Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

IL-1β Stimulates COX-2 Dependent PGE2 Synthesis and CGRP Release in Rat Trigeminal Ganglia Cells

  • Lars Neeb,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • Peter Hellen,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • Carsten Boehnke,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • Jan Hoffmann,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • Sigrid Schuh-Hofer,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

  • Ulrich Dirnagl,

    Affiliation Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

  • Uwe Reuter

    uwe.reuter@charite.de

    Affiliation Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

IL-1β Stimulates COX-2 Dependent PGE2 Synthesis and CGRP Release in Rat Trigeminal Ganglia Cells

  • Lars Neeb, 
  • Peter Hellen, 
  • Carsten Boehnke, 
  • Jan Hoffmann, 
  • Sigrid Schuh-Hofer, 
  • Ulrich Dirnagl, 
  • Uwe Reuter
PLOS
x

Abstract

Objective

Pro-inflammatory cytokines like Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine and inflammatory pain. The trigeminal ganglion and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) are crucial components in the pathophysiology of primary headaches. 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists, which reduce CGRP release, and cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors can abort trigeminally mediated pain. However, the cellular source of COX and the interplay between COX and CGRP within the trigeminal ganglion have not been clearly identified.

Methods and Results

1. We used primary cultured rat trigeminal ganglia cells to assess whether IL-1β can induce the expression of COX-2 and which cells express COX-2. Stimulation with IL-1β caused a dose and time dependent induction of COX-2 but not COX-1 mRNA. Immunohistochemistry revealed expression of COX-2 protein in neuronal and glial cells. 2. Functional significance was demonstrated by prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release 4 hours after stimulation with IL-1β, which could be aborted by a selective COX-2 (parecoxib) and a non-selective COX-inhibitor (indomethacin). 3. Induction of CGRP release, indicating functional neuronal activation, was seen 1 hour after PGE2 and 24 hours after IL-1β stimulation. Immunohistochemistry showed trigeminal neurons as the source of CGRP. IL-1β induced CGRP release was blocked by parecoxib and indomethacin, but the 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist sumatriptan had no effect.

Conclusion

We identified a COX-2 dependent pathway of cytokine induced CGRP release in trigeminal ganglia neurons that is not affected by 5-HT1B/D receptor activation. Activation of neuronal and glial cells in the trigeminal ganglion by IL-β leads to an elevated expression of COX-2 in these cells. Newly synthesized PGE2 (by COX-2) in turn activates trigeminal neurons to release CGRP. These findings support a glia-neuron interaction in the trigeminal ganglion and demonstrate a sequential link between COX-2 and CGRP. The results could help to explain the mechanism of action of COX-2 inhibitors in migraine.

Introduction

Pro-inflammatory cytokines have been linked to inflammation and pain [1]. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) are known to induce hyperalgesia in rats [2][4]. Cytokines also seem to play an important role in pathophysiological mechanisms involved in migraine headache. Among others, IL-1β and TNFα levels were elevated in jugular vein blood during migraine attacks [5], [6]. Plasma levels of IL-6 were also increased in patients with migraine compared to healthy controls [7]. Furthermore, enhanced expression of IL-1β was found in the meninges in an experimental animal model related to migraine [8].

The trigeminal system, neuropeptides and inflammatory mediators are key players in the pathophysiology of migraine. Activation of perivascular trigeminal nerves within meninges causes the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and other peptides e.g. substance P [9], [10]. This leads to a series of peripheral and central events such as vasodilatation, plasma protein extravasation [11] and neuronal activation [12].

CGRP is classified as the most important neuromediator in the pathophysiology of migraine and other primary headaches. It is believed not only to be involved in dilation of cerebral and dural blood vessels but also in release of inflammatory mediators from mast cells and transmission of nociceptive information [13]. In clinical studies, plasma levels of CGRP can be found to be elevated during migraine and cluster headache attacks [14], [15]. Intravenous injection of CGRP induces a typical headache in migraineurs [16] and CGRP receptor antagonists (BIBN4096BS/MK-0974) can abort attacks [17], [18].

On a cellular basis in an experimental cell culture model, stimulation of trigeminal ganglia neurons with potassium chloride, capsaicin or a cocktail of inflammatory mediators used to mimic neurogenic inflammation resulted in an elevated CGRP release in these cells. Stimulus induced CGRP release could be repressed by the 5-HT1B/D agonist sumatriptan [19], which is used in acute migraine treatment, and furthermore by botulinum toxin type A [20] and topiramate [21], two substances proved to be effective in migraine prophylaxis. Stimulation with TNFα increased the synthesis and release of CGRP in trigeminal ganglia neurons [22] indicating a link between cytokines and CGRP release.

In addition to CGRP, Cyclooxygenases (COX) are important peripheral mediators of inflammation and pain. COX enzymes are involved in migraine pathomechanisms as non-selective [23] and selective COX-2 inhibitors [24], [25] can abort attacks. The constitutively expressed isoform COX-1 and the inducible enzyme COX-2 both synthesize prostaglandins [26] which are involved in neuronal sensitization phenomena induced by Interleukin 1β (IL-1β) [27]. However, the precise pathophysiological role of COX and its reaction product prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in migraine remain unclear.

We investigated the expression of COX and its cellular sources in cultured trigeminal ganglia cells (TGC) upon stimulation with the cytokine IL-1β. We further assessed the effects of IL-1β on CGRP release in vitro. Based on the efficacy of COX- inhibitors to abort migraine we hypothesized that induced COX-2 expression leads to PGE2 production in TGC which may have an effect on CGRP release.

Materials and Methods

Animals

We used 3 days old male and female Sprague Dawley rats (Charles River, Sulzheim, Germany). All animals were kept under standard laboratory housing conditions with a 12-h light–dark cycle and with an adult female Sprague Dawley rat (Charles River, Sulzheim, Germany) with free access to food and water. For cell culture procedures 3 day old rats were anaesthetized with an isoflurane vaporizer (4%) and decapitated. All animal work was carried out in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC) regarding the care and use of animals for experimental procedures. The sacrifice of the rats and extraction of their brains was reported to and approved by the Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales Berlin (LaGeSo; T0322/96).

Cell culture

Trigeminal ganglia cell culture was established as previously described [28] with minor modifications. In brief, trigeminal ganglia were dissected from 3 day old male and female Sprague Dawley rats (Charles River, Sulzheim, Germany). The cells were incubated for 90 min at 37°C in 10 ml dissociation medium (modified eagles medium; Biochrom, Berlin, Germany; with 10% bovine serum, 10 mM HEPES, 44 mM glucose, 100 U penicillin + streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 100 IE insulin/l) containing collagenase/dispase (final concentration 100 µg/ml) (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany), rinsed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 0.1 M and again incubated with trypsin/EDTA (0.05%/0.02% w/v in PBS) for 30 min for dissociation. Subsequently, cells were rinsed twice with PBS and once with dissociation medium, dissociated by Pasteur pipette and pelleted by centrifugation at 2100× g for 2 min at 21°C. After suspension in starter medium (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 0,25% L-glutamine, 2% B27-supplement, 0,1% 25 mM glutamate, 2.5 mM calcium chloride and 100 ng/ml NGF-β, cells were plated in 24 well plates and filled to 500 µl with starter medium at a density of 0.5×10−6 cells/cm2 (equates approximately 2 ganglia/well). Cells used for immunohistochemistry were seeded on round glass cover slips previously inserted in the well plates. Wells were pretreated by incubation with poly-l-lysin (5% w/v in PBS) for 90 minutes at 4°C, then rinsed with PBS, followed by incubation with coating medium (dissociation medium with 1% w/v collagen G) for 90 minutes at 37°C in the incubator. After that, the wells were rinsed twice with PBS and filled with starter medium in which cells were seeded. Cytosine arabinoside (final concentration 10 µM; Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) was added at day 1 and day 3 to minimize growth of non-neuronal cells. Cultures were kept at 37°C and 5% CO2 and fed with neurobasal medium + B27 medium every second day by replacing 50% of the medium. Condition of cultures was assessed by light microscopy, cell types by cell morphology and immunohistochemistry (with antibodies against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) for glial cells and β-tubulin III for neurons). Cell damage was monitored by life-death assays. Stimulation experiments and immunohistochemistry were performed on day 6.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Cultured trigeminal ganglia cells were stimulated with recombinant rat IL-1β (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany; 10 ng/ml, diluted in PBS 0.1 M) or vehicle (0.1 M PBS). In experiments with the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra, R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany) cells were preincubated with 10 µg/ml IL-1ra 15 min prior to stimulation with 10 ng/ml IL-1β. The supernatant was removed carefully with a pipette at certain time points (1.5, 3 and 6 hours). Total cellular RNA of two equally treated wells was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) according to the supplier's manual. RNA preparation and cDNA synthesis were performed as described previously by our laboratory [29]. Real time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was carried out on a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) using the LC-Fast Start DNA Master SYBR Green I kit as recommended by the manufacturer and primers for CGRP, COX-1, COX-2 and GAPDH (Promega, Mannheim, German). The DNA polymerase was heat activated at 95°C followed by thermal cycling until saturation. Table 1 lists the used primer sequences, cycling conditions and primer efficacies. Specificity of all primers was confirmed by sequencing of amplicons. Each essay was run in duplicate. LightCycler Relative Quantification Software was used for amplification, detection and determination of the crossing point. The relative expression ratio for each time point of the measured genes was calculated from the previously determined RT-PCR efficiencies (E) of the primers and the crossing point deviation (ΔCP) of the sample (treated with IL-1β or vehicle) versus the control (0 hour time point) with normalization for RNA preparation and reverse transcriptase reaction on the basis of its mRNA content of the housekeeping gene Glycerinaldehyd-3-phosphat-Dehydrogenase [30].

thumbnail
Table 1. Sequences, cycling conditions and efficacies of all primers used in qRT-PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017360.t001

Western blot analysis

Trigeminal ganglia cells incubated 6 hours with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) or vehicle were homogenized with an electric grinder on ice in 250 µl buffer containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.42 M KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT and a protease inhibitor cocktail (diluted 1∶50 in PBS; Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany). The specimen was centrifuged at 21200× g for 30 min at 4°C. Homogenization was performed as described previously [31]. Whole cell lysates were separated on tris-glycine gels (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were incubated overnight with rabbit polyclonal anti COX-2 serum (1∶1250; 160126; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan) and then probed with a goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase coupled secondary antibody (1∶7500; Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). An enhanced chemoluminescence system (Luminol reagent, Santa Cruz, California) was used for visualization. For loading control, membranes were stripped and reprobed (2 hours) with a mouse polyclonal anti β-actin antibody (1∶5000; Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) followed by 2 hours incubation with goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase coupled IgG (1∶7500; Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). For positive control macrophage + IFNy/LPS cell lysate was used as provided by the manufacturer (BDBiosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Optical density measurement for COX-2 was performed by dividing the intensity of the COX-2 bands by the intensity of the house keeping protein (β-Actin, 1∶5000).

Immunohistochemistry

Trigeminal ganglia cell cultures (day 6) were incubated 6 or 24 hours with 10 ng/ml IL-1β or vehicle, subsequently rinsed with PBS 0.1 M (pH 7.4) and fixed with methanol 100% for 15 min at −20° (n = 4). Cells were washed 3 times with PBS 0.1 M and blocked with normal donkey serum 10% and 0.3% Triton X in 0.1 M PBS for 2 hours at 4°C. For COX-2/CGRP and β-tubulin III/GFAP co-staining cells were incubated overnight at 4°C in rabbit anti-COX-2 serum (diluted 1∶300 in PBS; 160126; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan) or in rabbit anti-CGRP serum (diluted 1∶200 in PBS; C8198; Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and in mouse anti-β-tubulin III serum (as a specific neuronal marker) (diluted 1∶600 in PBS; T5076; Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) or mouse anti glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) serum (as a glia marker) (diluted 1∶300 in PBS; MAB360; Chemicon) +3% normal donkey serum and 0.3% Triton X in 0.1 M PBS. The specimen was then washed 3×10 min in PBS and incubated for 90 min with Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1∶600 in PBS; A-21207; Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (diluted 1∶600 in PBS; A-21202; Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) +3% normal donkey serum and 0.3% Triton X in 0.1 M PBS at room temperature.

Prior to use, all secondary antibodies were tested for non-specific staining by omitting the primary antibodies in both IL-1β and vehicle-treated cell cultures. Non-specific staining was not observed with any of the secondary antibodies.

Cover slips were placed on slides, air-dried, mounted with a glycerol-containing mounting medium (Mowiol, Calbiochem, Bad Soden, Germany) and observed on a fluorescent microscope (DMRA2, Leica GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Fluorescent images were photographed by digital camera (DC300F, Leica GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and captured with Leica DC Twain 5.1.10 (Leica GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Images were processed with Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA) to visualize co-labelling by superimposing the digital images. Immunohistochemistry results of cell cultures were identical on day 2 and 6.

For co-staining of CGRP with COX-2 we used an Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (A-21202; Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) labeled rabbit anti-CGRP serum (diluted 1∶200 in PBS; C8198; Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and a rabbit anti-COX-2 serum (diluted 1∶300 in PBS) +3% normal donkey serum and 0.3% Triton X in 0.1 M PBS. For labeling of the anti-CGRP antibody we used the ApexTM Alexa Fluor 488 Antibody labeling Kit according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Labeling was performed to avoid cross binding with the use of the same anti-CGRP and anti-COX-2 antibodies that were utilized in the β-tubulin III/GFAP co-stainings before. Cells were incubated overnight at 4°C and COX-2 antibodies were recognized by Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1∶600 in PBS). All other procedures (washing, incubation and mounting) were performed as described above. Cover slips on slices were observed on a fluorescent confocal microscope (Leica TCS SPE confocal microscope; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Images were photographed by the system built in digital camera and captured with Leica Confocal Software (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Images were processed with ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) to visualize co-labelling.

PGE2 determination by enzyme immunoassay

For PGE2 determination 6 day old cultured trigeminal ganglia neurons were incubated with 10 ng/ml IL-1β or equal volume of vehicle (PBS 0.1 M) for 30 min or 4 hours. For inhibition studies cell cultures were preincubated for 15 min with sumatriptan (10 µM), indomethacin (10 µM) or parecoxib (10 µM or 1 µM) prior to stimulation with IL-1β (10 ng/ml). In control experiments, equal volumes of vehicle (PBS 0.1 M) were added at the corresponding time. Prior to stimulation 50 µl supernatant of each well were removed to assess baseline content of PGE2. 30 min or 4 hours after stimulation the supernatants of two dishes were pooled and 100 µl of the supernatant were removed for PGE2 determination. PGE2 release was determined using a specific PGE2 enzyme immunoassay (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The baseline samples of the two corresponding wells were also pooled and PGE2 content was determined. All samples were measured in duplicates. PGE2 release was determined in pg/ml as absolute increase over baseline values in the corresponding two wells.

CGRP determination by enzyme immunoassay

After 6 days in culture the medium was gently removed and replaced with fresh medium without NGF to exclude effects of NGF on protein release. 1 hour later cells were stimulated with IL-1β (10 ng/ml), PGE2 (100 nm or 10 µm) or equal volume of vehicle (PBS 0.1 M). For inhibition studies cells were preincubated 45 min before stimulation with sumatriptan (10 µM or 100 µM), indomethacin (10 µM) or parecoxib (10 µM). Prior to stimulation 50 µl supernatant of each well were removed to assess baseline content of CGRP. After 1, 4, 10 or 24 hours the supernatants of two dishes were pooled and 100 µl were removed for CGRP determination using a specific CGRP enzyme immunoassay (SPIbio, Montigny le Bretonneux, France) as recommended by the manufacturer. For each experiment, one set of wells was treated with 60 mM KCl to determine the responsiveness of the cultures to depolarizing stimuli as described previously [19]. Cultures that exhibited a response less than 2-fold on CGRP release after the depolarizing stimulus were not analyzed. CGRP release was determined in pg/ml as absolute increase over baseline values in the corresponding two wells. All samples were measured in duplicates.

Statistical analysis

For PCR statistical analysis was performed using variance analysis followed by Bonferroni correction. For PGE2 and CGRP studies values were first tested for normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) followed by an unpaired t-test to detect statistically significant differences between two groups using SPSS 17 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was assumed when p<0.05. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Results

Characterization of trigeminal ganglia cell culture

Trigeminal ganglia are a heterogeneous tissue containing neuronal cells, satellite cells and Schwann cells. Neurons were identified by their typical pseudo-unipolar morphology of sensory neurons and by staining with the neuronal marker β-tubulin III. Under our conditions the cell culture obtained from rat trigeminal ganglia contained approximately 10% β-tubulin III positive neurons. The rest of the cell population consisted of astrocytes staining positive for GFAP. Most of the sensory neurons were surrounded by GFAP positive glial cells (satellite glial cells).

IL-1β induces COX-2 mRNA

Incubation of cultured trigeminal ganglia cells with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) led to a time-dependent expression of COX-2 mRNA (Fig. 1A). COX-2 mRNA was significantly (∼4.5 fold) increased 90 min after incubation with IL-1β compared to vehicle (n = 4; p<0.05). COX-2 mRNA expression peaked after 3 hours (∼7 fold increase; n = 5; p<0.05) and declined after 6 hours but was still significantly (∼3 fold; n = 4; p<0.05) increased compared to vehicle stimulation.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Expression of COX-2 mRNA in trigeminal ganglia cell culture following IL-1β incubation.

Induction of COX-2 mRNA was time (A) and dose dependent (at the 3 hours time point; B). COX-2 mRNA expression was maximal after 3 hours (A) and at the IL-1β dose of 10 ng/ml (B) (n = 4-5/group). Co-incubation with the IL-1ra led to a significantly reduced COX-2 mRNA induction rate after 3 hours indicating the specificity of the effect (C). Application of the IL-1ra + vehicle resulted in a minor COX-2 mRNA induction rate comparable to vehicle administration (n = 3). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. * p<0.05 compared to vehicle.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017360.g001

To determine whether IL-1β induces COX-2 mRNA specifically, COX-1 mRNA expression was analyzed at the 3 hours time point. There was no difference between COX-1 mRNA expression in IL-1β (10 ng/ml) (0.49±0.02 SEM fold increase; n = 3) and vehicle stimulated cells (0.34±0.01 SEM fold increase; n = 3; p>0.05).

A dose response for IL-1β (1 pg/ml; 100 pg/ml; 10 ng/ml; 100 ng/ml) induced COX-2 gene expression was established at 3 hours since COX-2 mRNA expression was maximal at this time point. Increasing doses of IL-1β resulted in increased COX-2 mRNA levels (Fig. 1B). Stimulation with 1 pg/ml IL-1β showed no difference compared to stimulation with vehicle (n = 4; p>0.05). Higher doses of IL-1β (100 pg/ml; 10 ng/ml) led to a significant increase of COX-2 mRNA expression. Further increase of IL-1β doses (100 ng/ml) resulted in no further induction of COX-2 mRNA (data not shown). As IL-1β 10 ng/ml caused a reliable and strong COX-2 mRNA expression we used this dose for all further experiments.

To confirm the specificity of IL-1β induced COX-2 mRNA the IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) (1 µg/ml) was added 15 min prior to IL-1β (10 ng/ml) to the supernatant. IL-1ra significantly reduced COX-2 expression rate: IL-1β plus vehicle resulted in a 7-fold COX-2 mRNA increase after 3 hours whereas co-administration with IL-1ra led to a 3.5-fold increase (n = 4; p<0.05) (Fig. 1C). Stimulation with IL-1β + IL-1ra was not significantly different from vehicle + IL-1ra administration alone (p>0.05).

IL-1β induces COX-2 protein synthesis in neuronal and glial cells

To show that enhanced COX-2 transcription leads to increased protein synthesis western blot analysis was performed after 6 hours. Immunoblot analysis of IL-1β stimulated trigeminal ganglia cell cultures (n = 3) and the cell lysate (positive control) revealed a single clear band after 6 hours at the size of approximately 70 kDA corresponding to COX-2 protein (Fig. 2A). In vehicle treated cultures (n = 3) a faint COX-2 band could be detected. However, there was a striking difference in signal intensity in all three experiments (optical density 0.15 ± 0.04 SD for vehicle vs. 0.48 ± 0.09 SD for IL-1β treated cells; p<0.05).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Expression of COX-2 protein in trigeminal ganglia cells after IL-1β stimulation.

COX-2 protein in cell culture homogenates was analyzed 6 hours after stimulation with IL-1β using Western blot (n = 3). A representative image is shown in panel A. Cell lysate of IL-1β treated TGC and the positive control (IFNy/LPS treated macrophages) showed a clear band at 70 kDa corresponding to COX-2 protein. Vehicle stimulation resulted in a faint COX-2 expression. The expression of COX-2 protein in cultured trigeminal ganglia cells exposed 6 hours to vehicle (10 ng/ml, upper panel B1-B3/B7-B9) or IL-1β (0.1 M PBS, lower panel B4-B9/B10-B12) is shown in fluorescent micrographs in panel B. Cells were stained with a mouse β-tubulin III antibody, indicative of neuronal cells (B1 and B4) or a mouse GFAP antibody, indicative of glial cells (B7 and B10), and a rabbit COX-2 antibody (B2, B5, B8, B11). The β-tubulin III and the GFAP antibodies were recognized by an Alexa Fluor 488 labeled secondary donkey anti-mouse antibody (green) and the COX-2 antibody was recognized by an Alexa Fluor 594 labeled secondary donkey anti-rabbit antibody (red). Double stained cells appear orange in B3, B6, B9 and B12. IL-1β caused a clear upregulation of COX-2 in neuronal and glial cells (lower panel) whereas a faint COX-2 expression could also be observed in control experiments (upper panel). The strongest induction of COX-2 was seen in bigger glial cells (40-100 µm) and neuronal cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017360.g002

Induced COX-2 protein expression in trigeminal ganglia cell cultures could also be observed by immunohistochemistry with a COX-2 antibody 6 hours after treatment with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) (Fig. 2B; n = 4). Co-staining with mouse anti-β-tubulin III serum (β-tub III) for the identification of neuronal cells or with mouse anti-GFAP serum staining positive for glial cells revealed both neuronal and glial cells as the cellular source for COX-2 protein (Fig. 2B). Basal COX-2 expression could be observed in neuronal and glial cells and induction of COX-2 expression was seen also in both cell types. A strong induction of COX-2 was noted in particular in large glial cells.

IL-1β induced PGE2 release is dependent on COX-2 activity

To assess whether IL-1β induced COX-2 expression is functionally significant, PGE2 release into the supernatant was determined by Enzyme immunoassay (EIA). PGE2 release was measured before and after maximal induction of COX-2 mRNA (3 hours after stimulation with IL-1β). PGE2 content in the supernatant was not significantly different 30 mins after stimulation with IL-1β (48±261 SEM pg/ml (IL-1β) vs. 332±105 SEM pg/ml (vehicle); n = 4; p>0.05). In contrast, 4 hours after IL-1β stimulation PGE2 concentration in the supernatant of IL-1β treated cells was strongly elevated (1829±640 SEM pg/ml) while vehicle treatment was without effect (191±81 pg/ml SEM; n = 4; p<0.05 (Fig. 3A).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Induction of PGE2 levels in trigeminal ganglia cell culture after stimulation with IL-1β.

PGE2 levels were significantly increased in TGC 4 hours after stimulation with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) compared to vehicle (A). No effect on PGE2 release was seen 30 minutes after stimulation with IL-1β compared to vehicle (n = 4/group). Dependency of IL-1β induced PGE2 release on COX-2 activity is shown in (B). 15 min of incubation with the selective (parecoxib, 10 µM) or the non-selective (indomethacin, 10 µM) COX-2 inhibitor completely aborted IL-1β induced PGE2 release after 4 hours. PGE2 levels are illustrated as mean pg/ml ± SEM compared to baseline. *p<0.05 compared to vehicle (n = 3-4/group).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017360.g003

The non-selective COX inhibitor indomethacin (10 µM) and the selective COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib (10 µM) administered to the supernatant of TGC 15 min prior to IL-1β exposure completely aborted PGE2 release after 4 hours (Fig. 3B). Statistical significant difference (p<0.05) was achieved for all groups vs. IL-1β + vehicle (n = 3–4/group). In contrast, sumatriptan (10 µM) did neither affect IL-1β induced COX-2 mRNA synthesis nor PGE2 release (data not shown). 5-HT1B/D receptor expression in these cells was detected by RT-PCR. Because selective and non-selective COX-inhibitors block IL-1β induced PGE release we conclude that PGE2 release from trigeminal ganglia cells is dependent on COX-2 expression and function.

IL-1β induces delayed CGRP release in trigeminal ganglia neurons

TGN release CGRP upon stimulation with e.g. potassium chloride, a cocktail of inflammatory agents, capsaicin (Durham, 1999) or the cytokine TNFα (Bowen, 2006). To assess whether IL-1β activates trigeminal ganglia neurons (TGN) to release CGRP we studied CGRP concentrations in the supernatant. 24 hours after stimulation CGRP levels were significantly increased compared to vehicle (466±44 SEM pg/ml IL-1β vs. 238±29 SEM pg/ml vehicle; p<0.05 n = 12). CGRP was not different 1, 4 and 10 hours after stimulation with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) compared to vehicle, but a trend towards enhanced CGRP release was seen after 10 hours (226±101 SEM pg/ml (IL-1β) vs. 115±26 SEM pg/ml (vehicle); p>0.05; n = 4) (Fig. 4A).

thumbnail
Figure 4. IL-1β induced CGRP release in TGN is dependent on COX-2 activity but not on 5-HT1B/D receptor activation.

A: IL-1β (10 ng/ml) but not vehicle stimulation for 1, 4, 10 (n = 4) or 24 hours (n = 12) resulted in significantly enhanced CGRP levels in the supernatant of cultured trigeminal ganglia cells at the 24 hrs time point (* p<0.05 vs. vehicle). Earlier time points did not show a significant difference between groups. CGRP release is shown as mean pg/ml ± SEM compared to baseline. Panel B shows a representative fluorescent photomicrograph of trigeminal ganglia cells exposed 24 hours to IL-1β (10 ng/ml). Cells were stained with a mouse β-tubulin III antibody, which specifically recognizes neuronal cells (1) and a rabbit CGRP antibody (2). β-tubulin III staining was visualized with an Alexa 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG antibody (green, panel 1). CGRP IgG was recognized by Alexa 594 donkey anti-rabbit antibody (red, panel 2). All CGRP expressing cells stained positive for β-tubulin III (orange, panel 3). C: For inhibition experiments TGC were exposed to either parecoxib (10 µM), sumatriptan ( µM), indomethacin (10 µM) or vehicle 45 min prior to 24 h stimulation with IL-1β (10 ng/ml). Incubation with parecoxib (n = 7) and indomethacin (n = 4) blocked CGRP release in the supernatant significantly compared to IL-1β + vehicle (n = 10). Sumatriptan had no effect in the same paradigm (n = 4). CGRP release is shown as mean pg/ml ± SEM compared to baseline. * p<0.05 compared to IL-1β + vehicle. D: Immunofluorescence staining shows that CGRP is co-expressed with COX-2 in trigeminal ganglia neurons (n = 3). Cultured trigeminal ganglia cells were exposed to IL-1β (10 ng/ml) for 6 hrs. Cells were stained with an Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG labeled rabbit anti-CGRP serum (green, panel 1) and with a rabbit anti-COX-2 antibody, which was recognized by an Alexa Fluor 594 labeled secondary donkey anti-rabbit antibody (red, panel 2). Double stained cells appear orange (panel 3). All CGRP synthesizing cells also stained positive for COX-2. Additionally COX-2 was expressed in glial cells not staining positive for CGRP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017360.g004

By using quantitative real-time PCR we further assessed whether the stimulation with 10ng/ml IL-1β also leads to increased transcription of CGRP. We could not observe any differences of CGRP mRNA content between vehicle and IL-1β treated cultures after 1 h, 4 h, 10 h or 24 h (p>0.05; n = 4; data not shown).

To show that CGRP is derived from neurons we co-stained the cultures with CGRP- and β-tub III antibodies 24 hours after exposure to IL-1β or vehicle. All CGRP stained cells also stained positive for β-tub III, clearly indicating that CGRP is expressed by neuronal cells. CGRP could be detected in the cell body and neuronal processes (Fig. 4B). As seen previously in other trigeminal ganglia cell culture studies [19], [32] almost all neurons stained positive for CGRP, whereas in vivo in rat and human only approximately 23-50% of all trigeminal ganglia neurons contain CGRP [33], [34]. All neurons staining positive for CGRP were also positive for COX-2, whereas glial cells did only stain positive for COX-2 (Fig. 4C).

IL-1β induced CGRP release in in trigeminal ganglia neurons is COX-2 dependent

To analyze whether IL-1β induced CGRP release is affected by COX-2 activity, trigeminal ganglia cells were incubated 45 min prior to stimulation with IL-1β with 10 µM indomethacin or 10 µm parecoxib. Both COX inhibitors blocked enhanced CGRP release after 24 hours (548±70 SEM pg/ml for IL-1β + vehicle (n = 10) vs. 326±52 SEM pg/ml for IL-1β + parecoxib (n = 7; p<0.05) and 313±75 SEM pg/ml for IL-1β + indomethacin (n = 4; p<0.05)). There were no significant differences between CGRP release in the IL-1β + COX-inhibitor groups and vehicle + vehicle stimulation (257±40 SEM pg/ml; n = 10; p>0.1). Incubation with Sumatriptan 10 µM did not block IL-1β induced CGRP release (479±147 SEM pg/ml; p>0.1; n = 4) (Fig. 4C). Incubation with a higher dose of sumatriptan (100 µM) did also not change CGRP release in preliminary experiments.

To determine if the same population of trigeminal ganglia neurons expresses CGRP and COX-2, we co-stained trigeminal IL-1β treated (6 hours) trigeminal ganglia cell cultures with CGRP- and COX-2-antibodies. Immunohistochemistry revealed that all neuronal cells expressing COX-2 also stained positive for CGRP, whereas glial cells only stained positive for COX-2 (Fig. 4D).

PGE2 stimulation causes CGRP release in in trigeminal ganglia neurons

We could show before that IL-1β induces PGE2 release in TGC and activates TGN to release CGRP. To determine whether PGE2 directly activates TGN as determined by CGRP release, cultured trigeminal ganglia cells were stimulated for 1 hour and 4 hours using two different PGE2 concentrations (100 nm and 10 µm). One hour after stimulation with 10 µm PGE2 the CGRP concentration in the supernatant was significantly increased (101±32 SEM pg/ml for PGE2 vs. 23±8 SEM pg/ml for vehicle; p<0.05; n = 5) and further increased after 4 hours (655±95 SEM pg/ml for PGE2 vs. 94±14 SEM pg/ml for vehicle; p<0.05; n = 7). A lower dose of PGE2 (100 nM) led to a minor but still significantly increased CGRP concentration after 1 hour (117±45 SEM pg/ml; p<0.05 vs. vehicle; n = 6) and after 4 hours (447±122 SEM pg/ml; p<0.05; n = 5) (Fig. 5A).

thumbnail
Figure 5. CGRP release in the supernatant of cultured trigeminal ganglia cells after stimulation with PGE2.

A: PGE2 stimulation (100 nM and 10 µM) increased CGRP levels within the supernatant time and dose dependently after 1 hour (n = 5/group) and more pronounced after 4 hours compared to vehicle (n = 7/group). B: Incubation with 10 µM parecoxib and sumatriptan (10 µM and 100 µM [not shown]) did not alter PGE2 release compared to incubation with vehicle (n = 3-4). CGRP is shown as mean pg/ml ± SEM compared to baseline. * p<0.05 compared to vehicle. # p>0.1 compared to PGE + vehicle.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017360.g005

There was no effect of the COX inhibitors on PGE2 function in this paradigm. We added 10 µm parecoxib (45 min) prior to stimulation with PGE2 to the cultures, which did not alter CGRP release after 1 hour and 4 hours compared to vehicle (n = 3–4; P>0.1). There was also no effect on CGRP release by pre-stimulation with sumatriptan 10 µM (Fig. 5B) and 100 µM (Data not shown).

Discussion

We have shown that cultured primary trigeminal ganglia neurons and glial cells express COX-2 upon stimulation with IL-1β in a dose and time dependent manner leading to PGE2 synthesis and protracted CGRP release in trigeminal ganglia neurons. IL-1β induced PGE2 and CGRP release was blocked by selective and non-selective COX-2 inhibitors thereby demonstrating dependency on COX-2 enzyme activity. Neither PGE2 nor CGRP release were mediated by activation of 5-HT1B/D receptors as the pre-incubation with sumatriptan was without effect.

The trigeminal ganglion (TG) is known to play a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine and other primary headaches. Cultured sensory neurons derived from trigeminal or dorsal root ganglia have been shown to express the characteristics of “differentiated pain sensory” cells [28]. Cultured TG cells have been used to illustrate molecular mechanisms related to migraine pathophysiology e.g. 5-HT1B/D controlled CGRP release [19][21], [35], [36].

For stimulation we used IL-1β, a pro-inflammatory cytokine of significant importance in models of inflammatory pain [2], [27], [37] and sensitization [38]. IL-1β has been shown to activate nociceptors to induce pain hypersensitivity in a rat skin nerve preparation [38]. In inflammatory pain IL-1β was identified as the key mediator to induce COX-2 in spinal cord [27] and in cultured dorsal root ganglia cells [39][42]. The observation that IL-1β is elevated in plasma during a migraine attack points to an involvement in migraine pathophysiology [5], [6]. High levels of chemokines could stimulate the activation of trigeminal nerves and the release of vasoactive peptides, resulting in inflammation [43].

IL-1β induced COX-2 and PGE2 synthesis resulting in CGRP release

Stimulation of trigeminal ganglia cells with IL-1β led to a strong induction of COX-2 mRNA and protein with subsequently PGE2 synthesis. Direct stimulation of TG cells with PGE2 resulted in enhanced CGRP release in trigeminal ganglia neurons after one hour and more pronounced after 4 hours. In an in vitro preparation of the rat skull fluid-filled cavities electrical and chemical activation of trigeminal afferents resulted in enhanced release of PGE2 and CGRP from rat dura mater encephali [44] In a rat trigeminal ganglion cell culture model Jenkins and co-workers identified the EP-2 receptor as the key signaling mechanism for PGE2 induced CGRP release [45]. Enhancement of capsaicin induced CGRP release by PGE2 has been observed in slices of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, indicating a prostaglandin induced neuronal sensitization [46].

While these observations may support a role of PGE2 in neurogenic inflammation, it is uncertain which COX isoform accounts for the PGE2 release. Since COX-1 is constitutively expressed in many cells types (e.g. dural macrophages, fibroblasts) and PGE2 release occurs immediately after electrical and chemical meningeal stimulation [44] COX-1 may account for this response. In our model, immediate PGE2 release did not occur after stimulation with IL-1β. Additionally, COX-1 mRNA remained unchanged 3 hours after stimulation with IL-1β. In contrast, IL-1β induced COX-2 mRNA expression after 3 hours and PGE2 release after 4 hours. PGE2 release could be blocked by the selective COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib. These findings provide evidence for a COX-2 mediated pathway.

Glia-neuron interaction

We found neuronal and glial cells as a source of COX-2 as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. In particular, a strong stimulus dependent induction of COX-2 by IL-1β was seen in large glial cells. Stimulation of cultured trigeminal cells with PGE2 and IL-1β led to CGRP release exclusively in trigeminal ganglia neurons (cell body and neuronal processes). Immunohistochemistry did not reveal any CGRP expression in glial cells which is in line with the findings of others in rat and human trigeminal ganglia [34].

Our findings support a glia-neuron interaction within the trigeminal ganglion. We hypothesize that IL-1β activates glial cells and neurons in the trigeminal ganglion, which leads to the expression of COX-2 in these cells. In turn the COX-2 reaction product PGE2 activates trigeminal neurons to release CGRP.

Glia-neuron interaction plays an important role for the normal function of the brain as well in the pathophysiology of many CNS diseases [47]. Over the last years the importance of CNS glia for neuronal function in pain processing has been demonstrated in various experimental pain states [48]. The physiological function of the glial cells within the trigeminal ganglion is not well understood. In the trigeminal ganglia cell bodies of neurons are surrounded by satellite glial cells that can modulate their function and enhance their excitability [49]. In a recently published work IL-1β induced COX-2 expression and PGE2 synthesis in cultured trigeminal satellite cells. Stimulation of TGN with conditioned media from these activated satellite cells led to sensitization of TGN resulting in increased CGRP release after stimulation with capsaicin [50]. Activation of satellite glial cells in the trigeminal ganglion modulates the excitability of TG neurons via IL-1β following inflammation associated with hyperalgesia in rats [51]. The involvement of neuron-glia signaling via gap junctions and release of nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokines from the trigeminal ganglia satellite glial cells has been demonstrated recently in experimental models related to migraine pathophysiology [52][55]. Interestingly, CGRP receptors are expressed on trigeminal neurons and glial cells. CGRP released by trigeminal ganglia neurons has been shown to function in a paracrine manner to activate trigeminal satellite glial cells to release various cytokines including IL-1β and nitric oxide, a molecule known to be involved in migraine pathophysiology [52], [54]. Additionally CGRP possesses autocrine signaling function properties to increase mRNA levels of CGRP in cultured trigeminal neurons [35]. Our finding that induction of COX-2 expression by IL-1β in trigeminal glial and neuronal cells leads to direct induction of CGRP release from trigeminal neurons supports the notion of an important cross talk between neurons and glial cells in the trigeminal ganglion in processes involved in trigeminally mediated headaches.

IL-1β induced CGRP release in trigeminal ganglia neurons

In our model exposure of trigeminal ganglia cell culture to IL-1β led directly to delayed CGRP release from TGN 24 hours after stimulation with an earlier non-significant trend after 10 hours. This latency was not expected as IL-1β induced PGE2 release was significant after 4 hours and PGE2 caused CGRP release after 1 hour. Delayed (24 hours) IL-1β induced CGRP release was observed previously in dorsal root ganglia neurons. Blocking experiments demonstrated that IL-1β might activate proteinkinase C that in turn initiates c-Jun-N-terminal kinase mitogen activated protein kinase followed by activation of nuclear factor-kappaB, which finally induces alpha-CGRP gene expression and neuropeptide release from these sensory neurons [56]. In our hands IL-1β did not lead to an induction of CGRP mRNA synthesis in cultured trigeminal neurons as demonstrated by quantitative RT-PCR. We speculate that a certain threshold of PGE2 concentration in the supernatant is necessary to induce gradual CGRP expression, which may take several hours to archive. Direct stimulation of TG with 10 µm PGE2 did also not lead to the induction of CGRP gene expression. In line, in another rat model of isolated trigeminal ganglion the infusion of the NO donor glyceroltrinitrate induced the release of CGRP but did not change mRNA levels of CGRP [57]. Therefore, elevated CGRP release in the trigeminal ganglion in our and other models seems to be dependent on enhanced secretion rather than synthesis due to gene expression.

Non-selective (indomethacin) and selective (parecoxib) COX-2 inhibitors aborted L-1β induced CGRP release. In contrast, neither IL-1β nor PGE2 induced CGRP release could be blocked by sumatriptan, indicating a release mechanism independent of 5-HT1B/D receptor activation. A COX-2 dependent CGRP release could also be demonstrated in the dura mater in an isolated preparation of fluid-filled rat skull cavities. The COX-2 inhibitor S-flurbiprofen inhibited inflammatory mediator (bradykinin, histamine and serotonin) induced CGRP and PGE2 release while the 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist naratriptan was without effect [58]. Our findings demonstrate a direct link between COX-2 activity and CGRP release in TGN. In a slightly different cell culture model of trigeminal ganglia cells potassium chloride and inflammatory cocktail induced rapid CGRP release that could be blocked by sumatriptan [19]. The results of our study point to an alternative pathway of cytokine induced CGRP release in TGN regulated by COX-2 and not affected by sumatriptan.

Conclusion

In summary, our results demonstrate that primary trigeminal ganglia cells are able to synthesize COX-2 and PGE2 upon stimulation with the cytokine IL-1β in a functionally significant mode resulting in delayed CGRP release in trigeminal ganglia neurons. CGRP release is mediated by a COX-2 dependent pathway and independent of 5-HT1B/D receptor activation (Fig. 6).

thumbnail
Figure 6. COX-2 dependent induction of CGRP release in trigeminal ganglia neurons.

Stimulation with IL-1β leads to the synthesis of COX-2 in trigeminal neurons and glial cells followed by PGE2 release. PGE2 in turn activatesTGN to release CGRP. PGE2 and CGRP release can be blocked by selective (parecoxib) or non-selective (indomethacin) COX-2 inhibitors. The attenuation of CGRP and PGE2 release could contribute to the effect of COX-inhibitors to revoke sensitization and to abort pain.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017360.g006

COX-2 expression in trigeminal ganglion cells could contribute to the development of pain in trigeminal mediated headaches. Non-selective [23] and selective COX-2 inhibitors [24], [25] abort migraine attacks. The demonstrated attenuation of CGRP release by COX-2 inhibition could at least in part explain the mechanism of COX inhibitors in migraine therapy.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sonja Blumenau for excellent technical assistance and Francisco Fernández Klett for support with confocal imaging.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LN UR. Performed the experiments: LN CB PH JH SSH. Analyzed the data: LN UR PH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: UR UD. Wrote the paper: LN UR.

References

  1. 1. Sommer C, Kress M (2004) Recent findings on how proinflammatory cytokines cause pain: peripheral mechanisms in inflammatory and neuropathic hyperalgesia. Neurosci Lett 361: 184–187.C. SommerM. Kress2004Recent findings on how proinflammatory cytokines cause pain: peripheral mechanisms in inflammatory and neuropathic hyperalgesia.Neurosci Lett361184187
  2. 2. Cunha JM, Cunha FQ, Poole S, Ferreira SH (2000) Cytokine-mediated inflammatory hyperalgesia limited by interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 130: 1418–1424.JM CunhaFQ CunhaS. PooleSH Ferreira2000Cytokine-mediated inflammatory hyperalgesia limited by interleukin-1 receptor antagonist.Br J Pharmacol13014181424
  3. 3. Cunha FQ, Poole S, Lorenzetti BB, Ferreira SH (1992) The pivotal role of tumour necrosis factor alpha in the development of inflammatory hyperalgesia. Br J Pharmacol 107: 660–664.FQ CunhaS. PooleBB LorenzettiSH Ferreira1992The pivotal role of tumour necrosis factor alpha in the development of inflammatory hyperalgesia.Br J Pharmacol107660664
  4. 4. Oka T, Oka K, Hosoi M, Hori T (1995) Intracerebroventricular injection of interleukin-6 induces thermal hyperalgesia in rats. Brain Res 692: 123–128.T. OkaK. OkaM. HosoiT. Hori1995Intracerebroventricular injection of interleukin-6 induces thermal hyperalgesia in rats.Brain Res692123128
  5. 5. Perini F, D'Andrea G, Galloni E, Pignatelli F, Billo G, et al. (2005) Plasma cytokine levels in migraineurs and controls. Headache 45: 926–931.F. PeriniG. D'AndreaE. GalloniF. PignatelliG. Billo2005Plasma cytokine levels in migraineurs and controls.Headache45926931
  6. 6. Sarchielli P, Alberti A, Baldi A, Coppola F, Rossi C, et al. (2006) Proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, and lymphocyte integrin expression in the internal jugular blood of migraine patients without aura assessed ictally. Headache 46: 200–207.P. SarchielliA. AlbertiA. BaldiF. CoppolaC. Rossi2006Proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, and lymphocyte integrin expression in the internal jugular blood of migraine patients without aura assessed ictally.Headache46200207
  7. 7. Kocer A, Memisogullari R, Domac FM, Ilhan A, Kocer E, et al. (2009) IL-6 levels in migraine patients receiving topiramate. Pain Pract 9: 375–379.A. KocerR. MemisogullariFM DomacA. IlhanE. Kocer2009IL-6 levels in migraine patients receiving topiramate.Pain Pract9375379
  8. 8. Reuter U, Bolay H, Jansen-Olesen I, Chiarugi A, Sanchez del RM, et al. (2001) Delayed inflammation in rat meninges: implications for migraine pathophysiology. Brain 124: 2490–2502.U. ReuterH. BolayI. Jansen-OlesenA. ChiarugiRM Sanchez del2001Delayed inflammation in rat meninges: implications for migraine pathophysiology.Brain12424902502
  9. 9. Uddman R, Edvinsson L, Ekman R, Kingman T, McCulloch J (1985) Innervation of the feline cerebral vasculature by nerve fibers containing calcitonin gene-related peptide: trigeminal origin and co-existence with substance P. Neurosci Lett 62: 131–136.R. UddmanL. EdvinssonR. EkmanT. KingmanJ. McCulloch1985Innervation of the feline cerebral vasculature by nerve fibers containing calcitonin gene-related peptide: trigeminal origin and co-existence with substance P.Neurosci Lett62131136
  10. 10. Edvinsson L, Hara H, Uddman R (1989) Retrograde tracing of nerve fibers to the rat middle cerebral artery with true blue: colocalization with different peptides. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 9: 212–218.L. EdvinssonH. HaraR. Uddman1989Retrograde tracing of nerve fibers to the rat middle cerebral artery with true blue: colocalization with different peptides.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab9212218
  11. 11. Waeber C, Moskowitz MA (2005) Migraine as an inflammatory disorder. Neurology 64: S9–15.C. WaeberMA Moskowitz2005Migraine as an inflammatory disorder.Neurology64S915
  12. 12. Storer RJ, Akerman S, Goadsby PJ (2004) Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) modulates nociceptive trigeminovascular transmission in the cat. Br J Pharmacol 142: 1171–1181.RJ StorerS. AkermanPJ Goadsby2004Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) modulates nociceptive trigeminovascular transmission in the cat.Br J Pharmacol14211711181
  13. 13. Durham PL (2006) Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and migraine. Headache 46: Suppl 1S3–S8.PL Durham2006Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and migraine.Headache46Suppl 1S3S8
  14. 14. Juhasz G, Zsombok T, Modos EA, Olajos S, Jakab B, et al. (2003) NO-induced migraine attack: strong increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) concentration and negative correlation with platelet serotonin release. Pain 106: 461–470.G. JuhaszT. ZsombokEA ModosS. OlajosB. Jakab2003NO-induced migraine attack: strong increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) concentration and negative correlation with platelet serotonin release.Pain106461470
  15. 15. Fanciullacci M, Alessandri M, Figini M, Geppetti P, Michelacci S (1995) Increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide from the extracerebral circulation during nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache attack. Pain 60: 119–123.M. FanciullacciM. AlessandriM. FiginiP. GeppettiS. Michelacci1995Increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide from the extracerebral circulation during nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache attack.Pain60119123
  16. 16. Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, Jacobsen VB, Iversen HK, Sperling B, et al. (2002) CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia 22: 54–61.LH LassenPA HaderslevVB JacobsenHK IversenB. Sperling2002CGRP may play a causative role in migraine.Cephalalgia225461
  17. 17. Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt IW, Goadsby PJ, Hall D, et al. (2004) Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med 350: 1104–1110.J. OlesenHC DienerIW HusstedtPJ GoadsbyD. Hall2004Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine.N Engl J Med35011041110
  18. 18. Ho TW, Ferrari MD, Dodick DW, Galet V, Kost J, et al. (2008) Efficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet 372: 2115–2123.TW HoMD FerrariDW DodickV. GaletJ. Kost2008Efficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trial.Lancet37221152123
  19. 19. Durham PL, Russo AF (1999) Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion by a serotonergic antimigraine drug. J Neurosci 19: 3423–3429.PL DurhamAF Russo1999Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion by a serotonergic antimigraine drug.J Neurosci1934233429
  20. 20. Durham PL, Cady R, Cady R (2004) Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion from trigeminal nerve cells by botulinum toxin type A: implications for migraine therapy. Headache 44: 35–42.PL DurhamR. CadyR. Cady2004Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion from trigeminal nerve cells by botulinum toxin type A: implications for migraine therapy.Headache443542
  21. 21. Durham PL, Niemann C, Cady R (2006) Repression of stimulated calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion by topiramate. Headache 46: 1291–1295.PL DurhamC. NiemannR. Cady2006Repression of stimulated calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion by topiramate.Headache4612911295
  22. 22. Bowen EJ, Schmidt TW, Firm CS, Russo AF, Durham PL (2006) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide expression and secretion from rat trigeminal ganglion neurons. J Neurochem 96: 65–77.EJ BowenTW SchmidtCS FirmAF RussoPL Durham2006Tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide expression and secretion from rat trigeminal ganglion neurons.J Neurochem966577
  23. 23. Rasmussen MK, Binzer M (2001) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of migraine. Curr Med Res Opin 17: Suppl 1s26–s29.MK RasmussenM. Binzer2001Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of migraine.Curr Med Res Opin17Suppl 1s26s29
  24. 24. Goebel H, Heinze A, Heinze-Kuhn K (2003) Parecoxib i.v. in der Behandlung der aktuen Migräneattacke als Ersatzmedikaiton bei Ineffeketivität von Triptanen. Aktuelle Neurologie Supl S1: 776.H. GoebelA. HeinzeK. Heinze-Kuhn2003Parecoxib i.v. in der Behandlung der aktuen Migräneattacke als Ersatzmedikaiton bei Ineffeketivität von Triptanen.Aktuelle NeurologieSupl S1776
  25. 25. Silberstein S, Tepper S, Brandes J, Diamond M, Goldstein J, et al. (2004) Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rofecoxib in the acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 62: 1552–1557.S. SilbersteinS. TepperJ. BrandesM. DiamondJ. Goldstein2004Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rofecoxib in the acute treatment of migraine.Neurology6215521557
  26. 26. Simmons DL, Botting RM, Hla T (2004) Cyclooxygenase isozymes: the biology of prostaglandin synthesis and inhibition. Pharmacol Rev 56: 387–437.DL SimmonsRM BottingT. Hla2004Cyclooxygenase isozymes: the biology of prostaglandin synthesis and inhibition.Pharmacol Rev56387437
  27. 27. Samad TA, Moore KA, Sapirstein A, Billet S, Allchorne A, et al. (2001) Interleukin-1beta-mediated induction of Cox-2 in the CNS contributes to inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. Nature 410: 471–475.TA SamadKA MooreA. SapirsteinS. BilletA. Allchorne2001Interleukin-1beta-mediated induction of Cox-2 in the CNS contributes to inflammatory pain hypersensitivity.Nature410471475
  28. 28. Baccaglini PI, Hogan PG (1983) Some rat sensory neurons in culture express characteristics of differentiated pain sensory cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80: 594–598.PI BaccagliniPG Hogan1983Some rat sensory neurons in culture express characteristics of differentiated pain sensory cells.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A80594598
  29. 29. Ruscher K, Freyer D, Karsch M, Isaev N, Megow D, et al. (2002) Erythropoietin is a paracrine mediator of ischemic tolerance in the brain: evidence from an in vitro model. J Neurosci 22: 10291–10301.K. RuscherD. FreyerM. KarschN. IsaevD. Megow2002Erythropoietin is a paracrine mediator of ischemic tolerance in the brain: evidence from an in vitro model.J Neurosci221029110301
  30. 30. Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: e45.MW Pfaffl2001A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR.Nucleic Acids Res29e45
  31. 31. Matsushita K, Wu Y, Qiu J, Lang-Lazdunski L, Hirt L, et al. (2000) Fas receptor and neuronal cell death after spinal cord ischemia. J Neurosci 20: 6879–6887.K. MatsushitaY. WuJ. QiuL. Lang-LazdunskiL. Hirt2000Fas receptor and neuronal cell death after spinal cord ischemia.J Neurosci2068796887
  32. 32. Kuris A, Xu CB, Zhou MF, Tajti J, Uddman R, et al. (2007) Enhanced expression of CGRP in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons during cell and organ culture. Brain Res 1173: 6–13.A. KurisCB XuMF ZhouJ. TajtiR. Uddman2007Enhanced expression of CGRP in rat trigeminal ganglion neurons during cell and organ culture.Brain Res1173613
  33. 33. O'Connor TP, van der Kooy D (1988) Enrichment of a vasoactive neuropeptide (calcitonin gene related peptide) in the trigeminal sensory projection to the intracranial arteries. J Neurosci 8: 2468–2476.TP O'ConnorD. van der Kooy1988Enrichment of a vasoactive neuropeptide (calcitonin gene related peptide) in the trigeminal sensory projection to the intracranial arteries.J Neurosci824682476
  34. 34. Eftekhari S, Salvatore CA, Calamari A, Kane SA, Tajti J, et al. (2010) Differential distribution of calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptor components in the human trigeminal ganglion. Neuroscience 169: 683–696.S. EftekhariCA SalvatoreA. CalamariSA KaneJ. Tajti2010Differential distribution of calcitonin gene-related peptide and its receptor components in the human trigeminal ganglion.Neuroscience169683696
  35. 35. Zhang Z, Winborn CS, Marquez dP, Russo AF (2007) Sensitization of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors by receptor activity-modifying protein-1 in the trigeminal ganglion. J Neurosci 27: 2693–2703.Z. ZhangCS WinborndP MarquezAF Russo2007Sensitization of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptors by receptor activity-modifying protein-1 in the trigeminal ganglion.J Neurosci2726932703
  36. 36. Jansen-Olesen I, Zhou M, Zinck T, Xu CB, Edvinsson L (2005) Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in trigeminal ganglion cells during culture. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 97: 355–363.I. Jansen-OlesenM. ZhouT. ZinckCB XuL. Edvinsson2005Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in trigeminal ganglion cells during culture.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol97355363
  37. 37. Safieh-Garabedian B, Poole S, Allchorne A, Winter J, Woolf CJ (1995) Contribution of interleukin-1 beta to the inflammation-induced increase in nerve growth factor levels and inflammatory hyperalgesia. Br J Pharmacol 115: 1265–1275.B. Safieh-GarabedianS. PooleA. AllchorneJ. WinterCJ Woolf1995Contribution of interleukin-1 beta to the inflammation-induced increase in nerve growth factor levels and inflammatory hyperalgesia.Br J Pharmacol11512651275
  38. 38. Binshtok AM, Wang H, Zimmermann K, Amaya F, Vardeh D, et al. (2008) Nociceptors are interleukin-1beta sensors. J Neurosci 28: 14062–14073.AM BinshtokH. WangK. ZimmermannF. AmayaD. Vardeh2008Nociceptors are interleukin-1beta sensors.J Neurosci281406214073
  39. 39. Inoue A, Ikoma K, Morioka N, Kumagai K, Hashimoto T, et al. (1999) Interleukin-1beta induces substance P release from primary afferent neurons through the cyclooxygenase-2 system. J Neurochem 73: 2206–2213.A. InoueK. IkomaN. MoriokaK. KumagaiT. Hashimoto1999Interleukin-1beta induces substance P release from primary afferent neurons through the cyclooxygenase-2 system.J Neurochem7322062213
  40. 40. Igwe OJ, Murray JN, Moolwaney AS (2001) Interleukin 1-induced cyclooxygenase and nitric oxide synthase gene expression in the rat dorsal root ganglia is modulated by antioxidants. Neuroscience 105: 971–985.OJ IgweJN MurrayAS Moolwaney2001Interleukin 1-induced cyclooxygenase and nitric oxide synthase gene expression in the rat dorsal root ganglia is modulated by antioxidants.Neuroscience105971985
  41. 41. Morioka N, Inoue A, Hanada T, Kumagai K, Takeda K, et al. (2002) Nitric oxide synergistically potentiates interleukin-1 beta-induced increase of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA levels, resulting in the facilitation of substance P release from primary afferent neurons: involvement of cGMP-independent mechanisms. Neuropharmacology 43: 868–876.N. MoriokaA. InoueT. HanadaK. KumagaiK. Takeda2002Nitric oxide synergistically potentiates interleukin-1 beta-induced increase of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA levels, resulting in the facilitation of substance P release from primary afferent neurons: involvement of cGMP-independent mechanisms.Neuropharmacology43868876
  42. 42. Fehrenbacher JC, Burkey TH, Nicol GD, Vasko MR (2005) Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1beta stimulate the expression of cyclooxygenase II but do not alter prostaglandin E2 receptor mRNA levels in cultured dorsal root ganglia cells. Pain 113: 113–122.JC FehrenbacherTH BurkeyGD NicolMR Vasko2005Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1beta stimulate the expression of cyclooxygenase II but do not alter prostaglandin E2 receptor mRNA levels in cultured dorsal root ganglia cells.Pain113113122
  43. 43. Bruno PP, Carpino F, Carpino G, Zicari A (2007) An overview on immune system and migraine. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 11: 245–248.PP BrunoF. CarpinoG. CarpinoA. Zicari2007An overview on immune system and migraine.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci11245248
  44. 44. Ebersberger A, Averbeck B, Messlinger K, Reeh PW (1999) Release of substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide and prostaglandin E2 from rat dura mater encephali following electrical and chemical stimulation in vitro. Neuroscience 89: 901–907.A. EbersbergerB. AverbeckK. MesslingerPW Reeh1999Release of substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide and prostaglandin E2 from rat dura mater encephali following electrical and chemical stimulation in vitro.Neuroscience89901907
  45. 45. Jenkins DW, Feniuk W, Humphrey PP (2001) Characterization of the prostanoid receptor types involved in mediating calcitonin gene-related peptide release from cultured rat trigeminal neurones. Br J Pharmacol 134: 1296–1302.DW JenkinsW. FeniukPP Humphrey2001Characterization of the prostanoid receptor types involved in mediating calcitonin gene-related peptide release from cultured rat trigeminal neurones.Br J Pharmacol13412961302
  46. 46. Jenkins DW, Langmead CJ, Parsons AA, Strijbos PJ (2004) Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide release from rat trigeminal nucleus caudalis slices in vitro. Neurosci Lett 366: 241–244.DW JenkinsCJ LangmeadAA ParsonsPJ Strijbos2004Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide release from rat trigeminal nucleus caudalis slices in vitro.Neurosci Lett366241244
  47. 47. Benarroch EE (2005) Neuron-astrocyte interactions: partnership for normal function and disease in the central nervous system. Mayo Clin Proc 80: 1326–1338.EE Benarroch2005Neuron-astrocyte interactions: partnership for normal function and disease in the central nervous system.Mayo Clin Proc8013261338
  48. 48. McMahon SB, Malcangio M (2009) Current challenges in glia-pain biology. Neuron 64: 46–54.SB McMahonM. Malcangio2009Current challenges in glia-pain biology.Neuron644654
  49. 49. Hanani M (2005) Satellite glial cells in sensory ganglia: from form to function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48: 457–476.M. Hanani2005Satellite glial cells in sensory ganglia: from form to function.Brain Res Brain Res Rev48457476
  50. 50. Capuano A, De CA, Lisi L, Tringali G, Navarra P, et al. (2009) Proinflammatory-activated trigeminal satellite cells promote neuronal sensitization: relevance for migraine pathology. Mol Pain 5: 43.A. CapuanoCA DeL. LisiG. TringaliP. Navarra2009Proinflammatory-activated trigeminal satellite cells promote neuronal sensitization: relevance for migraine pathology.Mol Pain543
  51. 51. Takeda M, Tanimoto T, Kadoi J, Nasu M, Takahashi M, et al. (2007) Enhanced excitability of nociceptive trigeminal ganglion neurons by satellite glial cytokine following peripheral inflammation. Pain 129: 155–166.M. TakedaT. TanimotoJ. KadoiM. NasuM. Takahashi2007Enhanced excitability of nociceptive trigeminal ganglion neurons by satellite glial cytokine following peripheral inflammation.Pain129155166
  52. 52. Thalakoti S, Patil VV, Damodaram S, Vause CV, Langford LE, et al. (2007) Neuron-glia signaling in trigeminal ganglion: implications for migraine pathology. Headache 47: 1008–1023.S. ThalakotiVV PatilS. DamodaramCV VauseLE Langford2007Neuron-glia signaling in trigeminal ganglion: implications for migraine pathology.Headache4710081023
  53. 53. Ceruti S, Fumagalli M, Villa G, Verderio C, Abbracchio MP (2008) Purinoceptor-mediated calcium signaling in primary neuron-glia trigeminal cultures. Cell Calcium 43: 576–590.S. CerutiM. FumagalliG. VillaC. VerderioMP Abbracchio2008Purinoceptor-mediated calcium signaling in primary neuron-glia trigeminal cultures.Cell Calcium43576590
  54. 54. Li J, Vause CV, Durham PL (2008) Calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulation of nitric oxide synthesis and release from trigeminal ganglion glial cells. Brain Res 1196: 22–32.J. LiCV VausePL Durham2008Calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulation of nitric oxide synthesis and release from trigeminal ganglion glial cells.Brain Res11962232
  55. 55. Damodaram S, Thalakoti S, Freeman SE, Garrett FG, Durham PL (2009) Tonabersat inhibits trigeminal ganglion neuronal-satellite glial cell signaling. Headache 49: 5–20.S. DamodaramS. ThalakotiSE FreemanFG GarrettPL Durham2009Tonabersat inhibits trigeminal ganglion neuronal-satellite glial cell signaling.Headache49520
  56. 56. Hou L, Li W, Wang X (2003) Mechanism of interleukin-1 beta-induced calcitonin gene-related peptide production from dorsal root ganglion neurons of neonatal rats. J Neurosci Res 73: 188–197.L. HouW. LiX. Wang2003Mechanism of interleukin-1 beta-induced calcitonin gene-related peptide production from dorsal root ganglion neurons of neonatal rats.J Neurosci Res73188197
  57. 57. Eberhardt M, Neeb L, Vogel EM, Tiegs G, Reuter U, et al. (2009) Glyceroltrinitrate facilitates stimulated CGRP release but not gene expression of CGRP or its receptor components in rat trigeminal ganglia. Neuropeptides 43: 483–489.M. EberhardtL. NeebEM VogelG. TiegsU. Reuter2009Glyceroltrinitrate facilitates stimulated CGRP release but not gene expression of CGRP or its receptor components in rat trigeminal ganglia.Neuropeptides43483489
  58. 58. Zimmermann K, Reeh PW, Averbeck B (2003) S+ -flurbiprofen but not 5-HT1 agonists suppress basal and stimulated CGRP and PGE2 release from isolated rat dura mater. Pain 103: 313–320.K. ZimmermannPW ReehB. Averbeck2003S+ -flurbiprofen but not 5-HT1 agonists suppress basal and stimulated CGRP and PGE2 release from isolated rat dura mater.Pain103313320
  59. 59. Ivanov AI, Pero RS, Scheck AC, Romanovsky AA (2002) Prostaglandin E(2)-synthesizing enzymes in fever: differential transcriptional regulation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R1104–R1117.AI IvanovRS PeroAC ScheckAA Romanovsky2002Prostaglandin E(2)-synthesizing enzymes in fever: differential transcriptional regulation.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol283R1104R1117