJH, Willis BL, Reyes A, Miller DJ (2002) The highly cross-fertile coral species, Acropora hyacinthus and Acropora cytherea, constitute statistically distinguishable lineages. Mol Ecol 11: 1339–1349.